PIPE BOMBER IDENTIFIED?!? Government claims they are still looking | Ep 673 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:12):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends.

(00:39):
Welcome to today's Kyle Seraphinshow.
It is. It's 838 here on a Monday
morning. We're going to get rolling just
a few minutes later than normal.I warned our chat that we were
going to be behind schedule and not on purpose.
But as is often the case for this program, there are
competing interests. One of the things I do everyday

(01:01):
is a podcast and I come out hereand I talk to you when we talk
about news, we talk about some commentary, opinions, and I try
to give you a perspective that is based on my life experience,
times I spent the government, times I spent in private sector,
etcetera. The other thing I do, which is
probably the bulk of my job, 75%is I am a entirely unpaid

(01:23):
government transparency, I wouldsay radical activist, something
to that effect. And I generally introduce myself
to people that way. I do a podcast for a living, but
I'm a transparency activist and I want to see Government
Accountability. That's my real work.
And so today the real work got in the way of the paid work.
And that's unfortunate, but I think it's necessary.
And I wanted you guys to understand how it all kind of

(01:45):
shakes out before going live. Maybe about 15 minutes prior, we
had a whistleblower disclosure head over to the hands of an
attorney to be able to handle itand and pass off to members of
Congress. Now, I don't know how it's going
to go, but I do know that it's relevant.
I do know that it's important. And when it comes to protecting

(02:06):
current people inside our federal government that are
trying to get information into the hands of the American people
and the people that can do accountability, that actually is
more important to me than being,you know, 100% on time for for
starting a, a live stream podcast that many of you watch
afterwards. By the way, some of you guys
will never know that we were a little bit late this morning,
but I do want to talk about it for the live audience, of which

(02:27):
we have, you know, about 1000 people every morning on Rumble
that does it. And we got another couple 100
over on YouTube, which is reallycool that you guys join us for
that. So I want to I want to be
respectful of that audience. We're going to talk about the
pipe bomber today. We're going to talk about a
unbelievable story that dropped out on about, I don't know, what
was it like overnight Friday going into Saturday morning?

(02:51):
My friend Steve Baker pushed through the wall of, let's say,
government threats and and uncertainty and a bunch of
different competing interests that exist inside.
I don't know what whatever we'regoing to call this, the
intelligence apparatus that doesnot want to be able to have
truth and transparency with the American people came out the

(03:14):
other side of it made an announcement.
We're going to cover that story.In case you're just waking up
today for the first time and notpaying attention for the last
couple weeks here. If you're new to this program,
Steve Baker is a investigative reporter for The Blaze.
He has been on the government's pipe bomber.
I don't know. I'm going to call it a cover up
because I don't know any other way to to discuss it for about 5

(03:37):
years, Four years and change forsure.
He made a wild announcement on Glenn Beck that lit some fires
over in government agencies. We're going to try to debunk
what those look like. I'm going to try to give you
guys information. And strangely enough, despite
all the online commentary in thesocial media space, which is
really not reality, but it has an overbearing reaction for this
administration. The craziest part for me is I've

(03:59):
been part of this since, I don'tknow, week 1, I'll call it about
January 13th of 2021. So this is not me injecting
myself into a story. Unfortunately, I was injected
into this story quite a while ago.
So that's the explanation. We're going to talk about some
news right up front just becausewe should, everybody should
understand what's going on in the world.
And there's a bunch of things. I've got the phone out of the

(04:21):
Faraday bag, which I don't normally do, but it is out today
because I'm watching for, you know, if something crazy happens
and we have to discontinue the podcast.
And I'm going to do that becausethere are people whose
livelihood and safety are are more important to me.
All right, before we get into the actual podcast part of it,
let's do this one. Boom patriot-protect.com slash
Kyle. They're one of our sponsors.

(04:43):
They're one of the products thatI use.
I it's a fire and forget solution to Internet stalkers,
criminals, scammers, cyber threats out there in your life
that you don't want people to have access to your public
information. It is public information at the
end of the day. If you have a tax record, if you
have a phone number and e-mail address where you work, some of
these things are out there in the public.
They can be exposed through databreaches, but a lot of them are

(05:03):
just available if you want to make it a little bit less
available, which is not a bad idea.
It used to be that people had toget a white pages, didn't they?
That got delivered to their doorand they probably had to be in
the same area as you. There wasn't a little computer
machine that can go and type in your name and find out all this
information about you. I've used this stuff.
It's very effective. If you want to remove yourself
from these things, there's over 100 data broker websites.
They make money on clicks. It's pennies and pennies or you

(05:23):
know, fractions of pennies to beable to sell out access to you.
And then scammers can try to find you or pretend to be you
and all the other things. You don't want that.
It's not expensive to go ahead and prevent it.
patriot-protect.com slash Kyle again, patriot-protect.com/kyle.
You got to tell them some thingsabout yourself.
That's the nature of the beast. You go through an intake form
and then they go out there and look for that data and scrape it

(05:44):
off the web. Part of the story is you got to
tell them what it is so they cango find it.
Just so you know, because there are other people who have your
name, there may be other people that have similar identifiers.
Check out my friends over there.There's a link in the show
description. They've been with us for a
while. I feel very good about using it.
It has reduced the amount of nonsense and garbage that I have
on me, and I'm a very public figure, it turns out, and I'm
actually a pretty public target as well.
So you guys want to protect yourself.

(06:06):
Look at my friends at Patriot Protect.
They're a great sponsor to us and they are a like a fire and
forget it's a couple bucks a month at the end of the day, by
the time you use my promo code, make sure you got my name at
checkout so you guys get a discount on it.
And let's go ahead and do today's program.
Let's see what this this show takes us 'cause it's already a
weird morning for me. All right, so we did this for a

(06:33):
couple of shows the other day. Steve Baker indicated that he
was going to launch a story thatwas pretty wild and the day
after he and Glenn Beck publiclytalked about it.
This was an announcement. I do not know for a fact that
this is in fact related, but it is curious because this woman is
85,000 years old and she could have announced at any time, but

(06:57):
she chose to announce the day after Glenn Beck and Steve Baker
said that they were going to unveil unmask the pipe bomber
from January 6th. And for those of you who have
been paying attention over the weekend, this will not be a
shock. But if you have not been paying
attention and this is news to you and you're just tuning in on
a Monday morning for the first time.
The subject that they have alleged was the pipe bomber from

(07:21):
January 6th was a Capitol Policeofficer at that time.
And I did a program last week talking about them being the
Praetorian Guard. This female individual who will
read the story and and we'll cover Blaze's reporting on it.
This female was actively AUS Capitol Police officer and the
US Capitol Police answer to two people.

(07:41):
They answer to the Senate Majority Leader and the answer
to the speaker of the House. Of course, Nancy Pelosi was the
speaker of the House on that day.
And so many people have already drawn that parallel.
They've drawn that that line that said, OK, this agency
answer to this lady, this lady has made that announcement.
That's highly suspicious. It's quite true.

(08:01):
It is very suspicious. That's not an allegation.
It's simply looking at a fact pattern and saying that there
are some circumstantial things that we might be interested in.
But that's not the only news that's going on.
So let's do a quick survey so we're not completely in the dark
for what's going out there in the world.
Let's start with this. The government is going to try
to reopen, which I hate. It's my least favorite thing.

(08:23):
We're on day 41 of a government shutdown and this is CBS
reporting what to know. The Senate is returning to
Capitol Hill after voting on Sunday night to advance a House
passed short term funding measure that would end the
government shutdown, the first step in finalizing the deal at
the end of the impasse. Is this a government budget?
No. Is this going to solve the
problems that we have in our government?

(08:43):
Absolutely not. No.
This is just more nonsense. Opening up something that should
be closed because I think Americans are realizing while we
are inconvenienced with air travel, essentially a closed
government has no function, has no impact on your daily life.
And that's why each of us got upthis morning and were able to

(09:04):
function with a cup of coffee and water and the traffic lights
are going to work. The coalition advanced a measure
that's seeking to amend the legislation to extend government
funding through January. This is more kick the can down
the road and pass a trio of longer term spending bills as
part of the deal to move forward.
Senate Republicans have promisedto hold a vote in the future
date on extending health insurance tax credit under the

(09:27):
Affordable Care Act. So they're not agreeing to give
those tax credits back. They're agreeing that they will
now have a vote on it in the future.
And as I see it, it's likely that this vote at least gives
them cover to be able to hope that nobody's paying attention
and push it back through again, because our government never
tries to spend less money ever. We don't see that.

