Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
For those of you who've just had it with dan Quinshaw,
the race is beginning to take form, folks coming forward
to run against him. You'll want to hear our next
segment in just a few moments, but first to get
us started, as we always do. Courtesy of executive producer
Chattacone Nakanishi Big Big Balls, so one of them was
(00:32):
known as Big Balls. The beauty of this is that
then you had all of these liberal news agencies having
to save the name on air on evening news broadcasts.
In order for people to be as upset as they're
supposed to be about these kids who were do gooders
saving the federal government and saving the republic, they had
(00:53):
to say the name.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
A licensed Houston Obama is wanted after investigators say.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
She cut off a man's private part before cremating him.
Speaker 3 (01:04):
She cut off his private part, put it in his mouth.
Records show mortuary staff had just learned the victim was
a registered sex offender.
Speaker 1 (01:11):
Ethics is everything in this line of work.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
Jason Altieri runs Southeast Texas Crematory. He says families should
feel comfortable to ask questions.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
That y'all aren't one of those places you know, I
mean cut his winner off and stuff in his mouth.
Speaker 4 (01:26):
The Baytown man is charged with murder months after his
fiance's mysterious death.
Speaker 5 (01:30):
But perhaps most disturbing of all what police say he
allegedly searched for on the Internet before the murder.
Speaker 6 (01:35):
One of his Google searches quote, can I kill an
illegal human?
Speaker 1 (01:39):
He googled if it was legal to kill an illegal
people's lack of basic knowledge astounds me.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
A plumbing problem at forty thousand feet, the.
Speaker 7 (01:48):
Toilets were clawed and forcing the flight crew to turn
around back to Chicago.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
Twelve eleven of the lavoratories got plugged.
Speaker 4 (01:56):
Only one lavatories in the business glass was usable, the.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
F one toilet for three hundred passengers. I drink a
lot of water and I peel a lot. I gotta
tell you, and you gotta go, And there is somebody
in the toilet, and you wonder what are you doing
in there? How long do you need it? The tawdry
tail of Dan Crenshaw just keeps getting worse. Let's start
(02:21):
with his hot bike moment recently where he's talking to
a British reporter and he thinks that the mic and
camera are off and he starts making reference to killing
Tucker Carlson. It's his odd behavior. Have you ever met Tucker?
(02:49):
He's the work correctly. I ever see him, I'll kill him,
Okay as he grits his teeth. Maybe some people aren't
cut out for this job, or maybe some people feel well.
Then we go to Tucker Carls and when asked about this,
and he had this to say.
Speaker 8 (03:07):
I don't know if you saw this, but someone had
put out a tweet saying Dan Crenshaw's pushing for this
bill because it includes a forty percent pay race for
member of Congress. And Dan Crenshaw had recently been complaining
that like, oh, we don't make enough money, We're like destitute.
I want to quote it exactly because it's just hilarious.
So he responds to this guy on X and he says,
you flying piece of but hey, whatever gets you pathetic
bottom feeders, clickbait you in sell So now, if you're
(03:28):
against Dan Crenshaw's spending bill, you're you're like an in
sell or something.
Speaker 6 (03:32):
You don't have enough sex.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (03:33):
Dan Crenshaw obviously is not emotionally prepared to lead anything.
He's out of control. And I think that he's a
really volatile person. I hope he gets help. I mean that,
but you know, he's also a pretty sinister person, I
would say, whose priorities are not aligned with his party's voters,
but also have kind of nothing to do with the
United States. I feel sorry for Dan crenschaff had conflict
with Dan Crenshaw. I felt like he was emotionally out
(03:55):
of control, and so I feel sorry for him. But
I also think it's not just him, it's a lot
of leadership of that party just doesn't put the United
States first at all.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
So Dan Crenshaw goes on with Piers Morgan and unravels further.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
Dan's ongoing spat with Tucker Carlson. Now this again. When
there was you were called off you thought you were
off camera, still on Mike, saying he was the worst person.
We've talked a lot on Twitter. If I ever meet him,
I'm going to effing kill him. You then said, I
think anyone seriously watching him, being honest with themselves knows
that was hyperbole. You said in private. And no, Tucker
doesn't to worry about I've absolutely no desire to harm him.
(04:36):
And then Tucker went on a podcast with commentator Chris
Joseph's on his podcast and he said this about you.
Speaker 6 (04:44):
Tell us about my all time favorite member of Congress,
Dan Crenshaw.
