June 26, 2025 • 32 mins
Congressman & Dr. Andy Harris of Maryland, who is the Freedom Caucus Chair, joins us to discuss his support for the President. He is making sure he does everything he can to help with the Big, Beautiful Bill and he is also speaking loudly with support for the President’s efforts towards Iran, and for ICE as they attempt to secure the country.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
That will come in your city, going a way again.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Sang you a conscious Sun, will the entire Alan.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
And if you want a little banging a yunie, I
come along.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Are you going to run for president again?
Speaker 2 (00:19):
I am eighty three years of age, That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (00:22):
Yeah, you know that resides in the White House has unilaterally,
in my assumation, declared war.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
I've proposed is that we raise ten billion dollars to
pay for our entire economic agenda and start to Trump
proof our city because we know he'll use federal funding
his leverage over this city.
Speaker 5 (00:44):
Fredom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution that will.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
Coming your cent going the way against and sign you
a conscious Sun.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
New Sean Hennity show more him the scenes, information on
breaking news, and.
Speaker 5 (01:06):
More boned inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Coming up next Our final news roundup and information overload,
Our all right news roundup and information overload hour toll
free on numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program.
I have been reassured by key members of Republicans in
the Senate that this issue of the Senate Parliamentarian is
(01:32):
going to be dealt with what I am referring to. Now,
for the Republicans to get this one big, beautiful bill passed,
they have this arcane legal process that they have to
go through, and it's called reconciliation. This is how Biden
passed the Inflation Reduction Act. This is how Obamacare was
(01:55):
passed by Barack Obama. By the way, the Senate Parliamentarian
at the time objected to many aspects of that bill.
But that's another issue for another day. Now, the Senate
Parliamentarian is not elected. And for the reconciliation process, why
it is needed. It is allowed to be used for
issues involving economic issues. Bills that is passed by Congress.
(02:21):
You don't need the sixty vote threshold that would needed,
you know, as for cloture. In other words, to move
forward with the bill, you need a simple majority of
fifty one.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
That then gives the Republicans an opportunity to implement President
Trump's economic agenda. Now, the Senate Parliamentarian is not elected,
and she's not accountable to the American people, and yet
she holds veto power over the legislation supported by millions
of voters.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
And by the.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
Way, there was a point where Trent Lott, I think,
was one that fired a Senate parliamentarian. Their role is
to make a political judgments about Senate rules and procedures.
Now the Democrats want to make this as difficult as possible.
Senator Tommy Cobvervelt of Alabama's called for the proletarian to
(03:16):
be Senate parliamentarian to be fired. But if you look at,
you know, key portions of Presidents Trump agenda, the parliamentarian
is claiming using the reconciliation process in the Senate that
it doesn't fall into reconciliation. Okay, Actually on every issue
(03:36):
that the person's ruling on, they just happen to be wrong.
And this has to be dealt with first in the
Senate and then from there it will be dealt with,
you know, in conference because there are some differences between
the House version and the Senate version of this bill.
I'm not trying, I'm not trying to make this complicated,
but it does need to be dealt with.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
Now.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
The White House says, Congress is debating big footnotes and
the big beautiful bill, and anyway, the person that's kind
of spearheadiness is the White House Director of the National
Economic Council Kevin Hassett. He seems unfazed by the differences
between the House and Senate versions and that in conference
(04:18):
they'd come to an agreement. But I want to first
get your reaction, Kevin, to what the Senate Parliamentarian is saying,
because he's trying to gut very key provisions of the
Trump agenda.
Speaker 5 (04:32):
Yeah, V, thanks for having me on Sean. It's great
to speak with you again. The bottom line is that
you're one hundred percent correct. The Senate Parliamentarian is playing
dishonest partisan games ruling stuff has to be out of
the bill that should be in the bill. And the
thing though, I want to emphasize is that it's still
(04:55):
going to be a big, beautiful bill. The President's main
priorities are not being tossed out, and there's changes in
language that can happen right up to the last minute,
where in the end the parliamentarian caves. This is sort
of part of the unfortunate Senate process that the senators
that the rules and they've agreed to do it this
(05:15):
way for all of eternity, and they're playing by their rules,
and there are times when it's really frustrating. But the
bottom line is, don't lose sight of the prize. So
the prize is this is going to be a big,
beautiful bill. It's going to put ten thousand dollars into
the pockets of the typical American family. It's going to
cause economic growth to go way north of three probably
(05:37):
north of four percent, and it's going to reduce the
deficit ed orbously because of the big spending cuts. And so,
you know, I a hundred percent understand the frustration that
a lot of people have with the things that have
been changed, things that we really wanted to build, that
the parliamentarian is ruling against. But I don't want the
headline to be the bill is less, you know, isn't beautiful?
(05:59):
Because it is going to be beautiful.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
Can the Vice President, who is the president of the
Senate overrule the parliamentarian because the president called on well,
actually it was Congressman Greg Stuby that called on vice
President advanced to overrule the parliamentarian?
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Is that allowed?
Speaker 5 (06:17):
It is? It's unprecedented, but allowed and or almost unprecedented.
The bottom line though, is that the hope would be
that they'll find ways to change language around the edges
so that the parliamentarian stands down and we get everything
we want in the bill.
Speaker 3 (06:35):
But by the way, that this did happen during Obamacare, correct.
Speaker 5 (06:40):
That the parliamentarian was overruled a no.
Speaker 3 (06:44):
Yeah, that the parliamentarian originally would was against provisions, and
then they changed the language and then it's quote acceptable.
Speaker 5 (06:52):
Yes. That happens in every reconciliation bill. Is the parliamentarian.
It's kind of like, you know, every now and then
there you know, the umpire is corrupt in a baseball game,
but most of the time, the empire is just trying
to follow the rules. And so they said, it has
these rules that allow you to pass it in fifty
one votes, and the rules are pretty clear cut. But
every now and then, you know, there's some interpretation involved,
(07:16):
and so they call it, giving it a bird path
after the senator bird was the one who helps the
crafty's rules.
Speaker 3 (07:22):
It's based on the bird rules. If you want to
describe it, you can. But by the way, it's true
that in two thousand and one, then Majority Leader Trent
Lotte fired the Senate Parliamentary enduring reconciliation.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
Sure, sure, and I would not expect that this person
is likely to keep their job and if it gets
really out of hand, and of course then the Vice
President can step in. And if this person knows that,
then that hopefully will help them think about their decisions.
But again, the bottom line, the head how.
Speaker 3 (07:50):
Much of this is in the hands of John Thune,
because he has made clear he didn't intend to overrule
the parliamentarian.
Speaker 5 (07:57):
He's as here, here's the thing. The Senate has lots
of senators, and they are senators that agree with your
position on the parliamentarian and more moderate senators that perhaps
they know we got to do what the empire says.
And so I'm sure the Senator Thoon is frustrated with
(08:20):
the parliamenttarian, but it could well be that if he
just disregards the proletariat altogether, that there would be senators
that would say, okay, then I'm not voting for the bill.
