REVEALED! FBI 7th Floor HOOVER Building SOURCE Leaks Info on KASH! | Ep 687 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:14):
The place has taken a reputational hit.
There is zero question about it.There were a lot of bad actors.
One of them is still out there causing us all kinds of trouble.
One of them still out there causing us all kinds of trouble.
One of them still out there causing us all kinds of trouble.
So we had to fix it and rebuild public trust.
One of the ways to do it is these cases of significant
public interest that matter. Take a look behind the curtain

(00:37):
with a real whistle blower, an American patriot.
Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this
program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment
defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.

(01:02):
Well, hello, my friends. Welcome to the Kyle Seraphin
show. Today's Thursday.
It is October the 30th, the day before Halloween, and we have a
very exciting, very interesting,very revealing show for you this
morning. For those of you that are
joining us for the first time, Hello, my name is Kyle Seraphin.

(01:22):
I used to be an FBI agent. I was a paramedic.
I worked in the Air Force. I have spent over a decade of my
time working on the public, on the public service end of
things. I previously worked in some
other places. I worked in private industry.
I was in sales, worked in media sales.
I worked for Warner Brothers as a movie studio guy.
I've got an interesting back story in life and I'm not your

(01:44):
typical former FBI agent. I would say I used to have a fun
experience when I would go out and meet regular real people who
would say, Kyle, you're not whatI expected.
When I met somebody from the FBIand I said, yeah, that's OK,
because feds, they're a bunch ofnerds.
And then I would laugh and then they would laugh, and then the
person that was with me would look at their shoes awkwardly.
That was just the way it went. I can't help it.
That's the way I'm built. I have a little bit of a sense

(02:07):
of humor that is not common necessarily in people who've
worked in law enforcement. And maybe it's because I worked
as a paramedic as well. I don't know.
I've seen the darker side of life.
Today is not going to be one of those days, but we are going to
do a look into the darkness and reveal a source.
Now, I don't normally do that, and I don't generally claim
things like journalistic privilege and I don't generally
go out there and aspire to be a journalist.

(02:28):
But I've done some journalistic activity that nobody can deny.
Some of the things that we've exposed here on this podcast and
through the written form, through the social media and so
on. I have gone on to cause Congress
to do investigations. A lot of good it did US, by the
way, none at all. But some of the stuff that we've
put out in the world have made real impacts on the national

(02:49):
news, the national news story cycle, if you will.
One of the things that many people in the conservative space
just take as writ, you know, wrote knowledge at this point.
The FBI spied on parents who attended school board meetings,
sent counterterrorism agents, domestic terrorism investigators

(03:11):
to go out there and look into those parents.
That's true. And I helped reveal that.
But that wasn't the point of what I was revealing.
What I showed was that there wascorruption at the top of the
DOJ, that we had an attorney general at that time, Merrick
Garland, who looked like he liedto Congress when he said that he
would not use counterterrorism resources, patriotic tools and
so on to go after these parents.But it is considered to be

(03:33):
standard fair now that way if you listen to your Republican
representatives in Congress, thefirst thing that they will drop
when they talk about FBI malfeasance and criminal
activity and the things that they're so concerned about, the
things that they're fighting for.
They talk about how parents at school boards were were spied
upon. That was one of my protected
disclosures. It's one of the reasons why I do
not work at the FBI anymore. I also show that they went after

(03:54):
Catholics. I did this in January of 2023,
beginning of February of 2023, wrote the story that ended up
getting a man removed from his job.
Another source of mine inside the Bureau, and that turns out
to be the standard course, the regular fare that when the FBI
is exposed, it doesn't matter whether it's Chris Ray or Jim
Comedy or Robert Mueller or whether it's cash battalion

(04:14):
charge Paula Bate when he was the acting director.
Doesn't matter if you experienceor expose, if you experience the
the the the momentary instinct that you should share government
malfeasance with the people who pay for that government, then
the FB is instinct. Immediately their knee jerk
reaction is to go and attack that person.

(04:37):
So we found out yesterday. I found out.
Now you found out. Some of you are here because you
found out the FBI opened up a leak investigation to find out
who funneled me information about cash Patel's jet setting
trip up to State College, PA. Now, at the end of the day, it's
not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things.

(04:57):
The amount of money we're talking about is not that much.
Our government is is woefully like disrespectful with the
amount of money that they spend on things.
But it is a really awful look inthe middle of a government
shutdown to have a guy who claimed that we should shut down
the government jet, taking the government jet for personal
travel to go check out what his girlfriend's doing and singing
at some wrestling event and thenfollowing her home or maybe

(05:22):
taking her home on that private jet that we all have to pay for.
It's a really ugly look when airtraffic controllers are
controlling that aircraft and they're not getting paid and
they're worried about whether ornot they can feed their family
or make their mortgage payment. And should they?
Should they be worried about that?
Probably not. They should be more financially
solvent. But they do work and they do
expect to get paid for that work.

(05:43):
And that is a pretty reasonable thing to do.
People ask, well, like, well, hey, what?
Why are you so fixated on this stuff?
There's a couple of reasons. Number one, I really hate
hypocrisy. I despise it.
It is a ongoing theme here that I will tell you about hypocrisy
whenever it pops up. And it doesn't matter whether
it's Gavin Newsom sitting at French Laundry during COVID,
Nancy Pelosi getting her hair blown out, or whether it's
people inside my former agency using our money in a way that is

(06:06):
disrespectful to us. I have a massive problem with
hypocrisy. I don't like it.
I don't like big government. I don't like big government
spending our cash without our permission.
So it's SNAP benefits, it's federal salaries, it's agencies
that shouldn't exist. All of these things are
problematic for me and I'm goingto continue to do it.
And the second thing is Cash Patel has decided to target me
personally. Me, this guy sitting in this

(06:27):
little room in a little spot outside of Austin, TX,
broadcasting from the, the home studio that we rent 'cause I had
to sell my house when I used to work for the FBI.
And his girlfriend who he went to go see has sued me for
$5,000,000 using the lawyers from his legal foundation.
I'm expecting she doesn't pay any money for it.

(06:47):
And they're suing me for quote UN quote defamation on things
that were said long before I ever started talking about it
because people have been saying it since February and they sued
me in August. So I'm, I have a little personal
stake in this and I will acknowledge my personal bias
right up front. But shouldn't you also be pissed
that somebody who says that the government shouldn't be abusing
things and that there are thingscalled government gangsters
writes an entire book about it? And then you went and bought

(07:09):
that book and you were like, hell yeah, this guy's going to
go clean up the mess. And then the first thing he does
is like, well, there's a government shutdown for for
others, but not for me. I would be flying and drinking
champagne and eating snow cones in the back of this private jet
that you all paid for because I deserve it.
That's an easy way to get a little bit frustrated.

(07:30):
If you guys had gotten Epstein files, if you felt like people
who were the quote UN quote, deep state actors, the bad
people out there that were in our government that were doing
things, If they had gone out there and gotten arrested right
away or if they had started building cases and we started
seeing indictments. If you started seeing like
Obama's and Clintons and all thepeople that he promised were
going to go to jail, if they started going to jail, if they
started going to prison and having to face legal process,
you guys would be OK with that. I think so far we've got Jim

(07:52):
Comedy, we got Letitia James from Mortgage Fraud, and we've
got John Bolton who used to workfor Trump.
Those are the big players, right?
Oh, they got to start with the small fish.
No, they don't. This is the best you're going to
get, folks. We're going to talk today about
Arctic Frost as well, because that's super instrumental in
understanding why this agency, this FBI, this Hoover Building

(08:13):
that we were told was going to be closed on day one.
I knew that was hyperbolic. I don't take him at any other
word. But the idea that you would shut
down what goes on at the FBI, the FBI headquarters, that's the
piece that should be really discussed.
And so I'm going to go through alot of the information that
you're not going to understand unless you are an FBI, former
FBI employee. We're going to talk about what
Arctic Frost means. The BS outrage that we're seeing

(08:35):
from people on the Republican side of the coin who some of
whom were totally OK with FISA and seven O 2 FISA spying on
Americans and incidental collection of your calls, your
toll records, your content and so on.
That was going out across the wires and now they're super
outraged because the speech and debate clause and you've crossed
over the line. I'm going to show you my
argument is, is that Arctic frost is an indicator and why we

(08:58):
shouldn't have an FBI at this point because Arctic sprost was
a legally predicated investigation that was signed
off on by everybody. And that power still exists in
this DOJ and in that DOJ. And I'm going to be real clear,
the DOJ is not all that different because most of the
people who work in any of the DOJ's and the FBI are the same
people that worked there previously under the the former

(09:18):
regime. And they'd be willing to do the
same thing to you today. How's that sound?
We're going to do that. Was that about a 10 minute open?
Let's do it. OK, before we get started, I'm
going to pay some bills with a sponsor.
This is a sponsor I'm excited about because I think that they
make a really great product. It's Cove pure.com slash Kyle
Cove Pure. How much have you guys thought
about what's in your drinking water?
Do you care about what's in yourtap water?

