January 7, 2025 • 45 mins
The peaceful transfer of power is underway as Kamala Harris has certified Donald Trump's 2024 electoral college victory. Breanna Morello guest hosts this edition of I'm Right with Jesse Kelly and reveals some of Trump's expected first moves in an interview with Darren J. Beattie. This comes on the heels of a terror attack in New Orleans and a cloud of uncertainty revolving around an explosion near Trump's hotel in Las Vegas. National security expert Jim Hanson joins the show with the latest. Plus, some news from other countries as Justin Trudeau resigns as Canadian prime minister and things heat up across the pond as well.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 1-6-25
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
I'm Briana Morello in for Jesse Kelly. Today we have
a real treat for you, folks. It's the four year
anniversary of January sixth, so I'll be speaking with Darren
Batty all about that, Plus Jim Hanson joining the show
to give us an update on our national security, and
Justin Trudeaux just announced he is stepping down. I'll give
you the details. Plus Father Calvin Robinson is explaining what's
(00:25):
happening right now in the UK regarding the Pakistani grooming gangs.
All that and more is on the way.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
This announcement of the state of the vote by the
President of the Senate shall be deemed a sufficient declaration
of the persons elected President and Vice President of the
United States, each four a term beginning on the twentieth
today of January two thousand and twenty five, and shall
(01:05):
be entered together with the list of the votes, on
the journals of the House and the Senate.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
Thank you very much. Happy Patriots Day, America. Today we
celebrate by forcing Kamala Harris to certify her own loss.
And I got to be honest with you, folks, it
(01:33):
was glorious, glorious to watch, but the Communist hacks never
let a good opportunity go to waste. Of course, know
they continue to spew nothing but lies in regards to
January sixth. Department of Injustice. Their ringleader, Merrick Garland, used
this opportunity today to continue to push false claims in
regards to January sixth, saying five officers lost their lives
(01:57):
in the line of duty as a result of what
happened to them on January six Now, folks, I mean
to tell you that's not true. Garland is really being
very selective with his wording. In fact, he's sitting here
and he's not telling you the truth. He's just not
Four Capitol police officers did die after January sixth, but
sadly they took their own lives. No real word as
(02:20):
to why they did just that. And then there's also
the officers that they loved it to out as if
he did die during January six you might recall his name,
Officer Brian sick Nick. He died of natural causes. That's
according to the real experts, of course, But Garland, he
doesn't want you to know that. He just wants to
spew his lies and have them go unchecked. He knows
(02:43):
damn right, if you were to go in front of
a DC court room, even a DC courtroom, that that
argument wouldn't hold up. That's why you don't charge anyone
with manslaughter. He charged over one thousand j six ers
of crimes, but not manslaughter again because they know it's
a lie. We've reached a point where we have to
start figuring out how do we save the Americans right
(03:05):
now who are currently sitting in prison though due to
the DOJ's political persecutions. That's where my head is today,
and we're hoping that President Trump, coring to reports, is
actually going to go through with clemency. Now many speculate
whether or not he's going to just do a blanket
pardon for all January sixth defendants. We'll see how that goes.
(03:25):
But it seems to be extremely divided in all of that,
but not on the left. The left hates the idea
of pardons.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
Take a listen, President elect Trump says he is going
to pardon January sixth rioters. We don't know which ones are,
how many in the first hour after he is inaugurated.
How do you feel about that?
Speaker 4 (03:48):
I think that is a terrible idea.
Speaker 5 (03:49):
It's really a strange a person who's going to be
president of the United States who thinks that it's okay
to pardon people who are engaged in attack.
Speaker 6 (04:04):
So it doesn't matter how much or what way he
pardons them. These people die in sacrifice and they defending
our democracy, and to have the present pardon them is
an our age and their desecration to their sacrifice.
Speaker 7 (04:22):
My position is those individuals should never be pardoned because
their insurrectionist activities is not who we are as a nation.
Speaker 4 (04:33):
But I think he's also sending the message that, look,
if you commit violence on my behalf, I will pardon you.
That's pretty chilling.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Nah, you could ever never let a good opportunity go
to waste. Left wing hacks love to pounce on any opportunity,
but they won't call out what they've been participating in
the last four years, which is law fair people can
Riquetario know exactly what that means. He's been one of
the many J sixers who's been in solitary confinement for
(05:02):
nearly four years. But the difference with Torio, though, is
Tario was never there that day. He wasn't at the
Capitol on January sixth, but for some reason, he's been
sitting in a prison cell for at least twenty three
hours a day for the last nearly four years. He
was such as twenty two years in prison. Get that,
twenty two years in prison for what crime? Crime of
(05:24):
wrong thought. The DOJ took text messages from Toio out
of context, aired it in front of a liberal DC
jury and then got a conviction. And then when Tario,
according to Tario himself, because I spoke with him about this,
when Tario met with the DOJ, the DOJ told him
that if he lied and said that President Donald Trump
(05:44):
worked with him to orchestrate January sixth, he claims that
the DOJ was going to come of a deal that
wasn't going to give Hi much in the way of
prison time. Now Tario knew it was a lie and
rejected the DOJ's proposal, and as a result, the DOJ
fought back and asked judge sent him the thirty three
years in prison. Now the judge didn't give him thirty
(06:05):
three years. They give him twenty two years instead. But again,
it shouldn't have happened in the first place. Earlier today,
I broke a story in regards to Henrique A. Tario
as attorney, handed well candid Us a letter in regards
to President Trump, and he's looking for President Trump to
issue Trio a pardon. He details what I just told you,
that Trio literally sits in a prison cell by himself
(06:27):
for twenty three hours a day. That my friend, is
torture torture organization. Like the ACLU, they were well versed
on what solitary COFOM does to a person. They've written
so many pieces and they've studied it. They fight for
the worst of the worst. When I've reached out to
them about the abuse Atario and other January sixth defendants
(06:48):
have had to endure, they don't care. They don't get
back to us. Yes, I get it's the ACLU, but
if you're going to pretend to fight for Americans and
their constitution and rights, fight for them all. So we're
hopeful that President Donald J. Trump will extend his pen
to provide Taro and other January sixth defendants with freedom.
(07:08):
So now we're just sitting around and waiting to see
if that actually does take place. Joining me now to
discuss is Darren Batty of Revolver News. Darren, I want
to thank you for joining me. This is right up
your alley. You've done incredible coverage on everything j six related,
so it's important that we get your take on this.
It's very controversial in regards to January sixth pardons. Many are,
(07:30):
you know, kind of saying there should be a blanket
pardon given out by President Trump when he does get
back into the White House, and then there's others who
thinks he should be a little bit more selective. Where
do you stand on this issue, because it's an important one,
it gets a little heated.
Speaker 8 (07:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (07:44):
Well, actually there's a very very intelligent January sixth defendant
who has also done phenomenal research in the area of
fed surrection and other things, called William Pope, and he
was actually generous enough to write a guest post detailing
all of the possibilities here and had a very interesting
(08:06):
idea about how to approach the issue.
Speaker 8 (08:11):
I think it's interesting.
Speaker 9 (08:12):
I don't necessarily endorse all of the elements of it,
but it's basically give all of the January six prisoners
relief from day one, and then go about a process
to adjudicate get their sentences vacated. It's actually a pardon
still implies guilt or could there's some ambiguity there, and
(08:36):
so a lot of people, including this individual, feel like,
you know, there shouldn't pardon isn't even enough. There needs
to be some process to kind of correct the fact
that there were charges in the first place. That I
think is a very interesting and sensible proposal. There are
also some mechanisms in there to ensure that the whole
(09:00):
fed surrection component, the people who may have been actually
working as provocateurs and those kinds of things, that there's
a mechanism to discover information about that, and also mechanism
to protect against sealed indictments because there could be a
lot of sealed ones that wouldn't necessarily be encompassed in
(09:21):
a day one part. And so there are a lot
of interesting things there. It's a long and involved and
even in some areas technical articles. So I just refer
people to that. And so again I think these ideas
are interesting. You know, it's almost like I'm not in
that position as a defendant, so it's not even quite
(09:42):
my place to say this approach would be better than
the other approach. But obviously my general posture is I
think that January sixth was a sham. I think it
was not an insurrection, it was a fed surrection. I
think the people in prison for that are political prisoners
and and should get relief that they deserve.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
Yeah, and we need to hold people who participated in
this law fair against JA six ers, against Presdent Trump accountable.
I just kind of want to get your take on it,
because a lot of people are floating the idea that
Joe Biden, on his way out is going to be
issuing these preemptive pardons to those who are participants in
all of this. Do you think it's going to happen
or do you think that this is all just kind
(10:27):
of floating rumors out there and it's just all speculation
at this point.
Speaker 9 (10:34):
I mean, depends on who I suppose. I wouldn't be
surprised if there were some pardons. I would be surprised, frankly,
if there were any kind of effort to imprison you know,
I don't expect there to be an effort to imprison
Merrick Garland or something like that. I just I don't
think that's going to happen either way. So maybe the
(10:56):
pardon is unnecessary. But as to like many and who,
I don't have any special insight into who Biden might
pardon before he leaves office.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
Yeah, yeah, we'll see how that all plays out. Because
I know it's very controversial as well. I wanted to
get your take on this because the FBI and it's
so strange and all of a sudden, now it's coming
about but they just release new footage of the pipe bomber,
And you've done incredible work and covering just that they
waited nearly four years to release this footage, and it
would be laughable if it wasn't such an unjustice, unjust
that they've held onto this for so long. So when
(11:31):
you're watching this video suddenly get released, do you think
there's motive or do you think as to why they're
releasing it now? Is it possibly a distraction or do
you think that they've just held onto it now and
they think that this could do us some good.
Speaker 8 (11:44):
I think it's two things.
