June 18, 2024 • 45 mins
Chuck Schumer tried desperately to relate to voters and fell flat on his face. Jesse Kelly explains why this is a much bigger deal than just a joking matter. This comes as Joe Biden has been caught wandering off more than usual. It was so bad at the G7, some are describing it as the worst he's ever been. Jesse and Sean Spicer discuss whether the CNN debate will be Biden's last chance to keep himself from being kicked off the ticket. Plus, a cultural conversation with Sarah Parshall Perry, featuring an important update on Title IX.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Did you see that Chuck Schumer fake cheeseburger picture. I
actually have a lot to say about that. We'll discuss it.
Sehn Spicer is here to give us a little debate
preview for next week. More Pride Month, Insanity, all that
more coming up on right.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
All right, We're going to talk about something.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
And I'm sure it's the last thing in the world
you thought I was going to open the show with
on a Monday, But I think it's worth talking about
because I think there's a lot more to it than
people have really thought about Chuck Schumer over the weekend.
All right, Chuck Schumer. First, let's acknowledge something. Chuck Schumer
is a very very very powerful man. He is the
(00:49):
Senate Majority Leader. He is the leader of the United
States Senate. You could make an argument that Chuck Schumer
is one of the most powerful people on planet Earth.
I know that makes you want to vomit. It makes
me want to vomit. It all hurts. I get all that.
But Chuck Schumer is a big deal, a really, really
(01:10):
really big deal. And he put up and has since deleted,
a picture of him pretending to grill. Now you may
ask why he deleted it, and mister producer, if you
don't mind, would you just leave.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
That picture up?
Speaker 1 (01:27):
Looking at me right now is not gonna do anything.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
So he deleted it.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
If you look really closely, you can see why he
might delete it.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
He got some guph for that picture.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
He got guph for the picture because he's allegedly grilling
and he has raw burgers on the grill and a
piece of cheese laying on top of what is not
only a raw burger that very clearly just came out
of the pre made package. But you don't put the
(02:00):
she's on the raw berger to Melton. Okay, So that's
the picture now. Now I want you to leave the
picture up, if you don't mind, mister producer, that picture's
fine whatever. I want you to think about this in
a little more depth, because he's not the only one
who's done.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
Something like this.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
I was gonna show you the Kathy Hochel pictures. She
did the same thing, but set that aside. I want
you to just look at this, and I want you
to think about this. What went into this. The most
powerful man in the United States Senate decided that he
wanted to do something relatable, all right, So he.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
And or his staffers.
Speaker 1 (02:33):
We don't know how many staffers were involved in this decision.
He and or his staffers, they very clearly had a
discussion about.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
This, Hey, what do we do? How do I look normal?
What do I do to look like I'm one of
the people.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
And of course they came up with grilling. What do
those normal people do? What do the peasants do?
Speaker 2 (02:56):
Well?
Speaker 1 (02:56):
They grill? Right, okay, what are they grill? Burgers and dogs? Yeah,
let's let's do that. And they went and they purchased
some things at the store. They got a camera set
up for the photo op. But this is this is
this might be the part that fascinates me the most.
Chuck Schumer and or his staffers, actually everybody involved in this,
(03:21):
they don't.
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Even know how.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
And this is not about cheeseburgers, and you know my
love for cheeseburgers.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
This is not about grilling or not about anything.
Speaker 1 (03:31):
But the people who run the planet will make this
about America though. The people who run the United States
of America, they are so disconnected from you, They are
so disconnected from reality that even when they're bending over
backwards to lie and pretend like they understand you or
(03:55):
understand me. They are so disconnected from real people they
don't even know how to fake.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
Like they're grilling a cheeseburger.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
And again the mister producer, you can put it up
now if you want. I already teased it, Kathy Hokeel.
This is not a one off. These Democrat politicians continue
to do this. Kathy Hochel getting ready to serve up
some raw burgers in her white dress. Yeah, that dress
and look great or skirt or whatever it is when
you're done and grilling up all this, and she caught
all kinds of crap for that clearly fake picture. Not
(04:30):
only do these people live a lie every moment of
every day. Everything they say, everything they do, none of
it is genuine.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
It's all a lie.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
And they're lying to try to act as if they
understand or care about you at all. But I have
said this before. I know I've said it on my
radio show, and I know I've said it.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
To you here before.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
If the soul, you know, every human being has a soul,
if the soul was.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Actually an organ in your body.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Let's say your soul is your heart, and it's just
for argument purposes, So the soul is an organ.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
It's your heart. Now. You know, I know what a
heart looks like. A human heart.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
You've at least seen pictures of it or diagrams in
the doctor's office. Maybe you are a doctor and you've
seen one. But you know what a human heart looks like, right,
So let's make that the soul. If you were to
take the people who run this country and perform surgery
on them and open them up, Let's say maybe they
even died and you had to do an autopsy on them,
you were to open up Chuck Schumer's jest, it wouldn't
(05:35):
even look human compared to yours.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
You look at your soul and that of.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Your family members and friends and everyone you know, and
you would know that's what a human soul looks like.
But these people, they're so depraved, so twisted, so fake,
so I don't even know that what's inside of them
isn't even recognizable as human anymore. And the most amazing
(06:01):
thing about it is they don't even know how to
pretend to be. It used to be that could at
least pretend to know about what we know, to care
about what we care about, to do the things that
we do. These people are so disconnected from reality. They
don't know how to pretend to grilla cheeseburger. Now, it's why,
(06:22):
like when you see people like Janet Yellen. This is
actually a really great example. Janet Yellen is the Treasury Secretary.
And it's important to understand about Janet Yellen. She's much
more than that. She is the elite of the elite.
You know, she worked for Obama, and as soon as
Obama lost to Trump, Janet Yellen she didn't go to
(06:43):
the poorhouse. Of course, she went right from Obama to
working on Wall Street.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Clear in three million.
Speaker 1 (06:49):
Goldman Sacks speeches, given speeches, given lessons to the smartest,
most accomplished people in the world.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
And now she's back. She's Treasury secretary.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
Okay, that's a really big My goodness, America's monetary system
and the Treasury that these are major, major things. And
so this human being, just by the position she's held,
the jobs that everything else, everything should lead you to
believe that Janet Yellen is the most connected human being
(07:19):
on the planet, at least in the country, on what
people are going through financially, just by virtue of her position,
she should be the smartest person in the country.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
And listen, to this person.
Speaker 3 (07:34):
I think the inflation that we experienced after the pandemic
just compounded this feeling for them that life isn't affordable.
I would point out, of course, that wages have also
gone up during this time, and government studies show that
for all, for households at all points in the income distributions,
(08:00):
surges have gone up somewhat more than prices. Secretary, I
only have about American is somewhat better off.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
You're fine up prices, AH, wages have gone up more.
Everything's fine, everything's doing great. Nobody, nobody who's even vaguely
connected with real normal people, thinks everything is great right
now across the country. Everyone is suffering, savings being drained,
(08:35):
credit cards being maxed out, you name it. Financially. It's
happening to the people out there. And yet the people
who lead the country are so disconnected from us they
don't even know how to pretend to care about you.
And speaking of the disconnect, look, it's not just democrats.
(08:56):
I saw last week the House passed the NDAA National
Defense Authorization Act. It's not a big military spending thing,
eight hundred and ninety five billion dollars, and everyone was
yelling about this or that part of it.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Oh, there is.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
A selective service is mandatory.
Speaker 2 (09:12):
Now, oh my gosh, it's women. They're gonna draft.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Women and be Everyone was focused on all those things,
and all that stuff is fine, focus on whatever you want.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
But eight hundred and ninety five billion dollars. Do you
know how many.
Speaker 1 (09:27):
Politicians I saw complaining about that price tag on either side?
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Zero?
Speaker 4 (09:35):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
I saw some on the right complaining about the whole
women getting drafted thing and all that stuff, But not
a single Democrat or Republican that I saw. It may
have happened, but I didn't see it. Not a single
one that I saw complained about spending eight hundred and
ninety five billion dollars. So allow me to explain this
again for everyone who is confused. We don't have any
(10:00):
money left. All the money is gone. They have looted
the treasury. We are now borrowing every single penny we
are borrowing at all non discretionary spending, that's all the
spending that's automatic that they can't touch. It gobbles up
more than the entire federal budget.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
The interest on.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
The debt alone will exceed military spending. And so allow
me to explain this, because no one seems to care
about the debt.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Me and like five people. It's me and you and
five other people.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
The reason you can't afford eggs and burger is because
of Washington spending and printing every new trillion here and
trillion there and trillion here has made your life more expensive.
And what you're involved in now, what you are in now,
it's not a Biden blip.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
That's something we have to understand.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Yes, Joe Biden and the Democrats have made everything worse,
but this isn't a Biden blip that's going to get
fixed if we just get Biden out of the word
White House. We are having our entire nation torn up,
hollowed out, and gutted. And we are in the very
beginning stages. I know it feels like we're deep in it.
We are in the beginning stages. This is a taste
(11:14):
of the financial disaster that is coming for a country
that can no longer pay its bills and can no
longer print its way out.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
Of having problems.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
And the people who will pay for that are you.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
You're the one who's gonna pay.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
It won't be the Shuomers, it won't be the Janet yellens,
you will just slowly and steadily watch your entire standard
of living disappear like a vapor in a breeze, and
no one cares, No one talks about it. We need
another trillion in, another trillion there.
Speaker 2 (11:49):
We're gonna do this, and we're gonna do that.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
We need money for this, and money for that, and
military money, a medicare money, and we're gonna build buildings,
and we're gonna do that.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
With what money.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
Saudi Arabia just opted out of the petro dollar last week.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Do you think they're the last? They're the first.
