March 26, 2025 • 44 mins
The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally included on a Signal chat including some of America's top ranking officials. This report came out in line with the intel agency heads testifying to Congress. Jesse Kelly gives his thoughts on it all and plays highlights from the hearing. Speaking of national security news, there was a major Russia-Ukraine peace agreement reached. Jesse catches up with Stephen Yates to find out the details. You'll also hear from Julie Kelly about the ongoing judicial activism in America and the plan to stop it.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 3-25-25
Pure Talk: Get an additional 50% off your first month at https://PureTalk.com/JESSETV
Beam: Visit https://ShopBeam.com/JESSEKELLY and use code JESSEKELLY at checkout for 40% off
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
There was a big hearing today.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
We got embarrassed a little bit to talk about that
cease fire agreement for the Black Sea.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
That's a good thing.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Julie Kelly joins us to talk about activist judges.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
All that and more coming up.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
I'm right, okay, let's talk about the signal chat thing,
the war plans, the hearing from today. I know it's uncomfortable,
(00:34):
but let's have an uncomfortable conversation because it's important in
the wake of failures, even if they are mistakes, to
have uncomfortable conversations.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
It just is. We don't enjoy that.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
But when a when a football team loses the game,
next practice, they're gonna watch film. If you were missing blocks,
dropping passes, the whole team's gonna watch. We're gonna talk
about it. It's gonna hurt. It's how you learn. In
the military, something goes wrong, maybe when someone gets killed
out on a mission, we're going to talk about it.
(01:07):
Who screwed up, when, what went wrong? It's important. It's
how we advance, it's how we get better. So signal.
If you're older, you may not be aware of what
signal is. I'm only vaguely aware of it. It's a
social media app. It is supposedly one of the more
secure social media apps. It is apparently authorized for government use,
(01:30):
so it's installed on government computers. And there was a
signal group group text messaging was make it that about
that with a bunch of big shots on it. Pete hagsays,
jd Vance the works, a bunch of big shots on it.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
Mike Walls, that's going to matter.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
And in this signal chat they were discussing war plans
with Yemen.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
Should we do this? Should we not do that? I
want to do this. I don't want to do that. Somebody.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
I think we can guess that it would somebody in
Mike Wallas's camp or Mike Walls himself. Added Jeffrey Goldberg
to the chat. Jeffrey Goldberg is a vehemently anti Trump
editor of the Atlantic, which is a complete communist rag.
It's not any small thing to add a disgusting human
(02:22):
being like Goldberg onto there. So let's talk about it,
because we'll get to the hearing and things that happen today,
and you'll see evidence of what I'm about to talk about.
There are things that aren't a big deal but certainly
could have been a big deal, and so you've got
to make them a big deal. For instance, let's say
(02:44):
I have little, tiny kids. I don't anymore. My boys
are gigantic in their beatheads. But let's say I had
little kids again. They're two and four years old. We
go out, aub and I go out for a date.
We call a babysitter. Babysitter comes over. We get back
from dinner. It's dark outside, and not only are none
of the outside lights on, the babysitter has carelessly left
(03:07):
the front door of the house unlocked and opened a jar.
Anybody the dog could push it open. The two year
old could have pushed it open. And we get home.
Kids are just sitting there in the living room playing.
Babysitter is out back on the phone talking to her boyfriend.
Now the kids are safe and sound, but she can't
ever be the babysitter again. Yes, nothing happened this time,
(03:30):
but disaster could have happened. And showing that level of
carelessness was something so important, like the lives of my children,
has got to come with consequences. Those consequences being you
don't ever get to babysit my kids ever again. Look,
(03:52):
I know we instinctively understandably, we went to lock shields
every single time someone on our side does something wrong
because we are in a political war against the other side.
I understand it completely. Lord knows, I've probably done it myself,
defended the indefensible.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
I get that.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
But we have less than four years now, if you're
talking about the midterms, we have less than two years.
But we'll make it about Trump's presidency. We have less
than four years, less than four years to cure this
country of the terminal cancer that the Communists have given us.
Communists throughout the government, world leaders against us, we have
(04:35):
every single thing humanly possible stacked up against us. We
simply cannot possibly afford. We can afford the level of
carelessness that comes if it was carelessness, We can afford
the level of carelessness that comes with adding a filthy
communist to a group chat with the Vice president and
(04:56):
the Secretary of Defense. I'm sorry, and I know Donald
Trump came out today and said, Mike Wallas.
Speaker 1 (05:02):
Is a good man.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
He made a mistake, and I get that, and that's
certainly Donald Trump's right because he's president of the United
States of America.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
I want to know, I want you to know.
Speaker 2 (05:11):
I completely disagree Mike Walls if he is the responsible party,
and I think we could probably guess that by now
who's been on this show and I have nothing personal
against Mike Walls should be fired and fired immediately. It
should serve as a lesson to everybody in this administration
that accidents, mistakes, they're not good enough.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
It won't work. We only have four years.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
We have to move at breakneck speed, speed and purpose
getting things done. Boo boos like that can sink us.
For instance, today been a huge hearing today. We had
an opportunity today to put all kinds of great things
on tape for the American people, show them, Hey, this
is the Trump administration.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
This is what we're doing.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
We're doing this and that and this with the intelligence
and National security.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Instead, we got an entire day of this so that
we're clear.
Speaker 3 (06:04):
One of the first things that happened when I was
confirmed as CIA director was signal was loaded onto my
computer at the CIA, as it is for most CIA officers.
One of the things that I was briefed on very early,
Senator was by the CIA records management folks about the
use of signal as a permissible work use it is.
(06:28):
That is a practice that preceded the current administration to
the Biden ministry directly.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
All day answering why are you on signal? Should you
be using signal?
Speaker 2 (06:40):
While I mean the last administration used signal all day,
not getting our message out there all day on the
defense all day, having to answer questions all day.
Speaker 4 (06:50):
This stuff and the discussion included the Vice president's private
opinion on the wisdom of proposed US strikes and Yemen.
Speaker 5 (06:56):
Correct, I don't recall vance quote. I think we are
making a mistake.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
I am not sure the President is aware of how
inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now,
there was a strong argument for delaying this a month.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
You don't recall.
Speaker 5 (07:16):
As you don't recall seeing that read that. I don't
It included the.
Speaker 4 (07:20):
Private opinions of the Secretary of Defense on the timing
of strikes in Yemen.
Speaker 5 (07:24):
Correct, I don't recall Director Ratcliffe.
Speaker 4 (07:28):
Surely you prepared for this hearing today. You are part
of a group of principles senior echelons of the US government,
and now a widely publicized breach of sensitive information. You
don't recall whether the Vice President opined on the wisdom
of the strikes.
Speaker 5 (07:43):
That's your testimony today under oath.
Speaker 3 (07:45):
In that setting, I don't recall.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
Whoop's bad? You know what does? Don't bother? And is
this the end of the world? Of course not.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
Story will be gone twenty four hours from now. Looks bad.
I don't recall. I don't looks evasive, looks bad.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
It should have been.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
An entire day of us being able to make fun
of weapons grade boobs like Michael Bennett.
Speaker 5 (08:15):
I also know Jeff Goldberg. I don't use it to.
Speaker 6 (08:20):
Communicate with him, but you thought it was appropriate. By
the way, I think he's one of the more outstanding
journalists in America.
Speaker 5 (08:28):
But I'm shocked to find him on a.
Speaker 6 (08:30):
Thread that he's reading in the parking lot of a
grocery store in Washington, d C. And your testimony as
the director of the CIA is that it's totally appropriate?
Speaker 5 (08:40):
Is it appropriate? Now? Is not what I?
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Okay? Did I say it was?
Speaker 5 (08:46):
When did I use the word appropriate?
Speaker 1 (08:48):
Well?
Speaker 6 (08:48):
Go ahead, please, Well I didn't that everybody in America clearly, Senator,
here is what your testimony is. No, I'd never seen this,
just a normal day at the CIA where we chat
about this kind of stuff over signal. In fact, it's
so normal that the last administration left it here for us.
Speaker 5 (09:07):
That's your testimony today, that's your testimony. No, that's not
my testimony.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
That's where you sadn't say any of those things that
you just related to.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Do you say it?
Speaker 6 (09:16):
We'll let the American people decide.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
Michael Bennetts and moron, it's embarrassing. It's not what the
story is about today. We should have spent this entire
opening monologue today making fun of Angus King.
Speaker 7 (09:31):
One note that surprised me. I've been on this committee
now for this is my thirteenth year. Every single one
of these reports that we have had has mentioned global
climate change is a significant national security threat except this one.
Has something happened? Has global climate change been solved? Why
(09:52):
is that not in this report? And who made the
decision that it should not be in the report when
it's been in every one of the eleven prior reports words.
Speaker 8 (10:01):
I can't speak to the decisions made previously, but this
annual Threat Assessment has been focused very directly on the
threats that we deem most critical to the United States
and our national security.
Speaker 7 (10:12):
Let me ask a direct question, who decided climate change
should be left out of this report after it's been
in the prior eleven Where was that decision?
Speaker 8 (10:21):
I gave direction to our team at O D and
I to focus on the most extreme and critical national
security threats.
