January 21, 2023 • 31 mins
Nicole Parker, former FBI Special Agent, talks about the agency, why she left and the Biden classified documents situation.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I had news round up information overload our eight hundred
and nine pot one Sean if you want to be
a part of the program. Just to an update, Joe
Biden late yesterday. No regrets at all, none whatsoever. Meanwhile,
the same guy that was saying, ah ow, oh wow,
how did this happen? It's so irresponsible talking about Donald Trump.
(00:23):
You know they could daver that he is. But anyway,
so he said, no regrets over handling classified information. There's
what he said. As we found, we found a handful
of documents were failed or filed in the wrong place.
We immediately turned them over to the archives in the
Justice Department. We're fully cooperating, looking forward to getting this
resolve quickly. I think you're gonna find there's nothing there.
(00:46):
I have no regrets. I'm following what their lawyers have
told me they want me to do. It's exactly what
we're doing. There's no there there, thank you. Now. There
were documents there in four different places, Joe, top secret
classified documents. Joe add that up. How is this so irresponsible? Anyway?
(01:07):
I think I'm funny. I'm not Karine. Jean Pierre. You
know it has been twisted in a pretzel all week.
I mean, the White House's letter hang out to dry
with no answers at all whatsoever is a montage of that.
What I can tell you right now is what the
President is share with you. What the President said to
all of you right which is he was surprised by this.
(01:29):
He definitely truly respects the process here, and also when
it comes to classified he takes classified documents very seriously.
That search was completed last night, and now this is
in the hands of the Justice Department. You should assume
that it's been completed. Yes, right, they completed the search
(01:51):
with documents being found last night. I have answered your
questions as almost every day on this issue. And again,
any anything else that you may have, anything that's related
to the review, I would refer to the Department of Justice.
You guys can ask me this one hundred times, two
hundred times if you wish. I'm going to keep saying
the same thing. Are you upset that you came out
(02:13):
to this podium on Friday with incomplete and inaccurate information
and are you concerned that it affects your credibility up here? Well,
I'm what I'm concerned about is making sure that we
do not politically interfere in the Department of Justice. That
we continue to be consistent. Now. Christopher Ray was at
the the FBI director was at the World Economic Forum.
(02:34):
They talked about how the FBI needs to partner with
big tech companies. That already happened in the lead up
to the twenty twenty election. The FBI had Hunter Biden's
laptop in December twenty nineteen. They could have verified it, Oh, certainly,
sure within thirty days. That would be the maximum time
(02:54):
they need. Because there's pictures of Hunter, videos of Hunter,
emails from Hunter, Hunter spoking crack, Hunter with hookers. You
got a Hunter with you know, doing all sorts of things,
Hunter implicating his father. But anyway, so they lead up
this effort and lead up to the twenty twenty election.
You got this guy a special agent, fairly newly hired
(03:15):
because he wrote a twenty He wrote a thesis on
the twenty sixteen election about how Donald Trump colluded with
Russia to win the twenty sixteen presidency, which is a lie.
He was heading up the effort to meet weekly with
all the big tech companies and warned them about quote,
disinformation campaigns from foreign adversaries, and they might even be
information according to the site Integrity Ahead at Twitter, this guy,
(03:41):
mister Roth, they might even be about Hunter. Oh really,
So when the New York Post broke the story about
Hunter's laptop, well, they have been prepping all these big
tech companies not to print such information, and they systematically
teamed up to coordinate and that to hide information from
(04:01):
the American people that was true about Joe and Hunter Biden. Anyway,
this all comes to a head a pretty powerful article
that it was on Foxnews dot com and it was
written by Nicole Parker. She was an incredible life story.
She was working for Merrill Lynch on September eleven, two
(04:22):
thousand and one, on the top floor of the World
Financial Center in New York City. She watched up close
the horrific, deadly terrorist attacks. They evacuated their building, they went,
they got to safety, thank god, thanks to the efforts
of the NYPD. We lost, as I've said so many times,
two thousand, nine hundred and seventy seven of our fellow Americans,
the worst attack on our soil and on the history
(04:46):
of this country. Anyway, it changed her. She left her
multi billion dollar hedge fund in two thousand and nine,
there were forty five thousand people that year that applied
to be FBI agents, and only nine hundred may the cut.
But she tells why she left the FBI. Here she
is Nicole Parker. Welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. Hi,
(05:06):
thank you so much for having me. I really appreciate it. Well.
I wanted to get out your background because the reason
you chose to do this, this was something that was
like a calling to you. Is that fair to say? Absolutely, Sean.
It was a mission. Most agents that joined the FBI,
there's a higher purpose, you know. I was in the
(05:28):
financial sector prior to joining the FBI, and much more
lucrative to work at a multibillion dollar hedge fund than
to work for the FBI. But I wasn't motivated by
making money. I knew the morning of September eleventh to
two thousand and one that it was the effort of
heroic individuals such as the NYPD officers that helped lead
me and my colleagues and others to safety. And I
(05:51):
knew that day that God had protected me, and I
wanted to do something in the future to give back
and to serve, And so the FBI was the vehicle
which I selected to give service back to this country.
I have been so blessed, and I believe that where
God gives you a lot, where much as given, much
as required, and I just wanted to give up back
(06:12):
and serve the people of the United States of America.
You are only about eight years away from retirement. You
served over twelve plus years at the FBI. Why did
you write this article, or more importantly, why did you
walk away from the FBI and why did you leave so?
Like I said, I didn't join the FBI for a pension.
(06:33):
I came because I genuinely wanted to help protect Americans,
uphold the Constitution, and serve And I had an amazing
experience at the FBI. I met incredible individuals. We worked
very large cases, but we really felt like we were
making a difference, and I felt like I was making
an impactful difference. Do you see so many things in
(06:56):
this world? As an FBI agent, you see a lot
of darkness, and sometimes you wonder am I really making
an impact? There is so much evil out there. Can
I even put a dent in this? But you look
at each individual, one by one that you are helping
and you do feel like you're making a difference. It
got to the point when I originally joined, we were all,
you know, I know, I was just focused on stopping
(07:18):
criminals and trying to put bad people behind bars. And
it seemed that was the trajectory that the FBI was on.
That was the focus, that's what we spoke about all
of the time. And it seemed that as the years progressed,
and especially in the last couple of years, it's almost
as if the priorities and the trajectory of the FBI changed.
