Real News and History with Mike King

Today, The Two Mikes had the good fortune to speak with Mike King, who runs and writes from a site called "Real News and History" (https://realnewsandhistory.com).
 
Mr. King is known as a "correctionist historian" and has the courage and talent to take on the lies that have for decades taken the place of truth in the writing of both popular and academic history. Mr. King said that one highly important fact that all Americans should remember is that when almost any historian or politician speaks in public and starts by explaining that he is going to talk about an issue that is "extremely complex", the listener can be sure that the speaker is going to turn a relatively simple issue into an issue that is impossible for ordinary Americans to understand. Making a simple issue "extremely complex" is meant to make Americans uninformed, fearful, and line up with their traditional loyalty and patriotism to support the deceitful academics and politicians they have been trained in school to respect.
 
There is, for example, nothing hard to understand, for, about Ukraine; it's about the U.S. and NATO wanting to use that country against Russia, to fill it with chemical weapons labs to make plagues to use against Russia and the common citizens of the West; as well as about the corrupt skimming off the money sent there to "help" that country: About Israel: The enormous U.S. funding sent there is not to "protect the only democracy in the Middle East" but ensure that a part of the money to be used by the Israeli security services to control the U.S. Congress and federal bureaucracy; and About NATO: it's about tricking the American people into believing that the shameful amount of their taxes that are sent to NATO is mean to defend democracy for Europeans, even as their own governments grow authoritarian, discriminate against the native born, and flood the continent with foreigners who want supremacy not assimilation; and, finally, About the U.S. Civil War: all politicians and almost all academics peddle the nonsense that the war was fought simply and only to free the slaves. This is not only a lie, it is the mutilation of any plan for producing history that is as close to the truth as is possible. Lincoln, it should be remembered, raised 75,000 troops and invaded the south after the cannonading for Fort Sumter, an ancient and decaying facility only good for the offshore collection of the national tariffs that always overwhelmingly favored the economic and industrial development of the north. Quite simply, Americans in 1861 would never have fought a Civil War to free the slaves at the ultimate expense of 800,000 Americans, north and south. The war was not caused by but did end slavery. 
 
Mr. King runs a fine and very smart website. He is a brave, excellent and very provocative writer, and his timely and pertinent work is available at https://realnewsand history.com). Take a look at some of it and feel your eyes being opened.

Subscribe to Freedom First Network on Rumble to watch all of our shows LIVE: https://rumble.com/c/freedomfirstnetwork

Elevate your meals with Freedom First Beef… even if you find yourself in the middle of the apocalypse! Use code TWOMIKES for 15% off and enjoy high-quality beef whenever you crave it – today or tomorrow! https://freedomfirstbeef.com

Be ready for anything life throws your way with The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit. Order today using code TWOMIKES for a 10% discount at https://twc.health/ffn.

Protect your financial future with precious metals! Schedule your consultation with Our Gold Guy today and take control of your financial destiny! https://ourgoldguy.com

Unleash the spirit of liberty in every cup with Freedom First Coffee's Founders Blend. Order now using code TWOMIKES and savor the unparalleled taste of freedom in every patriotic sip. https://freedomfirstcoffee.com

Episode Transcript

(00:02):
A fountain is the hardest spot withmemorison, and that's time. That is
when we found me to yield theready gus. I'm the mom the soup
simon saying a fat shall of gobbles. We are read a note. Turn

(00:28):
on on, turn them on,Turn on these side songs with all gone,
I don't to turn and turn themhome. Reach into your road,
roll you feel it again out withall the gone side song says so trying

(01:03):
to Mike here. Thank you forlistening once again, and thank you for
all the comments. On two mikesdot Us. That's t w O mikes
dot Us. Another great podcast comingup. Enjoy by four three two one.

(01:48):
We're getting we're getting a little feedbackhere. I'm gonna do take two.
How come we're getting reverbed? Letme see Mike Kings say something here,
go ahead, Hello, Okay,he's good, Mike, you say
something, Yeah, I can Okay, you're clearer. I think it's okay.
Mike King, say it again,say hello, Hello, Hello,
Mike, Mike, Mike else,keep a little louder. No, that's

(02:12):
no, you're good. You don'thave to speak louder. Yeah, I
was getting reverbed. Oh okay,Okay, I'm gonna do a take too.
Now hang on a minute. Okay, take two, fuddy, this
is take two, five four threetwo one. Hey, welcome back here
on with two Mike's Dot to MichaelShuyer, New York Times bestselling author and

(02:32):
Colonel Mike. And don't forget beforewe get to today's guest on the screen
first time, or oh my gosh, we finally got him. It's two
Mike's dot us two ducs Mike Us. Hey, don't forget to check our
sponsors out. We only have acouple of guys out there, so say
hello, click on the stuff that'sout there. We got EMP shield and

(02:53):
helho by the way, e MPShield. Everybody knows what happened in Russia.
And don't don't think he's gonna staythere forever and not do some ping
pong. Okay, this is notChina, it's Russia. And we have
Gordon, and we also have ourgoldguy dot Com and we have ages and

(03:14):
don't think every day I read fiveor six major hacks. So click on
the pop up when you go tothe site. Let's say hello to the
band on the screen first time,Mike King. So it's not two mics
today, it's three mics, Mikesand this is Mike King. We're gonna
tell, We're gonna let you tell. He's gonna tell us a little bit

(03:35):
about himself, and then we're gonnahave some fun and we're gonna talk about
news, global stuff. His books. Oh my god, he's got a
library books. Unbelievable, Mike King. Welcome to two mics, Mike,
and Mike is good to be withyou. Thank you, sir, and
uh okay, Well let's see whatdoes Mike King do. I My website
is real News and history dot com, and it's probably it's a bit of

