December 3, 2024 • 32 mins
Dr. and Congressman Ronny Jackson, is outraged by the double standard for Hunter Biden and his laundry list of crimes.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Well, we have come in to your city.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Wanna way I.
Speaker 3 (00:07):
Get talas and sing you a conscious cell? Will all
be desire high jail.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
And if you want a little bang.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
In agin, you ain't come along.
Speaker 5 (00:20):
Okay, I know how it is to be spoken, but like, oh, well,
the Democrats need to just really the house is literally
on fire and y'all still looking for the keys.
Speaker 6 (00:28):
The damage that the twenty twenty four campaign has done, that,
the damage that this decade has done to a Democratic
brand is almost unfathomable.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
Well, here's an alternative thought. Make your own dinner.
Speaker 7 (00:39):
Mega, make your own sandwiches, wipe your.
Speaker 5 (00:41):
Own tears, troll amongst yourself with Elon, and leave us alone.
Speaker 8 (00:45):
Tradom is back in style.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Welcome to the revol Well.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
Coming to your city.
Speaker 3 (00:56):
Don't the way I get talasan saying you a conscious cell?
Speaker 1 (01:02):
Sean Hennity Show, More Me I'm the Scenes, information on
freaking news, and more bold inspired solutions for America Like
you Got can an hour two Sean Hannity's show told
Free It's eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn, if
you want to be a part of the program. Still
a ton of fallout as it relates to the issue
(01:24):
of illegal immigrants and the pardon of Hunter Biden, and
you know, it really is, it really is pretty amazing
the reaction to of Democrats when it comes to the
issue of their analysis and the legacy media's analysis of
why Donald Trump won and they didn't. We're going to
(01:45):
get to all of that in just a few minutes. First,
I want to bring in we want to talk a
little bit more about the Hunter Biden pardon. Jonathan Turtley
made a good point, and he pointed out that Hunter
Biden could still be prosecuted on additional charges which would
not have been covered by his father's pardon, which I
found interesting considering it's full and unconditional for what he
(02:07):
may have committed from January first, twenty fourteen, as I've
been pointing out interesting timeline considering Barisma to December first,
twenty twenty four but as Turley was on Fox and
Friends this morning pointing out Hunter could potentially face charges
if he's called to testify before Congress about the alleged
influence pedaling scheme, and could be charged with perjury if
(02:29):
he makes false statements, and he said he could be
called to testify and the last time he did that,
the House accused him of giving false testimony. Now we
brought this up last night. Now this does not exonerate
Joe Biden himself, the big guy. And remember Hunter, Biden's
laptop implicates his own father. Half my income goes to Pops,
(02:50):
and it goes on and on and then other family members.
How much did Joe Biden's brother make in all of this?
Is he going to get a part? Is Joe going
to pardon himself? What about wives and ex wives and
kids that got money as a result of zero experience Hunter,
you know, getting paid millions and millions of dollars from
Russian oligarchs Maerisman, no experience and energy oil Gas Ukraine,
(03:13):
Russia or a Chinese energy company CEFC. I'm sitting here
with my father, I mean, Joe Biden's implemented all over
all of this. Anyway, uh, Doctor Ronnie Jackson, Congressman Jackson
is with us. He is pretty outraged by all of this.
And anyway, Ronnie Jackson, Congressman Ronnie Jackson, Doctor Ronnie Jackson
(03:33):
joins us.
Speaker 3 (03:34):
Now, how are you, sar.
Speaker 8 (03:35):
Hey Sean, thank you for having me. I'm doing fine,
thank you?
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Uh well, let's talk about it.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
I mean, you obviously are pretty pissed off at this,
but it doesn't surprise me. I don't think it probably
surprised you either.
Speaker 8 (03:46):
Well, no, it's absolutely It just outrages me, to be
honest with, and outrages a lot of people in the
country right now. After four years, Sean, of this weaponization.
They actually took the federal government, the Biden administration did
and found every single way that they could to weaponize
it against President Trump and anybody that was associated with
him or anybody that shared his agenda. And then now
(04:06):
they roll in at the very end and they make
claims that there there was a political nature to this,
and that's why Biden is is is pardoning Hunter. It's
absolutely ridiculous, and the American people see right through it.
I think this is gonna this is gonna backfire on them, Sean,
I honestly do, because you know, as I was mentioned earlier,
I heard Jason's Jason Smith talking au a little bit earlier.
He said, you know now that they don't have the
(04:27):
the FBI and the d o J doesn't have an
investigation to use as an excuse for why they can't
provide emails and bank records and everything else. Now they're
gonna have to provide that information to Congress, and Congress
may actually get access to information that they haven't had before.
