December 2, 2024 • 27 mins
Gregg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analyst and Best Selling Author and David Schoen, Civil Liberties Attorney and Former Counsel for President Trump discuss the pardoning of Hunter Biden.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Right News round Up, Information overload. Our toll free. Our
number is eight hundred and nine to four one sean
if you want to be a part of the program.
At the bottom of this half hour, we're going to
play I think a super montage cut of the media
repeatedly saying, no, Joe Biden, he said he'd never pardon
his on Hunter. Now one time, He's not going to
do it. He's not he's not like that Trump guy.
(00:24):
And here he did it. And in spite of everybody
saying otherwise, pretty funny. Let's listen to the Biden administration
in their own words, saying over and over and over
and over and over again, no pardon for Hunter.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
Listen, and your son Hunter is on trial.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
And I know that you cannot speak about an ongoing
federal prosecution.
Speaker 3 (00:48):
But let me ask you.
Speaker 5 (00:49):
Will you accept the jury's outcome, their verdict, no matter
what it is.
Speaker 3 (00:53):
Yes? And have you ruled out a pardon for your son?
Speaker 6 (00:57):
Yes, your husband, the President has said he wouldn't pardon
your son, he wouldn't commute his sentence.
Speaker 7 (01:02):
That's correct.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
As a mother, though, you must want to see this
burden lifted off your son.
Speaker 7 (01:07):
You could do that.
Speaker 8 (01:08):
Well, Joe and I both respect the judicial system, and
that's the bottom line.
Speaker 5 (01:14):
The president would not pardon or community sens for his
son Hunter. I would make sure that that is not
going to change over the next six months.
Speaker 3 (01:22):
The presidents say, it's still a no. It's still an
it will always it's still a no.
Speaker 9 (01:27):
It will be a no.
Speaker 1 (01:29):
It is a no.
Speaker 9 (01:30):
And I don't have anything else to add.
Speaker 7 (01:31):
Will he pardon his son right now?
Speaker 5 (01:33):
From a presidential perspective?
Speaker 10 (01:35):
Is there any possibility that the president would end up
pardoning his son?
Speaker 11 (01:39):
No? Well, is there?
Speaker 7 (01:41):
I just said no.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
You said before the president would not pardon his son.
Speaker 11 (01:45):
Is that's still the case?
Speaker 3 (01:46):
Nothing has changed, That is still the case.
Speaker 5 (01:48):
I'm a cousin partner or commute the son if he's convicted.
Speaker 7 (01:52):
So I've answered this question before. It was asked of me,
not too long ago, a couple of weeks ago, and
I was very clear and I.
Speaker 8 (01:58):
Said no through the question regard in the family. I'm
extremely proud of my son Hunter. He is overcome an addiction.
He is He's one of the greatest, most decent men
I know, and I am satisfied that I'm not going
to do anything. I said, I advied by the jury decision,
I will do that, and I will not partner him.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
And I will not pardon him. Now.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
Interesting, Joe was asked by reporters after he pardoned Hunter,
and here's how that went.
Speaker 12 (02:32):
Change.
Speaker 3 (02:35):
Nothing has changed anyway.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Joining us now, Greg Jarrett Fox Knows, legal analysts and
best selling author, and David Shoon, civil rights attorney, former
counsel for President Trump. Welcome both of you back to
the program. Oh, mister Jarrett, take a bow. And I
believe David you made the same prediction that, in fact
he would pardon his son.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
And here we are.
Speaker 1 (02:55):
Well, you know, I think it was a couple of
months ago you asked me on air whether Hunter would
get pardon, and I said, and I'm quoting myself here.
You know, Biden repeatedly insists he won't do it, which
means that he will do it, you know, I mean,
he was always going to pardon his son. And the
(03:16):
decision was apparently made last GM when Hunter was first convicted.
NBC News is reporting the White House decided to say
publicly that he would not pardon his son, even though
doing so was quote unquote still on the table. In
other words, Biden his staff deliberately chose to lie to
(03:37):
the American people. Why because disclosing the truth of what
they intended to do would hurt Democrat chances of holding
on to the presidency. And you know, understand what is
so mendacious about this is that the pardon is not
just wiping out the two convictions of Hunter Biden. No,
(04:00):
Joe Biden granted a full pardon for any and all
other potential crimes that Hunter committed over wait for it,
a ten year period, So that includes the other felonies
like bribery, money laundering, foreign lobbying, crimes, conspiracy. You know,
(04:23):
the incoming dj could have potentially brought those charges based
on some pretty compelling evidence that Hunter was running this
corrupt influence peddling scheme with Ukraine and China and Russia, Romania,
Kazakhstan and other foreign adversaries and they banked in excess
(04:43):
of twenty million dollars through shell companies and into the
Biden family.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Let's get your take, David Schoum.
Speaker 13 (04:53):
The only thing I disagree with is what Greig said
is that the deal is actually for eleven years the
other community for eleven years. I'm not just ten. It's
really extraordinary. That means, as Drake explained, I think that
if there are crimes that Hunter committed up until yesterday,
federal crimes, he cannot be prosecuted for them, even if
(05:13):
we don't know about them yet. I think, you know
what would be interesting is after you played those dozen
clips in which they promised there'd be no pardon. Part
of the offensiveness of Joe Biden's announcement is the self righteousness.
This is a quote from him. For my entire career,
I have followed a simple principle, just tell the American
people the truth. Nothing changed, And now he's decided that
(05:37):
these were all an attack on him, a political attack.
There's nothing political about charging the gun charges that he faced.
In fact, there was a memo from the Department of
Justice around that time emphasizing the need to aggressively go
after gun charges just like this lying on applications. There's
nothing political about charging someone for not paying one point
four million dollars in taxes. I understand a father pardoning
(06:00):
the son, but not so offensively like this. To have
lied about it, and now to if someone wrote a
press release from President Trump that over the past years,
claims he's been attacked politically and used criminal charges to
attack him. This is what they've done to President Trump
for the last eight years, frankly from the Mother Commission.
(06:21):
So it's just it's really extraordinarily outrageous.