Speaker 1 (10:28):
For the direction.
Speaker 7 (10:29):
Include no comments on climate change.
Speaker 8 (10:34):
Senator as I said, I focus on the most extreme
and direct nationals.
Speaker 7 (10:38):
Of my questions that did you instruct that there'll be
no there, no finding in terms of climate change in
this report?
Speaker 8 (10:46):
I don't recall giving that instruction.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
Not a great day. Should have been making funny Angus
kid again. It's not the end of the.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
World, but it does matter, and we can't afford days
like today.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
We have too much to do. The mission is too important.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Look, I would if I had my brothers, I would
have spent the whole eight Bloc today making fun of
that idiot John Cornyan who's up for a primary next
year Texas.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
Maybe get out and vote someone out for once. It's
this guy.
Speaker 9 (11:20):
I'd like to refer to an AP story Associated Press
dated March twenty first, twenty twenty five. The title of
the article is Western officials say Russia is behind a
campaign of sabotage across Europe. This AP map shows it.
Speaker 1 (11:43):
This Chairman, I'd like to ask unanimous consent that's being
made part of the record. With that objection.
Speaker 9 (11:48):
The document that AP compiled, and I presume this is
through open sources documented fifty nine incidents including cyber attacks,
spread propaganda, plotting, killings, or committing acts of vandalism, arson,
sabotage or espionage. Is that consistent with your understanding and
(12:11):
impression of what Russia's currently engaged in Europe?
Speaker 8 (12:17):
Senator, I haven't seen that specific article, but I can
confirm that we assess Russia's attempts to conduct such sabotage
activities in Europe.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
That man is a United States Senator from Texas.
Speaker 2 (12:33):
Anyway, we will refocus move off of this as so
much to get to fact. We'll talk about Russia Ukraine
here in just the moment. But I wish we did better.
We screwed up. Someone should be fired. Apparently they won't be.
I guess we'll see how the four years goes. All
that may have made you uncomfortable, but I am right.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
I love pure talk. You know that.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
Pure talk has been America first, since before America first
was the cool thing to do. Oh I know every company. Now, hey,
we're hiring americans. Look at us, We're hiring americans. You
turn on the TV every day, Look at Apple, look
at this, and look. Pure Talk was doing that when
the dirty comedies were importing foreigners and hiring them over you.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
All day long.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
Pure Talk's been hiring Americans for ages you'll pay way less.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Than you're currently paying.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
My bill got cut in half when I switched from
T Mobile to Pure Talk. It's the veteran run company
that cares about this country.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
You can keep your phone, you keep your number. They
make it easy.
Speaker 2 (13:35):
Pure talk dot com, slash jessetv. We'll be back, Okay, Well,
I'll be honest about something. I'm really immature, and I
think the Black Sea is really cool.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
I don't even know much about it.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
I just know where it is, and I know that
that's a really cool dame for I also know there
are great things happening out there. Apparently there's some sort
of a ceasefire, but it's only a Black Sea ceasfire.
Speaker 1 (14:08):
But I'm dumb.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
Stephen Yates is not, So we're going to ask him
about what's going on in the world and why the
Black Sea cease fire matters at all if it does.
Joining me now, national security expert with the Heritage Foundation,
Stephen Yates. Stephen, the Black Sea sounds amazing. I wonder
if it's actually black and why is this important?
Speaker 10 (14:27):
Well, obviously the sea is important because there is a
lot of commerce that would normally be conducted there. You
have it's the crossroads of some old civilizations and very
important supply lines on energy and commodities, et cetera, et cetera.
And if you're going to have a durable peace between
Russia and Ukraine, you need to have some resumption of
(14:50):
civilian craft being able to pass through there. Another element
that was talked about was stopping the use of civilian
crafts for military purposes. And so basically that Black Sea
is an immense neighbor to the territories affected by Ukraine
and Russia. So there's military, economic, and sort of humanitarian
(15:13):
part of getting this piece right. You can't have peace
in Ukraine without the Black Sea having this restoration.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
Stephen.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
On a macro level, Western Powers have wanted the Crimean
Peninsula since oh, I don't know forever.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
They've freaking fought a war over it.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
In the mid eighteen hundreds, about the time we were
fighting civil wars. It's a big deal and countries have
wanted it for a long time. How do we solve
that problem no matter what comes with the peace agreement.
Russia wants it understandably, Ukraine wants it, The UK wants
it as they always have.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
What do we do with all this.
Speaker 10 (15:47):
Well, that is the tricky question through all of this.
The definition of what land is going to be under
what authority is I think going to be the last
part of whatever settlement comes out of this process. That's
why I never really believed this would be quick. I
thought the President was right to put pressure on this
to stop the killing quickly and saying he could end
(16:08):
the war. But how to secure the piece is going
to take a lot of work in a lot of time. Obviously,
it went into Russian hands about ten years ago, and
so it's going to be hard to redefine it as
something other than that under these terms. Maybe one of
the things that was agreed to with Ukraine and with
Russia announced today was that they would welcome the good
(16:31):
offices of third party countries that may or may not
be the United States, it could be others to help
negotiate some of these longer term tricky issues. But the
definition of where sovereignty rests with CRIMEA, I think is
going to be possibly the last hardest piece of this.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
Stephen, the details matter and things like this, and obviously
the details are still coming in.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
We don't have a lot.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
But for instance, you brought up civilian boats hauling military
e which of course would be nothing new. Everybody's aware
of the Lusitania.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
And things like that, But who inspects that. Who's in chance?
Is that one of those.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Things where Russia's gonna trust the UN? Who is the
one poking their noses around the fishing boat making sure
there's not a missile down below?
Speaker 10 (17:18):
Yeah, well, I'm glad you mentioned the UN. I've been
very happy that it's been conspicuously absent from a lot
of the conversation because I'm of the view that the
United Nations has a near perfect batting average of failure
when it comes to international security, and so if you
really want to solve a problem, best not to outsource
(17:38):
it to the UN blue hats. So this is going
to have to probably fall into that gray zone that
we got a beginning, not a middle, or an end
of definition of who the third party country good offices
are going to be. Is that going to be a
European country or grouping? Is that going to be some
kind of other grouping that might include powers from other
(18:00):
regions that have less of a vested interest The Indians
have come to mind in some ways in doing this.
It's unclear how any of this would work. Really, what
we have now is a definition of a goal, and
we don't have detail on implementation. But you're right about
what would not work, either having the Russians do the
inspections or have the UN get in charge.
Speaker 1 (18:20):
All right.
Speaker 2 (18:22):
General Cruz spoke today. Here's what he had to say
about the conflict.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
We do not see an imminent collapse in any of
the line of control battle spaces at.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
This point, Stephen. That sounds like they're all dug in.
So if that's the situation, surely that moves peace negotiations along, right,
if nobody thinks they have an advantage.
Speaker 10 (18:47):
It does. But what it does is it leaves things
kind of frozen in place. And so you have Ukraine
with a justifiable explanation expectation that their sovereignty would be
restored to what it was prior to that being compromised
ten years ago when they gave up nuclear weapons with
a promise of keeping their sovereign borders. That was violated.
(19:07):
But we live with reality of where things are. So
I see this as Trump saying mission one, stop the killing, mission,
I define and hold peace. Mission three after that is
get into.
Speaker 5 (19:20):
Where do you draw lines?
Speaker 10 (19:22):
And it may be that Russia claims sovereignty and Ukraine
claim sovereignty, and there's some kind of international force whatever
that might be, that is peacekeeping, or hopefully it's also
investment in development that gives people some hope for a
future other than taking up arms. But that's where we
are right now. I think this is the hardest part
(19:45):
of this and I expect it to take years.
Speaker 5 (19:48):
Not months.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
Stephen, We're going to shift gears to well, kind of
the same rough part of the world.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
Taiwan.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
There's a rumor out Wall Street journals reporting that China
is planning on blockading it. At the same time, Taiwan
very craftily getting in better with the Trump administration. They're announcing, hey,
one hundred billion dollar investment.
Speaker 1 (20:09):
For US chips.
Speaker 2 (20:11):
I'm sure that as I'm sure they want our protection
for something like that.
Speaker 1 (20:16):
Where are we going here.
Speaker 10 (20:19):
Well, it's definitely the case that China has been practicing
the blockade moves. I think that was kind of a
dopey headlined by the Wall Street Journal for an outfit
that has covered Asia in a very focused way for decades.
I thought that was kind of an echo of what
PRC talking points would be. Clearly, they want to be
able to have that blockade, They've tested it. But Japan
(20:40):
has been reforming and revitalizing in ways we've never seen before.
Taiwan has taken some moves to increase its capabilities, China
bloodying up the Philippines in using civilian craft to engage
in military activity, which is an echo of the Russia
Ukraine situation. All those things have awakened that first island
chain in a way that hasn't been the case for
(21:02):
a long time. So it's not a FATA complete, but
we've let things slide for a long time. So I
think Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense going to Indo,
PECM and Hawaii and getting out to Guam, Japan and
the Philippines is a really good investment in refreshing what
some new thoughts would be about revitalizing deterrence. We have
(21:23):
a lot of advantages. A lot of these countries I
mentioned are involved in AI and the most advanced chips.