And so he's managing a difficult thing. But let me
tell you this, it's one hundred percent this bill is
going to pass. It's one hundred percent. This is going
to pass by the weekend. It's going to have all
(08:41):
the things that the President has insisted on, They're going
to be in the bill. The main headline things when
we Secretary Dustin and I went up to meet with
the leaders of Congress. So maybe the twenty first of January.
We had a card of the president's priorities that he
ran on and you know, the no tax on tips,
no tax on over time, no taxis social Security, all
(09:01):
those things, permanent tax cuts. We had a card, a
pocket card that we gave to everybody said this is
what the President watson the bill and the President's bill.
His figurefits are all over this bill and it's great.
And the other thing I can tell you is that
I was a dinner speaker for House members this week,
and I would say that the White our expectation is
(09:23):
that the Senate bill will be close enough to the
House bill that the House members will consider and perhaps
be willing to just pass the Senate bill right away
and go home over the weekend.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
So the Senate parliamentarian, as part of the rulings, actually
ruled that illegal immigrants are eligible for federal student loans.
That tells me that this is a radical, extreme leftist
and the person has been in this job since what
twenty twelve.
Speaker 2 (09:56):
That is insane by that.
Speaker 5 (09:58):
You are one hundred percent right to be outraged by that.
And the fact is that remember that if you say
that you can't give federal money to say an illegal
then the main reconciliation rule is it has to have
an effect on the budget. So you can't you can't
go in and say ban cigarettes because you don't like
(10:20):
them in reconciliation, because that doesn't have an effect on
the budget or a direct effect on the budget. But
if you stop spending on something, that has a direct
effect on the budget, and so of course Congress controls
the first strin so of course Congress should have the
right to stop spending on something. And so it's just
a preposterous, preposterous ruling.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
All right, let's talk about some of the other changes
to Medicaid and so on and so forth. I mean,
there are some very significant, you know, provision changes. For example,
the Medicare Medicaid provider rate, which is the amount that
state medicaid programs pay providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries,
(11:01):
which proved to be a device of policy. But you know,
if you look at Medicaid Medicare, in one case you're
paying three times more for the same exact service than
the other. And the work requirement for able bodied people
that are getting a government benefits, which is something Bill
(11:21):
Clinton supported In case anyone's interested.
Speaker 5 (11:24):
Yeah, Medicaid waste proud and abuse is rampant, and there's
a lot of savings that are going to be had
in this bill because of ending waste broad and abuse.
And there are also they're putting money aside to make
sure that rural hospitals are not affected by these reforbes.
(11:45):
So I think that you know, people are going to
some people budget hawks, conservatives are going to be thrilled
with the progress, but they're going to want more in
the end as well.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Got to take a quick break. We'll come back more.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
Kevin Ascid, head of the Head Economic Council to President Trump.
On the other side, as we watch this one big
beautiful bill, you know, and a clearly partisan Senate parliamentarian
trying to muddy up the waters for Republicans, there will
be a solution that much. I can tell you more
on the other side than we'll get to your calls
(12:19):
coming up.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
I would continue now.
Speaker 3 (12:21):
Kevin Hassett is with US Head Economic Council to President
Trump as we are getting an update on the one
big beautiful bill we're really dealing with We're dealing with
two problems here. One is the Senate parliamentarian and the
second is is the House and Senate versions and coming
to agreement on one final agreed upon provision. Okay, so
(12:43):
how do you deal first with the Senate parliamentarian? How
difficult the process is that going to be? I know,
Lindsey Graham, the Senate Budget Committee chair, is all over
this today. Are you saying that you believe that they'll
he'll sit down with the Senate a parliamentarian and go
line by line and get and just like put a
comma and a period and get the exact verbiage that
(13:08):
the Centate parliamentarium wants and it will still be the
same outcome.
Speaker 5 (13:13):
It's in the in the end, it's a very difficult
process to project right now, given the terrible rulings that
happened over the last few days. But in you know,
traditionally what happens is that the rulings can change right
up to the last minute when you agree to changing
(13:35):
the language, and it's all kind of like a KOBOOKI
theater because of the end, you get pretty much what
you want, but you had to say it a different way.
And that's historically, the way this process has gone, it's
not clear to me that all of the changes will
be satisfactory to everybody. And then at that point, the
Senators are going to have to decide what are we
(13:55):
going to do about this?
Speaker 3 (13:57):
Well, what do you recommend considering you're kind of trying
to you're a leading point on spearheading this.
Speaker 5 (14:04):
Yeah, well not in the sense of the Senate has
to pass a bill, and it's a difficult process, and
the Senators have to decide how are they Well.
Speaker 3 (14:13):
For the White House, I mean, you've got to navigate
a lot of this and work with the House and
the Senate. You know, I guess the House past that
have bill, the Senator past that bill goes to conference.
Now the Senate, you know, as they've muddied the waters
by trying to take out very key critical agenda items
of the President and by an unelected you know, bureaucrat
(14:36):
that has been there since twenty twelve, the things that
we should be paying college tuition for illegal immigrants, which
in and of itself is should be illegal.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
If it's not, I think it is illegal.
Speaker 5 (14:48):
Right. Well, the Senate, you know, we'll see what the
final Senate bill looks like. But the hope is that
the Senators are able to navigate the bill to something
so close to the House bill that the House members
can just pass the Senate bill as is right away.
And if then it is unable to do.
Speaker 3 (15:09):
But do you know, there have been some some House
Republicans that have been, you know, pretty vocal that they
don't like some of the changes made by the Senate.
Speaker 5 (15:19):
Of course, and so and so what the Senate has
to do is get it as close to the House
bill as they can, given that they've got, you know,
different people in the Senate than there are in the House,
and they all have their opinions. But it's my expectation
that in the end, and I've spoken with leadership in
the House that in the Senate. I gave the dinner
(15:39):
talk to a whole bunch of House members just this week,
and my expectation is that in the end that the
House will be comfortable enough with what they get from
the Senate that that's the objective of the Senate, that
we won't have to go into a conference. If they're not,
then we can go into conference. It could happen, But
if that happens, then the bill won't be ready by
the fourth.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
So this is why we call it the swamp, isn't it?
Because this is all swamp bureaucracy. And you know, to
have a one unelected bureaucrat hold up a duly elected
president and his agenda and a party and their agenda
is pretty spectacular to me. And I think the Republicans
(16:21):
ought to bypass it any way they can and let
the American people decide in the next election if they
support the changes. There's your answer anyway, Kevin has it.
We appreciate you being with us, sir, Thanks Jean, eight
hundred nine one, Shawn, if you want to be a
part of the program, all right, twenty five now till
the top of the hour, eight hundred and nine four one, Sean,
(16:43):
if you want to be a part of the program.
There are significant implications as it relates to Mam Donnie.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
It was bending down again something.