(09:50):
That's not the nature of the beast.
In fact, even though we've got Donald Trump out there promising
certain things, saying that he was going to, you know, fix
tariffs and he was going to go out there and eliminate the IRS
because we don't need it, because we're going to give
everybody money back. We're actually going to be so
rolling in dough that we're all going to tax other countries,
hold them accountable and make American businesses more
accountable. Like we haven't shut down the
IRS and yeah, it's only been what, 10 months?

(10:15):
I get that. But you guys think that we're
going to be there in three years, that they're going to
shut down the IRS as promised, that we're going to see tariffs
take over everything because I don't I don't think any of that
is going to happen. It doesn't seem even close.
Let's continue on here. Senate Democrats were opposed to
moving forward with this deal. They got it basically through
exactly at 6040 because it doesn't address the health care

(10:37):
credits that they want. It's their key demand in the
fight, including some bunch of other stuff.
So there you go. And everyone's going to go out
there and claim their strong suit.
We comp and remember, this is this is the easiest thing for
you all to see. You can do it anytime you want.
Look at who says I did a great job, I stood my ground and I'm a

(10:57):
fighter for you. That's one version of it.
And the second version of it goes exactly like this.
I'm willing to compromise and work together.
I'm willing to reach across the aisle.
No matter what you did, you're the hero.
It's kind of like my colleagues at the FBI.
No matter what they did, whetherthe case went well or went
badly, they were always a hero. When they write it up in what's
called the 954, their sort of internal Bragg document to be

(11:19):
able to get the next job. There's never accountability.
These people don't actually eversay, you know what, I blew it.
I was on the wrong side of this issue and I had to change.
Nope. They'll just say I'm reaching
across the aisle or I stood firmand I fought.
And I basically make sure that there's just enough people so
that we never see any actual change in this country.
And that's now by design, but it's not the way our system was
designed. And as I continue to point out

(11:40):
to you guys, for those of you that say, hey, you know, do we
even live in America anymore? Well, the America that we all
dreamed we live in didn't exist even when we were born.
I don't care how old you are, ifyou're old enough to listen to
this podcast, if you actually have the physical capabilities
of holding onto this phone, you are not responsible for the
things that went down. So for all the attacks, and
there's plenty of reasons to be frustrated with other

(12:01):
generations, we all have them. We see the younger generations,
we think they're ignorant, stupid and lazy.
And you see the older generations and you think that
maybe they are entitled and thought it was too easy and
doesn't matter where you sit. It turns out that none of us
were on this planet when this system was fatally wounded.
And so here we are. We've inherited a system that is
broken, dramatically broken, that has been subverted from its

(12:22):
original take. I had some kind of amusing
moments last week where we talked about the 19th Amendment
and I do it as sort of a as sortof a poke at people.
But if your position is that the19th Amendment was a good idea
and that we think that it was great and your arguments are
essentially not based on the outcomes and the the evidence of
what happened. We repealed some of the other
things that happened at the time.

(12:43):
And the other stuff that happened in the context of the
19th Amendment were the 18th and17th and the 16th amendment.
And all of them are crap, givingpower and money to the federal
government first over your state.
That was a catastrophic. The direct election of senators,
which basically also took power away from your state.
That happened in 1913. All of this stuff happened
before any of us were walking around old enough to make a

(13:05):
decision about it. So we're talking about women
voting. All I say is if you're a
conservative, the answer should be no, but not because we don't
love women, not because we want women to have bad things or
something crazy like that. Just like, look, the
conservative position is that the system was set up properly
and it was subverted. And that was one of those
subversions. The expansion of the franchise

(13:27):
was one of these bigger, sort oflike, we need more democracy.
And the more you move toward democracy, the more you move
toward mediocracy in your votingbase.
Consider that as a really, really telling vine.
I've been doing some weird reading and I don't know why I
do this, but sometimes I just get into the space where I
cannot get away from it. The average IQ in the United
States, like the, the, the central mean is 98 for those,

(13:51):
you know, anything about Iqs, the range goes a little bit
below there until like the, the mid 80s up to about 1:15.
And that's your first sort of your bulk. 68% of the American
voting base fits into there. It's not a truly impressive IQ
base, and it's not necessarily evident that people who are in
the average are the ones who should be voting.

(14:13):
It doesn't mean that they don't value.
It just means it's like maybe they don't make great decisions
and that's evidenced by the factthat 1/3 of Americans can't
handle a $400.00 emergency or that people are thinking about a
50 year mortgage and thinking that would be great, that'd be
fantastic. If only I could take this thing
that I was otherwise going to pay off in 5 or 15 or 30 or 20
years. Maybe we could expand it to 50

(14:35):
years. That sits very clearly on that.
You will own nothing because thebank will own it.
What's the difference between that?
What is the difference between a50 year mortgage and rent?
The illusion of ownership, a mechanism of control.
I saw all these great posts thatwere going on over the weekend.
One of them this, OK, this is Donald Trump's true social post.

(14:57):
He's talking about giving peopleback a $2000, maybe stimulus
check or something to that effect.
The claim was is that if we can make a 50 year mortgage, then
people would be able to afford the mortgage.
First of all, the amount of overall debt that you're going
to be incurring and the amount that you would actually be
paying over that 50 years is insane.
And then the thought would be what?

(15:18):
That people could take that savings of 300 or $600 a month
and put it in the market or theycould invest it properly.
The reason why they're considering A50 year mortgage in
the 1st place. We already did this game and
some of us are are old enough toremember the 2008 housing crisis
when you no longer own the houseand the people who were buying
houses couldn't afford it in thefirst place.
That's why they were in that situation.

(15:39):
And then we had this complete collapse.
How many of you guys lost massive amounts of value in your
house because it was fake and inflated and you bought it at a,
at a price that wasn't real, only to find out that the real
price made you upside down in your mortgage?
I think a lot of people did. And then we've been pumping it
back up ever since. So all of these things are just,
they're just keeping the population at Bay, I suppose.

(16:00):
But it's really gross to me to see it.
And it makes me sad because it all it tells me is we don't have
to be mean to people to say thatNah, your, your decision process
is actually flawed. If you are in desperate times
and you are seeking a desperate measure in a 50 year mortgage,
sort of sounds out that that'd be a good idea.
It's not there. Here's Donald Trump talking
about tariffs. First, let me just read this
real quickly. People are against tariffs.

(16:22):
They're fools. We're now the richest and most
respected country in the world. There's almost no inflation and
a record stock market. That only makes sense for people
who actually have money in the stock market, which is not
everybody. And it also makes sense if you
actually were to say almost no inflation means we still have
inflation and everything is still more expensive than it was
under Joe Biden. It's not Donald Trump's fault

(16:42):
per SE. Our system is now built up to
actually degrade the value of our currency.
So things get more expensive every single year.
And month on month inflation, even at 2%, means that you're
essentially losing 2 pennies outof every dollar that you earn if
you hold on to it long enough. OK, so that's sad, but this is

(17:03):
punching it out to a group of people that are not going to be
able to beat the market average.They're not going to be able to
beat the inflationary rate. There's a huge chunk of
Americans that are destroyed. And we are $38 trillion with a
debt. We're taking in trillions of
dollars, soon to be paying down on enormous debt, 37 trillion.
It's now over 38 trillion. There's record investment in the
United States, plants and factories going up.

(17:24):
And so a dividend of at least 2000 person, $2000 a person, not
including high income people. No evidence of what that's going
to be will be paid to everyone here.
He was talking about tariffs on OAN and it sounds like he got
his numbers mixed up. He's taking the 10 year amounts
of these dollars that they're going to be bringing in.
That's it's a it's a projected amount and not the real amount,

(17:44):
which, by the way, politicians always do.
But let's be real about what they are.
Your tariffs are going to be over a trillion dollars a year.
In my opinion. We're going to do something.
We're looking at something where#1 we're paying down debt
because people have allowed the debt to go crazy.
But you know, with growth, with the kind of growth we have now,
the debt is very little relatively speaking.
You grow yourself out of that debt.