And I hope that Jamie Comer and and and Uh
Jim Jim Uh. I hope they basically in Judiciary and
(04:51):
and the Oversight Committee, Jim Jordan. I hope that they
they pursue this aggressively. I mean, I know they will,
And and I think that the Biden administration understands that,
you know, things are about to change drastically at DJ
and that stuff's probably about to become available anyways. But
he I think it's going to lead to the implication
of many other family members, including Joe Biden himself, And
(05:12):
I think they're going to be in a real bad
spot when the dust settles on all of this. And
just like you said, this covers him until until the
end of this year, until December of twenty twenty four.
But if they if he gets drug back before Congress
and his stories don't line up, or he lies to
the American people like he's repeatedly done, then he's in trouble.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
Well what about Joe Biden, not as president because we
had the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. But what
about his actions when he was vice president and as
someone was doing all these foreign business deals and he
was a financial beneficiary at least according to Hunter Biden
in his own words.
Speaker 8 (05:48):
Well, I mean, I think that's why the pardoner is
ten years, you know. I mean, it's you know, it's
a blanket pardon that goes all the way back to
the early days before Beresma, and I think they know
this is almost an admission on part of the on
the part of the Biden crime family, in my mind,
that there is stuff out there that we are going
to find when President Trump gets back into office, and
(06:09):
he's going to try his best to just way, I
guess he did go back and pardon him for ten
years with the blanket pardon, knowing knowing that there's going
to be criminal activity that's gonna that's going to be
you know, that that's going to come out, and that
he potentially is going to get charged with and they
could bring him down. So I think that this is
you know, Joe Joe Biden's trying to do it to
(06:29):
you know, to cover himself as well, because, like you said, Uh,
when you start looking into this and when you really
dig into it, we already know at this point, but
we're going to be able to prove without without any
doubt whatsoever in the very near future here when we
get the d O J and Uh. The FBI straightened
out that Joe Biden benefited from all of this, and
that you know that the hunter used the influence from
(06:51):
having Joe Biden as his father as vice president to
line the pockets of not just himself, but if Joe Biden,
Joe Biden's brother, other family members, then tar Biden family
got rich. You selling the influence of the vice president
at the time, and and that's that's the crime. Obviously.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
What do you make of Let's go back and Joe
Biden before the Council on Foreign Relations. It's a tape
I played often and he brags about the fact that
you know, he goes to Ukraine. He was tasked with
during the Obama administration, with being in charge of Ukraine,
and he goes there with the billion dollars in loan
guarantees and he says, well, you're not getting a billion.
(07:29):
You're not getting a billioned until you fire the prosecutor
the prosecutor is the guy that was investigating Barisma, and
the prosecutor was the guy that was that was investigating Hunter,
and you know, son of a bee, they did it.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
Here's what he said.
Speaker 9 (07:44):
I had gotten a commitment from Porshenko and from Yachtsnyuk
that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and
they didn't. So they said they had. They were walking
out to Prescott. I said no, I said, I'm not
going to go or we're not going to give you
the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority, you're
not the president. The president said, I said, call him.
(08:05):
I said, I'm telling you're not getting a billion dollars.
I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm gonna be
leaving here. And I think it was what six hours.
I look as I'm leaving the six hours. If the
prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money.
Speaker 10 (08:16):
Oh, son of them.
Speaker 3 (08:19):
Got fired.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
Okay, So the guy investigating his son, with zero experience
in Ukraine Energy gas Oil, had no experience whatsoever being
paid millions of dollars being investigated. He gets the prosecutor
doing the investigation fired, and he leverages a billion taxpayer dollars.
Why does that sound like a quid pro quote to me?
(08:40):
And here's the challenge for the new Congress. Should they
be investigating Joe Biden and Joe's brother and Joe's family,
and would it be wise for Joe to pardon himself
and other family members if he really wants us to go.
Speaker 8 (08:53):
Away, well stand by, I think you probably will. I
think that's that's coming. But you know, this is just
another example. If that had been Donald Trump or somebody
that had said those things, that would have been the
end of his political career right there and then. But
you know, this is just you know, it's no coincidence
that we've referred to, you know, the Biden family as
the Biden crime family, because you know, we can see
all the stuff that's that's that's happened. You know that
(09:14):
that's criminal, you know, in nature. But the way they
carry themselves, they carry themselves like they're a mafia family,
like they're untouchable. And that's just this whole attitude like
he didn't really care. But you know, I think that
he will. I think that he will go back and
he will see he will pardon other people in his family.
And I wouldn't be surprised if he provides a bank
a blanket pardon to himself for you know, ten years
on the way out the door, it wouldn't surprise me
(09:36):
a bit. But yes, absolutely answer questions. Congress should be
doing every single thing that we can to continue to
dig in this, dig into this and hold them accountable,
because look, Sean, if we don't hold people accountable, you know,
there's you know, President Trump has a lot of big
plans for the country. He's going to reform things and
make things a lot better. But in the process, people
that have done what they've done country over the last
four years, they have to be held accountable. If there's
(09:58):
no accountability, this will happen and again. And we can't
afford as a country for any of this kind of
stuff to happen again. With the weaponization and some of
the stuff that's gone on for the last four years.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
The leftwolds claim this is weaponization. However, you know, when
you look at the basic, simple fundamental facts, no experience
paid millions Russian oligarch Elena Batarina, Kazakhstan, Romania, Mexico, China,
et cetera. And the sheer volume of money that they
(10:28):
were making without any experience, and then it's being distributed
and given to this family member and that family member.