Speaker 1 (12:10):
The party is over and the people running this country
don't give a crap. The question is do the voters
do they care enough to do something about it? I
asked the question. It's a great question because I haven't
come up with an answer yet. Tell me the politician,
Republican or Democrat in recent decades who has lost their
(12:35):
position because of spending. They've lost their positions for various reasons,
but not because they spent too much money.
Speaker 2 (12:43):
Well, again, I.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Want to remind you, you're paying seven dollars a pound
for burger because of spending. All that may have made
you uncomfortable but I am right. We have many more
things to come, Debate preview stuff, LGBTDQ month and all
that other coming. Before we do that, Let's talk about
something amazing. You know what I did for Father's Day yesterday?
(13:08):
Breakfast in bed from the fam. My boys made me eggs,
wife took me out to a wonderful lunch cheeseburger, fries,
not the brag. Came home from that, watched a movie
with the fan, relaxed.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
It was wonderful.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
And then about nine o'clock nine thirty last night, I
mixed myself a little cup of Beam Hot Chocolate dream
Powder hot chocolate. It's chocolate, cinnamon, delicious, but it's got
melotone and all kinds of natural things in it. And
I went in and drifted off to sleep, and I
slept for ten straight hours and I woke up and
(13:40):
I feel like a champion today.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
How do you feel? On them Monday?
Speaker 1 (13:45):
Get some dream Powder in your life forty percent off
Shopbeam dot com. Slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back, Okay,
So next week is the Debate's next Thursday, and we're
(14:05):
going to talk to Sean Spicer about that. In just
a couple of minutes, just stay with me, And this
brings up an interesting debate. Ah, the debate brings up
an interesting debate. Anyway, what does Joe Biden have to do?
Speaker 2 (14:20):
How good?
Speaker 1 (14:20):
How bad does he have to be? How good does
he have to be to stay his denominee? How bad
does he have to be to get kicked out? He
was at the G seven last week, and you've already
seen all the video. We talked about it a million times,
you've laughed. Joe Biden was and this is, according to
the people who were there, as bad as he's ever been.
That's obviously. You're looking right now at a famous video
(14:43):
of the President of the United States of America wandering
off in the wrong direction, looking in the wrong way.
The Italian PM had to fetch the President like he
was a toddler and tell President boopye pants which direct
and he's supposed to be looking. And so it begs
(15:04):
the question, He's going to stand on stage for ninety
minutes next week and debate Donald Trump?
Speaker 2 (15:13):
Can he do that?
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Is it possible? And what if he can't? There's no
one going to come save you up there? What if
he just can't do it? Next week? Is appointment television.
That's a fact. Talk to Spicer about that. Next, before
we talk to Sean, let me talk to you about coffee, well,
(15:37):
values coffee. I don't need to really talk to you
about Everyone loves coffee, but where do you buy it?
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Because the hardest thing is putting your.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Money where your morals are at all times, or as
many times as we possibly can. I have started shopping
locally more than nationally. I try to focus on small business.
If we're going out, I try to go with a
local diner versus a national chain. I really try to
do this in every walk of my life. I can,
of course I fail, But coffee is easy. We don't
have any excuses now that Blackout Coffee is here. Blackout
(16:09):
Coffee will mail you your coffee. They mail it to
your front door, and they not only share your values,
they brag about it.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
They promote your values.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
How many companies out there take your money money for
things not related to anything cultural wise and then print
mugs that say God on them. Blackout Coffee does twenty
percent off your first order Blackoutcoffee dot com slash Jessie,
We'll be back.
Speaker 5 (16:44):
I do have to ask, though, I mean, this is
all thrown into sharp relief when the two men are
on stage debating, right, and it already feels like, you know,
the first presidential debate set for June twenty seventh, It
already feels like the bar that is set for Biden
to clear is so much more substantially, is so much
substantially higher than the Trump passic clear, which is literally,
is he alive? Is he standing? Are the words coming
(17:05):
out of his mouth? Setting aside what the words actually are?
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Literally?
Speaker 1 (17:10):
She just had to throw that word in there, didn't you.
You know what, I'm gonna let that go. I'm not
gonna focus on that. We're here to talk about debates.
We have a great Sean Spicer here of the Sean
Spicer Show.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
All right, Sean, So we have.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
This debate and obviously the rules are absurd. They're cutting
off microphones, words out today that Biden is going to
try to sit down, all right?
Speaker 2 (17:31):
They loaded it up for Biden.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
I don't know how Joe Biden can even sit down, Sean,
when he's gonna have Jake Tapper and Dana Bash's.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
Lips glued to his rear end.
Speaker 6 (17:41):
Well, you know, the funny thing about this, Jesse is
I think that they believe that the rules favor them.
Trust me when I say this, Donald Trump knows what
he's doing, and I have a feeling that everything that
they've done will boomerang and end up benefiting him.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
Okay, explain that, Well.
Speaker 6 (18:01):
Think about it. They think that somehow cutting off the
mic is going to benefit Joe Biden. The more that
Trump sticks to the issues and contrasts the record of
him versus Joe Biden, the better he does. I actually
think that all of this stuff they somehow believe will
benefit Joe Biden. Trump's The more that he can stay
(18:23):
focused on his record and that it's not a food
fit like it was in that first debate in twenty twenty,
the better for Trump. The more that it's about issues,
the more that it's about the contrast from his four
years as president to Joe Biden's three and a half,
the better. And so if they cut him off because
they're interjecting on each other and just stay focused, that's
(18:44):
going to benefit Trump. He just gets his points in.
Biden gets flustered the more that it's the focus is
on Joe Biden and he has to stand there and
articulate something that's not just a talking point. It's easy
for him. Everyone talks about the state of the union.
Sitting there and reading a teleprompter is one thing. Having
to respond to Donald Trump in the moment is quite another.
(19:05):
I just I think that he might give a couple
one liners and he might stand up, and that might
be a high bar for him to hit, or at
the end of the day, him having to respond to
Trump who says, here's my record, here's you tell me
about yours. He can't do that.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
He can't do that.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
And setting aside the dirty comedy we played at the
very beginning of this, isn't it true that Joe Biden
does have an extremely low bar because everyone can see.
Republicans can see, Democrats can see, everyone can see that
Joe Biden is half dead already. Donald Trump is sharp. Look,
whether you love Trump or hate Trump, Donald Trump is sharp,
very sharp, has great energy. Still, Joe Biden's half dead.
(19:45):
So if he just sits up there and doesn't poop
his pants on camera, that's gonna be seen, or at
least it's gonna be sold as a win, isn't it?
Speaker 6 (19:55):
Except I think that Trump can lay out, you know,
so here's my record, here's what I did on oil production,
on energy security, on border security, on lowering taxes. And
then go and Joe, what have you done? And it's
that's where I think that the dynamic changes. As I said,
State of the Union, all you had to do was
(20:15):
climb on top of that rostrum and read out of
a teleprompter and stop while people clap. That's not very tough,
But now doing it where Trump will be going back
and forth with him is quite another. That's the contrast
that this debate permits. So, yes, Joe Biden has a
low bar, there's no question about that. People don't have
high expectations for what he has to do. But's your
(20:37):
point when you see that contrast in real time, Trump
listing off his accomplishment, boom boom boom, boom boom, Here's
what I did, Here's what I had this and you
see the energy that is contrasted by the two individuals
standing there on stage together, it will be unmistakable who
the right, who the leading candidate is.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
Do you think that's what Trump intends to do? You
obviously have been right next to the big man. You're
very much in the know when it comes to this stuff.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
Look, sometimes he does that, sometimes he doesn't.
Speaker 1 (21:06):
And he's not exactly somebody who can always take advice
as famous for that.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
You and I have talked about that before.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
He has done these debates where it didn't go well,
couldn't control himself, just kept interrupting and looked terrible, And
he's done great at debates in other cases.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
What Trump do you think we're going to get here?
Speaker 6 (21:23):
See what you're putting your finger on is exactly right, Jesse.
Which one shows up? I've been with him. I briefed
him for a while before the Commander in Chief forum
that NBC held on board the Intrepid. I didn't think
he was paying attention at all. I mean I was
sitting there going over statistics and veteran suicide rates and
all these issues from a military and a veteran perspective,
(21:45):
and I thought to myself, oh my god, he's going
to get his clock cleaned. He's not paying attention. And
then he got out there and killed it. He has
an ability to synthesize information like no one E ever
seen before. So look, can he show up and crush it? Absolutely?
Has he done it before? Absolutely? But which Trump shows
up is going to be the million dollar question. I
(22:08):
have a feeling that considering how that first debate last
cycle went, that's still steered in his memory and the
idea that if he can come out and put this
away in the first or second round of which this is,
I mean, you come out this early, Biden doesn't do well,
he does well, I think Biden has everything to lose
and Trump has everything to gain. If Trump doesn't do well,
(22:29):
I don't think it kills him, but I think if
he does really well and Biden doesn't do well, then
then they're done. I have a hard time seeing how
you recover from that. Trump can fight another day. Biden
doesn't have the luxury. They wanted this debate early to
change the narrative and the trajectory of the race. If
they blow it, it's over. And I think Trump understands that,
(22:49):
and they're not going to let this day go by
without taking advantage of those circumstances. So the question you're
asking is the right one? Which Trump shows up? And
if the one we've seen before who kills it at
debate shows up, then it's game over.