We've got a good entrepreneurial spirit. We've got to revitalize
our manufacturing bases and put it to good work for
our economies but also our security. That is what can
meet the challenge with China. So we've got to start there.
But we've i think had I think bad inertia for
(21:46):
ten plus years. That makes that deterrence equation really hard
right now.
Speaker 2 (21:52):
Dude, tariffs, I'm assuming tariffs with China, this coming trade
war with China, I'm assuming they're going to have something
to do with this whole dust up, right, Surely they're
going to play a role.
Speaker 10 (22:03):
Well, the first round of tariffs were interestingly linked to, hey, China,
you'd need to cut off the supply of illicit FENTONYL precursors.
And that's I think an interesting litmus test because if
they won't do anything on that front, why would we
expect more on others as we ratchet up other tariffs.
But President Trump and his team have made clear there
(22:24):
will be other tariffs too, and there's going to be
other areas where we're going to put pressure.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
But clearly the.
Speaker 10 (22:29):
Best way forward is for us to have a really
strong sense of civil society resilience in Taiwan, which they've
been working on, and we should encourage and support having
maritime manufacturing revitalization. The coast guards of these countries need
investment and development, and they're starting. We should support that
(22:50):
and participate in that too. And then when it comes
to military procurement, I mean, unlike Ukraine, which I'm not
trying to disnecessarily, but Taiwan and Japan they pay for
things they get from the United States. And if the
United States is going to say you should do more,
then their response ought to be great. We'll buy as
much as you're able to manufacture and willing to sell
to us, and let's see where that goes. I think
(23:11):
we're inching towards that kind of a posture, and hopefully
we have enough time and create enough doubt in Beijing
to catch up.
Speaker 2 (23:21):
Finally, Greenland, this is not just you know, social media fodder.
This is clearly something Donald Trump is extremely intent on.
And we see France throwing a fit about the whole thing,
and Greenland's former PM is running his mouth about it.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
Where are we going with all this? I'll tell you what.
Speaker 10 (23:39):
This has been one of the most fantastical bolts from
the blue in conversation, and it's sort of typical Trump.
He'll push something out there that people just have kind
of backflips and conniptions about and they say, can't possibly
be real, and then they keep sending officials. And there
are economic agreements that are being proposed, and there's only
(24:01):
so many residents of Greenland who could be exceedingly well
taken care of if they formed some condominium with the
United States. When it comes to the nuts and bolts
of national security, this is a serious geography and there
are serious resources and if we don't have this kind
of relationship with them, who is And it's not gonna
be Denmark keeping them safe from Chinese or other encroachment
(24:25):
on those resources or access.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
To the pole.
Speaker 10 (24:28):
And so I think it's a much more serious issue
than was thought of a year or two ago, or
when it first floated in the.
Speaker 5 (24:35):
Trump first term.
Speaker 10 (24:36):
And boy, I can't tell you how it's gonna land,
but politically, if I was a resident of Greenland, I'd
like that deal that's being offered.
Speaker 1 (24:44):
Too. Stephen thank you, sir. I appreciate it. All right.
Speaker 2 (24:50):
Let's gets you a good night's sleep. There's just nothing
like starting your day when those eyes open up and
knowing you slept good and you're about to feel good
all day. You know you can have that. It's right
there in your grasp. It's called dream powder from Beam.
It's a cup of hot chocolate. It's delicious. You just
(25:12):
sip on a cup of hot chocolate before bed and
you sleep like a baby. It's got all kinds of
natural things in it, melatonin and magnesium and all kinds
of things drug free. And that's why when you sleep
it's natural, and when you wake up you feel good
instead of groggy. You one up to forty percent off
Shopbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly, we'll be back.
Speaker 1 (25:45):
All right. Let's talk about the good and the bad
of draining the swamp.
Speaker 2 (25:49):
And if it seems like it's two steps forward, one
step back, well just know that that's kind of how
it's designed. That's how a corrupt criminal organization known as
the United States Government, that's how it functions. Frankly, it
functions usually as one step forward, two steps back. The
system exists to protect itself. This gigantic, evil bureaucracy of
(26:13):
criminals we have running the United States of America is
not simply going to give away power. It's an organized
crime organization, just like the cartels, just like the Italian mafia.
They will do whatever they have to do to protect
the organization, to protect themselves. So let's talk about the
new CDC director, doctor Susan Monaez. First of all, she's
(26:38):
the acting cdcterct All right, she's the cdcterric. But you
probably saw a ton of things out there online of
her saying today about wearing masks.
Speaker 1 (26:49):
And things like that.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
If you've been paying attention, you saw all kinds of
that that did not.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Come from doctor Susan Monorez. It did not.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
Those things came from the CDC director account before she
took the account over.
Speaker 1 (27:03):
So just let me.
Speaker 2 (27:03):
Caution you with taking whatever you see.
Speaker 1 (27:06):
Online and running with it.
Speaker 2 (27:07):
That's not actually what she said, but she's said other things.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Now.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
First of all, keep in mind rumor has it that
Senator Collins Senator Cassidy, two of the biggest losers in
the United States Senate, both Republicans, of course, that they
torpedo Trump's original Now so this is his backup choice.
His backup choice does have some troubling things on camera.
Speaker 11 (27:38):
Know that during the COVID experience, there were challenges and
limitations about having clinical trials accessible to the entire patient population,
and there was you know, challenges that were overcome over time.
But we don't want to be put in that place again.
So that's where we started from.
Speaker 5 (27:53):
But as we were.
Speaker 11 (27:54):
Thinking about it from the our age perspective, what can
we do to ensure that at Steady State, not just
in response to a pandemic, but at Steady State, that
we have an open and inclusive and all fully benefiting
clinical trial network so.
Speaker 12 (28:09):
That we can ensure that.
Speaker 11 (28:12):
It's equitable, that it's accessible, that that it isn't just
skewed towards a demographic or geographic or a patient population,
but we actually have an inclusive clinical trial network.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
Do you know what you just heard.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
That's equitable, it's inclusive, it's you know what you deserved,
it's all KMMI language.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
Those are all commy buzzwords.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
And now that woman is taking over an organization that
went from maximum credibility pre COVID to now when you
mention CDC to people, you get a sneer because it
turned into an evil to randical communist organization that destroyed
your freedom and wrecked this country. The swamp's not draining
(28:58):
with somebody like this. You know what you heard? All right,
that's the bad. Let's talk about the good, shall we?
FEMA another one of these evil criminal organizations that shouldn't
exist anymore. Christy Nome sounds like she might make that happen.
Speaker 12 (29:15):
We don want to thank the Secretary of Defense and
the Navy for all of their help and partnership too.
We do operations together because they're obvious. Maybe warships are
in certain regions, but our cutters are faster and can
work together in a partnership. That's securing America. And we're
going to eliminate FEMA. So we've got a lot to do,
but it's all good, and we're working hard and we're
(29:37):
going to make sure that we're continuing to do exactly.
Speaker 1 (29:39):
What you promised. Right. Sounds good.
Speaker 2 (29:44):
Ali Henro Majorcis was the former head of DHS. Ale
Hondro Majorcis did so many tremendously evil things in this country.
Ale Hondro Majorcis just got his classified material access security clearance.
He just got that yanked away from him. Remember that's
(30:04):
not a small thing. It's a big thing. His secret
Service protection's gone, as security clearance is gone, he got
stripped of all the wonderful little privileges, all the little
goodies these people get for themselves, and that's how they
make money.
Speaker 1 (30:18):
Right.
Speaker 2 (30:18):
Hey, look at me, I'm a big shot with Secret
Service protection.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
Look at me.
Speaker 2 (30:22):
I have access to these secret documents. Trump continues to
take these things away from these lifelong criminals. Is it enough,
of course not. Alejandro Mayorcus presided over the invasion of
the United States of America by roughly twenty million foreigners,
many of whom complete savages who've raped and murdered Americans,
and Alejandro Mayorcus facilitated it. So taking away his Secret
(30:44):
Service protection or his security clearance is not near enough,
of course, But it is at least some sort of
a start. I mean, the guy not only committed these crimes,
he's going around the school is bragging about what he did.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
I am very proud of what we did do.
Speaker 3 (31:01):
I would have liked to have a wrestled with the
question of communication and narration.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
Some more.
Speaker 2 (31:12):
Yeah, it's just communication of course, the Communist loves to
do that. Whenever he's caught doing something in humanly evil,
which he's always doing something in humanly evil. Whatever the
American people chafe against his evil plans, he will always, always,
always talk about, well, you just don't understand what I'm doing.
Maybe I could have communicated it better. No, no, no,
(31:33):
no, no no, you communicated it just fine. You're a lifelong
open borders loser and you did what you did because
you're an evil demon. All right, all right, let's talk
to Julie Kelly next.
Speaker 13 (31:54):
We're not going to allow this mass deportation. Our state policy,
our state law does not allow for us, our state
police to be involved in those situations. Now, what we
have are some renegade counties in New York because individual
counties can sign a packed with ICE, and we have
a lot of them, some on Long Island, some in
upstate New York where there's different political views. They are
(32:16):
cooperating with their local police departments.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
But what I control is.