(04:01):
both, maybe half and half.I would say my niche is weaving in
the historical events with the contemporary happeningsbecause they're related. Everything is rooted,
could go back at least one hundredyears, two hundred years, and I
think that's important. If one doesn'treally have a solid grasp on history,

(04:26):
particularly the last one hundred to onehundred and fifty years, it's almost like
you have Alzheimer's and you're walking arounda shopping mall. You don't know where
he came from. So that's whatI do. I weave the two together.
I also consider myself an investigative journalistin a sense I do a lot
of research and try to make senseof contemporary events. But I would say

(04:48):
my particular niche and talent is takingsubjects which are seemingly complex and vast and
boil them down to their essence,keep things real, concer. I don't
write large academic tunes. My bookscan range anywhere from sixty pages to three
hundred. You know, my articlesaren't that long. I use a lot

(05:08):
of pictures and illustrations, so everythingI create is with the objective in mind
of getting someone up the learning curvequickly. It's kind of like, you
know, when a judge reads alegal brief, he wants it to be
just that of brief. You wantto piss off a judge, you give
them a thousand page summary of thecase. Now. I don't do that.

(05:29):
I keep things very concise, andit's about the simplicity because I'm an
activist at heart. I just don'twant to put out information to inform people,
but the kind of stuff that canspread virally because I keep it simple.
So that's what I do at realNews and history dot Com, and
it covers so many different subjects,from current events to history. So I

(05:55):
think you mentioned we'd have a free, willing discussion today. We can touch
a little bit about anything you wanttoo. Hey, Mike, what's your
background? What's your background? Well, my work background was I worked in
business. I worked in real estateand some advertising. Oh this was,
But things like history and philosophy werejust you know, a passion of mine

(06:17):
that I pursued on my own parttime. So I would say in that
in regards to the subjects, Iwrite about them and I'll auto didact so
totally so self taught. So butthat's that would be My true background would
be as a historian, journalist,little philosophy of little economics, you know,

(06:42):
but not what I was trained for. And I began doing this as
a full time and endeavor about thirteenyears ago. This is just put stuff
online and people enjoyed it so much. So that's when I began doing things
about thirteen years ago. All right, So let me just tell the audience.
He's also coined, which you know, maybe t my pant really the

(07:05):
name for bb nets in Yahoo.He calls him Satan Yahoo, which I
think is fantastic. It's it's it'sspot on, as I would say,
doctor Mike, you have a question. No, it's just a worthy thing
in my view anyway, to getaway from complexity. There's very little complexity
in life. You know, maybein biology and in physics and things like

(07:28):
that, but in terms of relationsbetween peoples and country, countries and politicians,
more often than that, complexity meansdeceit and anything that can be done.
And I admire your work. Ithink it's a great thing to have
people understand in two or three hundredwords, what's what? That's right.
I like to say truth simplifies andde seat complicates. Yes, it's so

(07:58):
true. And I often get feedbackfrom people saying, gee, I hated
history when I was in high schoolor college. It was so boring.
I couldn't understand it. And I'mlike, why what is history? It's
a story? Okay? Uh.And it's the most dramatic, suspenseful story
one can imagine. There's no fictionthat could even come close. Okay.

(08:20):
So it really is, if it'stold properly, a riveting, page turning
account. But it's not told properly. It's it's it's apart from the omissions
and the lies. It's always obfiscated, and they just give you a massive
dates and events and personalities and youjust left scratching your head, bored to

(08:43):
tears. And it's a shame becausehistory and current events and and what is
history but current events that have passedsoeration that people don't present it correctly.
Yeah, we've had two generations nowhistorians that basically teach that nothing in the
past really matters. They have nothingto tell us because we're we're the smartest

(09:07):
that ever lived in the most accomplished. And you don't get history, you
get dictats from the from universities,from the globalists, from the US government.
It's they've ruined the interpretation of theCivil War. You know, civil
War now is supposed to be foughtonly because of freeing the slaves. And

(09:28):
you know, you know as wellas I do, Lincoln could not have
raised a core of infantry in eighteensixty one to free the slaves. It
just wasn't possible. And it's somany other things that are like that now
that they're just to serve current politicalpurposes. And the only way you can

(09:48):
do that is by making sure studentsnever come to understand how we got from
sixteen twenty to here. Yeah,well I heard. The revolutionary solid part
problem is also apart from the deceptionaspect and using false history as a control
mechanism, absolutely, there's also theproblem of something becomes fossilized and it just

(10:15):
has to be accepted because it's accepted. Right. Well, that's the whole
idea of the whole issue on slaverythese days, that it's it's it's a
it's just a fabulous line that peoplehave told so often and have taught no
alternatives to that. We we seea whole section, a huge section of
our country as as latent racists readyto reclaim unemancipate the people that were emancipated.