Speaker 1 (23:06):
And that leads us to what the Democrats do If
Joe Biden doesn't deliver. I honestly all jokes and everything
else aside and what it means for the country.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
He's really bad, Sean.
Speaker 1 (23:17):
Obviously, you see it, you talk about it. He's clearly
getting worse. As people with that condition, whatever his condition is, they.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
Always they don't get better.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
Right, He's not getting younger, He's getting worse.
Speaker 2 (23:26):
What if he does go out there and boop his
pants or can't talk, or does.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
You know, does any one of the various things he's done.
Wonders off in the middle of the thing. What's the plan?
You and I have gone back and forth on dumping him.
Don't dump him. It has to happen at the convention.
These people are in panic mode right now, Sean.
Speaker 2 (23:44):
What are they going to do?
Speaker 6 (23:45):
Yeah, so a couple things. First of all, I think
that they are going to He's holed up at Camp
David for about a week ahead of this debate. I
think you're going to do exactly what they did at
the State of the Union. I mean, look, anybody can
rest as he did for that and be ready. So
I heavy feeling. Number one, they are going to do
everything they can to make sure that the Biden we
saw at the State of the union is the Biden
that we see at the first debate. That's number one.
(24:07):
Number two, if he were to have a really bad night,
you got to remember a couple things are happening. One,
they expedited the role call for the nomination. What does
that mean? Because these dumb dums couldn't figure out when
Ohio was having its ballot deadlines. They were gonna miss
it if they the Ohio ballot if they didn't get
(24:29):
him nominated earlier, because they put their convention so late.
So they are having a virtual role call well before
the convention so that they can get themselves on the
Ohio ballot. That shortens the window that the Democrat establishment
would have to try to make any kind of change.
I think it would have to be an unbelievably profound
(24:49):
screw up for anything to happen, because they just don't
have the runway to go in and change anything. And
Biden's not going to do that on his own volition.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
Oh man, I just can't believe they're gonna moment all
that's forget about him for a moment.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
Let's get back to Trump. All kinds of VP talk
out there. I love a lot of people on his list.
I actually think it's a really great list.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
Some of them, like elist Stephennick and are a complete
disaster who'd be hostile to everything he wants. Setting all
that aside, someone like jd Vance intrigues me. I love
jd Vance, but I tend to think Trump would need
a jd Vance in the Senate more than he'd need
him as VP. Whatever those are my thoughts. What's the
Shawan Spicer thoughts on all this?
Speaker 6 (25:33):
Well, look at the list that you've got up on
the screen right now. Jd Vance, Marco Rubio, Tim Scott
all senators from Republican states. What does that mean that
the governor of their state hoor each of them as
a Republican can replace them? And so I'm not that
worried if any of them were to be chosen. That
being said, I think the top three right now, in
(25:53):
my opinion is I think it's Doug Bergham and jd
Vance are tied for first, and then I think Marco
Rubio is sort of the distant second. Vance appeals to
him for a lot of reasons, but I think for
as much as Vance appeals to him, so does Bergham.
Because he's a contemporary he's a businessman, he's a governor,
(26:16):
and I think he sees an actual age wise contemporary
in him. He's yes, he's Bergham is younger than him,
but not by that much. It feels like he can
actually get along with him. And you know, he has
a partner or buddy if you will, for the next
four years. JD. Vance obviously a lot younger. He sees
them as the next generation to carry on the Mago movement.
(26:37):
So he's looking at each through a very different perspective.
But none of those three Scott, I mean, excuse me, Berghum,
Rubio or Vance would surprise me. The other ones I
think are lower down the list. I think there's a
big break between the top three and everybody else. My
dark horse right now on this that's not on the
list and not being vetted is Leezelden.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
Oh okay, now let's just finish up by talking about that.
Why would you go with Lee Zelden. Trump's not gonna
win New York. He knows that. Obviously, he's not a moron.
He's not gonna win New York. So what does leez
Elden bring him?
Speaker 6 (27:17):
Well, remember that this concept that the media likes to
float about. What they're bringing is not at all what
Trump cares about. He doesn't think anyone brings him anything.
He wants a partner. He wants a loyal cheerleader of
his policies and what he's doing in office. No one
brings him anything in his book, so let's start start
with that. He wants someone who's going to carry on
(27:39):
the agenda, et cetera, et cetera. What is Lee br
Zelden brings. He brings someone who's a fighter, somebody who
understands the Maga movement from its from its bare bone.
Lee has been loyal to the President. He's done great
on TV. He's a prolific fundraiser. He did really well
in New York and surprised a lot of people. He
didn't win, but he showed that by going everywhere and
(28:00):
being everywhere that you can bring more people into the movement.
He's very well thought of in the Jewish community, which
this movement I think, considering everything that's happening in Gaza,
is right for the picking. So I think that Lee
Zelden would be someone he looks at as a partner.
And remember this is why I say this more than
anything else, Trump still has that showman in him that
(28:21):
from the Apprentice. He wants everyone to be thinking, look
over here and here's the new answer. And So there's
thing about Zelden that intrigues me is that he's had
the President's back. He's a fighter, he knows how to win,
he's well respected, he's got national security credentials, he passes
the can You Be President Day one test, well liked
(28:43):
by everybody in the movement. He's done well on the
campaign trail. I just again, do I necessarily am I
going to put my money on it? I don't know yet.
I might put Jesse Kelly's money on it, but I
think that the three that we mentioned are definitely the
top of the list. But I always in the back
of my mind that think that Trump's always got something
(29:03):
going on that none of us are guessing right now,
And if I had to guess it, that would be.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
It that intrigues me because I likely I do.
Speaker 2 (29:13):
And if he's not thinking about that's a.
Speaker 6 (29:15):
Triating Thanks Sean, I had him on the So when
I had him on the show the other day, and
then we can go back on YouTube and check it out,
I asked him point blank. I said are you being vetted?
Because I think you would do a great job. And
he said, you know, he gave a very political answer
and if you're not being read and you say no,
I'm not, I'm looking at but he said something to
the effect of, you know, I'm just excited to blah
(29:36):
blah blah. And I'm like, that's the most flip.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
I tell you everything you need to know.
Speaker 1 (29:43):
Wow, I'm just being or not anyway, Sean, thank you brother.
Not you thought the Pride in Sanity couldn't get any
more insane. They're taking down street signs now for these people. Gosh,
we'll talk to Sarah partial Perry about that next, before
we talk about before we talk not about that, well,
I guess about that and whatever. Let's talk about loan
(30:04):
Star Transfer. Let's talk about the timeshare. You're not actually
stuck in. You think you're stuck in it. And you
think you're stuck in that timeshare because you've called the
timeshare company itself. You've called sent them an email, text
message let me go, and they keep telling you sorry,
you can't, sorry, you signed up pay your annual fees. Well,
(30:27):
lone Star Transfer is the one you should call. It's
the family business with the A plus rating from the
Better Business Bureau. And what they do is they get
you out of your time share legally and permanently.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Do you want to know how confident they are. It'sporderline cocky.
They put it in writing.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
They put it in writing, and they give you a
specific timeframe.
Speaker 2 (30:48):
Oh we'll get you out by this time. Sound good.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
Make a phone call not to the timeshare company eight
four four three one zero two six four six, We'll
be back.
Speaker 7 (31:14):
LA City Council members you go. Sodo Martinez and Nthia
Rahman were on hand today to help remove the signs.
They say the no cruising and no U turn signs
were put up in the nineteen nineties to prevent people
in the gay community from meeting up with other gay people.
Speaker 8 (31:30):
I was also surprised that these U turn signs were
still up. And at first, you know, they seem a
little oh okay, it's just a no U turn sign.
But when you learn the history of it and you
realize that these were used to profile gay people, it's
so important that we have these removed.
Speaker 2 (31:49):
Isn't it funny?
Speaker 1 (31:51):
All this activism for whatever whatever branch of American communism
it is from the climate change nutters to the feminazis
to the lgbtqdan mob. It's weird that it always always
seems to involve tearing things down.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Isn't that funny?
Speaker 1 (32:06):
This statue has to go, This U turn sign has
to go. Your education, your advanced education programs have to go,
Beauty standards have to go, everything you.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
Love has to go. All in the name of communism.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
Right joining me now, Sarah Parshall Perry, Senior legal Fellow
at the Heritage Foundation, also former Senior Council US Department
of Education. Sarah, it is it's crazy how once you
just accept that it's all just about destruction, you're never shocked.
You may be horrified, but you never look at anything
and say, I can't believe they did this, because it's
(32:39):
very obvious why they did all this stuff.
Speaker 9 (32:41):
So the answer to everything seems to be tearing down
things that you don't like, that are rooted somehow in
a purported basis for victimization, or ideologues that find themselves
really at the sort of twenty end of the colonialist
white system, privileged stick.
Speaker 4 (33:01):
We really are tired of it.
Speaker 9 (33:03):
But this is a Pride month in which I think
we've seen sort of a ramping up of efforts to
force Americans to swallow the woke juice when it comes
exactly to how individuals spend private time with other individuals
behind closed doors. We really don't care what you do
with your sexual organs, what your sexual orientation is. We're
(33:25):
also tired of the fact that you are clearly targeting
children for most of these efforts, not limited to the
fact that.
Speaker 4 (33:32):
We're seeing this now in pre k.
