11-13-25 - 11am - The Epstein Files... Again

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Ranie.

Speaker 2 (00:00):
What in Nie Sam hell was going on around here?

Speaker 3 (00:03):
You're gonna get pre.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
Emptied so we can hear how much the Rockies suck.

Speaker 4 (00:06):
Oh yeah, you know what's great about that is we
got the moneyball guy now. And as I was listening
to that, there was a there was a point in
behind the scenes, a little behind the scenes baseball here,
no pun intended, was depending on when the news conference ended,
I might have to fill in for thirty seconds or

(00:29):
a couple of minutes until we get to the top
of the news And I was thinking, what do I
talk about? And I thought what I was going to
talk about were two things. One you should know that
for almost a decade, I was a season ticket holder
right off third base. I mean, I had wonderful seats.
And when I when when they really did start sucking,
I really did just like, I'm not gonna spend this

(00:50):
kind of money for these two seats anymore. Even though
I had a group that we were, you know, we
distribute the seats.

Speaker 2 (00:56):
I was like, no, I'm done. I'm done.

Speaker 4 (00:59):
Now the proofs in the pudding, and we will see
that they've probably hired the right guy. But you've got
to give them Montforts, which I don't normally do. I
would give the Montfort's credit for coming right out of
the bat again no pun intended, and saying, uh, we
know that we haven't been exactly a fun plaze. We

(01:20):
haven't been doing what we're supposed to be doing. So
that's like acknowledging that, Yeah, we got to make a
big change here. So let's get rolling. I gotta stuff,
I got to cram in here. There was a big
explosion yesterday, gigantic explosion. In fact, I'm surprised that's the fallout.
In fact, the fallout is probably already hitting us right now.

(01:42):
So start taking your iodine tablets and start, you know,
burying yourself underground because the fallout is coming. And that's
the Epstein files. Oh my gosh, we're going to do
this again to kind of lay a baseline, let's to
Alan Dershowitz, constitutional law emeritus from HAF or the Law School.

Speaker 5 (02:07):
It's more than documents that haven't been released during control
of the White House and the DK.

Speaker 2 (02:11):
They could end this at any time. Guess there are
some things that are undersealed, But no they.

Speaker 6 (02:15):
Can't because they can't get the judges. It'll never end
just not as.

Speaker 2 (02:21):
But it is given the other Let's get them out there.
I know what's in those documents.

Speaker 7 (02:28):
I know something you don't know.

Speaker 2 (02:30):
I know what's in those documents.

Speaker 6 (02:32):
That's why it's so important to get these judicial documents
out there. I want them out there. If the judge
will give me permission. I have them in my possession,
my lawyers have them. Judge, let me give them to
Pierce Morgan. I want to give them to Pierce Morgan. Why, judge,
are you preventing me from disclosing.

Speaker 2 (02:50):
Material that would be very, very important.

Speaker 6 (02:53):
In putting a whole picture on this thing, the whole picture.

Speaker 2 (02:58):
Who was the whole picture? Nobody will the whole picture.
We don't want the whole picture.

Speaker 7 (03:03):
Grief.

Speaker 4 (03:04):
So the House Oversight Committee did release some of the
Epstein emails, and sure enough, shocker not Donald Trump is
in the Epstein files. We've known that, but I keep hearing.
Even KATVR this morning referred to the explosive emails. There

(03:25):
were three. There were three emails. I read them last night.
I read every single one, and I read it the
correct way. I started at the bottom, because they were
email chains. I started at the bottom and I read upwards.
So kind of like this, I don't know, Casper the
ghost or something that just haunts the president's dream. Epstein
has now risen from the great Beyond and he's pointing

(03:48):
a scraggly, little old closey light finger Donald Trump, saying
it was you all along?

Speaker 2 (03:54):
Or has he really because I don't think that he has.

