The Rod and Greg Show: Reaction to Bret Baier/Kamala Harris Interview; More on Candidate Signature Verification Audit

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You know that was happening in real time. During the show,
we talked a little bit about it. I've seeing some
good headlines, some good clips coming up, So we talked
a lot about it, earn a little bit about it yesterday.
But I think that you've probably if you listened to
the commentary last night or during the day, you've probably
got a better feel. But I'd like to hear Rod's reflection.
He's you know, he was able to listen. We talked

(00:21):
about this morning. I think a little discussion about Kamala,
Harris and Kate and a campaign ladies and gentlemen that
I don't think he's going very well. I really don't.
I don't think it's going as planned. Just think about this.
In twenty twenty, they at least had polls that said
that Biden was enjoying a healthy and comfortable lead of

(00:41):
six points or more, too much to everyone's surprise, not ours,
but to at least the general public. How close that
race ended up being, and whether you you know how
those votes are countered or what we want to say
about the twenty twenty election, that thing was minimally you know,
razor thin. How in the world do you take what's happening.
And I'm going to go over some of the polls.

(01:02):
I'm gonna go over some of the things that we're
seeing happen in real time with this campaign. Go over
those numbers for you. I don't know how they flip
the narrative on this. In terms of the trajectory of
the Kamala Harris campaign. It is not it's not a
good story, and it's there's infighting. I love it that
these snowflakes, that's let the leftists, they just tell on

(01:23):
each other when they're mad. They just go to the
press and they squeal on each other and say that
you know, they're not being treated well. There was a
story about the Pennsylvania Kamala Harris campaign managers just not
including all the staffers of color and the most important
meetings and they're excluding all the important politicians in Pennsylvania.
Just drama, and I love it. I just want more

(01:43):
of it. So we're going to get into that. But
I think that the that the interview, whatever the intent
was by the campaign to have that interview with Breton Behar,
I don't know that it was.

Speaker 2 (01:56):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:56):
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think it went as
they had hoped, or if it did, I don't know
what their objective was, because I thought that he asked
the questions that we had all hoped she would be
willing to address an answer, or if she doesn't answer,
at least we know the question has been asked, and
then we can watch her run away from it or
or give a different answer. And I've got some clips
about that, but we'll we'll talk to Rod this hour
about that as well and just get his take, which

(02:18):
is always, Uh, I'm not gonna I don't want to.
I don't want to kiss up to him too much,
but it's usually pretty good. So, uh, well, we'll speak
with him also on the program. We're going to talk
to aj Rice. He Uh, he's you know, he's been.
I've seen him on Laura Ingram. He's he's been on
Fox News Channel. He used to be a producer for
Laura Ingram and her program.

Speaker 3 (02:38):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (02:39):
He has a very he has a very popular book.
It's actually a sequel to a The Woking Dead. It's
a satire of the left. That he wrote a new
book that he's written called The White Privilege Album, And uh,
we're going to get into that, but he he's been
pointing out accurately the uh, the low t Maybe that's
my turn, but the test the the the testosterone deficiency

(03:03):
of the vice presidential nominee and the Harris Walls ticket, Uh,
Timmy Walls. It just whether it's the way he's waving
to everybody or how he's running around the stage, it's
just if they're trying to get the man vote. I
think there's a challenge with this Governor Walls. It's just
I don't know if it's translating as they had had hoped.

(03:23):
But we're gonna talk. We're gonna speak to him, and
then because Rod isn't on this show, I have I
just got to get some things off my chest that
I wouldn't probably do if it's a co host format,
because I got a lot to say and I've got
to you just gotta get off my chest. And you're
the listeners. You're the smartest listening audience and all the land,
and I need someone to share it with. I got events,

(03:44):
So there's some So after that interview at five o'clock hour,
we're gonna do that, and then we're going to get
back to the topic that we spoke about yesterday, and
we've got a lot of listener participation calls coming in
about the audit that occurred, the leg about it on
the election offices verifying of signatures to qualify a candidate

(04:06):
for the ballot. You know, folks, it was just a
few that didn't actually you know, qualify, or that were
six certified that probably that weren't supposed to be.

Speaker 2 (04:14):
Just a few.

Speaker 1 (04:15):
So you know, don't be petty. Don't be counting the
losses twenty eight thousand a state wide race. If it's
less than twenty eight thousand, you know, they got it
mostly right.

Speaker 2 (04:23):
Do you what?

Speaker 4 (04:23):
Do you?

Speaker 1 (04:24):
What are you complaining about? The elections offices says they
feel vindicated by this audit oddly enough. But I want
to get all the calls in yesterday. I'd like to
get some calls in today. But there's some things that
I didn't wasn't able to point out or share with
you about that issue. And it's an ongoing story. And
the reason it's ongoing, I'm not beating a dead horse here.

(04:45):
The Desert News came out with an editorial today that
I just find astounding, and it basically I'm just going
to paraphrase it if you the listeners of this program
or anyone in America, because this isn't unique to Utah.
If you have issues with our elections process, with transparency
in our elections, with chain of custody of ballots and

(05:08):
procedures like our signatures and those things, if you have
those questions, if you ask those questions, if you dare
demand answers to those questions or concern or have those
concerns addressed. The Deseret News editorial board is labeling you
as a domestic vigilante. Now you're not a domestic terrorist
like the Biden administration. And then the DOJ wants to

(05:29):
call you. You're not a domestic terrorist, but you are,
in fact a domestic vigilante. And they go on to
defend Dedre Henderson greatly in this editorial. So what I
want to editorialize about the editorial and we'll get into
that in the five o'clock hour.

Speaker 5 (05:45):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (05:46):
And then we had a glitch yesterday. We had a
show's roll and we're going one hundred miles an hour.
Everything's going great. I'm all by myself here in this
NASA like board. And then we had a elect we
had a glitch where uh, I had a great interview
with Patrick O'Donnell and what's that See Rays just yeah,

(06:07):
E Ray, the the you know, the great producer, E Ray.

Speaker 2 (06:12):
We just had it. We just had a glitch.

Speaker 1 (06:13):
So what ends up happening is we had a two
part interview with the best selling author and a military historian,
renowned and acclaimed historian, Patrick O'Donnell. We were out unable
to play the first part of that interview, which was
incredibly important because it's it's history and we can apply
it during the time of Lincoln's reelection. We can apply

(06:34):
that history in that October election to what we're seeing today.
And then the history is the first part of that discussion.
The second part after the break is how we apply
it to what we're seeing today, and that was we
didn't launch successfully yesterday in that part of the show.
So I'm going to replay. We're going to replay that
that exchanged that interview because I think it's important and

(06:57):
we worked very hard to get Patrick o'donnald, a very
busy man's mostly on I mean I see him all
the time on Fox News and everything else. He's in
the high demand. We got him on here, and you
need to hear from. So we're going to play that
in the six o'clock hour. So what I'm basically saying,
folks is we got one heck of a show for
you coming up here, and you're going to want to
hang on. So look, I'm going to tell you quickly

(07:18):
right now, the state of the race. Okay, as we
see it right now, the poly markets. Let's go there first.
You know, this is where I like to look because
this is money where the mouth is. Okay, This isn't
what people say on a random phone call or an
email or some online poll. This is people separating themselves
with hardcold cash on who they think is going to win.

(07:40):
So I think it's a little bit it's kind of
like a truth like a way they call those truth
light detector tests. Right is the markets. Since I've been
looking at this every multiple times a day since September first,
I have never seen this this large of a gap
for either candidate. And I think I said that yesterday
and I think we've just past that. Uh, sixty point

(08:02):
two percent of the money being wagered, and as to
who will win this race, sixty point two percent of
the money is coming in for Donald Trump thirty nine
point nine percent of the wagers that are going on
right now are wagering that Kamala Harris is going to win.
Poll Market goes into the states and they because you can,
you can bet, if not the whole election, who will win,

(08:25):
who will win respective states. So let's talk about some
of these swing states, Polly Market. This is again albert
in Michigan, a state that I would have told you
two weeks ago, just chuck it up for Kamalas. She's
gonna win Michigan, She's gonna win miscon Wisconsin. We're we're
staring at Pennsylvania. That's where that's that's the one we
have to we gotta get. We got to get, you know,
Georgia and North Carolina. We gotta get Arizona. But the

(08:45):
one we're staring at Pennsylvania. But let's go to Michigan,
the one that I wrote off in my own head.
Fifty five percent of the money is coming in for Michigan.
In Michigan for Trump, forty four percent for Harris, Trump
up fifty percent of the money in Nevada. Nevada has
been going Harris's way for at least since the after

(09:06):
the debate for forty nine, which is you know, right there,
forty nine percent of the dollars in are being wagered
to win Nevada for Kamala Harris. Here's that Pennsylvania. I
was staring at fifty eight percent of the wagers right
now going to Trump to win Pennsylvania, forty one percent
for Harris. Wisconsin fifty four percent, which is the state

(09:30):
of these states we're talking about in the rest belt,
was the one that Trump most narrowly missed by, and
they were all by less than a percent. Fifty four
percent of the money coming in for Trump, forty five
percent of the money in for Harris. That doesn't leave
a single swing state that she's seen right now as
the favorite, at least from those that are parting with
their dollars. And then I have some, uh, and I'm

(09:51):
not going to go over it right now, but I
have some of the poles that have come in. Those
poles that are coming in are showing a shift Trump's way.
So the momentum is going in way, and even the
the model, the modeling and the polls are now showing
real clear politics, showing that he is capturing those they're
not you know, Gray anymore. They're going pink. They're going

(10:12):
Trump's way. So the race looks like with nineteen days
left that if you want to be the candidate with
the momentum, that would be Donald J.