Speaker 3 (16:53):
James Carvill even warned that Mom Donnie has not walked
back calls for a global entifadom, and he said, well,
maybe it'll He'll turn out to be a very skilled candidate. However,
I do believe Republicans will jump on this. As you
think is that I can't imagine that any Democratic candidate
anywhere in the country is going to be able to
escape answering questions about Mamdani. There's a lot of Democrats
(17:15):
that are going to have to go hard at this.
I think that it's potentially a very damaging event. I mean,
crazy Karvel is crazy Krvl, but he's not stupid. He's
a lot of things. I debated him many times over
the years around the country. Well, let's play Mamdani saying
is mayor, he would arrest net and Yahoo. Now I
have a question. Why didn't he talk about arresting members
(17:38):
of Hamas, the people that were responsible for the murder
based on their population size versus ours of the equivalent
of forty thousand Americans in a day. And you know
the terror group that also committed atrocities murder, rape, kidnapping, torture, beheadings,
(17:59):
including children killing mothers and fathers in front of their children.
I need to call about them. No, he's talking about
arresting Netsa Yahu.
Speaker 5 (18:07):
But the man, I'm donny welcome Benjamin heto the city.
Speaker 6 (18:10):
No as mayor New York City with arrest Benjamin Netanyaho.
This is a city that our values are in line
with international law. It's time that our actions are also.
Speaker 7 (18:18):
Even though the US is not a signature of the ICC.
Speaker 6 (18:20):
No, it's time that we actually step up and make
clear what we are willing to do to showcase the
leadership that is sorely missing in the federal administration.
Speaker 3 (18:27):
I'm never going back to New York City. I've had
it with that place. Forget it. Place is nuts. I
think that place is nuts nuts. Listened to the LA
Area Vice mayor calling on gang members to defend territory
from Ice. Can't make this up. This is a you know,
crazy carvel. This is your party, might want to weigh
(18:47):
in on this.
Speaker 4 (18:48):
I want to know where the toilers are at in
Los Angeles, Eighteenth Street, Florentia.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
Where's the leadership at?
Speaker 7 (18:56):
Because you guys are all about territory and this is
eighteenth Street and this is so anthony you They.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Tag everything up claiming hood and now that.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
Your hood's being invaded by the biggest gang there is, they'rein't.
Speaker 8 (19:08):
A peep out of you.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
We're out there like by our tour, protecting our tur
protecting our people, like where you at. I don't want to.
Speaker 4 (19:17):
Hear a peep out of you once they're gone, trying to.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
Claim that this is my block. This was not your block.
You weren't even here helping out.
Speaker 4 (19:24):
So whoever's the leadership over there, just get your.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
Members in order, all right.
Speaker 3 (19:29):
That's your modern radicalized Democratic Party. What do you think
of this ticket? I've been thinking about this, Linda. You
can have Kasmin Crockett and Mom Donnie as the Democratic
Party ticket.
Speaker 8 (19:41):
They are they are they governing in some strange corner
of hell, or like, where are we talking about? No?
Speaker 3 (19:46):
No, no, that they would be the Democratic Party's ticket
for twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 8 (19:52):
So we have two people who've never run anything, who
don't run anything, who barely work in the roles they
currently have, and want to take everybody his money to
give it around because nobody should work because they don't work.
And they both make music videos. Remember Jasmine Crockett made
it a music dance video in the middle of the
holes of Congress.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
I think this would be a great ticket. Run Jasmine, run,
Mom Donnie. You know it's like Gavin Newsom thinks he's
a moderate. Gavin Newsom thinks he's reasonable the rest of them.
Speaker 8 (20:23):
And not sleep at the switch, and he does whatever
his wife tells him. This is not a man in
control of anything. Please, let's just stop.
Speaker 2 (20:29):
I have no idea. All right, let me get to
our busy. Well, you know what you could do.
Speaker 8 (20:33):
Why don't we do this? Why don't you use your
chef IQ make one of your fancy pants dinners and
invite them all over and you can all sit down
and talk about.
Speaker 3 (20:40):
Their You know, I love to cook. I find it
the most way. I am a better I am a
better cook than you are. That's all there is to it.
Speaker 2 (20:49):
Oh my god, that's all I mean.
Speaker 3 (20:52):
Just describing air fried French fries, I want to, you know,
blow my brains out.
Speaker 8 (20:56):
But the good thing is is.
Speaker 9 (20:57):
The chef i q Thermometer actually works in the little
Did you know, whether whether you're cooking steak or chicken,
or pork chops or burger, or pork ribs or fish,
you can make sure that whatever you're cooking is no
better feeling than when you cut into that juicy.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
Steak, those pork chops, that fish, those ribs, that burger,
and it's perfect. That chicken, it's perfect every time. It'll
be perfect thanks to Chef i Q Sense, a modern,
completely wireless cooking thermometer. There's no guesswork in cooking anymore.
It will literally you put you you know, you prepare
it the way you normally prepare it, and it doesn't
(21:39):
matter if you're roasted or grill it, or bake it
or broil it or deep fry it for that matter.
Chef i Q Sense delivers perfect results. But whatever you're cooking,
insert the probe. You select your desired level of dunness
on the chef i q app, and it's going to
tell you. For example, you're make a steak, it's going
to tell you when to flip it over. If you
(22:00):
you are making let's say, oh, I don't know whatever,
and then they'll tell you when your stake's done. I
like a medium, all right, It'll tell you exactly when
it's medium. You like a medium rare, tell you exactly
when it's medium rare. And if you like it rare,
just take it out of the plaque and start eating it.
Just kidding, but you're gonna love the technology. And you
(22:20):
know all your friends, your family, you know your neighbors,
they're gonna they're always gonna want you to cook because
it's gonna be perfect anyway, right, Now you'll get fifteen
percent off when you go to chefiq dot com use
the promo code Hannity. And while you're there, check out
their brand new chef iq Mini Oven. Now you can
pre order them. I got an early version and it
will It's gonna completely change. You'll never use your oven again.
(22:42):
Let's put it that way. It's a game changer, best
in class features, incredible technology. So why you're getting your
chef iq sence. Check it out when you go to
chefiq dot com promo code Hannity two day. All right,
Professor Katz is out in the United Socialist utopia of
Cali Fornia.
Speaker 2 (23:00):
Professor Katz, how are.
Speaker 10 (23:02):
You hi, Son? Well, it's always so an honor to
speak to you and to Linda, because you guys are
the voices of truth. And part of the problem with
what's going on, whether it's with Israel or in New York,
is that everybody gets to hear all the propaganda. You
need to start like your own college on how to
be journalists, because you're always right on everything and everybody
(23:25):
else is either deliberately getting it wrong or trying to
just push an ideology for where's the socialist capital New
York's about to be if this Bondami guy gets in.
So I pity New York and I hope that everybody
gets on.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
Well, you're in California.
Speaker 3 (23:42):
It is there really not going to be that much
different than what you have out there.
Speaker 10 (23:47):
It really won't, It really won't. And you know, I mean,
you know, Gavin Newsom is an idiot, but you know,
I don't know that he's an anti Semite. You've got
an anti Semite over there in New York where you've
got one of the second largest population of Jewish people.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
I'll give you that.