Speaker 4 (03:58):
In In April two, two eleven message to the Fixer,
his girlfriend and confidante, Disney, Maxwell, Epstein wrote this quote,
I want you to realize that that dog hasn't barked
as Trump. Then the word victim appears in a black box.

(04:18):
They've they've they've blocked it out, they redacted it, except
they've put the word victim in, followed by this quote,
he has never once been mentioned period, police chief, et cetera.
I'm seventy five percent there. Now forget that the fininceer
who didn't kill himself or did he see there's just

(04:42):
I just don't what. I kind of care, but I
kind of don't care too. He never seemed to use punctuation.
If you look, if you actually look physically at the emails,
he never uses punctuation. He never capitalizes anything in these
personal communications, and these personal emails. So the message does
appear to be be damning, but it's really vague. I

(05:03):
had been thinking about that, ellipse, meaning I have been
thinking about that dot dot dot dot, Maxwell said, But
what what what?

Speaker 7 (05:13):
What?

Speaker 2 (05:13):
What?

Speaker 7 (05:13):
What? What?

Speaker 2 (05:14):
Is unclear?

Speaker 7 (05:16):
Now?

Speaker 4 (05:16):
The victim in the note is this Virginia Guffrey, Jeffrey Guffrey, Affriget.
I'm not trying to purposely mispronounce this particular name. She
said earlier this year that Trump had committed no improprieties
for her, and that's the her that Trump was supposedly
at the house with that they refer to in these emails.

(05:39):
Now there was a natural reflection from the White House,
a blanket denial. The fact remains quote that President Trump
kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club decades ago for
being a creep to his female employees, including Jeffrey, said
Caroline Levitt.

Speaker 8 (05:57):
So what one of several factors in deciding whether to
go on the trip with Michael next October to the
Greek Isles is whether or not Dragon is going. Michael,
can you tell us if Dragon's going. If he is,
I might have to apply for some of those government
benefits to rebalance suns in certain accounts and be able

(06:22):
to join you.

Speaker 4 (06:25):
We can sort of go fund me fund me for you.
We could do that work. Yeah, we could do that.

Speaker 2 (06:31):
Works for criminals, why not for.

Speaker 4 (06:33):
He's got you know, you've goten committed some horrific crime.
You get to go fund me to pay for your
lawyer and your living expenses and you know, cover your
your baby mama while you're in prison and stuff.

Speaker 2 (06:42):
Well, yeah we can.

Speaker 4 (06:43):
We could do that, easy peasy, easy peasy. Or Dragon
just pay for your trip out of his pocket. We
could do that too.

Speaker 2 (06:49):
I just look at my couch, CHRISTI and see what
I got left over. So I would read you the email.

Speaker 4 (06:55):
I may eventually read you the emails, but I'm want
to waste a lot of time on that. What's in
play now? In addition to these three emails. Now, I
don't know the totality of how many emails in this truncheon,
the number of emails in this truncit were released, but
there are three emails one, two, three that mentioned Donald Trump.

(07:21):
What I find interesting is that now in play is
the master of Whisperers, a journalist Michael Wolf, who in
twenty fifteen warned Epstein now I want you to really
think about it. Most people just glass over this and
they don't think about it. So here's a journalist who
warned Epstein before a presidential candidate debate that CNN was

(07:44):
quote planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you,
either on air or insacrum afterwards. If we were able
to craft an answer for him, what do you think
it should be? Epstein responded, I think you should let
him hang himself, said the reporter. If he says he

(08:07):
hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then
that gives you, Epstein a valuable pr and political currency.

Speaker 2 (08:15):
Now I find that very juicy, juicy juicy.