Speaker 2 (10:20):
Trump.

Speaker 1 (10:21):
So he's in a good spot. We're not taking anything
for granted, but I want to give you that update
at the top of the show. When we come back,
we're going to talk about this the Kamala Harris Interview
with Brent behar And and I also have Rod ArKade,
my partner, my co host, join us on here on
the Rodd and Greg Show. You're listening to Talk Radio
one oh five nine canas We have Rod Maverick.

Speaker 2 (10:44):
Do you read are you? Can you hear me?

Speaker 6 (10:48):
I'm here, I'm here.

Speaker 1 (10:49):
Goose okay, yeah, here to Yes, Goose is missing, Maverick.
I tell you that you run this NASA like board.
I don't know how you do it. I would have
thought that, you know, in the eighteen hundreds they never
had a board like this. I don't know how you
run it so well, but it's a little bit difficult.

Speaker 2 (11:03):
I got to tell you, Yeah, it's easy. Well, look,
I get youthed to it.

Speaker 7 (11:07):
Get it.

Speaker 1 (11:08):
I stay out of a girl man's business. So our
listeners don't know why you just decided to boycott our show.
I don't know if you're canceling me, if you're part
of the cancel culture now, but we haven't seen you.
I know that this morning's conversation you said you're starting
to wear some pantyhose.

Speaker 2 (11:21):
I don't know what. If that's too much information, but.

Speaker 1 (11:24):
Maybe maybe some you can give some perspective as to
why you're not joining me, but then we can get
into this whole Kamala Harris interview.

Speaker 6 (11:32):
Well, I've I've had to I had to have a
little outpatient surgery on my left leg yesterday and right
now I've got to keep my leg propped up for
the next twenty for another twenty four hours to help
it out. Had some problems with the veins of my
leg that were leaking, so they had to seal those up.
And of course after you have they take the bandage off.
They had the bandage going from my toes all the

(11:53):
way up to my thigh. Took that off today and
now I have to wear lovely compression socks or compression
and I called.

Speaker 4 (12:00):
It thirty days.

Speaker 6 (12:01):
It's just they're kind of like panny. You just like
calling you like to rub.

Speaker 8 (12:06):
It in on that.

Speaker 1 (12:06):
That's right, and you know you could have we could
have got you something the proper leg up here. I mean,
why are you so soft? Are you from draper? Are
you draper soft?

Speaker 9 (12:13):
Is that what's going on here?

Speaker 2 (12:15):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (12:15):
Maybe I am.

Speaker 6 (12:16):
Well I've hung around with you, Lung.

Speaker 3 (12:17):
Maybe that's why I.

Speaker 1 (12:21):
Have to clarify. The kids are soft. The adults like
me and were not soft.

Speaker 4 (12:25):
It's the kid.

Speaker 3 (12:26):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (12:26):
So look, Rod, maybe you could share with our audience
because we didn't. We were without your commentary yesterday and
a lot was going on. You watched the interview Brent Bear,
it was it was actually maybe a real interview for
the first time. She's been getting fluff interviews that she's
had a hard time with. Brent Bear clearly came prepared.
What did you see in that interview? Uh, what were
your impressions?

Speaker 6 (12:47):
Well, my my first impression was, you know, if I'm
Donald Trump, after listening to that, you know you'd feel
awful because you were blamed for every ill the world
has ever experienced, from famine to pestilence to crime to
every She blamed him for everything, and that was her
go to response on almost every question, it's Donald Trump's fault.
He's crazy, he's nuts, you know, So that that stood

(13:11):
out to me. But I think what was missing from
that interview and she avoided this question. There are two
questions there, why do you want to be president of
the United States? And what will you do when you
become president? And her answers every time was well, I
don't you know, Donald Trump is a bad guy. That's
not the answer the American people are looking for. So
if she was trying to appeal with maybe a few

(13:33):
vulnerable Republicans out there who have issues about Donald Trump
and her wighing whether or not they vote for him,
I didn't think she succeeded last night because her answers
were rambling. She came in there combative, they you know,
but you have to look past all that and go
to those two key questions, why do you want to
be president of the United States, Kamala Harris? And if

(13:54):
you become president, what are you going to do? And
she can't answer that question because she doesn't know what
she's going to do, or maybe the people who were
the puppeteers who were controlling her know what they're going
to do, and she'll just do what she wants to do.

Speaker 4 (14:06):
So so that was.

Speaker 6 (14:07):
My impress I I thought Brett Bear was rushed. You know,
they were going to give him a half hour, then
it went to twenty five minutes, then it went to
twenty minutes. Then they were running late. So I mean
turning around an interview like that in the time he
needed to was amazing. So I think he had so much,
so many other things he wanted to get to and
because they squeezed the time. She's wonderful at filibuster answers,

(14:31):
so you know, he just didn't get time to get
there anything. But I think he raised some of the
good questions about immigration, about a little bit about her
flip flopping, you know, but every time she just kept
on going back to Donald Trump, Donald Trump, and we'd
like to know what she's going to do, because if
she wins, Donald Trump will be won't be there, then

(14:51):
what are you going to do? And she didn't answer that.

Speaker 2 (14:54):
I agree.

Speaker 1 (14:54):
I couldn't agree more I did, so I saw it
the same way, So I thought, so what would be
the point then? So she gets on the view, ask
her some very easy questions of which she had a
difficult time answering. And she was really by her own,
by their own measure, by the Democrats measure. She wasn't
specific enough in the questions asked by the view about
how are you different than Biden? Giving her a perfect
opportunity to separate herself from this current administration that nobody

(15:17):
can answer. They're better off four years ago than now
than they were four years ago. So she had to
know that this was not going to be necessarily a
great experience for her. Let me ask you this, Rod,
Was it her strategy? First off? Was it her strategy
just to have these sound bites that they can push
in social media where she's ripping on Trump on Fox

(15:37):
News to kind of raise her street cred with the left?
And if and if that is the case, do you
think whatever that strategy was, did she come out the
winner with whatever group that she was targeting, Because it's
kind of a hell Mary move for her to go
on Fox News. Is there some version of what she
did yesterday that you think is a win for her
in terms of this election?

Speaker 6 (15:57):
The only group, Yeah, the only group I think Greg
she won with last night was a group that already
support her. You know, the people are already there behind
her who hate Donald Trump and see her as the
savior of eliminating Donald Trump from the political scene in
this country. I mean, that's the only group she's going
to appeal to. She didn't say anything about what she's
going to do on the economy. You know, she philipbustered

(16:21):
the answers on immigration. I mean, as if she doesn't
know the number of people who've come into this country.
She knows, she just didn't want to admit it, you know,
So I think, yeah, I just think she she came
across again as a rambling as really you know, she talks.
There was no joy in that interview last night, and

(16:42):
she did not come across as a likable person. She
wanted to come in there and battle Brettbeer, who I
think did a really good job on all of this,
and her supporters got what they wanted. Now, if she's
appealing to other people, whatever group it is, I don't
know where. I don't know where she succeeded. I really don't.

Speaker 2 (17:01):
All Right, well, hey, it's good to hear your voice,
good to have you on the show.

Speaker 1 (17:05):
I'm just going to burn a candle here in the
studio for you.

Speaker 2 (17:10):
I don't know when you're coming back, but.

Speaker 10 (17:12):
I'll be back.

Speaker 6 (17:13):
I'll be back on Monday for sure. If not tomorrow,
we'll have to. We'll have to see how it all goes.

Speaker 2 (17:18):
All right. Well, I don't want to.

Speaker 1 (17:18):
I don't want the listeners boycotting or rising up against me.
So get back as soon as you can, sir.

Speaker 6 (17:25):
No, I think I kudos to Brett Behar. I don't
think we'll see another interview like this. I just saw today.
I think I edit on CNN, and I guess she's
going to sit down and do a town hall with
Anderson Cooper. You know how that's going to turn out.
But I don't think she'll do any more another combative
interview like this one. And it shows you've got to

(17:46):
do interviews like this to get good at it, because
this is the only really quote tough one she's had
so far, and she wasn't very good at it.

Speaker 2 (17:53):
Amen to that.

Speaker 1 (17:54):
Okay, Ron, thank you very much. Thanks thanks for joining us.
We'll talk to you. I'll probably harash tomorrow. If you're
not coming in, we'll call you again. We'll just get
more us keep the dream alive. Okay, all right, folks,
when we come back, I've got some clips from this
from this in exchange that I haven't heard other people
talking about that. I want to and some may have
that I want to drill down on when we get

(18:14):
back after this break, So you want to hang on
through that. You're listening to the Rotten Greg Show here
on Talk Radio one oh five nine Canorus, so we're
rolling right along. We were just talking with Maverick. I'm goose,
he might I am the wingman here on the Roden
Greg Show. He's home, but talking about the Kamala Harrison
interview yesterday with Brent Bear. And again I've heard the leftists,

(18:37):
you know, I read and I scan what the leftists say.
I intercept their communications with each other so that I
can inform you what the what they're saying about us
and about you know.

Speaker 2 (18:47):
The race.

Speaker 1 (18:49):
They're calling that interview and ambush. They're saying that Brent
Bear was a was a surrogate for Donald Trump, that
he was parroting Trump campaign talking points. It is just
I think I like it when they do that because
I think the irony is so rich. I think when
you see all the interviews she's done, or what they
call interviews, when you see the media and how they

(19:10):
treat her and then when they complain that she's had
a tough interviews, that's what a Tuesday a Thursday for Trump.
I mean, he's got how many interviews has this man
had right now? I just saw he's in the Bronx
in New York City at a barbershop today. Okay, there's
not a place in America that he won't go. He'll
go in the Belly of the Beast at CNN, He'll
go to the Belly of the Beast at ABC, He'll

(19:31):
go to the Belly of the Beast, and in the
Bronx in New York City. He'll go anywhere, talk to anyone.
And he'll go on Bloomberg and the CEO or whatever.
The editor in chief of Bloomberg magazine doesn't like him,
and he knew it. Went there any way to talk
about his economic plan, got tons of pushback, but the
audience liked what his message, with what Donald Trump's message was.

