Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
I'm going to ask a question right now that is
a fair question to ask, where is the president of
the United States of America?
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Why is it?
Speaker 1 (00:12):
My second question that we should all be asking that
a president of the United States America who has just
announced that he is not seeking reelection has not been
seen even in a still photograph since the announcement has
been made. Another question that we should all be asking
is why was Joe Biden's resignation letter the one saying
(00:36):
he's not going to seek reelection.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
I guess it is technically the.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Way to put it on presidential letterhead slash stationery. Another
question we should all be asking is why was Joe
Biden's name signed with an underline when if you look
at other signatures the president, there is not a line
under his signature. I have another question, why is it
(01:02):
that the media is not doing their job demanding proof
of life of the President of the United States of America,
especially knowing that his brother has said that it was
his health was one of the major contributing factors of
him deciding not to seek reelection. This is also a
(01:26):
White House that covered up clearly the major cognitive decline
of the president of the United States of America. So
there's no reason to believe and or trust them. Now
I ask all of these questions. These are important questions.
(01:48):
These are questions that we should all be asking, the
media should be asking. Joe Biden, we know dropped out
of the president to race, that's a fact. We know
that it was now related to his health. How do
we know that? Because that is what has been told
to us by his own family members. And if you
(02:12):
were looking at this, and I'm going to say this
because I think it's a point that needs to be made.
And I sent this tweet to some people earlier, I
should say texts some people earlier. And I said, if
this was happening in any other country, the United States
State Department would be calling this a coup attempt or
(02:33):
a possible coup attempt in another country. Why do I
say that? Number One, we have a president that is
clearly in hiding. If a president in another country is
in hiding, that would be a problem. No picture of
that president in hiding would also be another problem. Letterhead
that doesn't have presidential seal, another problem. A signature underline
(02:58):
which he never does, another problem. And I got to say,
if this was happening in another country. Okay, the US
State Department with saying this has all the markings of
a coup attempt. Now, I believe this president is in
hiding right now, but for different reasons, clearly because of
(03:21):
medical issues. We have a president that said I am
not resigning hours before he decided not to run for reelection.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
We have a White House that said, hours before.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
The decision came down that he was staying in the
race and he was keeping a schedule. Now, all of
that is important data points. Okay, they're very very very
important data points. But there's another data point that is
even more significant than what I just mentioned, and it
(03:55):
is the president's schedule. Something massive, something drass just happened
with the presidential schedule. Now I'm going to tell you
about that in a moment, but first let me tell
you about what's happening in Israel right now.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
Net Yahoo is coming to the US.
Speaker 1 (04:12):
It is important that we show our support for net
Yahu while he is in the US. We know what
happened on October the seventh, the attacks on Israel, and
the attacks have actually increased since then.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
Not decreased.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
With Iran and its proxies launching hundreds of drones and
missile attacks on a regular basis. Israel is fighting for
their existence. They are fighting the harsh reality of these
terror attacks every day. We also saw a tear attack
internally in Israel just a few days ago, and that's
where the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews is stepping
(04:47):
up in a major way on the ground addressing all
the urgent needs of those that are being attacked, the
Israeli people. That's why I'm partnering with the IFCJ and
I want you to take a look at what your
impact can be as well. What they do is they
deliver emergency bomb shelters and install them in neighborhoods all
(05:09):
over Israel. They also pack emergency bomb shelter kits that
can provide immediate relief for those in desperate need. And
your life saving donation today will help assemble in place
these bomb shelter kits with enough food and life saving
emergency supplies for twenty people that are huddled in a
bomb shelter. Now, the cost to put together and distribute
(05:31):
these kits is just two hundred and ninety dollars.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Because they're good stewards of their donations.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
Your gift now will help save lives period and thanks
to a matching challenge gift from a generous IFCJ donor,
your gift will double and impact help provide twice.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
The support immediately.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Now you can call them to make a donation one
eight eight eight four eight eight IFCJ. That's eight eight
eight four eight eight IFCJ. You can also go online
to support IFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org.
