Is Kamala Harris a Drinker?

Today on the Jimmy Barrett Show:

• Is Kamala Harris a drinker?
• Texas Children's Hospital whistle blower Vanessa Sivadge

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Well, what we need is more common sense.

Speaker 2 (00:07):
The.

Speaker 3 (00:10):
Breaking down the world's nonsense about how Americans common sense.

Speaker 4 (00:13):
Will see us through with the common sense of Houston.
I'm just pro common sense for Houston. From Houston. This
is the Jimmy Barrett Show, brought to you by viewind
dot Com.

Speaker 3 (00:29):
Now here's Jimmy Barrett.

Speaker 5 (00:31):
All right, we're start We're gonna start with this today,
and that is is Kamala Harris stupid or a drunk? Well,
nothing like, nothing like coming right on the gate there. Huh.
That's the question that some people are asking. There had
been been some questions about whether or not Kamala Harris
is a drinker, and whether or not she has been

(00:55):
drunk upon occasion, and if that is the origin of
her word salads, is that she's had a few too
many drinks, and there have been a few incidents where
she has it sounds a little bit like she's slurring
her words. So I thought, well, let's let's let's debate
that for just a second here, or I'll let somebody

(01:17):
else debate it here. I honestly don't know. I don't
know what Kamala Harris's drinking habits are. I don't know
if she drinks. I don't know if she uses any
other She is from California. Maybe there's something else here.
Maybe it's not alcohol, maybe it's related to something else.
I have no idea. Or maybe she just is not
a very adept speaker and repeats herself over and over

(01:40):
and over again, which is how you get the word salads.
But I did see making Kelly had the Ruthless Podcast
on her show, and we'll start with some examples of
why people might think that Kamala Harris maybe has a
few drinks, and then they'll speculate about what they think
the deal is, and then we can speculate amongst ourselves.
Here we we.

Speaker 6 (02:00):
Have to stay woke, like everybody needs to be woke.
And you can talk about if you're the wokeust.

Speaker 3 (02:08):
Or woker, but just say more woke than less woke.

Speaker 5 (02:12):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (02:13):
There is this wonderful word that has a great meaning,
and it's called hypothesis, which means that you have an
idea and then it is well accepted, it will be
tested as WiFi and.

Speaker 6 (02:29):
Even USB outlets next to every seat. I mean, come on,
imagine you can charge.

Speaker 3 (02:36):
Your phone on your way home from work. That's good stuff.

Speaker 6 (02:41):
I'm pointing to the direction of what I believe is
the capital. He's gonna speak in a minute.

Speaker 5 (02:48):
But there's a lot of love.

Speaker 3 (02:51):
Of this room for our president. Give us a hard
time sometimes.

Speaker 6 (02:55):
And she would say to us, I don't know what's.

Speaker 3 (02:57):
Wrong with you, young people.

Speaker 6 (02:58):
You think you just fell out a coconut tree. Say hey, Joe,
it's said to saying that we can't.

Speaker 3 (03:09):
Let's say yes we can.

Speaker 2 (03:13):
I can't say, you know, I'm not a doctor or
whatever I guess, or an officer on the side of
the road making to walk the line on this, or
a substance abuse counselor I just know when I have
like eight or nine bourbons, I think everything I'm saying
is really found smart and funny, and like if I
were being videoed, I'm probably the only person laughing.

Speaker 3 (03:33):
Yeah, And I bet it looks a lot like that.
I don't know, man. I'm also I'm also not a doctor.
But I think she's dumb. I really do. I think
that's the diagnosis is stupid.

Speaker 8 (03:47):
There's also sort of like a stoner mentality to her,
a little bit like the maybe a gummy that's good stuff,
Like that's like a high schooler with munchies at the
Taco Bell driving window at three in the Morningsten.