(19:52):
So the guy will go anywhere, do you know and
have this discussion with anyone. You can trast that with
Kamala Harris, who the Blueberg editor said to the crowd, Hey,
we made the same invitation to Vice President Kamala Harri.
She declined to come on stage and join us for
questions and answers. So and that's odd because if you
saw the interview yesterday, after all the leftists, you know,

(20:15):
complained that it was so unfair and it was an ambush,
and it was just, you know, he was just so biased.
These are questions that all of America has been dying
to hear her try to answer or avoid, but make
it official. You don't have an answer. I found one
of her answers to be curious. She Brent Bearr asked her,
if if you have a plan that is going to

(20:36):
you know, opportunity economy, I think she calls it, why
do polls show that they trust Donald Trump with the
economy more than they do you? And here's her answer,
which I find to be an interesting one.

Speaker 11 (20:51):
Why do you think more people say they trust him
on the economy than.

Speaker 2 (20:55):
They trust you.

Speaker 12 (20:56):
I think that when you look at an analysis of
our plans for what we would do as president of
the United States, it has been clear to those who
study and understand how economic policy works that moving forward,
because I do believe the American people are ready to
turn the page on the divisiveness and the type of

(21:17):
rhetoric that has come out of Donald Trump. People are
ready to chart a new way forward, and they want
a president who has a plan for the future and
a plan that is sound and will strengthen our country.
My plan for the economy does exactly that.

Speaker 1 (21:33):
Turn the page chart a new way forward. Do you
know you're the incumbent administration? Again, this is a very
strange thing, but what she essentially said there in that
forty seconds of an answer, there wasn't a lot she said.
But the one thing she did say is I don't
know why. Let me just translate. I don't know why.
The people don't think so. But the experts they know
that I have a better plan. The people, well, they're

(21:55):
just not smart enough or paying attention enough to appreciate
what the expert. And she just says, the experts know.
So her answer to you, the listeners, her answer is
you just don't. You're not smart enough. You're not you're
not calculated enough. You're not studious enough to know all
of her great plans and what they will do uh

(22:17):
for the economy and for you. And that's why you like,
that's why you trust Donald Trump more. That's a bad answer,
I would say that's not going to get you more votes.
I don't know if that's a campaign of edition there.
I think that that's a that's not the answer that
her people would have liked to have heard her say.
I can't believe that was the part of the script.
Let's go to another one. I love I like this
one because this is just an offhand comment that she makes.

(22:38):
It's very quick, but there's a lot packed into it,
and I want to share it with you. This goes
to her the Trump campaign's running that she's always supported
and does support, uh, transgender gender altering surgery for men
to become women that are in jail, that are in prison.
And this is a position she's had and that she

(22:59):
can and used to have, and so she he was
Brent bear Aster, do you still support this position of
trans gender surgery changing your gender men to women?

Speaker 7 (23:09):
Uh?

Speaker 2 (23:10):
Like the like the Trump ad suggests.

Speaker 1 (23:12):
This is her antswer this, this is a this is
a response to the clarification about Trump Trump's administration and
the same policy. I'd say that he never advocated for
that prison policy and no gender transition.

Speaker 12 (23:25):
Responsible for administration.

Speaker 2 (23:27):
Yeah, no surgeries happened in this president.

Speaker 1 (23:30):
So she was saying that, yeah, that's my I'll follow
the law, is how she answered it. She didn't say
she was fed against it. She's just going to follow
the existing law that allows for it and accommodates for it.
And she said, but it's interesting. It's interesting because Trump, uh,
when he was president, that was the same law, and
uh Bearis tries to say, yeah, but we didn't have
a single one.

Speaker 2 (23:50):
There wasn't.

Speaker 1 (23:51):
And she said, well, he has to take responsibility of
his administration. You don't say you heard her. He Trump
needs to take responsibility of his of his administration. Again,
he's not in office, and I don't see a ton
of that with her. Again, it's a disconnected I don't
even I can't even argue her position. I don't understand

(24:11):
it well enough. So anyway, I want you to hear that,
because taking responsibility for your administration is something she's lecturing
and calling for, but I haven't seen any evidence that
she's done the same. So we're gonna come back, we
come back after the break a little bit of more
of this, and then we'll go to calls. If you
have a comment question about this this Kama interview that

(24:33):
you'd like to share The number eight eight eight five
seven zero eight zero one zero eight eight eight five
seven zero eight zero one zero when we come back
after the break. This is Rod and Gregg Show on
Talk Radio one oh five to nine. Okay, an arrests,
talk about this Kamala Harris interview or whatever it was.
Let's go to Eric and Eagle Mount and Eric, thank
you for holding, Thank you for joining us on the
Rod and Gregg Show.

Speaker 2 (24:53):
What's say you about that interview?

Speaker 13 (24:56):
Well, I'll give her an A in politicians speech, meaning
the lady talked for twenty minutes and didn't answer a
single question and walked around everything but giving an answer.
So she's failed and everything politically as far as I'm concerned.
But she didn't make an a and being a perfect

(25:17):
politician and never answering a single question.

Speaker 1 (25:21):
Can you imagine anyone watching that and thinking, Wow, she
really gave him a hard time. She's a real leader.
Do you think anyone came away with a positive impression
of her?

Speaker 13 (25:30):
You know, if sad I have some crazy liberal friends
from California that I grew up with that think she's
the greatest thing since slice bread. I have a neighbor
right across the street from me that has a Hollis
or Harris Walls sign in his yard. And yeah, unfortunately
there are some people that are so blinded by their

(25:53):
hatred of Donald Trump, because that's one thing she did
do well. All she did was say Trump's bad Trump person.

Speaker 1 (26:00):
You know, Eric, thank you for calling, thank you for
your input. I agree with you. I couldn't agree with
you more. That's that's exactly what she did. I had
a clip that we don't have time to play of
jd Vance saying that there's just something wrong with her
when she's the current vice president and this current administration
and everything she refers to would suggest that Trump is
in charge and that these are Trump policies that we're

(26:22):
living under, or that whatever's wrong with this economy or
that people are frustrated with it is all. She lays
it all at his feet when he's not in office
at the moment, and she is very strange. It was
a very good point he'd put out right there. When
we come back, folks, AJ Rice, he's an author, he's
a he's a humorist, a commentator, talk about his new book,
The White Privilege Album When We come Back on Talk

(26:43):
Radio one five nine. Kay and arrests aj Rice. He
is an author, a humorist, he's a he's a PR specialist,
he's a conservative. He's written a book. It's actually a
I think a sequel to the book The Woking Dead.
This book, this new book, The White Privilege Album is out.
It's in stores. Mister Rice, thank you for joining us

(27:03):
on the Rod and Greg Show.

Speaker 3 (27:06):
Brother Greg, great to be here. Just a big shout
out out there. I mean, Rod is a legend, broadcasting legend,
so you got some big shoes to fill.

Speaker 4 (27:14):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (27:15):
Thanks, thanks, no pressure. I couldn't agree more.

Speaker 3 (27:18):
I've got my Karl Malone Jersey on just for this interview.

Speaker 1 (27:22):
Good Man, good Man. Yeah, I'm I'm I'm trying. I'm
trying to I'm trying to fill in. It's you know,
we're doing our best. But that's why I have you
on because you're gonna You're gonna bail me out right now.
So look, I've seen you on Laura Ingram Show. I
think you were her producer at one point in your life.
And uh, and you don't look like an old dude too.
So you've done a lot. And so here's my question
before we get to your book, because I love the title.

(27:43):
I think you get it. I want to talk about
what we're seeing in this selection because I think your
commentary will be will go miles, because I do think
you get it. We have instead of a divide and
conquer strategy that you will hear about in military history
or anything else, these democrats and count Kamala Harris I
swear they subscribe to like a divide and be conquered.

(28:05):
And whether it's you know, whether it's masks, whether it's
in vaccines, whether it's cancel culture, whether it's racism, you
know where you know, based judging someone on the content
of their character instead of the instead of the color
of their skin. They flip the script. It's really we're
going to judge people on the color of their skin.
Tell me about this, this this approach that they're taking.

(28:26):
It seems like it would be alienating people. That it's
not a campaign. Of addition, what do you see out
there in terms of the narratives. The narratives are insane
to me.

Speaker 3 (28:37):
What do they have put all their They have put
all their chips down on identity politics because sort of
in the old days when they could control one or
two TV channels and a few newspapers. It could work.
Right after the after nineteen sixty four, African Americans started
moving towards the Democrat Party writ large, and they've been
able to sort of play the game through the Nixon

(29:00):
and Reagan and Bush years up until now. But you
have generational change and you've got people getting their news
in different ways. So they are trying to divide us
into these you know, different M and M colors that
they're putting into you know, ice cube trays and telling
each of us not to talk to each other, not
to try to, you know, see eye to eye with

(29:22):
each other, and that each of us has a different
reason to be mad at whoever it is. I mean,
right now, it's Donald Trump, it's the Republican Party, it's
you know, the deplorables, it's the ultramaga, you know, you know,
you know, January sixth, whatever it is. That is all
they have the problem with that is, while they're doing that,

(29:44):
actual policies are destroying pretty much every type of American.
So you see her underwater with Muslims in Michigan, and
you see her underwater with Jewish voters in Pennsylvania, Latin
American voters in Arizona and Nevada, and then African Americans
in Georgia. So they're all sort of looking at her saying,

(30:06):
you're not a serious person. We look, most rational people
don't want most of this. They don't need they don't
need statues being torn down, they don't need Tim and
Jim in the women's locker room. And it has nothing
to do with Democrat and Republican. It has to do
with common sense, and it has to do with the
fact that they're willing to sort of cowtow to the

(30:28):
most radical, weird elements of MSNBC or you know, the
trans mafia as I call them, And I think most
Americans and this is the true insurrection, Okay, not the
one Liz Cheney was looking for. Most Americans. They they've
got real struggles and real problems, and they don't want
to be divided and they don't want to be condescended

(30:50):
to by Barack or Kamala or anyone else.

