Rand Paul and Lauren Boebert - July 1st, Hour 1

Between the crisis on the border and a failing economy, this has been a tough year!  In this "Best of Sean Hannity" show, Rand Paul and Lauren Boebert outline their solutions for the future.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Come in to y'all city, so I'll be desire and
if you want a little banging again, here and come along.
President Biden, he is saying he's going to run again

(00:23):
in twenty twenty four. Will you support him? You know,
if the President chooses to run again in twenty twenty four,
we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. Does
the President have the stamina physically and mentally? Do you
think to continue on even after twenty twenty four? You're
asking me this question. Oh my gosh, he's the president
of the United States. I don't want to hear anymore
in he's lies about reckless spending. We're changing people's lives.

(00:47):
Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the Revolution coming
to your city. You'nna play our gains new Sean Hannity
Show behind the scenes, information on breaking news and more

(01:10):
bold inspired solutions for America. This is a special edition
of The Sean Hannity Show America Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
Day number three hundred and twenty one. Our two Sean

(01:30):
Hannity Show. Glad you are with Us eight hundred nine
four one. Sean is our number. If you want to
be a part of the program. All right, so doctor
Fauci has covid um. So I blame doctor Fauci for
making mistakes. Especially early on. We we gave him a
lot of latitude and a lot of time. We didn't
know what we were dealing with, and it wasn't until

(01:52):
later that we discovered. We have the NIH emails, and
then of course we have Fauci's own emails. Flurry of
activity this is Remember we only found out about it
in late December twenty what's twenty twenty, No, it was
it twenty nineteen, and it was heading into twenty twenty.

(02:13):
And then there was a flurry of emails going back
between him and other high ranking officials at the NIH
over the funding of the Wuhan Virology lab, where they
knew coronavirus studies were taken place and gain a function.
Science was going on, and of the flurry was did
any of our money go to gain a function? Then,

(02:34):
of course the NIH emails basically confirmed all that. We
didn't get that until much later in year two of
the pandemic. In the interim, we had Project Veritesk ghetous information.
Then the Intercept got us information that proved that they
knew a lot more than what they said, and then
of course we have the lack of real science because

(02:55):
they never ever really talked much about therapeutics like monoclonal
antibodies or these anti virals which we had long before
the pandemic that a lot of people like paxilovin for example. Anyway,
so Fauci, remember, if you go back to the beginning,
he said, if you get vaccinated, you don't have to
worry about ever getting infected again. Wrong. Listen, if you

(03:18):
get vaccinated, after you get infected, your level of protection
will go sky high, and then you won't have to
worry about getting infected again. The only conclusion one can
reasonably come to from looking what I've told you over
the last few minutes is please get vaccinated. It will
protect you against the surging of the delta variant. He's

(03:42):
wrong on both counts, because people that got vaccinated after
they got infected, they're getting it a second time. People
that have got the first shot, the second shot, the
first booster, the second booster, and then on the delta variant,
we know that that was not true. If you got vaccinated,
it will protect you from the variant if you're fully vaccinated.
Guess what you still were getting the delta variant, and

(04:05):
that was the breakthrough variant, the first breakthrough variant prior
to Amicron one point zero or BA one and now
BA two. But they never talked about monocolo lantibodies. Now
the person that has been in the forefront of exposing Fauci,
it has been Senator Rand Paul. If Republicans get control
of the Senate, he will be calling Fauci under very

(04:27):
different circumstances and we will get to the bottom of this.
But this is Rand Paul pointing out and having Fauci
point out that there's no scientific evidence that booster vaccines
and kids reduce hospitalizations or death. Doctor Fauci, the government
recommends everybody take a booster over age five. Are you

(04:47):
aware of any studies that show reduction in hospitalization or
death for children who take a booster right now, there's
not enough data that has been accumulated, Senator Poul to
indicate the death's the case. The I belie that the
recommendation that was made was based on the assumption that
if you look at the morbidity immortality of children within

(05:09):
each of the age groups, you know zero to eleven,
So there are no studies, and Americans should all know this.
There are no studies on children showing a reduction in
hospitalization or death with taking a booster. The only studies
that were permitted, the only studies that were presented, were

(05:30):
anibody studies. So they say, if we give you a booster,
you make anibodies. Now, a lot of scientists would question
whether or not that's proof of efficacy of a vaccine.
If I give you ten or if I give a
patient ten mRNA vaccines and they make protein each time,
or they make anibody each time, is that proof that