(10:43):
Although Lincoln emaciate emancipated virtually no one. It's it's it's a very difficult
situation to be in. It's it'slike trying to explain to people that we
go to war for profit. Wedon't go to war for liberty or to
protect our own uh country. Wego to war to ravage other people,
to bleed them dry in terms oftheir resources or whatever else. We have

(11:07):
a well, we have allies,Mike, we have allies. We have
NATO, we have the I mF, we have the World Bank.
Come on, we have allies doingit with us. We're not alone.
Those allies are also the assassins ofthe Americans, of American society and the
American government, and the really theboom dagglers, of all boom dagglers there

(11:28):
there. They sell a product that'scompletely vacuous, and yet they have such
control of the media that they dominatethe headlines. Mike, you talk about
linking the current events to the past. All three of those institutions you mentioned,
the NATO, the I m F, what was the third one World

(11:50):
Bank, World Bank, and youcould throw in the c I A and
uh uh, the European Union,the DA, the FBI, the world.
That war comes specifically of those majorglobals institutions that were all imposed upon
the world from between forty five andforty seven immediately after World War Two,

(12:13):
because it was a lot like nineto eleven, when they had the Patriot
Act ready to go, Homeland Securityready to go, they had all this
stuff on the back burner. Theyjust needed that event and it just came
like this in forty five, six, forty seven, one after the other.
These were all the embryonic structures ofthe modern day New World Order,

(12:35):
and they had it all ready togo. Mike King, just give us
a couple of names of your titlesof the great books. I mean,
when when when the people go toyour website and we'll put that in the
footnotes, You're going to really geta chuckle. He makes great titles.
See like, for instance, Isaw the song you know, the violins

(12:56):
about the six million and for somereason or another, and Mike and I
talk about all time, the holocauststops at six million. Sixty three million
aborted babies that are sacrificed in America. Is not a holocaust. That's just
like a sexual thing, you know, pro choice, pro life. You
know, it's a what do theycall that, Mike? Pro choice,
isn't it? Isn't that what theycall it? Yeah, pro choice,

(13:18):
it's a pro choice thing. Hasnot do with a holocaust sixty three million
babies in America. But give usa couple of titles in between this conversation
here, Well, my most recentones. These are small, sixty seventy
pages. Again, you know,extended legal briefs, Crash Course nine to
eleven, Inside Job, and there'sour friend Satan Yaho was mentioned prominently in

(13:45):
that book. You know, hewas a prophet. He actually nailed it
in the nineteen ninety seven, asdid Big New Brazinski and Project for the
New American Century is It's amazing howmany big people and institutions during this period
kept raising the specter of Pearl Harbor, that kept using that term Pearl Harbor,

(14:07):
Pearl Harbor. And indeed, intwo thousand and one, the blockbuster
film of that summer it was sohyped, was Pearl Harbor. But I
talk about that a Crash Course nineto eleven inside job that's actually available on
Amazon. On Amazon, I'd removedall my books, but they're actually loosening
up now. I won't put anyof the World War II stuff on Amazon

(14:30):
now. I don't think they'll proveit. There's Crash Course nWo two hundred
and fifty years at a Globalist conspiracyin one hour. Obviously it's not going
to make one of PhD in NewWorld Order Studies, But in one hour,
I think one can get the basicskeletal structure to framework of what this

(14:52):
thing is, where it came fromideologically, and it's really quite remarkable.
I mean, you take the rothschildfamily for example. I mentioned them in
the book. The aristocrats of Europewanted to take down Napoleon. They wanted
to take down the first They justwanted to undo the French Revolution, and

(15:13):
you couldn't blame him for that.But even afterwards, when when Napoleon took
over and moderated France, they continuedto make war against him because they couldn't
control him. But they went crawlingto the Rothschilds for money, and they
emerged from those wars as the mastersof Europe. They had the big five
banking houses throughout various European countries.But then today you see people like the

(15:41):
Clinton's Robbie elbows with the Rothschilds.There's a photo of that in the book.
It begins to give you a senseof the continuity of this thing.
I think what people initially hear,what do you mean a two hundred and
fifty year old conspiracy. That's ludicrous, sounds crazy, But it's not because
some of these family blows lies justgo down from father to son to son

(16:03):
to son to son. Another Oneho'sthe New York Times one hundred and thirty
years, same family just passes downto the sun. It's Sulzburger Son,
you know. So there is definitelya continuity that goes back to at the
very least two hundred and fifty years. I begin that particularly narrative with the
founding of the Illuminati, because that'sthat's where we could really start to actually

(16:26):
document stuff. But just from logicalinference, it probably goes back further than
that. You know, all right, Mike, let's do nine to eleven,
because you have doctor Michael Schuyer onthe on with us, and doctor
Michael schuer was the bin laden hunted, that was denied, taking him out
ten times, and like he said, after him, there was another six
opportunities. So let's talk a littlebit about nine to eleven, real quick,

(16:48):
go ahead. Well, actually Itouch upon that in the book about
some of the the whistleblowers who cameout after the fact there and dj FBI
and and said, you know,we were onto something, and we in
advance, we knew something was brelling, and at every turn we were blocked

(17:12):
by our superiors. Okay, sothis is a pattern. And you know,
people will say, well, youknow, bureaucratic negligence and so forth,
But when you dig deeper. Thepeople blocking these investigations later some cases
received promotions. So that's that's uh. You know, there's there's no question

(17:33):
that you know, more astute andpatriotic people understood something was was afoot,
but they never were They were deniedthe opportunity to pull on that loose thread,
just just like you, Mike,So well, it's not it wasn't
really a lack of I think whatupset the most was we found a way

(17:56):
to kill them and presented them withopportunity. And really I used to have
a sign on the wall that saidmake the bastard say no, and we
apparently succeeded at that because he wentwalking free for five years before nine to
eleven. Even though we knew wherehe was, a great deal of the

(18:17):
time he was accessible to attacks.He was most of all vociferous. That's
one of the big problems in foreignpolicy if you don't listen to your enemy.
And he was vociferous and saying whathe was going to do, why
he was going to do it,and how to get us to stop.
And you know, we could neverhave gotten to the point of saying,