Speaker 2 (30:53):
So look, I love what you just said.

Speaker 9 (30:57):
This.

Speaker 1 (30:57):
The policies are destroying everyone. They keep trying to divide
it into different categories, but on the whole, everybody is
feeling the consequences of their horrific policies. Is it the
policies that people feel that that help them sniff this
out and say, you know, you're what you talk about
is not common sense. Is it the bad times that

(31:17):
are that are that are alienating them or is it
the is it the actual insane policy itself or is
it a combination.

Speaker 3 (31:24):
Well, the only thing that democrats are better at than
the equal distribute know, equal distribution of wealth is the
equal distribution of misery. Trickle down misery. Trickle down wokeism
is trickle down misery. So what do they want? They
want us all, you know, and I'm gonna apologize to
jd Vance for this, but they want us all alone, unmarried, childless,

(31:47):
sitting in our apartments, miserable. Maybe we get some cats imported.
We saved some cats from Ohio.

Speaker 2 (31:53):
We need to be there.

Speaker 3 (31:54):
We're we're listening to the tailor swift and we're mad.
We're mad. We're mad about toxic masculinity, and we're mad
about the patriarchy and we're mad about you know, white privilege.
And that's what they want because then we become their customers.
So that's what they're really good at. And and you know, look,
America has an uncanny ability to sniff out grifters. They do,

(32:18):
They've always done it. And you know, whenever the sort
of the body politic kind of starts to have an infection,
white blood cells come flying towards the infection and we're
slowly cured. So I think we're in the catharsis of
that right now.

Speaker 1 (32:34):
I love I love how you framed that. So I
find that humor that. I think that one of the
things they were trying to rob us from was humor.
I mean, nothing was funny anymore, and you weren't allowed
to be funny. I think some of the young comedians
were tracking that, and they're starting to get away from this,
this leftist and woke culture as well.

Speaker 2 (32:52):
But you have a book.

Speaker 1 (32:53):
Just let's talk about this book, this sequel, this the
White Privilege album, bringing racial harmony to very fine people
on both sides.

Speaker 2 (33:00):
So tell us about the book.

Speaker 3 (33:03):
Well started starting its little apology to the Beatles, not
to Yoko, but just look, yeah, exactly. She's wandering through
Manhattan right now, mumbling to herself. Yes, she's sleeping outside
the Met Gallery. So so look, I was I was
raised on on Limbaugh. I was raised on you know,

(33:27):
Hannity and different types of comedians. I was Laura's producer.
Andrew Breitbart was a mentor of mine. And the one
thing Rush used to say is that his job was
to use irreverent humor to illustrate truth. Right, use absurdity
to illustrate truth. He was a master of it, and
he understood that his job was, yes, to be a broadcaster, yes,

(33:47):
to be informative, but but it was an entertainment medium.
I mean, this is what we're doing right now on
the air. And when I do media training for my
own clients, I said, listen to me, it's not an interview,
it's a performance. It's a performance. You have to think
of it that way. You're not there to read a
white paper. So there's plenty of conservatives out there that
will write a book, and you know, they're very smart people.

(34:07):
They're academic types, or they're you know, preachy. I want
to try to sort of bring the youth back into
the fold. And I'm a millennial. I'm a geriatric millennial,
but I'm a millennial and I want to inform them
with some humor. Because in the old days, whether you
were a rock star or an entertainer, comedian, whatever you were,

(34:27):
your job was to check power. Your job and and
and there's nothing more devastating and checking power than humor. Right,
So so that's what I'm going to do. You know,
the definition of comedy is what tragedy plus time? Right,
So we're in the middle of the tragedy now, so
I'm wasting no time, Greg, I'm getting after right, so

(34:49):
you have to laugh and.

Speaker 2 (34:50):
With the anecdote ante right here.

Speaker 3 (34:53):
Right right, and it's and some of the stuff. And look,
I'm from Philadelphia, as I'm sure the audience.

Speaker 1 (34:58):
Philadelphia from Pittsburgh. That's okay, all right, I'm getting My.

Speaker 3 (35:05):
Point is I have a sort of way about me.
And and you know, we we tell it like it is.
You know, we invented America in Philadelphia. It's been all
downhill since then.

Speaker 1 (35:15):
Yeah, you're booing Santa Claus at the Eagles games, now,
you know, I don't I don't think you'll ever live that.

Speaker 3 (35:19):
Down you know, not only that we threw batteries at him,
So that's true.

Speaker 2 (35:24):
I forgot that part.

Speaker 3 (35:26):
But look, you look, if you're gonna take on the left,
and this is one of the reasons Gutfeld is cleaning
the Clock of the Jimmy's and the Stevens and Late
Night and the Babylon b is Is is doing well.
And you know, there are some famous comedians that are
willing to take on the woke. They've they're not exactly conservatives,
they're just free speech absolutists. The Bill Mahrge, the Ricky Gervaisis,

(35:48):
the Chappelle's. That's good for them to be out there,
But I guess I've got a wonder unless you can
get on with Gutfeld or someplace like that, maybe a
podcast here or there. And some are doing it, like
Shane Gillis on Roman. You know, if you're in the
club and you're trying to go into the club, I mean,
if you don't tell the right jokes, you may not
be able to get on stage. And that to me

(36:09):
when the comedians are scared. You know, true totalitarianism has arrived.
And and that's the problem is that, you know, a
comedy is supposed to be sort of the first version
of history, right yep, so's that's got to be our job.
You know, the historians could come later with the thirty
thousand foot view. We need to poke fun at these

(36:31):
people now and I think you know my books and
guys like Guttfeld and Tyrists and others. There's some other
guys out there like Jeff Dye and others. I mean,
I feel Vonne and so on. They're doing a good
job at this and they're not necessarily being idiological. They're
just sort of exposing, you know, some of this insanity

(36:51):
in our culture and having a good time doing it.

Speaker 1 (36:55):
Aj Rice, you're the author of the White Privilege album.
I'm telling you, foltionit to go out and get it.
I think there is so much irony out there. It's
in abundance. And I'm sure I haven't read it.

Speaker 2 (37:07):
I haven't.

Speaker 1 (37:07):
I have to come clean. I haven't read your book yet.
But I'm telling you I know what. I know where
it's going.

Speaker 5 (37:12):
Just on on.

Speaker 1 (37:13):
It's on this interview alone. I know what I'm I
know what I'm getting into. So hey, thanks so much
for joining us on the program. I'll have Rod will
be back so that you know, we'll raise the bar
next time you come back.

Speaker 3 (37:22):
Okay, excellent. Well look, you're a great pinch hitter. You're
no Aaron Judge, and you're doing you're doing. You're doing good. Brother.
I appreciate being on. You guys are patriots. You have
a whole team, Eric and the gang. They're fantastic. You know,
you could go get the book anywhere books are sold.
Let's get out there and vote November people.

Speaker 1 (37:41):
That's right. Amen to that, aj Rice, thank you for
joining us on the program.

Speaker 3 (37:45):
Thank you, sir.

Speaker 2 (37:46):
Okay, we're coming to a break.

Speaker 1 (37:48):
When we come back, I'm going to talk a little
bit about this is gonna be my rant, folks.

Speaker 2 (37:51):
I'm gonna get into this.

Speaker 1 (37:52):
I'm gonna get into the elections issues that we saw
and we touched on yesterday as well with the audit
your list. So hang on, hang on through the break
here on the Rotten Gregg Show. You're listening to Talk
Radio one oh five nine Cannis. It's just me where
I'm flying solo today. Look, we've been talking about I
really enjoyed that last interview, just the state of the
country and how things are going. And I got to

(38:14):
tell you, I can't be more proud of the United
States of America, the home of the Land of the Free,
home of the brave. I don't think what the Harris
campaign is selling anyone's buying, and I think it's starting
to get worse. The numbers look like that's happening. I
don't want to jinx it, and I don't want to
be I don't want to be too confident. But I
do think that that people are drawing the distinction between

(38:34):
these these policies that are destroying everyone. And I'm talking
on all fronts versus substantive leadership and what it means
and all that has happened before. But I gotta get
this off my chest. And if I don't do this
when Rod's not here, I'm just never going to get
this moment. So I'm taking this segment to share some
thoughts with you because I won't get this back. Rod

(38:56):
would put a big no on this, because I would
take the whole segment. You ever see one of those
movies or TV shows where it's like a crime show, right,
and there's some some murders happened, some something terrible has
happened in a room and they painted or they clean it,
and it looks just pristine, it looks fine, and then
they come in they turn the lights off and they
put a black light on, and then all of a sudden,

(39:17):
you see all these bloodstains all over the walls, folks.
I feel like COVID was that moment for me. I
felt like I lived in a pretty normal society. I
thought we were Americans. I figured that everyone kind of
got it, that you know, that self determination, you know, liberty,
the you know, equal opportunity. I knew that there was
people that they might be confused about it, but I

(39:39):
thought we lived in a pre stable society. COVID showed
me otherwise. COVID showed me that people will do exactly
as they're told, no matter what information might be contradicting
it or telling them what to do. They love snitch lines.
They don't mind if their phone starts to blare, if

(39:59):
they cross state lines or they leave their county. They
don't mind if the instantly the state of Utah wants
to know who you are, where you're going, what your
purpose is. You get You see that America keep the
casinos open and the and the churches closed. You saw,
you know, mask, the mask. You could see someone sitting

(40:20):
in a car all by themselves wearing a mask. And
I cannot tell you what that does to me when
I used when I saw that in the past, and
I don't see it as much now.