(09:39):
I actually did not at all until I married my wife.
That's my wife's department. I've kind of done a 180 on it #1
because we moved to a place where there's a lot of sulfur
and the water stinks. It actually smells bad, which is
not great. And then additionally, I used to
live at Kirtland Air Force Base.I found out that there was all
kinds of crazy stuff like arsenic and pesticides and
chemicals, and the military let some fuel tanks leak into the
mountain and we got all kinds ofgross water when I was in the

(09:59):
active duty service. So that's not amazing.
If you guys want something that's pretty cool, that's going
to be able to do excellent filtration, it's really easy.
There's no plumbing, all you do is you plug it in.
Takes about 15 minutes to set upand all you do is push buttons.
I've done other water purification setups and they
actually are a bummer. This one is sitting up for my
kids. It sits up on their countertop.
These are not cheap units, but they're effective units.
They also last way longer than like your Brita filters and some

(10:21):
of these other cheapy stuff. OK, they can last you 6 months
to 24 months and depending on which filters you're using,
they've got a four stage process.
If you guys don't want all kindsof chemisides, if you don't want
the the stuff that's turning thefrogs gay that you hear Alex
Jones talk about getting into your drinking water. 99.9% of
impurities will be filtered out with these Cove pure products.
They sit on your shelf. You push a button, it makes a

(10:44):
little Ding. You can get hot water, you can
get lukewarm water, You can get steaming hot for, for making a
cup of tea or instant coffee, which is really cool.
And I use that fairly frequently, sneak it away from
my kids. It's easy to fill up, it's easy
to maintain. It looks nice, it's got all
kinds of functionality, and it'snot the most expensive water
filter out there. I've paid more for other ones
for whatever it's worth. If you guys are interested in
doing that, you want to get fluoride and all the other junk

(11:04):
that's out of your water. That changes the taste.
That's the biggest thing you'll noticed.
Pretty great, but on top of all that, it's actually going to be
good for your health. So look into Cove Pure.
If you guys do not have filtration right now, you can
get icy cold water, you can get super hot water, you can get
lukewarm water. I'm just answering chat
questions in the chat right now.Cove pure.com slash Kyle.
There's a link in the show description.
You'll save $200 when you guys use that link and let's get it

(11:28):
done. If you guys are not getting pure
water, you'll notice a big upgrade.
It'll make everything taste better.
Let's get in today's program. I will be doing a reveal very
soon. Now, we're not going to totally
bury the lead here, but I am going to make this a little bit

(11:50):
longer than you guys are probably excited about because
there's a bunch of stories that I don't want to miss.
And we've talked more about thisthis week than I have about some
of the other stuff. So let's go through a list of
things that I think are important and I'm going to just
hit them off the top of my head.The first one here is a
Department of Defense step to get rid of more civilian
employees when necessary. I've been watching a handful of
these stories and I didn't coverthem over the last couple days,

(12:12):
so let's do it now. It's one of the upsides of a
government shutdown. You guys know, we're 30 days
into a government shutdown. There's lots of crying and
wailing and gnashing of teeth. And at the end of this week, we
may actually see SNAP benefits not fill up on the card so
people won't be getting them at the end of the day tomorrow.
I don't know if they like preload them on the 31st, if the
first falls on a weekend or if they still hit it on the weekend
or whatever, but we're going to have a SNAP shut down.

(12:34):
And that's making people very concerned their government
employees not getting paid. One of the upsides is you have
some interesting flexibility to go out there and drop civilian
employees. It is, well, it usually is very
hard to get rid of civilian employees inside government
agencies unless you happen to bea whistle blower, then it's
super easy. By the way, they pull out all
the stops. Ask me how I know.
The day before the government shutdown this month, senior

(12:55):
Pentagon official signed a memo that could make it easier for
the Defense Department to fire employees.
This is coming from NBC News. In the September 30th memo
called Separation of Employees with Unacceptable Performance,
you hear the title Unacceptable performance that actually should
be really relevant. It outlines new guidelines
directing supervisors and human resources to act with speed and
conviction to facilitate separating poor performing
employees from the Defense Department.

(13:17):
Now that's easy for them to do and abuse.
And yet I actually do think thisis a necessary thing because
federal employees are famously hard to get rid of.
They almost always have this like entitlement complex to the
point where they may not be doing any of their work and you
still have to beg them to it. You have to thank them when they
actually do a piece of their work.
And and they'll sit there for 20-30, forty years and then

(13:39):
they'll have a big retirement celebration where everyone
brings lunch and nobody likes them.
In the FBI, we used to call agents like that 25 year
mistakes or 20 year mistakes. That's a person that got hired
and you couldn't fire. Now all that person had to do
was shut their mouth, hang out and do nothing and they would
continue to get a paycheck, or as we like to say, the Golden
Eagle would crap in their bank account every two weeks.
And that's the thing they most love about that job.

(14:00):
I worked with plenty of people that were like that.
They were all awful and really frustrating if you wanted to
perform. Now if you were a person that
was like a hard charger and you want to go out there and get
active and you wanted to fix problems that you saw him, you
actually were more likely to getfired.
That was always the case. The government incentivized the
wrong behavior at all times. So this is not a terrible thing,
says Quote. Supervisors will work with HR to
issue written statements and notice of proposed removal

(14:23):
detailing specific performance deficiencies, consistent
failures of an employee to meet quality standards, deadlines, or
productivity targets. That sounds more like private
sector stuff, and that's probably something that should
be done. Everybody who who's mad about
the way the government performs has to realize the government is
not attempting to operate in inefficiencies.
They do not care about efficiencies, not even a little
bit. They have no interest in getting

(14:44):
it done. They simply are going to
continue to exist. This is the self licking ice
cream cone. It exists because it exists.
And my job is that I get to showup and my job is is to get paid
every two weeks. That's a governmental attitude.
There's a reason why I say that government is the worst solution
to every problem, including whenit is in fact the only solution
to the problem. Couple other stories that I

(15:05):
wanted to hit. Anyway, it's worth knowing that
we may get some clean up at the DoD, now called the Dow, the
Department of War. That's good.
Some of these stories, these aretwo from CBS that I wanted to
hit and we're going to touch them real quickly.
Hospitals are hoping for an exemption from Trump
administration's new $100,000 H-1B visa fee quote.
We cannot afford that. There's a real big problem in
this country when it comes to healthcare.

(15:26):
One of them is that we think that the government should be
involved in it at all. And another one is that there
are so many sick, fat and unhealthy people that they
actually require such a significant amount of healthcare
that we theoretically have to goand hire nurses from like third
world nations or Second World developing places and bring them
in. And what Trump has basically
said with the H1B system, and heprobably will renege because
that's what he does, He said that it's going to cost $100,000

(15:49):
to bring these people in. That's kind of good.
When was the last time anybody who worked in the in the VA or
anybody who has the VA Veterans Affairs, if you've ever gone in
there, you always get an Indian Dr. I don't know why that is,
but all my doctors have been Indian.
Some of them are hilarious, hilarious Indian doctors that
say really, really funny things,whether they mean to or not.
I had a doctor look at me straight in the eye after we
were discussing like musculoskeletal pain.

(16:11):
And he looks at me and he goes, OK, now, now we are going to
talk about the diarrhea. I'm like, we're going to talk
about the diarrhea. And he's like, we're talking
about the diarrhea. And when we're talking about the
diarrhea, we're talking about the loose stools.
OK, bro, we'll talk about loose stools.
What do you want to know? And I kid you not, the guy asked
me, tell me about the diarrhea. I said every, every shit that I
take is an emergency. This is going back like 1012

(16:32):
years ago, 13 years ago. And he wrote that down because
he was Indian. He wrote it down.
Every, every patient reports is an emergency.
We have a lot of people that arefrom not this country that work
in our healthcare system. That can be very frustrating,
especially when you're in a position where you cannot
communicate with them and you'rehaving a medical emergency.

(16:52):
I used to work in emergency rooms.
I have seen this nurses who speak from like whatever other
dialect of English that they have that's indecipherable to
those of us that are speaking ata native level.
Really hard to deal with. In any case, this is going to
hit some of these healthcare workers.
What's crazy is, is that chief nursing officers at health
departments outside of DC are quoted here saying that we've
had a continual desire to bring on 100 nurses each three years.

(17:14):
That's from out of out of the the country.
They won't be able to afford it.They're very frustrated.
They want more and more nurses. I get it.
It says a lot about what our system looks like too.
So one of the best things you can do, one of the most
important things I think you cando is get your body to the point
where you're not requiring healthcare.
And that means you got to start step one.
And we're going to talk about that thing.
We're going to be talking about that.

(17:36):
It's the same issue with SNAP. How many of these people are
ridiculously unhealthy? That's our country's sort of
like number one thing that we have as a problem.
And I actually thought Donald Trump kind of ran on that.
He ran on the Make America Healthy Again thing.
That was what the RFK junior wastrying to tell people like make
yourself not a consumer of healthcare.
And if you had that, then you wouldn't worry whether or not

(17:57):
the federal government was involved in it, whether
healthcare benefits spiked because you wouldn't be a
partaker of that until you were old enough where, you know,
there were some like long term palliative care.
And that was the end. Most people are are consuming
medicines every single day at such a young age.
It actually blows my mind. Another one here that I wanted
to point out because when I saw this, I went, oh God, here it
comes. New Mexico will be the first

(18:17):
state to offer free universal childcare next week.
This is coming from CBS News as well.
This story is truly wild. And if you guys don't know, I
used to live in New Mexico. I lived there in the Air Force
and then I lived there when I worked in the FBI, so two
different times, almost a decadeapart.
And when I was living there, what I realized is that New
Mexico is a testing ground, is aPetri dish for really bad
Democrat policies that they willtry on a state that people don't

(18:39):
even realize is in America. You may not know that, but New
Mexico is a great proving groundfor Democrat policies.
It will be a bellwether on whether or not they're going to
move before it. They do it with gun stuff, they
do it with public policy, they do with education, they do with
spending on things like this. New New Mexican parents are
going to no longer have to pay for childcare starting next
week, regardless of income, making the Land of Enchantment,

(19:00):
AKA the Land of Entrapment, the first state in the nation to
offer free universal childcare. The leftist governor there,
Michelle Lujan Grissom, who is famous for grabbing a dude's
junk and getting sued for it, has championed the new
initiative, saying it would savefamilies on average $12,000 a
year. Well, there's no such thing as
free childcare, as we all know. This is another problem.

(19:20):
When I talk about bad spending, what you're doing is you're
incentivizing women to leave thehouse and not raise their own
children, that you're going to outsource the raising of
children. And this is where leftist
ideology always falls dark. Is it just me, or is it kind of
distracting to have that, like, shadowy figure sitting here on
the side? I'm going to get rid of this
thing. One of the worst things that you
can do is like act like women can have these things and that

(19:42):
there's not a cost. The cost is you have to actually
have women who make very little money, who are subjugated and
they have to go in and they're going to be, they're going to be
paid far less right then the women who are going to go to
work. So you're going to subjugate
some younger girl who's going tohave some non professional
experience as a daycare worker. That's how you're going to have

(20:05):
it all. And now the state's going to pay
for it, which means we all get to pay for it, or everybody who
lives in New Mexico is going to do it.
This is a really bad idea. And you have these, like these
parents where two different people in the household work and
they say, well, it's going to save us $14,000 a year.
Well, you're going to turn around and pay it out of your
taxes. Now everybody has to pay that.
So now where does the line get drawn?
It's like a second mortgage for our house.

