September 26, 2024 • 36 mins
David Schoen, Civil Liberties Attorney and Former Counsel for President Trump and Mark Brnovich, Former Federal and State Prosecutor, discuss Jack Smith’s J6 information and the indictment of Mayor Eric Adams. And let’s not forget to take a look at Adams’ successor Jumaane Williams. Was Mayor Adams targeted because he spoke out against the overwhelming migrant influx into NYC?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Our two Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine four
one sewn if you want to be a part of
the program.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
We are keeping our.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Eyes on this hurricane now bearing down on the east
coast of Florida into the Tampa Tallahassee area, right into
the Panhandle up through Georgia. We just had Governor DeSantis
on I just urge everybody to please be safe, and
I knows it's for a lot of people you want
to reluctantly resist any government order. But it's always better
(00:29):
to be safe than sorry. I don't need you or
anybody in your family getting hurt. It's just not worth it.
They are expecting some storm surges as high as and
swells up to twenty feet wins now. It's a Category
three hurricane that we're looking at, and it's gonna be
rough for a couple of days. Storm surges expected to
be very high. We had WeatherBell. I've been checking in
(00:50):
with WeatherBell dot COM's Joebistarti about all of this, so
we'll continue to monitor every bit of it. We did
have the Special Council in the j sixth case bring
forward the full case that post the Supreme Court decision
regarding presidential immunity that had to be altered severely. And
(01:13):
it seems like the main argument is, well, this was
even though he was president. Every action that Donald Trump
took was really candidate Trump. I don't think it was
candidate Trump. It was President Trump. And you know, but
for a Obama appointed judge that you know, doesn't seem
to care about what has always been a sixty some
(01:35):
say even ninety days supposedly informal policy of the Department
of Justice not to bring politically charged information to the
public in the days leading up to an election, that
doing that anyway, we'll talk to David Shulman a minute.
He points out rightly that it's a violation. It violates
(01:55):
a provision in the DOJ manual. But the bottom line
is if the judge ali, how's this information to be
put before the public, there is no meaningful opportunity for
President Trump to rebut any and all of this, and
the media is gonna quote it, and then Donald Trump
will be under a gag order. I mean, you simply
(02:17):
can't make it up. In another case we have out
of New York, the Appeals Court in New York, some
of the judges, one judge. You know about this judge
and Goren, the guy that's stuck to the eighteen million
dollar value of mar Lago ignored a top realtor. He
wouldn't even allow the guy to testify, a guy that
(02:39):
knows Palm Beach real estate as well as anybody, that
this property was much closer in value to a billion
dollars than eighteen million. And he's just stuck to this
ridiculous valuation. And then of course they five hundred million
dollar judgment. One judge called the penalty troubling, wondered if
the state's policing and private business transacts amounted to deterrence
(03:01):
or mission creep anyway. A five judge panel in the
States Intermediate in the Appeals Court in New York City
quizzing the attorneys representing President Trump in the AG's office
during oral arguments, and at times the judges appeared dubious
of both sides, but often judges in appeals courts asked
(03:23):
pointed questions of both sides. I can't imagine they're not
going to see the bias in this case. Certainly, at
some level this is going to be overturned. I don't
think there's any doubt about that. Also, we are following
the story of the mayor of New York City, the
first mayor of New York City history, who has been
charged with accepting bribes from wealthy foreign business people, including
(03:46):
at least one Turkish government official. He's also accused of
campaign finance fraud. You know, just reading from what we
know so far. Eric Adams, the defendant, compounded his gains
from the straw contribute by using them to defraud New
York City and steal public funds. New York City has
a matching funds program that matches small dollar contributions from
(04:09):
individual city residents with up to eight times their amount
and public funds to give New Yorkers a greater voice
in elections. Adams campaigns applied for matching funds based on
what were known straw donations, fraudulently obtaining a goes on
as much as two thousand dollars in public funds for
each illegal contribution, Adams and those working at his discretion
(04:33):
falsely certified compliance and applicable campaign finance regulations. Despite Adam's
repeated acceptance of straw donations, relying on the concealed nature
of the illegal contributions, to falsely portray as his campaigns
as law abiding. As a result of those false certifications,
the mayoral campaign received more than ten million dollars in
(04:55):
public funds and that and you know a series of
people around the the mayor also being charged. And I
mean this has now been ongoing. This is not a surprise.
We played in the last hour. Under no circumstances. Eric
Adams says, will he resigned? Listen to what he says.
Speaker 3 (05:14):
Is there any circumstance by which.
Speaker 4 (05:16):
He would be signed? No, No, Listen, I'm here.
Speaker 5 (05:20):
I was elected by the people of this city over
seven hundred thousand strong. And this is a city, this
is a city that is extremely resilient. This is a
city that have we have gone through some difficult and
hard times and we're going to continue to move forward.
Speaker 4 (05:38):
As a city. And that's what that's shown.
Speaker 5 (05:39):
I think the the narrative here that's missing to missing
two months ago when.
Speaker 4 (05:44):
My phones would remove.
Speaker 5 (05:45):
We have not gone backwards, we have not stood still.
Speaker 4 (05:48):
We showed how we operate during difficult times.
Speaker 5 (05:51):
And when you say, who is the point person that's
gonna deal with business communities, who's gonna deal with the business.
Speaker 4 (05:56):
Of under of the city. The point person is Eric Adams.
Speaker 5 (05:59):
I'm the mayor of the city in New York and
I had a company team team of deputy mayors, a
company company team of people are going to continue to
leave forward.
Speaker 4 (06:11):
And we're excited about that.
Speaker 2 (06:13):
All right.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
So he's being defiant and uh. Now a series of
high ranking officials in his administration gone charged, and you know, uh,
and this is this is going to be a big deal.
Speaker 6 (06:26):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
He also claims that his comments about how illegal immigration
in that crisis is going to destroy New York City
has put him at odds with federal prosecutors. You know,
I think he's got a big problem before him. It's
it's kind of going to be a cut and dry case.
Either he took the money, knew about it, or didn't.
(06:46):
And I would assume they wouldn't go after a sitting
governor if they didn't have substantial amount of evidence, but
you never know. And joining us now the way in
on all of this, we have David Shown Civil Liberties attorney,
former counsel for President and Trump, Mark Bernovitch back with us,
former federal and state prosecutor and ag of the Great
(07:06):
State of Arizona. Welcome both of you, David, Let's start
with you, and first let's start with Eric Adams and
what you see going on there.
Speaker 7 (07:15):
Well, it's a very complicated situation. Obviously, it's a very
long speaking indictment. They obviously have interviewed and gotten to
so called cooperate some of his aides in the past.
The details could only have come from them. We're going
to see how it plays out. But I'll say this,
and I only can speak for myself. If he does resign,
(07:35):
what comes after him and mister Williams is not going
to be good for the city of New York or
for the American people. Quite frankly, he's taken a very
gremini Williams taken a very left wing position on police
conduct and on even international issues he weighs in on.
He's gone a moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
Essentially, let's see, Well, I mean it's been New York
City is Look, I left New York for a lot
of reasons, not the least of which I was not
liked at all in New York City. And I didn't
spend much time there because I lived in Long Island.
But when I did spend any time in New York City.
(08:19):
I just got it. Got to the point Attorney General Bernovich.
I just felt like anybody that was with me, that
I was putting them in jeopardy. I mean, you wouldn't
believe the hostility that exists for me in that city.
Speaker 8 (08:33):
Well, New York City is the kind of places where
good ideas go to die. And unless you're an illegal immigrant,
I think the government essentially doesn't care about you anymore.