(05:51):
we should give ten boosters. Dr Fauci, No, I think
that is somewhat of an absurd exaggeration. Well, that is
the proof that you use your committees us that that's
the only proof you have to tell children to say
good boosters, that they make antibodies. So it's not an absurdity.
You're already yet like five boosters for people you've had,

(06:11):
you know, two or three boosters. It's like, where is
the proof? All right? Now? One last exchange between Senator
round Paul and Bauci. I mean, i've Fouci admitting there's
no scientific evidence that a booster vaccine and a kid
in any way reduces hospitalization. A death is pretty remarkable.
And Fouc in this case refuses to reveal to Senator

(06:33):
round Paul which scientists received royalties and from which companies.
I'd like to know the answer to this question myself.
Why don't you reveal how much you've gotten and from
what entities? The NIX refuses. Look, we ask them, We
ask them the NIH We asked them whether or not
who got it and how much? They refuse to tell
us they send it redacted. Here's what I want to know.

(06:56):
It's not just about you. Everybody on the vaccine committee.
Have any of them ever received money from the people
who make vaccines? Can you tell me that? Can you
tell me if anybody on the vaccine approval committees ever
I sive any money questions? Sound bite number one? Are
you gonna let me answer a question? Okay? So let
me give you some information. First of all, according to

(07:19):
the regulations, people who receive royalties are not required to
devulge them, even on their financial statement. According to the BIDOLAC.
So let me give you some example. From two thousand
fifteen to two thousand and twenty, I the only royalties

(07:39):
I have was my lab and I made a monoclonal
anybody for use in vitro reagent that had nothing to
do with patience. And during that period of time, my
royalties range from twenty one dollars a year to seventy
seven hundred dollars a year, and the average per year

(08:00):
year was one hundred ninety one and forty six cents.
It's all it's all rejacted, and you can't get any
information on the scientists. Senator Paul, your time is up.
If Republicans take the Senate, which I hope in November. Uh,
those hearings will be run quite differently and Senator Rampaul
will get the answers. He joins us. Now, Senator welcome

(08:22):
back to the program. Uh. Look, I wish doctor Fauci.
Oh I don't. We've had enough death in this country. UM.
I wouldn't wish my worst enemy that they get sick
from this thing. And you know, but what frustrates me
is I will I will never trust the NIH again ever,
or Fauci again, or the CDC or Woolenski or any

(08:46):
politician that is telling me anything about science. So definitively
like you get the vaccine. You're not going to get COVID. Well,
that got blown out of the water five thousand times over.
So um, I feel like many ways we've all been
lied to, and especially on the origins of the coronavirus
and the virology lab. Think about it this way. You

(09:09):
heard his response. He says, well, he got twenty one
dollars in royalties. Well, the information we got from Freedom
of Information Act was eighteen hundred doctors or eighteen hundred
NIH employees got one hundred and ninety three million, So
we're not talking about twenty one dollars. He's being disingenuous
and he's misdirecting us. Here, eighteen hundred scientists got one

(09:31):
hundred and ninety three million dollars. We want to know
who the scientists were and what company paid them to money,
because you cannot and should not sit on the vaccine
committee if you have been getting royalties from the company
that makes the vaccine. That's so obvious that I don't
think anybody in the whole world could disagree with that.
But when we asked the NIH for this information, they

(09:54):
redact the names of the scientists and they redact the companies.
So all we know is eighteen hundred doctors on hundred
and ninety three million. We don't know what committees they
sit on. But doctor Fauci oversees all research, virtually all
research billions of dollars in the country. We need to
know who he gets money from. Doesn't He didn't mention
is he got a million dollar prize. Public servants don't

(10:16):
take million dollar prize. There's no politicians allowed to take
anything like that. He makes more money than the president.
He and his wife combined to make eight hundred and
sixty thousand dollars a year, and then he gets a
million dollar prize. So the thing is, we do want
more information, we want more sunshine, and we suspect him
that we did find out one bit of this. And

(10:38):
there's one of the little factor. Here's this kind of
ancestuous relationship. We have government officials, for example, working with
the FDA. Don't many of them when they leave government
service end up working for the drug companies that they've
been regulating all those years into revolving door. The current
guide that Biden appointed was with big pharma. Now he's

(10:58):
back in government. So yes, it's a revolving door between
big pharma and government and back again. Sometimes like the
people that approved the Purdue relationship that made oxyconton, some
of them were working at the FDA simultaneous to also
working for Big Farma. That was a making oxycont Oh,
that's not a conflict of interest at all, not one bit.