Speaker 2 (06:25):
And Greg, you've taken a step further and you say
that he put himself first, but then you go on
to say he went far beyond wiping out his son's
criminal convictions in both Delaware and California.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Explain that, Yeah, I mean, you know, what he's really
doing is protecting himself because there is substantial evidence that
the President was complicit, aiding and abetting his son's influence
pedaling schemes. So by foreclosing a further investigation pursue into
(07:03):
additional charges, what the President is really doing is impeding
any examination of his own lawlessness in criminality. Now it
doesn't stop it completely, but it sure throws a monkey
wrench into the whole thing. And so I think what
Joe Biden was really doing was helping himself the same
(07:25):
way that his Department of Justice was protecting Hunter, so
that it would also protect the President simultaneously.
Speaker 3 (07:35):
Yeah, pretty amazing.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
What does this mean in terms of how does this
impact Joe Biden himself? I mean, I guess what I
found the most offensive in all of this is he
went on to say that the charges in this case
only came about, you know, after several of my political
opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose
(07:57):
my election. Then a carefully negotia had played plea deal,
which by the way, it was his own lawyers. After
that plea deal was made, that was confronted by a
Delaware judge who asked the lawyers, have you ever seen
a deal like this in your life before? And the
answer was no, ma'am, we have not I mean thing
about that, he says, after they negotiated a plea deal
(08:19):
agreed to by the Department of Justice that would be
his Department of Justice, unraveled in a courtroom with a
number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for
bringing political pressure on the process. Had the plea deal held,
it would have been a fair reasonable resolution. But this
is a guy that that sacked quietly. His own wasn't rated,
(08:40):
and he had top secret classified documents in four locations.
Hillary Clinton's home wasn't rated and she had top secret
classified information and thirty three thousand subpoena emails that were deleted.
You know, he never spoke out against PISA abuse. David shown,
he didn't say a thing about PISA abuse. He didn't
say a word about the Hillary Clinton, you know, a
(09:00):
dirty Russian disinformation dossier that was used as the basis
for acquiring four FISA warrants to spy on Carter Page.
And Donald Trump, he didn't care at all. He didn't
care about a false valuation of mar A Lago at
a eighteen million when it's worth over a billion dollars,
probably a billion and a half dollars. He didn't care
about the unfairness of you know, this novel legal theory
(09:22):
in New York with a case you know about a
legal non disclosure agreement that was put together by a
lawyer labeled a legal expense, and they build this up
and they stack one charge on top of another, you know,
and get a guilty verdict and a venue that would
never be friendly to Donald Trump. They didn't care about
(09:43):
any He didn't care about any of this. So he
didn't care about justice. He only cares about his kid.
Speaker 13 (09:47):
Here, that's right, And let's not forget President Trump was
impeached the first time around for demanding an investigation of
their Ukraine dealings, not a prosecution, an investigation. But you know,
or one hundred percent right. But let's talk about for
one second the downside of this deal, because there is
one when you give a broad pardon like this without
(10:08):
specifying crimes, and it's eleven years blanket, any crime may
have been committed, and so on, the downside is he's
given broad immunity during that entire eleven year period of time,
which means January twentieth or whenever, sometime soon, you should
expect to see a subpoena from the House or the
Senate to Hunter Biden. He cannot take the fifth anymore
(10:32):
as to these things. He can be charged with perjury
or contempt of Congress.
Speaker 14 (10:37):
All that.
Speaker 13 (10:37):
That's the very real downside of this kind of broad pardon.
Now it's you know, they have a lot to investigate.
You started this segment out by asking what does this
do to Joe Biden. Hunter Biden must be a witness
as to his father's dealings and role in the Ukraine
and elsewhere. And remember it's the Democrats theory that any
(10:59):
former president and can be impeached at any time, including
George Washington or Thomas Jefferson. So let's see what happens.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
I w we continue now with our legal panel, Joe Biden, Pardning,
Hunter Breg Jared David Schoner with us. What do you
think happens to Joe here? I'm guessing that there might
be more Congressional investigation into this to get to the
bottom of it. But at the end of the day,
Greg Jarrett, I don't see Congress with the appetite, especially
if they want to aggressively pursue the agenda that Donald
(11:30):
Trump is doing, which is very ambitious and would be transformative.
I don't see that they're going to have an appetite
to go after an eighty some odd year old.
Speaker 3 (11:38):
Man on this.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
Well, the parton itself cements the fact in the minds
of most Americans that Hunter Biden's a cruk, and I
think the investigation by the Oversight Committee and the impeachment
Joint Committees have laid out Joe Biden's intimate involvement. Of course,
(12:00):
the in the laptop itself was a treasure trove of
incriminating evidence implicating Joe Biden. One email warning associate, don't
mention Joe being involved, and then in the China paid
a play deal which netted some five million dollars for
the Biden family. You know, Hunter is threatening a fishing
(12:23):
businessman that his dad's sitting next to him and would
exact revenge if the cash did not come through. And
of course within days all of it came through. So
I think Americans are well aware that it's not just
Hunter Biden's a crook, but Joe Biden is a crook.
And I don't I think you're right, Sean. They need
(12:45):
to focus on fixing America that was broken by Joe
Biden and Kamala Harris. And I think any further inquiries
should be done, you know, on the side, maybe a
bit later, a lot of the statute limitations would have
already run on some of this stuff. Americans know what
(13:09):
Joe Biden and Hunter Biden and Biden family are all about.
I you know, Frankly would counsel to move on and
fix what's broken.
Speaker 14 (13:17):
In America, you know.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
And also we have the Supreme Court immunity decision. How
much of this was done during his time as president
or vice president. By the way, we do have an
exclusive reaction tonight to all of this by Jim Jordan
and James Comer nine Eastern on Fox. What do you
think happens to Joe Biden in this? I think probably
it goes away for him as well. David, we'll give
you the last word.