And I was trying to be patient with the process, right,
(07:42):
I started kind of seeing things, and we all did,
and we kind of scrashed our heads a little bit,
but you know, we kept our heads low. We stayed
working on our cases and the different investigations that we
were assigned to. But it became so loud that it
was hard to keep your head low and just ignore
all of the things swirling around you. And that's when
(08:04):
I started to look at things, and myself in several
of my colleagues from around the country, we all had
similar concerns. So it's funny you say this because almost
everything you say in your column that you put up
on Foxnews dot Com. Has been told to me by
people that I know in the FBI, one that recently
retired the exact same thing, the shifting and recruiting practices,
(08:28):
lowering of eligibility requirements, politicizing the FBI. Now, Jim Jordan
on the Appropriations Committee is going to have a big
investigation into the question of whether the FBI has been
politicized and the Department of Justice weaponized. Based on your
experience what you saw, do you believe that's the case? Right? So, again,
(08:49):
I was working on the criminal side of the House,
and so I wasn't involved directly on any of these
investigations that seem to be a political nature. But it
is a large organization and we all feel the effects
of what's going on, regardless of a field office you're in.
It all comes from the top and you see what's
going on around the country. So although I may not
have been involved in it directly, I was feeling the
(09:10):
effects of it the American citizens who are seeing this
unravel behind before their eyes. They are watching and it
was making it difficult for us who had nothing to
do with this side of the House to do our
jobs because I'm going out trying to talk to witnesses,
you know, recruiting sources, and they it was almost like
(09:31):
a mistrust and I was constantly having to say, no, no,
I am not involved in that, Like I'm a trustworthy
FBI agent like I. You know, I'm just trying to
do the right thing. We're trying to fight violent crime
or whatever it might be. And it became, like I
said in the offed, almost exhausting to constantly have to
separate myself. You know, friends, family, you know, they'd always
(09:54):
be like, what is going on at the FBI. Well,
I'm just a field agent in the Miami DI And
how am I supposed to be held accountable and responsible
for what's going on? I have nothing to do with that,
But yet I was feeling the consequences of other people's behaviors.
I will tell you the FBI has you know, we
understand things that have happened in the past, certain employees
that have been removed from the FBI because of behavior
(10:18):
that was not in accordance with the FBI as principles.
And the problem is, it takes a long time to
regain the trust after that trust has been broken, right,
So something that may have happened back in twenty sixteen,
twenty and seventeen, It's going to take a lot of
time to rebuild the trust of the American people. For
a small destructive view employee's mistakes. I can't be held
(10:41):
accountable for their mistakes. But yet I was. And it
wasn't just one poticization. It seemed that constantly. It was
one thing after another, you know, and it just got
I almost felt like I was buried under something that
we had nothing to do with. Quick break right back.
Will continue with the Cole Parker, former FBI agent, Why
(11:01):
I left the FBI eight hundred and nine, Pot one, Shawn.
We get to your calls at the bottom of the
half hour. All right, We continue with Nicole Parker why
she left the FBI. The first of what will be
dozens of whistleblowers talking about how the FBI has been politicized.
Jim Jordan was on my TV show one night talking
about these whistleblowers. The very next day, Merrick Garland sent
(11:22):
out a quote memorandom or reminder that members of the
Department of Justice are not allowed to be talking to
members of Congress, meaning congressmen and senators. I thought we
had whistleblower protection laws. They are they are describing things
that should never happen to this organization. We now know
(11:45):
that the FBI was on a weekly basis talking with
big tech warning them that in twenty twenty that there
might be a massive disinformation campaign from some adversary or
adversarial country and it might involve Joe Biden or Hunter Biden.
And then lo and behold the Hunter Biden laptop comes out.
(12:07):
They had it since twenty nineteen. They could have corroborated it.
Everything in there is true. And yet they were telling
these these big tech companies be wary if you hear anything.
And then they they literally put their thumb on these
big tech companies. And Chris Ray was talking today at
the World Economic Forum about partnering with these big tech companies.
I'm like you already, are you paid Twitter three and
(12:29):
a half million? How much did you pay other big
tech companies? Right? And like I said, again, um, you
know we remember that email that came out. It was
by Believe in August. And you know again, I wasn't
a whistleblower. I wasn't asked to do anything of that nature.
But it was sent to all of us, and we
all kind of wondered, that's interesting. But again, there are
(12:52):
employees that may not agree with what's going on, but
it almost feels like it's bigger than yourself. You know,
you don't really feel like you're at the liberty to
be able to speak up. They can't speak up because
they don't want to target on their back. They don't
want to be looked at as a problematic employee. They
don't want to be difficult, but they genuinely have concerns
about what's going on, and then you know, they see
(13:14):
an email like that and then they're like, oh, I,
you know, we're giving a whistle blower training at the bureau,
and so when you take that training, you want to
think that that protection is there. And so it just
became difficult for people that we're seeing things to be
able to speak up. You know, the FBI is all
about being a safe place, and you know, a safe
(13:34):
place for us to work as far as you know,
feeling comfortable about who you are and you know different
well apparently not entities, but at the same time, those employees,
they want to feel safe when they're going to speak
up and share their genuine concern the last thing. They
did this in twenty sixteen. They sent FBI agents to
(13:55):
interview Christopher Steele in twenty sixteen, in October early October.
They were in August at twenty sixteen not to trust
the dossier Christopher Steele. They offered him a million dollars
to verify it. He couldn't get his million dollars. But
then they James Comey signed that FIS application that said
it was verified, and they used every bit of the dossiers,
(14:15):
the bulk of information, and nothing happened to him. But
I only have about ten seconds, right, I mean, the
bottom line is an FBI agent, you should be operating
with the highest level of integrity. Any FBI employee, Americas
deserve that you should be operating with the highest level
of integrity, regardless of your political persuasion. That is the
right thing to do, and that is what Americas deserve. Well,
we really appreciate your bravery, Nicole Parker. You're the first
(14:37):
of I think we will be many FBI agents talking
about this. Thank you for your service, and I think
it was very courageous for you to tell the truth.
Thank you, Thank you for having me. Eight hundred nine
one Shawn our number twenty five to the top of
the hour. We'll get to your calls. Eight hundred nine
four one Shawn this final half hour on a Friday
Hannity Tonight Studio audience show ninety Eastern on the News Channel.
(15:02):
You may not know this, but there are people all
over the world, criminals, and they are targeting American homeowners.
And what they are doing is they go search the
Internet and they look for your home title. Your home
title is the document that proves you own your home,
and you can find it very easily online. And these
(15:23):
steves will forge your signature on a legal document and
claim that you sold them your home, and then they'll
go out and take out loans on your home. They disappear.
You don't find out till you get a late payment
notice or even a foreclosure notice. And you know what
they're getting away with it in massive numbers. It's called
home title lock. Now, the way to protect yourself is
(15:45):
with home title lock dot com slash Sean, I want
to offer you a free check of your own home title.
In other words, if you go to home title lock
dot com slash on first verify your home's title is
still safely in your name, you register your address, and
for free you'll get a no obligation home title report.
