May 29, 2023 • 33 mins
Congressman Tom Tiffany is on the "Best of Hannity" to discuss the crisis on the border and just how little the Biden Administration is doing to control the influx of illegal immigrants to this country.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Right hour two Sean Hannity Show, Tolfrey, It's eight hundred
and ninety four to one, Shawn, if you want to
be a part of the program. These explosive hearings in
Jim Jordan's Judiciary Committee today, it just was unbelievable in
terms of the length and the depth of these whistleblowers
and what they've been able to expose. So much of
(00:23):
this we had already exposed on this program about when
they were investigating January sixth. There was so many details
that were left out, you know, all of a sudden
we find out even NBC News reports, oh, there was
significant actionable intelligence in the days leading up to January sixth.
Here we have a thirty year law enforcement veteran in Washington,
(00:46):
d C. Former chief of police of the United State
States Capitol Police, who had been begging in the days
leading up to January sixth because he saw some of
this intelligence and got no help, no less listening, no
assistance at all whatsoever. And yet he requested the National
Guard personally numerous times. Now, there was a terrific book
(01:10):
that nobody in the media really wanted to pay attention to,
and that was the Capitol Police chief. Now, notice when
they had the January sixth hearing, certain people were not involved.
Nancy Pelosi's phone records, her text messages mine were mine
were made public, you know, without my permission. My privacy
was invaded multiple times. It's now happened what five times
(01:32):
in my life. But they didn't have Nancy Pelosi's texts, emails.
This video of Nancy Pelosi and her daughter walking through
the halls in January sixth, nobody wants to see that
video on a tape as well. And anyway, the same
thing can be said for the Sergeant of Arms in
the House and the Senate. The same thing could be
(01:52):
said for Muriel Bowser who said no in writing to
bringing up any Guard troops. Or did anyone want to
hear from the cap Police chief himself, who was a
sole voice of sanity saying, guys, we have actionable intelligence here,
pay attention, give me the help. So they knew in advance,
and they did nothing, did nothing. And here's the Democrats,
(02:14):
you know, in temp trying to just beat up the
ever soul love whistleblowers.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
My colleagues have brought in these former agents, men who
lost their security clearances because they were a threat to
our national security who, out of malice or ignorance, or both,
have put partisan agenda above the oath they swore to
serve this country and protect its national security.
Speaker 3 (02:42):
On December fifth, twenty two, an account under the name
of Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said, quote Nancy
Pelosi stage January sixth, retweet if you agree end quote?
Do you agree with that statement?
Speaker 2 (02:57):
Yes or no?
Speaker 4 (02:58):
That is I don't know, ma'am.
Speaker 5 (03:01):
That's not my account at all.
Speaker 6 (03:02):
More than that, this hearing is an insult to the
brave whistleblowers out there who do risk their careers for
the good of their country. This circus of inmitted secret
accusations put to risk the critical row whistleblowers playing holding
the power of powerful accountable. Most whistleblowers aren't interested in
being political pawns in congressional Republicans' games. Playing politics is
(03:24):
holding up this scheme as whistleblowers will make other public
servants fearful of coming forward out of fear they will
just be used.
Speaker 7 (03:30):
When it comes to whistleblowers, you are not entitled to it.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
That's an individuestion of mister Allen. These individuals have been
determined need not to be whistle blowers. These are not whistleblowers.
They've been determined by the agency not to be whistleblowers.
Are you deciding that they're whistleblowers?
Speaker 1 (03:45):
Yes, the law decides.
Speaker 7 (03:46):
Did you not listen to mister Levitt's testimony?
Speaker 8 (03:48):
Do not read the law? The law.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
Attorney from the laws, not the lady from New York
has been recognized. Shoining us now is chief Son, thirty
year law enforcement vet in DC, former chief of the
police to get the United States Capitol Police. He wrote
a best selling book, Courage, under Fire, under Siege and
(04:11):
out numbered fifty eight to one. On January sixth, he
tells his story. He's one of only ten men in
history to ever hold the title of chief of the
US Capitol Police. Sir, welcome back to the program.
Speaker 5 (04:24):
Thank you, Sean. I certainly appreciate you having me on
your program. And you're after the right. You know, there
was a time they used to support whistleblowers, also support
the First Amendment.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
So here it is you get actionable intelligence now finally,
you know, after the January sixth committee hearings to bludgeon
Trump and if you want to criticize Trump on January sixth.
That's fair game. But they didn't tell the whole story,
did they. They purposely left out important parts that would
have added a lot of context and texture to what
(04:53):
actually happened.
Speaker 5 (04:55):
Absolutely, he left out the part about the law they passed.
There required by federal law that I seek approval from
the Capitol Police Board and congressional leadership to request National
Guard in advance of an event. January third, I went
and requested the National Guard and was denied. The Junior
sixth Committee wanted no part of that, and they wanted
to tie no part of that to the sar gens
or congressional leadership.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
Let me play for you, Chief, if you don't mind,
because you're not the only one that said this. This
is about the same date. It's either January second or third.
I forget it was the specific day, but it was
right in the same time period. I asked in interviews
four people. There were five people in the room, and
let me play it for you, including Donald Trump, his
(05:40):
chief of staff, Secretary of Defense Miller, his chief of staff,
and General Milly was in the room. And the Inspector
General report also cites him remembering that this was discussed.
Speaker 9 (05:52):
Did you authorize calling up the guard? And then it
became the chain of command went to Nancy Pelosi and
to the Mayor of d C Muriel Bowser. Did you,
as required by law, authorize.
Speaker 5 (06:06):
That one hundred percent?
Speaker 1 (06:09):
And attested to by many people, and they turned it down.
Nancy Pelosi turned it down.
Speaker 10 (06:15):
Mayor Bowser's written refusal the communications between the leader of
the Capitol Police and their chain of command to the
DoD refusing our request to allow National guardsmen and women
to stage on January four and five before January sixth.
Speaker 9 (06:30):
Did you both ask for the National Guard to be called.
Speaker 1 (06:33):
Up without a doubt?
Speaker 4 (06:35):
Sean, We've made that very clear, not just once, but
on numerous occasions. We wanted to make sure that there
was plenty of National Guard on the ready in case
there was some kind of violence.
Speaker 11 (06:47):
I had a meeting with President Trump on the third
of January concerning some international threats, and at the very
end he asked if there were any requests for National
Guard support. What was the President's response to you with
regard to the request made by Mayor Bowser, fill it
and do whatever was necessary to protect the demonstrators.
Speaker 1 (07:10):
Now, Chief I understand that in the very beginning, you know,
going out maybe eight days before, you did not see
actionable intelligence, and at that point you did not request
the Guard. But as you were getting closer to January sixth,
you did see actionable intelligence. Is that fair?
Speaker 5 (07:27):
Yeah? For me coming up on specifically Sunday, January third,
you know, I saw the size of the crowd that
we were expecting. I knew the size of the perimeter
I was going to have. Might be concerned was the
number of people I was going to have on my perimeter.
And that's specifically why I went and asked for the
National Guard, And yeah, it was it was denied. Dood
was eventually told that no, we would not be accepting
it because you know, of federal law, I can't accept
(07:48):
it without the approval of the Congressional Police Board, the
Capitol Police Board, and congressional leadership.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
Now let me ask you in line of what you
have said, is anybody in the mainstream media really reached out.
Was anybody in the mainstream media interested in your story?
