March 6, 2024 • 17 mins
Buck Sexton breaks down the latest headlines with a fresh and honest perspective! He speaks truth to power, and cuts through the liberal nonsense coming from the mainstream media. Subscribe to never miss an episode of The Buck Sexton Show.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts. Hey everybody, welcome to the
Buck Brief. On this episode, we have David de Rosiers
with us. He is the publisher of Real Clear Politics,
a great man. Going to talk to us a bit
about censorship in politics and also the samas Dot Prize
(00:33):
gala at the Breakers in Palm Beach, So I'm actually
gonna go to. A bunch of my friends will be there.
We'll talk about this big event why it is so
important in the era we live in. David, first, tell
us about samas dot and welcome.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
Thanks for having me Buck. Samas Dot is Russian for
underground publishing. You know, sadly, we're going to do this
on the eve of the State of the Union. This
is going to be our own State of the Union
where we really think that, you know, we're moving in
a direction that's bad with regards to one of our
founding cornerstones of the way we should conduct our lives
(01:07):
in our politics, the First Amendment. And you know, we
really think that, you know, the First Amendment is not
trending well and we want to praise those uh, you know,
intrepid souls that stand up for the rest of us
so we can remain free.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
What is samas don.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
As I said, it's it's Russian for underground publishing. You know,
it was the give me.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
The history, Give me the history a little bit, tell
me a little bit about it.
Speaker 2 (01:33):
Yeah, it was, uh, you know the reason you know,
the Gulag Archipelago souls and Eatson, the lie killer that
was that book had to be smuggled into their own countries.
So the greatest dissident thinkers that we have come to
know that really challenged the lie that was Soviet communism.
And you know, and even in any type of regime
(01:56):
that is suffering from material of the mind.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
I mean, you can see Vakloff hovel.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
You know it's you had to get under you know,
you went underground to get above ground. And what we
see is happening in our own country sadly something you know,
a country that's been committed to the First Amendment for
as long as I've known in my lifetime, has made
a dangerous turn away from it. And you know, we
want to call attention to that turn. Show people the
(02:20):
trajectory of where we're going. If we don't stand up
to it now, it's not going to get better, it's
going to get worse. And what we want to do
on Thursday, March seventh is to highlight, you know, three
intrepid people that we think kind of show what a
real clear presentation of you know, First Amendment courages.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
Why do you think it is that in this era
of increasing censorship, And I think it's obvious when you
look at the social media companies the different policies that
they have, that the censorship is highly part is in
and very active. Journalists aren't speaking out in general. I
know there are exceptions. You're honoring some of the exceptions
(03:02):
at your gallo, but journalists aren't speaking out and saying, yeah,
the First Amendment, irrespective of politics, is really hortant for us,
and we need to defend free speech, even if it's
the free speech that a lot of people don't want
to hear.
Speaker 2 (03:16):
Yeah, there was an Atlantic study that came out a
while ago that just really kind of captured our, I
think our modern problem. That's the higher level of education
that you have, the less tolerant you are of other views,
and then when you take that and you put it
into a university system that just by itself self selects.
(03:38):
We've raised the generation of people that really, their policy
towards the First Amendment is anti American. It seems uncharacteristically
out of the American mainstream where I think it's forty
percent of millennials, you know, against free speech. And if
you want to just go give a contrast to the
(03:59):
people who actually fought communists, who fought fascism, you know,
you know, they came back and you know, and their
attitudes going to their dying grave.
Speaker 3 (04:07):
Is thirteen percent.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
So there's been a movement in the American mind and
American culture and the American establishment where to your point,
it's like the fourth estate really is is you know,
does not have a commitment to First Amendment liberty, maybe
for them, but not for the I would describe it
as and it's a dangerous it's a dangerous trend. And
(04:31):
you know, it's it's awful when you know, the oldest
newspaper in America, the New York Post, can actually be
shut down on Twitter. And it's too it's not to
it's a it was a combination of silence and applause
and silence is a problem, but the applause if it
was problematic as well.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
Yeah, as we know, not only is their censorship, but
their censorship based on the premise that something is disinformation
because it is false, and the people pushing that as
the basis for the censorship don't seem the least bit
self aware, don't seem to care at all when it
comes out that what they said is false is actually
true one hundred Biden laptop the New York Post being
(05:11):
one of the best examples of this or clearest examples
of this.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
The three folks that we've kind of singled out to
get these awards, I think capture that. So we have
doctor j. Boticharia. You know, so he was the guy
who stood up to Fauci and said, hey, the scientific method,
can we stand a crisis? And everything that his ex experiences,
you know, in terms of even you know, in terms
(05:36):
of the science, was that you know, where we were
going was the wrong way. He was treated very poorly.