(18:41):
well, you know, supporting thesaudiast is not really a good thing for
the United States at all. Wegot all this oil here, why don't
we develop it? But it wouldhave been fine just to knock him out
of the place, because he hadan organization that was fragile in terms of
development of animosities between Muslims within theorganization, and to remove the head at

(19:04):
that particular time would have been veryuseful to us. It probably would have
not would have not killed the organization, but I think it would have stopped
nine to eleven. Well, Imean, I see nine to eleven as
an operation carried out by the bythe deep state. I mean to me,
that's all. It may well be. I can't know. Ten years

(19:27):
ago I would disagree strongly with that. But in recent years especially what struck
me to the heart, really forthe heart of the mind, maybe was
the film of Building seven coming downlong after the planes hit the two towers

(19:48):
that certainly looked like it was aplanned demolition. I'm still not sure,
but you know, you increasingly hearengineers with with really startlingly find records as
engineers saying, listen, this couldonly happen because it was detonated by some

(20:12):
kind of a Now they're saying thatthey flew helicopters near to the Trade Center
after it was hit to hide thesound of explosions that were occurring within the
building that had been pre planted.Now, I don't know if any of
that is true, but it iscertainly an accumulation of information that deserves debate

(20:34):
and examination by some sort of afree organization and not a non connected organization
to the government, if there issuch a thing anymore, Mike King,
Mike, I heard your version ofnine to eleven before, so I want
to hear your thoughts on that.The actors behind it, and remember,

(20:59):
let's let's just refresh the listener aroundthe globe's mind. We had Bush's president,
we had Cheney's vice president, whobasically was the president right at the
he was behind the scenes, rightAnd if I'm correct, we had Marvin
Bush had the security contract on theWorld Trade Center at the time. Correct,

(21:19):
Yeah, Okay, So let's hearyour version, Mike, Well,
okay, Well, as far asthe culprits, you know, we we
go back to the usual suspects.That's something that I had a gut instinct
about that day. Okay, ButI'm able to put that kind of stuff
aside and just look at things analytically, and you come time and time again,

(21:42):
there's just a preponderance of evidence.First of all, let's look at
who benefit. Who benefited? Itwas the the globalist faction of the establishment
had been saying years in advance,this big new Brazilskiy wrote a book,
The Grand Chess Board, and youknow, you know, uh, Mike,

(22:04):
Mike, sure you had mentioned.You know, people tell you what
they're about. And in there it'swriting his book, and it's not for
the general public. He's writing forhis fellow muckety MUCKs and academia and in
the foreign policy establishment. But hesays that control of Central Asia, when
its population, it's vast territory,and its resources, is critical to American

(22:30):
hegemony, which will one day yieldto a global hugenomy. It's right,
it's right there in his book,and he speaks about Pakistan and Kazakhstan and
Afghanistan, and he's worried that Chinaand Russia one day will get on their
feet and that they would they wouldbe the regional dominant players in the region,

(22:52):
and we can't allow that. Andthen he goes on to say in
his book that it's the difficulty.The challenge is galvanizing American public support behind
these kind of foreign interventions. Andhe alludes to Pearl Harbor. The shock
effect of Pearl Harbor is what gotAmericans out of their so called isolation,

(23:12):
isolationism, et cetera, et cetera. So you know, in a nutshell,
he's saying, we've got to takecontrol of Central Asia, but we're
going to need a boogeyman, okay, And he already had the boogeyman.
And that was the same year ofthat book, nineteen ninety eight, of
the embassy bombings in Africa. Sothat's why they weren't going to let you

(23:33):
go after bin Lad and he wasalready their boogeyman that they needed. I'll
tell you one thing about that.I don't know if I agree with all
of what you said, Mike,but I will tell you that about three
weeks four weeks before the attacks inAfrica, we had been traffic and we
have been tracking people who were ontheir way there for a reason we couldn't

(23:55):
figure out. But we were soshorthanded. We only had one analyst doing
Africa. She was abute, shewas great at it. But about a
month before those things happened. Shewas an FBI officer, and the FBI
called her back without without any discussionwith us about what kind of a gap

(24:17):
it was going to leave, andwe described it in detail and they called
her back. And we were atthe time of the explosion, we were
scurrying to restore our ability to tolook and understand what was going on there.
So there's there's a whole category micof internal affairs that bring you to
wonder what what was really going onwas that the aspirin factory, Mike,

(24:41):
was that an aspirin factory at thetime if I remember? No, No,
that was that was in Sudan.Oh okay, yeah, but the
one the ones in East Africa,the ones that Kenya I think you were
talking about Kenya and Tanzania. Mhm, Well the you go again with that
pattern. Yeah, okay, youknow it's it's it's partly my fault.

(25:04):
I was a much too naive,much too concerned with I thought our main
goal, which was to save Americanlives, and that was very very untrue.
What was true that every time youtook an operation to the seventh floor,
which are is the headquarters of allthe senior officers. The first thing

(25:29):
they would ask was not, well, if we don't try it, how
many Americans there would get killed?But if we try it and fail,
what is the Washington Post in theNew York Times going to say about them?
Yeah? Which another thing I couldI should have caught on to very
very much sooner. But the pointis for me at least, and for

(25:51):
the officers that worked for me,is we had We were laying the target
on the table for them repeatedly,and they repeatedly refused, and with no
real reason except that maybe it waspart of a bigger plan that taking bin
Laden out at the time would havedisturbed. That's right, But then we
would have never had the electronic scannersat the airport, brought to us by

(26:15):
former US attorney turned businessman Michael Chertoff. So continue, Mike King, Well,
you know along the lines of thatsame pattern. I mean, you
have this pattern leading up to nineto eleven. We had these clues.
Had they been followed up on,the conspiracy could have been unraveled. But

