November 19, 2025 • 29 mins
Join us for an eye-opening episode as we dive deep into the shocking revelations surrounding the Epstein files and the implications they hold for key political figures. We discuss the curious silence among some conservatives during Biden's presidency and the unsettling connection to the ongoing challenges Hakeem Jeffries faces. Also on the agenda, we cover the urgent new Republican bill aimed at speeding up the deportation process for criminal immigrants and Nicki Minaj's surprising support for Trump on global Christian persecution. Plus, we unpack a concerning tape of certain senators urging military personnel to disobey the President's orders, raising critical questions about authority and constitutional duty. Tune in for insights, commentary, and an open invitation for your thoughts!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Thanks to all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Right down our toll free telephone number if you want
to be a part of the program, it's eight hundred
and nine to four one Sean if you want to
join us. Uh wow. We're learning a lot about the
Epstein files. We're learning a lot about why Joe Biden
didn't release him for the four years, and we're also
(00:21):
learning why a bunch of so called conservatives have been
so you know, in a frenzy. You know, why were
they so quiet for four years? Why didn't they demand
the release of all this when Biden was president? Because
now it's impacting Hakeem Jeffries one congressman take a congresswoman
taking questions directly during a hearing with Michael Khne, apparently,
(00:42):
according to reports and information in the in the documents, verbatim,
asking the questions of Jeffrey Epstein at that time, a
convicted a felon for what was it, soliciting prostitution from
a minor? By the way, you know, the Bible is
very clear you don't hurt the look, don't hurt children.
(01:04):
I mean, I just I shudder to think what level
of Dante's inferno people like that will end up in
but it's it's just horrible. I mean, now they're talking
about thousands of victims, and even with the release of it,
the only you know, with all the talk about this,
thank god they put in their provision to leave people
that have been victimized, that probably live with this for
(01:27):
the rest of their lives, that alone, if they want to,
you know, deal with it privately and not expose them.
I can't imagine the pain, the tragedy, you know, and
the horror of such evil of young children. It is
disgusting on every level. A new Republican bill in the House,
by the way, will expedite deportations for criminal illegals. Will
(01:50):
hit that one illegal immigrant who was caught and released
by the Biden administration charged in a brutal hammer attack
on a Texas woman seventeen year old and arrested and
released by the federal immigration authorities during the Biden years,
charged with a brutal hammer attack on a woman jogging
in a Texas park.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
By the way, did you see Nicki Minaj praising President
Trump for prioritizing the issue of the persecution and slaughter
of Christians in Nigeria. Thanking him for his leadership on
the global stage. I mean, I can only imagine the
attacks have probably begun, you know, with the Hollywood lunatics
out there, Linda, Am I wrong about that? Or am
(02:31):
I right about not at all? Starting a very real thing.
She's being attacked for standing up for people. And President
Trump said, if they don't stop this, radical islamis apparently
attacking and killing innocent Christians. And you know, Donald Trump
has a moral compass, he has moral clarity. And this
is why I really don't understand even some people that
(02:54):
claim to be MAGA, what part of the Trump doctrine
some of these people have trouble understanding, and why some
people haven't interpreted this and misinterpreted this to mean isolationism,
because some have and they seem at times to be
the louder voice in the MAGA movement. I'm all for
no forever warse. You know, many years now I've been
(03:17):
saying on this program, we can never ever allow what
happened in Baghdad and elsewhere to ever happen again. And
that is you know, going door to door, stepping over
IEDs without up armored hum v's, and you know, our
brave men and women, our soldiers, our heroes, getting their
legs and their arms and blown off and their faces disfigured.
(03:39):
That's not how modern warfare is going to be fought.
I mean, you see the beginning stages of it.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Now.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
You saw it with the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
You see it the way. You know, even Israel is
now being attacked with you know, bombardments of ballistic missiles,
and thank god, they have missile defense systems that are
able to shoot those things out of the sky. Back
in the day they mocked Ronald Regan, they called it
star Wars if it was called strategic defense. Now President
(04:06):
Trump wants to modernize it and protect our entire country.
It's called the Golden Dome. Because of my sources, I
could tell you we are progressing at a level that
would really impress most of you. However, I keep some
sources private. It's not that I want to not tease
you and tell you that I know something you don't know.
It's just that it's not in our best national defense interests,
(04:29):
you know. I'm just I'm just getting little bits and
pieces and putting it all together, and I'm really feeling
very confident that we will achieve that goal of being
able to stop any type of attack on our country
with that technology that is advancing and that we're discovering,
all of which I think is very, very needed and necessary.
(04:50):
All of you should be angry about what I am
about to play for you. We have Senators Mark Kelly,
Ali Slotkin and and others, all these Democrats. They're actually
on tape and they are telling people in the intelligence community.
They are telling people that are in our military not
(05:14):
to obey unlawful orders, illegal orders of the president. The
problem is they don't identify what the hell they're talking about,
because I don't think they can, and I don't think
they have any intention to do so. But there's such
great damage and danger in what it is that they
are saying in this tape. And there's danger, you know,
(05:38):
it's almost like a subversion. It's almost like they're calling
for insurrection among our intelligence community and people in are
armed forces. What is President Trump ordered that caused them
to tell them they have a duty to disobey orders
(05:59):
of the commander in chief. I mean, the constitution is clear,
not a Leise Slacke and not Mark Kelly, not any
of the people in this video. They're not the commander
in chief of the United States of America. The President
is the commander in chief of our armed services. He
is the guy he makes the decisions. That's not Congress,
(06:20):
that's not a senator. That's not a former CIA officer,
not a former astronaut, not Alis Slocket.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
But here's what they say. We want to speak directly
to members of the military.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
And the intelligence community to take risks each day to
keep Americans safe.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
This administration is pitting our uniform military and intelligence community
professionals against American citizens like us.