He was treated very poorly, not just by the press,
not just by the politicians, but by his own profession.
And lo and behold, what do we see history of
vindicated him? Like he was the one that was on
the right side. You know, he was put up as
like a Monkish superstition, and then all of a sudden
(05:58):
it turns out that Fauci was the pope, and you know,
doctor j he was Galileo.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
As we know how that turned out turned out.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
And the same go yeah, and the same goes for
the other two that we picked. We you know, getting
to the example that I brought up both the New
York Post and Miranda Divine. You know, Miranda is our
other recipient. And you know, in my response there is
if someone gave you that laptom, you know, if you
didn't accept that and jump into it with the responsibility
(06:29):
that comes with being a representative of the Fourth Amendment,
you'd be a hack. And the same for Matt to
hebe the other gentleman who was receiving it. It's that,
you know, if you get invited into Elon's uh you
know twitter x. Now, if you get an invitation there
and you get to look behind the veil, you see
this alphabet soup of really you know, you know, violations
(06:51):
of the First Amendment.
Speaker 3 (06:52):
You know, the government's not supposed to.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Do it, regardless of whether a private company wants them
to do it.
Speaker 3 (06:57):
They're not allowed to do that.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
And you know, I think you see in the journalists
that we picked, the differences between them are of degree
and not kind, which is what a healthy difference within
journalism should be. You know, Matt and Miranda to share,
you know, share profession and ethics and a sense of
fearless reporting. And sadly, you know that type of reporting
is being attacked at scale.
Speaker 1 (07:21):
We'll get back into where this all goes, especially in
the era of AI here in just a second. But
first off, you know, I hear that some people are
still on the fence about owning gold and silver, and
that just doesn't make sense to me. Have we already
forgotten about regional bank closures, inflation, global instability, and the
potential for major catastrophe on the world stage that will
(07:41):
affect the value of the US dollar. Well, you can
look to precious metals for a whole range of regions.
One having tangible currency on hand, a bug out plant.
Two portfolio diversification, hedge against inflation, and then as a
store of value because historically gold increases in value over time.
I know you're paying attention to global events, wars bubbling
up everywhere countries are buying in mass and hoarding massive
(08:03):
amounts of gold, So why don't you get some gold
and silver on hand yourself. Nobody can break the future,
but we can't put our heads in the sand either.
It's time to take action. The Oxford Gold Group are pros.
They'll help you get gold and silver on hand. I
have gold and silver on hand from the Oxford Gold Group.
I think you should too. Call them right now. You
may qualify for up to ten thousand dollars in free
precious metals. Call eight three three nine nine five gold.
(08:26):
That's eight three three nine nine five gold. Eight three
three nine nine five gold. What do people on the right, David,
what should they do? What should we do about the
fact that now censorship is Yes, it's top down, it's
government and private sector colluding. That there's all. But it's
(08:47):
also increasingly mechanized. Right, it's not even necessarily a person.
It's a system that an algorithm that decides you're not
allowed to talk about something like what's the way forward.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
I think that conservatives have to wake up to the
to really how this is being exercised against them. I mean,
the real surprise for us is that you know, for
your listeners who know Real Clear Politics. I mean, if
you know us, you know that we show both sides,
and you know, so we try to do our best
to give an accounting of the news, right and it's
(09:21):
always you know, we do our best to make it comparative.
Speaker 3 (09:24):
You know.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
So you have two folks from you know, from prestigious
institutions saying the completely opposite thing about the same reality.
Let the reader decide. We found out in February of
last year, through some good report from Gabe Kaminski, that
what happened was that there was the state, our own
(09:45):
State Department was part of a you know, an international
funding group that gave money to companies whose purpose was
to kind of really censor American uh you know, viewpoint diversity.
And the way that they did it was by coming
up with a standard, you know, in ranking that these
(10:05):
these groups, News Guard being an American example of it,
uh GI, you know being another from a Bridge company.