Speaker 3 (24:05):
But I've never heard Gavin Newsom strongly condemned the radicals
in his own party and the virual and anti semitism
in Congress or on college campuses, including campuses in California.
I haven't heard it. He should be, should be the
most outspoken voice.
Speaker 10 (24:21):
Well he isn't because his sites are on the White House,
and he thinks by placating the radical left. And that's
basically the name of the game now with the Democrat
Party is that they've moved so far left and if
you want to get elected, you're just going to go
on the Bernie Sanders AOC train, and that's just really sad.
(24:41):
I don't know if there are any moderate Democrats left,
but I think if you're not a part of the
Republican Party right now, then you've forgotten all the values
and what America is about. And I don't know where again,
I always say this as the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.
You know, we've got the people who survived the Holocaust
that are always out there speaking about how wonderful President
(25:04):
Trump is and the wonderful alliance between him and Prime
Minister Netanyahu. And then, sadly, you've got all the people
who are, you know, on the opposite side of the isle,
and we've got a few in our party. And then
for all those people out there who call themselves influencers
and podcasters, shame on you for calling people, you know,
(25:25):
like patriotic Americans like you and Mark Levin, and if
Marian Agelson and so many others calling you warmongers. I mean,
those people also need a good talking to and they
have no honor because they don't understand in this country
that freedom isn't free. Everybody's been hanging around leftist professors
(25:46):
for way too long and listening to podcasters rather than
listening to the truth. And really I think that the
alliance between they are wonderful military and the IDEF they
have like a new symbol and it should be the Griffin,
because the griffin is part lion and it's part eagle,
(26:06):
and it stands for strength and it stands for bravery.
And these people who keep saying, oh, we don't want
to go to war, are they idiots? No one wants
to go to war. But you know, I had a
father that used to say, you never start a fight,
but if somebody else does, you better finish it because
bullies only understand strength and if you capitulate, you have nothing.
(26:28):
And it's a good thing. George Washington and all the
other generals and presidents before you know, the Democrats got
in didn't realize that if we hadn't fought for our freedom,
we wouldn't have it right now. And since my birthday,
I want to ask you, when are you going to
come to California with Jimmy Sayla. I just reunited with
(26:49):
my very first love, first boyfriend after being a widow
for seven years, and I want you to come to
Orange County, California.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
Wow, well, that's a great love story.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
First, I'm sorry about being a widow and uh, but
I am glad it sounds like you found love again
and I'm happy for you. I think it's hard to
go through this life alone, I really do. I think
it's better to have a significant other if you can.
I mean, you have to have the right one. And
I don't have any plan. I'll be honest. My goal
(27:21):
is to now stay out of New York in California forever.
I'm done with those states, I really have. It doesn't
mean I won't go occasionally where. But I have a
different recommendation for you.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
Maybe.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
You know, if this is mister Wright, you know you
guys can get married, and why don't you move to
the Free State of Florida or move to Texas.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
You have options. You can move to Tennessee.
Speaker 3 (27:45):
Is there's so many South Carolina's nice, North Carolina's nice.
You can you know, it depends on the weather. If
you like Vegas, you can move to Vegas. If you
like or Nevada, you can move to Arizona. There's so
many nicer places that don't you know, where government doesn't
abuse people. You know, the beauty of California is you know,
(28:07):
California Florida matches it. I happen to love states that
have a lot of water and you know, ocean, and
you know, I love that about Florida. I love that
about California. I mean, the Pacific Coast Highway is one
of the most beautiful highways to drive in the entire country.
But they make it impossible for people to really raise
(28:28):
their families in a way that they feel comfortable. They
want to indoctrinate your kids. Their school system sucks, their
level of taxation sucks. Their bureaucracy is out of control.
They want to they want to control every aspect of
your life. And you know, I just believe in living
in a more free state. Anyway, that's my challenge. Professor.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
Congratulations, God bless you, and uh. I don't know. I'll
think about going to California.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
I'll think about it, but I'll probably won't stay very long,
just in and out, because if Gavin finds out I'm there,
I'll probably be arrested. Back to our busy phones, Ken,
North Carolina, what's up, Ken, how are.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
You, sir?
Speaker 7 (29:06):
Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
Thank you.
Speaker 7 (29:10):
I've been to here with Franklin Graham to visit with
you a few times, and I was his cheapest staff
for several years. And also Nancy Reagan's the record of
projects back in the day, so I've got some history.
And I'm also a Jewish believer in Jesus, so i
have a different perspective of a lot of things. And
(29:33):
I was I was on the phone from a friend
from Israel and he is a journalist there, but he
was down in the guys. Who was some of these soldiers?
And I said, I asked him what is their take
on things? What do they want? And first of all,
the reason that we could take out Iran, Israel could
(29:55):
take out Ran so easily was because it was a
plan for over ten years. As we've heard, for the
mass they weren't prepared at all for the Hamas October
seventh issue. Obviously, that's why it was a surprise. But
trying to locate cheap leaders and find them and take
(30:15):
them out has been very difficult. And the ceasefire isn't
affecting Hamas. They're still still killing people, as we know.
And one of the reasons they said is because the
technology is not getting to them. They've got drones now
they can pick up blood samples and things like that,
(30:37):
but it hasn't been developed enough to use it and
take out those key leaders. But most of the biggest
question I asked was how do they feel about taking
out the whole regime? And I'll guarantee you the people
in Israel.
Speaker 3 (30:53):
And I think that America has. The President had a
whole different agenda here. Ran can't have nukes, and you
have to listen to what the president's agenda is. And
he took out the nuclear weapons, you know, and the
President has been very very clear he's not going to
get American troops involved in forever wars.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
I agree with the President on that.
Speaker 3 (31:14):
Now, with that said, Israel is our closest ally and
I think deserves our support in their war against radical
Islamic terrorism. I think it's our best interest, the world's
best interest, to not let this cancer grow. I think
it's critical and I think it's very very important that
the president, you know, took this stand. And just like
when he took out Solomoni and Beg Daddy, and when
(31:37):
he took out the Isis Caliphate and dropped the mother
of all bombs on Afghanistan, he didn't get us into
forever war and he accomplished the mission of making the
world more safe and secure. And I think that you know,
the Trump doctrine is the Hannity doctrine, peace through strength,
and I think in this case there's got to be
a heavy dose of trust. But verify with the Iranians,
(31:59):
because I don't try trust them anyway, My friend, I
appreciate you a good call. Eight hundred and nine four
one Sean. If you want to be a part of
the program, right, that's going to wrap things up for today,
loaded up news information you'll never get from the state
run legacy media mob. Senator Ted Cruz, Joe Kancha, the
Great One, Mark Levin, James Comer Tonight, Greg Jarrett, Riley Gaines,
(32:20):
nine Eastern. Say you DVR Hannity on Fox News You'll
never get from the legacy media mob. All coming up tonight.
We'll see you tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you for
making this show possible.