You can put it in your files. It's one hundred
(16:08):
dollar value, absolutely free. And this way you're not going
to be a victim of this. A lot of homeowners
insurance and some common identity theft programs they don't protect
you on this very thing anyway. Free no obligation home
title report for your files, one hundred dollar value for
free when you go to hometitlelock dot com slash shan
that's home titlelock dot com slash shan se a n
(16:32):
all right, it's been a crazy week. Let me let's
do a little recap here and then we'll get to
your calls. Here you have Karine's Jean Pierre, you know,
literally contradicting yourself, you know, twisted up in a pretzel,
the mob and the media getting frustrated with her. Everybody
knows she's just outright lying or just stalling and not
(16:52):
telling us the truth. Then you got the media with
their conspiracy theories. A Republicans probably planted all of this
in Joe's lock garage. Remember Joe said it was always locked.
Except for all the photos we have of the garage
door wide open where you can see the top secret documents,
UM and the media putting that forward and uh and
(17:13):
then Schumer, you know what a different take from him. Oh,
it's not a big deal. And then just think back
how all these Democrats are like, put Trump in jail.
You can't get him in jail soon enough. Merrick Garland,
Christopher Ray did the right thing. Here's like our weekly
recap of insanity. But you don't know how it's appealed
(17:33):
to me. If you're missing information, I don't be lamping.
If stuff is missing, I know it's gonna be like
oppo research to you. Does it feel like the Republicans
are behind it? I'm suspicious of the timing of it.
I'm also aware of the fact that things can be
planted on people. You see, so many of her questions
(17:56):
have been referred to the DOJ and to the Way
House Counsel's office. I'm sure you can understand it. We're
in sort of information blackout where DOJ refers us to
the Special Counsel. They're not holding any brief things. White
House Counsel reforces us to DOJ. So if you are
not able to talk about this from the program, would
you invite a DOJ official to take our questions here
(18:19):
to the brief, No, you would have to go to
the Department of Justice. That is not This is a
legal matter that is currently happening at the Department of Justice.
And the President has been very very clear when it
comes to these types of legal matters, when it comes
to investigations, he's not going to interfere. He wants to
make sure that we give back the independence that the
Department Justice should have when it comes to these types
(18:40):
of investigation. So certainly would not be bringing them here,
So I would refer to the Department of Justice. I
I was just very clear if you have any questions,
I would refer to the White House Counsel's Office. I'm
having a hard time understanding why. I just questions about
we shall see here we should and I just said,
and I just said to you, the White House Counsel's
(19:01):
Office will be able to address that question. Its President.
I am satisfied with the current sop of handling classified
materials here and turning them over to National Archives. Yea,
I will refer you to the White House Council's Office.
They are they're the people who would be able to
answer that question about classified information. From this point on,
(19:22):
are you not going to be taking questions about the
classified doctor. I have been very clear over and over again,
we are going to be prudent here. We're going to
be consistent. This particular matter is being is being looked at.
There's a legal process currently happening in the Department of Justice,
and I'm going to refer you to the Department of
Justice on any specifics to this particular case and anything
(19:46):
that has to deal with our what we're doing here,
I would refer to the White House Council's Office. And
let me remind you this is this is this is
not a new process here. We've been doing this for
the past two years. Anything that is really related to
a legal process, a legal matter, we refer to the
Department of Justice. There's nothing new in our process. We've
(20:07):
all reached out the Department of Justice. Law enforcement official
Towns NBC News the Justice Department has not told the
White House that it cannot talk about the facts underlying
the Special Counsel investigation and to classified documents. So trusting
you've received that same information, understanding the desire to be prudent,
then why can't speak by the underlying facts. We've been
very clear when it comes to even underlying facts, when
(20:30):
it comes to specifics, when it comes to something that
is under the purview is that the Department of Justice
is looking at, especially legal matters, investigations, we do not
comment from here, Peter. That has been consistent. So we've
been that very consistent. Bob Hower, who represents the president's
personal attorney, over the weekend, said that one of the
reasons why and he and Sam's your colleague who represents
(20:51):
who speaks on behalf of the special Counsel at the
White House, spoke to this in some form yesterday, but
he said one of the reasons why they shouldn't reveal
further details right now was regular ongoing public disclosures also
posed the risk that has further information develops, answers provided
on this periodic basis may be incomplete. When the White
House did release a statement, the Present spoke out on
(21:13):
January nine, the risk of incompletion was a function of
the White House's decision not to share all the information
anew In fact, because we knew on November second, then
the first discovery was made. We knew the second discovery
was made on December twentieth, So there's a risk of incompletion.
But will you conceive that it's the White House that
(21:34):
has been incomplete and its provision of information when it
did choose to speak out positive January. High Collie actually
dealt with this question on the call yesterday when the
White House Councils of the same as you as you
and I would refer you to the White House Councils.
I have to have to get in and have to
say this. You seem much more measured about this than
(21:56):
with the Trump documents, because you call for transparency with
the Trump documents. You want to lawmakers have access to
the documents sees from the former president his residence in Florida,
which it seems like you. Bottom line is I said
that night it's premature to comment on what should be done,
and I said to try that. Yes for President Trump,
that's exactly right. I think consistent classified material next year. Corvette,
(22:21):
what were you thinking? Let mean, we're gonna get a
chance to speak on all of this, God Williams soon.
But as I said earlier this week, people, and by
the way, my corvettes in the law karage. Okay, So
it's not like you're sitting out in the street anyway. Yes,
as well as my corvette. Um. But as I said
earlier this week, people know I take classified documents and
(22:45):
classified materials seriously. It just doesn't get any crazier than this.
But that's what you come to expect from liberal Democrats.
All Right, eight hundred nine for one, Sean is our number.
If you want to be a part of the program. Uh,
let's say high to Paul Is in West Virginia. Hey, Paul,
how are you glad you called? Sir? I'm doing great, Sean,
(23:05):
It's great to talk to you. Great to talk to you.
