All Episodes

October 29, 2025 80 mins

Our Sponsors:
https://PatriotCoolers.com/ (PROMO KYLE for 10%)

https://SLNT.com/KYLE (Save 15% off everyday Faraday bags)

http://ShieldArms.com - (KYLE for discounts on Montana build firearms and accessories)
__________________________________________________
Join the Kyle Seraphin Show LIVE 9:30a ET on YouTube, or on Spotify: https://KyleSeraphinShow.com
Links to all news references: https://KyleSeraphin.com

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:20):
Take a look. Behind the curtain with a real
whistleblower and American patriot, Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends.

(00:47):
I think that we are live now. That was interesting.
For some reason everything just died on my end.
Welcome to the Kyle Surfing showwith my friends.
It is Wednesday, October the 29th.
We are on the 29th day of the government shutdown and I've got
some information about that. Seems like the angle that's
being played by the media is going to be sympathy for the air

(01:09):
traffic controllers. Anything to drum up sympathy.
They tried Snap, they're going to try people who have a, a, a
job and work for a living. So that's what we're going to
see. We'll go through some of the
interesting sort of, I don't know if it's propaganda, but
it's certainly a position that is being taken by the mainstream
media. And I know that because
yesterday I was trying to put together a video.

(01:30):
What I wanted to do was a compilation of people saying the
word shutdown as sort of an opening.
And then I was going to go into the discussion of how I think
it's problematic that our FBI directors flying around on a
private jet while the people whoare controlling the air traffic,
who are fixing the the vehicle, who are working on that are
servicing the plane and so on, are not getting paid.
And that seemed like it would bea fun way to get that done.

(01:50):
So I wanted to go get like, shutdown, shut down, shut down, shut
down, shut down. So I go out there and look for
people talking about shutdown, and what I got was dozens of
videos and I grabbed a handful of them that were talking about
the air traffic controllers specifically, and I didn't go
looking for them. That's just what was suggested
to me. I don't think that has to do

(02:10):
with my algorithm. I think it actually has to do a
lot with what is being pushed atthe moment.
So we're going to talk a little bit about ATC sort of that that
thing. I want at least give you guys
some exposure to the same thing that I saw.
You can make up your own minds. I think it is a sympathetic
position in general. Like it sucks to go to work and
not get paid. It also is something that has
happened before. And and as I keep saying, my

(02:32):
sympathy is in existence. And yet, if you can't survive a
month without pay when you are well paid as a federal employee,
you've made a bad choice. Nobody is guaranteed anything in
this world. Many of us found that out during
COVID. Many of us found out that our
jobs that were stable and were were found us to be essential

(02:54):
and important workers. We're more than happy to ditch
us for what? For a failure to comply with the
the passing sort of orthodoxy that happened.
Even though it would turned out to be illegal, it was actually
unconstitutional. Most of us saw that up front.
So I'm going to show some comparisons.
What I think is universal among Americans.
And I do think that politicians miss this.

(03:14):
I don't know why they miss it. I don't know why it continues to
be a thing that eludes Washington, DC.
But it occurs to me that hypocrisy is something that
almost all regular people abhor.And if you don't see a problem
with hypocrisy, I think you're an outlier.
I don't think that you're common.
I don't think you're a regular person.

(03:37):
There are some real similarities.
Yesterday we did an entire show about the FBI directors jet
situation and, and, and I don't intend to do that again today,
but I do want to draw a comparison to why it resonates,
why there are over 1,000,000 people that have seen and been
interested in the story. Whether it was me covering it,
whether it was Ryan Maddow, whether it was other different
outlets that were discussing this is problematic and it is
because of hypocrisy. Saying one thing, doing another,

(04:01):
presenting values to the public and then not living those values
that bothers all people. It's one of the issues that
people have. It's it's kind of the thing that
keeps Donald Trump from getting in trouble because he never
presented himself like, I'm justa regular guy.
He's like, I sit on a golden toilet and you don't, I'm not
like you. I can buy your car with your
kids in it. And I think it's funny and you

(04:21):
think it's funny. That was the that was the lure
is that he at least he owned thefact that he's not like regular
people because he has more moneythan regular people, even if
he's not the richest man in the world.
Hypocrisy is the problem presenting, I am like you, I'm
just like you. And then the minute I get an
opportunity to not like you, I'mlike, let them let them have

(04:44):
shutdowns. I still have places to be.
I'm still important. Nobody likes that.
So that's what we're going to get into.
And then there's some stories about that and then the economy
looks like it's making a, a turnthat's going to get uglier.
Rates going down at the Fed, hiring going down across the
country. So we we face the potential of
stagflation and some other stuffthat are, you know, relevant to

(05:05):
most of us. We're going to touch all those
topics. First, we're going to talk about
my friends over at Patriot Coolers.
And yeah, times are tough sometimes you might need to
preserve some food. What if your refrigerator goes
out and you don't have backup power for that might be a thing
that you want. It's a survival tool.
It's also good camping and hunting tool.
It's a good RV thing. There are many uses to it.
At the very least, you could just maintain your food.

(05:25):
It finally dropped below 70° here in Texas, America, We've
had a 50° drop in the last, I don't know, three weeks.
So it's now in the 50s outside, my kids are wearing freaking
snow hats. If you guys want to make sure
that you can keep your, your hothot and your cold cold.
I've seen people put tamales in these things too.
Check out Patriot coolers. They make an outstanding thermal
molded product. It is as good as a Yeti or an

(05:46):
igloo or anybody else out there,but it says Patriot on it.
They support our program. I think they're ingenious
designs. They're a little bit more
modular than the other people. They're square ish and they'll
keep ice for days and days. My children are constantly
shocked that their water bottleskeep ice for days.
It's like that an ongoing amusement.
They've understood what a new vacuum sealed thermos does.
Patriot Coolers is the website Patriot coolers with an S on the

(06:08):
end of it.com. My promo code Kyle Kyle will
save you 10% at checkout, 10% off.
That's not nothing. 50 bucks or more, you get free shipping.
They're good company, they're good people.
They've supported us since basically we went live in 2023
at the beginning and we're goingto be going back in time a
little bit today. So that's probably a good
reminder that even when nobody else was watching, these folks

(06:28):
were supporting our program. We appreciate them.
We appreciate you. Let's get into today's show
right now. There's a link in the show
description, obviously. All right, my friend.
So it looks like everybody is onboard here.

(06:48):
We lost our chat for a little bit.
We lost the entirety of the of the feed, which is always fun to
see. I went from queuing up videos,
saving them, putting them in position, punching around in my
broadcast software, set them allup and then I hit live and
everything was silent and then it went.
And if you guys want to know what I was messing with at the

(07:09):
time that that happened, and I cannot rule out that this is the
problem. So if the stream crashes, you
know that not only me and my computer system and and OBS
studio and so on, but also Rumble and YouTube and locals
and acts and Twitch all reject the singing talents of 1 Laura
Trump. This is what I was queuing up.

(07:31):
I don't even know why I was queuing this up other than I
found it to be particularly interesting and offensive.
If you have a lot of money then people will listen to what you
have to say or they'll listen toyou sing.
But it's really gross. This is what I was queuing up.
This is what crashed my computer.
Hopefully it doesn't do it again.

(08:06):
It's so bad. That's hypocrisy.
There's a bunch of people dressed in suits and ties.
They dressed nicely. They came out to go have a nice
meal. And then you put a woman who
Can't Sing up, but she's got, like, a bunch of money and she's
connected to people who are in power.
And so everyone goes, yeah, clap.
This is not like some child's recital.

(08:28):
This is a grown woman without singing talent.
What? Why were people tolerating that?
I don't. I actually don't know.
It's beyond me why that happened.
I don't know why it was a thing.This is not the first time that
I've seen her sing. So, you know, she goes up there

(08:49):
and nobody tells her it's bad. That seems like a that seems
like a cruelty. What do you guys think?
It reminds me of another person that I've seen that doesn't sing
all that well, but apparently does it all the time.

(09:15):
So, yeah, I guess some people just like to be looked at and
they want attention. That was the FBI girlfriend, FBI
director's girlfriend. Imagine going out and filing a
lawsuit and hoping that it was going to be a big push to, like,
make you more of a national story, and then everybody just
refers to you as the FBI director's girlfriend and nobody

(09:36):
knows your name. That's not good.
All right, What am I talking about?
I'm talking about hypocrisy. Is there a point to this?
There is. There actually is on the screen
for those of you that can see it.
And for those of you who cannot,that means you're listening on
audio and you're not using Spotify.
And that is a potential mistake because you miss out on seeing
this picture of Gavin Newsom. This is the famous photograph

(09:56):
from the French Laundry during the COVID shutdown.
This man is likely to run for president and he's going to have
to deal with this. And many of us will not forget
he went to an incredibly expensive, Super Richie, very
exclusive club of dinner place. And he did so while everybody

(10:16):
else was being told, shut down your businesses.
You cannot open. You cannot go out in public, you
cannot go to your kids sporting events.
We're going to fill in the skatepark with sand lest people go
out and have some outdoor activities.
We're going to shut down the parks.
We're not going to allow any sort of organization of young
people who are not in any danger.
But I can go and have this very nice meal with my ritzy friends

(10:42):
and people go, that's really gross.
Now, Californians apparently don't seem to care.
They're willing to have this guybe their governor and they're
willing to have this lady. Do you remember her?
That's Nancy Pelosi. She looks awful all the time,
but she looks especially awful when she's getting her hair did
and she's walking around in one of those like salon robe things

(11:05):
that they put over you so you don't get all your clothes wet.
There's Nancy Pelosi, and she had a closed salon open up to
allow her to come in and get herhair done because she's got to
look a certain way. She has to maintain her sex
appeal. Folks.
She's only like 95,000 years old.
She's a walking corpse with, youknow, implants.

