Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six two six x sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay,
Wednesday seven twenty ish. You know what that means? Truth
or troll. Take it away, Mike.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
And Now America's favorite game show where you get to
decide on the Kooner Report. This is truth or Tall.
Today's entry for truth or Troll comes from President Trump
speaking to reporters about the strikes on Iranian nuclear sites,
(00:38):
when he had some choice words for a certain media network.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
Well, I see CNN all night long. They're trying to say, well,
maybe it wasn't really as demolished as we thought it
was demolishing. You take a look at the pinpricks and
you see that place is gone. And I will say,
I think CNN or to apologize for the pilots of
the V twos. I think MSDNCO to apologize. I think
(01:03):
these guys really these networks, are these cable networks really?
You really? You really.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
A bunch of real losers over there at CNN. So
what do you think, Jeff? No, is he trolling or
is he being serious? No?
Speaker 1 (01:21):
No, he's serious. Oh he's dead serious. I don't think
he's trolling on this one to get a reaction. No, No,
I think, and Mike, I mean, you could have thrown
in the cut the you know, just to add to
it that he called him scum. You know, I'm surprised
he didn't drop another F bomb.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
There's too many instances of this to put them all
into this.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
Well, you know what, great job. By the way, Mike,
let me ask all of you. So he's calling CNN
loser losers, a bunch of losers scum, MSNBC as well
for going with this garbage report, uh claiming now that
we did hardly any damage to Iran's nuclear weapons program.
(02:05):
So let me ask you, is it truth? Do you
think Trump really means it when he says they're losers'
is come? Or do you think he's just trying to
get a rise or a reaction out of him, that
he's trolling them? Truth or troll? You can vote on
our web page quo to WRKO dot com slash cooner
(02:25):
wrko dot com slash cooner kuh and is a national
er or if you prefer, you can go to x
vote there as well. My handle at the Kooner Report
k U h n E R. I say it's it's megatruth.
(02:46):
Not only does he mean it. He's dead serious. He's
completely right. They are losers. In's come but that's me
I want to hear from you, Larry in Leminster. Thanks
for holding Larry and welcome.
Speaker 4 (03:02):
Everyone treats the Air Force like the redheaded stepchild and
until it's time to do a flawless mission and then
everyone wants to celebrate.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Them, Larry. Just for people, Just for people who are listening, Larry.
Larry is a five year Air Force veteran, so that's
why he's very defensive about the reputation of the Air Force.
Please keep going, Larry.
Speaker 4 (03:29):
I said, Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't really affected and they
actually won the war.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
You can believe that. So, Larry, I got to ask you,
as an Air Force veteran, are you offended by what
CNN has now done defaming the pilots, impugning their professionalism,
(04:00):
really just the degrading and demeaning what they've accomplished.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
To be offended, you have to respect somebody who has
someone's respects. I don't care what CNN has to say.
What they're doing, though, stay with me on this is
diabolically brilliant, right, So how these bunker busters work is
The actual explosive material is encased in several different layers
(04:28):
of high tension material, so the idea behind it. It
goes in, doesn't explode at the surface. It actually burrows
down on a set. They can set how deep they
want this to go before it goes off.
Speaker 5 (04:46):
Right, So surface wise.
Speaker 4 (04:50):
It looks like a hole in the ground.
Speaker 5 (04:52):
Well, they can say.
Speaker 4 (04:53):
We have no proof there is no damage because all
the damage is two hundred feet below, and that's, in
my opinion, what they're trying to pull off. They're saying, well,
you know, you can't see any surface damage, so obviously
it was ineffective, and you know, the eye tollers are
going to be right back.
Speaker 6 (05:10):
In the game.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
Larry, you know a lot about these so called mop bombs,
these massive ordinance penetrators, the bunker busters, as they're more
informally called thirty thousand pounds, the most devastating bombs on
the planet. Larry, you drop twelve of them on four dough,
two of them on the tons. Do you think that
(05:36):
there's anything left of that four dough underground facility after
twelve of these babies were dropped?
Speaker 4 (05:45):
Now everyone else, a lot of people are also trying
to give the argument, Well, these trucks came in and
they safely moved out all the uranium, so it didn't
change a thing. Imagine, if you will, you want to
and do obviously not condoning this, I'm just using an example.
You want to do a like a mass attack, and
(06:07):
you have all this AMMO at your disposal, but no
means to use it. That's basically what's happened. They've got
all the AMMO, the uranium, they just got no where
to fire it. They got no way to get it
to where they wanted to go. Yes, it would have
been better if the plutonium or uranium excuse me that
(06:30):
I'm getting my chemicals mixed up was destroyed in that.
But on the flip side, maybe not, because yes, they
still have Larry.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
Can you hang on, I'm up against a break. We're
gonna come right back to Larry. Six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay,
let's go right back to Larry in Leminster, our Air
Force vet and a good friend of mine as well. Larry,
you were saying, look, I'm not offended by what CNN
(07:03):
and The New York Times and others have done defaming
the pilots who executed that brilliant bombing operation, because you
have to respect someone to be offended by what they've done. Larry,
please pick up where you left off.
Speaker 4 (07:22):
So, Jeff, I was a mechanic on cargo plane C
one thirty. I was too blind to fly, but my
plane could drop what's called a daisy cutter. It's like
a step down from the Moab. The moab is, you know,
the mother of all bombs. It is the most powerful
non nuclear bomb in world history, basically. And you know,
(07:44):
we're talking about the B twos. The B two is
funny two planes. The SR seventy one retired in nineteen
eighty eight, the year I went in, and they announced
the B two that same year, but didn't go into
production until nine years later. I wasn't I didn't know
how sophisticated that B two is, Jeff. It's a flying
(08:05):
seven to eleven. It's got a microwave so they can
cook burritos and stuff while they're flying. It's got a bathroom.
I didn't know this until this mission, to be honest,
and I was like, oh my god, I didn't realize.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
All this, Larry, Larry, is it true? It has a
wall of cigarettes.
Speaker 4 (08:23):
I don't think that would be true because you're on
oxygen at that height, you can't smoke. Okay, okay, right,
because I wouldn't think so.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
Because Mike's in my ear laughing, and he says, Jeff,
there's a wall of cigarettes. It's incredible. Now, hold on, Mike,
what about like, do they have like a coke machine
up there? Are you serious, Mike? A slushy machine? I mean,
do they have like, let's say you want a nice
diet coke or a coke zero or a cherry coke
(08:55):
or maybe hot dogs on the rollers? Do they got
stuff like that up there? Larry?
Speaker 4 (09:02):
Right? Yeah, it's like you know, air freshener is all that.
Anything you can find the seven eleven you're going to
find in this thing. But what I find lappable is
you brought it up. I want to touch on it.
Edward Snowden, evil Incarnate for disclosing secrets CNN hailed as heroes.
(09:25):
Make that make sense?