Speaker 9 (33:35):
Through kindergarten at the earliest ages in Companies like Scholastic,
who as the largest provider of children's material and educational
books driven towards children's literacy in the country, has now
declared that they will use resources to make sure that
books are not quote banned in public school and that
(33:56):
in fact, they want to institute an agenda, an active
agenda in American classrooms in which they're going to utilize
their platform to teach people that there are certain privileged
sexualities and gender identities, and among their Read with Pride
toolbook for teachers and educators includes a glossary of terminology
(34:21):
like sis, gender, alloseexual, too spirit, and too spirit, I
might add, means individuals who want to fight the colonialized
gender identity norm of two sexes and zero gender identities.
So if you can make sense of that, I have
a graduate degree. I can't seem to make sense of
(34:43):
it in my own I'm not quite sure how kindergarteners
are going to do that. But this is just one
of a number of growing corporate efforts to force everyone
to bend the need.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
Okay, so this company, Scholastic, sounds like a really really
evil company, of course, but this obviously is surely just
a small regional company. And let's say California or something
like that. Surely I'm not going to find any Scholastic books,
let's say, in a public school near me.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
Right.
Speaker 9 (35:13):
Scholastic is the largest publisher of children's literacy material designed
for classroom instruction all across the country.
Speaker 4 (35:22):
They brag about the fact that they are.
Speaker 9 (35:23):
In hundreds of thousands of American public classrooms across the coast. Again, this,
of course, is not to minimize the effect that Scholastic
book fairs have. I don't know if your kids have
been to a school where they had the annual Scholastic
book fair and you sent them in with money to
be able.
Speaker 4 (35:39):
To purchase most of these materials.
Speaker 9 (35:42):
They have actually now set aside a reading platform with
a hand selected group of pro LGBTQIA books designed specifically
for child consumers to go in and spend their lunch
money on. So this is actually not only widespread, it
is in just about every public school classroom in the country.
Speaker 2 (36:04):
Good agree.
Speaker 1 (36:06):
One of the things that tells you just how nefarious
this is is the lengths these people go to to
keep parents from knowing. They bend over backwards to try
to keep parents from knowing, don't they.
Speaker 9 (36:19):
Yeah, absolutely, And that's part of what we're seeing in
American classrooms overall. You know, the mission used to be
to instruct individuals in the basics of reading, writing, and arithmetic,
as the saying goes. But our NAP scores, our National
Association of Educational Placement Scores put average math and reading
literacy scores in American schools at thirty percent. Well, the
(36:43):
reason is because they are so beholden to the teachers'
unions and they are too busy promoting diversity, equity and
inclusion curricula designed to platform these gender and sexual minor communities.
Speaker 4 (36:59):
That they are less concerned with whether.
Speaker 9 (37:01):
Or not Johnny and Jane can read and perform arithmetic
calculations on grade level by the time they graduate high school.
Speaker 1 (37:12):
You you've heard, you've talked about this before. In fact,
you did a report on how it's unconstitutional for them
to hide it from parents. How is it unconstitutional? And
can we use this in some way? You're the legal
expert to go after these people. Surely we can.
Speaker 9 (37:30):
Oh, absolutely, But we've just seen the first state in
the country actually pass a law designed to prevent parents
from knowing. It is not just a you may inform
parents if students believe that parents are going to be supportive. No, no,
this is actually an admonition preventing any educator or administrator
(37:51):
from informing any parent if there is an expression of
gender identity sort of incongruence or dysphoya by any child
in pre K through twelfth grade.
Speaker 4 (38:04):
What we're seeing now, unfortunately, is the making of a lot.
Speaker 9 (38:06):
Of bad law, because many of the judges recognize that, yes,
there is a long standing parental right, but there isn't
necessarily a long standing parental right to know that your
child is expressing a different gender identity at school.
Speaker 4 (38:20):
Well, I can't.
Speaker 9 (38:20):
Imagine that any federal judge worth his or her salt
believes that argument's going to hold up in the Supreme Court.
In fact, the last of the Supreme Court's pronouncements on
parental rights was in a case called troxelv. Granville in
the year two thousand, in which Sandra de O'Connor, writing
for the Court, said, that is the oldest fundamental right
we have ever recognized. I don't think that is an
(38:42):
overstatement by the Supreme Court. The right to direct the care, upbringing,
an education of one's minor children has been recognized for
over one hundred years, and as far back as the
late seventeen hundreds in the Summa Theological So we've actually
seen centuries of jurisprudence on this precise issue, and suddenly,
(39:04):
out of thin air, we've seen these school policies decide
that they're going to shield parents from this very critical information.
Eleven million kids in America are in schools that are
subject to precisely these policies. It is incumbent upon us
to use the legislature to pass good protective law and
(39:26):
to use the judiciary to bring these cases to court.
Speaker 1 (39:32):
Eleven million frigging kids. All right, you've been all over
this Title nine stuff. Give me an update on the
latest on that.
Speaker 9 (39:39):
Well, we now have twenty four states that have gotten
a victory, temporary or permanent, depending on whether or not
the Biden administration decides to appeal, which.
Speaker 4 (39:48):
Naturally they will.
Speaker 9 (39:49):
But remember, after the rule was published, we saw within
the span of a month, nine federal lawsuits brought by
twenty five states, a handful of membership organizations and individual
a plaintiffs, all challenging the rule on a variety of
different legal bases, on everything from administrative law to civil
rights law to constitutional law. And sure enough, we've now
(40:12):
seen four federal trial judges and two federal appellate courts
say we agree, there is great reason to believe that
the rule is illegal, and we're going to put it
on pause until we actually address the merits of the
underlying questions involved.
Speaker 4 (40:29):
So at least for now twenty four states.
Speaker 9 (40:32):
They're given a bit of breathing room. The enforcement date
on Title nine is set for August first of this year,
but at least until then, we know that these particular
states are going to have their continued day in court
and have been given a temporary respite from the law's application.
Speaker 2 (40:51):
Keep Adam. Sarah.
Speaker 1 (40:52):
I hope you get all the wins in the world. Sarah,
I appreciate you very much. You know what I was
thinking about, Well, I was talking to say and I'm
just thinking about the dudes. The title nines that the
dudes and women's sports thing. Wrap your mind around this.
Let's think about this. The entire Democrat Party, all of them,
(41:13):
one hundred percent of elected Democrats in the country, now
pretend that dudes can become women and women can become dudes.
They just just that alone. They've accepted that. And I'm
not sure how we navigate that. Look, it's one thing
if you have differences political differences between the parties.
Speaker 2 (41:37):
We've always had those. Okay, I want.
Speaker 1 (41:39):
Taxes higher, I want taxes lower, more regulations here, more immigrants.
Speaker 2 (41:43):
It's one thing to have some differences.
Speaker 1 (41:47):
But when one party I'm not even talking about the
useless Republicans, when one party decides that dudes can become chicks.
Speaker 2 (41:56):
How do we navigate that? I don't freaking know.
Speaker 1 (41:58):
Whatever, Let's do some in the mood next. All right,
it is time to lighten the mood. And apparently I
inadvertently made some waves with Clay and Buck. Last week
(42:19):
I went on Clay and Bucks show.
Speaker 2 (42:20):
You see, let me explain something.
Speaker 1 (42:22):
In July, there's going to be a period for about
a week where this show is going to look different.
It'll be a condensed version. It'll be you'll enjoy it,
don't go wrong. We have some fun stuff playing, but
it's going to look different.
Speaker 2 (42:32):
It won't look like this.
Speaker 1 (42:34):
Why because the Republican National Convention is going on and
I will be there, and it's in Milwaukee, and I
don't want to go to freaking Milwaukee.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
I'm old, I'm forty two.
Speaker 1 (42:46):
I want my bed, my shower, my food, my restaurants,
my family, my dog.
Speaker 2 (42:52):
I don't want to go to Milwaukee.
Speaker 1 (42:54):
I don't want to hang out with Democrats. You know
they'll be hidden Democrats all over that place. I don't
want to hang out with Republicans. Soho I don't care
for anyway, And it's Clay's fault.
Speaker 2 (43:02):
Anyway, we talked about it.
Speaker 10 (43:05):
When's the last time you voluntarily went to Milwaukee? I
want to know. I want to know the date. I
want to know the year. Have you ever woke it
up in the morning and looked over at your lovely
bride and said gosh, let's get to Milwaukee this weekend.
Tell me, Clay, when was it you?
Speaker 11 (43:23):
I mean, first of all, you need to do your
OPO research better, my man, because you have just walked
into a steel trap here. You're the bear that's going
to have to cut his own leg off. I was
in Milwaukee last summer. I sold out the PABs Theater.
Speaker 10 (43:36):
You can't reframe the question like one of these dirty
kamie libs. I said, voluntarily went as in for leisure.
That's a work event. You sold out a theater, You
went to the work event. I'm sure you went to
Red Lobster and met the manager, You went to the
Art Museum and saw all the fingerpaints or whatever they
have there in Milwaukee. And now you're pretending like it's
(43:57):
some kind of vacation hub. No, I don't want to
go to Milwaukee in July, and now I'm going because
of you. This is your fault and the city. It's
not that the people of Milwaukee for the convention. It's
gonna suck. It's going to be full of Republican politicians
who are almost as repugnant as Democrat politicians. It's gonna
be full of honey pot, spies, and every other garbage
(44:18):
thing in the world. If you need me, if I'm
not doing my show, I'll be hiding in my room.
And it's because of you.
Speaker 6 (44:24):
We are all.
Speaker 11 (44:25):
Look what is this all? Number one in Milwaukee, your show,
my show, Bucks show, all of us, we are dominating.
So one last time, would you like to apologize to
all the fine people of Milwaukee who legitimately have your
show and our show as the number one show in
(44:46):
the entire city.
Speaker 10 (44:47):
Why would I apologize to the people of Milwaukee. They
know more than anyone else their city sucks. They're just
trying to get out like I'm going to be trying
to get out in July. It's not my fault.
