BOMBED! FBI tries to SPIN the UNSPINNABLE Pipe Bomber revelation | Ep 674 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:14):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Hello, my friends.

(00:42):
Welcome to the Kyle Serif and Show Band.
You know, you those days you wake up, you just got like that
pain in your neck. That's everyday.
The pain in my neck is that our federal government keeps
squashing us and doing dumb things and keeps trying to spin
stories that it doesn't want to touch because there's no
difference between who's in office.
If you're going to believe that there's something called a

(01:02):
uniparty, then you got to reallyact like there's a uniparty.
Have some uniparty stories todaywe're going to talk about.
Today's episode is going to be preoccupied by what I think is
still the biggest story in America, and it only got bigger
yesterday, at least for me, and it will get bigger for you quite
soon. There's only so much I can say
sometimes. You guys, I'm dancing between
this really crazy place where not only are we talking about

(01:26):
what's going on in the news, sharing some of the things that
are happening on a national scale, but I'm actively out
there participating in it and I kind of hate it.
Can I be really clear and honest, I guess with you all
that I don't enjoy, I don't enjoy being part of the story.
And a huge chunk of what we're going to cover today is me being
part of the story. And it's not, it's this is more

(01:47):
almost therapeutic because it's so crazy to me that here I sit.
I'm a regular dad. I've got 4 little kids
downstairs that are doing homeschooling.
Last night we had a little fire in our backyard.
We roasted marshmallows. We watched the sun go down like
normal everyday suburban dad stuff.
I went for a run, I'm 43 and I pulled a freaking muscle in my

(02:09):
calf again or it's got too tightfor me to run.
So I'm limping home like just like every the most regular
things you can think of. And I've got a lawsuit that's
pending right now that 5 secondsbefore we went live, I forwarded
it off to my attorneys to make astatement to Newsweek because
major national publications wantto know what we think about
stuff. And I have a public national

(02:32):
figure suing me for an amount ofmoney that I don't have.
And it's going to already at thevery bare minimum cost me like 2
plus month salary or earnings from what I do for a living.
Imagine someone just popped up, didn't like how you said
something and then pulled 20% ofyour earnings for the year.

(02:52):
It's almost like what our government does to us with your
with your taxes, except this isn't a tax.
This is done by someone who is related to one of the top
government officials in this country and is using donation
money. As far as I can tell, this is
the estimation I have. So a donation based like legal
firm Law Fund is being used to sue me.

(03:16):
And here's the craziest part about all this stuff.
I didn't even know I was going to say this, but I got invited
to the Christmas party for the law firm that is suing me for $5
million because I've been invited there for the last four
years because we helped them raise like $1.3 million when we
went public with our story and we referred people to the Fight
with Cash foundations. Do you guys get how like every

(03:39):
morning I wake up and I'm like, what is that feeling on my neck?
And it's just that I went from being a regular guy sitting in a
car watching bad guys and hopingthat we could find them,
including, it turns out, the neighbor of the freaking pipe
bomb subject that Steve Baker has identified.
We're getting there, trust me. To the point where now I wake up

(04:01):
and I'm carrying a $5,000,000 just threat lawsuit on frivolous
nonsense over my shoulders. And it feels like I'm yoked up
at all time. Like I'm carrying, you know,
couple of massive weights on either side.
And I don't mean to complain about it, but it's, it's such a
crazy experience that I'm sharing it with you as some of
you have been with me since the beginning.
When we started talking in the 1st place, I always knew we were

(04:23):
walking into something. I got a phone call last night,
for whatever it's worth, from a former FBI agent, a retired FBI
agent. And he goes, you know, this is
the kind of stuff that people get killed over.
I go, I know we, we're laughing about that.
I said the same thing as Steve Baker.
I said, hey, you know, every time I hang up the phone with
him, I'm like, don't get killed.And he was like, yeah, yeah, got
it, man OK, good. You know, or I'll be like, stay
safe, you know, stay underneath the 5th floor in your hotel.

(04:45):
And he's like, yeah, yeah, for sure, for sure.
I'm like, no balcony accidents, right?
We're we're talking about the most serious thing that someone
might come and kill us. And I've been talking about this
since, since I went privately toCongress with my story.
I went to Congress in in what, October of 2021 while an FBI
agent and my wife goes, are the death squads going to come for
us now? And I'm like, I don't know.

(05:06):
They better not send anybody they don't want dead 'cause I'm
going to kill him. I will shoot anybody that tries
to hurt my family or me. And I may go down in the
process. But like, this is a noted
regular conversation feature on my phone when I talk to almost
anybody that has any background.And it's getting more and more
familiar. That's truly nuts.
And I guess I didn't realize howmuch that actually weighs on me,

(05:28):
that when my friends and I are casually discussing being killed
for what we do, which we do discuss regularly, and then
strangers reach out that are former, FBI, former Intel
people. And they go, you know, people
get killed over this stuff. And you're like, yeah, you can't
think about that every day when you wake up.
But I've got to imagine that my body knows that every night when
I go to bed and I sleep with night vision above me, just that

(05:50):
I can pull it on and go. I'm not kidding here.
Anybody who's seen the pictures knows I've got a suppressed
rifle right above my head. I could literally reach up and
grab it and get to work. I don't ever want to do that.
I have babies, little ones. I have a 2 year old that doesn't
understand anything, just runs down and every morning says
you're my dad. And I'm like, thank God.
Yeah. Little bit of reality.

(06:10):
This is a heavy cycle and what we're seeing right now, for
whatever it's worth, we're walking into the spin cycle,
which is where there are two things that are aggressively
happening at the same time. Partially the guys that are
working in our government that do not want this big story to
come out. And it's not just Bongino and
Patel and the, and the story of the FBI, although that's a big
chunk of it. But the other piece of it is, is

(06:32):
that this brings the entirety ofthe, of the, the scam really
home to you. Multiple government agencies
don't want this out. The DOJ does not want this
background information we've been told will not prosecute.
He's not going to bring a case. He's doing everything they can
to avoid it. Federal law enforcement doesn't

(06:56):
want to touch it. Federal prosecution doesn't want
to touch it. The the media is scared of it.
They're terrified of it. I'm going to show you that
today. I got text messages yesterday
morning while we were doing the podcast saying, hey, would you
come on with Schmidt? And I'm like, who is Schmidt and
who are you? Why are you texting me?
And it turns out it was the producer for Rob Schmidt and
they booked me on the show last night.

(07:17):
For those of you that watch Newsmax, you'll realize I was
not on the show that night. Because as I went out for my
fitness and tried to get on a bike and move my heart rate a
little bit and not have as much tension in my back and did my
thing, guess what? Text messages on my way home on
the jog. Yeah, we're going to go with
somebody else. So I'm going to play you what
they went with. Not a bad guy.
By the way. I spent an hour talking to Chief
Sund yesterday. He's the one they interviewed,

(07:38):
but they found a skeptic, somebody that could go and throw
some shade on it. The call has gone out.
Suppress this story at all costs.
What they don't know and what they can't bargain on is those
radical actors. The suspendables.
I told you there aren't only theones you've seen.
I've always told you guys there are suspendables that you
haven't seen and I'm going to come.
Today is one of those days when I am reaffirmed that that is the

(08:01):
case. When you guys asked, can you
start a legal defense fund, maybe we'll have to do that.
My attorneys asked me if we could start doing something like
that. They agreed to a flat rate, and
the flat rate is still more thanmost of you guys could write a
check for. more than I want to write a check for.
You know, I'm super frugal and Isave everything.
And it's basically like, oh good, I'll just give that all to
an attorney because some chick who sings the national anthem
for a living is offended by somewords that didn't mean what she

(08:24):
said. Craziness.
All right, that's enough bitching about that nonsense.
Let's get into a freaking sponsor read.
I'm going to take a deep breath here because today is going to
be kind of heavy. We're going to talk about some
really wild stuff. If you're also worried about a
million things out there, and a lot of us have been since COVID,

(08:44):
millions of Americans were concerned, like what if
something bad happens? They go to my Patriot supply.
You can go to mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle
put my name at the end of it. mypatriotsupply.com/kyle.
There's a link in the show description.
Wherever it is you're listening.Just Scroll down or click open
expand, see more guys emergency food.
That's great. That's a good option.
You definitely want that. But the one problem people often

(09:05):
make is that they don't know howto cook it.
Like they don't actually have power in a real emergency or the
grids down or something else. So what are you going to do
about that? Our friends at my Patriot Supply
put together a Black Friday survival special.
That's what's going on right now.
That's the deal that they are featuring.
It's a four week emergency food kit plus $150.00 worth of free
gifts to include what you might need to prepare your emergency
meals like a cook stove, which can also keep you warm, fuel and

(09:26):
fire starters, water purification, bug out bag,
etcetera. A bunch of little things that
may make make it so that you canget through a minor emergency,
like a month. That's a minor emergency.
When we look at what's going on right now, it's complete
Survival kit for your family to write out natural disasters.
That could be enough for like a whole family to eat for a week,
which probably is the most realistic scenario.
It's a great Christmas gift. You guys can check it out.
It's now through Black Friday. They've started it early.

(09:48):
mypatriotsupply.com/kyle, if you're watching me on ATV, which
I found out that some of you actually do, very cool.
You can literally hold your phone up and scan that QR code
that you see on the screen. If you're watching me on
Spotify, you can take a screenshot of it.
If you're just listening on the audio, then you have to Scroll
down and use the link in the show description.
That's what we got for today on the 1st sponsor.
And make sure that whatever it is, like if you guys are not

(10:10):
ready for something goofy, it's starting to get chilly and
people are starting to realize, like, I'll tell you what, global
warming doesn't kill people, butglobal cold does kill people.
And this is the time we're moving into that season.
So make yourself prepared for whatever's coming your way.
And yeah, let's do that. Let's start right now.

(10:38):
And it is today is Tuesday, it is November the 11th.
I usually start with that I feellike, which means that it is
11/11/2025, it is Armistice Day or veteran's day.
So happy veteran's day to those of you who served.
We're all grateful for your service.
I'm grateful for people that I know that served.
Thanks for doing it. I know you got paid too, so we

(10:58):
don't actually have to thank you, but we will.
And for those of you that put iton the line and those of you who
lost something, whether it be a little bit of your, your, your
sanity, even for a little while,or for those of you who lost
part of your body or who were injured or still walking around
with a reminder of what it is from your service injuries and
so on, don't you be embarrassed about getting the VA benefit.

(11:19):
I know people that have always told me I really felt bad about
collecting from the VA. You know what, our government's
going to take our money and giveit to all kinds of insane
things. They're going to give it to the
Afghan refugees that probably snuck over here and and you
fought. They're going to give it to
people who haven't done anythingin this country and have never
contributed. They showed up and put their
hand out. So don't you be afraid of taking

(11:39):
a VA benefit. When that's the last bit of
fraud, waste and abuse that exists in our governmental
spending, then maybe we go aheadand worry about that.
But until then, collect your benefits, keep your head up high
and thank you for serving this nation, even though you probably
might think different things about it now than you did when
you signed up. And I think that's definitely
the case for me. If you'd ask me if I do it over
again, I couldn't change who I am or what it what things made

(12:01):
me. A lot of times I think about the
fact that signing up for military service at 27 was a
truly formative pivot in my lifefrom being kind of a dumb kid
who just kind of went with the flow.
I made a decision when I was about 25 and a half, 26, and I
thought, here I am in this worldand I'm not.

