September 19, 2025 • 14 mins
Jimmy Kimmel is off the air, and Buck Sexton says it’s about time. In this episode, Buck unpacks why Kimmel never lived up to the hype, why the media only invokes the First Amendment when it helps their side, and how corporate media protects mediocrity for political gain.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts. Oh my gosh, the libs
are in a panic over free speech because Jimmy Kimmel,
the least talented, least funny late night host on the scene,
has been pulled off the air indefinitely.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
Maybe canceled, maybe long term suspension.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
Either way, it's the funniest thing that's happened to or
with Jimmy Kimmel in a long time, Funnier than any
skits that he's done, Funnier than any monologue he has
put out there.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
I am laughing my.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
Butt off right now as Jimmy Kimmel is pulled off
the air. Because he's a jerk, he's a bad guy.
He celebrated when Tucker Carlson was kicked off of Fox News,
he celebrates when bad things happen to conservatives and Republicans
all the time. He's not funny, he's a jerk, he's
a sub mediocrity, not talented, and you can just tell
(01:12):
that he's been a tool of the lib elites for
a long time.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
That's it, And so I'll get.
Speaker 1 (01:18):
Into a little more of the specifics here, but I
just first want to celebrate this. And it's funny to
me that all these Democrats are saying, oh my gosh,
but what's gonna happen now. What's gonna happen now is
there's one less overpaid jerk on television making fun of
half the country and lying to the half of the
country that actually agrees with this guy. By the way,
(01:39):
very few people watch him. He was fourth in fourth place.
They always say third place. No, no, he's behind Guttfeld's number one.
So he's behind Guttfeld and whoever the other ones are.
And because I guess Colbert is done too. Oh maybe
it's third now because Colbert's gone. Whatever point is, he's
the worst. He had like a million viewers, which for
that kind of a show on a network is preposterous.
(02:03):
I mean, the Tonight Show with Jane Leno had episodes
at its absolute peak?
Speaker 3 (02:07):
Was it Tonight Shows Jay Leno?
Speaker 2 (02:09):
Right?
Speaker 1 (02:09):
I was get Late Showman. I didn't really watch this.
This is where Clay I disagree. I was always a
Leno guy, not a Letterman guy, even though I'm from
New York and I feel like you're supposed to like
Letterman in New York Letterman was I just thought he
was just kind of snide. I never really liked him.
I didn't get it anyway. Leno seemed to me like
he was at least jolly, so I like that more.
But on that show in the nineties, there were episodes
(02:31):
that were twelve to fifteen million viewers. It was crazy
viewers in some of those episodes, so a million for
Jimmy Kimmel. The ratings are trash, So I do think
because people are going to say this to me, Oh.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
But Buck, they wanted to get rid of him. They
wanted to get rid of him.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
That's why. Yeah, I'm sure they did.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
But they also realized they had a problem on their
hands with what he said about the Charlie Kirk assassination.
They also realized that this is a guy who wasn't
going to be increasing audience at any point. Really just
not that not not very talented, and I mean, honestly,
I've never heard him say anything funny.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
If you he has a staff of probably.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
I would guess ten to twenty writers who are writing
jokes from all the time. If you have ten to
twenty people who are writing jokes for you. You would
think you could be funny, right, That's their only job
is to write your jokes. He's not funny. He's just
not a very good comedian. I mean the best work
he ever did was The Man Show, which.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Was very.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Very uh, you know, locker room comedy kind of stuff,
bathroom humor, and you know, a lot of stuff about boobs,
but not that's anything wrong with boobs, but it's just
enough of this guy, Jimmy Kimmel on the TV.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
Okay, So that's from a.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
Taste and content perspective, I understand that there's going to
be all these people and they say that, oh, well,
what about the First Amendment, as if Democrats care about
the First Amendment at all. I'm sorry, We've seen this
play out too many times. We're very aware of the
game that they play, which is, when it's someone they like,
the First Amendment matters, and the First Amendment extends to
that person, have that job paid a lot of money
(04:12):
by a private company, always in forever because that person
agrees with them, And any public pressure or any public
rebuke of some lib who has some privileged perch in
the media is somehow a First Amendment issue. You know,
like they like they pulled Colbert because he sucks and
because the show is losing a ton of money.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
They're like, ugh, but he's stood up against Trump.
