December 4, 2025 • 26 mins
The FBI arrests a long-sought suspect tied to the pipe bombs planted near the DNC and RNC ahead of the Jan. 6 attack. Lawmakers prepare to question the Navy admiral who ordered the strike that killed survivors of an earlier boat attack. And in a lighter twist—are travelers really planning to show up to airports in pajamas as a form of protest? A packed episode of serious updates and strange headlines.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Gary and Shannon and you're listening to KFI
AM six forty, the Gary and Shannon Show on demand
on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
There's a bunch going on today.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
We didn't get to a story yesterday that I'm glad
it's actually changed a bit today. But it's a story
about this older guy, a vet who at eighty eight
years old, had to go.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Back to work because he had lost his pension.
Speaker 3 (00:24):
And somebody got word of this guy and they have
all come alongside him and have gifted him whatever future
he has in front of him at eighty eight years old,
it just got a whole lot easier.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
So we'll talk about that next hour. Oh you said,
Perigean spring back.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Today, I think we should let everybody in on what's
going on in here.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
What's going on in here.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
I've never seen you take a tile and all I've
never seen you take anything, no pills whatsoever. You are
straight as an arrow when it comes to taking a
pill for anything. And yesyesterday you surreptitiously, or so you thought,
put some cold medication in the old mall, the old hopper,
(01:08):
and you threw that in there like like it was nothing.
All surreptitiously. But I saw it, and I said, it's going.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
On over there because you're nosy.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
And today I'm understanding why you can hear it? Oh,
I can hear it. You've got a mister frog in
your throat. Feel hello, mister frog. I feel you feel fine?
Speaker 2 (01:27):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (01:28):
You are you just telling yourself that? Are you the
stage of telling yourself that? Yes, because you've got a
big weekend.
Speaker 3 (01:33):
Well, my wife went through it like two weeks of
a weird cold really for a long time. But that
was a month ago, and I never got any of it.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
Never. It didn't hit me.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Now now the chickens have come home to roost and
they are roost in.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
That's fine.
Speaker 1 (01:48):
You have your anniversary this weekend.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
I'm over here so you don't have to worry about
You have.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
Your anniversary this weekend. That's very nice. How many years
have you been married?
Speaker 2 (01:55):
It's pretty fine.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
You know how many years?
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Please tell me i'mber six ninety seven, twenty eight years?
Speaker 1 (02:02):
Twenty eight years?
Speaker 2 (02:04):
Yeah? Wow.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
You know what's really weird is I think of people
who are who are married for thirty plus years.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
Thank you, mom.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
Yeah, he's like dying in here. Apparently, do you hear it.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Was this in the cabinet. Because I looked for that earlier,
I didn't even see it. Okay.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
I looked at people who were married for thirty years,
and I thought, that's the long How could you possibly right?
Speaker 2 (02:27):
What kind of weird? What have you given up in
your life to be married? Three?
Speaker 1 (02:32):
I got married super late, just so I won't be married,
so you.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Don't have to worry about the thirty year in awful.
Speaker 3 (02:39):
It's awful. I'm kidding, but it's so Listen. It's better
today than it was twenty eight years ago. It's I
can't can't complain at all. And I know I'm lucky.
I know plenty of people who either didn't make it
just four years ago.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
You've got time to screw it up.
Speaker 2 (02:54):
Oh, there's plenty of so much. I could screw it
up between now and Saturday.
Speaker 1 (02:57):
You could screw it up between now and ten am.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
Possibly there is a Okay, So this was a breaking
news story that I did not expect to see today.
The FBI says that they've arrested a suspect and their
investigation into those pipe bombs that were planted in Washington,
d C. On January fifth, twenty twenty one, the night
before the January sixth attack on the Capitol, a guy
(03:21):
named Brian Cole identified as the suspect. The arrest marks
a breakthrough in this case that has stymied them for
nearly five years. An FBI official said that the arrest
was this morning in a place called Woodbridge, Virginia, at
what looks like a very nice house. I mean, at
least where all of the activity is right now. Appears
to be a nice house. Not sure if that's exactly
(03:42):
where this guy lived. The only thing that they the
only solid things they had to go on were a
physical description of this guy.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
White guy, about five to seven.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
Well, that's several million people who was wearing Nike Airmax
Speed turf shoes with a gold life.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
That sounds fancy. Are those fancy?
Speaker 2 (04:02):
If they're not fancy, it's just that they're not.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Usual, which is weird to say, because they still were
able to find about twenty five thousand pairs. Nike was
able to describe to the FBI that there were twenty
five thousand pairs or so that had been sold before
January fifth, twenty twenty one, and that's part of the
investigative thing. Just the basic investigative work that had to
be done to find this guy. We will hear from
(04:27):
FBI Director Cash Mattel. We believe expecting a news conference
on a pipe bomb, on the pipe bomb suspects coming
up again. The bombs themselves did not go off, but
they said that they were fully capable of exploding. They
just didn't and if they did, out in front of
the Republican National Committee headquarters and Democratic National Committee headquarters,
(04:49):
they could have injured a lot of people.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
It looks like Republicans on Capitol Hill are losing confidence
in Pete hag Seth. It was a shaky grind to
begin with when it comes to that confidence front for
Pete haig Seth. But now this Caribbean boat gate is
heating up. You've got the signal gate re emerging as
a major story on Capitol Hill, and what we know
(05:14):
about the admiral that this is being pinned on. We'll
get into all that coming up next.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
You're listening to Gary and Shannon on Demand from KFI
Am sixty.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Richie figured out the Wi Fi.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
Richie's basically the guy from Beautiful Mind.
Speaker 2 (05:35):
King Tides are back today.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
King Tides is that a single a baseball team.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
No king tides. High tides occur when the Sun, the Moon,
and the Earth aligned.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
Oh my gosh, did you just hear that?