You just did it again. You know, every time you
do one of those recaps we got. I'm one of
these guys driving home listening to the radio and we
yell at the radio. But nothing's ever gonna happen. That happens. Well,
it happens a lot listening to you, and actually that's
kind of a good thing. Well listen, yes, Ed, No,
(23:30):
do I think anything's going to happen on the document issue? No,
we know. Look as if Hillary Clinton got away with
everything she did, including deleting with bleach Pit thirty three
thousand emails and beating up hammers and I'm beating up
blackberries and iPhones with hammers and removing SIM cards. And
then she had more top secret classified information than anybody
(23:52):
on her many servers that she shouldn't have had. It's
the double standard is so glaring with the radar on
Mara Lago that I think that even Merrick Garland, I
think they're scared. The timing couldn't be worse for them,
because Jim Jordan is going to be all over this
in the Appropriations Committee. Here's where the Bidens have their
(24:14):
greatest vulnerability. Follow the money. Look at China Hunter Biden's
hundred thousand dollars shopping spree with the Chinese National Look
at the Penn Biden Center. Sixty seven million of that
sixty seven forty seven point seven came in just as
Joe left the White House and was setting up shop
(24:36):
at Upen. And then, by the way, another fourteen million
came in even after that. And then professors at Upen
write a letter to Merrick Garland to stop the investigation
of Espion Holage by the Chinese against us, and he
did it. Then you can add the other money, the
one point five billion dollar deal Bank of China. Then
(24:57):
you can add the five million, five million dollar no
interest forgivable loan. Wouldn't you like that? By the way, Paul,
would you if I gave you a five million dollars
no interest forgivable loan? What would you consider that? Yes?
I would. I would consider that for sure. Would you
a good deal to me? And would you pay me back?
Or would you say, well, it's forgivable, so I don't
(25:18):
need to pay you back. Well, I'm in the real world,
and I would probably make an honest effort. I don't
think I could have forty five million dollars loan, so well,
but if it's forgivable kind of there's a message there
isn't it isn't forgivable, mean, don't worry about it. Here's
five million dollars. There is for people who don't have
any any sense of standards in their lives. I guess yeh.
(25:40):
Would that be the whole Biden family? Now we're only
talking about China. What about Russia? What about Kazakhstan? What
about you know, Ukraine? You got my point, that's where
they're most vulnerable. Yeah, most you know the population in
the United States. I believe it's right at fifty or
six percent are under forty years old now, and they
(26:03):
have no clue really as to what China or Russia
is even about. They don't know what communism means, and
on the most part, I think some of these young
folks even would prefer it over what we've got going
on here. I see it every day. You see it
more than I do. Well, listen, I am. I am
telling you. It's You're absolutely right. That's sad. That's pretty sad.
(26:26):
You know. I called because I don't. You don't do it.
You point things out to people for a reason. I'm
pretty sure this is the reason is for people to
get involved. And we've got a lot of different things
that we can do. We can call our representatives, mainly
for therapy. I write letters to the newspapers and about
I get about ten a year in the paper, and man,
(26:48):
that's some great therapy there. But I think the most
important thing people can do is to teach their kids
what reality really is. Hardest job in the world is
being apparent my friend, UH, appreciate it eight hundred nine one.
You know, I naively thought I'd send my kids to
college and my job was done. No, I couldn't have
(27:10):
been more wrong in my life than to actually believe
that because I, unlike my parents, I was a helicopter parent.
Just I grew were in a helicopter parent. I was
with my kids. I had eyes on them at all.
That's different. That's not a helicopter parent. It's absolutely a
helicopter No, you were an engaged parent. Parenting is supposed
(27:30):
to be involved, engaged, paying attention. I get. I would
get off the school bus, get on my bicycle, and
my parents had no clue where I was. That's different.
That was its time in this country when you could
actually live your life and go outside and not be
afraid that your kid would be raped, mutilated, abducted, hurt,
(27:50):
sold fetanyl drugs. I mean, it just was a different time.
So it really was. Listen, I've told my kids, I said,
and they listen to the stories about me as a kid.
They're like, why do you Why didn't you let us
do stuff like that? And I'm like, because times have
changed and and listen, it all worked out. But it's
just different. I thought, you know, I was independent since
(28:10):
I was ten. My parents when I'm twelve years old
and washing dishes till two to three in the morning
and coming home on my bicycle, which is what I did.
And when I'm cooking and I'm intending bar and last
call is four o'clock and I'd leave the bar at
four thirty and then i'd go to the diner and
it's you know, the sun's up by the time I
(28:32):
get home. It was a very different life. My parents
never they never said where were you? What were you doing?
You know, they would see usually my father would see
a big pile of WATA cash. It would either be
on my bed or in my pocket, and end up
taking three quarters of it, putting it in a bank account.
And I ended up using that money. That was my
(28:52):
money for the college that I had, and I used
all of it for that. But how many parents are
not engaged now? Look at the parents of today, they're
they're totally checked out. But my parents had no clue
where I was. It's a different checked out. Your parents
were working. These parents are on Facebook. It's completely different.
I don't know about it. That's a problem. I can't
even imagine my parents on Facebook. I mean, seriously, you
(29:16):
know what I'm saying. I love the generation of people.
So I don't know how to work this damn phone.
That's the people I want to hang out with. Lay
that right now. Listen. I have some regrets that I
didn't appreciate who they were and how hard their lives were.
I didn't. Let me tell you something, sure, the people
of today could never do what the people that went
through the storm the beaches of Normandy and fought for
us in World War two. Forget about. There were many
(29:38):
of us that can. Oh, there are there, but there
are a lot of us that can't because they're lazy
and they're leaning on the government. There's a lot of
snowflakes out there. I'll forget about it. It's a freaking blizzard.
Eight hundred nine one. Sean. Hey, I've been telling you
if you believe in the sanctity of life, this is
a great organization I want to tell you about. And
they use the science of ultrasound to to save babies
(30:01):
from abortion. And by the way, they don't get a
penny from the federal government. It's only because of your
generous donations that they're able to do this. You know.
Abortions now continue to rise at an alarming rate, the
abortion pill accounting for what over fifty percent of all abortions,
it's getting harder. So anyway they use science, ultrasound is
so much different, Linda. You know, with Liam, I was
(30:23):
assumed you're probably at four d am sure I did.
The last one looked like he was wayman to me. Yeah,
I mean you could see their fingers and their toes
and their face. By the way, very early in pregnancy,
you see a lot of details that you never saw before.
Heartbeat six weeks so preborn they give these ultrasounds for
free to expecting mothers or people that have unplanned pregnancies.
(30:45):
And what they've discovered is once people see the child
growing inside them, hear that heartbeat, they're twice as likely
to choose life now. Preborn offers a ton of other services, counseling, diapers,
baby formula, baby clothes, full assistance up to two years.
Whatever you need, they're gonna help you. An ultrasound is
(31:07):
twenty eight bucks. They can only give them because of
your generous donations. They don't get a penny from the government.
And if you want to help this great cause, and
I'm going to be helping them, dial pound two fifty.
Say the keyword baby, pound two fifty, keyword baby, or
you can donate securely online at preborn dot com slash sean.
That's preborn dot com slash sean. Every gift, tax deductible,
(31:28):
one hundred percent of your donation goes to saving babies.