Speaker 3 (04:34):
So this is really no, it's not about the First Amendment.
Speaker 2 (04:36):
It's about he's not good.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
It's about he's not doing a show that people want
to watch that draws a large enough audience for advertisers
to want to continue to spend the preposterous money they
spend to be on these programs in the first place.
By the way, it's all there's all kind of a
lot of insider deals that go on here with the
libs who run the Madison Avenue agencies and the libs
(04:58):
who run the you know, the production and the corporate
side of Comcast or CBS or Paramount or you know,
all these different corporate entities, and they know each other,
and they're all just keeping that cash flowing through each other.
And they're Democrats somehow. The Democrats, and this is a
(05:18):
whole other conversation, have taken over all these places, with
the exception of Fox News.
Speaker 3 (05:23):
And they're able to just do whatever they want.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
Well, they have to have people at least that have
an audience, right, say what you will about John Stewart
in the early two thousands that I've said a lot.
I mean, he's a propagandist, he's very dishonest, but he
was clever, he was good at his job, and he
made a lot of money because he drew a big
audience to a show that wouldn't have had it otherwise.
That's capitalism. I mean, it is gross, but it's still capitalism.
(05:46):
But what you have here with Jimmy Kimmel is the
market working as it should. But then let's talk about
the First Amendment here, because there's a big problem the
Democrats have with this. Oh my gosh, the FCC commissioner
said that they should clean up their act over at
at ABC with Kimmel. We'll get to this in a second,
but our sponsored Paradigm Press wants to tell you that
AI is a big deal. As technology advances go, artificial
(06:08):
intelligence will be a game chan a historic, epic changing
game changer. And we let on the AI front before
Biden came along. Then we lost some of that, but
Trump is getting us back at the very top of
the game. The AI zar is doing a phenomenal job,
and this administration is preparing an estimated trillion plus dollar investment,
drawing in multiple partners what I call Manhattan Project too.
(06:30):
It could trigger an investment boom as soon as October fifteenth.
I break it all down in a brand new interview,
including the companies I believe could soar when this comes about.
Find this interview in all the details online at a
new website. The website is offair twenty five dot com.
That's off air twentyfive dot com, paid for by Paradigm Press.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
All right, so the.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Libs are playing the oh my gosh, but the First
Amendment game. All right, let's talk about the first event
for a second.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
Shall we?
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Where were all of these people.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Whether it's Chris Hayes over at MSNBC, which is still
a thing apparently I think they're changing it too, MS
now or something. Where were all these people when in
June of twenty four June of twenty twenty four, the
Supreme Court said that you know what, the Yeah, the
Biden administration absolutely pressured social media companies during COVID. But
(07:24):
bringing a lawsuit now, you can't prove that they made
those decisions because of the pressure, and you don't have standing.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
And you can't prove.
Speaker 3 (07:37):
That these that they're going to do it again.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
So for these essentially technicalities, we're going to allow the
government to use third parties to censor private speech. The
government can coerce third parties for speech censorship, and you
can't because you can't even prove a discernible harm from this.
According to the majority, it was a six to three decision.
Of course, the cowards, the coward Roberts and the mediocrity
(08:04):
Amy Cony Barrett went with the psycho.
Speaker 3 (08:08):
Libs on that one. That's how they got to the
six three. Uh. But yeah, this is where we are, folks.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
They the Supreme Court weighed in and said, the government
is allowed to agitate private companies to make certain kinds
of decisions, and unless you can prove that there was
some specific government action taken to harm that company, you
don't really have any standing. So I just want to
know where we're all the First Amendment? Where are all
(08:36):
these First Amendment absolutists. Oh my gosh, we need the
acou Where are they?
