May 29, 2024 • 46 mins
Mike Slater sits in for Jesse Kelly on this edition of I'm Right, diving into some breaking news out of the Donald Trump criminal trial in New York City. Is the former and potential future president preparing to go to prison? Josh Hammer, host of America on Trial, joins Mike with the very latest on it all, as well as some trouble for Hunter Biden. Plus, a wild story out of UCLA as well as appearances from Seamus Bruner and John Carney
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Completely surreal day in New York City in front of
the courthouse of Donald Trump's trial closing arguments to tell
you all the latest about that, plus insane story out
of UCLA Medic School.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Medical school.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
You should care about this if you.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
You know, have a doctor, give it.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Latest with the economy, can anything that Biden do turned
this around before it's time to vote? Also the latest
with Klaus Schwab stepping down from the world that I
can perform, but he's not really going anywhere. That's all
coming up next right here, I'm right with Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
Democratic you are you were?
Speaker 1 (00:50):
You your.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Trash?
Speaker 1 (00:54):
That was the drum trial that was outside the New
York City courtroom. Today. Am Mike Slater filling in for
Jesse Kelly. Oh is that the clip? This clip right here?
Look at them. There's Robert de Niro rolling up in
his COVID mask as well. We just stop all analysis
from him right at at that moment right there, I'm
(01:15):
Mike Slater filling in for Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 3 (01:16):
Today.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
I host Breitbart News Daily on Serious XM Patriot with
simulcast the show right here on the first TV every morning,
so we'll see it bright and early tomorrow morning at
seven o'clock, where we will talk in more detail about
all this as well. But surreal day at the Trump
trial at New York City, very bizarre. Joe Biden's team
has distanced themselves from this Trump trial, which I think
(01:37):
is a wise move for them, until today when they
sent out Robert de Niro and two Capitol Hill police officers.
Here's another clip of the press conference they gave. First
of all, let me say this first and foremost. We're
not here today because of what's going on over there.
Speaker 2 (01:55):
We're here today because you all are here.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
And so we're glad that you're all here this morning,
and we're here primarily because of the threat that Donald
Trump poses.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
To the United States of America and to our democracy.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
Is where Trump a threat to all these wars might
have gotten into any media questions. It's a weaponization of
the Justice Department.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
Cerre any media questions.
Speaker 6 (02:16):
You won't answer the real questions.
Speaker 3 (02:18):
Only the thing is, but this city is pretty accommodating.
We make room for clowns. We have them all over
the city. People who do crazy things in the street
we tolerated. It's part of the city. It's part of
the culture, but not a person like Trump who will
(02:38):
eventually run the country. That does not work.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
And we all know that.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
Anyway, we make group of clowns to each his own,
but no one takes him or took them really seriously.
They take them seriously now, of course, And that's why
I've joined the Biden Harris campaign, because the only way
to preserve our freedoms and hold on to our humanity
is to vote for Joe Biden for president. Really, we
(03:10):
don't have a choice.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
Robert de Niro is a lunatic.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
He's like Keith Olberman, totally obsessed TDS guy. So here's
how you need all you need to know about how
this happened. Polls are awful for Joe Biden right now.
The Politico had an article DEM's in full blown freakout
over Biden. So this is the sign of a campaign
(03:37):
that is in, as Trump would say, total free fall.
The Great Josh Hammer is here a host of America
on a trial with Josh Hammer, and he's going to
be hosting Jesse Kelly's show tomorrow right here, Josh, good to.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
Talk to you, Bron Mike always good to see you,
my friend.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
So it was extra weird today because it was closing
arguments today.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
So what happened?
Speaker 4 (04:00):
Yeah, So, first of all, let me just address the
Robert de Niro thing, you know, Mike, I mean this
kind of pings me on a very personal level. I
mean I grew up. I feel like I grew up
with Robertsonniro. I mean he was everywhere. I mean he
was with Meet the Parents, with Ben Still and all that.
But when I got old enough to watch older films
and appreciate him, it felt like Robert Zonniro was the
star of every single one. I mean Godfather, Part two,
(04:20):
Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, Goodfellows, Casino, a legendary actor. So
to watch him choose to go out like this as
a as a partisan left wing hack, as a SIKA
fan for The New York Times, CNN, MSDNBC agenda, it's
really sad. I mean, to go out not the bang,
but just with a profound whimper. So I saw a
personal level as a longtime fan of roberts Niro's. I mean,
(04:43):
this has just been an awful, awful, awful start to
the day so far. But what's actually happening in the
core room, as you allude to, is frankly, much more
important than all of the sermon drag, all the drama
outside of the core room. What's happening now is we
are getting to jury instructions that this at this point
I'll probably not going to come till tomorrow, but jury
instructions are going to possibly make or break this trial
(05:04):
because the judge who's going to have to be very
very specific with how he instructs the jurors with what
to look for there, He's going to have some decisions
to make here. And the big problem for the judge,
which is the big problem for this case in general,
is that the prosecution Alvin Brad, Matthew Colangelo, is Susan Hoffinger,
all the prosecutors there in the Manhattan DA's office, they
have thus far, this is the single most important legal
(05:26):
fast of this entire case, Mike, they have thus far
failed to actually say what the black letter theory of
the case is. Let me say that again. We are
about to reach a verdict in the first ever criminal
trial of a foreign president of the United States, and
the prosecution has literally not even told the American people
or the broader world.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
They've not told humanity what the.
Speaker 4 (05:47):
Actual legal theory is. We know that it is thirty
four counts of fraudulent bookkeeping in New York State, but
we are also told it's in furtherance of something else.
They haven't actually said what that something else is. You
and I have discussed elsewhere. We can surmise that it
is in further it's of a federal US campaign financial
law violation. First of all, dubious at best, whether Alvin
(06:09):
Bragg the Manhattan DA can even bring a federal prosecution
of this nature, especially when the US Attorney's Office, the
federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York looked
into this and then passed on that. Second of all,
most important is that, even if you assume that that
is the actual law here, you need an unambiguous, exclusive
and sole finding of specific intent on the part of
(06:32):
Donald Trump and the Trump organization. In other words, they
have to show beyond a reasonable doubt, because that's a
threshold for all of this, that the one hundred and
thirty thousand dollars an alleged hush money payment made to
Michael Collen, which is not a crime at all in
and of itself. That's totally legal, no matter what you
might think of him morally totally legal. They have to
show that that was made for the sole, exclusive, and
unambiguous purpose of actually helping Donald Trump's twenty sixteen campaign.
(06:54):
Will wamber Shawan actually put that into the jury instructions?
Speaker 7 (06:58):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
That's kind of where my guess game ends up short
because I don't know what was in this guy's head.
But that is what I'm looking for at this point.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
Okay, jury instructions.
Speaker 1 (07:06):
What a fascinating thing that if you didn't go to
law school, I have been on a jury, don't really
know what it is.
Speaker 2 (07:11):
But what you said there, you said soul. So it happens.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
So that payment has to be made proven beyond a
reasonable doubt, which I'd love if you could to find
that again for us, but beyond a reasonable doubt that
it was done for the sole purpose of advancing this
other crime or helping his campaign, right, but it could
be done for also other purposes and that would negate that.
Speaker 7 (07:32):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (07:33):
So I mean, I mean that, since day one has
been one of the easiest ways for the Trump legal defense,
in my mind, to try to prove that he is
not guilty of these of these crimes. And you know,
the Trump legal the defense, and not actually call a
lot of witnesses. They only call two witnesses to stand there.
But we got into this a little bit in some
of their testimony. If you can introduce anything remotely resembling
(07:53):
mixed motives into these hush money payments to Michael Cohen
in twenty sixteen, again even conceding for the sake of art,
that these payments even happened, that's a factual dispute, even
can seeing that they happened here, If you can introduce
any mixed motives into why Donald Trump and the Trump
organization felt the need to make these payments, the prosecution's
case is over. It's done, though, So in other word,
(08:14):
you can show that maybe Donald Trump want to make
these payments to try to hide his son Baron Trump,
to try to prevent him from being bullied in middle school,
or something like that, if you can introduce any kind
of evidence that would demonstrate that, oh, I don't know,
a very reasonable thing, like maybe Donald Trump wants to
protect his marriage with Milanya. He didn't want Malania to
kind of hear all this salacious stuff from Karen McDougal
(08:36):
and Stormy Daniels. If they can introduce that, then the
prosecution's case fails. But it's also this beyond a reasonable
doubt threshold, which is a very very high criminal threshold.
And this notion that in a criminal case that you
have to really, really really show beyond a reasonable doubt
that the guy is guilty. That goes way way back
to the English common law. I'll whip out a good
quote for you, Slater. So there's a great English common
(08:58):
layer by the name of Sir William Blackstone. He was
alive in the eighteenth century. He was probably the single
most formidable codifier of the entire English common law, which
America inherited at the time of our founding. And in
his most famous work is seventeen seventy five Commentaries on
the Laws of England, blacks And famously said that it
is better it is better to let one hundred guilty
(09:18):
men walk scott free and to put one innocent person
behind bars. That is kind of the best way to
think about beyond a reasonable doubt. That notion right there
is codified into our law. So again, with that, having
said all that, I have to reasonably expect that if
there is any juror on this jury who has any
scruples in his or horror bones. If they're approaching this
(09:39):
with any degree of intellectual honesty, then there's going to
be a hung jury. It's New York City, so maybe
that won't be the case, but we'll see.
Speaker 1 (09:47):
So hungury, again is just one person, one holdout. So
it could be a Trump supporter, it could be just
a fair person. Remember there's a correct a brother some
lawyers on this jury as well, so they know that
Blackstone quote as well. So just one of those guys
to be like, guys, no, forget it, I'm not it
(10:07):
didn't meet that threshold.
Speaker 2 (10:08):
That's a hung jury.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
And then I guess what are the legal ramifications of that?
And then what are the political ramifications of a hung jury,
especially knowing that most people and even most people in
the media probably don't even know what that means.
Speaker 4 (10:20):
Yeah, so hung jury means of that to what you said,
which is you literally just need one, you need one jury.
So basically, for a criminal trial in America at this point,
all fifty states require a unanimous criminal jury for conviction.
Now that wasn't always the case.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
Back in the day.