Speaker 13 (32:20):
The state police, and they will not cooperate in that.
Speaker 2 (32:26):
Tried to tell you this was all coming. This is
our problem. This is our obstacle. One of the obstacles
with mass deportation. Half the states in this country are
run by filthy communists who want the country full of
rapists and murderers. Joining me now, the Great Julie Kelly,
her substack is declassified. Julie. Look, they're not afraid to
put this stuff on camera. It doesn't matter that it's
(32:48):
a losing political issue. They will run to the camera
and brag all day long about all the barbarians they're
going to keep from deportation.
Speaker 14 (32:57):
It's just really insane, and especially not just these Democrat
elected officials. Of course we expect it from people like
Kathy Hochel, but when you have federal judges, especially in
the nation's capital, and as you know, Jesse, this is
one of the big issues that I've been following this
ACLU lawsuit that was filed on behalf of illegal Venezuelans
(33:18):
who the government, the Trump administration has identified as being
members of Trende Aragua, a very dangerous, destructive, deadly multinational cartel.
These thousands of them smuggled into the United States during
the Biden regime. And now you have a federal judge
(33:40):
who is not only put a halt to those deportation flights,
sending these illegal Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador. He
is grilling the Department of Justice and insisting that these
illegals have some sort of due process rights that the
Trump administration the DHI are violating. So, you know, I
(34:03):
was talking to a man recently. He is from Paraguay,
and he said, Americans just do not understand how dangerous
this TDA cartel is. And clearly people like Kathy Hochel
and Judge Bossberg and others don't as well.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
This Judge Bossburg has quite an interesting family situation and
an interesting background. You think, almost doesn't seem like an
honest broker to.
Speaker 1 (34:29):
Me, Julie.
Speaker 14 (34:31):
Right. Shockingly, here is Judge Bossberg. Jeb Bosberg right there.
Not only was he the former chief judge of the
Piza Court when it was attempting successfully to infiltrate and
spy on Donald Trump and his campaign. But yes, to
your point, I believe his wife, his sister, maybe his
daughter are tied to nonprofits that directly aid a legal immigrants. So,
(34:56):
just like so many judges in Washington, Jesse, you and
I talked about this related to the J six case,
and of course the two federal criminal indictments against the president.
These judges have all been their Washington Beltway lifers. Their
family members are as well. They're all tied to the
government or this democratic lawfair apparatus, and Jeb Blosberg is
(35:19):
just one example of that. But he is a highly
partisan Obama appointed judge and now he's doing whatever he
can to undermine what is strictly the president's purview, and
that is creating immigration policy, foreign policy, diplomatic policy that
this judge, single handedly, without authority, unchecked, wants to undermine
(35:44):
and at the same time risk the security and safety
of the American public.
Speaker 2 (35:51):
Truly, I know you have wonderful sources. What are you
hearing out of the Trump administration about all this? Because
you know, pointing out the unjustin this is fine, right,
I get to do that, and you get to do that.
But we need the Trump administration to save the country.
And are they just going to abide by these judges'
rules that the Supreme Court's not going to step in
(36:12):
and clearly they're in no hurry to do so what's
the plan.
Speaker 14 (36:17):
That's such a good question, Jesse. And of course everyone
frustrated but not necessarily surprised at the inaction and cowardice
of the Supreme Court at this point. But look, Judge Bossberg,
and I've written about this is attempting to create a
contempt trap for the Trump administration, claiming and insisting that
they misled him and that they did not abide by
(36:39):
his instantaneous temporary restraining orders on these flights that he
issued on March fifteenth. So he's still trying to dig
into the details of those flights, set up a contempt
trap for whom I don't know, a DOJ attorney, one
of the top cabinet officials. I mean, there's nothing standing
in his way. And so the Trump Department of Justice,
(37:02):
I know, is frustrated that they have to devote all
of this time and resources to fighting these lawsuits. How
many are there now, I think close to more than
five dozen. So this is time and resources that, as
you know, Jesse, they wanted to allocate to other investigations.
They wanted to devote to shoring up at the border
(37:22):
and kicking out these illegals to a drug trafficking You
saw FBI Director Cash Battel talk about that today during
the Senate Intelligence hearing. And so this is really hamstringing
the Department of Justice and FBI and other departments quite
frankly from doing what they want to do. It's more
wasted time. We saw this during the Trump administration. That
(37:43):
was the whole purpose of Special Counsel Robert Muller, who's
successfully hamstrung the first half of Trump's first administration. And
now you have these organizations, labor organizations ACLU, working hand
in glove with these federal judges to delay and thwart
as much as they can of the president's agenda once again.
Speaker 2 (38:06):
Julie Fatima Goss Graves is a name many people are
familiar with courtesy of you.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
She's the wife of Matthew Graves.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
Give us a little recap, shall or please give us
a little recap on this couple from Hell and what
Fatima has been up through recently.
Speaker 14 (38:23):
They are the couple of Hell. Of course, there's lots
of couples from how in Washington, d C. But this
has to be towards the top of the list. So
Matthew Graves, the DCUs attorney who was appointed by Joe Biden.
He presided over not only all of the j six prosecutions,
but also, as you recall, refuse to partner with Special
Counsel David Weiss in his investigation into Hunter Biden's tax
(38:47):
crimes committed in Washington, d C. There is Matthew Graves
right there, so more importantly, his wife, Fatima Goth's Graves
runs a very profitable, powerful radical left wing non profit
in Washington worth ninety to one hundred million dollars every year.
There she is that she raises. She was at the
Biden White House at least forty times during the Biden administration.
(39:11):
I reported on that as well. But it appears that
now she is part of this coalition planning these demonstrations
across the country against the president and against Elon Musk.
And I'm not sure if this is tied to what
they are doing at these dealerships or what they're planning
to do at Tesla dealerships, but certainly her organization and
(39:33):
she herself is a big part of this. She also
is part of the coalition to try to force Clarence
Thomas to resign, and of course that's not going to happen.
So now she has turned her sites and her influence
in all of her money big donors, big corporations, big
law firms, etc. Who donate to her National Women's Legal
(39:53):
Law Center, and now she is taking him at the
Trump administration again, and now Elon Musk as well.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
Julie, have you gotten any indication I've heard the talk
from Pambonni or whatnot. Have you gotten any indications so
far that there are going to be government people with
handcuffs on. I know about the FBI's most wanted that's good,
I got all that, But I'm talking about criminals inside
of the United States government, even ones who just left
(40:24):
the United States government.
Speaker 1 (40:26):
Have we heard or gotten any kind.
Speaker 2 (40:28):
Of a sniff that there's going to be some kind
of real accountability there.
Speaker 14 (40:33):
I truly believe that there will be. Jesse, and I
do think that this is another purpose of all of
this law there is to take them off put them
on their heels where they have to spend time and
resources fighting all of these lawsuits. But of course Pambonni
did announce on day one the Weaponization Working Group that
she has DCUs attorney the new one, Ed Martin, also
(40:54):
investigating how prosecutors handle J six cases, including the unlawful
use of fifteen twelve too that obstruction felony brought against
more than three hundred J six ers and the president
as well. And we know that the top DOJ officials
and the FBI are looking into thousands of FBI employees
who had their dirty, grubby myths on J six close
(41:18):
to one thy six hundred before the case was closed.
All of those investigations and prosecutions. Now, there's a lot
of work to be done. I know there's frustration on
our side. I see it that no one yet has
been charged and arrested, but it does take time to
build these cases. And once again, unfortunately, and we sort
(41:39):
of saw this with the climate slush fund City Bank,
they still are going to have to go to DC
magistrate judges and others to try to get grand jury
preceding subpoenas and indictments. That is going to be a
tough problem for the administration. We don't know if they've
already sought criminal charges or indictments against any government employees
(42:01):
that were turned down that we saw in that Climate
slash fund investigation, and DOJ finally had to do it
on its own. So this is another one hundred and
eighty degree angle of what these judges are doing in
Washington to support the President's agenda. On the other hand,
they can have act as a very powerful interference in
(42:24):
investigations and prosecutions in Washington against government employees in that city.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
July, Thank you, ma'am. As always, I appreciate you. Lighten
the mood.
Speaker 2 (42:37):
Next, all right, it's time to lighten the mood. And
I just can't get enough of Jasmine Crockett. Everyone gets
mad at Jasmine Crockett all the time because she's always
out there running her mouth saying something dumb. I absolutely
(42:58):
love it. What's that old napole in line? Never interrupt
your enemy when he's making a mistake. Here you have
this insanely ambitious politician from Texas who is rising in popularity.
Every day she wakes up, you know, she does. She
throws on her weave and she looks at social media
and sees she's gaining a bunch of followers in notoriety
(43:18):
and it's like a drug. At this point in time,
she just can't get enough of it. Now, that's the
good news for Jasmine Crockett. The good news for you.
The good news for me is every single time this
woman talks GOP, voter registration goes up nationally. Here she
was again today with another winner.
Speaker 15 (43:37):
Because we and these hot ass Texas streets. Honey, y'all
know we got Governor hot Wheels down there, Come on now,
and the only thing hot about him is that he
is a hot ass mess honey. So so yes, yes, all.
Speaker 1 (44:00):
Mad about that?