Speaker 2 (44:59):
I said it. Cinema
Did you see that Chuck Schumer fake cheeseburger picture. I
actually have a lot to say about that. We'll discuss it.
Sehn Spicer is here to give us a little debate
preview for next week. More Pride Month, Insanity, all that
more coming up on right.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
All right, We're going to talk about something.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
And I'm sure it's the last thing in the world
you thought I was going to open the show with
on a Monday, But I think it's worth talking about
because I think there's a lot more to it than
people have really thought about Chuck Schumer over the weekend.
All right, Chuck Schumer. First, let's acknowledge something. Chuck Schumer
is a very very very powerful man. He is the
(00:49):
Senate Majority Leader. He is the leader of the United
States Senate. You could make an argument that Chuck Schumer
is one of the most powerful people on planet Earth.
I know that makes you want to vomit. It makes
me want to vomit. It all hurts. I get all that.
But Chuck Schumer is a big deal, a really, really
(01:10):
really big deal. And he put up and has since deleted,
a picture of him pretending to grill. Now you may
ask why he deleted it, and mister producer, if you
don't mind, would you just leave.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
That picture up?
Speaker 1 (01:27):
Looking at me right now is not gonna do anything.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
So he deleted it.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
If you look really closely, you can see why he
might delete it.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
He got some guph for that picture.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
He got guph for the picture because he's allegedly grilling
and he has raw burgers on the grill and a
piece of cheese laying on top of what is not
only a raw burger that very clearly just came out
of the pre made package. But you don't put the
(02:00):
she's on the raw berger to Melton. Okay, So that's
the picture now. Now I want you to leave the
picture up, if you don't mind, mister producer, that picture's
fine whatever. I want you to think about this in
a little more depth, because he's not the only one
who's done.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
Something like this.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
I was gonna show you the Kathy Hochel pictures. She
did the same thing, but set that aside. I want
you to just look at this, and I want you
to think about this. What went into this. The most
powerful man in the United States Senate decided that he
wanted to do something relatable, all right, So he.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
And or his staffers.
Speaker 1 (02:33):
We don't know how many staffers were involved in this decision.
He and or his staffers, they very clearly had a
discussion about.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
This, Hey, what do we do? How do I look normal?
What do I do to look like I'm one of
the people.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
And of course they came up with grilling. What do
those normal people do? What do the peasants do?
Speaker 2 (02:56):
Well?
Speaker 1 (02:56):
They grill? Right, okay, what are they grill? Burgers and dogs? Yeah,
let's let's do that. And they went and they purchased
some things at the store. They got a camera set
up for the photo op. But this is this is
this might be the part that fascinates me the most.
Chuck Schumer and or his staffers, actually everybody involved in this,
(03:21):
they don't.
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Even know how.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
And this is not about cheeseburgers, and you know my
love for cheeseburgers.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
This is not about grilling or not about anything.
Speaker 1 (03:31):
But the people who run the planet will make this
about America though. The people who run the United States
of America, they are so disconnected from you, They are
so disconnected from reality that even when they're bending over
backwards to lie and pretend like they understand you or
(03:55):
understand me. They are so disconnected from real people they
don't even know how to fake.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
Like they're grilling a cheeseburger.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
And again the mister producer, you can put it up
now if you want. I already teased it, Kathy Hokeel.
This is not a one off. These Democrat politicians continue
to do this. Kathy Hochel getting ready to serve up
some raw burgers in her white dress. Yeah, that dress
and look great or skirt or whatever it is when
you're done and grilling up all this, and she caught
all kinds of crap for that clearly fake picture. Not
(04:30):
only do these people live a lie every moment of
every day. Everything they say, everything they do, none of
it is genuine.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
It's all a lie.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
And they're lying to try to act as if they
understand or care about you at all. But I have
said this before. I know I've said it on my
radio show, and I know I've said it.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
To you here before.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
If the soul, you know, every human being has a soul,
if the soul was.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Actually an organ in your body.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Let's say your soul is your heart, and it's just
for argument purposes, So the soul is an organ.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
It's your heart. Now. You know, I know what a
heart looks like. A human heart.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
You've at least seen pictures of it or diagrams in
the doctor's office. Maybe you are a doctor and you've
seen one. But you know what a human heart looks like, right,
So let's make that the soul. If you were to
take the people who run this country and perform surgery
on them and open them up, Let's say maybe they
even died and you had to do an autopsy on them,
you were to open up Chuck Schumer's jest, it wouldn't
(05:35):
even look human compared to yours.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
You look at your soul and that of.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Your family members and friends and everyone you know, and
you would know that's what a human soul looks like.
But these people, they're so depraved, so twisted, so fake,
so I don't even know that what's inside of them
isn't even recognizable as human anymore. And the most amazing
(06:01):
thing about it is they don't even know how to
pretend to be. It used to be that could at
least pretend to know about what we know, to care
about what we care about, to do the things that
we do. These people are so disconnected from reality. They
don't know how to pretend to grilla cheeseburger. Now, it's why,
(06:22):
like when you see people like Janet Yellen. This is
actually a really great example. Janet Yellen is the Treasury Secretary.
And it's important to understand about Janet Yellen. She's much
more than that. She is the elite of the elite.
You know, she worked for Obama, and as soon as
Obama lost to Trump, Janet Yellen she didn't go to
(06:43):
the poorhouse. Of course, she went right from Obama to
working on Wall Street.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Clear in three million.
Speaker 1 (06:49):
Goldman Sacks speeches, given speeches, given lessons to the smartest,
most accomplished people in the world.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
And now she's back. She's Treasury secretary.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
Okay, that's a really big My goodness, America's monetary system
and the Treasury that these are major, major things. And
so this human being, just by the position she's held,
the jobs that everything else, everything should lead you to
believe that Janet Yellen is the most connected human being
(07:19):
on the planet, at least in the country, on what
people are going through financially, just by virtue of her position,
she should be the smartest person in the country.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
And listen, to this person.
Speaker 3 (07:34):
I think the inflation that we experienced after the pandemic
just compounded this feeling for them that life isn't affordable.
I would point out, of course, that wages have also
gone up during this time, and government studies show that
for all, for households at all points in the income distributions,
(08:00):
surges have gone up somewhat more than prices. Secretary, I
only have about American is somewhat better off.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
You're fine up prices, AH, wages have gone up more.
Everything's fine, everything's doing great. Nobody, nobody who's even vaguely
connected with real normal people, thinks everything is great right
now across the country. Everyone is suffering, savings being drained,
(08:35):
credit cards being maxed out, you name it. Financially. It's
happening to the people out there. And yet the people
who lead the country are so disconnected from us they
don't even know how to pretend to care about you.
And speaking of the disconnect, look, it's not just democrats.
(08:56):
I saw last week the House passed the NDAA National
Defense Authorization Act. It's not a big military spending thing,
eight hundred and ninety five billion dollars, and everyone was
yelling about this or that part of it.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Oh, there is.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
A selective service is mandatory.
Speaker 2 (09:12):
Now, oh my gosh, it's women. They're gonna draft.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Women and be Everyone was focused on all those things,
and all that stuff is fine, focus on whatever you want.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
But eight hundred and ninety five billion dollars. Do you
know how many.
Speaker 1 (09:27):
Politicians I saw complaining about that price tag on either side?
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Zero?
Speaker 4 (09:35):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
I saw some on the right complaining about the whole
women getting drafted thing and all that stuff, But not
a single Democrat or Republican that I saw. It may
have happened, but I didn't see it. Not a single
one that I saw complained about spending eight hundred and
ninety five billion dollars. So allow me to explain this
again for everyone who is confused. We don't have any
(10:00):
money left. All the money is gone. They have looted
the treasury. We are now borrowing every single penny we
are borrowing at all non discretionary spending, that's all the
spending that's automatic that they can't touch. It gobbles up
more than the entire federal budget.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
The interest on.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
The debt alone will exceed military spending. And so allow
me to explain this, because no one seems to care
about the debt.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Me and like five people. It's me and you and
five other people.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
The reason you can't afford eggs and burger is because
of Washington spending and printing every new trillion here and
trillion there and trillion here has made your life more expensive.
And what you're involved in now, what you are in now,
it's not a Biden blip.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
That's something we have to understand.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Yes, Joe Biden and the Democrats have made everything worse,
but this isn't a Biden blip that's going to get
fixed if we just get Biden out of the word
White House. We are having our entire nation torn up,
hollowed out, and gutted. And we are in the very
beginning stages. I know it feels like we're deep in it.
We are in the beginning stages. This is a taste
(11:14):
of the financial disaster that is coming for a country
that can no longer pay its bills and can no
longer print its way out.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
Of having problems.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
And the people who will pay for that are you.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
You're the one who's gonna pay.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
It won't be the Shuomers, it won't be the Janet yellens,
you will just slowly and steadily watch your entire standard
of living disappear like a vapor in a breeze, and
no one cares, No one talks about it. We need
another trillion in, another trillion there.
Speaker 2 (11:49):
We're gonna do this, and we're gonna do that.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
We need money for this, and money for that, and
military money, a medicare money, and we're gonna build buildings,
and we're gonna do that.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
With what money.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
Saudi Arabia just opted out of the petro dollar last week.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Do you think they're the last? They're the first.
Speaker 1 (12:10):
The party is over and the people running this country
don't give a crap. The question is do the voters
do they care enough to do something about it? I
asked the question. It's a great question because I haven't
come up with an answer yet. Tell me the politician,
Republican or Democrat in recent decades who has lost their
(12:35):
position because of spending. They've lost their positions for various reasons,
but not because they spent too much money.