(18:05):
It's not a question of paying it.
You grow yourself out and the numbers are so much bigger than
they ever were. The numbers we have now are
bigger than they ever were. So when you have $36 trillion in
debt a year ago or two years agoand you have a lot less revenue
coming in, then you have 37 or 38.
It's not 38 yet, but it will be.And the numbers are so much

(18:27):
bigger. All of a sudden, 38, you're
under levered, whereas for 36 you were highly levered.
We're not highly levered anymore.
Now with that being said, we'll pay back debt, but we all, we
also might make a distribution to the people almost like a
dividend to the people of America.
How much are you thinking for that, Sir?
Well, we're thinking maybe 1000 to $2000 be great.

(18:49):
Another great. So are you going to get a check
for a thousand $2000 as long as you're not a high income person,
whatever that means? Well, probably not, probably not
exactly. And so these things just kind of
seem like the classic Donald Trump, you know, like, you know,
say something. Donald Trump has never mastered
the under promise and over deliver game.
Not even once has he done that in my experience.

(19:10):
And I think you guys could be realistic and say the same
thing. We thought we were going to get
a correction of the federal government.
We thought we were going to get a correction of maybe the
federal law enforcement, which was really scary.
That's not happened. He's gone out and made a couple
of Corrections. Some of them are very good.
I'm glad to be pardon all the J Sixers, including my friend
Steve Baker, whose story we're going to cover just a minute,
But what does that 2000 dollar, 1000 to $2000 dividend look

(19:34):
like? Here's our Treasury Secretary.
Not exactly sure with this answer.
You know, it could the the $2000dividend could come in lots of
forms and lots of ways, George. You know, it could be just the
the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's
agenda, you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax

(19:54):
on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans.
So, you know, those are substantial deductions that you
know are being financed in the tax bill.
Secretary, can I call my income tips since I earn almost
everything on a 1099? Is that doable, Mike?
So it's going to help the peoplewho are working for tips, and

(20:15):
it's going to mean that if you have an auto loan, then you're
going to be able to deduct that.Like what?
That's not a dividend, nor do weneed it per SE.
It'd be great if we actually fixed the problem and not try to
throw us scraps, which is what this looks like to me.
Call me crazy. Here's another correction that's
going on. And I think this is also related

(20:36):
to our story that we're going toend with here.
As we get moving in live updates.
The senators are advancing a deal to open the government.
We told you Donald Trump has pardoned Giuliani and others
over the 2020 efforts. Those 2020 efforts are the
so-called election denial efforts.
And so that's worth knowing. Donald Trump has pardoned
Giuliani and dozens of others that were involved in the effort

(20:57):
to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
The list includes this is was listed by Ed Martin last night.
Anything to distract from what we're going to be talking about
with this pipe bomber story because I don't think they want
to touch it at all. There's also an effort right
now, just so you guys are aware,Elaine Maxwell, the Co
conspirator of the late Jeffrey Epstein is looking for a
commutation of her 20 year prison sentence.

(21:18):
That's what they've asked for. So it's interesting that we're
going to see some movement. Anything that like that we can
go to shiny objects, Anything wecan do to kind of share with you
that this is what's up next. Just do not pay attention to the
pipe bomber. And why would that be?
You're seeing a concerted efforton the so-called right wing
media. I'm going to tell you that
they're pretty much all affiliated with the Federalist.

(21:40):
So that's going to be the the, what's his name, Sean Davis and
the Julie Kelly who was previously there and others that
are kind of aligned with that. They're going to line up with
some former feds who are going to say that Steve Baker's
information is not good because it's going to absolutely be a
damning implication to the FBI, to the United States Capitol

(22:00):
Police, potentially to the CIA and some others.
So you got Trump out here doing a, a, a pardon of these folks.
This seems like this should havebeen day one stuff as well.
This is all and, and, and is this going to go like lead to us
understanding, well, this was a setup and this is what happened?
I don't think so. Trump issued sweeping pardons
for key figures alleged in the alleged plot to arrange an

(22:22):
alternate slate of electors and expose voting fraud during 2020.
So say, if Ed Martin, I'm told Ed Martin is not interested in
pursuing the case that we're going to talk about in a minute.
It's kind of like a hearsay thing.
So let me just say what it is. I don't have confirmation that I
haven't talked to Ed Martin myself.
I don't think he would want to talk to me.
Trump pardoned high profile individuals allegedly involved

(22:42):
in the attempt. That's going to be Giuliani and
Sidney Powell and Boris Epstein and John Eastman and Mark
Meadows. Many of these people had their
names pop up in the Arctic Frost, and you saw that there
was a little bit more on Arctic Frost.
There was movement to basically fire off additional people that
were involved in that over the last week.
All of this stuff feels like cover fire for the ongoing FBI

(23:07):
scandal. It's always the stupidest and
the littlest stuff that gets people screwed up.
Do you guys realize that always this is where they end up going?
They get messed up over something small and then they
they overcompensate and they tryto bring back their credibility
and they try to do anything theycan.
Here's our little segment that we like to do here.
This this song's too fun not to play.
It's really catchy. OK, this is our Cash Me in the

(23:32):
Jet segment real quick. So our FBI director was hanging
out in Beijing, China, as I toldyou guys got on the plane flew
out of Beijing, made it all the way back to Almendorf over the
weekend while you guys were resting and not doing your
things, you know, not paying attention to news, hopefully
getting some time out time. Then he turned around.

(23:54):
He flew to Harry Reid as far as I can tell right now and haven't
seen an alert otherwise, but he's still hanging out in Las
Vegas, which is his home. And that's maybe why you didn't
get a a official notification onthe FB is position.
Here's here's my hold on. We'll just.

(24:15):
Such a good line. So what we saw over the weekend
as Steve Baker dropped the story, which we're going to hit
in just a second here, is that we saw Dan Bongino type
coverage, right? He leaned on his people.
I've told you guys, it's my belief that Julie Kelly is
essentially the official unofficial mouthpiece of Dan
Bongino. She's the one that's the most

(24:36):
loyal to what he does and has pushed us out.
So cash being out of pocket led to Dan Bongino doing what Dan
Bongino does and they and there's no mainstream coverage
of this at all. ABCCBSNBC, New York Times, like
you name it. No, nobody wants to touch the
story that the Blaze put out there.
And I don't think it's just cowardice.

(24:56):
I think it's actually like really a dangerous move.
Let's hit a couple more news stories.
We'll just kind of briefly on them for those of you government
shutdown. One of the things that was the
squeeze was the the issue with the FAA and flights canceled.
If you guys are flying today or if you're going to be flying
this week, sounds like more than1500 flights were cancelled,
1400 more were delayed, according to FlightAware, which
is one of my favorite websites. Don't ask me why on Sunday there

(25:18):
were 2900 cancelled flights. Another 10,000 were delayed.
And Sean Duffy, who is the transportation secretary has
said it's only going to get worse.
So as we move into the holiday season, guys, build in your
time, build in your your patience.
Build in a couple of downloaded Kyle Seraphin shows from the
past. Go out there and grab some of
our old interviews, perhaps figure out what's going to.

(25:40):
Yeah, figure out what's what's going to entertain you as you
sit there and wait because the FAA is warning the same thing
that the transportation secretary says.
It's going to get worse. It's going to get slower.
Even if they open the government, they're still going
to have kind of a backlog of people that are sick and tired
and didn't have money and are freaking out.
So all that stuff will continue to keep playing.
And don't expect to have, like, normal movement.
I will tell you that we're goingto do this little fun piece

(26:02):
here. This is coming from Steven
Collinson. It's been kind of a while since
I've covered the CNN politics desk, which I do like to do
every once in a while. And this one was kind of fun.
The actual way that they build the story was Democrats cave or
enough Democrats caved. There you have the the Democrat
unity fractures paving the way for the government to reopen.
I thought we were supposed to bewhere each individual person

(26:23):
maybe part of a party, but they represent their constituents
interest first. Obviously we know that's not the
case, but this is literally the way that he starts off his
article. So I thought that was kind of
funny. That's going to be the coverage
from the left is you guys gave in enough Democrats caved Sunday
night. The deal pushed it forward.
So just be aware that they are going to get demonized for even
doing the thing they do. And in reality, the Democrats