Global Disinformation Index is what it stands for. And Real
Clear Politics found itself on a top ten list of
disinformation and the purpose of this was to really have
censorship through advertise advertising starvation. So if you know, if
(10:29):
you have a media mind. You know, if you have
a flavor of the media, if you like real clear,
if you like your show, you like any of the
things that you take for granted, out there is existing.
They are behind the scenes being browned out through advertising starvation.
So I think that this is you know, first of all,
it's illegal for the you know, for own government to
(10:49):
do this. I think these cut out these companies that
are going out and doing this, like NewsGuard and GDI
are bad. Uh. You know, Soros has an effort called
check my Ads that if you don't follow this advice,
if you don't you know, you know, feed on the
diet that they want for media advertising. They go after
the companies that are you know, in fall in it.
Speaker 3 (11:10):
There is uh.
Speaker 2 (11:12):
I mean, there is probably sixty public universities and private
universities that are engaged in this. It's being funded by philanthropy.
It's trickling down to everybody's schools. I mean, if you
if you really want a cartographer of this kind of
you know, censorship industrial complex. Uh, there's a gentleman, Mike
Ben's out there. You put in bends, you'll let you'll
(11:34):
get you'll get a quick education to what's happening. But
you know, let me just first state it's that real clear.
Was the only kind of centrist media independent outlet on
a list, But the nine other people that we were
keeping company with, they were all conservatives.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
Well I want I want to get to that actually
and how And by the way, move a little to
your left, David, because you keep on believing get there
you go. You keep on disappearing from our video feed
entirely because you're so passionate about the First Amendment and
freedom of speech that you're you're out of the frame anyway.
One thing I think is very important for everyone to
recognize the the media used to play this game like
(12:12):
CNN was supposed to be center. It wasn't actually center,
but the game was we could have a place that
has this pretense of oh we hear from both sides.
Really was I mean I used to work there, so
I know conservatives get punched in the face and ridiculed,
but we have them on a little bit. And now
what we see is if you actually try to be
(12:33):
the center, that's not allowed, right because they got used
to a rigged game where oh yeah, we're just journalists,
we're neutral, we just provide people with no, that's unacceptable
to them. And if someone actually tries to do that,
and you're telling me that at real clear, part of
your mission is take the right, take the left, both
points of view, they will attack that too because they
(12:54):
don't want that to be out there, and they also
don't want to be held against that standard. They want
the rigged game, they want the silencing.
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Oh it's you know, it really is clear that this
viewpoint diversity, which is exactly what people get on our page,
that is a problem. So there's a new form of
speech out there. I mean, you could call it safe speech,
you could call it worll speech, but it uses filters
like disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation to give something out there
(13:26):
that is quite frankly less and ideologically lopsided and partisan.
I mean, so we're on the blacklist. It's you know,
real clear, and nine conservative entities. You look at the
white list, it's nine liberal entities. In the Wall Street Journal.
You know, if you go back twenty years, you know,
(13:47):
the Wall Street Journal was the only game in town.
Now that's no longer the case. And the Wall Street
Journal's behind a paywall, so unless you pay, you don't see, right,
But they want to get to a world where it's
nine to one liberal progressive to conservative, and the only
conservative voice that's allowed to get any type of money
is the Wall Street Journal that's behind a paywall. You know,
(14:09):
that's the time of I mean mono media that I
think is going out there. And I think that the
folks out there, the conservatives who who like coming to
our site because they get to see both sides, you're
going to realize they're coming after us in order to
really fracture and break up what we curate every day.
(14:32):
I've mean, I would like to think at our best
that we present you know, the winning, you know, winning
ascendant face of an ascendant democratic, Republican, liberal, progressive, conservative viewpoints.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
So we're just.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
Capturing what we see to be out there. But it's
very clear that people don't like to see two sides
to anything. That there is an approved, approved subject matter,
there are approved outlets. And you know, my company is
being undermined because I you know, in my editors and
the folks that work with us, they believe in you
viewpoint diversity, and that's under attack.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
And that's what we're going to be celebrating on March seventh. Well,
we'll heke it's still available.
Speaker 1 (15:14):
Take your gov. We'll have a little word about that
here at the end, but first up, you know the tunnel.
The Towers Foundation continues to do good and make sure
we never forget. That means never forgetting nine to eleven,
never forgetting the soldiers and first responders who risk their
lives and bodies for our country and communities, and never
forgetting those who are sickened because of their service. The
Foundation is committed to helping those heroes and their families.