That will come in your city, going a way again.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Sang you a conscious Sun, will the entire Alan.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
And if you want a little banging a yunie, I
come along.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Are you going to run for president again?
Speaker 2 (00:19):
I am eighty three years of age, That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (00:22):
Yeah, you know that resides in the White House has unilaterally,
in my assumation, declared war.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
I've proposed is that we raise ten billion dollars to
pay for our entire economic agenda and start to Trump
proof our city because we know he'll use federal funding
his leverage over this city.
Speaker 5 (00:44):
Fredom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution that will.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
Coming your cent going the way against and sign you
a conscious Sun.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
New Sean Hennity show more him the scenes, information on
breaking news, and.
Speaker 5 (01:06):
More boned inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Coming up next Our final news roundup and information overload,
Our all right news roundup and information overload hour toll
free on numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program.
I have been reassured by key members of Republicans in
the Senate that this issue of the Senate Parliamentarian is
(01:32):
going to be dealt with what I am referring to. Now,
for the Republicans to get this one big, beautiful bill passed,
they have this arcane legal process that they have to
go through, and it's called reconciliation. This is how Biden
passed the Inflation Reduction Act. This is how Obamacare was
(01:55):
passed by Barack Obama. By the way, the Senate Parliamentarian
at the time objected to many aspects of that bill.
But that's another issue for another day. Now, the Senate
Parliamentarian is not elected. And for the reconciliation process, why
it is needed. It is allowed to be used for
issues involving economic issues. Bills that is passed by Congress.
(02:21):
You don't need the sixty vote threshold that would needed,
you know, as for cloture. In other words, to move
forward with the bill, you need a simple majority of
fifty one.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
That then gives the Republicans an opportunity to implement President
Trump's economic agenda. Now, the Senate Parliamentarian is not elected,
and she's not accountable to the American people, and yet
she holds veto power over the legislation supported by millions
of voters.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
And by the.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
Way, there was a point where Trent Lott, I think,
was one that fired a Senate parliamentarian. Their role is
to make a political judgments about Senate rules and procedures.
Now the Democrats want to make this as difficult as possible.
Senator Tommy Cobvervelt of Alabama's called for the proletarian to
(03:16):
be Senate parliamentarian to be fired. But if you look at,
you know, key portions of Presidents Trump agenda, the parliamentarian
is claiming using the reconciliation process in the Senate that
it doesn't fall into reconciliation. Okay, Actually on every issue
(03:36):
that the person's ruling on, they just happen to be wrong.
And this has to be dealt with first in the
Senate and then from there it will be dealt with,
you know, in conference because there are some differences between
the House version and the Senate version of this bill.
I'm not trying, I'm not trying to make this complicated,
but it does need to be dealt with.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
Now.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
The White House says, Congress is debating big footnotes and
the big beautiful bill, and anyway, the person that's kind
of spearheadiness is the White House Director of the National
Economic Council Kevin Hassett. He seems unfazed by the differences
between the House and Senate versions and that in conference
(04:18):
they'd come to an agreement. But I want to first
get your reaction, Kevin, to what the Senate Parliamentarian is saying,
because he's trying to gut very key provisions of the
Trump agenda.
Speaker 5 (04:32):
Yeah, V, thanks for having me on Sean. It's great
to speak with you again. The bottom line is that
you're one hundred percent correct. The Senate Parliamentarian is playing
dishonest partisan games ruling stuff has to be out of
the bill that should be in the bill. And the
thing though, I want to emphasize is that it's still
(04:55):
going to be a big, beautiful bill. The President's main
priorities are not being tossed out, and there's changes in
language that can happen right up to the last minute,
where in the end the parliamentarian caves. This is sort
of part of the unfortunate Senate process that the senators
that the rules and they've agreed to do it this
(05:15):
way for all of eternity, and they're playing by their rules,
and there are times when it's really frustrating. But the
bottom line is, don't lose sight of the prize. So
the prize is this is going to be a big,
beautiful bill. It's going to put ten thousand dollars into
the pockets of the typical American family. It's going to
cause economic growth to go way north of three probably
(05:37):
north of four percent, and it's going to reduce the
deficit ed orbously because of the big spending cuts. And so,
you know, I a hundred percent understand the frustration that
a lot of people have with the things that have
been changed, things that we really wanted to build, that
the parliamentarian is ruling against. But I don't want the
headline to be the bill is less, you know, isn't beautiful?
(05:59):
Because it is going to be beautiful.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
Can the Vice President, who is the president of the
Senate overrule the parliamentarian because the president called on well,
actually it was Congressman Greg Stuby that called on vice
President advanced to overrule the parliamentarian?
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Is that allowed?
Speaker 5 (06:17):
It is? It's unprecedented, but allowed and or almost unprecedented.
The bottom line though, is that the hope would be
that they'll find ways to change language around the edges
so that the parliamentarian stands down and we get everything
we want in the bill.
Speaker 3 (06:35):
But by the way, that this did happen during Obamacare, correct.
Speaker 5 (06:40):
That the parliamentarian was overruled a no.
Speaker 3 (06:44):
Yeah, that the parliamentarian originally would was against provisions, and
then they changed the language and then it's quote acceptable.
Speaker 5 (06:52):
Yes. That happens in every reconciliation bill. Is the parliamentarian.
It's kind of like, you know, every now and then
there you know, the umpire is corrupt in a baseball game,
but most of the time, the empire is just trying
to follow the rules. And so they said, it has
these rules that allow you to pass it in fifty
one votes, and the rules are pretty clear cut. But
every now and then, you know, there's some interpretation involved,
(07:16):
and so they call it, giving it a bird path
after the senator bird was the one who helps the
crafty's rules.
Speaker 3 (07:22):
It's based on the bird rules. If you want to
describe it, you can. But by the way, it's true
that in two thousand and one, then Majority Leader Trent
Lotte fired the Senate Parliamentary enduring reconciliation.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
Sure, sure, and I would not expect that this person
is likely to keep their job and if it gets
really out of hand, and of course then the Vice
President can step in. And if this person knows that,
then that hopefully will help them think about their decisions.
But again, the bottom line, the head how.
Speaker 3 (07:50):
Much of this is in the hands of John Thune,
because he has made clear he didn't intend to overrule
the parliamentarian.
Speaker 5 (07:57):
He's as here, here's the thing. The Senate has lots
of senators, and they are senators that agree with your
position on the parliamentarian and more moderate senators that perhaps
they know we got to do what the empire says.
And so I'm sure the Senator Thoon is frustrated with
(08:20):
the parliamenttarian, but it could well be that if he
just disregards the proletariat altogether, that there would be senators
that would say, okay, then I'm not voting for the bill.
And so he's managing a difficult thing. But let me
tell you this, it's one hundred percent this bill is
going to pass. It's one hundred percent. This is going
to pass by the weekend. It's going to have all
(08:41):
the things that the President has insisted on, They're going
to be in the bill. The main headline things when
we Secretary Dustin and I went up to meet with
the leaders of Congress. So maybe the twenty first of January.