Speaker 2 (05:48):
What in the sun?
Speaker 1 (05:51):
Gary tell him about the high tides? The Earth, the moon,
and the Sun are all aligned, and that's why we
have high tides.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
Or paragean.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
About it? Pa thagoram Yeah, ABC, baby, I actually hy
you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
You don't get to see very often.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
The moon set it that morning, the setting out over
the mountains in the west.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
That's beautiful. It was just the moon last night. It
was incredible. It was a super moon last it was.
I was like that, right, there is a supermoon. It's
set in my head, but it's a it's called usually
it was a supermoon. I know the cold Oh, the
cold moon. Because it's cold, it runs longer. It's like
the harvest moon during the harvest season. The Native Americans
(06:39):
were very literal.
Speaker 3 (06:41):
The thunderbird community was clamoring last night because there was
an accident.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
One of the f sixteens went down.
Speaker 3 (06:46):
Oh really, where's this u Trona San Bernardino County out
there on the desert. The pilot escaped injury, escaped major injury.
There's always going to be at least minor injuries when
you eject from an sixteen.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
But we'll talk about that next dowur.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
Okay, Well, there was a classified briefing for lawmakers who
are raising eyebrows at the killing of those suspected drug
smugglers on the boat and the strikes that ensued following
that September second strike or strikes in question. The Pentagon
facing questions about the legal ground for attacking these civilian vessels.
(07:26):
If you're just joining us, The gist is there's a
boat in the Caribbean and it's believed it's caring drugs
to the United States under the guise of these are
drugs smuggled into the US to kill people. We're going
to take out this boat as a terrorist boat. They
take out the boat, there are survivors from the boat
(07:47):
men clinging two said boat, and they strike again. The
question is, what the hell were they doing striking again?
Is their legal ground for them to do so, or
is that just plain and simple a war crime? Can
it be a war crime if there is no war?
But the basis for attacking the boat is because it's
(08:08):
a terrorist boat and that's kind of under the guise
of you know war.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Yeah, but well, I heard an interview today with Senator
Corey Booker out of New Jersey who very clearly stated,
you can't use war as a defense if there is
no declared war, because Congress is the one that has
the power. Congress is the branch that has the power
to declare war. There are obviously some actions that can
be taken by the executive branch, but would those same
(08:36):
actions be protected under you know, under the similar laws.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
Admiral Frank M. Bradley, who goes by Mitch. I don't
know why you would go by Mitch if your name
was Frank. Frank's a pretty strong name. Uncle Frank, whose
middle name was also Mitch, him Frank. But anyway, Admiral
Frank Bradley goes by Mitch, and he is set to
meet with lawmakers today to discuss that missile strike. It
(09:02):
killed eleven people, including the two survivors that were killed
in the follow up attack as they clung to that wreckage.
He is expected to tell the lawmakers that he considered
the survivors viable targets, not shipwrecked defenseless mariners.
Speaker 2 (09:21):
Yeah, the story has kind of shifted.
Speaker 3 (09:24):
And again the original report from the Washington Post said
that these two guys after the initial strike were they
used the word clinging, clinging to the wreckage of the boat.
The way that Admiral Bradley is believed to have described this,
I think this was from the Wall Street Journal, is
that these guys were actually continue attempting to continue their
(09:48):
drug run, making them and the vessel legitimate targets for
another attack. Now, that is not them clinging to the
side of the boat or the wreckage like Rose and
Jack clinging to a door from the Titanic. If these
guys were then trying to regather themselves, I guess, and
(10:09):
continue their drug run, then yes, that would be not
out of the fight. They would be in just by definition,
back in the fight. So if they're able to convince,
if Admiral Bradley and his lawyers are able to convince
Congress that that's in fact what they saw, what would.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
They continue the drug run?
Speaker 2 (10:28):
I don't know how damaged.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
The boat was very damaged. There's no way that that
boat was going to continue out of us.
Speaker 5 (10:34):
It looks like the thing was blown to splinters. Yeah,
that's gonna be a hard thing to sell. There was
also supposedly some signals intelligence. Actually they intercepted radio calls
maybe from these guys that suggested they were asking for help,
that they were calling their other drug running buddies to
come pick them up and fix I don't know, I mean,
but that's that's all the stuff that has to be
figured out by Congress.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
Well, yeah, if you're clinging to a boat that's going down,
you're gonna call anybody who could come, say your life.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
But how did they have radio?
Speaker 3 (11:01):
That's the other thing, Like there's descriptions about what has happened. Yeah, listen,
we don't know exactly what we're looking at when we
see that that grainy black and white video, but it
sure looks like that thing was blown to splinters, right,
and that there would be very little for these guys
to cling to. And the idea that they would, I
don't know, pull out a radio or a cell phone
and be able to call somebody seems pretty far fetched.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
So the question is is it Admiral Bradley who is
the scapegoat or is it Pete haig Seth that is
to blame. That's what's going on in the jockeying behind
closed doors right now on Capitol Hill. We'll talk more
about that and what Republicans are saying about this when
we come back.
Speaker 4 (11:41):
You're listening to Gary and Shannon on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (11:47):
A new pole came out for governor here in California.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
That's going to be a good game.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Yeah, they're both.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
Well, I think Detroit seven and five and Cowboys are
six and five and one Desperate Emerson College released for
front front runners in the governor's race. Chad Bianco leads
Steve Hilton on the Republican side by one point, and
on the Democrat side, Eric Swalwell jumped to a lead
over former Congresswoman Katie Porter.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Well, that's like, you know, jumping over a very low
bar but.
Speaker 2 (12:21):
Still leading the poll. Is the great candidate we love.