(15:37):
Heroes like retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Michael Cardo's. Lieutenant
Cardos served his country for twenty years and received numerous commendations,
including a Bronze Star. During his time overseas, he was
exposed to toxic burn pits. Eighteen hours after being diagnosed
with service related cancer, he died. Telling the Towers then
paid off the mortgage on his family's home, enabling his
widow and their six children to stay in their home
(15:58):
and removing a financial burden. The foundation helps gold star
families and falling and families have fallen first responders, and
Telling the Towers is a fantastic organization of honored to
partner with help families like the Cardos donate eleven dollars
a month. The tunnel the towers at T two t
dot org. That's t the number two T dot org.
All right, David, before we let you go, tell everybody
(16:20):
one more time where they can go for this very
worthy samas dot Awards event and where they should check
it out all that good stuff.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
Yeah, you can find it on Real Clear. Any of
the Real Clear site should have an advertising up for it.
If you just type samas dot you can do it
is s A M I Z D E A T.
We're going to have it down at the Breakers March seventh,
this Thursday. There's still tickets available, and you know there's
one great reason to go, and it's because Buck Sexton
(16:50):
is going to be there.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
I would and again I don't think you would mind.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
It's like we're going to have we're going to honor
three people, but it's going to be a room full
of people that deserve the bird that we're going to
be giving out to the people there, as kind of
are saying, would just kind of turn it off this way.
We live in a society where we actually get more
of what we praise, and I think we have to
praise the First Amendment, that people have the courage for it.
(17:15):
You know, the Pubitur Prize has bent the arc of journalism,
and I don't think it's bent it the right way.
I think what we want to do is start something
this week, stand it up, and hopefully over time, not
only will we reward and praise the people who keep
us free, we might actually not actually have to go
underground and live in a Samostat world.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
There we go, David de Roziers of Real Clear Politics.
Thank you, sir. I will see you Thursday. I hope
other people go check it out, and if they're in
the area or they want to be in the area
for it, go get yourself a ticket. It'll be fun.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
A couple of rooms at my house from my closest friends.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
David Bucks, my fancy moves on the dance floor. Thanks
so much, David. Good to see you.
Speaker 3 (17:55):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
Byy
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts. Hey everybody, welcome to the
Buck Brief. On this episode, we have David de Rosiers
with us. He is the publisher of Real Clear Politics,
a great man. Going to talk to us a bit
about censorship in politics and also the samas Dot Prize
(00:33):
gala at the Breakers in Palm Beach, So I'm actually
gonna go to. A bunch of my friends will be there.
We'll talk about this big event why it is so
important in the era we live in. David, first, tell
us about samas dot and welcome.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
Thanks for having me Buck. Samas Dot is Russian for
underground publishing. You know, sadly, we're going to do this
on the eve of the State of the Union. This
is going to be our own State of the Union
where we really think that, you know, we're moving in
a direction that's bad with regards to one of our
founding cornerstones of the way we should conduct our lives
(01:07):
in our politics, the First Amendment. And you know, we
really think that, you know, the First Amendment is not
trending well and we want to praise those uh, you know,
intrepid souls that stand up for the rest of us
so we can remain free.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
What is samas don.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
As I said, it's it's Russian for underground publishing. You know,
it was the give me.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
The history, Give me the history a little bit, tell
me a little bit about it.
Speaker 2 (01:33):
Yeah, it was, uh, you know the reason you know,
the Gulag Archipelago souls and Eatson, the lie killer that
was that book had to be smuggled into their own countries.
So the greatest dissident thinkers that we have come to
know that really challenged the lie that was Soviet communism.
And you know, and even in any type of regime
(01:56):
that is suffering from material of the mind.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
I mean, you can see Vakloff hovel.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
You know it's you had to get under you know,
you went underground to get above ground. And what we
see is happening in our own country sadly something you know,
a country that's been committed to the First Amendment for
as long as I've known in my lifetime, has made
a dangerous turn away from it. And you know, we
want to call attention to that turn. Show people the
(02:20):
trajectory of where we're going. If we don't stand up
to it now, it's not going to get better, it's
going to get worse. And what we want to do
on Thursday, March seventh is to highlight, you know, three
intrepid people that we think kind of show what a
real clear presentation of you know, First Amendment courages.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
Why do you think it is that in this era
of increasing censorship, And I think it's obvious when you
look at the social media companies the different policies that
they have, that the censorship is highly part is in
and very active. Journalists aren't speaking out in general. I
know there are exceptions. You're honoring some of the exceptions
(03:02):
at your gallo, but journalists aren't speaking out and saying, yeah,
the First Amendment, irrespective of politics, is really hortant for us,
and we need to defend free speech, even if it's
the free speech that a lot of people don't want
to hear.