Speaker 2 (44:01):
Why don't get offended by the things these people say,
Governor hot wheel not offended at all. I think it's fantastic.
I think she should go out there and say those
exact same words every single day.
Speaker 1 (44:13):
We'll be back
There was a big hearing today.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
We got embarrassed a little bit to talk about that
cease fire agreement for the Black Sea.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
That's a good thing.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Julie Kelly joins us to talk about activist judges.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
All that and more coming up.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
I'm right, okay, let's talk about the signal chat thing,
the war plans, the hearing from today. I know it's uncomfortable,
(00:34):
but let's have an uncomfortable conversation because it's important in
the wake of failures, even if they are mistakes, to
have uncomfortable conversations.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
It just is. We don't enjoy that.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
But when a when a football team loses the game,
next practice, they're gonna watch film. If you were missing blocks,
dropping passes, the whole team's gonna watch. We're gonna talk
about it. It's gonna hurt. It's how you learn. In
the military, something goes wrong, maybe when someone gets killed
out on a mission, we're going to talk about it.
(01:07):
Who screwed up, when, what went wrong? It's important. It's
how we advance, it's how we get better. So signal.
If you're older, you may not be aware of what
signal is. I'm only vaguely aware of it. It's a
social media app. It is supposedly one of the more
secure social media apps. It is apparently authorized for government use,
(01:30):
so it's installed on government computers. And there was a
signal group group text messaging was make it that about
that with a bunch of big shots on it. Pete hagsays,
jd Vance the works, a bunch of big shots on it.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
Mike Walls, that's going to matter.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
And in this signal chat they were discussing war plans
with Yemen.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
Should we do this? Should we not do that? I
want to do this. I don't want to do that. Somebody.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
I think we can guess that it would somebody in
Mike Wallas's camp or Mike Walls himself. Added Jeffrey Goldberg
to the chat. Jeffrey Goldberg is a vehemently anti Trump
editor of the Atlantic, which is a complete communist rag.
It's not any small thing to add a disgusting human
(02:22):
being like Goldberg onto there. So let's talk about it,
because we'll get to the hearing and things that happen today,
and you'll see evidence of what I'm about to talk about.
There are things that aren't a big deal but certainly
could have been a big deal, and so you've got
to make them a big deal. For instance, let's say
(02:44):
I have little, tiny kids. I don't anymore. My boys
are gigantic in their beatheads. But let's say I had
little kids again. They're two and four years old. We
go out, aub and I go out for a date.
We call a babysitter. Babysitter comes over. We get back
from dinner. It's dark outside, and not only are none
of the outside lights on, the babysitter has carelessly left
(03:07):
the front door of the house unlocked and opened a jar.
Anybody the dog could push it open. The two year
old could have pushed it open. And we get home.
Kids are just sitting there in the living room playing.
Babysitter is out back on the phone talking to her boyfriend.
Now the kids are safe and sound, but she can't
ever be the babysitter again. Yes, nothing happened this time,
(03:30):
but disaster could have happened. And showing that level of
carelessness was something so important, like the lives of my children,
has got to come with consequences. Those consequences being you
don't ever get to babysit my kids ever again. Look,
(03:52):
I know we instinctively understandably, we went to lock shields
every single time someone on our side does something wrong
because we are in a political war against the other side.
I understand it completely. Lord knows, I've probably done it myself,
defended the indefensible.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
I get that.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
But we have less than four years now, if you're
talking about the midterms, we have less than two years.
But we'll make it about Trump's presidency. We have less
than four years, less than four years to cure this
country of the terminal cancer that the Communists have given us.
Communists throughout the government, world leaders against us, we have
(04:35):
every single thing humanly possible stacked up against us. We
simply cannot possibly afford. We can afford the level of
carelessness that comes if it was carelessness, We can afford
the level of carelessness that comes with adding a filthy
communist to a group chat with the Vice president and
(04:56):
the Secretary of Defense. I'm sorry, and I know Donald
Trump came out today and said, Mike Wallas.
Speaker 1 (05:02):
Is a good man.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
He made a mistake, and I get that, and that's
certainly Donald Trump's right because he's president of the United
States of America.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
I want to know, I want you to know.
Speaker 2 (05:11):
I completely disagree Mike Walls if he is the responsible party,
and I think we could probably guess that by now
who's been on this show and I have nothing personal
against Mike Walls should be fired and fired immediately. It
should serve as a lesson to everybody in this administration
that accidents, mistakes, they're not good enough.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
It won't work. We only have four years.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
We have to move at breakneck speed, speed and purpose
getting things done. Boo boos like that can sink us.
For instance, today been a huge hearing today. We had
an opportunity today to put all kinds of great things
on tape for the American people, show them, Hey, this
is the Trump administration.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
This is what we're doing.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
We're doing this and that and this with the intelligence
and National security.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Instead, we got an entire day of this so that
we're clear.
Speaker 3 (06:04):
One of the first things that happened when I was
confirmed as CIA director was signal was loaded onto my
computer at the CIA, as it is for most CIA officers.
One of the things that I was briefed on very early,
Senator was by the CIA records management folks about the
use of signal as a permissible work use it is.
(06:28):
That is a practice that preceded the current administration to
the Biden ministry directly.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
All day answering why are you on signal? Should you
be using signal?
Speaker 2 (06:40):
While I mean the last administration used signal all day,
not getting our message out there all day on the
defense all day, having to answer questions all day.
Speaker 4 (06:50):
This stuff and the discussion included the Vice president's private
opinion on the wisdom of proposed US strikes and Yemen.
Speaker 5 (06:56):
Correct, I don't recall vance quote. I think we are
making a mistake.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
I am not sure the President is aware of how
inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now,
there was a strong argument for delaying this a month.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
You don't recall.
Speaker 5 (07:16):
As you don't recall seeing that read that. I don't
It included the.
Speaker 4 (07:20):
Private opinions of the Secretary of Defense on the timing
of strikes in Yemen.
Speaker 5 (07:24):
Correct, I don't recall Director Ratcliffe.
Speaker 4 (07:28):
Surely you prepared for this hearing today. You are part
of a group of principles senior echelons of the US government,
and now a widely publicized breach of sensitive information. You
don't recall whether the Vice President opined on the wisdom
of the strikes.
Speaker 5 (07:43):
That's your testimony today under oath.
Speaker 3 (07:45):
In that setting, I don't recall.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
Whoop's bad? You know what does? Don't bother? And is
this the end of the world? Of course not.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
Story will be gone twenty four hours from now. Looks bad.
I don't recall. I don't looks evasive, looks bad.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
It should have been.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
An entire day of us being able to make fun
of weapons grade boobs like Michael Bennett.
Speaker 5 (08:15):
I also know Jeff Goldberg. I don't use it to.
Speaker 6 (08:20):
Communicate with him, but you thought it was appropriate. By
the way, I think he's one of the more outstanding
journalists in America.
Speaker 5 (08:28):
But I'm shocked to find him on a.
Speaker 6 (08:30):
Thread that he's reading in the parking lot of a
grocery store in Washington, d C. And your testimony as
the director of the CIA is that it's totally appropriate?
Speaker 5 (08:40):
Is it appropriate? Now? Is not what I?
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Okay? Did I say it was?
Speaker 5 (08:46):
When did I use the word appropriate?
Speaker 1 (08:48):
Well?
Speaker 6 (08:48):
Go ahead, please, Well I didn't that everybody in America clearly, Senator,
here is what your testimony is. No, I'd never seen this,
just a normal day at the CIA where we chat
about this kind of stuff over signal. In fact, it's
so normal that the last administration left it here for us.
Speaker 5 (09:07):
That's your testimony today, that's your testimony. No, that's not
my testimony.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
That's where you sadn't say any of those things that
you just related to.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Do you say it?
Speaker 6 (09:16):
We'll let the American people decide.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
Michael Bennetts and moron, it's embarrassing. It's not what the
story is about today. We should have spent this entire
opening monologue today making fun of Angus King.
Speaker 7 (09:31):
One note that surprised me. I've been on this committee
now for this is my thirteenth year. Every single one
of these reports that we have had has mentioned global
climate change is a significant national security threat except this one.
Has something happened? Has global climate change been solved? Why
(09:52):
is that not in this report? And who made the
decision that it should not be in the report when
it's been in every one of the eleven prior reports words.
Speaker 8 (10:01):
I can't speak to the decisions made previously, but this
annual Threat Assessment has been focused very directly on the
threats that we deem most critical to the United States
and our national security.
Speaker 7 (10:12):
Let me ask a direct question, who decided climate change
should be left out of this report after it's been
in the prior eleven Where was that decision?
Speaker 8 (10:21):
I gave direction to our team at O D and
I to focus on the most extreme and critical national
security threats.
Speaker 1 (10:28):
For the direction.
Speaker 7 (10:29):
Include no comments on climate change.
Speaker 8 (10:34):
Senator as I said, I focus on the most extreme
and direct nationals.
Speaker 7 (10:38):
Of my questions that did you instruct that there'll be
no there, no finding in terms of climate change in
this report?