Speaker 3 (08:41):
Where were all of those people?
Speaker 1 (08:43):
When the Supreme Court said that the massive censorship industrial
complex of the covid era was fine, they had no.
Speaker 3 (08:52):
Problem with that.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
So, okay, these are the rules. These are the rules.
So I don't want to hear any complaints about this.
I don't want to hear any whining from these libs.
I just simply do not care. And that's where it is.
I think Trump should just say whatever he wants about
whatever companies are doing, because the Supreme Court says decided
this is what it's gonna be. If they're gonna let
(09:14):
people get away, if they're gonna let the Biden White
House get away with having individual Americans singled out by
the White House for censorship pressure on the most powerful
speech platforms in the world. Which is a fact. It
happened to my friend Alex Parentson, happened to other people.
It is a fact that has happened. If that's those
are the rules, this is the game we're playing. Okay, fine,
(09:35):
Trump's gonna tell these companies. You know, I think that
guy's I think that guy stinks. You should take him
off air. I didn't do it into you. I'm just
telling you I think these stinks. You can't prove a harm,
you don't have standing. See how that works.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
Oh no, libs, So sad, let's.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
Talk about preborn every day, there are thousands of women
across our nation contending with an unplanned pregnancy, and there's
so many different pressures out there to choose abortion, which
is just tragic. But the Preborn network of clinics are
offering hope. They step in and offer life for that
child and compassion for that pregnant mother that she may
not get anywhere else. The Preborn Clinics begin this whole
(10:11):
journey with a free ultrasound for that mom when she
walks into that clinic, and that moment, that that connection
between mother and child so often is just the game
changer for the decision for life. Over three hundred and
fifty thousand babies have been saved through this life giving work,
and so many mothers have an entirely new outlook and
a love in their heart. So this is so important.
(10:32):
Please donate. It's happening every day. Preborn is there for
these moms and these tiny babies. Twenty eight dollars a
month can save a life. That's the price of a
free ultrasound for these moms when they walk in. Twenty
eight dollars a month, you'd be saving a baby a month.
With Preborn's help, Dial pound two fifty and say the
keyword baby. That's pound two five zero say the word baby,
(10:54):
or go to preborn dot com slash buck that's preborn
dot com slash b u c K.
Speaker 3 (10:59):
One more thing.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
The Cato Institute put out an analysis of murders by
political ideology since nineteen seventy five, excluding nine to eleven.
And you might say that seems very specific. Why nineteen
seventy five, that's kind of a oh oh, they're going
back fifty years. Interesting, they're leaving out and quite a
period there, aren't they Like the late sixties and the
(11:24):
early seventies. There's a lot of really bad stuff that
was going on. If your re membory, you know, but
you know, weather underground, you start to think about this.
But the bigger problem is that this analysis of murders
by political ideology, which of course shows that the right
is far and away the uh, you know, the biggest
it's three hundred and ninety one murders. Islamism is one
(11:45):
hundred and forty three murders, and leftists.
Speaker 3 (11:47):
Are only sixty five murders.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
That's what they want to tell you over at the
Cato Institute, which is a garbage a garbage thing.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
Think they leave out nine to eleven.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
They just excluded They say that, right, and thing like, yeah,
we're just not including nine to eleven.
Speaker 2 (12:03):
Ah, oh, you know this is real.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
Yeah. The team can't even believe this.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
I told you. They did this to me at C
and M one.
Speaker 3 (12:09):
They put me up.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
They're like, well, explain this. Look at all the right
wing murders that have happened in the last twenty years.
You know, this is back when it was this is
like twenty twenty fifteen, right, So like, look at all
the right wing murders over the last twenty years. And
they're like, there's so many more than Islamic murders. So
why are you so concerned about Islamism? And I'm like, you, guys,
cut out the three thousand people who were killed on
(12:31):
nine to eleven by ji honists, the worst terrorist attack
in the history of the planet. You just how do
you think cutting that out is a valid way to
get a sense of the threat. And by the way,
and I've had to make this argument before too, we
have spent probably trillions of dollars over the last twenty
some odd years trying to stop another nine to eleven.