We had a card of the president's priorities that he
ran on and you know, the no tax on tips,
no tax on over time, no taxis social Security, all
(09:01):
those things, permanent tax cuts. We had a card, a
pocket card that we gave to everybody said this is
what the President watson the bill and the President's bill.
His figurefits are all over this bill and it's great.
And the other thing I can tell you is that
I was a dinner speaker for House members this week,
and I would say that the White our expectation is
(09:23):
that the Senate bill will be close enough to the
House bill that the House members will consider and perhaps
be willing to just pass the Senate bill right away
and go home over the weekend.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
So the Senate parliamentarian, as part of the rulings, actually
ruled that illegal immigrants are eligible for federal student loans.
That tells me that this is a radical, extreme leftist
and the person has been in this job since what
twenty twelve.
Speaker 2 (09:56):
That is insane by that.
Speaker 5 (09:58):
You are one hundred percent right to be outraged by that.
And the fact is that remember that if you say
that you can't give federal money to say an illegal
then the main reconciliation rule is it has to have
an effect on the budget. So you can't you can't
go in and say ban cigarettes because you don't like
(10:20):
them in reconciliation, because that doesn't have an effect on
the budget or a direct effect on the budget. But
if you stop spending on something, that has a direct
effect on the budget, and so of course Congress controls
the first strin so of course Congress should have the
right to stop spending on something. And so it's just
a preposterous, preposterous ruling.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
All right, let's talk about some of the other changes
to Medicaid and so on and so forth. I mean,
there are some very significant, you know, provision changes. For example,
the Medicare Medicaid provider rate, which is the amount that
state medicaid programs pay providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries,
(11:01):
which proved to be a device of policy. But you know,
if you look at Medicaid Medicare, in one case you're
paying three times more for the same exact service than
the other. And the work requirement for able bodied people
that are getting a government benefits, which is something Bill
(11:21):
Clinton supported In case anyone's interested.
Speaker 5 (11:24):
Yeah, Medicaid waste proud and abuse is rampant, and there's
a lot of savings that are going to be had
in this bill because of ending waste broad and abuse.
And there are also they're putting money aside to make
sure that rural hospitals are not affected by these reforbes.
(11:45):
So I think that you know, people are going to
some people budget hawks, conservatives are going to be thrilled
with the progress, but they're going to want more in
the end as well.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Got to take a quick break. We'll come back more.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
Kevin Ascid, head of the Head Economic Council to President Trump.
On the other side, as we watch this one big
beautiful bill, you know, and a clearly partisan Senate parliamentarian
trying to muddy up the waters for Republicans, there will
be a solution that much. I can tell you more
on the other side than we'll get to your calls
(12:19):
coming up.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
I would continue now.
Speaker 3 (12:21):
Kevin Hassett is with US Head Economic Council to President
Trump as we are getting an update on the one
big beautiful bill we're really dealing with We're dealing with
two problems here. One is the Senate parliamentarian and the
second is is the House and Senate versions and coming
to agreement on one final agreed upon provision. Okay, so
(12:43):
how do you deal first with the Senate parliamentarian? How
difficult the process is that going to be? I know,
Lindsey Graham, the Senate Budget Committee chair, is all over
this today. Are you saying that you believe that they'll
he'll sit down with the Senate a parliamentarian and go
line by line and get and just like put a
comma and a period and get the exact verbiage that
(13:08):
the Centate parliamentarium wants and it will still be the
same outcome.
Speaker 5 (13:13):
It's in the in the end, it's a very difficult
process to project right now, given the terrible rulings that
happened over the last few days. But in you know,
traditionally what happens is that the rulings can change right
up to the last minute when you agree to changing
(13:35):
the language, and it's all kind of like a KOBOOKI
theater because of the end, you get pretty much what
you want, but you had to say it a different way.
And that's historically, the way this process has gone, it's
not clear to me that all of the changes will
be satisfactory to everybody. And then at that point, the
Senators are going to have to decide what are we
(13:55):
going to do about this?
Speaker 3 (13:57):
Well, what do you recommend considering you're kind of trying
to you're a leading point on spearheading this.
Speaker 5 (14:04):
Yeah, well not in the sense of the Senate has
to pass a bill, and it's a difficult process, and
the Senators have to decide how are they Well.
Speaker 3 (14:13):
For the White House, I mean, you've got to navigate
a lot of this and work with the House and
the Senate. You know, I guess the House past that
have bill, the Senator past that bill goes to conference.
Now the Senate, you know, as they've muddied the waters
by trying to take out very key critical agenda items
of the President and by an unelected you know, bureaucrat
(14:36):
that has been there since twenty twelve, the things that
we should be paying college tuition for illegal immigrants, which
in and of itself is should be illegal.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
If it's not, I think it is illegal.
Speaker 5 (14:48):
Right. Well, the Senate, you know, we'll see what the
final Senate bill looks like. But the hope is that
the Senators are able to navigate the bill to something
so close to the House bill that the House members
can just pass the Senate bill as is right away.
And if then it is unable to do.
Speaker 3 (15:09):
But do you know, there have been some some House
Republicans that have been, you know, pretty vocal that they
don't like some of the changes made by the Senate.
Speaker 5 (15:19):
Of course, and so and so what the Senate has
to do is get it as close to the House
bill as they can, given that they've got, you know,
different people in the Senate than there are in the House,
and they all have their opinions. But it's my expectation
that in the end, and I've spoken with leadership in
the House that in the Senate. I gave the dinner
(15:39):
talk to a whole bunch of House members just this week,
and my expectation is that in the end that the
House will be comfortable enough with what they get from
the Senate that that's the objective of the Senate, that
we won't have to go into a conference. If they're not,
then we can go into conference. It could happen, But
if that happens, then the bill won't be ready by
the fourth.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
So this is why we call it the swamp, isn't it?
Because this is all swamp bureaucracy. And you know, to
have a one unelected bureaucrat hold up a duly elected
president and his agenda and a party and their agenda
is pretty spectacular to me. And I think the Republicans
(16:21):
ought to bypass it any way they can and let
the American people decide in the next election if they
support the changes. There's your answer anyway, Kevin has it.
We appreciate you being with us, sir, Thanks Jean, eight
hundred nine one, Shawn, if you want to be a
part of the program, all right, twenty five now till
the top of the hour, eight hundred and nine four one, Sean,
(16:43):
if you want to be a part of the program.
There are significant implications as it relates to Mam Donnie.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
It was bending down again something.
Speaker 3 (16:53):
James Carvill even warned that Mom Donnie has not walked
back calls for a global entifadom, and he said, well,
maybe it'll He'll turn out to be a very skilled candidate. However,
I do believe Republicans will jump on this. As you
think is that I can't imagine that any Democratic candidate
anywhere in the country is going to be able to
escape answering questions about Mamdani. There's a lot of Democrats
(17:15):
that are going to have to go hard at this.