Speaker 13 (13:40):
I think you're probably right. But remember, you know, we
have new people coming in the justice part, we have
a brand new house coming in and President Trump has
said that, you know, there has to be some kind
of accountability for what was done. I agree with you
and with Greg that it is. This is we need
to do the work of repairing the country at this
(14:01):
time first and foremost. But I doubt anything happens really,
but there are avenues to do something if they're so inclined.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
I completely agree with both of you.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
I got to tip my hat to the two of
you because you guys have been all over this, and
Greg your columns really nailed it. In your comments, I
don't know when you first made them, but you made
them way before anybody else. When you said there's no
way he's not leaving office without pardoning his son, it
kind of makes sense. Didn't surprise me either.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
You were on board well, usually.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
I follow smart people, so it makes me smarter anyway,
Thank you both, Greg Jarrett, David Shoan. You know, looking
at the media, we've spoken a lot about legacy media,
and I say as a result of their lying, their corruption,
being nothing but mouthpieces for you know, all things hate Trump,
(14:52):
all things radical left, extreme Democratic Party. They never vetted
Kamala Harris, they never vetted Joe Biden. I never showed
you videos of his cognitive decline. And I can go
on and on and on, and as a result, after
nine years, from the moment Donald Trump came down that
escalator till election day, they thought they had influence the
(15:13):
American people. Whether you were listening to three broadcast channels,
whether you read major newspapers of the New York Times
and the Washington Post and the LA Times and USA
Today and local newspapers, they were all the same three
broadcast channels, you know, multiple liberal, extreme radical left cable
(15:34):
news channels, and their influence meant nothing. Late night comedy
show hosts that were politicized meant nothing. The American people
ignored the lies, the propaganda, the misinformation, the distortion, the smear,
the slander, the besmerchment, and they voted for Donald Trump. Anyway,
(15:55):
moving forward, and I kind of feel blessed. I said
this before Thanksgiving. I feel blessed that I was kind
of on the ground floor of what is described cumulatively
as new media, and that is the explosion of talk radio.
When I started in talk radio, there are only a
couple of hundred, like two hundred and some odd talk
(16:15):
radio stations or news talk radio stations in the country.
Now this close, what five thousand, four five thousand, the
biggest format in all of radio by far. You made
that possible. I never thought we'd be on nearly seven
hundred and fifty stations we are. You made that possible.
You know, I never thought when I went to Fox
in nineteen ninety six that I would still be on
(16:36):
the air my twenty ninth year. You made that possible.
And Americans now have those alternatives, including new alternatives like
social media and alternatives like podcasters people, you know, as
Elana has been saying, we are becoming the media. And
there's only one way I think to survive in this industry,
and that is to tell the truth. And you know,
(16:58):
I go through my long list for Richard Jewel to UVA,
to Duke Lacrosse to Freddie Gray in Baltimore, to ferguson Missouri,
telling the truth about Obama when nobody else would, playing
Kamala in her own words, playing Tim Walls in his
home words, exposing Joe's cognitive decline. These are all things
(17:20):
they got wrong and we got right. And I can
go on and on. There are multiple examples that we
have getting Russia collusion right, getting the PFI's abuse right,
getting the deep state right. And I'm not saying I
did it alone. We have a great ensemble cast of
people that work with us. There are not many of us.
There are others in this industry that do the same,
(17:43):
and we try to be in the forefront of exposing this.
We told you the truth about what Donald Trump, who
he really is, and what he would do. When I'd
interview him, I'd actually let him talk and so you
could get to know him as a person. And it
was never an interview on TV that I did with
this guy that went you know, that didn't go well
(18:04):
over the hour, and I would just let him explain
in his own words, what is his vision is for
the future of the country. He bravely withstood all the lawfare,
all the lies, all the attacks, and he put it
all on the line because it was either the White
House or the Big House. Democrats would not have stopped.
They would have put him on trial in DC. They
would have fought to put him on trial in Florida.
(18:27):
They would have sentenced him in New York. He'd have
to pay fines galore and probably would spend the rest
of his time in jail. Well, one other thing the
media got wrong. This is a super cut montage of
all montages, and that is Oh Joe Biden. He's not
like Trump. He'll never pardon Hunter. Oh no, He'll never
pardon Hunt.
Speaker 8 (18:44):
Listen, presidential promise to put the law before a family. Yeah,
I said, I ad buy by the jury decision.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
I will do that, and I'll not.
Speaker 15 (18:52):
Partnering, letting the world know that he will not wipe
away the decision of twelve of his son's peers.
Speaker 16 (18:57):
Was asked directly, and he has said he wouldn't pardon
his son if he gets convicted.
Speaker 14 (19:03):
Let's see what happens if he loves Yeah, but I mean,
but he said it.
Speaker 3 (19:06):
He's going to get pardoned by his dad. There's no
question about that. The president has ruled out pardoning his son.
Speaker 11 (19:12):
Major commitment from the President, accepting the outcome of the
trial and also pledging not to pardon his son. But
the challenge for him is really to continue to live
up to his values when it was really personal, and.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
He did that today.
Speaker 11 (19:24):
It seems like a pretty normal, straightforward answer, but it
takes new weight when we see what Trump is.
Speaker 15 (19:30):
Saying about the outcome of his trial.
Speaker 11 (19:31):
We're hearing from the Republicans who say they don't accept
the jury's verdict here in New York.
Speaker 14 (19:35):
The contrast is profound to sit there and say, well,
I'm not going to intervene in the legal process and
I wouldn't pardon my son one side, Democrats and Joe
Biden protecting the justice system, and on the other Republicans
and Trump protecting Trump.
Speaker 16 (19:49):
Our current president of the United States has so much
respect for the law that he has said he would
not pardon his son. I mean, what you know, again,
it's all a about the contrast.
Speaker 10 (20:01):
President Biden saying I will respect whatever this jury decides,
versus Donald Trump after he was convicted on thirty four counts,
saying the entire system is rigged against him.
Speaker 12 (20:10):
Their latest attack has been that Joe Biden has politicized
and weaponized the DOJ right. That was the whole argument
around Donald Trump's conviction. And this week, of course, Hunter
Biden was found guilty and Joe Biden has very clearly
said he would not pardon his son, he would not
commute the sentence. How stark is this difference? I mean,
(20:30):
how can Republicans keep making this argument? Now that note,
now that Joe Biden has really put it out there,
where's Hunter? And he stood there in the courtroom flanked
by his family, and he's accepted his sentence.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
He is not pardoning his son, which he could do.
These are federal charges. He is not doing that. He
is not doing it because he is living what it
means to have a rule of law in this country.
And then it is I mean, if you want to
know if he believes it, you can actually see what
is happening with his own son.
Speaker 9 (21:02):
The president Anderson has been really clear that he is
going to accept.
Speaker 7 (21:07):
The outcome of the trial no matter what happens.
Speaker 15 (21:10):
So Joe Biden's gotten asked about, you know, talking about
lawe order.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
He's gotten asked if he would pardon his son.
Speaker 15 (21:15):
He has said no, On the other side, you've got
Donald Trump, who has said that he will pardon the
January sixth insurrectionism. They're not even his sons, They're just
sons of bitches.
Speaker 5 (21:25):
Washington said, I am not running again because he understood
the self restraint was absolutely essential to this country.