Speaker 9 (11:46):
I think it's one it's actually directed at me and
revolvers reporting, because it was us that prove that they
had this very angle of footage and they were withholding it.
Speaker 8 (11:55):
So I think finally they're thinking.
Speaker 9 (11:57):
Oh, we'll release this, and all of a sudden, you know,
Revolver News has nothing to say, which is of course ridiculous.
All that doesn't make them look worse because it confirms
another dimension of our reporting, which is that the frame
rate of the footage has been doctored to make it
far more difficult next thing possible to identify the person
in the video. So there's that, and I also think
(12:19):
they do it to falsely convey the impression that this
is still a real investigation. Where I think the overwhelming
totality of evidence, furthermore confirmed in the recently released report
by louder Milk from the House addmin Committee, is that
this was a very live and real and active investigation
(12:39):
until about May twenty twenty one, and then the investigation
for all intensive purposes died. And I think the most
reasonable interpretation for that is that the FBI looked into
the case, they found out what actually happened, and they said,
holy crap, this is really embarrassing for the government.
Speaker 8 (13:02):
We're going to drop this right now. Hence nothing real
after May of twenty twenty one.
Speaker 9 (13:09):
And so after all this time, they released this thing
to like very faint gesture of saying.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
Oh, we're still looking into those guys. Give me a break.
Speaker 9 (13:18):
The investigation was dead by the summer of twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Yeah, yeah, and they continue to pretend like it's a
real case that's still ongoing. I know that a lot
of these corporate media outlits have been floating the oh,
there's a half a million dollar reward if you have
any details regarding this. But it all just seems bogus,
and it seems intentional at this point. So it's interesting
to see play out. I just don't know, Darren, where
we go from here, because the government has deceived us
(13:46):
intentionally at this point, and you know, we're now dealing
with other incidences like the New Orleans terrorists attack that
recently took place, and the incident involving the VEGUUS veteran
who sadly killed himself in the car allegedly and it
blew up. The FBI is telling us, hey, please trust us,
Please just take our information and don't question it. But
(14:08):
it's really hard for Americans at home right now to
not question the narrative. How do we as we get
closer and closer present I'm taking back though the White House,
how do we kind of take this information handed to
us by these federal agencies and dissect it for ourselves
and try to figure out how to get to the truth.
Speaker 8 (14:27):
Well, I mean that's a broad question.
Speaker 9 (14:30):
Let's start specifically with the pipe bomb, because we've been
on this for close to you know, three and a
half years. I think our first piece on this was
three and a half years ago. Basically, our first piece
was right around when the FBI dropped the investigation. So
it's been a long time. It's completely reshaped the way
that the nation thinks about January sixth. We've gotten ninety
(14:54):
five percent of the way there, and frankly, I'm not
sure there's much more that I can do in my
capacity as a journalist. I think the additional five percent
is very clear, it's very explicit, it's very easy. That
can be handed over to someone like Cash Battel, future
(15:17):
FBI director, on a silver platter, and if he has
the will and the courage and the inclination, he is
in a position to close the gap on that additional
five percent, and that will actually bring us the kind
of resolution that no one ever expects in cases like this.
That is very much a possibility, That is very much
(15:38):
a possibility on the horizon, but it's something that future
FBI Director Cash Ptel will have to be willing to do,
and he's going to get a lot of heat for it.
This is a very sensitive issue. This is outside of
the playpin To give you a sense of the kind
of hostility and stakes here just one case of there
(16:00):
was an FBI agent actually who was reading some of
our reporting on January sixth of Revolver dot news and
found some of it interesting and shared an article with
his colleagues simply for that, he had his security clearance
revoked and was put on leave. He's since been reinstated.
(16:21):
But that's just one example of this severity with which government,
the deep state has treated this reporting is a matter
of extreme sensitivity because think about it. Think of how
much they had vested in the false January sixth narrative,
the pretext to weaponize national security regime against American people,
(16:43):
the pretext for much of the lawfare against Trump, the
major rhetorical basis for their campaign strategy in twenty twenty four,
which failed.
Speaker 8 (16:53):
All of this, And.
Speaker 9 (16:54):
That's why they've been shoving it down our throats for
four years. So much resources, so much energy, so much
money he invested in it, and so it's going to
require a little bit of courage and you're going to
take a little bit of heat. But FBI Director Cash
Battel can be a hero if he's willing to take
what I can give him on the silver platter and
(17:16):
close the gap on that five percent and allow the
nation to get the accountability and justice that it deserves.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
Absolutely, and we hope Cash Hotel does just that. Darren,
I want to thank you for joining us today. As always,
we appreciate your time.
Speaker 8 (17:31):
Thank you so much, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (17:33):
Thank you. Speaking of pipe bombers, we're still getting to
the bottom of that New Orleans terrors attack. In Jim
Hansen showing us next to discuss After stirring up a
wave of confusion following the New Orleans terrors attack, the
(17:54):
FBI seems to be giving the illusion that they're transparent
with the American people all of a sudden and telling
the American people over the weekend that the terror attack
that did murder sadly fourteen people on New Year's Day,
while the terrorists himself visited Egypt and Canada back in
twenty twenty three, he also apparently wore metaglasses. He did
(18:16):
so just weeks prior to the attack, as well as
during the attack. But during the attack, apparently, according the FBI,
he did not film the attack. For some reason, our
federal government didn't prevent this horrific attack from taking place,
and that has many people on edge and we're all
wondering why. Well, I have an idea, maybe the White
House was too busy creating the first ever US national
(18:39):
strategy to counter Islamophobia and anti Arab Haye. No, seriously, folks,
that's still on the White House's website right now. This
took place just less than two weeks, two weeks before
the terrorist attack. The White House sided to dedicated to
resources to push this out, and well, one can only
wonder why were they prioritizing just that. But we're noticing
(19:03):
that globally, and so it's not really a surprise that
they're trying to focus on those who aren't really happy
with Arabs coming into their countries, and so it's quite
interesting to see play out. Do you wanting me to
discuss Jim Hansen, he's the president of World Stract Solutions. Jim,
I'm excited to have you on today because there's a
lot to dive into in regards to this terrorist who
(19:26):
committed a horrific act in New Orleans. The FBI they're
kind of pretending to be a little transparent, but I
think they're stirring up more controversy and confusion. If you
had to just kind of sit back and grate and
assess what they've done up to this point in regard
to telling the American people what actually took place that day,
what would you give them exactly what they gave the
(19:49):
American people nothing of substance.
Speaker 10 (19:52):
You know, they have spent their time trying to gloss
over this. They initially, the first chance they had to
speak to the American people about this, they old faced
lied to us and said it wasn't a terrorist attack
while they had in their hands an Isis Shahaa flag.
So I don't think they've done anything except try to
cover this up. And the investigation, to the extent they're
(20:13):
conducting it does not seem to be in the interests
of finding whether this guy was connected to other organizations.
It seems to be in covering up any connections to
other organizations.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
Yeah, I think that's the part that's deeply concerning. I
know the White House was focused on fighting back against
Arab hate and Islamophobia, and that could also, I think
be a reason why they weren't trying to be transparent
originally when they did their first press conference and one
of their own came out and said that this doesn't
have any ties or doesn't have They don't think it
has anything to do with the terrorist events. Knowing, like
(20:47):
you just said, there was an ISIS flag in this
individual's car, So it's pretty concerning. I'd say that they
are hiding that from the American people. Then a couple
of minutes later, had to issue a statement on Twitter
kind of debunking with their own age, told us, but
it's not really surprising. I think they're masters at creating confusion.
But I want to talk to you about something that
I found to be interesting yesterday, the FBI telling us
(21:10):
that the terror has traveled to Egypt back in twenty
twenty three. And for those of you who aren't familiar
with the region, I want to take a look at
the map because it's very close to Libya. And this
had me deeply concerned when I heard this, because he
spent you know, a couple of weeks in Egypt. We
don't know if he ever crossed the border, or if
we just stayed in Egypt. What about this regent Jim
do you think might potentially signaled that he could have
(21:33):
possibly received some training while he was spending some time
in Egypt.
Speaker 10 (21:38):
Egypt was the headquarters for the Muslim Brotherhood, the umbrella
organization for all of the worst Islamist groups worldwide. Now
they actually got shut down there. I'm not sure they
ever left, but their headquarters was shut down and burned.
But going there, he was not there to see the Pyramids,
you know, he was there for other reasons. And I
(21:59):
think it's deeply concerning when you've got someone who is
obviously espousing this violent cause. And again, as you mentioned
this report that the Biden administration put out, they're trying
to downplay the very danger that this guy brought, whether
it was from overseas or whether it was from his
own initiative. But it's the same ideology, and I think
(22:21):
the idea that we're pretending that that is something we
need to worry about talking about that at the same
time they're telling us the most dangerous people in the
world are white supremacists. They have their entire set of
priorities upside down.
Speaker 1 (22:34):
Yeah, yeah, they do, Jim, and that's part of it's
to be so annoyed, because I've repeatedly asked both DHS
and the FBI for the statistics regarding what you just cited.
They continue to say that domestic terrorism is there's a
threat increase, and they continue to push that narrative, but
they won't give you an actual statistic to prove it.
They'll just tell you individual cases that they've deemed as
those that are showing an increase, and there's no real
(22:56):
factual argument behind it, and it goes on checked by
the media on fortunately. But I wanted to mention something
else that I've been trying to look into and I'm
not getting any answers from the FBI. Of course, there
was the footage that we saw floating around on Twitter
of several journalists doing a tour of the terrorist home
just twenty four hours after the attack. It seemed like
and they somehow were able to gain access into his
(23:17):
home in Houston and do a walk around, and they
show you a Qur'an, some Islamic material, a Bible as well,
what appears to be a laptop, what appears to be
both the warrant possibly and a receipt for the items
that were pulled from the house when the FBI was present.