(12:21):
I'm not building anything and I'm not destroying anything.
So what mark am I making on thisplanet?
And where would I be if I were to look back 10,000 years ago
and we were living in a small tribe?
Like what would my role be in that tribe?
And I decided my role would be standing out in front of the
people that I was interested in protecting and making sure that

(12:43):
my life went first. I think a lot of you guys had
that same instinct. So for those of you that served,
consider that most of you are the same people.
Even if you wouldn't make the same decision today, you still
would have made the same decision back then because you
wouldn't be who you are without that.
So all right, our chat is already active.
So if you guys are watching right now, I'd appreciate if you

(13:04):
guys give me a thumbs up over onrumble.
I don't like the whole smash thelike button thing.
You're just clicking it like I don't even care if you're
watching on your phone like if you smash your phone, you're
goofy. So just go ahead and tap that
little thing that says like we appreciate those.
We work here for your they're not even tips.
We just work here for for your appreciation for your applause
rumble, YouTube X, all those places.
If you guys want to actually subscribe where it matters to

(13:25):
us, rumble and YouTube are the big ones.
And then lastly, you can always find us over on Spotify, which
is seraphinshow.com. If you ever want to send it to
someone, send them the link Kyleseraphinshow.com send and they
can pull it up on Spotify where they can watch audio or video
and they can transfer. If you're just listening, that's
what you're missing out on. Those are the best places to go.
Can we just get into it right now?
I saw this and I can't, I can't Unsee it.

(13:46):
There's a little mash up going on right now.
Alexis Wilkins. I knew this a couple days ago,
but Alexis Wilkins, who is the girl fraught girlfriend of Cash
Patel, has decided that she's now going to execute a new
lawsuit against Elijah Shaffer. And he thinks it's because she's
honed in on the fact that his company is worth $5,000,000 and
that's the valuation. And that's not what's going on

(14:07):
here. She's just sued everybody for
$5,000,000. And she sued a guy named Sam
Parker, who I spoke to and said he has $200 to his name.
So Sam Parker, not a wealthy guy, not worth $5,000,000.
She sued Kyle Seraphin, also notworth $5,000,000.
And she sued Elijah Shaffer, whonow apparently is actually worth
$5,000,000. That's pretty dark.

(14:27):
It's pretty frustrating. It's pretty frustrating when
your government is coming after you.
And I say government because when you are dating somebody,
you have access to somebody thatactually has the means of power
and the investigative capabilities of an $11 billion
agency. And also had the fundraising
behind him to pull in over $1,000,000.

(14:48):
I think more than more than several $1,000,000 over the last
couple years on the backs of whistleblowers, which is why I
was invited to their Christmas party.
It's truly troubling. It's not a good feeling.
It's nice to know that I'm not alone in this.
I think they actually suddenly realize like, hey crap, we sued
Serafin and he didn't create this, although they claim that I
did create it in the lawsuit, inthe complaint, since I

(15:09):
fabricated it. To fabricate would mean to, you
know, to create something out ofnothing to build it.
And I did not. The story.
This story has been going on since February, and it's come
from people inside and outside the United States.
And it turns out I believe in this America, the one that I
signed up to serve, meant that even if you didn't agree with me
and even if you said nasty things about me, you have a
right to say that. I have this weird instinct about

(15:30):
the First Amendment. Maybe some of you have that too,
though, especially you veterans.Didn't we always say that it was
a, you know, the service in the military was meant so that even
if you didn't agree with someone, you defend their right
to say it to the death. Isn't that kind of what you do
when you swear allegiance to theUnited States Constitution,
particularly that Bill of Rightsand that First Amendment out
there? That's what I believe in.

(15:51):
You know what's troubling? Our FBI director doesn't believe
it. You're seeing his face on the
screen right there. I'm going to play you something.
I want to hone in on two things in this clip.
First, censorship. I think that's a leftist value.
Call me crazy, but that's not a liberal and it's not a
conservative position. That is a like leftist value.
It might be a hard right value too, if you're sort of like

(16:12):
heading towards fascism where wetell you what you can say.
That's Part 1. So the censorship aspect of this
clip is, is troubling. I have played this before, but
it's been a few months, few weeks.
The second part of this clip that's really troubling to me.
He says our children, the FBI director is unmarried.
He has no children. He doesn't have children to

(16:34):
reference, and he cannot collectively claim our children.
But he uses that word and he does it really casually.
He's going to defend our children.
Well, thank you very much, Sir, but maybe not.
Maybe sit this one out. Why don't we just call you
Kamala Harris? I remember Kamala Harris told us
that the the children of the community are the children of
the community, then their community's children.
No, my children are my children and I teach them.

(16:57):
We just did a constitutional amendment vote in the state of
Texas saying that parents are the number one decision maker.
So if I want my kids on or off the Internet, if I want them
consuming or not consuming some information, or if I want to
keep content away from them or Iwant to expose them to it the
way that I want. Get the hell out of the way.
Guy who's the FBI director who'sdating some chick who's 20 years
younger. Guy who has no babies at all and

(17:19):
has no skin in this particular fight.
Why are you out there talking about it?
Kamala Patel, you listen to that.
You tell me this doesn't rub youawfully wrong, because it does
feel exactly the same thing as suing journalists who are making
the making their voices heard, whether you like them or not, no
matter how gross it may be. The simple answer, in my
opinion, is social media is wildly out of control and

(17:40):
there's too much clickbait in this country.
And one of the things I highlighted Congress in my
testimony last week was if we want to protect our youth, we
got to get more involved in social media and online
platforms because that's where the folks, the assassins of this
world get radicalized. That's where they're the long
Rd. afters in general. And so we have to get after that
problem set. And I asked for Congress to help
in doing so. But Speaking of Charlie Kirk,

(18:01):
who was a very dear friend of mine, and then I was tasked with
leading the nationwide manhunt to find the perpetrators
involved. Of course, we were going to use
every resource we have to find every single person involved in
the investigation still ongoing.But we as one of the pillars of
my leadership here at the FBI istransparency.
We've produced more documents toCongress than my last two

(18:22):
predecessors combined by two fold just to put it in
perspective So when we take our investigations out to the
streets, I have the same ethos and this is how we got Charlie
Kirk's assassin alleged assassinso fast.
The the Boston Marathon bomber which happened in downtown
Boston during the Boston Marathon took five days and he
there was a police officer was killed in that manhunt.

(18:45):
Luigi Mangion, who allegedly murdered an individual the CEO
of the healthcare company in downtown Manhattan in broad
daylight, took. I just want to hear more about
the transparency. If you could just someone could
just come. Could somebody please put a
comment below about the transparency that we're getting?
N708JH, United States government, Washington, DC.

(19:06):
This aircraft is not available for public tracking per the
request of the owner operator. That's my airplane.
Oh, can we track it? No, it's not.
It is our airplane because we own it as American taxpayers.
Tell me more about that transparency.
Director Cash Patel, could you please, could you tell me more
about our children that you don't have?
Guy, I don't mean to be flippantand I don't mean to be rude per

(19:29):
SE, but when someone starts talking about my kids, that's
about when you start hitting my emotions.
That's about when you start hitting my violent streak.
We had a little post the other day that I pushed up on, on, on
X 'cause I think it's funny. And somebody and some lady said,
I followed you for your trackingskills.
She's like some, you know, leftist with a bunch of emojis
in her banner that are like a, you know, like a trans flag and

(19:50):
a gay flag and a rainbow and some other and a Ukraine flag
and some other nonsense. She's like, I followed you for
your tracking skills. Like my tracking skills.
My tracking skills are going to a website where publicly
available information is available to the public.
That's my tracking skills. She's like, I feel sorry for
your wife. Like really?
My wife married me for my nunchuck skills and my hacking
skills and my Bo staff skills and my willingness to gut

(20:13):
somebody who wants to come afterour children's skills.
Like the absolute rage that I have as a father and my, and my
2 decades of training and violence so that I could deploy
that if somebody wants to come after our offspring.
Those are the skills that like Igot married for, for whatever
it's worth, folks. And probably my sense of humor,
which is pretty dark. This is my tracking skills

(20:33):
showing you our transparent FBI director said, no, you may not
follow what I'm doing. You cannot look at it.
We're going to go back to the toThe Jets or back to the the
podcast and the suing thing in asecond.
Let's just do this one real quick because this came from the
Independent, who I suspect, although I cannot prove, I
suspect the Independent has beenpulling an awful lot of their

(20:55):
stories from the Kyle Seraphin show.
Call me crazy, but what does this thing say?
Cash Patel won a secret chip to China last week amid criticism
about private jet usage. Well, who's been criticizing his
use of the private jet if not me?
You can actually go into some ofthese AI things and find out who
the first person to comment on it and make a trend on social
media. It was this guy right here,
sitting here. I'm not trying to claim it.
I'm just telling you I've been on the story for over three

(21:17):
years because it is a big story and it turns out that there is a
big spin that is going on. I'm going to open something up
to your eyes for those of you. I'm going to put the chat on the
screen for a second. Let me open this up to you.
We have two social media influencers that are running our
FBI. Why do you care about the FBI?
Because they're the part of the government that can come in and
kill you. They can take your freedom, they
can arrest you, they can spy on you, and then they can take you

(21:37):
away from your children or your grandchildren.
So that's Part 1. That's why I care so much.
And it just turns out that I'm just the guy that happens to
know some things about it more than most.
OK, when I was speaking to a whistleblower and a
whistleblower attorney yesterday, one of the crazy
things he said, which made me laugh, was that what are the

(21:59):
odds that the biggest thorn in the side of the FBI also
happened to be sitting on the actual surveillance that was
outside the person's house that has recently been named as a
potential subject for the pipe bomb dropping on January 6th.
And we both smirked. And he said 100%, the odds are
100% because God puts people where they need to be.

(22:20):
All you got to do is go back andread the Old Testament.
That made me think about it. Not wrong.
It turns out we've had this information for a long time.
We now have two social media influencers that are out trying
to run our most dangerous and scary government agency.
Hands down. They're scary in the CIA because
they operate more domestically. They're scarier than anyone
else. They're scarier than the IRS

(22:40):
because like, they'll be the ones that come and grab you.
The IRS, I've worked with them. They're actually not that scary
when it comes to like coming in.They'll knock on your door and
then they'll leave if you slam it.
We have two social media influencers running our FBI, our
FBI. That's their words, not mine.
So what do they do when things go wrong?
They go to influence. They go to influencing movement,

(23:04):
they go to influencing friendlies, they go and lean on
social media. People who might be able to
spend their story. We are in the spin cycle right
now. Dan Bongino went to his
mouthpiece. That's Julie Kelly.
I got her stuff. She went on abandoned yesterday.
It's embarrassing. I don't know.
Listen, I have some experience with people who are on
benzodiazepine type products like benzos Slow you down.

