FAILED: Republicans celebrate funding government they cried was spying on them | Ep 676 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:21):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well hello my friends, welcome

(00:49):
to the Kyle Serafin show. Today is Thursday, it is
November the 13th and we had a little trouble out the gates
because for some reason nothing wanted to work.
I always like it when the servers won't connect.
It's my favorite part of doing this job that I'm completely
reliant on some things that are outside my business.
It turns out, though, the thingsthat I am not reliant on is the
federal government, which just decided they were going to open

(01:10):
last night to thunderous applause and to the loss of a
fantastic opportunity to hack away at government waste and
government agencies and things that we don't need.
And honestly, none of you are going to notice a difference in
your day as you go unless you'reinvolved in air travel, I guess,
which is more of an argument that we should get rid the
federal government's involvementin these things.
Somebody asked me the other day,hey, well, what would we do with

(01:32):
all some of these federal agencies?
I don't know, devolve them to the states?
That's the that's the honest answer that that constitutional
libertarians would say. It's so simple to think about
it. The functional unit of our
nation is not meant to be a bunch of people hanging out in
Washington, DC. There's not supposed to be 535
people plus the president and a bunch of executive agencies that
run your life. And basically, they don't,

(01:53):
although they take all of our money and they decide what to
do. Coming back our way.
What if, novel idea, we actuallyembraced the name of this
country and we had a bunch of states that were united, which
means that they all had their own abilities to do what they
wanted to do. I don't know why this is really
difficult for folks. I don't understand why
Republicans didn't embrace theiropportunity, except we kind of

(02:14):
do know why, I guess if we're being totally fair, because that
would mean that they didn't matter as much.
We can't have that. So talk about government
opening. We're going to talk about a trip
to China. And you guys probably heard this
a little bit earlier on in this administration.
Sometime around the summer, almost the beginning of the
summer, the Trump administrationstarted marching out talking

(02:34):
points saying that they essentially had solved the
problem of murder, or at least they had so dramatically
decreased it that it was not going to be a problem for people
anymore. The murder rate in this country
was going to be the lowest ever.It's still a murder rate.
They're still going to be peopledoing it.
But that was the kind of the claim they wanted to go and
claim ownership of it before they even got halfway through
the year. And the newest claim coming

(02:55):
directly from director of Valhalla out of China is that
they solved drugs being a bit flippant here, but apparently
the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party, which has been involved
in exporting precursors to making fentanyl and other
synthetic opiates to cartels andso on around Mexico and others,

(03:16):
they're now done doing that. They do it on purpose, by the
way. They wanted the United States to
have the difficulty. They wanted to be able to take
all the folks that were sad, that were depressed that we're
looking at a bad economy or low outcomes or a diminishing
capabilities of being in the middle class.
And they thought, what if we could just export that and, you
know, accelerate the decline. The Chinese are very asymmetric

(03:38):
thinkers and long term, but now they're done with that because
they said so, because Kash Patel, he's so intimidating when
he goes into China. This one guy who can't follow
through on almost anything. He solved drugs first, he solved
murder, but actually it was Donald Trump and then they

(03:58):
solved drugs. Of course, it was Donald Trump
who actually did the negotiations, even though it was
cash Patel doing the negotiations.
No mention, by the way, of the Chinese investments that he has
or what the heck he was doing, why he had to go to China to
make this decision. And anyway, we got some stuff
from that. There's a press conference and
then the ongoing saga of the J6 pipe bomber reveal, which was

(04:22):
done last week. Over the weekend, Steve Baker,
Joe Hanneman, The Blaze, they shared a wild story that still
has 0 explanation from law enforcement.
And we just got our first reply.There's been these kind of like,
shady questions. There was another whistleblower

(04:43):
that came forward out of the FBI, not me.
And yesterday we got an emergency release from the
whistleblower attorney Kurt Suzdak, who's representing this
person. I know Kurt.
I know what Kurt does and he said that the Washington Field
office is planning to hold a meeting in 20 minutes from this
moment that I am recording this.So for those of you that are

(05:04):
listening, in 20 minutes, the Washington Field office of the
FBI, where I used to work, is holding a meeting in order to
suss out who is this whistleblower.
And we can pretty much guaranteethat there will be an attempt at
retaliation in violation of 28 CFR Part 2, seven.
I think that's what it is. I'll show it on the screen in a
moment. The old FBI, the new FBI, it's

(05:25):
all the same FBI. And so somebody's life is in the
balance as usual. Oh, I see the chat asking a good
question. Isn't that illegal to go after a
whistle blower? You bet you're damn bippy it is.
And yet, do they care? Of course they don't care.
That's why the FBI is what it is.
Come on now, you guys should know better than that.
If you watch this program, let'sget started by saying if you

(05:46):
want to protect your digital footprint, something the pipe
bomber should have done. Oh, wait.
Luckily they had a government agency to go and lose the
records. You guys want to make sure that
you keep your data secure when you're moving.
If you want to stop signals coming in and out of your phone,
Faraday Technology from my friends over at
silentitsslnt.com is a great answer for that.
Doesn't matter whether it's a government agency or big tech or

(06:07):
the corporate data brokers or cyber criminals or anybody else
that wants to figure out where the heck you're going.
Sniffing out all of those littlefootprints and the bread crumbs
that are being left. One of the things I saw, I
believe the the Bureau actually tried to go out there and ping
all the routers at the so-calledpipe bomber person was a walking
past because your phone is constantly reaching out to them.

(06:27):
If you want to shut down wireless, cellular, GPS, near
field communication, RFID, all those things.
If you wanted to not be leaving your device and you want to be
able to have a moment of silencein this crazy world, SLN t.com
slash Kyle. The backpacks are fantastic.
Their waste packs are really good.
They make things that keep radiation away from your body,

(06:47):
which is not a bad idea. All of their ideas.
They really all their their products are there.
They're super sharp. So the the Faraday sleeve is in
the the back here. It actually sits behind in this
pocket in the front is an overt sleeve that keeps it away from
your body, but it allows it still to receive signals.
You can actually choose your level of engagement, which is
kind of cool. If you guys didn't know this,
they're well thought out products just like that.

(07:07):
Having an extra pocket is brilliant and it could be used
for chargers or other things as well.
The backpacks again, E3 everydayFaraday backpack.
That's my go to riot bag whenever the food riot start or
whatever is going to happen next.
Check them out silent SLN t.com slash Kyle.
Save 15% on any purchase you make there.
The qualified purchases are going to get free shipping.
Look in the link below and let'sdo today's program.

(07:29):
Don't put your bag in the fair day.
Don't put your phone in the Faraday bag just yet.
Here we go. And so the government shutdown
has ended the way that it began,which is that the impact was
almost none. The government funding deal

(07:51):
would reverse some of Trump's mass federal firings, we found
out. But more importantly, or
potentially, I guess more accurately, it doesn't make a
difference. No Democrat agencies, which he
claimed would be shut down were shut down.
We have the same amount of government that we had
yesterday. So my disappointment is now
complete. But you probably knew that it
would sound like cheers and applause.

(08:12):
That's what we do. Here's Smithers.
You can see him on the screen and others that are going to
stand behind the signature into a continuing resolution that
never was meant to be. Why was it not meant to be?
Oh, because the guy said it two years ago.
We're done with continuing resolutions.
We're never going to do any moreof these things.
We're finished with it. We're going to do respectful
stewardship of your money. Just kidding.

(08:33):
Smithers for the loss again. Donald Trump claiming a victory.
So with all of that, I just wantto tell you the country has
never been in better shape. We went through this short term
disaster with the Democrats because they thought it would be
good politically. And it's an honor now to sign
this incredible bill and get ourcountry working again.

(08:55):
Thank you very much. Yay.

(09:29):
Part of the reason that clappingwent on so long is because Trump
has a very long signature, whichis one of his best assets.
That's that signature is iconic for sure.
But they were all just standing there waiting for him to do it.
Then he turns it around and he holds it up.
If you were just listening, that's what you missed.
President Donald Trump signed the bill Wednesday night, last
night officially opening the government after a 43 day

(09:49):
shutdown. They got the record after the
House passed a baripartisan funding bill.
Why it matters is a signature. This is from Axios.
I have it on pretty good authority that Donald Trump
reads Axios every morning. Did you guys know that?
Do you think that's why they released the memo there on the
Epstein thing at Axios? Because Trump reads it?
Huh. I can't unhear that.

(10:10):
I had a couple of people that are in a position to find these
kind of things out. Very, very unusual to find out
that that's what he got. Where I don't go to Axios almost
ever. I guess I should add it to my my
my list. Then we can see what the White
House briefing looks like. Donald Trump's signature on the
bill ends the longest federal shutdown in government history,
left thousands of workers without pay and disrupted
services across the country for nearly seven weeks.
Can, please, can, can please andthank you.

(10:32):
You please and thank you. Please put the government
services that you were unable toenjoy in the comments below.
Maybe it's just 'cause I work out of my house now and I don't
go enjoy government services, whatever they are.
I don't know what changed, and I'm kind of baffled that they
thought that they could just saythat we were without services,

(10:53):
whatever those services were. Anyway.
Let me know what they are, if you don't mind.
I would love to find out what itwas that I was missing out on
that I didn't realize. 6 Democrats, and that's going to
include Democrats from Maine andCalifornia and North Carolina
and Washington state, New York, Texas voted to support.
So you got some little cross partisanship there.
It's hard to call it bipartisan when basically all but six

(11:15):
people have not signed on. But whatever, they made it move
across the finish line. You had the controlled
opposition. Look, that is what you need.
I hope we can agree that a government shutdown should be
never, that the government should never be shut down again.
That's what he said. Great.
The thing is, is he made a claimthat the country has never been
stronger. Did you guys hear that too?

(11:37):
Is that, is that what's going on?
He made a couple other claims. Wants to blame it on Democrats.
We just can't get away from the silly blame game.
So this is still all theater andit continues to be sort of
really frustrating. If you once you notice it,
you're just going like, this is,it's like watching a bad movie.
It's bad acting, it's bad scripting, it's bad writing,
it's predictable outcomes. We know it's coming up next.

(12:00):
And then it's like, well, let's play the game where we blame
everybody. Here we go.
For the past seven weeks, the Democrats shut down as inflicted
massive harm. They caused 20,000 flights to be
cancelled or delayed. They departed so many times, so,
so late. People were hurt so badly.
Nobody's ever seen anything likethis one.