Speaker 5 (04:49):
Yeah, yeah, so's he's a tough one. He's he's a
hothead on Twitter now, Yeah, he's. I don't understand why
he's taken this stance a little bit.
Speaker 6 (04:59):
Because his personal life is out of control.
Speaker 5 (05:01):
Yeah, because he used to be like a right wing
darling like he was, you know, the with the Navy Seals.
I think earlierly on again with me.
Speaker 6 (05:08):
I always thought he was a freak and a warmonger,
really Weirdoh yeah, he's a freaking warmonger.
Speaker 5 (05:13):
But he's showing it now.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
And you're response to being a freak, a warmonger and
a weird.
Speaker 4 (05:20):
Yeah, well this is this is typical for Tucker. Tucker
has no actual substance. Right, He's been attacking me since
twenty twenty two when he became obsessed with me. I
live rent free in that little mongrel's head, and uh yeah,
you know, people ask me all the time, why does
he hate you? And I'm like, you know, the fact
that you can't answer that question is indicative of the
(05:42):
fact that he has no actual substance. See, I can
tell you why Mehdi disagrees with me. I can tell
you why Mehdi doesn't like me. At least he at
least he has you know, I disagree with them all,
but but at least he has things that he disagrees
with me on. Tucker never actually says anything. It's just
it's just insults to He'll use my war wound to
(06:02):
insult me. He's a he's a weird bad guy. I mean,
people should people people should not be uh tricked by
his his his supposed stance against the DC insider elites,
right because he literally is that. I mean, you know
it's on the people should know. You know what's on
the Hunter Biden laptops. You know it's funny females from
(06:22):
Tucker Carlson to Hunter Biden asking Hunter Biden for help
to get Tucker's son into Georgetown. You know, Tucker's a
silver spoon fed trust fund baby, went to board you
know boarding school guy. It is the epitome of the
DC elites who pretends to fight against it in order
to to to corner a market in the media.
Speaker 1 (06:40):
Of course, we've seen that Navy Coe, Eddie Gallagher viral
video where he has some very powerful things to say,
not nice about Dan Crenshaw on what he accuses. Dan
Crenshaw of David Goggins's beloved guest on this show, has
had some things to say after Crenshaw insulted him. There
(07:00):
is a comment going viral amongst conservatives by a fellow
named John Leffeff. He is a former investment banker of
some repute. He's an author, and he is a very
well read Twitter personality. His commentary often makes its way
(07:21):
onto my desk even before I get to my subscription
of him. And he posted the following two days ago
and it has millions of views. He said, I spent
two hours with Dan Crinshaw. To keep it simple, he
hates Donald Trump. Hates him to the core. He said
it point blank. If you support Trump, MAGA, Maha America First,
(07:46):
or the Republican Party, know this, Dan Crenshaw is your
enemy and you should never vote for him again. The
fact that he's also a Charlatan huckster, bully, blowhard, pseudo
policy intellectual and sanctimonious, well, I can say it is coincidental.
John Lefev tell us what you really think?
Speaker 7 (08:07):
Yeah, well, thanks, for having me.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
You know, what was the occasion upon which you spent
two hours with Dan Crenshaw.
Speaker 7 (08:15):
I've seen him a couple of times. I've seen him
at a corporate event, I've seen him in a fundraiser,
and he came to a podcast studio I was at
for a couple of hours and we were just hanging out.
So there have been several encounters that have led me
to form my opinion. And the clips you played summon
up perfectly right. He's a neo conn he's a bully,
(08:37):
he's a blowhard, he's sanctimonious. You can listen to how
condescending and smug he is in all of those clips.
But what I saw was it's not just say Tucker
Carlson that he hates. He hates his constituentcy. It's like
his hatred for Donald Trump. He's now become another one
(08:58):
of these victims of this so called Trump derangement syndrome.
And as Tucker said, there have been a lot of
you know, Republicans, true conservatives, who have not liked to
stance on Ukraine or the fact that he's aligned himself
as a as a neocon. But he is even beyond
that he's just seemingly completely unrattled. And when I saw him,
(09:21):
he seemed to hold the most serious disdain for the
so called January sixth insurrectionists, right, many of whom were veterans.
And I think it's fair to say.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
That hold with me right there, John lefev is our guest.
We're going to dig deeper into be He used the
word and I did as well, unraveling of Dan Crenshaw.
I want to come back to that word, Michael Barry, Joe.
It's a the unraveling of Dan Krenshaw continues of folks.