I think that it's potentially a very damaging event. I mean,
crazy Karvel is crazy Krvl, but he's not stupid. He's
a lot of things. I debated him many times over
the years around the country. Well, let's play Mamdani saying
is mayor, he would arrest net and Yahoo. Now I
have a question. Why didn't he talk about arresting members
(17:38):
of Hamas, the people that were responsible for the murder
based on their population size versus ours of the equivalent
of forty thousand Americans in a day. And you know
the terror group that also committed atrocities murder, rape, kidnapping, torture, beheadings,
(17:59):
including children killing mothers and fathers in front of their children.
I need to call about them. No, he's talking about
arresting Netsa Yahu.
Speaker 5 (18:07):
But the man, I'm donny welcome Benjamin heto the city.
Speaker 6 (18:10):
No as mayor New York City with arrest Benjamin Netanyaho.
This is a city that our values are in line
with international law. It's time that our actions are also.
Speaker 7 (18:18):
Even though the US is not a signature of the ICC.
Speaker 6 (18:20):
No, it's time that we actually step up and make
clear what we are willing to do to showcase the
leadership that is sorely missing in the federal administration.
Speaker 3 (18:27):
I'm never going back to New York City. I've had
it with that place. Forget it. Place is nuts. I
think that place is nuts nuts. Listened to the LA
Area Vice mayor calling on gang members to defend territory
from Ice. Can't make this up. This is a you know,
crazy carvel. This is your party, might want to weigh
(18:47):
in on this.
Speaker 4 (18:48):
I want to know where the toilers are at in
Los Angeles, Eighteenth Street, Florentia.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
Where's the leadership at?
Speaker 7 (18:56):
Because you guys are all about territory and this is
eighteenth Street and this is so anthony you They.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Tag everything up claiming hood and now that.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
Your hood's being invaded by the biggest gang there is, they'rein't.
Speaker 8 (19:08):
A peep out of you.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
We're out there like by our tour, protecting our tur
protecting our people, like where you at. I don't want to.
Speaker 4 (19:17):
Hear a peep out of you once they're gone, trying to.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
Claim that this is my block. This was not your block.
You weren't even here helping out.
Speaker 4 (19:24):
So whoever's the leadership over there, just get your.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
Members in order, all right.
Speaker 3 (19:29):
That's your modern radicalized Democratic Party. What do you think
of this ticket? I've been thinking about this, Linda. You
can have Kasmin Crockett and Mom Donnie as the Democratic
Party ticket.
Speaker 8 (19:41):
They are they are they governing in some strange corner
of hell, or like, where are we talking about? No?
Speaker 3 (19:46):
No, no, that they would be the Democratic Party's ticket
for twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 8 (19:52):
So we have two people who've never run anything, who
don't run anything, who barely work in the roles they
currently have, and want to take everybody his money to
give it around because nobody should work because they don't work.
And they both make music videos. Remember Jasmine Crockett made
it a music dance video in the middle of the
holes of Congress.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
I think this would be a great ticket. Run Jasmine, run,
Mom Donnie. You know it's like Gavin Newsom thinks he's
a moderate. Gavin Newsom thinks he's reasonable the rest of them.
Speaker 8 (20:23):
And not sleep at the switch, and he does whatever
his wife tells him. This is not a man in
control of anything. Please, let's just stop.
Speaker 2 (20:29):
I have no idea. All right, let me get to
our busy. Well, you know what you could do.
Speaker 8 (20:33):
Why don't we do this? Why don't you use your
chef IQ make one of your fancy pants dinners and
invite them all over and you can all sit down
and talk about.
Speaker 3 (20:40):
Their You know, I love to cook. I find it
the most way. I am a better I am a
better cook than you are. That's all there is to it.
Speaker 2 (20:49):
Oh my god, that's all I mean.
Speaker 3 (20:52):
Just describing air fried French fries, I want to, you know,
blow my brains out.
Speaker 8 (20:56):
But the good thing is is.
Speaker 9 (20:57):
The chef i q Thermometer actually works in the little
Did you know, whether whether you're cooking steak or chicken,
or pork chops or burger, or pork ribs or fish,
you can make sure that whatever you're cooking is no
better feeling than when you cut into that juicy.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
Steak, those pork chops, that fish, those ribs, that burger,
and it's perfect. That chicken, it's perfect every time. It'll
be perfect thanks to Chef i Q Sense, a modern,
completely wireless cooking thermometer. There's no guesswork in cooking anymore.
It will literally you put you you know, you prepare
it the way you normally prepare it, and it doesn't
(21:39):
matter if you're roasted or grill it, or bake it
or broil it or deep fry it for that matter.
Chef i Q Sense delivers perfect results. But whatever you're cooking,
insert the probe. You select your desired level of dunness
on the chef i q app, and it's going to
tell you. For example, you're make a steak, it's going
to tell you when to flip it over. If you
(22:00):
you are making let's say, oh, I don't know whatever,
and then they'll tell you when your stake's done. I
like a medium, all right, It'll tell you exactly when
it's medium. You like a medium rare, tell you exactly
when it's medium rare. And if you like it rare,
just take it out of the plaque and start eating it.
Just kidding, but you're gonna love the technology. And you
(22:20):
know all your friends, your family, you know your neighbors,
they're gonna they're always gonna want you to cook because
it's gonna be perfect anyway, right, Now you'll get fifteen
percent off when you go to chefiq dot com use
the promo code Hannity. And while you're there, check out
their brand new chef iq Mini Oven. Now you can
pre order them. I got an early version and it
will It's gonna completely change. You'll never use your oven again.
(22:42):
Let's put it that way. It's a game changer, best
in class features, incredible technology. So why you're getting your
chef iq sence. Check it out when you go to
chefiq dot com promo code Hannity two day. All right,
Professor Katz is out in the United Socialist utopia of
Cali Fornia.
Speaker 2 (23:00):
Professor Katz, how are.
Speaker 10 (23:02):
You hi, Son? Well, it's always so an honor to
speak to you and to Linda, because you guys are
the voices of truth. And part of the problem with
what's going on, whether it's with Israel or in New York,
is that everybody gets to hear all the propaganda. You
need to start like your own college on how to
be journalists, because you're always right on everything and everybody
(23:25):
else is either deliberately getting it wrong or trying to
just push an ideology for where's the socialist capital New
York's about to be if this Bondami guy gets in.
So I pity New York and I hope that everybody
gets on.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
Well, you're in California.
Speaker 3 (23:42):
It is there really not going to be that much
different than what you have out there.
Speaker 10 (23:47):
It really won't, It really won't. And you know, I mean,
you know, Gavin Newsom is an idiot, but you know,
I don't know that he's an anti Semite. You've got
an anti Semite over there in New York where you've
got one of the second largest population of Jewish people.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
I'll give you that.
Speaker 3 (24:05):
But I've never heard Gavin Newsom strongly condemned the radicals
in his own party and the virual and anti semitism
in Congress or on college campuses, including campuses in California.
I haven't heard it. He should be, should be the
most outspoken voice.