(11:27):
We need to have her look her best.
She is our representative. And so this is that classic
idea. Yesterday I said shutdowns for
the private planes. For me, it's hypocrisy, and I'm
willing to tell you that the hypocrisy anywhere is gross.
I do not know why people in Washington, DC don't recognize
that this is this is not a like,oh, that's my team, so I'm going

(11:50):
to cheer it on. Everybody went like, that's not
a good look, that's not good. You shouldn't do things like
that. It makes us all uncomfortable.
We don't want to be able to cheer on our person when they
make a misstep and when they show that they don't think that
they're accountable to you. The people who fund what they're
doing, if they act like they're better than you or they're
different than you, if they havethat sort of like royal

(12:11):
contempt, it doesn't go over. Regular people will flock to it
and they will be repulsed. And here's another picture of
exactly the same thing. These three pictures all have
the same energy. I'm going to fly in a private
jet while the people who are taking care of the jet can't get
paid. I'm going to make a salon open
up so they can do my hair, but I'm not going to let them open

(12:31):
up so they can make a regular living.
I'm going to go out to a dinner party with my friends, even
though restaurants everywhere are shutting down and we are
sending police to make sure thatthe doors do not open.
It's hypocrisy and it's not exclusive to one side or the
other. It's exclusive to certain people
who are kind of elitist, but they're not the people who
actually are like the Donald Trump type elitist.

(12:52):
Nobody minds if you say, look, Ihave more money than you and
I've been better than you forever and I'm always going to
be better than you. Beep.
We're fine with that. We're like, OK, fine, yeah,
whatever. If if Elon Musk or or a Mark
Zuckerberg are like, look, I have more money than God and I
can do whatever I want. I want to rent out.
I'm going to be Jeff Bezos, and I'm going to rent out the city
of Venice for my wedding. You're like, that's gaudy and

(13:14):
awful and gross, but like, whatever.
If Venice is up for rent and you're willing to pay the
millions and millions of dollarsto shut down a whole city for a
day, if that's your thing and you can do it, OK.
Like, yeah. You're not like a normal human
being, but if you pretend like I'm just a regular dude who just
wears camouflage. By the way, my girlfriend also

(13:35):
wears camouflage. Neither of us have served in the
military. Neither of us have any reason to
be wearing camouflage. I didn't even recognize how how
silly this picture was Like nothing worse than couples who
color coordinate or outfit coordinate.
I find that nauseating. But when you I didn't even
recognize it because I can't seecamouflage because it's it's so
effective. It just blends right in.

(13:55):
You're wearing a military military style field jacket with
a BDU pattern on it and the other guy is wearing like
Blammo. Do you know what BLAMMO is?
Blammo is like blue camo it. I think it helps the Navy blend
into the ocean so if a sailor goes overboard they disappear
forever and you never have to worry about them.
Blammo, I don't know. I put this together yesterday

(14:15):
because I couldn't help it. Once I realized that the people
that are the Chris Ray's, that are the Gavin Newsom's, that are
the Nancy Pelosi's, that are Cash Patel, that are Jim Comedy,
that are Robert Mueller, that are all of these people, when
these people reveal themselves, you can't help but see it.
You can't get away from it. I made this video because I went

(14:36):
like, oh, this is what happens when the same words come out of
different people's mouths. It tells me that once they get
into the job, it changes them orthe type of person who wants
that job is always the same, andthey're all awful.
This is Kennedy's law number one.
If you're familiar with this podcast, the original producer
and the creator of the Kyle Seraphin Show, he came up with a

(14:59):
law. It just says if you put somebody
in the FBI director's chair, they all become Jim Comedy.
Mueller becomes comedy. Sessions becomes comedy.
How do I know that? It's pretty clear that these
people all do the same thing. They all have had problems with
executive perks. This is a story going back

(15:20):
years. Kony's final flight in the GO JS
controversial jet stream. We've been talking about this
since the 90s, folks. This is 30 years of FBI
directors taking advantage because the minute they get in
there, they become very entitled.
And I'm going to play you a little bit of entitlement and
I'm also going to play you some fun.
Kudos here to one of our regularcallers on our our call in show.

(15:41):
This is inspired in some part byRenzo.
And those of you who listen knowwho I'm talking about.
Renzo, thank you. Renzo helped me realize that
Tropic Thunder and the the like a humorous take on this is the
only way that I can do it. But this is Josh Howley, this is
Peter Welch from yesterday, thisis Kash Patel, and this is Chris

(16:02):
Ray doing the thing. This is what hypocrisy sounds
like and looks like the universe.
He's talking to us right now. You just got to listen.

(16:23):
Last time you were here, you hadto leave early to take a jet to
your vacation in the Adirondacks.
Now let me just. Ask you this.
Whistleblower tells us that thatyou use the FBI jet to make that
travel. Is that correct?
All of my travel, personal or work related is required to be

(16:43):
done on FBI planes. That is long standing policy,
goes back. Well over a decade.
Well this is a great point. Do you know why I have to use a
private jet? Because Congress made it
mandatory and G5. Yes.
You were rightly critical of theway that the previous FBI
director used the the the FBI Jet AG5 airplane.

(17:08):
Yes. The whistleblower also says that
you pay only the lowest cost commercial ticket for that
Atlanta, DC trip, which is, I don't know what, 200 bucks or
something, when of course it cost 2030 thousand to operate
the jet. Is that correct?
The reimbursement that I provideis reimbursement that is set by
Owen, by his Bo and B. Policy, and I follow that

(17:29):
policy, which goes back. Over a decade.
But I pay the commercial equivalent per the lorraints of
the law. Don't more frequent.
Flyer bitch my house for my boy.You wanted to ground Chris Ray's
private jet travel that he pays for with taxpayer dollars to hop
around the country? Yeah.
You wanted to do the difference.I live in Las Vegas.
I'm allowed to go home. I didn't leave a congressional
hearing early on an FBI jet to dodge questions.

(17:52):
AG5 airplane. The whistleblower also says that
you regularly require the jet, which is based in Manassas to be
flown to DC because, and I quotenow Ray doesn't like to sit in
traffic. Yeah.
And what I've done with the withthe use of the private jet is
use Andrews Air Force Base versus Reagan National as what
the other directors have done tosave the taxpayer dollars.

(18:16):
AG 5 airplane. Yes.
And lots of money on the following weekend you attended
AUFC fight in Miami, also on theFBI jet, right?
That's correct. By the way, everyday FBI agents
who are signed in Washington don't get to fly home at a
private. Jet keep talking.

(18:36):
She found me better. That's how you can evolve.
So are you telling me that FBI agents who are signed in
Washington but who may live in Charlotte, they get paid by the
FBI? Sometimes they do.
That's right, you went full retard man.
Never go full retard. What many of you may not have

(19:01):
realized with that clip that we played yesterday of Josh Howey
talking about a whistleblower, which I told you was me, I
forgot that that I probably had that e-mail sitting there.
So I went looking and here you see it on the screen again.
Another pitch for those who are watching the video platform.
You know what? Let's talk about the video
platform, guys. Join the video platform.

(19:24):
It's Kyle serifandshow.com. If you want to check it on
Spotify, you don't even have to download it, but you can and you
can switch between audio and video.
So that's pretty cool if you're watching on the other channels,
obviously, if you're watching onlocals, thanks so much Kyle
serafin.com. You guys can see the video
there. You can also watch on YouTube.
You can watch on rumble. You can watch on X wherever
you're watching. Will you give us a like right at
this moment you're sitting thereit's real easy.

(19:44):
You just go and click on the thumbs up.
That'd be cool. You want to share with a friend
outstanding. Make sure you're subscribed to
the channel. Look at this.
I dug this out of my my my Gmailthe other day.
Protected disclosure regarding FBI jet.
Oh, so that's really specific, isn't it?
I'm going to go ahead and open this thing up over here because

(20:07):
I want to be able to read it to you.
I want to tell you what we wroteright away.
Simple. Dear Mr. Devine, this is Josh
Devine. He represents Josh Howley.
I got your name and your e-mail from guys.
This is the funniest part of thewhole thing.
That's why I zoomed in on the video.
Cash Patel. I got your name and your e-mail
from Cash Patel, he said to reference Scott Globby's.

(20:30):
I don't know who that is, but that's what he said.
I have some information I'd liketo disclose regarding the recent
hearing with FBI Director Chris Ray and the questions that
Senator Haley asked about the jet.
None of the information contained in this disclosure is
classified. This is an allegation based on
my reasonable belief that these behaviors of the FBI Director,
Chris Wray include provable fraud, waste, and abuse of
government resources in violation of rule, policy, or

(20:51):
federal law as described under 5USC23O35USC23O2.
Guys, this is how you do a protected disclosure.
You got to tell them up front what you're sending, and then
you tell them why. You tell them that you're
claiming whistleblower protection.
This makes you a whistleblower for all you guys that have any
questions. Hey, Serafin, can you prove it?
Yeah, I can. These are the emails right
there. Boom, your office may already be

(21:13):
aware, but friends of mine are on the protective detail for a
number of years and the directorreimburses the cost of the jet
determined by the lowest cost flight to the general area.
He's flying based on the cheapest airline he could find.
The example I was given that hisflight from Washington DC to
Atlanta would likely be covered by $110 or so the cost of a
coach ticket on Spirit or Frontier Airlines.
On occasion, Director Ray also flies on the Gulfstream 5 as

(21:33):
well as the G550. Doesn't like to sit in traffic.
That was a direct quote. Additionally, Director Ray does
not like to sit in traffic from the Hoover Building to where the
G550 tail number N708JH sits in the hangar at Manassas Regional
Airport. It's either known as HEF or MNZ.