I mean, your background, your record is beyond impressive. Only
one of ten people in the history of this country
to be the Capitol Police chief, one of ten thirty
(08:14):
year law enforcement veteran in Washington, d C. Your background
is impeccable. Did anyone in Congress seek your testimony on
the Democratic side? The January sixth Committee reach out to you.
Speaker 5 (08:27):
January sixth Committee did interview me informally. It wasn't videotape.
I mean it wasn't videotape. It was never broadcast to
the public. But any time I tried to relate to
the denial, I had to the National Guard. Again. They
did not want to accept that as a denial from
leadership or denial from the Capitol Police Board, and they
(08:47):
did everything they could keep clean hands from leadership. So
any of the interviews I've had, for the most part
mainstream media was much like the covering some of the
FBI stuff. They're looking to. Their narrative is how was
the White House involved versus you know, what are the facts.
When I wrote the book Courage under Fire, I wrote
it based on the facts. That's type of policing I've
(09:09):
been for a police officer, I've been for thirty years,
and that's what people were looking for with what half
on January sixth. So all the facts are there, you know,
you go back and look at what happened in the
White House May thirtieth to the beginning of June, all
the people attacking it there, they shut down the White
House operations. They've forced the President of the United States
to evacuate with his family into the bunker. That's as
much an insurrection as it is to shut down the
(09:32):
events up at the Capital. On January sixth, more police
officers were injured at the White House protest. Secret Service
was bloodied and beaten. And you had two significant incidents there.
One Metro and Police Department, an agency formed by Congress
to protect the President, wasn't allowed to go on the
cap of White House grounds to help defend the White
(09:52):
House and DEALG and FBI didn't pursue any of those suspects.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
Quick Break, Welcome back more with former Capital Police chief
Sundw's with us. And by the way, don't forget his book,
Courage Under Fire. And by the way, it is on
Amazon dot com, Hannity dot com, bookstor us everywhere. Hey,
I love Henry repeating Arms. You're gonna love this company.
I mean, they are phenomenal. They have a line of
two hundred rifles and shotguns. The company man I'm gonna
(10:19):
tell you something. Their owners are amazing patriots. They're dedicated
to our country. Their products are all made in America,
or they're not going to be made at all. They're
loyal customers know they provide award winning customer service. Henry
USA dot com the best company. You're gonna love this company.
(10:44):
The Shawan Hannity Show a thermonuclear mm they assault on
fake news.
Speaker 8 (10:52):
Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Hey, I've shared the importance of every school having a
Knox Entry access system that quick gets law enforcement into
locked doors when needed. Now, tragically, the importance continues. Eighteen
US school shootings have occurred from January through March. Many
schools have a Knox Entry system, but the statistics illustrate
the need and importance for all schools to provide law
(11:16):
enforcement with quick access to locked doors. I can learn
more about Knox Entry when you go to school entry
dot com. Do it Today's school entry dot com. All right,
we continue with former Capitol Police chief Sundays with us
his book Courage under Fire on Amazon dot com, Hannity
(11:39):
dot com, bookstores, everywhere. Let me play Luster Holt. This
was from January of this year. Acknowledging that the federal
law enforcement could have prevented the whole January sixth data
from Happening. Listen now to our NBC News exclusive.
Speaker 12 (11:56):
The January sixth Committee's final report was more than eight
hundred pages, but some material did not make the cut,
including much of its findings on the failures of federal
law enforcement leading up to the attack.
Speaker 13 (12:07):
The chief investigator of the January sixth Committee says the
government could have prevented it had law enforcement agencies acted
on the available intelligence. Do you believe the attack on
the Capitol could have been successfully repelled?
Speaker 14 (12:19):
I think it would have been a lot different had
law enforcement taken a more assertive protective posture. The intel
in advance was pretty specific, and it was enough, in
our view, for law enforcement to have done a better
job operationalizing a secure perimeter. Law enforcement had a very
direct role in contributing to cualy the failures, the security
(12:43):
failures that led to the violence.
Speaker 13 (12:44):
People familiar with the committee's work tell NBC News members
downplayed that finding because they wanted to keep the focus
on former President Trump. Committee members dispute that Hathey would
not discuss internal deliberations. Was this an intelligence failure.
Speaker 14 (12:58):
It was not an intelligence failure.
Speaker 13 (13:00):
That Peace Circle pres Live Kathe says. The committee found
the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies
did not act on the intelligence they had, including this
online threat forward to Capitol Police January fifth, calling on
thousands to go to Washington and help storm the Capitol.
In a statement to NBC News, the FBI said had
(13:21):
sent all the intelligence had had to the Capitol Police.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
Well, it seems like they want to blame you for this,
But simultaneously, sir, were you not chief asking for assistance?
National Guard assistants among them?
Speaker 5 (13:35):
Absolutely, And I've turned over all my phone records. They
actually ain't even have video records of me going into
both the House and the Senate Sergeant Arm's office because
I went in person, because I knew the sensitivity of
my request, so absolutely I went in request that absolutely
has denied. What they need to do is honestly, look
at the intelligence that FBI produced in advance. It wasn't
(13:56):
like any other event I've dealt with or the intelligence
that it was provided to me. You know, within Capitol Police,
there's a reason Capitol Police department also had whistleblowers much
like the FBI we're dealing with now.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
So they buried your testimony. Is it fair to say?
Do you conclude? And I don't want to put words
in your mouth. My conclusion is that they had a
political agenda, which was to make this report about Donald Trump,
not to prevent something like this from God forbid ever happening. Again.
Speaker 5 (14:24):
It's hard not to come to that conclusion when you
think about it, because they used just one aspect of
what the January sixty used as evidence in that hearing
was some of the internal video from my video cameras
at the Capitol. None of those video cameras have audio,
yet they went ahead and purposely imported dramatic audio sounds
of demonstrators. Imagine if any police chief in the country
(14:46):
had used that on a body worn camera and changed
the audio to help support a narrative. It was clear
they had a predetermined narrative. One they were focused on
sixteen hundred Percentia Avenue and doing everything they could to
keep any dirt off of CongressI leadership amazing.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
So basically they had a predetermined outcome, which I had
been saying from the very beginning. They never wanted to
get to the truth. Here's the sad thing, Chief, because
you could have prevented this if they had they listened
to you, had they listened to other law enforcement, had
they looked at the intelligence that was readily available, actionable intelligence.
To me, it is sad that they put politics above
(15:22):
the safety of our elected officials, our institution, the capital,
and that this could have been prevented, and that that's
not the lead of their report should tell you everything
I think you need to know. I want to remind
everybody if this book is phenomenal, it's called Courage, under Fire,
under Siege out number fifty eight to one on January sixth, unbelievable.
(15:44):
You did the right thing, sir, and I don't know
why you ended up leaving when it should have been
the other people leaving. And Congress should be ashamed of
itself because they've done nothing since to protect that capital,
and they should.
Speaker 5 (15:55):
You are absolutely correct, and Speaker Pelosi didn't give me
a whole lot of options, but I certainly appreciate all
the sport and there's a lot of facts people still
don't know about January sixth.
Speaker 1 (16:05):
All right, we're going to put the book on Hannity
dot Com Alink It's on Amazon dot Com hopefully bookstores everywhere.
Get yourself a copy. Stevensun Former only one of ten
Capitol police chiefs in history. We really appreciate you being
with us and giving us a very different story than
we were fed by the January sixth Committee.