To give one word support IFCJ dot org. So let's
(06:12):
talk now about the president's schedule. We know that the
president's schedule has been limited over the last several years.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Like that's just a fact, Okay.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
We know that, we know that the schedule has been
actually extremely limited, and that has been a really really
really really really big problem. We also know that the
president's schedule has been canceled and also cleared for the
remainder of this week.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
There are leaks that are.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Starting to come out in and around the President's office
as well that he may be canceling his meeting keyword may, Okay,
I want to be clear about this. May it might
happen cancel his meeting with Benjamin Nett and Yahoo because
the president is incapacitated in a major capacity. We've not
(07:05):
seen a president, we haven't heard from the president, we
have no idea where the president is, we don't know
what his condition is, and we have all of these
different data points that have happened. This is a major problem,
and the media should be doing their job right now
asking these exact questions.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
Why are they not.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
They are not asking these questions, I think for an
obvious reason that they don't want to know the answer.
Speaker 3 (07:36):
Now.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
If the president of the United States of America dropped
out of this race and actually didn't write the letter
to drop out this race and didn't sign the letter
to drop out this race, it goes back to the
question who is running the country right now? Because whoever
is running the country right now was elected by no
one to be the president of the United States of America.
(07:57):
That is also a major problem that I have have
right now with everything that is happening. And again, the
media that was attacking Joe Biden immediately stopped as soon
as they got rid of their problem, which was him
running for president. They do not care if Joe Biden
(08:17):
is incapacitated. In fact, they probably would be glad if
that happened, for no other reason, that if it was happening,
they could then let the country see a president Kamala Harris,
she's the vice president, she would immediately be in charge.
And if she was the president, it would make it
easier for her to then get the nomination, for people
(08:40):
to unite behind her, to coalesce behind her. That is
the problem that we now have. So when you look
at everything that I just mentioned, there is a question
that all of us should be asking. Where is this
(09:00):
sitting president of the United States of America? Is he healthy?
Is he incapacitated? Why are they hiding him from us?
Why are we not seeing any pictures of him?
Speaker 2 (09:12):
Now?
Speaker 1 (09:13):
I go back to what I said earlier, This isn't
a conspiracy theory. The data point suggests that they are
hiding Joe Biden for a reason. When we see him,
will he be better than he is today? And don't
we have a right to know? I also want to
bring up this data point. Do you remember when the
Joint chief disappeared for days and was incapacitated medically at
(09:35):
a hospital and no one knew and we asked the
question afterwards of Lloyd Benson who was calling the shots?
Speaker 2 (09:40):
Do you remember that?
Speaker 1 (09:43):
So this administration just a few months ago has a
history of doing exactly what I'm concerned about. Right now,
if you google right now Joe Biden health, let me
tell you the top stories that are coming up and
the headlines. By the way, Fox News has a headline
(10:03):
from three hours ago.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
It's part of the story I'm going to tell you
about in a moment.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
It says, after Biden drops out of race, doctors reveal
why decision was best Washington Posts.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
Three minutes ago.