(21:54):
That's the code. He requires the pilots to fly to
Manassas, Reagan, DCA, pick him up at a closer location.
Guys, all this stuff that you guys heard Josh Howley go out
there and allege not only with something that I shared with
Josh Howley, it's something thatI shared with Cash Patel and he
referred me to Senator Halley's office.

(22:15):
And there's the time stamped November 22nd, 2022 that goes
back almost three years to the day.
We're one month shy of that. Three years ago I made this
allegation. It's hypocrisy.
It looks like this and people don't like it.
And one of the things that came up because of this particular

(22:35):
event, this event was a fightingevent.
I've had multiple reporters reach out to me and ask me about
fighting and fighting sports. And does Cash Patel have an
ownership stake in there? Is he trying to make something
happen? Do you guys remember that?
If we go back in time a little ways, the FBI director was going
to bring the UFC in to teach FBIagents how to fight.
How many folks remember that? It was one of those things when

(22:57):
we were kind of like, I, I thought it was stupid right
away. For whatever it's worth, I
thought it was stupid. Why?
Because I've been to the FBI Academy and I know what they
teach. I thought it was because he was
trying to get Dana White some additional money that they were
going to try to make it a thing where there's an official
branding and you were going to have, you know, UFC fighters
catching extra dollars. That means that the owner of the
trademark of the brand can say we're associated with and we

(23:17):
train FBI agents, blah, blah, blah.
And that that that sort of like nasty corporate public private
partnership thing is really gross.
It actually went away for a verysimple reason.
I think I'm speculating here, but I'm going to show you what I
think the evidence is. But I'm going to read the story
because this goes back to February 27th.
This was a week into his time confirmed as FBI director.

(23:40):
The newly installed FBI DirectorKash Patel proclaims plans to
overhaul the nation's premier law enforcement agency and may
have rattled many within the Bureau has proposed enhancing
the FB is ranks from within fromthe Ultimate Fighting
Championship, a martial arts entertainment giant who's
wealthy CEO Dana White helped boost President Donald Trump's
election re election efforts, according to sources who were

(24:00):
told of Patel's proposal. Now we haven't heard anything
about it. I haven't heard anything about
it from my friends. Nobody's getting UFC training.
They're not getting guys that are fighters going out to the
field offices to teach, as far as I know.
On a teleconference Wednesday, the heads of the 55 FBI field
offices, Patel suggested that hewants to help the FBI establish
a formal relationship with the UFC, which could develop
programs for agents to improve their physical fitness.

(24:21):
It's actually not really necessary.
You guys can find out. But where did that plan go?
What happened to it? Why is it no longer the case?
Why have we heard about it sincethen?
That was months and months ago. We're now almost at the
beginning of November, which means that it's almost nine
months ago that that happened. And I think the answer is this.
This is a tweet from Deputy Director Dan Bongino.

(24:44):
This was going back to the time when the New York Times was
about to run a story about how Dan Bongino went down to the
Academy and got his ass handed to him by a couple of people
that actually do train what's called defensive tactics, which
is the the physical aspect, the ground grappling and so on that
they do at the FBI Academy. And he got to see it first hand,
which is why I always thought the USA was thing was dumb, he

(25:06):
says. Adam Goldman of the New York
Times is getting ready to run another one of their quote UN
quote journalism expose pieces on me spending time in our FBI
training facility, ground fighting with our dedicated and
skilled defensive tactics instructors.
Their big news hook is that after a solid few rounds of
grappling, I injured my shoulder.
And it's because Adam Goldman, you can generally assume he's
wrong and he is. Again, the instructor I was
grappling with got the best of me because he's incredibly

(25:28):
talented and that's why he's there.
And it was not an injury, but a bit of swelling in my right
elbow and not my shoulder because I'm 50 and I can't
recover it like I used to. The amount of pride that goes on
in this post right here that youguys see on the screen is
significant. First of all, you're 50.
That doesn't mean that the people that are teaching at this
Academy are not similar aged, bythe way.
Some of them are in their mid 40s or late 40s and they're

(25:51):
studs. They have black belts and
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and other fighting tactics and they've
been doing it for years. They're absolutely very capable.
The reason why you would never have the UFC involved with the
FBI and why Dan Bongino, I thinkrealized it after the fact and
probably should have upfront because we thought we were
bringing a guy in there that knew about federal law
enforcement. Cash Patel obviously doesn't.
He wears camouflage or blammo tofighting events because he

(26:13):
thinks it's cool. But guys like Bongino should
know that there are legal standards under which you can
use physical force to bring people into custody.
He should know that from being acop.
He should know that from being in the Secret Service.
You can't just go out there and start doing all kinds of mixed
martial arts, fighting tactics and Muay Thai because that's
just not what you do. We were absolutely told that I
was not able. I have, I have training in in

(26:34):
ground fighting from the military.
I've got some combative experience.
We were told you cannot bring somebody into submission with an
arm bar. If you get an arm bar, your job
is to kick them, create distance, and then draw your
weapon and get them to submit with the weapon and then have
them, if they want to come at you, fight again, you're
supposed to either holster up orshoot them.

(26:55):
The FBI has very specific training standards.
They're based on what the DOJ standards are.
It's the same thing that the ATFand the DEA and everybody else,
US Marshall Service, it's what law enforcement always has to go
to. There is not an ability to go
out there and become a ground and pound fighter.
And the UFC would not add any value.
And I think Dan Bongino went outthere like a macho dummy and he
tried to fight with guys who have black belts and he did what

(27:15):
a lot of people do at the FBI Academy, which is get injured.
You know why they get injured? Because they take the training
not for the training value, but they actually try to be
triumphant and and serious. And that's how you get really
hurt. And I think he got really hurt.
My buddy saw him right after that and he was nursing a sore
elbow or a sore arm, and I thinkthat's where that thing went.
So journalists have been asking me, hey, whatever happened to
that UFC thing? Was that the reason why Cash

(27:35):
Patel was flying out there? I don't know.
I think he just, I think he's just a poser.
I think he's just a guy that pretends.
And here's another thing that really bothers me because this
is the really big story that dropped yesterday.
This all has to do with deweaponizing government or not
deweaponizing government. All of this has to do with non
serious people in probably the most serious jobs they could be
in. Something that should scare the

(27:56):
ever loving hell out of you. This came out yesterday.
I got some recognition from Kevin Roberts, who's the
president of the Heritage Foundation.
We had a quick back and forth onsocial media.
When I saw this, I was like, isn't hasn't somebody?
I feel like some people, a couple of folks that used to
work at the FBI, have been trying to tell you all for
literally years now. I showed you that the FBI

(28:18):
director was probably engaged infraud, waste and abuse in
November of 2022. There were hearings that came
out about it. I've been trying to tell people
since September of 2022 when I first sat down to speak to Dan
Bongino, and I did so under the following premise.
He stated it could be very powerful for someone to come out
and put a face to the allegations being made against

(28:40):
this agency. And I did that begrudgingly, by
the way, with a lot of soul searching and not a lot of
excitement in my heart. It was a incredible burden to
take on, to lose my anonymity, to lose my ability to have no
social media and have nobody know my name and nobody makes
snarky or shitty comments about me because nobody knows who I
am. I'm just a guy raising kids with

(29:03):
a wife, trying to do my best to live the America that I want to
live in and seeing that the America that I live in would be
invaded by the America that I grew up in.
That's what I wanted. That was the goal.
This document dump that happenedat the House Judiciary
Committee, which is what you're seeing on the screen right now,
is a an exact reason why we needed somebody who understood

(29:26):
how to take apart the FBI and why the guy who claimed that he
could do it, who said that he understood the problem, who said
I'm going to break out the Intelcomponent and I'm going to get
rid of this politicization has done the exact opposite.
And now he's flying around to UFC or real American freestyle
wrestling or whatever the BS nonsense he's doing with his

(29:47):
half his age girlfriend. He's living like a billionaire,
including while the government is shut down, which is tone deaf
to say the least, but it's it's hypocrisy at its finest.
And it's just as bad as Gavin Newsom or Nancy Pelosi, except
he's not as wealthy and he doesn't have as much political
power, but he's every bit as dangerous because he's not
casting this ring that has so much power and has the ability
to do so many damaging things. It took down AUS president.

(30:10):
Do you guys realize that the FB is influence and failure to do
their job in 2020 was so catastrophic to this country
that we're still talking about it five years later?
Is that clear to everybody? We didn't solve the problem in
Portland, although we had the ability to do so.
We, the American federal government, we the American
people, we the American taxpayers, we all had the

(30:31):
ability because we as an entity,as a nation had people embedded
in the Antifa elements in Portland that were
professionals. They were doing undercover.
They were gathering information.I know because I was a part of
it, a small part of it. And we should have had the
ability to bring forward cases then and they didn't because we

(30:51):
had an unserious FBI director who said that antifa is an idea.
And we have a serious like a just an equally unserious guy
with a slightly different ideology who is equally captured
by that same agency that I warned would get bubble wrapped,
fly around, kiss the babies high5, the support staff, check out
the jet, have a freaking ice, you know, ice, snow, pop in the

(31:13):
back, snow cones for everyone. Bring your booze out to Las
Vegas. Go hang out with your pretty
girlfriend, even though nobody'sgetting paid.
That's working on your jet. This is really scary stuff.
That e-mail that I'm going to show you back on the screen
again, it represents the worst of the FBI, but also the most
common thing in the FBI. And the people who brought about

(31:35):
this e-mail, who brought about these policies and who promoted
the folks and allowed these things to start and then
continue and they still exist. Those people haven't been
removed. The GS15, that was over the
squad. So imagine this.
You're AGS 13. That means that you're a brick
agent. What do you guys call rank and
file? The brick agent is the frontline
investigator. Above that is AGS 14.