Speaker 4 (08:18):
But he also doesn't necessarily see these emails as a
sort of smoking gun that reveals the president to be
some sort of pedal like everybody keeps claiming. And this
is a trickle, this is not a fire hose, it's
not a torrent, And are really more revealing of the
power dynamics behind Trump's first election than they are of

(08:39):
any shenanigans at mar A Lago or an Epstein island, Because,
as the reporter Wolf told Epstein, quote, of course, it
is possible that when asked, He'll say, Jeffrey is a
great guy who's gotten a raw deald and is a
victim political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a
Trump regime. That's what the reporter is telling Epstein. But

(09:01):
wave political correctness is now called woke. But in that
kind of pression, really Democrats, According to a Republican on
the House Oversight Committee, Democrats continued to carelessly cherry picked
documents to generate clickbait that is not grounded in facts. Actually,

(09:22):
in last year's interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche
Gislaie Maxwell said of Trump that she quote never witnessed
the president in any inappropriate setting, in any way in
the times that I was with him. She said he
was a gentleman in all respects. So now we have

(09:44):
the question is it Angel Trump or Devil Trump? Only
Epstein knows for sure, But we just seem to not
be able.

Speaker 2 (09:56):
To let it go.

Speaker 5 (09:58):
I'm not sure, but it's sounds like you're kind of
excited about old Paul Day Podesta coming on over to
the Rockies. Just like to temper that a little bit
with two words, Cleveland Brown's.

Speaker 4 (10:12):
All right, let's see what this will see what Jack
Corgan has to say about that.

Speaker 2 (10:16):
Jack, how you doing today?

Speaker 7 (10:17):
I am good, Michael, how are you?

Speaker 3 (10:19):
And as a Cleveland during a long time Cleveland Browns fan,
you know that's one of the elephants in the room.

Speaker 7 (10:28):
Might be a herd if you will.

Speaker 4 (10:29):
Yeah, I've got one simple question for you. So, as
as a former season ticket holder who finally gave up,
do you think this time the monfers are serious?

Speaker 7 (10:40):
Yes? I do.

Speaker 3 (10:42):
I think it was very evident in the news conference
that maybe not officially, but it is much more about
Walker Montford in charge of the day to day. He's
still obviously going to have to run things. Passed his
dad to a degree, but the way Dick talked, and

(11:05):
maybe in many ways, the lack of involvement in the
news conference with Paul and having Walker be front and
center on it, the hiring of Paul Deepodesta, and the
way Walker carried today. Yes, they are aware of what
they have to do and now the challenge is trying

(11:27):
to make it succeed.

Speaker 2 (11:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (11:28):
In fact, that was my first comment after we broke
away from the press conference, was if we had somebody
you know, talk back to talk, you know, said something
to the effect about I can't believe, you know, because
they sucked blah blah blah blah. And my response was,
but I thought what I heard the Momford say was,
we know we have sucked for the past, you know,
umpteen years, and this is why we're doing this today.

Speaker 7 (11:50):
Yeah, there's no question.

Speaker 3 (11:52):
I mean, it's been eight years since the ball club's
been in the postseason. The three straight hundred plus lost seasons.
You know, they're wearing it. They admit that that's a problem.
And here's one of the most important things.

Speaker 7 (12:08):
You know.

Speaker 3 (12:08):
Albeit the fan talking about Paul's work over the last
decade with the Cleveland Browns, the thing about Paul de
Podesta is one this is a guy with immense experience
in multiple sports with multiple teams. So a smart guy
like him is going to understand, you know, the things

(12:32):
that need to be done and if he is given
the wherewithal to do that. I think they have made
the commitment, the Walker Montford led Rockies now to make
sure that we turn over every stone, if you will,

(12:54):
to find a better way to make this team not
only have success again, but to have sustained success.

Speaker 4 (13:00):
You know, Jack, I think that's a very wise statement,
because people really do learn from their mistakes, and if
they take what they learn from those mistakes or the
bad times they go through, then that means the next
chapter of their life can be even better. So let's
hope that that's true.

Speaker 2 (13:15):
Here.