Speaker 1 (06:49):
You all swore an oath to protect any then this constitution.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming
from a broad but from right here at home.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Our laws are clear. You can refuse the legal orders,
you can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
You must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry
out orders that violate the law or our constitution. We
know this is hard and that it's a difficult time
to be a public servant.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, or Navy,
the Air Force. Your vigilance is critical, and know that
we have your.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Back, O that we have your back. I'll think about this.
How scary is that tape? This is TDS Trump derangement
syndrome on steroids and human growth hormone. It is not
just it is so morally repugnant and inappropriate, but it's
(07:44):
downright dangerous what they are saying there is Again, if
they had a specific issue where they identified that the
very examples where people must refuse illegal orders, they have
a duty and obligation to spell it out.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
They didn't do that.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
No, it is just, you know, as far as I'm concerned, constitutionally,
they are undermining the authority of the president and his
constitutional authority as commander in chief. I mean, if that
it's it's if that's not subversion, tell me what it is.
(08:28):
If that's not a call for some type of insurrection,
then please tell me what it is.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
I'll give you a number. It's eight hundred and nine
point one. Shawn.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
I'm open to any any points you want to make
on this, but you know, they might as well just
breach the walls of the White House and you know,
sending their radical supporters because remember it was a five
hundred and seventy four official riots in the summer of
twenty twenty their radical base, and they never lifted a
(08:59):
finger to stop them.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
They never criticized them.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
No, they just flat out either their silence was deafening,
or they went out there and just flat out lied
and said they're mostly peaceful, or they went out like
you know, their vice presidential candidate at the time later
Vice President Kamala Harris and you know, said those rioters
aren't going to stop.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
They shouldn't stop, and.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
We're not going to stop supporting them, okay, And then
they claimed only care they ignored those five hundred and
seventy four rights. They rationalized something that wasn't true. Dozens
of Americans that Summer of Love lost their lives. Thousands
of cops were injured during the Summer of Love. You know,
they were pelted with bricks, rocks, bottles, molotov cocktails, things
(09:47):
like that. Billions of dollars in property damage took place.
You know, where was Benny Thompson and or whatever his
name is and Liz Cheney at the time, they cared
so much about one riot where the president actually said
many of you will peacefully and patriotically, you know, march
(10:08):
to the Capitol so your voices will be heard.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
That's what he said at the time. But they didn't.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Of course, that never came up, and then all the
records magically just disappeared. They're just gone, you know, in
thin air, you know. And if we're going to talk
about moments where maybe just maybe, you know, members of
our intelligence community for example, and high ranking people and
(10:35):
law enforcement for example, maybe they should have stood up
against the Russia hoax that they knew was a hoax.
We now know they knew it was a hoax. We
now learned from the classified materials of Tulca Gabbard that
in fact, they had information it was a hoax. They
had a meeting about Hillary Clinton's plan to unveil this
(10:56):
hoax against Donald Trump. And then when career years senior
intelligence officials did their job after the twenty sixteen election
and came to the determination that in fact, there was
no Russia Trump collusion, well then it was presented to
Barack Obama, and according to these declassified documents and Tulsea Gabbard,
(11:19):
Barack Obama didn't like the conclusion, so he got his
political operatives involved, and they decided to redo the intelligence
assessment come up with a new one that had a
completely different conclusion, and again based on the Dirty Russian
Disinformation NOSSI, which they also were warned about that it
was political in August of twenty sixteen. They apparently were
(11:44):
worn multiple times and again statute of limitations run out
unless they come up with a grand conspiracy investigation. But
you know, you think about that, the Russia hoax, the
Mueller investigation, that witch hunt, two bogus impeachments to Donald
trum and then of course, you know, we've got three
phases of the grand conspiracy. One includes no reasonable prosecutor
(12:08):
would prosecute Hillary Clinton's you know, servers with top secret
classified information on them. They didn't raider her home or office,
just like later they wouldn't raid Joe Biden's homes or
offices the four locations where he had top secret classified information.
Presidential Record Zact actually gave Donald Trump a lot more
(12:28):
leeway than any of them, but they rated mar a lago.
That sounds like a dual justice system to me. Using
the dirty Russian disinformation dossier that not only was not corroborated,
but it was completely bogus, And even after they knew
it was completely bogus and Christopher Steele was long gone,
they used it three more times for three separate PISA
warrants lied to a phis A court. Law requires that
(12:51):
once you know it's false, that you're supposed to go
to the PHISA court. You know, with the fact that
intelligence now we were finding out we don't know how
many Americans, including senators and congressmen and other people and
groups like Turning Point and so many other conservative organizations
were targeted by our government to be spied on without
(13:14):
without any indication that a proper warrant was sought or granted.
Whatever happened, unreasonable search and seizure. I'm sure there was
great need to rip through Milania Trump's closet and Baron
Trump's bedroom, you know. And then four years of weaponization
because well they couldn't stop them. Remember, Originally the dirty
(13:36):
dossier was designed to prevent Trump from getting elected. Then
after the election it was used to sabotage the incoming president,
which it did effectively. Then, of course, the suppression of
the very real laptop from Hell that they've had verified
as authentic. In March at twenty twenty, and then they
(13:57):
prebunked it, meeting weekly with big tech companies in twenty
twenty because they didn't want the truth about that laptop
coming out. And then of course big tech asked, well
is this information in the New York Post reel? They
knew the answer, but they wouldn't tell them and they
didn't want the American people to know them. When that
didn't work, Let's just, you know, take a case where
(14:20):
the statute of limitations had run out. That's only a
minor misdemeanor in New York, and let's turn it into
thirty four felon accounts. And let's value Maro Lago at
eighteen million dollars, not one point five trillion, and let
everybody not say a word about any of it because
we're okay, Because it's just to prevent Trump from becoming president.