(31:57):
That's a supervisor. Above that is AGS 15.
We call that an ASAC in the field.
OK, Those are the levels. Agent, case agent, whatever.
Supervisor ASAC 3 levels. The ASAC that was in charge of
the squad that did Arctic Frost that, quote, UN quote, spied on
Josh Howley and Chuck Grassley and others and Lindsey Graham.

(32:19):
The ASAC that would have had to approve that sensitive
investigative matter still worksfor the FBI today and has been
promoted by Cash Patel. Does that make sense?
They don't know what they don't know.
And I continue to expose it onlybecause it scares the living
shit out of me that we're going to still have this problem when
Donald Trump leaves office. For right now, we're fine, ish.

(32:40):
They're going to go after anti ICE protesters.
They're going to make a nuisanceand go after Antifa.
Guess what? The same people that refused to
go after Antifa previously because the previous
administration didn't force it are the same people that are
going to go out there and knock on the doors of people that were
protesting against ICE, all of whom have a constitutional right
to do that. It's the violent people, it's

(33:00):
the organizers, it's the folks that are involved in probably
like some sort of a Rico charge where they have conspired to do
something that is against federal law.
Those people, they're not currently being targeted and all
the same people exist and all they've said is is what's the
order, boss? No problem.
Roundup Christians, you got it. Go after Antifa guys, no
problem. Whatever it takes to get to 20

(33:22):
years and get my pension in my retirement.
This attitude doesn't make thesepeople morally evil human
beings. It makes them good Germans,
which by the way, goes back all the way to October of 2021.
My first allegation to Congress was that we have an agency full
of good Germans, ordinary men, people who would kick your

(33:42):
mother or your grandmother into a freaking boxcar to keep their
pension. And that is a a belief that is
shared very widely among conservative FBI agents, that
the people around them are operationally moral.
In other words, the means are irrelevant as long as the ends
justify what happens. As long as my job continues, I'm
willing to keep doing it. Do I have to get a shot?

(34:04):
Great. Do I have to stop talking to my
colleagues because they won't get a shot?
No problem. Do we have to go after pro-life
Christians? Even though I myself go to A to
a Catholic Mass? Whatever.
They're probably bad people. They're probably white
supremacists. How could the analysts be wrong?
I don't want to lose my job. I was asked by people to do
something. I've got a legal search warrant
here from a judge. I'm going to go into the former
president's house. This attitude is what you see on

(34:26):
the screen. I'm going to read it to you guys
for those who are listening. This is from the SE division,
which I'm actually trying to figure out if somebody will tell
me which one it is, and I can't remember what SE is, but I will
get back to you. I'll post it over on social
media. What SE is.
It doesn't really make a difference.
It's one of the FB is divisions.It's going to somebody at
Washington Field. This is the so-called
transparency that Cash Patel hasbeen offering everybody.

(34:48):
Do you see how many redacted squares are on this screen?
From unknown to unknown? When?
September 12th, 2022. That's two weeks before I went
and talked to Dan Bongino. I was already out of the FBI by
then. Unclassified communication
according to blank. We don't know who communicates
with blank. Who we don't know Blank is a

(35:10):
blank of Ed Kerrigan. I assume that like is someone
saying a friend and Corrigan. Sorry, Corrigan is pro Putin and
anti Biden statement of fact. This is essentially a source
reporting document that is not couched in those terms.
It kind of says that right there.
According to blank, who is a communicate with blank, that's
saying that this person is a source.
Whether or not they're signed upas ACHS is another question.

(35:32):
Blank along with blank colleagueat the blank, blank, blank,
blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank.
Consider what Corrigan is doing.Quote, UN quote treason.
We are now getting an e-mail that is essentially sharing
source type material, which should be put in delta, which is
the system that we use to file source material.
And it should also be couched inthe fact that this person is a

(35:55):
source. So this is their opinion.
They're kind of saying that they're but we're seeing it
through a bunch of different redactions.
Blank believes that Corgan and his boss Mark Meadows, Trump
administration are engaging in willful criminal activity.
After this, I would put NFI because it's not actually stated
what it is. According to Blank, Corrigan has
Blank properties at which he wants to build up infrastructure

(36:18):
to train people for civil war. Do you know what inflammatory
and wild this is? Corgan secretly controls the
Freedom Caucus, secretly controls no, no facts to back
that up either, and has plans that are not good for the FBI.
And that's where the crux of theissue is.
What have I always told you? The number one sent in the FBI
is embarrassing the Bureau. The number one thing that would

(36:40):
cause you to get on the wrong side of the FBI is talking about
doing bad things to the FBI as they believe that they are meant
to do. God forbid you have actual
oversight coming from outside the FBI.
That's why they wrap up every single director.
Corgan hates the FBI, who he refers to as Spooks.
Corgan claims to have identifiedBlank as a spook.

(37:01):
In the Blank, he additionally thinks that Kushner, that's
Jared Kushner, may have given classified documents to the
Saudis as part of a $2 billion deal.
That doesn't make a lot of senseto me either.
I've attached the bio for Blank.Here's a document about him and
our system, which means that this person has is a known
entity to the FBI. Blank thinks that Blank would be
willing to talk to the FBI. This is a tent essentially
saying we should recruit this person and here's why they fit

(37:24):
into all of our favorite things.The FBI has not been de
weaponized and it will not be deweaponized because the people
who are running it don't even know what the problem is that
they're dealing with and they'regoing to continue to do FBI
things. Allow me to do a quick read for
my friends over at Silent. If you guys are in the
distrustful space because you don't think government is going

(37:46):
to look after you, maybe you might want to go ahead and take
control of your own data. Your phone is a tracking device.
People on January 6th found thatout.
The only person that doesn't find that out on January 6th is
the alleged pipe bomber who apparently cannot be tracked.
So whatever technology or hoodiethey have, you should have.
Maybe that person was using a silent Faraday bag.
We know that's not true. Government agencies, big tech,
corporate data brokers, cyber criminals, take your pick.

(38:07):
People who have not your best interest at heart are always
fighting for a piece of your digital footprint.
They can do it through terms of service.
They don't have to ask, they just take it and you agree to
it. That's why you have options like
silent slnt.com slash Kyle is the website to go to.
They make everyday Faraday products that block all wireless
signals coming in and out of your phone.
And that's how you can be tracked.

(38:27):
Cellular, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPSRFID, near field
communications. No signal means no tracking
period. No remote access, no bread
crumbs, nobody being able to dump your phone and find out
what's going on. This is the technology that
special operations use. This is that what people use in
the intelligence sphere and whatpeople use in the
counterintelligence sphere. And I know because I've used
Faraday products. Usually they fail.

(38:47):
They almost all suck. That's worth knowing if you want
to secure your comms, if you want to avoid surveillance by
any number of people, whether itbe Big Tech or whether the
government itself. You can block signals.
You can also just get some peaceand quiet.
You might get some silent time with your family.
It's slnt.com slash Kyle again, silent.com.
It's silent with no vowels. That's how you say it.
It's available to you to protectyour family and your freedom and

(39:09):
your digital footprint. Just drop your phone in the
Faraday sleeve and go off grid. Get completely silent, invisible
to the outside world. Have a little bit of peace and
quiet. It does something we all need
more of. They do really like their
products. You guys are seeing the E3
everyday Faraday backpack on thescreen.
Check it out. Let's go to another gear
picture. How about this gear picture?
This looks familiar to me. Multiple, multiple acts of

(39:31):
violence were planned against synagogues.
Of course, of course. What do we have here?
We have an AR15 and a pump action shotgun, neither of which
look to be particularly expensive.
There's not even optics on it. There's a plate carrier.
God forbid Alabama police arrestthe suspect who was allegedly
planning multiple acts of violence against the synagogue.
One of my FBI buddies sent this to me, said when in doubt,
execute the playbook. Everything about this looks like

(39:53):
playbook. You've got a stack of ammo.
Look how dangerous and scary that ammo is.
That's not even that much. Those are all like 20 round
boxes of of 20 round boxes or 50round boxes for handguns.
It's like a couple 100 rounds ofammo there.
You could blow that in a in likea range day if you were doing
real solid training for a day. I've had classes where I went to
where they said make sure you bring 1000 rounds for the two
days you're going to be here. You could burn through like most

(40:14):
of that out there. Oh my gosh, look at the shotgun
shells on the bottom right. They don't even look like
they're the same caliber usually.
The yellow ones I have are usually 20 gauge and the red
ones are are 12 gauge. I wonder if those are mixed
calibers. But they look good at a picture.
Look at that long Glock magazine.
There's a 30 round Glock magazine.
You're seeing 3 firearms on the screen.
What's the story here? The local story for now until

(40:35):
the FBI gets further into it. A person was arrested in
southern Alabama or allegedly making, quote, UN quote credible
threats of violence against several synagogues in Alabama
and surrounding states. Do you know why?
Surrounding states? Because there's not enough
synagogues in Alabama to make enough threats about them.
I'm just guessing. I don't think there's that many
synagogues. I lived in the South
intermittently. I've lived in Mississippi, I've
lived in Texas, spent some time in Florida, got friends in

(40:58):
Louisiana. There's not a lot of synagogues
there. There are, except I guess in
Louisiana there are. I knew a lot of Jewish people
that were there. The person was arrested in
southern Alabama after making credible threats of violence,
according to the Clark County Sheriff's Office.
Multiple agencies were notified of the threat, including the
FBI, the First Judicial Circuit District Attorney and the First
Judicial Circuit Special Response Team.