(20:26):
It's amazing all the sectors of our economy are over performing,
said Lujan Grissom. So we need more people to work.
We need 67% of the women with children under the age of five
to get out there. We need to raise your children
for you is what they say. That's essentially what I read
on that. It's an important story.
I didn't want to miss out on it.We will move slowly onward.
One of the other things that I thought was really interesting,

(20:46):
this coming ABC News, a story that I saw just the headline
alone was too fun not to read. You guys tell me if you see the
irony in this. I did show you.
Here's Gavin Newsom. Let's put Gavin Newsom on the
screen. Gavin Newsom says the United
States faces a quote, UN quote, 5 alarm fire.
And he warns that we will not have a country #1 the attitude
that we will not have a country is quite amazing #2 the idea

(21:08):
that a guy that presided over a state that had a horrific fire
down in the Palisades and they were, well, fully unprepared,
they could not handle the, the, the response to it is going to
talk about fires. I just feel like he's setting
himself up for incredible memes.This guy clearly is going to be
running for president. And so this is what we're up
against. That's why all this stuff
actually matters right now. I'm going to give you a little

(21:28):
taste of what I think is going on with this thing and why Gavin
Newsom is not out of line and why he's going to have support.
This is a little clip from Jon Stewart the other day.
He's talking about the opposite side of the country, what's
going on in New York. They have an election right now
where they're poised to elect a 30 something year old socialist,
which is truly incredible. The man has no experience.

(21:51):
He has no business running a city like New York City, doesn't
even seem to know what the powers of the mayor are.
And Jon Stewart is puffing him up.
I think it is a broader problem for people on the left and to
act like this is somehow all funded by Soros or that it's
propped up by people who are, you know, shady and nefarious
figures. There's still an audience for
it. There continues to be.
I'm going to play this little clip from Jon Stewart, and I'm
going to follow it up with one from a woman who's flooded my

(22:13):
timeline of late on social media.
Her name is Jennifer Welch and she seems truly awful.
She seems really, really nasty. And they're starting to call her
people are that are on the left that she's going to be the Joe
Rogan of the left. This is the second time I've
heard there's going to be a Joe Rogan of the left.
That was the the Call Her Daddy,a podcast that was supposedly
the same thing and gets like, you know, one 100th or one one

(22:34):
thousandth of the audience. But sure, this is going to be
the Joe Rogan of the left. First, Jon Stewart talking to
Mondami and giving him like, glowing praise on stuff that
seems like he doesn't even know who he's talking to.
I wish you all the best, honestly.
You know, I think any New Yorkerwho looks at someone getting an
opportunity, who's representing communities that have not been
as representative a, a Muslim, a, a young person, a

(22:55):
progressive, a democratic socialist, You know, there are
so many different communities that are looking to you.
And and this, I hate to put it on you as a bit of a Jackie
Robinson moment, and I know thatthat that probably wield some
weight, but man, oh man. What an exciting opportunity and
I wish you the best. Gross, gross to all of that.

(23:20):
A Jackie Robinson moment. You've got to be kidding me.
You have to be kidding me. Jackie Robinson had talent.
I guess this guy does have a talent to go out and like say
things to people and make them like him.
That's kind of scary. And as I said, there are people
all around the country that are like, hey, you think this is a
one off that young people are into it.
I think young people are going very divergent.
I think that people that are significantly younger than me

(23:41):
are doing something that my generation didn't do.
Many of your generations did notdo as well.
We're fragmenting at a politicallevel at a very, very young age
where people are like, I'm goinghard, right?
I'm going to the point where I want to do radical stuff.
And then the other side of it islike, I think that the
government should give us everything and we're entitled to

(24:03):
it and we shouldn't work and we should have free child care
because somebody else should raise our kids because they're
inconvenient. So I can go out there and live
my dream of having a great corporate experience or whatever
the hell it is. There's someone that's doing
this stuff right now. So they're fragmenting.
This is Jennifer Welch saying something that I think is truly
nasty because it also adds to the point that there are those
who would celebrate violence. And it's the people that are

(24:24):
raising the youngest generation.This woman, she calls her a wine
mom. She's like this chubby lady on
the street. And I think it's Caitlin Bennett
that's out there doing the interview who seems pretty
reasonable. I mean, she's inflammatory.
She does this sort of provocative game, but she's not
someone that should be shot. And to think that that's OK and
say it out loud, we've crossed the line where people are

(24:45):
willing to talk about it. Finally, if you think this Zoran
thing is happening just in New York and you think people are
waking up only in New York City,you're mistaken.
Look at this clip of a wine mom at the No Kings March.
Play the clip. Word's name was Charlie Kirk,
ma'am. Yeah.
Him is horrible. Horrible.
Charlie Kirk is horrible. Yes.

(25:06):
I'm glad he's not here. You're glad he's dead?
Yes. Why would you say something like
that, ma'am? He was horrible on the campuses,
the college campuses. Horrible person.
You know what? I do the exact same thing.
Would you be glad if I would die?
Maybe. I'd have to think about it.
Should be ashamed of herself. Her friend just said she'd be

(25:27):
happy if I died. So listen up, Democratic
establishment, you can either jump on board with this shit or
we're coming after you in the same way that we come after
MAGA. Period.
Stop taking APEC money. Go on.

(25:48):
And I'm sorry I took APEC money.Atonement tour.
If you want to stay in power, stop missing out on these big
rallies. Hakeem and Chuck should have
been front and center. They're introducing the next
mayor of New York City. But no, they wouldn't show up
because they're pussies. They're pussies that are

(26:09):
beholden to the same corporations that Donald Trump
that helped Donald Trump get elected.
That's a hell of a take. It's a hell of a mouth.
You think she kisses her mother with that mouth?
that Lady supposedly is a chef from Oklahoma.
She's supposed to represent, I don't know, like regular
American people. I don't know women that talk
like that. I don't know moms that talk like

(26:29):
that. I don't know moms that have skin
that is pulled that tightly backon their face.
She looks like a transgender person.
I'll show you a transgender person just for funsies that
looks more feminine than that woman.
There's another story that's been blasting through my
timeline here as well, and I can't help but notice it.
Someone called Leah Smith, whichwas a man, Lia.

(26:50):
Again, not real Leah, not LEAI or LEH.
Leah Smith was a student at the same school that this guy Ari
went to, and Ari is a Media Matters consultant or something
to that effect. And I follow just for sort of
like amusement occasionally. And I get this sort of garbage.
But for some reason, I'm gettingblasted with the story of a

(27:10):
transgender person who was kicked off a team because of the
Trump administration's policy saying men are men, women are
women. You can't share the same
bathroom. This seems pretty reasonable.
I've got three daughters. I'm 100% behind that.
If I saw a dude going into the women's restroom while my wife,
who's under 5 feet tall decides to go in there with my babies,
I'll go in there and drag him out by his freaking wig or his
neck. I don't care.

(27:30):
Like that's what men need to be doing.
In the meantime, we're getting this sort of like weird
sympathy, like you're killing us.
Anyway, that woman who was saying the, the nasty words has
a foul mouth, looks less feminine.
And I think there's something toit.
They're trying to be something. They think that the, the, the
secret magic of, of, of Joe Rogan is that he has an
occasionally foul mouth and thathe talks tough.

(27:52):
The difference is Joe Rogan could probably kick you in the
body and break your body, like snap your spine with a, with a
leg kick because he's really, really masculine and he's very
muscular. He's super fit and he's funny
and he's clever and he's interested and he's curious and
he's willing to hear other people's perspectives.
Like Joe Rogan's interesting because he represents like what
we think we should be like when someone listens to someone that

(28:14):
we don't agree with or someone that we do.
That woman's just nasty and again, less feminine than this
man who is presenting himself asa woman and and telling the the
sad, sad story of another man who was not accepted as a woman
and therefore he took his own life, which is truly sad.
But we're living in 2025 America.
So as that woman was talking about AIPAC and all the other
stuff, you also have to realize that that same party that's

(28:36):
going to go out there and be real tough.
They also want to represent likecomplete fantasies and illusions
that don't exist. And we're not having it.
I just think Americans are looking and going like, no,
we're done with that thing. We're done pretending you can't
make us live in your fantasyland.
In late October, Middlebury College announced that Leah
Smith, a 21 year old trans womenstudent and competitive diver,

(28:56):
had passed away. Leah was from Berkeley, CA.
She was a senior double majoringin computer science and
Statistics, active in LGBTQ and campus clubs.
Known for being curious, funny and kind, she loved music,
history and her cat Edgar. He that was a that was a young

(29:18):
man who had a tragic end. In any case, I just want to show
you the picture. I want to get into the story
because the story is not particularly interesting if
you're just joining us and you guys are tuning in for the live
show. Thanks for joining us.
Really excited to have you along.
We have not done the big reveal yet, but it is coming.
We're getting some worked up information.
We're getting a Steam head of information behind us.
You're seeing the Hoover building there on the screen.
If you are listening, if you're watching one of these programs
where you've got the the video closed, why don't you guys check

(29:39):
out our friends over on Spotify?You guys will get a really good
replay of this. You can share it very easily.
Kyle serifandshow.com will take you right to Spotify.
You don't even have to download the app Joe Rogan's on that app
too. If you pay for it, great, no big
deal. We have like one or two ads that
start at the show and one at theend of it.
And that's what happens anyway. You can also join us over on
locals if you want to support what we're doing over here.
It is independent, quote UN quote journalism and also
entertainment. I'm trying to entertain and

(30:00):
inform and if you're watching onYouTube, if you're watching on
Rumble, if you're watching on X,like it hit the like, hit the
share with somebody that you love and go ahead and subscribe
to the channel or subscribe to the account.
That would be fantastic. Apparently I've been unlocked
over on XI, watched like 400 people start following the
account in the last couple days.So something has changed, either
algorithmically or maybe somebody has pulled a block off,

(30:20):
or maybe I'm just pissing off the right people and certain
people are showing up. So we will be talking FBI stuff.
The reveal of the FBI source who's giving me inside
information. It was inevitable.
It was going to come out. They were going to find it
anyway. And we're going to go out there
and tell you. So the FBI's inspection division
doesn't have to go out there anddo a long term investigation and
interview a bunch of decent agents who didn't do anything
wrong because it wasn't them, itwas only one person and it is a

(30:43):
7th floor source. So guys, hang into that.
Let's do a quick read for one ofour sponsors here.
This is one of our friends over at the Patriot Protect.
Guys, if you have not done something to shield yourself,
yesterday I found an online influencers home address and
found out that she was using a fake name.
Just because I'm good at this. If you want to hide your
information in general and you don't want to be Googleable by a
Kyle Seraphin type who's out there in the world who might

(31:05):
have more nefarious intent than just finding out that you're a
liar, Oh well, why don't you do something about it,
patriot-protect.com slash Kyle? It is absolutely easy.
It is scarily easy. We're coming up on Halloween,
right? For criminals, scammers, for
cyber threats to go out there and determine your personal
information. They can pretend to be you or
they can represent that they area real company when calling you.
They can find your family members and do that.