Preborn dot com slash shan
I had news round up information overload our eight hundred
and nine pot one Sean if you want to be
a part of the program. Just to an update, Joe
Biden late yesterday. No regrets at all, none whatsoever. Meanwhile,
the same guy that was saying, ah ow, oh wow,
how did this happen? It's so irresponsible talking about Donald Trump.
(00:23):
You know they could daver that he is. But anyway,
so he said, no regrets over handling classified information. There's
what he said. As we found, we found a handful
of documents were failed or filed in the wrong place.
We immediately turned them over to the archives in the
Justice Department. We're fully cooperating, looking forward to getting this
resolve quickly. I think you're gonna find there's nothing there.
(00:46):
I have no regrets. I'm following what their lawyers have
told me they want me to do. It's exactly what
we're doing. There's no there there, thank you. Now. There
were documents there in four different places, Joe, top secret
classified documents. Joe add that up. How is this so irresponsible? Anyway?
(01:07):
I think I'm funny. I'm not Karine. Jean Pierre. You
know it has been twisted in a pretzel all week.
I mean, the White House's letter hang out to dry
with no answers at all whatsoever is a montage of that.
What I can tell you right now is what the
President is share with you. What the President said to
all of you right which is he was surprised by this.
(01:29):
He definitely truly respects the process here, and also when
it comes to classified he takes classified documents very seriously.
That search was completed last night, and now this is
in the hands of the Justice Department. You should assume
that it's been completed. Yes, right, they completed the search
(01:51):
with documents being found last night. I have answered your
questions as almost every day on this issue. And again,
any anything else that you may have, anything that's related
to the review, I would refer to the Department of Justice.
You guys can ask me this one hundred times, two
hundred times if you wish. I'm going to keep saying
the same thing. Are you upset that you came out
(02:13):
to this podium on Friday with incomplete and inaccurate information
and are you concerned that it affects your credibility up here? Well,
I'm what I'm concerned about is making sure that we
do not politically interfere in the Department of Justice. That
we continue to be consistent. Now. Christopher Ray was at
the the FBI director was at the World Economic Forum.
(02:34):
They talked about how the FBI needs to partner with
big tech companies. That already happened in the lead up
to the twenty twenty election. The FBI had Hunter Biden's
laptop in December twenty nineteen. They could have verified it, Oh, certainly,
sure within thirty days. That would be the maximum time
(02:54):
they need. Because there's pictures of Hunter, videos of Hunter,
emails from Hunter, Hunter spoking crack, Hunter with hookers. You
got a Hunter with you know, doing all sorts of things,
Hunter implicating his father. But anyway, so they lead up
this effort and lead up to the twenty twenty election.
You got this guy a special agent, fairly newly hired
(03:15):
because he wrote a twenty He wrote a thesis on
the twenty sixteen election about how Donald Trump colluded with
Russia to win the twenty sixteen presidency, which is a lie.
He was heading up the effort to meet weekly with
all the big tech companies and warned them about quote,
disinformation campaigns from foreign adversaries, and they might even be
information according to the site Integrity Ahead at Twitter, this guy,
(03:41):
mister Roth, they might even be about Hunter. Oh really,
So when the New York Post broke the story about
Hunter's laptop, well, they have been prepping all these big
tech companies not to print such information, and they systematically
teamed up to coordinate and that to hide information from
(04:01):
the American people that was true about Joe and Hunter Biden. Anyway,
this all comes to a head a pretty powerful article
that it was on Foxnews dot com and it was
written by Nicole Parker. She was an incredible life story.
She was working for Merrill Lynch on September eleven, two
(04:22):
thousand and one, on the top floor of the World
Financial Center in New York City. She watched up close
the horrific, deadly terrorist attacks. They evacuated their building, they went,
they got to safety, thank god, thanks to the efforts
of the NYPD. We lost, as I've said so many times,
two thousand, nine hundred and seventy seven of our fellow Americans,
the worst attack on our soil and on the history
(04:46):
of this country. Anyway, it changed her. She left her
multi billion dollar hedge fund in two thousand and nine,
there were forty five thousand people that year that applied
to be FBI agents, and only nine hundred may the cut.
But she tells why she left the FBI. Here she
is Nicole Parker. Welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. Hi,
(05:06):
thank you so much for having me. I really appreciate it. Well.
I wanted to get out your background because the reason
you chose to do this, this was something that was
like a calling to you. Is that fair to say? Absolutely, Sean.
It was a mission. Most agents that joined the FBI,
there's a higher purpose, you know. I was in the
(05:28):
financial sector prior to joining the FBI, and much more
lucrative to work at a multibillion dollar hedge fund than
to work for the FBI. But I wasn't motivated by
making money. I knew the morning of September eleventh to
two thousand and one that it was the effort of
heroic individuals such as the NYPD officers that helped lead
me and my colleagues and others to safety. And I
(05:51):
knew that day that God had protected me, and I
wanted to do something in the future to give back
and to serve, And so the FBI was the vehicle
which I selected to give service back to this country.
I have been so blessed, and I believe that where
God gives you a lot, where much as given, much
as required, and I just wanted to give up back
(06:12):
and serve the people of the United States of America.
You are only about eight years away from retirement. You
served over twelve plus years at the FBI. Why did
you write this article, or more importantly, why did you
walk away from the FBI and why did you leave so?
Like I said, I didn't join the FBI for a pension.
(06:33):
I came because I genuinely wanted to help protect Americans,
uphold the Constitution, and serve And I had an amazing
experience at the FBI. I met incredible individuals. We worked
very large cases, but we really felt like we were
making a difference, and I felt like I was making
an impactful difference. Do you see so many things in
(06:56):
this world? As an FBI agent, you see a lot
of darkness, and sometimes you wonder am I really making
an impact? There is so much evil out there. Can
I even put a dent in this? But you look
at each individual, one by one that you are helping
and you do feel like you're making a difference. It
got to the point when I originally joined, we were all,
you know, I know, I was just focused on stopping
(07:18):
criminals and trying to put bad people behind bars. And
it seemed that was the trajectory that the FBI was on.
That was the focus, that's what we spoke about all
of the time. And it seemed that as the years progressed,
and especially in the last couple of years, it's almost
as if the priorities and the trajectory of the FBI changed.