Speaker 1 (09:27):
Oh, you're dead on, You're absolutely dead on, Larry. Look,
let me ask you point blank. Obviously that leaker. I
hope they find him and they throw the book at him.
What about CNN should CNN. Should there be criminal penalties
for CNN for doing what they did? Should at a minimum,
should they lose their broadcast license? I mean, how many
(09:50):
times can they keep doing this with impunity?
Speaker 4 (09:52):
What say you, Larry Yes? Because you know what's going
to end up happening is if anyone pushes it, the
SEC is going to do what find them right, and
the fine is always like a half a percent of
their worth, so it's like nothing. Yeah, they need to
feel the punishment as like why I enjoy that Trump
(10:14):
had successfully sued CNN over the or not seeing an
ABC over the George Steffie comments and all that. They
need to be held to task and publicly humiliated. And
it's no secret that you know Congress is hidding lows
right now? What the teams and CNN and MSNBC, they're
(10:36):
in for a penny, in for a pounds no matter
how dumb their takes are. They know they're dumb, but
they're going to go with it because they have to
bring Trump down. How embarrassing is it that? I know
I'm going a little off topic, but it'll come back
around that Green makes a case finally, one that would
(10:59):
actually kind of makes sense. For impeachment, saying he should
have come to Congress first, and over a hundred of
his fellow Democrats voted against it because it's not because
they didn't think Trump committed any crimes. And they had
in their head, he breathes, he commits a crime that
they knew how bad they're pulling numbers are. They're like,
(11:20):
we can't do this again. It's just going to kill it,
and we'll never take back to Congress.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
Oh, Larry again, excellent point. No, you're right. One hundred
and twenty eight Democrats voted against the impeachment resolution last
night or yesterday afternoon, forgive me. So they voted with Republicans,
and Trump taunted them. He taunted AOC, he taunted Green,
He taunted all of them. He said, go ahead and
make my day, Jasmine Crockett, all of them, Chuck Schumer,
(11:45):
he said, go ahead, impeach me over this, Go ahead,
I dare you. And they got destroyed in that vote yesterday. Destroyed. Larry.
I've got to ask you this, because you know so
much about the air force and airplanes and and war fighting,
especially from the sky. Twelve of these mother of all bombs, Okay,
(12:07):
twelve as you said, the most powerful non nuclear conventional
bomb on the face of the earth. You drop twelve
of them right down two holes in four dou can
it is there any way humanly possible that four Doaux
(12:28):
is still intact and still standing, because that's what they're claiming.
The report says, what say.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
You, I mean there there's nothing in it but dust
and you know, flag tites, But no, there is. It
didn't like if anyone was in there, there were, they
were just obliterated. They're they're now part of the walls
in there. Nothing's left. Even if there was no nuclear
(12:55):
stuff in there, nothing's left.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Nothing's left. So okay, so you're saying this report is
one thout BS.
Speaker 6 (13:01):
Correct, Yes, it's BS.
Speaker 4 (13:04):
It was like you would put Eodesh sorry Hags Seth
had said this was like some preliminary outlier, like an
outlier poll that Trump is going to lose by a
thirty points type thing. It was an outlier, initial assessment
by one person. And like you said, it's bad enough
that they don't have the report. They're just taking the
(13:25):
word as some schmuck who told them, Hey, this was
actually didn't work. Yeah, it's all bogus. But CNN knows
that it's hard to prove because no one can get
in there and give definitive proof that is you're right.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
No, no, you're right. You can't go to Iran and
go underneath the ground and say, hey, look look so
you're right. So they can just lie and lie and
lie with impunity. Larry, great, outstanding call, one of your
best ever. Thank you, Larry, as always and always thank
you for your service. Tim in South Dennis, thanks for
(14:00):
bilding Pam and welcome.
Speaker 5 (14:02):
Good morning, Jeff. Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
Pleasure. Tim.
Speaker 7 (14:07):
You know, I was.
Speaker 5 (14:08):
Thinking it's off the top of my head, you know,
just typical leftist stuff to get Trump. But if you
think about it, I mean, the left has been controlling
the media for a long time, and the media is
in a position it can actually determine the outcomes of
wars and other situations. I mean, just look at every
(14:31):
time Israel gets into a conflict with anybody. All you
ever hear out of CNN and all the rest is
Israel did this to civilians. Israel did that. You don't
ever see what the enemy's doing, you know, and it
goes back the ways if you remember the tet offensive
in Vietnam, the VC came out of the Jungles. They
(14:52):
were smashed, utterly, destroyed, so bad that even leaders in
the v thought the North set them up to fail
because the NBA took over the war after but there
was cronkite out there. It looks like we've lost the
war and it can't be one. Or when we went
(15:13):
into Grenada in eighty three and they said, well, the
students were never threatened, but everyone that was rescued said
they were never so happy to see US troops and
their life. I mean, they're in a position they control
the narrative, and you know, so originally I thought, you know,
just another way to get Trump Trump.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
You know, Tim, I got to tell you, I'm so
happy you mentioned the Tet offensive, you know, nineteen sixty eight,
because that I thought was a real turning point in
the media and how they really became anti American traders.
And I'm choosing my words very carefully because you are
not one hundred You're one thousand percent correct. As an American,
I know you're a military guy, Tim, so you know
(15:53):
this better than I do. But as an historian, you know,
I used to teach about the tense the Vietnam War
and the Tetsive. You're right, the Tet offensive was a
disaster for the Vietcong. They got their heads handed to
them and by the time Cronkite and the American media
was done, six one seven two, six, six sixty eight
(16:14):
sixty eight is the number. Okay, cooner Man now on
the war path, at least against CNN and the New
York Times. Uh. This is from Lisa on Messenger, and
I think she hit the nail right on the head. Jeff.
It's time to remove all mainstream media from the White House,
(16:36):
every last one of them. I am so sick of them.
They truly are the enemy of the people. This has
to stop. I couldn't agree with you more. Lisa could
not agree with you more. Natalie in Lunenburg, thanks for
holding Natalie and welcome.
Speaker 8 (16:57):
Hey Jeff, Natalie, how are you happy?
Speaker 2 (17:01):
Happy?
Speaker 7 (17:01):
He waved.
Speaker 4 (17:02):
H Hey, you know, Jeff, I'm confused.
Speaker 8 (17:07):
Maybe you can help me figure out what's going on.
I just I'm confused here. I remember that the media
was in high dudgeon, outraged to the fact that the
FBI had to actually raid the President's home at Mara
a Lago because he had classified documents and he had
(17:29):
the authority to have them. Correct. He was an ex
president at that time, right, so he had the security
clearance mar A Lago. Not anybody can just get in there.
There's a level of security there. And yet that was
you know, they had to have guns ablazing there, and
the media was outraged about the breach of security that
there were classified documents there, and now they're broadcasting classified
(17:55):
stuff all over the planet. What am I missening?