Speaker 5 (03:59):
Manager's like, there's a USB charger, you all are she's
a California stoner. Maybe that's what. I have no idea. Now,
there were a couple in there that did kind of
sound to me like when she was in both cases
introducing Joe Biden, where she did sound like she was

(04:20):
slurring her words a little bit. Where I could I
could see where somebody saying, hmmm, I think maybe she's
had a few too many cocktails. But I don't know.
I don't know there are I'm sure there are plenty
of people who can sound smarter than that when they've
had too many cocktails. I don't think. I mean, I
can see slurring your to me, slurring your words would

(04:41):
be a sign that maybe you've had a few too
many drinks, but just being repetitive or not making a
whole heck of a lot of sense, I don't think that.
I don't think the word salads are explained by that.
Maybe she's both, maybe she's not super bright. Maybe she
does like to drink. I have no idea, but I thought,
you know, obviously I'm not voting for the woman. But

(05:04):
is that a disqualifier in your mind to hire a
president of the United States. We just had a president
for four years who has dementia or something along those lines,
who is cognitively impaired, and somehow, you know, we got
through it, I mean doing get through it in a

(05:24):
good way. But you know, clearly having a few too
many cocktails is better than having dementia if you're going
to be president of the United States. And I thought, well,
you know, I'm kind of curious here now, now I've
asked this question about her, I'm kind of curious myself.
Do you think that we've had other drunks per se
as president of the United States? What were the drinking

(05:44):
habits of people like our founding fathers? I mean George Washington.
He drank as a soldier, he drank as a general,
he drank as a president. He's been He was known to,
you know, enjoy a bottle of Madeira, which was a
four to five wine. Many of the founding fathers drank that.
He might even have some rum or beer, but nobody ever,

(06:08):
I don't think there was ever a case where anybody
thought they was a drunk or an alcoholic. Yeah, President
John Adams, he was not. He was not a drinker.
Thomas Jefferson, he drank lighter wines from France and Italy,
but he again said he couldn't take you know, couldn't

(06:30):
drink the strong stuff. So I was like me, couldn't
drink the strong stuff. And it was never accused of
being a drunk. Now there were there were a couple
of presidents who were well known alcoholics. Franklin Pierce was
one of them. Uh, Franklin Pierce. In fact, I think
that the last thing that Franklin Pierce, he served one term,

(06:52):
The last thing that Franklin Pierce said was, you know,
in leaving the White House after after being defeated, he
basically said, well, there's nothing else to do but go
and get drunk. So he was a well known drinker.
Uless he's as Grant was a heavy drinker, heavy smoker too.

(07:13):
In fact, there were several times that he was supposedly
smoked like twenty cigars a day. I can't even imagine.
I mean, that's constantly having a lit cigar in your mouth.
It's no small wonder. He died from throat cancer given
the exposure he had to alcohol into smoking. So there
were a couple that had too much to drink, but
there are very very few. There are probably more tee totalers,

(07:36):
as it turns out, non drinkers in the White House
than there were drinkers. And that includes by the way,
Donald J. Trump, who does not drink, has never used drugs,
and yeah, he's pretty much a straight arrow when it
comes to that stuff. All right, quick little break, We
are back with more in just a moment. Jimmy Barrett

(07:56):
show here on a nine fifty KHRC. Yesterday the Democrat

(08:20):
National Convention, a lot of protesting going on outside, and
I was wondering myself today there's some irony here and
the protesters targeting Democrats because it's the Democrats who let
them out of jail. The Democrats are trying to keep
the protesters from interrupting their convention or acting up right

(08:43):
outside of the convention hall at the United Center in Chicago.
They are probably fairly concerned, and I realized that they're
fair amount of you that probably you know, are too
young to remember what happened in nineteen sixty eight. I
was just a kid myself, but in nineteen sixty eight,
massive protesting going on outside the Democrat National Convention, you know,

(09:05):
Vietnam War stuff and all that stuff, and it got violent.
There's a lot of violence going on, and it was
not a good look for the Democrats. And they don't
need or want something like that to happen, especially over
this because the protesting is going on is anti Israel,
pro Palestinian protesting, and you've got you've got people out