Speaker 4 (13:15):
Hey this, Jack, appreciate your insight. Very good as always.
Take care my pleasure. Michael, you take care as well.
All right, let's go back to the Epstein files real quickly.
So here's Caroline Levitt yesterday talking about the about the
release of the documents or the emails.

Speaker 1 (13:33):
Mary here you going two questions on this.

Speaker 9 (13:35):
In the interest of transparency, why not just go ahead
release the full files on Epstein to get this all
over we have This administration has done more with respect
to transparency when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein than any
administration ever.

Speaker 4 (13:50):
I want to insert something here that we tend to forget.
Many of these files in the possession of both the
FBI and the Department of Justice the Attorney General, are
under sealed by a federal court, and until the court
releases them, you can't do it. If you do it,
you're you're in contempt of court, You're violating the law

(14:13):
and Todd Blanche and the others have been going to
court trying to get the files released.

Speaker 9 (14:18):
In fact, this administration, the Department of Justice has turned
over tens of thousands of documents to the American people.
We are cooperating and showing support for the House Oversight Committee.

Speaker 8 (14:30):
That's part of the reason you are seeing.

Speaker 9 (14:32):
These documents that were released today because of the House
Oversite committees and Republicans' efforts to get these out to
the public. This administration also moved the Department of Justice
also moved to unseal ranjury testimony, which we know unfortunately
a judge declined those requests. So this administration has done
more than any and it just shows how this is

(14:52):
truly a manufactured hoax by the Democrat Party. For now
they're talking about it all of a sudden because President
Trump is an office, But when Joe Biden was sitting
in there, the Democrats never brought this up. This wasn't
an issue that they cared about because they actually don't
care about the victims in these cases. They care about
trying to score political points against President Trump, as we

(15:12):
have course seen with this government shutdown and this entire thing.

Speaker 4 (15:16):
That's enough of Caroline. Not that I don't disagree with her,
but she makes the best point. We've done all that,
we've released all of these things, we've done this, We've
gone to the courts to try to get things unsealed.
Now we're cooperating with the House Oversight Committee, so we
will eventually get you know, whatever we can get released released.

(15:38):
It's kind of how things in Washington, DC work. The
main thing that's been made that has made the Epstein
files seen politically as opposed to morally significant is that
Donald Trump appears I'm not sure that he is, but
he appears to be obsessed with preventing them from seeing

(15:59):
the light of day. That's why he devoted you know,
much of yesterday to import you know, trying to convince
Republicans such as Lauren Bobert, Colorado congressman, not to back
the release. But senior Republicans, according to Politico, are expecting
mass vote defections in the coming weeks as legislators are

(16:20):
going to start preparing for a disclosure bill is sponsored
by Congressman Rocanna and Thomas Massey. And then Marjorie Taylor
Green comes out and says they're releasing the files. Is
not only the right thing to do for the victims,
but it's also the right thing to do for the country.
I don't disagree with that, And I also don't disagree
with Caroline Levitt that if the Biden administration had any

(16:43):
inkling at all that Donald Trump was involved somehow in
the molestation of underage children, they would have released that.
They absolutely would have released that. So I don't know
whether Trump's just trying to protect some of his rich friends.
I don't know what it is, but I do fall

(17:05):
on the side of for Pete's sake, let's just release
these files and get rid of them whatever whoever it effects,
whoever it affects, it's mind numbing to me that when
all else fails, distract everybody with a shiny new object, right,

(17:29):
And I think that's the obvious takeaway from the latest
so called.

Speaker 2 (17:32):
News, because this is not really news.

Speaker 4 (17:35):
So Democrats, you think about the timing yesterday, and I
think it's the first time I've said it on this
new show in Kawai, and I'll prove it to you
again and again and again. There are no coincidences in Washington, DC.
I lived it for six years in the belly of
the beast at the highest levels of government in the
White House, and I'm telling you there are no coincidences.