Speaker 1 (18:04):
Natalie, Let me just play it, and I want to
get your reaction, by the way you checkmate, checkmate, game
set match. This is CNN. This is when they disclosed
this supposed and I'm putting in air quotes pop secret info,
this top secret report about the impact or the lack
of of the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Listen, now,
(18:30):
this is what they leaked live on air. Roll cut eleven, Mike.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
What we are.
Speaker 9 (18:37):
Told is that as of now, this Defense Intelligence Agency assessment,
it does conclude at this point, again it is still
very early that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including
the highly enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so
much about, those are largely intact Now, of course, this
does stand at odds with what President Donald Trump and
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have been saying in recent
(18:59):
days about the impact of these US military strikes. Of of course,
President Trump said it was totally obliterated, and Secretary Hexitth
did as well.
Speaker 1 (19:08):
Natalie, They're just they ran on the air, a guy
read to them what he says was in this DIA
quote unquote top secret intel report, not verified, not corroborated.
They just on blind faith and they just leaked it
(19:29):
right there to the entire world.
Speaker 8 (19:33):
Oh then, if we're gonna have consistency here, shouldn't the
FBI like go in with guns blazing with CNN and
the New York Times and like ransack and put all
of their records all over the floor and post those
pictures all over the place. And you know something, Jeff,
if they were to do it, the hue and cry Trump,
(19:55):
he's a dictator, he's hitler, he's a teching free journalists.
Speaker 4 (20:00):
Oh my god.
Speaker 8 (20:00):
It's like it's like they have no standards. The only
standard they did a complete one from their previous position
with the Mara a Lago raid. It's their only standard.
Is we will say the exact opposite. We have no
moral compass. Our only compass is get Trump. They're playing
both sides of the field here. It's just that people
(20:23):
can't see this. They're just such an agenda and they
just have to always be negative.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Brilliant, absolutely, and Natalie dropped the mic. Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant, Natalie,
thank you very much for that call. And you know,
shoot the kill orders. And never forget that the FBI
raided Mara a Lago not only with guns blazing, but
literally would shoot the kill orders. So if we're gonna
(20:50):
be fair, they should be FBI now should be kicking
down the doors at the headquarters of CNN, the building
where the New York Times is and shoot the kill
guns blazing, shoot the kill orders. Hey, you phonies, you frauds.
You you're completely right, Natalie. If they did that, here's
a duck turner Hitler. That's a that's an assault on
(21:13):
free on the freedom of the press. So you can
do it to Trump, but we can't do it to you.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Jim in Kingsborough. Thanks for holding Jim, and welcome.
Speaker 6 (21:31):
Good maman Jeff, how are you today?
Speaker 1 (21:33):
Very good, Jim, how are you?
Speaker 6 (21:37):
I'm doing okay? I guess yeah, you know, I'll tell you.
I mean, actually they're actual.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Jim, Can you do me a favor? Can you get
off speaker? Can you pick up your phone because we
can barely hear you.
Speaker 10 (21:54):
Better?
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Much better? Oh like night and day?
Speaker 6 (21:57):
Go ahead, Jim, All right now, Jeff, let's CNN is
absolutely sickening.
Speaker 10 (22:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (22:04):
And you know what they say though, if you remember
the old saying of you know, seeing is believing, Well,
I have I have a vote of our CNN in
New York Times. I feel that what they need is
have done inscration. So I would say we take one
of them deals and drop it on them. And it's
(22:26):
this way they can experience it personally before they you know,
before they start opening their mouths.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
Yeah, you know, Jim, would I find incredible? Seriously, that's
the other thing. Please again, don't take my word for it.
In the when Israel first attacked Iran, the liberal media
CNN and MSNBC, you know, the same culprits New York Times.
There's no weapons program any wrong, That's what they were saying.
(22:58):
There's no program. They don't want the Ayatolas don't want
to get a bomb. What are you talking about. No,
there's no enrichment, there's no nuclear underground program. This is
a figment of Israel's imagination. There says Baby's war. There
(23:18):
says baby, that's all this is. Then, when it looked
like Trump was gonna bomb, there's no weapons program. How
dare he do this? Now, listen to this after it's
been incredibly successful. And of course there was a weapons program,
it's an ashes. Now Trump destroyed and obliterated it. Now, Jim,
(23:40):
have you noticed like this like the snap of the finger.
Oh yeah, there's a weapons program. But he didn't set
it back only two or three months. So I'm scratching
my head and I'm like, Okay, just ten days ago
you said that they Ayatolas didn't have any any right,
(24:01):
any enrichment, any nuclear program. Now you're saying, well, yeah,
Trump bombed them, but no, no, no, their nuclear weapons
program is still intact and they're going to reactivate it
in two months. So which is it. Do they have
the program or do they not have the program. It's
like talking to Bill in Sudbury. You see what I'm
(24:21):
talking about, Jim.
Speaker 6 (24:23):
Absolutely, Jeff. I mean, you know this is you know
the media. You know they got a lot to win.
Like I said, definitely, you know, show show them what
it's all about. Let him see you one firsthand.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Give him a demonstration. Huh. Thank you very much for
that call. Best, I'm telling you, best audience in the business,
Best audience in the business, Bob, Bob in Plymouth. Thanks
for holding Bob, and welcome.
Speaker 7 (24:55):
Thanks for taking my call, My pleasure, Bob.
Speaker 5 (24:58):
Hell.
Speaker 7 (24:59):
Earlier is Michelle, you were talking about liberals and the
type of people they are, and all I can think
about is anytime I've been in a crowd or you know,
amongst a bunch of people and there's a liberal person
that's a CNN fan, and you can't reason with them,
(25:19):
you can't have a conversation with them, you just stop
talking to them because it's so ridiculous. And that's all
I can see here with this the story about you know,
the bombs didn't work and this and that, and now
doesn't Tam Bondy have the authority go after the CNN
(25:39):
now for that story.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Well, they're going after the leaker, right because the leaker
committed a crime. There's no question I'd love for her
to go after CNN. Will she I doubt it. She should,
but I doubt it. But you know, there's so much
uproar now. I've got to tell you, Bob, there's a
lot of press sure now on the FBI to not
(26:02):
just go after the leaker, but to go after CNN
and the New York Times and the Associated press like
this has got to stop. And you know, look, really, Natalie,
it's really is the checkmate argument. So the president or
now then the former president of the United States, has
(26:23):
declassified documents and takes him with him, he has the
authority to do that because he declassified him. Yet the
FBI said, no, no, you can't have top secret information. No,
absolutely not. And so they kicked his doors down, guns blazing,
(26:43):
shoot the kill orders, and they raided mar A Lago.