(31:26):
They can do things like virtual kidnapping, they can hack your
accounts, and so on and so forth.
There's always a concern about data breaches, but your public
information on data broker websites can be the scariest
thing out there cuz people can kind all kinds of wild stuff.
Your home address, your phone number, your e-mail address,
etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Get off these data broker
websites. They are ubiquitous and they
make money on your information and it costs like almost nothing

(31:48):
for someone to get access to it.Sometimes it's totally free and
I used to use it on on the job when I was in the, in the
fbipatriot-protect.com slash Kyle my name at checkout will
save you 15% on an annual subscription.
It's a couple bucks a month. At the end of the day, it's less
than $100 a year if my memory serves.
We signed up for it. It was a fire and forget thing.
And then I find myself getting less spammer calls.
I have less garbage emails and Ihave public listed emails and

(32:10):
stuff like that and I have a pretty high profile with like I
think about 350 or maybe 400,000followers across platforms.
It might even be worse than that.
So if you guys want to keep yourself out of the pile and not
get all kinds of garbage calls and all kinds of garbage scams,
I got patriot protect. They're good folks.
You guys, you've probably seen the CEO on here, one of the Co
CE OS and founders. We've done some interviews about
cybersecurity and I I appreciatehim.

(32:31):
He's a decent human being. We've also found out that when
somebody had an issue with theirservice, it was corrected within
less than three days, which is pretty good for for a small
company that's going out there and trying to solve problems.
So had nothing but favorability on that.
All right, is my chat back on here because it was gone for a
little bit. You know what I'm going to
refresh the chat here. My, my dears, you guys have
been, we've been chatting away and what I saw was is a weird

(32:55):
sort of there it is, let's do a refresh.
There it is, It's coming back. Things sometimes get wonky when
we start talking about FBI stuff.
So we're going to keep doing it.Let's talk about this story,
which some of you may have seen.And I think it's truly
important. I'm done with the sort of the
the random grab bag. Let's talk about this.
Official access to FBI files in the Charlie Kirk case has drawn
pushback, according to sources. This is a New York Times story.

(33:17):
It was picked up by the Daily Mail yesterday.
I talked about it with Alex Jones just a little bit.
The story goes that Joe Kent, who leads the National
Counterterrorism Center, was trying to get access to the
Charlie Kirk files and see if they were in fact foreign
terrorist actors. Now, I think the line that they
are using is that Joe Kent, who's running the center, would
like to be able to tie foreign money, foreign and nation state

(33:39):
actors, something to that effectto the people that were the
radicals and in the Discord channel with the Charlie Kirk
shooter. I'm not going to get into the
stories and the conspiracies andall the other stuff on there.
At the end of the day right now,I'm going to wait for the story
to get played out in court because we don't have anywhere
near the amount of information we would need to make good
decisions. So for all you guys that are big
Candace Owens fans, knock yourself out.

(34:00):
For all you that are Ryan Madda guys and you want to just roll
down the rabbit hole with those people and you want to just be.
I think it's obsessive and I think it's masturbatorial that
people are basically they're they're getting off on the idea
that they're going to be able tosolve a murder mystery case that
they don't have access to at all.
They don't have access to the interviews.
You don't have access to the evidence, you don't have the
Ballistics, you don't have the you don't have the exam on the

(34:21):
body. There's a lot of information
that you're not going to be ableto deal with.
So because of that, I don't wantto play in the speculation game.
I'll wait until the story is made until the actual argument
is made in court, which by the way, they haven't even assessed
the probable cause statement which was used to arrest Tyler
Robinson, just so you know. But the outside of it is there's
some additional sort of shenanigans going on in the

(34:42):
outside. And I think people have said,
well, Chaz Patel is covering up the Epstein files and some other
things. This is an actual story that I
have pretty good information from the inside is actually
going on that there is a fight. It's a territorial turf fight
between who should be the primary agency and should you
actually share information amongst government entities in
the Intel space. The FBI does have a significant

(35:03):
amount of the people that work there that answer to ODNI.
I've explained this to before with our friend George Hill, the
FBI analytical cadre. They may get paid by the FBI,
but they answer to and their their priorities are set out by
OD and I and that's Tulsi Gabbard's organization.
So Joe Kent should be able to have some free information
sharing. We would want that to be the

(35:23):
case. You would expect that the the
director of the National Counterterrorism Center might be
able to ask for some, you know, some professional courtesy.
Can we look across what you got?It's not a criminal case right
now. The FBI may be investigating
something, but as it stands, there is no criminal case at the
federal level being charged by the FBI in the Charlie Kirk
shooting. You guys realize that it's 100%

(35:46):
local and state. It's done out of the county in
Utah. So if Joe Kent's trying to make
an establishment on, and my guess is he's trying to find
out, can we link an Antifa type organization?
Can we call them a foreign terrorist organization?
It opens up all kinds of wild tools.
It opens up the ability to do FISA.
It opens up the ability to do bigger surveillance.
They can actually add some assets out there, including NSA.

(36:08):
Can we task these people to be collected upon based on their
foreign ties? But if you can't have access to
the files and you can't have access to the Discord server
channels and so on, then you're going to be in bad space.
And so the story goes is that Joe Kent was involved in a very
contentious meeting along with Tulsi Gabbard, who are arguing
on behalf of OD. And I and Cash Patel,
representing the FBI, said this is our vested interest.

(36:30):
We're the lead agency and we're not going to share.
And apparently JD Vance had to go and mediate this thing with
Cash Patel screaming like a toddler.
That's not the first time that I've heard that he scream cries
when he gets upset and doesn't get his way.
I had friends on phone calls that were involved in the the
Charlie Kirk investigation and they said that Cash Patel was
scream crying their words, not mine.

(36:50):
Scream crying about whether or not he was going to get the
first shot at tweeting out pictures of the subject, Tyler
Robinson, when they were trying to find him in the middle of the
manhunt. That seems problematic, but it's
no more problematic than some ofthe other big things that we
keep seeing. What we keep seeing over and
over again is that this guy who's running the agency really

(37:11):
is not up to the task and he's proving it to us regularly.
And I don't know why he wants toprove it, but he keeps doing it.
So let me show you something that came out of late.
This is the story of Arctic Frost.
For those you have not seen it yet, I'm going to maybe reveal
it here for you. If you're watching over on
Spotify, actually, let's do thisreal quick.
Spotify, you guys may hear a Spotify ad right now.
You may hear it. And so if you are on Spotify,

(37:32):
very good. If you're listening on one of
the audio platforms, then you won't be able to see this.
And maybe Spotify is right for you because it allows you to
switch between audio and video. All right, I want to show you
Arctic Frost. And some of this stuff is
visually relevant. Look at the top line that you're
seeing on the screen right now. Produced by FBI director Cash
Patel. It is on every single page of
this document, which is 234 pages long.

(37:55):
Are you trying to tell me that Cash Patel produced this
discovery and did all of the redactions or is he doing what
every other influencer type clown does on social media where
they throw a watermark across itand they want credit?
They should have just put his X handle on there since that's
where he seems to spend most of his time.
You know, this FBI has done thisand under the President Trump,

(38:16):
the knob slobbery that we alwayscall out here, it's really gross
and it's on every freaking page.I've never seen that done in
government production. Never.
So they watermarked it so that you would know that it's really
Cash Patel as the one who's doing this reveal.
And what did he reveal? Probably not what he thought he
did. To be fair, I've gone through
most of this document. There's all kinds of stuff

(38:36):
that's very inflammatory to people.
What I think is going on, though, is that people are
missing. They're missing the forest.
They're looking at all the individual trees.
Let me give you Marsha, what's her name?
Marsha Blackburn. She'll probably be the she'll be
the new governor there in Tennessee.
She's very incensed because Verizon didn't fight a subpoena
and they gave up her records. I'm going to tell you why all

(39:00):
these people are making it aboutthemselves.
They're all fundraising. They're all going to have a a
nice little political moment at the end of the day.
They missed the bigger story. And just a news flash before we
get to the end of it, the biggerstory is the FBI as it stands is
the problem, not this investigation.
This was not a rogue case. I'm going to make that argument
to you in about 5 different points here after we play a

(39:21):
couple of clips of these people doing their fundraising and and
catching their little media hit.I'm one of those senators that
did have their records revealed.Verizon is my wireless carrier
and Verizon never challenged, never moved to quash.
They complied with the subpoena that went forward on our

(39:44):
records. Now, Ted talked about the Speech
and Debate Clause. This is also a violation of our
First Amendment and 4th Amendment rights.
It is a violation of the separation of powers.
It is a violation of the Stored Communications Act.

(40:05):
I am looking forward to bringingJack Smith before us.
I am looking forward to bringingthe wireless companies before us
and finding out exactly what happened.
No citizen of the United States should ever be subject to
treatment like this. I'm one of those, Senator.

(40:29):
Yeah, great. OK.
So no, no one should ever be treated that way.
Is that correct? The problem is, is they are
treated that way. And it's one of the
whistleblower disclosures that Ibrought forward.
Folks. One of the things that I found
problematic is that you've now asked who to do with the
investigation. Is it going to be Congress?
Is are is, is the Congress goingto go out and investigate?
And then what charge? They can't do that.

(40:51):
They can make a referral. And who will they refer it back
to? Oh, the same FBI that
investigated them. This is like a physician heal
thyself sort of moment. What you've asked is for the
government to investigate the government, find culpability in
the actions of the government, and then hold the government
accountable. I'm going to give you a quick
news flash from personal experience.
That's not how this stuff works,guys.