Speaker 3 (12:52):
Okay, so we're.
Speaker 1 (12:54):
Spending we're not spending trillions of dollars trying to stop
the next Amish terror attack.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
I can assure you.
Speaker 1 (12:59):
So it's not even just the attacks that have happened,
it's all the plots that we have stopped and all
the resources and time and effort to stop those plots.
I've been in the offices in this country where this
is the mission, and I can tell you it is
Muslims who want to blow up people that are the
premier terror threat of the last twenty five years, without question.
(13:25):
And if you're going to start to look at the
So that's part one, and I just love this though
just excluding nine to eleven, I don't know, it's kind
of excluding Pearl Harbor makes it pretty difficult to understand
why World War two got the US involved, right, I
mean that this seems a little weird.
Speaker 3 (13:40):
Just skip that one.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
But then there's also when you look at the I
looked at some of the data set that they have.
I mean, they have all these different people that they're
claiming a right wing like some guy who was upset
at the like he was getting massage parlor stuff and
he killed some ladies who worked in the massage parlor
and he was just like a nut. They're calling that
right wing terrorism. All we know about the guys that
(14:06):
he was getting massages and there were like prostitutes that
work there and he was like upset about it and
you kill I mean this guy, how is he right wing?
There are other guys. There are immigrants who are non
white who are basically in cells who have killed people,
and they count that as right wing terrorism. When you
look at the list, you go so basically, everything that's
(14:29):
a murder that's really weird that doesn't have somebody who
says I'm a Trantifa, you know, Bernie bro left wing
and even then they try to exclude that. But everything
that's a murder that has some kind of psychological psychiatric
component is right wing according to this data set. Yeah,
it's it's nuts. It's really nuts. They're liars, that's not
(14:51):
a surprise. But I'm here to hold them to account.
Thanks for hanging everybody,
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts. Oh my gosh, the libs
are in a panic over free speech because Jimmy Kimmel,
the least talented, least funny late night host on the scene,
has been pulled off the air indefinitely.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
Maybe canceled, maybe long term suspension.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
Either way, it's the funniest thing that's happened to or
with Jimmy Kimmel in a long time, Funnier than any
skits that he's done, Funnier than any monologue he has
put out there.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
I am laughing my.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
Butt off right now as Jimmy Kimmel is pulled off
the air. Because he's a jerk, he's a bad guy.
He celebrated when Tucker Carlson was kicked off of Fox News,
he celebrates when bad things happen to conservatives and Republicans
all the time. He's not funny, he's a jerk, he's
a sub mediocrity, not talented, and you can just tell
(01:12):
that he's been a tool of the lib elites for
a long time.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
That's it, And so I'll get.
Speaker 1 (01:18):
Into a little more of the specifics here, but I
just first want to celebrate this. And it's funny to
me that all these Democrats are saying, oh my gosh,
but what's gonna happen now. What's gonna happen now is
there's one less overpaid jerk on television making fun of
half the country and lying to the half of the
country that actually agrees with this guy. By the way,
(01:39):
very few people watch him. He was fourth in fourth place.
They always say third place. No, no, he's behind Guttfeld's number one.
So he's behind Guttfeld and whoever the other ones are.
And because I guess Colbert is done too. Oh maybe
it's third now because Colbert's gone. Whatever point is, he's
the worst. He had like a million viewers, which for
that kind of a show on a network is preposterous.
(02:03):
I mean, the Tonight Show with Jane Leno had episodes
at its absolute peak?
Speaker 3 (02:07):
Was it Tonight Shows Jay Leno?
Speaker 2 (02:09):
Right?
Speaker 1 (02:09):
I was get Late Showman. I didn't really watch this.