(12:20):
This was a no brainer. This was an easy extension, but
they didn't want to do it the easy way.
They had to do it the hard way. And they look very bad.
The Democrats do. They deprived more than
1,000,000 government workers from their paychecks and cut off
food stamp benefits for millionsand millions more Americans in
need. They caused 10s of thousands of

(12:41):
federal contractors and small businesses to go unpaid.
And the total effect of the damage here antics cause will
take weeks and probably months to really calculate accurately,
including the serious harm that they did to our economy and to
people and the families. So I just want to tell the
American people, you should not forget this when we come up to

(13:04):
midterms and other things. Don't forget what they've done
to our country. You also want to call for a
termination to the filibuster sothat this can never happen
again. He went on to say what they
would do if they terminated the filibuster.
Don't forget this at the midterms, he said.
ABC News covered this one. Trump urges voters to remember

(13:25):
Democrats caused the shutdown. That's what he thinks is going
to resonate with people. People don't remember government
shutdowns unless they work in the government.
There's a few million people, I guess that that affects, but not
the 10's and 10s of millions that you need to come out and
win during the midterms. So what do people remember?
They remember some questions about Jeffrey Epstein's files

(13:46):
and what was going on there and how disappointed they were to
find out that they were promisesthat we're not going to be kept.
They remember things like guys going into the FBI claiming that
they were going to solve the bigcases, cocaine in the White
House. They're going to hold people
accountable. The deep state was going to be
destroyed. They were going to wreck the

(14:06):
swamp and drain it and go ahead and hang all these people out.
It would be prosecutions. No, there would not be.
There's like a little narrator in the back of my head going,
you know, that would not be the case.
Just want to tell American people, you shouldn't forget
this. Come up on the midterms.
Well, The thing is, is that midterms, they're not what drive
people to the polls unless there's an emotional thing

(14:28):
behind it. I don't think a shutdown a year
from the midterms is going to bethe thing that does it.
I think saying dumb things aboutwhat's going on in this country
might do it. I think making some claims about
whether or not, you know, Americans can actually do simple
things and are able to, I don't know, get higher education.

(14:52):
They think like what can they can improve their their station
in life. That seems problematic.
This interview that that Fox News did.
And they tend to be kind of a fluffy for this, for this
administration. It's really damning.
The more you listen to it, the more you can just go.
He's completely out of touch. I'm going to play the Epstein
stuff in a second because that'scoming up.
But let's just hone in on that. It's the Democrats fault.

(15:14):
America's never been stronger. That's the message you want to
go with, I guess project strength and then tell people it
don't matter that you'd rather have a bunch of foreign students
and Chinese students and H1 BS and some of this, it's real sad.
This is just AI think this week has been as disastrous as any
between seeing that the law enforcement aspect of IT, people
are willing to not talk about it.

(15:34):
We did finally get a response from the FBI about Steve Baker's
story that dropped on the weekend.
And then we've got Trump coming out and saying, yeah, we're
going to, you know, the country's great, everything's
amazing. Your life is incredible.
It's all me. I did a great job.
We solved murder. We solved drugs.
Chinese students are awesome. How did you not know?
Listen, I mean, does this hit for you?
Is this what's going to make yougo bit vote at a midterm

(15:55):
election? Or are you just going to sit
home? Folks are not thrilled about
this idea of hundreds of thousands of foreign students in
the United States. We have about 350,000 Chinese.
One point during COVID you were going.
To, you know, push to. You know, get them out.
But that was pulled back. You've said as many as 600,000
Chinese students could come to the United States.

(16:15):
Why Sir, is that a pro MAGA position when so many American
kids want to go to school and there are places not for them
and these universities are getting rich off Chinese money?
Sure. Never said about China, but I we
do have a lot of people coming in from China.
We always have China and other countries.
We also have a massive system ofcolleges and universities, and

(16:38):
if we were to cut that in half, which perhaps makes some people
happy, you would have half the colleges in the United States go
out of business. So what?
Well, I think it's a big deal. Are they?
You would have the and for the United States.
Yeah. But you would have, as you know,
historically black colleges and universities would all be out of
business and you would have a system of colleges and

(17:00):
universities. So we're dependent.
On China to keep our. Universities, but, but I think
it's good to have. I actually think it's good to
have outside countries. Look, I want to be able to get
along with the world. They're not the French, they're
the Chinese. They spy on us.
They steal our intellectual. Property.
What do you think the French arebetter?
Yeah, really. I'll tell you, I'm not so sure.
We've had a lot of problems withthe French where we get taxed

(17:22):
very unfairly on our technology with, you know, they put 25%
taxes on American products. Look, assuming everyone treats
us badly because that's the way I am, but we take in trillions
of dollars from students. You know, the students pay more
than double when they come in from most foreign countries.

(17:43):
I want to see our school system thrive, but at the same time, I
want to, I know you and I disagree.
We're never going to agree on it, but that's OK.
And it's not that I want them, but I view it as a business.
We have millions and millions ofpeople.
Also, I want to get along with countries if possible.
You know, people are shocked. Remember Hillary Clinton said
we'll be in a war. I stopped 8 wars in the last

(18:04):
nine months. I I don't want to be in wars.
If I am in a war, we're going towin the thing fast and it'll be
violent. But you know what?
I don't want to be in wars. But one thing.
What is he doing? By the way?
Great job Laura Ingraham, just asking real questions.
Outstanding work. The H1B store thing we played

(18:24):
yesterday, I'll play it again because the tone deaf nature of
claiming our country is in brilliant shape and nobody
should be complaining. And by the way, remember the
things that did go bad, that's not from me, that was from the
other bad guys. Meanwhile, we're going to sign a
continuing resolution despite having said for literally years
now the Speaker of the House said he would not do them
anymore. How do you handle that kind of

(18:45):
hypocrisy? How can you claim these are the
values? This is what we ran on.
This is America first. She she actually said, is that
MAGA, does it make America greatagain to bring in a bunch of
Chinese people? And Donald Trump's argument was
they give us a lot of money. That is about the most calloused
and awful way. I thought the whole point of the

(19:07):
tariffs was that we were going to tighten our belt, we were
going to lose some business. I've lost sponsorships.
You guys may recognize there aresome people that do not appear
on this program anymore. They said they couldn't afford
due to the price of their importing to be able to sponsor
us. And that's fine.
I understand they made a business decision and it's like,
OK, fine, we're good with that. In so much as you do the other

(19:27):
things you said you were going to cut some government agencies.
You were going to try to fund some of that rest of the
government by using tariffs. That means that it's a
consumption tax on us, right? It is going to be passed on to
us, but only if we choose to partake in products that come
from overseas and that we cannotgenerate here.
That's protecting American businesses.
Are we going to protect Americanstudents that want to go there?
Now, I don't love the universitysystem and I don't necessarily

(19:48):
think that your children should go to college, but a lot of it
is because there are full pricedforeign students that are coming
in to do it. And the other end of it is the
United States government is subsidizing these people so they
can run up the cost. So you're going to go into debt.
Their country's going to go in and subsidized them coming in.
And what do they do? They just pay for access.
Do you know how many, like do you know how many Chinese
students come in here and just like run wild and do wild stuff

(20:09):
like sit outside of military bases and take pictures or they
run a drone? Oh, I didn't know I couldn't do
that. I cannot help but remember when
I was driving around before I got into like actual law
enforcement, I was thinking about being a University of
Texas police officer because it was close to where I lived and
it would be the stepping stone to get into an Academy and, and
work in Texas and local law enforcement.
And that was something I thoughtabout.

(20:30):
It was like a state agency and the Academy was transferable.
I drove around with a cop on a Friday night on the campus of
the University of Texas in Austin and we ended up pulling
over at one point, these Chinesestudents, foreign students, they
were the weirdest looking women you've ever seen, by the way.
They were not normal looking. Like their faces look all
smashed up and they, and they were horrified because there was
a cop behind them. They didn't know what to do.

(20:51):
They didn't understand America. They barely spoke English.
They when we pulled over, there was a girl in the back seat and
she got out and she went and shejust had this like freeze frame
of crazy looking face, didn't know how to pull over.
We followed them for a mile, stop lights, stop signs.
They drove all the way until they got to like a parking lot
and then they parked and then they panicked and the cop got

(21:12):
out and he was super nice to them.
That's what we're importing. We want 600,000 people like that
because of money. I don't, I don't know, man.
I because this guy just lost thethreat.
I mean, I understand he can't run again and this is it, but it
sounds like he wants to not onlylose the midterms, he wants to
basically have his final legacy.I'm already seeing it show up on
some of the commentators that other people are saying the same

(21:33):
thing. January 2027, mark your
calendars. That's when that's when the
impeachment start. You got such a little narrow
window to make progress and do good things.
It's always until the next election.
I thought people understood that.
And these are your snapshots andyour sound bites.
To quote a guy who now works forthe government in the
administration, They're awful. They're they're, they're
legitimately atrocious. Here's the H1B thing we said

(21:55):
yesterday. I don't know how you can give an
interview like that and walk away and then be like, nailed
it. Signed up in the government.
Everything's amazing. There's never going to be a
country like what we have right now and does that the
Republicans have to talk about it.
And does that mean the H1B visa thing will not be a big priority
for your administration? Because if you want to raise
wages for American workers, you can't flood the country with
with with 10s of thousands or. Hundreds of thousands of foreign

(22:17):
workers also do have to bring intalent when the country get
talented. No, no, you don't.
No, you don't. We don't have talent.
No, you don't have you don't have certain talents and you
have to people have to learn. You can't take people off an
unemployment like an unemployment line and say I'm
going to put you into a factory,we're going to make missiles or
I'm going to put how did we? Ever do it before?
Well, let me just, I'll give youan example.

(22:38):
In Georgia, they raided because they wanted illegal immigrants.
They had people from from South Korea that made batteries all
their lives. You know, making batteries are
very complicated. It's not an easy thing and very
dangerous. A lot of explosions, a lot of
problems. They had like 5 or 600 people
early stages to make batteries and to teach people how to do it

(23:02):
well. They wanted them to get out of
the country. You're going to need that,
Laura. I mean, I know you and I
disagree on this. You can't just say a country's
coming in going to invest $10 billion to build a plant and,
you know, take people off an unemployment line who haven't
worked in five years and they'regoing to start making missiles.
It doesn't work that way. Listen, you piece of garbage
who's been on the unemployment line for five years, we can't

(23:25):
put you to work and make missiles because you suck.
We need to bring Koreans in thatknow about batteries.
Who's going to pick the crops? Same energy.
That's what I heard. What I heard Donald Trump say is
who's going to pick these high technology crops in well paying
jobs, whether they be in manufacturing, whether they be
in advanced military technology?Who's going to pick those?