And I'm sorry, but that's They went into Baron's room,
they went through Millennia's underwear, they went through the president safe,
they took everything, They took all of his documents, they
took his passport, they took everything. So by that logic,
(27:06):
she's completely right. If it's illegal for Trump to have
classified information, then how the hell is it legal for
CNN and the New York Times and the Associated Press
to leak this so called Paul secret DIA Defense Intelligence Agency,
(27:28):
you know, low confidence report this assessment very early, you know,
either in print or live on the air. If we're
going to be in any way consistent, the FBI now
should be kicking down their door and arresting them. So, yeah, Bob,
you're not one hundred is I like to say you're
a thousand percent correct? And Bob, let me just add
(27:48):
one other thing, and I want to get your take
on this. This is I think it's not just that
they're going after the pilots that they're discrediting the incredible
success and the professionalism and just the training and the
This was an incredible, an incredible operation. Whether you agree
(28:09):
or disagree, this was the execution of this was at
such a high level. It's literally one of the greatest
military operations in warfare period, full stop. And so now
you're demeaning and defaming what they've accomplished. Okay, that's number one,
But this is the utter thing, Bob, For once, just
(28:34):
for once, can't we come together as a country and
just go bravo, Just go bravo again, Whether you're for
or against the military operation here. Tucker Carlson, Okay, was
against it, completely was against it. Steve Bannon completely against it.
(28:55):
Marjorie Taylor Green completely against it. And by the way,
now there's a civil war within MAGA. Mark Levin is
now attacking them. They're attacking Mark Levin and Sean Hannity,
and I mean it's a food fight. Now, it's an
all out brawl. And I may even get into that
later in the show, we'll see. But my point is
even those that opposed the attack, the US strike on
(29:19):
those three nuclear sites came out and said, from a
military standpoint, wah flawless, flawless, bravo flawless, best military in
the world, best pilots in the world. And just the
execution of this, the decoy, the deception, the B two
(29:40):
bombers going west, but the real attack team went east,
one hundred and twenty five planes in total, perfect in
perfect coordination, along with thirty Tomahawk missiles launched from a
nuclear submarine four hundred miles away. I mean, this is
(30:01):
we annihilated Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure in what ten minutes?
I know the operation was thirty six thirty seven hours
to get there and back. But the actual dropping of
the bombs and the missiles, this is almost unheard of.
The Chinese can't believe it, the Russians can't believe it.
(30:21):
The world is looking at all like this is real
shock and awe. And you know, Bob Dick Cheney and
George W. Bush, if you remember, in the build up
to the Iraq War, what did they say? They said
Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and he had a
so called WMD program. Okay, in other words, he had
(30:45):
nukes or whatever, biological chemical weapons. So what did they do?
Five hundred thousand troops, okay, hundreds of thousands of troops,
three trillion dollars over what was it, six seven, eight years?
How many Americans dead maimed? Trump Iran's WMD program, Give
(31:13):
me twenty pilots forty five minutes and I'll take care
of it for you. I mean, it's incredible. And so
we couldn't as a country just say no, look it's gone.
They did it. They obliterated it, They wiped it out
(31:35):
in one of the most effective, spectacular military operations in
history and at least show pride in our military. And
what we've achieved. They couldn't even do that. They can't
even do that. I don't mean that the Dems tried
to impeach him then and it failed yesterday, or that
(31:56):
they're calling Trump a war criminal, or that their protest
thing on the streets waving the Iranian flag literally waving
the flag of the Mullus. So this is what the media,
this is what the Democrats, this is what the left
now has come to. They can't even celebrate even acknowledge
(32:18):
an incredible American military success. That's how much they hate
this country. That's how much they hate Trump. That's how
much they hate our military. Bob, final word to you.
Speaker 7 (32:32):
You know, to suppose if Kamala was president and she
had this operation midnight Hammer, wouldn't they have changed the
name to Hammered by noon?
Speaker 1 (32:52):
Yeah, Bob, this thing would have ended. Israel would have
been defeated by Iran. She would have sabotaged and stabbed
Israel in the back if this thing, if she was
in power, No, no, the Molas would have the bomb.
That's thank the Lord she lost. Thank you Jesus, Bob,
(33:15):
thank you very much for that call. I got to say.
I mean, even the way Trump has defined it the
twelve day war. It's going to go down as a
twelve day war. Even the name of the operation Operation
Midnight Hammer. I mean, I'm telling you it's it's it's perfection.
Everything about it was awesome everything again, that's just me. Agreed,
(33:39):
disagree Marlene in waal fam. Thanks for holding Marlene and
welcome Hi Jeff, love you, Thank you, Marlene.
Speaker 10 (33:52):
We pray for you all the time.
Speaker 1 (33:54):
Thank you, thank you.
Speaker 10 (33:55):
We do you know, I would say, what precedent has
President Trump said now to the world. That's major and
also definitely revoke the certification tax extent whatever they have.
Consequences matter. We can saying this and stay one and
everybody that has called in consequences matter. It's time, you
(34:20):
know hammer the period. I mean, Brennan came out yesterday.
I saw him on TV and I turned the TV
off immediately. I don't know what he said, but I
don't want to hear those guys are still around. Brendan
Klopper called me all of them were the consequences? Oh
they did, which is a lot, and also pelosed to
yesterday on TV and she did say no impeachment. What
(34:42):
has happened is a good thing. So I'm not sure
why she said that, but she did so maybe she's
trying to be in the good side of President Trump
just in case, just in case.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
Well, Marlene, the reason why she said that, and the
reason why undred and twenty eight Democrats voted against impeachment yesterday,
and that's why AOC got her head handed to her.
Her and al Green, the guy who actually officially pushed
a vote, and the squad, and you know, the crazy left,
the fanatical left, the radical left is because they can
(35:18):
read the polls, over eighty percent of Americans say that
this was an incredibly successful strike and that Trump did
the right thing. That they don't want Iran to get
the bomb. It's a literally an eighty twenty issue. And
many of these Democrats are worried about getting re elected,
(35:40):
so that's why they did it. Marlene, you're completing and
that's I think that explains it all. But no, Marlene, look,
I want to go back to your original point. You're
right about John Brennan Clapper. The whole gang. Since twenty sixteen,
when Trump first won, the deep state has been out
to get them, to sabotage, to undermine him, to destroy
(36:02):
his presidency. And yes, they've purged some of these rabid
anti trumpers from the deep state, from the intelligence community,
but not all. And you can see that now with
this bogus report, this leak, of this ridiculous you know,
top secret assessment, you still have Brennan's people, Clapper's people,
(36:26):
these anti Trump traders in the deep state that are
trying to sabotage Trump, even after an incredibly successful military operation.
And so my advice to Trump and you know, and
to Hegseeth and to everybody in the administration, you got
(36:49):
more cleaning house to do. You got to continue to
clean house. Find this leaker, find the people who helped
him with this leak, and you put him in jail.
And you say, you let people know you set an example.
If you're going to try to sabotage Trump illegally commit
crimes as this is, you are going to pay, and
(37:10):
you're going to pay dearly.
Six two six x sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay,
Wednesday seven twenty ish. You know what that means? Truth
or troll. Take it away, Mike.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
And Now America's favorite game show where you get to
decide on the Kooner Report. This is truth or Tall.