They're people's personal safety, personal spaces, and everything else. I mean,
I do think that perhaps Mayor Adams's biggest crime was
not including any kickback or cash for the big guy,
if you know what I mean. I mean even Hunter
(08:54):
Biden knows better than that. And so it really timing wise,
I talk about the Solvent T. I'ms a former prosecutor.
You look at the three t's timing type and theory
of a case, the fact that Mayor Adams had come
out and said some derogatory things about the Biden administration's
border policies, timing the suspect, the fact that you have
a type of case where literally, just like with President Trump,
(09:16):
they're going back a decade to try to find stuff
that's really quite frankly beyond the statute limitations should be
really troubling. And then you look at this theory of
this case. My goodness, Sean if going on boondoggles. And
you know it is a crime that half the people
in Washington, d c. Bet are lawyer up right now.
I mean, come on, and you know the reality is
(09:36):
is that I think that Mayor Adams is probably you know,
even demanding to stay at the Saint Regis. His defense
is going to be all he wants is the same
hotels that illegal migrants are getting from the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
I mean one of the conversations they have is Adams
to Turkey. The promoter stated, in part, fundraising in Turkey
is not illegal, but I think I could raise money
for your campaign quote off the record. The Adam stafford
quite well, how do you declare the money here? And
the promoter responded, he won't declare it, or we'll make
a donation through an American citizen in the US a
(10:10):
turk or I'll I'll just give cash to him in Turkey,
or I'll send it to America and he will make
a donation to you. And then the staffer replied, I
think he wouldn't get involved in such games. They may
cause a big stink later on, but I'll ask anyways.
And the staffer then asked how much do you think
would come from you? And the guy said one hundred grand?
(10:31):
And the Adam staffer said one hundred grand. Do you
have a chance to transfer that here? We can't do
it while Eric is in Turkey. And then he said, well,
let's think so. I mean, if that conversation is correct,
that doesn't sound particularly good in my view.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
David Schong, No, I.
Speaker 7 (10:50):
Think that's right. There's a tremendous amount in this long
indictment that sounds very bad and sinister. But remember the
prosecutors got to pick and choose what they would put in,
and they get to choose the context and so on.
And you know, Sean, I don't know if there's any
bigger defender of the presumption of innocence than you are
on your show every day when the issue comes up.
And so that's where we are now in this case.
(11:12):
You know, he's presumed innocent unlessoned until they can prove otherwise.
He has been has had a career of being a
law and order man.
Speaker 8 (11:21):
Its one thing, Sean, is that I think it's important
to remember. Look when I worked at when I worked
at the Department of Justice as an assistant US attorney,
there was a time not that long ago, ten fifteen
years ago where everyone respected DOJ and knew that they
would never bring a case unless they were ninety nine
percent sure they were going to get a successful conviction,
and they knew someone was guilty. Unfortunately, I think in
(11:42):
the last decade we have seen a lot of politicization
of the Department of Justice, and that's why I think
a lot of people are more suspect when they see
this stuff and they look at the timing, and you know,
obviously you look at things in the best light. The prosecutors,
like David just said, they get to pick and choose
what's part of that indictment. But reality is is that,
you know, where's the quid pro quo? I mean, you know,
(12:04):
you've got this issue with you know, this money from
Turkey or these trips, whatever, But did that affect his
official conduct? And then you have the second question I
think that's being glossed over by everyone is why in
the heck are New York City taxpayers subsidizing politicians with
all these matching funds like millions of dollars is essentially
welfare for politicians. To me, that's a that's a much
(12:26):
greater crime in a lot of ways.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Yeah, I think.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
So what is your reaction to the appeals court. I
know it's hard to read questioning from judges on a
on an appeals court of the Supreme Court. Do you,
David Showan, do you interpret anything from what the judges
said in this particular case. I'd say that the one
line that really kind of stood out to me was
(12:50):
you had one judge on the court calling the president's
penalty troubling and wondering if the state's policing a private
business transactions amounted to de turn or mission creep. That's
a pretty powerful line, right.
Speaker 7 (13:03):
I agree one hundred percent with what you said in
the introduction. This judgment cannot stand on appeal. I've said
that the folks involved, I've said that all along. This
is a very broad executive law that's sex and sixty
three to twelve. It's they call it, you know, fraud,
except that it doesn't require any material misstatement, any reliance,
(13:23):
any loss by any victim, which is also something that
the court noted today. They asked whether this law has
ever been applied in a situation where there's no loss
of any kind. But I'll tell you this also, I
think there's an issue in this case that the lawyers
have missed, and I think it's a very important one
for the American public. And that is sixty three twelve.
According to a decision by that New York Supreme Court,
(13:44):
a different judge, Judge Ramos, on the same court as Engron,
has said, there's no right to a jury trial here
because damages are incidental to it. It's really something for
injunctive relief to stop a business practice and all of that.
In this case, the hundreds of millions of dollars under
no circumstances could be considered incidental. And in twenty twenty one,
(14:05):
Judge Stanton in the Federal Court in the US Court
of the Southern District of New York had the same
statute before him in federal court, and he held that
there is a right to a jury trial. So a
court literally a block away held there's a right to
a jury trial. And here they've held there's no right
to a jury trial. Just a judge, politically appointed, elected
judge can make this decision to really strip a company
(14:26):
of hundreds of millions of dollars when the banks made
money and were tickled to death to make these loans.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
That's so true. Last word we'll give to you, Attorney
Jardinal Burnovich.
Speaker 8 (14:37):
Yeah, I think there's all sorts of issues on appeal. Obviously,
there's a statute of limitations issue. There's the fact that
this was an unprecedented crime. You can't even point out
the victims, you can't explain in thirty seconds or less.
And you know, frankly, there's a Eighth Amendment, fourteenth Amendment issue.
The US Supreme Court has been very in tune to
when you have these excessive fines, they essentially end up
(14:59):
acting like a criminal penalty. The fact that literally every
day there's what one hundred and fourteen thousand dollars in
interest and penalties, I mean, it just really shocks the conscious.
So I can't imagine any federal court, well especially US. Yeah,
will allow us to stand.
Speaker 4 (15:15):
All right.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
I appreciate both of you, Attorney General Bernovich and David
Show and quick break, Donald Trump, we expected the bottom
of the hour. We'll carry that for you, and much
more straight ahead all I'm watching Hurricane Helene now headed
barreling a Category three towards Tallahassee, the Panhandle up into Georgia.
We'll continue to cover and monitor. We expect Donald Trump
at the bottom of the half hour with the presser.
(15:38):
We'll get to your calls. We expect President Trump in
a press conference at the bottom of the hour. Eight
hundred nine four one. Shawn is our number. We are
monitoring Hurricane Helene, now a Cat three officially, as it
is barreling now towards the coast of near Tallahassee and
into the Panhandle and then up straight through George. George
(16:01):
is expected to get hit very hard. We don't know
what some of the storm surgeons are going to be like,
but we got to pay very close attention to that.
If you're in these areas, I just urge you to please,
you know, put your put your safety security, your family
safety security above. I don't know any thought that, Wow,
I'm just going to ride this out. Category three can
become a Category four, and you know what, people died
(16:23):
during hurricanes and just don't let it be you.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
You know.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
I used to say to my kids all the time,
don't be the kid throwing up in the bushes.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
Is that a good Is that a good advice lend?
Or is that bad?
Speaker 9 (16:35):
No? I think that's great advice. You should never be
the right.
Speaker 1 (16:39):
All the years I became a bartender, there's certain rules
that I learned. You want to know what they are
drinking one oh one, drinking one O two, drinking one
O three, one O four R one O one is
everybody has a number. Everybody's number is different. How do
you define a number? The number of drinks somebody can
have and every it's unique to every individual. It's weird,
(17:03):
but every the number of drinks you can have before
it changes or alters your personality. That's how you define
your number. Now I would say, probably your number is
very low. Is that a fair statement?