(23:47):
Not going to be you can't be you.
You're too dumb. Like you're not skilled.
And and if you thought that you might go to college to try to
get that squared away so you could up to your your skill
level or maybe increase your sophistication so you could
actually go do that job. Don't be ridiculous.
The Chinese pay way more than you can afford.
So the Chinese government's going to go ahead and send their
students over here who are eventually going to spy on these

(24:09):
technologies. Then they're going to bring them
home. Do you guys know what technology
transfer is? Technology transfer is the thing
that the FBI actually investigates.
It's the the the banner goes under what's called
counterintelligence, counter proliferation.
And what they do is they send people over that start up labs
and technology transfer means they get somebody from an

(24:30):
American University that's doingresearch on the American
taxpayers dollar National Science Foundation grant.
Maybe they have some additional corporate investments.
Yeah, they go ahead and and theybuild these things up.
OK. They build up this this
supercomputing. They build up an algorithmic,
you know, sort of capability. They build up some high level

(24:50):
material science and then the Chinese government will throw
345 times that amount of money at them to go and build a lab
over in China. Well, it doesn't take that much
money to build a lab in China. So that money goes back into the
pockets of the professor or the person.
It's not even illegal half the time because even though we put
our grant money in front of it, and even though we back this
research and you're doing it on the backbone and infrastructure
of American schools where we have huge supercomputing

(25:14):
technology and a, and a, a vast amount like whether you like
them or not, universities actually do create a lot of the
modern products and, and breakthroughs because that's
where people will do things for the sake of doing things.
And then the Chinese just pay that person a bunch of money to
come over there and set the samething up and duplicate that
research. What they're able to do because
they already know what works, doesn't cost nearly as much,

(25:34):
doesn't have any kind of time inbehind it, and then that person
pockets the difference and that's actually considered
legal. It's technology transfer.
So we have to try to see if it'sa dual use technology or a
military application. But they can do it most the
time. Ain't that something Donald
Trump wants to put these students in here so they can be
part of that? You know how many people come in
from China that are ethnically Chinese that are still

(25:56):
dramatically and always will be loyal to the original regime
that they came from, even if they naturalize into citizens
here we had cases open on several of them came to the
United States, became U.S. citizens, worked in our
academia, also went back to China 10 * a year, spent a huge
chunk of their time, skipped outon teaching classes, didn't do
what they were told were tenuredprofessors.

(26:17):
So they were allowed to do it. And that would sponsor by the
boatload Chinese scientists delegations to come in and check
out that water treatment plant. Like we showed you yesterday.
I'm in water treatment. I do advance stuff.
Let me bring a bunch of my Chinese Communist friends and
maybe one spy that's in there orone what's called Co-op D in
there. And then we'll just have them
tour these facilities and then they'll go back and report it

(26:38):
back and see what can they do better.
So they can always be at the head of the best things and they
know how to compromise our stuff.
Like, call me crazy, but that's what I heard Donald Trump
talking about. You know what I didn't hear him
talk about? This would have been a win.
And this just happened yesterdaytoo.
Some reporters tried to ask him about the Epstein files as they
were signing that document. Don't do that.

(26:59):
You can't. That's not allowed.
We're going to just close the book.
Here we go. Thank you very much, everybody.
Mr. President, are you prepared to negotiate with?
Democrats now Mr. President. Mr. President, can you?
Respond to these Epstein emails that were released today.

(27:26):
And the camera goes wild and leaves.
Sorry, we can't talk about that.Couldn't even hear you.
I can't even hear the words, Epstein.
If you say them, they just go right past me.
And I don't even know what you're saying.
What are these people saying? Yeah, it does make the news when
you say that. And guess what, Epstein?
Discharge position has reached the final level.
The final signatures needed to force the House to vote on
releasing these files in an effort to force the House vote

(27:51):
to compel the Justice Departmentto release materials related to
convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was secured.
They got their final vote after the House Speaker delayed the
swearing in of a newly elected Democrat for a total of seven
weeks during the shutdown. The effort, known as a discharge
position, defies House GOP leaders who have opposed putting
legislation that backs it. So you've had ROH Khanna, who's

(28:13):
a Democrat from California and Tom Massie who's a Republican
and kind of independent minded from Kentucky on the floor
talking about it. I've got a couple of little
clips of them. Before we get to that, let's
just talk about it. I feel like things are not going
the right direction. This is not fear mongering.
This is just trend spotting. So we'll just let you know here.
One of the things you can do, add yourself against it.

(28:33):
We've been in bag times in this country. mypatriotsupply.com
slash Kyle is a good website to go check out right now for the
Black Friday Survival Special. A lot of people figured out
emergency food. That's a big deal.
Some of you have stocked up. Good for you, I have as well.
What about cooking it? Do you have Canned Heat?
Do you have a cook stove? Do you have the ability to
handle things if the power grid goes down?

(28:53):
Just additional things you mightthink about.
And if you haven't started any of this stuff, you might check
out the Black Friday Survival Special.
It's four weeks of emergency food.
There's $150.00 worth of free gifts in there and everything
you need to prepare emergency meals like a stove and fuel that
can also keep you warm. Fire starters, water
purification, bug out bag. It goes on
mypatriotsupply.com/kyle's, the website.
It's a complete Survival kit foryour family to ride out a small

(29:15):
disaster, civil unrest, God knows what the hell is coming
in. Makes a good Christmas gift for
somebody that you're worried about that maybe you can't get
to in a short period of time. It's available from now until
Black Friday, so that's just before Thanksgiving.
Head to mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle.
Check out all the things that are included.
You can also just scan the QR code if I'm sitting on your
television screen, which I have found out some of you do.

(29:37):
And that's kind of interesting. I didn't know that people
watched me on TV, but they send me pictures of their TV and
perhaps you can see this picture.
You can just hold your phone up.You have to take it out of the
Faraday bag to do it if you're watching on TV.
And then you just take that 150 bucks in free gear, get yourself
prepared, whatever you got goingon.
These things last for a very long time.
Their food will last up to 25 years in good storage.
So do do what makes sense for you and your family.

(29:57):
You don't want to get caught behind enemy lines with nothing,
right? Epstein stuff.
Let's do some videos of this stuff.
I feel like the Epstein stuff was an issue at some point in
time. Some people talked about it.
Donald Trump's I can't hear you kind of reminds me of another
guy who couldn't hear you. And why are is the Epstein
files? You have been very clear that
there's going to be video evidence that proves that
Epstein killed himself. And I've known you long enough.

(30:19):
If you say it, I believe you andI know it'll be forthcoming.
What explain the priority since you have gotten in this position
and Cash has gotten into his position and Pam has gotten in
her position and and maybe why this didn't go as quickly as
some people anticipated. Well, I lost you a little bit,

(30:40):
but I assume you can hear me. So I'm just going to answer your
question. I can hear you.
Yeah, there has been. Let me get to this first.
I had a graduation ceremony thismorning down in Quantico with
some, with some with a class of new agents.
And I looked every one of them in the eye, shook their hands.
I said, listen, you're going to do this for us.
You're going to protect the homeland and you're going to go
bring me bad guys. You understand?
I said there's no one coming to save us.

(31:01):
The Marvel Avengers ain't coming.
It is us. We are in charge.
We have the counterterrorism portfolio, this president and
this attorney general, they havea a different view than we've
had in the past of the FBI. This is very important.
Your audience understands this. The FBI in the past focused on
large enterprise cases, you know, the Al Capone, John Gotti,

(31:21):
KSM, al Qaeda times and we are still and always going to do
that. But there's a parallel.
Track, I didn't hear anything about the Epstein file.
Am I crazy? Did he ask a question?
And he said, hey, where are the Epstein files?
And Dan said, let me tell you about this graduation I once
went to. If I can bullshit you for long
enough, maybe we could skip out on that stuff.
Why, Why doesn't Dan Bongino talk about the Epstein files

(31:43):
like this was months ago, by theway, This seems pretty
straightforward. Maybe because he let his
spokesperson do the talk. I also don't care about the
Epstein information. I don't care about those files.
I think it's irrelevant. No one is going to be charged.
Everyone got away with it and I,I would much rather dig into
January 6th. Much rather dig.
Into, you've got to get, no. I just have never cared about it

(32:04):
because I've just never cared about those.
Like, I'm a lady. I have millions of dollars, My
husband makes millions of dollars a year.
And I I just don't care about girls potentially being
trafficked. I mean, where were they even
trafficked to? Who were they even trafficked
to? Nobody could even know.
Maybe we'll ask the FBI director.
You've seen most of the files. Who, if anyone, did Epstein

(32:29):
traffic these young women too, besides himself?
Himself, there is no credible information, none.
If there were, I would bring thecase yesterday that he
trafficked to other individuals and the information we have
again is limited. So the answer is no one.
For the information that we have.

(32:49):
In the files. In the case file OK.
Now you've seen. Well, what?
Maybe you should go on Rogan andmake this clear to people
because they probably didn't understand.
Did Jeffrey Epstein kill himself?
Who killed Jeffrey Epstein? This doesn't look right.
It doesn't look like a suicide. And so the way based on public

(33:10):
information at the time that he ended up put the pictures and
him hanging himself, I was like,man, that guy killed himself.
What did you? Think before you got into
office, did you think that Epstein was murdered?
No. No suspicion at all of it.
This doesn't look right. It doesn't look like a suicide,
but I have a different background, right, right.
So I was a public defender back in the day.

(33:31):
When you're in that kind of confinement, we call it solitary
confinement, You're not supposedto have these things that you
are able to hang yourself with. That's the whole point of the
strict rules in there. You're not supposed to have 6
feet of cloth that you can dangle from the ceiling so you
can hang yourself. This is prison one O 1.
I used to spend a lot of time injails and a lot of time in
aggregated housing units, shoes as we call them, right?

(33:54):
So I've spent a lot of time in federal detention facilities as
a public defender before talkingto my clients.
So I kind of know how those workand I know how you get in, how
you get out, who works the system.
He was in isolation. He was in a unit where it's he's
in there not just to protect himself, but he's in there to
protect the rest of the prison population because he was such a

(34:15):
high profile case. And so, and I've known people
that have committed suicide in these cells, in these units.
They're supposed to be 24/7 guard duty on him directly.
It's there's just no way that you could have run an op.
The guard fell asleep. Now, I don't really buy that,

(34:39):
but it's almost impossible to prove otherwise unless you can
obtain the videotape. Well, it's hard to surmise that
from a video. And usually there isn't video
looking into people's cells for a lot of reasons.
And had people go into that celland not have any video of it and
not have any people come out andsay, hey, yeah, I saw that guy.
He shouldn't have been there, The guard or this guy.

(34:59):
So correct me if I'm wrong, but what I was told, what I'd read
was that the guards were not paying attention or were
sleeping. The guard fell asleep.
Now, I don't really buy that. Well, it's hard to surmise that
from a video, right? Like where they like, you know,
And look, do guards doze off on the night shift?
Yeah. What did you think before you

(35:19):
got into office? Did you think that Epstein was
murdered? No.
Kyle, why are you so mean to that guy?
Why do you think he's such a liar?
Oh, maybe because I've watched him lie and you just did too,
right? You've seen most of the files.
Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women too,

(35:43):
besides himself? Himself, there is no credible
information. And how many Republicans do they
go vote for this on the floor? Well, I've already had a couple
Republicans tell my office privately that they're going to
vote for it. And I think that could snowball
to be, you know, the deal for Republicans on this vote is that

(36:05):
Trump will protect you if you vote the wrong way.
In other words, if you vote to cover up for pedophiles, you've
got cover in a Republican primary.
But I would remind my colleaguesthat this vote is going to be on
your record for longer than Trump is going to be president.
And what are you going to do in 2028 and and 2030?
When you're in a debate either with a Republican or a Democrat

(36:28):
and they say, how can we trust you?
You covered up for a pedophile back in, you know, 2025.
Does anyone else remember that when all this was going on,
which goes back to when was thisLook at the the date on here,
July ish. We're going to get some files.
There's Pam Bondi. So that was a couple months and
they had three months. We needed to wait 6 to 8 months.
We're well past that window now.But do you remember when this

(36:49):
drama was going on? But Dan Bongino was outraged
that they were going to do this to him and they they screwed his
reputation. And so he was going to leave.
And Cash Patel said he would leave too.
He would follow him out. He would say no, you will not
run my friend Dan Bongino out because she is doing the work
and I am having all kinds of fun.