(09:55):
I don't mean to sound like a school marm here,
and I'm sure that's how it comes across. I really
we're going to talk about whether Dan Crenshaw should continue
to serve in the United States Congress at your pleasure,
because he works for you. We're going to talk about
from now in the next primary, which is less than
a year away. We're going to talk about his fitness
(10:18):
for the job. We're talking about what he has and
hasn't done. We're going to talk about stock trades, but
we're going to talk about votes, statements, actions. But I
want to be very clear, and I say this often,
but not often enough. You can criticize Dan Crenshaw for
a number of things, and I do, and I'm extremely
(10:39):
disappointed because I got behind him. I believed in him,
and I was wrong. I'm here to say it I
was wrong. That being said, there is no doubt that
Dan Crenshaw served in war and lost his eye, almost
lost the other one in war. I see people calling
(10:59):
him making jokes about him losing an eye in war.
Do you have any idea, even if you don't have
a sense of decency, do you have any idea how
veterans look at that? What if he had one leg?
Would you ha hop around there? Crenshaw? Because you were
wrong on an issue, criticize him for what he does.
(11:21):
There's so much of a body of work. But when
you go make in fun of a guy for a
wound he sustained in war, not only is it wrong,
you're actually helping him. You're driving people in because what
kind of monster are you that you're criticizing the guy
for that? Nobody then says, yeah, I'm going to take
(11:42):
your advice. Crenshaw's not a good congressman, because he's not.
He's a terrible congressman. He's the ultimate neo con in Congress.
This guy was involved supposedly in the Security Committee and
did nothing for border security, but couldn't send enough money
to to Ukraine. John lefev is our guest. He put
(12:04):
up a post that has received a lot of attention
that said, I spent two hours with Dan Crenshaw. To
keep it simple, he hates Donald Trump, hates him to
the core. He set at point blank. If you support Trump, MAGA,
Maha America First, or the Republican Party, know this, Dan
Crenshaw's your enemy and you should never vote for him again.
The fact that he's also a Charlottean huckster, bully, blowhard,
(12:26):
pseudo policy intellectual and sanctimonious. Whether it's another term, I
can't say it's coincidental, folks. Go take a look. We've
played it before. It's a ten minute clip. Eddie Gallagher
beloved Navy seal, And see what Eddie Gallagher says Dan
Crenshaw did to him a fellow seal behind his backs.
What Eddie says, I don't know. Go see what David
(12:46):
Goggins says about Dan Crenshaw. David Goggins, who came to
me pretty highly recommended from Marcus Atrell and other well,
mostly from Marcus, a guy who people beloved as beloved
for who he is, and he gets into it with Crenshaw.
You start noticing these things you're adding up. He's saying
(13:07):
these horrible things about Tucker Carlson. Dan Crenshaw is the
common denominator here, John Lefev, let me ask you what
did you get a sense from Crenshaw's comments? What his
bitterness related to Trump maga anyone who questions him.
Speaker 7 (13:23):
Is I think it's the fact that he has a
chip on his shoulder, as you know. As I said,
he's this kind of pseudo intellectual, so condescending when he
gets challenged on policy, he just gets angry and turns
(13:43):
into this bully and this blowheart.
Speaker 9 (13:48):
And so.
Speaker 7 (13:51):
Again, I'll go back to the term Trump derangement syndrome,
you know, because it's caused him to essentially abandon all
of his principles, or at least what we thought were
his principles just a few years ago. You know, the
example I was giving when I met with him, he
was talking about January sixth and referring to basically as
(14:13):
a blanket statement all of the so called insurrectionists, as
many of whom were veterans as criminals, and we all
know that most of those people were railroaded by corrupt
courts where they saw one hundred percent of conviction rates,
or they were given plea bargains, facing hard decades in
(14:35):
prison and victims of two tier justice. In light of
how BLM and other protesters and were treated around the
same time, Crunshaw did not care because he's so blinded
by his arrogance and the chip on his shoulder and
his hatred for Trump. There's there's another clip there when
(15:02):
he was asked about it if the Intel agencies had
coordinated censorship programs with social media companies. Not only did
he deny it and take the side of the deep state,
he belittled the hell out of the guy who asked
him a simple, fare honest question. He just does not
have the temperament to serve.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
I fear it's more than that, you know. I think
of the case of Adam Kinzinger and how disgraced he
was when he stepped down because he knew he couldn't
win reelection. There's this sort of Liz Cheney level of
entitlement and anger, and I would love to say that
it's just that he's not emotionally capable of this because
(15:42):
he has a hot temper. I think it's more than that.
