6-26-25 - 6am - Asking Questions, Chinese Student Spies, Tesla and Auto Driving

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning, Michael and Dragon.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
So what kind of crazy stuff is going on in
the world today?

Speaker 3 (00:09):
What was that hw Bush that sounds like George h
W Bush right there at the end, you would know better,
or or Dana or sounded more like actually sounded more
like Dana Carvey imitating George.

Speaker 4 (00:22):
That's what it was. That's what it was.

Speaker 3 (00:25):
I want to get to some daddy issues in just
a minute, but before I do that, scrolling through X
last night, I come across a short clip from Jake
Tapper and the Cairon on CNN, is Trump maintains US
strikes destroyed or on nuclear program? There's only eight seconds,

(00:50):
but just to give you a a framework in which
to think about this short little eight seconds, you know,
Jake Tapper conducted the first debate between Trump and Biden
when the entire world could no longer ignore ignore that
Joe Biden was a deminda doldfart who really didn't have

(01:13):
a clue where he was, what he was doing, or
you know, why he was there, I don't think. And
even Trump said something about, you know, I'm not even
sure that he knows what he said. And Jake Tapper
goes on to write a book original sin. You know,
we've talked about it because I, you know, I borrowed
the book from Barnes and Noble. They they made me

(01:35):
leave a deposit of twenty nine ninety five or thirty
nine ninety five, whatever the cost of the book is.
And then once I finished with the book, you know,
borrowing it, I got my deposit back. So it was
a pretty good deal for me. And I read the book,
and throughout the entire book, Jake Tapper talks about all
of the signs that were there and how, you know,

(01:56):
after the election they decided to write a book make
some money for themselves. They they did so, and they
went on a humongous book tour, interviewed by you know,
every left wing outlet and every right wing outlet, because
they wanted everybody to read and buy the book. And
you know, as much as I wanted to, I didn't

(02:16):
want to give him any money. So I borrowed it
from Barnes and Noble. In the book and in many
the sound bites that we played after I read the book,
from some of the interviews that Tapper did, it was
always that something to the effect that maybe they didn't

(02:39):
ask enough questions, or maybe they didn't deal with it
as forthrightly as they should, or maybe they were blinded
by their own ideology and their own the fact that
he was of the preferred Biden was of the preferred party.

(02:59):
Any number, any number of excuses that you know, a
Megan Kelly or a Tucker Carlson or anybody on Fox
News might ask he always had. You know, this maya
kulpa that you know, in hindsight, maybe we should have
done a better job. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

Speaker 4 (03:17):
Well, yesterday Jake Tepper said this.

Speaker 5 (03:21):
Asking questions is literally our job, demanding facts and answers
instead of just taking a president's word for it. Asking
questions is literally our job, demanding facts and answers instead
of just taking a president's word.

Speaker 3 (03:37):
For it, or instead of just seeing what we see
and turning a blind eye to it and saying, oh, yep,
that was pretty bad. He doesn't know where he's standing.
Oh that's pretty bad, he wandered off, Oh that's pretty bad.
He asked somebody that's been dead for a while and
he went to their funeral to you know, hey, stand

(03:59):
up me recognized, Or the time he asked somebody to
stand up who was confined to a wheelchair. The all
the stories that Biden had about this and that and
everything else that was just you know, a total bull crap.
Jake Tapper has the cajones the audacity to go back
on his program and after four years of not asking questions,

(04:27):
which he says is literally their job, not demanding facts
and answers, and instead of just taking a president's word
for it, comes out and actually says.

Speaker 5 (04:39):
That on air asking questions is literally our job, demanding
facts and answers instead of just taking a president's word
for it.