Speaker 1 (10:18):
Now again, I just googled Joe Biden's health, But three
minutes ago, the Washington Post has this headline running, which
tells you how big of a scumbag group of people
they are. You ready, Trump's age and health under renewed
scrutiny after Biden's exit, So they don't care that Joe
Biden's missing. They're now going to say, Hey, Kamwa Harris
(10:43):
is young and vigorous, Joe Biden is old and had
to drop out. Well, do you want to have the
same thing with Donald Trump that you just witnessed with
Joe Biden? Right, That's the connection they're now trying to
make Washington Posts sixteen hours ago. So this, however, before
they understood the game that had just changed. As Biden
(11:05):
ends campaign, same newspaper focus shift to health for remainder
of his term. So they want Biden gone now, But
they're also now switching to Donald Trump, saying, oh, well,
Donald Trump's the real problem this is.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
And I want to go to the.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
Fox article just for a second, because this is the
latest that we have, and I'm going to read it
for you. After President Joe Biden's announcement, Fox writes on
Sunday that he is dropping out of the twenty twenty
four president e race. Two doctors shared thoughts with Fox
News Digital about what it means in terms of Biden's
ongoing cognitive health. Looking back, some experts believe the path
to Biden's dropout began with what was widely described as
(11:45):
a disastrous debate performance in late June, during which the
president seemed to display an unclear trend of thought and
a lack of coherence. President Biden has shown signs of
cognitive impairment for many years, is what doctor Brett Osborne,
afforded neurosurgeon who specializes in cognitive function, said to Fox
New Sunday. He has not treated Biden, of course, or
(12:07):
advised him, but he's a doctor that knows what to
look for.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
It is medically probable that when he.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
Took office in twenty twenty, he was afflicted by mild
cognitive impairment known as MCI, a gateway syndrome to Alzheimer's
disease and potentially parkinson Parkinson's, not necessarily Parkinson's disease itself,
but parkinson ism, he continued, and he has only deteriorated
(12:35):
since then as a typical of those with this disease
or these cognitive issues. Given signs of his ailing cognitive status,
President Biden's decision to step down from the race seems prudent,
the doctor said, expressing his professional opinion. In my opinion,
he is unfit to run the country and is unsuitable
(12:58):
for his duties as commander and chief, he said. By
stepping down, President Biden can prioritize his health and potentially
mitigate further cognitive decline, while also ensuring the leadership role
is filled by someone fully capable of handling the demanding
responsibilities of the position. Now you look at this statement
and then you go back to what I said earlier.
(13:21):
We are now being told there's a very good chance
the president is been incapacity to the point where he
cannot meet with Benjamin Nett and Yahoo.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
Yes, that's a real possibility right now.
Speaker 1 (13:33):
We also know that there's an FAA flight restriction that
just went up in Wilmington, Delaware, where Joe Biden lives.
The flight restriction is for quote VIP movement. This coincides
with presidential movement Joe Biden. Many believe his health is
a massive question mark which is growing rapidly, and why
(13:57):
haven't we seen the President of the United State States
of America the White House Chief of staff. We also
were told a is holding a mandatory call from all
while righte ouse staff, followed by a call for all
political pointees in the Biden administration at eleven o'clock. We
have not received leaks yet, but it's very clear that
(14:19):
there's a good chance now we may be getting somewhat
close to a full blown resignation from Joe Biden. What
is his medical condition and why are they continuing to
hide him now? We wouldn't have to have this conversation
if the President of the United States of America would
(14:40):
come out and make a statement. What we also know
is Benjamin Netanya, who is officially landed in the US,
Joe Biden may be too ill to meet him, Kamala Harris,
who's anti Israel and anti Jewish, is anti SIMI refuse
(15:01):
to go see him. And Donald Trump might actually meet
with him on his trip to the US. You combine
all of that right now, all of it. It is
shocking what we are seeing unfold before our very eyes.
I will say one more thing about this. Where the
(15:23):
hell is the media, the same media that was going
after Joe Biden until he dropped out. Where are they now?
Why aren't they asking questions? Why aren't they doing their job?
Why aren't they making sure that we have a president
who is actually alive or hasn't been mentally incapacity to
the point where he cannot serve? Why is it that
I'm the one having to ask these questions now when
(15:44):
they should be the one asking the same questions.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Let me tell you about my friends at Ammo's squared.
Speaker 1 (15:49):
If you are like me and you love buying Ammo
at a great price, and you want to be stocked
up on Ammo always, then you're gonna love Ammo squared.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
What does it do? It's amazing.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
They help you stay stocked up on ammunition automatically. It
is truly automated. Set it and forget it. Ammo purchasing program.