Speaker 3 (12:25):
In the state of California undecided, thirty one percent of
people say they're undersided, and I mean a year before
we have to vote for governor.
Speaker 1 (12:35):
Footage is hard to get over because that's something that's
going to come back up. Yes, nobody's talking about it anymore,
but that's going to be quick to research.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
It will easily.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Oh, it's too good.
Speaker 3 (12:47):
It's easily packaged into a thirty second commercial against her.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
And that is so not gonna fly in California. It's
just it's just too pretty of a place to have
that ugly of an attitude.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
Peegon Chief Pete haig Seth, Secretary of Defense or Secretary
of War, depending on how you like to label him,
has gotten some heat.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Obviously.
Speaker 3 (13:10):
We've talked about what's going on with the double tap
boat strike from September, and whether or not he is
responsible for the second strike, and whether or not it
is illegal, all to be determined. The independent watchdog for
the Pentagon also determined that he did violate security protocols
by using a personal phone to share sensitive operational details
(13:33):
on the signal app. Now, the Defense Department Inspector General
report was delivered to Congress yesterday. It's supposed to be
officially released today. And there's something special about it because, well,
there's a specific finding in there, which is that the
Secretary of Defense, in situations like this does have the
(13:55):
power to declassify information. But much like we saw with
the document's case against President Trump, does him, does him?
Does the act of him putting something like this in
an unclassified environment count as declassifying that information because, as
(14:19):
President Trump said, he could think something was declassified and
therefore it's declassified. That's not necessarily how it works. But
that's kind of the finding that the Inspector General has
in this report, which is there is a mechanism by
which a Secretary of Defense can declassify information. Does is
(14:39):
that a defense for what happened with that signal? App
chat about targeting who they's in Yemen?
Speaker 1 (14:46):
But back to the more pressing issue, being the boat gate.
The military's assessment was that the survivors did appear to
be singularly, singularly focused on their goal to transport drugs,
even minutes after their boat erupted in flames. How you're
able and maybe they have audio, I don't know how,
(15:09):
but maybe they have audio or something. But how you're
able to decipher intent in those moments when somebody's clinging
to the side of a burning boat, I don't know.
Senator Roger Wicker, Republican out of Mississippi, he chairs the
Senate Armed Services Committee, and he said that the incident
(15:32):
is very serious, the allegations very serious. He has sought
video and audio recordings, along with other materials documenting this
and the subsequent strikes as well. The Pentagon has not
complied with this request. Bradley's meetings today on Capitol Hill,
they say, could be the first step toward a more
(15:53):
formal investigation and whether signal Gate and boat gate are
conflated and they all come out together some sort of
public lynching of Pete Haigseth on Capitol Hill. Who knows.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
Well this?
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Admiral Bradley is expected to be telling members of Congress
today that the US military members who were observing the
operation believed that those two survivors did possess communications equipment
that would have been able to call other drug smugglers
for help recovering the cargo, although it's not clear if
they actually made it the contact.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
Yeah, and if they did, were they calling them to
recover the cargo or calling them to recover their own lives?
Pick us up. We're on a burning raft.
Speaker 2 (16:38):
Perhaps you know about us.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
The Washington Post does say that one of their sources
also confirmed that the survivors were observed dragging bundled narcotics
back on board what remained of the boat.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
Well, that would be proof that they were trying to
carry on with the drug but again, and it goes
back to again the base question. I guess, are we
okay with blowing up a U haul full of drugs
crossing the Mexico border into the United States, knowing that
there's there were eleven people on this boat, knowing let's
(17:16):
say there's four guys in the U haul carrying drugs.
Do we just blow up that U haul? Or because
it's the same thing, it's a boat truck, whatever the
method is the vehicle, are we okay with that? Is
that something that we're cool with? Does this happen all
the time? It certainly happened all the time in September, October, November,
because this happened September second, and there were twenty such
(17:36):
strikes after the fact. Well, I didn't know we did this, Well,
we don't.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
We haven't. That's the other part about this. We haven't
done that.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
We've treated people who have done this as criminals, not.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Enemy well that I may not be using it, not
as terrorists, not as terrorists, but we've treated them as criminals.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
And in the event they are when we have found
a boat, we would arrest those people, confiscate the drugs, put.
Speaker 2 (18:06):
Them on trial. That's the way we were doing it.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
We don't blow up people who have killed nineteen people
in this country. We don't blow them up. We put
them through the rigamarole of the system. Why aren't we
putting these people through the rigamarole?
Speaker 3 (18:17):
Well, and again, I want to point out that something
happened after this attack, after this strike September two, because
they did something similar in October one of the other
You know many times that they've hit these narco terrorist
boats and there were two survivors in that instance. They
didn't continue shooting until the thing was until those guys
(18:39):
were dead. They picked them up and then sent They
didn't put them on trial, even though they're criminals. They
sent them back to their home countries to them what
to go back to the drug trade.
Speaker 2 (18:51):
To do this all again. It didn't make sense, you know.
Speaker 1 (18:54):
It also doesn't make sense the complete waste of drugs.
We could make a lot of money as a country
selling those drugs, repackaging them, maybe selling them in another country.
I don't know, I don't know if that's the right.
D it's not the right. It's not a hot take.
A lot of drugs just gone. You know what, all
those that drug money could have fed a lot of kids,
(19:16):
and listen, this is there.
Speaker 3 (19:17):
There have been other presidents, other administrations who have done
this sort of uh. They refer to as the extra
extra judicial killings, where they don't go through a criminal proceeding.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
We don't give a death penalty.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
I'm happy to blow up certain criminals really nilly.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
Absolutely well. I don't even I don't.
Speaker 3 (19:40):
I don't have a problem with these guys being blown
to find pink myst it's we do have a set
of rules in this country that we have followed for
a few hundred years. Let's not throw them out just yet.