(26:43):
are still winning. Getting funding at Biden levels
is the worst. So Republicans are going to try
to frame this as a win. Again, this is all posturing and
nonsense as far as I can tell and it all makes me sick.
So let's do one more quick little sponsor read for my
buddies over at Patriot Coolers who have been us with since the
beginning. They've actually been our
sponsor, whatever it's worth. I think Patriot Coolers has been

(27:04):
sponsoring us since I've been publicly talking about the story
of the January 6th pipe bomber. I think that's a pretty, I think
that's a pretty accurate statement.
If not, they are within a few days of it.
We're certainly in negotiations.This is the this is the hard
cooler that you're seeing on thescreen.
If you guys are not watching on Spotify, you're missing out on
the opportunity to see it. If you're watching on YouTube
and Rumble, you guys get it. Look, it's an outstanding, great

(27:26):
looking piece of equipment. It does what it's supposed to
do. It keeps ice for days and days,
just like you'd see in any otherroto molded cooler.
It says Patriot on there. They've got thoughtful little
things on there like a measuringtape on the top.
They've got replaceable latches in case they wear out, which
they eventually can do if you guys use them in the sun or you
put them on a boat or something like that.
The drain is well thought out aswell.
It goes down on a slight slant so you can get rid of the water

(27:46):
out of there and you can keep itstaying cold.
Bear resistant is funny. They don't call it bear proof,
but yeah, it's difficult to get in there.
You need human fingers to figureout how to use this thing and
they're easily carryable and totable and they're actually,
you know, my my wife can move itand she's tiny.
It's Patriot coolers.com if you guys want to check this stuff
out. If you're going to family
members houses and you're bringing cold goods for
Thanksgiving or for Christmas oryou're traveling, you're RV ING

(28:06):
and you decide you don't want tofly, you want to drive across
the country, check that out. Otherwise, you can always use
one of these. They make a great gift and they
have everything from this kind of, let's say, handsome and well
appointed wood grain vacuum sealed Tumblr.
You can also find things that are a little bit more a little
bit more in the tactical or or custom space.

(28:28):
This is the one that I've been holding out behind me.
If you guys have never seen this, this is actually really
cool. They do a laser etching in house
and so they do this themselves, but this is a suspendables logo
with our upside down flag and the badge and a rifle and a
feather and it's very, very intricate.
They've got a really nice capability of doing that.
So you guys can do that. You can do corporate gifts them
as well. They'd be more than happy to
help you out. Check them out.
Patriot coolers.com. Use the promo code Kyle 10% off
link in the show description. It's familiar to any of you

(28:49):
who've been around for a while. But more importantly, if you
guys are new and you want to setsomething up special with them,
corporate gift, maybe something for your employees, maybe
something for a big group of family.
You're going to a family gathering and you want to get
them all something very easy. You can e-mail me, it's
info@kyleserafin.com and I'll connect you with Garriet and
they'll they'll do an order for you.
They won't cancel you no matter how conservative or how

(29:10):
inflammatory your message is, asfar as I can tell.
So check out Patriot Coolers. Good stuff.
Let's do, let's do the story. OK, so first of all, let's get
the official word. Here it is.
Brianna Morello sent me this last night.
She went and got a quote. This happened at 6:43 PM my time
at 743 I believe Eastern Time at7:43 on a Sunday night.

(29:32):
The FB is press office is still working and they're getting
emergency statements out to Brianna Marullo who asked, hey,
have you guys decided that this is the pipe bomber?
Has it been, has the pipe bomberbeen discovered?
This is coming directly out of her Twitter.
This is her e-mail that she thatshe screenshotted says below is
the FBI statement. I'm going to read it in

(29:53):
totality. Let's just make sure that we are
on on page with the official story.
The investigation into who placed the pipe bombs on Capitol
Hill on January 5th, 2021 remains a high priority for the
FBI and our law enforcement partners.
Kyle Seraphins aside. Yeah, I bet continuing on, a
$500,000 reward remains in effect for information leading
to the arrest and prosecution. Remember, they always say arrest

(30:15):
and prosecution, which they may not do.
They can decide not to of the individual who placed the pipe
bombs. The tips we've received so far
from the American people, including open source leads,
have helped us advance the investigation with expediency
and professionalism. And we asked the public to
continue to assist us by taking a fresh look at our Seeking
Information web page, which includes images and updated

(30:35):
videos of the suspect, the suspect's backpack and the
suspect's shoes, the explosive devices, and a map of the route
the suspect walked on the night the pipe bombs were placed.
We urge anyone who may have previously hesitated to come
forward or anyone who may not have realized they had important
information to contact us and share anything relevant.
Anyone with information should call 1800.

(30:56):
Call FBII thought it was 1800 FBI tips.
Maybe they have two phone numbers.
Submit tips online at tips.fbi.gov Regards the
National Press Operations Unit for the Office of Public Affairs
at the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
That would be the, well, the onethat is run by Ben Williamson,

(31:16):
who is a non FBI person who camein under Cash Patel as a buddy
and has absolutely no business being an assistant director of
the United States law enforcement entity known as the
FBI, has no business being there.
And So what this e-mail says to me now we're moving into the
commentary space. I guess what it says is if you
have any way to help Dan Bonginoand Cash Patel spin this so that

(31:40):
they don't have to address the ridiculously capable allegations
of my friend Steve Baker and theBlaze and the very well
researched piece they did and the infinitesimally small odds
of what I will share with you today, please give them
information they want to spend this.
If you guys recall 1313 months ago, Cash Patel actually

(32:00):
speculated that they would come up with a plausible story and it
was that it was a training exercise.
For those of you that are Dan Bongino listeners and many of
you that say in our chat every morning are former Dan Bongino
listeners prior to him going into the government and you'll
recall he said eventually the government will find a way to
blame it on a training exercise.That is the reason why I
interviewed Joe Hanneman the other day.
This is going back about 3 weeksago and we demolish the

(32:23):
possibility that they could try to use the thing that they get
have been speculating gets. Remember the concept that we've
talked about here before of illusory truth.
Illusory truth is when somethingis stated enough times.
In other words, kind of like repeat the lie enough times, you
start believing it to be the truth.
Illusory truth means without anyfactual basis.
If you've heard it, if it's goneinto your head enough times,

(32:44):
then you could actually believe that something is true.
You can convince yourself of something that is false.
And ain't it interesting that the same people who were out
there telling you over and over again the government's going to
cover up by calling it a training exercise, the
government's going to use training exercise as an excuse
for what happened. Those same people were hoping to
use the training exercise and exploit the illusory truth

(33:04):
effect on your brains, on the onthe brains of the audience.
Now, prior to prior to me, actually, let's see here, prior
to me realizing what was going to happen with our with our
Bureau, I went on Betty Johnson's show.

(33:24):
This is a interview that I did back and forth with him in
February of 2025 prior to Cash Patel being confirmed as FBI
director. So you can hear a little bit
more of a hopeful tone because this is, although I had some
doubts after the confirmation, they were far more significant
after the man got into the to the the director suite and
immediately went and apparently,according to a source I just

(33:46):
had, had the entire jet reupholstered.
He apparently also had a whiskeybar installed in his office
because he's such a baller, because he's living in like a
fantasy version of what he thinks the nerdy kid who becomes
J Edgar Hoover does. Before all that, I had a little
bit more hope and this is what we came up with and I laid out

(34:07):
parts of a plan here. I'm not going to cover all of
it, but you guys can find this on social media at least once.
You didn't know I was talking about this prior to to Patel
getting in. And I did tell them that this
was really important. And by the way, so did they.
They told us that I I don't believe they're that
incompetent. There's one J Sixer, there's one
J Sixer, Kyle, that I will devote every resource of this
program to personally. It's a finding.

(34:27):
It is the pipe bomber for sure. One person who behaved in a way
that would have caused mass terrorism, right?
And in, in, in, in, in planted apipe.
So let's believe the official story could have killed the vice
president, right? Theoretically, cause 'cause
right? Theoretically, Kamala Harris
walks right by the bomb. And how do you take, how do you
take my team, which is sitting on someone that is going to
hopefully get us there and pull us off, which is what they did

(34:48):
in the second week. They took they, they took us off
and they said you can't go watchthis person anymore.
You need to go back to your offices, sit out at the, the
airport and just look at your computer terminal and read
random tips of people who hate conservatives and who hate
Republicans that are coming in wholesale across the, the lines
from, from West Virginia. And that's what they they did.
They had they had a, a a hot. Lead dead to rights that had

(35:12):
direct. Physical connections and
transactions with the pipe bomber and they pulled you.
Correct. And I said, I'm like, look, if
you guys don't want to go talk to him, I will.
I understand. Like counterintelligence agents,
counterterrorism agents, they work in national security.
They get real cagey about going out and talking to people.
I used to work in outside sales.I'm not exactly afraid of like,
knocking on a door and having a chat with somebody.
I was like, supposedly this person was associated with the
Air Force. I was an Air Force veteran.