(37:10):
I'm going to UFC fights, man. My chick lives in Nashville.
I got to fly places. I got to do stuff.
I got to go hang out in Las Vegas.
Dan Bongino needs to do the crappy job.
That's why he's miserable. Dan Bongino lost it today.
For whatever it's worth, I'm going to read you his full
statement about the other thing that they've screwed up.
So what are they screwed up? The Epstein file release.
I actually seem to remember there's this guy, what was his

(37:31):
name, Dan Bongino talking about Charlie Kirk.
You remember that? That happened in September.
Somebody shot Charlie Kirk in front of a bunch of students and
we were going to get the whole story.
We were going to get the conspiracy that was outside.
Now, I don't think necessarily that there was a conspiracy at
the place. So a lone shooter makes perfect
sense. It wasn't a hard shot.

(37:52):
It's a place that nobody was expecting to come from.
That all makes perfect sense foryou to think otherwise.
That's your business. He went out and immediately ran
to well, he would normally run to Julie Kelly, but Julie Kelly
doesn't ever on show. So he ran to the next best thing
to Julie Kelly, who's actually prettier and more talented.
He ran to Megyn Kelly to let youknow.
We're looking into this stuff. You guys remember this?
How many unfinished on unanswered promises have these

(38:14):
people gone through? We're going to release files.
We're going to find all the things.
We're going to be transparent with you.
And instead, what they did is they claimed they solved murder,
which I'll play in a second. But here's Bongino with Megyn
Kelly talking about how they're going to go out there and round
up the conspiracy surrounding the people that knew better and
helped the Charlie Kirk killer pull it off.

(38:37):
Oh, we got to hit the play button.
Good job, Kyle. Way to go, stand by.
We are go are not done anyone under the assumption out there
that this is you know, the end of the investigation is is
categorically wrong. It's, you know, not even the end
of the beginning of the investment.
Not even the end of the. Beginning, we're exhausting
every lead. There are thousands, there are

(38:58):
thousands of leads that have come in through open source to
our in talk line, through our specific FBI tip line.
Some of them did not pan out. Some of them will pan out, but
some of them may. But we're not, we're not done at
all looking into any. Possible support?
Or aiding and abetting in the case.
Do we believe the Twigs had advanced knowledge of the

(39:18):
shooting, given the fact that heclearly received texts from
Tyler telling him where to find the gun, what was written on the
casings and so on, and that the he had those when you guys went
knocking on his door? Well, given the cooperation of
that subject at this time, I don't want to say too much about
what he's saying or not saying. However, there are indicators

(39:41):
just beyond twigs that there were a lot of warning signs here
in this case. Have you heard of detail yet?
Like a single solitary detail that he put out there?
There were warning signs, there were inklings, there were, there
were what is it? Indications?
Shadow of a penumbra? Like I thought these guys were

(40:04):
supposed to be good at media. I thought you were supposed to
go out there and say simple. Straightforward commutative
declarative sentences. Nope.
And having said that, this is, you know, this is a good moment
to put out there when you look at these targeted violence
attacks, political assassinations of space.
I'm unfortunately all too familiar with in my time with

(40:27):
the Secret Service school shootings.
You're not. Wait a minute, Which targeted
political attacks took place during his time with the Secret
Service? I'm kind of wondering that along
with the sort of same story where Cash Patel said he knew
people who killed himself in specialized housing units in the
shoes, as we call them, per his words.
Do you think there's any chance that Cash Patel had a client

(40:47):
that committed suicide in a federal prison when he was a
public defender? Do we know of any targeted
physical violence attacks that like maybe they exist?
I don't know. These guys always refer to
resume. I see this so frequently.
Refer to resume previous credibility.
Don't worry. What I'm saying right now, it
must be true because previously,you know that I used to say

(41:07):
things to you. And when I did, man, I was so
great doing that stuff. It's hard.
It's hard to go through with that.
And it's not like there's anything better out there.
Here's Tim Burchett telling you.He tried to do it.
He tried to go get them FC files, but doggone it, doggone
it. There's Tim Burchett here and
they didn't work. Hey, everybody, Tim Burchett in

(41:27):
Washington, DC today. Of course, trying to open up the
government, but I tried to make them release the Epstein files.
Yeah, but. That didn't work.
For the Democrats. Democratsmanship, folks.
All theaters in the Files. I'm not part of the theater.
They would have released it. Biden had it for four years and
they're. From anything in the world.

(41:49):
So now they blocked it and. So they can piece meal the truth
and the half truths, both sides of what we went down with
Epstein. Did he say Wet Willie?
Disgusting. Really.
Well, I tried. That's all I can tell you.
That's all we can do. Here, everybody.
Tim Birch. Tim, take it easy there.
All right, Take a take a rest there.

(42:09):
Take a moment. I think he said wet Willie.
He said we tried to do up dip, dip, dip, dip.
Naber dared Aaron seven time phone Tim Wet Willie.
It's not as good as Cash Patel who still has the best dog
online dog Gummit that's been delivered this year.
The most trustworthy thing I've ever heard.

(42:30):
I'll see you. I don't know.
Are they doing anything good? This is what this is our this is
our consolation prize. When you all sent me this, it's
pretty funny. The National Pulse is reporting
that the United States is going to restrict visas for fatties

(42:51):
coming into this country. I wonder if they're going to use
the fat guidelines from the fat girl that we played the other
day who described herself as fat.
I am not calling her fat, even though she isn't, of course fat.
But remember they had like the small fat, the medium fat, and
then the Super fats or some effect.
I should go find that clip. I don't want to misquote her.
Apparently, if you're a fatty, why are they showing a white guy
fatty? That seems weird.
What kind of what kind of fatty foreigners are we bringing in

(43:11):
here anyway? This is pretty funny.
You can't help but smile. This is this is your wins.
We're going to bring in unlimited Chinese people as long
as they're fit. We're going to bring in
unlimited H1B visa. Indian people, as long as
they're fit, They're too fat, they can't come here.
I guess that's OK. It beats fat foreigners.
New guidance issued by the United States Department of

(43:34):
State recommends a denial of immigration visas for foreign
nationals who are obese or overweight.
What do the guidance? Obesity, along with other
medical conditions like cardiovascular disease, cancer
and mental health issues add strain to the country's
healthcare system, causing taxpayers to incur additional
costs. What about all those freaking
illegals we were going to deport?
Remember? We were going to do that.
I remember Donald Trump said mass deportations, but not of

(43:55):
the people that are doing the things that my friends own
businesses that handle and also not the people who are working
illegally in career factories that are making batteries
because you can't learn how to make a battery, you dummy.
We can't do that. But at least they're going to
make sure they're not fat. I guess that's, I guess that's
your half consolation prize, MAGA, that's what you get.
Notable health conditions cause skyrocketing healthcare

(44:18):
expenses, sometimes upwards of hundreds of thousands of dollars
in prolonged hospital stays. The Trump administration is
putting America people 1st and they include enforcing policies
that ensure immigration will notburden the American taxpayer,
said a guy. This is part of a broader effort
to tighten policies. For instance, the cost of H1
visas, including high skilled workers, has risen to $100,000

(44:39):
annually. Except for the ones that don't,
because we need those, because you're too dumb to build a bomb
or a missile or a battery. We can't just take you out of
the unemployment line and put you to work.
Don't be ridiculous. You know, it's even funnier on
the screen. If you guys are watching right
now and, and you should be, you should be watching.

(45:00):
But if you're not, you could switch over and watch if you
were listening on Spotify. So you may hear a Spotify ad
right now. We play those throughout the the
show and you can find us on Spotify at kyleseraphinshow.com.
You can support us at Locals if you want to get involved in what
we're doing here and if you're watching on one of the video
platforms, you can already see what I'm about to show you.

(45:22):
But please give us a like that would be great.
Make sure you've subscribed. If you're watching on YouTube,
make sure you've subscribed or followed whatever the heck they
call it over on Rumble as well. You can share it with a friend
very easily, but I'd love it if you guys did Spotify only
because it allows you to switch between audio.
You're listening, you're driving, you're mowing the lawn,
you're walking your dog, whatever it is, and then you
want to see, hey, what is Seraphin talking about out
there? And this is it, bottom right
hand or bottom left hand corner of the screen, Fleckis talks the

(45:45):
bonus land pipe bomb edition. They're talking about pipe bomb
gate, which we're going to get into in just a second.
So there you go. It's a good little Segway and
I'm a huge fan of Austin Fleckis.
And if you guys have never listened to him, check him out.
Also, shameless plug for a guy that I think is pretty cool,
he's funny. My wife has listened to his
podcast forever. I used to really love his man on
the street interviews and he used to just cut it straight
down the middle. You just go ask people

(46:06):
questions. What are we doing out here?
And then they would say something really dumb, like as
dumb as saying that you're too dumb to go and get a job and do
high skilled stuff like build batteries.
And then he'd be like very cool,very cool.
And he would move on. I was a big fan of what Austin
used to do in the streets. I wish he would do more of that,
but I know it's a lot easier to do a podcast, so I don't I don't
hate him for that. All right, so we're going to get

(46:26):
to bomb gate in a second, which is a fun name of calling it.
I didn't call it pipe bomb Gate,but I like it.
Let's do quickly the trip to Chinese, shall we?
We do the booty call song. You guys wanted to hear this the
other day. I'll just put the chat on the
screen. We'll just listen to it because
somebody said can you please play it so I can clip it.
So the answer is yes, I can do that chat.
Here we go every. Movie makes I see it on the

(46:59):
screen. Making his booty.
Call it's. Not a petty crime.

(47:46):
I can't help it. It's super catchy and you guys
like it too. I did get a request to just play
it so they could record it or something.
Somebody wants to screen captureit and make it part of their
life. What am I talking about?
Cash Patel went on a secret tripto Chinese.
You guys don't know. I don't like saying China for
some reason. One of my buddies asked me if I
was from Chinese when I was at the FBI Academy and it has
forever changed my lexicon. Cash Patel went to Chinese last

(48:09):
week amid criticism of his private jet uses, which is not
going away. We did a whole story on this
yesterday talking about Boondoggle Ranch, which is still
coming out. It's ridiculous.
These stories are quite funny. So what the heck was he doing in
Chinese? What was he about?
Ah, there he is. That is that man Mr. Sniff.
Director Patel flew to China in secret.