Speaker 3 (21:32):
So you don't have a king.
Speaker 7 (21:33):
He did not pardon his son.
Speaker 5 (21:35):
He did not order the Department of Justice to say,
don't prosecute my son.
Speaker 3 (21:39):
So impressive.
Speaker 11 (21:41):
Could have ordered the Justice Department to halt the prosecution
of Hunter Biden. According to Discourt, everyone understands he's a
decent man.
Speaker 15 (21:48):
I think Joe Biden has a chance here to stand
up for the role of law, to say the laws
the law, no matter who it is, no matter if
it's Trump or Biden. And remember, part of trump ISM's
dat juriousness is that it tears down institutions, important institutions
of our democracy. So there is an opportunity here for
Biden to say, you know, the jury found him guilty.
(22:11):
This is how it's supposed to work. Period, paragraph end
of story.
Speaker 3 (22:14):
Have you ruled out a pardon for your son?
Speaker 11 (22:16):
Yes, As I said last week, I will accept the
outcome of this case. And will continue to respect the
judicial process as Hunter considers an appeal. You know, the
President said he won't touch it. He's that he's not
going to pardon his son, and it seems that Mayor
Garland let it go through. How can the Justice Department
be weaponized against Trump when all of that is happening.
Speaker 17 (22:34):
But Democrats stand for the rule of law, a number,
law and order, you know, and we've been saying that
Trump's not above the law. Hunter, Biden's not above the law.
No one is above the law. And it is amazing
to see the stark contrast between how Democrats handled today
and how Republicans handled this whole thing over the last
couple of weeks.
Speaker 10 (22:52):
For years, these conservatives have been crowing about a politicized
Justice Department, Biden politicizing it, and so on. What happened
today The Justice Department convicted the president's own son, his
only living son. You heard the President say he would
accept the outcome of the case. I know no other
(23:13):
word for that, but presidential.
Speaker 17 (23:16):
He even went so far as to say he wouldn't
pardon his son.
Speaker 3 (23:19):
That's how much respect he has for the sistant.
Speaker 7 (23:22):
President has said that he will not pardon his son.
Speaker 3 (23:25):
What did you think of that?
Speaker 7 (23:26):
I thought it was extraordinary. I mean it was. It
was a moment of just moral clarity on the part
of Joe Biden, and couldn't have been in you know,
starker contrast to the way Donald Trump has handled his
own conviction.
Speaker 4 (23:41):
He could still pardon and he said he won't do that.
All of that conduct it's his son is kind of
You should pause for a moment and think about how
unbelievable it is.
Speaker 3 (23:51):
In a million years, if the shoe.
Speaker 4 (23:53):
Were on the other and Donald Trump was facing the
prospect of his son being prosecuted by a Biden, if
I had been held over a Biden, holdover Obama holdover
prosecutor not in a million million years.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
Would that have happened.
Speaker 4 (24:08):
So, you know, some of the people on the right,
that people who support Donald Trump are trying to cast
this as some clever ops program.
Speaker 3 (24:16):
Yeah, a hunter.
Speaker 18 (24:17):
Biden was found guilty by a jury of his peers,
just like Donald Trump. Because this is our justice system
at work. The divide here is stunning, and it's a
great reminder that one political party remains committed to the
rule of law and the other does it.
Speaker 4 (24:31):
Joe Biden has already proven he's willing to stand up
for the rule of law in a way that we
could all never imagine Donald Trump to do it pretty emphatic.
Speaker 6 (24:38):
Over the last few days that he does not plan
to pardon or commute his son. What that really is
him saying is I don't plan to use the powers
of the office, the powers of the presidency, to provide
private relief for my family. In a sense, he's staking
out a pretty bright line between being, as he says,
a president and a dad. And that's not just an
emotional expression. He's in effect saying, I don't think that
(25:01):
I should. I don't have a right even if it's legal,
and God knows it must be tempting to use this
power in a way that is not available to so
many other Americans facing similar kinds of struggles.
Speaker 7 (25:11):
There's a kind of.
Speaker 6 (25:12):
Old school, sort of flinty core to his conception of
how you are to be in the system, how you
are to be as a person, a moral person, and
ultimately how to contend with questions of power. One of
the things that anybody spends time around Joe Biden comes
to know is that he's had this long running focus
on how much he is bothered by abuses of power.
Speaker 2 (25:33):
I got to give credit to Gravy and for putting
this together. We played most of it, we didn't play
all of it. I wish I had time to play
all of it on TV too, so you could see it.
But it just does it not expose Linda what I've
been saying. Legacy media is dead and the only way
to survive in our industry is to tell the truth,
which we try to do every day.
Speaker 3 (25:51):
We work pretty darn hard at it.
Speaker 17 (25:53):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (25:53):
You know, Catherine Herridge was actually on Excess Weekend talking
about comparing legacy media ratings to how many people are
using and getting their news on x and other social
media platforms, and I thought it was really interesting because obviously,
you know, this is a woman who's been a TV
legacy media journalist for whole life, and she's like, yeah,
I'm done them out. I can't do it, Like it's
just ridiculous there, and look at what she went through.
(26:14):
And other friends of ours like Cheryl Atkinson is another one.
You know, that's why people are turning to social media
and the truth because they.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Know these guys like and you know, the interesting thing
is they're all doing well. Look at John Solomon, look
out well, he's.
Speaker 9 (26:25):
Doing exactly an excellent point totally.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
You know, everybody in this industry, they're hyper competitive and
they think that their success is predicated on other people's failures.
But I will say this, the failure of legacy media
has absolutely contributed in part to my success because we
get to do things and tell people news and information
then that they're not going to get anywhere else, and
we get it right because we work hard to getting
it right. That's going to wrap things up with Today
(26:49):
Hannity Tonight nine eastern on the Fox News Channel, Exclusive
reaction to the Hunter pardon with Jim Jordan. James Comer
will also get reaction from Greg Allen Dershwitz, Greg Jared
Allen Dershowitz, and John Solomon. Also will check in with
Senator Ted Cruz, Adam Carolla and Linda You'll love this
Glyslallone and his wife Jennifer nine Eastern c DVR Tonight
(27:13):
Hannity on Fox Seed Tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you
for making the show possible.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Right News round Up, Information overload. Our toll free. Our
number is eight hundred and nine to four one sean
if you want to be a part of the program.