So I reached out to the FBI. I wanted some
answers on all of this. I asked them specifically, why
(23:38):
did they why were they able to clear it within
twenty four hours? I mean, I've never heard of this
ever in my life. And I also asked them why
didn't take critical pieces of information with them, evidence or
any of this. The FBI telling you that they cleared
the house on Thursday release it back to the property owner,
and then I asked around and it turns out that
the fbaction might I went back to the house after
we asked them about those critical pieces of evidence that
(23:59):
they left behind, and they might have actually recovered it. Now, again,
the FBI is not telling me whether or not they
did go back into that house. I could just confirm
with local news reporters that the local Harris County deputies
were outside, and then the sheriffs. I asked him, and
this is very wordy, but the sheriff told me that
the FBI is the one handling the case and he
has no comment on it. So that tells me the
FBI went back in to get more evidence. What concerns
(24:22):
you about a kurna being left behind originally by the FBI,
Islamic material being left behind as well, and possibly a
laptop left on the desk, and the FBI just doesn't
want any part in it.
Speaker 10 (24:33):
I'm not gonna lie. When I saw that footage, I
thought it was fake.
Speaker 1 (24:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 10 (24:38):
I could not believe in that timeframe that any competent
law enforcement organization would go ahead and allow a crime
scene to be compromised and contaminated. Now, if they went
through and looked at stuff, left any of that behind,
that's one fail. Allowing journalists and other people inside another
(24:58):
massive fail. Now, if they go go back and they
take evidence out of there after they allowed it to
be compromised, any of that evidence is contaminated. How do
we know that when the cameras were off, that journalists
didn't plant something interesting there to make a better story.
Speaker 4 (25:12):
We don't know. And that's not how competent law.
Speaker 10 (25:15):
Enforcement organizations work, and our national security cannot be entrusted
to people who are that incompetent. I tell you right now,
the room that cash Betel is going to use to
empty out the FBI cannot be big enough.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Yeah, it can't be at this point. I mean, even
just trying to communicate with their people who are in
charge of being able to communicate with the media, it's
painful because they don't want to give you direct answers.
They're dancing around all of this, and it's not what
a transparent organization would actually want to achieve. Speaking of transparency,
I've got to ask because that same day, that horrific
day when the terrorist attack took place, we also witnessed
(25:52):
an explosion outside the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. Matt
Leivesberg is the individual who, apparently foreign reports, did take
his own life in that explosion. According to the FBI
and local PD, he apparently took his own life for
shot himself in the head and then the explosion did happen. Now,
(26:12):
it's really hard to cipher through all of this because again,
the American people don't trust law enforcement, and rightfully so
at this point, because they've done so much to lie
to us in the past. But we're now seeing images
of an email, according to the Sean Ryan Show, make
its way around and in the email, it just shows
that this individual, Matt, the veteran, he might have been
(26:33):
dealing with PTSD that he's talking about drones, the drones
that we saw in New Jersey and how this might
be an issue with China. He also says that he
was potentially being followed as well. So when Americans are
trying to look at all of this and trying to
figure out is this just somebody struggling with mental health issues,
or is this somebody who might have actually been followed
by the government, it might have been targeted. How should
(26:55):
we handle all of this.
Speaker 10 (26:58):
With the same skeptism that we have to show everything now,
because as you mentioned, we cannot trust anything we're told
by the people who we entrust with our safety. So
I think in the end, the simplest answer to this
is that a guy whose wife left him, had a
new baby, he had a bunch of personal problems, and
(27:19):
if that email is legitimate, was paranoid and delusional, took
his life in front of the Trump Hotel, and according
to what the police found there say they found was
trying to create a stunt to wake up the American people.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
So the simplest answer is that's what happened.
Speaker 10 (27:35):
It's complicated, and some of the surveillance video makes it
difficult to see the exact sequence of events. I think
he could have detonated the fireworks and the cooking fuel
and stuff by releasing fumes into the cab of the
vehicle and then clacking off that Desert Eagle, which is
a giant muzzle flash producing weapon, and that could have
(27:55):
caused the whole explosion. But we don't know, and until
they give us some specific information, we're going to go
to going to have to continue to mistrust what we're
being told.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
Yeah, and that's the problem with all of this is
we just can't trust it. I want to ask you
before you go in regards to again, the Sean Ryan Show,
we saw an incredible interview that he did with former
CIA targeting officer Sarah Adams, and in it she details
how there's Islamic terrorists all around the world who are
looking to plot an attack here on US soil and
around in our embassies as well. I've spoken with people
(28:30):
like Sonia Labosco, who works with the Air Marshals, and
she's been upset because and rightfully so, they're carrying they
are capable of making these undetectable vests that do that
do explode, and for our audience at home, it makes
it very, very uneasy to be traveling during times like this.
Now that we know, according to Sonya Labosco, that they're
(28:51):
not really coordinating any efforts to TSA and the Air
marshals about these devices. She's made several attempts to reach out.
How do we handle this knowing that number one, Joe
Biden's left us completely vulnerable over these last four years.
And number two, I mean, how do we travel knowing
that this is possibly being missed by our own TSA agents.
Speaker 10 (29:13):
I think we hold our breath for the next two weeks. Fortunately,
Donald Trump's election was certified. He's bringing in with him
a wartime cabinet his first term. The cabinet and the
people working for him, I would classify as a peacetime cabinet.
Nobody's going in with the slightest illusions this time. Everybody
has been told the status quo is not just broken,
(29:37):
it's counterproductive and dangerous.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
So empty out the dead weight, get.
Speaker 10 (29:42):
Rid of the policies that are making us less safe,
and bring in ones. Regardless of the screaming and wailing
and gnashing of teeth, anybody does that.
Speaker 4 (29:53):
The American people want.
Speaker 10 (29:54):
We want our borders closed, we want our enemies scared,
and we want the entire homeland of our country secured.
And I think we're going to see a lot of
that coming in the very short term.
Speaker 1 (30:06):
Yep. Well we need that. We need that right now
more than anything. Jim as always thank you for a time.
We greatly appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (30:13):
Good to be with you.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
Big news happening all around the world, but specifically our
friends up north. I'll bring you the very latest.
Speaker 11 (30:31):
I intend to resign as party leader, as prime minister
after the party selects its next leader through a robust
nationwide competitive process.
Speaker 1 (30:46):
What a beautiful announcement. Another plandemic tyrant has fallen. Oh yes,
you'll love to see it. Canadian Prime Minister justin to
Joe just announced earlier today that he is resigning, stepping
down as the Liberal Party leader. Trudeau's leadership started off
very promising. He had about a sixty percent approval rating,
(31:09):
and then it quickly collapsed after people realize that he's
just a communist and nothing more. It's been quite the
ride to sit back and watch. Canadians have been embarrassed,
and rightfully so. We in the United States have been
as well with our so called leader. But they've been
fed up with hearing things like this.
Speaker 12 (31:28):
Now, it shouldn't be that way. It wasn't supposed to
be that way. We were supposed to be on a steady,
if difficult, sometimes marched towards progress. And yet, just a
few weeks ago, the United States voted for a second
time to not elect its first woman president. Everywhere, women's
(31:50):
rights and women's progress is under attack, overtly and subtlely.
But I want you to know that I am and
always will be a proud feminist. You will always have
an ally in me and in my government.
Speaker 1 (32:05):
Oh well, listen here, folks. I'm very proud that the
United States of America rejected two female candidates for president
because well, they weren't qualified to be president of United States,
just like you, Trudeau, you're not qualified to be the
Prime Minister, because you're an embarrassment. You're a joke. In fact,
you're such a joke that you took an emergency flight
tomorrow lago with the kiss the ring of President Trump
(32:27):
after you made those embarrassing communist comments. And well, I
got to say, President Trump knew exactly who you were
when you stepped through the front door, and he dragged
you like the little man that you are. Instead, he
sat there and told you that if Canada can't survive
twenty five percent tariffs, then Canada has become a state
(32:48):
in the United States and you could just become governor,
and just like that, it was over for Trudeau. Canadians
have been reminding Justin Trudeau that he is, in fact
a weak little man all only along the road. Take
a lesson, King Trudeau.
Speaker 13 (33:04):
What gives you the right to continue? What gives you
the right to stay in office? You've failed Canada. You've
ruined our country. You're done, walk away. You don't have
an ounce of your father's integrity. At least we walked
into snow. You've ruined this country. Everyone around you is
running from you. They're abandoning you. Christia Freel and Sean Frazier,
(33:24):
they've all left you. It's time for you to go.
It's time for Canada to have an election. You're not
the king. The taxes and same and I don't have
a doctor.
Speaker 11 (33:35):
The four hundred million dollars invested investing in that.
Speaker 8 (33:39):
Cartdown job, I think, mister Prime Minister.
Speaker 11 (33:45):
Yeah, please get b C have a wonderful day round.
Speaker 4 (33:52):
Yeah, exact.
Speaker 1 (33:55):
It's beautiful, beautiful music to my ears. The people have spoken.
They're done with the globalist agenda. They're done with all
of these Marxists. You have all failed. Whether it's America,
Canada or Europe, we're all fighting back. Your days are numbered.