(35:33):
I'll go knock on the door and say, look, man, you probably got
on the wrong side of this thing.Why don't you come in and help
us out 'cause we're trying to figure out so nobody gets hurt
and you wouldn't want that. But that wasn't what they did,
as far as I know. Now, maybe they went back and
did it after the fact, but I wasin the Bureau for at least
another year after that and I never heard that that ever got
done. And I got friends that were on
that surveillance team and they were never put back out there
again. That goes up to right now.
That's never been done. They claimed they went and did

(35:56):
the interview. And if that's the case, then the
interview actually exists in theFB is files and that's even
worse for what's going on. I'm going to take you back in
time right now. This goes back to a story
September 22nd of 2022. This is 2 days before the
fateful interview where I walkedout and put my face on camera
and spoke with Dan Bongino for the first time.
That goes back a little bit morethan three years at this point.

(36:18):
FBI whistleblower counterterrorism cases against
alleged right wing extremists are mostly entrapment.
This is the thing that set off the government coming and and
trying to discredit everything that I've had to say.
And what I've said here is factually accurate and continues
to be. People will go out there and try
to poke holes and what I have tosay.
They may not like the personality that I deliver the
message with, but I don't care because the information I have

(36:40):
has been overwhelmingly well received by people that are
still inside the FBII got yet another message from a current
FBI agent on the edge of retirement saying you're spot
on. By the way, this person disagree
with me about Steve Jensen said he's a great guy.
We don't all have universal opinions about human beings.
But what we do agree on, the people that are honest that have
worked inside the FBI, we agree that the FBI is doing what I

(37:02):
would refer to as dog shit work all the time and they are a
danger to regular Americans and these guys are hoping they can
get out with their pensions. My concern is, is that what are
you getting out to? And that's why I don't have a
pension. This is from Carrie Pickett
again, Thursday, September 22nd,2022.
The FBI is counterterrorism investigations targeting alleged
white supremacists and right wing extremists are mostly

(37:23):
entrapment. Since his former agent, he's
been involved in these cases. A startling accusation came from
Kyle Serif, an FBI agent of six years, recently suspended by the
Bureau. He worked in multiple field
offices. close. I worked in 2 field offices, but
I worked in multiple AOR. During the work I did, my team
was deployed to 20 or 25 different high profile national
terrorism organization or terrorism investigations between
2018 and 2021. And what I saw is the most

(37:46):
obvious statement is that there are three things about
counterterrorism investigations #1 the demand for white
supremacy vastly outstrips the supply of white supremacy to the
FB is playbook. You guys see where this word
came from? It came from day one.
The playbook when it comes to counterterrorism investigations
is always an unequivocally morally equivalent to

(38:07):
entrapment, even if there's a legal, legal definition that
allows them to skirt that. And thirdly, Mr. Seraphin said
the FBI has no objective metricson how they prioritize
investigations. It is an entirely internal
process for determining what is a national security priority.
And they negotiate it back and forth to see what is going to be
of value to them. I want to just keep going

(38:29):
through this timeline with you alittle bit as we get to the time
the the story of the pipe bomber, because unfortunately,
my name and my credibility is going to be relevant to it.
But more importantly, this story's sticking power is also
part of the story and how long it's been out there.
FBI officials warned that after January 6th, some in the Bureau
were, quote, UN, quote, sympathetic to the Capitol
rioters. This is the first smear piece

(38:54):
that was ever done that includedme.
This was written by Ryan Riley and Ken Delanian, by the way.
Both of those men are 100% behind what I've been doing
about Cash Patel and the jet story in that.
Interesting. I stay the same.
Different people are willing to talk to me.
I have a friendly relationship with Ryan Riley.
I have a professional back and forth open DMS with Ken

(39:17):
Delanian. Does it mean that I trust them
all the time? No, of course not.
Does it mean that we agree on things?
It does not. But what it means is, is that
sometimes we find that just because I stay in the middle and
say the things that I've been saying for the last couple
years, the the political aisle shift has happened, the pole
shift has happened, and that's pretty wild.
Again, here's the two that wroteit.
The week after the January 6th attack, an e-mail landed in top

(39:40):
FBI officials inbox expressing concerns that some Bureau
employees may not be particularly moted to help bring
justice to the rioters who stormed the US Capitol and
threaten lawmakers lives. Now, why would it be that some
of us who worked inside the Bureau within a few days of
January 6th had a bad instinct about it?
Maybe because it looked like a set up from the beginning.

(40:01):
Maybe that the same things that you saw as not FBI agents, I saw
as an FBI agent and I wasn't alone.
This guy said there's no good way to say it, so I'll be
direct. It's my first and second hand
information from conversations since January 6th that there is
best, at best, a sizable percentage of the employee
population that's felt sympathetic to the group that
stormed the Capitol and that it was no different from the Black

(40:23):
Lives Matter protest of 2020, said a person who wrote it to
Paula Bate. Paula Bate was the over the top
of proving official of Arctic Frost.
Paula Bate was the deputy director of the FBI.
Do you guys hear his name on thelist of people that's being
investigated? Paula Bate, let me just break it
over here. Paula Bate hand picked many of
the people that are currently inthe senior leadership positions

(40:44):
that Cash Patel is taking advicefrom right now.
You get it. And the story goes that Paula
Bate got on a call and said if if you are not behind the
prosecutions of January 6th and you need to get the hell out and
find yourself another job. I'm paraphrasing something to
that effect. This e-mail was disclosed again.

(41:07):
This piece was written in October of 2022.
So this was about what, 1819 months after January 6th,
something like that. It was part of a FOIA request.
They go on and they talk not particularly nice about me.
They have the president of the FBI Agents Association saying
that the FBI agents understand the importance of separating
their own personal views from their professional work.

(41:28):
And you know that they did this.How do you know, folks?
Because FBI agents who are otherwise well meaning and
decent human beings went out anddid the work that their
government asked them to do. And they arrested J Sixers en
masse and they destroyed families and they destroyed a
lot of Americans trust in their own government, did they not?
Is that not what they did? I'm just saying, here's where it

(41:52):
gets fun. This is from The Washington
Times. Again, this is again from Carrie
Pickett. And this is in May of 2023.
January 6 pipe bombs at the DNC in the RNC were inoperable, says
ex agent whose story contradictsthe FBI's official story.
I paraphrase the title, sorry. You guys know the story of who
this person was. She quotes me going back to May

(42:16):
of 2023. This story is something that I
have been telling you since the beginning.
And what's amusing is we've beenvalidated this year as Patel's
people are trying to put stuff out and as John Solomon is
leaking information on behalf ofthe FBI that tries to make it
look like they're involved in transparency.
The former agent, Kyle Serafin, said the technicians were
working in the joint program forcountering IEDs told him the

(42:39):
devices left of the RNC and the DNC could not detonate.
The devices were primitive. I'm just going to quote myself
here. The devices were primitive and
had all the components that you would have for a bomb, but they
weren't assembled like a real bomb.
They would have never gone off. There's no chance they could
have actually detonated. So they were inert devices.
They just looked good or as I recall the words being looked
very bomb like. And one of those looked very
bomb like devices. Look like.
There they are. This is an A declassified

(43:01):
unclassified and then, let's say, you know, distributed.
It says not for external dissemination.
And then it was externally disseminated to the folks over
at Just the News, John Solomon, the prime outlet for Cash Patel.
Remember when Dan Bongino goes crying to someone, he runs
crying to Julie Kelly. And when Cash Patel goes crying

(43:21):
to someone, he runs off to John Solomon.
And here it is. By the way, there's another
story today, which I'm not goingto cover.
John Solomon has something on his website talking about how
although the FBI director is using the jet, he's saving money
by abusing the jet in a way that's better than the old
people who were abusing the jet.I'm paraphrasing, of course,
again with sarcasm. Here's the piece.
They've got a power source, they've got an initiation