Let's find the ways that we can do this and
protect our citizens.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Might be not to be selling drugs around your ass.
You make me and the fine pink mist last time
I sell any drugs around here.
Speaker 2 (20:09):
That's okay, Oh people, I didn't realize this.
Speaker 3 (20:14):
Yeah, people wearing pajamas at the airport made to make
a political statement.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
This made me overly upset this morning when I read this,
because we've seen the sad political statements that have gone
on in this country when people act like effing juveniles,
and now it's going to infiltrate in my own peace
of mind. When I fly on Christmas. Yep, I'm gonna
(20:40):
have to look at somebody's freaking genitals through their baggy ass,
loose worn too many times, dirty mfing sweats genitals. I
don't want to see. I have no business seeing. I'm
gonna see them flapping around, flapping around because of Trump's transpisation. Secretary,
(21:02):
I do not want to see unwashed liberal testicles at
the airport on Christmas. Baby Jesus does.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Our lit testicles. You don't want to see that.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
Baby Jesus's parents don't want to see it. God, all
of the books, nobody in the books wants to see
your genitals.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Gary and Shannon will continue.
Speaker 4 (21:22):
You're listening to Gary and Shannon on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
Halle Berry's going after Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 3 (21:31):
Oh yeah, and pulling no punches. She was very adamantly
saying that he should not be the president of the
United States. Wow.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
I follow her advice too. I've worn a broad of
bed for thirty years because of halle Berry. Me too,
and look at you, look at me here.
Speaker 6 (21:52):
But not for long period. I cannot period understand how
you are defending criminals bringing drugs into our country.
Speaker 4 (22:03):
Period.
Speaker 2 (22:03):
Period.
Speaker 6 (22:03):
I don't care if they blow them up. I'd rather
see them blown up than whittling away in prison at
you know, taxpayer dollars, or being sent back to their
country only to come back.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
Period.
Speaker 6 (22:14):
I don't get you, guys, honestly, period, been a good run.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
Period, been a good run. That was it.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
It's very clear we're not saying that there's anything positive
about people bringing drugs into the country. And you said
explicitly you're perfectly fine with them blowing these guys up
in the ocean.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
I am too. I'm just saying, no, I didn't say that.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
I'm not okay with blowing people up for bringing drugs
in the ocean. I'm not okay with that.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
I am.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
I know you are, and that's fine. It's the same
way that I'm not okay with the with the U
haul uh you know, scenarios scenario. I'm not okay with that.
It's just they're they're they're it's they're not killing people,
is my problem. I don't. I you know, you come
to this country, you kill people, blow them up, blow
(23:01):
them up on the way to whatever detention facility you're in.
Taime too fine, You're born here and you kill people.
I don't like the whole system. I'm a big, big
proponent of the death penalty. I'm big proponent of vigilante justice,
not even waiting for the death penalty, which takes too long.
But you've smuggled drugs. I don't like blowing up boats
(23:22):
sight unseen in the Caribbean for people bringing in drugs.
And bringing in drugs, you don't know where they came from.
You don't know their livelihood. I know the drugs coming
here and they kill people, but we need to do
a better job at the borders. There's a way to
stop the flow of drugs into the country that doesn't
entail blowing people up willy nilly. And that's my position.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
Yeah, and I would agree with that.
Speaker 3 (23:42):
I would say that this is an extreme, extreme way
to try to send the message to drug traffickers, to
countries that would sponsor drug trafficking, This is an extreme
way to do it.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
We didn't have to go this far.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
We could have beefed up all of the international water patrols,
the we have the Coast Guard that interdicts this sort
of stuff. All of those things could have been done
before we're asking Sealed Team six to go in and
take out what what amounts to I mean a couple
of dozen bad guys over the course of the last
two months. That I mean the payoff at this point,
(24:17):
the payoff doesn't seem to be high enough for the
amount of of uh.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
And are they these and are these the bad guys
or are they doing the bad guys dirty work?
Speaker 2 (24:30):
That is also a good point.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
I think a lot of people have been saying, you're
you're you're smushing ants, right, You're not going after.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
The car going over the head of the cartel. You're
you're killing the people. But me to do this kind
of crap to pay for whatever they can't pay for
at all.
Speaker 3 (24:45):
And maybe that's what this the threat of President Trump
has been talking about the threat of land strikes. Maybe
that's what they would do, is start moving up the chain,
moving up the ladder and going after the bigging.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
There's a smarter, more efficient way to go after drugs
that are being funneled into the US, and it's to
go after the cartels, or to manipulate the cartels, or
to make friends with the cartels and get them to
haven't hasn't everyone watched land Man, There's a way to
handle the heads of the drug cartels, and you don't
(25:21):
have to choose the base option, which is blowing up
the ants. I mean, if you're in favor of it, fine,
that's just a difference of opinion.
Speaker 3 (25:31):
You know, nobody wants drugs coming into the country, period.
I think that's the easy way, right, And the idea
that we would somehow suggest, period that there is that's
when we want.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
It, doesn't it? Okay? All right? Please don't call Oh,
I don't.
Speaker 1 (25:47):
I don't care.
Speaker 2 (25:48):
I know you don't, but I do.
Speaker 4 (25:49):
You do?
Speaker 1 (25:50):
Well, you're like a shelter puppy. You like people to
beat you in the corner?
Speaker 2 (25:54):
What I like people?
Speaker 4 (25:57):
Again?
Speaker 2 (25:59):
I like people to beat me in the course.
Speaker 1 (26:01):
Sorry, it got weird. Oh, period, period, period. Well, it
was a good run, Gary, it was a good run.
That was a good run. Halle Berry diving into politics?
What yeah talk about when we come back to Gary
and Shannon.