Speaker 2 (40:28):
But it is that.

Speaker 1 (40:30):
I can't it's a family friendly show. I can't even
tell you what thoughts go through my mind when I
see someone wearing a mask alone in a car. It's
it's just it's it's crazy to me. And there's more
of this crazy town than I was giving credit to
prior to COVID.

Speaker 2 (40:45):
But it didn't end, you know, with COVID.

Speaker 1 (40:47):
I mean, I'm telling you that that once they were
out and they were just running, running, saying, you know,
this whole freedom of speech thing. We even heard this
from Google. You know, this whole freedom of speech thing.
You know, it has its limits. Like it it might
not be what we want, you know, it could be dangerous.
They were saying this out loud. They just got wound
up and they kept going. So they're pushing pronouns. Do

(41:08):
you know how hard it is for me to use
the word today. I won't actually I won't do this.
But the word they as a pronoun for a singular
person unless they suffer from some multiple personality disorder. They
are not a they. It's a he, she, it's something.
But I cannot use the I'm fifty five. I cannot
use the word they in referring to the singular and

(41:29):
singular form in one person. So we got pronouns and
we got that pushed on us really hard. We had masks,
we had endless vaccines, doesn't matter how old you are,
doesn't matter what your comorbidities are. Everybody had to sign
up and they had to get these things. They were
just mandating it. And by the way, you needed an
id you had to have a doctor administrate, you had
to have your medical record that shows that you did

(41:52):
it legally to get into a grocery store. But these
are the same exact people that think that to have
the idea to vote, people are unable to do it.
I don't know how they were all getting their vaccines
and showing proof of vaccination, but now they can't vote
if they have to show an id A. It's a
selective logic at best. Cancel culture. We saw riots, we

(42:12):
saw people's properties getting destroyed. Now we have gender confusion.
You know you've seen the Matt Walsha a video or
a documentary. If you haven't, you've read about it. You
get one of these leftists what I'm talking about, and
the final woman. It's it's not an easy question anymore.
In twenty twenty four, That is a very difficult question
for people to answer.

Speaker 2 (42:32):
What is a woman?

Speaker 1 (42:34):
So we got you know, we did we're seeing all this,
you're seeing. We had a president that was we could
all see was losing it, that wasn't there, and they
hit it and they acted like he was Sharper's attack.
He asked him Joe Scarborough from you know, morning, Joe.
Republicans might not like this, but I've never seen Joe
Biden Sharper. He's never been more on his game. Two
weeks later, after the debate, Oh, this guy needs to go.

(42:58):
His credibility is completely lost in that moment, not yours,
not that we didn't see it, and that we should
have believed him then and we should believe him now
as he completely flips the script. We saw what we saw,
yet we were never allowed to be even amit or
it was a fake news that were as some AI
generated video that was showing that he was vacant and
not there until they decided that he was Trump's destroying democracy.

(43:22):
While we got a nominee here that's never received a
single vote anywhere. She was just inserted and she's she's
you know, protecting America against Trump, who's gonna kill you know,
that's gonna destroy our democracy, which by the way, is
a is a democratically elected republic.

Speaker 2 (43:40):
I just got to tell you this.

Speaker 1 (43:41):
I think that this the people that want Kamala Harris
to win this November are the most annoying voters and
people that we've ever had as a voting block in
American history. I think they work on the politics of subtraction.
I think they want to divide each other. I think
they want I mean they're giving us Elon Musk, Rfk Junior,

(44:03):
Tulcy Gabbard. These were Republicans at one point or Democrats
at one point. They don't want them. They're telling them
to get out of there. They're mocking him in real time.
Today I'll trade. I'll trade Mitt Romney and Liz Cheney
and Adam Kissinger for those three all day, every day.
I'm going to tight right now. Ronald Reagan was the
great communicator, and we love him and we remember him

(44:24):
because why he asked two simple questions in nineteen eighty
are you better off today than you were four years ago?
And he said, let's make America great again? Now, who
does that sound like? And what does that sound like.
You don't have to give up on your principles, your values.
The way Trump is not flipping around saying things to
different crowds. He is who he is, and he makes
his case, and he is finding common ground, and he

(44:44):
is a He is an effort and a movement of addition.
And you see that with this, with this with Donald Trump,
and you see it with today's Republican Party. Okay, I
got that off my chest. When we come back after
this break, I just had to get I had to
say it.

Speaker 2 (44:59):
When we come back after.

Speaker 1 (45:00):
Break, we're going to talk about the latest Deseret News
editorial board editorial that says that questioning our elections makes
you a domestic vigilante. We'll get into that when we
come back after the break. You're listening to Talk radio
one oh five nine. Cannais which poses a bigger threat
to election integrity in the United States is that the
domestic vigilantes. And by domestic vigilantes, they mean you, the listener.

(45:23):
And I'll tell you why. It's because you're asking questions,
you have concerns, and you're not just going away. You
want you want answers to these In terms of our
election integrity and does your vote count? That that amounts
to And they're getting this term, I believe from our
Lieutenant Governor Dedre Henderson in a speech that she had
about election integrity and how the eroding effect of concerns,

(45:46):
complaints or demanding answers to questions, what that's had on
our institutions and our process. It's hard to know what's worse.
Is it the domestic vigilantes or the sophisticated foreign influence campaigns?
But let me I just want to get into they
quote extensively in their editorial today the Lieutenant governor, and
we talked about her and her absolute belief and assertion

(46:10):
that our elections are fine, that they're safe there, there's
no problems whatsoever. And then you have an audit and
you find out, well, if it takes twenty eight thousand
votes or signatures to qualify for the ballot, they didn't
actually get to twenty eight thousand. It's a handful short.
It's like, and it's okay, really that's there. They're telling
you that that's it's like a Martha Rattitts moment where
she said, you know, it's only a handful of apartment

(46:32):
complexes that the the Venezuelan gangs have taken over. It's
just a handful. What's the big deal. I think that
down to two voters can change it a complete office
and an election outcome. I don't think that there's room for,
you know, a handful to be wrong and to have
votes that were said to be verified and in legal

(46:53):
and turn out that after the audit they were not.
And an audit that came out this week from legislative
auditors said that in the state wide signature gathering of
the Cox and Cox and ddre Henderson campaign, the John
Curtis campaign, and the Derek Brown campaign statewide campaigns, there
were vote there were signatures that were verified as legal

(47:15):
votes or signatures counted, and they were not. So they
were they were south of the twenty eight thousand needed.
Now all those campaigns will tell you, Look, they depend
on the work of the election's office. They told them
you actually can't have them certified anymore once they get
the twenty eight thousand, and so they're using their best,
you know, best faith in the process. I'll give every
one of these candidates a benefit of the doubt that

(47:36):
they weren't trying to do. There's no skullduggery necessarily, but
to not have a transparent process to make sure that
they were getting that exactly right, not just kind of
right or mostly right, that we're getting it right, that
our chain of custody is absolutely pure, and that we're
not losing votes. To know that that process is one
that we can have confidence in asking questions and wanting answers,

(47:59):
is not hostel to our institutions or our process. In fact,
I would tell you that, And look, I like your
comments on this, because I'm going to go back to
the phones on this. Eight eight eight five seven zero
eight zero one zero is the number to call. I
just want to give you an experience I've had about
the rule of law and elections. When I was the

(48:19):
majority Whip, we had a representive Craig Frank was a
House lawmaker. He ran for reelection. Prior to his reelection,
he had decided he'd like to build a home. He
went to the Utah County elections clerk and said, I'd
like a map of my district because our law in
the state of Utah is you have to live inside
your district to represent that legislative House district, and legislative

(48:40):
or Senate State Senate district as well. So it's a
pretty important detail that if you're going to move, you bet,
and you want to stay the representative, you better stay
inside your district. He received a map, looked at lots
to purchase and build a home, and did so, ran
for reelection and won an easy re election. Come to

(49:00):
find out though, that the map that he received was
off by a block. It was that lot and that
home was just outside of his legislative district. Now I
knew at the time, I was just I was thewhip.
This would have been in the mid two thousands or
maybe late two thousands, that we could go to we
could get into session. We had an issue in Draper
and Suncrest between the Utah County and Salt Lake County

(49:22):
line that was actually by just the county line was
going through homes and you had to change the boundary
to make that on the roads, and then to do
so you also changed the house boundaries. So I knew
that it's something you could do, and certainly the people
that voted for him did so in good faith, and
so why would you take him away, especially if the

(49:42):
Elections office map was incorrect? Well, I was told that
the laws of the law, it really doesn't matter who
was in error, doesn't matter if it was a simple mistake.
He has to live inside his district right now, and
he doesn't. And he was not allowed. He was actually gone.
He wasn't able to be sworn in. We didn't change it.
We didn't change the boundary. And what I learned is

(50:03):
the legislative whip is the law is the law, and
it doesn't really matter if someone thought they were doing
it right and didn't do it right, that's the consequence
because it's the rule of law. Well, you fast forward
to now and I read this audit and it's like, well,
you know they had extra they had extra signatures, they
had extra you know, they would have had it there.
And I'm not saying that they wouldn't, but I am
going to tell you that it just riles me that