You pick your calibers, you set your budget, you select
a shipping trigger, and that's it. Your AMMO grows slowly
over time and is stored for free as it builds up,
(16:21):
and it's shipped with a click of a button or
automatically however you want to do it. It's like ammunition
subscription on steroids because you are not forced into a
set budget or a shipment every month. Instead, you decide
your budget and it can change whatever you want it
to change and schedule when you want your AMMO shipped.
Ammo Squared offers over sixty different caliber options, and if
(16:46):
you change calibers, you can trade that in for another caliber,
no problem.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
It's customizable.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
You can buy as little as a few dollars a
month and use the dollar cost averaging to your advantage
over time. Plus, if you get a bunch of Ammo
and the price skyrockets, you can sell it back for
big profits. So check out Amo Squared. There's no minimum
to buy, no memberships needed and no extra fees. I
want to say that again, there are no extra fees,
(17:16):
no extra fees.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Sign up.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
Now you're gonna get some free Ammo in your account.
That's right, some free AMO in your account. Go to
amosquare dot com slash ben. That's ammo squared dot com
slash ben ammo squared dot com slash ben. Now, while
all of this is happening, there's also another extremely important story,
(17:40):
and that is the Secret Service. Ahead of the Secret
Service was in front of Congress Representative Anna Paulina Luna
had a lot of questions for the Secret Service Director.
I want you to listen to some of this back
and forth.
Speaker 4 (17:58):
Director Sheetel. Can you please give me the names of
the individuals who are in charge of your connupt for
the rally.
Speaker 5 (18:04):
I'm not going to release names.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
Can you give me the titles and how many individuals?
Speaker 5 (18:09):
No?
Speaker 6 (18:10):
Nothing, We had a full advanced team that was responsible
for their advance.
Speaker 4 (18:13):
How many people are the final approval authority?
Speaker 5 (18:16):
There are a number of people. Can you give me
number engaged in approving? Can you play a number? No,
I do not have affirm number.
Speaker 4 (18:23):
Can you just confirm whether or not I understand this
is an open investigation, but in order to dispel conspiracy theorists,
have you guys been able to subpoena the shooter's discord
records or has the FBI?
Speaker 5 (18:34):
To your knowledge, I believe that the FBI is working
on those.
Speaker 4 (18:38):
Okay, is it factual to say that you have not
ruled out that the shooter was working with other people
or persons.
Speaker 6 (18:44):
Again, the FBI is conducting the criminal investigation, and.
Speaker 4 (18:47):
Can you, at least in an effort to dispel conspiracy theories,
can you confirm or deny that.
Speaker 5 (18:52):
At this time, we do not have that there were.
Speaker 6 (18:54):
Any other people engaged, so you believe he's acting long
I do?
Speaker 5 (18:57):
Okay, have you been made.
Speaker 4 (18:59):
Aware of multiple well, I would witness reporting that there
was che a second shooter on a water tower.
Speaker 6 (19:05):
I do not have any information related to any second shooter.
Speaker 5 (19:08):
Okay. The reason I asked that is.
Speaker 4 (19:10):
Because according to testimony for multiple witnesses, they did report that.
And again to my understanding, there were over forty sniper
teams that were briefed by the butler ESU, and I
want to make sure that people are aware if you're
saying that there's not another shooter that we are able
to clear that information because from this whole entire briefing,
it doesn't seem like much information has been able to
(19:30):
get out to the American people. So I'm trying to
dispel rumors, as I'm sure you understand. Was it true
that Secret Service was present at the Butler ESU briefing?
Speaker 6 (19:42):
There was a briefing between the counter sniper teams.