(11:21):
Quick break. We'll come back more with Senator Ram Paul
of Kentucky on the other side. Eight hundred nine one,
Shawn a number if you want to be a part
of the program. In early January twenty twenty, as the
virus was just taken hold in the country, that there
was a flurry of emails with high ranking NIH officials
about whether or not they funded the Wuhan virology lab.

(11:42):
We know of the NIH what last October they finally
released their information that confirmed that they knew coronavirus research
was taking place and that gat of function research was
being held there. And we know through the Intercept and
Project Veritas we have even more common information. Does anyone
get held responsible? Is it true that American taxpayers help

(12:05):
fund this viology lab in Wuhan? Without question, American taxpayers
paid for this research. And why in the world we'd
be giving any money to China, this large country that
is our competitor. Why would we give them any money?
But I've passed an amendment already that should stop that.
If Nancy Pelosi lets my amendment stands as this bill
goes forward. If we win in November and I'm chairman

(12:28):
of a committee, I will use subpoena power to get
every last shread of evidence. We will bring in scientists
of all persuasions, not just Republican scientists. We will bring
in scientists of all political persuasions, but that are concerned
about gain a function research, and we will talk about
whether or not did this come from a lab, what's
the evidence in support of that. But we will also

(12:50):
talk about what do we do to prevent this from
happening again. A million people died in America, six million
people died worldwide. There has not been one congressional here
or investigation of the origins of this virus. We have
investigations every day on whether or not the plastic in
your bottles causes cancer, but we have not had one

(13:10):
investigation of where the pandemic started. This is outrageous. A
million Americans debt and not one congressional investigation unbelievable. Let
me move on to another issue that not many people
in Washington talk about. That's the debt and the deficit.
Years ago, Congressman Connie mac came out with the quote
penny plan. I know, I think you co sponsored its
in the Senate or sponsored or similar bill at the time.

(13:33):
But when Donald Trump was president, he talked about a
nickel plan. Now you're talking about a sixpenny plan, in
other words, to get the federal budget within balance. And
want to explain it because it's really simple. And I
think the average household because of Biden inflation and the

(13:54):
extra six thousand dollars per household that they're paying because
of the inflation, the extra two thousand dollars they're paying
for gas because of his gas crisis that he caused.
I think most Americans can relate to cutting back on spending,
and you're just trying to rein in spending at the
federal government level. Absolutely. The Balance Budget Amendment to the

(14:15):
Constitution is something that we've all voted for. Almost every
Republican in Congress has voted for it. And when it
comes forward as a budget, though, when I put forward
a budget that actually balances in five years, we lose
half of the Republicans, so they'll vote for something they
know won't pass to be symbolic. But when they get
a real chance to vote for a budget in the

(14:36):
Senate that will balance in five years, they don't do it.
When I started presenting this years ago, you could freeze
spending and the economy would grow when you would balance
the budget in five years. Then it became the penny plan.
Connie Mack and others were on it as well, and
you could cut one percent, cut one penny out of
every dollar and it would balance in five years. Now
we're up to sixpennies. Why I'm because spending has exploded.

(14:57):
But it's important that we have a budget. And one
reason you want to have a budget, for one reason
you want to minimize debt is that's where inflation comes
from the high price of gasoline and groceries. It's because
we run a deficit. The federal reserve buys the debt,
the federal reserve creates new money, the money supply expands,
and that new money chases the goods and chases the
prices higher. It's as simple as that. See if all

(15:19):
these Biden administration officials say, well, we don't know what
to do we've done everything well, now they've done everything wrong.
They keep adding more debt. The way you fix inflation
is quit spending so much and quit going so far
to debt. By the way, when you see Moe Brooks
over the weekend, I know you're doing two town halls
with him. I'm supporting him as well. He used to
fill in on my radio show and I was a

(15:40):
local host in Huntsville, Alabama, and he was the Madison
County District Attorney. And I know you're going to be
doing one event in Huntsville, and I'm not sure where
the other event is. I think in Homewood, Alabama, somewhere
around there. And just tell Moe said alow and wish
him luck in this runoff we'll do. I'm gonna be