(41:19):
Everybody got the notice. This sounds like an E guardian
lead gone wrong. Suspect was not immediately
identified and then the individual suspected of making
the threats was then arrested inNeedham Monday night after a
warrant was executed. They went after the suspect and
found that there were weapons more than a suitcase full of
ammo. Well, that's the, that's the,
that's the determining factor. If there's more than a suitcase,

(41:41):
you know it's for violence. God, they better not look in my
garage, huh? Body armor and other items were
found related to plans of violence.
That's enough. This screams playbook.
It screams it to me. So we'll see.
Was this somebody organically orwas this something going on
online? Was somebody being followed
simply because they said the wrong bad idea out loud and

(42:05):
somebody decided to go out thereand push them further?
Further investigation revealed that the subject had intentions
of not being taken alive and yetwas taken alive.
His plans were thwarted, I guess.
And possibly, possibly. I love possibly was planning
attacks on public figures as well.
All the things that are so bad, all the things that are
dangerous. Was this a right wing person?
Was this a left wing person? The FBI doesn't care.

(42:26):
What they care about is, can we get a person and is that person
going to make us look good? It looks something like this.
The right is currently trying tocast this thing.
That's why we had Mr. Michael Knowles, who is a known expert
on political violence. I suppose he's a commentator at
Daily Wire. These guys at Daily Wire seem to
get an awful lot of time in front of the cameras and

(42:47):
congressional hearings. It's probably because they play
nice. They don't call out people for
hypocrisy, and they smoke cigars.
Michael Knowles seems like an OKdude, but every opportunity that
people have had to have me on the show with him, including his
bodyguards like reaching out andbeing like Michael, you got to
talk to this guy. Some of their former like Green
Berets and some of the dudes that are like prior military
that do a security for him. None of it has resulted in ever

(43:08):
sitting down and talking to him.You'd think it'd be a shoo in
after my Catholic of the year nomination and and win from from
Catholic folk. What was it 2 years ago?
Anyway, here's Michael Knowles testifying about dangerous
violence. We have to make sure that we say
it's only on the left. We can't just say that there are
bad actors out there in the world and that people that are
thinking of violence is a good answer may turn to violence.
Whether they're left or right. That would be bad.

(43:29):
We got to polarize. We need to get people simple
bite sized solutions. So here it is.
It's the left's fault, guys. On the left, what happened after
President Trump came within 120th of an inch of being
assassinated? You saw jokes, you saw
minimizations, you saw comments throughout the social media
saying maybe we'll get him next time.
There is in a certain type of left wing ideology, the belief

(43:50):
that ideas don't really matter and that we're really just
warring groups that must clobbereach other over the head, which
is why you're seeing the increased violence there.
I think you saw this not only inthe horrific assassination of
Charlie, but in the reactions that came afterward.
You know, as the scene was unfolding, a Democrat analyst,
Matthew Dowd, on MSNBC, the leftwing cable outlet, blamed

(44:13):
Charlie Kirk. He said, quote, hateful thoughts
lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions.
The New York Times reacted by publishing the assassination
related musings of Hasan Piker, a prominent left wing streamer
who has suggested the assassination of Senator Tom
Cotton and who has said, quote of conservatives, kill those

(44:33):
mother effers, murder those mother effers in the street.
Let the streets soak in their effing red capitalist blood.
I could go on and on with the reactions.
We all saw it. And they're reflected in other
public opinion surveys relating to approval of of violence.
So it would appear that this is not merely a matter of some
fringe actors, some extremists who simply have an emotional

(44:54):
problem, as has been suggested here today.
This would seem to be clearly anideological issue at every level
of the American left, which needs to be addressed
accordingly or else we're just twiddling our thumbs.
We are not doing anything to solve the problem.
What would you do? By the way, his his claim that
this clearly looks like possiblythat it is this thing at this.

(45:16):
There's a massive series of likegeneralizations that go on in
that statement. How about we just say that when
people are desperate, they sometimes do bad things.
And when people are not includedin the system for whatever
reasons, they often result in whatever their most aggressive
movements are. And it turns out that our
federal law enforcement is incentivized to go out there and
encourage that as best they can.And sometimes it could get out

(45:37):
of hand. What he just said there was very
polished, and yet we can just dissect the words.
There was a lot of conditional and potential language in there.
And then also some conclusions that are not, there are not
things that we can draw. How do I know that?
Because the world's a messy place.
And if you want to draw a box and say that all political
violence exists on one side of the coin or the other, it

(45:58):
doesn't it that it's just, that's silly.
It's the same reason why you can't paint our current FBI and
say, well, they've they've decided to change their, their,
their situation. No, there are problems on all
sides of the spectrum. People will often times result
in violence and they do so when they're desperate because their
message is not being heard. It doesn't mean it's the right
answer and it doesn't mean we should tolerate it.

(46:18):
It doesn't mean we shouldn't recognize threats.
It was very clear to me that there were people that were part
of an organization that were aligned with an ideology called
Antifa, and it wasn't just an idea.
How do I know? Because I saw them, and that
idea surrounded my car. So I'm far more likely to be
able to give a nuanced perspective.
But we don't do nuance in this country right now.

(46:40):
We just do emotion and we beat you over the head over it and
you say you're on my team or on the other team.
And if you play nice with my team and you're part of the
quote UN quote movement, then you can get all the air time you
want. You can go out there and talk to
people. Do these hearings have any
meaning? They don't.
I just played it for you becauseit's theatrical.
It's as theatrical as the the claim that Donald Trump is going
to run for a third term, which is something that's going out

(47:01):
there. I want to talk about some
serious news because this may actually bring about some of the
real dangers that we're talking about.
I saw this article multiple times.
This has been up for like the last three or four days.
Various different people have talked about the no hire, no
fire job market. And that's not immediately
evident to me what the hell thatis.
And maybe it's not evident to you either.
So I wanted to talk about it so we can understand that there are
people who are going to find some real hard times and maybe

(47:23):
some of you are in there. No hire no fire job market may
no longer be a thing as big companies announce mass layoffs.
If I could just be spared from, I don't know what it is, teenage
editors that write horrible headlines like this 'cause it's
really bad. For most of 2025, the job market
was described by economists as no hire, no fire, a stretch of
time when job seekers face slim prospects, but workers who

(47:46):
currently had jobs could count on relative job security.
But that fragile balance may be shifting right now.
There's some real big numbers inhere that are worth hearing
because the federal government not working.
That's one problem. The fact that we rely on the
federal government as one of thelargest single employers in this
country is terrifying because it's so easily stopped.

(48:06):
But let's get into the broader spectrum of how many people are
being laid off because of AI andsome of the other things out
there. Amazon announced 14,000 jobs.
They're shifting towards AI and they cut those.
This one is really scary. In a year, UPS has laid off
48,000 people. My guess is they've moved to
contractors. It doesn't address that in the
piece. That's generally speaking, what

(48:26):
people do as an interim, and it gives them more flexibility to
be able to drop folks at a moment's notice when the
technology improves. And people who are not good
workers because they're not treating, you know, learning
good ethics and understand that the purpose of their job is the
function of what they do. They think the purpose of the
job is that they get paid if they show up, and that's not how
it's supposed to work. So we have a work ethic problem,
which I think Mike Rowe talks about a lot.

(48:47):
And I've seen in my own lifetimea drop in that.
But we also have a technology gap where people are deciding
whether or not they want to dealwith crappy employees, and some
employees are not worth having. I saw about 80% of the people in
the federal government, they weren't worth having.
They weren't someone that you could work with and get them to
do their job without completely slobbing the knob.
As we've been saying over here over and over again, Sorry, I
know that's kind of gratuitous, but like, I really do like the

(49:09):
way it sounds. Target on Tuesday announced that
the state employment agency in Minnesota plans to lay off more
than 800 workers in January. That's a broader trend.
The retailer said that it would come with an 1800 corporate
positions as it trims the fat intheir global workforce by about
8%. The mass layoffs comes as the
Federal Reserve scrutinizes the labor market for signs of
weakness. The claim is, is that without

(49:32):
government statistics, how wouldthey know?
Well, it turns out we have plenty of statistics from the
private industry. We don't need government
statistics to tell us. The danger here is, is that you
shut down some of the job market.
You take people out of the workforce, you put them on those
benefits that are going away. And then you also cut the
interest rates. So you free up some of the money

(49:52):
and then you end up with inflation.
But you don't have a a growing market.
So it's called stagflation and that's where you basically have
a stagnant economy, but but yourinflation continues to grow on
Tuesday, job cuts. The layoffs have been trending
even higher, according to data from oh, look, there's private
companies that do a Challenger Gray and Christmas.
That's a good name. Employers across the United

(50:13):
States have cut nearly 950,000 jobs this year through
September, with the largest layoffs since 2020.
The official report, federal report coming from the state
labor markets have been suspended because of the
shutdown and are other things. And this is right in the wake of
people who are going to drop off, they're not going to have
access to certain public assistance.
And so those of us who grew up in a more Hardy society, those

(50:34):
of us who came of age in the 80sand maybe the 90s or those of
you who did before, you're at least familiar with the concept
of this video game. That was something that we all
learned. You could die from anything.
You could die because you tried to Ford the river and you fell
out of the wagon. You could die because Mary got
typhoid or dysentery or starve to death.