At the bottom of this half hour, we're going to
play I think a super montage cut of the media
repeatedly saying, no, Joe Biden, he said he'd never pardon
his on Hunter. Now one time, He's not going to
do it. He's not he's not like that Trump guy.
(00:24):
And here he did it. And in spite of everybody
saying otherwise, pretty funny. Let's listen to the Biden administration
in their own words, saying over and over and over
and over and over again, no pardon for Hunter.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
Listen, and your son Hunter is on trial.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
And I know that you cannot speak about an ongoing
federal prosecution.
Speaker 3 (00:48):
But let me ask you.
Speaker 5 (00:49):
Will you accept the jury's outcome, their verdict, no matter
what it is.
Speaker 3 (00:53):
Yes? And have you ruled out a pardon for your son?
Speaker 6 (00:57):
Yes, your husband, the President has said he wouldn't pardon
your son, he wouldn't commute his sentence.
Speaker 7 (01:02):
That's correct.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
As a mother, though, you must want to see this
burden lifted off your son.
Speaker 7 (01:07):
You could do that.
Speaker 8 (01:08):
Well, Joe and I both respect the judicial system, and
that's the bottom line.
Speaker 5 (01:14):
The president would not pardon or community sens for his
son Hunter. I would make sure that that is not
going to change over the next six months.
Speaker 3 (01:22):
The presidents say, it's still a no. It's still an
it will always it's still a no.
Speaker 9 (01:27):
It will be a no.
Speaker 1 (01:29):
It is a no.
Speaker 9 (01:30):
And I don't have anything else to add.
Speaker 7 (01:31):
Will he pardon his son right now?
Speaker 5 (01:33):
From a presidential perspective?
Speaker 10 (01:35):
Is there any possibility that the president would end up
pardoning his son?
Speaker 11 (01:39):
No? Well, is there?
Speaker 7 (01:41):
I just said no.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
You said before the president would not pardon his son.
Speaker 11 (01:45):
Is that's still the case?
Speaker 3 (01:46):
Nothing has changed, That is still the case.
Speaker 5 (01:48):
I'm a cousin partner or commute the son if he's convicted.
Speaker 7 (01:52):
So I've answered this question before. It was asked of me,
not too long ago, a couple of weeks ago, and
I was very clear and I.
Speaker 8 (01:58):
Said no through the question regard in the family. I'm
extremely proud of my son Hunter. He is overcome an addiction.
He is He's one of the greatest, most decent men
I know, and I am satisfied that I'm not going
to do anything. I said, I advied by the jury decision,
I will do that, and I will not partner him.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
And I will not pardon him. Now.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
Interesting, Joe was asked by reporters after he pardoned Hunter,
and here's how that went.
Speaker 12 (02:32):
Change.
Speaker 3 (02:35):
Nothing has changed anyway.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Joining us now, Greg Jarrett Fox Knows, legal analysts and
best selling author, and David Shoon, civil rights attorney, former
counsel for President Trump. Welcome both of you back to
the program. Oh, mister Jarrett, take a bow. And I
believe David you made the same prediction that, in fact
he would pardon his son.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
And here we are.
Speaker 1 (02:55):
Well, you know, I think it was a couple of
months ago you asked me on air whether Hunter would
get pardon, and I said, and I'm quoting myself here.
You know, Biden repeatedly insists he won't do it, which
means that he will do it, you know, I mean,
he was always going to pardon his son. And the
(03:16):
decision was apparently made last GM when Hunter was first convicted.
NBC News is reporting the White House decided to say
publicly that he would not pardon his son, even though
doing so was quote unquote still on the table. In
other words, Biden his staff deliberately chose to lie to
(03:37):
the American people. Why because disclosing the truth of what
they intended to do would hurt Democrat chances of holding
on to the presidency. And you know, understand what is
so mendacious about this is that the pardon is not
just wiping out the two convictions of Hunter Biden. No,
(04:00):
Joe Biden granted a full pardon for any and all
other potential crimes that Hunter committed over wait for it,
a ten year period, So that includes the other felonies
like bribery, money laundering, foreign lobbying, crimes, conspiracy. You know,
(04:23):
the incoming dj could have potentially brought those charges based
on some pretty compelling evidence that Hunter was running this
corrupt influence peddling scheme with Ukraine and China and Russia, Romania,
Kazakhstan and other foreign adversaries and they banked in excess
(04:43):
of twenty million dollars through shell companies and into the
Biden family.
Speaker 3 (04:51):
Let's get your take, David Schoum.
Speaker 13 (04:53):
The only thing I disagree with is what Greig said
is that the deal is actually for eleven years the
other community for eleven years. I'm not just ten. It's
really extraordinary. That means, as Drake explained, I think that
if there are crimes that Hunter committed up until yesterday,
federal crimes, he cannot be prosecuted for them, even if
(05:13):
we don't know about them yet. I think, you know
what would be interesting is after you played those dozen
clips in which they promised there'd be no pardon. Part
of the offensiveness of Joe Biden's announcement is the self righteousness.
This is a quote from him. For my entire career,
I have followed a simple principle, just tell the American
people the truth. Nothing changed, And now he's decided that
(05:37):
these were all an attack on him, a political attack.
There's nothing political about charging the gun charges that he faced.
In fact, there was a memo from the Department of
Justice around that time emphasizing the need to aggressively go
after gun charges just like this lying on applications. There's
nothing political about charging someone for not paying one point
four million dollars in taxes. I understand a father pardoning
(06:00):
the son, but not so offensively like this. To have
lied about it, and now to if someone wrote a
press release from President Trump that over the past years,
claims he's been attacked politically and used criminal charges to
attack him. This is what they've done to President Trump
for the last eight years, frankly from the Mother Commission.
(06:21):
So it's just it's really extraordinarily outrageous.
Speaker 2 (06:25):
And Greg, you've taken a step further and you say
that he put himself first, but then you go on
to say he went far beyond wiping out his son's
criminal convictions in both Delaware and California.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Explain that, Yeah, I mean, you know, what he's really
doing is protecting himself because there is substantial evidence that
the President was complicit, aiding and abetting his son's influence
pedaling schemes. So by foreclosing a further investigation pursue into
(07:03):
additional charges, what the President is really doing is impeding
any examination of his own lawlessness in criminality. Now it
doesn't stop it completely, but it sure throws a monkey
wrench into the whole thing. And so I think what
Joe Biden was really doing was helping himself the same
(07:25):
way that his Department of Justice was protecting Hunter, so
that it would also protect the President simultaneously.