And I was trying to be patient with the process, right,
(07:42):
I started kind of seeing things, and we all did,
and we kind of scrashed our heads a little bit,
but you know, we kept our heads low. We stayed
working on our cases and the different investigations that we
were assigned to. But it became so loud that it
was hard to keep your head low and just ignore
all of the things swirling around you. And that's when
(08:04):
I started to look at things, and myself in several
of my colleagues from around the country, we all had
similar concerns. So it's funny you say this because almost
everything you say in your column that you put up
on Foxnews dot Com. Has been told to me by
people that I know in the FBI, one that recently
retired the exact same thing, the shifting and recruiting practices,
(08:28):
lowering of eligibility requirements, politicizing the FBI. Now, Jim Jordan
on the Appropriations Committee is going to have a big
investigation into the question of whether the FBI has been
politicized and the Department of Justice weaponized. Based on your
experience what you saw, do you believe that's the case? Right? So, again,
(08:49):
I was working on the criminal side of the House,
and so I wasn't involved directly on any of these
investigations that seem to be a political nature. But it
is a large organization and we all feel the effects
of what's going on, regardless of a field office you're in.
It all comes from the top and you see what's
going on around the country. So although I may not
have been involved in it directly, I was feeling the
(09:10):
effects of it the American citizens who are seeing this
unravel behind before their eyes. They are watching and it
was making it difficult for us who had nothing to
do with this side of the House to do our
jobs because I'm going out trying to talk to witnesses,
you know, recruiting sources, and they it was almost like
(09:31):
a mistrust and I was constantly having to say, no, no,
I am not involved in that, Like I'm a trustworthy
FBI agent like I. You know, I'm just trying to
do the right thing. We're trying to fight violent crime
or whatever it might be. And it became, like I
said in the offed, almost exhausting to constantly have to
separate myself. You know, friends, family, you know, they'd always
(09:54):
be like, what is going on at the FBI. Well,
I'm just a field agent in the Miami DI And
how am I supposed to be held accountable and responsible
for what's going on? I have nothing to do with that,
But yet I was feeling the consequences of other people's behaviors.
I will tell you the FBI has you know, we
understand things that have happened in the past, certain employees
that have been removed from the FBI because of behavior
(10:18):
that was not in accordance with the FBI as principles.
And the problem is, it takes a long time to
regain the trust after that trust has been broken, right,
So something that may have happened back in twenty sixteen,
twenty and seventeen, It's going to take a lot of
time to rebuild the trust of the American people. For
a small destructive view employee's mistakes. I can't be held
(10:41):
accountable for their mistakes. But yet I was. And it
wasn't just one poticization. It seemed that constantly. It was
one thing after another, you know, and it just got
I almost felt like I was buried under something that
we had nothing to do with. Quick break right back.
Will continue with the Cole Parker, former FBI agent, Why
(11:01):
I left the FBI eight hundred and nine, Pot one, Shawn.
We get to your calls at the bottom of the
half hour. All right, We continue with Nicole Parker why
she left the FBI. The first of what will be
dozens of whistleblowers talking about how the FBI has been politicized.
Jim Jordan was on my TV show one night talking
about these whistleblowers. The very next day, Merrick Garland sent
(11:22):
out a quote memorandom or reminder that members of the
Department of Justice are not allowed to be talking to
members of Congress, meaning congressmen and senators. I thought we
had whistleblower protection laws. They are they are describing things
that should never happen to this organization. We now know
(11:45):
that the FBI was on a weekly basis talking with
big tech warning them that in twenty twenty that there
might be a massive disinformation campaign from some adversary or
adversarial country and it might involve Joe Biden or Hunter Biden.
And then lo and behold the Hunter Biden laptop comes out.
(12:07):
They had it since twenty nineteen. They could have corroborated it.
Everything in there is true. And yet they were telling
these these big tech companies be wary if you hear anything.
And then they they literally put their thumb on these
big tech companies. And Chris Ray was talking today at
the World Economic Forum about partnering with these big tech companies.
I'm like you already, are you paid Twitter three and
(12:29):
a half million? How much did you pay other big
tech companies? Right? And like I said, again, um, you
know we remember that email that came out. It was
by Believe in August. And you know again, I wasn't
a whistleblower. I wasn't asked to do anything of that nature.
But it was sent to all of us, and we
all kind of wondered, that's interesting. But again, there are
(12:52):
employees that may not agree with what's going on, but
it almost feels like it's bigger than yourself. You know,
you don't really feel like you're at the liberty to
be able to speak up. They can't speak up because
they don't want to target on their back. They don't
want to be looked at as a problematic employee. They
don't want to be difficult, but they genuinely have concerns
about what's going on, and then you know, they see
(13:14):
an email like that and then they're like, oh, I,
you know, we're giving a whistle blower training at the bureau,
and so when you take that training, you want to
think that that protection is there. And so it just
became difficult for people that we're seeing things to be
able to speak up. You know, the FBI is all
about being a safe place, and you know, a safe
(13:34):
place for us to work as far as you know,
feeling comfortable about who you are and you know different
well apparently not entities, but at the same time, those employees,
they want to feel safe when they're going to speak
up and share their genuine concern the last thing. They
did this in twenty sixteen. They sent FBI agents to
(13:55):
interview Christopher Steele in twenty sixteen, in October early October.
They were in August at twenty sixteen not to trust
the dossier Christopher Steele. They offered him a million dollars
to verify it. He couldn't get his million dollars. But
then they James Comey signed that FIS application that said
it was verified, and they used every bit of the dossiers,
(14:15):
the bulk of information, and nothing happened to him. But
I only have about ten seconds, right, I mean, the
bottom line is an FBI agent, you should be operating
with the highest level of integrity. Any FBI employee, Americas
deserve that you should be operating with the highest level
of integrity, regardless of your political persuasion. That is the
right thing to do, and that is what Americas deserve. Well,
we really appreciate your bravery, Nicole Parker. You're the first
(14:37):
of I think we will be many FBI agents talking
about this. Thank you for your service, and I think
it was very courageous for you to tell the truth.
Thank you, Thank you for having me. Eight hundred nine
one Shawn our number twenty five to the top of
the hour. We'll get to your calls. Eight hundred nine
four one Shawn this final half hour on a Friday
Hannity Tonight Studio audience show ninety Eastern on the News Channel.
(15:02):
You may not know this, but there are people all
over the world, criminals, and they are targeting American homeowners.
And what they are doing is they go search the
Internet and they look for your home title. Your home
title is the document that proves you own your home,
and you can find it very easily online. And these
(15:23):
steves will forge your signature on a legal document and
claim that you sold them your home, and then they'll
go out and take out loans on your home. They disappear.
You don't find out till you get a late payment
notice or even a foreclosure notice. And you know what
they're getting away with it in massive numbers. It's called
home title lock. Now, the way to protect yourself is
(15:45):
with home title lock dot com slash Sean, I want
to offer you a free check of your own home title.
In other words, if you go to home title lock
dot com slash on first verify your home's title is
still safely in your name, you register your address, and
for free you'll get a no obligation home title report.