(50:54):
You could die because you have cancelled food stamps.
If you guys are just listening right now, what you're missing
is a great Oregon Trail graphic of a covered wagon being pulled
by oxen and the words you have died from cancelled food stamps.
There is a push right now. There is a a concern that a
bunch of people in America are no longer going to be alive
simply because the federal government's subsidy program is

(51:18):
going away, even temporarily. And it could be quote UN quote,
catastrophic. And so you have people that are
getting very riled up. They're getting their
constituents riled up. They're talking about it in a
way that will make people react in a pretty dangerous manner, I
think potentially overreact. Here is the senator from
Georgia, this is Raphael Warnocktrying to let people know whose

(51:40):
fault it is. We're going to get into kind of
the shutdown game here. And I'm going to show you the
the the sympathy play that's being done by the media to try
to make air traffic controllers the face of this.
I think they're going back to like 80s playbook.
That's why this 80s graphic is so interesting to me.
This is a choice, a choice that Trump's USDA is making.
There's no reason why those benefits could not be available

(52:03):
to folks come November. But we are in a moment where we
have Craven politicians who are literally using people as pawns.
I was a free lunch kid. That's how I got through school.
I, I know what it's like to needthose benefits.
But here's the thing that the folks it particularly in rural
Georgia and rural parts of our country who who benefit from the

(52:27):
SNAP benefits, whether we're talking about the beneficiaries
themselves or the ways in which that is connected to the to that
economy. Those are the same folks who are
also being robbed of their health care as they see those
premiums double, triple, quadruple.
Those are often the same people.And so politicians need to stop
playing games, stop centering the politics and center the

(52:48):
people. We can fund the government and
we can fund health care. They're in charge.
Of the White House, the House and the Senate.
We're in a shutdown because Republicans are playing games.
All right, everybody's going to try to blame it on the other
side. Again, I think that the
Republicans should just own it. That would be the right move.
They probably shouldn't also have some of the people in their
administration flying around on private jets because that's a
really terrible look. Isn't it interesting?

(53:10):
They said that you don't have tocancel SNAP, you don't have to
do it, you don't have to cancel it because we could declare an
emergency and have funds released to that.
But here's the real issue. I used to work in emergency.
I worked in emergency when things were really obviously
emergency and when most things were not.

(53:30):
As a paramedic, we'd go out and we would find that people were
quote UN quote, having an emergency.
And what I often diagnose was that their life was in fact an
emergency. If you're 300 lbs overweight.
And that is conservative for some of the people that we dealt
with. If you are that far overweight
and you have problems because you've been a smoker your whole
life and you're diabetic and you're hypertensive and you're

(53:51):
on a slew of medications and youcannot exist, your entire life
is an emergency. I used to say that our average
911 call was somebody whose lifewas 7 out of 10 shitty every
single day, and they called 911 because today was an 8 instead
of a nine. That means they had a cough in
addition to all the other problems they had.
That's where our SNAP benefits are right now.

(54:12):
The SNAP benefits in this country are not an emergency and
should not be given emergency funding because it's a well
known fact that every single endof September, beginning of
October, we start a new government budget.
That's how it's set up. So it's not an emergency when
you've known for literally as many years as you want to
predict into the future that there will be a requirement to

(54:33):
pass a budget. There's a requirement to pass a
budget every single year. That's the job of Congress.
The power of the purse, as they love to remind us.
That's the single biggest power under the Article 1 powers.
You get to control the freaking federal budget.
And that means you have to come together. 435 people have to
agree to it. Well, a percentage of 435
people, right? And another 100 have to vote.

(54:55):
It's got to be 60 to be able to punch it in.
And here's Warnock asking otherwise people in the chat
that are new, if you guys are new to the program and you're
like, wait, did you just say that the Republicans are
responsible for the shutdown? No, I said they should own it.
Because The funny thing about hypocrisy is nobody wants to be
told, you know, one thing and then act another way.
I think that the issue in Washington, DC is and the reason

(55:17):
why people think they can get away with hypocrisy is because
they are not exposed to regular people.
Imagine if somebody came up to you and be like, hey, man, a
hole. You spent all your money.
Now you don't have any money. You'd be like, OK, yeah, that's
true. I did spend all my money.
They'd be like, and now you're screwed.
Now you can't go out on a date tonight.
You're a teenager. You can't go out on a date
tonight because you spent all your money and you don't have
money for a date. You'd be like, I do want to go

(55:39):
on a date, but I understand thatI don't have any money.
Even if I'm mad about it, I knowit's my own fault.
Why doesn't why doesn't the Republican Party just say you
voted for for certain things? We're going to shut down and
have smaller government. We want smaller government, and
no government is the smallest government.
And we're willing to slash things as long as we need to
because we're not going to compromise on these principles.

(56:00):
And people will be like, we're really mad.
But yeah, like that, that's actually makes sense.
It's the same people that you thought would not be able to get
behind ICE and immigration enforcement.
And you find out, oh, shoot, there's a bunch of Hispanic
people that are really pro get rid of illegal aliens in all the
places you go. You find out there's a bunch of
black people you thought were pro crime for some reason
because you're a Democrat. And then you're like, hey, how

(56:22):
do you feel about ICE coming in and rounding up illegal aliens
at Home Depot? And they're like, yeah, that
sounds pretty good. Like the, you know, how do you
feel about Trump putting in the National Guard and and shutting
down dangerous streets? And they're like, I can walk
home. Yeah, I like it.
And people go, oh, my God, Really.
Wait. You're saying that people are
actually comfortable with folks doing the thing they said they
would do instead of hypocritically, like, trying to

(56:42):
blame the other side? Trump could do it.
He could pivot. He could be like, yeah, I'm, I'm
running the shutdown because I actually want to have less
government and I want less inefficiency.
And I'm going to use this as thetool.
And we're not going to compromise so Democrats can come
to the table or not. And if it means starving people
out, yeah, that's what we're going to do.
It's because they're inflexible and we have the power.

(57:03):
That's the way you own the shutdown.
You can say we're going to do the things we're going to do.
They may be responsible for not compromising, but it's not their
shutdown. It's my shutdown.
Stop kicking it away. That's not what he does.
This is what he does. He's on the tarmac here talking
about this and that's going to lead us to air traffic control
stuff since we're at a plane anyway.
So the shutdown continues. The Republican Party's not going

(57:24):
to pay a trillion and a half dollars to illegal immigrants
coming into our country, coming in for a lot of reasons, coming
in from prisons, from jails fromall over the place, from
Venezuela, many countries. We're not going to do that.
So the shutdown continues. It's a Democrat shutdown.
It's a Schumer shutdown because his career has failed and it's

(57:45):
over. I met with President Zelensky,
as you know today. So there you go.
The Schumer shut down and he sucks and so on and so forth.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's not going to win.
He was asked about what they were going to do about certain
people and whether or not they were going to fund all the
people after the shutdown happens.

(58:06):
This is a really funny answer. This is really callous.
This is why Donald Trump can do it and other people cannot
because he's Donald Trump. Very few people can pull this
off. It's the reason why I think he's
in a unique position to be able to actually do the thing I just
said, which is that he could ownthe shutdown and still make it a
win in the same way that, quote,UN quote, sending in federal
troops to different cities has been a win for him.

(58:28):
You could do this, but he doesn't.
But he does say stuff like this,which is kind of the same.
Why don't we just unify the messaging?
Is it the White House? 'S position that furloughed
workers should be. Paid for their back.
Pay, I would say it depends on who we're talking about.
I can tell you this, the Democrats have put a lot of
people in great risk and jeopardy, but it really depends

(58:50):
on who you're talking about. But for the most part, we're
going to take care of our people.
There are some people that really don't deserve to be taken
care of, and we'll take care of them in a different way.
OK, Thank you. Do you?
Want to hear that in a differentway?
Let's go to a cartoon. And how do they say it?
In cartoon, some of you may die,but it's a sacrifice I am
willing to make, right? Some of you will not make it,

(59:13):
some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make.
And some of you will die from cancelled food stamps.
It's a sacrifice that 80s kids understand.
You shot a squirrel, you have retrieved 3 lbs of meat, right?
I don't know the expectation that this safety net is going to

(59:33):
make sure that you survive and thrive and that everything will
work. Like that's that's that's Lord
Farquhar from the from the Shrekseries, which is funny.
And he wasn't the least likable.Like he was a villain in the in
the thing, but he was also sort of like sympathetic.
We sort of got a kick out of him.
He was comedic relief. John Lithgow does a great job
playing him. It actually looks like John
Lithgow if he were going to be some sort of fake tiny little

(59:56):
Prince Charming, right? They they don't have any
consistency on this. You could own it and you could
take control of it or you can keep waiting.
Here's the sympathy response that's going on.
These are Republicans. They are Democrats.
Everybody is trying to make the political play with air traffic
control for some reason, which by the way, in and of itself is
kind of funny because air traffic control only handles

(01:00:17):
people who are flying. And I don't think many of you
are flying all the time, all theyear.
And if it turned out you were like, hey, no more flying.
You do what my parents do, they just get in their RV and drive.
You get in your truck, your car and you drive.
And it would take longer. You know, it's a lot shorter
than the Oregon Trail used to be.
It used to take months to go from one side of the country to
the other. And now it might take, you know,

(01:00:37):
2-3 days if you're, if you're pushing it, It might take a week
if you're taking your time and seeing the sights.
But they are making air traffic control sort of the bargaining
chip. And historically, this is a
thing that has shut down shutdowns because people somehow
feel really sympathetic about air traffic control.
I never hear about it until there's a government shutdown
and the essential workers have to work.