(09:25):
there burning the American flag, You've got people out there
who are channing, you know, f the USA, Death to America,
all that kind of stuff, and this is happening on
our soil, and they're targeting the Democrat Party, which is
ironic in several ways. Number One, the Democrats are the
only ones that have a pro progressive wing of the

(09:48):
party that supports the Palestinian movement that is anti Israel.
The Republicans doill have that. I mean, at least they
know where they stand. With the Republicans. The Republicans support Israel,
support the Jewish nation, which is why I again don't
understand why we have so many people of Jewish faith
who continue to vote Democrat even with all this stuff

(10:09):
going on, and the Democrats are just trying to thread
this really fine needle in the middle, which seems like
an impossible thing to do of you know, supporting both
sides of not coming across as being anti Israel but
also coming across as being pro Palestinian. And so they
talk about what they are desperately trying to bring an

(10:32):
end to the fighting going on between you know, Hamas
and Israel. But even if the fighting were to stop,
the protesting is not going to stop. The protesting won't
stop until they develop a position of being anti Israel.
They made you know, these protesters have made up their mind,
and and there's no doubt that they might be more

(10:54):
inclined to not be supportive of the protesters if not
for the fact that the election in Michigan could be
hanging in the balance because of the large Arab American population.
But I don't know that there's anything they can do.
You know, they've been targeted by these these protest groups
of not being progressive enough, of not of not being

(11:16):
supportive enough for the Palestinian movement, and so they're not
making anybody happy right now. They're not making making Jews happy,
and they're they're not making Muslims happy either. So you know,
again they're just trying to you know, trying to massage
things and keep things from getting worse. Charlie Hurt on

(11:36):
Fox talking about you know, this, this little dance they're
doing with the protesters. They are desperately they are desperately
afraid of this thing turning into sixty eight, aren't they?

Speaker 9 (11:47):
You better believe it, And they do love these walls.
And quite frankly, the way this whole convention is being
run right now, and in fact, the entire primary has
been run, I would argue that probably Democrats of power
brokers probably feel pretty confident that they have this fairly contained,
at least in terms of too much disruption inside the

(12:08):
building here.

Speaker 3 (12:09):
This is the way they like it.

Speaker 9 (12:11):
They you know, recognize what's going on outside the building.
But to Ben's point, and I think this is so important.
You know, you're always going to have crazy people with
crazy beliefs. For what's really shocking here is that is
that the highest leaders of the Democrat Party in this
building today are still courting these people and their votes.

Speaker 3 (12:35):
They still want their votes.

Speaker 9 (12:37):
And unfortunately, you know, the media, the political media, because
Kamala Harris refuses to answer any basic questions about her
policy positions. She's hiding from expressing any of them. She's
not being not answering any of the important questions about
this issue. And her hope is that if she just

(12:57):
hides from it long enough and they get through this
invention without some really ugly disruptions, then it will be
a victory for her.

Speaker 5 (13:05):
I don't know, can she hide from it. I'm not
saying that they won't try to hide from it, Clearly
they are, and can they can they hide from their
Jewish voters? So Mark pen you know what Mark pen is,
Mark pen He's a Polster number one, but he also
being was an advisor to the Clinton campaign. He's from
the Clinton democraph. He's a Clinton Democrat, which I would

(13:27):
consider to be a fairly moderate Democrat, certainly compared to
the Democrat Party that we see today. He thinks, what's
going right now, going on right now with the parties
with aers Biden, you know, the way they're they're they're
dealing with the protesters and the way they're dealing with
the Jewish voters. He thinks it's it's cowardly. Here's what

(13:47):
he had to say.

Speaker 10 (13:48):
I'm seeing alangerish and look, you know, Senator Fetterman isn't
even going to the convention because well, I mean, I
thought he'd actually give a powerful speech. And somebody like
Fretterman has incredible ratings in Pennsylvania, along with Governor Shapiro,
right the absolute key to the race.

Speaker 3 (14:08):
And you see that.