Speaker 4 (10:35):
You could actually define beyond a reasonable doubt as being
three quarters eighty percent. But in his Supreme Court case
three or four years ago, the Supreme Court actually over
termed the last two holdouts, which were the states of
Louisiana and Oregon, of all states, and they actually now
have it constitutionally mandated that every all fifty states, even
in their state courts, have to have a unanimous jury
for criminal condictions. So that actually is what has to
(10:55):
happen here. And if you get one jury holdout, then
you actually have a hung jury. To your point as well,
which is the point that I've been making on America
on Trial for at least a month or two now,
since we learned the jurors identity or at least their
vocational backgrounds, I've been saying over and over again that yes,
I actually am costly optimistic about the fact that there
are two that there are two jurors who are lawyers
(11:16):
by training, like myself. Again, they're probably liberals. I mean,
this is a New York so they're probably liberals, but
at a bare minimum, at a bare minimum, like you
have two people who went to law school who understands
that the very first thing you need to do when
you're looking at a legal case is to at a
bare minimum, ask what is the law? Are we citing
constitutional provisions here? Are we citing criminal statutes? Civil statues?
(11:37):
Is it judge made common laws? International treaty? Is a
United Nations so called international law which aka is actually
fake law? But like, what is the actual source of law?
Speaker 6 (11:46):
Here?
Speaker 4 (11:47):
At a bare minimum, a juror who is a lawyer
should be asking these questions. Again, the prosecution has not
met even this bare bones, bare bones rudimentary threshold, which
is why I saw Tom Cotton earlier today say that
a judge and wamber Shawn's position, should not even let
this thing get to a jury. He should just dismiss
it or deliberately instructures to order a conviction. That's what
(12:07):
he should. Excuse me, an acquittal, that's what he should do.
He's not going to do so, though, so I guess
we're again we're just going to have to see.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Wow, So what we about a minute? When do you
expect there to be a decision made by the jury?
And then what do you think the political ramifications are
going to be of this, especially knowing that most people
don't like most people will hear hung jury and they'll
think that he was sentenced to hanging. So most people
have no idea what that will even mean. So what
do you see the political ramifications.
Speaker 4 (12:35):
Yeah, we're probably gonna find out this week. I would
be surprised if it goes till next week, although it's possible,
I mean, it's possible that the jury really just takes
a lot of time to deliberate here. But they've been
chewing on this for a lot for weeks now. They
haven't heard a ton of new information, to be honest
with you, over the past week or so ever, since
Michael Cohen got off the witness stand. But Michael cohen
testimony really should have been the final nail on the
coffin for the prosecution. They probably should have just wrapped
(12:57):
it up and gone straight to a jury vote at
that point, because you know, objectively speaking, there's no coming
back from that. The political ravocations of a hung jury
or acquittal, I think are fantastic for Donald Trump. He
will skyrocket up the polls there on the flip side
if they actually convict and they really do put him
in Riker's Island, God forbid for you know, a day
or two, or maybe even longer than that. I don't
(13:18):
think it's going to help democrats, Mike. I could even
see a situation like that where it might politically backfire
in their face as well.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
Yeah, I think Trump's in a win win right here.
Josh Hammer America on Trial. That's the podcast. You can download,
listen to it everywhere, and please do Josh, Craig Toddge your.
Speaker 2 (13:33):
Brother, you bet anytime, and.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Josh again filling and tomorrow for Jesse Kelly so more
great insight frohim tomorrow coming next, more on Biden family corruption.
More in the latest with the World Economic Forum the
head Klaus Schwab has stepped out.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
What does that mean for the World Economic Forum?
Speaker 1 (13:53):
And then the latest with dei wokeness slash communism infiltrating
our medical schools. It's all coming next here on I'm
Right with Jesse Kelly, Mike Slator Filling and Slater Radio
on Twitter and Instagram.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
More next by the word.
Speaker 7 (14:10):
I love coffee. I love it so much and you
know it does my heart. Well, it happened to me
this morning. I was filling up my little coffee bean
thing and I was out, Oh my gosh, am I
at a blackout coffee and I went and pulled open
the freezer and there's a big bag of Blackout Coffee
beans waiting for me.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
There was the best.
Speaker 7 (14:28):
Blackout Coffee is not only incredible coffee, they deliver it
to my front door, amazing prices, and most importantly to
me is they share my values. Blackout Coffee doesn't do
it quietly either. Go look at their freaking merchandise talking
about America and God and guns. How many corporations in
this country actually talk about that stuff anymore? Blackout Coffee does.
(14:53):
I love them? I always will. It's the only place
I get coffee from.
Speaker 8 (14:57):
Now, go to.
Speaker 7 (14:58):
Blackoutcoffee dot com slash jesse. What that does is it
gets you twenty percent off your first order Blackoutcoffee dot
com slash jesse.
Speaker 6 (15:09):
All right, what we are very proud of now it's
a young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina
and so on. So if we penetrate the.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Cappinets, penetrate, penetrate the cabin it's guys like so Central
Casting Bond Villain's unbelievable. He that guy is, well say,
he's no longer.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
He's still with us, but.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
He's no longer The head of the World Economic Forum
and let's not get too excited.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
He's still there at.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
The world, it's just not the head of it anymore.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
Always good to get an update on Klaus Schwab with
Seamus Bruner, the author of this book. Right here controller
Arcs and I don't know if you can see once
this fancy shmancy graphic goes away as it slides through here.
I don't know if you can see here all the
marks I.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
Have in the book, all the corners folded.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
I don't know if you can see that, Seamous Brunett here,
what's going on? Seamus Hawaii, Mike.
Speaker 8 (16:11):
Great to be back with you. Thank you so much
for showing the book. There, Klaus Schwab on the cover.
I guess I'll have to do another book with the
new head of World Economic Forum.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Yeah, who's just as evil. But we'll get to him
in a second. So one of your chapters. Of course,
we got the big guys, we got Soros, we got Zuckerberg, Gates, Besos,
and Klaus. What do we need about Klaus and what's
he doing now?
Speaker 5 (16:39):
Yeah?
Speaker 8 (16:39):
So Klaus Schwab has always been sort of the figurehead,
the frontman, the spokesperson.
Speaker 5 (16:46):
For the global elite.
Speaker 8 (16:47):
A lot of people you don't even know who they
are dictating the policies of your country, of our country
here in America. But Klaus Schwab is the front man,
and so he comes out of the shadows and announces
some create new thing, like let's say the Great Reset
during the pandemic. But he's really just announcing policies that
were cooked up in the shadows years beforehand. And so
(17:10):
in some ways with him stepping back, he's gonna still
be the chairman of the Board of Trustees, so he's
not really going anywhere.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
But it's really no change.
Speaker 8 (17:18):
I mean, the World Economic Forum is still going to
be drafting these policies, working with organizations like the World
Health Organization on pandemic treaties. A lot of the stuff
that comes out of the UN and things like the
Paris Climate Accords, those are all drafted and conceived at Davos.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
And so it's not a big change.
Speaker 8 (17:39):
But what the World Economic Forum says they're going to
be doing, that's really what should alarm us.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Actually kind of good for him for building an organization
that's bigger than him, that can live on beyond. Unfortunately,
it's an organization for bad for people. But he built
it from nothing and made it. So congratulations.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
What is next on the World Economic Forum agenda?
Speaker 8 (18:04):
Yeah, and I mean his family, by the way, will
still be heavily involved. He's got two kids, he's got
a nephew. They're all on the World Economic Forum payroll.
They're each is as crazy as their father. And so
the Schwabs are still in the mix. Olivier and Nicole
Schwab are the children, and they're they're on steering committees
and all that. And it's a huge payday for the
(18:25):
Schwab family. But what's next for the World Economic Forum?
So they are going to continue being the leading global
institution for public private partnerships, And that sounds sort of,
you know, benign, and you know what's going on with
what's a public private partnership anyway, And whenever you hear
that word, you need red flags sirens going off, because
(18:46):
what a public private partnership is is when the corporations
partner with the government. And so they get it's the
worst of both worlds for us, the best of both
worlds for them. For example, the government has all of
the powers that a government has monopoly on the coercive.
Speaker 5 (19:01):
Use of force.
Speaker 8 (19:03):
But the corporations have all the benefits that the government lack,
which is like total opaqueness in their movements. That corporations
are able to hide behind things like intellectual property or
proprietary work product so that we can't peer behind the curtain.
For example, you can foia the emails of the government,
you can't foya the emails of a corporation. And so
(19:24):
let me give you just a couple examples of public
private partnerships and action big tech censorship. The government isn't
allowed to infringe on your First Amendment rights, but the
tech platforms because they're a business, and the left always
comes at you like don't you support a business's right
to choose who they do business with? Therefore, Facebook is
allowed to censor you. All of the other big tech
(19:46):
platforms are allowed to censor you where, and the government
can't censor you. But what they can do is shoot
an email over to Facebook and say, hey, take these
accounts offline. So that's an example of a public private partnership.
Another example is the pandemic response. The government isn't always
able to completely lock you down and completely infringe on
all of your basic human rights. But all of the
(20:08):
businesses in partnership with the government said, well, unless you
get the vaccine, you're not allowed to come to our restaurant,
you're not allowed to work for our company. And all
the left suddenly fell in love with corporations after hating
them since forever and said, yeah, yeah, it's the business
is right to force you to take the job. And
so that's another example. So these public private partnerships, that's
(20:29):
what the World Economic Forum is going to be focusing on.
They said it, they admitted it, and that's what is
really alarming for the future.
Speaker 1 (20:38):
We made a statement there that's very fascinating and deserves
further detail. In our lifetime, there was a balance between
government and business to the point where as you said,
progressives hated business, but for the rest of us, that
create a nice ballance the progressives over here in government
and more conservative people in business. But something happened relatively recently,
perhaps you know better than me, surely you do, where
(21:01):
business now moved over to the left as well, and
now we have no balance us regular people will speak
to that.
Speaker 8 (21:09):
Yeah, you're exactly right. I mean, it's the woke offication.
I mean, here's another public private partnership. They have businesses
coming in and giving DEI trainings to students and to teachers,
and so ordinarily parents would have a right to check
out what's going on, what's in the curriculum, but now,
because it's a private business, you're not allowed to look
at their proprietary training materials. Same thing with software. They're
(21:32):
putting kids in front of laptops that are basically, you know,
taking them on a journey of like are you trans
or are you just gay? And the parents want to
see the software and what's under the hood, but the
laptops are in the schools and the companies are saying, no,
you can't look at the software because we're a private
company and this is our work product. And so when
did the corporations go woke? I mean, that's a great question.
(21:56):
It's kind of been happening for fifty sixty seventy years.
I mean, the World Economic Forum is the hub for
where the largest corporations in the world, the Fortune five
hundred in the US, they are all with I mean,
with maybe a few handful of exceptions, they are all
members of the World Economic Forum. And they find that
they've gone left, They've gone woke because they get the
(22:17):
awesome powers of the government. The Left is the government party,
and so this marriage between big business and big government
has really blossomed into full blown fascism, full blown tyranny.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
I mean, the moral of this story, unfortunately for today,
is that Klaus Schwab no longer the head the president
of World Economic Forum, but is still involved and World
Economic Forum is not going anywhere.
Speaker 2 (22:44):
Is that right?