(01:00:58):
They're not crying about ICE getting paid, by the way.
They're not crying about other sort of law enforcement getting
paid. It's just air traffic control.
It's very interesting. Just today, the American
Federation of Government Employees Large Union came out
and said, quote, it's time to pass a clean continuing
resolution and end this shutdowntoday.

(01:01:19):
No hash half measures and no gamesmanship.
And the union went on to say today, quote, because when the
folks who serve this country arestanding in line for food banks
after missing a second paycheck because of this shutdown, they
aren't looking for partisan spin.

(01:01:41):
They're looking for the wages they earned the.
Yeah, and that's why there's a little bit of sympathy there
because they actually should getpaid for doing the work.
And it is a work that we've farmed out to the federal
government. Whatever happened to this guy
that, like, is the speaker of the House?
Do you remember Smithers? He's still there.
Smithers. Mike Johnson, he's such a good,
strong, principled conservative.He's not going to do CRS, but

(01:02:03):
they want to do a clean CR but they're never going to do ACR.
Here's 2023 Mike Johnson, you guys remember.
This is why I get so pissed about this.
Just own the damn shutdown and don't do ACR.
Committed to never being in thissituation again.
I'm done with short term CRS. We are.
We're resolved. So what that means is you're
going to see in the beginning ofthis next year we'll be walking
and chewing gum at the same time.
We're going to get the appropriations process running

(01:02:23):
on time as it's supposed to be under law.
The Budget Control Act of 1974 has very specific provisions in
there on how this is to be done.Congress hasn't done that for as
long as we can remember, but we're going to get back to that
because that's good stewardship.The American people deserve it,
and the debt situation we find ourselves in necessitates that
so. Yeah, that was a 23 months ago
and Smithers is still doing whatSmithers does.

(01:02:43):
They're just liars. They're just liars.
They just cannot be honest. Our debt situation necessitates
it. We're done with CRS, so we're
committed to that. We're committed to it so much so
that we are not committed to it in the same way that we've had
people step into our government,that we're committed to fixing
agencies, but they're not committed to it.
Totally OK with it going on. Here's some more sympathy for

(01:03:05):
ATC. Again, I can, I can look at them
and say, yeah, you should get paid for the work you're doing.
Wouldn't this be an interesting opportunity to to evolve this to
the states to stop? I don't know that we need to
have a unified federal air traffic control system.
I'm not confident we do. Why would you not have it?
Like you could have federal standards and then just hire
them under the states. Then you don't have to have this

(01:03:26):
problem. Maybe I'm too simplistic about
it. I don't know.
Here's the here's the president of their union.
I also really, really, really hate public sector unions.
I don't think that you can quoteUN quote, be a public servant
and then also have a union that argues against the position that
the public has created and that seem problematic.
I've always had a problem with that.
Doesn't matter whether they're teachers or air traffic control,

(01:03:46):
here they are talking about it. I am the president of the
National Air Traffic ControllersAssociation, Nick Daniels, and I
proudly stand here. But at the same time, I'm here
to tell the story and normally have prepared remarks for you
today. But today isn't a day for
prepared remarks. Today's a day to speak on behalf
of the men and women. As the secretary just said, they

(01:04:06):
go in day in and day out and do the job of unsung heroes.
They keep America safe. They keep America moving.
But today, an air traffic controller showed up at their
facility to see $0.00 in their paycheck.
That air traffic controller justmoved hundreds of miles from
Oklahoma City after passing a grueling 4 months at Oklahoma

(01:04:28):
City Academy is at the lowest end of our pay scale and it's
showing up to a job that pays them $0.00.
They're trying to move in. They're trying to get set up on
just even having a place of being able to put up for rent.
And guess what's due in a few days?
Rent for everybody. It's not the gas that they have

(01:04:48):
to put in the car, the food thatthey have to put on the table.
It's the stress that they now wear.
This job is stressful enough. We go to work day in and day out
and make thousands of decisions.We do it five days a week.
Most of us actually do it 65's hard enough and we do it 6 and
10 hours a day. And now you add in the fact that

(01:05:08):
we had a partial paycheck already and we missed a full
paycheck today. America's air traffic
controllers are now having to focus on how do they put gas in
the car? How do they take care of their
children? How do they pay for childcare?
Yeah, all of that tells me that maybe the federal government
shouldn't be handling this. Maybe we should devolve it to a

(01:05:29):
smaller entity that can actuallybe controlled and and keep a
budget. Isn't that, isn't that the
answer? The answer is not throw shit
loads of money and everybody should be financially insolvent
and our country should go into further debt because because a
guy can't put gas in his car. It's like, yeah, that's a really
micro problem. Sounds like he should be a
member of a church. It sounds like he should be a
person that is supported by his community.
Sounds like his community shouldactually value that job because

(01:05:51):
we think it's important. And I think we all agree air
Traffic Safety is really a big deal for those of us that ever
get on a plane, we want to not have to worry about it.
So I I'm down with that. But the answer is not like we
have to fund the government because this guy, they always do
this though, they play on heartstrings, they always go out
there and make a sympathetic 'cause this is another example
of it. This was put out by some
professional group or semi professional group.

(01:06:13):
It's slightly better editing that I can do.
It's slightly better than my, mylittle thing with the with the
G5 jet from the beginning. But they're, they're playing on
heartstrings and they're going out and doing this public
campaign again. I I hate unions.
I hate public unions. I don't know how you can argue
against the public good if you claim to be a public servant.
And all of this tells me that itshouldn't belong in the federal
government, which, by the way, should be the position of the

(01:06:35):
Trump administration. They're like, yeah, we're going
to spin this stuff off. We wouldn't.
We want to reduce the size of government.
We're going to, we're going to reduce the weaponization
possibilities because we're going to give it back to states.
That would actually be a real conservative position.
We don't have that government. We have a motion.
Traffic controllers are among the federal workers receiving
their last regular paychecks as the government shutdown drags

(01:06:58):
into its third week. My wife and I are both FAA
employees, which means we're both still continuing to go to
work and doing our safety critical jobs while receiving no
pay and no way to provide for our two young children.
I don't know when my family is going to get a paycheck so that
we can pay our childcare to pay our mortgage.
I would trainee. I'm a.
Single mom to a 5 year old and Isupport my 13 year old half

(01:07:21):
brother who's in foster care. We are all working.
Without paying and that creates a lot of stress and anxiety.
Missing a paycheck has kept me up.
That night has been a huge distraction.
Missing a paycheck adds significant stress to all of us.
It adds additional mental load that we shouldn't have to deal
with. Both my husband and I are air
traffic controllers and not receiving a paycheck currently,

(01:07:44):
and adding in the fact that we have a 4 1/2 month old, it's
starting to add stress into our lives.
Sounds sad, very emotional. Sounds like some of you put all
your eggs in the same basket too.
That doesn't seem smart. If you guys Google how many

(01:08:08):
government shutdowns there have been, there have been many and
some of them substantive. And in my lifetime there have
been 4 long term major ones in the last 40 something years.
It's predictable that this couldhappen.
You're relying on a public budget.
So welcome to the world. The world is full of stress.
Nobody gets a, a, a chance to live without stress.

(01:08:28):
It turns out there used to be a lot more stress.
I think that's why we had games like The Oregon Trail.
I think it is. We used to be like, hey, do you
think that your time on earth isdifficult?
Sarah just died from typhoid. You're the only person from your
party who made it to Oregon, right?

(01:08:50):
Wasn't that the wasn't that the deal?
You know how safe the net was there?
There was a piece of canvas between you and hostile Indians,
wild animals, really, really rough weather, difficult
terrain. And you were doing it on a wood
wagon with like wood wheels and a big animal that needed to eat
that was dragging you across theentirety of the country.

(01:09:13):
Like, it's very interesting whenpeople are like, my life is
really difficult. I've lost sleep in my beautiful
house. Did you can see that that guy's
house, he had the beams, the exposed beams in his house.
Beautiful was well kept. He was living well.
How many of you guys don't realize that?
Like, you should have been putting money away every single
week, every single week that youhad a paycheck for the years

(01:09:35):
since the last shutdown. Why?
Because you probably had that job in the last shutdown the way
that I did. It's crazy to me how how
suddenly people go like I've failed to prepare for this
emergency and now my not emergency is an emergency and it
is your fault and you must fix it.
Is it working? Here's the argument.
No, the argument is, by the way,it's not working.

(01:09:56):
But it is interesting because I saw this push.
There are more videos. I've got a whole computer full
of videos of this stuff right now.
I just don't want to burn you with it because it all popped up
all at once in a period of like 3 days.
Suddenly it was all air traffic control all the time here the
analyst Harry and Harry, we saw the troops.
We talked about air traffic controllers not clear their
pain. Well on the shutdown, one thing
that might end a shutdown is political pain if parties start

(01:10:19):
to feel that it's hurting them. So let's talk about that
starting with Republicans how isthe shutdown seem to have
affected their political standing Yeah, you might think
given that the Republicans are in charge of both the House and
the Senate, that a government shutdown might actually hurt the
Republican brand. But in fact, it hasn't, if
anything, it's been helped a little bit.
Take a look here. The shift in net popularity

(01:10:39):
versus pre shutdown among the G when we're looking at the
Republican Party overall, that brand actually up two points.
That's within the margin of error, but clearly it hasn't
dropped come over this side of the screen.
Look at the net approval ratingsfor Republicans in Congress.
It's actually up five points since pre shutdown.
So what we're seeing here is theRepublican brand in Congress has
actually improved somewhat compared to where we were pre

(01:11:01):
shutdown despite the fact that Republicans control.
And that's the math that John and Mike Johnson are looking at
is, hey, why should we give an electorally speaking when our
brand has actually improved a little bit?
It's a great question. Why should you?
There you go. I would love for the public to
reach out to the members of Congress and just say, hey,
look, you need to find a solution and the government
shutdown. What government workers are

(01:11:25):
finding out is that most people don't realize where the federal
government even touches their life.
This is a propaganda video put out by the National Association
of Air Traffic. Controllers talk about being in
a job where. You have to be 100% right 100%
of the time. Now, on top of all of those
things, you're putting on the stress of not getting a paycheck
today, not knowing. Yeah, that's most people's job,
actually. That's every ambulance driver.