Speaker 10 (24:21):
Well he isn't because his sites are on the White House,
and he thinks by placating the radical left. And that's
basically the name of the game now with the Democrat
Party is that they've moved so far left and if
you want to get elected, you're just going to go
on the Bernie Sanders AOC train, and that's just really sad.
(24:41):
I don't know if there are any moderate Democrats left,
but I think if you're not a part of the
Republican Party right now, then you've forgotten all the values
and what America is about. And I don't know where again,
I always say this as the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.
You know, we've got the people who survived the Holocaust
that are always out there speaking about how wonderful President
(25:04):
Trump is and the wonderful alliance between him and Prime
Minister Netanyahu. And then, sadly, you've got all the people
who are, you know, on the opposite side of the isle,
and we've got a few in our party. And then
for all those people out there who call themselves influencers
and podcasters, shame on you for calling people, you know,
(25:25):
like patriotic Americans like you and Mark Levin, and if
Marian Agelson and so many others calling you warmongers. I mean,
those people also need a good talking to and they
have no honor because they don't understand in this country
that freedom isn't free. Everybody's been hanging around leftist professors
(25:46):
for way too long and listening to podcasters rather than
listening to the truth. And really I think that the
alliance between they are wonderful military and the IDEF they
have like a new symbol and it should be the Griffin,
because the griffin is part lion and it's part eagle,
(26:06):
and it stands for strength and it stands for bravery.
And these people who keep saying, oh, we don't want
to go to war, are they idiots? No one wants
to go to war. But you know, I had a
father that used to say, you never start a fight,
but if somebody else does, you better finish it because
bullies only understand strength and if you capitulate, you have nothing.
(26:28):
And it's a good thing. George Washington and all the
other generals and presidents before you know, the Democrats got
in didn't realize that if we hadn't fought for our freedom,
we wouldn't have it right now. And since my birthday,
I want to ask you, when are you going to
come to California with Jimmy Sayla. I just reunited with
(26:49):
my very first love, first boyfriend after being a widow
for seven years, and I want you to come to
Orange County, California.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
Wow, well, that's a great love story.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
First, I'm sorry about being a widow and uh, but
I am glad it sounds like you found love again
and I'm happy for you. I think it's hard to
go through this life alone, I really do. I think
it's better to have a significant other if you can.
I mean, you have to have the right one. And
I don't have any plan. I'll be honest. My goal
(27:21):
is to now stay out of New York in California forever.
I'm done with those states, I really have. It doesn't
mean I won't go occasionally where. But I have a
different recommendation for you.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
Maybe.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
You know, if this is mister Wright, you know you
guys can get married, and why don't you move to
the Free State of Florida or move to Texas.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
You have options. You can move to Tennessee.
Speaker 3 (27:45):
Is there's so many South Carolina's nice, North Carolina's nice.
You can you know, it depends on the weather. If
you like Vegas, you can move to Vegas. If you
like or Nevada, you can move to Arizona. There's so
many nicer places that don't you know, where government doesn't
abuse people. You know, the beauty of California is you know,
(28:07):
California Florida matches it. I happen to love states that
have a lot of water and you know, ocean, and
you know, I love that about Florida. I love that
about California. I mean, the Pacific Coast Highway is one
of the most beautiful highways to drive in the entire country.
But they make it impossible for people to really raise
(28:28):
their families in a way that they feel comfortable. They
want to indoctrinate your kids. Their school system sucks, their
level of taxation sucks. Their bureaucracy is out of control.
They want to they want to control every aspect of
your life. And you know, I just believe in living
in a more free state. Anyway, that's my challenge. Professor.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
Congratulations, God bless you, and uh. I don't know. I'll
think about going to California.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
I'll think about it, but I'll probably won't stay very long,
just in and out, because if Gavin finds out I'm there,
I'll probably be arrested. Back to our busy phones, Ken,
North Carolina, what's up, Ken, how are.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
You, sir?
Speaker 7 (29:06):
Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
Thank you.
Speaker 7 (29:10):
I've been to here with Franklin Graham to visit with
you a few times, and I was his cheapest staff
for several years. And also Nancy Reagan's the record of
projects back in the day, so I've got some history.
And I'm also a Jewish believer in Jesus, so i
have a different perspective of a lot of things. And
(29:33):
I was I was on the phone from a friend
from Israel and he is a journalist there, but he
was down in the guys. Who was some of these soldiers?
And I said, I asked him what is their take
on things? What do they want? And first of all,
the reason that we could take out Iran, Israel could
(29:55):
take out Ran so easily was because it was a
plan for over ten years. As we've heard, for the
mass they weren't prepared at all for the Hamas October
seventh issue. Obviously, that's why it was a surprise. But
trying to locate cheap leaders and find them and take
(30:15):
them out has been very difficult. And the ceasefire isn't
affecting Hamas. They're still still killing people, as we know.
And one of the reasons they said is because the
technology is not getting to them. They've got drones now
they can pick up blood samples and things like that,
(30:37):
but it hasn't been developed enough to use it and
take out those key leaders. But most of the biggest
question I asked was how do they feel about taking
out the whole regime? And I'll guarantee you the people
in Israel.
Speaker 3 (30:53):
And I think that America has. The President had a
whole different agenda here. Ran can't have nukes, and you
have to listen to what the president's agenda is. And
he took out the nuclear weapons, you know, and the
President has been very very clear he's not going to
get American troops involved in forever wars.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
I agree with the President on that.
Speaker 3 (31:14):
Now, with that said, Israel is our closest ally and
I think deserves our support in their war against radical
Islamic terrorism. I think it's our best interest, the world's
best interest, to not let this cancer grow. I think
it's critical and I think it's very very important that
the president, you know, took this stand. And just like
when he took out Solomoni and Beg Daddy, and when
(31:37):
he took out the Isis Caliphate and dropped the mother
of all bombs on Afghanistan, he didn't get us into
forever war and he accomplished the mission of making the
world more safe and secure. And I think that you know,
the Trump doctrine is the Hannity doctrine, peace through strength,
and I think in this case there's got to be
a heavy dose of trust. But verify with the Iranians,
(31:59):
because I don't try trust them anyway, My friend, I
appreciate you a good call. Eight hundred and nine four
one Sean. If you want to be a part of
the program, right, that's going to wrap things up for today,
loaded up news information you'll never get from the state
run legacy media mob. Senator Ted Cruz, Joe Kancha, the
Great One, Mark Levin, James Comer Tonight, Greg Jarrett, Riley Gaines,
(32:20):
nine Eastern. Say you DVR Hannity on Fox News You'll
never get from the legacy media mob. All coming up tonight.
We'll see you tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you for
making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club
Welcome to Bookmarked by Reese’s Book Club — the podcast where great stories, bold women, and irresistible conversations collide! Hosted by award-winning journalist Danielle Robay, each week new episodes balance thoughtful literary insight with the fervor of buzzy book trends, pop culture and more. Bookmarked brings together celebrities, tastemakers, influencers and authors from Reese's Book Club and beyond to share stories that transcend the page. Pull up a chair. You’re not just listening — you’re part of the conversation.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com