(50:27):
if people have questions, and I have questions, why is
it that if you are a favored candidate or a
favorite issue, Well, then we can be flexible. We know
what the spirit of the law is. We know that
there could be some mistakes here or there. That's fine.
If you are a candidate or an issue that is
out of favor. Well, there's a letter of the law
that must be followed, and it lands on the shoulders

(50:49):
of our voters. You know that in that race. I've
mentioned this race before the election, the congressional primary, over
one hundred and seven thousand people voted. It was down
to one hundred and forty six votes. The law says
that if you have a ballot that you received in
the mail and it needs to be cured because the
signature's wrong or something's wrong with it, by law, they
have two days to notify the voter. You had someone

(51:11):
through the postal service, and that in southern Utah that
took eleven days to get to the voter and it
was too late to have a cured in count. You
had over two thousand ballots that were thrown out. People's
votes not count because it didn't follow what the letter
of the law. And then you get to this issue
and it's like, well, you didn't qualify for the ballot,
but we know you meant to, we know you could have,
but you know, it's it's just a little bit of

(51:32):
a gray area. These are issues that will not bolster
confidence in our elections and our processes if we cannot
ask those questions, and we cannot reasonably say we have
to improve these processes. We have to be and we
cannot be called domestic vigilantes for doing it. So we
got to look at the definitions of these things. I
got to go to a break, but if you'd like

(51:52):
to talk about this, I think we have time in
the next sect, the next segment to talk about it.
Eight eight eight five seven zero eight zero one zero
is the number to call if you'd like to comment
on our election integrity And do you yourself feel like
you are a domestic vigilante because you have questions or
concerns about our election process. Okay, to your calls when
we come back after this break. You're listening to the

(52:13):
Rod and Greg Show on Talk Radio one oh five
nine can Arres. July eleventh, twenty twenty four. Just this summer,
the headline in the in the Saint George newspaper was
Washington County clerk auditor urges voters to use ballot drop
boxes vote in person following postmark issues.

Speaker 2 (52:30):
Do you think can we.

Speaker 1 (52:30):
Ask about that? Can we see if that's going to
be resolved? I think we should. We got an audit
here that just on Tuesday or Wednesday said that verification
standards would benefit from further clarification and transparency, and it
gives recommendations. Are we vigilant, domestic vigilanes if we want
answers and resolve and resolve to these issues. We're gonna

(52:51):
get your calls when we come back after the break
here on talk radio one oh five nine k n RS.
So I'd like to hear from you. We have calors.
We're going to get to you right now. What say
you about this whole process? I find it very frustrating
and I do not accept the premise that we are
wrong in wanting this process to be that we can

(53:11):
ask questions, we can want answers, and we can have
greater confidence when we have greater transparency. So let's go
to the phones and see what say you. Let's go
to Aaron in smithfield erin thank you for holding, sir,
and thank you for calling the Rodd and Greg show
what say you, sir?

Speaker 4 (53:27):
Hi, citizen yours. We could probably go on for probably
an hour.

Speaker 2 (53:32):
Easy on this, yes, sir, but this is from altoon
a PA.

Speaker 4 (53:38):
This is absolutely of major public interest and I find
very little, if any at all on media so I
hope that you'll continue to drive this home because it
is of public interest. So I know that there were lawsuits. Well,
first of all, in the law, is there anywhere where
it says that there are exceptions to the twenty eight

(53:59):
thousands natures? If the clerk counts I'm wrong, and the
clerk actually works under the purview of one of the
candidates that runs the election process, there's really no exception
in that law.

Speaker 2 (54:13):
There is, and I know that they're good, and I know.

Speaker 4 (54:18):
That there has been grammar requests and people because this
really isn't a new issue. This has been going on
for quite some time, and there is supposedly an Attorney
general investigation on this, and then one side will deny
it and the other side says that there is. And
my second point is what is the remedy if the

(54:42):
can the court offer or enact and injunction like they
did on an Amendment A and Amendment C and say well,
we need to have the gubernatorial race later in the
year until these things are cleaned up. And another point,
why do you ever need twenty eight signatures in the
state of Pennsylvania with twelve and a half million people,

(55:05):
You only need two thousand signatures. Yeah, and then when
you get those signatures, they appear online immediately, and it's
up to the candidates to oppose those signatures.

Speaker 1 (55:15):
Aaron, I'm gonna you ask them questions. I'm going to
answer them because I want to get these other callers.
But you ask good questions, so I want to answer it.
So thank you for calling. But number one, what's the remedy? Well,
you got to bring these ballots in person, and you
got to get it rid of this. I think the
signature of verification is the tail wagging the dog. You
need to come with your ID. You can get it
mailed to you, but you come in with your ballot
and you show your ID and you just you do it.

(55:36):
And if you can't bring your family and you can't
do it twenty four to seven, too bad, come in
to a drop box with the person there that can
scan your ID, drop your ballot. The other question, what's
the remedy, I'm going to tell you, I don't think
that courts are in the business they I don't think
that the courts will do it. I think it's it's
a preference politically that they don't want to remove any
of these state wide incumbent candidates, so they won't the
reverse engineer from there, And why twenty eight thousand vote

(55:57):
or signatures. It was a legislative attempt to incentivized going
through the caucus convention cycle and not getting signatures because
it was supposed to be a very high heeled to climb.
Those are answers to Aaron. I think Aaron's incredibly important questions.
See how that works, folks. You can answer questions. You
can answer questions. You don't have to take it off,
you don't have to be offended by it, like the
Lieutenant governor is. Let's go to Howard in provo. Howard,

(56:19):
thank you for holding what say you, sir?

Speaker 14 (56:23):
Well better speaker? I love you when you were in
the house. Sorry you're not our governor, and that your
congressional campaign was run short. But you know, I think
Senator Bert Kurt Brambles FB fifty four signature gathering bill
has disenfranchised the entire state of Utah. And I think

(56:46):
with Lieutenant Governor Hendrickson and there is the Fox and
the Henhouse and the way they have went around and
put the Lineman family clan to convolute the phil Lyman
Governor raised, and now that they're short signatures, I think,

(57:07):
like everyone is saying, like the points you're making, sir,
that if they're gonna follow the real well they're short
on the signatures. I think Cox's gonna be off the
ballot now.

Speaker 3 (57:20):
I know that with a g.

Speaker 14 (57:22):
Derek Brown and John Curtis now probably for the third
or fourth time is used signatures to retain this congressional
seat and now run for Senate. And I just I
just think they're disenfranchising the delegates that take all their
time to go to the county and state conventions.

Speaker 2 (57:41):
Well said Howard, Thank you. I agree.

Speaker 1 (57:43):
I just fundamentally agree with what you're saying. I just
worry that what we'll see the legislature do potentially is
just go to a straight direct primary and just forget
the caucus convention cycle entirely. That is a worry that
I have. But let's keep going with the calls. I
love the observations and the questions. Let's go to David
and I fifteen. David, thank you for holding, thank you

(58:03):
for joining us. What say you about all this?

Speaker 2 (58:07):
Are you? Are you a domestic vigilante? David?

Speaker 11 (58:11):
Apparently I am, because I have a brain and I
asked questions. Amazing and I see things that don't add up. Yeah,
it's amazing the things that the labels you get when
you think, I mean, we can't question King Cox and
his tyranny over the elections. And you know he didn't
meet the requirements at the convention. He clearly didn't meet

(58:34):
the requirements to get on the ballot and have the primary.
And yet here we are. There's a word for those
who don't follow the law.

Speaker 4 (58:43):
Criminal.

Speaker 2 (58:44):
Look, thank you for the call.

Speaker 1 (58:47):
It is without question that the that the legal threshold
was not met. Now I can make the argument that
candidates will make. They do their They assume that these
election officers are looking at these signatures and they're not allowed.
They say, meant more than the twenty eight thousand, but
anything more than twenty eight thousand are certified are never counted.
They're going to say that's not their problem, that's the
elections problem, the elections office problem. That's fine, but memorialize

(59:12):
that in statute and then have some consistent policy statewide.
We have different election clerks interpreting a law different ways,
and we absolutely need clarification here, and we need this
to be taken seriously it was a remark that the
media doesn't jump on this. In fact, they're apologists for
the current system without any of these major changes that
we're talking about. Let's keep going. Let's talk to Jennifer

(59:34):
in Leyton. Jennifer, thank you for holding and what are
you thinking about this issue?

Speaker 15 (59:43):
Well, as a conspiracy theorist, it's like sixty three and
zero And as a member of the state Central Committee,
I was elected to be on the audit Committee of
the Republican Party and I are in our last state
Central Committee meaningly voted to allow the members of the
audit committee to to grammar request the signatures, and the

(01:00:08):
party has been denied the private and held. So we
as a party are being forced to allow the Republican
right next to the candidate. But we have to all
these candidates that have collected signatures, but we have no
way of verifying the legitimacy. So we have really shot

(01:00:28):
ourselves in the foot with this SB fifty four allowing
us to go forward.

Speaker 1 (01:00:32):
Thank you, Jennifer. I you know that that's a vicious
thing to do. We have a way that you can
hide your voter registration and your party affiliation from a
public record. Well, I guess that works until when you
file for office and you have to be a member
of the party of which you're looking to represent or
get gain the nomination from. There's no way the party
itself can actually confirm that from those that have filed,

(01:00:53):
and now you're hearing it from the signature side as well.
I got to tell you it is just simple. You've
got to just put bright lights on all of this.
You've got to be able to let everybody see all
of it. This is how campaigns and elections have always worked.
You've always had poll watchers, You've always had people that
could be there. Transparency and chain of custody or absolute
gold standard and should actually be standard. There should be

(01:01:14):
nothing less than that. And every time you hear someone
say that we should have less, you know, argue against
more transparency, there is a problem with that. That's not
our problem. That's a problem. So we're gonna keep going. Look,
if you'd like to talk about this, we can keep going,
or we don't have to. Eight eight eight five seven
zero eight zero one zero is the number to call
if you have comments about the election integrity and really

(01:01:38):
what we have found out by way of audit and experience.