Speaker 5 (16:24):
I appreciate it, sir, Thank you all.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Right, eight hundred ninety four one seawan if you want
to be a part of the program. But you know what,
he's like a whistleblower, just like the people today. They
get smeared, slandered, besmirched, attacked, silence. All right, So we
have a lot of other issues here. You know, we
have these hearings from earlier today, which you know, unbelievable
to me with these whistleblowers. Everybody loves whistleblowers, except when
(16:49):
they are Democratic whistleblowers. They only like ones that go
after Donald Trump. You know, we're still waiting to get
full reports. I know Senator Rubia released a report this
week and we had them on TV earlier exposing the
the COVID origins in more detail and specificity than ever before.
(17:10):
What about what's going on with the border? We ever
going to get details on that? What about the FBI,
now we know, has been weaponized and politicized the same
with the DOJ and what's happening to our country. Congressman
Tom Tiffany is with it from Wisconsin, sounding the alarm
on the Biden administration, in this case about the border
(17:32):
the World Health Organization. Sir, welcome to the program. Thanks
for being with us.
Speaker 8 (17:37):
Good, it's good to join you. And the hits just
keep coming, don't they.
Speaker 1 (17:41):
They really do. I mean, what did you think of
these whistleblowers today?
Speaker 8 (17:45):
Yeah, you know, I didn't get a chance to watch
the transcripts of what happened. I don't serve on that committee,
but hearing that the Democrats went after the whistleblowers, and
as you said at the top here, Democrats used to
love whistleblowers. They used to believe that that person who
worked in the rank and file that they should have
something to say if leadership is failing them, The leadership
(18:07):
of the FBI is failing us in this country. We
should be hearing the whistleblowers.
Speaker 1 (18:12):
Well, we should be, and they spoke out today, and predictably,
the Democrats attacked them and tried to smear them, just
as the FBI has been trying to do for speaking out.
I thought we had whistleblower protection laws in this country.
Do we no longer have them? That I miss the
rescinding of those laws.
Speaker 8 (18:30):
Well, represent Wasserman Schultz went so far as to say that, well,
these are not legitimate whistleblowers because FBI leadership says they're not.
Of course, they are going to say they're not legitimate
whistleblowers because they're the people that are perpetrating the leadership
of the FBI, that is, that are perpetrating this on
the people of the United States. The dual system of justice.
(18:53):
We see another example date the dual system of justice
in America.
Speaker 1 (18:56):
I don't know what the answer is. Is the answer
now that we know that the FBI put their cinder
blocks on the scales of not one, but two consecutive
presidential elections, obviously in the case of giving Hillary Clinton
every break possible imaginable and yet leaning into something that
was never corroborated, a dirty Hillary Clinton bought and paid
(19:18):
for Russian disinformation dossier, and pushing a phony, false narrative
from the beginning. As we learned from the Durham Report
this week. You know, nobody seems to be held accountable
in the end. Congressman, why is that so?
Speaker 8 (19:32):
It's a great point that you're bringing up, and I
would propose the following things. The FBI has a massive
new building that is slated to be built in Washington, DC.
I believe we pulled funding back from that until we
actually see reforms, until the agency is reformed. I think
we used the appropriations process as we go forward to
(19:54):
defund those that are not doing their job. Until we
see reforms, a concrete plan of reform, we shouldn't get
them anymore. We should we should inject ourselves into the approach.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
Okay, well, well, Chris Stpherferray, the FBI director, swore that
he implemented all the Inspector General's reforms. But yet here
the FBI had Hunter Biden's laptop in December of twenty nineteen,
it was authenticated, according to John Solomon, by the spring
of twenty twenty, and yet FBI agents in the months
(20:29):
leading up to the twenty twenty presidential election were meeting
weekly with every big tech company, and according to testimony
in Missouri, that they were being warned that they might
be victims of a foreign misinformation campaign that might have
to do with issues involving Joe and Hunter Biden. So
then the Hunter Biden laptop story breaks, the very real laptop,
(20:52):
and then it gets totally censored by Big Tech who
had been pre bunked by the FBI agents for MSN
end is that putting is that putting their own influence
on a presidential election. Seems like that to.
Speaker 8 (21:04):
Me, no doubt about it. And if you read the
Durham Report, the Durham Report makes it very clear if
they have little confidence that they're going to enact the
reforms that need to be done on the FBI, that's
where Congress comes in, and we need to use the
power of the first We also.
Speaker 1 (21:19):
Need to use the Home and Sean Well, you know,
I'm looking at all of these issues and I'm gonna
be honest, I'm not sure that we're going to get
the changes that are necessary because you know, at the
end of the Durham Report, which frankly in my view,
was three years too late, with all that we now
(21:40):
know and all that we knew about, you know, all
the lye to fize the court judges, and all of
the disinformation and all of the the accommodations given to
Hillary Clinton and the dual system of justice as all
things related to Donald Trump, does the FBI and the
CIATION may be having this type of involvement and our
life process.
Speaker 8 (22:01):
No, we should not have that type of involvement. But
the one way in which we can affect this is
to use the power of the purse in Congress. We
need to have the fortitude to do that. We also
should be using the Holman Holman role. Can we can
take an employee of the government down to one dollar
their salary for a year down to one dollar And
(22:22):
we need to do that with a few people to
send a very clear message. But I get it, Sean.
I hear from people at home all the time. They're like,
they just don't have any confidence that we're going to
be able to get to it. But I believe be
to the appropriations process, we got to be We got
to be brave, like we've been so far with some
of this stuff that we've been doing in the House representatives.
(22:42):
We need to do the right thing for the American people.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
Now, what's going to happen when Kevin McCarthy meets again.
I know that Joe Biden is in Japan. I guess
he's busy probably falling asleep in meetings. But so he's
going to come back. He wasted nearly one hundred days,
ninety seven days. You refuse to meet with Kevin McCarthy
said in the beginning. He refuse to negotiate with Kevin McCarthy.
So you and the House House Republicans, it's the majority.
(23:07):
It's a small one, but it's the majority voted to
pass a debt ceiling increased bill that brings us back
to twenty twenty two spending levels, which I think is
very responsible. That also reduces baseline budgeting increases to a
maximum of one percent. That allows for more drilling so
we can be more energy independent, good for national security
(23:29):
and job creation, and was scored out by the CBO
as saving four point eight trillion dollars in ten years.
And I'm tired of robbing our kids and grandkids blind.
So my question is what's going to happen if if
Joe Biden assists on this change, that change, and then
another change, our House Republican is going to sign onto
(23:50):
that bill. I would tend to doubt it. In thirteen days.
Speaker 8 (23:53):
What I'm merging leadership to do is the whole term
we passed a responsible bill. I mean in exchange or
the debt limit increase. The American people should get fiscal responsibility,
and that's exactly what we're doing, as well as the
pro growth policies that you mentioned, including work requirements, which
just passed by an eighty percent vote here in my
(24:14):
home state of Wisconsin. We should be insisting that these
things are done. We should stand firm. We're the only
ones that have put together a responsible budget and we
need to stand tall now as the Democrats try to
beat us into submission that all just do a debt
sealing increase.
Speaker 1 (24:31):
Well, they walked away for one hundred days. They wouldn't negotiate,
so you guys had no choice but to act on
your own. You passed a responsible debt sealing increase that
also stops the bleeding in terms of stealing money from
future generations. I'm not sure I would change the thing either,
And if Biden wants to, you know, in the end,
(24:51):
be the first president to have a default on the country,
then that's up to him. He made that decision a
long time ago, and I'm going to tell you why, Congressman.