This is sick stuff. These are sick people. This is
(14:40):
a sick time that we're living.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
In, all right.
Speaker 2 (14:43):
So I may lose Linda here a little bit. Linda
doesn't love technology the way I do in this sense. Now,
I've never been the most technologically savvy person in the world,
but I am obsessed with artificial intelligence because I can
learn so much from it. Friend of mine who pretty
high ranking with Elon Musk and smart as a whip.
(15:07):
I mean, this guy is is so out there smart.
It's he's spectacularly smart. You know who I'm talking about, right,
And he's also the nicest guy you'd ever want to
meet in your life. He works so hard. I mean,
when you work for Elon, you don't stop working. By
the way, you think I'm tough as a boss, I'm
(15:27):
really not. I'm actually, you know, a pussy cat compared
to Elon Musk. But anyway, and they are driving and
driving and driving.
Speaker 1 (15:38):
I mean this Elon.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Will sleep on his office floor for like an hour
and a half, we can get up and start working again.
He just doesn't stop. I mean, it's pretty fascinating to
watch it.
Speaker 1 (15:49):
Now.
Speaker 2 (15:49):
Do I think he was he was designed for the
DC Washington swamp or bureaucracy. Absolutely not. It just goes
against his very nature. He is a genius CEO at
the highest level and an innovator and creator. And there's
a great series on the History Channel The Men That
Built America, and it talks about you know, the Rockefellers
(16:12):
and the Conegies and the Melons, and you know, the
Morgans and all these people. By the way, they're all ruthless,
ruthless business people. There's the side of them is rough.
But I think with genius, I think, you know, when
people have really spectacular gifts, I think, and I've been
blessed in my life to meet a lot of brilliant people,
(16:33):
and it's a very common trait that with their gift
comes a little bit of a curse and it manifests
itself in different forms.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
Linda, that makes sense. You're with me so far, right.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
Sure, and okay, but the work ethic that Elon has
coupled with the genius that he has is is it's
just undeniable that he is the brightest guy in the
world that I can think of right now. If there's
anybody smarter, you can tell me, But I don't think
there is. Having spent time with him and spoken with him,
(17:08):
actually at dinner with him one night and it was outside,
and you know, he was looking up at the stars
and he's pointing out that that's Venus, that's Mars, that's this,
that's this, that's this, and he's like pointing all this
stuff out to me, and the difference is the way
my mind works, which is, you know, rather on hip
(17:30):
base compared to his level.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Very simple and basic.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
I don't look at Venus and Mars and think that
I want to figure out a way to travel there
and maybe establish life there and send people there and
bring them home. But that's how he thinks. It's just
a whole different dimension of thinking. I've met people that
are so insightful in terms of politics.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
You know, one of the geniuses of RUSSI.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
I always felt Rush had a take that nobody else
would have, and I think that was part of his
great creativity and genius, and he was a great entertainer
on top of it. It's just great at everything that
he did, and which is why when he passed, God
rest his soul, we miss him dearly. You know, I said,
nobody can replace this guy. He's irreplaceable, and we all
he would want all of us to do our very
(18:18):
best because he believed so much in the in the
in the in the individual, in the concept of liberty
and freedom and talent that God gave every individual, and
that the only way that that those talents can be
brought brought to fruition is if you live in freedom
and liberty and which is the antithesis of top down
(18:40):
government run everything in our lives. So you know we've
gone through many different revolutions, if you will. I mean
when the train was first created, that was a big deal.
You know, going shopping with Linda to buy a little
toy train for her son at the time was the
biggest deal I've ever seen in my life. And after
an hour of picking up every single solitary train and
(19:03):
turning it over and playing with the wheels and looking
at the price and comparative shopping, I couldn't take it anymore.
I went and got a shopping cart and I just
filled it up full of a bunch of trains. And
I figured, let our son pick it out on his own,
and they'll be happy with more trains rather than a
few trains. And I don't think he's going to miss
out on whether or not Linda picked out the perfect train.
(19:23):
And Linda doesn't like when I tell that story, but
it's true. So why am I bringing all of this up?
So there's an article of Business Insider and it says
Elon Musk says optimists will eliminate poverty, and a speech
after his one trillion dollar pay package was approved. This
is with Tesla if he meets certain goals and certain
(19:46):
benchmarks that they have set out for him. And what
I've been trying to communicate to people is the we
are living through an age that is going to be
so impactful. Nobody is going to everybody's going to be
impacted by it. And it's a matter of are you
(20:09):
ready for it, are you ready to adapt to it?
Are you going to get ahead of the curve or
you're going to be behind the curve. And my hope
is as we discuss this periodically to make sure that
you are ready for it, it doesn't take you by surprise,
it doesn't overwhelm you, and that you actually take advantage
(20:33):
of it by having more knowledge than other people and
are fully aware of the magnitude of what's about to happen.
It would be the equivalent of okay, well, communications changed
when we had telephones. It would be the equivalent of
electricity versus you know, having you know, a gas lamp
(20:55):
in your house. It is that dramatic an innovation with
artifice intelligence, so you know, the Tesla's optimist robot, which
is what he was talking about on this call, he
actually believes ultimately will eliminate much of the need for
human labor. Now that that is a little bit shocking,
(21:18):
earth shattering, but something I think I want all of
you to be aware of so that you're prepared for it.