Today's entry for truth or Troll comes from President Trump
speaking to reporters about the strikes on Iranian nuclear sites,
(00:38):
when he had some choice words for a certain media network.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
Well, I see CNN all night long. They're trying to say, well,
maybe it wasn't really as demolished as we thought it
was demolishing. You take a look at the pinpricks and
you see that place is gone. And I will say,
I think CNN or to apologize for the pilots of
the V twos. I think MSDNCO to apologize. I think
(01:03):
these guys really these networks, are these cable networks really?
You really? You really.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
A bunch of real losers over there at CNN. So
what do you think, Jeff? No, is he trolling or
is he being serious? No?
Speaker 1 (01:21):
No, he's serious. Oh he's dead serious. I don't think
he's trolling on this one to get a reaction. No, No,
I think, and Mike, I mean, you could have thrown
in the cut the you know, just to add to
it that he called him scum. You know, I'm surprised
he didn't drop another F bomb.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
There's too many instances of this to put them all
into this.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
Well, you know what, great job. By the way, Mike,
let me ask all of you. So he's calling CNN
loser losers, a bunch of losers scum, MSNBC as well
for going with this garbage report, uh claiming now that
we did hardly any damage to Iran's nuclear weapons program.
(02:05):
So let me ask you, is it truth? Do you
think Trump really means it when he says they're losers'
is come? Or do you think he's just trying to
get a rise or a reaction out of him, that
he's trolling them? Truth or troll? You can vote on
our web page quo to WRKO dot com slash cooner
(02:25):
wrko dot com slash cooner kuh and is a national
er or if you prefer, you can go to x
vote there as well. My handle at the Kooner Report
k U h n E R. I say it's it's megatruth.
(02:46):
Not only does he mean it. He's dead serious. He's
completely right. They are losers. In's come but that's me
I want to hear from you, Larry in Leminster. Thanks
for holding Larry and welcome.
Speaker 4 (03:02):
Everyone treats the Air Force like the redheaded stepchild and
until it's time to do a flawless mission and then
everyone wants to celebrate.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Them, Larry. Just for people, Just for people who are listening, Larry.
Larry is a five year Air Force veteran, so that's
why he's very defensive about the reputation of the Air Force.
Please keep going, Larry.
Speaker 4 (03:29):
I said, Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't really affected and they
actually won the war.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
You can believe that. So, Larry, I got to ask you,
as an Air Force veteran, are you offended by what
CNN has now done defaming the pilots, impugning their professionalism,
(04:00):
really just the degrading and demeaning what they've accomplished.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
To be offended, you have to respect somebody who has
someone's respects. I don't care what CNN has to say.
What they're doing, though, stay with me on this is
diabolically brilliant, right, So how these bunker busters work is
The actual explosive material is encased in several different layers
(04:28):
of high tension material, so the idea behind it. It
goes in, doesn't explode at the surface. It actually burrows
down on a set. They can set how deep they
want this to go before it goes off.
Speaker 5 (04:46):
Right, So surface wise.
Speaker 4 (04:50):
It looks like a hole in the ground.
Speaker 5 (04:52):
Well, they can say.
Speaker 4 (04:53):
We have no proof there is no damage because all
the damage is two hundred feet below, and that's, in
my opinion, what they're trying to pull off. They're saying, well,
you know, you can't see any surface damage, so obviously
it was ineffective, and you know, the eye tollers are
going to be right back.
Speaker 6 (05:10):
In the game.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
Larry, you know a lot about these so called mop bombs,
these massive ordinance penetrators, the bunker busters, as they're more
informally called thirty thousand pounds, the most devastating bombs on
the planet. Larry, you drop twelve of them on four dough,
two of them on the tons. Do you think that
(05:36):
there's anything left of that four dough underground facility after
twelve of these babies were dropped?
Speaker 4 (05:45):
Now everyone else, a lot of people are also trying
to give the argument, Well, these trucks came in and
they safely moved out all the uranium, so it didn't
change a thing. Imagine, if you will, you want to
and do obviously not condoning this, I'm just using an example.
You want to do a like a mass attack, and
(06:07):
you have all this AMMO at your disposal, but no
means to use it. That's basically what's happened. They've got
all the AMMO, the uranium, they just got no where
to fire it. They got no way to get it
to where they wanted to go. Yes, it would have
been better if the plutonium or uranium excuse me that
(06:30):
I'm getting my chemicals mixed up was destroyed in that.
But on the flip side, maybe not, because yes, they
still have Larry.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
Can you hang on, I'm up against a break. We're
gonna come right back to Larry. Six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay,
let's go right back to Larry in Leminster, our Air
Force vet and a good friend of mine as well. Larry,
you were saying, look, I'm not offended by what CNN
(07:03):
and The New York Times and others have done defaming
the pilots who executed that brilliant bombing operation, because you
have to respect someone to be offended by what they've done. Larry,
please pick up where you left off.
Speaker 4 (07:22):
So, Jeff, I was a mechanic on cargo plane C
one thirty. I was too blind to fly, but my
plane could drop what's called a daisy cutter. It's like
a step down from the Moab. The moab is, you know,
the mother of all bombs. It is the most powerful
non nuclear bomb in world history, basically. And you know,
(07:44):
we're talking about the B twos. The B two is
funny two planes. The SR seventy one retired in nineteen
eighty eight, the year I went in, and they announced
the B two that same year, but didn't go into
production until nine years later. I wasn't I didn't know
how sophisticated that B two is, Jeff. It's a flying
(08:05):
seven to eleven. It's got a microwave so they can
cook burritos and stuff while they're flying. It's got a bathroom.
I didn't know this until this mission, to be honest,
and I was like, oh my god, I didn't realize.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
All this, Larry, Larry, is it true? It has a
wall of cigarettes.
Speaker 4 (08:23):
I don't think that would be true because you're on
oxygen at that height, you can't smoke. Okay, okay, right,
because I wouldn't think so.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
Because Mike's in my ear laughing, and he says, Jeff,
there's a wall of cigarettes. It's incredible. Now, hold on, Mike,
what about like, do they have like a coke machine
up there? Are you serious, Mike? A slushy machine? I mean,
do they have like, let's say you want a nice
diet coke or a coke zero or a cherry coke
(08:55):
or maybe hot dogs on the rollers? Do they got
stuff like that up there? Larry?
Speaker 4 (09:02):
Right? Yeah, it's like you know, air freshener is all that.
Anything you can find the seven eleven you're going to
find in this thing. But what I find lappable is
you brought it up. I want to touch on it.
Edward Snowden, evil Incarnate for disclosing secrets CNN hailed as heroes.
(09:25):
Make that make sense?
Speaker 1 (09:27):
Oh, you're dead on, You're absolutely dead on, Larry. Look,
let me ask you point blank. Obviously that leaker. I
hope they find him and they throw the book at him.
What about CNN should CNN. Should there be criminal penalties
for CNN for doing what they did? Should at a minimum,
should they lose their broadcast license? I mean, how many
(09:50):
times can they keep doing this with impunity?