He was betting there was no way that all of you,
especially after all the votes to Speaker McCarthy across the
finish line. He was betting you would not unite. He
was betting that you'd never pass a bill, and he
(25:12):
was betting that he'd get a clean debt ceiling bill
with no responsibility fiscal responsibility measures in it. You think
I'm wrong on that?
Speaker 8 (25:21):
Oh no, No, that's exactly what they were thinking. And
what we should do now is if you don't want
to do this, then let's help the Annie. Let's include
HR two to Secure the Border Act. Let's put that
in there also. Now, the price tag does not get
lower if you're not going to negotiate for as ninety
seven days and you're thinking you're just going to be
able to steamroll us.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
No, well, I love the idea. Let me ask you
this question. It's an election question because it impacted the
state of Wisconsin, where you're from, and I'm making the
case that Republicans have got to be very careful. I
don't see Democrats running traditional campaigns anymore. They don't cans,
they don't kiss babies, they don't take selfies, they don't
(26:02):
do press aveils, they don't do town halls. They spend
hundreds of millions of dollars on negative ads, and then
they have quote legal ballot harvesting efforts that have proven
very successful, especially in swing states. Now, if Republicans don't
adopt early voting, mail in voting and the same measures
and hopefully surpassing even the measures the Democrats have adopted
(26:26):
with legal ballot harvesting, I think they'll lose elections that
they can win. The second thing is, you just had
an election for seat open on your Supreme Court and
the issue of abortion was front and center, and I
think Republicans, if they continue to run candidates. I'm not
trashing Doug Monstreano, but the fact that he had no
(26:46):
exceptions for rape incests of the mother's life in Pennsylvania,
a purple state, at best, it was political suicide. Do
you think abortion played that big a role in that?
In that Supreme Court race?
Speaker 5 (27:02):
It played a big role.
Speaker 8 (27:03):
But we also need to talk about we're not talking
about other things that affect women, especially crime. We do,
we've done some of that, but we also need to
talk about Title nine. Sean, I got three daughters, they
all participate in interscholastic sports, and now men get to
take women's positions we're not talking about that enough. And
the other thing we're not talking about enough is that
(27:25):
every Democrat except one in the last Congress voted for
abortion on demand all the way up to nine months.
People don't know that, and we need to tell them
that Democrats are beyond extreme on abortion.
Speaker 5 (27:38):
No.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
I couldn't agree anymore anyway. Congressman Tom Tiffany, Wisconsin, we
appreciate you being with us. Please come back check out
with US office and thank you.
Speaker 8 (27:48):
Sewan Allays good to join you eight hundred and.
Speaker 1 (27:50):
Nine four one Sean. If you want to be a
part of the program.
Speaker 8 (27:58):
Fine hour roundup.
Speaker 12 (28:00):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the final hour free for all on the Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
Hey Sean Hannity, here for my friends at lone Star Transfer.
If you felt like booking your time share was difficult
in the past, you know it's recently been almost impossible now.
Most clients are shocked to learn that their timeshare is
now available to the public and that severely limits booking options.
Many owners have also reached out, and they're upset that
their yearly dues have nearly doubled during the maintenance fee season. Now,
(28:31):
for well over a decade, our friends at lone Star Transfer,
a family owned company, they have had the pleasure of
helping thousands and thousands of people legally and permanently get
out of their never ending timeshare fees. Now lone Star
Transfer guarantees the release of all liability to your time
share in writing and in a specific time frame. Call
(28:52):
my good friends for a free, no obligation consultation. Write
this down call today eight three three five nine fours
zero zero zero seven five eight three three five ninety
four zero zero seven five. They're online at lone star
Transfer dot com. Right back to our busy phones eight
(29:12):
hundred and ninety four one Sean our number if you
want to join us, Hi Jim and Florida Jim. You're
on the Sean Hannity Show. What's going on?
Speaker 7 (29:19):
Thanks Shawan, Thank you so much for continuing to stand
firm in the faith. I'm calling you because, of course
you're a believer. I'm a believer. We're kind of fond
of America and last time I checked and pulled out
a bill, it still says in God we trust. My
question is with the latest debacle with the FBI and
that those funny words. Somebody said about, yeah, we had
(29:39):
a couple of missteps. Well, as the light is being
shined on them, it's becoming a parent that there's been
really some nefarious things afoot. So here's my question to you.
It took a few guys to stand up, a very few.
If we could get a few more, what is it
three percent started a revolution men, fifteen percent listened and
it changed America's history. We could get twenty to thirty
(30:01):
percent of the FBI to say, you know what, there's
something awry here. There's something to foot. It's obviously not
the put soldiers and the people out in the field,
but the upper management has got something going on. What
do you say to that?
Speaker 1 (30:14):
You know, I am seeing more and more that, look,
there's a lot of factors in play here. For somebody
to become a whistlefuler, it does take a lot of
courage because you are risking your career and in most
cases you're probably destroying any chance of advancement, especially in
an organization that is so bureaucratic and so politicized as
(30:37):
the FBI. And that's sad. You know, we should be
encouraging those people that have the bravery and the courage to,
you know, hold true to the fidelity of the Bureau's mission.
I've said it all many, many times. This was the
world's premier law enforcement agency. It is not anymore. I
can't say that and believe it because it's not true.
(31:00):
And it's unfortunate that we have now weaponized the FBI,
politicized the FBI, politicized the DOJ. We have a dual
system of justice and we don't have equal justice or
application of our laws. So yeah, it's going to take
It would take a lot of people to make that happen,
to make that biggest statement, and maybe that'll happen one day.
Speaker 7 (31:20):
Well a few people like you, Sean doing the great
job you're doing. I would encourage my fellow Americans to
read the first two sentences the pre amble. Don't even
read the whole Constitution.
Speaker 8 (31:29):
Read the first.
Speaker 7 (31:30):
Two sentences of the Constitution, right in there where it
says established justice, promote domestic or ensured domestic tranquility. I mean,
just get through the first two sentences and think about
what our forefathers did when they signed the Constitution. Most
of them, in the Declaration of Independence, thought they were
signing their death warrant because they risked their life, their families,
(31:51):
their sacred honor, and their name. And by the way,
they have something that's very scarce now, a conscience, a
godly conscience that you and I grew up with. When
we swore an oath, it was to God.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
Well, I can't say it any better. God faith, family,
country boy. That would never lead us in the wrong direction,
would it. You know, it's really not that complicated. These
hearings will blockbuster today, but just like the Durham Report,
they will ignore it. Hey, there's still a lot more
ahead on the Best of the Sean Hannity Show. Stay
tuned for more right after news on this station. Verizon
(32:29):
AT and t T Mobile. Now, if you're with them,
you are overpaying. And it's that pure and that simple.
Pure Talk can easily save the average family close to
one thousand dollars a year. And right now you get
unlimited talk, unlimited text, and ultra fast five gen data
for twenty bucks a month. Is one of their best
deals ever. Now, what about the coverage, you ask, It's phenomenal.
(32:51):
Why because I'm on it. It's my cell phone company.