(48:29):
It wasn't so secret. If you listened to child Kyle
Serpent show, we told you about it live.
We told you while it was going on.
He's gone out and touted this. Can I just say I actually miss
Chris Ray. Do you know disgusting?
That is for me as a former FBI agent who actually got fired
because I worked under Chris Ray.
I actually miss somebody who wasa competent and more honest

(48:52):
liar. At least I expected him to lie,
and I didn't expect him to come in and do something different.
Chris Wray now is like giving mea nostalgic feeling.
It's so awful that we've reachedthis point.
I don't know how else to describe it.
I don't know how else you would describe it.
So let me have him describe it. He's going to let you know.
And by the way, with the requisite amount of knob

(49:14):
slobbery, let me see if I can find where is this other clip
here? Oh, there it is.
I didn't recognize it because helooks like his eyes are like
he's about to sneeze. Maybe he's about to sniff.
Here we go. Let's find out what was going on
in. Chinese This was the first time
an FBI director has been to China in over a decade and
received the audience with his counterpart to address this

(49:35):
matter directly. And again, thanks to President
Trump's direct engagement, President Xi, the government of
China committed fully to my engagement there on the ground
in Beijing at a level never seenbefore.
While at Ministry of Public Security headquarters, I met
with my counterpart at MPs wherethe Chinese government agreed on

(49:56):
a plan to stop fentanyl precursors.
What does that mean? The People's Republic of China
has fully designated and listed.All. 13 precursors utilized to
make fentanyl. Furthermore, they have agreed to
control 7 chemical subsidiaries that are also utilized to
produce this lethal drug effective immediately.

(50:17):
Essentially, President Trump hasshut off the pipeline that
creates fentanyl that kills 10s of thousands of Americans.
These substances are now banned and they will no longer be
utilized by the Mexican drug trafficking organizations or any
other DT OS around the world to make this drug.
This historic achievement has saved 10s of thousands of lives.

(50:42):
This historic achievement would not have been possible without
the tremendous team of PresidentTrump, the Attorney General, the
Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
and Ambassador Perdue in China, whose ground level engagements
were imperative to achieving this result.
That is the saddest thing that I've ever heard.
And this this administration keeps doing this.

(51:04):
They they win by press release, they announce the thing that has
not been done yet. He just saved 10s of thousands
of lives. Which ones can you please point
to a life currently saved? Will someone whose life was
saved, will you please come forward even if you shut off the
logistical pipeline? What sort of back stores do they
have in these these cartels? Do you think they just bought

(51:26):
what they needed and they and they're running on a on like a
one day. Are they doing like a like a net
30 system? Are they doing a net 90 where
they have 90 days worth of supply and they can pay 90 days
out as they get paid back? How does that work that you
saved 10s of thousands of lives?You just got back from what?
From the Chinese? We're going to trust the Chinese
who sent them here on the like in the 1st place on purpose.

(51:49):
The Chinese didn't accidentally leak a bunch of precursors onto
the market and allow someone to do, you know, fentanyl
manufacturing and have drug cartels smuggling them up.
There's two real problems with it.
You didn't stop the desire. You didn't stop the demand side
of the curve. So people will look for it and
they always do. And it doesn't matter what it is
that they go look for. They'll find things to escape

(52:10):
their lives. You know, when they don't need
it, when they're busy building freaking batteries that are
super high technology and their,their wages are high when
they're making missiles and theyknow that they're part of
something that is important. I had a kind of a homily that I
wasn't a big fan of from, from our, our priest.
We have two priests at our, our parish and one of them is, does
great homilies and he's Vietnamese and the other guy is

(52:32):
Hispanic and his homilies are very mediocre.
He kind of delivers them the wayCash Patel does.
They're clearly written down. He's clearly trying to read them
and he's trying to deliver with like more moxie than he has.
But he was talking about the story that I've always heard
about the stone cutters. And it goes back to the Middle
Ages and there's three men and somebody walks up on them and
they're all cutting stones. The first guy's asked, what are
you doing? And he says, I'm just making a

(52:53):
living. I'm just trying to feed my
family. I can't wait to get out of this
heat. It's just a real bummer.
He asked the other guy, what's going on.
He says, well, I have a job as astone cutter.
So I'm turning this piece of stone into a into a perfect
block. And so I just cut all these
angles and try to get all these sides really, really smooth.
And then he goes, ask the third guy and says, you know, what are
you up to? And he said, I'm on a team and
we're building a cathedral to worship God.

(53:15):
And we're doing something that for generations will stand and
allow my community to observe the majesty of the creator.
And there's a big difference, right?
You can be on a team when peoplehave function and purpose, when
they're not just a wage slave, like looking down and just
wondering how crappy their life is and how do I escape this?
And can I go home and just, you know, blast through a six pack
or a 12 pack or a 24 pack like some of the friends I used to

(53:37):
have, right? They have purpose.
They have meaning in their life.They have children.
They have posterity, kind of thethings that are mentioned in the
Constitution or the what is it? What does Benny Johnson think it
is? Yeah, those aspirational parts
of the declaration where they said, you know, we want to try
to bestow these types of blessings down.
Why would we want to do this? Why would we want our our

(53:57):
posterity? Well, it gives you some skin in
the game. Nothing against people who don't
have kids, but I'm just telling you it changes the game when you
know that your decisions will affect people that you love,
that you are watching, that you are putting a ton of your energy
in, that you're losing sleep over, that you're not eating
because of that, you're stressedout because of you've gone
without, you've worked harder, you put an extra hours on.
Yeah, it makes a difference. You know, doesn't mean that

(54:19):
other people don't have skin in the game at all.
Just saying the skin is different when it's your
offspring, when it's your genetic material that's going to
continue on. It's your legacy in the world.
We didn't remove the demand side.
How in the hell did Cash Patel save 10s of thousands of lives
by flying off to Chinese and hanging out in South Korea for a
couple of days and hanging out in Japan?

(54:41):
As far as I can tell he spent more time kicking it in Asia
than he did in this negotiation,so at least he worked in some
fun times. This is from Reuters.
China agreed on a plan to stop fentanyl related chemicals as
though it was an accident in part of this deal that Donald
Trump worked to crack down on the legal opioid.
So says Cash Patel. They're seriously spiking the

(55:02):
ball before the kickoff. I don't even know what that
like. I don't even know how you would
think that's a good idea. But then again, I just showed
you he's willing to lie about Epstein.
He's willing to lie about who heknew in in conservative media.
He's willing to lie about going on Stu Peters show.
He's willing to lie and lie and lie.
And they're claiming things thathaven't happened, which is the
same thing Donald Trump did the other day.
We're going to see, you know what $37 trillion worth of worth

(55:23):
of revenue from things. What we haven't, we don't have
that. Like that's just your hope.
Those are aspirational claims. These guys never learned the the
age-old thing and only Donald Trump seems to be able to get
away with it. But I don't, I don't think Cash
Patel has the moxie. I don't think he has the
charisma to sell this. It's pretty straightforward.
You under promise, you over deliver.

(55:45):
You get a very happy customer. You over promise, you under
deliver and nobody wants you andyou get slaughtered at the
midterms. Here's some some, you know,
classic grade A knob slobbery. This is Donald Trump's work for
Cash Patel to party in Asia. This is all thanks to President
Trump's brave leadership to engage directly with President
Xi and make one of the pillars of his administration defeating

(56:08):
the plague of fentanyl and illegal narcotics.
And that set in motion the Attorney General to call her
counterpart and designate the FBI and myself as a lead to
engage and follow up with President Trump's historic
engagement with President Xi just a few weeks ago in Korea.
And what was accomplished when Iwent to Beijing was an actual
full out agreement to concretelyadhere to the to the notion that

(56:31):
we will not allow fentanyl to pour into the United States of
America. But you got to break that down.
What is that? What the hell did he just say?
I got to go back here. I want to hear that again.
A concrete something. Something.
There were a lot of words that didn't mean anything.
When I went to Beijing was an actual full out agreement to
concretely adhere to the to the notion that we will not allow

(56:52):
fentanyl to pour into. It was a concrete, discrete
agreement to adhere to the notion.
One of you out there is a formerEnglish teacher.
I just know that somebody that taught English can tell me what
grammatical structures we just went through.
And then what does that mean? Maybe some of you taught
rhetoric or logic. Can you diagram that sentence
out for me and send it to me in Adm?
Please Send a picture, post it on Twitter, tag me, please.

(57:13):
What in the what in the actual hell did he just say?
Just a few weeks ago in Korea, and what was accomplished when I
went to Beijing was a actual full out agreement to concretely
adhere to the to the notion thatwe will not allow fentanyl to
pour into the United States of America.
All right, somebody outlined that.
Tell me what he just said, what it means.

(57:37):
And I'm I'm totally serious there.
I actually don't know of what that meant.
But you got to break that down. What does that mean?
The Mexican drug traffickers aremaking it, but where are they
getting the ingredients? The fentanyl precursors are
distributed by and through companies in China.
And what? And that must be on accident.
They didn't even realize they were doing that right, folks.
So that's why they're going to fix.

(57:57):
Oh, they're, they're bad. They're sorry.
They have now done is pursuant to our agreement where we asked
for all 13. They've asked for an agreement,
and pursuant to that agreement, they've agreed to block things.
What are the enforcement priorities here?
What are we going to do? Are we going to bomb them if
they start moving them? How are we going to know if they
do? Is there an enforcement
mechanism in a massive sovereigngeopolitical foe of the United

(58:18):
States that has a vested interest in seeing us under, you
know, our US fall apart? And they've been working against
it for literally decades. Fentanyl precursors to be
designated and fully restricted and a further 7 chemicals to be
restricted as well. This effectively shuts off all
of the chemicals and ingredientsused to make fentanyl.
No other president has done this.

(58:39):
Thanks to the Department of Justice and the FBI, we were
able to get on the ground and get in the room with the Chinese
for the first time ever and receive the reception that
President Trump. They received a reception.
Are you guys good? Because I'm good.
I think fentanyl's done. I think they nailed it.
There's like four more seconds. Let's see what else he said.
Created with President Xi and now 10s of thousands of American

(59:01):
lives have been saved. They've been freaking saved.
This is like, OK, so that's it. That's the claim. 10s of
thousands of lives. That's not the only lives they
saved. I seem to remember this from
June. Do you remember this from June?
We solved, we just solved drugs.There should be a like a parade.

(59:22):
America should have a parade because Cash Patel and Donald
Trump, obviously it was really Donald Trump, but it was Cash
Patel because of Donald Trump, because that's how it goes.
Just solved drugs, which they'vebeen fighting since I was a kid.
I mean, he basically did what a DARE program could never do over
all, all the decades that peoplehave been out there trying to

(59:42):
dare kids not to use drugs and showing fried eggs and what your
brain looks like on drug. That didn't do it.
Cash Patel just did it by going to Chinese and getting he
received a reception. So that's pretty good.
And that's not to say that thoseare the only 10s of thousands of
lives they saved. They actually saved others who
are not going to be murdered. And if you weren't murdered
today, if you woke up today unmurdered, why don't you thank

(01:00:05):
Cash Patel, Dan Bongino? And Donald Trump, that's who you
really owe your thanks to. I know you don't have a job and
you have to stand in the waitingline and you can't make
batteries, but will you please thank your president for them
solving murder? Law and order is back in America
under President Trump. And on that same note, there are
new crime statistics that show crime is plummeting.