It really is remarkable, And I think you're right, the
double standards thinks to high heaven. With all of that said,
and in the interest of justice, I think it has
to be. It certainly has to be investigated, and we
have to get to the bottom of it. But the
(10:49):
second part of it is, I don't want it to
interfere with fixing the economy, making us energy dominant. I
don't want this to interfere at all with securing our borders,
restoring law and order in small towns and big cities.
We already see the world reacting to Donald Trump's presidency.
You see little Justin in Canada, you see Mexico reacting.
(11:11):
You see all over the Middle East his Ballah and
Hamas and the Iranians are hiding. The Chinese have been
awfully quiet, and you know, the world and even Zelensky's
talking about, Yeah, I'd give up land in order to
make this work.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 8 (11:26):
No, I don't think it only fear. I think that,
you know, the Republicans can can do this and do
the work of the work of the people at the
same time, and that's really what the judiciary or what sorry,
what the Oversight committee and committees like that, they're they're
supposed to be doing stuff like this, like you know,
looking into things that have happened and holding people accountable.
And I think that they'll be able to do this,
(11:47):
and I think they had. Like I said, I think they.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
Have to do this.
Speaker 8 (11:50):
I'm a firm believer that if no one's held accountable
that and and people get away with this. It's the
same thing with the voter fraud that we've seen over
the last few years. As long as no one goes
to jail for voter fraud, voter fraud's going to keep happening.
No one's going to care. And it's the same kind
of thing here with the weaponization of government. As long
as people that have done this I don't pay a
price for it, the people that fall in in the
next democratic administration, we'll pull that out of the playbook
(12:13):
and do the exact same thing. It worked last time,
and they'll do it again.
Speaker 3 (12:17):
Yeah. I mean, it really is.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
And you know, I think some of the more important
things that we've got to do here is put in
place measures that this type of weaponization can't happen again.
I mean, you know, Joe Biden talked about, well, this
only happened to my son because of politics. I Meanwhile,
he sat idly by when the Statute of Limitations case
in New York was going on and a novel leag
(12:39):
legal theory was put forward that had never been tried before,
and the third highest ranking member of the Justice Department
go out goes to New York to help Alvin Bragg.
Nobody would take that kind of demotion unless you really
wanted to get somebody running on a campaign of get Trump.
Alan Dershwitz wrote a book about it. You know they
(13:01):
call it, you know they would. They stacked the charges
one after another, but again it was a legal nda
put together by an attorney and labeled the legal expense.
It should have gone away. Then we have the whole
January sixth issue. Alan Dershowitz is out there today's saying
and urging Joe Biden a pardon the January sixth protesters,
(13:21):
not the people that were violent, but the many people
that you know, their their mistake was they they they
went into the Capitol when they shouldn't have the uh,
but they're getting five ten year sentences.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
That sounds excessive to me.
Speaker 8 (13:33):
Yeah, I agree with to Sewan, and I think, you know,
if he doesn't do that, which I doubt he will,
but Trump's gonna, you know, President Trump is going to
do that. They made one big miscalculation in this whole thing, Sean,
and that was that they were dealing with Donald Trump, because,
to be honest with you, it didn't succeed. Overall, the weaponization,
all the things you just described that were directed to
President Trump to try to, you know, to politically kill
him and get him, get him, you know, out of
(13:55):
the game. None of that worked. And the only reason
that didn't work but worked was because it was done Trump.
Had that been a normal presidential candidate, another politician, they
would have devastated them and they would have went away.
So just because it didn't work this time doesn't mean
that they can't make it work next time if we
let them get away with it. The only reason it
didn't work this time was because they were dealing with
Donald Trump and any individuals.
Speaker 1 (14:17):
You know, let me play Hillary Clinton from two thousand
and eight talking about the illegal immigrants, and here's a quiz,
who does it sound like?
Speaker 11 (14:24):
I think we got to have tough conditions. Tell people
to come out of the shadows. If they've committed a crime,
deport them, no questions asked, They're gone.
Speaker 3 (14:33):
If they.
Speaker 11 (14:36):
If they've been working in are law abiding. We should say,
here are the conditions for you staying. You have to
pay a stiff fine because you came here illegally. You
have to pay back taxes, and you have to try
to learn English, and you have.
Speaker 10 (14:49):
To wait in line.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
Oh, who's that sound like? It sounds like Donald Trump?
Speaker 8 (14:55):
Anyways, she sounds maga, sounds mad.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
A great way to put it. Well, it's it's going
to be a little difficult in the House. Do you
believe that the slim majority will hold well Republicans? Will
they agree on the major portions of the President Trump's agenda.