Freedom always wins, and you're about to get that message
(34:15):
and learn it the hard way. And we look forward
to all of you learning the hard way. Coming up,
there's a lot of noise coming from our friends across
the Pond, and it has to deal with Elon musk,
Pakistani's and children who have been sexually abused. I'll bringing
the details next. Politics in the UK have been kind
(34:42):
of crazy these last few days. If you're looking on X,
Elon Musk is getting involved. He's been a critic of
how the UK government has handled the crisis that's on
its hand regarding children being raped. Now, this has been
going on for years. All of a sudden, now people
are starting to pay attention to this. The government in
the UK has been distaning itself and trying to ignore
what's going on in their own country. Islamic migrants what
(35:05):
has called them for now, have been happened sexually assaulting
children for years and their own government has completely ignored
the issue and helped cover it up. And those who
are critical of any of this are thrown in jail
regarding whether you show to protest, you put something on Facebook,
they throw even prison. In the UK, British Prime Minister
(35:27):
or Kier Starmer has really been feeling the heat since
Elon must stepped in and he had who address his
critics publicly earlier today. So let's take a.
Speaker 14 (35:36):
Listen and when politicians and I mean politicians who's sat
in government for many years a casual about honesty, decency,
truth and the rule of law, poling for inquiries because
they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right,
(35:58):
and that affects.
Speaker 1 (36:02):
Listen, we're talking about children who've been sexually assaulted, okay,
by people who should not be in your country in
the first place. It's not far right. Just because you
don't want children to be sexually assaulted by these animals.
You've let them into your country, you let them destroy
your country. Now you're afraid to speak up because while
you're afraid it, number one, you're gonna lose your election.
And number two, they are violent. We're not talking about
(36:23):
people who are peaceful. They know that. That's why in
the past you've seen probably all these BBC reports from
the reporting on protests and they quickly cut the feed
when one of these non British individuals comes behind them
with a weapon. It's happened repeatedly, folks. This issue has
gone unspoken about for years in the UK and it's
(36:43):
finally starting to catch the attention of some very important people.
And rightfully, so, you're not far right for saying you
don't want children to be raped. That's not far right.
Do you know what I mean now to discuss is father,
Calvin Robinson. Father, I want to say thank you for
joining me. I am so thrilled for sexual assault victims
in the UK right now because they're finally getting some attention.
(37:06):
People like Sammy Woodhouse, who's been fighting for this her
whole life after she was rapped at the age of fourteen,
are now getting some national coverage and so I'm very
happy for all of this. But explain to our audience
why all of a sudden is Elon Musk getting involved
and what does this mean for those in the UK.
Speaker 15 (37:24):
Yeah, first of all, follow us. I must say thank
God for Elon Musk. I don't share his politics, I
don't share his worldview, but I do appreciate that he
at least agrees with me on certain issues, and free
speech is one of them. Without him, and without ex
we would not be having this conversation. Our politicians in
the United Kingdom, across the bench, so from the left
wing Labor Party to the so called center right Conservative Party,
(37:47):
have brushed this issue under the carpet for so long,
and now it's finally getting the time of day. And
this is the most important issue. This is about the
protection of the most vulnerable in society. For the clip
you just play is right there of our Prime Minister
Sekire Stormer. For him to stand there today and say,
anyone who's dressing this issue is on the far right.
(38:09):
He's jumping on a far right bandwagon. That is the
most evil thing I've heard in a long time, because
first and foremost it's disingenuous, as if any of his
contemporaries would be wanting to jump on a far right bandwagon.
We don't have a single politician in Parliament who is
far right. I would argue there want to even any
far right people in the United Kingdom, but there is
(38:30):
not a single politician that's been elected on a far
right platform. We have the Green Party, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Labor,
We've even got some Islamists who've been invited into the
houses of Parliament, which is astonishing to me and should
shouldn't be even be happening in our country. But besides
the matter, there's not a single person who would say
let's jump on a far right bandwagon. So for him
to say that, he's dismissing what is the most important
(38:53):
topic of protecting vulnerable young girls. And what we've seen
in the UK is time and time again, whenever this
issue gets raised, it gets pushed away, swept under carpet,
either either deflected or ignored. And this time it won't happen.
Thanks to Enil Musk, thanks to x, thanks to people
like you who are sharing this from abroad, that the
(39:15):
conversation will be finally had and the voices you're quite
right to point out, Sammy would have. There are a
number of the others, Sammy Smith's another one. There are
a number of survivors to who I'm friends with. I
know people who have been victims and survived these Pakistani
Muslim rape gangs, and their story hasn't been told. The
police have helped cover it up, The counselors have helped
(39:36):
cover it up. The therapists, the MPs and the ministers.
Every single part of the establishment has either deflected or
covered up. So our whole country is pretty much complicit
at this point. But thank god once more that we
are finally having the conversation. Let's get some justice for
these poor girls.
Speaker 1 (39:54):
Yeah, and they have waited a very long time and
they shouldn't have and they do deserve justice. I wanted
to ask you because Elon Musk is going after a
lot of politicians in the UK right now. One it
seemed a little odd for me, but I'm no expert
on British politics. Nigel far ferrars who we know here
in this country as the Reform Party leader and has
(40:15):
done an incredible job. But he's also calling for him
to probably step down at this point, considering he says
he doesn't have what it takes to lead, and that
was concerning. Now, you know, Nigel has made comments in
the past that's I guess I would say that don't
really sound like he understands the issue when it comes
to protecting these children. Let's play a quick clip, and
(40:38):
then I want to hear your reaction on the other
side of that.
Speaker 16 (40:41):
We have a Muslim population in Britain growing by about
seventy five percent every ten years. That's just where we are.
If we politically alienate the whole of Islam, we will lose,
will lose. So how does one include will lose by
(41:01):
twenty fifty Goodness knows what kind of a terrible stake
we're going to be in.
Speaker 1 (41:09):
So that's a very It sounds like I always make
fun of those rhinos who are in America who want
to just teeth the line and they don't want to
offend anyone, and they say things like that. But he's
telling you straight up that this is all about preserving votes.
What do you make of this?
Speaker 4 (41:26):
Nigel Ferras has been good on many things. Brexit was
one of them.
Speaker 15 (41:30):
He helps us leave the unite, the European Constitut European Union.
We wouldn't have done it without him, that's a given. However,
that does not mean he's a perfect None of us
are perfect.
Speaker 4 (41:40):
But he's not a perfect politician.
Speaker 15 (41:42):
He's he succumbs to popularity, he wants to be liked,
he wants to win, He wants to maintain his position.
It's taken him twenty years to get into the houses
of Parliament and he's not going to give up now.
He wants to go further, but that comes at a cost,
and right now that cost is truth and that cost patriotism.
He is putting himself and his party above the interests
(42:04):
of the country. This is what we see from time
and time again from many many politicians across the bench.
And we're waiting, as BRIT's waiting for our Trump, waiting
for a politician who doesn't need the money, doesn't need
the esteem and the respect that comes with these positions.
We're waiting for a politician that will say I care
about this country and I'm wanting to make sacrifices for
(42:25):
this country. And people will be upset with me right
now because Farajas all we've got and we've got to
get behind him is that No, I will not support
someone who is not loyal. I will not support someone
who puts himself first. I will not support someone who
says things like we need to embrace his Lam, and
Ity'll say no, he didn't say we need to embrace it.
He said we need to not alienate it. That there's
no difference with Islam, either you reject it or by
(42:48):
de facto you embrace it. And we've seen the results
of that. Many liberals over the years have been saying
fluffy things like, you know, we're just we can just
accept them to do whatever they want to. You know,
they can live their lives and know it impacts us,
it impacts the country. And when we see that Pakistani
Muslim rape gangs are in Rochdale, Telford, Blackpool, Doncaster, pretty
much up and down the United Kingdom systematically grooming and
(43:14):
raping young British girls, the court demographics of Pakistani and Islam,
and it's not just down to those demographics. We do
see some of it in the United States too. Within
Muslim communities. It's a difference in the way that they
see people that are not part of their faith. And
so at some point we just have to say, look,
we're not all about all faiths. We're not about all
ideas and all faiths being equal. We know there is
(43:34):
one truth. That truth is Jesus Christ. But even if
you're not going to commit to being a Christian, you
can see that there are some faiths that are detrimental
to our way of life, one faith in particular, that
would throw someone off a roof for being same sex attracted.
That would say a woman is not allowed to leave
a house, and a company that should not allowed to drive,
not a lot of vote, not allowed to learn, that
would groom and systematically abuse young girls of a different
(44:00):
and faith. That's evil and so we should be able
to say we don't want that in our nation. And
Nigel Raj is supposed to be the right wing figure
in our politics, so he's the one that people are
looking to to say that.
Speaker 4 (44:11):
And what did he says?
Speaker 15 (44:12):
Said No, we need to We pretty much said we
need to embrace Islam because he needs the votes.
Speaker 4 (44:16):
He's seen that.
Speaker 15 (44:17):
That's how Labor get elected. That's not a Conservatives have
been elected by courting votes that essentially are counterproductive to
our nation and will bring us down. And so I
will not support him. I will not support his party.
And I think it's bold that Elon Musk has come
out and said there needs to be a new leader
of reform and I think he's absolutely right.
Speaker 1 (44:38):
Yeah, well see how that plays out, because Elon Musk
is pressing the heat and I know that they're going
to fight back. On this and of course so, but
I am all on board for Elon Musk bringing attention
to it. I don't know why it's happening all of
a sudden, but I'm on board for giving these victims
of voice. I think it's really important. Father Calvin Robinson,
as always, I got to thank you for joining me.
It's always a great discussion when you're on board.
Speaker 8 (44:59):
So thank you, God bless you happily.
Speaker 1 (45:01):
Yeah, nay, well, thank you. We will be right back
with a clip you're not gonna want to miss in
just a few moments. It is time to lighten the
moon and we've got the great SoundBite for you to
take a listen to Happy birthday, to.
Speaker 12 (45:26):
Happy birthday, Happy birthday, haftery birthday.
Speaker 1 (45:38):
All right, oh man, as well as bad as Kamala
Harris who forgot the pledge of allegiance last week. That
was pretty pretty rough. Oh, it's been a great time
villaing in for Jesse. He'll be back here tomorrow. Have
a great evening.