(16:00):
with Mobrooks Friday this Friday at noon in Homewood at
the Valley Hotel, and then this Friday at three o'clock,
I'm gonna be in Huntsville at the four Points Sheraton.
We think Mo Brooks has a chance. Runoffs are extraordinary.
He is the conservative candidate. All of the establishment in
Washington wants the other candidate because all the establishment wants

(16:21):
a rubber stamp for big government. I promise you Mo
Brooks is a fighter and I'm all in for him.
We support him as well. Senator, thank you for being
with us. Eight hundred nine one. Shawn. If you want
to be a part of the program, you are listening

(16:46):
to the best of the Shawn Hannity Show. Shawn Scott.
More behind the scenes information, more contacts than anybody, more friends,
behind the curtain. Shawn Hannah is on. So I'm reading
yesterday a story about Congresswoman Lauren Bobert, who's been a

(17:09):
real fighter, and I'm a great congresswoman from from the
great state of Colorado. And anyway, there's this group I've
heard of him before, mud Breakers, American mud Breakers Pack,
and they made such unbelievable claims against her. I said,
I sat there and I said, this is incredible. And

(17:31):
she denies every one of them, claiming she was an
unlicensed paid escort, making allegations that she didn't have one,
that she had two abortions, saying, you know, basically accusing
her of being a call girl, and everything in between.
I don't even want to get into the specifics of it.

(17:52):
Congressman Bobert is with us congresswoman, thank you for being
with us, and I know that you and your lawyers
have said absolutely every allegation is blatantly false and disgusting,
and it won't stop you from advancing freedom and conservative values.
You pointed out this group's vile conduct and demonstrates why
people are fed up with politics. I'm not going to

(18:13):
stand by and pretend this is normal behavior. This political committee,
funded by far left democratic donors, run by two left
wing political operatives, published pages false statements they knew were
completely fabricated. You said, the law on this type of
defamation is clear and this conduct will be subject to
civil and criminal penalties. Let's first talk about where did

(18:36):
this all come from. Well, i'll tell you Sean. First
of all, thanks so much for having me on to
talk about this. But I think if we're going to
start with the malice being proved here, muck rakers they
came out and said we're gonna go after Lauren Bobert
in Colorado. They didn't say we're going to Colorado, We're
going to try to learn more about this person. They

(18:57):
said we're going after, We're taking her down, we're going
to fire her. So there was malice intent. From the
very beginning of all of this, and then there is
no evidence to back up any of their claims. And
it's really a shame that I have to come on
your show and defend myself from such baseless and horrific allegations.
When I decided to run for office, I knew that
I'd take shots from the squad, the left, and even

(19:19):
rhinos in my own party, but never sean in my
wildest dreams that I believe that some political hacks could
say I was an escorted license or unlicensed. I don't
care to say that I had two abortions, say that
I was a meth addict, all totally false and with
zero evidence that it even trended number one on Twitter

(19:40):
and would be written up by reckless publications later. So
I'm going to defend myself, defend my name, defend my family,
and I'm taking legal actions against this guy, David Wheeler
and muckrakers, and we're moving forward with a lawsuit now.
I guess the reason that some people picked up on
this is this is this same group as I understand

(20:01):
that that went after Madison Cawthorne, only in his case.
I guess some of the allegations were true and backed
up by photographic evidence. Isn't that true? Right? This is
the same group that went after Madison Cawthorne, And you know,
they felt a little high a mighty after after his
unfortunate loss there, and they decided to come after me.

(20:22):
They said, hey, we got a good thing going here.
But you know, the thing with this is John, It's
it's so sloppy. Allegations are sloppy and false. And I
couldn't have even had two abortions when they said that
I was. I was pregnant with two of my sons.
When they're claiming I had these abortions and I've never
had one to begin with. So they're so called anonymous source.