Speaker 3 (04:51):
To all of you that are yawning right now, going yeah,
we know that, Yeah, you know this. This that's that's
nothing new. Have you ever thought about how so blatantly
hypocritical it is and how they are able. This is

(05:12):
the fascinating part to me, that they are able to
go through four years of not asking questions, which is,
according to him, literally their job, not demanding facts and answers,
which he says is literally their job, and instead literally
just taking the president's word for it, or the staff's

(05:34):
word for it, or you know, Kareem abdul Jabar's word
for it. That the President's fine. You know, it's hard
to keep up with hims. You know, he moves so
fast that we have to we have to run around
like you know, a bunch of rabbits trying to chase.

Speaker 4 (05:47):
Him all the time.

Speaker 3 (05:50):
That hypocrisy and the ballsiness of coming back on air.
You know, now the book tour is over. Come back
on the air, go right back into your routine of
just oh well, you know what, Yeah, we wrote a
book about how we failed to answer questions or ask questions,

(06:10):
which is literally our job. And now we're back, and
you know our job is to you know, to question everything.
And nobody bats an I. Nobody bats an I. This
is a eight seconds that every talk show host in
the country should be playing that. You know, Fox and

(06:32):
Friends this morning should have been playing this. Maybe they have.
I don't know because I don't listen to them. Even
CNN ought to be making a comment about you know this.
You know, mister Tipper was right. Maybe maybe the president
of the CNN, maybe the news director ought to you know,
call him in because he's he's the news anchor of
his program and his is ostensibly a news program and

(06:58):
say we need to be a little more careful, a
little more circumspect about what we do, how we say
it would seem.

Speaker 4 (07:07):
To be reasonable to me.

Speaker 3 (07:08):
And if you can't find it on that mainstream media stuff,
you can go to Michael says, gohere dot com.

Speaker 4 (07:12):
It's opposted right there.

Speaker 3 (07:14):
Yeah, and it's you know, I know it's eight seconds,
and I know that your attention span is about six seconds.
But if you really struggle, if you really think to yourself,
I can I can do this, Michael, I'll do it
for you. You can make it through the eight seconds.

Speaker 4 (07:27):
Focus focus, Cacus, that's right, focus focus.

Speaker 3 (07:31):
Thousands upon thousands of Chinese nationals posing as students have
been denied entry into the United.

Speaker 4 (07:37):
States, and it's about time.

Speaker 3 (07:40):
All this comes after revelations of espionage that's linked to
China's people liberations army first exposed back in twenty twenty,
so in twenty twenty five we finally decide to do
something about it. It involves operatives that are being placed
at American universities and research centers so that they can
steal it, intellectual property and sensitive information. All these so

(08:03):
called experts now estimate this somewhere around ten thousand Chinese
students in this country may actually be shocker Communist Party agents,
and those agents have been specifically tasked with acquiring technology, health,
and defense secrets and turning those back over to the

(08:24):
Chinese Communist Party, all while masquerading as well, I'm just
a brilliant Asian student, really good in math and engineering,
you know, all the stereotypical stuff, and I want to
get my degree from Harvard or the University of Colorado
or whatever it might be.

Speaker 4 (08:40):
And then I'll know.

Speaker 3 (08:41):
I'll pay for every kind of secret I can possibly get,
and then I'll turn it back over. And by the way,
I'll get a degree, live in the country, and maybe
stay in the country and continue to do my spy work. Unbelievable.
We national suicide. We're just committing national suicide. Customs and
Border Protection arrested two Chinese nationals tied to the University

(09:04):
of Michigan, remember that story. They were trying to smuggle
a toxic fungus into the country. The act was described
as agro terrorism.

Speaker 1 (09:15):
Use.