I'm Briana Morello in for Jesse Kelly. Today we have
a real treat for you, folks. It's the four year
anniversary of January sixth, so I'll be speaking with Darren
Batty all about that, Plus Jim Hanson joining the show
to give us an update on our national security, and
Justin Trudeaux just announced he is stepping down. I'll give
you the details. Plus Father Calvin Robinson is explaining what's
(00:25):
happening right now in the UK regarding the Pakistani grooming gangs.
All that and more is on the way.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
This announcement of the state of the vote by the
President of the Senate shall be deemed a sufficient declaration
of the persons elected President and Vice President of the
United States, each four a term beginning on the twentieth
today of January two thousand and twenty five, and shall
(01:05):
be entered together with the list of the votes, on
the journals of the House and the Senate.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
Thank you very much. Happy Patriots Day, America. Today we
celebrate by forcing Kamala Harris to certify her own loss.
And I got to be honest with you, folks, it
(01:33):
was glorious, glorious to watch, but the Communist hacks never
let a good opportunity go to waste. Of course, know
they continue to spew nothing but lies in regards to
January sixth. Department of Injustice. Their ringleader, Merrick Garland, used
this opportunity today to continue to push false claims in
regards to January sixth, saying five officers lost their lives
(01:57):
in the line of duty as a result of what
happened to them on January six Now, folks, I mean
to tell you that's not true. Garland is really being
very selective with his wording. In fact, he's sitting here
and he's not telling you the truth. He's just not
Four Capitol police officers did die after January sixth, but
sadly they took their own lives. No real word as
(02:20):
to why they did just that. And then there's also
the officers that they loved it to out as if
he did die during January six you might recall his name,
Officer Brian sick Nick. He died of natural causes. That's
according to the real experts, of course, But Garland, he
doesn't want you to know that. He just wants to
spew his lies and have them go unchecked. He knows
(02:43):
damn right, if you were to go in front of
a DC court room, even a DC courtroom, that that
argument wouldn't hold up. That's why you don't charge anyone
with manslaughter. He charged over one thousand j six ers
of crimes, but not manslaughter again because they know it's
a lie. We've reached a point where we have to
start figuring out how do we save the Americans right
(03:05):
now who are currently sitting in prison though due to
the DOJ's political persecutions. That's where my head is today,
and we're hoping that President Trump, coring to reports, is
actually going to go through with clemency. Now many speculate
whether or not he's going to just do a blanket
pardon for all January sixth defendants. We'll see how that goes.
(03:25):
But it seems to be extremely divided in all of that,
but not on the left. The left hates the idea
of pardons.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
Take a listen, President elect Trump says he is going
to pardon January sixth rioters. We don't know which ones are,
how many in the first hour after he is inaugurated.
How do you feel about that?
Speaker 4 (03:48):
I think that is a terrible idea.
Speaker 5 (03:49):
It's really a strange a person who's going to be
president of the United States who thinks that it's okay
to pardon people who are engaged in attack.
Speaker 6 (04:04):
So it doesn't matter how much or what way he
pardons them. These people die in sacrifice and they defending
our democracy, and to have the present pardon them is
an our age and their desecration to their sacrifice.
Speaker 7 (04:22):
My position is those individuals should never be pardoned because
their insurrectionist activities is not who we are as a nation.
Speaker 4 (04:33):
But I think he's also sending the message that, look,
if you commit violence on my behalf, I will pardon you.
That's pretty chilling.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Nah, you could ever never let a good opportunity go
to waste. Left wing hacks love to pounce on any opportunity,
but they won't call out what they've been participating in
the last four years, which is law fair people can
Riquetario know exactly what that means. He's been one of
the many J sixers who's been in solitary confinement for
(05:02):
nearly four years. But the difference with Torio, though, is
Tario was never there that day. He wasn't at the
Capitol on January sixth, but for some reason, he's been
sitting in a prison cell for at least twenty three
hours a day for the last nearly four years. He
was such as twenty two years in prison. Get that,
twenty two years in prison for what crime? Crime of
(05:24):
wrong thought. The DOJ took text messages from Toio out
of context, aired it in front of a liberal DC
jury and then got a conviction. And then when Tario,
according to Tario himself, because I spoke with him about this,
when Tario met with the DOJ, the DOJ told him
that if he lied and said that President Donald Trump
(05:44):
worked with him to orchestrate January sixth, he claims that
the DOJ was going to come of a deal that
wasn't going to give Hi much in the way of
prison time. Now Tario knew it was a lie and
rejected the DOJ's proposal, and as a result, the DOJ
fought back and asked judge sent him the thirty three
years in prison. Now the judge didn't give him thirty
(06:05):
three years. They give him twenty two years instead. But again,
it shouldn't have happened in the first place. Earlier today,
I broke a story in regards to Henrique A. Tario
as attorney, handed well candid Us a letter in regards
to President Trump, and he's looking for President Trump to
issue Trio a pardon. He details what I just told you,
that Trio literally sits in a prison cell by himself
(06:27):
for twenty three hours a day. That my friend, is
torture torture organization. Like the ACLU, they were well versed
on what solitary COFOM does to a person. They've written
so many pieces and they've studied it. They fight for
the worst of the worst. When I've reached out to
them about the abuse Atario and other January sixth defendants
(06:48):
have had to endure, they don't care. They don't get
back to us. Yes, I get it's the ACLU, but
if you're going to pretend to fight for Americans and
their constitution and rights, fight for them all. So we're
hopeful that President Donald J. Trump will extend his pen
to provide Taro and other January sixth defendants with freedom.
(07:08):
So now we're just sitting around and waiting to see
if that actually does take place. Joining me now to
discuss is Darren Batty of Revolver News. Darren, I want
to thank you for joining me. This is right up
your alley. You've done incredible coverage on everything j six related,
so it's important that we get your take on this.
It's very controversial in regards to January sixth pardons. Many are,
(07:30):
you know, kind of saying there should be a blanket
pardon given out by President Trump when he does get
back into the White House, and then there's others who
thinks he should be a little bit more selective. Where
do you stand on this issue, because it's an important one,
it gets a little heated.
Speaker 8 (07:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (07:44):
Well, actually there's a very very intelligent January sixth defendant
who has also done phenomenal research in the area of
fed surrection and other things, called William Pope, and he
was actually generous enough to write a guest post detailing
all of the possibilities here and had a very interesting
(08:06):
idea about how to approach the issue.
Speaker 8 (08:11):
I think it's interesting.
Speaker 9 (08:12):
I don't necessarily endorse all of the elements of it,
but it's basically give all of the January six prisoners
relief from day one, and then go about a process
to adjudicate get their sentences vacated. It's actually a pardon
still implies guilt or could there's some ambiguity there, and
(08:36):
so a lot of people, including this individual, feel like,
you know, there shouldn't pardon isn't even enough. There needs
to be some process to kind of correct the fact
that there were charges in the first place. That I
think is a very interesting and sensible proposal. There are
also some mechanisms in there to ensure that the whole
(09:00):
fed surrection component, the people who may have been actually
working as provocateurs and those kinds of things, that there's
a mechanism to discover information about that, and also mechanism
to protect against sealed indictments because there could be a
lot of sealed ones that wouldn't necessarily be encompassed in
(09:21):
a day one part. And so there are a lot
of interesting things there. It's a long and involved and
even in some areas technical articles. So I just refer
people to that. And so again I think these ideas
are interesting. You know, it's almost like I'm not in
that position as a defendant, so it's not even quite
(09:42):
my place to say this approach would be better than
the other approach. But obviously my general posture is I
think that January sixth was a sham. I think it
was not an insurrection, it was a fed surrection. I
think the people in prison for that are political prisoners
and and should get relief that they deserve.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
Yeah, and we need to hold people who participated in
this law fair against JA six ers, against Presdent Trump accountable.
I just kind of want to get your take on it,
because a lot of people are floating the idea that
Joe Biden, on his way out is going to be
issuing these preemptive pardons to those who are participants in
all of this. Do you think it's going to happen
or do you think that this is all just kind
(10:27):
of floating rumors out there and it's just all speculation
at this point.
Speaker 9 (10:34):
I mean, depends on who I suppose. I wouldn't be
surprised if there were some pardons. I would be surprised, frankly,
if there were any kind of effort to imprison you know,
I don't expect there to be an effort to imprison
Merrick Garland or something like that. I just I don't
think that's going to happen either way. So maybe the
(10:56):
pardon is unnecessary. But as to like many and who,
I don't have any special insight into who Biden might
pardon before he leaves office.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
Yeah, yeah, we'll see how that all plays out. Because
I know it's very controversial as well. I wanted to
get your take on this because the FBI and it's
so strange and all of a sudden, now it's coming
about but they just release new footage of the pipe bomber,
And you've done incredible work and covering just that they
waited nearly four years to release this footage, and it
would be laughable if it wasn't such an unjustice, unjust
that they've held onto this for so long. So when
(11:31):
you're watching this video suddenly get released, do you think
there's motive or do you think as to why they're
releasing it now? Is it possibly a distraction or do
you think that they've just held onto it now and
they think that this could do us some good.
Speaker 8 (11:44):
I think it's two things.
Speaker 9 (11:46):
I think it's one it's actually directed at me and
revolvers reporting, because it was us that prove that they
had this very angle of footage and they were withholding it.
Speaker 8 (11:55):
So I think finally they're thinking.
Speaker 9 (11:57):
Oh, we'll release this, and all of a sudden, you know,
Revolver News has nothing to say, which is of course ridiculous.