(18:00):
So here are the Democrats, and they're reeling, They're they're
they're absolutely imploding from the defeat in the tumor shutdown.
And they repeatedly voted against opening the government fifteen times
or whatever it was, and then a few of them
finally caved. They become they become rational, and then the
party becomes livid at those people. Even the cabal turned

(18:24):
admitting what we all knew the entire time. That is,
the Democrats shut down the government for a record forty
three days, leading to you know, other signs of the apocalypse,
besides chaos at the airports, unpaid air traffic controllers, canceled flights,
starving masses of people threatening to loot stores because they
couldn't buy Well, pieces.

Speaker 2 (18:44):
Are in the buttercups or whatever they were going to buy.

Speaker 4 (18:48):
So what's a party of political performance artists supposed to do?

Speaker 2 (18:52):
Release three three of Epstein's.

Speaker 4 (18:55):
Emails and try to use that as explosive Trump look Bad.

Speaker 2 (19:02):
News Nation reported.

Speaker 4 (19:03):
In one email from twenty nineteen, Epstein appeared to write
to journalist Michael Wolfe, I told you this. Of course
he knew about the girls as he asked Islaine to stop. Okay,
Uh did he did he do anything else? I don't know,
but that's all the email says. He it's to a journalist.

(19:25):
Of course, he knew about the girls as he asked
Islaine to stop. In another email, Epstein's girlfriend, who is
this a reminder? Serving a twenty year federal prison sentence
for sex trafficking, Epstein said, I want you to realize
that that dog hasn't that the dog that hasn't barked
this Trump and that blank the victim, that woman spent

(19:46):
hours at my house with him. He has never once
mentioned period, police chief, period, et cetera.

Speaker 7 (19:52):
Period.

Speaker 4 (19:52):
I'm seventy five percent there, But News Nation sets up
the third this way. In another email from twenty fifteen,
Epstein asked Wolf what he should do if the media
asked then Canada Trump about their friendship, and Wolf replied
that Epstein should let Trump quote hang himself.

Speaker 2 (20:09):
That's it.

Speaker 4 (20:10):
That's what the Democrats have and I think quite funny. Hilariously,
the Republicans were ready for that. The Democrats released three
hand picked emails. So Republicans, you haven't heard this. I
bet how many emails do you think there are emails
and documents? I should say, because they're not all the emails,

(20:31):
but how many documents and emails do you think Republicans
released yesterday? Got a figure in your head? You ready,
twenty thousand. So out of twenty thousand we find these three.
I think there's a total cognitive dissonance going on. That
is what I mean by the shiny new object. That's

(20:51):
the distraction. And of course, as you heard, Caroline Levitt
was ready for it. They selectively linked emails blah blah
blah blah, but she added some history that I don't
think we should gloss over.

Speaker 2 (21:05):
Quote.

Speaker 4 (21:06):
The fact remains that Donald Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out
of his club decades ago for being a creep to
his female employees, including Giffrey whatever her name is. I'm
sorry these stories are nothing more than bad faith efforts
to distract from Trump's historic accomplishments. In any Americans common sense,
He's right through this hoax and clear distraction from the government.

Speaker 2 (21:26):
Opening back up again.

Speaker 4 (21:27):
But again, I would emphasize the main takeaway from the
Democrats release, other than their desperate attempt for attention is
that so far, again, we still have no evidence Trump
did anything wrong related to Epstein.

Speaker 2 (21:41):
And again, if.

Speaker 4 (21:42):
You buy my thesis, which if you don't yet, I
know you soon will. If there are no coincidences inside
the Beltway that for the entire four years, in fact,
for that matter, going back even further, but particularly during
the four years of the Biden administration, and if he
really was cognitively declined and didn't know what the hell

(22:04):
was going on, you don't think that the chief of staff,
You don't think that other people. You don't think that
all the Obama acolytes working inside the White House while
Biden was taking a nap.

Speaker 2 (22:15):
That they wouldn't have released those emails.