Speaker 3 (09:15):
Attorney Jerome Gordon says the alleged actions of these Chinese nationals,
including a loyal member of the Chinese Communist Party, are
of the gravest national security concerns, So the State Department
has started to intensify their efforts so they can identify
and block individuals that have ties to the Chinese Communist Party,

(09:37):
or at least trying to really vet those that are
studying in critical fields prevent them from coming into the country.
Now there's a court injunction that currently prevents the deportation
of students that are already in the country. The Trump
administration previously ordered the American embassies to deny visus to

(09:59):
the new aut implicants, and Tammy Bruce, the former talk
show host who's now the State Department spokeswoman, emphasizes that
we are instead going to use every tool that we
have to vet and to make sure that we know
who's coming in. A retired Army major general by the
name of Paul Vowley has warned that the Chinese regime
carefully selects the students bound for US institutions, briefing them

(10:25):
to report their findings to Chinese intelligence operaties. He says,
it's a very well organized, very well programmed operation. Nearly
three hundred thousand Chinese students were studying in this country
during the twenty three to twenty four academic year, including
ironically at New York University, where there's a student by

(10:48):
the name of Baron Trump. We've known and seen this
Chinese infiltration as early as twenty twenty one. That's when
the Harvard Ynity School, ironically the Kennedy School, actually collaborated
with several Chinese Communist Party propaganda arms trying to influence

(11:09):
Western organizations.

Speaker 1 (11:11):
They just it's freaking unbelievable to me.

Speaker 3 (11:14):
How this just kind of slides under the radar and
nobody really cares. Tesla Tesla is. We mentioned Tesla at
the very end of the program yesterday, and that caused
me to kind of start digging into what's really going
on with their evs because the story that I had
yesterday the end of the program was about Tesla's kind

(11:37):
of shifting or I should maybe be more precise, Elon
musk is shifting to robotics. Well, apparently Tesla's facing an
intense regulatory scrutiny in both this country and in France
over their self driving technology and the safety claims that

(11:58):
goes along with that self driving technology. The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration lost an investigation into Tesla's robo taxi
service down in Austin because they found videos showing vehigles
violating traffic laws during their debut weekend, and over in France,
regulators have ordered Tesla to stop what they described as

(12:21):
deceptive marketing practices regarding the capabilities of the self driving vehicles. Now,
the French action, no, no, there's any correlation here follows
a sharp decline in Tesla's sales in France, registrations dropping
from more than thirty one hundred in January from thirty

(12:44):
one hundred January to eleven hundred and forty one so
far this year. And of course you can go online.
You can find videos everywhere troubling incidents involving the robo
taxi service, including one really interesting one about a vehicle
veering into a lane for on oncoming traffic and then
it crosses the double yellow line to correct itself. So

(13:06):
the rollout in Austin involved about ten vehicles operating in
a limited area, each with a safety driver in the
front passenger seat, which you always find interesting because if
it's self driving, then why do you have a safety person.
It's like you know we used to have on trains.
If you're a trained person, remember when's the last time

(13:26):
you saw a caboose A caboose, I love that word caboose.
And there was always somebody in the caboose. And I
remember as a kid, you know, always waving to the
guy in the caboose. Well, they're no longer cabooses, and
you know, so you eliminate that caboos because you don't
really need it. Well, do you really need if you
have a self driving robotaxi, do you really need somebody
there to watch the self driving drive itself?

Speaker 4 (13:46):
I don't know. It seems kind of redundant to me.

Speaker 3 (13:48):
But the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, you can confirm
that is aware of the referenced incidents and is in
contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information. And they
emphasize that manufacturers are responsible for self certifying that their
vehicles meet safety standards. So then what does the NHTSA

(14:08):
do if everybody just self certifies. They wait till something
bad happens and then they go investigate it. This seems
to me, what they're doing seems backassword.

Speaker 4 (14:17):
To me, But what do I know.

Speaker 3 (14:19):
NHTSA they say, quote will continue to enforce the law
on all manufacturers of motor vehicles and equipment in accordance
with the Vehicle Safety Act and our data driven, risk
based INVESTIGADI process.

Speaker 1 (14:33):
Musk.

Speaker 4 (14:33):
Meanwhile, of course, he remains optimistic.