(23:26):
I don't know that that's what's going on there, but I'm looking
at it and I'm listening and going.
You sound like you're really, really trying to get through
something, like you're either having an emotional breakdown or
maybe medicated. So OK, that's who Dan Bongino
goes to when there's a problem. He goes to his loudest
mouthpiece, and it turns out nowit's Jilly Kelly.
Who does Cash Patel go to? He goes directly to a man named

(23:48):
John Solomon. They work together on the
archives project. I've showed you guys before.
There is a letter from Donald Trump authorizing two people,
Cash Patel and John Solomon, to access his records with his
authorization to the National Archives.
And this is a public source opendocument that was written by the
White House. OK, fine.
That goes back to like 2022 after Donald Trump was out of

(24:10):
office. Let's quickly cover this story
about the the the movement. Patel flew to Beijing on Friday
met with officials on Saturday, Reuters reports.
Do they now reporting that neither the Chinese foreign
minister or the US Embassy in the Chinese capital acknowledged
the fly in visit. Do you know who had Mullah did
and who knew You guys knew because I've been covering this
thing, because I've been tracking this plane.

(24:30):
He's, by the way, still hanging out in Las Vegas.
I guess he's working from home this week trying to catch up
after a long, important trip to the Asia Orient.
The development comes after the use of his personal jets came
under spotlight when he's accused of using a Bureau plane
to travel to watch his country music sensation girlfriend.
I added that part Alexis Wilkinsperformed at a wrestling event
at Pennsylvania State University, also known as Penn

(24:52):
State. He angrily he was upset about
that. He he reacted angrily to the
incident and then he actually interpreted as an attack on his
partner, who he called a true patriot and a rock solid
conservative. I actually have some footage of
said rock solid conservative. We're going to get to more about
the plane stuff in a second. I found this footage.
This was tweeted out by shadow of Ezra.
I don't know why they're interviewing her.
I don't know why this woman is wearing a like a Wonder Woman

(25:17):
costume top, I guess. I mean, she's going to go do the
things she does for a living. She's going to go sing the
national anthem. I don't know what singing the
national anthem pays, but she's singing the national anthem at
another event, which seems to beall that she does.
And I'm going to let her explainwho she is.
This woman is a public figure. And when you're a public figure

(25:40):
who gets interviewed by random people and you get invited on TV
shows to talk about whether there's sleeper cells in America
because you're a counterterrorism,
counterterrorism expert commentator and you run a
podcast, which by the way, is over here.
I think I have that. Do you have the podcast?
Yeah, there it is. She's got more followers than I
got over on Rumble. She hasn't made one of these

(26:00):
things in quite a while. We're going back three months
now since the last one between the headlines.
And I know most of you are wondering like, is there a way,
Kyle, is there a way that I can find out what a 26 year old
who's never had a real job thinks about politics?
And the answer is yes, you can. You can go to Alexis Wilkins
Rumble page right now. You can find out what somebody
who's never held AW2 employment the way that you guys go do

(26:24):
where you out there and you use your your mind and your skills
and you go out there and create something or you destroy
something or you're out there providing a service.
Like she's a singer and she's a advisor to the NRA and she's an
ambassador to Turning Point and she sings the national anthem,
as far as I can tell. I don't know.
Here's what she had to say aboutherself.
So let's just listen to her own words.
What are you doing here, Alexis?How did you get here on the

(26:45):
ground here in front of the stage?
So, Alexis, what are you doing here?
Why are you at this event? Why was important?
So I am here because I am singing the Ashley Anthem and
we're doing a show after the amazing speakers.
But I love Independent Women's Forum and our bodies are sports,
whole program and organization because it is so much further
than even sports. I mean, sports are a huge issue

(27:06):
keeping biological men out of women's sports.
It not only is dangerous for women, it's dangerous in locker
rooms, it's dangerous on the field or the pool or wherever
you're competing with men, but it's also just it's anti common
sense. And that's something that I
think everyone's working really hard to combat right now.
So I'm so excited to be here. And it it does, it goes beyond
sports. And like I said, it's just, it's

(27:27):
something that, you know, anything that's not common
sensical, we need to be fightingright now.
And so we need to protect our girls.
That's perfect. You tell us a little bit about
your music. Yeah, so I sing country music,
and I have for a long time. I sing songs that are, you know,
regular country music that, you know, kind of like I grew up on.
We do real instruments, try to keep it really classic.

(27:48):
But I also sing patriotic songs and write patriotic songs for
people who want to listen to that and people who love
America. You know, there are a lot of
artists that sing songs that maybe don't agree with your
values or that you can't play infront of your kids.
And I try to avoid that and definitely do avoid that.
And so hopefully, you know, everyone can listen to some
music. And then I also have a show
called Between the Headlines on Rumble where we recap the news

(28:10):
every Friday and then do variouspolitical.
Commentary does political commentary on the side while
she's singing country music, andher Spotify channel gets like
almost 8400 total listens per month just for anybody that's
listening to this program. If you're really curious about
numbers, because that's kind of how I operate, we get about 60
to 65,000 listens on Spotify permonth and it constitutes 28.5%

(28:35):
of our total audience downloads on just the audio, not the
video. So we're about 27 times more
listened to than this gal is who's a country music sensation.
So I'm actually going to redesignate myself as a
political podcasting sensation and I hope you guys will come
along with that as we go out there and deal with people on

(28:56):
social media. If anybody actually refers to me
otherwise as a MAGA podcaster ora conspiracy theorist or a
former FBI guy, I would really prefer that we get corrected to
political podcasting sensation because that's really what's up.
And I dabble also, by the way, in singing to children in the
bathtub. And occasionally I also sing
goodnight lullabies to my kids. So if you guys want to add that

(29:18):
we could do that too. We could talk about those
things. The sad thing is, is that the,
the music that we have about cash Patel's jet, that one of
our our one of the social media followers, I have said to me is
actually catchier than anything that I can think of that this
woman has sung. In fact, I actually know the
words to the, the silly AI song that he made and not the words
to anything that you sung. And I listen to female country

(29:40):
music artists and I have for a long time.
I, I grew up listening to country.
I actually grew up listening to country.
I actually grew up in Texas, America for like a big chunk of
my life. I've moved to the state 7 times.
Anyhow, let's do, let's do a read for my friends at silence.
A good reminder. There's no reason to trust what
our government's up to. They're willing to block their

(30:01):
travel, but not yours. If you want to block your
access, you know, from them following you, this is how you
do it. Good Faraday product something
like this this is the most inexpensive one they have it's a
really effective Faraday sleeve with magnets in it so you just
slide it in and close it it's even got an external pocket.
So if you want to keep the radiation away from your body,
the the sort of RF signals coming off these devices, you
can block it on your body side and you can still have it

(30:21):
actually receive phone calls andstuff, which is kind of a cool
little thing. You're seeing the E3 everyday
Faraday backpack on the screen. That is an outstanding backpack.
It carries way more than it really should.
They did not designed it very well.
It's got all kinds of little like gadgets and pockets and
stuff and they're very well thought out, which is not always
the case when you go and buy somebody else's design on a
backpack. Zippers are great.
Chest strap is great. It's very low visibility, which

(30:44):
I love. It's just a great design.
Anyway, Silent is slnt.com slashKyle.
Go to that website. Use my name at checkout.
Kyle, save yourself 15%. What are we trying to do?
We're trying to block governmentagencies and big tech and
corporate data brokers and cybercriminals and scumbags and
whoever else is out there fighting for a piece of your
digital footprint. You guys are finding out with
the Blaze story and gait analysis, they can find

(31:06):
everything about you. If you want to kind of limit
some of that exposure, it may betoo late in some cases, but
certainly where you are currently, you can do that.
And they do it by blocking all the wireless signals coming out
of your phone and your tablet and your laptops and so on.
Cellular, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, RFIDG, PS:, NFC, you name it,
the tracking goes away. The remote access is not
possible, and there are no breadcrumbs for anyone to follow you.

(31:26):
Special operations use the stuff.
Counterintelligence agents use the stuff.
Intelligence officers use them overseas.
It is a very capable thing. They've got contracts with the
military. Silent makes great stuff.
If you guys want want to spend more and you want to want buy
one that's made in the US, you can certainly do that and you
can afford it. Knock yourself out.
Berry compliance is an option. You can also buy the ones that
are sown in the overseas stuff and they work as well.

(31:46):
Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe better, I don't know.
They certainly are a better price point.
And so by the thing that makes the sense, these are good
company, good people. They've been supporting us for
quite a while. They just signed up to to do
some more work with us. So I really appreciate them and
I love their products. I actually buy them and I use
them and and I use them all the time.
So guys check them out. I bring them with me wherever I
go. slnt.com slash Kyle. It is a link in the show
description that you can easily find.

(32:07):
And I encourage you to do so. If you're in the market for, I
don't know, not having your government come after you, which
would be good. Can we just do the cover up
story there? You heard the girl, here's the
guy. So as I told you, social media
influencers, what do they do? They go to what they know under
times of crisis. We all do that, right?
You just do the thing that you're familiar with.
There's a reason why we we cook comfort food because it's
something that we know when it'sfamiliar and it brings us a

(32:29):
sense of security. So what did Patel do when this
story about the jet broke out? He went to his good buddy John
Solomon. I'm going to read you the story
here. The story says FBI Chief Ray
rolls dice with Congress contempt over.
And then he vets Jessa Vegas. What does that mean?
Oh, no, that's not Kaash Patel. That was Chris Ray getting beat
up over his jet usage, and John Solomon was the guy who did the

(32:53):
beatings. Why?
Because as I've been pointing out for literally three years
now, we've got a real problem with the usage of FBI jets and
private jets used by government officials.
It's been an issue. It's been an ongoing issue.
There have been FBI directors removed going back to the 90s.

(33:13):
You guys recall this. This is what Bill Sessions was
removed over. Clinton got rid of him, so this
is not a new thing. When did they actually change
the policy? Some of you may know this.
It was between 2011 was the initial study, as far as I can
tell. It was definitely codified in
2013. That's when we ended up having
the movement towards mandated travel, not by Congress, but by

(33:38):
executive policy. We've got it's a requirement now
for everybody to use government jets when they are the attorney
general and when they are the FBI director.
So who was the FBI director in 2013?
Oh, it was Jim Comedy. It was Jim Comedy.
And who have we been bitching about the jet usage of of late?

(33:59):
It's been Chris Ray and now CashPatel.
Here's the funniest part. I'm actually going to put this
on the screen because I didn't grab it earlier and now I will.
You guys will love this. John Solomon's cover is that
Cash Patel is actually saving you guys money.
OK, He's saving you money in theway that he's using the private

(34:21):
jet. Let's just do this live right
there. Boom.
I'm going to put this headline up.
How is he saving you money, you wonder?
Well, he's not the biggest abuser.
It's a cash back is what it's called.
FBI boss Patel, he uses the jet on par with his predecessors,
but he's saving taxpayer dollars, so you should be saying
thank you for his use of the jet.