Speaker 8 (10:46):
I don't recall giving that instruction.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
Not a great day. Should have been making funny Angus
kid again. It's not the end of the.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
World, but it does matter, and we can't afford days
like today.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
We have too much to do. The mission is too important.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Look, I would if I had my brothers, I would
have spent the whole eight Bloc today making fun of
that idiot John Cornyan who's up for a primary next
year Texas.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
Maybe get out and vote someone out for once. It's
this guy.
Speaker 9 (11:20):
I'd like to refer to an AP story Associated Press
dated March twenty first, twenty twenty five. The title of
the article is Western officials say Russia is behind a
campaign of sabotage across Europe. This AP map shows it.
Speaker 1 (11:43):
This Chairman, I'd like to ask unanimous consent that's being
made part of the record. With that objection.
Speaker 9 (11:48):
The document that AP compiled, and I presume this is
through open sources documented fifty nine incidents including cyber attacks,
spread propaganda, plotting, killings, or committing acts of vandalism, arson,
sabotage or espionage. Is that consistent with your understanding and
(12:11):
impression of what Russia's currently engaged in Europe?
Speaker 8 (12:17):
Senator, I haven't seen that specific article, but I can
confirm that we assess Russia's attempts to conduct such sabotage
activities in Europe.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
That man is a United States Senator from Texas.
Speaker 2 (12:33):
Anyway, we will refocus move off of this as so
much to get to fact. We'll talk about Russia Ukraine
here in just the moment. But I wish we did better.
We screwed up. Someone should be fired. Apparently they won't be.
I guess we'll see how the four years goes. All
that may have made you uncomfortable, but I am right.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
I love pure talk. You know that.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
Pure talk has been America first, since before America first
was the cool thing to do. Oh I know every company. Now, hey,
we're hiring americans. Look at us, We're hiring americans. You
turn on the TV every day, Look at Apple, look
at this, and look. Pure Talk was doing that when
the dirty comedies were importing foreigners and hiring them over you.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
All day long.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
Pure Talk's been hiring Americans for ages you'll pay way less.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Than you're currently paying.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
My bill got cut in half when I switched from
T Mobile to Pure Talk. It's the veteran run company
that cares about this country.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
You can keep your phone, you keep your number. They
make it easy.
Speaker 2 (13:35):
Pure talk dot com, slash jessetv. We'll be back, Okay, Well,
I'll be honest about something. I'm really immature, and I
think the Black Sea is really cool.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
I don't even know much about it.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
I just know where it is, and I know that
that's a really cool dame for I also know there
are great things happening out there. Apparently there's some sort
of a ceasefire, but it's only a Black Sea ceasfire.
Speaker 1 (14:08):
But I'm dumb.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
Stephen Yates is not, So we're going to ask him
about what's going on in the world and why the
Black Sea cease fire matters at all if it does.
Joining me now, national security expert with the Heritage Foundation,
Stephen Yates. Stephen, the Black Sea sounds amazing. I wonder
if it's actually black and why is this important?
Speaker 10 (14:27):
Well, obviously the sea is important because there is a
lot of commerce that would normally be conducted there. You
have it's the crossroads of some old civilizations and very
important supply lines on energy and commodities, et cetera, et cetera.
And if you're going to have a durable peace between
Russia and Ukraine, you need to have some resumption of
(14:50):
civilian craft being able to pass through there. Another element
that was talked about was stopping the use of civilian
crafts for military purposes. And so basically that Black Sea
is an immense neighbor to the territories affected by Ukraine
and Russia. So there's military, economic, and sort of humanitarian
(15:13):
part of getting this piece right. You can't have peace
in Ukraine without the Black Sea having this restoration.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
Stephen.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
On a macro level, Western Powers have wanted the Crimean
Peninsula since oh, I don't know forever.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
They've freaking fought a war over it.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
In the mid eighteen hundreds, about the time we were
fighting civil wars. It's a big deal and countries have
wanted it for a long time. How do we solve
that problem no matter what comes with the peace agreement.
Russia wants it understandably, Ukraine wants it, The UK wants
it as they always have.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
What do we do with all this.
Speaker 10 (15:47):
Well, that is the tricky question through all of this.
The definition of what land is going to be under
what authority is I think going to be the last
part of whatever settlement comes out of this process. That's
why I never really believed this would be quick. I
thought the President was right to put pressure on this
to stop the killing quickly and saying he could end
(16:08):
the war. But how to secure the piece is going
to take a lot of work in a lot of time. Obviously,
it went into Russian hands about ten years ago, and
so it's going to be hard to redefine it as
something other than that under these terms. Maybe one of
the things that was agreed to with Ukraine and with
Russia announced today was that they would welcome the good
(16:31):
offices of third party countries that may or may not
be the United States, it could be others to help
negotiate some of these longer term tricky issues. But the
definition of where sovereignty rests with CRIMEA, I think is
going to be possibly the last hardest piece of this.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
Stephen, the details matter and things like this, and obviously
the details are still coming in.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
We don't have a lot.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
But for instance, you brought up civilian boats hauling military
e which of course would be nothing new. Everybody's aware
of the Lusitania.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
And things like that, But who inspects that. Who's in chance?
Is that one of those.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Things where Russia's gonna trust the UN? Who is the
one poking their noses around the fishing boat making sure
there's not a missile down below?
Speaker 10 (17:18):
Yeah, well, I'm glad you mentioned the UN. I've been
very happy that it's been conspicuously absent from a lot
of the conversation because I'm of the view that the
United Nations has a near perfect batting average of failure
when it comes to international security, and so if you
really want to solve a problem, best not to outsource
(17:38):
it to the UN blue hats. So this is going
to have to probably fall into that gray zone that
we got a beginning, not a middle, or an end
of definition of who the third party country good offices
are going to be. Is that going to be a
European country or grouping? Is that going to be some
kind of other grouping that might include powers from other
(18:00):
regions that have less of a vested interest The Indians
have come to mind in some ways in doing this.
It's unclear how any of this would work. Really, what
we have now is a definition of a goal, and
we don't have detail on implementation. But you're right about
what would not work, either having the Russians do the
inspections or have the UN get in charge.
Speaker 1 (18:20):
All right.
Speaker 2 (18:22):
General Cruz spoke today. Here's what he had to say
about the conflict.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
We do not see an imminent collapse in any of
the line of control battle spaces at.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
This point, Stephen. That sounds like they're all dug in.
So if that's the situation, surely that moves peace negotiations along, right,
if nobody thinks they have an advantage.
Speaker 10 (18:47):
It does. But what it does is it leaves things
kind of frozen in place. And so you have Ukraine
with a justifiable explanation expectation that their sovereignty would be
restored to what it was prior to that being compromised
ten years ago when they gave up nuclear weapons with
a promise of keeping their sovereign borders. That was violated.
(19:07):
But we live with reality of where things are. So
I see this as Trump saying mission one, stop the killing, mission,
I define and hold peace. Mission three after that is
get into.
Speaker 5 (19:20):
Where do you draw lines?
Speaker 10 (19:22):
And it may be that Russia claims sovereignty and Ukraine
claim sovereignty, and there's some kind of international force whatever
that might be, that is peacekeeping, or hopefully it's also
investment in development that gives people some hope for a
future other than taking up arms. But that's where we
are right now. I think this is the hardest part
(19:45):
of this and I expect it to take years.
Speaker 5 (19:48):
Not months.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
Stephen, We're going to shift gears to well, kind of
the same rough part of the world.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
Taiwan.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
There's a rumor out Wall Street journals reporting that China
is planning on blockading it. At the same time, Taiwan
very craftily getting in better with the Trump administration. They're announcing, hey,
one hundred billion dollar investment.
Speaker 1 (20:09):
For US chips.
Speaker 2 (20:11):
I'm sure that as I'm sure they want our protection
for something like that.
Speaker 1 (20:16):
Where are we going here.
Speaker 10 (20:19):
Well, it's definitely the case that China has been practicing
the blockade moves. I think that was kind of a
dopey headlined by the Wall Street Journal for an outfit
that has covered Asia in a very focused way for decades.
I thought that was kind of an echo of what
PRC talking points would be. Clearly, they want to be
able to have that blockade, They've tested it. But Japan
(20:40):
has been reforming and revitalizing in ways we've never seen before.
Taiwan has taken some moves to increase its capabilities, China
bloodying up the Philippines in using civilian craft to engage
in military activity, which is an echo of the Russia
Ukraine situation. All those things have awakened that first island
chain in a way that hasn't been the case for
(21:02):
a long time. So it's not a FATA complete, but
we've let things slide for a long time. So I
think Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense going to Indo,
PECM and Hawaii and getting out to Guam, Japan and
the Philippines is a really good investment in refreshing what
some new thoughts would be about revitalizing deterrence. We have
(21:23):
a lot of advantages. A lot of these countries I
mentioned are involved in AI and the most advanced chips.
We've got a good entrepreneurial spirit. We've got to revitalize
our manufacturing bases and put it to good work for
our economies but also our security. That is what can
meet the challenge with China. So we've got to start there.
But we've i think had I think bad inertia for
(21:46):
ten plus years. That makes that deterrence equation really hard
right now.
Speaker 2 (21:52):
Dude, tariffs, I'm assuming tariffs with China, this coming trade
war with China, I'm assuming they're going to have something
to do with this whole dust up, right, Surely they're
going to play a role.