(43:42):
device, they've got alligator clips, which is your, you know,
your, your electrical conduction.
It goes into a kitchen timer. You have a casing which is going
to be your pipe and the and the ends.
And then they had some sort of energetic material.
But the problem with this whole thing was, and as I said, it was
inert from the beginning, which is something I've been on record
saying. And the FBI denied it, including

(44:02):
underoath, when Steve d'antuana,who is the top of the Washington
field office, said no, I understand that these devices
were viable. Here is the FBI lab division
piece on it. Powder from device one.
Item 2 contained the oxidizer potassium nitrate, the fuel
sulfur, and the fuel consistent with charcoal.
The powder was tested for thermal susceptibility, known as

(44:25):
a flame test, with negative results.
It was not thermally susceptible, but this is where
it gets fun. In the proper proportions, these
chemicals can form the low explosive black powder.
There are two types of explosives, essentially high
explosives and low explosives. You guys are familiar with the
idea that like things like C4 and dynamite, they explode at a

(44:47):
rate of like I think it's like 2, two, 20,000 to 25,000 feet
per second and and low explosives are significantly
less. They're in the hundreds of feet
per second. They still explode, they're just
not as powerful. The thermal susceptibility test
was negative on this information, which means it
probably would have set off a bog, a bomb dog's nose, but it

(45:08):
but it couldn't go off. Oh, wait a minute.
What was it that Seraphin said again?
This was so this was really, this was corrosive.
He was, he was somehow, uh oh. That they were inoperable is
what I said, that they were inert, that they looked very
bomb like. I've been saying this out loud,
publicly, and probably at some risk to be fair, because we've
always kind of played this line of like, what can I say and what

(45:29):
can I not say? There are NDA's that exist
inside the government when you go work these things.
The difference is, is that afterI got my NDA, they also handed
me another letter who was signedfrom my boss, who also, by the
way, happened to be my boss on January 6th, of all things, who
happened to work underneath Steve d'antuano, who made some
lies about this, this particulardevice, Steve d'antuano was the

(45:51):
addict of the Washington Field Office.
Directly beneath him, Jennifer Moore.
Jennifer Moore was the lady who removed me from federal service
and she wrote me a letter and had me sign it that said that I
had been removed to my duties and responsibilities as an FBI
agent after I'd signed the NDA. The NDA says certain things and
then I was removed to my duties and responsibilities as an FBI
agent right there, to which my attorney and I basically said

(46:12):
it's pretty nebulous and it sounds like it may have removed
me from my duties as the the NDA.
Now, I'm not going to go out there and compromise national
security, and I'm not going to go out there and share things
that I know about the technologies that exist or the
way that the FBI does certain things.
But when it comes to an intereststory like this, where we know
that thousands of lives were disrupted and destroyed because
of this thing, and there's been numerous pieces of information

(46:35):
that have been shared with the public to include this.
This is a report that was released by Tom Massey.
I think we covered it last week,but I'm going to do more.
Tom Massey's office released a four year long report on what it
was that they knew. Four years after the January 6th
pipe bombs were placed, the FBI initially identified multiple
persons of interest. This is where we're going to get
to Baker's story. Almost immediately after January

(46:56):
6th, the FBI identified multiplepersons of interest whose
actions on or before January 6thraised questions for the case
team and documents obtained by the subcommittee.
The FBI identified a person of interest.
POI 2. That's person of interest too,
who on the morning of January 5th, approximately 9 hours
before the subject the suspect planted the explosive device on
security cameras, was captured photographing the dumpster next

(47:18):
to the location where the RNC pipe bombs would later be
planted. According to the FBI, after
taking pictures of the dumpster,POI 2 walked around the Capitol
complex, met with two unidentified subjects in the
same alleyway behind the RNC, and then entered the Capitol
South Metro station and rode theMetro to Falls Church, Virginia.
I'm saying things that are publicly record here.

(47:38):
Falls Church, VA. Notably, the agents assigned to
the case team determined that POI 2 used an Uber account and a
Metro card that was registered to a separate individual, POI
Three, who lived in Falls Church, VA.
And according to internal emailsthat were obtained by the
subcommittee, the FB is Case team considered POI 2's movement
to be highly suspicious, considered POI Two to be a

(48:00):
possible accomplice to the pipe bomber.
In the weeks following January 6th, the FBI directed
significant resources toward investigating POI 2 and POI 3.
For example, they placed both these people under what's called
Pfizer or physical surveillance.That was my job.
Pfizer, the Washington field office, WFO put in special
operations group, SOG, that was my job, that was my team, that

(48:21):
was us. The FBI also obtained grand jury
subpoenas for the cell phone data associated with POI 2 and
POI 3's phone numbers and issuedpreservation requests for blank,
blank, and blank accounts with the help from the United States
Capitol Police. Oh, really?
The FBI also tracked the movements of those two when POI
2 was met walking around the Capitol complex on January the

(48:42):
5th, on January 19th, 2021. This was a week after we did the
surveillance. Apparently, FBI agents
interviewed POI 2 and ultimatelyeliminated the person as a
person of interest, according toa summary of the interview
obtained by the subcommittee. Which would be the three O2.
All right, I'm tracking. Let me show you guys the greater
Washington, DC area. That's what it looks like on the

(49:04):
left hand boundary there. You have sort of the beginning
of Loudoun County. It goes further out and people
live much further out. They live out there and certain
places like all the way anyway, they live all the way out in
Loudoun County. That's like an hour in.
That's like Tim Pool country. The further out you go, you can
go all the way out to Winchester.
That's the state line for for West Virginia.
People travel all the way into Washington, DC from there.

(49:27):
On the right hand side you see sort of the outer parts, the
Marlboro area and that's all Maryland.
On the northern side, you're going to see things that are
going to be leaving, I think Montgomery County into Frederick
County, things like that. So below that.
And then at the bottom of this map here, you're seeing
Woodbridge. Woodbridge is not even close to
the furthest S stuff. They go all the way down to
Fredericksburg, which is another40 minutes or so down South.
So yes, this is a big, big spacewith a lot of things.

(49:49):
That little dot in the middle ofthe red, that's Falls Church,
VA. It's a little blip in a sea of
places where people live. And this is worth you seeing. 2
red squares. Those are doors obscured by an
aerial photograph. On the right hand side is the
person that was PY 2 that we were surveilling.
On the left hand side is the alleged pipe bomber that Steve

(50:09):
Baker came up with. And he told me about that
person's address on Thursday or Friday of last week.
And he told me the address and Isaid MFR, they must have been in
on it. And the reason why is because it
was one door away. It was 8 feet away from the

(50:30):
place that we were on January 13th, January 14th with my
surveillance team. We were watching right next door
to what Steve Baker and his crewcame up with over the last
couple weeks. And I get goosebumps thinking
about this. This is their story and this is
the person that they've identified.
They say Capitol Police officer,former Capitol Police officer

(50:51):
was a forensic match for the J6 pipe bomber.
Sources say Steve Baker and Joe Hanneman, do not forget Joe,
even though he's the quieter of the two and he's the the less
broadcast media guy. He's great and he's been on this
program as well. A computer program compared this
bomb suspect's gate to that of Shaney Kirkoff.
That produced a 94% match. The forensic analysis of the

(51:11):
former female US Capitol Police officers gate is a 94 to 98%
match with a unique stride of the long sought after January
6th pipe bomber. According to Blaze News, they've
been working with multiple intelligence sources.
I know more about that than I can say, but let me just say
it's not my story and it does sound very convincing.
The source close to the congressional investigation on

(51:32):
January 6th additionally told Blaze that evidence is removed
recently that pointed towards law enforcement possibly being
involved in the planting of the pipe bombs.
The software algorithm analyzes The Walking parameters including
flexion, which is knee bend, hipextension, speed, step length,
cadence and variance. Which rated that Shaney Ray
Kirchhoff, 31 years old of Alexandria, VA was a 94% match

(51:54):
to the bomb suspect shown on video from January 5th, 2021.
A veteran analyst who ran who checked into it for Blaze said
that based on visual observations that the the
program can occasionally struggle with, he pegged the
match even higher, closer to 98%.
I've read some of the other sourcing that Baker has on this
too, and the sourcing says some pretty wild stuff, like they

(52:18):
would have ordered a capture kill mission based on less than
what he had. Kirkoff was a Capitol Police
officer 4 1/2 years, left the department in mid 2021 for a
security detail inside the Central Intelligence Agency.
They've since walked back some of this story and said that she
wasn't at the security detail. The way that it works over at
CIA, as I understand it, is theyhave security guards that guard
the premise the the campus of the CIA.