Speaker 8 (22:46):
Yeah, that's right. And really what it is is he's
just the figurehead. So I mean, these big businesses and
people like Bill Gates and George Soros, they're not going
anywhere either. They're really driving the ship. I mean, he's
not the total brains behind the operation. I mean, you know,
a figurehead or a spokesperson. He kind of just comes out.
They chose a terrible spokesperson because, like you said, central
(23:07):
casting for Bond villain. But the new guy, Borga Brenda
who's running the day today is the former so called conservative.
Don't let the European version of the word conservative fool you.
He is the He's from Norway. He's a total lefty,
big donor to the Clinton Foundation. You know, he's on
the board of the various globalist organizations like the United
(23:30):
Nations or the Builder Burger conferences, and so this guy
is going to be no better than Klaus Schwab. But
you do see the mainstream media saying he's a conservative.
He's a conservative, so they're at least trying to give
a little lip service. But you can't fall for it.
Speaker 1 (23:46):
Yeah, but Trump in the World Economic Forum, We'll see
how they like that. Seamus, regretfully, you're following all this
for us.
Speaker 2 (23:51):
Everyone.
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Go buy the book Control of Garchs. You read about
all these guys trying to control your life. Appreciate your Seamus.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Thanks.
Speaker 1 (23:58):
Mike Shas mentioned DEI come in and asks me have
an incredible, horrific DEI story coming for your doctors. I'll
tell you about that next right here on I'm right
with Jesse Kelly in the first TV it'spread.
Speaker 7 (24:11):
The word sleep might be the most underrated thing in
the world.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
Because it changes everything.
Speaker 7 (24:21):
It changes your entire life, your entire day. Haven't you
gone through so many nights where you didn't get a
good night's sleep, toss and turn and back, hurt or
even worse. This is what always got me. If you
end up taking something to sleep, everything you take to sleep.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Makes you feel like crap the next day. It's awful.
Speaker 7 (24:39):
You wake up in this fog, you never fully wake up.
It's terrible. And then I found dream Powder. What a name, right,
Beam is the name of the company. They're wonderful and
they came up with dream Powder. It's basically hot chocolate,
but it's got all this natural stuff at it, melowtonin
and whatnot. And I drink it every single night before
bed and I knocked out eight nine hours, just beautiful sleep.
(25:03):
But that's not the best part. The best part is
the next day when I wake up, I don't wake
up in a fog. I wake up feeling like a
million bucks. Go get some Shopbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Hey, welcome back to I'm right with Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 2 (25:23):
Of course I'm not Jesse Kelly. I'm my slater feeling
in for Jesse.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
Today I host Brad Part News Daily, which we simulcast
right here in the first TV every Weday morning from
seven to night.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
So join us bright and early tomorrow morning.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
One thing Jesse is honestly the best at is not
getting distracted by what the media is telling you to
focus on, but instead he's excellent, always looking at the
things that directly affect your life, the things that are
most important. And there are a few things, I would
argue that are more directly important than your doctor. If
you're on the medical operating table, that's supremely important. Have
(25:55):
you heard about what's going on in UCLA Medical School.
UCLA Med School used to be one of the best
med schools in the country. But this is what communists do.
They infiltrate and destroy. I've made the argument that that
woke people actually have a better sense of what's good,
beautiful and true than the average person because they need
(26:15):
to seek out what is good, beautiful and true in
order to destroy it. Regular people may not realize what
is good to beautiful and true and what's essential, and
they take these things for granted. But the woke they
see these things and they hate them, and they infiltrate them,
and they take them over, and they use them for
power for as long as they can, and they ultimately
destroy Themness is a disease. It should be something that
(26:37):
they treat, they teach how to treat and cure at
med school, not something that spreads in med school anyway.
U CLA Med school, they get thirteen thousand applications a year.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
Last year they accepted one hundred and seventy three students.
Speaker 1 (26:49):
That's a one point three percent acceptance, right, I share
that because they could accept the best, but they don't.
Back in twenty twenty one, there was a black applicant
who grades and test scores were far below the UCLA average.
But the dean of the emissions department when the committee
rejected that applicant because obviously, the dean said, did you
(27:10):
not know that African American women are dying at a
higher rate than everybody else. We need people like this
in this medical school. We need more black doctors, even
if it means accepting unqualified.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
Black doctors.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Affirmative action is illegal in California. It's one of the
few conservative things that still exist in California. Actually, there
was a vote in twenty twenty to allow affirmative action
and it got voted down fifty seven to forty two
by the people of California.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
It's illegal affirmative action, but they get.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
Around and they still do it at UCLA Med School.
And there's been some whistleblowers. There's a report by the Freebeacon,
the Washington free Beacon. Race based admissions have turned UCLA
into a failed medical school. That's from one of the
former members of the admission committee.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
Who said, we want racial diversity so.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
Badly we're willing to cut corners together. They talked with
eight professors at the med school other UCLA officials. How
bad does it have to be for these otherwise progressive
people at UCLA Med School to come forward and speak
out against what's happening at their school. How bad must
it be in some of the groups that this dean
of the medical school admissions department has admitted more than
(28:25):
fifty percent of students failed standardized tests on emergency medicine,
family medicine, internal medicine.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
Pediatrics more than fifty percent.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
One professor said that a student in the operating room
could not identify a major artery, and then a classic
woke victim mentality berated the professor for putting her on
the spot. In Sir Jesse Kelly joke about putting her
on the spot, another student said, excuse me. Another professor
said that students at the end of their clinical rotations
(28:56):
don't know basic lab tests and some cases are unable
to zent patients presenting a patient just means here's there's symptoms,
here's what it could be, Here's what a cure could
be like, that's what a doctor does, and here we
have these students unable to do it. One professor said,
the faculty of seeing a shocking decline and knowledge from
our medical students, and of course the double standard. Right,
(29:18):
all the normal criteria for getting into medical school, one
professor said, or one admissions officer said, only apply to
certain to people of certain races. For other people, those
criteria are disregarded. This dean of admissions, she also just
happens to be the vice chair for Equity, Diversity and
Inclusion of UCLA's anesthesiology department, and she routinely this is,
(29:44):
according to people on the emissions committee, gives black and
Hispanic applicants a pass for some par metrics, and Asians
and white people need a near perfect score to even
be considered.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
Check this out.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
One professor one committee members says the bar for underrepresented
minorities is quote as low as you could possibly imagine,
as low as you could imagine amazing. One professor says
she's lashed out at anyone who dare question the qualifications
(30:21):
of minority students is from five different sources. He said
that if you disagree with what her decisions, then you
are privileged and racist and you have to do diversity training.
There was a Native American applicant who they rejected, and
this dean shoot out the committee and made them sit
through a two hour lecture on Native American history delivered
by her own sister. Little re education happened. She said
(30:47):
that two people backed up this story that there was
a highly qualified white male who has knocked down several
spots because, as she said, quote, we have too many.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
Of his kind already his kind.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
She also told people who said, that's ridiculous that you're
not allowed to have an opinion because you're not BIPOC.
That's a black Indigenous person of color. One professor says
that UCLA still produces some good graduates, but a third
to a half of the medical school is incredibly unqualified.
(31:23):
Keep that in mind, not a third to half is
it's like, ah, like less than we would maybe like, no, no,
incredibly unqualified. Twenty four percent of students failed three or
more of what they call shelf exams. So you do
a clinical rotation and like pediatrics, and then you take
a shelf exam about that twenty four percent have failed
three or more. So I'll tell you what's gonna happen here.
(31:48):
First of all, this is that UCLA Med school. We
know surely it's other med schools across the country, certainly
across California. What they're gonna do is they're gonna lower
the standard, the standards of the test. But they did
this when I was in high school. It used to
be a sixty five to pass the exam, and then
it made it a fifty five, and oh gosh, golly,
whn't you know more people passed. We must be doing
better in school. So they're going to lower what it
takes to pass, and then eventually they're just going to
(32:10):
get rid of the tests altogether, just like they did
with air traffic controllers.
Speaker 2 (32:14):
They got rid of the air traffic controller.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
Test to find out who would be the best at
being an air traffic controller.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
And now we have planes.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
Running into each other on the runways and planes almost
landing on.
Speaker 2 (32:22):
Top of each other on the runay.
Speaker 1 (32:23):
They turned that test for air traffic controllers into a questionnaire.
What sports did you play in high school? What was
your worst subject in school, and I can. One professor
at UCLA said some students are accepted with GPA solo.
Speaker 2 (32:37):
They shouldn't even be applying.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
I'll end with this one, a reporter said, Or excuse me,
a faculty member said, I normally I wouldn't normally talk
to a reporter. But there's no way to stop this
without embarrassing the medical school. It needs to be stopped.
We're talking about our health and listen, it's all pretend
(33:03):
this dean if her child was in the operating room,
you think, and the best doctors coming should be like
who whoa, whoa, whoa. You're not Chicano. I need a
Hispanic doctor. I need a Chicano doctor. Two other stories
that also match this theme. We don't have time for
it today, though, But just do a search for La
Times Killer King Hospital in Compton, that's the first DEI
(33:26):
hospital a couple decades ago, and then search the name
Patrick Chavis cha v I s UC Davis. He's the
original DEI doctor hire back in nineteen seventy three. Maybe
we'll share tho another day of Jesse Dare take another vacation.
Here's the problem with this. I had a black man
calling on my radio show today and say, oh, Slater,
so you don't think black people can become doctors?
Speaker 2 (33:46):
Quiet?
Speaker 1 (33:50):
It is a shame the med schools are lowering standards
for people who looked at it look certain ways, because
now they have created unfortunately, and fortunately, it is now
rational to look at someone, to look at a doctor
of a certain skinned color and think.
Speaker 2 (34:10):
Where'd you go to school? Again? UCLA? And I shouldn't
be the one lamenting this. I mean I do.
Speaker 1 (34:16):
I shouldn't be the only one. It should be black activists.
There should be black activists who are demanding that UCLA
only choose the best applicants. And they should be the
black activists who are fighting k through twelve schools and
demanding that they do better so they can get more
qualified black applicants into the med schools. And they shouldn't
have to lower the standards. This shouldn't be just on me.
I want I just want the best. I don't care
(34:37):
about color. But if you're obsessed with race and you
want more black Dodgers, whatever, right, but they got to
meet the standard right now at UCLA, and sure the
other schools they don't. And I feel terrible for the
excellent black doctors because now they'll be judged.
Speaker 2 (34:51):
It's not qualified. It's not my fault, it's UCLA's.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
Now. Can we embarrass the schools enough to get them
to change their ways?
Speaker 2 (34:58):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (34:59):
Marxists have no shame, so you can't shame them. Their
goal is to destroy the good people at UCLA Med School.