Speaker 9 (17:15):
My number?
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Yeah?
Speaker 9 (17:17):
Oh no, my number is very high.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
That's such great, that's such a crock.
Speaker 9 (17:21):
I worked in bars and restaurants for how many years?
Speaker 1 (17:24):
And right, but if you have a drink and a half,
you get this giddy smile on your face that just
normally isn't well.
Speaker 9 (17:30):
There's a difference between buzzed and drunk in my opinion.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
Okay, where your personality changes is when the number kicks in.
Now it manifests itself in different ways for different people.
And you know, God forbid I say different sexes.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
Right.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
For men, it tends to manifest itself in in you know,
then be a macho and aggressive. And for women, this
is just my observation. I'm giving you my observations as
a bartender.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
All those.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
They tend to be a little more flirtatious. That that's
what I observed in all the years that I tended bar,
which was a lot of years. And so that's like
one oh one, know your number and don't go past
whatever your number is. Number two, don't ever do shots.
It's stupid if you do shots, or if you mix alcohol,
that is just really dumb. That's actually not mixing your
(18:25):
alcohol's number two. If you want to start out with beer,
stick with beer. You're gonna do Winestick with wine. If
you don't do shots and you don't mix your alcohol.
Don't ever drink a Long Island iced tea or if
you go to New Orleans, don't drink a Hurricane. It's
the dumbest drink you can you can ever have, and
it almost guarantees you're gonna get pretty, you know, Adam
Schiff faced and you're gonna be pukeing into bushes, which
(18:47):
is rule number three one oh three, which is you know,
I tell my kids, don't be the idiot that's throwing
up in the bushes because you drank too much. And
you know, I mean, kids are always gonna make mistakes and
experiment when they're in college and drinking. I don't know
how you avoid it, really. I mean, there's certain things
you just got to accept as a parent that you
don't even I don't even want to know about it.
(19:10):
Does that make sense to you because you have older kids?
Speaker 9 (19:12):
I do.
Speaker 10 (19:12):
I mean, I have two kids in college, and I
know that I never drank in college. But I was
an anomaly, you know what I mean. But I know
they're drinking.
Speaker 9 (19:19):
I know.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
I was twelve years old washing dishes every Friday Saturday
Sunday night. Thirteen. I was a cook every Friday Saturday
Sunday night. I'd finish at two two thirty in the morning,
I'd go sit at the bar. I'm twelve and thirteen
years old.
Speaker 9 (19:35):
It's so weird.
Speaker 10 (19:36):
I'm not going to lie to you. I mean, we
never let any of the younger kids when we were working.
And you know, I was a cocktail waitress. I didn't
let I didn't let any of the younger kids drink.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
All right, Well whatever they didn't, they didn't really care.
It wasn't a big deal. I was a bartender. The
legal drinking age was eighteen, but I started when I
was seventeen, and nobody really cared.
Speaker 9 (19:54):
Well, yeah I would. That's that still happens today.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
Okay, So you know now, did I have to learn
a few lessons the hard way? Unfortunately? Yeah, I did,
and more more than a few, to be very honest.
And you know, I did realize that I actually had
a high number, but I just then became a lightweight
(20:18):
as I got older.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
I just don't. I just don't feel like doing it.
Speaker 10 (20:21):
Listen, it's not good for you. Drinking too much is
not good for you. Honestly, you should eliminate it from
your diet if you're able. But if you want to
have one or two on the weekend, go for it.
Knock yourself out.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
Not one or two on the weekend, one or two
on night.
Speaker 9 (20:33):
Oh god, you can't do that.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
No, it's terrible for you.
Speaker 9 (20:36):
It's bad for you.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
I can't if I want to maintain my incredible figure. Uh,
just a joke. No, it's you know, the only dumb
thing I'd do is stupid jewels. But I've been switching
to the gum. I'm making the transition.
Speaker 10 (20:51):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (20:51):
Anyway, let's get to our busy phones while we wait
for President Trump at a press conference. Janice is in Louisiana.
Hate Janis. How glad you.
Speaker 11 (21:00):
Called, Sean. It's a privilege to get to speak to you.
Speaker 6 (21:04):
Man.
Speaker 11 (21:05):
I haven't talked to you in so long, and I
want to show you that I think you are doing
a fabulous, wonderful and marvelous job with this campaign, talking
about letting people know about Kamala and your Kamala files
and everything here and what she has to say when
she says she hasn't changed her views on things, she
(21:28):
really means.
Speaker 1 (21:28):
That he really does. I could talk to you all day.
Here's the problem. And we're going to call you back
later in the show or tomorrow because it's not fair,
but because President Trump's beginning his press conference. Okay, and
God bless you. You've made my day. Here's President Trump
at Trump Tower.
Speaker 11 (21:47):
You make mine too, have a good day.
Speaker 6 (21:50):
For nearly four years, we have been living through the
worst border crisis in the history of the world, There's
never been anything like it which has brought untold suffering, misery,
and death upon our land. The architecture of this destruction
(22:11):
is Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (22:16):
When you look at the four years that have taken place.
Speaker 6 (22:21):
After being named Border Czar, Kamala Harris will be visiting
the southern border that she.
Speaker 3 (22:30):
Has completely destroyed. From what I understand tomorrow.
Speaker 6 (22:35):
Why would she go to the border now playing right
into the hand of her opponent. I mean, you take
a look at this, why would you do that? There
can be no justification for.
Speaker 3 (22:48):
What she's done.
Speaker 6 (22:50):
There's no body's saying, oh gee, she's done a fabulous hip.
She's done the worst job probably in the history of
any border, not just our border. She keeps talking about
how she supposedly wants to fix the border. We would
merely ask why didn't she do it four years ago?
Speaker 3 (23:09):
It's a very simple question.
Speaker 6 (23:10):
I can say this with everything she has she talks
about borders and taxes and all these different things, and
her policies on tax by the way, you're terrible, But
I can say it for everything, why didn't she fix
it almost four years ago? She's got no plans, got
(23:30):
no talent, got no ability to do it. I'm here
today to present you with the facts, and only the facts,
about how Comrade Kamala Harris willfully threw open our border,
helping to virtually destroy our country. Our country has never
(23:51):
been under siege like this. Four years ago, Kamala inherited
the most secure border in US history with the lowest
illegal immigration on record. You know the chart. I loved
that chart. I love that chart. I probably wouldn't be
here right now except for that chart. Those who violated
(24:15):
our borders were captured, detained, and quickly sent back home
under the Trump administration. But on her first day in office,
Kamala Harris terminated every single Trump policy that sealed and.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
Secured the border.
Speaker 6 (24:33):
She ordered an immediate stop to the completion of the border.
Wall was almost complete. We built hundreds and hundreds of
miles of wall, and it worked. I always said, walls
and wheels, everything else is obsolete.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
But walls and wheels and this wall worked, and we.
Speaker 6 (24:52):
Were ready to build and throw up another two hundred
could have been done within weeks.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
Everything was complete.
Speaker 6 (24:59):
The wall was all built, ready to go, laying there.
Speaker 3 (25:04):
Ready to be fixed.
Speaker 6 (25:07):
All they had to do was throw it up, and
you would have had an extra two hundred miles of wall,
far more than I promised in the election. She suspended
all deportations. She instituted catch and release across the entire
southern border, and we had catch and release also, but
(25:29):
we released in Mexico. Her catching release was to release
in the United States and never see them again. She
sent Congress a bill demanding amnesty for all illegal aliens,
every single illegal alien, even if they're criminals, even if
they're murderers, even if they're drug dealers, human traffickers. She
(25:51):
wanted amnesty for everybody radical left. This is a radical
left person. She terminated remains in Mexico, something that took
me and a lot of talent, a lot of other people,
but it took a lot of talent to get from
the President of Mexico, good Man, but we got it.