Speaker 8 (15:15):
I think we have to sean. This is our last
chance to fix this. I think everybody knows that. I
think that there'll be people like me, and I've always
been very hesitant about calling out other Republicans if they
don't agree with me on something, or they don't you know,
vote you know the way. You know I would vote
with something like this, supporting President Trump. But I think
we're going to have to get to a point, honestly
where we just have to we have to hold each
(15:36):
other accountable. And you know, if they feel like they're
coming from a you know, a blue district and they
won their district there and they're a Republican in the
blue district and they can't do this, they can't do that.
The rest of us are just going to have to
give them top cover. Tell them that will help them
when reelection comes around. We'll make sure they keep their seat.
But they got to do the right thing. They got
to vote with President Trump and they got to save
this party. Are they going to save this country?
Speaker 1 (15:58):
Tungers and Ronnie Jackson, Doctor Ronnie Jackson, Thank you, sir,
appreciate it. Quick break right back will continue, all right.
Remember Mika Brazinski swearing up and down on the Liberal
Joe Show, Liberal Joe and Mika Show that oh no, no,
Joe will never pardon Hunters, not like Trump.
Speaker 12 (16:16):
Current President of the United States, has so much respect
for the law that he has said he would not
pardon his son. I mean, what you know, again, it's
all about the contrast.
Speaker 1 (16:30):
All about the contrast. So Joe to contrast pardons Hunter
and I bet there are more pardons to come. Time
will tell. And now what is Joe Liberal Joe and
Mika saying. They're they're ripping the New York Times and
other mainstream organizations for blowing you know, the Hunter Biden
(16:51):
pardon out of out of context and out of proportion.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
I'm like, you got to be kidding me.
Speaker 12 (16:56):
Listen, no matter what you think of this pardon, the
coverage of this is as if. I mean, you look
at what has happened on the Trump side, especially if
you have parallel pardons that Trump has done himself. It's
just always so it seems so hysterically imbalanced. I just
(17:17):
you know, when you when you read how they're covering this,
you look at the things that are happening on the
other side, it is well.
Speaker 7 (17:24):
Dave, that's something that you're hearing. I know you're not
a media critic, but I know you've heard this complaint.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
You know, the New York.
Speaker 7 (17:30):
Times, like the top six stories on online today we're
all about the pardon. You looked at the Washington Post yesterday,
you expected like war is over, you know, in massive
headlines talk about the frustration that many Democrats are having.
On the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal,
(17:51):
a lot of mainstream organizations blowing this up to a
size that they believe is really out of proportion given
everything down Trump has done in the past. So what
he's doing right.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Now hysterically imbalanced. That would describe the entire show and
network their show, and the network that is MSDNC, and
that would be fake New CNN, and that would be
most broadcast channels when it comes to all things Donald
Trump and the media, you know, legacy media, which I've
(18:22):
declared dead, gone and buried with no influence, and that
was proven in this election.
Speaker 3 (18:27):
Washington Post.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
By the way, I'm laughing at this some idiot over there,
you know today slamming me.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
Well, Hannity quotes the mainstream media.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
Usually I'm making fun of them, or we actually do
something called attribution on this program, and if I see something,
I attributed to what the source is, even when I
disagree with it or mocking it, just as a means
of being accurate. And they're wrong all the time, and
we end up getting everything right. But anyway, the media,
(18:57):
you know, was out there telling America you know that
Joe's not going to do it list.
Speaker 7 (19:03):
And this week, of course, Hunter Biden was found guilty,
and Joe Biden has very clearly said he would not
pardon his son.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
He would not commute his sentence.
Speaker 12 (19:11):
The current president of the United States has so much
respect for the law that he has said he would
not pardon his son.
Speaker 13 (19:20):
He is not pardoning his son, which he could do.
These are federal charges. He is not doing that. That
is a power. He is a power for both of those.
He is not doing it because he is living what
it means to have a rule of law in this country.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
So I guess now he doesn't believe in the rule
of law. Wasn't that the pitbull of Robert Muller Andrew
Weisman making that comment. I think it was him, I'm
not sure. And then we have Dan Goldman, I love
this today, confronted with his past comments that Biden wouldn't
pardon Hunter and lo and behold, he did listen to this.
Speaker 10 (19:59):
Do you think pardon for his son would be a mistake?
Speaker 2 (20:03):
Yes, And I don't think there's any chance that President
Biden is going to do that, unlike his predecessor, who
pardoned all of his friends and anyone who had any
access to him. And I think you see that in
this case where he kept on and Merrick Garland kept on.
A Trump appointed US attorney to investigate the president's son.
If there is not an indication of the independence of
(20:26):
the Department of Justice beyond that, I don't know what
we could look for.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
Well, when you reacted, this was when the deal had
fallen through. And I hear what you're saying about the
Cash Petel appointment. But you know you took him at
his word. So what does that feel like knowing that
he's gone back on it.