Speaker 2 (03:16):
Yeah, there was an Atlantic study that came out a
while ago that just really kind of captured our, I
think our modern problem. That's the higher level of education
that you have, the less tolerant you are of other views,
and then when you take that and you put it
into a university system that just by itself self selects.
(03:38):
We've raised the generation of people that really, their policy
towards the First Amendment is anti American. It seems uncharacteristically
out of the American mainstream where I think it's forty
percent of millennials, you know, against free speech. And if
you want to just go give a contrast to the
(03:59):
people who actually fought communists, who fought fascism, you know,
you know, they came back and you know, and their
attitudes going to their dying grave.
Speaker 3 (04:07):
Is thirteen percent.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
So there's been a movement in the American mind and
American culture and the American establishment where to your point,
it's like the fourth estate really is is you know,
does not have a commitment to First Amendment liberty, maybe
for them, but not for the I would describe it
as and it's a dangerous it's a dangerous trend. And
(04:31):
you know, it's it's awful when you know, the oldest
newspaper in America, the New York Post, can actually be
shut down on Twitter. And it's too it's not to
it's a it was a combination of silence and applause
and silence is a problem, but the applause if it
was problematic as well.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
Yeah, as we know, not only is their censorship, but
their censorship based on the premise that something is disinformation
because it is false, and the people pushing that as
the basis for the censorship don't seem the least bit
self aware, don't seem to care at all when it
comes out that what they said is false is actually
true one hundred Biden laptop the New York Post being
(05:11):
one of the best examples of this or clearest examples
of this.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
The three folks that we've kind of singled out to
get these awards, I think capture that. So we have
doctor j. Boticharia. You know, so he was the guy
who stood up to Fauci and said, hey, the scientific method,
can we stand a crisis? And everything that his ex experiences,
you know, in terms of even you know, in terms
(05:36):
of the science, was that you know, where we were
going was the wrong way. He was treated very poorly.
He was treated very poorly, not just by the press,
not just by the politicians, but by his own profession.
And lo and behold, what do we see history of
vindicated him? Like he was the one that was on
the right side. You know, he was put up as
like a Monkish superstition, and then all of a sudden
(05:58):
it turns out that Fauci was the pope, and you know,
doctor j he was Galileo.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
As we know how that turned out turned out.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
And the same go yeah, and the same goes for
the other two that we picked. We you know, getting
to the example that I brought up both the New
York Post and Miranda Divine. You know, Miranda is our
other recipient. And you know, in my response there is
if someone gave you that laptom, you know, if you
didn't accept that and jump into it with the responsibility
(06:29):
that comes with being a representative of the Fourth Amendment,
you'd be a hack. And the same for Matt to
hebe the other gentleman who was receiving it. It's that,
you know, if you get invited into Elon's uh you
know twitter x. Now, if you get an invitation there
and you get to look behind the veil, you see
this alphabet soup of really you know, you know, violations
(06:51):
of the First Amendment.
Speaker 3 (06:52):
You know, the government's not supposed to.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Do it, regardless of whether a private company wants them
to do it.
Speaker 3 (06:57):
They're not allowed to do that.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
And you know, I think you see in the journalists
that we picked, the differences between them are of degree
and not kind, which is what a healthy difference within
journalism should be. You know, Matt and Miranda to share,
you know, share profession and ethics and a sense of
fearless reporting. And sadly, you know that type of reporting
is being attacked at scale.
Speaker 1 (07:21):
We'll get back into where this all goes, especially in
the era of AI here in just a second. But
first off, you know, I hear that some people are
still on the fence about owning gold and silver, and
that just doesn't make sense to me. Have we already
forgotten about regional bank closures, inflation, global instability, and the
potential for major catastrophe on the world stage that will
(07:41):
affect the value of the US dollar. Well, you can
look to precious metals for a whole range of regions.
One having tangible currency on hand, a bug out plant.
Two portfolio diversification, hedge against inflation, and then as a
store of value because historically gold increases in value over time.