And he's talking about humanoid robots are going to be
a production challenge and it's not launching anytime soon. But again,
I want you to be thinking in the future and
not be sure, shocked or surprised by it. As I
(21:39):
have spoken to people that are involved in this industry,
what they're telling me is middle class families. This is
sort of like the creation of the Model t and
you know Henry Ford and the fact that he made
it in a way that was affordable so the average
person can own one, And the way they're designing these
(22:01):
robots that would take care of mundane tasks for middle
class Americans.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
We're talking about robots that will clean.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
Your house, cut your lawn, cook your dinner, you know,
do all of these mundane tasks that you take for granted,
put the sheets on your bed, et cetera, et cetera.
It may sound crazy, but I'm telling you this is
what they're telling me. And he has a bigger vision
for robots. He wants them to transform the economy. That
should be scary to everybody. He says, you know, people
(22:33):
often talk about eliminating poverty, giving everyone amazing medical care.
And this goes to my conversation with Gary Brecker, who's
in the health, wellness, fitness, nutrition space. And Gary Breker says,
if you live the next five years, the odds of
you living to one hundred will go up exponentially.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
I agree with him.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
And I talk to a friend of mine that's in
radiology and they are already using artificial intelligence, and what
he has discovered is the ability of artificial intelligence to
pick up spots on an MRI that no human eye
would be able to detect. In other words, early detection
(23:17):
is the key to longevity, especially on issues like cancer.
And I believe probably we're going to look back on
how we treat cancer today and one day we'll say
we were living in the dinosaur era, and they are
going to be far more sophisticated ways of detecting and
treating cancers long before they get bad. Anyway, so Musk
(23:39):
double down. He said optimists will actually eliminate poverty minutes earlier.
The crowd cheered and broke out in chance of Elani
Lan and the shareholders approved a trillion dollar pay package
and he's the world's richest person. It will unlock up
to a trillion dollars in shares if Tesla achieves the
lofty targets, including selling a million Optimists robots in the
(24:02):
next decade, I believe that will happen. Musk said that
Optimists would change life for incarcerated people. He said, for
instead of physically jailing prisoners, he said, you know, optimists
will follow you around and stop you from doing crime
and things like that. I don't know how, but just
follow me here that these are his remarks, not mine.
(24:23):
He said the robots would increase global economy by a
factor of ten or even possibly one hundred, and I
would argue even maybe greater than that. He did this
on the Tesla third quarter earnings call. He imagines a
world of sustainable abundance, a goal outlined by the Tesla
(24:44):
master Plan Part four, with Optimists leading the way. An
Optimist robot would have five times the productivity of any
human being per year, he predicted, because it would be
able to operate twenty four to seven. Let me stop here.
There's a company in our Australia. A friend of mine
sent me this video and sure enough, in less than
(25:05):
a week, a massive, big warehouse is being built perfectly,
no flaws at all, where it would take a construction
company six months to a year. And you can see it.
And maybe I should post it online, Linda, because it's
worth posting it and eliminates waste and they work twenty
(25:28):
four hours a day and the job gets done. He said,
there's no limit how much AI can do in terms
of enhancing the productivity of humans, and is not really
a limit to AI that is embodied, he said. He
said described how sustainable abundance and a robotic future. He
told Joe Rogan, this will transform the economy. He said,
(25:50):
I came to the conclusion that the only way to
get us out of the debt crisis and to prevent
America from going bankrupt is artificial intelligence and robotics. And
he said that robots like Optimists will make working optional
in the future. I don't like that part of it,
as long as I think people need to be of
service to other people.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
Really that's spiritual for me. But put that aside.
Speaker 2 (26:13):
It's not my thoughts here we'll have a benign scenario
universal income. He's saying that the wealth that will be
created and generated and food production generated, that there won't
be something like poverty that exists. If you can build
a home at one hundred and fifty dollars a square foot,
everybody's going to have their own home. And that's how
(26:36):
once the robotics are up and running and building homes
or building out seventy or seventy five percent of them,
that's what you're going to have. Is that anyone can
have any product or service they want, but there'll be
a lot of trauma disruption along the way. This is
why I'm warning all of you. And he's not the
only business leader that is touting the prospects of universal
basic income. Saying that the money is not coming from
(26:58):
the government, he's not suggesting that. I don't interpret it
that way anyway. And Rogan, you know, said there's an
economic irony here the capitalist implementation of AI and robotics,
assuming he goes down the good path, and there's always
a danger with technology that it can be used for
something horrible, you know, could result in this utopia that
(27:20):
we as conservatives launchly disagree with. I do believe that
human beings are designed with talent and gifts from God,
and you've got to bring him to fruition, and you
can't be all about being served all day. But he said,
AI robots will replace a lot of jobs. Working for
some will be optional, like growing your own vegetables instead
(27:40):
of buying them is optional. That's a pretty ambitious prediction.
I'm not saying all of this is going to be true,
but what I am saying is the economy's changing. And
what I want to tie this into is Donald Trump's
securing an other trillion trillion dollars. You know, the Saudi's
committed up to a trillion of manufacturing in this country
the next four years. Okay, that's going to be You know,
(28:03):
we're gonna need workers for these jobs, and I want
you to be ready to get those jobs. We're gonna
have the energy sector building out like never before, high
paying career jobs, and if you're interested, I want you
to be ready for those jobs. I want you to
be ready for the semiconductor manufacturing facilities, the pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities,
(28:25):
the AI and robotic manufacturing facilities that they're going to
need workers and they're also going to need a very
well educated population to get in on this and be
productive members of this new technology. And I would add
to that, the tax cuts automatically are going to kick in,
and when that does, that's going to be economic growth, prosperity, hopefully,
(28:49):
the golden era that Donald Trump talks about. To me,
it's just fascinating. Did that interest you at all? Into
I wonder if I can hire about to replace you?