This is where Clay I disagree. I was always a
Leno guy, not a Letterman guy, even though I'm from
New York and I feel like you're supposed to like
Letterman in New York Letterman was I just thought he
was just kind of snide. I never really liked him.
I didn't get it anyway. Leno seemed to me like
he was at least jolly, so I like that more.
But on that show in the nineties, there were episodes
(02:31):
that were twelve to fifteen million viewers. It was crazy
viewers in some of those episodes, so a million for
Jimmy Kimmel. The ratings are trash, So I do think
because people are going to say this to me, Oh.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
But Buck, they wanted to get rid of him. They
wanted to get rid of him.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
That's why. Yeah, I'm sure they did.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
But they also realized they had a problem on their
hands with what he said about the Charlie Kirk assassination.
They also realized that this is a guy who wasn't
going to be increasing audience at any point. Really just
not that not not very talented, and I mean, honestly,
I've never heard him say anything funny.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
If you he has a staff of probably.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
I would guess ten to twenty writers who are writing
jokes from all the time. If you have ten to
twenty people who are writing jokes for you. You would
think you could be funny, right, That's their only job
is to write your jokes. He's not funny. He's just
not a very good comedian. I mean the best work
he ever did was The Man Show, which.
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Was very.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
Very uh, you know, locker room comedy kind of stuff,
bathroom humor, and you know, a lot of stuff about boobs,
but not that's anything wrong with boobs, but it's just
enough of this guy, Jimmy Kimmel on the TV.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
Okay, So that's from a.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
Taste and content perspective, I understand that there's going to
be all these people and they say that, oh, well,
what about the First Amendment, as if Democrats care about
the First Amendment at all. I'm sorry, We've seen this
play out too many times. We're very aware of the
game that they play, which is, when it's someone they like,
the First Amendment matters, and the First Amendment extends to
that person, have that job paid a lot of money
(04:12):
by a private company, always in forever because that person
agrees with them, And any public pressure or any public
rebuke of some lib who has some privileged perch in
the media is somehow a First Amendment issue. You know,
like they like they pulled Colbert because he sucks and
because the show is losing a ton of money.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
They're like, ugh, but he's stood up against Trump.
Speaker 3 (04:34):
So this is really no, it's not about the First Amendment.
Speaker 2 (04:36):
It's about he's not good.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
It's about he's not doing a show that people want
to watch that draws a large enough audience for advertisers
to want to continue to spend the preposterous money they
spend to be on these programs in the first place.
By the way, it's all there's all kind of a
lot of insider deals that go on here with the
libs who run the Madison Avenue agencies and the libs
(04:58):
who run the you know, the production and the corporate
side of Comcast or CBS or Paramount or you know,
all these different corporate entities, and they know each other,
and they're all just keeping that cash flowing through each other.
And they're Democrats somehow. The Democrats, and this is a
(05:18):
whole other conversation, have taken over all these places, with
the exception of Fox News.
Speaker 3 (05:23):
And they're able to just do whatever they want.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
Well, they have to have people at least that have
an audience, right, say what you will about John Stewart
in the early two thousands that I've said a lot.
I mean, he's a propagandist, he's very dishonest, but he
was clever, he was good at his job, and he
made a lot of money because he drew a big
audience to a show that wouldn't have had it otherwise.
That's capitalism. I mean, it is gross, but it's still capitalism.
(05:46):
But what you have here with Jimmy Kimmel is the
market working as it should. But then let's talk about
the First Amendment here, because there's a big problem the
Democrats have with this. Oh my gosh, the FCC commissioner
said that they should clean up their act over at
at ABC with Kimmel. We'll get to this in a second,
but our sponsored Paradigm Press wants to tell you that
AI is a big deal. As technology advances go, artificial
(06:08):
intelligence will be a game chan a historic, epic changing
game changer. And we let on the AI front before
Biden came along. Then we lost some of that, but
Trump is getting us back at the very top of
the game. The AI zar is doing a phenomenal job,
and this administration is preparing an estimated trillion plus dollar investment,
drawing in multiple partners what I call Manhattan Project too.