(52:40):
They also have a dignitary protection unit and those are
all the same job description. So it's not real clear to say
what is and what is not the case.
Whether she was specifically a security detail person for the
CIA director or whether she justdid physical surveillance there.
By the way, I've confirmed it with another CIA employee that
they have in fact seen this woman on the campus working

(53:00):
there. She does in fact work in a
security role. What that role is kind of
irrelevant. She now works at the CIA.
The CIA, by the way, came back and pushed and said she's not on
the security detail for the CIA director.
So now we're supposed to believewhat the CIA says about CIA
employees because the CIA is notallowed to lie to us.
Just be clear. That's the that's the claim that
you're going to see from people on the on the political right.

(53:22):
All right. She has a residence in Virginia.
It appeared under the watchful eye of law enforcement on Friday
night before they actually launched this story.
Blaze editor in Chief Chris Bedford was pulled over by local
police when he stopped near the home just to observe and see if
anybody had actually served a search warrant there.
That happened on Friday night and this story was dropped very,
very late in the day on I guess it was Friday going into

(53:46):
Saturday. The FBI failed to solve this
case with nearly five years worth of investigative
resources. Again, our FBI, an $11 billion a
year federal law enforcement agency, was unable to handle the
single most terroristic act thathappened on January 6th.
Can we just go ahead and grasp how ridiculous that is?
Because for me, it is beyond ridiculous.

(54:08):
As I said to Benny Johnson in February, they're better than
that. Even when the FBI is not great,
it's still competent. It was able to find people based
on their freaking earlobes and determine that somebody was a
match and then go knock down doors and put them in prison
from January 6th. But it can't find somebody that
was a government employee that had government information,

(54:32):
including polygraph and all kinds of other stuff on file
that walked around for hours on government video cameras that
left physical evidence that was unexploded in an inert pipe
bomb. They couldn't find touch DNA,
trace DNA. They couldn't find a hair or a

(54:54):
fiber anywhere on this. Are you kidding me?
She worked in a sterile environment and never handled
this thing. Maybe so very impressive
tradecraft. And then she was on a cell phone
on, on video. The person who placed this bomb
was on a cell phone. So you're telling me that you
couldn't find this person? Are you telling me that you

(55:14):
didn't want to find it? And then comes the kicker.
The FBI put US1 door away from the person that Baker's team
found five years later, one dooraway within a week.
And then we were pulled off whenwe wanted to go and do a quick
knock and talk interview to clean this thing up.
Because if you guys recall, and this is a totally reasonable

(55:36):
thing for anyone to think, if you're an FBI agent, you'd go
look, we need to not have someone throw another bomb in
the capital. And so that's actually a really
big deal. Like, I've got kids.
The people that work in the FBI are all people who, you know,
travel in and out of Washington,DC.
We had an inauguration coming up.
Were we going to do an inauguration?

(55:56):
And the belief that there was a random person that randomly was
going to throw pipe bombs into the nation's capital and we
weren't going to do everything, including like maybe doing
something a little bit more aggressive than normal, like
doing a knock and talk on somebody and seeing if they
would talk to us. We got pulled in.
Don't do that again. Go evaluate garbage leads.
As I told Betty Johnson in February, as I told Carrie

(56:18):
Pickett, going back to May of 2023, my story's been consistent
the whole time because that's what happened.
Guys, if you think I don't know,if you think that we can't
substantiate that and there's not actual documentation you
already read, I already read it out loud to you.
Tom Massie's piece, they went out there and said they put SOG
on there. Guess what?
There was 1 squad that did SOG. That's it.

(56:40):
That was my squad. We did that.
I was on ID 21ID, Intelligence Division 21.
That's where we worked. The claim that we didn't, it's
already been substantiated by congressional investigators.
The question is why did they pull us off?
And I can't, I can't think, think otherwise.
We spent two days out there. The article says 2 days.

(57:03):
I confirmed with another person from that surveillance team.
We were out there for two days. We got pulled off after the
second day when I said, let's godo a knock and talk and get this
thing done because we didn't seethe guy come out of the door.
That was a very contentious and scary time.
For those of you who remember January 6th, those of you who
were in the the National CapitalRegion, this was the biggest
like terroristic threat. The idea that there was a rogue

(57:23):
person that was going to throw random explosives, even if they
were just dummy explosives, which by the way, we were
briefed. And I talked to another FBI
agent who was my buddy. I called him and I was like, do
you remember that? And he was like, yeah, you
called me when you were out there.
And we talked about it because he had friends that were on the
team at headquarters that were way up in the bomb program.
And they were like, yeah, it wasit was common knowledge that

(57:45):
these were inert devices. So why have they been lying
about this to the public if theywere serious about trying to
have somebody collect this reward?
Says here the FBI tied DC Metro rail trip cart allegedly used by
the pipe bomb suspect. You guys heard a very similar
version of that and Tom Massey'sthing as well.
And that goes back away. For those of you that are
wondering, hey, Kyle, like, why would you even need to know
about the bomb if you guys are out there doing surveillance?

(58:06):
Because it actually has a big, abig decision on how your
security posture is set up. You can get closer to people if
they have no explosive advice and they're not likely to be
like a, you know, a suicide vest.
But if you're dealing with somebody who's got an S vest
with the possibility of blowing themself up and you might stand
back a little bit to the minimumsafe, it's called officer safety
considerations. These are very standard in
surveillance operations and so on.

(58:28):
This has been an ongoing thing. Guys, I'm going to show you what
the door looks like. OK?
Can I just show you how crazy this is?
Alright, For all of you that arewatching on YouTube right now,
for all you that are on Rumble, actually, let's just do a
Spotify ad. You're seeing it on the screen
already. If you're not watching on on
Spotify, you're missing out on that.
If you're watching on one of thevideo platforms, make sure you
guys like us at kyleseraphinshow.com.
Audio listeners consider doing Spotify.

(58:49):
We don't make any extra money onit.
That has nothing to do with it. I just think it's a better
experience for you and you can switch over and see what I'm
about to show you folks on locals.
Thanks for being there. If you guys support us, you guys
are the best. If you're watching any of the
other platforms and you want to become a member of the channel
or support us, that's awesome. We really appreciate it.
The easiest way in the freeway is by hitting a like.
You could like us over on YouTube.
I'd appreciate if you did that. Now, if you're watching on
rumble boost this video up, hit a like, go ahead and share it

(59:10):
with anybody. Same thing over on X.
You can like it. Let's make this thing move.
These are the doors, folks. I've scrubbed the data of the
the house number so they're not necessary like so I've altered
this photo. Just so you guys know, I took
the the street names off and I took the the numbers off the
doors. OK, This is the house.
On the right hand side was the House of the person that we were

(59:31):
watching. On the left hand side of the
person that Steve Baker's team identified.
Almost five years later. You get it.
Do you see how close we were? What is the door?
3 feet wide? That's 9 feet center to center,
maybe 10 feet away, 15 feet awaytops.
On a bad day, if the person thatwe were watching spit outside,

(59:53):
it could have hit the door of the person that Steve Baker's
team identified. Do you know how many people live
in the Washington, DC area and how freaking improbable it is
that that would be the case? The gait analysis, by the way,
was done by some pretty capable individuals.
I'm not going to be able to say much more than that, but let's
just say that the the story thatI heard on it is very, very
convincing. And for those of you that don't

(01:00:14):
know, gait analysis is somethingthat is used by Defense
Information Systems. It is used by the National
Geospatial Agency. It's used by a lot of pieces of
the United States Intelligence Community.
Is it a stand alone metric, generally speaking, for
identification? No, not without some context,
but they had some context, and that's why it was functional.
It was one of the tools that wasused to identify Osama bin Laden