I know you're paying attention to global events, wars bubbling
up everywhere countries are buying in mass and hoarding massive
(08:03):
amounts of gold, So why don't you get some gold
and silver on hand yourself. Nobody can break the future,
but we can't put our heads in the sand either.
It's time to take action. The Oxford Gold Group are pros.
They'll help you get gold and silver on hand. I
have gold and silver on hand from the Oxford Gold Group.
I think you should too. Call them right now. You
may qualify for up to ten thousand dollars in free
precious metals. Call eight three three nine nine five gold.
(08:26):
That's eight three three nine nine five gold. Eight three
three nine nine five gold. What do people on the right, David,
what should they do? What should we do about the
fact that now censorship is Yes, it's top down, it's
government and private sector colluding. That there's all. But it's
(08:47):
also increasingly mechanized. Right, it's not even necessarily a person.
It's a system that an algorithm that decides you're not
allowed to talk about something like what's the way forward.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
I think that conservatives have to wake up to the
to really how this is being exercised against them. I mean,
the real surprise for us is that you know, for
your listeners who know Real Clear Politics. I mean, if
you know us, you know that we show both sides,
and you know, so we try to do our best
to give an accounting of the news, right and it's
(09:21):
always you know, we do our best to make it comparative.
Speaker 3 (09:24):
You know.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
So you have two folks from you know, from prestigious
institutions saying the completely opposite thing about the same reality.
Let the reader decide. We found out in February of
last year, through some good report from Gabe Kaminski, that
what happened was that there was the state, our own
(09:45):
State Department was part of a you know, an international
funding group that gave money to companies whose purpose was
to kind of really censor American uh you know, viewpoint diversity.
And the way that they did it was by coming
up with a standard, you know, in ranking that these
(10:05):
these groups, News Guard being an American example of it,
uh GI, you know being another from a Bridge company.
Global Disinformation Index is what it stands for. And Real
Clear Politics found itself on a top ten list of
disinformation and the purpose of this was to really have
censorship through advertise advertising starvation. So if you know, if
(10:29):
you have a media mind. You know, if you have
a flavor of the media, if you like real clear,
if you like your show, you like any of the
things that you take for granted, out there is existing.
They are behind the scenes being browned out through advertising starvation.
So I think that this is you know, first of all,
it's illegal for the you know, for own government to
(10:49):
do this. I think these cut out these companies that
are going out and doing this, like NewsGuard and GDI
are bad. Uh. You know, Soros has an effort called
check my Ads that if you don't follow this advice,
if you don't you know, you know, feed on the
diet that they want for media advertising. They go after
the companies that are you know, in fall in it.
Speaker 3 (11:10):
There is uh.
Speaker 2 (11:12):
I mean, there is probably sixty public universities and private
universities that are engaged in this. It's being funded by philanthropy.
It's trickling down to everybody's schools. I mean, if you
if you really want a cartographer of this kind of
you know, censorship industrial complex. Uh, there's a gentleman, Mike
Ben's out there. You put in bends, you'll let you'll
(11:34):
get you'll get a quick education to what's happening. But
you know, let me just first state it's that real clear.
Was the only kind of centrist media independent outlet on
a list, But the nine other people that we were
keeping company with, they were all conservatives.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
Well I want I want to get to that actually
and how And by the way, move a little to
your left, David, because you keep on believing get there
you go. You keep on disappearing from our video feed
entirely because you're so passionate about the First Amendment and
freedom of speech that you're you're out of the frame anyway.
One thing I think is very important for everyone to
recognize the the media used to play this game like
(12:12):
CNN was supposed to be center. It wasn't actually center,
but the game was we could have a place that
has this pretense of oh we hear from both sides.
Really was I mean I used to work there, so
I know conservatives get punched in the face and ridiculed,
but we have them on a little bit. And now
what we see is if you actually try to be
(12:33):
the center, that's not allowed, right because they got used
to a rigged game where oh yeah, we're just journalists,
we're neutral, we just provide people with no, that's unacceptable
to them. And if someone actually tries to do that,
and you're telling me that at real clear, part of
your mission is take the right, take the left, both
points of view, they will attack that too because they
(12:54):
don't want that to be out there, and they also
don't want to be held against that standard. They want
the rigged game, they want the silencing.