(26:13):
You had to remain in Mexico. You couldn't come in
under any circumstance. You weren't allowed into the United States
until we checked it out. And many people did not
come in and were not allowed to come in because
they didn't check out. They were drug dealers, they were
gang members, they were in jail for murder in a
couple of cases, we wouldn't let them in. And she
(26:36):
canceled every safe third agreement. Anybody here, I think would
know what that is. But that was a horrible thing
that she did. And she canceled remain in Mexico. He
would have something remain in Mexico.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
You'd have to explain it. She canceled.
Speaker 6 (26:53):
She ordered ICE to halt the removal of virtually all
criminal aliens, including M thirteen gang members, the worst gang
anywhere in the world. They say, evil, evil gang. She
ended all of our programs that we instituted to stop
(27:14):
child and woman trafficking. The trafficking is at a level
now that it's never been before. I had it down
to the lowest level it's been in thirty two years
because we had such a strong border.
Speaker 3 (27:27):
They couldn't get through.
Speaker 6 (27:30):
But now it's the worst it's been in thirty two
years plus. And then she lost and this is probably
the worst statistic of them all, three hundred and twenty
five thousand children. Think of that, three and a half years,
she lost three hundred and twenty five thousand children, and
(27:52):
they're either dead, being sold into sex slavery, or just
playing mines. Think of the number three hundred and twenty
five thousand, if that were a Republican instead of her,
and she was the borders are she says, well, I
wasn't the borders are she was? And tomorrow she'll make
(28:15):
a case that, oh, she did a fairly good job.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
You can't say much, you can't justify it.
Speaker 6 (28:20):
She should save her airfare, She should go back to
the White House and tell the President to close the border.
He can do it with the signing of a of
a just a signature and a piece of paper to
the patrol. Instead, she's going there to try and convince
people that she wasn't as bad as everybody knows.
Speaker 3 (28:39):
She was the worst in.
Speaker 6 (28:41):
History, grossly incompetent, weak and ineffective. And all you have
to do is ask Brandon Judd Border Patrol. You could
ask any of them, Tom Homan. We had the best
people that we've ever had, and they said Trump was
the best president on the book order ever. She ripped
(29:04):
up every single reform that we put in place to
stop asylum fraud. She ended a travel band that was
unbelievably successful.
Speaker 3 (29:13):
We had the strongest.
Speaker 6 (29:13):
Travel band anywhere in the world. And was upheld by
the United States Supreme Court. She canceled Title forty two,
that was a medical title.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
She canceled it very hard to get.
Speaker 6 (29:29):
And altogether, she took ninety three executive orders that I
put on all which made the border the best border
we've ever had in recorded history, and she terminated them
along with all.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Right, for stations along the shot Hannity Show Radio Network,
we are going to continue with President Trump's press conference
into the top of the hour and stay with us
for continuing coverage.
Speaker 6 (29:55):
In less than four years, twenty one million illegal aliens
at the that's the real number. You don't hear that
year fifteen sixteen. Sometimes you hear seventeen. The numbers at
least twenty one million. And on top of that, you
have got aways. That's got aways, that's people that came
over or got away, and they've stormed across our border
(30:17):
like nobody in history or any border anywhere in the world.
Speaker 3 (30:20):
There's never been any border in.
Speaker 6 (30:22):
History where you had millions of people storming us like that.
No third world country would allow it. But she allowed
it because she's incompetent. She allowed it because she never
went there. She says she went once, but it was
not the right location. It's a location that was very
(30:43):
mild and no danger. She never went there. She's going
there tomorrow after almost four years. She's going there tomorrow
to try and show you what a great job she did.
But even now the numbers are terrible. And remember, they're
flying people over and they haven't stopped that. They're flying
hundreds of thousands of people over the border right now.
(31:04):
They never stopped that. They didn't think they'd be caught.
But they were two weeks ago from prisons, in jails,
mental institutions and insane asylum, all these insane asylums where
you have the sickest people, mentally ill people, and terrorists
(31:25):
at record levels. We've never had terrorists come into our
country like this. They come and they keep coming and coming,
and nobody has ever seen anything like it. People that
go to the border, they look professionals and they said,
there's never been anything like this in the history of
(31:47):
the world. And they're destroying they are destroying the fabric
of our country. She did nothing to stop any of it.
In fact, she encouraged them to keep and you know
that for years she did. Only recently did she say, oh, well,
we're going to try and put us up to it.
Speaker 3 (32:09):
And I ask again, you know, this should be the
why didn't she do it? Speech? Why didn't she do it?
All of these.
Speaker 6 (32:16):
Things, including unrelated elements to what we're talking about now,
like taxes, like military, like so many other things. Why
didn't she do it? She's got plans for the future.
Why didn't she do it?
Speaker 3 (32:32):
She's been there almost four years.
Speaker 6 (32:34):
Kamala created a brand new program to fly in migrants
from Venezuela, Haiti, and Nicaragua and resettle them in American communities,
including small towns all across our nation, but in particular
in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, and North Carolina.
Speaker 3 (32:58):
Nobody can believe it.
Speaker 6 (33:00):
These towns have been destroyed, and the mayors of the
towns and the governors of the states can't talk about
it because they're embarrassed that they allowed it to happen.
In addition, through her phone app something totally new now.
It's a phone app for migrants where migrants call in
(33:22):
highly sophisticated migrants. She's allowed virtually unlimited numbers of illegals
to press a button schedule their illegal immigration appointment at
our ports of entry and show up to be released
into the interior of our country.
Speaker 3 (33:43):
Can anybody believe this? And they're invading our towns.
Speaker 6 (33:47):
It's an invasion of our country like no country has
ever had to suffer before. And this was purposeful. They
did this on purpose. This was not a mistake on
their part. They did this on purpose because their policies
are so wrong and so evil and so unfair. And
(34:10):
there's only three reasons they'd want to do that. Number one,
they're incompetent, and I'm not sure that that's the reason.
Number two, they wanted for the votes. Number three, you
know what that one is.
Speaker 3 (34:27):
We don't have to talk about that one.
Speaker 6 (34:31):
But there can only be a very few reasons, because
they're destroying our country at a level that's never been
seen before. Importantly, as part of this conjob, it's a conjob.
None of the illegal aliens she is smuggling in through
the ports or on the airplanes.
Speaker 3 (34:49):
Think of it.
Speaker 6 (34:50):
Big jet planes loaded up with migrants flying into the
middle of our country and going to Iowa and lots
of others. They've all become border states. We only have
where it's been a mass invasion. These were two beautiful,
successful towns idyllic, and they're in trouble, big trouble, and
(35:17):
very unfair that people want to leave, They want to
get out, but everyone's afraid to say I want to
get out because they want.
Speaker 3 (35:23):
To be politically correct.
Speaker 6 (35:25):
And other towns just like them, hundreds of them all
over America. Americans have watched their communities destroyed by this sudden,
suffocating inundation of illegal alience. It's an inundation, it's an invasion.
(35:45):
This influx has overwhelmed their schools. They're taking the seats
of students that can no longer go there, and they
don't even speak English. They're trying to fire a lot
of people and hire interpreters. Can you believe that they
want to get rid of some people they want to hire.
Springfield is looking the mayor said it the other day,
(36:08):
looking for interpreters, because nobody in all of the thirty
two thousand people that took into the town think of this.
Do you have a town of fifty thousand people and
almost instantly you have thirty two thousand people, in this
case from Haiti. Most of them don't speak English, so
(36:29):
they're looking for interpreters. You have to get them out.
We have to save our country. You have to save
these towns.
Speaker 3 (36:36):
They flooded the job market with low.