Speaker 2 (12:43):
Well, again, I.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Want to remind you, you're paying seven dollars a pound
for burger because of spending. All that may have made
you uncomfortable but I am right. We have many more
things to come, Debate preview stuff, LGBTDQ month and all
that other coming. Before we do that, Let's talk about
something amazing. You know what I did for Father's Day yesterday?
(13:08):
Breakfast in bed from the fam. My boys made me eggs,
wife took me out to a wonderful lunch cheeseburger, fries,
not the brag. Came home from that, watched a movie
with the fan, relaxed.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
It was wonderful.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
And then about nine o'clock nine thirty last night, I
mixed myself a little cup of Beam Hot Chocolate dream
Powder hot chocolate. It's chocolate, cinnamon, delicious, but it's got
melotone and all kinds of natural things in it. And
I went in and drifted off to sleep, and I
slept for ten straight hours and I woke up and
(13:40):
I feel like a champion today.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
How do you feel? On them Monday?
Speaker 1 (13:45):
Get some dream Powder in your life forty percent off
Shopbeam dot com. Slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back, Okay,
So next week is the Debate's next Thursday, and we're
(14:05):
going to talk to Sean Spicer about that. In just
a couple of minutes, just stay with me, And this
brings up an interesting debate. Ah, the debate brings up
an interesting debate. Anyway, what does Joe Biden have to do?
Speaker 2 (14:20):
How good?
Speaker 1 (14:20):
How bad does he have to be? How good does
he have to be to stay his denominee? How bad
does he have to be to get kicked out? He
was at the G seven last week, and you've already
seen all the video. We talked about it a million times,
you've laughed. Joe Biden was and this is, according to
the people who were there, as bad as he's ever been.
That's obviously. You're looking right now at a famous video
(14:43):
of the President of the United States of America wandering
off in the wrong direction, looking in the wrong way.
The Italian PM had to fetch the President like he
was a toddler and tell President boopye pants which direct
and he's supposed to be looking. And so it begs
(15:04):
the question, He's going to stand on stage for ninety
minutes next week and debate Donald Trump?
Speaker 2 (15:13):
Can he do that?
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Is it possible? And what if he can't? There's no
one going to come save you up there? What if
he just can't do it? Next week? Is appointment television.
That's a fact. Talk to Spicer about that. Next, before
we talk to Sean, let me talk to you about coffee, well,
(15:37):
values coffee. I don't need to really talk to you
about Everyone loves coffee, but where do you buy it?
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Because the hardest thing is putting your.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Money where your morals are at all times, or as
many times as we possibly can. I have started shopping
locally more than nationally. I try to focus on small business.
If we're going out, I try to go with a
local diner versus a national chain. I really try to
do this in every walk of my life. I can,
of course I fail, But coffee is easy. We don't
have any excuses now that Blackout Coffee is here. Blackout
(16:09):
Coffee will mail you your coffee. They mail it to
your front door, and they not only share your values,
they brag about it.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
They promote your values.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
How many companies out there take your money money for
things not related to anything cultural wise and then print
mugs that say God on them. Blackout Coffee does twenty
percent off your first order Blackoutcoffee dot com slash Jessie,
We'll be back.
Speaker 5 (16:44):
I do have to ask, though, I mean, this is
all thrown into sharp relief when the two men are
on stage debating, right, and it already feels like, you know,
the first presidential debate set for June twenty seventh, It
already feels like the bar that is set for Biden
to clear is so much more substantially, is so much
substantially higher than the Trump passic clear, which is literally,
is he alive? Is he standing? Are the words coming
(17:05):
out of his mouth? Setting aside what the words actually are?
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Literally?
Speaker 1 (17:10):
She just had to throw that word in there, didn't you.
You know what, I'm gonna let that go. I'm not
gonna focus on that. We're here to talk about debates.
We have a great Sean Spicer here of the Sean
Spicer Show.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
All right, Sean, So we have.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
This debate and obviously the rules are absurd. They're cutting
off microphones, words out today that Biden is going to
try to sit down, all right?
Speaker 2 (17:31):
They loaded it up for Biden.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
I don't know how Joe Biden can even sit down, Sean,
when he's gonna have Jake Tapper and Dana Bash's.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
Lips glued to his rear end.
Speaker 6 (17:41):
Well, you know, the funny thing about this, Jesse is
I think that they believe that the rules favor them.
Trust me when I say this, Donald Trump knows what
he's doing, and I have a feeling that everything that
they've done will boomerang and end up benefiting him.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
Okay, explain that, Well.
Speaker 6 (18:01):
Think about it. They think that somehow cutting off the
mic is going to benefit Joe Biden. The more that
Trump sticks to the issues and contrasts the record of
him versus Joe Biden, the better he does. I actually
think that all of this stuff they somehow believe will
benefit Joe Biden. Trump's The more that he can stay
(18:23):
focused on his record and that it's not a food
fit like it was in that first debate in twenty twenty,
the better for Trump. The more that it's about issues,
the more that it's about the contrast from his four
years as president to Joe Biden's three and a half,
the better. And so if they cut him off because
they're interjecting on each other and just stay focused, that's
(18:44):
going to benefit Trump. He just gets his points in.
Biden gets flustered the more that it's the focus is
on Joe Biden and he has to stand there and
articulate something that's not just a talking point. It's easy
for him. Everyone talks about the state of the union.
Sitting there and reading a teleprompter is one thing. Having
to respond to Donald Trump in the moment is quite another.
(19:05):
I just I think that he might give a couple
one liners and he might stand up, and that might
be a high bar for him to hit, or at
the end of the day, him having to respond to
Trump who says, here's my record, here's you tell me
about yours. He can't do that.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
He can't do that.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
And setting aside the dirty comedy we played at the
very beginning of this, isn't it true that Joe Biden
does have an extremely low bar because everyone can see.
Republicans can see, Democrats can see, everyone can see that
Joe Biden is half dead already. Donald Trump is sharp. Look,
whether you love Trump or hate Trump, Donald Trump is sharp,
very sharp, has great energy. Still, Joe Biden's half dead.
(19:45):
So if he just sits up there and doesn't poop
his pants on camera, that's gonna be seen, or at
least it's gonna be sold as a win, isn't it?
Speaker 6 (19:55):
Except I think that Trump can lay out, you know,
so here's my record, here's what I did on oil production,
on energy security, on border security, on lowering taxes. And
then go and Joe, what have you done? And it's
that's where I think that the dynamic changes. As I said,
State of the Union, all you had to do was
(20:15):
climb on top of that rostrum and read out of
a teleprompter and stop while people clap. That's not very tough,
But now doing it where Trump will be going back
and forth with him is quite another. That's the contrast
that this debate permits. So, yes, Joe Biden has a
low bar, there's no question about that. People don't have
high expectations for what he has to do. But's your
(20:37):
point when you see that contrast in real time, Trump
listing off his accomplishment, boom boom boom, boom boom, Here's
what I did, Here's what I had this and you
see the energy that is contrasted by the two individuals
standing there on stage together, it will be unmistakable who
the right, who the leading candidate is.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
Do you think that's what Trump intends to do? You
obviously have been right next to the big man. You're
very much in the know when it comes to this stuff.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
Look, sometimes he does that, sometimes he doesn't.
Speaker 1 (21:06):
And he's not exactly somebody who can always take advice
as famous for that.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
You and I have talked about that before.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
He has done these debates where it didn't go well,
couldn't control himself, just kept interrupting and looked terrible, And
he's done great at debates in other cases.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
What Trump do you think we're going to get here?
Speaker 6 (21:23):
See what you're putting your finger on is exactly right, Jesse.
Which one shows up? I've been with him. I briefed
him for a while before the Commander in Chief forum
that NBC held on board the Intrepid. I didn't think
he was paying attention at all. I mean I was
sitting there going over statistics and veteran suicide rates and
all these issues from a military and a veteran perspective,
(21:45):
and I thought to myself, oh my god, he's going
to get his clock cleaned. He's not paying attention. And
then he got out there and killed it. He has
an ability to synthesize information like no one E ever
seen before. So look, can he show up and crush it? Absolutely?
Has he done it before? Absolutely? But which Trump shows
up is going to be the million dollar question. I
(22:08):
have a feeling that considering how that first debate last
cycle went, that's still steered in his memory and the
idea that if he can come out and put this
away in the first or second round of which this is,
I mean, you come out this early, Biden doesn't do well,
he does well, I think Biden has everything to lose
and Trump has everything to gain. If Trump doesn't do well,
(22:29):
I don't think it kills him, but I think if
he does really well and Biden doesn't do well, then
then they're done. I have a hard time seeing how
you recover from that. Trump can fight another day. Biden
doesn't have the luxury. They wanted this debate early to
change the narrative and the trajectory of the race. If
they blow it, it's over. And I think Trump understands that,
(22:49):
and they're not going to let this day go by
without taking advantage of those circumstances. So the question you're
asking is the right one? Which Trump shows up? And
if the one we've seen before who kills it at
debate shows up, then it's game over.
Speaker 1 (23:06):
And that leads us to what the Democrats do If
Joe Biden doesn't deliver. I honestly all jokes and everything
else aside and what it means for the country.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
He's really bad, Sean.
Speaker 1 (23:17):
Obviously, you see it, you talk about it. He's clearly
getting worse. As people with that condition, whatever his condition is, they.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
Always they don't get better.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
Right, He's not getting younger, He's getting worse.