Speaker 14 (20:47):
Well, as I said, I'm disappointed that after the plea
fell through and it became clear about why it did,
including Republican congressional inter mention in this case, which made
this case very unique and very different from any other case.
(21:07):
I think that we all, perhaps I should have as well,
recognized that this is not the normal prosecution. I said
many times that if Hunter Biden were not Hunter Biden,
he would never be charged with these crimes.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Anyway, let's get to our phones. James and Mississippi.
Speaker 3 (21:25):
How are you. You're on the Sean Hannity Show, thy.
Speaker 4 (21:27):
Son, how are you doing today? Man?
Speaker 3 (21:29):
I'm good man. What's going on?
Speaker 2 (21:31):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (21:31):
Not much hope you had it, Happy Thanksgiving and everything.
Speaker 3 (21:34):
Love it. I like a little time off, can't wait
what's going on?
Speaker 4 (21:38):
But yeah, I was wondering, since Cash Pateel did get
the FBI director spot, would it be possible for Donald
Trump to tell him or anybody who he appoints to
try and find something to go after the bidens with
this blanket pardon.
Speaker 1 (21:53):
And look, I've talked about this publicly and I'll repeat
it again because it's so important to me, and I
just I think that the power of the pardon can
be transformational under this administration coming in. And you know,
for example, Aliceburray Johnson is somebody that we love on
(22:14):
this program, and why not make her like the pardons
are and task her with finding people in jail with
excessive sentences, people who have been have dramatically changed their
lives behind bars, People like her, You had a life sentence,
one drug offense. Donald Trump let her out, and you know,
transform that power of the presidential pardon.
Speaker 3 (22:37):
And I would.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
I'd give out pardons, you know, once a week at
least to worthy people that people like Alicebury Johnson confined.
And I would I'd have I'd focus on disparity in sentencing,
which is very real, and and that's against minorities. They've
been unfairly sentenced. For example, cocaine is cocaine. To me,
I don't care if it's crack or powder, but you
get a bigger sentence of its crack versus powder cocaine. Well,
(23:02):
to me, it's it's it's you know, if we're gonna
have laws against using cocaine, which I think we should
not for full drug legalization, I think that would be
such a danger to our society. But you know, you know,
I think we have to be fair and sentencing, and we're.
Speaker 4 (23:18):
Not absolutely and I think even the pardon should extend
all the Jay six people.
Speaker 8 (23:24):
Violent or not.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
Well, that's what Alan Dershowitz is are urging Joe Biden
to do, you know, except for maybe the few people
that were involved in violence against police or whatever. I mean,
the sentences were so over the top. I mean it
was pretty unbelievable. You know, five ten years for trespassing.
I mean that's ostensibly what happened, and it should it
(23:47):
have happened? No, should they have in place measures so
it never happens again? Yes, I said that in real time.
I meant it and the people that are responsible for
acting in ways that were absolutely responsible and law breaking,
they've got to be held accountable. But for the people
that had just walked in and were taking pictures and
roaming around and taking videos, did they really deserve five
(24:10):
ten years in jail. No, they did not, And to
me it was like such a hyper focus. Meanwhile, we
have known terrorists, cartels, illegal immigrants that are rapist, murderers,
and violent criminals, and nobody paid any attention to that.
And the prioritization of this and this weaponized DJ was
just to get Trump rather than keeping all of us
(24:32):
safe from wide open borders. That and those laws should
have been enforced. Or going after you know, traditional Catholics
are going after pro life people, or going after people
like Linda that dare to speak up at a school
board meeting. I mean not that they went after her,
but the point is they're going after moms and dads
at school board meetings. Anyway, my friend, appreciate the call.
(24:54):
Glad you're out there, Gary in Tennessee. Gary, how are
you glad you called?
Speaker 8 (24:59):
Yes?
Speaker 10 (25:00):
A big fan, Shawn. First of all, I'm going to
thank you for having me on. Thank you the epitome
of the unmitigated gall of Biden to think that his
son should be above the law of all of us,
and he just proved it by doing what he did.
(25:20):
He doesn't give two flips for the rest of the
United States. He never has. You know, I'm seventy seven.
About about four years ago, they put us put our
food stamps down to thirty dollars. That was Biden when
he first went in office. How can a person live
on thirty dollars a month. That's insane. That guy is criminal.
(25:42):
We know he's a criminal. They got the money trails
to him, They got everything they need to figure out
that he knew what he was doing when he put
that pardon on his son.
Speaker 6 (25:55):
He did a.
Speaker 10 (25:56):
Blanket anything he might have done, even if he don't
get caught, for if he gets caught later, he's pardoned.
So that is just that's just admitting that they're all criminals.
Like you said, the Biden crime family, that's what they are.
Speaker 1 (26:12):
If I called it, we affectionately refer to him as
the syndicate. Now do I do I think this is
the end of it. No, I think there's going to
be more pardons. I would not be surprised if Joe's
brother is next and other family members have pardoned as well.