Speaker 2 (26:14):
You've been listening to The Gary and Shannon Show.
Speaker 3 (26:17):
You can always hear us live on KFI AM six
forty nine am to one pm every Monday through Friday,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
This is Gary and Shannon and you're listening to KFI
AM six forty, the Gary and Shannon Show on demand
on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
There's a bunch going on today.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
We didn't get to a story yesterday that I'm glad
it's actually changed a bit today. But it's a story
about this older guy, a vet who at eighty eight
years old, had to go.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Back to work because he had lost his pension.
Speaker 3 (00:24):
And somebody got word of this guy and they have
all come alongside him and have gifted him whatever future
he has in front of him at eighty eight years old,
it just got a whole lot easier.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
So we'll talk about that next hour. Oh you said,
Perigean spring back.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Today, I think we should let everybody in on what's
going on in here.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
What's going on in here.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
I've never seen you take a tile and all I've
never seen you take anything, no pills whatsoever. You are
straight as an arrow when it comes to taking a
pill for anything. And yesyesterday you surreptitiously, or so you thought,
put some cold medication in the old mall, the old hopper,
(01:08):
and you threw that in there like like it was nothing.
All surreptitiously. But I saw it, and I said, it's going.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
On over there because you're nosy.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
And today I'm understanding why you can hear it? Oh,
I can hear it. You've got a mister frog in
your throat. Feel hello, mister frog. I feel you feel fine?
Speaker 2 (01:27):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (01:28):
You are you just telling yourself that? Are you the
stage of telling yourself that? Yes, because you've got a
big weekend.
Speaker 3 (01:33):
Well, my wife went through it like two weeks of
a weird cold really for a long time. But that
was a month ago, and I never got any of it.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
Never. It didn't hit me.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Now now the chickens have come home to roost and
they are roost in.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
That's fine.
Speaker 1 (01:48):
You have your anniversary this weekend.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
I'm over here so you don't have to worry about
You have.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
Your anniversary this weekend. That's very nice. How many years
have you been married?
Speaker 2 (01:55):
It's pretty fine.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
You know how many years?
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Please tell me i'mber six ninety seven, twenty eight years?
Speaker 1 (02:02):
Twenty eight years?
Speaker 2 (02:04):
Yeah? Wow.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
You know what's really weird is I think of people
who are who are married for thirty plus years.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
Thank you, mom.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
Yeah, he's like dying in here. Apparently, do you hear it.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Was this in the cabinet. Because I looked for that earlier,
I didn't even see it. Okay.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
I looked at people who were married for thirty years,
and I thought, that's the long How could you possibly right?
Speaker 2 (02:27):
What kind of weird? What have you given up in
your life to be married? Three?
Speaker 1 (02:32):
I got married super late, just so I won't be married,
so you.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
Don't have to worry about the thirty year in awful.
Speaker 3 (02:39):
It's awful. I'm kidding, but it's so Listen. It's better
today than it was twenty eight years ago. It's I
can't can't complain at all. And I know I'm lucky.
I know plenty of people who either didn't make it
just four years ago.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
You've got time to screw it up.
Speaker 2 (02:54):
Oh, there's plenty of so much. I could screw it
up between now and Saturday.
Speaker 1 (02:57):
You could screw it up between now and ten am.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
Possibly there is a Okay, So this was a breaking
news story that I did not expect to see today.
The FBI says that they've arrested a suspect and their
investigation into those pipe bombs that were planted in Washington,
d C. On January fifth, twenty twenty one, the night
before the January sixth attack on the Capitol, a guy
(03:21):
named Brian Cole identified as the suspect. The arrest marks
a breakthrough in this case that has stymied them for
nearly five years. An FBI official said that the arrest
was this morning in a place called Woodbridge, Virginia, at
what looks like a very nice house. I mean, at
least where all of the activity is right now. Appears
to be a nice house. Not sure if that's exactly
(03:42):
where this guy lived. The only thing that they the
only solid things they had to go on were a
physical description of this guy.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
White guy, about five to seven.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
Well, that's several million people who was wearing Nike Airmax
Speed turf shoes with a gold life.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
That sounds fancy. Are those fancy?
Speaker 2 (04:02):
If they're not fancy, it's just that they're not.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Usual, which is weird to say, because they still were
able to find about twenty five thousand pairs. Nike was
able to describe to the FBI that there were twenty
five thousand pairs or so that had been sold before
January fifth, twenty twenty one, and that's part of the
investigative thing. Just the basic investigative work that had to
be done to find this guy. We will hear from
(04:27):
FBI Director Cash Mattel. We believe expecting a news conference
on a pipe bomb, on the pipe bomb suspects coming
up again. The bombs themselves did not go off, but
they said that they were fully capable of exploding. They
just didn't and if they did, out in front of
the Republican National Committee headquarters and Democratic National Committee headquarters,
(04:49):
they could have injured a lot of people.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
It looks like Republicans on Capitol Hill are losing confidence
in Pete hag Seth. It was a shaky grind to
begin with when it comes to that confidence front for
Pete haig Seth. But now this Caribbean boat gate is
heating up. You've got the signal gate re emerging as
a major story on Capitol Hill, and what we know
(05:14):
about the admiral that this is being pinned on. We'll
get into all that coming up next.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
You're listening to Gary and Shannon on Demand from KFI
Am sixty.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Richie figured out the Wi Fi.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
Richie's basically the guy from Beautiful Mind.
Speaker 2 (05:35):
King Tides are back today.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
King Tides is that a single a baseball team.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
No king tides. High tides occur when the Sun, the Moon,
and the Earth aligned.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
Oh my gosh, did you just hear that?
Speaker 2 (05:48):
What in the sun?