Speaker 4 (09:52):
What say you, Larry Yes? Because you know what's going
to end up happening is if anyone pushes it, the
SEC is going to do what find them right, and
the fine is always like a half a percent of
their worth, so it's like nothing. Yeah, they need to
feel the punishment as like why I enjoy that Trump
(10:14):
had successfully sued CNN over the or not seeing an
ABC over the George Steffie comments and all that. They
need to be held to task and publicly humiliated. And
it's no secret that you know Congress is hidding lows
right now? What the teams and CNN and MSNBC, they're
(10:36):
in for a penny, in for a pounds no matter
how dumb their takes are. They know they're dumb, but
they're going to go with it because they have to
bring Trump down. How embarrassing is it that? I know
I'm going a little off topic, but it'll come back
around that Green makes a case finally, one that would
(10:59):
actually kind of makes sense. For impeachment, saying he should
have come to Congress first, and over a hundred of
his fellow Democrats voted against it because it's not because
they didn't think Trump committed any crimes. And they had
in their head, he breathes, he commits a crime that
they knew how bad they're pulling numbers are. They're like,
(11:20):
we can't do this again. It's just going to kill it,
and we'll never take back to Congress.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
Oh, Larry again, excellent point. No, you're right. One hundred
and twenty eight Democrats voted against the impeachment resolution last
night or yesterday afternoon, forgive me. So they voted with Republicans,
and Trump taunted them. He taunted AOC, he taunted Green,
He taunted all of them. He said, go ahead and
make my day, Jasmine Crockett, all of them, Chuck Schumer,
(11:45):
he said, go ahead, impeach me over this, Go ahead,
I dare you. And they got destroyed in that vote yesterday. Destroyed. Larry.
I've got to ask you this, because you know so
much about the air force and airplanes and and war fighting,
especially from the sky. Twelve of these mother of all bombs, Okay,
(12:07):
twelve as you said, the most powerful non nuclear conventional
bomb on the face of the earth. You drop twelve
of them right down two holes in four dou can
it is there any way humanly possible that four Doaux
(12:28):
is still intact and still standing, because that's what they're claiming.
The report says, what say.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
You, I mean there there's nothing in it but dust
and you know, flag tites, But no, there is. It
didn't like if anyone was in there, there were, they
were just obliterated. They're they're now part of the walls
in there. Nothing's left. Even if there was no nuclear
(12:55):
stuff in there, nothing's left.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Nothing's left. So okay, so you're saying this report is
one thout BS.
Speaker 6 (13:01):
Correct, Yes, it's BS.
Speaker 4 (13:04):
It was like you would put Eodesh sorry Hags Seth
had said this was like some preliminary outlier, like an
outlier poll that Trump is going to lose by a
thirty points type thing. It was an outlier, initial assessment
by one person. And like you said, it's bad enough
that they don't have the report. They're just taking the
(13:25):
word as some schmuck who told them, Hey, this was
actually didn't work. Yeah, it's all bogus. But CNN knows
that it's hard to prove because no one can get
in there and give definitive proof that is you're right.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
No, no, you're right. You can't go to Iran and
go underneath the ground and say, hey, look look so
you're right. So they can just lie and lie and
lie with impunity. Larry, great, outstanding call, one of your
best ever. Thank you, Larry, as always and always thank
you for your service. Tim in South Dennis, thanks for
(14:00):
bilding Pam and welcome.
Speaker 5 (14:02):
Good morning, Jeff. Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
Pleasure. Tim.
Speaker 7 (14:07):
You know, I was.
Speaker 5 (14:08):
Thinking it's off the top of my head, you know,
just typical leftist stuff to get Trump. But if you
think about it, I mean, the left has been controlling
the media for a long time, and the media is
in a position it can actually determine the outcomes of
wars and other situations. I mean, just look at every
(14:31):
time Israel gets into a conflict with anybody. All you
ever hear out of CNN and all the rest is
Israel did this to civilians. Israel did that. You don't
ever see what the enemy's doing, you know, and it
goes back the ways if you remember the tet offensive
in Vietnam, the VC came out of the Jungles. They
(14:52):
were smashed, utterly, destroyed, so bad that even leaders in
the v thought the North set them up to fail
because the NBA took over the war after but there
was cronkite out there. It looks like we've lost the
war and it can't be one. Or when we went
(15:13):
into Grenada in eighty three and they said, well, the
students were never threatened, but everyone that was rescued said
they were never so happy to see US troops and
their life. I mean, they're in a position they control
the narrative, and you know, so originally I thought, you know,
just another way to get Trump Trump.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
You know, Tim, I got to tell you, I'm so
happy you mentioned the Tet offensive, you know, nineteen sixty eight,
because that I thought was a real turning point in
the media and how they really became anti American traders.
And I'm choosing my words very carefully because you are
not one hundred You're one thousand percent correct. As an American,
I know you're a military guy, Tim, so you know
(15:53):
this better than I do. But as an historian, you know,
I used to teach about the tense the Vietnam War
and the Tetsive. You're right, the Tet offensive was a
disaster for the Vietcong. They got their heads handed to
them and by the time Cronkite and the American media
was done, six one seven two, six, six sixty eight
(16:14):
sixty eight is the number. Okay, cooner Man now on
the war path, at least against CNN and the New
York Times. Uh. This is from Lisa on Messenger, and
I think she hit the nail right on the head. Jeff.
It's time to remove all mainstream media from the White House,
(16:36):
every last one of them. I am so sick of them.
They truly are the enemy of the people. This has
to stop. I couldn't agree with you more. Lisa could
not agree with you more. Natalie in Lunenburg, thanks for
holding Natalie and welcome.
Speaker 8 (16:57):
Hey Jeff, Natalie, how are you happy?
Speaker 2 (17:01):
Happy?
Speaker 7 (17:01):
He waved.
Speaker 4 (17:02):
H Hey, you know, Jeff, I'm confused.
Speaker 8 (17:07):
Maybe you can help me figure out what's going on.
I just I'm confused here. I remember that the media
was in high dudgeon, outraged to the fact that the
FBI had to actually raid the President's home at Mara
a Lago because he had classified documents and he had
(17:29):
the authority to have them. Correct. He was an ex
president at that time, right, so he had the security
clearance mar A Lago. Not anybody can just get in there.
There's a level of security there. And yet that was
you know, they had to have guns ablazing there, and
the media was outraged about the breach of security that
there were classified documents there, and now they're broadcasting classified
(17:55):
stuff all over the planet. What am I missening?
Speaker 1 (18:04):
Natalie, Let me just play it, and I want to
get your reaction, by the way you checkmate, checkmate, game
set match. This is CNN. This is when they disclosed
this supposed and I'm putting in air quotes pop secret info,
this top secret report about the impact or the lack
of of the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Listen, now,
(18:30):
this is what they leaked live on air. Roll cut eleven, Mike.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
What we are.