(01:11:47):
That's every person that's in a truck.
That's a lot of people in certain logistics.
That's every nurse whoever delivers medicine.
That's every Doctor Who does surgery.
All of these things are normal stresses for life.
You have to be 100% right 100% of the time for a lot of the
things you do in your professional life.
Sure, got it. OK, it's also voluntary.

(01:12:07):
By the way, nobody made you become an air traffic
controller. That's the other thing that I
always it was like when people cried about losing the job.
It's like, OK, that sucked. It's the reason why I moved on
as fast as I did. I was like, this sucks.
I had this job. I spent a decade trying to get a
job and, and working at it and doing a decent job and not even
being allowed to do the job thatI could have been doing.
My buddy was talking to me the other day.
He's like, what a waste of time.The federal government spent all

(01:12:29):
that time cultivating you into a, a capable employee.
They kicked you out and then they found out that you weren't
going to let it go and that you're going to go ahead and
apply your talents to like showing how much of A screw up
they are, that you're going to continue to expose the
shenanigans of the people that still work there.
And they didn't ever find A use for it.

(01:12:51):
And I'm like, yeah, well, lucky for me, I don't have to work for
these people and I'm happy aboutit.
But they're not going to get anymore of these because they've
already getting rid of the people that did those protected
disclosures. They've already shown the people
who still work there and people that work there are the ones
that are willing to write these emails.
You can fire a Walter Gardena. You can get rid of the people

(01:13:11):
that may have, you know, sort ofsilly just worked and say, well,
I don't feel good about this, but I'm going to keep doing.
You can get rid of all like a couple of the, the, the good
Americans that have highlighted themselves that have skylined
themselves. There's an entire agency culture
that exists like that. There's an entire federal
culture that looks like this. It's what is my job?
Did that guy ever say the valuable service that we provide
for the community? No, every single thing he said

(01:13:32):
was like me. He's like, I'm having a hard
time. My job is really difficult.
Everyday I go to work as hard. How about the value of the
service you provide? It's the problem is just that
nobody who works in quote UN quote federal service thinks
that they serve the people. They think the job serves
themselves, which is probably the reason why people are
stopping hiring. That's why people don't want to
have. It's why employees are a pain in
the ass. Ask anybody who's ever employed

(01:13:54):
anybody. Having an employee means you're
taking on pains. What's the, what's the, the old
expression? They used to do something
similar in the FBI. They would talk about your pain
or your, your, your difficulties, right?
They would say little cases, little problems, big cases, big
problems, no cases, no problems.It's the same thing with
employees, right? Few employees, few problems.

(01:14:18):
Many employees, many problems. No employees, no problems.
You want to know what it looks like?
It looks like this. This is no employees.
I have very few problems with employees.
The only person I got a boss around is me.
Some of you guys know that working for yourself makes you
the hardest boss, but you're theeasiest person to know what is
and what doesn't work. And I don't ever have to like,

(01:14:38):
act like I serve something I don't.
Real simple. Anyhow, we're living in an
interesting time right now, folks, and we're going to see
like a lot of people and some difficulties come out.
Let's, let's just at least put one thing to bed.
Thank God we found out that Donald Trump will not be running
for a third term. Probably.
The media has been dealing with this forever.
He's been trolling with them fora very long time.

(01:14:59):
This is ABC News reporting President Donald Trump appeared
to acknowledge Wednesday that hecannot run for a third term
after previously declining to rule out the possibility, which
made them ask him about the possibility forever.
Quote, I have my highest poll numbers I've ever had And, and,
you know, based on what I've read, I, I guess I'm not allowed
to run. I don't believe him.
I believe he knows that. So we'll see what happens.

(01:15:21):
He said that's not really, really good out, is it?
So goofy. He said.
Quote, I would say that if you read it, it's pretty clear I'm
not allowed to run. It's too bad.
We have a lot of great people. We have a lot of great people, a
lot of great people. I could run.
It's been a great run. Mike Johnson, AKA Smithers, who
is never going to do another CR,you know, he would immediately
roll over and be like, there's probably a great reason for him

(01:15:43):
to run because I don't know. I just don't say anything that's
true. He said, quote, it's been a
great run. I think the president knows and
he and I have talked about it and the constrictions of the
Constitution as much as many of the American people lament that
I don't want another Trump presidency.
I think you're nuts if you do. I think you're absolutely out of
your freaking mind if you think we need another one.
We can have an equally capable to Donald Trump which means we

(01:16:06):
get some of what we want and certainly not all of it.
At any time there are unlimited numbers out possibilities of
people who could bring on a mediocre ish sometimes getting
it right, not all he's getting it right sort of situation.
Just remember some of you may die but it's a sacrifice I am
willing to make. Less people can pull that off

(01:16:28):
than Donald Trump, but but not none.
The number is not zero. So anyway, seeing people say
this is the most conservative president I've ever had.
That's because you guys don't know what conservative
presidents look like. How dare you guys say Rubio in
the chat. Somebody said Rubio.
Gosh. All right, we're going to end
the show on that. I will remind you that you guys
can watch us over on Spotify. And if you're not watching us on
Spotify, then you're screwed up because it's the best place to

(01:16:48):
watch out on the replay. If you're going to go and listen
to us, that's the way to do it because you can switch between
audio and video. Kyle seraphinshow.com.
Check it out on locals. If you guys want to be part of
our call in show, which will be tomorrow, it's Kyle
seraphin.com. Go be a subscriber there.
Meet the great community. You can contribute to the show
otherwise like it, share it, subscribe to the channels,
YouTube, Rumble X and so on. Thanks for being part of that.

(01:17:11):
Let's do something funny. I do like mediocre impressions.
This guy does a really series oflike a good series of
impressions. I guess Nick Fuentes sat down
with Tucker Carlson, which has got people up in arms.
I could care less who talks to who.
It doesn't bother me at all. The whole idea of quote UN quote
platforming people is not a big deal to me, not even a little
bit. I don't care.
Talk to anybody, have a conversation, agree or don't
agree, all the easy. This is a very funny impression,

(01:17:36):
and I don't really care about the take one way or another.
I just think that people who do good impressions sometimes are
really fun to watch. And so this guy does Tucker
Carlson and Nick Fuentes. He's switching sides of the
camera. Enjoy a little palate cleanse
before we go and shut down for the day.
So how did you get fired from that job?
What happened? Well, I said that Jews were
parasites and that they were controlling all the halls of
power and they need to be foughtat every level and that they

(01:17:58):
never could be trusted and they were disgusting vermin.
I called some of my colleagues Jew boys.
You all need to be fought. You're disgusting parasitic
creature and that Jews effectively are just this
parasitic force in our society that's holding white men back.
And I also said how blacks were racially inferior as well.
So that's it. Yes, that was it.

(01:18:19):
I can't understand why that would upset people.
And what happened next after that.
After that they just fired me. So.
And who likes parasites anyway? I mean, I don't know anyone who
likes parasites. I had a stomach bug that was a
parasite. I had diarrhea for a week.
It was bad. It was bad, like really bad.
I remember it was. I ended up having to see a, a

(01:18:40):
gastro who was, who was Jewish actually.
And oops, I guess they start it and they finish it.
Exactly. And so you said all those things
you said them. What are your actual beliefs
like? What do you believe?
I generally a good person. I'm a Catholic, I love
everybody. I want everybody to succeed.
Of course, I certainly don't wish harm to any people.
I don't. I'm not a violent person and I'm

(01:19:01):
just a regular fun, lover lovingguy who wants everyone to
prosper together. So despite everything you've
actually said, like every, like everything you've ever said, you
don't actually believe all thosethings.
You are actually a nice person, like a good person, tolerant,

(01:19:21):
mainstream person. Despite all the things you've
ever said or believed, really, like, deeply believed, like
deeply held, hateful, disgustingbeliefs, despite all those
beliefs and all the statements and all the things you've ever
said, you're actually not those things.
You're actually, like, a a nice,good person, is what you're
saying. Yeah.
Despite everything I've ever said ever about anything and all
of my kind of core beliefs. This is what I'm saying now.

(01:19:45):
It's so true. So true, you know.
That's such a good that's such agood Tucker impression.
That's I like Tucker. I like Tucker's.
I like everything about Tucker. I think his delivery is great.
The laugh is weird and quirky, but it's him and I think he's
really smart. I think Nick Fuentes is really
smart. I think that's really funny

(01:20:06):
impression too. So enjoy that.
I'll try to figure out who that comedian is.
I'll go share it over on the on locals if you guys want to see
that. Anyway, I hope you guys have a
great rest of your day. I hope you.
I hope that made you smile a little bit.
We could all just sort of laugh at the ridiculousness of
everything. It's all ridiculous.
It all tends to be so it's not all bad.
God bless you. Look forward to seeing you guys
again tomorrow. Who knows what sort of things

(01:20:26):
will be delivered to us in our in our evening, in our evening
as we are apart. Let's see you then.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSeraphin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Seraphin.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!

Ruthie's Table 4

Ruthie's Table 4

For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

The Joe Rogan Experience

The Joe Rogan Experience

The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.