Speaker 1 (05:51):
Gary tell him about the high tides? The Earth, the moon,
and the Sun are all aligned, and that's why we
have high tides.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
Or paragean.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
About it? Pa thagoram Yeah, ABC, baby, I actually hy
you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
You don't get to see very often.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
The moon set it that morning, the setting out over
the mountains in the west.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
That's beautiful. It was just the moon last night. It
was incredible. It was a super moon last it was.
I was like that, right, there is a supermoon. It's
set in my head, but it's a it's called usually
it was a supermoon. I know the cold Oh, the
cold moon. Because it's cold, it runs longer. It's like
the harvest moon during the harvest season. The Native Americans
(06:39):
were very literal.
Speaker 3 (06:41):
The thunderbird community was clamoring last night because there was
an accident.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
One of the f sixteens went down.
Speaker 3 (06:46):
Oh really, where's this u Trona San Bernardino County out
there on the desert. The pilot escaped injury, escaped major injury.
There's always going to be at least minor injuries when
you eject from an sixteen.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
But we'll talk about that next dowur.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
Okay, Well, there was a classified briefing for lawmakers who
are raising eyebrows at the killing of those suspected drug
smugglers on the boat and the strikes that ensued following
that September second strike or strikes in question. The Pentagon
facing questions about the legal ground for attacking these civilian vessels.
(07:26):
If you're just joining us, The gist is there's a
boat in the Caribbean and it's believed it's caring drugs
to the United States under the guise of these are
drugs smuggled into the US to kill people. We're going
to take out this boat as a terrorist boat. They
take out the boat, there are survivors from the boat
(07:47):
men clinging two said boat, and they strike again. The
question is, what the hell were they doing striking again?
Is their legal ground for them to do so, or
is that just plain and simple a war crime? Can
it be a war crime if there is no war?
But the basis for attacking the boat is because it's
(08:08):
a terrorist boat and that's kind of under the guise
of you know war.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Yeah, but well, I heard an interview today with Senator
Corey Booker out of New Jersey who very clearly stated,
you can't use war as a defense if there is
no declared war, because Congress is the one that has
the power. Congress is the branch that has the power
to declare war. There are obviously some actions that can
be taken by the executive branch, but would those same
(08:36):
actions be protected under you know, under the similar laws.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
Admiral Frank M. Bradley, who goes by Mitch. I don't
know why you would go by Mitch if your name
was Frank. Frank's a pretty strong name. Uncle Frank, whose
middle name was also Mitch, him Frank. But anyway, Admiral
Frank Bradley goes by Mitch, and he is set to
meet with lawmakers today to discuss that missile strike. It
(09:02):
killed eleven people, including the two survivors that were killed
in the follow up attack as they clung to that wreckage.
He is expected to tell the lawmakers that he considered
the survivors viable targets, not shipwrecked defenseless mariners.
Speaker 2 (09:21):
Yeah, the story has kind of shifted.
Speaker 3 (09:24):
And again the original report from the Washington Post said
that these two guys after the initial strike were they
used the word clinging, clinging to the wreckage of the boat.
The way that Admiral Bradley is believed to have described this,
I think this was from the Wall Street Journal, is
that these guys were actually continue attempting to continue their
(09:48):
drug run, making them and the vessel legitimate targets for
another attack. Now, that is not them clinging to the
side of the boat or the wreckage like Rose and
Jack clinging to a door from the Titanic. If these
guys were then trying to regather themselves, I guess, and
(10:09):
continue their drug run, then yes, that would be not
out of the fight. They would be in just by definition,
back in the fight. So if they're able to convince,
if Admiral Bradley and his lawyers are able to convince
Congress that that's in fact what they saw, what would.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
They continue the drug run?
Speaker 2 (10:28):
I don't know how damaged.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
The boat was very damaged. There's no way that that
boat was going to continue out of us.
Speaker 5 (10:34):
It looks like the thing was blown to splinters. Yeah,
that's gonna be a hard thing to sell. There was
also supposedly some signals intelligence. Actually they intercepted radio calls
maybe from these guys that suggested they were asking for help,
that they were calling their other drug running buddies to
come pick them up and fix I don't know, I mean,
but that's that's all the stuff that has to be
figured out by Congress.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
Well, yeah, if you're clinging to a boat that's going down,
you're gonna call anybody who could come, say your life.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
But how did they have radio?
Speaker 3 (11:01):
That's the other thing, Like there's descriptions about what has happened. Yeah, listen,
we don't know exactly what we're looking at when we
see that that grainy black and white video, but it
sure looks like that thing was blown to splinters, right,
and that there would be very little for these guys
to cling to. And the idea that they would, I
don't know, pull out a radio or a cell phone
and be able to call somebody seems pretty far fetched.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
So the question is is it Admiral Bradley who is
the scapegoat or is it Pete haig Seth that is
to blame. That's what's going on in the jockeying behind
closed doors right now on Capitol Hill. We'll talk more
about that and what Republicans are saying about this when
we come back.
Speaker 4 (11:41):
You're listening to Gary and Shannon on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (11:47):
A new pole came out for governor here in California.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
That's going to be a good game.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Yeah, they're both.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
Well, I think Detroit seven and five and Cowboys are
six and five and one Desperate Emerson College released for
front front runners in the governor's race. Chad Bianco leads
Steve Hilton on the Republican side by one point, and
on the Democrat side, Eric Swalwell jumped to a lead
over former Congresswoman Katie Porter.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Well, that's like, you know, jumping over a very low
bar but.
Speaker 2 (12:21):
Still leading the poll. Is the great candidate we love.
Speaker 3 (12:25):
In the state of California undecided, thirty one percent of
people say they're undersided, and I mean a year before
we have to vote for governor.
Speaker 1 (12:35):
Footage is hard to get over because that's something that's
going to come back up. Yes, nobody's talking about it anymore,
but that's going to be quick to research.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
It will easily.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Oh, it's too good.