Speaker 10 (14:09):
Some of the most popular democratic figures in fact, you know,
in fact, are quite clear about their support for the
survival of Israel. Now one could steal the point say something, right, still,
somebody could still say something about the protesters. But to
not mention Israel at all, that really is cowardly. Look,
I think the whole point in the convention is to

(14:30):
pitch to the future and to in many ways suggest
that there wasn't a Biden Harris administration.

Speaker 3 (14:38):
But this is an entirely new election. So they gave
him a speech.

Speaker 10 (14:42):
They gave it, they moved it as far away as
possible from the last night of the convention, and they
put it as late as possible to minimize the audience.
And he gave probably the same speech he was going
to give if he was the nominee, raising she's about
democracy and you know, attacking Trump, and that's probably the

(15:05):
positioning he that really he took during the campaign, and
so they made the past.

Speaker 3 (15:10):
You know, Monday night, and they're going to plan to
move to the future.

Speaker 10 (15:14):
That's the idea.

Speaker 5 (15:15):
Well, yeah, but you've got a lot of baggage for
the past that you got to carry along with you, right,
Because Kamala Harris was a part of the administration. She's
a part of the inflation problem. She's a big part
of the inflation problem. She's a part of the crime problem.
She's a part of the border problem. She was a
borders art. For goodness sakes, here's a story today that

(15:35):
over thirty thousand, little over thirty two thousand, actually children,
unaccompanied minors are missing. ICE has no idea where they are.
Over thirty thousand, how many those kids are being trafficked?
I mean, it's that's that's an amazing thing, amazingly bad thing.

(15:55):
All right, let's talk a little bit here for a
second about out What else was it I wanted to
throw into this mix? Oh, oh, one of the one
of the one of the more interesting interviews I heard.
And I've watched very little of what's going on. I've
watched some of the Fox coverage about not really you know,
when they go long form coverage. I don't really pay
that much attention, but I thought this was worth sharing

(16:18):
with it. Laura Ingram on her show last night had
a Minnesota representative Democrat on her show. He's a moderate Democrat,
he's an old more of an old school Democrat. And
they're talking about, you know, this whole thing that Democrats
try to say that Trump is a threat to democracy.
They had quite a conversation. Take a listen to me.

Speaker 1 (16:37):
I think that democracy will end if Joe Biden's successor,
Tamala Harris does not win.

Speaker 3 (16:44):
I do not believe democracy.

Speaker 8 (16:46):
Lan.

Speaker 11 (16:46):
Do I have grave concerns about Donald Trump's character? Yes?

Speaker 3 (16:49):
I do. I'm not gonna lie about that. Do I do?

Speaker 11 (16:51):
I have that same great concern about my Republican colleagues.

Speaker 3 (16:53):
I don't. But here's where my biggest concern is.

Speaker 11 (16:56):
It is a unique disease I think across the board
in American politics, where we have too many people willing
to be silent, too many people focus on self preservation
instead of principle, and too many people willing to be
quiet and walk the company line simply to ascend that ladder.

Speaker 3 (17:12):
And they did it.

Speaker 11 (17:12):
Look at my side, did it and frankly, Laura, most
of my Republican colleagues excoriated Donald Trump privately in the
halls of Congress.

Speaker 1 (17:19):
Who only did from did Donald Trump? Where was the
effort to silence his opponents? Where was the uppercross publican opponents?

Speaker 11 (17:28):
He didn't make any I'm not I'm not throwing stones
at that.

Speaker 3 (17:30):
I'm just I'm just.

Speaker 11 (17:31):
All I'm saying is that, No, I don't think democracy
is in peril. I think Donald Trump lacks character. That
is true, and I think again.

Speaker 1 (17:37):
Never we've never had presidents before, including are some of
the best presidents who had any character issues?

Speaker 11 (17:43):
Combresman, Look, I think it's fair to say that, well,
every hum has character, every human being has character issues.
But Laura, what I want you know, Look, I know
most people watching right now probably a door President Trump.

Speaker 3 (17:53):
I spent time with him in the White House.

Speaker 11 (17:55):
I saw both sides, the side, but the side that
so many find distasteful and also the side that so
many friends.