Speaker 3 (14:36):
He's optimistic about everything except the ability to cut government spending,
which tells you just how bad of a cancer that is.
During an earnings call a couple of months ago, he said,
I predict that there will be millions of Teslas operating
fully autonomously in the second half of next year. But unfortunately,
I think their challenges extend way beyond the regulatory scrutiny

(14:58):
with you know, incidents like all the arsenal attacks on
the vehicles and lawsuits legend the company's association with must
political views has armed the brand. Tessa's got a lot
of problems. I saw the most fascinating video online yesterday
when I was digging through these stories, and it shows
a cop pulling over a car. I don't think it

(15:23):
was a way Mo because again and the I don't
know whether it was in California, Texas, I forget where
it was. Doesn't make any difference. But a cop pulls
a car over because it's missed the turn in a
construction zone. You know how often times it will say,
you'll see in a construction zone, you know traffic, do

(15:45):
not enter construction traffic only, and it make sure that
you turn and you don't keep going straight where all
the construction traffic's going. Well, that's precisely what the self
driving vehicle did. It didn't, you know, was either unable
to read the sign, unable to up at the sign,
or whatever, you know, whatever it was, and it just
kept going. And when it reached you know, o where

(16:07):
all the construction traffic and machinery was, it came to
a stop and there was a cop car behind it.
And the cop car is, you know, it's got its
lights flashing, and it's chasing the car. And it pulls up,
I mean, the car stops. Cop gets out, walks up
to the car, The window comes down. There's nobody in
the car. There's nobody in the car. So he starts

(16:31):
talking to customer service because customer services somehow realizes or
is able to see somehow that the car has stopped
and that there is a cop at the window. And
so now the cop is talking to somebody, you know,
way off somewhere else.

Speaker 4 (16:50):
What happens when the.

Speaker 3 (16:51):
Cop says can I see your license and registration? Well,
there may be a registration in the vehicle, but there's
no license because there's no driver. And then who do
you if you issue the ticket, you you have to
issue the ticket to the person driving the vehicle. There's
no one driving the vehicle. So I'm sitting here thinking, Okay,

(17:15):
as a lawyer, if that's my client, if the company
is my client, who violated the law? I know the
easy answer is, well, the company did because it's caller
failed to do something. Yes, but you have to issue
the ticket. So does the cop then have to find

(17:35):
out who that person was they were speaking to, and
is the customer service representative liable for the ticket or
is the company liable for the ticket? And how do
you issue the ticket because the cop doesn't have time.
For example, if let's just say this happened in Austin
and the customer service representative is in Amorello or Phoenix

(17:58):
or Denver, think could be anywhere, how do they.

Speaker 4 (18:02):
Issue the ticket?

Speaker 3 (18:04):
So as the technology advances and we you know, you
get into an uber that's driverless and the uber violates
some traffic law, is the cop going to hand you
the ticket?

Speaker 1 (18:14):
Well?

Speaker 3 (18:14):
No, because you didn't do anything. You were just sitting
in the back, you know, on your computer. Except I
wouldn't be. I'd be I'd be too nervous watching everything. Yeah,
I'm not sure the law has actually caught up with
the technology, or on the other hand, technology is way
gone beyond the law.

Speaker 6 (18:38):
Good morning from South Kota, Michael. You and Dragon have
been together for several years, and I sure hope the
fire truck you know what you're doing, and don't be
calling me daddy. Everyone have a great day.

Speaker 3 (18:52):
Guber number twenty seven to twenty you caught on. I
wondered if anybody would Mike and Dragon, how do you
segue between Asian infiltrators to a radic driving without taking
a breath. If I was Asian, I would be offended,
But I'm not, so one said, I'm just laughing my
ass off because I came in here today with I
got a pos a pile of stuff that are just

(19:15):
a bunch of short stories that I haven't gotten to
that I think are funny or interesting, and I'm just
trying to wham bam, thank you man get through them. Yeah,
but this is a brilliant suggestion fifty five sixty six.
All they need to do the self driving cars is
to add a QR code stickers of the window of
where to send the tickets. Yeah, I mean, but I

(19:37):
suppose though if you're not, you know, you can't. For example,
you don't get any points if you get a uh
ticket from from a speed camera or a light camera.
So if you're if it's a well, who would.