Speaker 3 (12:47):
It's easily packaged into a thirty second commercial against her.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
And that is so not gonna fly in California. It's
just it's just too pretty of a place to have
that ugly of an attitude.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
Peegon Chief Pete haig Seth, Secretary of Defense or Secretary
of War, depending on how you like to label him,
has gotten some heat.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Obviously.
Speaker 3 (13:10):
We've talked about what's going on with the double tap
boat strike from September, and whether or not he is
responsible for the second strike, and whether or not it
is illegal, all to be determined. The independent watchdog for
the Pentagon also determined that he did violate security protocols
by using a personal phone to share sensitive operational details
(13:33):
on the signal app. Now, the Defense Department Inspector General
report was delivered to Congress yesterday. It's supposed to be
officially released today. And there's something special about it because, well,
there's a specific finding in there, which is that the
Secretary of Defense, in situations like this does have the
(13:55):
power to declassify information. But much like we saw with
the document's case against President Trump, does him, does him?
Does the act of him putting something like this in
an unclassified environment count as declassifying that information because, as
(14:19):
President Trump said, he could think something was declassified and
therefore it's declassified. That's not necessarily how it works. But
that's kind of the finding that the Inspector General has
in this report, which is there is a mechanism by
which a Secretary of Defense can declassify information. Does is
(14:39):
that a defense for what happened with that signal? App
chat about targeting who they's in Yemen?
Speaker 1 (14:46):
But back to the more pressing issue, being the boat gate.
The military's assessment was that the survivors did appear to
be singularly, singularly focused on their goal to transport drugs,
even minutes after their boat erupted in flames. How you're
able and maybe they have audio, I don't know how,
(15:09):
but maybe they have audio or something. But how you're
able to decipher intent in those moments when somebody's clinging
to the side of a burning boat, I don't know.
Senator Roger Wicker, Republican out of Mississippi, he chairs the
Senate Armed Services Committee, and he said that the incident
(15:32):
is very serious, the allegations very serious. He has sought
video and audio recordings, along with other materials documenting this
and the subsequent strikes as well. The Pentagon has not
complied with this request. Bradley's meetings today on Capitol Hill,
they say, could be the first step toward a more
(15:53):
formal investigation and whether signal Gate and boat gate are
conflated and they all come out together some sort of
public lynching of Pete Haigseth on Capitol Hill. Who knows.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
Well this?
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Admiral Bradley is expected to be telling members of Congress
today that the US military members who were observing the
operation believed that those two survivors did possess communications equipment
that would have been able to call other drug smugglers
for help recovering the cargo, although it's not clear if
they actually made it the contact.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
Yeah, and if they did, were they calling them to
recover the cargo or calling them to recover their own lives?
Pick us up. We're on a burning raft.
Speaker 2 (16:38):
Perhaps you know about us.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
The Washington Post does say that one of their sources
also confirmed that the survivors were observed dragging bundled narcotics
back on board what remained of the boat.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
Well, that would be proof that they were trying to
carry on with the drug but again, and it goes
back to again the base question. I guess, are we
okay with blowing up a U haul full of drugs
crossing the Mexico border into the United States, knowing that
there's there were eleven people on this boat, knowing let's
(17:16):
say there's four guys in the U haul carrying drugs.
Do we just blow up that U haul? Or because
it's the same thing, it's a boat truck, whatever the
method is the vehicle, are we okay with that? Is
that something that we're cool with? Does this happen all
the time? It certainly happened all the time in September, October, November,
because this happened September second, and there were twenty such
(17:36):
strikes after the fact. Well, I didn't know we did this, Well,
we don't.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
We haven't. That's the other part about this. We haven't
done that.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
We've treated people who have done this as criminals, not.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Enemy well that I may not be using it, not
as terrorists, not as terrorists, but we've treated them as criminals.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
And in the event they are when we have found
a boat, we would arrest those people, confiscate the drugs, put.
Speaker 2 (18:06):
Them on trial. That's the way we were doing it.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
We don't blow up people who have killed nineteen people
in this country. We don't blow them up. We put
them through the rigamarole of the system. Why aren't we
putting these people through the rigamarole?
Speaker 3 (18:17):
Well, and again, I want to point out that something
happened after this attack, after this strike September two, because
they did something similar in October one of the other
You know many times that they've hit these narco terrorist
boats and there were two survivors in that instance. They
didn't continue shooting until the thing was until those guys
(18:39):
were dead. They picked them up and then sent They
didn't put them on trial, even though they're criminals. They
sent them back to their home countries to them what
to go back to the drug trade.
Speaker 2 (18:51):
To do this all again. It didn't make sense, you know.
Speaker 1 (18:54):
It also doesn't make sense the complete waste of drugs.
We could make a lot of money as a country
selling those drugs, repackaging them, maybe selling them in another country.
I don't know, I don't know if that's the right.
D it's not the right. It's not a hot take.
A lot of drugs just gone. You know what, all
those that drug money could have fed a lot of kids,
(19:16):
and listen, this is there.
Speaker 3 (19:17):
There have been other presidents, other administrations who have done
this sort of uh. They refer to as the extra
extra judicial killings, where they don't go through a criminal proceeding.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
We don't give a death penalty.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
I'm happy to blow up certain criminals really nilly.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
Absolutely well. I don't even I don't.
Speaker 3 (19:40):
I don't have a problem with these guys being blown
to find pink myst it's we do have a set
of rules in this country that we have followed for
a few hundred years. Let's not throw them out just yet.
Let's find the ways that we can do this and
protect our citizens.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Might be not to be selling drugs around your ass.
You make me and the fine pink mist last time
I sell any drugs around here.
Speaker 2 (20:09):
That's okay, Oh people, I didn't realize this.