Speaker 5 (19:47):
Was that we're working on there was present? Yes, to
my knowledge.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
Okay, I want to read your report from people that
seemed to be throwing you under the bus and stated
that they were in attendance, and that Service was not
in attendance at this security briefing according to individuals with
knowledge to also include that the AGR building where the shooter,
Thomas Matthew Crooks was located, was actually not a part
(20:11):
of their security perimeter for that so there was not
Secret Service present.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
It seems as though, can we just stop right there.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
And just take in what was just admitted by the
Secret Service director by her lack of response, Representative Paulina
Luna leaves the disgrace Secret Service director shaking and in
silence after catching her and what many would would argue
is a perjury lie because she just claimed something that
(20:48):
wasn't true and then just got called out for it,
which is that the Secret Service was not in attendance
of the meeting. Because people around her are literally throwing
her under the bus right now. So you've got a
president coming, You've got a big meeting about the president
safety and security. The Secret Service wasn't present at that
meeting about the event where the President United States of
(21:08):
America was shot and almost assassinated. It gets better. Let
me play for you the second part of what she
had to say with Congresswoman Annapolina Luna about what happened
on that day in refusing to answer certain questions.
Speaker 4 (21:26):
That when you were asked earlier from Rep. Christen Morphy
about whether or not Secret Service was aware of a threat,
you had said, no, they're unaware of a threat. And
yet according to communications again from law law enforcement that
were in some of these group chats, they actually had
reported that Secret Service was made aware of a threat
at around five point fifty nine PM as a part
(21:49):
of the command including Secret Service aware of messages and
requests about information about the suspects location. Can you please
tell me if you have knowledge of that at all.
Speaker 6 (22:00):
Again, I think we're conflating the difference between the term
threat and suspicious.
Speaker 4 (22:06):
But you guys did have knowledge at five fifty nine
pm according to those group chats.
Speaker 5 (22:10):
Did you not of a suspicious individual? Okay, Chairman.
Speaker 4 (22:15):
In my opinion, according to some of the testimony today,
I feel that you have perjured yourself in some instances,
and so I'm going to ask for a full review
of the transcripts by staff, and if you find that
to be the case, I do ask that you bring
perjury charges against the director. I will say this, it
is very frustrating, and I've talked to my colleagues and
we've said it to your face that you have been
up here basically stonewalling our ability to get the answers
(22:39):
to the American people. Every single member of Congress does
not feel safe with you in charge. You have heard that,
and I think that we are all sitting ducks with
you and directing the Secret Service currently. But more importantly,
it sends a message to our adversaries that we are
not protected and we are one of the strongest countries
in the world. So you have essentially made us a
less safe country because of it.
Speaker 2 (22:57):
As a result of.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
That, I'm asking you to form step down. I share
my same opinions as my Democrat colleagues, and I also
think that your efforts to bring forward a full investigation
and report in sixty days is unacceptable, and as a
result of that, I'm going to do everything in my
legislative toolkit to ensure that that happens sooner rather than later.
And I'm sure that you know that we brought a
(23:21):
vote on inherent contempt against Garland for essentially blocking a
congressional investigation, and I don't think that you should be
any different. So I will say that I am just
completely disgusted by your performance today, and I understand that
you are probably in a position where you are being
told not to testify, which is why we had to
subpoena you.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
I think that goes back.
Speaker 5 (23:38):
To Garland, but again.
Speaker 4 (23:40):
That is part of the flushing that we need to
get out of Washington, and I would be happy to
assist in that process, Chairman Yield the rest of my time.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
This isn't the only one, by the way, that came
after her with facts and information and question the corruption
of the Secret Service Director and the cover up by
the Secret Service Director of the assassination attempt.
Speaker 2 (24:07):
I want you to hear this.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
This was a very short clip from Rocanna about what
happened after another president was shot, but put in perspective.
Speaker 7 (24:24):
Okay, listen, buffal event now, Director Katl would you agree
that this is the most serious security lapse since President
Reagan was shot in nineteen eighty one.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Of the Secret Service?
Speaker 5 (24:38):
Yes, sir, I would.
Speaker 7 (24:40):
And you know, do you know what Stuart Knight did
when he was in charge at the time of the
Secret Service?