(34:41):
FBI directors, like the AttorneyGeneral have been required to
use it in the aftermath of the September 11th attack.
He knows that's not true. It's actually 12 years later,
government jets instead of commercial for security reasons.
That's also false. It's because who wanted to use
them? Jim Comedy, the most damning
piece of the silly article, which you should know, is as
follows. Patel has been subject to a
whisper campaign, a whisper campaign in Washington, DC

(35:04):
circles echoed by legacy news sites since he took office in
February. Did he know or is he dealing
with the modern new media, AKA social media?
And this guy right here talking about it.
There's no whispers. I'm yelling it.
Go back and check the tape. Since he took office in
February, The Flight Log shows that he's actually flown

(35:24):
slightly less than the former FBI director to Jim Comedy.
He didn't fly less than Ray. He flew less than Comedy, folks.
And here's the stupidest thing that I've read.
Overall, the Flight Log show that Jim Comedy was the most
prodigious air traveler, averaging roughly 2.58 flights

(35:45):
per week, compared with Kash Patel, who averaged 2.48 flights
per week. Of course, Chris Ray, who was
told that we should shut it downbecause of his usage, he
actually flew 1.98 flights per week.
So that is a difference. Let's see here.
So the difference between being a prodigious air traveler and

(36:06):
being totally acceptable and saving you money is .1 flights
per week, 1/10 of a flight there's what, 52 weeks in a
year? So in a year, Cash Patel has
saved us about 1/2 of 1 flight. Am I doing that right?

(36:27):
No, that's not right. He saved us five flights over a
year. Is that right, .1 * 52?
Yeah. 5.2 flights. He's going to save us 5.2
flights a year over Jim Comedy, but he's going to be taking
something like .52530 flights more a year.
And Chris Wray, who he wanted toground.

(36:48):
I'm just saying, you go to John Solomon for your cover and
you're going to get mediocre cover.
This is pretty silly and pathetic.
This is the best they got. The other person that went to
cover, I told you Dan Bongino went to his favorite outlet for
coverage. He went to Miss Julie Kelly to
cover up about the pipe bombs. Now, I haven't even told you

(37:10):
guys this yet and I didn't mean to bury the lead here, but let's
just do it real quickly. We got a whistleblower
disclosure yesterday about this story, this pipe bomb story that
they would love to not cover. They would love to ignore it.
You should read it if you haven't read it.
This is where you go. The truth about January 6th.
It's Blaze media.com/truth. The story is still there.

(37:31):
Former Capitol Police officer isa forensic match for J6 pipe
bomber. Sources say that's the headline.
Steve Baker, Joe Hanneman doing the work that an $11 billion a
year agency could not do. And also the story of the FBI
not prosecuting and the Capitol Police officers apparently
having no problem using lethal force that is a less than lethal

(37:52):
tool in a lethal manner or a potentially lethal manner on
January 6th. And it turns out that their
stories are related because the person they've identified as one
of the trainers for less than lethal shooting on January 6th
also happened to be the person who was a forensic match for the
gait analysis and some other things that are going to be
coming out in the near future. Let's do Julie Kelly, let's go

(38:12):
ahead and do a let's do a Bureaucover up if we can.
This is who they chose to represent them.
I may stop in the midst of it only because it's really hard to
listen to. At least she got better
lighting. She still has horrific taste.
Julie Kelly is a multi millionaire.
Her husband makes all the money.He's a lobbyist.
You guys may know this. He's a Democrat lobbyist out of
Chicago and lobbies for like bigFood, which is why she used to

(38:33):
do quote, UN quote food blogging, which was really just
sort of propaganda pieces from Monsanto and others.
So that's what goes on there. There's this old expression.
I remember seeing it in like a, an art class maybe when I was in
high school and it was a performative art or it was sort
of like a modern art where somebody spent money and bought
billboards or they brought marquees that were out in Las
Vegas, NV. And one of the ones I'll never

(38:53):
forget was money creates taste. I want you to consider that as
you see this clip as a sort of meta analysis.
Money creates tape. You ever meet like, rich people?
People who have a bunch of moneyand they spend it on the most
God awful hideous things? Let's just put it this way.
Julie Kelly is never going to out her husband for his campaign
donations, even if he did them in her name, because Chanel

(39:16):
doesn't by itself. She spends horrifically stupid
amounts of money on God awful, ugly looking things, including
this hideous piece of art that'sbehind her, which is not a good
like she should go back to beingwhatever her natural hair color
is too, because this just looks awful.
She looks not well. And I'm saying that because what
she says sounds worse. So let the the best thing we can

(39:36):
do is talk about the visual. She's actually improved the
visual appearance of her appearances on Bannon.
For a lady who shows up on on podcasts and on, you know,
broadcast as frequently she does, it's really wild to me
that's nobody has told her. Hey, lady, you look terrible.
You sound worse. You should just stay with print.
You can't do it. Narcissism is a problem.
Here we go. Oh, we got to play it too, don't

(39:58):
I? Here we go.
Lay clip. This is a report on Blaze Media
and this was authored by Steve Baker and Joe Hanneman, 2
reporters who have covered January 6th.
And this was teased last week, to your point, by Glenn Beck and
Steve Baker, that this was goingto be the greatest political

(40:19):
scandal of all time, that this would implicate high level Trump
administration officials, including perhaps CIA Director
John Radcliffe, DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard and others.
I'm. Going to stop you right there
for a second. You guys can take a breather.
If you need to pull out your barf bags, knock yourself out.
That's OK. Here's the best part.

(40:40):
She's telling the story of of what was written.
She's adding facts that are not part of it.
Nobody said it would implicate Tulsi Gabbard.
Nobody said it would implicate John Ratcliffe.
What was said was that this woman in the actual story, which
she, she probably didn't even read based on what I'm saying,
because she completely ignores the fact that what I shared is

(41:03):
another nail in a really, reallystrong story.
Nobody said that they were involved.
What they said is that they may be actually part of the, they
might be in danger because this woman operates in a physical
security role, an armed role around the OD and I, the
director of national intelligence and the director of

(41:24):
the CIA, she's part of the campus physical security team or
force protection over at CIA. The woman that they have named
and let me add to that real quickly as well.
If you guys don't know how protective details work in the,
in the federal government, it's it's unlikely that many of you
do. But when you have someone that's
let's say the FBI director's detail or you have let's say the

(41:46):
president's detail, at some point in time, they run out of
overtime. You guys may be aware of this.
They run out of overtime becausethey burn up so many hours doing
overtime. The FBI is very famous for this.
So what do they do? They lean on people that have
similar backgrounds as the actual train protective detail
to step into that role and they do TD wise and then they lean on

(42:07):
the TDY guys because those guys have not maxed out their
overtime. Essentially the people that are
on the detail that are going to be punching in a bunch of
overtime, they don't want to work for free, which is
reasonable. They want to get paid for the
overtime that they do. And when they can no longer be
paid for that because there's a federal salary cap, they end up
leaning into the the pool of people that would be useful.
The FBI will grab agents from all the different SWAT teams,
TYN fly them, pay them per DM, pay them for a hotel, pay them

(42:29):
for an extra car, whatever, and put them on these details so
that the guys who are going to not be able to get overtime
don't have to work for free. You know what they do over at
CIA, Same thing they do with theFBI.
When you run out of overtime foryour security detail, which
always happens and it happens towards the end of the year, you
start leaning on people that have similar backgrounds.
Do you know how this has a similar background and is in the
same little division? The force protection people,

(42:51):
whether they're working on campus or whether they are
directly working for the detail,It's all the same umbrella over
at CIA when it comes to the way the org chart works.
So the people you would lean on would be your security officers
that are already trained and already carry a weapon on behalf
of your agency. The odds that this woman was not
tapped at some point in time to be part of the security detail,
it's just not her full time job.So CIA issued a correction this

(43:13):
week and said, well, she's not part of the security detail.
The question is, has she ever been?
Because I bet you she's been armed around the CIA director.
And that means I bet you she's been armed around the DNI.
I bet you she's been armed around a lot of people that the
CIA director would be around on any given day.
And at the end of the day, she'salso freaking armed around all
the people that work on Langley's campus who are our
security professionals. You got me.

(43:35):
Julie Kelly made a materially false, let's say, insinuation
with what she said, and she mischaracterized Glenn Beck.
Like totally inaccurate because I don't know that she read the
piece. I think she, the rage that she
had blinded her. Here we go.
Related to who these reporters believe they have identified as
the individual seen on that verygrainy, low quality surveillance

(43:58):
video. She's really mad about the
surveillance video because the guys went and did the work and
got better video. By the way, if you're hearing a
feedback loop or a little bit ofher audio, she has
unprofessional audio because she's working with Real
America's Voice, who's not a great professional broadcaster
service, and she apparently doesn't have any ear monitors.
This is really easily solved, but you're going to keep hearing
her voice echo back at herself. That's on her end.
That's not on our end. Of a hoodie suspect walking

(44:20):
around Capitol Hill on January 5th.
That evening, which is the time frame that the FBI and law
enforcement believe those two dummy explosive pipe bombs were
planted outside the headquartersof the RNC and the DNC, only to

(44:40):
be conveniently and coincidentally discovered 17
hours later to coincide with thestart of the joint session of
Congress. Honestly, is she medicated?
What causes people to speak in single phrases if they are a
professional who knows all the things about the story that they

(45:07):
are called to talk about? So this article took over social
media and the Internet all weekend, and it was supposed to
not just identify this pipe bomber, but also expose this big
scandal. Well, the article in my opinion
fell far short of providing enough solid evidence to almost

(45:33):
definitively they said 98% basedon this gait analysis which we
can kind of talk about. I would really love it if she
did. Can we also talk about that the
name of her subject or her her sub stack where she makes a
bunch of money is declassified live with Julie Kelly, a woman
who's never held a security clearance, who's never worked

(45:54):
under a security clearance, who's never been read in with a
security clearance, who knows nothing about classification or
declassification, Doesn't understand exactly how how basic
paperwork functions in law enforcement.
Who had a big tiff with me? Because apparently I didn't
believe the FBI was setting up Donald Trump for an

(46:14):
assassination because they put the same piece of, you know,
little, little blurb that they do want every single search
warrant and every single single operation order that they've
done since Ruby Ridge. Let's keep declassifying this
live as we. Go meaning The Walking
mannerisms and style. Punishing me too, guys.
Of a Capitol Police officer. You mean gate?
You mean gate like a horse wouldhave a gate or like a human

(46:35):
would have a gate? The way the.
Do you mean like a gate? Like if you had hinges on a
piece of wood and it would swingand close people from inside or
outside of a fence gate? Or do you mean like gate like a
horse would have a gate and thensomebody else might be walking
with the You don't know what gate analysis is.
Don't be ridiculous man is not dumb.
Why are we doing this the way you?
Would walk correct the way you would propel yourself forward?