Speaker 4 (22:18):
Merrick Garland, who appointed Jack Smith to go after Trump,
and mar Alogo, and on January sixth, they headed out
for Trump. If he really wanted to bury Trump, then
bury Trump by showing that he was on the island
engaging in sex with minors. They would destroy anyone's career.

(22:40):
And yet, chup, chirp, chirp, chirp. Sure now, I ad
meant Trump is not cleaned as a whistle when it
comes to his history with women. But if he were
guilty of engaging in sex with underage girls. Epstein related
or not, otherwise you know, we wouldn't know that by now.

(23:01):
Democrats have been trying to personally destroy Trump for more.

Speaker 2 (23:06):
Than a decade.

Speaker 4 (23:08):
They've fired every round in their evil AR fifteen high
capacity magazine, and nothing, nothing is hit now. Of course,
the entire maga wright is built on distrust of the
federal government and all things that are in the deep state.

(23:28):
And I'm telling you as you should be. So there
is a sizeable element of Trump's own supporters who still
do believe there's a cover up of Epstein's relationships, and
that very well may be true. The infamous list on again,
off again, And I say infamous list because there is
evidence that there was a list, And then Gislaine says, no,

(23:50):
there was never a list. So there is he said,
she said, there is, There is not. The Trump Justice
departments releases have been the duds. Now, the problem with
duds is for many ways, of the many ways that
people think a dud only elevates the suspicion.

Speaker 2 (24:13):
So the sag is no doubt.

Speaker 4 (24:14):
Going to continue to attract public attention, and politicians on
both sides are going to exploit that to keep their
audiences tuned in real crimes, in my opinion, were committed
and powerful people connected with Epstein have a lot to
answer for. Prince Andrew looking at you. And the House
is poised to pass a discharge petition, meaning that they

(24:36):
will actually allow that bill, that the bill that releases
the documents, to allow that to come up for a vote,
and Speaker Johnson among others have indicated that they.

Speaker 2 (24:47):
Will vote for it.

Speaker 4 (24:50):
So, as always, I guess I would say stay tuned,
But in the meantime, it also encourage everybody to maybe
just take maybe a deep breath.

Speaker 2 (25:00):
As opposed to this bill, Well, we'll see where it goes.

Speaker 10 (25:05):
I wonder if you're having conversations or at least hearing
stuff from the Senate side if it gets through the House.
So let me ask you what your level of confidence
is about that. But what are you hearing about the Senate.

Speaker 2 (25:17):
Side of things?

Speaker 11 (25:20):
I think that if Mike Johnson follows through with what
he said, which I have to have a level of
skepticism about, just giving how he's operated over the course
of the last four or five months, how he shut
down Congress early.

Speaker 4 (25:33):
He didn't, Yeah, he shut down Congress early. Mike Johnson
did not shut down Congress. Mike Johnson passed a clean cr.
He did you know what schoolhouse rock? He sent the
bills of the Senate.

Speaker 2 (25:45):
He was done.

Speaker 4 (25:46):
So he sends people home, which I think was a
brilliant tactical move because that pushed the entire responsibility for
either passing or not passing a clean cr where it belonged.
And that's right in the middle of the United States Senate.
So once again here's the cabal trying to twist your
perception of what really took place.

Speaker 11 (26:07):
I think that having every single Republican on the record,
potentially next week we are going to definitely pass us
through the House of Representatives. I think enough Republicans who
will recognize that they absolutely cannot be on the side
of protecting pedophiles.

Speaker 1 (26:22):
And then that's a great question.