Speaker 3 (07:35):
Yeah, pretty amazing.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
What does this mean in terms of how does this
impact Joe Biden himself? I mean, I guess what I
found the most offensive in all of this is he
went on to say that the charges in this case
only came about, you know, after several of my political
opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose
(07:57):
my election. Then a carefully negotia had played plea deal,
which by the way, it was his own lawyers. After
that plea deal was made, that was confronted by a
Delaware judge who asked the lawyers, have you ever seen
a deal like this in your life before? And the
answer was no, ma'am, we have not I mean thing
about that, he says, after they negotiated a plea deal
(08:19):
agreed to by the Department of Justice that would be
his Department of Justice, unraveled in a courtroom with a
number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for
bringing political pressure on the process. Had the plea deal held,
it would have been a fair reasonable resolution. But this
is a guy that that sacked quietly. His own wasn't rated,
(08:40):
and he had top secret classified documents in four locations.
Hillary Clinton's home wasn't rated and she had top secret
classified information and thirty three thousand subpoena emails that were deleted.
You know, he never spoke out against PISA abuse. David shown,
he didn't say a thing about PISA abuse. He didn't
say a word about the Hillary Clinton, you know, a
(09:00):
dirty Russian disinformation dossier that was used as the basis
for acquiring four FISA warrants to spy on Carter Page.
And Donald Trump, he didn't care at all. He didn't
care about a false valuation of mar A Lago at
a eighteen million when it's worth over a billion dollars,
probably a billion and a half dollars. He didn't care
about the unfairness of you know, this novel legal theory
(09:22):
in New York with a case you know about a
legal non disclosure agreement that was put together by a
lawyer labeled a legal expense, and they build this up
and they stack one charge on top of another, you know,
and get a guilty verdict and a venue that would
never be friendly to Donald Trump. They didn't care about
(09:43):
any He didn't care about any of this. So he
didn't care about justice. He only cares about his kid.
Speaker 13 (09:47):
Here, that's right, And let's not forget President Trump was
impeached the first time around for demanding an investigation of
their Ukraine dealings, not a prosecution, an investigation. But you know,
or one hundred percent right. But let's talk about for
one second the downside of this deal, because there is
one when you give a broad pardon like this without
(10:08):
specifying crimes, and it's eleven years blanket, any crime may
have been committed, and so on, the downside is he's
given broad immunity during that entire eleven year period of time,
which means January twentieth or whenever, sometime soon, you should
expect to see a subpoena from the House or the
Senate to Hunter Biden. He cannot take the fifth anymore
(10:32):
as to these things. He can be charged with perjury
or contempt of Congress.
Speaker 14 (10:37):
All that.
Speaker 13 (10:37):
That's the very real downside of this kind of broad pardon.
Now it's you know, they have a lot to investigate.
You started this segment out by asking what does this
do to Joe Biden. Hunter Biden must be a witness
as to his father's dealings and role in the Ukraine
and elsewhere. And remember it's the Democrats theory that any
(10:59):
former president and can be impeached at any time, including
George Washington or Thomas Jefferson. So let's see what happens.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
I w we continue now with our legal panel, Joe Biden, Pardning,
Hunter Breg Jared David Schoner with us. What do you
think happens to Joe here? I'm guessing that there might
be more Congressional investigation into this to get to the
bottom of it. But at the end of the day,
Greg Jarrett, I don't see Congress with the appetite, especially
if they want to aggressively pursue the agenda that Donald
(11:30):
Trump is doing, which is very ambitious and would be transformative.
I don't see that they're going to have an appetite
to go after an eighty some odd year old.
Speaker 3 (11:38):
Man on this.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
Well, the parton itself cements the fact in the minds
of most Americans that Hunter Biden's a cruk, and I
think the investigation by the Oversight Committee and the impeachment
Joint Committees have laid out Joe Biden's intimate involvement. Of course,
(12:00):
the in the laptop itself was a treasure trove of
incriminating evidence implicating Joe Biden. One email warning associate, don't
mention Joe being involved, and then in the China paid
a play deal which netted some five million dollars for
the Biden family. You know, Hunter is threatening a fishing
(12:23):
businessman that his dad's sitting next to him and would
exact revenge if the cash did not come through. And
of course within days all of it came through. So
I think Americans are well aware that it's not just
Hunter Biden's a crook, but Joe Biden is a crook.
And I don't I think you're right, Sean. They need
(12:45):
to focus on fixing America that was broken by Joe
Biden and Kamala Harris. And I think any further inquiries
should be done, you know, on the side, maybe a
bit later, a lot of the statute limitations would have
already run on some of this stuff. Americans know what
(13:09):
Joe Biden and Hunter Biden and Biden family are all about.
I you know, Frankly would counsel to move on and
fix what's broken.
Speaker 14 (13:17):
In America, you know.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
And also we have the Supreme Court immunity decision. How
much of this was done during his time as president
or vice president. By the way, we do have an
exclusive reaction tonight to all of this by Jim Jordan
and James Comer nine Eastern on Fox. What do you
think happens to Joe Biden in this? I think probably
it goes away for him as well. David, we'll give
you the last word.
Speaker 13 (13:40):
I think you're probably right. But remember, you know, we
have new people coming in the justice part, we have
a brand new house coming in and President Trump has
said that, you know, there has to be some kind
of accountability for what was done. I agree with you
and with Greg that it is. This is we need
to do the work of repairing the country at this
(14:01):
time first and foremost. But I doubt anything happens really,
but there are avenues to do something if they're so inclined.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
I completely agree with both of you.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
I got to tip my hat to the two of
you because you guys have been all over this, and
Greg your columns really nailed it. In your comments, I
don't know when you first made them, but you made
them way before anybody else. When you said there's no
way he's not leaving office without pardoning his son, it
kind of makes sense. Didn't surprise me either.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
You were on board well, usually.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
I follow smart people, so it makes me smarter anyway,
Thank you both, Greg Jarrett, David Shoan. You know, looking
at the media, we've spoken a lot about legacy media,
and I say as a result of their lying, their corruption,
being nothing but mouthpieces for you know, all things hate Trump,
(14:52):
all things radical left, extreme Democratic Party. They never vetted
Kamala Harris, they never vetted Joe Biden. I never showed
you videos of his cognitive decline. And I can go
on and on and on, and as a result, after
nine years, from the moment Donald Trump came down that
escalator till election day, they thought they had influence the
(15:13):
American people. Whether you were listening to three broadcast channels,
whether you read major newspapers of the New York Times
and the Washington Post and the LA Times and USA
Today and local newspapers, they were all the same three
broadcast channels, you know, multiple liberal, extreme radical left cable
(15:34):
news channels, and their influence meant nothing. Late night comedy
show hosts that were politicized meant nothing. The American people
ignored the lies, the propaganda, the misinformation, the distortion, the smear,
the slander, the besmerchment, and they voted for Donald Trump. Anyway,
(15:55):
moving forward, and I kind of feel blessed. I said
this before Thanksgiving. I feel blessed that I was kind
of on the ground floor of what is described cumulatively
as new media, and that is the explosion of talk radio.