(26:37):
after the fact the pattern continues.No, I'll give you one example,
the infamous dancing Israeli's of nine toeleven and right here in New Jersey.
One of the main newspapers, theBergen Record, the next day, September
twelfth, right on their front pagefive men detained as co conspirators, and
I reproduced that in the book CrashCourse not let an inside job. And

(27:02):
you read the article and it tellsyou that they were They were Israeli nationals.
They were the only people arrested onnine to eleven, and they were
arrested. According to the story,multiple people saw them celebrating, high fiving,
et cetera. Their van was pulledover, the dogs reacted as if
there was some explosive materials. Youknow, it was a little shaky,

(27:22):
but we had five Israeli's arrested asco conspirators. They were held for forty
days, which shows you that,you know, on a local level,
your FBI operatives are looking out forthe country. They're like, okay,
we have something here. They weretreated very roughly, they were isolated,
so this was serious. Forty dayslater, without explanation, the word came

(27:48):
from on high, let them go, and they went back to Israel,
and they made a nice little coverstory saying that while they were just caught
up in a dragnet after nine toeleven. It was over reaction, and
they rounded up all these legal immigrantsand that's what they did to cover this
up. They did this maybe aweek after they were arrested. They arrested
Pakistanis and Indians and whatever, juston minor immigration violations. And then so

(28:15):
the New York Times now did astory on these five Israelis headlined caught in
the dragonet Okay, So it washundreds of people rounded up and five of
them happened to be Israelis. Theother ones were whatever, Indians, Pakistanis,
Arabs, et cetera. Just immigrationviolations. Nothing to see here,
move along. Oh, I wasthinking maybe that was like they were dancing

(28:41):
to the bar mitz for that wascoming up in two days or something.
I didn't know what that was allabout. You know, Well, it
came out that they had cigarette Therewere lighter cigarette lighters with pictures of the
burning towers and the background. Butyou know, the reality, and this
is there. The one thing Israelis not is an ally. It is

(29:06):
not throw American, it never hasbeen. But the other reality is that
they own the Congress and apparently mostpresidents because the idea that we're currently having
an invasion of this country from thesouth, and we're giving billions of dollars
to the Israelis and sacrificing our ownmilitary out there is just proof that we

(29:30):
have no concept of strategic importance.Israel is not of strategic importance to the
United States. If it wasn't there, we wouldn't We would be better off,
probably in terms of money and interms of perhaps having a less corrupt
government. But you know those things. You say those things, and they
cost you a lot, but they'retrue. It's undeniable. What kind of

(29:53):
a five hundred and thirty five electedAmerican representatives in both Houses of I was
voting, you know, ninety percentof the time, and ninety percent of
them for something for Israel. EvenRand Paul the Great, you know,
America Firster, more often than not, he votes for aid to Israel.

(30:14):
And that's the only that's just thebig number. We don't know how much
is stuck into the military budget orother places, or the number of contracts
the US military gives to Israeli companieswithout probably much of a competition from US
companies. It's it's an astounding situationfor a little rat like country ruling over
a big rat. But that's whatwe got. I have a name for

(30:38):
Israel too, the SLS. Ididn't coin this. I got it from
somebody I forget who was. Itmight have been a foreign politician, but
a shitty little state I called thesl But you know it. Now going
back to that theme, remember Isaid I like to weave the history with

(31:00):
current events because it's important because onceyou have president illuminates the current. Mike,
can you tell us something before yougo to that? Can you tell
us some of the some of thepeople that were renting and leasing at the
World Trade Center, you know beforethis happened home and it happened, not
to go to work. I meansomebody might have not went to work that
day. Yeah, well, wellthe leaseholder, okay, the owner of

(31:25):
World Trade Center one two and sevenwas Larry Silverstein who And I got this
from an Israeli newspaper. I backall my stuff up. It was very
close, wasn't it. And yeahwho they spoke once a week for years,
no matter what, Stan Yaho alwaystake the call. This is what
I think it was how that wrotethis article? Like, what what are

(31:48):
they like? Women? I meanthey spoke for years once a week.
Okay, So that's how close theywere. But he owned the lease and
through him you could gain access tothe building. Now this is also confirmed.
Larry Silverstein had breakfast every morning lightclockwork at Windows on the World,
the top floor restaurant a World TradeCenter. That particular day he was absent.

(32:15):
And the reason given is is hiswife reminded him at the last minute,
you have a doctor's appointment. Hesays, oh, I can't do
it today, said and then mywife, she put her foot down and
she insisted, and he went tothe doctor's appointment when he should have been
at the top floor dead. Hisson Roger works in the tower. He
was absent that day. His daughterLisa works in the tower. They were

(32:38):
all absent that day. That's afact that defies the laws of probability right
there, okay. Zim Navigation theninth largest shipping company in the world Israeli
owned. It's half government, halfprivate. They had offices in the World
Trade Center. They moved out,breaking their in August of two thousand and

(33:00):
one. They moved to Virginia,and later on there was a story and
a company spokesman said, well,we saw the event on television. We
felt so lucky. All our officeswas there. We moved to Virginia as
a cost saving measure. Ninth largestshipping goupy in the world. They can't
afford rent, isn't it. Yeah. No one will follow up with a

(33:25):
question. They say their business,and no one says, right, well,
who are you kidding? You're notYou're not allowed to make any inference
or form any kind of hypothesis justto say, Okay, let's just look,
maybe there's nothing there. Okay there, Oh, there's no evidence of
this. But that's not how acriminal process works. You don't start with