Speaker 1 (18:01):
It says gen z Ers are dumb? Is that good character?
When she said they're stupid? When all the newspaper articles
came out said her staff hated her and they all
quit because she was a nightmare to work for. I mean,
is that all roses and sunshine for Comma?

Speaker 3 (18:14):
Of course I don't think so.

Speaker 11 (18:15):
There is no roses in sunshine and American politics, and
here it is.

Speaker 3 (18:18):
Well, let me just.

Speaker 11 (18:19):
Say though that, you know, I would say, we have
an entertainment industry that would have us believe we are
so utterly divided that it's irretrievable, and that is not true.
And I will tell you said it before I went
to a MAGA. I went to a Donald Trump rally
when I was campaigning in New Hampshire back in the
winter of twenty three, and I was met with handshakes
and friendship and hospitality and decent statutes.

Speaker 3 (18:40):
You should be a Republican. I should be a Republican.

Speaker 1 (18:42):
Yeah, that's why, Caroline, You're basically a Republican. I'm recruiting
a lot of people tonight.

Speaker 7 (18:52):
Man.

Speaker 5 (18:52):
She had him on his heels. That was awesome. All right,
quick little break back with mort moment. We're going to
visit with the whistleblower that outed Texas Children's Hospital for
their gender modification surgeries that they were doing. She got
fired this last week. We'll talk to her about that
and more coming up. Next here on a nine fifty

(19:13):
k PRC. Texas Children's Hospital has been in the news

(19:35):
a lot lately. This young mama we're gonna talk to
you right now, helped put that story in the news.

Speaker 3 (19:41):
But she's a whistleblower.

Speaker 5 (19:42):
She outed Texas Children's Hospital for what they were doing
as far as gender modification surgeries. And ironically enough, here
we are what was about a week week and a
half ago, I guess where we found out that there's
massive layoffs going on at Texas Children's Hospital. You kind
of wonder, don't you if the tour related joining us
is a whistleblower who, by the way, got fired in

(20:03):
the last week. Vanessa Savage, Vanessa, welcome to the show.
Thank you for being the source of information that got
this whole story going. Let me first ask you before
we get into the story of why you made the
decision you did about what they were doing at Texas
Children's Hospital. Do you think there's any relationship between your

(20:23):
activities a whistleblower and reporting this story and the massive
layoffs we're seeing now at Texas Children's Hospital.

Speaker 12 (20:32):
You know, that's a great question. As you said several
months ago in the news, we all learned that Texas
Children had lost the Medicaid contract. And I am very
suspicious in wondering, just like you, if any of what
I have brought to light has anything to do with that.

Speaker 5 (20:51):
I guess we may never know, or we may eventually
find out. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
So take me back, how I know you just got fired.
Let's start with that. What was the official notification that
you got? Why did they tell you you were being
let go?

Speaker 4 (21:07):
Yes?

Speaker 12 (21:08):
On August sixteenth, which is just a couple of days ago.
Last week I got a call that Texas Children's Hospital
had fired me. And I believe that this is a
vungul termination in retaliation against me for blowing the whistle,
and it is unlawful for two reasons. It is retaliation
for my coming forward with information on the hospitals degregious

(21:31):
pattern of deception and medicaid fraud, and for the listeners
listening who don't aren't aware of the story. In June
of this year, I came forward with journalist Christopher Russo
to expose that Texas Children's Hospital using taxpayer dollars to
cover procedures related to cross six hormones transgender procedures and

(21:55):
using Medicaid CHIP or set federal and state insurance to
cover those things. And this is illegal under the Texas
Medicaid policy. And I blew the whistle on that, in
addition to transgender providers intentionally misdiagnosing children to justify puberty blockers.

(22:15):
And so I came forward to expose that. And I
also submitted a religious request, religious accommodation request to leave
the endochronology clinic and go back to a different clinic
that would essentially where I could practice and work as
a nurse without it violating my religious beliefs as it

(22:38):
relates to children, men and women being biologically different and
having nothing to do with the care of children who
are receiving cross sex hormones or adults now. And so
the hospital didn't denied that request. They ignored my request,
and they essentially discriminated against my religious beliefs.