They got to take power back now before it's too late.
Might be too late already. Well, let's learn a lesson.
If you see the Marxists taking over the places you love,
you see the communists taking over the things you love,
do not let the devil get a foothold. Coming to next,
(35:23):
John Carny is going to be here with the latest
with the economy, well economic update next right here on
I'm right with Jesse Kelly, Mike Slater, pill and Slater
Radio on Twitter and Instagram.
Speaker 2 (35:36):
You're not stuck in your time share.
Speaker 7 (35:38):
You believe you are stuck in your time share because
these time share companies are a bunch of big fat liars.
What they do is, I mean, look what they did
to you, They do to everybody. They get you in
with the fancy seminar looks good, and look at the
beach house and you like it, and I hope you
did enjoy it, right, They can be so much fun.
Speaker 2 (35:56):
I hope you had a wonderful time friends, family.
Speaker 7 (35:58):
But eventually, as they know, oh everyone's gonna move on.
Speaker 2 (36:01):
You're done with it.
Speaker 7 (36:02):
Maybe you can't even afford it anymore with the way
prices are with everything now, and so you let them know, Hey,
all right, I'm done.
Speaker 2 (36:07):
Y'all can have it back. And that's when they drop
it on.
Speaker 7 (36:10):
You have it back. Oh sorry, it's yours for life.
They don't let you out. Lone Star Transfer will get
you out. They will legally and permanently get you out
of that time share. Make one phone call, but not
to the timeshare company. Stop wasting your breath. Call Loan
Star Transfer. This family business will set you free. Eight
(36:32):
four four three one zero two six four six lone
Star Transfer.
Speaker 1 (36:42):
Hey, welcome back to I'm Right with Jesse Kelly. I
am Mike sliderfillin in for Jesse. I host Bride Partners
daily every weekday morning. And we saw we'll cast seven
to nine right here on the first TV. So we'll
see again Brian early tomorrow morning.
Speaker 2 (36:56):
Report.
Speaker 1 (36:57):
So we start off the show talking about what's happening
at the courthouse in New York, and they're in full
blow and panic mode. As we've been talking about, things
are so bad for the Biden campaign that Politico just
throughout an article with the headline.
Speaker 2 (37:10):
DEM's are in full blown freak.
Speaker 1 (37:12):
Out over Biden, and of course the main reason is inflation.
One Democratic strategist said, it's the letter I but not
capitalized and Israel but lowercase I as an inflation. The
great John Carney is here, Breitbart News Finance and economics editor,
and please sign up for the best business newsletter. It's
the Breitbart Business Digest newsletter. He must sign up for
(37:35):
that and get that business news. John.
Speaker 2 (37:36):
How are you, sir, I'm doing well.
Speaker 5 (37:39):
Thanks for the promotion of the digest. Everybody.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
It's free.
Speaker 5 (37:42):
There's no reason that anybody should not subscribe.
Speaker 1 (37:45):
No, it's truly the only economics analysis that I trust.
Here's my question for you, the main one. I like
talking to you mostly just about the economy for the
economy's sake, but let's talk about the economy for politic
politics and sake. Is there anything that can change in
the next five months and is there anything they're buying
can do in the next five months here to make
(38:07):
people forget how bad it is or think how good
it is.
Speaker 5 (38:12):
No, not really, He's going to try to pour about
a trillion dollars into the economy, money that was appropriated
and has not yet been spent. He is going to
try to push that into the economy as fast as
he can before the end of the year. But it's
not going to change people's impressions of the economy. Things
are pretty much set once you get to Memorial Day.
(38:32):
People's view of what's happening in the economy is locked down,
and what they know is that inflation has been very,
very high. Home prices are way out of reach. You
can't buy a home because the combination of really high
prices and really high mortgage rates, and people are very
upset about this. They are not going to suddenly get
(38:54):
over that, even if we got better inflation numbers between
now and the end of the year, which I don't
think will happen. Even if that were to happen, I
think it's too late to change people's impression that Biden
basically really mismanaged this economy.
Speaker 2 (39:10):
Is a cliche or true to say that it's it's
just it's the grocery store.
Speaker 1 (39:15):
Man, you go to the groc store, it's hundreds of dollars.
I mean, we have six, four kids, six of us,
but it's hundreds of dollars every.
Speaker 2 (39:21):
Time it goes insane. Is that the biggest hurt?
Speaker 1 (39:25):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (39:26):
Absolutely, that of the That is one of the most
salient prices in everybody's lives for a few reason. It's
one because you know, furniture prices go up, car prices
go up, but how often do you buy a couch?
You buy groceries every week. The other thing is they're
very transparent when you go to the grocery store. The
prices are all over the place. You see them, and
(39:46):
so you notice, oh, that's a lot different than it
used to be just a couple of years ago. The
other thing is that grocery prices went up a lot.
It wasn't just like they went up ten percent over
the last couple of years. They're over around twenty one percent.
That's a huge increase. That's the kind of increase you'd
expect to see over ten years, not just three years.
(40:08):
So people are reeling from that kind of inflation, and
it leaves them less money to spend up things like
family vacations, fun, summertime. Nope, it's all going into the
grocery store.
Speaker 1 (40:20):
So Biden's rebuttal to that is it's corporate greed. Shri
inflation and corporate greed. Is that going anywhere?
Speaker 2 (40:25):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (40:26):
So suddenly the theory here is that suddenly all these
companies they didn't used to be greedy under Donald Trump,
I guess, no greed at all, right under even under Obama,
no greed. George Bush, no greed. Byday gets elected president
and suddenly all at once they become greedy. That's a
crazy theory. And if it weren't true, you would mean
(40:46):
we should vote bite it out because he's doing something
that drove people crazy with greed. Of course, it's not true.
Prices are up because they pumped too much money into
the economy. If corporations could just raise prices whenever they
got greedy, we would have all already had maximum prices.
So By did. When he's lying to people, and I
think people sense that they know when he says, oh,
(41:08):
it's greed that caused this, that greed is his oldest humanity.
There's no explosion of greed that happened. It's not much
driving grocery prices. It's Biden's policies that drove inflation.
Speaker 2 (41:21):
That's really interesting too.
Speaker 1 (41:22):
The other thing he goes to all the time, we'll
say if he does it again, is like the junk fees.
California just passed that bill. They got rid of all
junk fees. That's what they branded them. I don't know
what people call them, like got resort fees at hotels
and California specifically, you can no longer put at the
bottom of the bill like a five percent surcharge for
minimum wage increases us.
Speaker 2 (41:42):
So you can't.
Speaker 1 (41:43):
You can't do that stuff anymore. And that's we hate
those things. And like when you go to Ticketmaster, like
Ticketmaster's crib and all the hypoot, but I mean, like
does that move the needle a all?
Speaker 5 (41:52):
No, it doesn't. And by the way, you're still paying
those They just now put them in the bill without
telling you that you have a resort fee there. The
room just costs board. It's not like that they said, oh,
never mind, we're not going to charge you that money. No,
they're still charging you. If they were charging you four
hundred dollars a night or some place there and fifty
(42:13):
dollars of that was a resort fee. Now they just
charge you fifty dollars in the entire fee, so they
it's actually just got rid of the transparency. Used to
be able to see some of this stuff, now you can't.
It doesn't make a difference. It's not going to lower
anybody's prices. What's really happening. And look, they switched it.
They started calling it junk fees because when they tested
(42:34):
resort fees that sounded like something just rich people had
to pay. And so they said, oh, let's not talk
about resort fees. Let's call it junk fees. Everybody's against them.
But again, it doesn't actually.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
Lower the cost for any of us.
Speaker 1 (42:47):
Oh I'm so glad you said that, because, as I
said junk fees out loud, I was like, wait a second,
that sounds like a to like that sounds like I'm
buying the party line or stffing. I don't really thought
about where that fee, where that word came from, which.
Speaker 5 (42:58):
Ells definitely did be called the junkies when you got
your bill, you weren't like they weren't like, oh yeah,
very great point.
Speaker 1 (43:07):
Go about one minute left, what's the latest with the
FED and what they're up to, what they can do
moving forward here with rates.
Speaker 5 (43:12):
Right, So the Fed is just not going to raise
rates this year at all. It looked like they may
have one or two raises. Most people on Wall Street
still think they might cut rates at least once, but
there will be no cuts this year. That's what Breitbart's
position is. You can read it in bright part Business Digests.
We'll explain to you exactly why the Fed may want
(43:33):
to cut rates, but they're just not going to have
the opportunity because inflation is going to stay too hot
through the end of the year.
Speaker 2 (43:40):
Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1 (43:41):
John Corney, Briepart News Finance and Economics editors the Breitbart
Business Digest news that are Where can people sign up
for that?
Speaker 5 (43:48):
John, Just go to Breitbart look at the news. There's
a little tag that says newsletters. Click on that sign up.
Speaker 2 (43:55):
It's free.
Speaker 5 (43:56):
We have a bunch of other newsletters you can subscribe
to those two. The bright purpose is it just comes
out every day and it gives you exactly what you
need to know, not just about what happened, but why
it happened and what's happening next.
Speaker 1 (44:09):
Yeah, that's it, John, great to dog your brother for jet.
Thank you well on a light note coming up next
right here, and I'm right with Jesse Kelly my Slator
filling and Slater Radio on Twitter and Instagram.
Speaker 2 (44:28):
Time to light in the mood.
Speaker 1 (44:30):
Even this, even this young lass is upset with inflation.
Speaker 7 (44:35):
Girls, what's just happened?
Speaker 1 (44:37):
So there's a nice.
Speaker 9 (44:38):
Cream brown there, silly just two ih screams with two
chewing gums in it. It's a bloody nine pounds for
two of the band chords for so yeah, now quid,
Now he's going to get nowhere? One like my streets,
I have a one pound a pig or two pounds
like he's going to get nowhere to.
Speaker 1 (44:57):
That annoying, No annoying, That's what I got.
Speaker 9 (44:59):
It is should know say you only just bloody card,
stop dating that cash.
Speaker 1 (45:06):
That's well, but yeah, daddy. I had to listen to
it ten times to figure out exactly what she was saying.
I think my favorite line.
Speaker 2 (45:18):
Is he's not gonna get anywhere with that.
Speaker 1 (45:21):
I also decided I'm gonna start using the adjective bloody
more often.
Speaker 2 (45:27):
Every time I go to the grocery store.
Speaker 1 (45:28):
Bloody, how much for bloody oatmeal? Bloody quicker, quicker, oat
meal cuikey, that's done.
Speaker 2 (45:35):
That's awesoe. I'll keep the British accent to Jesse's. Jesse,
have a good British accent.
Speaker 1 (45:41):
Bloody Josh Hammer, filling in tomorrow, filling it for Bloody Jesse. Kelly.