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Yeah, why don't you? Same sass.
Speaker 2 (29:03):
Will teach him to be sassy, sarcastic, you know, to
try and get me angry every day before the fool
of vinegar.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
It'll be great.
Thanks to all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Right down our toll free telephone number if you want
to be a part of the program, it's eight hundred
and nine to four one Sean if you want to
join us. Uh wow. We're learning a lot about the
Epstein files. We're learning a lot about why Joe Biden
didn't release him for the four years, and we're also
(00:21):
learning why a bunch of so called conservatives have been
so you know, in a frenzy. You know, why were
they so quiet for four years? Why didn't they demand
the release of all this when Biden was president? Because
now it's impacting Hakeem Jeffries one congressman take a congresswoman
taking questions directly during a hearing with Michael Khne, apparently,
(00:42):
according to reports and information in the in the documents, verbatim,
asking the questions of Jeffrey Epstein at that time, a
convicted a felon for what was it, soliciting prostitution from
a minor? By the way, you know, the Bible is
very clear you don't hurt the look, don't hurt children.
(01:04):
I mean, I just I shudder to think what level
of Dante's inferno people like that will end up in
but it's it's just horrible. I mean, now they're talking
about thousands of victims, and even with the release of it,
the only you know, with all the talk about this,
thank god they put in their provision to leave people
that have been victimized, that probably live with this for
(01:27):
the rest of their lives, that alone, if they want to,
you know, deal with it privately and not expose them.
I can't imagine the pain, the tragedy, you know, and
the horror of such evil of young children. It is
disgusting on every level. A new Republican bill in the House,
by the way, will expedite deportations for criminal illegals. Will
(01:50):
hit that one illegal immigrant who was caught and released
by the Biden administration charged in a brutal hammer attack
on a Texas woman seventeen year old and arrested and
released by the federal immigration authorities during the Biden years,
charged with a brutal hammer attack on a woman jogging
in a Texas park.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
By the way, did you see Nicki Minaj praising President
Trump for prioritizing the issue of the persecution and slaughter
of Christians in Nigeria. Thanking him for his leadership on
the global stage. I mean, I can only imagine the
attacks have probably begun, you know, with the Hollywood lunatics
out there, Linda, Am I wrong about that? Or am
(02:31):
I right about not at all? Starting a very real thing.
She's being attacked for standing up for people. And President
Trump said, if they don't stop this, radical islamis apparently
attacking and killing innocent Christians. And you know, Donald Trump
has a moral compass, he has moral clarity. And this
is why I really don't understand even some people that
(02:54):
claim to be MAGA, what part of the Trump doctrine
some of these people have trouble understanding, and why some
people haven't interpreted this and misinterpreted this to mean isolationism,
because some have and they seem at times to be
the louder voice in the MAGA movement. I'm all for
no forever warse. You know, many years now I've been
(03:17):
saying on this program, we can never ever allow what
happened in Baghdad and elsewhere to ever happen again. And
that is you know, going door to door, stepping over
IEDs without up armored hum v's, and you know, our
brave men and women, our soldiers, our heroes, getting their
legs and their arms and blown off and their faces disfigured.
(03:39):
That's not how modern warfare is going to be fought.
I mean, you see the beginning stages of it.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Now.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
You saw it with the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
You see it the way. You know, even Israel is
now being attacked with you know, bombardments of ballistic missiles,
and thank god, they have missile defense systems that are
able to shoot those things out of the sky. Back
in the day they mocked Ronald Regan, they called it
star Wars if it was called strategic defense. Now President
(04:06):
Trump wants to modernize it and protect our entire country.
It's called the Golden Dome. Because of my sources, I
could tell you we are progressing at a level that
would really impress most of you. However, I keep some
sources private. It's not that I want to not tease
you and tell you that I know something you don't know.
It's just that it's not in our best national defense interests,
(04:29):
you know. I'm just I'm just getting little bits and
pieces and putting it all together, and I'm really feeling
very confident that we will achieve that goal of being
able to stop any type of attack on our country
with that technology that is advancing and that we're discovering,
all of which I think is very, very needed and necessary.
(04:50):
All of you should be angry about what I am
about to play for you. We have Senators Mark Kelly,
Ali Slotkin and and others, all these Democrats. They're actually
on tape and they are telling people in the intelligence community.
They are telling people that are in our military not
(05:14):
to obey unlawful orders, illegal orders of the president. The
problem is they don't identify what the hell they're talking about,
because I don't think they can, and I don't think
they have any intention to do so. But there's such
great damage and danger in what it is that they
are saying in this tape. And there's danger, you know,
(05:38):
it's almost like a subversion. It's almost like they're calling
for insurrection among our intelligence community and people in are
armed forces. What is President Trump ordered that caused them
to tell them they have a duty to disobey orders
(05:59):
of the commander in chief. I mean, the constitution is clear,
not a Leise Slacke and not Mark Kelly, not any
of the people in this video. They're not the commander
in chief of the United States of America. The President
is the commander in chief of our armed services. He
is the guy he makes the decisions. That's not Congress,
(06:20):
that's not a senator. That's not a former CIA officer,
not a former astronaut, not Alis Slocket.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
But here's what they say. We want to speak directly
to members of the military.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
And the intelligence community to take risks each day to
keep Americans safe.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
This administration is pitting our uniform military and intelligence community
professionals against American citizens like us.