(41:12):
It just does not. When the government investigates
the government, what they usually find out is that the
government acted reasonably, lawfully, and therefore all
you're going to have is hearingsand you're going to have some
nail wailing and some and some crying and some gnashing of
teeth. We can actually rewind a few
weeks ago and this is Senator Kennedy asking 10,000 year old
senator, a 91,000 year old Senator Chuck Grassley saying,

(41:33):
hey, Chuck. And he says, am I still here?
Like, am I alive? Am I what?
And he says, yeah, are we going to do something about this or is
there a timeline? Are we going to straighten this
out? This is before this stuff came
out. And I say this as someone who
had the record subpoenaed. I say this as someone who's
telco, whose emails were in factsubpoenaed by that FBI, the same

(41:54):
FBI that you're seeing right there about the same time.
By the way, the craziest part for mine was Elon Musk, an X
corporation fought that subpoena.
And you know what happened? They lost.
They lost. The FBI got my stuff, and then
they appealed it and they've hadmore favorable readings and
they're still fighting it. And it's an ongoing case and
it's in the District of DC and it's in the circuits out there.

(42:16):
Fine. At the end of the day, the FBI
would have gotten what they wanted because the subpoena was
lawfully issued. And as long as they follow
process, they're going to get it.
Then you can find out whether ornot it's appropriate or whether
or not there's some sort of lawsthat might govern, govern
holding on to this stuff. But they would have got what
they wanted one way or another. So Verizon contesting it,
Verizon's just like it's a wasteof my money.
Here's Senator Kennedy talking about, well, can we can we sue

(42:37):
privately? You're going to privately sue
FBI agents who are agents of thegovernment doing things that are
in fact legal. Guys are asking how is this not
a violation of the 1st Amendment?
Because they did due process. They went through the thing
you're allowed to do. There are certain things that we
require a search warrant for andthere are other things that are
just records and they are subpoenaed.
And if you don't know this aboutthe way that our justice system
work, now is a great time to tune into civics because it's

(42:59):
going to affect you. At some point.
It's going to affect you becausepeople on this, on this screen
that you're seeing whose names are redacted, they all still
work at the FBI. That's the news flash.
Every redacted name you see, there are current FBI employees
and that's why they're redacted.The ones that they revealed,
they no longer work there. So they're happy to tell you the
names of the people that don't work there, but the people that
do that, we're all part of this.By the way, that the supervisor,

(43:22):
that's ground level stuff. The CDC, that's the chief
division, that's the legal advisor who says what is in and
out of bounds. That person said this was OK
too. This is why the FBI is probably
beyond saving. And it actually turns out that
guys like Patel and Bongino who are supposed to be in charge of
it, that used to kind of know that here's Senator Kennedy
asking are we going to do anything?
And the answer is well designed later as a bother time.

(43:45):
Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, may I ask you a question if I can
answer it? Yes, Thank you.
Mr. Chairman, are you going to hold a separate hearing on your
whistleblower account of the FBIinvestigation of 8 United States
Senators? I think we need.

(44:06):
My answer to your question is I think we need to wait until we
see what the FBI can report and whether it's necessary to have a
hearing right now. I haven't ruled one out, but I
haven't made a decision. And what year do you think that
will happen in? I, I, I want the FBI to be a

(44:26):
thorough investigation of it andreport to us what information
they can give us. And I don't know how long
that'll take them. I would like the FBI to
investigate from the FBI, and then maybe we'll get produced by
director Patel. Maybe we'll get a documentary
movie at some year and I'll still be alive if I'm lucky.

(44:46):
I'm just saying it's crazy stuff, the outrageous
theatrical. At least Chuck Grassley is like,
I don't, I've been here forever.This always happens.
At least he's not moved by it. Kennedy still does his acting
routine. Marsha Blackburn is outraged, So
is Ted Cruz. They're all very, very, very
mad. They're so upset, they're so
upset. But what are they going to do

(45:07):
about it? They're going to vote for a
continuing resolution that fundsthis agency again, aren't they?
Do you guys want to take money on that?
Anyone want to bet that we defund the FBI after the stuff?
Or do you want to bet that the exact same people that did this
work, who still work there, are going to go back to getting paid
again by the same people that were violated?
I'm willing to put some money onthat.
You guys sidebar me on this. We'll put some money.
We'll put together. You guys see how many of you

(45:28):
want to bet? We'll find somebody that wants
to hold the money in escrow. I'll just tell you I'm going to
take your money, so don't do it.The Biden Justice Department
signed off on issuing subpoenas for the phone records.
Of at least nine US senators, 20% of the Republicans in the

(45:48):
United States Senate were the target of.
This fishing expedition, they did so in complete contravention
of the constitution of separation, of powers, of the
Speech and Debate clause of freespeech.

(46:09):
Of basic rights of privacy. This is an executive who
believes it is justified spying on their opponents in the
legislature because they convinced themselves the ends
justify the means. OK, maybe.
Or maybe they followed all of the rules that were set forward

(46:30):
for them. And this is where the real
problem arises. We are getting to the
disclosure. I promise you guys, I will
reveal it. But I do want to set this thing
up properly and let you know whythis is so problematic.
This is an article on the screenright now from NPR.
I love NPR because of NPR thinksexactly the opposite of how I
do. Attorney General Bill Barr
issues new rules for politicallysensitive investigations.
You're like, wait a minute. The attorney general's Pam Bondi

(46:52):
right now. This is from February of 2020.
This is at the end of Donald Trump's term when he had William
Barr running the DOJ. He's issued new restrictions on
opening investigations to politically sensitive
individuals, also known as Sims,in the FBI.
By the way, another SIM that I had some experience with and
dealt with was the Project Veritas investigation.
They were Sims news media. This is Sims political figure,

(47:15):
Sims special, special privilegesgo on.
They lock them down internally so less people can read it and
they actually have a higher burden when it comes to getting
approvals. You have to go above and you
have to get lawyers to consent to it and agree that the things
you want to do, the tactics and the techniques you're going to
do in your investigation are in fact authorized.
And they're authorized specifically taking into account
the the different sort of sensitivities, whether it be

(47:36):
news media or academics or religious people, or in this
case, politicians. That includes A requirement that
he that he, Bill Barr, the AG approve any inquiry into a
presidential candidate or campaign.
This was backlash to the Russiagate stuff, folks.
What they did is they tried to put some policies in place.
I also want you to remember thatwe got the Durham report under
Biden. And one of the things that was

(47:57):
conclusive about the Durham report is that no policies, no
procedures, no law, in fact, it sounds like would actually stop
the FBI from what they were doing when they went wrong in
the Russiagate scandal. What it would do is require them
to hire people that actually believed in the spirit of what
they were doing. OK, the Durham report said you

(48:19):
cannot fix the the problems withpolicy.
Or maybe quote someone like Dan Bongino, who maybe maybe thinks
that I'm the problem. Wait a minute.
Did he think that I'm the problem?
Hold on a second. The place has taken a
reputational hit. There is zero question about it.
There were a lot of bad actors. One of them still out there
causing us all kinds of trouble.One of them still out there
causing us all kinds of trouble.One of them still out there

(48:41):
causing us all kinds of trouble.Wait, I'm just asking a real
quick question. Am I that person?
Dan Bongino has been famously bad about naming me when I'm the
bad guy for him. Am I the bad actor that they're
talking about? Because if so, I'm going to keep
doing what I'm doing. I'm just really interested
because I, I actually missed that.
And one of our, our listeners pointed out like, hey, are you
the bad guy? Maybe.
So maybe I'm the troublemaker. Let me just keep making this

(49:02):
trouble then. Bongino used to say that
personnel is policy. Many people have said that.
What does that mean? It means that the people that
you bring in will find a way around whatever litigious things
that you've done to cover thingsup if they want to get it done
because they know the system better than you.
So your personnel and the types of personnel that you have does
dictate your policy. Your policy is, I hire these

(49:23):
people and I give them the imprimatur to go forward and
carry our banner and do the thing that we do.
They represent our agency. If you've got bad
representatives on the inside, you're the problem here.
So Bill Barr tried to correct this with a three page memo
basically saying you have to have AG approval to do
politically sensitive investigations into a
presidential candidate. All right, fine.

(49:44):
Well, that was the goal. And now we're going to go back
to the real issue here. We're going to go back in to
Arctic frost. Arctic frost.
This is the case opening. I'm going to share with you
something that you may not understand.
Here are some of the pages. We're going to scroll through
it. There's a synopsis.
Communication establishes the opening of a new 56D case. 56D

(50:08):
was an election fraud or election interference case.
It's the exact same Title 56 Delta that they used on Project
Veritas, which I famously disclosed and it got myself, you
know, into hot water with the FBI.
Probably why they subpoenaed my records.
I also thought what they were doing was illegal and that's why
I disclose it. I also thought they weren't
going to be able to defend themselves in court because it
was secretly on the FBI servers and it wasn't being disclosed in

(50:29):
discovery, for whatever that's worth.
The process is that the, that these are certified, they're
created, they're signed, they'resent to the United States
government for the purpose whichthey're intended.
They're talking about their election voter results.
So they're going to do election fraud investigations, but
they're only going to do it based on finding out whether or
not Americans did something wrong and those Americans happen
to be politicians. All right, then you've got

(50:50):
administrative notes per policy.This has to be approved at the
SAC level, The SAC level, Special agent in charge.
That's kind of interesting due to a potential conflict of
interest. Well, the conflict of interest
is that the the SAC was a guy named Wayne Jacobs, as I
understand it, and his conflict of interest was his wife who was
on the January 6th committee. That's the way I understand
that. You guys double check.
The Heritage Foundation Oversight project has been

(51:11):
working on this. So they had the ADIC, which was
Steve Deantuano. He was famous for being in
charge of the Detroit field office when they did the Whitmer
thing. He was also in charge of the
Washington field office when January 6 went down.
He also, as far as I can tell, lied underoath about the pipe
bomb. DD Antoine was the approving
official in lieu of a special agent in charge, which would
have been the SAC of Criminal and Cyber Division.