Speaker 1 (19:52):
The points go to anyway?

Speaker 4 (19:53):
Exactly? Is it?

Speaker 3 (19:54):
Nobody get the points to? Yeah, so all you're doing
is just it's just a revenue, which most laws are
just for revenue. So yeah, in fact, why not just
have a QR sticker on there for your Venmo account,
you know, and cop What cops should do is just
have you know, set up a police department Venmo account

(20:16):
and you can just pay right there on the spot.
I you know, this has been decades ago, but there
was a time when I think, or maybe I'm just
misremembering this, but you get a speeding ticket, and you know,
there was the there was the option to pay on

(20:37):
the spot. You could write a check on the spot
and be done with it and drive on and then
in in there's a huge story about this. I don't
have it in front of me, but it reminds me
of this huge story that's going on in the Oklahoma Panhandle,
actually in the county that I grew up in. Ironically,

(21:00):
it's in the Oklahoma Panhandle, and the name of the
county is Texas County. Figure that out, So Texas County, Oklahoma.

Speaker 1 (21:07):
And what was going on.

Speaker 3 (21:10):
They were stopping truckers for any number of things they
could find. The most minor thing they could find. They
would stop the trucker speeding, you know, two miles over
the speed limit, or you know, failure to leave yours
turn signal long enough to turn it, you didn't turn

(21:30):
it on early enough. I mean, just really minor stupid things.
Then they would pull the trucker over. They would go
through you know, I stopped you because of everything, you know,
show me all the papers you know the truckers have
to carry, and show me all of that stuff. And
then they would make an offer to the truck driver,

(21:52):
I can issue you a ticket for this or in
the alternative, and I don't know exactly how they worded it,
but it was essentially this, you can make a contribution
to our you know how they have the civil Asset
Forfeiture where they take things and then they sell like

(22:15):
they'll take cars or property or whatever and somehow converted
to cash, or they'll use the cars themselves.

Speaker 4 (22:20):
Whatever.

Speaker 1 (22:21):
But that was the scam going on. I forget what
I think it was the local sheriff in that county.

Speaker 3 (22:30):
I may be wrong. Could have been the highway patrol,
but it was one of the it was. It was
one of those two law enforcement agencies. And the scam
was the trucker could avoid the ticket, which they would
want to do because of the insurance costs and you
know the problems they would have with the company not
wanting to pay the ticket. But if you made the
contribution to the Asset Forfeiture fund in some amount, you know,

(22:53):
they would just I don't know how they calculated the amount,
but whatever it was, you could do that and avoid
the ticket. Now think about that.

Speaker 4 (23:03):
What what a scam.

Speaker 3 (23:05):
And finally it took it took one and she was female,
a female trucker. Finally had the Cahonys, So maybe she won,
you know, maybe she was a trans trucker. I don't know,
but she had the Cohonys and she decided that she
was not No, this is wrong, I'm not gonna do it,
uh one. I don't think that I was speeding. So
I'm going to challenge the speeding ticket, and I'm going

(23:27):
to make sure that the judge finds out that I
was also offered the opportunity to avoid this ticket by
you know, making a contribution, and she took that. She
may or may not have the support of some union
or some other organization, but they took it. I'll see
if I can dig the story up and give you

(23:48):
more details of it later. But she took it all
the way up and of course the the Daily Oklahoma
and other newspapers in Oklahoma picked it.

Speaker 4 (23:57):
Up and it became a BFD.

Speaker 3 (24:00):
And I so when you said add a QR sticker
code to the window to send the tickets to the
driver of the cars, why not just think what those
cops should have had was just a venmo QR code
and just allow them to, you know, the trucker to
just take their phone scan it and you know, make
a one hundred dollars contribution to the Asset Forfiture fund,

(24:20):
which the DA and the local sheriff apparently we're using to.