(01:00:35):
16 years ago from satellite imagery.
This wasn't taken from a satellite.
We have actual images of this person walking in and out from a
few feet away because there's like, you know, actual cameras
all over the place in DC. You guys get it?
That's what I'm asking. Consider how probable it is when
people who are interested in finding the answer actually may

(01:00:56):
have found something versus the folks that are out there on the
right right now that are trying to say otherwise.
And there are significant people, if I had seen this and
you were like, hey, what if we were to tell you what if I were
to tell you that the FBI had an assassination plot on the former
president of the United States, AKA Donald Trump.
And my evidence was that they had a pre printed form that had

(01:01:17):
things that said the FB is deadly force policy on it.
If that's evidence for you that the FBI tried to kill the, the,
the, the former president and now the current president, are
you seriously going to question something like gait analysis
coming out of an Intel thing andfinding out that the person was
being watched was a few feet away from an FBI surveillance
team five years ago? That's going to be that's too
much for you to swallow. But you believe that pre printed

(01:01:39):
forms that were written after Ruby Ridge were a plot to kill
the president? And I'm talking, of course,
about Julie Kelly, who's the mouthpiece for Dan Bongino.
She doesn't say anything that hedoesn't agree with.
It sounds like that's my, that'smy impression.
That's my opinion based on the way I've watched her, her
communicate. Are we really that I had a
picture. I don't even think I put it up

(01:02:00):
on the screen here, but let's doit.
Let me let me just grab it real quick.
Hold on. Give me a SEC, folks.
It's like it's like the point ofview of the right wing clown
show right now. I think we can put this up here.
This would be easy enough to see.
See if I can expand it out. Yeah, let's do that.
OK. This is what the right wing
clown show looks like. That's out here.
This is all the federalist type folks that are trying to show

(01:02:20):
you. Oh, this couldn't be the case.
Why would they care to defend the government today?
There it is. It's a bucket of crabs.
It's a bucket of crabs that are trying to call the one most
interested party. Where any of the other reporters
that you hear that are out there, like disparaging the work
of Steve Baker, were any of themarrested by the FBI, put in
handcuffs and walked out? Does anyone else remember that?

(01:02:44):
Because I remember that. I remember that it looked like
this. These are people that would have
been my former colleagues. They put my buddy in cuffs while
he was wearing a suspendable pinon his lapel and his jacket.
And he walked out there dressed like a man in a suit.
They told him to show up in shorts because they were going
to go and they were going to take him to a detention cell
where he was going to be belly cuffed.
He was going to be cuffed at thehands on a on a belly band.

(01:03:08):
And then he was going to be put in a prison cell or a jail cell
waiting for his initial appearance with a bunch of like
methamphetamine dealers. And there's the two agents from
Dallas that did it. Do you think my buddy doesn't
kind of hold like a grudge and want to actually get the story
right and doesn't want to just wing it?
He's been pretty darn patient. The so-called Biden

(01:03:28):
administration, FBI arrested my man and put him in that car and
drove him, drove him into a federal courthouse.
Has Julie Kelly ever dealt with that?
Has she ever done any original work as far as we can tell?
Or does she just go out there and find things on Pacer and
then tell everybody that she's that revelations on her?
She has revolutionary reporting.Let me tell you a revolutionary

(01:03:48):
piece of information. The person that I watched was
right next door to the person that this guy just identified in
his story. Does that not blow your mind
just a little bit? How do you explain that?
Let's just say that you don't believe.
Can you explain away that these people live next door to each
other? Because I can't, not even close.

(01:04:12):
And the gait analysis is just one aspect of it.
That's about it, man. I mean, I don't, I don't need to
tell you much more than that. This is the guy that's out there
spending the story. If you look at his previous
experience, you know what it is.Oh, he was a chief of staff in
the House of Representatives. He was a member.

(01:04:34):
He was working for a member of Congress.
The people that are running the FB is public relations team
right now, both came out of Congress.
So I'm quite interested finding out that they're the ones
pushing back against it. That's going to be Marshall
Yates, who used to work under Tom Massie.
A lot of questions I have. He was Tom Massie's expert on
the pipe bomb and now he is the congressional liaison for the

(01:04:56):
FBI to Congress. He's the assistant director of
the, I think, the Office of Congressional Affairs and Ben
Williamson, both of whom tried to figure out how to spin this
stuff. And there's more going on behind
the scenes than I can say at themoment, folks, that I don't do
that, like, dangle it out there.Let me just say that this is not
the entirety of the story. But even if it was, it's pretty
freaking damning. And it's not damning to this

(01:05:18):
person, this gal on the screen. What's damning is, is that the
intelligence apparatus has closed ranks.
And so today, if you're a MAGA person, you're supposed to
believe that we just trust the government after the government
proved that they are not worthy of our trust for literally
years, and for many of you, for decades.
Isn't that a problem? Can we answer those questions

(01:05:40):
before you go out there and start taking shots at Steve
Baker? And remember, lest you forget,
lest you think anything else, ifyou have information for the
FBI, you can give it to them at 1800, call FBI, or you can send
it to tips.fbi.gov because they're still looking even
though they're not looking there.
It's like the people that don't want to look at the one thing in
front of them. So anything else would be

(01:06:01):
useful. Can you give them an opportunity
to try to discredit Steve Banker, please?
Anything you can, Can you pleasehelp them find like an
alternative answer? I predicted this over the
weekend. They're going to either spin it
and act like they were always behind it, or they're going to
discredit it as best they can. And you can stand by the
discrediting, OP. It's already started, all right.
I'm not going to repeat myself any further than that.

(01:06:24):
You guys can hit the replay button.
You can share it out there with folks.
I would appreciate if you did. You guys can support us, the
various platforms that we're on.It's free.
It cost you nothing. This information again, most of
the work I do is actually free on the during the day.
Subscribe to the program on Rumble subscribe over on
YouTube. We just crossed 15,000 followers
over the weekend on your or 15,000 subscribers on YouTube.
Thanks so much for doing that, guys.
Make sure you guys have set up notifications If you want to

(01:06:45):
know when we go live. It's right about 8:30 my time.
It's 9:30 on the East Coast. Like the the videos wherever
you're at, that'd be great. And then you can find us on
Locals and X as well. Very easy to do.
That's the Kyle Seraphin show. How about that?
That's what we do here sometimes.
I'm going to go back to making sure that the people that want
to give the truth out and hand it over to members of Congress,
who I hope do oversight and actually don't play politics

(01:07:08):
with these bureaucratic agenciesthat outlast them.
And they don't have some sort of, you know, nasty information
that the Praetorian Guard can use against them.
I'm hoping that our members of Congress actually give a damn,
at least a few of them, about what the truth is.
And if you're one of these people that doesn't, you're on
the enemies list. And Americans are fed up with,
if you have not realized this, people in power, folks who

(01:07:32):
listen to this program that are thinking, yeah, this guy, this a
hole, he's a real problem. I am not alone with my disgust
with this government. And I don't think that I'm alone
in the fact that most of us wouldn't care if you guys ever
opened up again. Yeah, there'll be a bunch of
people have to find new jobs. They would find them.
They have a skill set that's useful or they don't and they'll
have to go out there. But you're about to vote to put

(01:07:52):
what, 40 million people back on a a welfare system because of
the failing of your system? Your system fails.
And you guys knew, you freaking knew that this budget was going
to be due and you did nothing about it.
So spare me any of this stuff and reopening it.
Please don't. I hope the Democrats get back
together, rejoin ranks and keep it shut down.
And I'm sorry if that screws up your holiday plans.

(01:08:14):
Maybe get an RV or maybe just drive.
Maybe celebrate locally because maybe things get spicy.
If this stuff starts bringing down some of the the walls of
the temple, it could all fall down on all of us.
And that's fine because otherwise our children don't
live in the America that even has the same illusion that we
did when we grew up. I got nothing funny to end the
show on. That's where we're going to
edit. God bless all of you all.

(01:08:35):
I appreciate you being part of the program.
I appreciate you sharing it and I look forward to seeing what
comes up. Today's going to be a wild day
as we even shut this thing down.So catch you guys tomorrow at
0930 Eastern Time. God bless.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSerafin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,
Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.

All Episodes

PIPE BOMBER IDENTIFIED?!? Government claims they are still looking | Ep 673

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}PIPE BOMBER IDENTIFIED?!? Government claims they are still looking | Ep 673