Speaker 3 (20:14):
Yeah, people wearing pajamas at the airport made to make
a political statement.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
This made me overly upset this morning when I read this,
because we've seen the sad political statements that have gone
on in this country when people act like effing juveniles,
and now it's going to infiltrate in my own peace
of mind. When I fly on Christmas. Yep, I'm gonna
(20:40):
have to look at somebody's freaking genitals through their baggy ass,
loose worn too many times, dirty mfing sweats genitals. I
don't want to see. I have no business seeing. I'm
gonna see them flapping around, flapping around because of Trump's transpisation. Secretary,
(21:02):
I do not want to see unwashed liberal testicles at
the airport on Christmas. Baby Jesus does.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Our lit testicles. You don't want to see that.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
Baby Jesus's parents don't want to see it. God, all
of the books, nobody in the books wants to see
your genitals.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Gary and Shannon will continue.
Speaker 4 (21:22):
You're listening to Gary and Shannon on demand from KFI
AM six forty.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
Halle Berry's going after Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 3 (21:31):
Oh yeah, and pulling no punches. She was very adamantly
saying that he should not be the president of the
United States. Wow.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
I follow her advice too. I've worn a broad of
bed for thirty years because of halle Berry. Me too,
and look at you, look at me here.
Speaker 6 (21:52):
But not for long period. I cannot period understand how
you are defending criminals bringing drugs into our country.
Speaker 4 (22:03):
Period.
Speaker 2 (22:03):
Period.
Speaker 6 (22:03):
I don't care if they blow them up. I'd rather
see them blown up than whittling away in prison at
you know, taxpayer dollars, or being sent back to their
country only to come back.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
Period.
Speaker 6 (22:14):
I don't get you, guys, honestly, period, been a good run.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
Period, been a good run. That was it.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
It's very clear we're not saying that there's anything positive
about people bringing drugs into the country. And you said
explicitly you're perfectly fine with them blowing these guys up
in the ocean.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
I am too. I'm just saying, no, I didn't say that.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
I'm not okay with blowing people up for bringing drugs
in the ocean. I'm not okay with that.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
I am.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
I know you are, and that's fine. It's the same
way that I'm not okay with the with the U
haul uh you know, scenarios scenario. I'm not okay with that.
It's just they're they're they're it's they're not killing people,
is my problem. I don't. I you know, you come
to this country, you kill people, blow them up, blow
(23:01):
them up on the way to whatever detention facility you're in.
Taime too fine, You're born here and you kill people.
I don't like the whole system. I'm a big, big
proponent of the death penalty. I'm big proponent of vigilante justice,
not even waiting for the death penalty, which takes too long.
But you've smuggled drugs. I don't like blowing up boats
(23:22):
sight unseen in the Caribbean for people bringing in drugs.
And bringing in drugs, you don't know where they came from.
You don't know their livelihood. I know the drugs coming
here and they kill people, but we need to do
a better job at the borders. There's a way to
stop the flow of drugs into the country that doesn't
entail blowing people up willy nilly. And that's my position.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
Yeah, and I would agree with that.
Speaker 3 (23:42):
I would say that this is an extreme, extreme way
to try to send the message to drug traffickers, to
countries that would sponsor drug trafficking, This is an extreme
way to do it.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
We didn't have to go this far.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
We could have beefed up all of the international water patrols,
the we have the Coast Guard that interdicts this sort
of stuff. All of those things could have been done
before we're asking Sealed Team six to go in and
take out what what amounts to I mean a couple
of dozen bad guys over the course of the last
two months. That I mean the payoff at this point,
(24:17):
the payoff doesn't seem to be high enough for the
amount of of uh.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
And are they these and are these the bad guys
or are they doing the bad guys dirty work?
Speaker 2 (24:30):
That is also a good point.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
I think a lot of people have been saying, you're
you're you're smushing ants, right, You're not going after.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
The car going over the head of the cartel. You're
you're killing the people. But me to do this kind
of crap to pay for whatever they can't pay for
at all.
Speaker 3 (24:45):
And maybe that's what this the threat of President Trump
has been talking about the threat of land strikes. Maybe
that's what they would do, is start moving up the chain,
moving up the ladder and going after the bigging.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
There's a smarter, more efficient way to go after drugs
that are being funneled into the US, and it's to
go after the cartels, or to manipulate the cartels, or
to make friends with the cartels and get them to
haven't hasn't everyone watched land Man, There's a way to
handle the heads of the drug cartels, and you don't
(25:21):
have to choose the base option, which is blowing up
the ants. I mean, if you're in favor of it, fine,
that's just a difference of opinion.
Speaker 3 (25:31):
You know, nobody wants drugs coming into the country, period.
I think that's the easy way, right, And the idea
that we would somehow suggest, period that there is that's
when we want.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
It, doesn't it? Okay? All right? Please don't call Oh,
I don't.
Speaker 1 (25:47):
I don't care.
Speaker 2 (25:48):
I know you don't, but I do.
Speaker 4 (25:49):
You do?
Speaker 1 (25:50):
Well, you're like a shelter puppy. You like people to
beat you in the corner?
Speaker 2 (25:54):
What I like people?
Speaker 4 (25:57):
Again?
Speaker 2 (25:59):
I like people to beat me in the course.
Speaker 1 (26:01):
Sorry, it got weird. Oh, period, period, period. Well, it
was a good run, Gary, it was a good run.
That was a good run. Halle Berry diving into politics?
What yeah talk about when we come back to Gary
and Shannon.
Speaker 2 (26:14):
You've been listening to The Gary and Shannon Show.
Speaker 3 (26:17):
You can always hear us live on KFI AM six
forty nine am to one pm every Monday through Friday,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
Gary and Shannon News
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com