Speaker 10 (22:03):
Well, the first round of tariffs were interestingly linked to, hey, China,
you'd need to cut off the supply of illicit FENTONYL precursors.
And that's I think an interesting litmus test because if
they won't do anything on that front, why would we
expect more on others as we ratchet up other tariffs.
But President Trump and his team have made clear there
(22:24):
will be other tariffs too, and there's going to be
other areas where we're going to put pressure.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
But clearly the.
Speaker 10 (22:29):
Best way forward is for us to have a really
strong sense of civil society resilience in Taiwan, which they've
been working on, and we should encourage and support having
maritime manufacturing revitalization. The coast guards of these countries need
investment and development, and they're starting. We should support that
(22:50):
and participate in that too. And then when it comes
to military procurement, I mean, unlike Ukraine, which I'm not
trying to disnecessarily, but Taiwan and Japan they pay for
things they get from the United States. And if the
United States is going to say you should do more,
then their response ought to be great. We'll buy as
much as you're able to manufacture and willing to sell
to us, and let's see where that goes. I think
(23:11):
we're inching towards that kind of a posture, and hopefully
we have enough time and create enough doubt in Beijing
to catch up.
Speaker 2 (23:21):
Finally, Greenland, this is not just you know, social media fodder.
This is clearly something Donald Trump is extremely intent on.
And we see France throwing a fit about the whole thing,
and Greenland's former PM is running his mouth about it.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
Where are we going with all this? I'll tell you what.
Speaker 10 (23:39):
This has been one of the most fantastical bolts from
the blue in conversation, and it's sort of typical Trump.
He'll push something out there that people just have kind
of backflips and conniptions about and they say, can't possibly
be real, and then they keep sending officials. And there
are economic agreements that are being proposed, and there's only
(24:01):
so many residents of Greenland who could be exceedingly well
taken care of if they formed some condominium with the
United States. When it comes to the nuts and bolts
of national security, this is a serious geography and there
are serious resources and if we don't have this kind
of relationship with them, who is And it's not gonna
be Denmark keeping them safe from Chinese or other encroachment
(24:25):
on those resources or access.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
To the pole.
Speaker 10 (24:28):
And so I think it's a much more serious issue
than was thought of a year or two ago, or
when it first floated in the.
Speaker 5 (24:35):
Trump first term.
Speaker 10 (24:36):
And boy, I can't tell you how it's gonna land,
but politically, if I was a resident of Greenland, I'd
like that deal that's being offered.
Speaker 1 (24:44):
Too. Stephen thank you, sir. I appreciate it. All right.
Speaker 2 (24:50):
Let's gets you a good night's sleep. There's just nothing
like starting your day when those eyes open up and
knowing you slept good and you're about to feel good
all day. You know you can have that. It's right
there in your grasp. It's called dream powder from Beam.
It's a cup of hot chocolate. It's delicious. You just
(25:12):
sip on a cup of hot chocolate before bed and
you sleep like a baby. It's got all kinds of
natural things in it, melatonin and magnesium and all kinds
of things drug free. And that's why when you sleep
it's natural, and when you wake up you feel good
instead of groggy. You one up to forty percent off
Shopbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly, we'll be back.
Speaker 1 (25:45):
All right. Let's talk about the good and the bad
of draining the swamp.
Speaker 2 (25:49):
And if it seems like it's two steps forward, one
step back, well just know that that's kind of how
it's designed. That's how a corrupt criminal organization known as
the United States Government, that's how it functions. Frankly, it
functions usually as one step forward, two steps back. The
system exists to protect itself. This gigantic, evil bureaucracy of
(26:13):
criminals we have running the United States of America is
not simply going to give away power. It's an organized
crime organization, just like the cartels, just like the Italian mafia.
They will do whatever they have to do to protect
the organization, to protect themselves. So let's talk about the
new CDC director, doctor Susan Monaez. First of all, she's
(26:38):
the acting cdcterct All right, she's the cdcterric. But you
probably saw a ton of things out there online of
her saying today about wearing masks.
Speaker 1 (26:49):
And things like that.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
If you've been paying attention, you saw all kinds of
that that did not.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Come from doctor Susan Monorez. It did not.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
Those things came from the CDC director account before she
took the account over.
Speaker 1 (27:03):
So just let me.
Speaker 2 (27:03):
Caution you with taking whatever you see.
Speaker 1 (27:06):
Online and running with it.
Speaker 2 (27:07):
That's not actually what she said, but she's said other things.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Now.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
First of all, keep in mind rumor has it that
Senator Collins Senator Cassidy, two of the biggest losers in
the United States Senate, both Republicans, of course, that they
torpedo Trump's original Now so this is his backup choice.
His backup choice does have some troubling things on camera.
Speaker 11 (27:38):
Know that during the COVID experience, there were challenges and
limitations about having clinical trials accessible to the entire patient population,
and there was you know, challenges that were overcome over time.
But we don't want to be put in that place again.
So that's where we started from.
Speaker 5 (27:53):
But as we were.
Speaker 11 (27:54):
Thinking about it from the our age perspective, what can
we do to ensure that at Steady State, not just
in response to a pandemic, but at Steady State, that
we have an open and inclusive and all fully benefiting
clinical trial network so.
Speaker 12 (28:09):
That we can ensure that.
Speaker 11 (28:12):
It's equitable, that it's accessible, that that it isn't just
skewed towards a demographic or geographic or a patient population,
but we actually have an inclusive clinical trial network.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
Do you know what you just heard.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
That's equitable, it's inclusive, it's you know what you deserved,
it's all KMMI language.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
Those are all commy buzzwords.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
And now that woman is taking over an organization that
went from maximum credibility pre COVID to now when you
mention CDC to people, you get a sneer because it
turned into an evil to randical communist organization that destroyed
your freedom and wrecked this country. The swamp's not draining
(28:58):
with somebody like this. You know what you heard? All right,
that's the bad. Let's talk about the good, shall we?
FEMA another one of these evil criminal organizations that shouldn't
exist anymore. Christy Nome sounds like she might make that happen.
Speaker 12 (29:15):
We don want to thank the Secretary of Defense and
the Navy for all of their help and partnership too.
We do operations together because they're obvious. Maybe warships are
in certain regions, but our cutters are faster and can
work together in a partnership. That's securing America. And we're
going to eliminate FEMA. So we've got a lot to do,
but it's all good, and we're working hard and we're
(29:37):
going to make sure that we're continuing to do exactly.
Speaker 1 (29:39):
What you promised. Right. Sounds good.
Speaker 2 (29:44):
Ali Henro Majorcis was the former head of DHS. Ale
Hondro Majorcis did so many tremendously evil things in this country.
Ale Hondro Majorcis just got his classified material access security clearance.
He just got that yanked away from him. Remember that's
(30:04):
not a small thing. It's a big thing. His secret
Service protection's gone, as security clearance is gone, he got
stripped of all the wonderful little privileges, all the little
goodies these people get for themselves, and that's how they
make money.
Speaker 1 (30:18):
Right.
Speaker 2 (30:18):
Hey, look at me, I'm a big shot with Secret
Service protection.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
Look at me.
Speaker 2 (30:22):
I have access to these secret documents. Trump continues to
take these things away from these lifelong criminals. Is it enough,
of course not. Alejandro Mayorcus presided over the invasion of
the United States of America by roughly twenty million foreigners,
many of whom complete savages who've raped and murdered Americans,
and Alejandro Mayorcus facilitated it. So taking away his Secret
(30:44):
Service protection or his security clearance is not near enough,
of course, But it is at least some sort of
a start. I mean, the guy not only committed these crimes,
he's going around the school is bragging about what he did.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
I am very proud of what we did do.
Speaker 3 (31:01):
I would have liked to have a wrestled with the
question of communication and narration.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
Some more.
Speaker 2 (31:12):
Yeah, it's just communication of course, the Communist loves to
do that. Whenever he's caught doing something in humanly evil,
which he's always doing something in humanly evil. Whatever the
American people chafe against his evil plans, he will always, always,
always talk about, well, you just don't understand what I'm doing.
Maybe I could have communicated it better. No, no, no,
(31:33):
no, no no, you communicated it just fine. You're a lifelong
open borders loser and you did what you did because
you're an evil demon. All right, all right, let's talk
to Julie Kelly next.
Speaker 13 (31:54):
We're not going to allow this mass deportation. Our state policy,
our state law does not allow for us, our state
police to be involved in those situations. Now, what we
have are some renegade counties in New York because individual
counties can sign a packed with ICE, and we have
a lot of them, some on Long Island, some in
upstate New York where there's different political views. They are
(32:16):
cooperating with their local police departments.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
But what I control is.
Speaker 13 (32:20):
The state police, and they will not cooperate in that.
Speaker 2 (32:26):
Tried to tell you this was all coming. This is
our problem. This is our obstacle. One of the obstacles
with mass deportation. Half the states in this country are
run by filthy communists who want the country full of
rapists and murderers. Joining me now, the Great Julie Kelly,
her substack is declassified. Julie. Look, they're not afraid to
put this stuff on camera. It doesn't matter that it's
(32:48):
a losing political issue. They will run to the camera
and brag all day long about all the barbarians they're
going to keep from deportation.