All that doesn't make them look worse because it confirms
another dimension of our reporting, which is that the frame
rate of the footage has been doctored to make it
far more difficult next thing possible to identify the person
in the video. So there's that, and I also think
(12:19):
they do it to falsely convey the impression that this
is still a real investigation. Where I think the overwhelming
totality of evidence, furthermore confirmed in the recently released report
by louder Milk from the House addmin Committee, is that
this was a very live and real and active investigation
(12:39):
until about May twenty twenty one, and then the investigation
for all intensive purposes died. And I think the most
reasonable interpretation for that is that the FBI looked into
the case, they found out what actually happened, and they said,
holy crap, this is really embarrassing for the government.
Speaker 8 (13:02):
We're going to drop this right now. Hence nothing real
after May of twenty twenty one.
Speaker 9 (13:09):
And so after all this time, they released this thing
to like very faint gesture of saying.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
Oh, we're still looking into those guys. Give me a break.
Speaker 9 (13:18):
The investigation was dead by the summer of twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Yeah, yeah, and they continue to pretend like it's a
real case that's still ongoing. I know that a lot
of these corporate media outlits have been floating the oh,
there's a half a million dollar reward if you have
any details regarding this. But it all just seems bogus,
and it seems intentional at this point. So it's interesting
to see play out. I just don't know, Darren, where
we go from here, because the government has deceived us
(13:46):
intentionally at this point, and you know, we're now dealing
with other incidences like the New Orleans terrorists attack that
recently took place, and the incident involving the VEGUUS veteran
who sadly killed himself in the car allegedly and it
blew up. The FBI is telling us, hey, please trust us,
Please just take our information and don't question it. But
(14:08):
it's really hard for Americans at home right now to
not question the narrative. How do we as we get
closer and closer present I'm taking back though the White House,
how do we kind of take this information handed to
us by these federal agencies and dissect it for ourselves
and try to figure out how to get to the truth.
Speaker 8 (14:27):
Well, I mean that's a broad question.
Speaker 9 (14:30):
Let's start specifically with the pipe bomb, because we've been
on this for close to you know, three and a
half years. I think our first piece on this was
three and a half years ago. Basically, our first piece
was right around when the FBI dropped the investigation. So
it's been a long time. It's completely reshaped the way
that the nation thinks about January sixth. We've gotten ninety
(14:54):
five percent of the way there, and frankly, I'm not
sure there's much more that I can do in my
capacity as a journalist. I think the additional five percent
is very clear, it's very explicit, it's very easy. That
can be handed over to someone like Cash Battel, future
(15:17):
FBI director, on a silver platter, and if he has
the will and the courage and the inclination, he is
in a position to close the gap on that additional
five percent, and that will actually bring us the kind
of resolution that no one ever expects in cases like this.
That is very much a possibility, That is very much
(15:38):
a possibility on the horizon, but it's something that future
FBI Director Cash Ptel will have to be willing to do,
and he's going to get a lot of heat for it.
This is a very sensitive issue. This is outside of
the playpin To give you a sense of the kind
of hostility and stakes here just one case of there
(16:00):
was an FBI agent actually who was reading some of
our reporting on January sixth of Revolver dot news and
found some of it interesting and shared an article with
his colleagues simply for that, he had his security clearance
revoked and was put on leave. He's since been reinstated.
(16:21):
But that's just one example of this severity with which government,
the deep state has treated this reporting is a matter
of extreme sensitivity because think about it. Think of how
much they had vested in the false January sixth narrative,
the pretext to weaponize national security regime against American people,
(16:43):
the pretext for much of the lawfare against Trump, the
major rhetorical basis for their campaign strategy in twenty twenty four,
which failed.
Speaker 8 (16:53):
All of this, And.
Speaker 9 (16:54):
That's why they've been shoving it down our throats for
four years. So much resources, so much energy, so much
money he invested in it, and so it's going to
require a little bit of courage and you're going to
take a little bit of heat. But FBI Director Cash
Battel can be a hero if he's willing to take
what I can give him on the silver platter and
(17:16):
close the gap on that five percent and allow the
nation to get the accountability and justice that it deserves.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
Absolutely, and we hope Cash Hotel does just that. Darren,
I want to thank you for joining us today. As always,
we appreciate your time.
Speaker 8 (17:31):
Thank you so much, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (17:33):
Thank you. Speaking of pipe bombers, we're still getting to
the bottom of that New Orleans terrors attack. In Jim
Hansen showing us next to discuss After stirring up a
wave of confusion following the New Orleans terrors attack, the
(17:54):
FBI seems to be giving the illusion that they're transparent
with the American people all of a sudden and telling
the American people over the weekend that the terror attack
that did murder sadly fourteen people on New Year's Day,
while the terrorists himself visited Egypt and Canada back in
twenty twenty three, he also apparently wore metaglasses. He did
(18:16):
so just weeks prior to the attack, as well as
during the attack. But during the attack, apparently, according the FBI,
he did not film the attack. For some reason, our
federal government didn't prevent this horrific attack from taking place,
and that has many people on edge and we're all
wondering why. Well, I have an idea, maybe the White
House was too busy creating the first ever US national
(18:39):
strategy to counter Islamophobia and anti Arab Haye. No, seriously, folks,
that's still on the White House's website right now. This
took place just less than two weeks, two weeks before
the terrorist attack. The White House sided to dedicated to
resources to push this out, and well, one can only
wonder why were they prioritizing just that. But we're noticing
(19:03):
that globally, and so it's not really a surprise that
they're trying to focus on those who aren't really happy
with Arabs coming into their countries, and so it's quite
interesting to see play out. Do you wanting me to
discuss Jim Hansen, he's the president of World Stract Solutions. Jim,
I'm excited to have you on today because there's a
lot to dive into in regards to this terrorist who
(19:26):
committed a horrific act in New Orleans. The FBI they're
kind of pretending to be a little transparent, but I
think they're stirring up more controversy and confusion. If you
had to just kind of sit back and grate and
assess what they've done up to this point in regard
to telling the American people what actually took place that day,
what would you give them exactly what they gave the
(19:49):
American people nothing of substance.
Speaker 10 (19:52):
You know, they have spent their time trying to gloss
over this. They initially, the first chance they had to
speak to the American people about this, they old faced
lied to us and said it wasn't a terrorist attack
while they had in their hands an Isis Shahaa flag.
So I don't think they've done anything except try to
cover this up. And the investigation, to the extent they're
(20:13):
conducting it does not seem to be in the interests
of finding whether this guy was connected to other organizations.
It seems to be in covering up any connections to
other organizations.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
Yeah, I think that's the part that's deeply concerning. I
know the White House was focused on fighting back against
Arab hate and Islamophobia, and that could also, I think
be a reason why they weren't trying to be transparent
originally when they did their first press conference and one
of their own came out and said that this doesn't
have any ties or doesn't have They don't think it
has anything to do with the terrorist events. Knowing, like
(20:47):
you just said, there was an ISIS flag in this
individual's car, So it's pretty concerning. I'd say that they
are hiding that from the American people. Then a couple
of minutes later, had to issue a statement on Twitter
kind of debunking with their own age, told us, but
it's not really surprising. I think they're masters at creating confusion.
But I want to talk to you about something that
I found to be interesting yesterday, the FBI telling us
(21:10):
that the terror has traveled to Egypt back in twenty
twenty three. And for those of you who aren't familiar
with the region, I want to take a look at
the map because it's very close to Libya. And this
had me deeply concerned when I heard this, because he
spent you know, a couple of weeks in Egypt. We
don't know if he ever crossed the border, or if
we just stayed in Egypt. What about this regent Jim
do you think might potentially signaled that he could have
(21:33):
possibly received some training while he was spending some time
in Egypt.
Speaker 10 (21:38):
Egypt was the headquarters for the Muslim Brotherhood, the umbrella
organization for all of the worst Islamist groups worldwide. Now
they actually got shut down there. I'm not sure they
ever left, but their headquarters was shut down and burned.
But going there, he was not there to see the Pyramids,
you know, he was there for other reasons. And I
(21:59):
think it's deeply concerning when you've got someone who is
obviously espousing this violent cause. And again, as you mentioned
this report that the Biden administration put out, they're trying
to downplay the very danger that this guy brought, whether
it was from overseas or whether it was from his
own initiative. But it's the same ideology, and I think
(22:21):
the idea that we're pretending that that is something we
need to worry about talking about that at the same
time they're telling us the most dangerous people in the
world are white supremacists. They have their entire set of
priorities upside down.
Speaker 1 (22:34):
Yeah, yeah, they do, Jim, and that's part of it's
to be so annoyed, because I've repeatedly asked both DHS
and the FBI for the statistics regarding what you just cited.
They continue to say that domestic terrorism is there's a
threat increase, and they continue to push that narrative, but
they won't give you an actual statistic to prove it.
They'll just tell you individual cases that they've deemed as
those that are showing an increase, and there's no real
(22:56):
factual argument behind it, and it goes on checked by
the media on fortunately. But I wanted to mention something
else that I've been trying to look into and I'm
not getting any answers from the FBI. Of course, there
was the footage that we saw floating around on Twitter
of several journalists doing a tour of the terrorist home
just twenty four hours after the attack. It seemed like
and they somehow were able to gain access into his
(23:17):
home in Houston and do a walk around, and they
show you a Qur'an, some Islamic material, a Bible as well,
what appears to be a laptop, what appears to be
both the warrant possibly and a receipt for the items
that were pulled from the house when the FBI was present.