Speaker 1 (06:49):
You all swore an oath to protect any then this constitution.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming
from a broad but from right here at home.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Our laws are clear. You can refuse the legal orders,
you can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
You must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry
out orders that violate the law or our constitution. We
know this is hard and that it's a difficult time
to be a public servant.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, or Navy,
the Air Force. Your vigilance is critical, and know that
we have your.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Back, O that we have your back. I'll think about this.
How scary is that tape? This is TDS Trump derangement
syndrome on steroids and human growth hormone. It is not
just it is so morally repugnant and inappropriate, but it's
(07:44):
downright dangerous what they are saying there is Again, if
they had a specific issue where they identified that the
very examples where people must refuse illegal orders, they have
a duty and obligation to spell it out.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
They didn't do that.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
No, it is just, you know, as far as I'm concerned, constitutionally,
they are undermining the authority of the president and his
constitutional authority as commander in chief. I mean, if that
it's it's if that's not subversion, tell me what it is.
(08:28):
If that's not a call for some type of insurrection,
then please tell me what it is.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
I'll give you a number. It's eight hundred and nine
point one. Shawn.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
I'm open to any any points you want to make
on this, but you know, they might as well just
breach the walls of the White House and you know,
sending their radical supporters because remember it was a five
hundred and seventy four official riots in the summer of
twenty twenty their radical base, and they never lifted a
(08:59):
finger to stop them.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
They never criticized them.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
No, they just flat out either their silence was deafening,
or they went out there and just flat out lied
and said they're mostly peaceful, or they went out like
you know, their vice presidential candidate at the time later
Vice President Kamala Harris and you know, said those rioters
aren't going to stop.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
They shouldn't stop, and.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
We're not going to stop supporting them, okay, And then
they claimed only care they ignored those five hundred and
seventy four rights. They rationalized something that wasn't true. Dozens
of Americans that Summer of Love lost their lives. Thousands
of cops were injured during the Summer of Love. You know,
they were pelted with bricks, rocks, bottles, molotov cocktails, things
(09:47):
like that. Billions of dollars in property damage took place.
You know, where was Benny Thompson and or whatever his
name is and Liz Cheney at the time, they cared
so much about one riot where the president actually said
many of you will peacefully and patriotically, you know, march
(10:08):
to the Capitol so your voices will be heard.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
That's what he said at the time. But they didn't.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Of course, that never came up, and then all the
records magically just disappeared. They're just gone, you know, in
thin air, you know. And if we're going to talk
about moments where maybe just maybe, you know, members of
our intelligence community for example, and high ranking people and
(10:35):
law enforcement for example, maybe they should have stood up
against the Russia hoax that they knew was a hoax.
We now know they knew it was a hoax. We
now learned from the classified materials of Tulca Gabbard that
in fact, they had information it was a hoax. They
had a meeting about Hillary Clinton's plan to unveil this
(10:56):
hoax against Donald Trump. And then when career years senior
intelligence officials did their job after the twenty sixteen election
and came to the determination that in fact, there was
no Russia Trump collusion, well then it was presented to
Barack Obama, and according to these declassified documents and Tulsea Gabbard,
(11:19):
Barack Obama didn't like the conclusion, so he got his
political operatives involved, and they decided to redo the intelligence
assessment come up with a new one that had a
completely different conclusion, and again based on the Dirty Russian
Disinformation NOSSI, which they also were warned about that it
was political in August of twenty sixteen. They apparently were
(11:44):
worn multiple times and again statute of limitations run out
unless they come up with a grand conspiracy investigation. But
you know, you think about that, the Russia hoax, the
Mueller investigation, that witch hunt, two bogus impeachments to Donald
trum and then of course, you know, we've got three
phases of the grand conspiracy. One includes no reasonable prosecutor
(12:08):
would prosecute Hillary Clinton's you know, servers with top secret
classified information on them. They didn't raider her home or office,
just like later they wouldn't raid Joe Biden's homes or
offices the four locations where he had top secret classified information.
Presidential Record Zact actually gave Donald Trump a lot more
(12:28):
leeway than any of them, but they rated mar a lago.
That sounds like a dual justice system to me. Using
the dirty Russian disinformation dossier that not only was not corroborated,
but it was completely bogus, And even after they knew
it was completely bogus and Christopher Steele was long gone,
they used it three more times for three separate PISA
warrants lied to a phis A court. Law requires that
(12:51):
once you know it's false, that you're supposed to go
to the PHISA court. You know, with the fact that
intelligence now we were finding out we don't know how
many Americans, including senators and congressmen and other people and
groups like Turning Point and so many other conservative organizations
were targeted by our government to be spied on without
(13:14):
without any indication that a proper warrant was sought or granted.
Whatever happened, unreasonable search and seizure. I'm sure there was
great need to rip through Milania Trump's closet and Baron
Trump's bedroom, you know. And then four years of weaponization
because well they couldn't stop them. Remember, Originally the dirty
(13:36):
dossier was designed to prevent Trump from getting elected. Then
after the election it was used to sabotage the incoming president,
which it did effectively. Then, of course, the suppression of
the very real laptop from Hell that they've had verified
as authentic. In March at twenty twenty, and then they
(13:57):
prebunked it, meeting weekly with big tech companies in twenty
twenty because they didn't want the truth about that laptop
coming out. And then of course big tech asked, well
is this information in the New York Post reel? They
knew the answer, but they wouldn't tell them and they
didn't want the American people to know them. When that
didn't work, Let's just, you know, take a case where
(14:20):
the statute of limitations had run out. That's only a
minor misdemeanor in New York, and let's turn it into
thirty four felon accounts. And let's value Maro Lago at
eighteen million dollars, not one point five trillion, and let
everybody not say a word about any of it because
we're okay, Because it's just to prevent Trump from becoming president.