Speaker 2 (23:26):
What if he does go out there and boop his
pants or can't talk, or does.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
You know, does any one of the various things he's done.
Wonders off in the middle of the thing. What's the plan?
You and I have gone back and forth on dumping him.
Don't dump him. It has to happen at the convention.
These people are in panic mode right now, Sean.
Speaker 2 (23:44):
What are they going to do?
Speaker 6 (23:45):
Yeah, so a couple things. First of all, I think
that they are going to He's holed up at Camp
David for about a week ahead of this debate. I
think you're going to do exactly what they did at
the State of the Union. I mean, look, anybody can
rest as he did for that and be ready. So
I heavy feeling. Number one, they are going to do
everything they can to make sure that the Biden we
saw at the State of the union is the Biden
that we see at the first debate. That's number one.
(24:07):
Number two, if he were to have a really bad night,
you got to remember a couple things are happening. One,
they expedited the role call for the nomination. What does
that mean? Because these dumb dums couldn't figure out when
Ohio was having its ballot deadlines. They were gonna miss
it if they the Ohio ballot if they didn't get
(24:29):
him nominated earlier, because they put their convention so late.
So they are having a virtual role call well before
the convention so that they can get themselves on the
Ohio ballot. That shortens the window that the Democrat establishment
would have to try to make any kind of change.
I think it would have to be an unbelievably profound
(24:49):
screw up for anything to happen, because they just don't
have the runway to go in and change anything. And
Biden's not going to do that on his own volition.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
Oh man, I just can't believe they're gonna moment all
that's forget about him for a moment.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
Let's get back to Trump. All kinds of VP talk
out there. I love a lot of people on his list.
I actually think it's a really great list.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
Some of them, like elist Stephennick and are a complete
disaster who'd be hostile to everything he wants. Setting all
that aside, someone like jd Vance intrigues me. I love
jd Vance, but I tend to think Trump would need
a jd Vance in the Senate more than he'd need
him as VP. Whatever those are my thoughts. What's the
Shawan Spicer thoughts on all this?
Speaker 6 (25:33):
Well, look at the list that you've got up on
the screen right now. Jd Vance, Marco Rubio, Tim Scott
all senators from Republican states. What does that mean that
the governor of their state hoor each of them as
a Republican can replace them? And so I'm not that
worried if any of them were to be chosen. That
being said, I think the top three right now, in
(25:53):
my opinion is I think it's Doug Bergham and jd
Vance are tied for first, and then I think Marco
Rubio is sort of the distant second. Vance appeals to
him for a lot of reasons, but I think for
as much as Vance appeals to him, so does Bergham.
Because he's a contemporary he's a businessman, he's a governor,
(26:16):
and I think he sees an actual age wise contemporary
in him. He's yes, he's Bergham is younger than him,
but not by that much. It feels like he can
actually get along with him. And you know, he has
a partner or buddy if you will, for the next
four years. JD. Vance obviously a lot younger. He sees
them as the next generation to carry on the Mago movement.
(26:37):
So he's looking at each through a very different perspective.
But none of those three Scott, I mean, excuse me, Berghum,
Rubio or Vance would surprise me. The other ones I
think are lower down the list. I think there's a
big break between the top three and everybody else. My
dark horse right now on this that's not on the
list and not being vetted is Leezelden.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
Oh okay, now let's just finish up by talking about that.
Why would you go with Lee Zelden. Trump's not gonna
win New York. He knows that. Obviously, he's not a moron.
He's not gonna win New York. So what does leez
Elden bring him?
Speaker 6 (27:17):
Well, remember that this concept that the media likes to
float about. What they're bringing is not at all what
Trump cares about. He doesn't think anyone brings him anything.
He wants a partner. He wants a loyal cheerleader of
his policies and what he's doing in office. No one
brings him anything in his book, so let's start start
with that. He wants someone who's going to carry on
(27:39):
the agenda, et cetera, et cetera. What is Lee br
Zelden brings. He brings someone who's a fighter, somebody who
understands the Maga movement from its from its bare bone.
Lee has been loyal to the President. He's done great
on TV. He's a prolific fundraiser. He did really well
in New York and surprised a lot of people. He
didn't win, but he showed that by going everywhere and
(28:00):
being everywhere that you can bring more people into the movement.
He's very well thought of in the Jewish community, which
this movement I think, considering everything that's happening in Gaza,
is right for the picking. So I think that Lee
Zelden would be someone he looks at as a partner.
And remember this is why I say this more than
anything else, Trump still has that showman in him that
(28:21):
from the Apprentice. He wants everyone to be thinking, look
over here and here's the new answer. And So there's
thing about Zelden that intrigues me is that he's had
the President's back. He's a fighter, he knows how to win,
he's well respected, he's got national security credentials, he passes
the can You Be President Day one test, well liked
(28:43):
by everybody in the movement. He's done well on the
campaign trail. I just again, do I necessarily am I
going to put my money on it? I don't know yet.
I might put Jesse Kelly's money on it, but I
think that the three that we mentioned are definitely the
top of the list. But I always in the back
of my mind that think that Trump's always got something
(29:03):
going on that none of us are guessing right now,
And if I had to guess it, that would be.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
It that intrigues me because I likely I do.
Speaker 2 (29:13):
And if he's not thinking about that's a.
Speaker 6 (29:15):
Triating Thanks Sean, I had him on the So when
I had him on the show the other day, and
then we can go back on YouTube and check it out,
I asked him point blank. I said are you being vetted?
Because I think you would do a great job. And
he said, you know, he gave a very political answer
and if you're not being read and you say no,
I'm not, I'm looking at but he said something to
the effect of, you know, I'm just excited to blah
(29:36):
blah blah. And I'm like, that's the most flip.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
I tell you everything you need to know.
Speaker 1 (29:43):
Wow, I'm just being or not anyway, Sean, thank you brother.
Not you thought the Pride in Sanity couldn't get any
more insane. They're taking down street signs now for these people. Gosh,
we'll talk to Sarah partial Perry about that next, before
we talk about before we talk not about that, well,
I guess about that and whatever. Let's talk about loan
(30:04):
Star Transfer. Let's talk about the timeshare. You're not actually
stuck in. You think you're stuck in it. And you
think you're stuck in that timeshare because you've called the
timeshare company itself. You've called sent them an email, text
message let me go, and they keep telling you sorry,
you can't, sorry, you signed up pay your annual fees. Well,
(30:27):
lone Star Transfer is the one you should call. It's
the family business with the A plus rating from the
Better Business Bureau. And what they do is they get
you out of your time share legally and permanently.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Do you want to know how confident they are. It'sporderline cocky.
They put it in writing.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
They put it in writing, and they give you a
specific timeframe.
Speaker 2 (30:48):
Oh we'll get you out by this time. Sound good.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
Make a phone call not to the timeshare company eight
four four three one zero two six four six, We'll
be back.
Speaker 7 (31:14):
LA City Council members you go. Sodo Martinez and Nthia
Rahman were on hand today to help remove the signs.
They say the no cruising and no U turn signs
were put up in the nineteen nineties to prevent people
in the gay community from meeting up with other gay people.
Speaker 8 (31:30):
I was also surprised that these U turn signs were
still up. And at first, you know, they seem a
little oh okay, it's just a no U turn sign.
But when you learn the history of it and you
realize that these were used to profile gay people, it's
so important that we have these removed.
Speaker 2 (31:49):
Isn't it funny?
Speaker 1 (31:51):
All this activism for whatever whatever branch of American communism
it is from the climate change nutters to the feminazis
to the lgbtqdan mob. It's weird that it always always
seems to involve tearing things down.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Isn't that funny?
Speaker 1 (32:06):
This statue has to go, This U turn sign has
to go. Your education, your advanced education programs have to go,
Beauty standards have to go, everything you.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
Love has to go. All in the name of communism.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
Right joining me now, Sarah Parshall Perry, Senior legal Fellow
at the Heritage Foundation, also former Senior Council US Department
of Education. Sarah, it is it's crazy how once you
just accept that it's all just about destruction, you're never shocked.
You may be horrified, but you never look at anything
and say, I can't believe they did this, because it's
(32:39):
very obvious why they did all this stuff.
Speaker 9 (32:41):
So the answer to everything seems to be tearing down
things that you don't like, that are rooted somehow in
a purported basis for victimization, or ideologues that find themselves
really at the sort of twenty end of the colonialist
white system, privileged stick.
Speaker 4 (33:01):
We really are tired of it.
Speaker 9 (33:03):
But this is a Pride month in which I think
we've seen sort of a ramping up of efforts to
force Americans to swallow the woke juice when it comes
exactly to how individuals spend private time with other individuals
behind closed doors. We really don't care what you do
with your sexual organs, what your sexual orientation is. We're
(33:25):
also tired of the fact that you are clearly targeting
children for most of these efforts, not limited to the
fact that.
Speaker 4 (33:32):
We're seeing this now in pre k.
Speaker 9 (33:35):
Through kindergarten at the earliest ages in Companies like Scholastic,
who as the largest provider of children's material and educational
books driven towards children's literacy in the country, has now
declared that they will use resources to make sure that
books are not quote banned in public school and that
(33:56):
in fact, they want to institute an agenda, an active
agenda in American classrooms in which they're going to utilize
their platform to teach people that there are certain privileged
sexualities and gender identities, and among their Read with Pride
toolbook for teachers and educators includes a glossary of terminology
(34:21):
like sis, gender, alloseexual, too spirit, and too spirit, I
might add, means individuals who want to fight the colonialized
gender identity norm of two sexes and zero gender identities.