So I reached out to the FBI. I wanted some
answers on all of this. I asked them specifically, why
(23:38):
did they why were they able to clear it within
twenty four hours? I mean, I've never heard of this
ever in my life. And I also asked them why
didn't take critical pieces of information with them, evidence or
any of this. The FBI telling you that they cleared
the house on Thursday release it back to the property owner,
and then I asked around and it turns out that
the fbaction might I went back to the house after
we asked them about those critical pieces of evidence that
(23:59):
they left behind, and they might have actually recovered it. Now, again,
the FBI is not telling me whether or not they
did go back into that house. I could just confirm
with local news reporters that the local Harris County deputies
were outside, and then the sheriffs. I asked him, and
this is very wordy, but the sheriff told me that
the FBI is the one handling the case and he
has no comment on it. So that tells me the
FBI went back in to get more evidence. What concerns
(24:22):
you about a kurna being left behind originally by the FBI,
Islamic material being left behind as well, and possibly a
laptop left on the desk, and the FBI just doesn't
want any part in it.
Speaker 10 (24:33):
I'm not gonna lie. When I saw that footage, I
thought it was fake.
Speaker 1 (24:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 10 (24:38):
I could not believe in that timeframe that any competent
law enforcement organization would go ahead and allow a crime
scene to be compromised and contaminated. Now, if they went
through and looked at stuff, left any of that behind,
that's one fail. Allowing journalists and other people inside another
(24:58):
massive fail. Now, if they go go back and they
take evidence out of there after they allowed it to
be compromised, any of that evidence is contaminated. How do
we know that when the cameras were off, that journalists
didn't plant something interesting there to make a better story.
Speaker 4 (25:12):
We don't know. And that's not how competent law.
Speaker 10 (25:15):
Enforcement organizations work, and our national security cannot be entrusted
to people who are that incompetent. I tell you right now,
the room that cash Betel is going to use to
empty out the FBI cannot be big enough.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Yeah, it can't be at this point. I mean, even
just trying to communicate with their people who are in
charge of being able to communicate with the media, it's
painful because they don't want to give you direct answers.
They're dancing around all of this, and it's not what
a transparent organization would actually want to achieve. Speaking of transparency,
I've got to ask because that same day, that horrific
day when the terrorist attack took place, we also witnessed
(25:52):
an explosion outside the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. Matt
Leivesberg is the individual who, apparently foreign reports, did take
his own life in that explosion. According to the FBI
and local PD, he apparently took his own life for
shot himself in the head and then the explosion did happen. Now,
(26:12):
it's really hard to cipher through all of this because again,
the American people don't trust law enforcement, and rightfully so
at this point, because they've done so much to lie
to us in the past. But we're now seeing images
of an email, according to the Sean Ryan Show, make
its way around and in the email, it just shows
that this individual, Matt, the veteran, he might have been
(26:33):
dealing with PTSD that he's talking about drones, the drones
that we saw in New Jersey and how this might
be an issue with China. He also says that he
was potentially being followed as well. So when Americans are
trying to look at all of this and trying to
figure out is this just somebody struggling with mental health issues,
or is this somebody who might have actually been followed
by the government, it might have been targeted. How should
(26:55):
we handle all of this.
Speaker 10 (26:58):
With the same skeptism that we have to show everything now,
because as you mentioned, we cannot trust anything we're told
by the people who we entrust with our safety. So
I think in the end, the simplest answer to this
is that a guy whose wife left him, had a
new baby, he had a bunch of personal problems, and
(27:19):
if that email is legitimate, was paranoid and delusional, took
his life in front of the Trump Hotel, and according
to what the police found there say they found was
trying to create a stunt to wake up the American people.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
So the simplest answer is that's what happened.
Speaker 10 (27:35):
It's complicated, and some of the surveillance video makes it
difficult to see the exact sequence of events. I think
he could have detonated the fireworks and the cooking fuel
and stuff by releasing fumes into the cab of the
vehicle and then clacking off that Desert Eagle, which is
a giant muzzle flash producing weapon, and that could have
(27:55):
caused the whole explosion. But we don't know, and until
they give us some specific information, we're going to go
to going to have to continue to mistrust what we're
being told.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
Yeah, and that's the problem with all of this is
we just can't trust it. I want to ask you
before you go in regards to again, the Sean Ryan Show,
we saw an incredible interview that he did with former
CIA targeting officer Sarah Adams, and in it she details
how there's Islamic terrorists all around the world who are
looking to plot an attack here on US soil and
around in our embassies as well. I've spoken with people
(28:30):
like Sonia Labosco, who works with the Air Marshals, and
she's been upset because and rightfully so, they're carrying they
are capable of making these undetectable vests that do that
do explode, and for our audience at home, it makes
it very, very uneasy to be traveling during times like this.
Now that we know, according to Sonya Labosco, that they're
(28:51):
not really coordinating any efforts to TSA and the Air
marshals about these devices. She's made several attempts to reach out.
How do we handle this knowing that number one, Joe
Biden's left us completely vulnerable over these last four years.
And number two, I mean, how do we travel knowing
that this is possibly being missed by our own TSA agents.
Speaker 10 (29:13):
I think we hold our breath for the next two weeks. Fortunately,
Donald Trump's election was certified. He's bringing in with him
a wartime cabinet his first term. The cabinet and the
people working for him, I would classify as a peacetime cabinet.
Nobody's going in with the slightest illusions this time. Everybody
has been told the status quo is not just broken,
(29:37):
it's counterproductive and dangerous.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
So empty out the dead weight, get.
Speaker 10 (29:42):
Rid of the policies that are making us less safe,
and bring in ones. Regardless of the screaming and wailing
and gnashing of teeth, anybody does that.
Speaker 4 (29:53):
The American people want.
Speaker 10 (29:54):
We want our borders closed, we want our enemies scared,
and we want the entire homeland of our country secured.
And I think we're going to see a lot of
that coming in the very short term.
Speaker 1 (30:06):
Yep. Well we need that. We need that right now
more than anything. Jim as always thank you for a time.
We greatly appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (30:13):
Good to be with you.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
Big news happening all around the world, but specifically our
friends up north. I'll bring you the very latest.
Speaker 11 (30:31):
I intend to resign as party leader, as prime minister
after the party selects its next leader through a robust
nationwide competitive process.
Speaker 1 (30:46):
What a beautiful announcement. Another plandemic tyrant has fallen. Oh yes,
you'll love to see it. Canadian Prime Minister justin to
Joe just announced earlier today that he is resigning, stepping
down as the Liberal Party leader. Trudeau's leadership started off
very promising. He had about a sixty percent approval rating,
(31:09):
and then it quickly collapsed after people realize that he's
just a communist and nothing more. It's been quite the
ride to sit back and watch. Canadians have been embarrassed,
and rightfully so. We in the United States have been
as well with our so called leader. But they've been
fed up with hearing things like this.
Speaker 12 (31:28):
Now, it shouldn't be that way. It wasn't supposed to
be that way. We were supposed to be on a steady,
if difficult, sometimes marched towards progress. And yet, just a
few weeks ago, the United States voted for a second
time to not elect its first woman president. Everywhere, women's
(31:50):
rights and women's progress is under attack, overtly and subtlely.
But I want you to know that I am and
always will be a proud feminist. You will always have
an ally in me and in my government.
Speaker 1 (32:05):
Oh well, listen here, folks. I'm very proud that the
United States of America rejected two female candidates for president
because well, they weren't qualified to be president of United States,
just like you, Trudeau, you're not qualified to be the
Prime Minister, because you're an embarrassment. You're a joke. In fact,
you're such a joke that you took an emergency flight
tomorrow lago with the kiss the ring of President Trump
(32:27):
after you made those embarrassing communist comments. And well, I
got to say, President Trump knew exactly who you were
when you stepped through the front door, and he dragged
you like the little man that you are. Instead, he
sat there and told you that if Canada can't survive
twenty five percent tariffs, then Canada has become a state
(32:48):
in the United States and you could just become governor,
and just like that, it was over for Trudeau. Canadians
have been reminding Justin Trudeau that he is, in fact
a weak little man all only along the road. Take
a lesson, King Trudeau.
Speaker 13 (33:04):
What gives you the right to continue? What gives you
the right to stay in office? You've failed Canada. You've
ruined our country. You're done, walk away. You don't have
an ounce of your father's integrity. At least we walked
into snow. You've ruined this country. Everyone around you is
running from you. They're abandoning you. Christia Freel and Sean Frazier,
(33:24):
they've all left you. It's time for you to go.
It's time for Canada to have an election. You're not
the king. The taxes and same and I don't have
a doctor.
Speaker 11 (33:35):
The four hundred million dollars invested investing in that.
Speaker 8 (33:39):
Cartdown job, I think, mister Prime Minister.
Speaker 11 (33:45):
Yeah, please get b C have a wonderful day round.
Speaker 4 (33:52):
Yeah, exact.
Speaker 1 (33:55):
It's beautiful, beautiful music to my ears. The people have spoken.
They're done with the globalist agenda. They're done with all
of these Marxists. You have all failed. Whether it's America,
Canada or Europe, we're all fighting back. Your days are numbered.
Freedom always wins, and you're about to get that message
(34:15):
and learn it the hard way. And we look forward
to all of you learning the hard way. Coming up,
there's a lot of noise coming from our friends across
the Pond, and it has to deal with Elon musk,
Pakistani's and children who have been sexually abused. I'll bringing
the details next. Politics in the UK have been kind
(34:42):
of crazy these last few days. If you're looking on X,
Elon Musk is getting involved. He's been a critic of
how the UK government has handled the crisis that's on
its hand regarding children being raped. Now, this has been
going on for years. All of a sudden, now people
are starting to pay attention to this. The government in
the UK has been distaning itself and trying to ignore
what's going on in their own country. Islamic migrants what
(35:05):
has called them for now, have been happened sexually assaulting
children for years and their own government has completely ignored
the issue and helped cover it up. And those who
are critical of any of this are thrown in jail
regarding whether you show to protest, you put something on Facebook,
they throw even prison. In the UK, British Prime Minister
(35:27):
or Kier Starmer has really been feeling the heat since
Elon must stepped in and he had who address his
critics publicly earlier today. So let's take a.