You can put it in your files. It's one hundred
(16:08):
dollar value, absolutely free. And this way you're not going
to be a victim of this. A lot of homeowners
insurance and some common identity theft programs they don't protect
you on this very thing anyway. Free no obligation home
title report for your files, one hundred dollar value for
free when you go to hometitlelock dot com slash shan
that's home titlelock dot com slash shan se a n
(16:32):
all right, it's been a crazy week. Let me let's
do a little recap here and then we'll get to
your calls. Here you have Karine's Jean Pierre, you know,
literally contradicting yourself, you know, twisted up in a pretzel,
the mob and the media getting frustrated with her. Everybody
knows she's just outright lying or just stalling and not
(16:52):
telling us the truth. Then you got the media with
their conspiracy theories. A Republicans probably planted all of this
in Joe's lock garage. Remember Joe said it was always locked.
Except for all the photos we have of the garage
door wide open where you can see the top secret documents,
UM and the media putting that forward and uh and
(17:13):
then Schumer, you know what a different take from him. Oh,
it's not a big deal. And then just think back
how all these Democrats are like, put Trump in jail.
You can't get him in jail soon enough. Merrick Garland,
Christopher Ray did the right thing. Here's like our weekly
recap of insanity. But you don't know how it's appealed
(17:33):
to me. If you're missing information, I don't be lamping.
If stuff is missing, I know it's gonna be like
oppo research to you. Does it feel like the Republicans
are behind it? I'm suspicious of the timing of it.
I'm also aware of the fact that things can be
planted on people. You see, so many of her questions
(17:56):
have been referred to the DOJ and to the Way
House Counsel's office. I'm sure you can understand it. We're
in sort of information blackout where DOJ refers us to
the Special Counsel. They're not holding any brief things. White
House Counsel reforces us to DOJ. So if you are
not able to talk about this from the program, would
you invite a DOJ official to take our questions here
(18:19):
to the brief, No, you would have to go to
the Department of Justice. That is not This is a
legal matter that is currently happening at the Department of Justice.
And the President has been very very clear when it
comes to these types of legal matters, when it comes
to investigations, he's not going to interfere. He wants to
make sure that we give back the independence that the
Department Justice should have when it comes to these types
(18:40):
of investigation. So certainly would not be bringing them here,
So I would refer to the Department of Justice. I
I was just very clear if you have any questions,
I would refer to the White House Counsel's Office. I'm
having a hard time understanding why. I just questions about
we shall see here we should and I just said,
and I just said to you, the White House Counsel's
(19:01):
Office will be able to address that question. Its President.
I am satisfied with the current sop of handling classified
materials here and turning them over to National Archives. Yea,
I will refer you to the White House Council's Office.
They are they're the people who would be able to
answer that question about classified information. From this point on,
(19:22):
are you not going to be taking questions about the
classified doctor. I have been very clear over and over again,
we are going to be prudent here. We're going to
be consistent. This particular matter is being is being looked at.
There's a legal process currently happening in the Department of Justice,
and I'm going to refer you to the Department of
Justice on any specifics to this particular case and anything
(19:46):
that has to deal with our what we're doing here,
I would refer to the White House Council's Office. And
let me remind you this is this is this is
not a new process here. We've been doing this for
the past two years. Anything that is really related to
a legal process, a legal matter, we refer to the
Department of Justice. There's nothing new in our process. We've
(20:07):
all reached out the Department of Justice. Law enforcement official
Towns NBC News the Justice Department has not told the
White House that it cannot talk about the facts underlying
the Special Counsel investigation and to classified documents. So trusting
you've received that same information, understanding the desire to be prudent,
then why can't speak by the underlying facts. We've been
very clear when it comes to even underlying facts, when
(20:30):
it comes to specifics, when it comes to something that
is under the purview is that the Department of Justice
is looking at, especially legal matters, investigations, we do not
comment from here, Peter. That has been consistent. So we've
been that very consistent. Bob Hower, who represents the president's
personal attorney, over the weekend, said that one of the
reasons why and he and Sam's your colleague who represents
(20:51):
who speaks on behalf of the special Counsel at the
White House, spoke to this in some form yesterday, but
he said one of the reasons why they shouldn't reveal
further details right now was regular ongoing public disclosures also
posed the risk that has further information develops, answers provided
on this periodic basis may be incomplete. When the White
House did release a statement, the Present spoke out on
(21:13):
January nine, the risk of incompletion was a function of
the White House's decision not to share all the information
anew In fact, because we knew on November second, then
the first discovery was made. We knew the second discovery
was made on December twentieth, So there's a risk of incompletion.
But will you conceive that it's the White House that
(21:34):
has been incomplete and its provision of information when it
did choose to speak out positive January. High Collie actually
dealt with this question on the call yesterday when the
White House Councils of the same as you as you
and I would refer you to the White House Councils.
I have to have to get in and have to
say this. You seem much more measured about this than
(21:56):
with the Trump documents, because you call for transparency with
the Trump documents. You want to lawmakers have access to
the documents sees from the former president his residence in Florida,
which it seems like you. Bottom line is I said
that night it's premature to comment on what should be done,
and I said to try that. Yes for President Trump,
that's exactly right. I think consistent classified material next year. Corvette,
(22:21):
what were you thinking? Let mean, we're gonna get a
chance to speak on all of this, God Williams soon.
But as I said earlier this week, people, and by
the way, my corvettes in the law karage. Okay, So
it's not like you're sitting out in the street anyway. Yes,
as well as my corvette. Um. But as I said
earlier this week, people know I take classified documents and
(22:45):
classified materials seriously. It just doesn't get any crazier than this.
But that's what you come to expect from liberal Democrats.
All Right, eight hundred nine for one, Sean is our number.
If you want to be a part of the program. Uh,
let's say high to Paul Is in West Virginia. Hey, Paul,
how are you glad you called? Sir? I'm doing great, Sean,
(23:05):
It's great to talk to you. Great to talk to you.
You just did it again. You know, every time you
do one of those recaps we got. I'm one of
these guys driving home listening to the radio and we
yell at the radio. But nothing's ever gonna happen. That happens. Well,
it happens a lot listening to you, and actually that's
kind of a good thing. Well listen, yes, Ed, No,
(23:30):
do I think anything's going to happen on the document issue? No,
we know. Look as if Hillary Clinton got away with
everything she did, including deleting with bleach Pit thirty three
thousand emails and beating up hammers and I'm beating up
blackberries and iPhones with hammers and removing SIM cards. And
then she had more top secret classified information than anybody
(23:52):
on her many servers that she shouldn't have had. It's
the double standard is so glaring with the radar on
Mara Lago that I think that even Merrick Garland, I
think they're scared. The timing couldn't be worse for them,
because Jim Jordan is going to be all over this
in the Appropriations Committee. Here's where the Bidens have their
(24:14):
greatest vulnerability. Follow the money. Look at China Hunter Biden's
hundred thousand dollars shopping spree with the Chinese National Look
at the Penn Biden Center. Sixty seven million of that
sixty seven forty seven point seven came in just as
Joe left the White House and was setting up shop
(24:36):
at Upen. And then, by the way, another fourteen million
came in even after that. And then professors at Upen
write a letter to Merrick Garland to stop the investigation
of Espion Holage by the Chinese against us, and he
did it. Then you can add the other money, the
one point five billion dollar deal Bank of China. Then
(24:57):
you can add the five million, five million dollar no
interest forgivable loan. Wouldn't you like that? By the way, Paul,
would you if I gave you a five million dollars
no interest forgivable loan? What would you consider that? Yes?