(33:46):
evidence. You begin with the standardof reasonable suspicion. Okay, do you
have a legitimate cause for having alittle suspicion? Yes, you do,
and then you progress, but itnever goes to the further levels. They
just kill it. They said,oh, are you an anti semi This
is preposterous. Let it go,and it just dies. But there's so
many of these. It's a patternthat it just defies the laws of statistical

(34:09):
probability. And it's not the firsttime. You know, Roosevelt was criminally
involved in the suppression of civil libertiesin this country. In supporting Hollywood movies
that would would make the American peoplewant to go to war in Europe,
and of course with Pearl Harvard itself. So we've seen presidents before and allowing

(34:31):
the British intelligence services to operate inthis country completely without hinder and with the
assistance of the FBI, to ruinthe reputations of all the people who said,
this isn't our war, but theRussians and their Germans and the British

(34:52):
tear their guts out. We gotsucked into one twenty years ago. We
don't want to do it again.So Michael King, Michael King, have
you ever heard this expression we foughtthe wrong enemy in World War Two?
I believe that's a tributed to patentright. You know, you ought to

(35:12):
read You ought to read the lettershe was writing back home to his wife.
Oh my goodness. And it wouldn'tsurprise me if they opened those letters
and read some of the stuff thatwas in there. People die in little
fender benders all the time, youknow. But you know, Patton was
a type of individual. Certain peoplehave a character about him with they you're

(35:39):
just not going to take things,and you know they're going to fight,
and Patton, in the letter tohis wife even said this, and I'm
sure people around them probably inferred itthat once he's a civilian and he said
to his wife, he's going tobegin his counter attack or something like that.
So I believe he was going tocome home and now he already had

(36:00):
the aura of the war hero thatthey created, so that made him a
Frankenstein monster. Okay, Patton wasa god back then. So he comes
home and he starts his own movement. He's gonna be a very formidable adversary.
But they nipped that in the butt, you know. And I think

(36:20):
on a lower level maybe that thatfootball player in Afghanistan, that's how they
did him, because he threw awayhis whole career to go to Afghanistan.
Very noble, misinformed, but noble. But once he figured it out,
you know, that's the kind ofpersonality's going to come back. He's going
to come back at you because theyalready made him a hero. Was Pat

(36:40):
Tillman fall we fired? How convenient? Well, you know that your discussion
about Patton was the Presidency's has alreadyseen one of those happen with Smedley Butler.
The most decorated marine in history.I think who was approached by people
to overthrow the Roosevelt for Roosevelt infavor of fascism. And he went to

(37:08):
Roosevelt and he said this is what'shappening. Where he went to the Congress.
I don't remember which one, buthe was a you know he and
then he went on to explain thathe spent thirty years in the Marine Corps
or twenty eight years, whatever itwas, and he turned out to be
a hitman for JP Morgan. Andyou know, they couldn't let that happen

(37:28):
again. So, especially after thereputation that Paton had earned during the war,
they had to get rid of him. At least that's what I think.
Who knows what the truth is,Yeah, no, it was.
It was really a whole pattern withhim, and his frustration was building and
building because he unbeknownst to him,the deal was made very early on Stalin.

(37:52):
You get, you get Eastern Europe. That's your Christmas present, okay.
And you know Patten's tactics were rapidadvance, and he was They couldn't
stop him, like Eisenhower would puthim out of off balls when he needed
a victory but then as he beganthe role, it's like they cut off
his gasoline. Then they suspended himover that slapping incident, which was nothing.

(38:15):
That story was broken by the communistjournalist Drew Pearson. That was just
to you know, provide the pretextto get Paton out of there. Then
for the Battle of the Bulls,they have to bring him back. So
it was one of that, andit's like, we need him, but
at the same time we have torestrain him because hills roll all the way

(38:37):
through Berlin. Yes, they know. He stopped and he wrote to his
wife. He says, they rapedevery woman in Berlin. Berlin gave me
the blues. I could have takenit. I was stopped from taking it.
It was really really frustrated about it, really disgusted about it. And
when they reached Berlin and they sawwhat they had done to that city,

(39:00):
a lot of those people were ravagedby Soviet No. They say every woman
eight to eighty was raped and anyonewho ran away was shot, anyone who
resisted was shot. That really deeplymoved Patton. He says, why why
did we give it to these monsters? Well, Paton was the last I
think American general officer except for themarine commanders probably in the Pacific, who

(39:28):
really remembered what's his name, theConfederate Cavalry officer Forest, Bedford Forest,
who said, wars about fighting,and fighting is about killing. And as
soon as the fighting is over andenough people have been killed to stop it,
then the war is over and wecan worry about reconstruction. But you
got to win first. And whathave we won? What we twenty years

(39:51):
in Iraq, for more than twentynow twenty years in Afghanistan, we won
nothing. We lost everything. Wellthat's Mike, it's because we go back
to the NW do now. Ithink right now, if you look back
at Afghanistan and everything, the wholethe whole purpose is not to just take
down America. It's to make uslose face. Would you agree, before

(40:12):
we take down America, I don'tthink anybody needs to do that. We
do it ourselves. We think it'sbecause we are. We think we are
the best and the brightest that everlived at this point in time. And
that you know, no no presidentvalues anything more than being called the leader
of the free world. You know, screw this stuff about America. First,

(40:34):
I'm the leader world. Look atwhat happened at the border, the
invasion the other day. They charged, all these people charged against the National
guard. It is the most it'sthe most horrible two seconds of film you're
going to see. And then youhear, well they charged because they were
trying to get to the border patrol. They want to get registered as asylum.