Speaker 2 (01:01:41):
What say you, folks? Feel free to call. We'll keep talking.

Speaker 1 (01:01:44):
About it if we want, if you're if you're if
you're interested, it's your world. I just live in it.
Hang on through the break. You're listening to talk radio
one oh five nine can Ras. Deseret News rather, their
editorial board says that they liking you not only just
to domestic vigilantes, but they don't though, which is worse
you or sophisticated foreign influences like Russia and Iran. That's

(01:02:05):
who you're being compared to. And and it's because you're
asking questions and you're and you'd like some changes to
our process, which doesn't deserve that kind of title. So
we're gonna go to the phones. I want to hear
from you smartest listening audience and all the land. I'm
going to go to Richard, but I'm going to just say, Richard,
welcome to the program. Richard from Worm. I'm reading your description.
You are going to get me in so much trouble, sir,

(01:02:26):
I am I am dead man walking to this call.
Welcome to the program.

Speaker 16 (01:02:31):
Well okay, well, thank you very much. Yes, sir, well
I changed my tune, just changed my tune. Just a
little bit. Okay, give me give me some yes, okay, okay,
women in general, and if you look at the behavior
we're looking at the behavior of women in politics, seems

(01:02:54):
to me they don't understand what politics is really all about.
And women think differently.

Speaker 2 (01:03:02):
That is true.

Speaker 16 (01:03:02):
And you look at yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:03:05):
You think that.

Speaker 16 (01:03:05):
You look at you know, Nancy Pelosi and and Aaron
menden Hall and governor and lieutenant governor s because he's
a female and others as.

Speaker 5 (01:03:18):
A female governor or women governor.

Speaker 11 (01:03:20):
In I think Arizona.

Speaker 5 (01:03:22):
Yes, I mean, if you look at the whole picture
in Michigan.

Speaker 16 (01:03:27):
And it is they seem to they're they're not whose
side are they on. I mean, they seem to cause
in quotation of much trouble because they don't understand I mean,
and they seem to want to fix things.

Speaker 4 (01:03:42):
Uh.

Speaker 16 (01:03:42):
They they're because they're emotional that they realign their emotions
first before they put their heart into motion, before they
put their brain into motion.

Speaker 1 (01:03:53):
Okay, hey, Richard, I like that. I look, it's very
thought provoking and I'm going to thank you for the call.
I'm going to tell you right now now, men and
women do absolutely think differently. And I'm the litany of
leaders that are governors, but they're actually Democrat though they're there.
It's not hard to spot whether it's Nancy Pelosi, you
know in the House, or Governor Whitmer that's the governor

(01:04:15):
of Michigan, or whatever it might be. Is it gender though,
because I I wonder sometimes. But I will tell you this,
our lieutenant governor takes personal offense when you ask these questions, folks,
and you want answers.

Speaker 2 (01:04:27):
She equates that.

Speaker 1 (01:04:28):
To an attack, an attack on her, an attack on
the institutions, on attack on the process. And I don't,
I don't. I don't mean to be attacking anyone. I'm
not even describing skullduggery unless you want to hide it,
unless you you ignore it, then we will gotta. We
got to ask the obvious question as to why. So
let's keep going. I love the discussion. Let's go to Brent,

(01:04:49):
Brent and Springville. Brent, thank you for holding and thank
you for joining us on the road in Greg show
uh these elections and election integrity and domestic vigilantes. Where
do you fall in this whole conversation.

Speaker 17 (01:05:02):
Well, I'm a precint chair down here in Springville, and
I went to the convention and basically Governor Cox got
up and just basically gave us the finger when people said, no,
we don't want you, and he didn't care because he
had gathered signatures. My thing is, after going through that process,
I went to my Stay representative, House representative and I'm

(01:05:23):
contacting my senator. He hasn't contacted me back. But the
solution is this one. It's the law, so they need
to enforce the law. They didn't get the signatures, they're
off the ballot. My point was this is we need
to have everybody contact their House representative and their Stay
senator and say SB fifty four needs to be revised.
If they want to get the signatures, great, but you

(01:05:45):
cannot pay a company to go get them for you.
It all has to be volunteer, your family, your friends, whoever.
If you're that popular you think you can win it,
then have them get the signatures. And number two, they
have to be open, open to the public and to
scrutiny and to be verified. And I'm getting contacting my

(01:06:07):
state representatives to say this needs to be revised and
what can we do to do it? And I will
courage everybody to do that.

Speaker 1 (01:06:13):
I love it, Brenton, And you know what, those are
not unreasonable asked. In fact, they're absolutely logical. We should
not have paid signature gathers because it get paid per signature,
so there's a there's a gross incentive there, and it
should be transparent. We guess what else is if you
do an initiative, if you do a referendum, those lists
are public or public information, So why would these lists
not be I think it's absolutely You're absolutely correct. Let's

(01:06:36):
go now to Josh in Levan. Josh, thank you for holding,
thanks for joining us on the Rodd and Greg show.

Speaker 9 (01:06:45):
You Bett, thank you.

Speaker 13 (01:06:46):
I'll be sure.

Speaker 9 (01:06:47):
I was just going to say, I also was a
state rep from our thriving metropolis of Levan. I did
my homework. I went through multiple times. I met with
most every candidate that was in the purview of checking
them out. Some of them I met with three to
four times, asking questions and sometimes hard questions to them,

(01:07:12):
but I wouldn't let them get out of certain answers.
I made my selections, send an email out said these
are my thoughts and things. Everybody got back and said
they sound like the people for the job. I thought
I was going to be an outlier. And the difference
of the temperature of the room from when Phil Lyman
walked on to the stage and it was like being

(01:07:33):
front row and an ACDC concert, and energy of the
delegates who also did their homework versus the cock side
of things was night and day difference. Last collar hit
it on the nail, right on the head. He knew,
I'm done, walk away, We're finished. I got my ballot

(01:07:54):
today out of my peel box. I'm going to write
in Liman. I hope that there's some type of a hey,
this is the way the numbers are going, because I
know everybody out there is worried that it won't make
a difference. We have to vote the way that we're
going to vote so that the Democrats don't win. But
if there's a strong number and you vote quick and
you vote early, people are going to see that if

(01:08:15):
the numbers start to get turned in, I hope and
it might change the type.

Speaker 2 (01:08:20):
So Josh, I love it.

Speaker 9 (01:08:21):
I appreciate all you do.

Speaker 2 (01:08:22):
Thanks so much for your call. I love the comments
are great. I like that.

Speaker 1 (01:08:26):
Sorry, I love that your process as well. Was that
you as a delegate, you communicate to the caucus that
elected you exactly where you were. You were you yourself,
were very transparent in that, folks. We got to go
to a break. We have hold, we have callers on hold.
We've got to get to these I'm not going to
give up on them. I want to keep this conversation
going through the break. So I would like you if
you will hang on, be patient. We'll come back to
your calls and comments here on the Ronning Greg Show

(01:08:49):
on Talk Radio one oh five nine. Canteress, I'm going
to be called domestic vigilante or if I am, I'm
going to wear it like a badge of honor. I
think our listeners will as well. So let's get to
the phones. Let's go to a Barrett in Ogden. Barrett,
thank you for holding, sir, very patient. Welcome to the
Rod and Greg Show. What say you about voter integrity?
Are you a domestic vigilanti?

Speaker 5 (01:09:10):
Hey, I'm here.

Speaker 2 (01:09:10):
I appreciate everything you guys do there, Barrett.

Speaker 5 (01:09:13):
I am h I am not a vigilanti. I'll tell
you that much right now. Yeah, I will tell you
what I am though. I am a state in County
delegate out of Weaver County and I was at the
rn C, and you know, I did a lot of
what the other callers we're talking about. And this is
what I found out, you know, not too long ago.

(01:09:38):
From my understanding, they have another writing candidate by the
name of Liman. I don't think that's a very common name.
So for everybody that's listening, make sure that when you
write in if you do write in Liman, I'm writing
in Lyman, you write in his entire name, Phil Lyman
Claws and you have to do that. I believe it

(01:10:00):
that other Lineman is an insert to uh sway the
vote for the people that you know are going ahead
with that rite in campaign. I just wanted that to
be known.

Speaker 2 (01:10:11):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:10:12):
Also, I just got my ballot, man and listen to this. Okay,
I thought, this is really weird. I've never seen this
in my entire life. I opened up my ballot. Now
in the federal races, there is one that says Lucifer
just in case every love, and there's not a name
attached to it at all.

Speaker 3 (01:10:30):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:10:30):
I saw, well, yeah, a huge disgrace. So you know
that the powers that are at work here. But I
I don't want to get off topic. As far as
Lyman goes, just so everybody understands, you know, he lost,
you know, I mean Phil Lymon won and Cox lost.

(01:10:51):
So as far as the signatures go, they denied phil Lyman,
the signatures, the transparency multiple times with tenant Governor Henderson
did that as well. I'm not happy with that at all.
We need transparency and the real true vigilance vigilanti in
my eyes from what I've seen and and and done
my vetting and everything else, is Spencer Cox is is

(01:11:13):
who is there right now on the ballot, and it's
doing the delegation of a big disservice as well as
it's doing the entire state of Utah and every voter
a big disservice.