Puretalk uses the most dependable five G network in the country,
the same one that the big carriers. You use, the
same cell towers that they use. Grab your phone dial
pound two fifty, say the keyword save now, and you
can get unlimited talk, text and plenty of data for
twenty bucks a month. Choose this veteran own company. They
(33:13):
care about keeping jobs right here in America and saving
you money for the exact same service. Pick up your
phone dial pound two fifty. Use the keywords save now
for unlimited talk, text and plenty of five G data
twenty bucks a month pound two fifty. Keywords save now
from Pure Talk
Right hour two Sean Hannity Show, Tolfrey, It's eight hundred
and ninety four to one, Shawn, if you want to
be a part of the program. These explosive hearings in
Jim Jordan's Judiciary Committee today, it just was unbelievable in
terms of the length and the depth of these whistleblowers
and what they've been able to expose. So much of
(00:23):
this we had already exposed on this program about when
they were investigating January sixth. There was so many details
that were left out, you know, all of a sudden
we find out even NBC News reports, oh, there was
significant actionable intelligence in the days leading up to January sixth.
Here we have a thirty year law enforcement veteran in Washington,
(00:46):
d C. Former chief of police of the United State
States Capitol Police, who had been begging in the days
leading up to January sixth because he saw some of
this intelligence and got no help, no less listening, no
assistance at all whatsoever. And yet he requested the National
Guard personally numerous times. Now, there was a terrific book
(01:10):
that nobody in the media really wanted to pay attention to,
and that was the Capitol Police chief. Now, notice when
they had the January sixth hearing, certain people were not involved.
Nancy Pelosi's phone records, her text messages mine were mine
were made public, you know, without my permission. My privacy
was invaded multiple times. It's now happened what five times
(01:32):
in my life. But they didn't have Nancy Pelosi's texts, emails.
This video of Nancy Pelosi and her daughter walking through
the halls in January sixth, nobody wants to see that
video on a tape as well. And anyway, the same
thing can be said for the Sergeant of Arms in
the House and the Senate. The same thing could be
(01:52):
said for Muriel Bowser who said no in writing to
bringing up any Guard troops. Or did anyone want to
hear from the cap Police chief himself, who was a
sole voice of sanity saying, guys, we have actionable intelligence here,
pay attention, give me the help. So they knew in advance,
and they did nothing, did nothing. And here's the Democrats,
(02:14):
you know, in temp trying to just beat up the
ever soul love whistleblowers.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
My colleagues have brought in these former agents, men who
lost their security clearances because they were a threat to
our national security who, out of malice or ignorance, or both,
have put partisan agenda above the oath they swore to
serve this country and protect its national security.
Speaker 3 (02:42):
On December fifth, twenty two, an account under the name
of Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said, quote Nancy
Pelosi stage January sixth, retweet if you agree end quote?
Do you agree with that statement?
Speaker 2 (02:57):
Yes or no?
Speaker 4 (02:58):
That is I don't know, ma'am.
Speaker 5 (03:01):
That's not my account at all.
Speaker 6 (03:02):
More than that, this hearing is an insult to the
brave whistleblowers out there who do risk their careers for
the good of their country. This circus of inmitted secret
accusations put to risk the critical row whistleblowers playing holding
the power of powerful accountable. Most whistleblowers aren't interested in
being political pawns in congressional Republicans' games. Playing politics is
(03:24):
holding up this scheme as whistleblowers will make other public
servants fearful of coming forward out of fear they will
just be used.
Speaker 7 (03:30):
When it comes to whistleblowers, you are not entitled to it.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
That's an individuestion of mister Allen. These individuals have been
determined need not to be whistle blowers. These are not whistleblowers.
They've been determined by the agency not to be whistleblowers.
Are you deciding that they're whistleblowers?
Speaker 1 (03:45):
Yes, the law decides.
Speaker 7 (03:46):
Did you not listen to mister Levitt's testimony?
Speaker 8 (03:48):
Do not read the law? The law.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
Attorney from the laws, not the lady from New York
has been recognized. Shoining us now is chief Son, thirty
year law enforcement vet in DC, former chief of the
police to get the United States Capitol Police. He wrote
a best selling book, Courage, under Fire, under Siege and
(04:11):
out numbered fifty eight to one. On January sixth, he
tells his story. He's one of only ten men in
history to ever hold the title of chief of the
US Capitol Police. Sir, welcome back to the program.
Speaker 5 (04:24):
Thank you, Sean. I certainly appreciate you having me on
your program. And you're after the right. You know, there
was a time they used to support whistleblowers, also support
the First Amendment.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
So here it is you get actionable intelligence now finally,
you know, after the January sixth committee hearings to bludgeon
Trump and if you want to criticize Trump on January sixth.
That's fair game. But they didn't tell the whole story,
did they. They purposely left out important parts that would
have added a lot of context and texture to what
(04:53):
actually happened.
Speaker 5 (04:55):
Absolutely, he left out the part about the law they passed.
There required by federal law that I seek approval from
the Capitol Police Board and congressional leadership to request National
Guard in advance of an event. January third, I went
and requested the National Guard and was denied. The Junior
sixth Committee wanted no part of that, and they wanted
to tie no part of that to the sar gens
or congressional leadership.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
Let me play for you, Chief, if you don't mind,
because you're not the only one that said this. This
is about the same date. It's either January second or third.
I forget it was the specific day, but it was
right in the same time period. I asked in interviews
four people. There were five people in the room, and
let me play it for you, including Donald Trump, his
(05:40):
chief of staff, Secretary of Defense Miller, his chief of staff,
and General Milly was in the room. And the Inspector
General report also cites him remembering that this was discussed.
Speaker 9 (05:52):
Did you authorize calling up the guard? And then it
became the chain of command went to Nancy Pelosi and
to the Mayor of d C Muriel Bowser. Did you,
as required by law, authorize.
Speaker 5 (06:06):
That one hundred percent?
Speaker 1 (06:09):
And attested to by many people, and they turned it down.
Nancy Pelosi turned it down.
Speaker 10 (06:15):
Mayor Bowser's written refusal the communications between the leader of
the Capitol Police and their chain of command to the
DoD refusing our request to allow National guardsmen and women
to stage on January four and five before January sixth.
Speaker 9 (06:30):
Did you both ask for the National Guard to be called.
Speaker 1 (06:33):
Up without a doubt?
Speaker 4 (06:35):
Sean, We've made that very clear, not just once, but
on numerous occasions. We wanted to make sure that there
was plenty of National Guard on the ready in case
there was some kind of violence.
Speaker 11 (06:47):
I had a meeting with President Trump on the third
of January concerning some international threats, and at the very
end he asked if there were any requests for National
Guard support. What was the President's response to you with
regard to the request made by Mayor Bowser, fill it
and do whatever was necessary to protect the demonstrators.
Speaker 1 (07:10):
Now, Chief I understand that in the very beginning, you know,
going out maybe eight days before, you did not see
actionable intelligence, and at that point you did not request
the Guard. But as you were getting closer to January sixth,
you did see actionable intelligence. Is that fair?
Speaker 5 (07:27):
Yeah? For me coming up on specifically Sunday, January third,
you know, I saw the size of the crowd that
we were expecting. I knew the size of the perimeter
I was going to have. Might be concerned was the
number of people I was going to have on my perimeter.
And that's specifically why I went and asked for the
National Guard, And yeah, it was it was denied. Dood
was eventually told that no, we would not be accepting
it because you know, of federal law, I can't accept
(07:48):
it without the approval of the Congressional Police Board, the
Capitol Police Board, and congressional leadership.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
Now let me ask you in line of what you
have said, is anybody in the mainstream media really reached out.
Was anybody in the mainstream media interested in your story?
I mean, your background, your record is beyond impressive. Only
one of ten people in the history of this country
to be the Capitol Police chief, one of ten thirty
(08:14):
year law enforcement veteran in Washington, d C. Your background
is impeccable. Did anyone in Congress seek your testimony on
the Democratic side? The January sixth Committee reach out to you.