I'll see you tomorrow at seven am, right here on
the first TV for Pride Partners Daily. Bloody Hell
Completely surreal day in New York City in front of
the courthouse of Donald Trump's trial closing arguments to tell
you all the latest about that, plus insane story out
of UCLA Medic School.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Medical school.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
You should care about this if you.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
You know, have a doctor, give it.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Latest with the economy, can anything that Biden do turned
this around before it's time to vote? Also the latest
with Klaus Schwab stepping down from the world that I
can perform, but he's not really going anywhere. That's all
coming up next right here, I'm right with Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
Democratic you are you were?
Speaker 1 (00:50):
You your.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Trash?
Speaker 1 (00:54):
That was the drum trial that was outside the New
York City courtroom. Today. Am Mike Slater filling in for
Jesse Kelly. Oh is that the clip? This clip right here?
Look at them. There's Robert de Niro rolling up in
his COVID mask as well. We just stop all analysis
from him right at at that moment right there, I'm
(01:15):
Mike Slater filling in for Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 3 (01:16):
Today.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
I host Breitbart News Daily on Serious XM Patriot with
simulcast the show right here on the first TV every morning,
so we'll see it bright and early tomorrow morning at
seven o'clock, where we will talk in more detail about
all this as well. But surreal day at the Trump
trial at New York City, very bizarre. Joe Biden's team
has distanced themselves from this Trump trial, which I think
(01:37):
is a wise move for them, until today when they
sent out Robert de Niro and two Capitol Hill police officers.
Here's another clip of the press conference they gave. First
of all, let me say this first and foremost. We're
not here today because of what's going on over there.
Speaker 2 (01:55):
We're here today because you all are here.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
And so we're glad that you're all here this morning,
and we're here primarily because of the threat that Donald
Trump poses.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
To the United States of America and to our democracy.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
Is where Trump a threat to all these wars might
have gotten into any media questions. It's a weaponization of
the Justice Department.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
Cerre any media questions.
Speaker 6 (02:16):
You won't answer the real questions.
Speaker 3 (02:18):
Only the thing is, but this city is pretty accommodating.
We make room for clowns. We have them all over
the city. People who do crazy things in the street
we tolerated. It's part of the city. It's part of
the culture, but not a person like Trump who will
(02:38):
eventually run the country. That does not work.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
And we all know that.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
Anyway, we make group of clowns to each his own,
but no one takes him or took them really seriously.
They take them seriously now, of course, And that's why
I've joined the Biden Harris campaign, because the only way
to preserve our freedoms and hold on to our humanity
is to vote for Joe Biden for president. Really, we
(03:10):
don't have a choice.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
Robert de Niro is a lunatic.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
He's like Keith Olberman, totally obsessed TDS guy. So here's
how you need all you need to know about how
this happened. Polls are awful for Joe Biden right now.
The Politico had an article DEM's in full blown freakout
over Biden. So this is the sign of a campaign
(03:37):
that is in, as Trump would say, total free fall.
The Great Josh Hammer is here a host of America
on a trial with Josh Hammer, and he's going to
be hosting Jesse Kelly's show tomorrow right here, Josh, good to.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
Talk to you, Bron Mike always good to see you,
my friend.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
So it was extra weird today because it was closing
arguments today.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
So what happened?
Speaker 4 (04:00):
Yeah, So, first of all, let me just address the
Robert de Niro thing, you know, Mike, I mean this
kind of pings me on a very personal level. I
mean I grew up. I feel like I grew up
with Robertsonniro. I mean he was everywhere. I mean he
was with Meet the Parents, with Ben Still and all that.
But when I got old enough to watch older films
and appreciate him, it felt like Robert Zonniro was the
star of every single one. I mean Godfather, Part two,
(04:20):
Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, Goodfellows, Casino, a legendary actor. So
to watch him choose to go out like this as
a as a partisan left wing hack, as a SIKA
fan for The New York Times, CNN, MSDNBC agenda, it's
really sad. I mean, to go out not the bang,
but just with a profound whimper. So I saw a
personal level as a longtime fan of roberts Niro's. I mean,
(04:43):
this has just been an awful, awful, awful start to
the day so far. But what's actually happening in the
core room, as you allude to, is frankly, much more
important than all of the sermon drag, all the drama
outside of the core room. What's happening now is we
are getting to jury instructions that this at this point
I'll probably not going to come till tomorrow, but jury
instructions are going to possibly make or break this trial
(05:04):
because the judge who's going to have to be very
very specific with how he instructs the jurors with what
to look for there, He's going to have some decisions
to make here. And the big problem for the judge,
which is the big problem for this case in general,
is that the prosecution Alvin Brad, Matthew Colangelo, is Susan Hoffinger,
all the prosecutors there in the Manhattan DA's office, they
have thus far, this is the single most important legal
(05:26):
fast of this entire case, Mike, they have thus far
failed to actually say what the black letter theory of
the case is. Let me say that again. We are
about to reach a verdict in the first ever criminal
trial of a foreign president of the United States, and
the prosecution has literally not even told the American people
or the broader world.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
They've not told humanity what the.
Speaker 4 (05:47):
Actual legal theory is. We know that it is thirty
four counts of fraudulent bookkeeping in New York State, but
we are also told it's in furtherance of something else.
They haven't actually said what that something else is. You
and I have discussed elsewhere. We can surmise that it
is in further it's of a federal US campaign financial
law violation. First of all, dubious at best, whether Alvin
(06:09):
Bragg the Manhattan DA can even bring a federal prosecution
of this nature, especially when the US Attorney's Office, the
federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York looked
into this and then passed on that. Second of all,
most important is that, even if you assume that that
is the actual law here, you need an unambiguous, exclusive
and sole finding of specific intent on the part of
(06:32):
Donald Trump and the Trump organization. In other words, they
have to show beyond a reasonable doubt, because that's a
threshold for all of this, that the one hundred and
thirty thousand dollars an alleged hush money payment made to
Michael Collen, which is not a crime at all in
and of itself. That's totally legal, no matter what you
might think of him morally totally legal. They have to
show that that was made for the sole, exclusive, and
unambiguous purpose of actually helping Donald Trump's twenty sixteen campaign.
(06:54):
Will wamber Shawan actually put that into the jury instructions?
Speaker 7 (06:58):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
That's kind of where my guess game ends up short
because I don't know what was in this guy's head.
But that is what I'm looking for at this point.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
Okay, jury instructions.
Speaker 1 (07:06):
What a fascinating thing that if you didn't go to
law school, I have been on a jury, don't really
know what it is.
Speaker 2 (07:11):
But what you said there, you said soul. So it happens.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
So that payment has to be made proven beyond a
reasonable doubt, which I'd love if you could to find
that again for us, but beyond a reasonable doubt that
it was done for the sole purpose of advancing this
other crime or helping his campaign, right, but it could
be done for also other purposes and that would negate that.
Speaker 7 (07:32):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (07:33):
So I mean, I mean that, since day one has
been one of the easiest ways for the Trump legal defense,
in my mind, to try to prove that he is
not guilty of these of these crimes. And you know,
the Trump legal the defense, and not actually call a
lot of witnesses. They only call two witnesses to stand there.
But we got into this a little bit in some
of their testimony. If you can introduce anything remotely resembling
(07:53):
mixed motives into these hush money payments to Michael Cohen
in twenty sixteen, again even conceding for the sake of art,
that these payments even happened, that's a factual dispute, even
can seeing that they happened here, If you can introduce
any mixed motives into why Donald Trump and the Trump
organization felt the need to make these payments, the prosecution's
case is over. It's done, though, So in other word,
(08:14):
you can show that maybe Donald Trump want to make
these payments to try to hide his son Baron Trump,
to try to prevent him from being bullied in middle school,
or something like that, if you can introduce any kind
of evidence that would demonstrate that, oh, I don't know,
a very reasonable thing, like maybe Donald Trump wants to
protect his marriage with Milanya. He didn't want Malania to
kind of hear all this salacious stuff from Karen McDougal
(08:36):
and Stormy Daniels. If they can introduce that, then the
prosecution's case fails. But it's also this beyond a reasonable
doubt threshold, which is a very very high criminal threshold.
And this notion that in a criminal case that you
have to really, really really show beyond a reasonable doubt
that the guy is guilty. That goes way way back
to the English common law. I'll whip out a good
quote for you, Slater. So there's a great English common
(08:58):
layer by the name of Sir William Blackstone. He was
alive in the eighteenth century. He was probably the single
most formidable codifier of the entire English common law, which
America inherited at the time of our founding. And in
his most famous work is seventeen seventy five Commentaries on
the Laws of England, blacks And famously said that it
is better it is better to let one hundred guilty
(09:18):
men walk scott free and to put one innocent person
behind bars. That is kind of the best way to
think about beyond a reasonable doubt. That notion right there
is codified into our law. So again, with that, having
said all that, I have to reasonably expect that if
there is any juror on this jury who has any
scruples in his or horror bones. If they're approaching this
(09:39):
with any degree of intellectual honesty, then there's going to
be a hung jury. It's New York City, so maybe
that won't be the case, but we'll see.
Speaker 1 (09:47):
So hungury, again is just one person, one holdout. So
it could be a Trump supporter, it could be just
a fair person. Remember there's a correct a brother some
lawyers on this jury as well, so they know that
Blackstone quote as well. So just one of those guys
to be like, guys, no, forget it, I'm not it
(10:07):
didn't meet that threshold.
Speaker 2 (10:08):
That's a hung jury.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
And then I guess what are the legal ramifications of that?
And then what are the political ramifications of a hung jury,
especially knowing that most people and even most people in
the media probably don't even know what that means.
Speaker 4 (10:20):
Yeah, so hung jury means of that to what you said,
which is you literally just need one, you need one jury.
So basically, for a criminal trial in America at this point,
all fifty states require a unanimous criminal jury for conviction.
Now that wasn't always the case.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
Back in the day.
Speaker 4 (10:35):
You could actually define beyond a reasonable doubt as being
three quarters eighty percent. But in his Supreme Court case
three or four years ago, the Supreme Court actually over
termed the last two holdouts, which were the states of
Louisiana and Oregon, of all states, and they actually now
have it constitutionally mandated that every all fifty states, even
in their state courts, have to have a unanimous jury
for criminal condictions. So that actually is what has to
(10:55):
happen here. And if you get one jury holdout, then
you actually have a hung jury. To your point as well,
which is the point that I've been making on America
on Trial for at least a month or two now,
since we learned the jurors identity or at least their
vocational backgrounds, I've been saying over and over again that yes,
I actually am costly optimistic about the fact that there
are two that there are two jurors who are lawyers
(11:16):
by training, like myself. Again, they're probably liberals. I mean,
this is a New York so they're probably liberals, but
at a bare minimum, at a bare minimum, like you
have two people who went to law school who understands
that the very first thing you need to do when
you're looking at a legal case is to at a
bare minimum, ask what is the law? Are we citing
constitutional provisions here? Are we citing criminal statutes? Civil statues?