Speaker 2 (01:11:24):
Barret, thank you for your call.

Speaker 1 (01:11:25):
I have to hate to cut you off, but I
got people waiting, and I think your points right. By
the way, it is true you got to write the
full name of your writing candidate now because they have
a second Lineman candidate. I think it's a two linemans
of a son and his mother. But but that's that
is designed to uh to take the write in vote
of whatever portion and to divide it. And it's uh,
it's it's it's not. There's only one reason that would happen,

(01:11:46):
and that would be to confuse people in their writing. Otherwise,
if there was nothing not another lineman, you could just
simply write a lineman. All right, let's go to Carrie
in Lehigh. Carrie, thank you for holding uh, welcome to
the Roden Greg Show.

Speaker 7 (01:12:02):
Hi, Greg, thank you so much. I just wanted to
say that I agree with the previous gentleman who said
he thinks that women let emotions get in the way.
I don't want a woman as president of the United
States of America, and I think that if a woman

(01:12:27):
is not emotional and not in tune with her emotions,
then she's probably not a good woman who I would
want to vote for. So I just wanted to share that.

Speaker 1 (01:12:37):
Thank you, Carrie, thank you for the call. You can
say that I will never say that. I will never
say about women can't be a can't run or shouldn't run.
But Carrie's more than welcome to make that case and
make that point. So thank you for calling, thank you
for waiting, and thank you for sharing that perspective. Let's
keep going to Paul an American Fork. Paul, thank you
for holding sir, thank you for calling into the run

(01:13:00):
Greg show, what say you?

Speaker 5 (01:13:02):
Well?

Speaker 10 (01:13:03):
Thanks?

Speaker 3 (01:13:04):
Uh.

Speaker 10 (01:13:04):
This signature issue has not just happened this week. It's
been going on for months. The Lineman campaign, as far
as I understand, have have been fighting this signature thing
for quite a while. And right when the ballots are released,
they they decide to bring up the signature issue, which
seems kind of odd when that the tyranny is strong

(01:13:28):
well above us. That says that, you know, it's, uh,
it's too late. I could have had the signatures if
I if I wanted to. They're here, but they're there's
just excuse after excuse to uh to uh not follow
the law. The law has been set up and and

(01:13:51):
we're not following it.

Speaker 2 (01:13:52):
Paul, thank you for the call.

Speaker 1 (01:13:53):
You know, that's a double edged sword because some people
would say, why bring it up at all as an
audit right before the elections if it's going to put
a negative cast, a negative pall over one of the candidates.
And then but the other side of the coin is, boy,
would that have been important information to have understood or
earlier on before ballots were printed. Some of that is
the schedule of the legislative auditor. I know that department.

(01:14:17):
They don't play games. They're going to do their job.
They're going to get that report out to the Legislative
Audit Committee, which is made up of legislative leaders in
the both majority and minority. They're going to do that
as quick as they can. But I see your point,
and I don't disagree with you that this information in
this I'll go back to the editorial, the Desert News
editorial that says that these these attacks, and they call

(01:14:40):
them attacked, You know what an attack is. It's actually
at you having the goal of asking the questions or
actually even demanding that we have some answers. We not
be ignored and that there be answers to the questions
we have about process, about transparency, about chain of custody.
It is not an inherently negative attack on anyone to
want these kind of answers. What gets ugly is when

(01:15:02):
you're ignored or there is no answer that's provided, then
you start to wonder, well, why why won't they what
is wrong with transparency? And that's where people begin to
get cynical. And by the way, that's not Utah unique.
We are not some outlier in fifty states in this country.
It is a common concern and worry amongst Americans. Forget

(01:15:24):
Republicans or Democrats. Americans are concerned about voter integrity. And
it's not an unwarranted concern. It is real. And I'm
going to tell you that when you pull this question
and you ask people, should you have a driver's license
and should you show ID to vote, it's like seventy
two plus percent of Americans, without regard to party affiliation,

(01:15:46):
who intuitively say yes. Right now, you've got a Justice Department. Oh,
by the way, and this editorial like quotes NBC News
as an authority on election integrity and the Justice Department.
You know NBC News with the sixty minuts where they
edited Kamala Harris's answers. I mean, if that's not electioneering,
I don't know what is To change her actual answer

(01:16:07):
to a question and refuse to give the transcript of
the entire interview out. That's not transparent. They're one of
the Editorial Board's sources of authority on election integrity. And
then the Justice departments. The other joke, they are currently
suing the state of Virginia, who's trying to get people
who have self affirmed that they are not citizens or
have failed to affirm that their citizens removed from the

(01:16:29):
voting rules, so that we have one citizen, one vote,
and you have a justice department that's trying to turn
that around. That does not make us domestic vigilantes to
have an issue or a problem with that, And that
is not something unique to Utah by itself. That is
something that everyone in America is watching and not feeling
those same concerns. Let's go back to the phones. We

(01:16:50):
have time, eray for more calls. Okay, let's keep going.
Then let's go to Ka Kay in South Jordan. K.
Thank you for holding, Thank you for calling in.

Speaker 9 (01:17:00):
You bet you hey.

Speaker 8 (01:17:01):
I just wanted to ask everybody if you guys have
noticed when you open up your ballot and you say,
you fill it out and you write in Phil Lyman
and Natalie Clawson, and then you fold it back up
and put it in your envelope. You know there's that
little hole in the ballot envelope. You can see that
you have written somebody in. That hole is right over
where the write in part is. So anybody, any clerk

(01:17:22):
looking at an envelope, a sealed envelope, can see that
that person wrote in. Now that should not be. That
should not be because that way your ballot is not secure. Now,
what about what out into those little sleeves that used
to go around your ballot? Remember everybody used to get
a sleeve that went around it. Now that sleeve is
not there, and they can see from the envelope that
you have written in a name, and I think that's

(01:17:44):
really open for fraud.

Speaker 16 (01:17:47):
Kay.

Speaker 1 (01:17:47):
I can't thank you enough for your call because someone
asked I got a text about that today. Somebody asked me,
is this hole always been here? And I haven't opened
up my ballot? You know, our family's ballots arrived, but
I didn't know. I didn't understand the context. That's the context.
And I think that you're right. I mean, you're supposed
to be secret ballots. Hey, we're gonna let's see what
do we We have one more segment left in the show, righty, Ray, Okay,

(01:18:08):
hang on if you're calling eight eight eight five seven
zero eight zero one zero is the number to call.
We have some callers on hold. Hang on and when
we come for our final segment, we'll continue this discussion
here on talk radio one oh five to nine.

Speaker 10 (01:18:20):
Canterests yep, to just cruising around and putting a lot
of miles on on all the beautiful groom trails that
we have out here.

Speaker 1 (01:18:26):
And before I go to our callers, Bob, thank you
for waiting and thank you for calling.

Speaker 9 (01:18:30):
What say you, hey, citizen?

Speaker 18 (01:18:33):
You used This is vigilante Bob from Agin.

Speaker 10 (01:18:36):
Yes.

Speaker 18 (01:18:37):
Well I'm on the SEC as well. Yes, Greg, Hi
the GOP SEC, and I saw this train coming. So
a month ago I put forward a resolution that we
should go back to having an independently elected Secretary of State,
and the SEC passed that by a healthy majority sixty
something percent. And one of the provisions on there was

(01:19:00):
that we should make the names of those who signed
to put a candidate on the ballot public, just like
we do for an initiative or referendum. And you might
like this too, Greg. We also put a provision that candidates,
not the clerk, not the LG. The candidates should be
able to trigger a full hand recount in their race
if they're willing to pay towards it, and left the

(01:19:22):
legislature decide what they should pay. But that way, there can't.

Speaker 9 (01:19:25):
Be cover up.

Speaker 18 (01:19:26):
Right, if you think something's wrong, let's do a hand recount.
Let's do it ballot safe. Thank you.

Speaker 1 (01:19:31):
I love it, Bob, I love it. That is a
citizen soldier you just heard from Bob. I'll tell you
that this editorial that I've been criticizing this whole hour
says there's no credible information that handcounting is any more
accurate than the machines that do it. I think I know, Bob.
I bet you anything. He's got all the data you
need to know that handcounting is accurate. Let's go to
Fred and Sandy. Fred, thank you for calling. We have

(01:19:53):
just about a minute minute and a half.

Speaker 7 (01:19:57):
Go.

Speaker 19 (01:19:58):
Okay, hey, great another former Pittsburgh Gilbert uh So, real quick.
Just a few things that I wanted to bring up.
Vigilante you'd call that, but I consider myself a patriot.
And how dare any elected official come out and try

(01:20:22):
to intimidate the public. That's not what their role is,
all right? And if you if you stand by Trump,
then put up your fist. That's what I'm doing and
I'm gonna fight. I'm gonna do the same thing. So
whatever you people are in Utah are elected officials. I

(01:20:44):
don't know the GA, but how dare you? I will
not be intimidated by any elected official. You're there to
represent me, the people of Utah, period.

Speaker 2 (01:20:59):
There you go, folks. Let me tell you, let's get
the food chain right. They work for us, they're the
public servants. We'll see you tomorrow on The Rod and
Gregg Show. Thanks for listening, to see you tomorrow

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Rod Arquette Show News

Popular Podcasts

Good Game with Sarah Spain

Dateline NBC

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Rod and Greg Show: Reaction to Bret Baier/Kamala Harris Interview; More on Candidate Signature Verification Audit

Episode Transcript

Rod Arquette Show News .css-1q01m3q{margin:0 0 -2px 0;}

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Good Game with Sarah Spain

Dateline NBC

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

All Episodes