(01:00:26):
In fact, Politico summed it up like this.
Murder rates are tumbling acrossthe US in 2025.
Homicide stats are down at least20% over last year, and we could
be on course for the lowest number on record with President
Trump in charge. The days of criminals being put
over victims are. Over, I'm looking around.

(01:00:49):
I wanted to show you guys the studio room so if you guys are
just listening and you could seeright now if you wanted to
switch over, this is the room. This is where we're looking at.
And I have noticed that I am also very, very thankful at this
exact time in history that thereare no murderers here.
I think that I am also going to be marked safe from murder.
So is it also dark to say that Ithink Carolyn Levitt, the

(01:01:10):
spokesperson at the White House,has more bass in her voice than
than the FBI director here he was on Rogan also claiming that
they solved murder. This was not even halfway
through the year. These are the same guys that
went on podcast after podcast both he and Bongino claiming
over and over again a very simple thing.
Crime statistics are BS because what happens is unlike the FBI,

(01:01:33):
which is incentivized to have more crime and report more crime
and get more budget, people who actually are accountable to a
local office or to a a local populace that elects them to be
sheriff or puts a mayor in and you have to have a Police
Department, they actually want to see less crime.
So rather than have less crime, which is hard to do, they
actually just report no crime. That means they're not
investigating it. They're not taking those

(01:01:54):
homicide reports. They're not actually just giving
it to the FBI at all. So the FBI is reporting lower
numbers, which these guys, including the guy you're about
to see on the screen, used to say was a lie and now they go
tout it. So I don't believe them.
We are on track to have the lowest homicide rate ever,

(01:02:19):
murder rate? Excuse me, murder rate ever.
In the country. Yeah.
Really. We're all ready.
And look, we got six more monthsto go.
So we're not done yet for the year, but we're already down 20%
from last year, and we broke it this week that right now the
murder rate, if we, the FBI and our government partners achieve
the mission, will give the American people the lowest

(01:02:39):
murder rate in decades. That's incredible.
And that's what I'm focused on. I'll see you in.
My brother, brother, it's the lowest.
It's the lowest homicide rate ever.
It's the lowest murder rate, whatever.

(01:03:00):
He doesn't know the difference. The FBI doesn't investigate
homicides generally speaking either.
Well, at least they cured it. Let's see, we're on the 13th day
of November. This is just in Chicago.
They were 9 homicides. Not safe from murder.
Total homicide this year, 387. It's down from other years.
Congratulations, Chicago. You're murdering less people.

(01:03:22):
You must be so proud. Send Cash Patel a thank you note
perhaps. Oh, this is my favorite one.
This always tells me how bad things are, and I've seen it
worse. No question in my mind.
I've seen it worse. I've seen it that a person is
shot every two hours on average.So it's it's twice as good as
it's been. It's only once every four hours
and 18 minutes on average. Somebody in Chicago is freaking
shot. How many 4 hour periods in a

(01:03:44):
day? It's a little bit less than six
People on average are shot in Chicago on a daily basis, and
they're average averaging more than one murder per day.
Quite a bit more actually, every19 hours and 32 minutes out
freaking standing way to go guys.
You solved murder in addition todrugs.

(01:04:04):
I'm sure now that the fentanyl pipeline is shut down in those
10s of thousands of lives you saved, I'm sure they're safe
from murder. By the way, you can actually go
see the total number of people shot if you guys go to Hey
Jackass. This is one of my favorite
websites, so feel free to enjoy it if you like.
Tells you that the number of people who've been shot and
killed by year and people who are shot and wounded, like the
percentage of people that were killed and this year's accuracy

(01:04:26):
rates of of homicides is higher than others, but lower than
under Joe Biden. So I guess people are shooting
less accurately. You got that going in their
favor still. Turns out that it's mostly black
people who are killing mostly black people and the rest of
them are mostly Hispanic people who probably also kill mostly
black and Hispanic people. This is a real problem.

(01:04:47):
It's a poverty problem. If they were building batteries,
if they could actually go out there and maybe handle some sort
of sophisticated technologies, but too bad they're not smart
enough. We need career horns to bring in
so we can do that. 76.2% of the people who are victims in 2025
have been black. 18.8% just do the rough numbers.
Only 5% white or Asian in Chicago.

(01:05:10):
That's the victim end and overwhelmingly victim and
perpetrator. The race will tend to match at a
very, very high percentage. It's like 6 or 8:00 or 12:50
because people end up hurting people that are in the places
where they are, and people tend to look like the people that are
around you. Unfortunately, this is an
actual, still ongoing epidemic. But luckily they solved murder,

(01:05:32):
so we've got that going on. I'm just saying it's just a
silly thing to walk out and try to take claim the the year is
not over. The stats have not been done.
They have not been revised. And if you've never seen some of
the funny stuff over at Hey Jackass, one of my absolute
favorite metrics. They're serious metrics, but the
silly metrics are the ones that always made me happy, not
because they're good, just because of the absurdity of how
sad the world we live in is. They have a shot in the ass O

(01:05:54):
meter, which are people who havebeen shot in the buttocks and
it's been 72 year to date, whichis lower than the last couple
years. So congratulations Chicago, less
people being shot in the bum. And then also the shot in the
Junko meter, which is 38, which is a lot of people to have been
shot in the junk and it is a that's a record high in a while.
This month alone has more people, almost 7 people last

(01:06:16):
month shot in the junk. That's terrible.
And then the people who have shot themselves by carrying
their gun, probably in sweatpants, In any case,
apparently they solve murder butdidn't actually solve murder.
And if you guys don't want to know what the actual thing is,
this is the actual best way to look at it.
So yes, we've had highs in murder and low in murder.
At least Chicago, one of our most violent cities, is not

(01:06:37):
going to end up at the lowest rates.
And this is what the lowest rates look like.
And they started following this in 1957.
So murder rates have been tracked on and off.
The problem with your murder rates that you try to track
through the year is people have to actually give you accurate
reporting. And we know for a fact that they
don't. And I know that guys like Dan
Bongino, we used to talk about that on his podcast on a regular
basis because they were defending the policies or they

(01:06:57):
were decrediting or discreditingguys like Chris Ray who went out
and said the exact same damn thing.
We're solving murder. We did it, we're great.
Nobody believes you. And that takes me to Bomb Gate,
which is going to be our last little piece that we'll talk
about here. Bomb GATE continues.
Blaze Media, It's theblaze.com/truth if you want
to read the story. If you have not read it, let me

(01:07:19):
tell you guys some things that Iactually ran down for you
because I had the same questionsand I got them yesterday.
Before we do it real quick, if you guys want to jump over to
Spotify, you may hear an ad. Sorry.
If you're listening on the audio, you may hear an ad at
this exact moment. Additionally, if you're
listening on Rumble or if you'reon YouTube or on X, make sure
you guys have liked us share it,subscribe to the channel.
If you want to be notified when we go live, I can just tell you

(01:07:40):
up front it's right around 0930 Eastern Time or 8 central, but
you can also notify yourself. OK?
I wanted to know first of all, my surveillance team, which was
known as ID 21 or Intelligence Division 21, that was the squad
was sitting outside of a house. That house had a door which I

(01:08:01):
believe I've even shown to you and I may even have it.
There it is. The door is framed in black.
It is on the closest side of thescreen to me.
It is on the left. We were watching that door, but
we weren't sitting outside of the door.
Let's anybody think otherwise. We weren't actually trapping
that door where we were, like, sitting there from 30 feet away
with binoculars like you see in movies where you're going to get
caught. We were outside, and that was
the door that we were assigned to.

(01:08:22):
On the door to the right is the person that Steve Baker has
identified as the person he believes did the pipe bombing.
And her name was Shady Kirkoff. And everybody seems afraid to
say that, but that's what's being reported.
We're talking about a new story that is in the public.
All right. So that being the case, the
question has arisen to many people who didn't get it from
the story. So I'll say it explicitly, I sat

(01:08:42):
outside door number one on the left in the black thing and
roughly in that neighborhood with my team for two days,
January 13th and January 14th. Seems like the days we were
there is about one week after January the 6th and we were
watching someone who's known as an Air Force veteran and he's
also known as person of Interest3.
It's very difficult to suss out what person of interest was
being listed during the time that the FBI wrote it up because

(01:09:06):
the documentation isn't the samethat the FBI necessarily used
while we were being briefed in the field.
And I'm going off like a conversation I had five years
ago standing in a parking lot ofa of a fire station.
It's not like I can go back and refresh myself with the files.
So we sat outside that door. Baker, five years later, came up
with a person completely independently, and that person

(01:09:29):
just happened to live in the door that doesn't have the dark
outline that's on the screen right now at that time.
That's a massive coincidence. How did the FBI get us within a
few feet of that target and put us in the same, let's say,
building the same roof and a shared wall if they were not on
track and I don't have an explanation for it, They were
independently done. The question then becomes, well,

(01:09:51):
how did he identify this lady, Shanie Kirkoff?
And I had to ask him. I was like, hey man, how many
people did you go looking for? Here's what happens.
You guys can actually see the stories that they were doing on
the screen. Here on the right is Capitol
Police office. Capitol Police repeatedly use
less lethal force on protesters early on January 6th.
The video shows that was the article that they were doing the

(01:10:12):
research on. And this has been done by other
people. There's a group called
Investigate J6. There's another one called Stop
Hate. There's a couple of other like
online accounts that have been doing a lot of identification of
who were the cops in the crowd? Who were the cops that were
firing pepper balls? They want to know.
They already named this person, but they didn't know this was
going to lead to something. And while Steve was doing that,
he began running a logical investigative series of

(01:10:33):
questions. Who is this woman?
I don't recognize her. Couldn't even tell if it was a
woman or a man from the picturesthey had.
Took it to a Capitol Police officer.
Source. The Capitol Police officer said,
Aha, well, we know who that is. That's shady.
Kirkoff. She's one of us.
She's in the dignity Protection Unit.
She trains the less than lethal stuff.
She's, you know, like one of thepeople that handles these
devices. The devices being the the FN 3O3

(01:10:53):
launchers, the the tipman 90 eights.
OK, great. So he started looking at it and
then he went and kind of just dug in who who she is.
You go do some open source searches.
What do you find out? The first thing is that she was
a soccer player and she's 5 foot7.
And she has a, you know, athletic build, but she's slim.
And that starts making people who've been looking at the same
videos the FBI has been putting out for five years go, well, the

(01:11:15):
pipe bomber was 5 foot 7. That's totally coincidental.
And then he asked the Capitol Police officer to think, hey,
does she still work at Capitol Police?
And he said, no, no, she actually moved to like an
intelligence agency. She left about six months after
January 6th, and she went away. She didn't work here anymore.
And he said, well, which one wasit?
He said, you know, I don't know.She deleted all of her social
media, and she scrubbed and and tossed her phone numbers.