Speaker 5 (08:27):
January sixth Committee did interview me informally. It wasn't videotape.
I mean it wasn't videotape. It was never broadcast to
the public. But any time I tried to relate to
the denial, I had to the National Guard. Again. They
did not want to accept that as a denial from
leadership or denial from the Capitol Police Board, and they
(08:47):
did everything they could keep clean hands from leadership. So
any of the interviews I've had, for the most part
mainstream media was much like the covering some of the
FBI stuff. They're looking to. Their narrative is how was
the White House involved versus you know, what are the facts.
When I wrote the book Courage under Fire, I wrote
it based on the facts. That's type of policing I've
(09:09):
been for a police officer, I've been for thirty years,
and that's what people were looking for with what half
on January sixth. So all the facts are there, you know,
you go back and look at what happened in the
White House May thirtieth to the beginning of June, all
the people attacking it there, they shut down the White
House operations. They've forced the President of the United States
to evacuate with his family into the bunker. That's as
much an insurrection as it is to shut down the
(09:32):
events up at the Capital. On January sixth, more police
officers were injured at the White House protest. Secret Service
was bloodied and beaten. And you had two significant incidents there.
One Metro and Police Department, an agency formed by Congress
to protect the President, wasn't allowed to go on the
cap of White House grounds to help defend the White
(09:52):
House and DEALG and FBI didn't pursue any of those suspects.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
Quick Break, Welcome back more with former Capital Police chief
Sundw's with us. And by the way, don't forget his book,
Courage Under Fire. And by the way, it is on
Amazon dot com, Hannity dot com, bookstor us everywhere. Hey,
I love Henry repeating Arms. You're gonna love this company.
I mean, they are phenomenal. They have a line of
two hundred rifles and shotguns. The company man I'm gonna
(10:19):
tell you something. Their owners are amazing patriots. They're dedicated
to our country. Their products are all made in America,
or they're not going to be made at all. They're
loyal customers know they provide award winning customer service. Henry
USA dot com the best company. You're gonna love this company.
(10:44):
The Shawan Hannity Show a thermonuclear mm they assault on
fake news.
Speaker 8 (10:52):
Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Hey, I've shared the importance of every school having a
Knox Entry access system that quick gets law enforcement into
locked doors when needed. Now, tragically, the importance continues. Eighteen
US school shootings have occurred from January through March. Many
schools have a Knox Entry system, but the statistics illustrate
the need and importance for all schools to provide law
(11:16):
enforcement with quick access to locked doors. I can learn
more about Knox Entry when you go to school entry
dot com. Do it Today's school entry dot com. All right,
we continue with former Capitol Police chief Sundays with us
his book Courage under Fire on Amazon dot com, Hannity
(11:39):
dot com, bookstores, everywhere. Let me play Luster Holt. This
was from January of this year. Acknowledging that the federal
law enforcement could have prevented the whole January sixth data
from Happening. Listen now to our NBC News exclusive.
Speaker 12 (11:56):
The January sixth Committee's final report was more than eight
hundred pages, but some material did not make the cut,
including much of its findings on the failures of federal
law enforcement leading up to the attack.
Speaker 13 (12:07):
The chief investigator of the January sixth Committee says the
government could have prevented it had law enforcement agencies acted
on the available intelligence. Do you believe the attack on
the Capitol could have been successfully repelled?
Speaker 14 (12:19):
I think it would have been a lot different had
law enforcement taken a more assertive protective posture. The intel
in advance was pretty specific, and it was enough, in
our view, for law enforcement to have done a better
job operationalizing a secure perimeter. Law enforcement had a very
direct role in contributing to cualy the failures, the security
(12:43):
failures that led to the violence.
Speaker 13 (12:44):
People familiar with the committee's work tell NBC News members
downplayed that finding because they wanted to keep the focus
on former President Trump. Committee members dispute that Hathey would
not discuss internal deliberations. Was this an intelligence failure.
Speaker 14 (12:58):
It was not an intelligence failure.
Speaker 13 (13:00):
That Peace Circle pres Live Kathe says. The committee found
the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies
did not act on the intelligence they had, including this
online threat forward to Capitol Police January fifth, calling on
thousands to go to Washington and help storm the Capitol.
In a statement to NBC News, the FBI said had
(13:21):
sent all the intelligence had had to the Capitol Police.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
Well, it seems like they want to blame you for this,
But simultaneously, sir, were you not chief asking for assistance?
National Guard assistants among them?
Speaker 5 (13:35):
Absolutely, And I've turned over all my phone records. They
actually ain't even have video records of me going into
both the House and the Senate Sergeant Arm's office because
I went in person, because I knew the sensitivity of
my request, so absolutely I went in request that absolutely
has denied. What they need to do is honestly, look
at the intelligence that FBI produced in advance. It wasn't
(13:56):
like any other event I've dealt with or the intelligence
that it was provided to me. You know, within Capitol Police,
there's a reason Capitol Police department also had whistleblowers much
like the FBI we're dealing with now.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
So they buried your testimony. Is it fair to say?
Do you conclude? And I don't want to put words
in your mouth. My conclusion is that they had a
political agenda, which was to make this report about Donald Trump,
not to prevent something like this from God forbid ever happening. Again.
Speaker 5 (14:24):
It's hard not to come to that conclusion when you
think about it, because they used just one aspect of
what the January sixty used as evidence in that hearing
was some of the internal video from my video cameras
at the Capitol. None of those video cameras have audio,
yet they went ahead and purposely imported dramatic audio sounds
of demonstrators. Imagine if any police chief in the country
(14:46):
had used that on a body worn camera and changed
the audio to help support a narrative. It was clear
they had a predetermined narrative. One they were focused on
sixteen hundred Percentia Avenue and doing everything they could to
keep any dirt off of CongressI leadership amazing.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
So basically they had a predetermined outcome, which I had
been saying from the very beginning. They never wanted to
get to the truth. Here's the sad thing, Chief, because
you could have prevented this if they had they listened
to you, had they listened to other law enforcement, had
they looked at the intelligence that was readily available, actionable intelligence.
To me, it is sad that they put politics above
(15:22):
the safety of our elected officials, our institution, the capital,
and that this could have been prevented, and that that's
not the lead of their report should tell you everything
I think you need to know. I want to remind
everybody if this book is phenomenal, it's called Courage, under Fire,
under Siege out number fifty eight to one on January sixth, unbelievable.
(15:44):
You did the right thing, sir, and I don't know
why you ended up leaving when it should have been
the other people leaving. And Congress should be ashamed of
itself because they've done nothing since to protect that capital,
and they should.
Speaker 5 (15:55):
You are absolutely correct, and Speaker Pelosi didn't give me
a whole lot of options, but I certainly appreciate all
the sport and there's a lot of facts people still
don't know about January sixth.
Speaker 1 (16:05):
All right, we're going to put the book on Hannity
dot Com Alink It's on Amazon dot Com hopefully bookstores everywhere.
Get yourself a copy. Stevensun Former only one of ten
Capitol police chiefs in history. We really appreciate you being
with us and giving us a very different story than
we were fed by the January sixth Committee.