I think it's an arrogance. And this is the ultimate
neo con arrogance. I saw this with the people who
came out for George P. Bush. I saw this with
the people who supported Nicki Haley in Texas. A bitterness,
a bitterness George Conway type bitterness. The folks at NRO,
(16:03):
some of the folks at n ROW, the folks at
the Bull or Jonah. It's all these folks that feel like, look,
I'm the true conservative. I wear the right shoes, I
wear the right suit. I'm in the position of Congress.
Who are y'all to question me? You don't understand why
we have to always be at war? And I find
it to be this just sense of great entitlement and
disdain for the rest of us.
Speaker 7 (16:26):
He hates his constituents, plain and simple. And the interesting
thing about my tweet, which as you said, now has
you know, millions of views and four thousand comments. If
you go through the comments, they're filled. You know, he
doesn't just have altercations with high profile people like Tucker Carlson.
He has confrontations with people like me or his constituents.
(16:49):
So the comments in that tweet are filled with thousands
of people saying exactly the same thing, regular people with
no agendas, and Dan Crunch y'all just dismisses them with
such arrogance and disregard.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
It is extraordinarily disappointing because I think on paper, this
was a guy who could have been a great leader.
He is smart. I know the guy very well. He's
whip smart, he presents well, he has a great story.
But somewhere along the way they brought him into the
(17:28):
circle and I feel like he cut a deal and
that deal was for the deep state. That deal was
for the neocons and everyone else that it's this sort
of Jeb Bush hatred of the base. It's the Mitt
Romney hatred of the base. It's all for the same reasons.
Who were y'all. Y'all shouldn't be participating. John Lefev, you
(17:52):
made time for us on very short notice. I appreciate that.
We would love to have you back. He's a great
follow on Twitter, folks. Thank you man, Thank you very much.
Speaker 7 (18:02):
Big fit.
Speaker 9 (18:04):
All right.
Speaker 1 (18:04):
Check him out on Twitter. A lot of people do.
It's spelled l E f as in frank E v
r E. John Lefev is an interesting fellow, and he's
got a great post up right now about things I've
learned that I wish I knew at eighteen that is
worth the read again. It's John J.
Speaker 9 (18:27):
O H. M.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Lefev l E f E v r E. Your call's
coming up. Seven to one three nine, one thousand out.
Speaker 5 (18:35):
Of five.
Speaker 7 (18:37):
Michael Barry in.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
The one hundred to two days, one hundred two years
ago today, President Warrang G. Harding was the first president
file a tax return, and they probably made a big
deal out of it, in the same stupid way as
Joe Biden getting his COVID shot. Here, here's this thing
that will enrich other people and be absolutely toxic for you.
(19:03):
The President's doing it, so you should too. For the Yeah,
they probably tweeted it out. It was nineteen twenty three.
For those of you who don't get a chance to
hear our evening show, I would encourage you to go
to the podcast and hear yesterday evening show, which I
devoted almost exclusively the first ninety percent to President Trump's
(19:28):
economic plan to replace an internal revenue service which eats
the soul of the American people with income taxes. To
replace the internal revenue service with an external revenue service,
which says to the outside world, if you want to participate,
if you want to sell to the greatest, largest, most powerful,
(19:51):
most enriching market in the world, then it's going to
cost you and to offset the loss in income tax
revenue from you not having to pay taxes with outsiders
in a buyer's club mentality, Why wouldn't you at least
(20:12):
have that conversation. Why wouldn't you be open to a
conversation that would free up the American people. Why would
we leave the rest of the world to be enriched
from our consumer market that's built off the backs of
American taxpayers. Why wouldn't you be doing everything you could
despoil rotten your own people. That's what a government should do,
(20:36):
should protect its own people first, should create an opportunity
for its own people to grow wealthy first. Anyway, that's
the entirety of last night's show. If if you want
to go to your podcast, to our podcast on whatever
platform you use and hear it seven one three, nine
nine nine one thousand seven to one, three, nine, nine,
one thousand. Let's go first to Bart your on the
(21:00):
Michael Barryshow.
Speaker 9 (21:00):
Welcome Bart, Thank you. I'm wondering if you could answer
a question that keeps me up at nine. Isn't boneless
chicken wings the same thing as chicken strips?