(46:55):
OK, keep going. Propel yourself forward.
GAIT, not GATE, gate. So apparently what happened is
Steve Baker was looking at videofrom January 6th, Capitol Police
officers who were using what they call non lethal ammunitions
on the crowd. Nobody calls them non lethal
munitions, but if you're not a cop, if you're not a law

(47:16):
enforcement professional, you don't know.
The article refers to them as less than lethal, which is the
official term. This freeze frame is truly
haunting. I think we should leave it for a
second. If you guys are not watching us
over on Spotify, you're missing out.
Check us out on Spotify, it's Kyle serifandshow.com.
If you're just listening to this, you're missing a really,
really bad freeze frame that is as bad as any I've ever done.

(47:38):
You may hear of Spotify adhere to.
And I've talked about that and he apparently saw a Capitol
Police officer who he thought had the same gait pattern as the
site of this individual on January 5th.
Who's? He didn't think it.
They ran it through computers, sophisticated, incredibly
expensive computers that are cutting edge technology that our

(48:00):
intelligence service uses to identify terrorists, that uses
the official biometric. You can go back to 2017 and 2018
and you can look up DISA, that'sthe Defense Information Systems
Agency that handles all biometric information to the
United States Pentagon and for the DoD.
And they use gait analysis as a biometric.
And it turns out it's one of theprimary biometrics they use

(48:20):
because it is unique and specific.
But according to Julie Kelly, who's declassifying this for You
Live, she believes that Steve Baker watched some video and
then decided that somebody was something based on him watching
it. Do you understand how
disingenuous this is? What spin looks like?
This is a discredit operation going on right now, Bill.
Has not been identified. January 5th, 2021 SO.

(48:43):
Apparently, is there something unique enough about the suspect
because. Yes.
This is like the Magruder film, kinda.
No. And BD and Pasovic and, and
Glenn Beck's team and many others for hours and hours and
hours have gone over all this grainy footage.
I mean, BD was on the show 1 time.

(49:04):
You talk about Glenn and his team.
I mean, BD was on the show 1 time for an hour.
And I think we went over this thing and he had like every
movement of this. And I didn't have a, a suspect
at the time. But why this is so important?
Why couldn't why the official narrative was a lie and how this
was going to be something that would explode the whole feds
erection ma'am? Ma'am.

(49:26):
All right, so they're going to go here and there's more of this
and I'll post it over on my page.
If you guys want, you can go to kyleseraphin.com and watch it.
If you're so inclined, you can go watch band and show from
yesterday, which is essentially look at that smug face.
You can't make it up on on Kelly.
She's doing everything she can. This is what jealousy looks
like. She's absolutely cooked.
She's also been quoting a guy named John Nance, who was my
former supervisor, but not the supervisor of my squad on

(49:47):
January 6th, who said that what I'm saying never happened.
I'm going to make you a little promise right now.
We proved that it did. The paperwork backs it up.
Oh, you mean there's FBI paperwork that backs up what
Serafin said about when he was on surveillance?
It's there's an old saying in the Bureau.
If it wasn't written down, it didn't happen.
We wrote down everything. We write down everything.
Everything is documented. That's how it works.

(50:08):
Of course it was documented. What, are you guys nuts?
All right, you know who else used to know this stuff?
By the way, this is a video fromMay of this year.
This is after Dan Bongino went over to the to the FBI and his
replacement, who I'm a big fan of, by the way.
I think Vince Colonnaise is a really nice man.

(50:29):
And I'm going to continue to think that regardless of what he
says about me or what he thinks about me, which I don't know
anymore, but Vince Colonnaise isa great guy.
He's stuck in this horrible scenario where he has to now
cover for a boss who has decidedto join the the dark side.
And I'm going to prove it to you.
Today is November the 11th. That means that Bongino has been

(50:50):
in for eight months. I think we're past the six to
eight months of of the cutesy time window, are we not?
Here's Vince Colonnades talking about his boss, Dan Bongino,
who's talking about we got to fix this pipe bomber scenario.
This was from May, I think, 28thor 29th of this year.
US Attorney, the head of the weaponization task force now has
been working with Dan. He told us that he came.

(51:12):
He told you, he told this audience about that.
I've been working with Dan on getting to the bottom of the
pipe bomb case and Dan gave an update this morning on that
subject and he said actually we've had some late breaking
developments. Cut 14 Dan Bongino on what
they're learning now you know. We had two pipe bombs planted on
January 6th. I mean, we were told by partisan

(51:33):
actors out there this was the insurrection.
The world was going to fall apart.
And no one seemed to show any interest in this case.
The second we got in, I put a team on it and I said, I want
answers on this. And I'm, I'm pretty confident
that we're, we're closing in on some suspects.
The we got a the reason, by the way, I use social media with
these cases. I'm trying to communicate on
social media is nothing's by accident, guys.

(51:55):
I do nothing by accident. That is the most cocky BS that
I've ever heard. I do nothing by accident.
Seriously bro? Like you are an accident.
You've been an accident in that role.
Do you know how I know? Because you haven't produced
those results. See.
May, June, July, August, September, all of October.
We're halfway into November. Oh my.

(52:15):
We're 5 1/2 months since you didthat.
Lot of good stuff coming in. Nothing is by accident.
You know what that means to me? That means you are intentionally
not talking about this and trying to hide it.
The spin cycle is you don't do anything by accident, using your
own words. And you have not even come close
to addressing what Steve Baker said.
And there's more behind that scenes.
It's not my story yet to share, but let me just go.

(52:36):
Remember, he said there was a problem of the FBI, that there
was a reputational problem. He also said that there's
somebody out there that's still causing a problem.
Listen to the clip. Am I that problem?
And the more I think about it, Ithink I am.
So the moment Cash and I swore in, we realized that the first
thing we had to do is rebuild public trust.

(52:56):
This is your FBI. It's not mine.
I tell the employees every day, you don't own it.
You don't own it. I don't own it.
It's like being the center fielder for the Yankees that'll
live with you forever, but you don't own the Yankees.
It's a proud franchise. The place has taken a
reputational hit. There is zero question about it.
There were a lot of bad actors, one of them still out there
causing us all kinds of trouble.So we had to fix it and rebuild

(53:19):
public trust. One of the ways to do it is
these cases of significant public interest that matter.
You know, we had two pipe bombs planted on January 6th.
I mean, we were told by partisanactors out there, this was the
insurrection. The world was going to fall
apart. And no one seemed to show any
interest in this case. The second we got in, I put a
team on it and I said, I want answers on this.

(53:39):
And I'm, I'm pretty confident that we're, we're closing in on
some suspects the we. Really.
Again, that was the end of May. Where are they, buddy?
Listen, you used to know some stuff.
Maybe because he used to listen to me.
Do you guys know this is from January of 2024, back when
Bongino knew some stuff before he got into that office and

(54:03):
nothing he did was on accident. He's going to quote a reporter
who's quoting me. You know how weird this is.
Again, I'm just a regular dude sitting here.
This is not false humility, by the way.
I think very highly of myself inso much as the places where I
should. I think I'm a pretty OK dad.
I could definitely be better. I think I'm an OK athlete for a

(54:24):
guy who's 43 and doesn't play sports anymore.
But like, I'm not, I'm not goingto go out there and try to step
out and play pro ball. Like, I think we do a pretty
good podcast here. I think we have a lot of fun
with it. But I know I can be better.
And so I watch sometimes to try to make it better.
It's not false humility, but I do know what I'm talking about
when I talk about the FBI. And I got reassured yesterday in
the whistleblower disclosure that went out to members of
Congress. Not only did the things I say

(54:47):
turn out to be 100% correct frommy memory, which I hadn't seen
in almost five years, but even things that I was doubting
turned out to be correct. And some additional connections
were made. And they're not public yet, but
they will be soon. And I'm not saying TuneIn next
week. I'm just telling you these
people are full of crap. And Dan theoretically would have
access to all this stuff and he's chosen to not use it.

(55:09):
Do you know how I know he has access?
Because he's freaking quoting what I said, which means he
should know where to look. The case file from January 5th
or January 6th moved into the end of January of 2021 is
critical information. There are not that many things
in the serial files that you could take nine months to get to
them. Let me tell you something else

(55:30):
that's really crazy that makes me think that this cover up
story that he used to believe isso legit.
This is actually really, really crazy stuff folks, because I
didn't realize it till yesterday.
The former deputy director, the guy who sat in the chair that
Dan Bongino currently sits in was a guy named Paul Abate.
Now, Paul Abate was atrocious. He was atrocious for America.

(55:50):
He was atrocious for people thatbelieve in conservative
principles. He was atrocious for people that
believe in constitutionality andnonpartisan law enforcement.
I'm going to officially say I did not like Paul Abate.
I didn't like him when I worked there and I don't think he was a
good person. And all the stories I've heard
since are incredibly bad, including things like sexual
malfeasance. And there were allegations and
rumors that he was involved in in relationships with

(56:11):
subordinates that he tried to abuse some of the FB is power in
what's called the Afib, the alternate federal ID system.
We had a whistleblower come and say that somebody was asked to
buy a house or help him buy a house in a fake ID that the FBI
created. I can't substantiate any of
those stories right now. So those are the allegations
that I've heard. But the all the smoke on Paula
Bate is bad. And he also pretty publicly to

(56:34):
people like George Hill who heard it where there were phone
calls where he said across the whole nation as he took over and
became deputy director, which happened in February of 2021, by
the way. That's why January is important.
In February he apparently went out and said something to the
effect of if you're not on boardwith the J6 prosecutions, you
better find yourself the hell out of here and get another job.
Now let's get real honed. In January 5th pipe bombs are

(56:57):
placed. January 6th the so-called
insurrection, the capital riot takes place.
The investigation starts immediately.
If you were going to say Kyle Seraphin, how long would it take
somebody to find an unknown subject with an unknown,
previously unknown mechanism of attack in the United States
Capitol, where we have a pretty significant amount of resources
and a massive public push? How long would it take you to
find that person? I'm going to tell you it would

(57:19):
take the FBI about a week. You heard Patel trying to, you
know, puff his credibility up. Oh, we found Charlie Kirk's
assassin in three days. Yeah, he turned himself in.
Good job. Oh, we found the the person from
the the Boston Marathon bombing,5 days.
That's about right. They knew who it was.
They got pretty close. But that was that was that was a
very analogous scenario. Dropped bombs.
The difference was the bombs were actually exploded and there

(57:40):
was a lot of injuries and there was a really messy crime scene.
So that actually should have taken longer.
But about five to seven days is a pretty reasonable time for the
FBI to be on a subject of interest.
And by the way, we were out surveilling somebody on January
13th, January 14th, which is about a week.
And that fits right into the time frame.
And it would take another coupleof days to be feeling good
enough to go out there and do a subject interview if you thought

(58:02):
that person was it. And by the way, as I showed you
guys the other day, boom, they did an interview of a person of
interest on January the 19th. But I think I know a little bit
more after yesterday's disclosures, POI2I, I'm not
confident POI 2 was in fact the bomber.
And I don't think it refers to the subject that Steve Baker
talked about. I think POI 2.