(20:44):
It's supposedly proved I was an escort by sending this
guy a photo that wasn't even me. It's been verified
as another woman. And worst of all, we have the
text where this man was told by his source that
one of his allegations was made up. Before he released it,
he knew it was false, and he moved forward anyway,

(21:05):
even published his source saying this is totally made up,
and then changed his story later. So my team has
spoken with multiple's attorney and multiple attorneys, and we're going
to speak with more to find the right fits, and
we're going to make sure that this political hack never
has the opportunity to do this to anyone else again.
So they published a picture, a picture supposedly as from

(21:28):
years ago, and apparently that person has been identified as
not you. Is that correct? That's correct. Yes, the woman
is not me, and it's completely smeared all over these
reckless publications and all over social media saying that this
is me. You know, Sean, this is the politics of
personal destruction, and this is why people hate politics. I've

(21:50):
been in DC this week, and I mean, I just
want you to put this in perspective. I had home
tonight and I have to explain to my nine year
old what an escort is and that mom never did that.
I have to reassure my four voys that I didn't
have two abortions, that they don't have two siblings that
never made it. This is absolutely disgusting. It's thick, and

(22:13):
it needs to stop. Let me ask you about because
Fox Digital talk to the I guess the president of
this organization, and they claim that the only one person,
the one person they can answer these questions, is you
and they stand behind their source. Now my understanding is
is that there's one source and they're claiming they have

(22:34):
text messages. Are any of the text messages from you
or to you or from you or anybody you know? No,
this is a personal string of text messages from this
anonymous source. Between this anonymous source and David Wheeler, these
are the only two people that are talking. This anonymous
source grabbed wrong photos from the Internet and put them

(22:56):
in the text string and said, this is Lauren Bobert
on some sugar Daddy website that I was trying to
obtain clients and uh, you know, and that I called
this paper play, I mean absolutely discussing. So his anonymous
source is his only source. And then he turns around
and says, Lauren Bobert is the only person who can

(23:18):
answer these claims, and I stand by my source. So
if if you stand by the source. But if the
photo isn't really a photo of you, and that's been
pointed out, why wouldn't they at least correct that part
of the story, right? And even after that was uh
was made apparent in these publications, Um, even the Daily

(23:38):
Beast came out and said this is not Lauren Bobert
and uh and and they still said, we stand beside
our source. I believe it was the Washington Examiner article.
He said, No, our source says this is her, that
they saw this on the website. The photo isn't on
the website. Uh, and it's not me. Um, So for
for them to continue this is absolutely nonsense, and this

(24:03):
is why I have UM Legal involved. But I do
want to assure your listeners that these lives will not
stop me from fighting for freedom, liberty, and conservative values.
I don't get my identity from Twitter trolls or fake news.
My identity. My identity is found in christ and that
will never change. Now the issue is who are you

(24:24):
going to sue? And obviously the organization or the pack
in this particular case, but I assume they're getting their
money to do this work from high end liberal donors.
Do they Are they helped accountable for the actions of
the people they hire. Well, this is what we're looking
into right now with my attorneys. I got off the
phone with the attorneys to to join you. I'll be

(24:45):
calling them again once we we end this, and I'm
really trying to button this down. But they see the allegations.
They see, they see the truth and what I'm saying
and the things that I'm able to prove, and they
believe that they This is a really strong case, and
the law is clear, Sean. If you knowingly spread lies
to hurt someone, that's libel. That's exactly what's happening here.

(25:09):
And that's why I'm not letting this go. I've been
working with these lawyers, you know, talking with defamation specialists,
and I'm going to see this through. Lawsuits are expensive,
so I mean, of course, you know, we're going to
need a lot of help to see this through to
the end. Any listeners willing to help contribute to defend
my name, which I think goes really to the greater

(25:30):
good to make sure that this can never happen again.
And and something that we're really focusing on is defamation
per se. I mean that is that is very weighty
and you cannot accuse someone of a crime, you cannot
accuse someone of having an STD, you cannot impune the
chastity of a woman, and that's exactly what they're doing here.

(25:50):
So you know, I don't think it's a coincidence that
these lives were spread while voters in my district are
currently casting their ballots. Radical Democrats want me out of office,
and they'll lie and writes the laws to try to
beat me. But that's not going to happen because my
district knows. The good people of Colorado know that I
that I am fighting for them, and I know that

(26:10):
they will have my back. Um, I've got to imagine
that this was probably the most winnable libel slander defamation
case of a public figure that I've seen in my lifetime. Yeah,
you know, and proving a defamation claim against the public
figure does in fact fall under a heightened standard of proof.
It not only requires proof that the statement was false,

(26:32):
but requires evidence that the defendant knew or should have
known that the statement. Uh what's false? So is what
is legally and financially disastrous for muckrakers is the fact
that we also have evidence, including internal muckrakers text and
email communications, that demonstrates muckrakers did in fact public statements