Speaker 14 (32:57):
It's just really insane, and especially not just these Democrat
elected officials. Of course we expect it from people like
Kathy Hochel, but when you have federal judges, especially in
the nation's capital, and as you know, Jesse, this is
one of the big issues that I've been following this
ACLU lawsuit that was filed on behalf of illegal Venezuelans
(33:18):
who the government, the Trump administration has identified as being
members of Trende Aragua, a very dangerous, destructive, deadly multinational cartel.
These thousands of them smuggled into the United States during
the Biden regime. And now you have a federal judge
(33:40):
who is not only put a halt to those deportation flights,
sending these illegal Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador. He
is grilling the Department of Justice and insisting that these
illegals have some sort of due process rights that the
Trump administration the DHI are violating. So, you know, I
(34:03):
was talking to a man recently. He is from Paraguay,
and he said, Americans just do not understand how dangerous
this TDA cartel is. And clearly people like Kathy Hochel
and Judge Bossberg and others don't as well.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
This Judge Bossburg has quite an interesting family situation and
an interesting background. You think, almost doesn't seem like an
honest broker to.
Speaker 1 (34:29):
Me, Julie.
Speaker 14 (34:31):
Right. Shockingly, here is Judge Bossberg. Jeb Bosberg right there.
Not only was he the former chief judge of the
Piza Court when it was attempting successfully to infiltrate and
spy on Donald Trump and his campaign. But yes, to
your point, I believe his wife, his sister, maybe his
daughter are tied to nonprofits that directly aid a legal immigrants. So,
(34:56):
just like so many judges in Washington, Jesse, you and
I talked about this related to the J six case,
and of course the two federal criminal indictments against the president.
These judges have all been their Washington Beltway lifers. Their
family members are as well. They're all tied to the
government or this democratic lawfair apparatus, and Jeb Blosberg is
(35:19):
just one example of that. But he is a highly
partisan Obama appointed judge and now he's doing whatever he
can to undermine what is strictly the president's purview, and
that is creating immigration policy, foreign policy, diplomatic policy that
this judge, single handedly, without authority, unchecked, wants to undermine
(35:44):
and at the same time risk the security and safety
of the American public.
Speaker 2 (35:51):
Truly, I know you have wonderful sources. What are you
hearing out of the Trump administration about all this? Because
you know, pointing out the unjustin this is fine, right,
I get to do that, and you get to do that.
But we need the Trump administration to save the country.
And are they just going to abide by these judges'
rules that the Supreme Court's not going to step in
(36:12):
and clearly they're in no hurry to do so what's
the plan.
Speaker 14 (36:17):
That's such a good question, Jesse. And of course everyone
frustrated but not necessarily surprised at the inaction and cowardice
of the Supreme Court at this point. But look, Judge Bossberg,
and I've written about this is attempting to create a
contempt trap for the Trump administration, claiming and insisting that
they misled him and that they did not abide by
(36:39):
his instantaneous temporary restraining orders on these flights that he
issued on March fifteenth. So he's still trying to dig
into the details of those flights, set up a contempt
trap for whom I don't know, a DOJ attorney, one
of the top cabinet officials. I mean, there's nothing standing
in his way. And so the Trump Department of Justice,
(37:02):
I know, is frustrated that they have to devote all
of this time and resources to fighting these lawsuits. How
many are there now, I think close to more than
five dozen. So this is time and resources that, as
you know, Jesse, they wanted to allocate to other investigations.
They wanted to devote to shoring up at the border
(37:22):
and kicking out these illegals to a drug trafficking You
saw FBI Director Cash Battel talk about that today during
the Senate Intelligence hearing. And so this is really hamstringing
the Department of Justice and FBI and other departments quite
frankly from doing what they want to do. It's more
wasted time. We saw this during the Trump administration. That
(37:43):
was the whole purpose of Special Counsel Robert Muller, who's
successfully hamstrung the first half of Trump's first administration. And
now you have these organizations, labor organizations ACLU, working hand
in glove with these federal judges to delay and thwart
as much as they can of the president's agenda once again.
Speaker 2 (38:06):
Julie Fatima Goss Graves is a name many people are
familiar with courtesy of you.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
She's the wife of Matthew Graves.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
Give us a little recap, shall or please give us
a little recap on this couple from Hell and what
Fatima has been up through recently.
Speaker 14 (38:23):
They are the couple of Hell. Of course, there's lots
of couples from how in Washington, d C. But this
has to be towards the top of the list. So
Matthew Graves, the DCUs attorney who was appointed by Joe Biden.
He presided over not only all of the j six prosecutions,
but also, as you recall, refuse to partner with Special
Counsel David Weiss in his investigation into Hunter Biden's tax
(38:47):
crimes committed in Washington, d C. There is Matthew Graves
right there, so more importantly, his wife, Fatima Goth's Graves
runs a very profitable, powerful radical left wing non profit
in Washington worth ninety to one hundred million dollars every year.
There she is that she raises. She was at the
Biden White House at least forty times during the Biden administration.
(39:11):
I reported on that as well. But it appears that
now she is part of this coalition planning these demonstrations
across the country against the president and against Elon Musk.
And I'm not sure if this is tied to what
they are doing at these dealerships or what they're planning
to do at Tesla dealerships, but certainly her organization and
(39:33):
she herself is a big part of this. She also
is part of the coalition to try to force Clarence
Thomas to resign, and of course that's not going to happen.
So now she has turned her sites and her influence
in all of her money big donors, big corporations, big
law firms, etc. Who donate to her National Women's Legal
(39:53):
Law Center, and now she is taking him at the
Trump administration again, and now Elon Musk as well.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
Julie, have you gotten any indication I've heard the talk
from Pambonni or whatnot. Have you gotten any indications so
far that there are going to be government people with
handcuffs on. I know about the FBI's most wanted that's good,
I got all that, But I'm talking about criminals inside
of the United States government, even ones who just left
(40:24):
the United States government.
Speaker 1 (40:26):
Have we heard or gotten any kind.
Speaker 2 (40:28):
Of a sniff that there's going to be some kind
of real accountability there.
Speaker 14 (40:33):
I truly believe that there will be. Jesse, and I
do think that this is another purpose of all of
this law there is to take them off put them
on their heels where they have to spend time and
resources fighting all of these lawsuits. But of course Pambonni
did announce on day one the Weaponization Working Group that
she has DCUs attorney the new one, Ed Martin, also
(40:54):
investigating how prosecutors handle J six cases, including the unlawful
use of fifteen twelve too that obstruction felony brought against
more than three hundred J six ers and the president
as well. And we know that the top DOJ officials
and the FBI are looking into thousands of FBI employees
who had their dirty, grubby myths on J six close
(41:18):
to one thy six hundred before the case was closed.
All of those investigations and prosecutions. Now, there's a lot
of work to be done. I know there's frustration on
our side. I see it that no one yet has
been charged and arrested, but it does take time to
build these cases. And once again, unfortunately, and we sort
(41:39):
of saw this with the climate slush fund City Bank,
they still are going to have to go to DC
magistrate judges and others to try to get grand jury
preceding subpoenas and indictments. That is going to be a
tough problem for the administration. We don't know if they've
already sought criminal charges or indictments against any government employees
(42:01):
that were turned down that we saw in that Climate
slash fund investigation, and DOJ finally had to do it
on its own. So this is another one hundred and
eighty degree angle of what these judges are doing in
Washington to support the President's agenda. On the other hand,
they can have act as a very powerful interference in
(42:24):
investigations and prosecutions in Washington against government employees in that city.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
July, Thank you, ma'am. As always, I appreciate you. Lighten
the mood.
Speaker 2 (42:37):
Next, all right, it's time to lighten the mood. And
I just can't get enough of Jasmine Crockett. Everyone gets
mad at Jasmine Crockett all the time because she's always
out there running her mouth saying something dumb. I absolutely
(42:58):
love it. What's that old napole in line? Never interrupt
your enemy when he's making a mistake. Here you have
this insanely ambitious politician from Texas who is rising in popularity.
Every day she wakes up, you know, she does. She
throws on her weave and she looks at social media
and sees she's gaining a bunch of followers in notoriety
(43:18):
and it's like a drug. At this point in time,
she just can't get enough of it. Now, that's the
good news for Jasmine Crockett. The good news for you.
The good news for me is every single time this
woman talks GOP, voter registration goes up nationally. Here she
was again today with another winner.
Speaker 15 (43:37):
Because we and these hot ass Texas streets. Honey, y'all
know we got Governor hot Wheels down there, Come on now,
and the only thing hot about him is that he
is a hot ass mess honey. So so yes, yes, all.
Speaker 1 (44:00):
Mad about that?
Speaker 2 (44:01):
Why don't get offended by the things these people say,
Governor hot wheel not offended at all. I think it's fantastic.
I think she should go out there and say those
exact same words every single day.
Speaker 1 (44:13):
We'll be back
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
40s and Free Agents: NFL Draft Season
Daniel Jeremiah of Move the Sticks and Gregg Rosenthal of NFL Daily join forces to break down every team's needs this offseason.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.