Speaker 5 (23:05):
How many years were you in nurse at Texas Children's
How long were you employed there?

Speaker 12 (23:10):
Six years?

Speaker 3 (23:11):
Okay?

Speaker 5 (23:12):
And how long and how long did it take you
in your six years there to discover exactly what was
going on? How were you exposed to the problem to
begin with?

Speaker 12 (23:21):
I accepted a role in a pediatric multi specialty clinic
in twenty twenty one, and I was working with doctor
Richard Roberts, who was an endocrinologist providing gender affirming care
for children confused about their sex, and he was providing
and prescribing cross sex hormones to these children. I had

(23:46):
many interactions with this patient population, with these parents. I
saw how he affirmed the false identities that these children,
that these children claimed, and that variety of associated diagnoses
like depression, anxiety, many of these children were autistic. Many

(24:07):
of them had, you know, histories of abuse in their
past was ignored because these doctors would convince and manipulate
parents into initiating this, you know, initiating children down the
path of cross ex hormones and ultimately what I believe

(24:29):
is irreversible harm and lifelong regret.

Speaker 5 (24:31):
In your mind, was this done because of an ideal
ideology situation or was this done because there was a
lot of money to be made from it.

Speaker 12 (24:42):
I think it's both. I think that this industry is highly,
highly lucrative. There's a lot of money to be made
with gender room and care. And I also think that
you know, the administration and providers in the endocrinology department.
Physically gender providers have pledged their allegiance to the transgender

(25:03):
flag and that is the priority.

Speaker 5 (25:07):
So this is this is I think. I think people
were shocked when the when the story came out, they
did a very good job of keeping this quiet. I
think that there must be a basic understanding that generally speaking,
Texas is a conservative state. Clearly they understand that because
of the laws that we had passed here. But yes,

(25:29):
but but but clearly they also do not agree with
the laws that are passed. Were trying to find ways
to ignore it.

Speaker 4 (25:36):
Yes.

Speaker 12 (25:36):
Absolutely. In fact, in May of last year, I was
the anonymous whistleblower who came forward affirming the existence of
this secret transgender program. That the hospital had made multiple
statements essentially denying its existence and stating to the public,
to parents and dilawmakers that it didn't did not exist.

(25:58):
And it was the courage of the first whistle blower,
who we now know is doctor Aton him who came
forward to expose that that ended. That essentially led to
the Texas legislature passing SB fourteen, and in September of
last year, that bill was assigned into law. By our governor.
But Texas Children's Hospital has continued to provide a quote

(26:20):
unquote gender I firming care to adults because that is
not in violation of law. And it is my belief
that many of those adults are on Medicaid or similar
insurance and that there's also fraud happening there.

Speaker 5 (26:35):
So they're providing it for adults because it's legal for
them to do so, even though there are children's hospitals.
So clearly that would tell me it is about the money.
If you are all of a sudden training adults instead
of treating children, because that's the category you can treat
for this, you must be doing it for the insurance money.

Speaker 12 (26:50):
Right absolutely, And this is going to be a long
battle for me. I've retained the Burklau group to defend
me against what I believe it was a wrongful retaliation
and termination. But I am asking the public for their
support by donating to my Gifts and Go.

Speaker 3 (27:10):
Okay, how did they go about doing that?

Speaker 12 (27:13):
Yeah, they can go to Gifts and Go and it's
nurse Underscore whistleblower and I am so so grateful for
the support and the donations in order to defend me against.

Speaker 5 (27:24):
This So when did you cease to be anonymous as
it relates to Texas Childon's Hospital. Obviously, if you began
as an anonymous whistleblower, they don't know it's you. When
did they find out that's you?