(26:53):
knowing those statements to be false. Further a, numerous statements
and images you know that they list, With even a
five minute webster, muckrakers would have been able to see
that this was false. So as I said, Sean, muckrakers,
they're sloppy, reckless, and wildly irresponsible. And these these actions

(27:14):
have created substantial legal liability for muckrakers, David Wheelers in
his personal capacity, and probably each a donor to the
organization who chose to fund the effort knowing that it
would result in defamation. You know, it's it's it's just
a sad thing. Quick break. More with Congresswoman Lauren Bobert
on the other side than your calls, all right, More

(27:50):
with Congresswoman Lauren Bobert of Colorado. When we were vetting
Barack Obama, I knew that I had to get every
fact right, and we checked and we double checked, and
we triple checked, and we had numerous sources, and we
even we sent people the Reverend Rights Church and we
bought tapes that they were selling there. And the same
with Bernadine Dorn and Bill Airs and Acorn and all

(28:14):
these different organizations they're part of. When we were investigating
the the conspiracy Trump Russia collusion, which we were totally
vindicated on, I mean, there were we double checked, we
had always had more than one particular source. We had
background information because I knew if I got it wrong,
I would be in trouble, but I'd also be putting

(28:35):
people that work for me in potentially legal in harms
way legally, or or my partners in radio and TV
in a bad position. So I always tried to do
it very thoroughly, and maybe it doesn't go as fast
as you want. Um. It seems like this was all rushed,
and I'm a little bewildered that it's we're talking about

(28:56):
only one source here redacted, and they're not releasing these
quote so called evidence that they have that would prove this,
and you are denying it as emphatically as anybody I've
ever heard, and I've known you long enough to believe you,
and I and I think it's horrible in the middle
of an election for you to have to go through this. Yes,

(29:17):
and you know it's interesting, even with the horrible abortion claims,
I am staunchly pro life. I just spend the most
vulnerable of our nation. I'm excited to see this Rob
Wade decision come out and hopefully we will begin to
send save hundreds of thousands of lives with that decision.

(29:38):
We've lost sixty three million children in our nation since
Rob Way has has passed. But even even in a
recording recorded phone call that David Wheeler has published on
his website with another person who he was trying to
get information from. He led that person and said, you know,

(29:58):
we'll tell me about abortion, and she was like, what
are you talking about. This person said, no, I don't
believe that she's ever had an abortion. I don't know
anything about that, and I know her better than anyone.
And so before this anonymous text drink even it was
even published, maybe before it even happened, he asked somebody
who said that they were very closely connected with me,

(30:20):
and that person said, no, she's never had an abortion.
So he was even trying to back this up and couldn't,
and still went ahead with that information, saying that I
had abortions, which is, I mean, absolutely horrible. And like
I said, Sean, I have to go home and explain
this to my children. Now I've lived this with you.

(30:41):
I know exactly the feeling. It's not fun, it's not
and you know this is why I always urged my audience,
and my audience does understand this. Never rushed to judgment,
always believe in the presumption of innocence. And I'm listening
to the passion which you are defending yourself and your
honor and your family's honor and integrity. And I hope

(31:01):
the people of Colorado give you that presumption because that
is fundamental in our society, is our system of justice.
And an allegation so salacious like this is just the
worst kind and it hurts. It's painful. Talk about pain
and suffering. This is painful. This causes suffering in families,
and you're right there are kids involved as well. But

(31:24):
we'll stay on top of this. Congresswoman. Let us know
any updates you might have, and we'll watch it closely.
But I've not seen a case like this that is
more clear cut in my life based on everything you
just told us. So we appreciate you you sharing it.
We'll sorry you going through it. Thank you so much.
On I certainly appreciate you allowing me to come on
here and talk about this. I trust the voters in

(31:46):
my district. I trust the American people. And if any
of your listeners want to help make sure I get
reelected in the in the primary and continue this fight,
please go to Lauren for freedom dot com. You know
this stuff can get it can get price and you know,
I mean just every little bit helped to combat these
wives with truth. Appreciate Congresswoman Lauren Boebert out in Colorado

(32:08):
who's been a fighter for conservative causes. Thank you for
being with us, Quick break right back, your calls on
the other side, straight ahead. This is the best of
the Sean Hannity Show. Don't forget. Stay tuned for more
right after the latest news, right here on this radio station.