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Seems that would seem to make sense. Let me get
Sam from Big City Wings. Let me call him during
the break, because here is what I think happens. I
think boneless chicken strips are the breast pounded out and
cut out, and boneless chicken wings this is what I
(21:38):
think are simply a de boned wing. That's what I
believe to be the case. But it may be the
case that boneless chicken wings. Well, if it is, you know,
if it is, you've got a great point. And the
reason is because what a great marketing point, because chicken
(21:59):
strips are for kids kids, right. Somehow along the way,
chicken strips became the things that kids got at restaurants
when they didn't want to order big, big people food.
And you go to you can go to any restaurant
any My wife and I were coming back from Galveston
and we stopped at the Gringoes in it's right near
(22:21):
mall of the Mainland. I don't know what that's actually
is that Texas city. Yeah, And so so Jonathan Kim,
who's the president of the old Operation. So he's out
making his weekend run. He goes to each location and
he's out making his runs, and he comes over and
meets us. And so he has a friend of his
(22:42):
who's a girl. It was a lady her son, and
they were out running the roads getting his car Washington.
So they came over and we're having a long chat.
And I said, you got to eat with me to
the little fellow, and he said, all right, I said,
what do you get here? He's chicken strips. I said,
you gotta be kidding me. Chicken strips at Gringos. And
Jonathan put the order in and I mean it must
(23:05):
have been about a minute. I mean it was. It
was raising canes quality speed. But they may have done
what raising canes does. The reason raising canes has your
your chicken strip your your chicken They call them what
chicken fingers? What do they what does raisin canes actually
call them? Jim, can you look that up real quick?
(23:27):
They say raising canes and then they have whatever they
claim that that they are serving what is that word
that they use for that? So whatever that is that,
I mean, that's what Zaxby's does. Bart, You've raised a
very interesting question from a technical perspective. I think that
(23:51):
the chicken strip or the chicken finger is a different
cut of meat. And I think, although I'm not what
chicken finger, they call them chicken fingers, which is really funny, right,
the hell is that you ever seen the chickens feet?
But I think and I don't know where that came from.
(24:14):
That would be a very interesting question. What a great
You know, America is the best in the world at marketing,
the best in the world at marketing. Our marketing minds
market products around the world. And what is an election
but a marketing campaign. You're marketing your product against their product,
(24:36):
and so you start early on, We're all smiling, We're
all nice guys. My product is glossy, my product works
for whatever you need. My product is the elixir for
what ails you. Here's my product, Buy my product. And
then the other side is doing the same thing for
their product, and in time, one or the other is
(24:57):
building their positives more than the other guys positives. So
the guy who can't seem to build his positives to
the level of the other guy's positives, then starts negative. Well,
if we can't beat them, we'll destroy them. So that's
where you go. His product has arsenic, His product is
laden with bad things inside. His product is terrible. And
(25:21):
whether we like it or not, I get this Every
election cycle. People will say to me, why do we
have to have all the negative campaigning? For one very
simple reason, because it works. It always works. It's effective,
and when you hire people to come in and run
(25:43):
your campaign, your job is that person's job is to
figure out a way to get you fifty one percent
of the vote. That doesn't have to mean that fifty
one percent of the people like you. It doesn't have
to mean that that you know, fifty one percent of
the people think you're great. It just has to mean
that fifty one percent of the people who cast a
vote in that race cast it for you and not
(26:07):
the other guy. It is, honestly that simple and negative
campaigning works. You look at the number of things that
you're told about a candidate that later you look back
and think that was the dumbest thing ever. You didn't
have time to stop and think about it. You know,
when you study the prank call industry, which is to
(26:29):
me one of the most hilarious of the comedy kind
of genres. The trick with a prank call, whether it's
Roy D Mercer or Shirley Q lickor or whoever else,
the trick of the prank call is to get someone
in a hurry. And when you get them rattled, that's
when you throw an interception. That's when you get the
happy feet, that's when you don't make good judgments. Well,
(26:51):
that's what happens right before an election. We're just about
to vote, and they tell that other guy's a pedophile,
murder tax, cheek, horrible person. Uh shoot, I wanted to
vote for him, but I don't want to be I
don't want to vote for him then be stuck with him,
and I gotta vote real soon. So that's why at
the very end they bombard the other guy, all right,
(27:11):
seven one three, nine nine nine, one thousand. And of course,
if you can't get through, or you just don't see
yourself as a person who calls in, you can email
me through the website Trocobury Show dot com.