Speaker 6 (36:40):
Wage migrants, but many cases migrants that also have horrible
criminal records, murder, drug dealing, so many different things. A
lot of human traffickers, and it's mostly human traffickers in
women
Our two Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine four
one sewn if you want to be a part of
the program.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
We are keeping our.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Eyes on this hurricane now bearing down on the east
coast of Florida into the Tampa Tallahassee area, right into
the Panhandle up through Georgia. We just had Governor DeSantis
on I just urge everybody to please be safe, and
I knows it's for a lot of people you want
to reluctantly resist any government order. But it's always better
(00:29):
to be safe than sorry. I don't need you or
anybody in your family getting hurt. It's just not worth it.
They are expecting some storm surges as high as and
swells up to twenty feet wins now. It's a Category
three hurricane that we're looking at, and it's gonna be
rough for a couple of days. Storm surges expected to
be very high. We had WeatherBell. I've been checking in
(00:50):
with WeatherBell dot COM's Joebistarti about all of this, so
we'll continue to monitor every bit of it. We did
have the Special Council in the j sixth case bring
forward the full case that post the Supreme Court decision
regarding presidential immunity that had to be altered severely. And
(01:13):
it seems like the main argument is, well, this was
even though he was president. Every action that Donald Trump
took was really candidate Trump. I don't think it was
candidate Trump. It was President Trump. And you know, but
for a Obama appointed judge that you know, doesn't seem
to care about what has always been a sixty some
(01:35):
say even ninety days supposedly informal policy of the Department
of Justice not to bring politically charged information to the
public in the days leading up to an election, that
doing that anyway, we'll talk to David Shulman a minute.
He points out rightly that it's a violation. It violates
(01:55):
a provision in the DOJ manual. But the bottom line
is if the judge ali, how's this information to be
put before the public, there is no meaningful opportunity for
President Trump to rebut any and all of this, and
the media is gonna quote it, and then Donald Trump
will be under a gag order. I mean, you simply
(02:17):
can't make it up. In another case we have out
of New York, the Appeals Court in New York, some
of the judges, one judge. You know about this judge
and Goren, the guy that's stuck to the eighteen million
dollar value of mar Lago ignored a top realtor. He
wouldn't even allow the guy to testify, a guy that
(02:39):
knows Palm Beach real estate as well as anybody, that
this property was much closer in value to a billion
dollars than eighteen million. And he's just stuck to this
ridiculous valuation. And then of course they five hundred million
dollar judgment. One judge called the penalty troubling, wondered if
the state's policing and private business transacts amounted to deterrence
(03:01):
or mission creep anyway. A five judge panel in the
States Intermediate in the Appeals Court in New York City
quizzing the attorneys representing President Trump in the AG's office
during oral arguments, and at times the judges appeared dubious
of both sides, but often judges in appeals courts asked
(03:23):
pointed questions of both sides. I can't imagine they're not
going to see the bias in this case. Certainly, at
some level this is going to be overturned. I don't
think there's any doubt about that. Also, we are following
the story of the mayor of New York City, the
first mayor of New York City history, who has been
charged with accepting bribes from wealthy foreign business people, including
(03:46):
at least one Turkish government official. He's also accused of
campaign finance fraud. You know, just reading from what we
know so far. Eric Adams, the defendant, compounded his gains
from the straw contribute by using them to defraud New
York City and steal public funds. New York City has
a matching funds program that matches small dollar contributions from
(04:09):
individual city residents with up to eight times their amount
and public funds to give New Yorkers a greater voice
in elections. Adams campaigns applied for matching funds based on
what were known straw donations, fraudulently obtaining a goes on
as much as two thousand dollars in public funds for
each illegal contribution, Adams and those working at his discretion
(04:33):
falsely certified compliance and applicable campaign finance regulations. Despite Adam's
repeated acceptance of straw donations, relying on the concealed nature
of the illegal contributions, to falsely portray as his campaigns
as law abiding. As a result of those false certifications,
the mayoral campaign received more than ten million dollars in
(04:55):
public funds and that and you know a series of
people around the the mayor also being charged. And I
mean this has now been ongoing. This is not a surprise.
We played in the last hour. Under no circumstances. Eric
Adams says, will he resigned? Listen to what he says.
Speaker 3 (05:14):
Is there any circumstance by which.
Speaker 4 (05:16):
He would be signed? No, No, Listen, I'm here.
Speaker 5 (05:20):
I was elected by the people of this city over
seven hundred thousand strong. And this is a city, this
is a city that is extremely resilient. This is a
city that have we have gone through some difficult and
hard times and we're going to continue to move forward.
Speaker 4 (05:38):
As a city. And that's what that's shown.
Speaker 5 (05:39):
I think the the narrative here that's missing to missing
two months ago when.
Speaker 4 (05:44):
My phones would remove.
Speaker 5 (05:45):
We have not gone backwards, we have not stood still.
Speaker 4 (05:48):
We showed how we operate during difficult times.
Speaker 5 (05:51):
And when you say, who is the point person that's
gonna deal with business communities, who's gonna deal with the business.
Speaker 4 (05:56):
Of under of the city. The point person is Eric Adams.
Speaker 5 (05:59):
I'm the mayor of the city in New York and
I had a company team team of deputy mayors, a
company company team of people are going to continue to
leave forward.
Speaker 4 (06:11):
And we're excited about that.
Speaker 2 (06:13):
All right.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
So he's being defiant and uh. Now a series of
high ranking officials in his administration gone charged, and you know, uh,
and this is this is going to be a big deal.
Speaker 6 (06:26):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
He also claims that his comments about how illegal immigration
in that crisis is going to destroy New York City
has put him at odds with federal prosecutors. You know,
I think he's got a big problem before him. It's
it's kind of going to be a cut and dry case.
Either he took the money, knew about it, or didn't.
(06:46):
And I would assume they wouldn't go after a sitting
governor if they didn't have substantial amount of evidence, but
you never know. And joining us now the way in
on all of this, we have David Shown Civil Liberties attorney,
former counsel for President and Trump, Mark Bernovitch back with us,
former federal and state prosecutor and ag of the Great
(07:06):
State of Arizona. Welcome both of you, David, Let's start
with you, and first let's start with Eric Adams and
what you see going on there.
Speaker 7 (07:15):
Well, it's a very complicated situation. Obviously, it's a very
long speaking indictment. They obviously have interviewed and gotten to
so called cooperate some of his aides in the past.
The details could only have come from them. We're going
to see how it plays out. But I'll say this,
and I only can speak for myself. If he does resign,
(07:35):
what comes after him and mister Williams is not going
to be good for the city of New York or
for the American people. Quite frankly, he's taken a very
gremini Williams taken a very left wing position on police
conduct and on even international issues he weighs in on.
He's gone a moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
Essentially, let's see, Well, I mean it's been New York
City is Look, I left New York for a lot
of reasons, not the least of which I was not
liked at all in New York City. And I didn't
spend much time there because I lived in Long Island.
But when I did spend any time in New York City.
(08:19):
I just got it. Got to the point Attorney General Bernovich.
I just felt like anybody that was with me, that
I was putting them in jeopardy. I mean, you wouldn't
believe the hostility that exists for me in that city.
Speaker 8 (08:33):
Well, New York City is the kind of places where
good ideas go to die. And unless you're an illegal immigrant,
I think the government essentially doesn't care about you anymore.
They're people's personal safety, personal spaces, and everything else. I mean,
I do think that perhaps Mayor Adams's biggest crime was
not including any kickback or cash for the big guy,
if you know what I mean. I mean even Hunter
(08:54):
Biden knows better than that. And so it really timing wise,
I talk about the Solvent T. I'ms a former prosecutor.