(11:37):
Is it judge made common laws? International treaty? Is a
United Nations so called international law which aka is actually
fake law? But like, what is the actual source of law?
Speaker 6 (11:46):
Here?
Speaker 4 (11:47):
At a bare minimum, a juror who is a lawyer
should be asking these questions. Again, the prosecution has not
met even this bare bones, bare bones rudimentary threshold, which
is why I saw Tom Cotton earlier today say that
a judge and wamber Shawn's position, should not even let
this thing get to a jury. He should just dismiss
it or deliberately instructures to order a conviction. That's what
(12:07):
he should. Excuse me, an acquittal, that's what he should do.
He's not going to do so, though, so I guess
we're again we're just going to have to see.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Wow, So what we about a minute? When do you
expect there to be a decision made by the jury?
And then what do you think the political ramifications are
going to be of this, especially knowing that most people
don't like most people will hear hung jury and they'll
think that he was sentenced to hanging. So most people
have no idea what that will even mean. So what
do you see the political ramifications.
Speaker 4 (12:35):
Yeah, we're probably gonna find out this week. I would
be surprised if it goes till next week, although it's possible,
I mean, it's possible that the jury really just takes
a lot of time to deliberate here. But they've been
chewing on this for a lot for weeks now. They
haven't heard a ton of new information, to be honest
with you, over the past week or so ever, since
Michael Cohen got off the witness stand. But Michael cohen
testimony really should have been the final nail on the
coffin for the prosecution. They probably should have just wrapped
(12:57):
it up and gone straight to a jury vote at
that point, because you know, objectively speaking, there's no coming
back from that. The political ravocations of a hung jury
or acquittal, I think are fantastic for Donald Trump. He
will skyrocket up the polls there on the flip side
if they actually convict and they really do put him
in Riker's Island, God forbid for you know, a day
or two, or maybe even longer than that. I don't
(13:18):
think it's going to help democrats, Mike. I could even
see a situation like that where it might politically backfire
in their face as well.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
Yeah, I think Trump's in a win win right here.
Josh Hammer America on Trial. That's the podcast. You can download,
listen to it everywhere, and please do Josh, Craig Toddge your.
Speaker 2 (13:33):
Brother, you bet anytime, and.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Josh again filling and tomorrow for Jesse Kelly so more
great insight frohim tomorrow coming next, more on Biden family corruption.
More in the latest with the World Economic Forum the
head Klaus Schwab has stepped out.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
What does that mean for the World Economic Forum?
Speaker 1 (13:53):
And then the latest with dei wokeness slash communism infiltrating
our medical schools. It's all coming next here on I'm
Right with Jesse Kelly, Mike Slator Filling and Slater Radio
on Twitter and Instagram.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
More next by the word.
Speaker 7 (14:10):
I love coffee. I love it so much and you
know it does my heart. Well, it happened to me
this morning. I was filling up my little coffee bean
thing and I was out, Oh my gosh, am I
at a blackout coffee and I went and pulled open
the freezer and there's a big bag of Blackout Coffee
beans waiting for me.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
There was the best.
Speaker 7 (14:28):
Blackout Coffee is not only incredible coffee, they deliver it
to my front door, amazing prices, and most importantly to
me is they share my values. Blackout Coffee doesn't do
it quietly either. Go look at their freaking merchandise talking
about America and God and guns. How many corporations in
this country actually talk about that stuff anymore? Blackout Coffee does.
(14:53):
I love them? I always will. It's the only place
I get coffee from.
Speaker 8 (14:57):
Now, go to.
Speaker 7 (14:58):
Blackoutcoffee dot com slash jesse. What that does is it
gets you twenty percent off your first order Blackoutcoffee dot
com slash jesse.
Speaker 6 (15:09):
All right, what we are very proud of now it's
a young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina
and so on. So if we penetrate the.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Cappinets, penetrate, penetrate the cabin it's guys like so Central
Casting Bond Villain's unbelievable. He that guy is, well say,
he's no longer.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
He's still with us, but.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
He's no longer The head of the World Economic Forum
and let's not get too excited.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
He's still there at.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
The world, it's just not the head of it anymore.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
Always good to get an update on Klaus Schwab with
Seamus Bruner, the author of this book. Right here controller
Arcs and I don't know if you can see once
this fancy shmancy graphic goes away as it slides through here.
I don't know if you can see here all the
marks I.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
Have in the book, all the corners folded.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
I don't know if you can see that, Seamous Brunett here,
what's going on? Seamus Hawaii, Mike.
Speaker 8 (16:11):
Great to be back with you. Thank you so much
for showing the book. There, Klaus Schwab on the cover.
I guess I'll have to do another book with the
new head of World Economic Forum.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Yeah, who's just as evil. But we'll get to him
in a second. So one of your chapters. Of course,
we got the big guys, we got Soros, we got Zuckerberg, Gates, Besos,
and Klaus. What do we need about Klaus and what's
he doing now?
Speaker 5 (16:39):
Yeah?
Speaker 8 (16:39):
So Klaus Schwab has always been sort of the figurehead,
the frontman, the spokesperson.
Speaker 5 (16:46):
For the global elite.
Speaker 8 (16:47):
A lot of people you don't even know who they
are dictating the policies of your country, of our country
here in America. But Klaus Schwab is the front man,
and so he comes out of the shadows and announces
some create new thing, like let's say the Great Reset
during the pandemic. But he's really just announcing policies that
were cooked up in the shadows years beforehand. And so
(17:10):
in some ways with him stepping back, he's gonna still
be the chairman of the Board of Trustees, so he's
not really going anywhere.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
But it's really no change.
Speaker 8 (17:18):
I mean, the World Economic Forum is still going to
be drafting these policies, working with organizations like the World
Health Organization on pandemic treaties. A lot of the stuff
that comes out of the UN and things like the
Paris Climate Accords, those are all drafted and conceived at Davos.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
And so it's not a big change.
Speaker 8 (17:39):
But what the World Economic Forum says they're going to
be doing, that's really what should alarm us.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Actually kind of good for him for building an organization
that's bigger than him, that can live on beyond. Unfortunately,
it's an organization for bad for people. But he built
it from nothing and made it. So congratulations.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
What is next on the World Economic Forum agenda?
Speaker 8 (18:04):
Yeah, and I mean his family, by the way, will
still be heavily involved. He's got two kids, he's got
a nephew. They're all on the World Economic Forum payroll.
They're each is as crazy as their father. And so
the Schwabs are still in the mix. Olivier and Nicole
Schwab are the children, and they're they're on steering committees
and all that. And it's a huge payday for the
(18:25):
Schwab family. But what's next for the World Economic Forum?
So they are going to continue being the leading global
institution for public private partnerships, And that sounds sort of,
you know, benign, and you know what's going on with
what's a public private partnership anyway, And whenever you hear
that word, you need red flags sirens going off, because
(18:46):
what a public private partnership is is when the corporations
partner with the government. And so they get it's the
worst of both worlds for us, the best of both
worlds for them. For example, the government has all of
the powers that a government has monopoly on the coercive.
Speaker 5 (19:01):
Use of force.
Speaker 8 (19:03):
But the corporations have all the benefits that the government lack,
which is like total opaqueness in their movements. That corporations
are able to hide behind things like intellectual property or
proprietary work product so that we can't peer behind the curtain.
For example, you can foia the emails of the government,
you can't foya the emails of a corporation. And so
(19:24):
let me give you just a couple examples of public
private partnerships and action big tech censorship. The government isn't
allowed to infringe on your First Amendment rights, but the
tech platforms because they're a business, and the left always
comes at you like don't you support a business's right
to choose who they do business with? Therefore, Facebook is
allowed to censor you. All of the other big tech
(19:46):
platforms are allowed to censor you where, and the government
can't censor you. But what they can do is shoot
an email over to Facebook and say, hey, take these
accounts offline. So that's an example of a public private partnership.
Another example is the pandemic response. The government isn't always
able to completely lock you down and completely infringe on
all of your basic human rights. But all of the
(20:08):
businesses in partnership with the government said, well, unless you
get the vaccine, you're not allowed to come to our restaurant,
you're not allowed to work for our company. And all
the left suddenly fell in love with corporations after hating
them since forever and said, yeah, yeah, it's the business
is right to force you to take the job. And
so that's another example. So these public private partnerships, that's
(20:29):
what the World Economic Forum is going to be focusing on.
They said it, they admitted it, and that's what is
really alarming for the future.
Speaker 1 (20:38):
We made a statement there that's very fascinating and deserves
further detail. In our lifetime, there was a balance between
government and business to the point where as you said,
progressives hated business, but for the rest of us, that
create a nice ballance the progressives over here in government
and more conservative people in business. But something happened relatively recently,
perhaps you know better than me, surely you do, where
(21:01):
business now moved over to the left as well, and
now we have no balance us regular people will speak
to that.
Speaker 8 (21:09):
Yeah, you're exactly right. I mean, it's the woke offication.
I mean, here's another public private partnership. They have businesses
coming in and giving DEI trainings to students and to teachers,
and so ordinarily parents would have a right to check
out what's going on, what's in the curriculum, but now,
because it's a private business, you're not allowed to look
at their proprietary training materials. Same thing with software. They're
(21:32):
putting kids in front of laptops that are basically, you know,
taking them on a journey of like are you trans
or are you just gay? And the parents want to
see the software and what's under the hood, but the
laptops are in the schools and the companies are saying, no,
you can't look at the software because we're a private
company and this is our work product. And so when
did the corporations go woke? I mean, that's a great question.
(21:56):
It's kind of been happening for fifty sixty seventy years.
I mean, the World Economic Forum is the hub for
where the largest corporations in the world, the Fortune five
hundred in the US, they are all with I mean,
with maybe a few handful of exceptions, they are all
members of the World Economic Forum. And they find that
they've gone left, They've gone woke because they get the
(22:17):
awesome powers of the government. The Left is the government party,
and so this marriage between big business and big government
has really blossomed into full blown fascism, full blown tyranny.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
I mean, the moral of this story, unfortunately for today,
is that Klaus Schwab no longer the head the president
of World Economic Forum, but is still involved and World
Economic Forum is not going anywhere.
Speaker 2 (22:44):
Is that right?
Speaker 8 (22:46):
Yeah, that's right. And really what it is is he's
just the figurehead. So I mean, these big businesses and
people like Bill Gates and George Soros, they're not going
anywhere either. They're really driving the ship. I mean, he's
not the total brains behind the operation. I mean, you know,
a figurehead or a spokesperson. He kind of just comes out.