This is sick stuff. These are sick people. This is
(14:40):
a sick time that we're living.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
In, all right.
Speaker 2 (14:43):
So I may lose Linda here a little bit. Linda
doesn't love technology the way I do in this sense. Now,
I've never been the most technologically savvy person in the world,
but I am obsessed with artificial intelligence because I can
learn so much from it. Friend of mine who pretty
high ranking with Elon Musk and smart as a whip.
(15:07):
I mean, this guy is is so out there smart.
It's he's spectacularly smart. You know who I'm talking about, right,
And he's also the nicest guy you'd ever want to
meet in your life. He works so hard. I mean,
when you work for Elon, you don't stop working. By
the way, you think I'm tough as a boss, I'm
(15:27):
really not. I'm actually, you know, a pussy cat compared
to Elon Musk. But anyway, and they are driving and
driving and driving.
Speaker 1 (15:38):
I mean this Elon.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Will sleep on his office floor for like an hour
and a half, we can get up and start working again.
He just doesn't stop. I mean, it's pretty fascinating to
watch it.
Speaker 1 (15:49):
Now.
Speaker 2 (15:49):
Do I think he was he was designed for the
DC Washington swamp or bureaucracy. Absolutely not. It just goes
against his very nature. He is a genius CEO at
the highest level and an innovator and creator. And there's
a great series on the History Channel The Men That
Built America, and it talks about you know, the Rockefellers
(16:12):
and the Conegies and the Melons, and you know, the
Morgans and all these people. By the way, they're all ruthless,
ruthless business people. There's the side of them is rough.
But I think with genius, I think, you know, when
people have really spectacular gifts, I think, and I've been
blessed in my life to meet a lot of brilliant people,
(16:33):
and it's a very common trait that with their gift
comes a little bit of a curse and it manifests
itself in different forms.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
Linda, that makes sense. You're with me so far, right.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
Sure, and okay, but the work ethic that Elon has
coupled with the genius that he has is is it's
just undeniable that he is the brightest guy in the
world that I can think of right now. If there's
anybody smarter, you can tell me, But I don't think
there is. Having spent time with him and spoken with him,
(17:08):
actually at dinner with him one night and it was outside,
and you know, he was looking up at the stars
and he's pointing out that that's Venus, that's Mars, that's this,
that's this, that's this, and he's like pointing all this
stuff out to me, and the difference is the way
my mind works, which is, you know, rather on hip
(17:30):
base compared to his level.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Very simple and basic.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
I don't look at Venus and Mars and think that
I want to figure out a way to travel there
and maybe establish life there and send people there and
bring them home. But that's how he thinks. It's just
a whole different dimension of thinking. I've met people that
are so insightful in terms of politics.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
You know, one of the geniuses of RUSSI.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
I always felt Rush had a take that nobody else
would have, and I think that was part of his
great creativity and genius, and he was a great entertainer
on top of it. It's just great at everything that
he did, and which is why when he passed, God
rest his soul, we miss him dearly. You know, I said,
nobody can replace this guy. He's irreplaceable, and we all
he would want all of us to do our very
(18:18):
best because he believed so much in the in the
in the in the individual, in the concept of liberty
and freedom and talent that God gave every individual, and
that the only way that that those talents can be
brought brought to fruition is if you live in freedom
and liberty and which is the antithesis of top down
(18:40):
government run everything in our lives. So you know we've
gone through many different revolutions, if you will. I mean
when the train was first created, that was a big deal.
You know, going shopping with Linda to buy a little
toy train for her son at the time was the
biggest deal I've ever seen in my life. And after
an hour of picking up every single solitary train and
(19:03):
turning it over and playing with the wheels and looking
at the price and comparative shopping, I couldn't take it anymore.
I went and got a shopping cart and I just
filled it up full of a bunch of trains. And
I figured, let our son pick it out on his own,
and they'll be happy with more trains rather than a
few trains. And I don't think he's going to miss
out on whether or not Linda picked out the perfect train.
(19:23):
And Linda doesn't like when I tell that story, but
it's true. So why am I bringing all of this up?
So there's an article of Business Insider and it says
Elon Musk says optimists will eliminate poverty, and a speech
after his one trillion dollar pay package was approved. This
is with Tesla if he meets certain goals and certain
(19:46):
benchmarks that they have set out for him. And what
I've been trying to communicate to people is the we
are living through an age that is going to be
so impactful. Nobody is going to everybody's going to be
impacted by it. And it's a matter of are you
(20:09):
ready for it, are you ready to adapt to it?
Are you going to get ahead of the curve or
you're going to be behind the curve. And my hope
is as we discuss this periodically to make sure that
you are ready for it, it doesn't take you by surprise,
it doesn't overwhelm you, and that you actually take advantage
(20:33):
of it by having more knowledge than other people and
are fully aware of the magnitude of what's about to happen.
It would be the equivalent of okay, well, communications changed
when we had telephones. It would be the equivalent of
electricity versus you know, having you know, a gas lamp
(20:55):
in your house. It is that dramatic an innovation with
artifice intelligence, so you know, the Tesla's optimist robot, which
is what he was talking about on this call, he
actually believes ultimately will eliminate much of the need for
human labor. Now that that is a little bit shocking,
(21:18):
earth shattering, but something I think I want all of
you to be aware of so that you're prepared for it.
And he's talking about humanoid robots are going to be
a production challenge and it's not launching anytime soon. But again,
I want you to be thinking in the future and
not be sure, shocked or surprised by it. As I
(21:39):
have spoken to people that are involved in this industry,
what they're telling me is middle class families. This is
sort of like the creation of the Model t and
you know Henry Ford and the fact that he made
it in a way that was affordable so the average
person can own one, And the way they're designing these
(22:01):
robots that would take care of mundane tasks for middle
class Americans.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
We're talking about robots that will clean.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
Your house, cut your lawn, cook your dinner, you know,
do all of these mundane tasks that you take for granted,
put the sheets on your bed, et cetera, et cetera.