(01:11:37):
And we can't reach her anymore. Like, we were buddies, but she's
moved on. All right, Well, that's kind of
unusual. So then he went and started
looking at the trial and he got Guy Rafford, what's his name
Rafford, who we talked to last night in a, in a Twitter SpaceX
space. And she was the first witness in
the first trial that convicted the 1st January Sixer.

(01:11:58):
And there were some unusual things about that trial.
So I had Steve tell me yesterdaythat he went and read the
transcripts. I'm reporting what he told me.
Verify for yourself on the transcripts, but I don't think
he's making this up. He said it was kind of unusual.
They started off the trial talking about this witness with
a sidebar. The two attorneys, the

(01:12:18):
prosecutor and the defense were reminded by the judge that there
were some equities that were in play that they were not allowed
to discuss, and they wanted to make sure that both attorneys
understood that. And so when she was asked,
what's your name, she said her name.
Where do you work? She said, I work for the United
States government. And there was no follow up.
What agency do you work for? What do you do for the federal
government? Apparently that was included in
that sidebar and then when the defense came over to do cross.

(01:12:40):
So after the direct examination,you have cross examination and
the defense came in and didn't touch it at all and was worn in
an additional sidebar which is noted in the transcript that I
don't want to see you waving that three O 2, which would be
the FBI interview that she did and gave her statement.
I don't want to see you waving that three O 2 around the
courtroom, potentially because it has things on there that you
can't talk about because it's part of that sidebar.

(01:13:03):
So the government didn't allow anyone to say that she moved
from the place she had been, that she moved into a new
government job, which she did not describe.
And it turns out that governmentjob was at the CIA doing
essentially force protection in their security division, almost
a a lateral move from what she did at Capitol Police, but with
the added benefit of working at an intelligence agency.
And all of her stuff had been scrubbed and she didn't talk to
any of her old friends. Does that make some sense why he

(01:13:29):
was interested? So then he started looking.
He said, do we have footage of this girl coming in and out of
this building because she's in uniform?
We can find out who she is. We can find out what shift she
was on. That's easy enough to do.
So they started doing comparisons visually, just
people staring at it with no sophisticated software, and
noticed that she had a pretty prominent right leg drag, which
is a kind of a limp. And they went, well, that's

(01:13:50):
interesting. Then they started doing side by
sides with the unknown subject known as person of interest, one
who was the pipe bomber. And then when they did that,
they went like this looks like they could be the same person,
same height, similar build, difficult to say.
We got some side by sides that look kind of good from the naked
eye. Do we have somebody that has
software that can go and do thisanalysis and get us a little bit

(01:14:11):
more scientific thing? The fact the matter is the
United States military and the Intel sphere had been using this
for a long time. We had people come into our
space last night that said that they worked for contractors that
have been using this types of technology and gate recognition.
And it is like a frequent biometric that is used in our
airports. It's certainly used by our
military overseas and it is a individual unique thing to you

(01:14:32):
that also goes in time, place, distance.
Now if you were to find out thatsomebody had a cell phone in
some place and that cell phone that they normally carried, Kyle
Seraphin's cell phone came out of the the Faraday bag and was
pinging in a shed out in, you know, Illinois right now and
they wanted to get Kyle Seraphin.
They couldn't get a search warrant to go in there and they
probably couldn't go drone strike the thing and take out

(01:14:53):
Kyle Seraphin in the shed. But if somebody got the ping
that Kyle Serif and cell phone was there and a man matching my
description or had the same gateas me who was wearing a mask and
a hoodie was rolling around in the back of the backyard from
satellite imagery, then you might have a little bit more to
it. So this is not a solid, you
know, singular thing. We know she was in the National
Capital Region. We know she had access to
certain buildings that they believe the pipe bomber had

(01:15:14):
access to. We know that she was in the
vicinity of January 6th because she was actually there on the
day of shooting pepper balls. And then they did this analysis
and that's when they got the 94%match, which is mentioned.
And nobody can explain to me howthe FBI, which usually takes
about five to seven days to end up on somebody when they are
completely caught off guard, they end up with a subject very,
very quickly. But remember, they found a

(01:15:35):
partial VIN number at the bottomof the 1993 World Trade Center
bombing. And we're able to come up with a
subject in that you guys can have all your conspiracies you
want. The FBI is competent.
I don't love it. I don't like it, but it's
competent and it does work, OK. And the idea that they would
have put us within the vicinity of the person that had done this
within a week is well within therange of what I would expect for

(01:15:55):
the FBI to do. And unlike the the bomb that
detonated at the bottom of the World Trade Center in 93, they
had a physical pipe bomb, a second physical pipe bomb,
significant amounts of video camera footage.
And they know for a fact the person was using a cell phone on
which they were captured, both using the cell phone and we saw
it on video. So you got a lot of evidence to

(01:16:19):
go and rundown. So why did the FBI not come up
with it? And it's a very serious real
question. Why did I end up outside of the
door watching the person who lived behind the black rim door?
And we were one like 9 feet awayfrom the door that was on the
other side that Steve Baker found five years later.
And I don't know the answer to that.
What we do know is that Daily Wire just released a really cool

(01:16:39):
story yesterday that kind of goes a little further into it.
So let's read that. The development in the January
6th blaze pipe bomb story. This is written by Luke Roziak.
I spoke to him years ago and I gave him that address from
memory of where it was, and he went out and spoke to that
person years ago and found nothing.
And the reason why he found nothing actually makes perfect
sense. The person we were watching was

(01:17:00):
not in fact, the person that would have had anything to do
with this stuff, but did buy theMetro card, like I said, and did
in fact have some mail that was staying with him.
And I'm going to read you some of the interesting parts of it
because it actually opens up a lot more lines of inquiry.
And if we had a proper FBI, they'd be handling that
business, one would think. I know we've changed tunes here.
I'm not nearly as funny when I do this stuff.
So let's go. All right, so the man who owned

(01:17:23):
the Metro card that law enforcement believed would link
to a person of interest, the January 6th pipe bombing case,
spoke to the Daily Wire on Tuesday of this week.
Luke went out and talked to thisperson.
The man is an Air Force veteran and he requested anonymity due
to being linked to a serious crime.
Again, that's the story. The gait analysis is the piece
that we've just talked about. You guys heard where it came
from and they named a particularCapitol Police officer who shot

(01:17:44):
non lethal or less than lethal or less lethal rounds at
protesters on the day of. People got excited about it.
So the question then was what was going on?
Apparently the man that we were surveilling was somehow
interviewed, although I don't have any details on that
interview. And according to himself,
according to that man, it was bytransit cops that called and
asked him some questions on the phone.

(01:18:04):
It was a telephonic interview and it may have coincided with
us being pulled from surveillance.
I've never heard of a telephonicinterview clearing somebody.
If it was a transit cop, that was somebody who worked for the
JTTF or the Joint Terrorism TaskForce, or it was an FBI agent
lying and saying they were a transit cop, which you're
allowed to do. Or it was someone from DC Metro
and he misunderstood that they were a transit cop, in which

(01:18:25):
case they also worked for the JTTF.
So I think the three possibilities are he got
interviewed in some way shape orform by the FB is Joint
Terrorism Task Force. But it was over the phone and
that was enough for them to pullus, I believe.
And that may have been semi logical to them.
It doesn't make any sense to me because they were more than
happy to leave us on surveillance.
That made no sense for a long time.

(01:18:46):
He says he doesn't believe that his Metro card was used by a
Capitol Police officer on January 5th.
He said he had a childhood friend who traveled from from
the southern part of America to attend the Trump rally and
stayed with him. To save money.
The vet let him borrow his travel card and he picked him up
at the Metro station. All of that ties out to what I
was briefed at the time and all that makes sense.
About a week later in 2021, he got a call from law enforcement,

(01:19:07):
which would have been about the week that we were sitting out
there, and he believed it was Metro Transit Police who asked
about the card. They previously had interviewed
me. He said this guy's a big black
guy. He's like 5 foot.
I'm sorry. He's like 6 foot 4.
He's like 280 lbs. He's a big man in his 60s.
And he said that his friend who was staying with him was a white
male who was about 58, I'm sorry, about 5-10 or 511.

(01:19:28):
We're reading from the story here.
He said he met, he went to school with the guy decades ago,
so childhood sort of friend, butdidn't remain in touch, but then
reconnected over social media. This is where it gets kind of
interesting. I think the vet's about the same
age. He's 66 now.
The guy's about the same age andapparently spends large portions
of his year in foreign countriesspreading Christianity as like

(01:19:49):
some sort of a missionary. He freaked out after the call,
called up the friend said, hey, do you have a secret life that I
don't know about? The guy said no law enforcement
made contact with a friend. We've read that previously.
And then they cleared him. But it's not clear why they
cleared him or why they agreed that it was OK.
And here's where I think it getsweird.
And this is my this is my supposition.

(01:20:10):
And I think we're allowed to have some, some guesses on this
because we're working from old information, but we're trying to
figure out what the heck actually happened.
How do we, how do we get outsideof that door?
And what we also know is that the door on the, on the left
hand side, not the black rim door, sorry, the right, the
right side. I'm looking at the screen
backwards. The one that Cheney Kurkov lived
in was home to a Capitol Police officer, AKA Shawnee Shawnee

(01:20:31):
Kurkov. And additionally, there was a
male that lived there. And that male was also a Capitol
Police officer and was apparently a romantic partner of
Miss Kirkhoff. That was actually substantiated
not just by like records, because there's some record
polls you can do, but was actually substantiated by the

(01:20:52):
neighbor to Luke over at Daily Wire.
So there we have it. They quote the story that we've
been reading over here from thisis the Loudermilk summary, which
I keep calling the Massey summary.
Both their names are on it. So that's part of the game.
The things that are quite interesting to me is that the
fallout from this. Now, he said that they, the

(01:21:13):
people that live next door were Capitol Police officers.
He said that the that the address next door, the
neighboring unit was occupied by, in fact, 2 Capitol Police
officers, female and a romantic partner who was also on the
force. So there you have it.
That substantiates that that Kirkhoff was living there.
And I don't think there's any real debate about that.
I think that's the case. This is where it gets kind of

(01:21:34):
weird. After his buddy said, no, I
don't have a secret life, he maintained contact with his
friend, who apparently travels overseas on a regular basis to
spread Christianity. The friend came back in town
after Donald Trump won for the second inauguration, and he
annoyed the veteran, the guy wholived there that we were
supposed to be watching, we never saw, by the way, by

(01:21:56):
insisting on wearing a Donald Trump hat in this deep blue area
of Virginia. And it is pretty blue.
It's false. Church is pretty Lib and he
said, quote, I, I felt like, Oh my God, how did I get myself
involved with this? End Quote.
And after that he made the guy go stay in a hotel instead of
staying with him and he blocked his old friend on the phone.
Not really that close of a friend to begin with.