(06:30):
It could trigger an investment boom as soon as October fifteenth.
I break it all down in a brand new interview,
including the companies I believe could soar when this comes about.
Find this interview in all the details online at a
new website. The website is offair twenty five dot com.
That's off air twentyfive dot com, paid for by Paradigm Press.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
All right, so the.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Libs are playing the oh my gosh, but the First
Amendment game. All right, let's talk about the first event
for a second.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
Shall we?
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Where were all of these people.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Whether it's Chris Hayes over at MSNBC, which is still
a thing apparently I think they're changing it too, MS
now or something. Where were all these people when in
June of twenty four June of twenty twenty four, the
Supreme Court said that you know what, the Yeah, the
Biden administration absolutely pressured social media companies during COVID. But
(07:24):
bringing a lawsuit now, you can't prove that they made
those decisions because of the pressure, and you don't have standing.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
And you can't prove.
Speaker 3 (07:37):
That these that they're going to do it again.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
So for these essentially technicalities, we're going to allow the
government to use third parties to censor private speech. The
government can coerce third parties for speech censorship, and you
can't because you can't even prove a discernible harm from this.
According to the majority, it was a six to three decision.
Of course, the cowards, the coward Roberts and the mediocrity
(08:04):
Amy Cony Barrett went with the psycho.
Speaker 3 (08:08):
Libs on that one. That's how they got to the
six three. Uh. But yeah, this is where we are, folks.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
They the Supreme Court weighed in and said, the government
is allowed to agitate private companies to make certain kinds
of decisions, and unless you can prove that there was
some specific government action taken to harm that company, you
don't really have any standing. So I just want to
know where we're all the First Amendment? Where are all
(08:36):
these First Amendment absolutists. Oh my gosh, we need the
acou Where are they?
Speaker 3 (08:41):
Where were all of those people?
Speaker 1 (08:43):
When the Supreme Court said that the massive censorship industrial
complex of the covid era was fine, they had no.
Speaker 3 (08:52):
Problem with that.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
So, okay, these are the rules. These are the rules.
So I don't want to hear any complaints about this.
I don't want to hear any whining from these libs.
I just simply do not care. And that's where it is.
I think Trump should just say whatever he wants about
whatever companies are doing, because the Supreme Court says decided
this is what it's gonna be. If they're gonna let
(09:14):
people get away, if they're gonna let the Biden White
House get away with having individual Americans singled out by
the White House for censorship pressure on the most powerful
speech platforms in the world. Which is a fact. It
happened to my friend Alex Parentson, happened to other people.
It is a fact that has happened. If that's those
are the rules, this is the game we're playing. Okay, fine,
(09:35):
Trump's gonna tell these companies. You know, I think that
guy's I think that guy stinks. You should take him
off air. I didn't do it into you. I'm just
telling you I think these stinks. You can't prove a harm,
you don't have standing. See how that works.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
Oh no, libs, So sad, let's.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
Talk about preborn every day, there are thousands of women
across our nation contending with an unplanned pregnancy, and there's
so many different pressures out there to choose abortion, which
is just tragic. But the Preborn network of clinics are
offering hope. They step in and offer life for that
child and compassion for that pregnant mother that she may
not get anywhere else. The Preborn Clinics begin this whole
(10:11):
journey with a free ultrasound for that mom when she
walks into that clinic, and that moment, that that connection
between mother and child so often is just the game
changer for the decision for life. Over three hundred and
fifty thousand babies have been saved through this life giving work,
and so many mothers have an entirely new outlook and
a love in their heart. So this is so important.
(10:32):
Please donate. It's happening every day. Preborn is there for
these moms and these tiny babies. Twenty eight dollars a
month can save a life. That's the price of a
free ultrasound for these moms when they walk in. Twenty
eight dollars a month, you'd be saving a baby a month.