So if you can make sense of that, I have
a graduate degree. I can't seem to make sense of
(34:43):
it in my own I'm not quite sure how kindergarteners
are going to do that. But this is just one
of a number of growing corporate efforts to force everyone
to bend the need.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
Okay, so this company, Scholastic, sounds like a really really
evil company, of course, but this obviously is surely just
a small regional company. And let's say California or something
like that. Surely I'm not going to find any Scholastic books,
let's say, in a public school near me.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
Right.
Speaker 9 (35:13):
Scholastic is the largest publisher of children's literacy material designed
for classroom instruction all across the country.
Speaker 4 (35:22):
They brag about the fact that they are.
Speaker 9 (35:23):
In hundreds of thousands of American public classrooms across the coast. Again, this,
of course, is not to minimize the effect that Scholastic
book fairs have. I don't know if your kids have
been to a school where they had the annual Scholastic
book fair and you sent them in with money to
be able.
Speaker 4 (35:39):
To purchase most of these materials.
Speaker 9 (35:42):
They have actually now set aside a reading platform with
a hand selected group of pro LGBTQIA books designed specifically
for child consumers to go in and spend their lunch
money on. So this is actually not only widespread, it
is in just about every public school classroom in the country.
Speaker 2 (36:04):
Good agree.
Speaker 1 (36:06):
One of the things that tells you just how nefarious
this is is the lengths these people go to to
keep parents from knowing. They bend over backwards to try
to keep parents from knowing, don't they.
Speaker 9 (36:19):
Yeah, absolutely, And that's part of what we're seeing in
American classrooms overall. You know, the mission used to be
to instruct individuals in the basics of reading, writing, and arithmetic,
as the saying goes. But our NAP scores, our National
Association of Educational Placement Scores put average math and reading
literacy scores in American schools at thirty percent. Well, the
(36:43):
reason is because they are so beholden to the teachers'
unions and they are too busy promoting diversity, equity and
inclusion curricula designed to platform these gender and sexual minor communities.
Speaker 4 (36:59):
That they are less concerned with whether.
Speaker 9 (37:01):
Or not Johnny and Jane can read and perform arithmetic
calculations on grade level by the time they graduate high school.
Speaker 1 (37:12):
You you've heard, you've talked about this before. In fact,
you did a report on how it's unconstitutional for them
to hide it from parents. How is it unconstitutional? And
can we use this in some way? You're the legal
expert to go after these people. Surely we can.
Speaker 9 (37:30):
Oh, absolutely, But we've just seen the first state in
the country actually pass a law designed to prevent parents
from knowing. It is not just a you may inform
parents if students believe that parents are going to be supportive. No, no,
this is actually an admonition preventing any educator or administrator
(37:51):
from informing any parent if there is an expression of
gender identity sort of incongruence or dysphoya by any child
in pre K through twelfth grade.
Speaker 4 (38:04):
What we're seeing now, unfortunately, is the making of a lot.
Speaker 9 (38:06):
Of bad law, because many of the judges recognize that, yes,
there is a long standing parental right, but there isn't
necessarily a long standing parental right to know that your
child is expressing a different gender identity at school.
Speaker 4 (38:20):
Well, I can't.
Speaker 9 (38:20):
Imagine that any federal judge worth his or her salt
believes that argument's going to hold up in the Supreme Court.
In fact, the last of the Supreme Court's pronouncements on
parental rights was in a case called troxelv. Granville in
the year two thousand, in which Sandra de O'Connor, writing
for the Court, said, that is the oldest fundamental right
we have ever recognized. I don't think that is an
(38:42):
overstatement by the Supreme Court. The right to direct the care, upbringing,
an education of one's minor children has been recognized for
over one hundred years, and as far back as the
late seventeen hundreds in the Summa Theological So we've actually
seen centuries of jurisprudence on this precise issue, and suddenly,
(39:04):
out of thin air, we've seen these school policies decide
that they're going to shield parents from this very critical information.
Eleven million kids in America are in schools that are
subject to precisely these policies. It is incumbent upon us
to use the legislature to pass good protective law and
(39:26):
to use the judiciary to bring these cases to court.
Speaker 1 (39:32):
Eleven million frigging kids. All right, you've been all over
this Title nine stuff. Give me an update on the
latest on that.
Speaker 9 (39:39):
Well, we now have twenty four states that have gotten
a victory, temporary or permanent, depending on whether or not
the Biden administration decides to appeal, which.
Speaker 4 (39:48):
Naturally they will.
Speaker 9 (39:49):
But remember, after the rule was published, we saw within
the span of a month, nine federal lawsuits brought by
twenty five states, a handful of membership organizations and individual
a plaintiffs, all challenging the rule on a variety of
different legal bases, on everything from administrative law to civil
rights law to constitutional law. And sure enough, we've now
(40:12):
seen four federal trial judges and two federal appellate courts
say we agree, there is great reason to believe that
the rule is illegal, and we're going to put it
on pause until we actually address the merits of the
underlying questions involved.
Speaker 4 (40:29):
So at least for now twenty four states.
Speaker 9 (40:32):
They're given a bit of breathing room. The enforcement date
on Title nine is set for August first of this year,
but at least until then, we know that these particular
states are going to have their continued day in court
and have been given a temporary respite from the law's application.
Speaker 2 (40:51):
Keep Adam. Sarah.
Speaker 1 (40:52):
I hope you get all the wins in the world. Sarah,
I appreciate you very much. You know what I was
thinking about, Well, I was talking to say and I'm
just thinking about the dudes. The title nines that the
dudes and women's sports thing. Wrap your mind around this.
Let's think about this. The entire Democrat Party, all of them,
(41:13):
one hundred percent of elected Democrats in the country, now
pretend that dudes can become women and women can become dudes.
They just just that alone. They've accepted that. And I'm
not sure how we navigate that. Look, it's one thing
if you have differences political differences between the parties.
Speaker 2 (41:37):
We've always had those. Okay, I want.
Speaker 1 (41:39):
Taxes higher, I want taxes lower, more regulations here, more immigrants.
Speaker 2 (41:43):
It's one thing to have some differences.
Speaker 1 (41:47):
But when one party I'm not even talking about the
useless Republicans, when one party decides that dudes can become chicks.
Speaker 2 (41:56):
How do we navigate that? I don't freaking know.
Speaker 1 (41:58):
Whatever, Let's do some in the mood next. All right,
it is time to lighten the mood. And apparently I
inadvertently made some waves with Clay and Buck. Last week
(42:19):
I went on Clay and Bucks show.
Speaker 2 (42:20):
You see, let me explain something.
Speaker 1 (42:22):
In July, there's going to be a period for about
a week where this show is going to look different.
It'll be a condensed version. It'll be you'll enjoy it,
don't go wrong. We have some fun stuff playing, but
it's going to look different.
Speaker 2 (42:32):
It won't look like this.
Speaker 1 (42:34):
Why because the Republican National Convention is going on and
I will be there, and it's in Milwaukee, and I
don't want to go to freaking Milwaukee.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
I'm old, I'm forty two.
Speaker 1 (42:46):
I want my bed, my shower, my food, my restaurants,
my family, my dog.
Speaker 2 (42:52):
I don't want to go to Milwaukee.
Speaker 1 (42:54):
I don't want to hang out with Democrats. You know
they'll be hidden Democrats all over that place. I don't
want to hang out with Republicans. Soho I don't care
for anyway, And it's Clay's fault.
Speaker 2 (43:02):
Anyway, we talked about it.
Speaker 10 (43:05):
When's the last time you voluntarily went to Milwaukee? I
want to know. I want to know the date. I
want to know the year. Have you ever woke it
up in the morning and looked over at your lovely
bride and said gosh, let's get to Milwaukee this weekend.
Tell me, Clay, when was it you?
Speaker 11 (43:23):
I mean, first of all, you need to do your
OPO research better, my man, because you have just walked
into a steel trap here. You're the bear that's going
to have to cut his own leg off. I was
in Milwaukee last summer. I sold out the PABs Theater.
Speaker 10 (43:36):
You can't reframe the question like one of these dirty
kamie libs. I said, voluntarily went as in for leisure.
That's a work event. You sold out a theater, You
went to the work event. I'm sure you went to
Red Lobster and met the manager, You went to the
Art Museum and saw all the fingerpaints or whatever they
have there in Milwaukee. And now you're pretending like it's
(43:57):
some kind of vacation hub. No, I don't want to
go to Milwaukee in July, and now I'm going because
of you. This is your fault and the city. It's
not that the people of Milwaukee for the convention. It's
gonna suck. It's going to be full of Republican politicians
who are almost as repugnant as Democrat politicians. It's gonna
be full of honey pot, spies, and every other garbage
(44:18):
thing in the world. If you need me, if I'm
not doing my show, I'll be hiding in my room.
And it's because of you.
Speaker 6 (44:24):
We are all.
Speaker 11 (44:25):
Look what is this all? Number one in Milwaukee, your show,
my show, Bucks show, all of us, we are dominating.
So one last time, would you like to apologize to
all the fine people of Milwaukee who legitimately have your
show and our show as the number one show in
(44:46):
the entire city.
Speaker 10 (44:47):
Why would I apologize to the people of Milwaukee. They
know more than anyone else their city sucks. They're just
trying to get out like I'm going to be trying
to get out in July. It's not my fault.
Speaker 2 (44:59):
I said it. Cinema
Popular Podcasts
1. Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
2. Stuff You Missed in History Class
Join Holly and Tracy as they bring you the greatest and strangest Stuff You Missed In History Class in this podcast by iHeartRadio.
3. Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.