When I started in talk radio, there are only a
couple of hundred, like two hundred and some odd talk
(16:15):
radio stations or news talk radio stations in the country.
Now this close, what five thousand, four five thousand, the
biggest format in all of radio by far. You made
that possible. I never thought we'd be on nearly seven
hundred and fifty stations we are. You made that possible.
You know, I never thought when I went to Fox
in nineteen ninety six that I would still be on
(16:36):
the air my twenty ninth year. You made that possible.
And Americans now have those alternatives, including new alternatives like
social media and alternatives like podcasters people, you know, as
Elana has been saying, we are becoming the media. And
there's only one way I think to survive in this industry,
and that is to tell the truth. And you know,
(16:58):
I go through my long list for Richard Jewel to UVA,
to Duke Lacrosse to Freddie Gray in Baltimore, to ferguson Missouri,
telling the truth about Obama when nobody else would, playing
Kamala in her own words, playing Tim Walls in his
home words, exposing Joe's cognitive decline. These are all things
(17:20):
they got wrong and we got right. And I can
go on and on. There are multiple examples that we
have getting Russia collusion right, getting the PFI's abuse right,
getting the deep state right. And I'm not saying I
did it alone. We have a great ensemble cast of
people that work with us. There are not many of us.
There are others in this industry that do the same,
(17:43):
and we try to be in the forefront of exposing this.
We told you the truth about what Donald Trump, who
he really is, and what he would do. When I'd
interview him, I'd actually let him talk and so you
could get to know him as a person. And it
was never an interview on TV that I did with
this guy that went you know, that didn't go well
(18:04):
over the hour, and I would just let him explain
in his own words, what is his vision is for
the future of the country. He bravely withstood all the lawfare,
all the lies, all the attacks, and he put it
all on the line because it was either the White
House or the Big House. Democrats would not have stopped.
They would have put him on trial in DC. They
would have fought to put him on trial in Florida.
(18:27):
They would have sentenced him in New York. He'd have
to pay fines galore and probably would spend the rest
of his time in jail. Well, one other thing the
media got wrong. This is a super cut montage of
all montages, and that is Oh Joe Biden. He's not
like Trump. He'll never pardon Hunter. Oh no, He'll never
pardon Hunt.
Speaker 8 (18:44):
Listen, presidential promise to put the law before a family. Yeah,
I said, I ad buy by the jury decision.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
I will do that, and I'll not.
Speaker 15 (18:52):
Partnering, letting the world know that he will not wipe
away the decision of twelve of his son's peers.
Speaker 16 (18:57):
Was asked directly, and he has said he wouldn't pardon
his son if he gets convicted.
Speaker 14 (19:03):
Let's see what happens if he loves Yeah, but I mean,
but he said it.
Speaker 3 (19:06):
He's going to get pardoned by his dad. There's no
question about that. The president has ruled out pardoning his son.
Speaker 11 (19:12):
Major commitment from the President, accepting the outcome of the
trial and also pledging not to pardon his son. But
the challenge for him is really to continue to live
up to his values when it was really personal, and.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
He did that today.
Speaker 11 (19:24):
It seems like a pretty normal, straightforward answer, but it
takes new weight when we see what Trump is.
Speaker 15 (19:30):
Saying about the outcome of his trial.
Speaker 11 (19:31):
We're hearing from the Republicans who say they don't accept
the jury's verdict here in New York.
Speaker 14 (19:35):
The contrast is profound to sit there and say, well,
I'm not going to intervene in the legal process and
I wouldn't pardon my son one side, Democrats and Joe
Biden protecting the justice system, and on the other Republicans
and Trump protecting Trump.
Speaker 16 (19:49):
Our current president of the United States has so much
respect for the law that he has said he would
not pardon his son. I mean, what you know, again,
it's all a about the contrast.
Speaker 10 (20:01):
President Biden saying I will respect whatever this jury decides,
versus Donald Trump after he was convicted on thirty four counts,
saying the entire system is rigged against him.
Speaker 12 (20:10):
Their latest attack has been that Joe Biden has politicized
and weaponized the DOJ right. That was the whole argument
around Donald Trump's conviction. And this week, of course, Hunter
Biden was found guilty and Joe Biden has very clearly
said he would not pardon his son, he would not
commute the sentence. How stark is this difference? I mean,
(20:30):
how can Republicans keep making this argument? Now that note,
now that Joe Biden has really put it out there,
where's Hunter? And he stood there in the courtroom flanked
by his family, and he's accepted his sentence.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
He is not pardoning his son, which he could do.
These are federal charges. He is not doing that. He
is not doing it because he is living what it
means to have a rule of law in this country.
And then it is I mean, if you want to
know if he believes it, you can actually see what
is happening with his own son.
Speaker 9 (21:02):
The president Anderson has been really clear that he is
going to accept.
Speaker 7 (21:07):
The outcome of the trial no matter what happens.
Speaker 15 (21:10):
So Joe Biden's gotten asked about, you know, talking about
lawe order.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
He's gotten asked if he would pardon his son.
Speaker 15 (21:15):
He has said no, On the other side, you've got
Donald Trump, who has said that he will pardon the
January sixth insurrectionism. They're not even his sons, They're just
sons of bitches.
Speaker 5 (21:25):
Washington said, I am not running again because he understood
the self restraint was absolutely essential to this country.
Speaker 3 (21:32):
So you don't have a king.
Speaker 7 (21:33):
He did not pardon his son.
Speaker 5 (21:35):
He did not order the Department of Justice to say,
don't prosecute my son.
Speaker 3 (21:39):
So impressive.