I would. I would consider that for sure. Would you
a good deal to me? And would you pay me back?
Or would you say, well, it's forgivable, so I don't
(25:18):
need to pay you back. Well, I'm in the real world,
and I would probably make an honest effort. I don't
think I could have forty five million dollars loan, so well,
but if it's forgivable kind of there's a message there
isn't it isn't forgivable, mean, don't worry about it. Here's
five million dollars. There is for people who don't have
any any sense of standards in their lives. I guess yeh.
(25:40):
Would that be the whole Biden family? Now we're only
talking about China. What about Russia? What about Kazakhstan? What
about you know, Ukraine? You got my point, that's where
they're most vulnerable. Yeah, most you know the population in
the United States. I believe it's right at fifty or
six percent are under forty years old now, and they
(26:03):
have no clue really as to what China or Russia
is even about. They don't know what communism means, and
on the most part, I think some of these young
folks even would prefer it over what we've got going
on here. I see it every day. You see it
more than I do. Well, listen, I am. I am
telling you. It's You're absolutely right. That's sad. That's pretty sad.
(26:26):
You know. I called because I don't. You don't do it.
You point things out to people for a reason. I'm
pretty sure this is the reason is for people to
get involved. And we've got a lot of different things
that we can do. We can call our representatives, mainly
for therapy. I write letters to the newspapers and about
I get about ten a year in the paper, and man,
(26:48):
that's some great therapy there. But I think the most
important thing people can do is to teach their kids
what reality really is. Hardest job in the world is
being apparent my friend, UH, appreciate it eight hundred nine one.
You know, I naively thought I'd send my kids to
college and my job was done. No, I couldn't have
(27:10):
been more wrong in my life than to actually believe
that because I, unlike my parents, I was a helicopter parent.
Just I grew were in a helicopter parent. I was
with my kids. I had eyes on them at all.
That's different. That's not a helicopter parent. It's absolutely a
helicopter No, you were an engaged parent. Parenting is supposed
(27:30):
to be involved, engaged, paying attention. I get. I would
get off the school bus, get on my bicycle, and
my parents had no clue where I was. That's different.
That was its time in this country when you could
actually live your life and go outside and not be
afraid that your kid would be raped, mutilated, abducted, hurt,
(27:50):
sold fetanyl drugs. I mean, it just was a different time.
So it really was. Listen, I've told my kids, I said,
and they listen to the stories about me as a kid.
They're like, why do you Why didn't you let us
do stuff like that? And I'm like, because times have
changed and and listen, it all worked out. But it's
just different. I thought, you know, I was independent since
(28:10):
I was ten. My parents when I'm twelve years old
and washing dishes till two to three in the morning
and coming home on my bicycle, which is what I did.
And when I'm cooking and I'm intending bar and last
call is four o'clock and I'd leave the bar at
four thirty and then i'd go to the diner and
it's you know, the sun's up by the time I
(28:32):
get home. It was a very different life. My parents
never they never said where were you? What were you doing?
You know, they would see usually my father would see
a big pile of WATA cash. It would either be
on my bed or in my pocket, and end up
taking three quarters of it, putting it in a bank account.
And I ended up using that money. That was my
(28:52):
money for the college that I had, and I used
all of it for that. But how many parents are
not engaged now? Look at the parents of today, they're
they're totally checked out. But my parents had no clue
where I was. It's a different checked out. Your parents
were working. These parents are on Facebook. It's completely different.
I don't know about it. That's a problem. I can't
even imagine my parents on Facebook. I mean, seriously, you
(29:16):
know what I'm saying. I love the generation of people.
So I don't know how to work this damn phone.
That's the people I want to hang out with. Lay
that right now. Listen. I have some regrets that I
didn't appreciate who they were and how hard their lives were.
I didn't. Let me tell you something, sure, the people
of today could never do what the people that went
through the storm the beaches of Normandy and fought for
us in World War two. Forget about. There were many
(29:38):
of us that can. Oh, there are there, but there
are a lot of us that can't because they're lazy
and they're leaning on the government. There's a lot of
snowflakes out there. I'll forget about it. It's a freaking blizzard.
Eight hundred nine one. Sean. Hey, I've been telling you
if you believe in the sanctity of life, this is
a great organization I want to tell you about. And
they use the science of ultrasound to to save babies
(30:01):
from abortion. And by the way, they don't get a
penny from the federal government. It's only because of your
generous donations that they're able to do this. You know.
Abortions now continue to rise at an alarming rate, the
abortion pill accounting for what over fifty percent of all abortions,
it's getting harder. So anyway they use science, ultrasound is
so much different, Linda. You know, with Liam, I was
(30:23):
assumed you're probably at four d am sure I did.
The last one looked like he was wayman to me. Yeah,
I mean you could see their fingers and their toes
and their face. By the way, very early in pregnancy,
you see a lot of details that you never saw before.
Heartbeat six weeks so preborn they give these ultrasounds for
free to expecting mothers or people that have unplanned pregnancies.
(30:45):
And what they've discovered is once people see the child
growing inside them, hear that heartbeat, they're twice as likely
to choose life now. Preborn offers a ton of other services, counseling, diapers,
baby formula, baby clothes, full assistance up to two years.
Whatever you need, they're gonna help you. An ultrasound is
(31:07):
twenty eight bucks. They can only give them because of
your generous donations. They don't get a penny from the government.
And if you want to help this great cause, and
I'm going to be helping them, dial pound two fifty.
Say the keyword baby, pound two fifty, keyword baby, or
you can donate securely online at preborn dot com slash sean.
That's preborn dot com slash sean. Every gift, tax deductible,
(31:28):
one hundred percent of your donation goes to saving babies.
Preborn dot com slash shan
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
United States of Kennedy
United States of Kennedy is a podcast about our cultural fascination with the Kennedy dynasty. Every week, hosts Lyra Smith and George Civeris go into one aspect of the Kennedy story.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.