With Preborn's help, Dial pound two fifty and say the
keyword baby. That's pound two five zero say the word baby,
(10:54):
or go to preborn dot com slash buck that's preborn
dot com slash b u c K.
Speaker 3 (10:59):
One more thing.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
The Cato Institute put out an analysis of murders by
political ideology since nineteen seventy five, excluding nine to eleven.
And you might say that seems very specific. Why nineteen
seventy five, that's kind of a oh oh, they're going
back fifty years. Interesting, they're leaving out and quite a
period there, aren't they Like the late sixties and the
(11:24):
early seventies. There's a lot of really bad stuff that
was going on. If your re membory, you know, but
you know, weather underground, you start to think about this.
But the bigger problem is that this analysis of murders
by political ideology, which of course shows that the right
is far and away the uh, you know, the biggest
it's three hundred and ninety one murders. Islamism is one
(11:45):
hundred and forty three murders, and leftists.
Speaker 3 (11:47):
Are only sixty five murders.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
That's what they want to tell you over at the
Cato Institute, which is a garbage a garbage thing.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
Think they leave out nine to eleven.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
They just excluded They say that, right, and thing like, yeah,
we're just not including nine to eleven.
Speaker 2 (12:03):
Ah, oh, you know this is real.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
Yeah. The team can't even believe this.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
I told you. They did this to me at C
and M one.
Speaker 3 (12:09):
They put me up.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
They're like, well, explain this. Look at all the right
wing murders that have happened in the last twenty years.
You know, this is back when it was this is
like twenty twenty fifteen, right, So like, look at all
the right wing murders over the last twenty years. And
they're like, there's so many more than Islamic murders. So
why are you so concerned about Islamism? And I'm like, you, guys,
cut out the three thousand people who were killed on
(12:31):
nine to eleven by ji honists, the worst terrorist attack
in the history of the planet. You just how do
you think cutting that out is a valid way to
get a sense of the threat. And by the way,
and I've had to make this argument before too, we
have spent probably trillions of dollars over the last twenty
some odd years trying to stop another nine to eleven.
Speaker 3 (12:52):
Okay, so we're.
Speaker 1 (12:54):
Spending we're not spending trillions of dollars trying to stop
the next Amish terror attack.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
I can assure you.
Speaker 1 (12:59):
So it's not even just the attacks that have happened,
it's all the plots that we have stopped and all
the resources and time and effort to stop those plots.
I've been in the offices in this country where this
is the mission, and I can tell you it is
Muslims who want to blow up people that are the
premier terror threat of the last twenty five years, without question.
(13:25):
And if you're going to start to look at the
So that's part one, and I just love this though
just excluding nine to eleven, I don't know, it's kind
of excluding Pearl Harbor makes it pretty difficult to understand
why World War two got the US involved, right, I
mean that this seems a little weird.
Speaker 3 (13:40):
Just skip that one.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
But then there's also when you look at the I
looked at some of the data set that they have.
I mean, they have all these different people that they're
claiming a right wing like some guy who was upset
at the like he was getting massage parlor stuff and
he killed some ladies who worked in the massage parlor
and he was just like a nut. They're calling that
right wing terrorism. All we know about the guys that
(14:06):
he was getting massages and there were like prostitutes that
work there and he was like upset about it and
you kill I mean this guy, how is he right wing?
There are other guys. There are immigrants who are non
white who are basically in cells who have killed people,
and they count that as right wing terrorism. When you
look at the list, you go so basically, everything that's
(14:29):
a murder that's really weird that doesn't have somebody who
says I'm a Trantifa, you know, Bernie bro left wing
and even then they try to exclude that. But everything
that's a murder that has some kind of psychological psychiatric
component is right wing according to this data set. Yeah,
it's it's nuts. It's really nuts. They're liars, that's not
(14:51):
a surprise. But I'm here to hold them to account.
Thanks for hanging everybody,
Host
Buck Sexton
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.