They chose a terrible spokesperson because, like you said, central
(23:07):
casting for Bond villain. But the new guy, Borga Brenda
who's running the day today is the former so called conservative.
Don't let the European version of the word conservative fool you.
He is the He's from Norway. He's a total lefty,
big donor to the Clinton Foundation. You know, he's on
the board of the various globalist organizations like the United
(23:30):
Nations or the Builder Burger conferences, and so this guy
is going to be no better than Klaus Schwab. But
you do see the mainstream media saying he's a conservative.
He's a conservative, so they're at least trying to give
a little lip service. But you can't fall for it.
Speaker 1 (23:46):
Yeah, but Trump in the World Economic Forum, We'll see
how they like that. Seamus, regretfully, you're following all this
for us.
Speaker 2 (23:51):
Everyone.
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Go buy the book Control of Garchs. You read about
all these guys trying to control your life. Appreciate your Seamus.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Thanks.
Speaker 1 (23:58):
Mike Shas mentioned DEI come in and asks me have
an incredible, horrific DEI story coming for your doctors. I'll
tell you about that next right here on I'm right
with Jesse Kelly in the first TV it'spread.
Speaker 7 (24:11):
The word sleep might be the most underrated thing in
the world.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
Because it changes everything.
Speaker 7 (24:21):
It changes your entire life, your entire day. Haven't you
gone through so many nights where you didn't get a
good night's sleep, toss and turn and back, hurt or
even worse. This is what always got me. If you
end up taking something to sleep, everything you take to sleep.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
Makes you feel like crap the next day. It's awful.
Speaker 7 (24:39):
You wake up in this fog, you never fully wake up.
It's terrible. And then I found dream Powder. What a name, right,
Beam is the name of the company. They're wonderful and
they came up with dream Powder. It's basically hot chocolate,
but it's got all this natural stuff at it, melowtonin
and whatnot. And I drink it every single night before
bed and I knocked out eight nine hours, just beautiful sleep.
(25:03):
But that's not the best part. The best part is
the next day when I wake up, I don't wake
up in a fog. I wake up feeling like a
million bucks. Go get some Shopbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Hey, welcome back to I'm right with Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 2 (25:23):
Of course I'm not Jesse Kelly. I'm my slater feeling
in for Jesse.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
Today I host Brad Part News Daily, which we simulcast
right here in the first TV every Weday morning from
seven to night.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
So join us bright and early tomorrow morning.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
One thing Jesse is honestly the best at is not
getting distracted by what the media is telling you to
focus on, but instead he's excellent, always looking at the
things that directly affect your life, the things that are
most important. And there are a few things, I would
argue that are more directly important than your doctor. If
you're on the medical operating table, that's supremely important. Have
(25:55):
you heard about what's going on in UCLA Medical School.
UCLA Med School used to be one of the best
med schools in the country. But this is what communists do.
They infiltrate and destroy. I've made the argument that that
woke people actually have a better sense of what's good,
beautiful and true than the average person because they need
(26:15):
to seek out what is good, beautiful and true in
order to destroy it. Regular people may not realize what
is good to beautiful and true and what's essential, and
they take these things for granted. But the woke they
see these things and they hate them, and they infiltrate them,
and they take them over, and they use them for
power for as long as they can, and they ultimately
destroy Themness is a disease. It should be something that
(26:37):
they treat, they teach how to treat and cure at
med school, not something that spreads in med school anyway.
U CLA Med school, they get thirteen thousand applications a year.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
Last year they accepted one hundred and seventy three students.
Speaker 1 (26:49):
That's a one point three percent acceptance, right, I share
that because they could accept the best, but they don't.
Back in twenty twenty one, there was a black applicant
who grades and test scores were far below the UCLA average.
But the dean of the emissions department when the committee
rejected that applicant because obviously, the dean said, did you
(27:10):
not know that African American women are dying at a
higher rate than everybody else. We need people like this
in this medical school. We need more black doctors, even
if it means accepting unqualified.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
Black doctors.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Affirmative action is illegal in California. It's one of the
few conservative things that still exist in California. Actually, there
was a vote in twenty twenty to allow affirmative action
and it got voted down fifty seven to forty two
by the people of California.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
It's illegal affirmative action, but they get.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
Around and they still do it at UCLA Med School.
And there's been some whistleblowers. There's a report by the Freebeacon,
the Washington free Beacon. Race based admissions have turned UCLA
into a failed medical school. That's from one of the
former members of the admission committee.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
Who said, we want racial diversity so.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
Badly we're willing to cut corners together. They talked with
eight professors at the med school other UCLA officials. How
bad does it have to be for these otherwise progressive
people at UCLA Med School to come forward and speak
out against what's happening at their school. How bad must
it be in some of the groups that this dean
of the medical school admissions department has admitted more than
(28:25):
fifty percent of students failed standardized tests on emergency medicine,
family medicine, internal medicine.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
Pediatrics more than fifty percent.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
One professor said that a student in the operating room
could not identify a major artery, and then a classic
woke victim mentality berated the professor for putting her on
the spot. In Sir Jesse Kelly joke about putting her
on the spot, another student said, excuse me. Another professor
said that students at the end of their clinical rotations
(28:56):
don't know basic lab tests and some cases are unable
to zent patients presenting a patient just means here's there's symptoms,
here's what it could be, Here's what a cure could
be like, that's what a doctor does, and here we
have these students unable to do it. One professor said,
the faculty of seeing a shocking decline and knowledge from
our medical students, and of course the double standard. Right,
(29:18):
all the normal criteria for getting into medical school, one
professor said, or one admissions officer said, only apply to
certain to people of certain races. For other people, those
criteria are disregarded. This dean of admissions, she also just
happens to be the vice chair for Equity, Diversity and
Inclusion of UCLA's anesthesiology department, and she routinely this is,
(29:44):
according to people on the emissions committee, gives black and
Hispanic applicants a pass for some par metrics, and Asians
and white people need a near perfect score to even
be considered.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
Check this out.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
One professor one committee members says the bar for underrepresented
minorities is quote as low as you could possibly imagine,
as low as you could imagine amazing. One professor says
she's lashed out at anyone who dare question the qualifications
(30:21):
of minority students is from five different sources. He said
that if you disagree with what her decisions, then you
are privileged and racist and you have to do diversity training.
There was a Native American applicant who they rejected, and
this dean shoot out the committee and made them sit
through a two hour lecture on Native American history delivered
by her own sister. Little re education happened. She said
(30:47):
that two people backed up this story that there was
a highly qualified white male who has knocked down several
spots because, as she said, quote, we have too many.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
Of his kind already his kind.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
She also told people who said, that's ridiculous that you're
not allowed to have an opinion because you're not BIPOC.
That's a black Indigenous person of color. One professor says
that UCLA still produces some good graduates, but a third
to a half of the medical school is incredibly unqualified.
(31:23):
Keep that in mind, not a third to half is
it's like, ah, like less than we would maybe like, no, no,
incredibly unqualified. Twenty four percent of students failed three or
more of what they call shelf exams. So you do
a clinical rotation and like pediatrics, and then you take
a shelf exam about that twenty four percent have failed
three or more. So I'll tell you what's gonna happen here.
(31:48):
First of all, this is that UCLA Med school. We
know surely it's other med schools across the country, certainly
across California. What they're gonna do is they're gonna lower
the standard, the standards of the test. But they did
this when I was in high school. It used to
be a sixty five to pass the exam, and then
it made it a fifty five, and oh gosh, golly,
whn't you know more people passed. We must be doing
better in school. So they're going to lower what it
takes to pass, and then eventually they're just going to
(32:10):
get rid of the tests altogether, just like they did
with air traffic controllers.
Speaker 2 (32:14):
They got rid of the air traffic controller.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
Test to find out who would be the best at
being an air traffic controller.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
And now we have planes.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
Running into each other on the runways and planes almost
landing on.
Speaker 2 (32:22):
Top of each other on the runay.
Speaker 1 (32:23):
They turned that test for air traffic controllers into a questionnaire.
What sports did you play in high school? What was
your worst subject in school, and I can. One professor
at UCLA said some students are accepted with GPA solo.
Speaker 2 (32:37):
They shouldn't even be applying.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
I'll end with this one, a reporter said, Or excuse me,
a faculty member said, I normally I wouldn't normally talk
to a reporter. But there's no way to stop this
without embarrassing the medical school. It needs to be stopped.
We're talking about our health and listen, it's all pretend
(33:03):
this dean if her child was in the operating room,
you think, and the best doctors coming should be like
who whoa, whoa, whoa. You're not Chicano. I need a
Hispanic doctor. I need a Chicano doctor. Two other stories
that also match this theme. We don't have time for
it today, though, But just do a search for La
Times Killer King Hospital in Compton, that's the first DEI
(33:26):
hospital a couple decades ago, and then search the name
Patrick Chavis cha v I s UC Davis. He's the
original DEI doctor hire back in nineteen seventy three. Maybe
we'll share tho another day of Jesse Dare take another vacation.
Here's the problem with this. I had a black man
calling on my radio show today and say, oh, Slater,
so you don't think black people can become doctors?
Speaker 2 (33:46):
Quiet?
Speaker 1 (33:50):
It is a shame the med schools are lowering standards
for people who looked at it look certain ways, because
now they have created unfortunately, and fortunately, it is now
rational to look at someone, to look at a doctor
of a certain skinned color and think.
Speaker 2 (34:10):
Where'd you go to school? Again? UCLA? And I shouldn't
be the one lamenting this. I mean I do.
Speaker 1 (34:16):
I shouldn't be the only one. It should be black activists.
There should be black activists who are demanding that UCLA
only choose the best applicants. And they should be the
black activists who are fighting k through twelve schools and
demanding that they do better so they can get more
qualified black applicants into the med schools. And they shouldn't
have to lower the standards. This shouldn't be just on me.
I want I just want the best. I don't care
(34:37):
about color. But if you're obsessed with race and you
want more black Dodgers, whatever, right, but they got to
meet the standard right now at UCLA, and sure the
other schools they don't. And I feel terrible for the
excellent black doctors because now they'll be judged.
Speaker 2 (34:51):
It's not qualified. It's not my fault, it's UCLA's.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
Now. Can we embarrass the schools enough to get them
to change their ways?
Speaker 2 (34:58):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (34:59):
Marxists have no shame, so you can't shame them. Their
goal is to destroy the good people at UCLA Med School.
They got to take power back now before it's too late.
Might be too late already. Well, let's learn a lesson.
If you see the Marxists taking over the places you love,
you see the communists taking over the things you love,
do not let the devil get a foothold. Coming to next,
(35:23):
John Carny is going to be here with the latest
with the economy, well economic update next right here on
I'm right with Jesse Kelly, Mike Slater, pill and Slater
Radio on Twitter and Instagram.