Speaker 3 (24:46):
You know what he did afterwards?
Speaker 5 (24:49):
He remained on duty.
Speaker 3 (24:50):
He resigned.
Speaker 7 (24:51):
He resigned, and Stuart Knight was not a Democratic appointee
or a Republican appointee. Look, I'm not questioning your judgment.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
I he resigned.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
She doesn't even know he remained on duty the Congressari
Spawn's back like you're you're insane. He resigned. Let me
let you hear what Representative Pat Fallon said to the
FBI director in the questioning Listen carefully.
Speaker 7 (25:22):
Sharon, I recognizes mister Fallon from Texas.
Speaker 8 (25:25):
How did a twenty year old loaner with a week's
notice pick the absolute best location to assassinate President Trump
when the entire Secret service missed it, Director Chittall and
your leadership, your agency got out smarted and out maneuver
by a twenty year old How can we have any
confidence that you could stop a trained professionals from the
Afarios nation state.
Speaker 6 (25:47):
Those are absolutely questions that we need to have those questions.
Speaker 3 (25:50):
But you know the fact of the matter is we
can't have that confidence. Director.
Speaker 8 (25:54):
Do you have the ability personally and do you have
the authority to beef up security of any of your protectees?
Speaker 5 (25:59):
Yes?
Speaker 3 (26:00):
Okay?
Speaker 8 (26:01):
So were you also where there was a credible threat
President Trump was facing, he was facing a heightened security
threat to a foreign adversary. Yes, okay, So, given that
there was an increased threat to President Trump's life, was
he provided a full security compliment akin to what a
city US.
Speaker 3 (26:17):
President would receive.
Speaker 6 (26:20):
He was provided a full complement of security based on
the threat assessed we had.
Speaker 3 (26:27):
That's not my question, ven.
Speaker 8 (26:28):
My question is if he'd been the sitting president, would
he have had the same security he had on July
thirteenth or would have.
Speaker 3 (26:33):
Been beefed up?
Speaker 5 (26:34):
There is a difference between the city.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
With your answers, he didn't.
Speaker 5 (26:38):
And continuity of government and the responsibility.
Speaker 3 (26:41):
He did not.
Speaker 8 (26:41):
Okay, there wasn't a CAT team, the full CAT team
on site. There wasn't counter save allence teams on site.
But this is the thing you just said. You have
the ability to beef up the security. He knew about
the threat and you didn't. And that's as telling as
it is chilling. We have satellite images from the fair grounds.
Have you visited the site?
Speaker 7 (27:02):
No?
Speaker 6 (27:02):
I have not.
Speaker 8 (27:03):
Nine days and you have not visited the site. You
should have been there that night. Did you talk to
that in evening? Did you talk to the team the
heroes that surrounded the president.
Speaker 3 (27:12):
Did you call them that night?
Speaker 5 (27:14):
They were still operational work, so that's any answers.
Speaker 3 (27:16):
No, did you call them the next day?
Speaker 5 (27:18):
Yes? I spoke.
Speaker 8 (27:19):
You call them the very next day, not the day of?
Or was it seventy two hours after?
Speaker 5 (27:23):
I don't know the timeline, but I spoke with it because.
Speaker 3 (27:25):
You're under imediately. I think it was seventy two hours
after you waited three days.
Speaker 8 (27:29):
What is immediately clear is that there are a number
of structures that need to be secured of these director
other than the first you know, immediate four. What's the
most dangerous site that should have been secured because you
know security one on one, you got to mitigate the
high ground. Yes, okay, do you know what the next
most dangerous site? What was the closest structure to the
president other than the four immediate ones that you had
(27:51):
your counter sniper teams on.
Speaker 6 (27:54):
There are a number of structures around that events site.
Speaker 3 (27:57):
You know who the shooter knew.