You look at the three t's timing type and theory
of a case, the fact that Mayor Adams had come
out and said some derogatory things about the Biden administration's
border policies, timing the suspect, the fact that you have
a type of case where literally, just like with President Trump,
(09:16):
they're going back a decade to try to find stuff
that's really quite frankly beyond the statute limitations should be
really troubling. And then you look at this theory of
this case. My goodness, Sean if going on boondoggles. And
you know it is a crime that half the people
in Washington, d c. Bet are lawyer up right now.
I mean, come on, and you know the reality is
(09:36):
is that I think that Mayor Adams is probably you know,
even demanding to stay at the Saint Regis. His defense
is going to be all he wants is the same
hotels that illegal migrants are getting from the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
I mean one of the conversations they have is Adams
to Turkey. The promoter stated, in part, fundraising in Turkey
is not illegal, but I think I could raise money
for your campaign quote off the record. The Adam stafford
quite well, how do you declare the money here? And
the promoter responded, he won't declare it, or we'll make
a donation through an American citizen in the US a
(10:10):
turk or I'll I'll just give cash to him in Turkey,
or I'll send it to America and he will make
a donation to you. And then the staffer replied, I
think he wouldn't get involved in such games. They may
cause a big stink later on, but I'll ask anyways.
And the staffer then asked how much do you think
would come from you? And the guy said one hundred grand?
(10:31):
And the Adam staffer said one hundred grand. Do you
have a chance to transfer that here? We can't do
it while Eric is in Turkey. And then he said, well,
let's think so. I mean, if that conversation is correct,
that doesn't sound particularly good in my view.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
David Schong, No, I.
Speaker 7 (10:50):
Think that's right. There's a tremendous amount in this long
indictment that sounds very bad and sinister. But remember the
prosecutors got to pick and choose what they would put in,
and they get to choose the context and so on.
And you know, Sean, I don't know if there's any
bigger defender of the presumption of innocence than you are
on your show every day when the issue comes up.
And so that's where we are now in this case.
(11:12):
You know, he's presumed innocent unlessoned until they can prove otherwise.
He has been has had a career of being a
law and order man.
Speaker 8 (11:21):
Its one thing, Sean, is that I think it's important
to remember. Look when I worked at when I worked
at the Department of Justice as an assistant US attorney,
there was a time not that long ago, ten fifteen
years ago where everyone respected DOJ and knew that they
would never bring a case unless they were ninety nine
percent sure they were going to get a successful conviction,
and they knew someone was guilty. Unfortunately, I think in
(11:42):
the last decade we have seen a lot of politicization
of the Department of Justice, and that's why I think
a lot of people are more suspect when they see
this stuff and they look at the timing, and you know,
obviously you look at things in the best light. The prosecutors,
like David just said, they get to pick and choose
what's part of that indictment. But reality is is that,
you know, where's the quid pro quo? I mean, you know,
(12:04):
you've got this issue with you know, this money from
Turkey or these trips, whatever, But did that affect his
official conduct? And then you have the second question I
think that's being glossed over by everyone is why in
the heck are New York City taxpayers subsidizing politicians with
all these matching funds like millions of dollars is essentially
welfare for politicians. To me, that's a that's a much
(12:26):
greater crime in a lot of ways.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Yeah, I think.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
So what is your reaction to the appeals court. I
know it's hard to read questioning from judges on a
on an appeals court of the Supreme Court. Do you,
David Showan, do you interpret anything from what the judges
said in this particular case. I'd say that the one
line that really kind of stood out to me was
(12:50):
you had one judge on the court calling the president's
penalty troubling and wondering if the state's policing a private
business transactions amounted to de turn or mission creep. That's
a pretty powerful line, right.
Speaker 7 (13:03):
I agree one hundred percent with what you said in
the introduction. This judgment cannot stand on appeal. I've said
that the folks involved, I've said that all along. This
is a very broad executive law that's sex and sixty
three to twelve. It's they call it, you know, fraud,
except that it doesn't require any material misstatement, any reliance,
(13:23):
any loss by any victim, which is also something that
the court noted today. They asked whether this law has
ever been applied in a situation where there's no loss
of any kind. But I'll tell you this also, I
think there's an issue in this case that the lawyers
have missed, and I think it's a very important one
for the American public. And that is sixty three twelve.
According to a decision by that New York Supreme Court,
(13:44):
a different judge, Judge Ramos, on the same court as Engron,
has said, there's no right to a jury trial here
because damages are incidental to it. It's really something for
injunctive relief to stop a business practice and all of that.
In this case, the hundreds of millions of dollars under
no circumstances could be considered incidental. And in twenty twenty one,
(14:05):
Judge Stanton in the Federal Court in the US Court
of the Southern District of New York had the same
statute before him in federal court, and he held that
there is a right to a jury trial. So a
court literally a block away held there's a right to
a jury trial. And here they've held there's no right
to a jury trial. Just a judge, politically appointed, elected
judge can make this decision to really strip a company
(14:26):
of hundreds of millions of dollars when the banks made
money and were tickled to death to make these loans.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
That's so true. Last word we'll give to you, Attorney
Jardinal Burnovich.
Speaker 8 (14:37):
Yeah, I think there's all sorts of issues on appeal. Obviously,
there's a statute of limitations issue. There's the fact that
this was an unprecedented crime. You can't even point out
the victims, you can't explain in thirty seconds or less.
And you know, frankly, there's a Eighth Amendment, fourteenth Amendment issue.
The US Supreme Court has been very in tune to
when you have these excessive fines, they essentially end up
(14:59):
acting like a criminal penalty. The fact that literally every
day there's what one hundred and fourteen thousand dollars in
interest and penalties, I mean, it just really shocks the conscious.
So I can't imagine any federal court, well especially US. Yeah,
will allow us to stand.
Speaker 4 (15:15):
All right.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
I appreciate both of you, Attorney General Bernovich and David
Show and quick break, Donald Trump, we expected the bottom
of the hour. We'll carry that for you, and much
more straight ahead all I'm watching Hurricane Helene now headed
barreling a Category three towards Tallahassee, the Panhandle up into Georgia.
We'll continue to cover and monitor. We expect Donald Trump
at the bottom of the half hour with the presser.
(15:38):
We'll get to your calls. We expect President Trump in
a press conference at the bottom of the hour. Eight
hundred nine four one. Shawn is our number. We are
monitoring Hurricane Helene, now a Cat three officially, as it
is barreling now towards the coast of near Tallahassee and
into the Panhandle and then up straight through George. George
(16:01):
is expected to get hit very hard. We don't know
what some of the storm surgeons are going to be like,
but we got to pay very close attention to that.
If you're in these areas, I just urge you to please,
you know, put your put your safety security, your family
safety security above. I don't know any thought that, Wow,
I'm just going to ride this out. Category three can
become a Category four, and you know what, people died
(16:23):
during hurricanes and just don't let it be you.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
You know.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
I used to say to my kids all the time,
don't be the kid throwing up in the bushes.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
Is that a good Is that a good advice lend?
Or is that bad?
Speaker 9 (16:35):
No? I think that's great advice. You should never be
the right.
Speaker 1 (16:39):
All the years I became a bartender, there's certain rules
that I learned. You want to know what they are
drinking one oh one, drinking one O two, drinking one
O three, one O four R one O one is
everybody has a number. Everybody's number is different. How do
you define a number? The number of drinks somebody can
have and every it's unique to every individual. It's weird,
(17:03):
but every the number of drinks you can have before
it changes or alters your personality. That's how you define
your number. Now I would say, probably your number is
very low. Is that a fair statement?
Speaker 9 (17:15):
My number?
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Yeah?
Speaker 9 (17:17):
Oh no, my number is very high.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
That's such great, that's such a crock.
Speaker 9 (17:21):
I worked in bars and restaurants for how many years?