Speaker 4 (26:23):
And in Sonette throw out the straw man, and the
straw man is so they're gonna they're going to vote man,
you know, so maybe sometime next week, and so now
we're gonna who's going to be on the side of
the pedophiles. Oh so, if you have a deeply held
belief that perhaps and that I could come up with,
I don't know, a dozen different rationales or maybe half
a dozen different rationales or why you might vote against

(26:45):
this bill trying to protect victims, or might you might say, hey, listen,
I'll vote for the bill, but I want to make
certain that on the discharge petition that we're going to
redact all of the victims' names. I mean, there are
different ways that you can do this bill, and we
don't know what the final versions going to look like
because they're still voting procedurally or getting ready to vote
procedurally on the discharge position, so we don't know yet.

Speaker 11 (27:08):
Question, I do feel, you know, somewhat confident that this
could get through the Senate. I think the American public
has been demanding accountability and transparency for the victims.

Speaker 2 (27:17):
The fact that we've seen, yes, I don't think there's anybody.

Speaker 4 (27:21):
And if you are opposed to justice for the victims,
then you're some kind of pervert yourself, You're some kind
of demanded individual yourself. We all want these victims to
get the justice they deserve.

Speaker 11 (27:34):
Survivors who have never spoken out before come to Capital Hill,
have press conferences outside the Capital share their stories for
the very first time.

Speaker 4 (27:43):
How many of those have you heard? Because because that
she is correct about that, the victims do often appear
and there'll be a small crowd, there might be a
couple of reporters standing around, and they will talk, they
will talk about their story. I'm sure it's cathartic for them,
and I'm also certain that they're doing it because they
need the attention. They need the cabal to pay attention

(28:04):
to their stories so that we can put pressure to
have the files released. And then again, sure, sure, sure
you don't hear anything.

Speaker 11 (28:15):
Republican senators will not be able to deny that, and
we'll have a very difficult time.

Speaker 2 (28:22):
The real question will be.

Speaker 11 (28:23):
Though, is what Donald Trump and the White House decide
to do and when. On that issue, I am very,
very skeptical because we have seen that the Department of
Justice under Pam Bondi, Cashpitel, every senior level administration official,
you know, Caroline Lovett, et cetera, are in full on
denial mode.

Speaker 2 (28:41):
They're calling denial.

Speaker 4 (28:43):
How's it denial? Particularly if you've been asking if you've
actually been going to court, you've been going to the
Southern District of New York, and you've been asking federal
judges to hey, listen, we've got grand jury testimony, we've
got evidence all under seal. We'd like to have it released.
How how in the world is that a cover up?

(29:05):
Because now, why don't you go ask the judge. We're
all the amigas brief, we're all the friend of the
court briefs. Where other parties are going in that have
an interest? Say, where's the ABC news, NBCCBS. Why aren't
they going to the same federal judge and saying we
believe in filed amigas brief, a Friend of the court
brief and say we believe too that these documents ought

(29:25):
to be released.

Speaker 2 (29:26):
I haven't seen that.

Speaker 11 (29:27):
And there's a democratic hoast. They have completely flipped the
script and changed their tune and one hundred and eighty degrees.

Speaker 4 (29:34):
Oh, everybody's changing their tune, all the one hundred and
eighty degrees. I suppose you're changing here? Do you even
have a tune?

Speaker 1 (29:39):
I have a student, but I can't carry in a bucket,
so nobody really wants to hear me sing it?

Speaker 10 (29:42):
Now?

Speaker 4 (29:43):
Why either?

Speaker 7 (29:44):
You know? I don't either.

Speaker 2 (29:46):
Oh no, you're not a tap dance for God's sake,
I'm a lawyer, tap dancer around.

Speaker 4 (29:52):
I can tap dance around anything you want me to
tap dance around. Sweet, aren't anything you want?

Speaker 1 (29:57):
Did you see Representative timber Chet who said that he
brought a motion for unanimous consent to release the Epstein
files and the Democrats voted against it.

Speaker 2 (30:06):
No, I missed.

Speaker 1 (30:08):
I mean I saw him on the interwebs say it,
so I thought that was kind of interesting.

Speaker 2 (30:12):
That's very interesting, unbelievable. Hey, I'm out of here.