(40:59):
Sy well, you know what thatis the set And by the way,
both mics they had the balls,the balls to put in the press,
news media and print that uh youknow, we're just we're discussing this
budget and we got to pass thisbudget. Like nobody even had the nerve

(41:19):
to get out and say like whatis this? What do we look at
that? Colonel is where are thefifty calibers? Yeah, nine hundred and
eighty billion dollar budget and we can'tprotect our border. Forget calibers, Mic,
just any kind of gun. Theyshould have shot in the air,
the warning shot and they just mowthem down. Now, Okay, what

(41:39):
are they going to say, Mikeand Mike King? What are they going
to say? Oh? How andyou may no, fuck off? Fuck
off, you're invading the country,period. But we don't have that kind
of spine anymore. Well, Ithink that's some people. But they get
they get shut it aside, orthey just choose to keep quiet. There's

(42:00):
I live in a place where manypeople would be delighted to do that,
I think just for this country's sake, not because they have any animosity towards
foreigners. It's just you do itthe right way, or you don't get
in here. Well, you gotthe governor, the governor in Texas.
You know, one day he's thegreat guy for these people, next day
he's not. He's all New WorldOrder, Mike King. You agreed,

(42:20):
Mike, Sure, you agree.He's w ef the governor. He could
have deputized one hundred two hundred thousandmen and throughout this country to go down
there and defend the border. Butno, he can't do it. But
in the meantime, our tax dollarsare going to Panama to build camps.
We have our Secretary of Homeland Securitygoing down there with five suburbans and Blackhawk

(42:40):
helicopters escorting him to move these peopleinto our country so that when the next
chaos Mike King comes the next nineto eleven, they're going to say,
gee, we didn't know this,We thought they were here just to get
jobs. And by the way,we should have got your guns a lot
early this way. Now they're lettingpeople squat in your homes. Now,

(43:05):
who's next in the line? Mikeis it Mike King? Is it the
judges? Is it the judges?Well, let me just say about the
immigration. I see a bright liningaround this dark cloud, and I believe
this may not be by accident.It is doing more than any other issue

(43:25):
or event that I can think of, to gradually turn people off to the
Democratic Party and against Biden, especiallybecause now they're shipping them in the cities
New York, Chicago. Recent pollingthat it shows Trump has thirty support amongst

(43:46):
black voters, which is historic,Okay, or you haven't seen something like
that since black in the days whenblacks to vote for Republicans in the thirties.
Uh, it's Hispanics as well.But people across the whole spectrum,

(44:07):
the entirety of the American center,they're all opposed to this. And there's
a polling data that shows that theidea of a wall, which was once
opposed by the vast majority of Americanpublic, it's now flipped around they support
it. So all of this isprep work Now Trump has said specifically clearly

(44:28):
when he returns, they're all goingback, and he has hinted very strongly
it's going to be a military operation. Okay, now, talk is cheap.
How is he going to do that? Why don't he do his first
term. Here's what's different, Andthis has happened under the radar. I
don't think many people are aware ofit. Over the course of the last
seven years, Trump has completely retooledthe Republican Party. The neo cons is

(44:53):
they're gone. There's over one hundredRepublican congressman and senators who have resigned or
lost in Mary's I mean you lookat Liz Cheney and and and Romney,
and Ben sass and Bob Corker,Jeff Flake. I mean, it's on
and on. It's been a bloodbath. But it's happened over a seventy eight
year period, not all at oncethat I think many people haven't noticed it.

(45:17):
What this means is when Trump returns, uh, he's not going to
be dealing with his own party stabbinghim in the back at every time.
The Paul Ryan's, the John McCain's, the Mitch mcconnald's, they're all gone.
Okay, He's essentially going to bethe buzzword these days. Is authoritarian
means he can get shited done.And I and I and I do believe

(45:39):
all of this is prep work andthe American public is going to be scared
straight. And when and when hereturns, I think he's going to have
such a mandate behind him that alot of these things are going to get
fixed quick Trump style. Go ahead, Mike. I was just going to
say, Trump is still surrounded bysomeone to the people who were his son

(46:04):
in law, for example, He'sstill surrounded by people who help bring him
down the first time. There's nodoubt that he can get things done,
and not in an authoritarian manner,just in a manner of putting pressure of
an extremely popular president on the onthe Congress. But he has to show
us. I think that there's notgoing to be any more And Colonel Mike

(46:27):
says this all the time, thatthere's not going to be any more of
the clowns he had in the OvalOffice or near the Oval office to advise
him. That's got to stop.But I mean, he's got handlers,
He's got Mike King, who's gothandlers and shipbirds all around him. We
know who they are. We don'thave to name them on the show.
They've been around, they're still aroundfor round two. They're called a campaign

(46:49):
something or other. You know,it's just look, a common sense guy
could get off a job putting aroofing or aluminum siding or vinyl siding on
a house and go tell them whatwe're going to tell them, which is
get rid of these people around you. Okay. You know they're all going
to write a book, they're allgoing to try to get a job,
they're all going to try to getin positions. They all want to get

(47:10):
the six figure salary, and youknow, look, just get rid of
them. Just you know what,Hire Joe Schmoll on the street. The
guy that's doing something with some moreconstruction work. He could do a better
job around him, you know whatI mean. It's just it's different for
me. For me, the analogyis Michael Corleoni, get friends closer,

(47:31):
your friends close, keep your enemiescloser. And I and I say,
with Trump, the final judgment shouldnot be made just just in fairness and
logic until he returns, okay,because the first go around, you've got
to appreciate this he's he's stepping intothe vipers then, and he's just surrounded