(58:22):
And by the way, this is a publicreport guys.
You can find this. Tom Massey put it out.
It's in yesterday's show notes. This is a four year update on
the pipe bomb subject. POI one, POI 2 and POI 3.
I believe that my team was following POI three, although it
was not named as such. Having sort of like refreshed
memory, I believe POI 3 was the person that we followed simply
because the smart card traffic card from from metro, the metro

(58:46):
travel system rather was registered to separate integral
POI three that fits with the information.
So POI 3 was most likely the door that we were sitting
outside of POI 2. Initially I thought, Oh well,
that had to be the pipe bomber. I think actually POI one, which
makes sense that the FBI would prioritize them.
Person of interest one, most likely.
Person of interest 2 also suspicious but also interesting.
Person of interest 3. The furthest person out somehow

(59:08):
connected, maybe only just by a sort of happenstance and
location. I think that our subject that
Steve Baker identified is actually POI, one which is not
necessarily brought up in this document, but was known at the
time, a week after January 6th. Guess what?
Bongino knows what I used to saytoo.
Here he is. We don't know the January 5th

(59:28):
backpack guy. Weird, because we have his
license plate in his Metro card.We don't know the identity of
the January 6th bomb discovery guy, despite the fact he's a
hero and a Capitol Hill Police officer.
It's strange. Everybody else house.
Post Millennial drops this little bombshell yesterday
morning by Hannah Nightingale. FBI blocked the surveillance

(59:50):
team from interviewing the person of interest in the
January 6th pipe bomb case. They note that the
counterintelligence team used security footage to follow the
person to a metro station. This is January 5th guy and they
know the card used to access thetransit system.
The card allowed them to determine he got off a stop in
North Virginia where the person was seen in their car.

(01:00:10):
The car and the car registered in the theme of that was the
name of an Air Force Chief Master Sergeant is now working
as a contractor with the security clearance folks.
That last angle is a new part. We've covered that first, but
that's the new part was a contractor with a security
clearance. So I just want to be clear here.
I just want to be clear here. Dan Bongino used to know this,

(01:00:31):
and by the way, that story was not new at the time when he was
covering it. That was January 30th of 2024.
That story actually broke with his friend Carrie Pickett, who
covered all of those details at The Washington Times in May of
2023, more than six months earlier.
Not only did I say that the pipebombs were inoperable, Let me
Scroll down here and I will showyou exactly what I said.

(01:00:52):
By the way, I remembered it being that he was a chief master
Sergeant is what they told us. Guess what?
That's what they freaking told us.
My memory is still good from five years ago on that go
freaking figure. OK, here it goes.
Mr. Seraphin, who was suspended in February.
Sorry, suspended for the FBI in April of 2022.
My bad. I'm reading right here because
he refused to get the COVID vaccine and was eventually fired

(01:01:13):
a month later for unprofessionalconduct.
Criticized the bureau's early handling of the FBI pipe bomb
investigation. Within days of discovery of the
bomb, he said investigators reviewed closed circuit video of
the masked pipe bomber as he traveled through the metro
system. What's shocking?
Mr. Seraphin says with the FBI early on linked the bomber to
ADC Metro rail smart car. The card indicated that the

(01:01:34):
person got off at a train, got off a train in Northern Virginia
stop after planning both deviceson January 5th.
So they tagged the entrance timeand the exit the exact time that
that guy. Then they found out who bought
the card. The guy who bought the card was
not the guy who was using it as said the card had never been
used. He was brought a year prior by a
retired chief master Sergeant inthe Air Force.
He was a security contractor. He held a security clearance.

(01:01:55):
This is this is Bongino is reporting it like it's a
bombshell when it's actually sixmonths later.
FBI had surveillance footage showing the person entering a
car with a visible license plateexiting the metro stop.
That license plate tied back to the person whose door I sat
outside of. All of this stuff was covered
back then. This goes back to 2023.
Bongino used to know this stuff.So what the hell happened?

(01:02:18):
Where do they go? Where do those guys go?
This is not the only time. He continued to cover this
stuff. He continued to allege that he
had inside information. He's now the deputy director,
the number 2. Here's the craziest thing about
that deputy director role. As I mentioned, Paul Abate took
over in February. The reason is because the guy
before it, who was an agent's agent by all accounts, and
someone that I met very briefly and in my minimal contact with

(01:02:38):
him, I had a very positive read on him.
He still carried a gun despite being the top #2 guy in the FBI.
He was the number one agent because the director's not an
agent, the number one agent in the FBI.
His name was David Bowditch. And again, I had one
conversation, maybe 2 with him over a period of time while we
were dealing with Portland and the and the burnings that was
going on out there. I liked him.
I read on him was like this is aguy that I want to charge.

(01:03:00):
You know what happened? January 6th happened.
I think they had a subject a week later, I believe they went
and cleared that person and shouldn't have about a two weeks
after the incident. And then on January the 29th, at
about 4:00 PM in Eastern Time, David Bowditch, who had more
than 20 years of experience inside the FBI, retired with no

(01:03:21):
notice. He sent out an e-mail saying
that he retired effective immediately, and he was gone.
No goodbye party. No, like, here's the long bio
and what a great guy he is. No video that was out to the
troops. Hey, you know, it's been really
a great time serving with you. And this has been a thing.
He disappeared. He retired on a Friday with no
notice. And anybody who was part of the
FBI in 2021 will remember that because it was really unusual.

(01:03:44):
And the next Monday morning we woke up and we had Paula Bate,
ABLM sympathizer, a guy who was apparently allegedly sleeping
with the employees inside the FBI, Young women.
I had credible information from multiple sources on this stuff.
There are multiple whistleblowerdisclosures about that
specifically. The number 2 walked away with no

(01:04:05):
fanfare and no notice. Now, that's not normal for,
like, that wouldn't bother you guys because you wouldn't know.
But I at the time was like, whatthe hell just happened?
And so did many other senior agents.
That same role is now occupied by Dan Bongino.
You think they didn't ask him todo the same thing they asked
Bowders to do? And if he said yes, I can
imagine that probably haunts him.
Just telling you the guy used toknow something.

(01:04:26):
Where are all those sources thathe had you ready for #2 Here's
another one. Separate whistle blower reaches
out to me and this I've been working on for a while.
This isn't new folks. Let's just get this out of the
way. About January 6th.
It is now confirmed. I mean, you knew this in

(01:04:47):
advance. So this part, just why I put
this first. This is not breaking news.
However, I can confirm to you, in case you were even remotely
deluded about it, Say you're a lefty watching my show, that the
FBI 100% had undercovers in the crowd on January 6th.
I know you know that. I'm just saying Christopher
Wray's been shady about it and others.
I'm telling you from a source onthe ground with photo evidence

(01:05:10):
to back it up. The FBI and other agencies, not
just the FBI by the way, had multiple undercovers on the
ground on January 6th. Period.
There's now no disputing it. I've seen the evidence #2 the
pipe bombs that were placed at the DNC and the RNC that I

(01:05:32):
believe were planted there on purpose by people looking to
frame Trump supporters to stop the objection to the
certification of the vote. They didn't want people talking
about voter fraud problems, so they needed this.
After the pipe bombs were found,assets on the ground, including

(01:05:57):
a whistleblower who was not there but was one of the assets
on the ground, was briefed aboutthe pipe bombs the next day and
shown a picture of a guy in a hoodie.
Hey, we're looking for this guy planted these pipe bombs.
And they were like, wow, that's crazy.
Almost killed Kamala Harris. God forbid this whistleblower

(01:06:20):
tells me that. But two days later, after the
pipe bombs, he notes, emphasis his without explanation, they
were told to stand down. No need to look for the guy
anymore, which is really strangebecause the FBI is telling us
now there's like a $22 trillion reward for finding this guy,

(01:06:42):
500,000. Dan Bongino is wearing a cutesy
time shirt there. Is that not the most ironic
thing in the world, what you're looking at right now?
On the left, the one with the dark frame, is the door that I
was tasked with watching along with my surveillance team.
And on the right is the door at that time that Steve Baker's

(01:07:02):
identified subject lived at. We did this yesterday.
They share a common wall. They share a roof, their
stairwell is connected and it isdivided only by a like a facade
of bricks. If you were to spit outside of
one of those doors and the wind was blowing right, it would blow
directly back into the neighbor's door.
They're maybe 9 feet apart on center of the doors on walking

(01:07:24):
in. You think it's a freaking
coincidence that if you just looked at the same of facts that
the investigators did on the ground for the week after
January 6th, they wouldn't come up with the same thing that
Steve Baker came up with? I don't think the FBI missed it.
I think the FBI nailed it. I think they were on the ball.
I think they absolutely put us in the right place on purpose.

(01:07:46):
And I can't think otherwise because there are literally
millions of doorways in the DC metro area between Baltimore and
Fredericksburg and going all theway out to Winchester.
There are millions of people living in millions of different
residences. And they put us 9 feet away from
the actual person because we went to the person who was not

(01:08:09):
supposedly the bomber but was the best connection we had at
the time that we were going to pattern up.
And then what you find in the Massey piece when they went out
and released the four year update, it looks exactly like
this. Bottom line here.
On January the 19th, 2021, FBI agents interviewed Person of
Interest 2, which I don't think was the bomber, and ultimately
eliminated this individual as a person of interest.