I would not be surprised if Joe ends up pardoning
himself if he feels that the law is going to
be enforced equally.
Speaker 10 (26:33):
We'll know what the laws of treason are. But you know,
these things have to be looked into because a lot
of us know what has happened over these last four years.
And I watched you Know faithfully, and I watch your
program all the time. That was my favorite show. But
I can tell you that the laws they twisted around
(26:55):
to say like they're the good people, they're they're not
virtuous in any way in any means, you know. And
people like Obama, I remember him, he was doing the
same kind of thing, all behind everybody's back, giving away
billions of dollars, just like Biden. You know, these are
facts we all know that we've seen their place. Got
(27:15):
the video on it right.
Speaker 3 (27:17):
Well, I appreciate the call. Thank you. Eight hundred and
nine point one, Shawn is our number. Listen.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
I want to remind you, with the Harris Biden economy
still impacting so many Americans lives, one way to save
money non sacrifice service is with the cell phone provider
that you have. Now my provider, Pure Talk, a veteran
own company. Now they use the exact same five G network,
the same exact cell towers as the big carriers AT
and T, Verizon and T Mobile. And the beauty is
(27:45):
you get the exact same service, no difference at all whatsoever,
for about half the price.
Speaker 3 (27:51):
I mean, that's how real it is.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
They have better plans, they have better opportunities for you,
and you know, the average family saving close to it
that dollars a year for the exact same service. Now,
a lot of these big companies will say we're going
to give you a free phone, but you better go
see the fight in print, because that free phone means
you're going to sign your life away and sign a
contract and pay, you know what, one hundred dollars a month,
(28:14):
get an unlimited plan, thirty five dollars activation fee. Freeze
is usually not so free, and in this case it
absolutely is not. Now at pure Talk, you can get
a new iPhone fourteen all the bells and whistles you want,
unlimited talk and text, fifteen gigs of data, mobile hotspot
for about fifty bucks a month. That's half the price
(28:34):
no activation fee anyway. Just dial pound two to fifty
on your cell. The switch is simple, fast and easy.
Pound two fifty keywords save now. Do it now you
save an additional fifty percent off your first month Pound
two fifty keyword save now from puret Talk, America's wireless company.
All right, quick break, we'll come right back. More your
calls coming up eight hundred and nine to four one, Sean.
(28:56):
If you want to be a part of the program,
Devin Neunz will on this at the top of the
next Now we're talking about Donald Trump's pick for the
FBI cash Betel. He knows him well. Trey Goudie has
come out very very hard for him, as also and
many other conservatives. But yet the media and of course Democrats,
they they don't want any Donald Trump pick to get through.
(29:18):
More on that and your call straight ahead as we continue.
Speaker 10 (29:26):
The final hour of the Sean Hannity Show was up next,
hang on for Shawn's conservative solutions.
Speaker 1 (29:43):
All right, let's get back to our busy phones. Robert Marilyn.
Next Sean Hannity Show, Robert, how are you man?
Speaker 6 (29:49):
Thank you for having me. Love the show and you
know a big fan and it's like.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
Thank you.
Speaker 6 (29:54):
It's like being in a house. It's the only window
that's open for fresh air nowadays.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
Well, I appreciate it. That's a pretty good analogy. I
need fresh air myself. What's going on.
Speaker 6 (30:04):
A couple of things. Uh, you know, we're the whole
four B thing and I'm like, you know, people, you
know it's half full, half empty. You kind of got
to look at it like, well, one less liberal will
ever be born, one less abortion will.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
Ever be ouch. You know you're you're going hard in
the pain here, keep going, I guess.
Speaker 6 (30:24):
Let me go, you know. And it's the other part
of that equation is is let's just say these women.
Speaker 1 (30:31):
Liberal liberals can have you know, conservative children. I mean
it probably would drive them nuts. I mean, if my
kids were liberally it would drive me nuts. Thank God
they're not, but they could.
Speaker 6 (30:42):
Be the preacher's kid syndrome.
Speaker 3 (30:44):
But yeah.
Speaker 6 (30:46):
And the other part of it is is, you know,
don't fland yourself. Is if you're a store, nobody wants
to shop there anyhow, if you know what I mean.
So if you're a store.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Look, I mean the bottom line is, if you're a woman,
you want to shave your head and you're a woman,
and that's a sign of protest, and you're you're you're
saying no sex, and you want to divorce your husband,
and you want to stockpile abortion pills or what you
want to get sterilized, which now women apparently are doing.
I believe in freedom. That's your choice. And I'm not
(31:17):
sure why if you're getting sterilized, or if you're not
having sex, why you need to stockpile the abortion pills.
Speaker 3 (31:23):
But they can do whatever they want. We live in
a free country.
Speaker 6 (31:25):
You look at it from from twenty thousand feet. Look
at what they value sex, nothing about moral compass or
anything like that. That's that's what they distill their value too.
So I wanted to mention something, and you.
Speaker 2 (31:40):
Know you have.