Speaker 9 (18:37):
Told is that as of now, this Defense Intelligence Agency assessment,
it does conclude at this point, again it is still
very early that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including
the highly enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so
much about, those are largely intact Now, of course, this
does stand at odds with what President Donald Trump and
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have been saying in recent
(18:59):
days about the impact of these US military strikes. Of of course,
President Trump said it was totally obliterated, and Secretary Hexitth
did as well.
Speaker 1 (19:08):
Natalie, They're just they ran on the air, a guy
read to them what he says was in this DIA
quote unquote top secret intel report, not verified, not corroborated.
They just on blind faith and they just leaked it
(19:29):
right there to the entire world.
Speaker 8 (19:33):
Oh then, if we're gonna have consistency here, shouldn't the
FBI like go in with guns blazing with CNN and
the New York Times and like ransack and put all
of their records all over the floor and post those
pictures all over the place. And you know something, Jeff,
if they were to do it, the hue and cry Trump,
(19:55):
he's a dictator, he's hitler, he's a teching free journalists.
Speaker 4 (20:00):
Oh my god.
Speaker 8 (20:00):
It's like it's like they have no standards. The only
standard they did a complete one from their previous position
with the Mara a Lago raid. It's their only standard.
Is we will say the exact opposite. We have no
moral compass. Our only compass is get Trump. They're playing
both sides of the field here. It's just that people
(20:23):
can't see this. They're just such an agenda and they
just have to always be negative.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Brilliant, absolutely, and Natalie dropped the mic. Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant, Natalie,
thank you very much for that call. And you know,
shoot the kill orders. And never forget that the FBI
raided Mara a Lago not only with guns blazing, but
literally would shoot the kill orders. So if we're gonna
(20:50):
be fair, they should be FBI now should be kicking
down the doors at the headquarters of CNN, the building
where the New York Times is and shoot the kill
guns blazing, shoot the kill orders. Hey, you phonies, you frauds.
You you're completely right, Natalie. If they did that, here's
a duck turner Hitler. That's a that's an assault on
(21:13):
free on the freedom of the press. So you can
do it to Trump, but we can't do it to you.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Jim in Kingsborough. Thanks for holding Jim, and welcome.
Speaker 6 (21:31):
Good maman Jeff, how are you today?
Speaker 1 (21:33):
Very good, Jim, how are you?
Speaker 6 (21:37):
I'm doing okay? I guess yeah, you know, I'll tell you.
I mean, actually they're actual.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Jim, Can you do me a favor? Can you get
off speaker? Can you pick up your phone because we
can barely hear you.
Speaker 10 (21:54):
Better?
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Much better? Oh like night and day?
Speaker 6 (21:57):
Go ahead, Jim, All right now, Jeff, let's CNN is
absolutely sickening.
Speaker 10 (22:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (22:04):
And you know what they say though, if you remember
the old saying of you know, seeing is believing, Well,
I have I have a vote of our CNN in
New York Times. I feel that what they need is
have done inscration. So I would say we take one
of them deals and drop it on them. And it's
(22:26):
this way they can experience it personally before they you know,
before they start opening their mouths.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
Yeah, you know, Jim, would I find incredible? Seriously, that's
the other thing. Please again, don't take my word for it.
In the when Israel first attacked Iran, the liberal media
CNN and MSNBC, you know, the same culprits New York Times.
There's no weapons program any wrong, That's what they were saying.
(22:58):
There's no program. They don't want the Ayatolas don't want
to get a bomb. What are you talking about. No,
there's no enrichment, there's no nuclear underground program. This is
a figment of Israel's imagination. There says Baby's war. There
(23:18):
says baby, that's all this is. Then, when it looked
like Trump was gonna bomb, there's no weapons program. How
dare he do this? Now, listen to this after it's
been incredibly successful. And of course there was a weapons program,
it's an ashes. Now Trump destroyed and obliterated it. Now, Jim,
(23:40):
have you noticed like this like the snap of the finger.
Oh yeah, there's a weapons program. But he didn't set
it back only two or three months. So I'm scratching
my head and I'm like, Okay, just ten days ago
you said that they Ayatolas didn't have any any right,
(24:01):
any enrichment, any nuclear program. Now you're saying, well, yeah,
Trump bombed them, but no, no, no, their nuclear weapons
program is still intact and they're going to reactivate it
in two months. So which is it. Do they have
the program or do they not have the program. It's
like talking to Bill in Sudbury. You see what I'm
(24:21):
talking about, Jim.
Speaker 6 (24:23):
Absolutely, Jeff. I mean, you know this is you know
the media. You know they got a lot to win.
Like I said, definitely, you know, show show them what
it's all about. Let him see you one firsthand.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Give him a demonstration. Huh. Thank you very much for
that call. Best, I'm telling you, best audience in the business,
Best audience in the business, Bob, Bob in Plymouth. Thanks
for holding Bob, and welcome.
Speaker 7 (24:55):
Thanks for taking my call, My pleasure, Bob.
Speaker 5 (24:58):
Hell.
Speaker 7 (24:59):
Earlier is Michelle, you were talking about liberals and the
type of people they are, and all I can think
about is anytime I've been in a crowd or you know,
amongst a bunch of people and there's a liberal person
that's a CNN fan, and you can't reason with them,
(25:19):
you can't have a conversation with them, you just stop
talking to them because it's so ridiculous. And that's all
I can see here with this the story about you know,
the bombs didn't work and this and that, and now
doesn't Tam Bondy have the authority go after the CNN
(25:39):
now for that story.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Well, they're going after the leaker, right because the leaker
committed a crime. There's no question I'd love for her
to go after CNN. Will she I doubt it. She should,
but I doubt it. But you know, there's so much
uproar now. I've got to tell you, Bob, there's a
lot of press sure now on the FBI to not
(26:02):
just go after the leaker, but to go after CNN
and the New York Times and the Associated press like
this has got to stop. And you know, look, really, Natalie,
it's really is the checkmate argument. So the president or
now then the former president of the United States, has
(26:23):
declassified documents and takes him with him, he has the
authority to do that because he declassified him. Yet the
FBI said, no, no, you can't have top secret information. No,
absolutely not. And so they kicked his doors down, guns blazing,
(26:43):
shoot the kill orders, and they raided mar A Lago.