Speaker 12 (27:37):
In June of this year, I came forward to expose
that Texas Children's is using Medicaid to cover these Cross
six womens and puberty blockers and this is against the law.
But before that, I received a visit last July from

(27:58):
too subtle age to FBI agents who had come to
my home and they thought that they could intimidate me
into silence and coerce me into helping their investigation targeting
doctor him, who we now know and he's public now,
but at the time I had no idea who he was,

(28:18):
and they knew what I believed, and so they came
to my home in order to coerce me into revealing
his identity. So I've already faced federal intimidation for what
I've done, and now the hospital has fired me for
my beliefs.

Speaker 3 (28:33):
Wow wow, wow. Any regrets of having done this.

Speaker 12 (28:39):
Absolutely not. At the end of the day, all I
want is for children not to be harmed. For children
not to be become slaves of the medical industrial complex
in starting down a path of irreversible harm in the
form of cross sex hormones. That is my goal. That

(29:00):
is why I'm doing what I'm doing.

Speaker 5 (29:02):
I'm assuming that you're probably looking for monetary compensation for
wrongful termination, but I'm guessing you probably don't have any
desire to go back to Texas Children's Hospital to work.

Speaker 12 (29:14):
You know, that's a great question. That's something I'm exploring
with my attorney. But regardless of you know, what's coming down,
you know the pipe, because I just it's hard to
know what to expect. I do have legal fees, and
I just would so appreciate any support.

Speaker 5 (29:32):
Well, and we appreciate what it is that you did,
because there's not a whole lot of people Vanessa's You're
only too well aware that would you know, put their
job on the line, put their livelihood on the line,
put their reputation on the line for something like this.
It's easier just to put your head down, ignore what's
going on around you, and trudge on.

Speaker 3 (29:51):
But you decided you were not willing to do that.

Speaker 12 (29:55):
Thank you so much.

Speaker 5 (29:56):
Yes, well, thanks for coming on the show. Appreciate it.
Great to hear your story. You'll be in our thoughts
and prayers. I hope everything turns out.

Speaker 3 (30:04):
Well for you. Thank you so much for having me
my pleasure.

Speaker 5 (30:08):
Vanessa Savitch, the whistleblower who out of Texas Children's Hospital
for what they were doing as far as Jennifer modification
treatments and surgery back with boredem off a Jimmy Bart show,
A nine fifty KPRC all right final secretly coming up today.

(30:40):
Thanks to Vanessa Sivitch for coming on the show. The Whistleblower.
That's yeah. Here's the thing. I give any whistleblower credit
for putting their neck on the line because so few
of us would ever do that. At the end of
the day, most of us are about self preservation. And
I don't mean to make that sound like that's a

(31:01):
selfish thing. I completely understand it. I'm sure I've been
guilty of that in the past myself, where you put
your and your family's needs first instead of doing what
you believe in your heart would be the right thing
to do. And this is a prime example of why.
I mean, she had a nursing career that's put on hold.

(31:23):
You've got to believe, you've got you know, she has
lost her job, she's been visited by the FBI because
she is not going along with the transgender agenda, and
you know, her life has been turned upside down. She's
got to hire an attorney, she's got to come up
with legal fees, you know, all the kinds of things

(31:43):
you got. She has to wonder if she's going to
be able to get her career back at some point
in time. You know, all those things that would worry
us about doing the same thing ourselves. So again, I
have nothing but admiration for people like her who are willing,
you know, to to to follow their convictions and try
to do what they believe is the right thing. All right,
here's a couple of story. Well, this one for sure.

(32:06):
I saw this today and it's kind of healthcare related. Actually,
two stories I saw today that may be are healthcare related.
This one for sure. Kamala Harris imposed this new COVID
nineteen vaccine mandate on campaign employees. First of all, By
all accounts, she is a very difficult person to work for.