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Oh it's you know, it really is clear that this
viewpoint diversity, which is exactly what people get on our page,
that is a problem. So there's a new form of
speech out there. I mean, you could call it safe speech,
you could call it worll speech, but it uses filters
like disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation to give something out there
(13:26):
that is quite frankly less and ideologically lopsided and partisan.
I mean, so we're on the blacklist. It's you know,
real clear, and nine conservative entities. You look at the
white list, it's nine liberal entities. In the Wall Street Journal.
You know, if you go back twenty years, you know,
(13:47):
the Wall Street Journal was the only game in town.
Now that's no longer the case. And the Wall Street
Journal's behind a paywall, so unless you pay, you don't see, right,
But they want to get to a world where it's
nine to one liberal progressive to conservative, and the only
conservative voice that's allowed to get any type of money
is the Wall Street Journal that's behind a paywall. You know,
(14:09):
that's the time of I mean mono media that I
think is going out there. And I think that the
folks out there, the conservatives who who like coming to
our site because they get to see both sides, you're
going to realize they're coming after us in order to
really fracture and break up what we curate every day.
(14:32):
I've mean, I would like to think at our best
that we present you know, the winning, you know, winning
ascendant face of an ascendant democratic, Republican, liberal, progressive, conservative viewpoints.
Speaker 3 (14:47):
So we're just.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
Capturing what we see to be out there. But it's
very clear that people don't like to see two sides
to anything. That there is an approved, approved subject matter,
there are approved outlets. And you know, my company is
being undermined because I you know, in my editors and
the folks that work with us, they believe in you
viewpoint diversity, and that's under attack.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
And that's what we're going to be celebrating on March seventh. Well,
we'll heke it's still available.
Speaker 1 (15:14):
Take your gov. We'll have a little word about that
here at the end, but first up, you know the tunnel.
The Towers Foundation continues to do good and make sure
we never forget. That means never forgetting nine to eleven,
never forgetting the soldiers and first responders who risk their
lives and bodies for our country and communities, and never
forgetting those who are sickened because of their service. The
Foundation is committed to helping those heroes and their families.
(15:37):
Heroes like retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Michael Cardo's. Lieutenant
Cardos served his country for twenty years and received numerous commendations,
including a Bronze Star. During his time overseas, he was
exposed to toxic burn pits. Eighteen hours after being diagnosed
with service related cancer, he died. Telling the Towers then
paid off the mortgage on his family's home, enabling his
widow and their six children to stay in their home
(15:58):
and removing a financial burden. The foundation helps gold star
families and falling and families have fallen first responders, and
Telling the Towers is a fantastic organization of honored to
partner with help families like the Cardos donate eleven dollars
a month. The tunnel the towers at T two t
dot org. That's t the number two T dot org.
All right, David, before we let you go, tell everybody
(16:20):
one more time where they can go for this very
worthy samas dot Awards event and where they should check
it out all that good stuff.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
Yeah, you can find it on Real Clear. Any of
the Real Clear site should have an advertising up for it.
If you just type samas dot you can do it
is s A M I Z D E A T.
We're going to have it down at the Breakers March seventh,
this Thursday. There's still tickets available, and you know there's
one great reason to go, and it's because Buck Sexton
(16:50):
is going to be there.
Speaker 3 (16:51):
I would and again I don't think you would mind.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
It's like we're going to have we're going to honor
three people, but it's going to be a room full
of people that deserve the bird that we're going to
be giving out to the people there, as kind of
are saying, would just kind of turn it off this way.
We live in a society where we actually get more
of what we praise, and I think we have to
praise the First Amendment, that people have the courage for it.
(17:15):
You know, the Pubitur Prize has bent the arc of journalism,
and I don't think it's bent it the right way.
I think what we want to do is start something
this week, stand it up, and hopefully over time, not
only will we reward and praise the people who keep
us free, we might actually not actually have to go
underground and live in a Samostat world.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
There we go, David de Roziers of Real Clear Politics.
Thank you, sir. I will see you Thursday. I hope
other people go check it out, and if they're in
the area or they want to be in the area
for it, go get yourself a ticket. It'll be fun.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
A couple of rooms at my house from my closest friends.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
David Bucks, my fancy moves on the dance floor. Thanks
so much, David. Good to see you.
Speaker 3 (17:55):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
Byy
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Death, Sex & Money
Anna Sale explores the big questions and hard choices that are often left out of polite conversation.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.