(47:53):
by these characters. There's no wayto get rid of them. I mean,
you have to bring them in onto them. And you know,
on his way out the door Decembertwenty twenty, okay, he decapitated the
the Pentagon Civilian Review Board, HenryKissinger, Eric Kent or a lot of

(48:17):
big names on it. Got ridof them all. He did the same
thing at the Defense Department, andhe did this droughout his presidence slowly but
surely. There's a lot of deepstations were removed. It's a gradual process.
And I talked earlier about all thesecongressmen who are all anti Trump Republicans,
they were put aside. So itappears to me that it has been

(48:40):
a long process by necessity to getyour pieces in place. And we're going
to see the real Trump presidency whenhe returns, and that's what we can
judge him. And going back towhat I said earlier about like historical precedents,
how they help understand help want tounderstand current events. You know,
William mc was dead set against theSpanish American War, didn't want it,

(49:02):
okay, but he had such anenormous pressure. He was being threatened by
both Houses of Congress. You hadTeddy Roosevelt, he was assistant Secretary of
the Navy. On his own,he was making the He made the provocative
move of sending the main into aVana harbor where it conveniently blew up.
And even after that, Spain deniedany involvement. Okay, Teddy Roosevelt assistant,

(49:29):
he was acting Naval secretary. He'ssaying, this is the act of
an enemy. The Yellow Press isblaming Spain. Such an intense pressure,
and yet William McKinley said it lookslike an accident, and he resisted going
to the war. Finally they squeezedhim so much and we had the Spanish
American War, and that's how wegot the bases in Asia, in Philippine

(49:50):
and mcguoms wasn't about Cuba. Thatwas secondary. And there's other historical precedents.
But the Marl of the story isa chief executive. Powerful as he
is, he's still only a coggonmachine. You've got this administrative machine,
you've got both Houses of Congress,You've got the press, which is a
power in its own right. Soyou know when you put that perspective,

(50:15):
you realize there's no way Trump couldhave done the job in one term.
But what he has done in thefirst term and in the subsequent four years
is he set the table. He'sgot all the pieces in place. What's
going to happen he returns. Ijust say this in fairness. Now there's
no excuses. Let's see what happens. Well, he's paid a big price

(50:37):
by King. I mean, lookwhat he's going through now. They're trying
to hawk his stuff, they're tryingto impound his real estate. No,
I mean, it's just ridiculous.And you know what, it just shows
you how bad it is. Now. I'm going to quote a friend of
mine who always talks to me aboutwhat's going on with the invasion. He

(50:58):
said, when the black wake upthat the browns are coming for the cheese,
that's one action is going to takeplace. And that's happening right now.
Blacks are waking up to the factthat they're being dissed and moved over.
It's not just whites, and theblacks are waking up to the fact
that hey, wait a minute.You know I I saw a clip at
Philadelphia there was you know, aguy in the hood he's filming, and

(51:21):
he goes, why are these sixAfricans standing on our corner every day?
They got no jobs? How dothey live? We don't know where they
live. And the guy, thisguy in the hood with the the iPhone
filming is says, when are theygoing to deliver the weapons to them to
kill us? This is what hesays on the video. So who knows

(51:42):
how it's gonna end. Mike Kinghas been great. Last word Michael,
she will go ahead. Yeah,just thanks for joining us. Please come
back again. You have sure anability to present things that is very provocative
and insightful but also debate provoking.So we'd be happy to talk to you
again, I think, Mike,before you go, can I get two
titles? One is the Ike Bookand the other one is the six Million

(52:06):
Song. What are the titles onthose books? Oh? Well, this
is what I have right here.I don't like Ikey. The story of
Eisenhower. Deal with Eisenhower is isnineteen fifty two, it looked like Robert
Taft would be the Republican standard bearer. The Democrat Party was in big trouble.

(52:29):
Truman was so unpopular he didn't runhe could have run again. And
you know, Robert Taft was like, you know, the Ron Paul of
the day. America first actually votedagainst NATO membership. I think they were
only like ten senators who voted againstNATO membership. So the globalist establishment were
quite worried. So they brought intheir soldier boy, their war hero,

(52:52):
and there was a big manipulation atthe convention. They didn't have primaries in
those days, and the Taft forcesreferred to as big steal and Eisenhower was
installed in eight years of Eisenhower fundamentallytransformed the Republican Party from a true conservative,
constitutionalist, non interventionist Taft party.By the time he was done,

(53:16):
it was the Party of Rockefeller Bushand that was all by designate. They
recruited him. So that's quite astory. But he's just note, just
on a side note, if you'rea political button junkie like some of my
friends are, you could get atafft button the size of a dime to

(53:37):
about the size of it, i'dsay, a little bigger than a silver
dollar, and pay an enormous amountof money, like twenty five bucks to
maybe two hundred dollars. That's howrare they are. Wow, but taft
political buttons. I remember being atSeapack years ago when it was actually besides

(53:58):
Goldwater, it was the hottest.Mike. I saw one go off for
a buck twenty five, one hundredand twenty five dollars. Wow. So
he must have been good. It'sa great intervention. It's been a constitutionalist
Yep, yep. They did himdirty. His father too, Yeah,
his father too. Ye. Theycheated him out of reelection in nineteen twelve.

(54:20):
Well didn't we didn't we have ataft in modern days we had a
taft. I guess what just twentyyears ago running didn't we have I think
it would have been the grandson.Yeah in the Ohio, in Ohio somewhere.
Yeah, yeah, all right,Mike King, great, come back
again, doctor Mike, Thank youagain. Okay, it was great show,
guys. Thank you, Mike andMike, thank you. I thought I