Speaker 4 (24:25):
I don't know what they were using it for.

Speaker 3 (24:27):
I have no idea, but talk about a scam proves
that wherever you turn, there's always a scam going again,
no segue. So the Pentagon, which by the way, they're
doing the briefing right now about the strikes in Iran.
I thought about taking that live, and I think we'll
wait and see what they say, and then maybe later

(24:49):
in the program we can get back to it. But
the Pentagon has decided to designate two new military zones
along the southwest border in Arizona, Texas. This is obviously
an attempt to really kind of pushed the Trump administration's
effort to even further secure the southern border. You know,
we already we already have it down to about zero,

(25:09):
but that's not good enough. We want to start sealing
it off. I think this is actually pretty smart that
designating two new military zones along the border, officially called
National Defense areas, which are patrolled.

Speaker 4 (25:27):
By US troops.

Speaker 3 (25:29):
One will be added to the Marine Corps air station
in you, Arizona, and the other two joint based San
Antonio in Texas. Officials at DHS say that the illegal
immigrants entering these zones will be treated as trespassers and
therefore can be detained by American troops until the border

(25:51):
patrol arrives. Yeah, not a bad idea, right, just designated
a military zone.

Speaker 4 (26:00):
Let's see.

Speaker 3 (26:00):
This is Northern Command Chief General Gregory Guilo. The establishment
of a second National Defense Area increases that operational reach
and effectiveness in denying illegal activity along the southern border.
So we now have four newly established military zones along
the border. Back in April, they had done this. I
totally missed that a two hundred mile sixty foot wide

(26:23):
strip along New Mexico was added to a military base
then near Fort lyss Texas. It was a sixty three
mile zone that was designated as a military zone. We
now have more than nine thousand activeuty troops deployed to
the border. That includes the troops, surveillance aircraft, US Navy

(26:46):
ships offshore, all operated under a Joint Task Force Southern
Border led by Northern Command. The ground forces include combat
season troops from the Army's fourth Infantry Division.

Speaker 1 (26:59):
I'm not even sure that the cartels.

Speaker 4 (27:04):
What a deal with the military. I may be wrong,
but I doubt they will.

Speaker 3 (27:09):
I got to go back for just a moment to
the newly nominated Democrat nominee for mayor in New York City, Zorong.

Speaker 4 (27:19):
Mandani Himity Christmas.

Speaker 3 (27:24):
I'd put it this way, I New York City did
not take one small step towards Shuria yesterday. It took
a giant leap forward. Reacting to the outcome of the
Democrat primary. Mandani apparently represents a radical shift in the

(27:46):
city's politics. In fact, you might start expecting no go zones.
I didn't realize this, but Mandani is a self identified
follower of twelver Shia Islam. That's a member of a
sect that believes that this day, there's a twelve hundred
year old living prophet on earth.

Speaker 1 (28:08):
Who is in hiding and is going to come out
at some point soon and proselytize Islam the world over. Now,
when you think about.

Speaker 3 (28:21):
Mandali's religious affiliations, and you accuse or the media can
be accused of completely ignoring the relevance, I've yet to
hear any reporters anywhere nationally or out of New York
put any questions to him and say, you remember this

(28:41):
sect that believes there's somebody in hiding. Do you really
believe that stuff? Or how about this, what if he
is that twelve hundred year old living prophet in hiding
who has now come out.

Speaker 4 (28:58):
Think about it.

Speaker 3 (29:00):
He's talking about rent control, grocery stores owned by the government,
all of these Kako style policies that have failed.

Speaker 4 (29:06):
All over the world time and time and time again.