Speaker 1 (17:24):
And right, but if you have a drink and a half,
you get this giddy smile on your face that just
normally isn't well.
Speaker 9 (17:30):
There's a difference between buzzed and drunk in my opinion.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
Okay, where your personality changes is when the number kicks in.
Now it manifests itself in different ways for different people.
And you know, God forbid I say different sexes.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
Right.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
For men, it tends to manifest itself in in you know,
then be a macho and aggressive. And for women, this
is just my observation. I'm giving you my observations as
a bartender.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
All those.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
They tend to be a little more flirtatious. That that's
what I observed in all the years that I tended bar,
which was a lot of years. And so that's like
one oh one, know your number and don't go past
whatever your number is. Number two, don't ever do shots.
It's stupid if you do shots, or if you mix alcohol,
that is just really dumb. That's actually not mixing your
(18:25):
alcohol's number two. If you want to start out with beer,
stick with beer. You're gonna do Winestick with wine. If
you don't do shots and you don't mix your alcohol.
Don't ever drink a Long Island iced tea or if
you go to New Orleans, don't drink a Hurricane. It's
the dumbest drink you can you can ever have, and
it almost guarantees you're gonna get pretty, you know, Adam
Schiff faced and you're gonna be pukeing into bushes, which
(18:47):
is rule number three one oh three, which is you know,
I tell my kids, don't be the idiot that's throwing
up in the bushes because you drank too much. And
you know, I mean, kids are always gonna make mistakes and
experiment when they're in college and drinking. I don't know
how you avoid it, really. I mean, there's certain things
you just got to accept as a parent that you
don't even I don't even want to know about it.
(19:10):
Does that make sense to you because you have older kids?
Speaker 9 (19:12):
I do.
Speaker 10 (19:12):
I mean, I have two kids in college, and I
know that I never drank in college. But I was
an anomaly, you know what I mean. But I know
they're drinking.
Speaker 9 (19:19):
I know.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
I was twelve years old washing dishes every Friday Saturday
Sunday night. Thirteen. I was a cook every Friday Saturday
Sunday night. I'd finish at two two thirty in the morning,
I'd go sit at the bar. I'm twelve and thirteen
years old.
Speaker 9 (19:35):
It's so weird.
Speaker 10 (19:36):
I'm not going to lie to you. I mean, we
never let any of the younger kids when we were working.
And you know, I was a cocktail waitress. I didn't
let I didn't let any of the younger kids drink.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
All right, Well whatever they didn't, they didn't really care.
It wasn't a big deal. I was a bartender. The
legal drinking age was eighteen, but I started when I
was seventeen, and nobody really cared.
Speaker 9 (19:54):
Well, yeah I would. That's that still happens today.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
Okay, So you know now, did I have to learn
a few lessons the hard way? Unfortunately? Yeah, I did,
and more more than a few, to be very honest.
And you know, I did realize that I actually had
a high number, but I just then became a lightweight
(20:18):
as I got older.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
I just don't. I just don't feel like doing it.
Speaker 10 (20:21):
Listen, it's not good for you. Drinking too much is
not good for you. Honestly, you should eliminate it from
your diet if you're able. But if you want to
have one or two on the weekend, go for it.
Knock yourself out.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
Not one or two on the weekend, one or two
on night.
Speaker 9 (20:33):
Oh god, you can't do that.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
No, it's terrible for you.
Speaker 9 (20:36):
It's bad for you.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
I can't if I want to maintain my incredible figure. Uh,
just a joke. No, it's you know, the only dumb
thing I'd do is stupid jewels. But I've been switching
to the gum. I'm making the transition.
Speaker 10 (20:51):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (20:51):
Anyway, let's get to our busy phones while we wait
for President Trump at a press conference. Janice is in Louisiana.
Hate Janis. How glad you.
Speaker 11 (21:00):
Called, Sean. It's a privilege to get to speak to you.
Speaker 6 (21:04):
Man.
Speaker 11 (21:05):
I haven't talked to you in so long, and I
want to show you that I think you are doing
a fabulous, wonderful and marvelous job with this campaign, talking
about letting people know about Kamala and your Kamala files
and everything here and what she has to say when
she says she hasn't changed her views on things, she
(21:28):
really means.
Speaker 1 (21:28):
That he really does. I could talk to you all day.
Here's the problem. And we're going to call you back
later in the show or tomorrow because it's not fair,
but because President Trump's beginning his press conference. Okay, and
God bless you. You've made my day. Here's President Trump
at Trump Tower.
Speaker 11 (21:47):
You make mine too, have a good day.
Speaker 6 (21:50):
For nearly four years, we have been living through the
worst border crisis in the history of the world, There's
never been anything like it which has brought untold suffering, misery,
and death upon our land. The architecture of this destruction
(22:11):
is Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (22:16):
When you look at the four years that have taken place.
Speaker 6 (22:21):
After being named Border Czar, Kamala Harris will be visiting
the southern border that she.
Speaker 3 (22:30):
Has completely destroyed. From what I understand tomorrow.
Speaker 6 (22:35):
Why would she go to the border now playing right
into the hand of her opponent. I mean, you take
a look at this, why would you do that? There
can be no justification for.
Speaker 3 (22:48):
What she's done.
Speaker 6 (22:50):
There's no body's saying, oh gee, she's done a fabulous hip.
She's done the worst job probably in the history of
any border, not just our border. She keeps talking about
how she supposedly wants to fix the border. We would
merely ask why didn't she do it four years ago?
Speaker 3 (23:09):
It's a very simple question.
Speaker 6 (23:10):
I can say this with everything she has she talks
about borders and taxes and all these different things, and
her policies on tax by the way, you're terrible, But
I can say it for everything, why didn't she fix
it almost four years ago? She's got no plans, got
(23:30):
no talent, got no ability to do it. I'm here
today to present you with the facts, and only the facts,
about how Comrade Kamala Harris willfully threw open our border,
helping to virtually destroy our country. Our country has never
(23:51):
been under siege like this. Four years ago, Kamala inherited
the most secure border in US history with the lowest
illegal immigration on record. You know the chart. I loved
that chart. I love that chart. I probably wouldn't be
here right now except for that chart. Those who violated
(24:15):
our borders were captured, detained, and quickly sent back home
under the Trump administration. But on her first day in office,
Kamala Harris terminated every single Trump policy that sealed and.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
Secured the border.
Speaker 6 (24:33):
She ordered an immediate stop to the completion of the border.
Wall was almost complete. We built hundreds and hundreds of
miles of wall, and it worked. I always said, walls
and wheels, everything else is obsolete.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
But walls and wheels and this wall worked, and we.
Speaker 6 (24:52):
Were ready to build and throw up another two hundred
could have been done within weeks.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
Everything was complete.
Speaker 6 (24:59):
The wall was all built, ready to go, laying there.
Speaker 3 (25:04):
Ready to be fixed.
Speaker 6 (25:07):
All they had to do was throw it up, and
you would have had an extra two hundred miles of wall,
far more than I promised in the election. She suspended
all deportations. She instituted catch and release across the entire
southern border, and we had catch and release also, but
(25:29):
we released in Mexico. Her catching release was to release
in the United States and never see them again. She
sent Congress a bill demanding amnesty for all illegal aliens,
every single illegal alien, even if they're criminals, even if
they're murderers, even if they're drug dealers, human traffickers. She
(25:51):
wanted amnesty for everybody radical left. This is a radical
left person. She terminated remains in Mexico, something that took
me and a lot of talent, a lot of other people,
but it took a lot of talent to get from
the President of Mexico, good Man, but we got it.