(51:31):
All right, now we move forward. It says the enclosures.
Here's what we've included. Here are the details, There's
the caption, piece of the case, relevant facts, circumstances
and allegation. By the way, folks, most case
openings are like a one page EC or electronic communication.
They are very short. They don't have to be super
detailed. They make the allegation or
information that a federal crimetook place and that the FBI has
the jurisdiction to investigate it and then they're going to go

(51:52):
do so. I have never seen one that is so
well laid out as this. Yes, but it makes sense because
the deputy director actually signed off on it.
Let me go to the top here. The, the, this is the top level
of the FBI that you're seeing onthe screen.
Paula Bate, Paul Emma Bate was the number two guy in the Bureau
and he has the functionality of the number one for signing off.
Below that is the executive assistant director.
That's the person just below that runs the, the entire

(52:14):
branch. The way the the FBI is
structured is you have the wholeFBI, then you have branches,
then below that you would have divisions.
The divisions then have individual like sections and
units and so on and so forth. In this case you have the top
top of the FBI. You have A at the top of the
branch, you have the top of the division, that's Jason Jones.
You have the top of another division.
Then you have the top of the actual individual field office,

(52:34):
which is also known as a division.
You have three ADS. Those are all SES senior
executive. Then you go down and you have
what's called another branch, which is inside the division.
This is the branch 2 criminal supervisor I believe Timothy
Tebow who was removed for his anti Trump hatred and they
replaced him with someone who still works for the FBI by the
way. Then you have the chief division
counsel. Then you have the the SSA which

(52:55):
is the supervisory level. And then you have the actual
agents, which is probably these these things up here that are
all blacked out and they all still work for it.
Remember, blacked out equals still works there.
I have no idea why they blacked out the the the number of the
case like that matters at all. All right, we're going to lay
out this case for you. Facts, relevant circumstances
and allegations. They define the Electoral
College. They talked about what
fraudulent certificates are. There's a bunch of that.

(53:15):
So this is all background information.
This is very meticulously done public statements by Donald
Trump and his campaign. You got Rudy Giuliani in here,
you got John Eastman, you got Steve Bannon and his podcast.
You've got all this stuff laid out as background information on
and on January 6th, what it was and what they allege.
Some of these things are non factual statements.
They're just their opinion and the FBI was really bad about

(53:37):
their opinions. It goes on.
It's still going OK, federal violations that they're going to
be considering. Here you go 18 USC 1512 C that's
the that's the obstruction. That's what I was told that they
were investigating me for quite interesting.
Obstruction of certain proceedings is going to be 1505
fifteen 19371 is conspiracy to for the United States aiding and

(53:57):
abetting figure mail fraud, seditious conspiracy.
These are the things that they were going to potentially charge
if they were able to prove theircase as they wanted.
There's a statement of predication and approvals
required for the SIM full investigation.
I've never seen this in there again, but here's another little
section. Very litigious, incredibly well
laid out, produced by Cash Patel.

(54:18):
Can't help it. All right, so in addition to the
standard requirements for opening a SIM, there's also
something they have to comply with.
Oh, I remember I brought you up the Merrick Garland thing.
Memorandum from the Attorney General dated February 5th,
2020. Now you see why I went back
there. Additional requirements for the
opening of certain sensitive investigations.
AG memo, FBI policy notice, 1096, November.

(54:41):
And so that was what they went. They complied with that, but
remember, that means the attorney general had to sign off
on it. So not only did the top of the
FBI signed off on it, we also find out that the attorney
general, Merrick Garland, signedoff on it.
This is the scandal. This is why this was legal.
They followed every single rule to the T and they were very
meticulous in how they did this thing.

(55:03):
OK, so now they tell you who they got per FBI policy.
They got chief division counsel review.
That's the top attorney at Washington Field, probably
somebody I know, if we're being honest.
The SAC approval, we already said there was a conflict of
interest. So you got the what's called a
Dick approval or assistant director in charge approval.
Then you got director's approval, which was given out in
this case by the deputy director.
You've got the AAG, the associate attorney general,

(55:26):
you've got the United States Attorney in DC.
That was Matthew Graves wrote with it, written approval from
the AG and the deputy attorney general who actually wrote the
approval. Every freaking level of the
Justice Department signed off onthis particular investigation.
And that's not all, folks, because they also got approval
from the National Archivists. They also got buy in from the

(55:49):
Postal Inspection Service. They claim what the venue is.
It's going to be out of Washington, DC because even
though it's across the country, we're going to have this again,
here's your your approval from Matthew Graves that I mentioned
earlier. Scrolling down, sensitive other
investigative matters. Here you go.
National Archives is going to bepart of this game.
So everybody concurs. We're going to open a grand jury
investigation. We're going to have access to
it. The prosecuting attorneys on

(56:09):
board, the top of the DOJ is on board.
The top of the FBI is on board. The top of the field offices on
board. The postal inspectors on board.
The people who might be giving us relevant information for the
National Archives is on board. All parts of the government, all
the equities are accounted for, and they are all in approval of
this. It is legal.
This is not a rogue investigation.
This is a totality of governmenteffort to do the thing that you

(56:31):
guys think should be wrong and that you just heard senators
crying about. So are they going to fund this
government? Are they going to fund this
agency that does this? You're damn right they are.
They don't care. Who are the subjects.
Donald J Trump for President Incorporated, That was his.
That was his campaign. John Eastman is an
identification of subject. Rudy Giuliani is a subject.
Boris Epstein, whatever. I know that one electors 60

(56:54):
individuals from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and
Wisconsin allegedly signing fraudulent certificates.
They're all on the hook, and so are all those places, and so are
all those Republican committees,and so are all those
legislators. They have an investigative plan,
which is not always common. Usually that's an e-mail to your
boss. This is laid out and it is very
particular. Full identification of known
subjects. They're going to find everybody

(57:15):
biographical particulars and locations, pertinent review of
open source, and they're going to get videos relating to
conspiracy to obstruct. They're going to go through
social media and going to find what's posted in all the
interviews. So they're going to do that game
coordination with the United States Attorney's office in DC.
They're going to have grand jurysubpoenas for records, including
toll and bank records, as appropriate.
They laid out what they were going to do and the AG said,

(57:35):
Yep, no problem. And they named people there that
were at high levels of government.
Right, Got it. As such records are identified,
the issuance of preservation letters will be done.
So they're going to send it out to social media companies and to
different phone companies and soon.
Preserve your records. We're going to come get them
later. Electronic facilities, they're
going to have orders and search warrants for relevant digital
content. They're going to conduct witness

(57:56):
interviews. Now, these are not outlandish
things to do, but they're layingout exactly how they're going to
go through it. And they're going to work
through and with the United States Postal Inspection Service
to locate and preserve evidence in any documents or records
associated with registered mail sent from the archivist and the
President of the Senate. That's the vice President.
Conduct or attempt to conduct orI'm sorry, they're going to
conduct or attempt to conduct sensitive interviews with

(58:17):
potential witnesses in this matter.
Here are the approvals required and they document that they are.
In fact, they are done. We're on page 14 of this case
and we haven't gotten into substance of anything.
There are no case documents except covering my ass and
showing you that what we're doing is in accordance with all
of the required policies, again,including that bar memorandum
from 2020. You guys get it?

(58:39):
This was 100% above board and everybody was on board with it.
So there you go. On the 15th page, you end, you
have a blank page and then we start document production.
And guess what? The people who did it, they're
redacted because they still workfor the FBI, drafted by, that's
your case, agent SSA, that's your supervisor.
That person approved it. Here you go, statements from
Jeff Clark. It goes on and on.

(59:02):
This is full of redactions of anybody that actually works in
the FBI. I'm just scrolling here.
They don't want to tell you who was involved obtain this, not
going to tell you. So they went in and dug up some
things that were inflammatory tothem and set them and they were
anger. Look, Special Agent Blank, why
don't we tell that's a public employee.
That person works for US. Senior Special Agent Blank of

(59:25):
Perry's phone gave them to SA Blank not going to be named.
SA Blank not going to be named. All people.
You know who they do name right here, no longer works for the
FBI, got fired because of my tweets.
Walter Gardena, he no longer works for the FBI.
So they're going to throw him out there.
So they're only going to give you information that's already
exposed by me. And that's why this reveal is
going to be so important to you guys.

(59:46):
I want you to understand five points that I put out on social
media. They are relevant.
They should be things that you understand.
I would like you guys to hear all five of them #1 The names
redacted are current FBI employees to include
supervisors, attorneys, and brick agents #2 the top levels
of DOJFBI, the United States Attorney's Office in DC, Postal
Inspection Service and others concerned with opening this case
all signed off on it. Former AG Barr issued guidance

(01:00:09):
in 2020 to try to stop this kindof thing and it did not work.
They did not held themselves accountable.
They simply did what they were required to do and they got the
sign offs #4 This is not a single rogue, sensitive
investigation targeting political opposition.
It's an agency that is full of current management who could and
did sign off on this and similarinvestigations.
Project Veritas being. An example of him and lastly,

(01:00:29):
Cash Patel is trying to take credit for this because he's so
freaking thirsty that he put a watermark on there.
This is a problem that is FBI culture wide.
It is not a problem of a specific agency or a sub part of
the agency or a specific field office.
Folks, this is the FBI. This is what the FBI does.
This is a really well written upcase, having read hundreds of

(01:00:52):
cases, because that's what we did.
We reviewed them before to see if there was predication when we
would go do surveillance. Hey, do you guys have the
information out there? Republicans are going to raise
money on this. I'm just telling you, they're
raising money on their own demise because they're going to
turn around and fund this damn thing.
They're 100% into it. OK, so that's pretty exciting

(01:01:14):
stuff. Let's get into.
Let's get into why and what and the story of of how the leak
comes up. When I revealed that there was a
radical traditionalist Catholic bend inside the FBI, when Intel
analysts were going out and writing documents and it turned
out that multiple field offices were involved.
When we proved that and showed it to people, something crazy

(01:01:36):
happened. They didn't go and say, holy
crap, we are investigating Catholics for being Catholic and
saying that they're potentially white supremacists.
We got a real problem inside ouragency.
They didn't do that. What they said was we've got
someone who leaked a document and it went to Congress.
It's freaking embarrassing. And Kyle Seraphin got a hold of
it. We must stop that person.
And so they took my friend and they got him out of the office.

(01:01:57):
He'd been there for almost 30 years.
He was an attorney. He was a senior manager at the
FBI in that field office. And he was removed and he had
all of his stuff and all the things from his office in banker
boxes unceremoniously thrown in his front yard, including his
certificate saying 25 years of service.
I think you get a 20 year service and I think you get a 25
supplement. You guys know how sick that is?

(01:02:18):
What they said is, is that the problem is you.
It's not a problem that we're doing the wrong thing.
It's a problem that you told people we are.
And that's what I've been experiencing for a while now.
So let's talk about this thing. This is the attitude of the FBI.
It is not a joke, even though itis a meme.
That's Don Draper, right? Mad Men.