Speaker 3 (29:08):
And the funny thing is, oh, he'll bring prices down
for sure, because once everybody leaves, there'll be no demand
and prices will collapse. He's put together an unholy alliance.
He's going out there on one hand saying he's a
twelve ver Muslim. On the other hand, he's saying he's
for LGBT rights. Now, that contradiction, according to Sharia law

(29:31):
is hurram under the twelve or doctrine and ought to
be a central attack point by Eric Adams or Cuomo,
whoever's going to run against him. If I were running
a campaign against him, I would drive that wedge through
his campaign over and over and over again and just
find out who are you and what do you really represent?

Speaker 4 (29:54):
What do you really stand for?

Speaker 2 (29:56):
Hey, Michael, you got to understand that Jake tamper ash
he takes after Joe Biden when Joe said we choose
truth over facts. Yeah, the only thing is both of
them forgot to tell you, they have their own truths
and the facts don't matter.

Speaker 4 (30:13):
Have a good day.

Speaker 3 (30:15):
You Know what's really funny about your talk about is
in one of my stories today, I talk about how
we have we're living in an age where everybody has
their own truth and their own facts. And well, i'll
tell you more about that when when we get to
that story. But yeah, that's that's already on my mind,

(30:37):
and you're exactly right. It's it's it's going back to
my whole theory that our dearness kick and I can't
let it go, and it's driving me nuts because it
makes showprep even harder, and it makes it makes you know,
sometimes you sometimes I just like to mindlessly scroll through
either Facebook or x just to kind of generally see
what people are saying. And I've just gotten so cinny

(31:00):
about it because I just nothing's real, there's nothing right
about any of it. Then Steve from down in the
ilklum Pananas, a retired law enforcement officer, reminds me of
the text line that it was the Texas County District
Attorney and the local Drug Task Force that were running
the extortion scheme that got blown up. It was just

(31:23):
freaking hilarious. I mean it's don't get me wrong, it's
hilarious in the sense that one they thought they could
get by with it, and that it finally took a
I mean, all you tough truckers out there, it finally
took a female trucker, a female trucker with Cajoney's, which
you know, you can interpret that any way you want to.

(31:45):
That finally blew the whole scheme up by saying, you
know what, no, I'm not going to make a contribution,
give me a ticket, and I'm going to challenge the ticket,
and then suddenly, kaboon, it blows up.

Speaker 4 (31:57):
Wow.

Speaker 3 (31:58):
You combine that, I mean, the gutsiness of trying to
get money for your drug task Force by extorting truck
drivers is phenomenal. At the same time that because of
artificial intelligence, you're not really sure what you can believe
or not believe when you're reading something or looking at something.

(32:19):
What's real and what's not real? Or that goes all
back to transgenderism. Is it live or is it memorys?
Is it real or is it not real? Who knows anymore?
It just shows that no matter how far technology advances,

(32:41):
you never know what you're going to get. So, imagine
that you're in a congressional hearing and during the course
of that hearing that a Democrat puts up a poster
that says, how do you rate the work of E Long,
Musk and doge? Now listen to the numbers and add
them up in your head. Sixty seven percent disapprove, thirty

(33:03):
eight percent approve, five percent, don't know, got it?

Speaker 6 (33:10):
Just appoint of clarification the poll behind you, behind our
ranking member, it adds up to one hundred and ten percent.

Speaker 1 (33:16):
Just wanted to clarify.

Speaker 6 (33:18):
Is it meant to add up to one hundred and
ten percent or is that an error?

Speaker 4 (33:21):
Yelp, yeah, I do.

Speaker 7 (33:23):
This is from a Quinnympiac poll that was held two
weeks ago, and this is the data that was provided.
There's a wealth of information, including information about Donald Trump's
falling poll numbers.

Speaker 4 (33:34):
So you should take a look. Thanks fail bet.

Speaker 6 (33:38):
The gentleman yields and it still adds up to one
hundred and ten percent.

Speaker 1 (33:42):
That's a fake poll right there.

Speaker 3 (33:49):
Oh, how embarrassing calling the judge. Honey, Yeah, look at
this poll. Yeah, those is disliked by a majority of
American Your poll adds up to one hundred and ten percent,
how cannot be