(32:29):
Nobody likes working with Kamala Harris. She's kind of like
she kind of like Sheila Jackson Lee was May she
rest in peace or may she least the breast nobody
wants to work for. She's very notoriously difficult to work for.
You know, she tries to come across as this nice person.
Evidently she's not a very nice person, highly demanding. And

(32:52):
now the additional hurdle you have to jump through if
you're going to work on her campaign, anybody working on
her campaign, is you have to be up to date
on your COVID nineteen vaccines. Now, why is this. The
campaign is employing people all across the country. I assume

(33:13):
that means that anybody working for the campaign in any
capacity has to be vaccinated. Now for one thing, I
mean vaccine mandates. Aside, most all of us are against
vaccine mandates. If you want to take the vaccine, more
power to you up, don't ask me to join you.
I had the first shot, and I had the booster shot,

(33:35):
and then after that I said, the hell with this?
Do you know how many? Do you know how many shots?
By the way, there have been, how many COVID shots
there have been? Now ten we're up to ten, you know,
because the virus mutates and they quote unquote changed the shot,
just like they changed the flu shot every year, and

(33:55):
you have to get the shot if you're going to
follow the CDC mandate. You've been vaccinated ten times? How
many times? How many of the people have been vaccinated
ten times? Wouldn't you like to know how many of
them got COVID? How many of them actually got COVID,
and how many times they got COVID? You know how
many times I got COVID so far? Anyway, zero, not once.

(34:22):
The only reaction I had was to the second vaccine
that was I had, and I had. I felt like
crap for about twelve hours and then I was fine,
and I just I'm not a believer in this. I'm
also not a believer in the flu shot. But all
this tells me is how much money there is to
be made, Just like we were talking with a whistleblower

(34:45):
about why is Texas Trollton's Hospital involving itself and all
this gender care stuff and now treating adults for gender
gender issues in gender transitions because there's money to be made,
lots of money to be made by doing it. So
in Kamala Harris's case, if she's going to mandate to

(35:05):
her campaign employees that they have to have the COVID shot.
Is it too far fetched for me to think that
if she became president of the United States, she would
demand that we all follow whatever the latest CDC edict is,
which means, if the CDC is still recommending you get
a COVID vaccine, she's going to make it mandatory you
get a COVID vaccine. How would that even begin to

(35:27):
work if she decided that that is something she wanted
to do. The other story is somewhat health related, I guess,
or in my mind could be health related. Is there's
a story going around that evidently Robert F. Kennedy Junior
is shopping his endorsement around now. He shopped his endorsement

(35:50):
to the Democrats in return for he wanted some sort
of a position within the new government and they turned
it down. Now he supposedly is court the Trump campaign
for the same kind of deal where they give him
some sort of some sort of a job with the
with the with the UH, the Trump White House should
he win, should Trump win, and in returning he will

(36:14):
give his endorsement. Now I don't know what his endorsement
is worth. He's got about six percent support around the country.
And I don't know if it's more Trump supporters or
likely Trump voters that would vote for RFK or the
or or in the case of Kamle Harris. In other words,
I don't know who he hurts most, if anybody, by
being in the campaign right now, they claim he would

(36:35):
hurt Trump the most. I don't know if that's true
or not. But let's say, for the sake of argument,
they were to make some sort of a deal. What
would be a good job for Robert F. Kennedy Junior
in a Trump white House? And there's there's two things
that come to mind. One, he's very much the anti vaxxer,

(36:57):
very much against the COVID vaccine, especially anything that's mandatory
along those lines. So how about we make him head
of the CDC. We could probably we could probably stop
all these crazy eatings for things like monkey pocks, COVID,
any of these other things that they're trying to sell us.
As far as vaccinations go, I mean, I'm not completely

(37:19):
anti vaccine. I mean I understand that the vaccinations against
mumps and beaesels and that kind, those kinds of polio,
all those childhood's diseases. I understand that those things are
proven and they work. It's just that I think we're
being I've always been taken advantage of when it comes
to things like the flu in COVID nineteen, So I'd
like to see that. And I think maybe the other
thing would be, maybe we should make him the head

(37:41):
of the CIA. Maybe we could finally find out what
really happened with the Kennedy assassination, not just his father Robert,
but his but his uncle John F. Kennedy. Maybe we
could get to the bottom of that. Hey, listen, y'all,
have a great day. Thanks for listening. See tomorrow morning
bright and early five am on new Is Radio seven
forty k t r H with Serah. We're back here

(38:03):
at four on a M nine fifty k t r C.