(01:08:31):
That's going to be really interesting.
You just heard Dan Bongino say something that you have to hone
in on. He said they were showing a
picture of a dude in a hoodie. If only that picture had made it
to somebody in Congress at some point in time in the last, I
don't know, 48 hours. If only that picture could
actually identify something thatwould actually substantiate the

(01:08:53):
things that Steve Baker and Co were involved in.
If only. What else does Dan have to say
other than cutesy time is over? What did I do now?
Because Michael, our batting average is what is it again?
The blackout coffee time out to celebrate our batting average of

(01:09:14):
yes, 1000. I told you that the January 6th
bomber case where a pipe bomb was planted at the DNC, where
Kamala Harris was on January 6thand nobody in the media wants to
talk about it. I told you when Donald Trump
won, did I not go back and find the videos yourself, that there
are going to be people in the FBI who are trying to protect

(01:09:36):
their jobs and they're going to start releasing information now
about the bomber, which was an inside job.
No question. In my mind, it was clearly some
Democrat operative trying to stop the Republicans from
questioning the January 6th, 2020 election.
I told you insiders were going to start releasing information

(01:09:57):
because they wanted to cozy up to the Trump team and they were
going to say it's new video. How is it new video?
Well, it's not new video. It's video that's been there
since January 6th and January 5th of 2021.
The question is, could you get access to it?
And the answer is yes. Like some people actually got
some access to it. Those people are called Joe
Hanneman and Steve Baker and a Internet observer known as

(01:10:20):
Armitas. You think that I'm going to
share something with kind of like just tradecraft.
Those of you who were in law enforcement, we please validate
what I'm saying here. We were put on persons of
interest. My team did specialty
surveillance. What we did is we sat outside
people's houses for indefinite amounts of time for no
particular reason. And you can use surveillance in
various different ways. Way #1 you want to know things

(01:10:43):
about that person, you're going to quote UN quote, pattern of
life them, you're going to pattern their life.
You're going to find out what time they wake up.
When do the lights kick on? We're there at 3:00 in the
morning. When their lights kick on at
5:45, we note that, OK, they walked out the door every single
day at 7:18 or 7:20 and they go on work and they go to work on
foot or they go to work in a vehicle or they go to the bus
stop or they get picked up on a scooter and a friend and they

(01:11:04):
hug that person and they ride itin whatever.
We find out what that pattern is.
They go to the same job and theydo it on these days, they work
at a different job because they're a contractor.
They work at a random construction site, which has
been the same for the last little bit, but it could change
when they have a new job and they're they're contracted out
somewhere else, right? We pattern their life.
That's one way to do it. The other way is we want to see
something very specific. This is a potential drug dealer

(01:11:26):
and we think that there is goingto be a handoff or a purchase or
a supplier visiting them or themvisiting and we want to see
that. So we're going to be there when
fill in the blank person shows up and sometimes we take that
pattern of life piece and we hold on to it long enough.
What we developed some interesting sort of questions.
And so the case agent will want to go out and knock on the door
and do what's called a knock andtalk or an arranged interview or

(01:11:46):
a field interview or an impromptu interview.
They want to do a bump in the field at a restaurant and ask
this person questions. And when you do that, you
usually get the subject kind of hanked up.
That's kind of the word that people use.
They get kind of a squirrelly because now the feds or the law
enforcement officers, the cops have come and talk to them.
And so they may act a little bitdifferently than they would
otherwise. You can squeeze people and then
see where it squirts out. This is sort of like the water

(01:12:07):
balloon theory. You squeeze and where does it
pop out? That's where you want to go.
So sometimes you'll use surveillance to be able to watch
somebody know what their normal pattern is and then squeeze them
and see what the change in that pattern would be.
Let me tell you very, very clearly that my surveillance
team was regularly used for another thing called CYA, which
is that somebody might be accused at some point in time of

(01:12:27):
being involved in some sort of obscure violence plot.
And rather than have to answer for how they got away with it,
they would park me and my team at $10,000 a shift when it comes
to salary and operating costs and all the equipment we had.
And they would do that for threeshifts in a row, 24/7 for as
long as they needed to. To the point where we actually
sat on a guy who was in the Marine Corps and had no access

(01:12:49):
to anything and was living on base with a camera outside of
his door. And we sat there for literally
months at $30,000 a day. OK.
The Bureau does not care about wasting your money.
They do not care about wasting surveillance resources.
And CYA was a regular thing thatwe did.
Management wanted to say we did something.

(01:13:10):
Well, can you prove it? I sure can check this out
because this is not what I wouldconsider significant resources.
But they did it anyway. Almost immediately after the FBI
identified multiple persons of interest, blah blah, blah, blah
blah. Documentation obtained by the
subcommittee. Person of interest identified
morning of January 5th, blah blah blah blah blah.
They have person of interest too, walking around.
What did they say? Oh.

(01:13:30):
In the following week after January 6th, the FBI directed
significant resources towards investigating POI two and three.
For example, the FBI placed bothPOI 2 and POI 3 under Pfizer.
That was my job. Pfizer FISUR or physical
surveillance, which was held by Washington Field Offices WFO
Special Operations team, also known as SOG.

(01:13:52):
For those of you who have never seen what goes on in this
office, allow me to point something out to you right back
here. That's my plaque that came from
that squad ID 21, which is whereI worked.
It says Washington Field Office Special Operations Group.
For those of you that are on my locals, you guys have seen the
tour of the studio and that's what's there.
OK. We were the significant
resources deployed along with others.

(01:14:14):
One of the things you would do when you put those resources on
is you would leave them on as long as humanly possible.
You would never tell anybody what was going on.
You would let them just sit there and I sat there and peed
in a bottle and saw nobody all the time for sometimes weeks on
end. It was regular.
Why did they put us on for two days, pull us off and then go do
the interview and not follow thepeople after the interview to

(01:14:36):
see what the squeeze was? When you can answer that, you'll
understand exactly why Dan Bongino thought that there was a
put up job and a cover up. A lot of people think that.
Some people still do. One would think is it
potentially the biggest setup inthe history of this country?
Potentially one of the greatest crimes against the American
people. That's why it's so.
Important to get the truth with this.

(01:14:56):
That's what we're working for and the cover ups that happened
after January 6th is what I'm really after as well.
What about the Republicans involved in those cover ups?
I know it's hard for you to address those things.
This is your own party, but thisis the reality.
I mean, we're going to go where evidence leads, no matter what.
No matter what, I'm going to hold you to that.

(01:15:17):
Yes, that was Congressman Loudermilk.
We're going to hold him to it, aren't we?
I think we can. I think that'll be OK.
I think that we're in good shapewith that.
Who else can we believe that doesn't seem to understand or
seems to understand what the problem is?
Here's this other guy. Here's my question.
Is anybody representing the people anymore?

(01:15:38):
Because it kind of feels like itused to feel like you at the
parties were against each other,and now it feels like it's the
government versus the people. That's what it feels like.
I think it is. I mean, I call it the UNI party.
Last year Marjorie Taylor Green and I introduced a resolution to

(01:15:58):
oust Mike Johnson after Mike Johnson put a bill on the floor
and was a tie breaking vote to send more money to Ukraine after
he passed another omnibus. After he passed another bill to
spy on Americans using mostly Democrat votes because a lot of
Republicans are waking up to that and didn't vote for it.
After he did like 3 or 4 really bad things, Marjorie and I put a

(01:16:22):
resolution on the floor. Which you think are bad things,
right? I think they're bad things.
Spying. Spying on Americans, sending all
the money to Ukraine. Yeah, I think they are.
I think they're not Republican priorities.
And so, and he's a Republican speaker.
So we put a resolution on the floor to vacate the speaker's
office. And what does that mean to get a
new speaker? Get a new speaker and typically

(01:16:45):
no Democrat will vote for that and if he if he doesn't have
enough Republicans to to sustainthat vote, he will lose and you
get a new speaker. Why would no Democrat vote for
that? Well, for the first time in
history, they did like they did vote to keep Mike Johnson
because it was as good as they've ever had it.
They were getting everything they wanted you.

(01:17:05):
Believe he was. He was helping their party.
Yeah, he was helping their party, so they.
Let's just leave it right there.You guys think Mike Johnson is
helping anybody? I don't.
Massey doesn't. That's why I like him.
No, we don't have to agree with everything that Massey says, but
it turns out he's pretty spot onwith that.
He calls out the unit party where it is and isn't it time
when you guys brought up the surveillance thing as the rubber

(01:17:27):
gun squad? So I want to actually, sometimes
our chat brings up some really salient points.
So if you guys are not joining our our morning chat, if you
have the opportunity, come in and join us.
Like I read the chat while the videos are playing.
I oftentimes will see things that catch my eye.
One of the things that just was was trolled on there was, hey,
wasn't, wasn't the special operations group, wasn't the SOG
squad? Aren't they the rubber gun
squad? That's a slang term in, in law
enforcement for the people that basically suck so much that they

(01:17:47):
can't actually do real work. So you got to send them out
there to get rid of them. I have a different name for SOG
and it's one of the things that got me in trouble with former
FBI guys that really wanted to go up there and burnish their
reputation. I don't mind telling you that
the stuff that I did was often times not very interesting,
glamorous, or even like really impressive.
It actually wasn't most of the time.
The SOG, the the, the surveillance squad, I call it

(01:18:09):
the Island of Misfit Toys, rightfrom the original little like
Rudolph Claymation thing. It's a bunch of people that
couldn't get along with other groups.
Like they either were like real smart and they were hard
chargers and they went to like alow charging area And so they
didn't fit in, or they were people that were just
personality problems or they were just too old and lazy and
didn't want to work. Or maybe they'd already done a
bunch of other work and they wanted to sit out and be part of

(01:18:30):
the team. We had a whole mix of people.
Some were great with some reallylegendary type characters out
there. We had some totally useless
people that couldn't even show up with their equipment every
day. And I'm not even sure if they
were armed. Like fat, lazy, out of like I
had a guy that showed up drunk to multiple shifts and I sent
them home when I was a team leader.
So yeah, it was was kind of the rubber gun squad in a lot of
ways. The difference was after we got
rid of John Nance as our supervisor.

(01:18:51):
Oops, I said that. But yeah, he got moved out by by
the inspection division. He went over to handle an
aviation squadron, even though he's not a pilot, knows nothing
about planes, including transponders.
When he went over there and did that, we got a new supervisor in
and he was a former HRT guy. And so HRT is the hostage rescue
team. They're probably like the
hardest charging most like physically killer athlete stud
operator type dudes. They're not necessarily the best

(01:19:11):
case agent, but this guy was actually really, really squared
away and he was a W pointer and he was a former Ranger battalion
dude. And so he was like what you'd
hope if you wanted to put together like kind of a team of,
of studs that wanted to go do real work when you had a group
that previously didn't. So we implemented a fitness
standard which had never been done at Washington Field and we
actually set the standard. I actually got awarded for the
work that we did rebuilding thatSOG squad.

(01:19:34):
And by the time January 6th rolled around, we were
considered the second maybe and one of the few non all SWAT but
tactically oriented and SOG squads where we had former cops
and guys who knew how to shoot and guys who could run down.
And we had multiple language. We had Arabic and Spanish
speakers. We could go and do like really,
really advanced and capability driven surveillance, which was

(01:19:55):
not common in the FBI. And so we were recognized for
that. I actually got an award for like
3 grand. They wrote me a check saying
like you did an awesome job. And I got it from none other
than Jen Moore who ended up firing me.
So that's pretty interesting. So yes, that was the case.
And on that day, the people who were the studs that we had put
together and gotten there, we'reactually watching on this
particular moment. So you'd think that there'd be
some information that would actually help them unless they

(01:20:18):
were willing to cover it up. And here's why you're not
hearing anything from today's FBI.
They got compromised. They got captured by the FBI.
That doesn't mean that somebody,like, showed them a picture of
them, you know, sleeping around on their wife or something like
that. What it means is that for
whatever reason, their instinctsnow aligned with the FBI more
than they aligned with what theyused to say.
Here's Kash Patel doing it Underoath, and look what he

(01:20:38):
does. He immediately spins, diffuses,
deflects, answers, not at all. And we've never seen the
information that he has while he's talking to Dick Durbin
here. Apparently he had lots of
evidence. Where the hell is it?
Steve Baker got it. And he beat you to your own
story. Director Patel, much like you,
Deputy Director Don Bongino, wasa conspiracy theorist who built

(01:21:02):
a lucrative career making inflammatory and unsubstantiated
statements about the FBI that would be disqualifying in any
administration that cared about nonpartisan law enforcement.
For instance, Mr. Bongino calledthe placement of pipe bombs
outside the DNC and RNC headquarters on January 6th,
quote an inside job and went on to say this was a setup I've

(01:21:25):
zeroed out and whoever goes intothe FBI, you better get an
answer about why Director Patel,you and Deputy Director Bongino
are now leading the FBI. What is the evidence to suggest
the pipe bombs placed outside ofthe DNC and RNC on January 6th
were an inside job? I appreciate the opportunity to
discuss Director Bongino's mind record.