(01:22:16):
Now we've been trying to suss out who these people are because
it's not immediately apparent. And if you don't know anything
about the the we're not reading the case file.
We don't have like documentationon who's POI 1-2 and three.
We know that POI one in this whole story that's been going on
out there. POI One was the pipe bomber as
identified on video, and the belief is by Steve Baker and his
company that they think that that pet bomber, POI 1 is in

(01:22:39):
fact Shanny Kirkoff. That's what their story is
about. That's what they've been out
there working on. POI 2 appears to be, I think, a
mixed character. I think that it is a combination
of both this Southern evangelical guy who's roughly in
his, who's in his 60s, who spends his time outside the
United States and was like long time ago friends and recent

(01:23:01):
connection and now blocked from the guy that we were watching.
And that person was PY 3. So PY one bomber, PY 2 is the
guest. PY 3 is the guy living in the
apartment that we were watching who's the the Air Force veteran.
And here's where it gets really weird.
Steve Baker believes, and The Blaze has made the claim, that

(01:23:21):
PY 1 is in fact Shanny Kirkoff, who lives next door to PY 3.
There was a male staying with POI three who's called POI 2.
That's the southern evangelical guy.
There's also a male living in the door next door.
So we have 2 doors, 2 people behind each door, a man and a
woman and A and two men. We already know one of the men
wasn't involved because of his build.
You can see it. It's completely obvious.

(01:23:42):
The other one is a female and she's obviously not a man.
The FBI had pictures of someone they called POI 2.
The pictures do not look like a 60 something year old man.
They look like a 25 or a 30 yearold man.
And that's where it gets really weird.
And it'd be nice if we had an FBI that was willing to address

(01:24:03):
this craziness because it is crazy.
And it'd be really nice if we could get like a straightforward
statement on it. What we got instead was a
whistleblower disclosure yesterday saying that they were
going after the whistleblower, bringing forward information in
good faith that there was a violation or misconduct in this
investigation to Tom Massey. Tom Massey shared that
whistleblower disclosure, which I will read you real quickly.

(01:24:24):
It says regarding 28 CFR Port part 27 protected disclosure by
an FBI employee to the United States Congress related to
serious misconduct and gross misconduct by the FBI, sent by
e-mail. Dear Honorable Chairman
Congressman Massey and HonorableChairman Loudermilk, pursuant to
28 CFR Part 2 seven, please accept the following as a
protected disclosure from an FBIemployee related to serious

(01:24:46):
misconduct that the leadership of the FBI, the Federal Bureau
of Investigation in the Washington Field Office.
On November 11th, 2025, U.S. Congress received a protected
disclosure about the J6 pipe bomb investigation.
The J6 pipe bomb investigation was conducted by the Washington
Field Office today. Leadership in the Washington
Field Office notified its management.
There will be a management meeting tomorrow at 10 AM.
It was obvious from the information provided by senior

(01:25:07):
leadership in the Washington Field Office that this meeting
was an attempt to identify the FBI whistleblower who made the
protective disclosure to Congress.
That is very familiar to those of us who understand.
This attempt by the Assistant Director and other senior
leadership in the Washington Field Office to identify the
whistleblower is a reprisal and it's a violation of 28 CFR .27.

(01:25:27):
The Justice Department's Office of Attorney, Recruitment and
Management Whistle Blower court has upheld the right of
employees to make anonymously protected disclosures without
being subject to retaliation by FBI management.
Identifying the whistle blower only serves one purpose, which
is to allow FBI management to retaliate.
Kurt Souzdak who represents the whistle blower.
And since Tom Massey shared thatthis is pretty juicy stuff, Dan

(01:25:50):
Bongino cracked out. He absolutely fell apart here,
folks. I'm going to read what he said.
And this is like, this is verbatim.
I'm just going to use his words.He's been very tight lipped on
social media after all the dumb things.
And now we're here. Congressman Massey, he's writing
to Massey in a public statement to the entire public.

(01:26:12):
When Director Patel and I entered on duty in our
leadership positions in the FBI,we had our hands full, but we
were happy to be part of the president's team and we still
are. Means nothing.
Despite the multitude of challenges we faced, our first
initiative was to aggressively pursue a new strategy to
investigate the January 6th pipebomb terror attack.
We brought a new personnel to take a look at the case.
We flew in police officers and detective working as TF OS task

(01:26:35):
force officers to review FBI work.
We conducted multiple internal reviews, held countless in
person and STV meetings with investigative team members.
We dramatically increased investigative resources and we
increased the public award for information in the case to
utilize crowdsourcing leads. There's only a small sample of

(01:26:56):
the work the FBI personnel and leadership team have put into
this critical investigation. When I spoke with you yesterday
a little after 8:00 AM Eastern Time, screenshots attached.
I've offered you an in person brief on our work.
We spoke for 10 minutes. I called you back a little after
7:00 PM Eastern Time to again make the offer.
You didn't answer the call and you get to call me back.
This is crying and whining from the Deputy director of the FBI.

(01:27:18):
Never seen this in my life, nor would you.
He's taking his like private cry, whining to public and
people are excited about this. I guess despite this, you've
continued to imply the director and I are targeting
investigators in this case. That's what they're going to do
definitively. That's what the FBI does
definitively. How do I know?
Oh, because I was the victim of this.

(01:27:38):
I know this. This is disgusting even by the
low standards many have for politicians.
You know my number and you're free to call me anytime, but
it's easier to tweet and throw BS bombs.
Yes, our leadership team will bemeeting with F with FBI team
members today and we will avail them of all the whistleblower
resources they need to disclose any evidence of malfeasance in
the prior administration. I know factually that this is

(01:28:00):
inaccurate and I know what's going on here.
I'm not at liberty to say at themoment.
But folks, this is a massive story in and of itself.
What's going on with Bongino, and hopefully it will become
clear. I hope somebody grows a spine
and actually goes forward with this story and they know what
they need to do. We will ask about any threads
that may have gone unpulled under the prior leadership

(01:28:22):
because we are passionate about solving this case.
Well, what about tendrils and Nuggets because I heard those
were also important. We need all the tendrils and
Nuggets. Morris gave up a big nugget.
That's what we need. The big nugget.
This is the best part. But a but a week of near 24 hour
work? I guess he means 24/7 hour work,
whatever. But a week of near 24 hour work

(01:28:43):
on recent open source leads in the case has yet to produce a
breakthrough. And some of the media reporting
regarding prior persons of interest is grossly inaccurate
and serves only to mislead the public.
No, it's not, buddy. It is not.
I proudly serve in this administration and I proudly
work with Director Patel to reform and advance the crime
fighting and national security missions the of the FBI.

(01:29:05):
We would love to have you as a partner in this mission rather
than a dog barking from behind the fence.
And then he includes some screenshots of trying to call
him Massey. Guys, you can just keep watching
this. That guy's cracked.
That's an emotional scream cry as I was heard it described that
Patel did when they couldn't getthe Charlie Kirk information out
fast enough. It's, it's insane to me that

(01:29:26):
this emotional garbage is what constitutes that's a personal
cry that should have been a callor a text message or a voicemail
or an e-mail. Or maybe just shut the hell up
and stop acting like a baby because somebody went out there
and published something and toldyou very publicly that if you're
going to go out and try to public whistleblowers, there are
at least one member of Congress and sounds like 2 better willing

(01:29:47):
to step up and try to stop it. And they're letting people know
that we see upfront. It's the one thing they didn't
have When I went public. Nobody knew that we did it and
nobody knew that they were coming after us watching you.
You guys keep tuning in. This is going to be interesting
because where this goes, they'vejust opened a door for people to
share a story that should have. That should show you everything

(01:30:09):
about who this guy is and what this team has been doing behind
the scenes. All they do is fluff themselves.
Remember, they've advanced crimefighting and national security
missions. They solved drugs and they
stopped murder and it's all Donald Trump.
And also they can't find a freaking pipe bomber who had all
of the physical evidence. And we were outside, like right

(01:30:31):
around the corner. We were just outside.
Persty Baker. They're not going to come out
and say what they are going to try to debunk.
But the people that are trying to debunk this are Capitol
Police. You can't imagine the agency she
worked for is trying to stop this.
The agency that works for Congress is trying to stop this.
Shame on these people. Major, major shame, because I do

(01:30:54):
remember this and so do you. You know, I was highlighting A
reporter at The Blaze over the past few weeks.
His name is Steve Baker. He's been ripping the the covers
off this January 6th bomber casewith Kamala Harris.
A lot of the videos I've showed you about the infamous bombing
case that nobody wants to talk about but Steve Baker, Julie

(01:31:14):
Kelly, Darren Beattie and a few others, folks, Steve Baker has
been now arrested by the FBI. And This is why.
Jim's shaking his head because it's almost hard to believe how
much of A police state we live in right now.
They used to hide this stuff anddisguise it.
They don't even hide it, disguise it, or even deny it
anymore. Steve Baker is a journalist at

(01:31:36):
The Blaze. He is clearly yet another
political prisoner in the state.He was locked up today by the
FBI and I suspect it has a lot to do with the fact that he was
exposing the fake bomb plot on January 6th to take out Kamala
Harris at the DNC. Go to his Twitter profile and

(01:31:58):
take a look. He'll be disgusted.
The police state is just metastasized.
Yeah, I am disgusted. But it's metastasized to Dan
Bongino, as evidenced even by this last crying clip here, this
last little piece of what he posted today.
You guys can stand find that I'mgoing to archive it right now,
and that is the program. I don't like doing like the stay
tuned, but freaking stay tuned because we're not done yet.

(01:32:22):
We should go to Valhalla. I'll.
See you in Valhalla, brother. Check us out over on Spotify if
you have not previously. If you guys are traveling with
it, Kyle serafinshow.com. I apologize and thank you guys
for letting me know. I actually posted yesterday's
show a little bit late because Iforgot to do it all together.

(01:32:43):
Just a one man show here. So check us out.
If you want to support us over at kyleserafin.com, you can do
that. That's locals.
I put all the links up, and that's kind of fun.
If you're watching the video, now's the time to like it.
We're bumping up on the rumble board.
We are bumping around and addingsubscribers every single day
over on YouTube. Like, share, subscribe it.
Put yourself on the notifications if you want to see
us when we go live. And God bless you guys.
I don't. I have a palate cleanse, but

(01:33:04):
yeah, whatever. What the hell?
It's long, but let's do it. Here we go.
This is Eddie Murphy. Remember, we used to have fun in
this country. We used to be able to say things
out loud and you could say that maybe Americans are Americans
and people who don't seem like they're from here and H1B visas
are not beneficial in their job competition.
Yeah, I remember that too. I don't like that shit, that
Arabic that the motherfuckers bespeaking in the 711, that shit.
Fuck with me. They sound nasty and shit.

(01:33:29):
We're getting all this. That's a word in Arabic that
means some shit to them. Maybe walking out, you and I
have a ham and cheese hero. Never mind, man.
I don't want no Hocking on my bread, motherfucker.

(01:33:51):
That's why. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,Truth Social and Instagram at
Kyle Seraphin.

All Episodes

FAILED: Republicans celebrate funding government they cried was spying on them | Ep 676

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}FAILED: Republicans celebrate funding government they cried was spying on them | Ep 676