Speaker 5 (16:24):
I appreciate it, sir, Thank you all.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Right, eight hundred ninety four one seawan if you want
to be a part of the program. But you know what,
he's like a whistleblower, just like the people today. They
get smeared, slandered, besmirched, attacked, silence. All right, So we
have a lot of other issues here. You know, we
have these hearings from earlier today, which you know, unbelievable
to me with these whistleblowers. Everybody loves whistleblowers, except when
(16:49):
they are Democratic whistleblowers. They only like ones that go
after Donald Trump. You know, we're still waiting to get
full reports. I know Senator Rubia released a report this
week and we had them on TV earlier exposing the
the COVID origins in more detail and specificity than ever before.
(17:10):
What about what's going on with the border? We ever
going to get details on that? What about the FBI,
now we know, has been weaponized and politicized the same
with the DOJ and what's happening to our country. Congressman
Tom Tiffany is with it from Wisconsin, sounding the alarm
on the Biden administration, in this case about the border
(17:32):
the World Health Organization. Sir, welcome to the program. Thanks
for being with us.
Speaker 8 (17:37):
Good, it's good to join you. And the hits just
keep coming, don't they.
Speaker 1 (17:41):
They really do. I mean, what did you think of
these whistleblowers today?
Speaker 8 (17:45):
Yeah, you know, I didn't get a chance to watch
the transcripts of what happened. I don't serve on that committee,
but hearing that the Democrats went after the whistleblowers, and
as you said at the top here, Democrats used to
love whistleblowers. They used to believe that that person who
worked in the rank and file that they should have
something to say if leadership is failing them, The leadership
(18:07):
of the FBI is failing us in this country. We
should be hearing the whistleblowers.
Speaker 1 (18:12):
Well, we should be, and they spoke out today, and predictably,
the Democrats attacked them and tried to smear them, just
as the FBI has been trying to do for speaking out.
I thought we had whistleblower protection laws in this country.
Do we no longer have them? That I miss the
rescinding of those laws.
Speaker 8 (18:30):
Well, represent Wasserman Schultz went so far as to say that, well,
these are not legitimate whistleblowers because FBI leadership says they're not.
Of course, they are going to say they're not legitimate
whistleblowers because they're the people that are perpetrating the leadership
of the FBI, that is, that are perpetrating this on
the people of the United States. The dual system of justice.
(18:53):
We see another example date the dual system of justice
in America.
Speaker 1 (18:56):
I don't know what the answer is. Is the answer
now that we know that the FBI put their cinder
blocks on the scales of not one, but two consecutive
presidential elections, obviously in the case of giving Hillary Clinton
every break possible imaginable and yet leaning into something that
was never corroborated, a dirty Hillary Clinton bought and paid
(19:18):
for Russian disinformation dossier, and pushing a phony, false narrative
from the beginning. As we learned from the Durham Report
this week. You know, nobody seems to be held accountable
in the end. Congressman, why is that so?
Speaker 8 (19:32):
It's a great point that you're bringing up, and I
would propose the following things. The FBI has a massive
new building that is slated to be built in Washington, DC.
I believe we pulled funding back from that until we
actually see reforms, until the agency is reformed. I think
we used the appropriations process as we go forward to
(19:54):
defund those that are not doing their job. Until we
see reforms, a concrete plan of reform, we shouldn't get
them anymore. We should we should inject ourselves into the approach.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
Okay, well, well, Chris Stpherferray, the FBI director, swore that
he implemented all the Inspector General's reforms. But yet here
the FBI had Hunter Biden's laptop in December of twenty nineteen,
it was authenticated, according to John Solomon, by the spring
of twenty twenty, and yet FBI agents in the months
(20:29):
leading up to the twenty twenty presidential election were meeting
weekly with every big tech company, and according to testimony
in Missouri, that they were being warned that they might
be victims of a foreign misinformation campaign that might have
to do with issues involving Joe and Hunter Biden. So
then the Hunter Biden laptop story breaks, the very real laptop,
(20:52):
and then it gets totally censored by Big Tech who
had been pre bunked by the FBI agents for MSN
end is that putting is that putting their own influence
on a presidential election. Seems like that to.
Speaker 8 (21:04):
Me, no doubt about it. And if you read the
Durham Report, the Durham Report makes it very clear if
they have little confidence that they're going to enact the
reforms that need to be done on the FBI, that's
where Congress comes in, and we need to use the
power of the first We also.
Speaker 1 (21:19):
Need to use the Home and Sean Well, you know,
I'm looking at all of these issues and I'm gonna
be honest, I'm not sure that we're going to get
the changes that are necessary because you know, at the
end of the Durham Report, which frankly in my view,
was three years too late, with all that we now
(21:40):
know and all that we knew about, you know, all
the lye to fize the court judges, and all of
the disinformation and all of the the accommodations given to
Hillary Clinton and the dual system of justice as all
things related to Donald Trump, does the FBI and the
CIATION may be having this type of involvement and our
life process.
Speaker 8 (22:01):
No, we should not have that type of involvement. But
the one way in which we can affect this is
to use the power of the purse in Congress. We
need to have the fortitude to do that. We also
should be using the Holman Holman role. Can we can
take an employee of the government down to one dollar
their salary for a year down to one dollar And
(22:22):
we need to do that with a few people to
send a very clear message. But I get it, Sean.
I hear from people at home all the time. They're like,
they just don't have any confidence that we're going to
be able to get to it. But I believe be
to the appropriations process, we got to be We got
to be brave, like we've been so far with some
of this stuff that we've been doing in the House representatives.
(22:42):
We need to do the right thing for the American people.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
Now, what's going to happen when Kevin McCarthy meets again.
I know that Joe Biden is in Japan. I guess
he's busy probably falling asleep in meetings. But so he's
going to come back. He wasted nearly one hundred days,
ninety seven days. You refuse to meet with Kevin McCarthy
said in the beginning. He refuse to negotiate with Kevin McCarthy.
So you and the House House Republicans, it's the majority.
(23:07):
It's a small one, but it's the majority voted to
pass a debt ceiling increased bill that brings us back
to twenty twenty two spending levels, which I think is
very responsible. That also reduces baseline budgeting increases to a
maximum of one percent. That allows for more drilling so
we can be more energy independent, good for national security
(23:29):
and job creation, and was scored out by the CBO
as saving four point eight trillion dollars in ten years.
And I'm tired of robbing our kids and grandkids blind.
So my question is what's going to happen if if
Joe Biden assists on this change, that change, and then
another change, our House Republican is going to sign onto
(23:50):
that bill. I would tend to doubt it. In thirteen days.
Speaker 8 (23:53):
What I'm merging leadership to do is the whole term
we passed a responsible bill. I mean in exchange or
the debt limit increase. The American people should get fiscal responsibility,
and that's exactly what we're doing, as well as the
pro growth policies that you mentioned, including work requirements, which
just passed by an eighty percent vote here in my
(24:14):
home state of Wisconsin. We should be insisting that these
things are done. We should stand firm. We're the only
ones that have put together a responsible budget and we
need to stand tall now as the Democrats try to
beat us into submission that all just do a debt
sealing increase.
Speaker 1 (24:31):
Well, they walked away for one hundred days. They wouldn't negotiate,
so you guys had no choice but to act on
your own. You passed a responsible debt sealing increase that
also stops the bleeding in terms of stealing money from
future generations. I'm not sure I would change the thing either,
And if Biden wants to, you know, in the end,
(24:51):
be the first president to have a default on the country,
then that's up to him. He made that decision a
long time ago, and I'm going to tell you why, Congressman.