(26:13):
You had to remain in Mexico. You couldn't come in
under any circumstance. You weren't allowed into the United States
until we checked it out. And many people did not
come in and were not allowed to come in because
they didn't check out. They were drug dealers, they were
gang members, they were in jail for murder in a
couple of cases, we wouldn't let them in. And she
(26:36):
canceled every safe third agreement. Anybody here, I think would
know what that is. But that was a horrible thing
that she did. And she canceled remain in Mexico. He
would have something remain in Mexico.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
You'd have to explain it. She canceled.
Speaker 6 (26:53):
She ordered ICE to halt the removal of virtually all
criminal aliens, including M thirteen gang members, the worst gang
anywhere in the world. They say, evil, evil gang. She
ended all of our programs that we instituted to stop
(27:14):
child and woman trafficking. The trafficking is at a level
now that it's never been before. I had it down
to the lowest level it's been in thirty two years
because we had such a strong border.
Speaker 3 (27:27):
They couldn't get through.
Speaker 6 (27:30):
But now it's the worst it's been in thirty two
years plus. And then she lost and this is probably
the worst statistic of them all, three hundred and twenty
five thousand children. Think of that, three and a half years,
she lost three hundred and twenty five thousand children, and
(27:52):
they're either dead, being sold into sex slavery, or just
playing mines. Think of the number three hundred and twenty
five thousand, if that were a Republican instead of her,
and she was the borders are she says, well, I
wasn't the borders are she was? And tomorrow she'll make
(28:15):
a case that, oh, she did a fairly good job.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
You can't say much, you can't justify it.
Speaker 6 (28:20):
She should save her airfare, She should go back to
the White House and tell the President to close the border.
He can do it with the signing of a of
a just a signature and a piece of paper to
the patrol. Instead, she's going there to try and convince
people that she wasn't as bad as everybody knows.
Speaker 3 (28:39):
She was the worst in.
Speaker 6 (28:41):
History, grossly incompetent, weak and ineffective. And all you have
to do is ask Brandon Judd Border Patrol. You could
ask any of them, Tom Homan. We had the best
people that we've ever had, and they said Trump was
the best president on the book order ever. She ripped
(29:04):
up every single reform that we put in place to
stop asylum fraud. She ended a travel band that was
unbelievably successful.
Speaker 3 (29:13):
We had the strongest.
Speaker 6 (29:13):
Travel band anywhere in the world. And was upheld by
the United States Supreme Court. She canceled Title forty two,
that was a medical title.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
She canceled it very hard to get.
Speaker 6 (29:29):
And altogether, she took ninety three executive orders that I
put on all which made the border the best border
we've ever had in recorded history, and she terminated them
along with all.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Right, for stations along the shot Hannity Show Radio Network,
we are going to continue with President Trump's press conference
into the top of the hour and stay with us
for continuing coverage.
Speaker 6 (29:55):
In less than four years, twenty one million illegal aliens
at the that's the real number. You don't hear that
year fifteen sixteen. Sometimes you hear seventeen. The numbers at
least twenty one million. And on top of that, you
have got aways. That's got aways, that's people that came
over or got away, and they've stormed across our border
(30:17):
like nobody in history or any border anywhere in the world.
Speaker 3 (30:20):
There's never been any border in.
Speaker 6 (30:22):
History where you had millions of people storming us like that.
No third world country would allow it. But she allowed
it because she's incompetent. She allowed it because she never
went there. She says she went once, but it was
not the right location. It's a location that was very
(30:43):
mild and no danger. She never went there. She's going
there tomorrow after almost four years. She's going there tomorrow
to try and show you what a great job she did.
But even now the numbers are terrible. And remember, they're
flying people over and they haven't stopped that. They're flying
hundreds of thousands of people over the border right now.
(31:04):
They never stopped that. They didn't think they'd be caught.
But they were two weeks ago from prisons, in jails,
mental institutions and insane asylum, all these insane asylums where
you have the sickest people, mentally ill people, and terrorists
(31:25):
at record levels. We've never had terrorists come into our
country like this. They come and they keep coming and coming,
and nobody has ever seen anything like it. People that
go to the border, they look professionals and they said,
there's never been anything like this in the history of
(31:47):
the world. And they're destroying they are destroying the fabric
of our country. She did nothing to stop any of it.
In fact, she encouraged them to keep and you know
that for years she did. Only recently did she say, oh, well,
we're going to try and put us up to it.
Speaker 3 (32:09):
And I ask again, you know, this should be the
why didn't she do it? Speech? Why didn't she do it?
All of these.
Speaker 6 (32:16):
Things, including unrelated elements to what we're talking about now,
like taxes, like military, like so many other things. Why
didn't she do it? She's got plans for the future.
Why didn't she do it?
Speaker 3 (32:32):
She's been there almost four years.
Speaker 6 (32:34):
Kamala created a brand new program to fly in migrants
from Venezuela, Haiti, and Nicaragua and resettle them in American communities,
including small towns all across our nation, but in particular
in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, and North Carolina.
Speaker 3 (32:58):
Nobody can believe it.
Speaker 6 (33:00):
These towns have been destroyed, and the mayors of the
towns and the governors of the states can't talk about
it because they're embarrassed that they allowed it to happen.
In addition, through her phone app something totally new now.
It's a phone app for migrants where migrants call in
(33:22):
highly sophisticated migrants. She's allowed virtually unlimited numbers of illegals
to press a button schedule their illegal immigration appointment at
our ports of entry and show up to be released
into the interior of our country.
Speaker 3 (33:43):
Can anybody believe this? And they're invading our towns.
Speaker 6 (33:47):
It's an invasion of our country like no country has
ever had to suffer before. And this was purposeful. They
did this on purpose. This was not a mistake on
their part. They did this on purpose because their policies
are so wrong and so evil and so unfair. And
(34:10):
there's only three reasons they'd want to do that. Number one,
they're incompetent, and I'm not sure that that's the reason.
Number two, they wanted for the votes. Number three, you
know what that one is.
Speaker 3 (34:27):
We don't have to talk about that one.
Speaker 6 (34:31):
But there can only be a very few reasons, because
they're destroying our country at a level that's never been
seen before. Importantly, as part of this conjob, it's a conjob.
None of the illegal aliens she is smuggling in through
the ports or on the airplanes.
Speaker 3 (34:49):
Think of it.
Speaker 6 (34:50):
Big jet planes loaded up with migrants flying into the
middle of our country and going to Iowa and lots
of others. They've all become border states. We only have
where it's been a mass invasion. These were two beautiful,
successful towns idyllic, and they're in trouble, big trouble, and
(35:17):
very unfair that people want to leave, They want to
get out, but everyone's afraid to say I want to
get out because they want.
Speaker 3 (35:23):
To be politically correct.
Speaker 6 (35:25):
And other towns just like them, hundreds of them all
over America. Americans have watched their communities destroyed by this sudden,
suffocating inundation of illegal alience. It's an inundation, it's an invasion.
(35:45):
This influx has overwhelmed their schools. They're taking the seats
of students that can no longer go there, and they
don't even speak English. They're trying to fire a lot
of people and hire interpreters. Can you believe that they
want to get rid of some people they want to hire.
Springfield is looking the mayor said it the other day,
(36:08):
looking for interpreters, because nobody in all of the thirty
two thousand people that took into the town think of this.
Do you have a town of fifty thousand people and
almost instantly you have thirty two thousand people, in this
case from Haiti. Most of them don't speak English, so
(36:29):
they're looking for interpreters. You have to get them out.
We have to save our country. You have to save
these towns.
Speaker 3 (36:36):
They flooded the job market with low.
Speaker 6 (36:40):
Wage migrants, but many cases migrants that also have horrible
criminal records, murder, drug dealing, so many different things. A
lot of human traffickers, and it's mostly human traffickers in
women
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
1. Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
2. Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
3. Crime Junkie
If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people.