It may sound crazy, but I'm telling you this is
what they're telling me. And he has a bigger vision
for robots. He wants them to transform the economy. That
should be scary to everybody. He says, you know, people
(22:33):
often talk about eliminating poverty, giving everyone amazing medical care.
And this goes to my conversation with Gary Brecker, who's
in the health, wellness, fitness, nutrition space. And Gary Breker says,
if you live the next five years, the odds of
you living to one hundred will go up exponentially.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
I agree with him.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
And I talk to a friend of mine that's in
radiology and they are already using artificial intelligence, and what
he has discovered is the ability of artificial intelligence to
pick up spots on an MRI that no human eye
would be able to detect. In other words, early detection
(23:17):
is the key to longevity, especially on issues like cancer.
And I believe probably we're going to look back on
how we treat cancer today and one day we'll say
we were living in the dinosaur era, and they are
going to be far more sophisticated ways of detecting and
treating cancers long before they get bad. Anyway, so Musk
(23:39):
double down. He said optimists will actually eliminate poverty minutes earlier.
The crowd cheered and broke out in chance of Elani
Lan and the shareholders approved a trillion dollar pay package
and he's the world's richest person. It will unlock up
to a trillion dollars in shares if Tesla achieves the
lofty targets, including selling a million Optimists robots in the
(24:02):
next decade, I believe that will happen. Musk said that
Optimists would change life for incarcerated people. He said, for
instead of physically jailing prisoners, he said, you know, optimists
will follow you around and stop you from doing crime
and things like that. I don't know how, but just
follow me here that these are his remarks, not mine.
(24:23):
He said the robots would increase global economy by a
factor of ten or even possibly one hundred, and I
would argue even maybe greater than that. He did this
on the Tesla third quarter earnings call. He imagines a
world of sustainable abundance, a goal outlined by the Tesla
(24:44):
master Plan Part four, with Optimists leading the way. An
Optimist robot would have five times the productivity of any
human being per year, he predicted, because it would be
able to operate twenty four to seven. Let me stop here.
There's a company in our Australia. A friend of mine
sent me this video and sure enough, in less than
(25:05):
a week, a massive, big warehouse is being built perfectly,
no flaws at all, where it would take a construction
company six months to a year. And you can see it.
And maybe I should post it online, Linda, because it's
worth posting it and eliminates waste and they work twenty
(25:28):
four hours a day and the job gets done. He said,
there's no limit how much AI can do in terms
of enhancing the productivity of humans, and is not really
a limit to AI that is embodied, he said. He
said described how sustainable abundance and a robotic future. He
told Joe Rogan, this will transform the economy. He said,
(25:50):
I came to the conclusion that the only way to
get us out of the debt crisis and to prevent
America from going bankrupt is artificial intelligence and robotics. And
he said that robots like Optimists will make working optional
in the future. I don't like that part of it,
as long as I think people need to be of
service to other people.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
Really that's spiritual for me. But put that aside.
Speaker 2 (26:13):
It's not my thoughts here we'll have a benign scenario
universal income. He's saying that the wealth that will be
created and generated and food production generated, that there won't
be something like poverty that exists. If you can build
a home at one hundred and fifty dollars a square foot,
everybody's going to have their own home. And that's how
(26:36):
once the robotics are up and running and building homes
or building out seventy or seventy five percent of them,
that's what you're going to have. Is that anyone can
have any product or service they want, but there'll be
a lot of trauma disruption along the way. This is
why I'm warning all of you. And he's not the
only business leader that is touting the prospects of universal
basic income. Saying that the money is not coming from
(26:58):
the government, he's not suggesting that. I don't interpret it
that way anyway. And Rogan, you know, said there's an
economic irony here the capitalist implementation of AI and robotics,
assuming he goes down the good path, and there's always
a danger with technology that it can be used for
something horrible, you know, could result in this utopia that
(27:20):
we as conservatives launchly disagree with. I do believe that
human beings are designed with talent and gifts from God,
and you've got to bring him to fruition, and you
can't be all about being served all day. But he said,
AI robots will replace a lot of jobs. Working for
some will be optional, like growing your own vegetables instead
(27:40):
of buying them is optional. That's a pretty ambitious prediction.
I'm not saying all of this is going to be true,
but what I am saying is the economy's changing. And
what I want to tie this into is Donald Trump's
securing an other trillion trillion dollars. You know, the Saudi's
committed up to a trillion of manufacturing in this country
the next four years. Okay, that's going to be You know,
(28:03):
we're gonna need workers for these jobs, and I want
you to be ready to get those jobs. We're gonna
have the energy sector building out like never before, high
paying career jobs, and if you're interested, I want you
to be ready for those jobs. I want you to
be ready for the semiconductor manufacturing facilities, the pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities,
(28:25):
the AI and robotic manufacturing facilities that they're going to
need workers and they're also going to need a very
well educated population to get in on this and be
productive members of this new technology. And I would add
to that, the tax cuts automatically are going to kick in,
and when that does, that's going to be economic growth, prosperity, hopefully,
(28:49):
the golden era that Donald Trump talks about. To me,
it's just fascinating. Did that interest you at all? Into
I wonder if I can hire about to replace you?
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Yeah, why don't you? Same sass.
Speaker 2 (29:03):
Will teach him to be sassy, sarcastic, you know, to
try and get me angry every day before the fool
of vinegar.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
It'll be great.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com