Speaker 14 (35:36):
Listen and when politicians and I mean politicians who's sat
in government for many years a casual about honesty, decency,
truth and the rule of law, poling for inquiries because
they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right,
(35:58):
and that affects.
Speaker 1 (36:02):
Listen, we're talking about children who've been sexually assaulted, okay,
by people who should not be in your country in
the first place. It's not far right. Just because you
don't want children to be sexually assaulted by these animals.
You've let them into your country, you let them destroy
your country. Now you're afraid to speak up because while
you're afraid it, number one, you're gonna lose your election.
And number two, they are violent. We're not talking about
(36:23):
people who are peaceful. They know that. That's why in
the past you've seen probably all these BBC reports from
the reporting on protests and they quickly cut the feed
when one of these non British individuals comes behind them
with a weapon. It's happened repeatedly, folks. This issue has
gone unspoken about for years in the UK and it's
(36:43):
finally starting to catch the attention of some very important people.
And rightfully, so, you're not far right for saying you
don't want children to be raped. That's not far right.
Do you know what I mean now to discuss is father,
Calvin Robinson. Father, I want to say thank you for
joining me. I am so thrilled for sexual assault victims
in the UK right now because they're finally getting some attention.
(37:06):
People like Sammy Woodhouse, who's been fighting for this her
whole life after she was rapped at the age of fourteen,
are now getting some national coverage and so I'm very
happy for all of this. But explain to our audience
why all of a sudden is Elon Musk getting involved
and what does this mean for those in the UK.
Speaker 15 (37:24):
Yeah, first of all, follow us. I must say thank
God for Elon Musk. I don't share his politics, I
don't share his worldview, but I do appreciate that he
at least agrees with me on certain issues, and free
speech is one of them. Without him, and without ex
we would not be having this conversation. Our politicians in
the United Kingdom, across the bench, so from the left
wing Labor Party to the so called center right Conservative Party,
(37:47):
have brushed this issue under the carpet for so long,
and now it's finally getting the time of day. And
this is the most important issue. This is about the
protection of the most vulnerable in society. For the clip
you just play is right there of our Prime Minister
Sekire Stormer. For him to stand there today and say,
anyone who's dressing this issue is on the far right.
(38:09):
He's jumping on a far right bandwagon. That is the
most evil thing I've heard in a long time, because
first and foremost it's disingenuous, as if any of his
contemporaries would be wanting to jump on a far right bandwagon.
We don't have a single politician in Parliament who is
far right. I would argue there want to even any
far right people in the United Kingdom, but there is
(38:30):
not a single politician that's been elected on a far
right platform. We have the Green Party, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Labor,
We've even got some Islamists who've been invited into the
houses of Parliament, which is astonishing to me and should
shouldn't be even be happening in our country. But besides
the matter, there's not a single person who would say
let's jump on a far right bandwagon. So for him
to say that, he's dismissing what is the most important
(38:53):
topic of protecting vulnerable young girls. And what we've seen
in the UK is time and time again, whenever this
issue gets raised, it gets pushed away, swept under carpet,
either either deflected or ignored. And this time it won't happen.
Thanks to Enil Musk, thanks to x, thanks to people
like you who are sharing this from abroad, that the
(39:15):
conversation will be finally had and the voices you're quite
right to point out, Sammy would have. There are a
number of the others, Sammy Smith's another one. There are
a number of survivors to who I'm friends with. I
know people who have been victims and survived these Pakistani
Muslim rape gangs, and their story hasn't been told. The
police have helped cover it up, The counselors have helped
(39:36):
cover it up. The therapists, the MPs and the ministers.
Every single part of the establishment has either deflected or
covered up. So our whole country is pretty much complicit
at this point. But thank god once more that we
are finally having the conversation. Let's get some justice for
these poor girls.
Speaker 1 (39:54):
Yeah, and they have waited a very long time and
they shouldn't have and they do deserve justice. I wanted
to ask you because Elon Musk is going after a
lot of politicians in the UK right now. One it
seemed a little odd for me, but I'm no expert
on British politics. Nigel far ferrars who we know here
in this country as the Reform Party leader and has
(40:15):
done an incredible job. But he's also calling for him
to probably step down at this point, considering he says
he doesn't have what it takes to lead, and that
was concerning. Now, you know, Nigel has made comments in
the past that's I guess I would say that don't
really sound like he understands the issue when it comes
to protecting these children. Let's play a quick clip, and
(40:38):
then I want to hear your reaction on the other
side of that.
Speaker 16 (40:41):
We have a Muslim population in Britain growing by about
seventy five percent every ten years. That's just where we are.
If we politically alienate the whole of Islam, we will lose,
will lose. So how does one include will lose by
(41:01):
twenty fifty Goodness knows what kind of a terrible stake
we're going to be in.
Speaker 1 (41:09):
So that's a very It sounds like I always make
fun of those rhinos who are in America who want
to just teeth the line and they don't want to
offend anyone, and they say things like that. But he's
telling you straight up that this is all about preserving votes.
What do you make of this?
Speaker 4 (41:26):
Nigel Ferras has been good on many things. Brexit was
one of them.
Speaker 15 (41:30):
He helps us leave the unite, the European Constitut European Union.
We wouldn't have done it without him, that's a given. However,
that does not mean he's a perfect None of us
are perfect.
Speaker 4 (41:40):
But he's not a perfect politician.
Speaker 15 (41:42):
He's he succumbs to popularity, he wants to be liked,
he wants to win, He wants to maintain his position.
It's taken him twenty years to get into the houses
of Parliament and he's not going to give up now.
He wants to go further, but that comes at a cost,
and right now that cost is truth and that cost patriotism.
He is putting himself and his party above the interests
(42:04):
of the country. This is what we see from time
and time again from many many politicians across the bench.
And we're waiting, as BRIT's waiting for our Trump, waiting
for a politician who doesn't need the money, doesn't need
the esteem and the respect that comes with these positions.
We're waiting for a politician that will say I care
about this country and I'm wanting to make sacrifices for
(42:25):
this country. And people will be upset with me right
now because Farajas all we've got and we've got to
get behind him is that No, I will not support
someone who is not loyal. I will not support someone
who puts himself first. I will not support someone who
says things like we need to embrace his Lam, and
Ity'll say no, he didn't say we need to embrace it.
He said we need to not alienate it. That there's
no difference with Islam, either you reject it or by
(42:48):
de facto you embrace it. And we've seen the results
of that. Many liberals over the years have been saying
fluffy things like, you know, we're just we can just
accept them to do whatever they want to. You know,
they can live their lives and know it impacts us,
it impacts the country. And when we see that Pakistani
Muslim rape gangs are in Rochdale, Telford, Blackpool, Doncaster, pretty
much up and down the United Kingdom systematically grooming and
(43:14):
raping young British girls, the court demographics of Pakistani and Islam,
and it's not just down to those demographics. We do
see some of it in the United States too. Within
Muslim communities. It's a difference in the way that they
see people that are not part of their faith. And
so at some point we just have to say, look,
we're not all about all faiths. We're not about all
ideas and all faiths being equal. We know there is
(43:34):
one truth. That truth is Jesus Christ. But even if
you're not going to commit to being a Christian, you
can see that there are some faiths that are detrimental
to our way of life, one faith in particular, that
would throw someone off a roof for being same sex attracted.
That would say a woman is not allowed to leave
a house, and a company that should not allowed to drive,
not a lot of vote, not allowed to learn, that
would groom and systematically abuse young girls of a different
(44:00):
and faith. That's evil and so we should be able
to say we don't want that in our nation. And
Nigel Raj is supposed to be the right wing figure
in our politics, so he's the one that people are
looking to to say that.
Speaker 4 (44:11):
And what did he says?
Speaker 15 (44:12):
Said No, we need to We pretty much said we
need to embrace Islam because he needs the votes.
Speaker 4 (44:16):
He's seen that.
Speaker 15 (44:17):
That's how Labor get elected. That's not a Conservatives have
been elected by courting votes that essentially are counterproductive to
our nation and will bring us down. And so I
will not support him. I will not support his party.
And I think it's bold that Elon Musk has come
out and said there needs to be a new leader
of reform and I think he's absolutely right.
Speaker 1 (44:38):
Yeah, well see how that plays out, because Elon Musk
is pressing the heat and I know that they're going
to fight back. On this and of course so, but
I am all on board for Elon Musk bringing attention
to it. I don't know why it's happening all of
a sudden, but I'm on board for giving these victims
of voice. I think it's really important. Father Calvin Robinson,
as always, I got to thank you for joining me.
It's always a great discussion when you're on board.
Speaker 8 (44:59):
So thank you, God bless you happily.
Speaker 1 (45:01):
Yeah, nay, well, thank you. We will be right back
with a clip you're not gonna want to miss in
just a few moments. It is time to lighten the
moon and we've got the great SoundBite for you to
take a listen to Happy birthday, to.
Speaker 12 (45:26):
Happy birthday, Happy birthday, haftery birthday.
Speaker 1 (45:38):
All right, oh man, as well as bad as Kamala
Harris who forgot the pledge of allegiance last week. That
was pretty pretty rough. Oh, it's been a great time
villaing in for Jesse. He'll be back here tomorrow. Have
a great evening.
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club
Welcome to Bookmarked by Reese’s Book Club — the podcast where great stories, bold women, and irresistible conversations collide! Hosted by award-winning journalist Danielle Robay, each week new episodes balance thoughtful literary insight with the fervor of buzzy book trends, pop culture and more. Bookmarked brings together celebrities, tastemakers, influencers and authors from Reese's Book Club and beyond to share stories that transcend the page. Pull up a chair. You’re not just listening — you’re part of the conversation.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com