(01:02:38):
He's doing the pitch. Should I do the pitch?
He's doing the pitch. Hear me out.
Reform, but with the same guys, we're going to use the same
people that work here, and we'regoing to fix the problem that
these people created. We're going to take the people
whose names are redacted from Arctic Frost, and we're going to

(01:02:59):
let them stay here so they can keep doing Arctic Frost.
But we're going to call it reform produced by Cash Patel.
There's a reason why I have started thinking of Cash Patel
as Tom Haverford from Parks and Recreation.
I cannot help it. OK?
I can't help it because I once you see it, you're like, yeah,
that guy's the same guy that goes treat yourself.

(01:03:19):
Sometimes you got to schmooze him.
Sometimes you got to lie to tellthe truth or like whatever catch
phrase he has. Good cops got to be cops.
And that's what Donald Trump's the best.
Parks and Rec has actually become like pretty front of mind
for me. And so before we decided to do
this reveal, so we got about like a record audience over on
YouTube right now. So that's fun.
Before we did this reveal, I wanted to consult with someone

(01:03:41):
who knew a lot about the FBI. Some of you know know who this
person is. I'm going to give you a little
look at this because this was not something I came to lightly
Before I reveal it, let's just go ahead and remind people.
You guys can find us on Spotify,Badoom, find us on Spotify.
You may hear another Spotify ad right here that will be a total
of 2 in the middle of the program.
Spotify ad find us at kyleservantshow.com if you guys
want to be part of it. All right, hear me out.

(01:04:02):
You ready? All right, this is who we
consulted with because I wanted to make sure we made the right
decision when it came to revealing this stuff.
It's Burt Macklin. All right, everybody.
Move, move, move move this. Entire events under federal
jurisdiction unless he's in trouble.
There's only one man for the job.
Burt Macklin. FBI.
You thought I was dead. So did the president's enemies.

(01:04:28):
The president's enemies still work at the FBI.
That's why we need a Burt Macklin type, don't we?
All right, So the reveal looks something like this.
There are people who knew exactly what was going on and
the people that gave us the information that needed to be

(01:04:49):
out there, they're concerned right now.
This is the 7th floor. This is a drawing that Bert
Macklin made of the guys that work on the 7th floor of the
Hoover building. You can tell the I thing is
contagious. They're upset and they're
concerned. They're worried.
It's possible that more people will find out what is in fact
going on there. All right.

(01:05:11):
Who did it? Who gave me the info?
Who shared with me what's going on with the FBI director's
plane? Donald Trump's going to help me
do the reveal. There it is.
I don't want to make a big fanfare about this.
I really don't. There it is.
That's who showed me. That's my 7th floor source.

(01:05:33):
You guys don't believe me. There he is.
It's freaking Cash Patel. Cash Patel leaked this
information. He told me who it was.
I want you guys to know we're coming clean.
Director Patel, add this to yourdaily briefing.
You're the reason that I know that you were in State College.
It was you. It was you all along, right?

(01:05:56):
It was Cash Patel. People, there's this Twitter
feed at Cash under score Patel. What's the first thing Cash
Patel retweeted real American Freestyle Wrestling 002 and it's
pictures of I kid you not, him and the girlfriend.
The girlfriend is singing. How did you know she was
singing? Because the because you shared a

(01:06:18):
picture of it, buddy, I follow you.
Oh, how did you know that it wasa real American freestyle
wrestling? Oh, because she was carrying the
belt. Because you let her go
backstage. Yay.
And then you posted a picture ofyourselves.
What are we talking about here? How did you not know this man?
It's so easy. And then the question comes up,

(01:06:38):
well, how did you know where he flew?
Well, this is this is actually alittle bit more concerning for
you guys. You guys are going to get some
inside info here. OK.
I do want you to know how I knewthat he was flying.
I knew that he was flying because one of the things that I
did while Cash Patel was helpingme was get a message to Senator
Josh Haley in November of 2022. If you guys look at the first

(01:07:01):
line here, I got your name and e-mail from Cash Patel, and
inside this e-mail that I sent off to Josh Haley's
representative so that we could do a disclosure about a misuse
of Director Ray in the jet was the tail number of the G550,
that G5 airplane, right? The tail number is N708JH.

(01:07:22):
That's public information now, and I shared it with a
congressperson and I've had it for three years.
So how on earth did Kyle Seraphin manage to find out?
Well, it turns out that they publicly post this stuff, man.
And here's Josh Howey talking about it at the time.
Last time you were here. You had to leave early to take a

(01:07:43):
jet to your vacation in the Adirondacks.
Now, let me just ask you This whistleblower tells us that you
also maintain a home in Atlanta to which you fly on a regular
basis. I'm told by this whistleblower
from the FBI that you use the FBI jet to make that travel.
Is that correct? All of my travel, personal or

(01:08:03):
work related is required to be done on FBI planes.
That is long standing policy goes back well over a decade.
I'll take that as a yes. The whistleblower also says that
you regularly require the jet, which is based in Manassas, to
be flown to DC because, and I quote now, Ray doesn't like to
sit in traffic. Is that accurate?

(01:08:24):
No, that's not accurate. He also says that you pay only
the lowest cost commercial ticket for that Atlanta DC trip,
just I don't know what, 200 bucks or something when of
course it cost 2030 thousand to operate the jet.
Is that correct? The.
The reimbursement that I provideis reimbursement that is set by
OMB policy and I follow that policy which goes back over a

(01:08:46):
decade and I think it's been chronicled in GSA report from
back in like 2013. All he's spot on.
It is from 2013. Way to go, Chris Ray.
He doesn't say that Congress mandates me to do this.
By the way, that's what Cash Patel said a little bit later
when he was the director. Here's Cash Patel two years ago.
Brandon Dray holding the FBI to account.
Hey, Chris Ray, how many millions of our money have you

(01:09:08):
spent on the convenience of flying a private jet you don't
own? Operational necessity does not
require 140 30 mile trip. So I can pick you up because you
don't like traffic. Did Cash Patel know what I was
talking about? You're damn right he did.
He quoted the article that I helped contribute to with
Brandon Dray at the Daily Wire. This goes back two years ago.

(01:09:28):
That's a January 2023 Chris Ray lying to Congress, jetting off
on taxpayer dollars while dodging accountability for the
implosion of the FBI on his watch.
Cash. You're the source, buddy.
You're the freaking source. I'm gonna blow your mind.
I know the jet number. So do like dozens and dozens of

(01:09:50):
others, including reporters all over the place.
The source is, it's public information.
This is the FlightAware website.Did you know that there's your
tail number right there that we own?
It's also known as Jenna Seven O8.
For those of you who are curious, it turns out Thursday
morning that jet is in San Antonio, TX right now.
Did you fly out here to hang outwith me?

(01:10:10):
I hope not. I hope you're not coming to
bother Kyle Seraphin and the Kyle Seraphin Show because by
the way, San Antonio folks, is is where the field office is
that governs the area that I live.
Go figure. Here we go past flights.
This is really fun. OK, let's go down to here from
from Pennsylvania to HEF, that'sManassas Regional.

(01:10:31):
Manassas Regional is where it was on Saturday morning and it
flew to oh, yeah. State College Regional Airport.
There you go. That's a tiny little airport.
Then from State College, it flewdirectly to Nashville.
You guys can see it right here. From Nashville, it flew to San
Angelo, so it was obviously workrelated.
OK, San Angelo, it flew to JointBase Andrews, dropped him off
Joint Base Andrews flew back to Manassas Regional.

(01:10:52):
Oh, that's why they did that. The claim that they made and the
reason that the the FBI claims that they had to go and fly to
other places like DCA and why they had to fly to Manassas
Regional was really, really silly.
They said that there are covert facilities out there at the
Manassas Regional Airport. Are you shitting me?
It's public information that youfly to the Manassas Regional
Airport. What are you talking about?

(01:11:13):
You actually listed on a websitethat you are required to give
because the FAA data is publiclyavailable and from Manassas
Regional, it turns out they actually were able to fly to San
Antonio. Was the director on that one OK,
in on Wednesday, it was at Manassas, which is where it
lives. And then Wednesday afternoon,
Boop turns around and flies out to San Antonio, which is where
it is right now apparently. And it looks like it may be en

(01:11:37):
route again. Is that what it's doing?
No, as of today, it's still sitting there.
Sounds like. No, it is en route.
There it is. Look, it says it en route right
there. The the plane is flying today.
OK. Our plane, our $60 million
aircraft that we own. Are you guys tracking who the
source was? It's almost like it was publicly
available and the information was always there.

(01:11:58):
It's almost like they did a whole article at the event that
you attended. Real American Freestyle
Wrestling did this. Real American Freestyle Talks
weekly series 2026. They might do it all the time.
When was this written? October 27th.
That was days ago. I'm going to just roll down here
because it's amazing when you read a news story, which is what
I do for a living now. I read news and I find out
what's going on. I found out that Real American

(01:12:21):
freestyle #3 is booked for November 2020, ninth at the
Wintrust Arena in Oklahoma and in Oklahoma City, sorry, in
Chicago and Oklahoma City is a strong contender for #4.
You're going to have various different MMA icons.
Previously having competed in the first event, former FBI
director Cash Patel was also saying ring tied at #2.
Let me put it in the middle of the screen, guys.

(01:12:43):
The news media who cover fights picked it up.
This is public information and maybe that's why when you go and
you look right now, this is whatthe Google search results are.
If you type in cash jet girlfriend.
Oh, the story got picked up. It wasn't just me, although I
was a big piece of it. There it is.
Cash Patel slammed for using $60million jet to watch girlfriend

(01:13:04):
perform. Cash Patel flew $60 million FBI
jet to attend girlfriend performance.
Outrage grows. Cash Patel scrambled government
jet to watch girlfriend sing at wrestling bout, report says That
report, I think is me. Who is this girl?
Who's the other source? The other source it turns out is
it's Alexis. I showed you guys the other day.
She put it on her freaking public Instagram.

(01:13:26):
Who is Alexis? Anyway?
I found a really good synopsis you guys are going to enjoy.
This my beautiful girlfriend Alexis is here.
Yes, I I agree. She stood beside Kash Patel as
he placed his hand on the Bhagwat Gita and took oath as
the director of the FBI. Here's what we know about her.
I've said bright stars. According to the Daily Mail,

(01:13:49):
Alexis Wilkins first met Patel, 18 years her senior, at a
conservative Reawaken America event in October 2022.
They started dating a few monthslater, in January 2023.
Wilkins, a country singer, was born and mostly raised in the US
but spent a part of her childhood in England and
Switzerland. She said she wrote her first

(01:14:11):
song as a child to help raise money for those affected by coal
fires in Pennsylvania. She has been the opening act for
prominent country artists including Lee Greenwood, Sarah
Evans, Joe Nichols and Aaron Lewis.
Some of her notable songs include Country Back, Quite Like
Whiskey, and Old Fashioned Christmas, and she has over

(01:14:32):
14,000 monthly listeners on Spotify.
Beyond music, Wilkins frequentlycreates videos for Prager U, a
nonprofit media organization that advocates for conservative
viewpoints. She also delivered speeches for
Young America's Foundation, a conservative youth group.