Speaker 2 (35:36):
You're not stuck in your time share.
Speaker 7 (35:38):
You believe you are stuck in your time share because
these time share companies are a bunch of big fat liars.
What they do is, I mean, look what they did
to you, They do to everybody. They get you in
with the fancy seminar looks good, and look at the
beach house and you like it, and I hope you
did enjoy it, right, They can be so much fun.
Speaker 2 (35:56):
I hope you had a wonderful time friends, family.
Speaker 7 (35:58):
But eventually, as they know, oh everyone's gonna move on.
Speaker 2 (36:01):
You're done with it.
Speaker 7 (36:02):
Maybe you can't even afford it anymore with the way
prices are with everything now, and so you let them know, Hey,
all right, I'm done.
Speaker 2 (36:07):
Y'all can have it back. And that's when they drop
it on.
Speaker 7 (36:10):
You have it back. Oh sorry, it's yours for life.
They don't let you out. Lone Star Transfer will get
you out. They will legally and permanently get you out
of that time share. Make one phone call, but not
to the timeshare company. Stop wasting your breath. Call Loan
Star Transfer. This family business will set you free. Eight
(36:32):
four four three one zero two six four six lone
Star Transfer.
Speaker 1 (36:42):
Hey, welcome back to I'm Right with Jesse Kelly. I
am Mike sliderfillin in for Jesse. I host Bride Partners
daily every weekday morning. And we saw we'll cast seven
to nine right here on the first TV. So we'll
see again Brian early tomorrow morning.
Speaker 2 (36:56):
Report.
Speaker 1 (36:57):
So we start off the show talking about what's happening
at the courthouse in New York, and they're in full
blow and panic mode. As we've been talking about, things
are so bad for the Biden campaign that Politico just
throughout an article with the headline.
Speaker 2 (37:10):
DEM's are in full blown freak.
Speaker 1 (37:12):
Out over Biden, and of course the main reason is inflation.
One Democratic strategist said, it's the letter I but not
capitalized and Israel but lowercase I as an inflation. The
great John Carney is here, Breitbart News Finance and economics editor,
and please sign up for the best business newsletter. It's
the Breitbart Business Digest newsletter. He must sign up for
(37:35):
that and get that business news. John.
Speaker 2 (37:36):
How are you, sir, I'm doing well.
Speaker 5 (37:39):
Thanks for the promotion of the digest. Everybody.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
It's free.
Speaker 5 (37:42):
There's no reason that anybody should not subscribe.
Speaker 1 (37:45):
No, it's truly the only economics analysis that I trust.
Here's my question for you, the main one. I like
talking to you mostly just about the economy for the
economy's sake, but let's talk about the economy for politic
politics and sake. Is there anything that can change in
the next five months and is there anything they're buying
can do in the next five months here to make
(38:07):
people forget how bad it is or think how good
it is.
Speaker 5 (38:12):
No, not really, He's going to try to pour about
a trillion dollars into the economy, money that was appropriated
and has not yet been spent. He is going to
try to push that into the economy as fast as
he can before the end of the year. But it's
not going to change people's impressions of the economy. Things
are pretty much set once you get to Memorial Day.
(38:32):
People's view of what's happening in the economy is locked down,
and what they know is that inflation has been very,
very high. Home prices are way out of reach. You
can't buy a home because the combination of really high
prices and really high mortgage rates, and people are very
upset about this. They are not going to suddenly get
(38:54):
over that, even if we got better inflation numbers between
now and the end of the year, which I don't
think will happen. Even if that were to happen, I
think it's too late to change people's impression that Biden
basically really mismanaged this economy.
Speaker 2 (39:10):
Is a cliche or true to say that it's it's
just it's the grocery store.
Speaker 1 (39:15):
Man, you go to the groc store, it's hundreds of dollars.
I mean, we have six, four kids, six of us,
but it's hundreds of dollars every.
Speaker 2 (39:21):
Time it goes insane. Is that the biggest hurt?
Speaker 1 (39:25):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (39:26):
Absolutely, that of the That is one of the most
salient prices in everybody's lives for a few reason. It's
one because you know, furniture prices go up, car prices
go up, but how often do you buy a couch?
You buy groceries every week. The other thing is they're
very transparent when you go to the grocery store. The
prices are all over the place. You see them, and
(39:46):
so you notice, oh, that's a lot different than it
used to be just a couple of years ago. The
other thing is that grocery prices went up a lot.
It wasn't just like they went up ten percent over
the last couple of years. They're over around twenty one percent.
That's a huge increase. That's the kind of increase you'd
expect to see over ten years, not just three years.
(40:08):
So people are reeling from that kind of inflation, and
it leaves them less money to spend up things like
family vacations, fun, summertime. Nope, it's all going into the
grocery store.
Speaker 1 (40:20):
So Biden's rebuttal to that is it's corporate greed. Shri
inflation and corporate greed. Is that going anywhere?
Speaker 2 (40:25):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (40:26):
So suddenly the theory here is that suddenly all these
companies they didn't used to be greedy under Donald Trump,
I guess, no greed at all, right under even under Obama,
no greed. George Bush, no greed. Byday gets elected president
and suddenly all at once they become greedy. That's a
crazy theory. And if it weren't true, you would mean
(40:46):
we should vote bite it out because he's doing something
that drove people crazy with greed. Of course, it's not true.
Prices are up because they pumped too much money into
the economy. If corporations could just raise prices whenever they
got greedy, we would have all already had maximum prices.
So By did. When he's lying to people, and I
think people sense that they know when he says, oh,
(41:08):
it's greed that caused this, that greed is his oldest humanity.
There's no explosion of greed that happened. It's not much
driving grocery prices. It's Biden's policies that drove inflation.
Speaker 2 (41:21):
That's really interesting too.
Speaker 1 (41:22):
The other thing he goes to all the time, we'll
say if he does it again, is like the junk fees.
California just passed that bill. They got rid of all
junk fees. That's what they branded them. I don't know
what people call them, like got resort fees at hotels
and California specifically, you can no longer put at the
bottom of the bill like a five percent surcharge for
minimum wage increases us.
Speaker 2 (41:42):
So you can't.
Speaker 1 (41:43):
You can't do that stuff anymore. And that's we hate
those things. And like when you go to Ticketmaster, like
Ticketmaster's crib and all the hypoot, but I mean, like
does that move the needle a all?
Speaker 5 (41:52):
No, it doesn't. And by the way, you're still paying
those They just now put them in the bill without
telling you that you have a resort fee there. The
room just costs board. It's not like that they said, oh,
never mind, we're not going to charge you that money. No,
they're still charging you. If they were charging you four
hundred dollars a night or some place there and fifty
(42:13):
dollars of that was a resort fee. Now they just
charge you fifty dollars in the entire fee, so they
it's actually just got rid of the transparency. Used to
be able to see some of this stuff, now you can't.
It doesn't make a difference. It's not going to lower
anybody's prices. What's really happening. And look, they switched it.
They started calling it junk fees because when they tested
(42:34):
resort fees that sounded like something just rich people had
to pay. And so they said, oh, let's not talk
about resort fees. Let's call it junk fees. Everybody's against them.
But again, it doesn't actually.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
Lower the cost for any of us.
Speaker 1 (42:47):
Oh I'm so glad you said that, because, as I
said junk fees out loud, I was like, wait a second,
that sounds like a to like that sounds like I'm
buying the party line or stffing. I don't really thought
about where that fee, where that word came from, which.
Speaker 5 (42:58):
Ells definitely did be called the junkies when you got
your bill, you weren't like they weren't like, oh yeah,
very great point.
Speaker 1 (43:07):
Go about one minute left, what's the latest with the
FED and what they're up to, what they can do
moving forward here with rates.
Speaker 5 (43:12):
Right, So the Fed is just not going to raise
rates this year at all. It looked like they may
have one or two raises. Most people on Wall Street
still think they might cut rates at least once, but
there will be no cuts this year. That's what Breitbart's
position is. You can read it in bright part Business Digests.
We'll explain to you exactly why the Fed may want
(43:33):
to cut rates, but they're just not going to have
the opportunity because inflation is going to stay too hot
through the end of the year.
Speaker 2 (43:40):
Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1 (43:41):
John Corney, Briepart News Finance and Economics editors the Breitbart
Business Digest news that are Where can people sign up
for that?
Speaker 5 (43:48):
John, Just go to Breitbart look at the news. There's
a little tag that says newsletters. Click on that sign up.
Speaker 2 (43:55):
It's free.
Speaker 5 (43:56):
We have a bunch of other newsletters you can subscribe
to those two. The bright purpose is it just comes
out every day and it gives you exactly what you
need to know, not just about what happened, but why
it happened and what's happening next.
Speaker 1 (44:09):
Yeah, that's it, John, great to dog your brother for jet.
Thank you well on a light note coming up next
right here, and I'm right with Jesse Kelly my Slator
filling and Slater Radio on Twitter and Instagram.
Speaker 2 (44:28):
Time to light in the mood.
Speaker 1 (44:30):
Even this, even this young lass is upset with inflation.
Speaker 7 (44:35):
Girls, what's just happened?
Speaker 1 (44:37):
So there's a nice.
Speaker 9 (44:38):
Cream brown there, silly just two ih screams with two
chewing gums in it. It's a bloody nine pounds for
two of the band chords for so yeah, now quid,
Now he's going to get nowhere? One like my streets,
I have a one pound a pig or two pounds
like he's going to get nowhere to.
Speaker 1 (44:57):
That annoying, No annoying, That's what I got.
Speaker 9 (44:59):
It is should know say you only just bloody card,
stop dating that cash.
Speaker 1 (45:06):
That's well, but yeah, daddy. I had to listen to
it ten times to figure out exactly what she was saying.
I think my favorite line.
Speaker 2 (45:18):
Is he's not gonna get anywhere with that.
Speaker 1 (45:21):
I also decided I'm gonna start using the adjective bloody
more often.
Speaker 2 (45:27):
Every time I go to the grocery store.
Speaker 1 (45:28):
Bloody, how much for bloody oatmeal? Bloody quicker, quicker, oat
meal cuikey, that's done.
Speaker 2 (45:35):
That's awesoe. I'll keep the British accent to Jesse's. Jesse,
have a good British accent.
Speaker 1 (45:41):
Bloody Josh Hammer, filling in tomorrow, filling it for Bloody Jesse. Kelly.
I'll see you tomorrow at seven am, right here on
the first TV for Pride Partners Daily. Bloody Hell
Popular Podcasts
1. Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
2. Stuff You Missed in History Class
Join Holly and Tracy as they bring you the greatest and strangest Stuff You Missed In History Class in this podcast by iHeartRadio.
3. Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.