Speaker 3 (31:41):
I got about twenty seconds. Make it quick, go ahead, sir.
Speaker 6 (31:44):
I think you know they give all this money away
to Ukraine, unchecked free money. I think that, you know,
hopefully maybe the Trump administration can look at like forgiving
a lot of the ideal EIDL COVID loans because we're
basically working for the the government. We didn't shut the
country down, or at least make them interest free. Because
a lot of small businesses are being hammered by that
(32:08):
and barely surviving because they're on the hook for that.
And it was great that it was there, but you know,
that would be a wonderful thing to look at.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
You know, we just got to get this economy humming.
And the way to do it is energy. The way
to do it is lower taxes. The way to do
it is freedom, you know, less regulation. And I think
that's all going to happen. I think it's going to
be transformative. I do have a lot of hope, I
really do. Robert appreciate you being with us. Eight hundred
(32:36):
and ninety four to one, Shawn a number if you
want to be a part of the program.
Well, we have come in to your city.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Wanna way I.
Speaker 3 (00:07):
Get talas and sing you a conscious cell? Will all
be desire high jail.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
And if you want a little bang.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
In agin, you ain't come along.
Speaker 5 (00:20):
Okay, I know how it is to be spoken, but like, oh, well,
the Democrats need to just really the house is literally
on fire and y'all still looking for the keys.
Speaker 6 (00:28):
The damage that the twenty twenty four campaign has done, that,
the damage that this decade has done to a Democratic
brand is almost unfathomable.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
Well, here's an alternative thought. Make your own dinner.
Speaker 7 (00:39):
Mega, make your own sandwiches, wipe your.
Speaker 5 (00:41):
Own tears, troll amongst yourself with Elon, and leave us alone.
Speaker 8 (00:45):
Tradom is back in style.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Welcome to the revol Well.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
Coming to your city.
Speaker 3 (00:56):
Don't the way I get talasan saying you a conscious cell?
Speaker 1 (01:02):
Sean Hennity Show, More Me I'm the Scenes, information on
freaking news, and more bold inspired solutions for America Like
you Got can an hour two Sean Hannity's show told
Free It's eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn, if
you want to be a part of the program. Still
a ton of fallout as it relates to the issue
(01:24):
of illegal immigrants and the pardon of Hunter Biden, and
you know, it really is, it really is pretty amazing
the reaction to of Democrats when it comes to the
issue of their analysis and the legacy media's analysis of
why Donald Trump won and they didn't. We're going to
(01:45):
get to all of that in just a few minutes. First,
I want to bring in we want to talk a
little bit more about the Hunter Biden pardon. Jonathan Turtley
made a good point, and he pointed out that Hunter
Biden could still be prosecuted on additional charges which would
not have been covered by his father's pardon, which I
found interesting considering it's full and unconditional for what he
(02:07):
may have committed from January first, twenty fourteen, as I've
been pointing out interesting timeline considering Barisma to December first,
twenty twenty four but as Turley was on Fox and
Friends this morning pointing out Hunter could potentially face charges
if he's called to testify before Congress about the alleged
influence pedaling scheme, and could be charged with perjury if
(02:29):
he makes false statements, and he said he could be
called to testify and the last time he did that,
the House accused him of giving false testimony. Now we
brought this up last night. Now this does not exonerate
Joe Biden himself, the big guy. And remember Hunter, Biden's
laptop implicates his own father. Half my income goes to Pops,
(02:50):
and it goes on and on and then other family members.
How much did Joe Biden's brother make in all of this?
Is he going to get a part? Is Joe going
to pardon himself? What about wives and ex wives and
kids that got money as a result of zero experience Hunter,
you know, getting paid millions and millions of dollars from
Russian oligarchs Maerisman, no experience and energy oil Gas Ukraine,
(03:13):
Russia or a Chinese energy company CEFC. I'm sitting here
with my father, I mean, Joe Biden's implemented all over
all of this. Anyway, uh, Doctor Ronnie Jackson, Congressman Jackson
is with us. He is pretty outraged by all of this.
And anyway, Ronnie Jackson, Congressman Ronnie Jackson, Doctor Ronnie Jackson
(03:33):
joins us.
Speaker 3 (03:34):
Now, how are you, sar.
Speaker 8 (03:35):
Hey Sean, thank you for having me. I'm doing fine,
thank you?
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Uh well, let's talk about it.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
I mean, you obviously are pretty pissed off at this,
but it doesn't surprise me. I don't think it probably
surprised you either.
Speaker 8 (03:46):
Well, no, it's absolutely It just outrages me, to be
honest with, and outrages a lot of people in the
country right now. After four years, Sean, of this weaponization.
They actually took the federal government, the Biden administration did
and found every single way that they could to weaponize
it against President Trump and anybody that was associated with
him or anybody that shared his agenda. And then now
(04:06):
they roll in at the very end and they make
claims that there there was a political nature to this,
and that's why Biden is is is pardoning Hunter. It's
absolutely ridiculous, and the American people see right through it.