(01:21:47):
So many on this committee in themedia jettison are 31 years of
public service. Prior to taking.
I'm answering the question. You're you're questioning the
integrity of the deputy directorof the FBI and mine.
And I'm going to answer the question.
The pipe bomb investigation is ongoing.
And I'm not going to discuss thedetails of the pipe bomb
investigation. Mr. Bongino was a Secret Service

(01:22:08):
agent for 15 years, a police officer for five.
I served this country in multiple administrations for 16
years. We were also private citizens.
And we are now back in government service.
And what we have the ability to do is set aside our personal
beliefs to deliver the mission of justice for this country.
And we're doing it day in and day out.
And I find it disgusting that everyone and anyone would
jettison our 31 years of combined experience that is now

(01:22:29):
at the helm of the FBI, delivering historic results at
historic speeds for the Americanpeople.
So you have no evidence? I got a lot of evidence and I'll
give it to you when I can. I'm.
Looking forward to it. You're so full of shit.
How sad is that, that you went out and gave that speech and you

(01:22:50):
thought that was, like, dominating?
You're like, yeah. Do you think he wrote, you guys
ever see it? Like, there was this kind of
scandal after he did one of these things?
He wrote himself little affirmations on his director of
Cash Patel letterhead and he made himself little tablets that
said director of Cash Patel. You know, not from the director
of the FBI or like the office ofthe FBI director.
No, no, it says Director Cash Patel on his little document

(01:23:12):
pages. And he's out there like writing
himself, like he did a good job.That was a great answer.
Like stay in the pocket. Like keep it going like you're
doing it. Tell him what's up.
Dick Durbin's a jerk, you know, like this kind of stuff.
He was writing himself affirmations.
This dude is a clown. And I had no idea.
And I'm so ashamed that I didn'tknow that Dick Durbin owned you.
Dick Durbin, who is not going togo back for re election.
It's Nick Durbin who's done and he's been doing this forever and

(01:23:34):
he's exhausted. He's 1000 years old and he
doesn't even care whether or nothe cares.
And he still owned you. He said, can you answer the
question? You're like, no, I'm going to go
on my freaking speech about how great I am.
Can you imagine that I would ever yell to you?
He's like, he's like a Mark Levin.
Anyway, that was amazing. That was amazing to me because

(01:23:56):
he said I'm going to show you the evidence.
Well, that was months ago. Where are you at, bro?
All you're doing is blocking access to the jet with your most
transparent nonsense. How sad.
How pathetic are we right now with these guys?
And what have you done? You've sent your freaking crappy
Blue Crabs out there to pull thecrabs that are trying to climb

(01:24:17):
out of the basket and give people the truth.
You're trying to pull them back in.
So there's a live view of Jilly Kelly at the bottom.
They're trying to pull Steve Baker, who's.
Almost out. He's almost got it.
I feel like we nailed it. I think the information that
they've got is going to be very substantial.
The problem is, is none of thesepeople have actually evaluated
the evidence that Blaze has. Do you know how I know?

(01:24:37):
Because nobody has seen what they've done.
They went out there to a intelligence agency and or
intelligence adjacent sort of situation kind of being
deliberately vague here on purpose because it's not my
story to tell. And I don't want to expose
anybody else's, you know, equities here or their or their
sourcing. If you guys think that that
biometrics such as gait analysisis some random connection.

(01:25:01):
And you had Julie Kelly on ban and crying about how there's bad
footage. The FBI put it out and they
didn't use the bad footage. So we've got questions.
Well, did you go do any originalwork?
How many hours has Julie Kelly spent in the Capitol Police CCTV
footage room? Anybody know?
I'm going to be willing to bet that it is like a whole number
that is less than 10. Baker's is in the hundreds of

(01:25:22):
hours spent in there, as is the rest of his team.
They've spent thousands of combined hours going over the
stuff, and then some of the stuff was actually downloaded.
And so they did it at home. Thousands of hours of time
pouring over hundreds of different cameras, looking at
the same thing from as many angles as they can find,
reaching through, figuring out, walking the grounds, looking for

(01:25:44):
more cameras. Would they have an angle here?
What number is that camera rightthere?
Oh, it's #675 OK. Can we get the time stamp from
675 and go in and zoom in on this?
What can we do? Can we enhance this at all?
Blah, blah, blah blah blah. These guys busted their ass to
find a story and rather than people going thank God, you're
going to expose truth, They're like come back into the barrel
with us where we don't know anything.

(01:26:06):
It's really embarrassing that spin is going to keep going on.
Where are the guys that we thought were going in to run
these agencies? Because once you pull this down
and this goes back to the beginning, the weight that's
sitting on the shoulder right now, when somebody calls you and
tells you that the people get killed for what you're talking
about, it's because the implications are, this is the
implications of maybe the middleend of what the story could look

(01:26:27):
like. Capitol Police officers involved
in placing a bomb at the Capitolon January the 5th.
Then those same Capitol Police officers allegedly go out there
and then are engaged in the lessthan lethal munitions used to
stir up a crowd, hoping that they would be something that
would be more terroristic and more aggressively violence and
potentially even bloodshed on the day of January 6th.
Who asked those people to do it?Who do they answer to?

(01:26:49):
Well, they roll up one place. They roll up to the speaker of
the House and the Senate Majority Leader.
So you've got people in Congressas part of it.
Then you have that person transferred over the CIA where I
had an FBI source tell me yesterday, we moved people to
the CIA when we wanted them to disappear and go away, not
because like they earned a promotion, but because we wanted
to stash them somewhere. And the CIA has the ability to

(01:27:10):
go wipe their social media. And they do this because they
have covert operatives that comeand work for them.
So isn't that a good place to gostash somebody, even if it's a
lateral job? It's actually more prestigious
to work for Capitol Police than to work for force protection
over at CIA. Folks.
Just telling you, as far as likethe ladder of federal law
enforcement honor goes, being a security guard at the CIA is not

(01:27:30):
a promotion, but it is a place where they have the ability to
scrape, scrape all your stuff. And you think there wasn't a
polygraph? So who let the polygraph slide
if that's the case? That's what we got to know.
And that means that somebody made some phone calls.
And then why did the FBI pull off the case in mid January when
my team was sitting outside thisdoor and we were 9 feet away

(01:27:53):
from the right door? Per Steve Baker story?
That's the question that has to be asked.
And the people who could answer it, they're not saying anything.
They haven't weighed in. The reward still, what did, what
did Dan call it? A $21 trillion reward, AKA
500,000. All right, this is what we're
dealing with here. We're dealing with people that

(01:28:14):
don't want to be honest. And it's coming.
It turns out the truth finds a way out eventually.
It comes out a lot faster in theInternet era and it comes out a
lot faster when a couple of people have some bravery.
So thank God for that too. That's it.
That's what we're going to talk about today.
This week's going to be nuts forme.

(01:28:35):
I think it might be nuts. If you guys are paying attention
to this, I hope you share it. I hope you share the podcast
with somebody who doesn't understand what it is that's
going on. And you guys can do that over at
kyleserifandshow.com. Just pick up that link, send it
to a friend, say, yo, you got tolisten to the last episode.
Please do it. We need to share people.
We need to have this spin cycle get dismembered as fast as we
can. You can join us on locals.
If you guys want to see some of the extra resources we put out,

(01:28:56):
call serafin.com. By the way, the we, it's just
me. I'm sorry.
I don't mean to say that it's just me though.
And you, you guys are the other part of it.
And so you can like us, you can share the video, you can share
the video, you can share the video, you can share the video.
You can subscribe over on YouTube.
You can subscribe over on rumbleand and you haven't, if you
haven't subscribed on Spotify, if you're an audio only
listener, again, no additional money for me.
It doesn't make a difference where you listen other than I

(01:29:17):
think the format is better on Spotify because you can close it
out. You can open it back up again
and still get the audio just like you would on Apple Pie
Podcast or iheart or anything else.
But you can also push a button and flip over to video when you
want to see something. And maybe you're curious about
what that really tasteless art looks like, or maybe you want to
see Dan Bongino's cutesy Time shirt.
Whatever it is, if you want to see the crabs that are pulling
each other back in the visuals here, the show is not the most

(01:29:38):
visual thing in the world. It's just me pushing buttons.
But it does have the opportunityfor you to see some of the
things that I'm making in a visual point.
So that's my pitch. I really appreciate you guys.
I didn't give you a palate cleanser yesterday and I did
feel kind of bad about it, so let's just go completely off the
reservation and do something funny.
You know who are great? We had a Marine Corps birthday
the other day. Let's honor Marines and their
ingenuity to entertain themselves in the barracks.

(01:30:00):
Here's a palette cleanse for today.
Marines are always on the lookout for a new ways to
entertain themselves and stumbled upon a peculiar ritual
where they dipped the Cheetos and a small amount of Nyquil and
left them out as bait for a local squirrel population.
Once the squirrel were sedated, the Marines would meticulously
shave officer ranks into their fur.

(01:30:20):
This ritual was dubbed Squirrel Salute, and when the squirrels
woke up sporting their new officer military Insignia,
whenever they would wander into the Marines area, all Marines
would say on deck and proceed tosalute the incoming officers.
This odd pastime continued without incident until one

(01:30:42):
particularly feisty squirrel, now sporting the rank of
Lieutenant, woke up earlier thananticipated.
Most likely enraged and likely disoriented, it sought
retribution, sinking its teeth into the Marines finger as he
attempted to complete his commissioning process.
Hoorah, that's what happens. Do not go and drug squirrels
with Nyquil and Cheetos and shave officer ranks into them.

(01:31:04):
The squirrel salute is not an acceptable form of salute, but
it is a really good way to entertain yourself.
I guess it's better than Midget hookers, which is a story I've
heard from guys in the Army. So well done Marine Corps.
Congrats to all of you that haveserved.
Regardless of whether you guys would send your kids into it, I
thank you for your service. This country is better off
because you're out there in it. Even if you're just a voice
that's listening and saying, I'mstill going to hold true to my

(01:31:25):
principles and the values that Ihad.
God bless you. Look forward to seeing you guys
again tomorrow. Do it again at 0930 Eastern Time
or thereabouts. Watch out for that spin cycle.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSeraphin Show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle

(01:31:47):
Seraphin.

All Episodes

BOMBED! FBI tries to SPIN the UNSPINNABLE Pipe Bomber revelation | Ep 674

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}BOMBED! FBI tries to SPIN the UNSPINNABLE Pipe Bomber revelation | Ep 674