He was betting there was no way that all of you,
especially after all the votes to Speaker McCarthy across the
finish line. He was betting you would not unite. He
was betting that you'd never pass a bill, and he
(25:12):
was betting that he'd get a clean debt ceiling bill
with no responsibility fiscal responsibility measures in it. You think
I'm wrong on that?
Speaker 8 (25:21):
Oh no, No, that's exactly what they were thinking. And
what we should do now is if you don't want
to do this, then let's help the Annie. Let's include
HR two to Secure the Border Act. Let's put that
in there also. Now, the price tag does not get
lower if you're not going to negotiate for as ninety
seven days and you're thinking you're just going to be
able to steamroll us.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
No, well, I love the idea. Let me ask you
this question. It's an election question because it impacted the
state of Wisconsin, where you're from, and I'm making the
case that Republicans have got to be very careful. I
don't see Democrats running traditional campaigns anymore. They don't cans,
they don't kiss babies, they don't take selfies, they don't
(26:02):
do press aveils, they don't do town halls. They spend
hundreds of millions of dollars on negative ads, and then
they have quote legal ballot harvesting efforts that have proven
very successful, especially in swing states. Now, if Republicans don't
adopt early voting, mail in voting and the same measures
and hopefully surpassing even the measures the Democrats have adopted
(26:26):
with legal ballot harvesting, I think they'll lose elections that
they can win. The second thing is, you just had
an election for seat open on your Supreme Court and
the issue of abortion was front and center, and I
think Republicans, if they continue to run candidates. I'm not
trashing Doug Monstreano, but the fact that he had no
(26:46):
exceptions for rape incests of the mother's life in Pennsylvania,
a purple state, at best, it was political suicide. Do
you think abortion played that big a role in that?
In that Supreme Court race?
Speaker 5 (27:02):
It played a big role.
Speaker 8 (27:03):
But we also need to talk about we're not talking
about other things that affect women, especially crime. We do,
we've done some of that, but we also need to
talk about Title nine. Sean, I got three daughters, they
all participate in interscholastic sports, and now men get to
take women's positions we're not talking about that enough. And
the other thing we're not talking about enough is that
(27:25):
every Democrat except one in the last Congress voted for
abortion on demand all the way up to nine months.
People don't know that, and we need to tell them
that Democrats are beyond extreme on abortion.
Speaker 5 (27:38):
No.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
I couldn't agree anymore anyway. Congressman Tom Tiffany, Wisconsin, we
appreciate you being with us. Please come back check out
with US office and thank you.
Speaker 8 (27:48):
Sewan Allays good to join you eight hundred and.
Speaker 1 (27:50):
Nine four one Sean. If you want to be a
part of the program.
Speaker 8 (27:58):
Fine hour roundup.
Speaker 12 (28:00):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the final hour free for all on the Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
Hey Sean Hannity, here for my friends at lone Star Transfer.
If you felt like booking your time share was difficult
in the past, you know it's recently been almost impossible now.
Most clients are shocked to learn that their timeshare is
now available to the public and that severely limits booking options.
Many owners have also reached out, and they're upset that
their yearly dues have nearly doubled during the maintenance fee season. Now,
(28:31):
for well over a decade, our friends at lone Star Transfer,
a family owned company, they have had the pleasure of
helping thousands and thousands of people legally and permanently get
out of their never ending timeshare fees. Now lone Star
Transfer guarantees the release of all liability to your time
share in writing and in a specific time frame. Call
(28:52):
my good friends for a free, no obligation consultation. Write
this down call today eight three three five nine fours
zero zero zero seven five eight three three five ninety
four zero zero seven five. They're online at lone star
Transfer dot com. Right back to our busy phones eight
(29:12):
hundred and ninety four one Sean our number if you
want to join us, Hi Jim and Florida Jim. You're
on the Sean Hannity Show. What's going on?
Speaker 7 (29:19):
Thanks Shawan, Thank you so much for continuing to stand
firm in the faith. I'm calling you because, of course
you're a believer. I'm a believer. We're kind of fond
of America and last time I checked and pulled out
a bill, it still says in God we trust. My
question is with the latest debacle with the FBI and
that those funny words. Somebody said about, yeah, we had
(29:39):
a couple of missteps. Well, as the light is being
shined on them, it's becoming a parent that there's been
really some nefarious things afoot. So here's my question to you.
It took a few guys to stand up, a very few.
If we could get a few more, what is it
three percent started a revolution men, fifteen percent listened and
it changed America's history. We could get twenty to thirty
(30:01):
percent of the FBI to say, you know what, there's
something awry here. There's something to foot. It's obviously not
the put soldiers and the people out in the field,
but the upper management has got something going on. What
do you say to that?
Speaker 1 (30:14):
You know, I am seeing more and more that, look,
there's a lot of factors in play here. For somebody
to become a whistlefuler, it does take a lot of
courage because you are risking your career and in most
cases you're probably destroying any chance of advancement, especially in
an organization that is so bureaucratic and so politicized as
(30:37):
the FBI. And that's sad. You know, we should be
encouraging those people that have the bravery and the courage to,
you know, hold true to the fidelity of the Bureau's mission.
I've said it all many, many times. This was the
world's premier law enforcement agency. It is not anymore. I
can't say that and believe it because it's not true.
(31:00):
And it's unfortunate that we have now weaponized the FBI,
politicized the FBI, politicized the DOJ. We have a dual
system of justice and we don't have equal justice or
application of our laws. So yeah, it's going to take
It would take a lot of people to make that happen,
to make that biggest statement, and maybe that'll happen one day.
Speaker 7 (31:20):
Well a few people like you, Sean doing the great
job you're doing. I would encourage my fellow Americans to
read the first two sentences the pre amble. Don't even
read the whole Constitution.
Speaker 8 (31:29):
Read the first.
Speaker 7 (31:30):
Two sentences of the Constitution, right in there where it
says established justice, promote domestic or ensured domestic tranquility. I mean,
just get through the first two sentences and think about
what our forefathers did when they signed the Constitution. Most
of them, in the Declaration of Independence, thought they were
signing their death warrant because they risked their life, their families,
(31:51):
their sacred honor, and their name. And by the way,
they have something that's very scarce now, a conscience, a
godly conscience that you and I grew up with. When
we swore an oath, it was to God.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
Well, I can't say it any better. God faith, family,
country boy. That would never lead us in the wrong direction,
would it. You know, it's really not that complicated. These
hearings will blockbuster today, but just like the Durham Report,
they will ignore it. Hey, there's still a lot more
ahead on the Best of the Sean Hannity Show. Stay
tuned for more right after news on this station. Verizon
(32:29):
AT and t T Mobile. Now, if you're with them,
you are overpaying. And it's that pure and that simple.
Pure Talk can easily save the average family close to
one thousand dollars a year. And right now you get
unlimited talk, unlimited text, and ultra fast five gen data
for twenty bucks a month. Is one of their best
deals ever. Now, what about the coverage, you ask, It's phenomenal.
(32:51):
Why because I'm on it. It's my cell phone company.
Puretalk uses the most dependable five G network in the country,
the same one that the big carriers. You use, the
same cell towers that they use. Grab your phone dial
pound two fifty, say the keyword save now, and you
can get unlimited talk, text and plenty of data for
twenty bucks a month. Choose this veteran own company. They
(33:13):
care about keeping jobs right here in America and saving
you money for the exact same service. Pick up your
phone dial pound two fifty. Use the keywords save now
for unlimited talk, text and plenty of five G data
twenty bucks a month pound two fifty. Keywords save now
from Pure Talk
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.