Speaker 8 (27:59):
The shooter has visit did the site two more times
than you have, and he had a drone and he
picked the AGR building.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
So you said you rather the shooter has been there
two more times than you have. This is talking the director,
and he picked the building and he had drones that
you guys didn't even have the day you're supposed to
be protecting the president of the United States of America
and noticed the arrogance of this chart. She didn't give
a crap that I think Trump was shot. I really don't.
(28:27):
I don't think she cares. She just mad that she's
having answer questions from Congress.
Speaker 8 (28:32):
Remember in an ABC interview, you did that you didn't
have people on the roof of the AhR building because
you were worried about safety because of the slope.
Speaker 5 (28:40):
I recall that statement.
Speaker 8 (28:43):
Does the secret service have written policy you can share
with us about slope proofs.
Speaker 3 (28:49):
No, okay, so why did you act like there was one?
Speaker 8 (28:52):
Because is it your practice to comment on enormous events
of enormous national implications when you're taking into the fact
that's rhetorical.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
So here's this thing with the slopes you.
Speaker 8 (29:04):
Go all up to like eighteen twelve, you can go
to a one twelve, which is about as flat as
you can get without being completely flat, and you're saying
that there was a danger safety concern there. But the
problem is, director you put your counter snipers on a
three twelve roof, which is steeper than the one twelve.
Speaker 3 (29:20):
And by the way, the one twelve is eighty eight compliant.
Speaker 8 (29:23):
You can build a ramp for a wheelchair on a
one twelve roof.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
So she just flat out lied. And this is where
it's so important. The media will not play that for you.
So I hope every one of you listening will take
the podcast share it everywhere so that you understand what
we just learned from this investigation is not only is
she full of crap, but she lied about the safety
of the agents on that and saying, well, they weren't
(29:50):
on that roof because it was sloped you know too much.
If there was any roof for the Secret Service agents
to be on, it would have been the roof that
was sloped less, which is the one they weren't on.
The roof that was sloped more right, that was sloped
more is the roof that the snipers were actually on,
(30:12):
which means she's a scumbag liar who allowed because of
her incompetency or on purpose, I don't know, for the
president of United States of America to be a sitting dock.
Donald Trump the leader this time to become the next president,
and she just sat there on TV and thought, no
one's gonna go measure that roof. No one's gonna know
(30:35):
that I'm lying to them. The media is not going
to run up there with a level and measure that
roof slope to see if I'm completely and utterly lying
to them. I'm just gonna make this crap up to
cover my aas so I keep my job, keep listening.
Speaker 8 (30:52):
So these are nothing but pathetic excuses and they make
no sense in their bunch of cowdom. All the law
enforcement I've spoken with for the last nine days are
amazed that the AGR rooftop was not secure, and you
want to know why, because it's dangerous. I have never
had any long gun training in my life. I own
an AR fifteen and last time I shot it, I
shot it one time.
Speaker 3 (31:13):
My whole life was six years ago.
Speaker 8 (31:15):
That is until Saturday, where we recreated the events in Savoy, Texas,
where you recreated what happened to about her. I was
lying prone on a slope roof at one hundred and
thirty yards at six thirty at night, and I knew
that he had a scope, but I know a kind
red dot or magnified, So I shot eight rounds from both.
Speaker 4 (31:30):
You know what.
Speaker 8 (31:31):
The result was fifteen out of sixteen kill shots and
the one I missed would have hit the President's ear.
That's a ninety four percent success rate. And that shooter
was a better shot than me. It is a miracle
President Trump wasn't killed.
Speaker 1 (31:45):
It is a miracle. I love that he brought the
targets to Congress so you could see them. This is
how easy the shot was. This is how easy the
president was to shoot. This is how close the shooter
was to the president. And this woman is still employed,
has not been fired, should have already been fired, should
(32:08):
have resigned, but this is what you get with Kamala
Harris and Joe Biden. Make sure you share this podcast
with your family and your friends, and I'll see you
back here tomorrow