Speaker 11 (21:41):
Could have ordered the Justice Department to halt the prosecution
of Hunter Biden. According to Discourt, everyone understands he's a
decent man.
Speaker 15 (21:48):
I think Joe Biden has a chance here to stand
up for the role of law, to say the laws
the law, no matter who it is, no matter if
it's Trump or Biden. And remember, part of trump ISM's
dat juriousness is that it tears down institutions, important institutions
of our democracy. So there is an opportunity here for
Biden to say, you know, the jury found him guilty.
(22:11):
This is how it's supposed to work. Period, paragraph end
of story.
Speaker 3 (22:14):
Have you ruled out a pardon for your son?
Speaker 11 (22:16):
Yes, As I said last week, I will accept the
outcome of this case. And will continue to respect the
judicial process as Hunter considers an appeal. You know, the
President said he won't touch it. He's that he's not
going to pardon his son, and it seems that Mayor
Garland let it go through. How can the Justice Department
be weaponized against Trump when all of that is happening.
Speaker 17 (22:34):
But Democrats stand for the rule of law, a number,
law and order, you know, and we've been saying that
Trump's not above the law. Hunter, Biden's not above the law.
No one is above the law. And it is amazing
to see the stark contrast between how Democrats handled today
and how Republicans handled this whole thing over the last
couple of weeks.
Speaker 10 (22:52):
For years, these conservatives have been crowing about a politicized
Justice Department, Biden politicizing it, and so on. What happened
today The Justice Department convicted the president's own son, his
only living son. You heard the President say he would
accept the outcome of the case. I know no other
(23:13):
word for that, but presidential.
Speaker 17 (23:16):
He even went so far as to say he wouldn't
pardon his son.
Speaker 3 (23:19):
That's how much respect he has for the sistant.
Speaker 7 (23:22):
President has said that he will not pardon his son.
Speaker 3 (23:25):
What did you think of that?
Speaker 7 (23:26):
I thought it was extraordinary. I mean it was. It
was a moment of just moral clarity on the part
of Joe Biden, and couldn't have been in you know,
starker contrast to the way Donald Trump has handled his
own conviction.
Speaker 4 (23:41):
He could still pardon and he said he won't do that.
All of that conduct it's his son is kind of
You should pause for a moment and think about how
unbelievable it is.
Speaker 3 (23:51):
In a million years, if the shoe.
Speaker 4 (23:53):
Were on the other and Donald Trump was facing the
prospect of his son being prosecuted by a Biden, if
I had been held over a Biden, holdover Obama holdover
prosecutor not in a million million years.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
Would that have happened.
Speaker 4 (24:08):
So, you know, some of the people on the right,
that people who support Donald Trump are trying to cast
this as some clever ops program.
Speaker 3 (24:16):
Yeah, a hunter.
Speaker 18 (24:17):
Biden was found guilty by a jury of his peers,
just like Donald Trump. Because this is our justice system
at work. The divide here is stunning, and it's a
great reminder that one political party remains committed to the
rule of law and the other does it.
Speaker 4 (24:31):
Joe Biden has already proven he's willing to stand up
for the rule of law in a way that we
could all never imagine Donald Trump to do it pretty emphatic.
Speaker 6 (24:38):
Over the last few days that he does not plan
to pardon or commute his son. What that really is
him saying is I don't plan to use the powers
of the office, the powers of the presidency, to provide
private relief for my family. In a sense, he's staking
out a pretty bright line between being, as he says,
a president and a dad. And that's not just an
emotional expression. He's in effect saying, I don't think that
(25:01):
I should. I don't have a right even if it's legal,
and God knows it must be tempting to use this
power in a way that is not available to so
many other Americans facing similar kinds of struggles.
Speaker 7 (25:11):
There's a kind of.
Speaker 6 (25:12):
Old school, sort of flinty core to his conception of
how you are to be in the system, how you
are to be as a person, a moral person, and
ultimately how to contend with questions of power. One of
the things that anybody spends time around Joe Biden comes
to know is that he's had this long running focus
on how much he is bothered by abuses of power.
Speaker 2 (25:33):
I got to give credit to Gravy and for putting
this together. We played most of it, we didn't play
all of it. I wish I had time to play
all of it on TV too, so you could see it.
But it just does it not expose Linda what I've
been saying. Legacy media is dead and the only way
to survive in our industry is to tell the truth,
which we try to do every day.
Speaker 3 (25:51):
We work pretty darn hard at it.
Speaker 17 (25:53):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (25:53):
You know, Catherine Herridge was actually on Excess Weekend talking
about comparing legacy media ratings to how many people are
using and getting their news on x and other social
media platforms, and I thought it was really interesting because obviously,
you know, this is a woman who's been a TV
legacy media journalist for whole life, and she's like, yeah,
I'm done them out. I can't do it, Like it's
just ridiculous there, and look at what she went through.
(26:14):
And other friends of ours like Cheryl Atkinson is another one.
You know, that's why people are turning to social media
and the truth because they.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Know these guys like and you know, the interesting thing
is they're all doing well. Look at John Solomon, look
out well, he's.
Speaker 9 (26:25):
Doing exactly an excellent point totally.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
You know, everybody in this industry, they're hyper competitive and
they think that their success is predicated on other people's failures.
But I will say this, the failure of legacy media
has absolutely contributed in part to my success because we
get to do things and tell people news and information
then that they're not going to get anywhere else, and
we get it right because we work hard to getting
it right. That's going to wrap things up with Today
(26:49):
Hannity Tonight nine eastern on the Fox News Channel, Exclusive
reaction to the Hunter pardon with Jim Jordan. James Comer
will also get reaction from Greg Allen Dershwitz, Greg Jared
Allen Dershowitz, and John Solomon. Also will check in with
Senator Ted Cruz, Adam Carolla and Linda You'll love this
Glyslallone and his wife Jennifer nine Eastern c DVR Tonight
(27:13):
Hannity on Fox Seed Tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you
for making the show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Monster: BTK
'Monster: BTK', the newest installment in the 'Monster' franchise, reveals the true story of the Wichita, Kansas serial killer who murdered at least 10 people between 1974 and 1991. Known by the moniker, BTK – Bind Torture Kill, his notoriety was bolstered by the taunting letters he sent to police, and the chilling phone calls he made to media outlets. BTK's identity was finally revealed in 2005 to the shock of his family, his community, and the world. He was the serial killer next door. From Tenderfoot TV & iHeartPodcasts, this is 'Monster: BTK'.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.