(01:14:54):
Additionally, she hosts the political podcast Between the
Headlines on Rumble. In 2025, she accepted the role
of a press secretary for Republican Representative
Abraham Hamaday. Some of you are wondering why I
let that run so long, but it's because I really like the
charming Indian voice of the lady reading it, including the

(01:15:14):
thing that whatever the heck that thing is that he put his
hand on to swear allegiance to. So that was really cool.
Yeah. That's the source.
Here it is. Dina, I know you were in State
College homie because a picture from your girlfriend who I
follow because she's suing me claiming she's not a public
figure when you just heard all the public figure things that
she does, said she was at Penn State and posted a picture of

(01:15:37):
you and matching blammo camo. So there you go.
FBI, please close your inspection division link or a
leak investigation. Don't waste any more of our
money. We don't need it.
You're already wasting plenty ofit.
It'd be great if you didn't do any more.
We don't need a Hoover building thing going on right now from

(01:15:57):
inspection division. Do you guys want to know the
last piece of corruption? I know you do here.
The last piece of corruption is actually freaking shocking.
This just came in to me before we went live talking about
Arctic Frost. Brian Turner was the executive
assistant director. Should we put that back on the
screen? Let me do it on the screen here.
We're we're we're quarterbackingthis in real time, folks.

(01:16:19):
So stand by Brian Turner. Is this guy OK?
He's at the top of the screen here.
He's the executive assistant director that would have been in
here. He is.
I'm going to highlight the name,OK?
Brian Turner was directly mixed in here, approved all of this.
He was the one that was just below the deputy director of the

(01:16:39):
entire FBI signing off on it. His special assistant was a guy
named Bill Dobagno DELBAGNOI think Bill Dobagno still works
for the FBI. So Brian Turner gone.
Bill Dobagno still works there. He also went along with this,
didn't blow the whistle when they were doing these things,
was totally complicit. Do you know that the inspection

(01:17:00):
division is the one that was looking into the leak apparently
into me and how I got this information from the public
sources that I found it? Do you want to know who the
assistant director is of the inspection division?
It's Bill del Bagno. Bill, why didn't you blow the
whistle on Arctic Frost now thatyou guys are producing it out
there? Why are you agreeing to do

(01:17:21):
inspection investigations into leaks when it's publicly
available information on a public website?
Because your freaking director is lazy and has bad opsec and
his girlfriend posts stuff on Instagram.
Why are you wasting our money, Bubba?
Where you been? Ain't that something?
This FBI, same as the last FBI. There is no difference.
They are the same FBI. They are one in the same.

(01:17:43):
And that's why when you see emails that look like this,
everybody is redacted because all these people freaking still
work there. Look at this one too.
All the e-mail addresses are allredacted except Walter Gardena.
Why? Because we're happy to throw him
under the bus. He doesn't work there anymore.
They fired him, probably illegally, for whatever it's
worth. We don't need to get into the

(01:18:04):
details of this. We need to look broader.
I don't care about trees. I care about the forest.
The forest is a rotted government agency that did
everything by the book and went out there.
There's another one went out there and did exactly what you
would hope a secret police wouldnot eventually do, but they do
because that's how they're built.
This was full. And by the way, looking on the
screen, WF is Washington Field AT Atlanta, DE, That's Denver

(01:18:28):
Division. PG, Pittsburgh, pH, Philadelphia
AQ, Albuquerque Division. You guys get this.
Every office was involved in allthis stuff.
All these people were copied on emails.
It's so easy to see it. There's some other ones out
there. SE was Seattle.
I saw that earlier on. We're talking about a, a
predicated investigation that involved the entire FBI.

(01:18:51):
Oh, you know what this is? Office of the Inspector General
was copied on it. OIG was there.
So you had people out of headquarters.
You had people out of all the field offices.
CID, criminal investigation division.
Cool. I wonder if they had CTD on
there as well. The fact is, is that this was
approved by everybody who saw itand nobody went out there and

(01:19:13):
did anything to stop it because that's what this agency does.
Produced by Cash Patel. Oh, there's another, there's an
SOS that's a analytical personnel also redacted also
still works there. I think you guys get the point.
The point is, is that this agency hasn't changed.
There's nothing different about it.
And when I have to go out there and reveal that my source is the
director of the FBI, it's you, bub.

(01:19:37):
Donald Trump knows it. You leaked your own information,
and now you're going to go and do an investigation internally
and waste our money. What, because of bad press
Because you're dumb and you don't understand how optics
work, and you're going to fight with Joe Kent?
You're going to fight with Joe Kent over what?
Doing his freaking job. Andrew Bailey's ready.

(01:19:57):
He's already there, folks. He got, he got signed in there
on the September the eighth, as we understand it, and he's been
very, very quiet. Let's give the man a chance to
work. I don't think the agency could
be saved, but it could. You could ruin the the current
path and trajectory. Try to obliterate that and go
back to what we said we were going to do, which was fix a
politically toxic and ugly organization.
So Director Bailey, when you step in and sign in, when you're

(01:20:19):
the acting director, give me a call.
You guys know how to reach me. You follow me on X.
You can DM me over there. I'll send you my number.
I'm not trying to be cocky. I will put you in touch with
people who know how to do it. I don't know how to do
everything. I certainly don't.
But I can put you in touch with people that have the same
mission that you probably do whowant to see not this, not
everybody saying yes. And it's going to start with
gutting your middle management and all your senior management's

(01:20:42):
got to go. All of them, because they were
all hired under Ray and Comedy and Mueller.
That's who came there. Your analytical coordinates to
go over to Tulsi Gabbard. These were all laid out to Cash
Patel. This is not shocking.
This should be pretty easy for you and that's what I have to
say for the day. I hope you guys feel like we
revealed it properly and I hope you understand that hypocrisy

(01:21:03):
everywhere bothers me all the time and I will never sit
quietly on it. I do not accept it is
unacceptable and if you want to follow an FBI director jet that
we all pay for it because your tax dollars are part of it.
Knock yourself out. Here you go.
N708 JH. It is public record.
It is open source. It does not require a leak.
It doesn't require an FBI investigation.

(01:21:24):
It doesn't even require like a trained investigation.
I just told you FlightAware is agood one to do it with.
So there's that. Let's have some fun.
Can we have some fun? I think we can.
For the people that are about tolose SNAP benefits, I'm going to
just say it. This was the most convincing
argument that I've heard yet. And then we're going to go into
a palate cleanse. And I think I'm going to take
the day off tomorrow because I've got little kids that are
going to be very excited about Halloween and I think I've
exhausted the ability to hit allthe high topics today.

(01:21:47):
I don't think we can do more than that.
So let me give you SNAP benefitsfor those of you that are
looking at losing benefits. This is the most convincing
argument that I've heard. I've heard sympathy.
I've heard not sympathy. I've heard hatred.
I've heard thing. This guy seems like he gets it
and it's really, really short. You should be able to remember
it. He says it three times.
You were supposed to be looking for a job while you had
benefits. You were supposed to be looking

(01:22:07):
for a job while you had benefits.
You were supposed to be looking for a job while you have
for a job while you have benefits.
You were supposed to be looking for a job while you had
for a job while you have benefits there it is OK, you get
it all right, like the show, please I'd appreciate it

(01:22:28):
Subscribe if you're a first timelistener, if you haven't been
here before, we have a lot of fun and we you know, we're kind
of sarcastic. So that may be your brand of of
news. Rumble YouTube X all easy
locals. I always post all the links and
all the descriptions. I always put in the the show
description under the comments section.
You will be able to find all my references.
You can always refer to anythingthat I I read and including the
entire document that came out there.

(01:22:50):
Make sure you guys are liking itagain, because it does move us
up in the leaderboard, especially on Rumble, and it
wouldn't be interesting if the deputy director of the FBI's
website was actually out there promoting this dramatic leak of
FBI material. Should we do something fun?
One of the things we always do here, if you're new, we like to
shut it down with a little bit of a smile, something that makes
us all laugh just a bit. This is some real weird sick

(01:23:11):
humor. But my wife and I were giggling
in bed the other night and I showed her this.
This caused her to to like, haveto make audible laughing.
So when someone laughs out loud,that's a winner for me.
This is the kind of brand of weirdness that I think is great.
My girlfriend wants to get a bird.
Yeah. And not just any bird, A parrot.
So she's really set on this, huh?
Yeah, she's set on it. Nothing I can do about it.

(01:23:32):
Well, if you can't stop it, destroy it.
The parrot. The parrot owning experience.
What do you mean you'll pretend to adore the parrot?
Offer to watch it every time she's busy.
Guarantee some alone time with it.
Alone with it. I don't even want her to get it.
During which you'll meticulouslytrain this bird to say 4 phrases

(01:23:57):
and four phrases only. I miss my hands.
Never gamble with a witch. Bro.
Please help me lift this curse bro.
I just want to hold my kids again and I venture to guess she

(01:24:17):
won't want to keep that parent for very long.
I can't imagine why. Or just like communicate with
your partner like an adult? That guy sounds like my little
brother. That a fork.
You mean cereal with a fork? I hope you guys have an

(01:24:42):
outstanding weekend. Have a fun and safe Halloween.
Go to church on Saturday, maybe do the All Saints thing.
That's a good idea. Take care of your kids and let
them have some fun. God bless you.
Thanks for being part of our funreveal.
I hope that was illuminating. I hope that the logic was easy
to follow. I look forward to seeing you
guys on the other end. By the way, we crashed the
Rumble chat. Shocker, something didn't work

(01:25:03):
over there. We'll have a good weekend.
I'll see you guys on the other side of it.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSeraphin Show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Bobble. Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social
and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.

All Episodes

REVEALED! FBI 7th Floor HOOVER Building SOURCE Leaks Info on KASH! | Ep 687

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}REVEALED! FBI 7th Floor HOOVER Building SOURCE Leaks Info on KASH! | Ep 687