And I'm sorry, but that's They went into Baron's room,
they went through Millennia's underwear, they went through the president safe,
they took everything, They took all of his documents, they
took his passport, they took everything. So by that logic,
(27:06):
she's completely right. If it's illegal for Trump to have
classified information, then how the hell is it legal for
CNN and the New York Times and the Associated Press
to leak this so called Paul secret DIA Defense Intelligence Agency,
(27:28):
you know, low confidence report this assessment very early, you know,
either in print or live on the air. If we're
going to be in any way consistent, the FBI now
should be kicking down their door and arresting them. So, yeah, Bob,
you're not one hundred is I like to say you're
a thousand percent correct? And Bob, let me just add
(27:48):
one other thing, and I want to get your take
on this. This is I think it's not just that
they're going after the pilots that they're discrediting the incredible
success and the professionalism and just the training and the
This was an incredible, an incredible operation. Whether you agree
(28:09):
or disagree, this was the execution of this was at
such a high level. It's literally one of the greatest
military operations in warfare period, full stop. And so now
you're demeaning and defaming what they've accomplished. Okay, that's number one,
But this is the utter thing, Bob, For once, just
(28:34):
for once, can't we come together as a country and
just go bravo, Just go bravo again, Whether you're for
or against the military operation here. Tucker Carlson, Okay, was
against it, completely was against it. Steve Bannon completely against it.
(28:55):
Marjorie Taylor Green completely against it. And by the way,
now there's a civil war within MAGA. Mark Levin is
now attacking them. They're attacking Mark Levin and Sean Hannity,
and I mean it's a food fight. Now, it's an
all out brawl. And I may even get into that
later in the show, we'll see. But my point is
even those that opposed the attack, the US strike on
(29:19):
those three nuclear sites came out and said, from a
military standpoint, wah flawless, flawless, bravo flawless, best military in
the world, best pilots in the world. And just the
execution of this, the decoy, the deception, the B two
(29:40):
bombers going west, but the real attack team went east,
one hundred and twenty five planes in total, perfect in
perfect coordination, along with thirty Tomahawk missiles launched from a
nuclear submarine four hundred miles away. I mean, this is
(30:01):
we annihilated Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure in what ten minutes?
I know the operation was thirty six thirty seven hours
to get there and back. But the actual dropping of
the bombs and the missiles, this is almost unheard of.
The Chinese can't believe it, the Russians can't believe it.
(30:21):
The world is looking at all like this is real
shock and awe. And you know, Bob Dick Cheney and
George W. Bush, if you remember, in the build up
to the Iraq War, what did they say? They said
Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and he had a
so called WMD program. Okay, in other words, he had
(30:45):
nukes or whatever, biological chemical weapons. So what did they do?
Five hundred thousand troops, okay, hundreds of thousands of troops,
three trillion dollars over what was it, six seven, eight years?
How many Americans dead maimed? Trump Iran's WMD program, Give
(31:13):
me twenty pilots forty five minutes and I'll take care
of it for you. I mean, it's incredible. And so
we couldn't as a country just say no, look it's gone.
They did it. They obliterated it, They wiped it out
(31:35):
in one of the most effective, spectacular military operations in
history and at least show pride in our military. And
what we've achieved. They couldn't even do that. They can't
even do that. I don't mean that the Dems tried
to impeach him then and it failed yesterday, or that
(31:56):
they're calling Trump a war criminal, or that their protest
thing on the streets waving the Iranian flag literally waving
the flag of the Mullus. So this is what the media,
this is what the Democrats, this is what the left
now has come to. They can't even celebrate even acknowledge
(32:18):
an incredible American military success. That's how much they hate
this country. That's how much they hate Trump. That's how
much they hate our military. Bob, final word to you.
Speaker 7 (32:32):
You know, to suppose if Kamala was president and she
had this operation midnight Hammer, wouldn't they have changed the
name to Hammered by noon?
Speaker 1 (32:52):
Yeah, Bob, this thing would have ended. Israel would have
been defeated by Iran. She would have sabotaged and stabbed
Israel in the back if this thing, if she was
in power, No, no, the Molas would have the bomb.
That's thank the Lord she lost. Thank you Jesus, Bob,
(33:15):
thank you very much for that call. I got to say.
I mean, even the way Trump has defined it the
twelve day war. It's going to go down as a
twelve day war. Even the name of the operation Operation
Midnight Hammer. I mean, I'm telling you it's it's it's perfection.
Everything about it was awesome everything again, that's just me. Agreed,
(33:39):
disagree Marlene in waal fam. Thanks for holding Marlene and
welcome Hi Jeff, love you, Thank you, Marlene.
Speaker 10 (33:52):
We pray for you all the time.
Speaker 1 (33:54):
Thank you, thank you.
Speaker 10 (33:55):
We do you know, I would say, what precedent has
President Trump said now to the world. That's major and
also definitely revoke the certification tax extent whatever they have.
Consequences matter. We can saying this and stay one and
everybody that has called in consequences matter. It's time, you
(34:20):
know hammer the period. I mean, Brennan came out yesterday.
I saw him on TV and I turned the TV
off immediately. I don't know what he said, but I
don't want to hear those guys are still around. Brendan
Klopper called me all of them were the consequences? Oh
they did, which is a lot, and also pelosed to
yesterday on TV and she did say no impeachment. What
(34:42):
has happened is a good thing. So I'm not sure
why she said that, but she did so maybe she's
trying to be in the good side of President Trump
just in case, just in case.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
Well, Marlene, the reason why she said that, and the
reason why undred and twenty eight Democrats voted against impeachment yesterday,
and that's why AOC got her head handed to her.
Her and al Green, the guy who actually officially pushed
a vote, and the squad, and you know, the crazy left,
the fanatical left, the radical left is because they can
(35:18):
read the polls, over eighty percent of Americans say that
this was an incredibly successful strike and that Trump did
the right thing. That they don't want Iran to get
the bomb. It's a literally an eighty twenty issue. And
many of these Democrats are worried about getting re elected,
(35:40):
so that's why they did it. Marlene, you're completing and
that's I think that explains it all. But no, Marlene, look,
I want to go back to your original point. You're
right about John Brennan Clapper. The whole gang. Since twenty sixteen,
when Trump first won, the deep state has been out
to get them, to sabotage, to undermine him, to destroy
(36:02):
his presidency. And yes, they've purged some of these rabid
anti trumpers from the deep state, from the intelligence community,
but not all. And you can see that now with
this bogus report, this leak, of this ridiculous you know,
top secret assessment, you still have Brennan's people, Clapper's people,
(36:26):
these anti Trump traders in the deep state that are
trying to sabotage Trump, even after an incredibly successful military operation.
And so my advice to Trump and you know, and
to Hegseeth and to everybody in the administration, you got
(36:49):
more cleaning house to do. You got to continue to
clean house. Find this leaker, find the people who helped
him with this leak, and you put him in jail.
And you say, you let people know you set an example.
If you're going to try to sabotage Trump illegally commit
crimes as this is, you are going to pay, and
(37:10):
you're going to pay dearly.
Popular Podcasts
Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club
Welcome to Bookmarked by Reese’s Book Club — the podcast where great stories, bold women, and irresistible conversations collide! Hosted by award-winning journalist Danielle Robay, each week new episodes balance thoughtful literary insight with the fervor of buzzy book trends, pop culture and more. Bookmarked brings together celebrities, tastemakers, influencers and authors from Reese's Book Club and beyond to share stories that transcend the page. Pull up a chair. You’re not just listening — you’re part of the conversation.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com