I think this is gonna this is gonna backfire on them, Sean,
I honestly do, because you know, as I was mentioned earlier,
I heard Jason's Jason Smith talking au a little bit earlier.
He said, you know now that they don't have the
(04:27):
the FBI and the d o J doesn't have an
investigation to use as an excuse for why they can't
provide emails and bank records and everything else. Now they're
gonna have to provide that information to Congress, and Congress
may actually get access to information that they haven't had before.
And I hope that Jamie Comer and and and Uh
Jim Jim Uh. I hope they basically in Judiciary and
(04:51):
and the Oversight Committee, Jim Jordan. I hope that they
they pursue this aggressively. I mean, I know they will,
And and I think that the Biden administration understands that,
you know, things are about to change drastically at DJ
and that stuff's probably about to become available anyways. But
he I think it's going to lead to the implication
of many other family members, including Joe Biden himself, And
(05:12):
I think they're going to be in a real bad
spot when the dust settles on all of this. And
just like you said, this covers him until until the
end of this year, until December of twenty twenty four.
But if they if he gets drug back before Congress
and his stories don't line up, or he lies to
the American people like he's repeatedly done, then he's in trouble.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
Well what about Joe Biden, not as president because we
had the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. But what
about his actions when he was vice president and as
someone was doing all these foreign business deals and he
was a financial beneficiary at least according to Hunter Biden
in his own words.
Speaker 8 (05:48):
Well, I mean, I think that's why the pardoner is
ten years, you know. I mean, it's you know, it's
a blanket pardon that goes all the way back to
the early days before Beresma, and I think they know
this is almost an admission on part of the on
the part of the Biden crime family, in my mind,
that there is stuff out there that we are going
to find when President Trump gets back into office, and
(06:09):
he's going to try his best to just way, I
guess he did go back and pardon him for ten
years with the blanket pardon, knowing knowing that there's going
to be criminal activity that's gonna that's going to be
you know, that that's going to come out, and that
he potentially is going to get charged with and they
could bring him down. So I think that this is
you know, Joe Joe Biden's trying to do it to
(06:29):
you know, to cover himself as well, because, like you said, Uh,
when you start looking into this and when you really
dig into it, we already know at this point, but
we're going to be able to prove without without any
doubt whatsoever in the very near future here when we
get the d O J and Uh. The FBI straightened
out that Joe Biden benefited from all of this, and
that you know that the hunter used the influence from
(06:51):
having Joe Biden as his father as vice president to
line the pockets of not just himself, but if Joe Biden,
Joe Biden's brother, other family members, then tar Biden family
got rich. You selling the influence of the vice president
at the time, and and that's that's the crime. Obviously.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
What do you make of Let's go back and Joe
Biden before the Council on Foreign Relations. It's a tape
I played often and he brags about the fact that
you know, he goes to Ukraine. He was tasked with
during the Obama administration, with being in charge of Ukraine,
and he goes there with the billion dollars in loan
guarantees and he says, well, you're not getting a billion.
(07:29):
You're not getting a billioned until you fire the prosecutor
the prosecutor is the guy that was investigating Barisma, and
the prosecutor was the guy that was that was investigating Hunter,
and you know, son of a bee, they did it.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
Here's what he said.
Speaker 9 (07:44):
I had gotten a commitment from Porshenko and from Yachtsnyuk
that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and
they didn't. So they said they had. They were walking
out to Prescott. I said no, I said, I'm not
going to go or we're not going to give you
the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority, you're
not the president. The president said, I said, call him.
(08:05):
I said, I'm telling you're not getting a billion dollars.
I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm gonna be
leaving here. And I think it was what six hours.
I look as I'm leaving the six hours. If the
prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money.
Speaker 10 (08:16):
Oh, son of them.
Speaker 3 (08:19):
Got fired.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
Okay, So the guy investigating his son, with zero experience
in Ukraine Energy gas Oil, had no experience whatsoever being
paid millions of dollars being investigated. He gets the prosecutor
doing the investigation fired, and he leverages a billion taxpayer dollars.
Why does that sound like a quid pro quote to me?
(08:40):
And here's the challenge for the new Congress. Should they
be investigating Joe Biden and Joe's brother and Joe's family,
and would it be wise for Joe to pardon himself
and other family members if he really wants us to go.
Speaker 8 (08:53):
Away, well stand by, I think you probably will. I
think that's that's coming. But you know, this is just
another example. If that had been Donald Trump or somebody
that had said those things, that would have been the
end of his political career right there and then. But
you know, this is just you know, it's no coincidence
that we've referred to, you know, the Biden family as
the Biden crime family, because you know, we can see
all the stuff that's that's that's happened. You know that
(09:14):
that's criminal, you know, in nature. But the way they
carry themselves, they carry themselves like they're a mafia family,
like they're untouchable. And that's just this whole attitude like
he didn't really care. But you know, I think that
he will. I think that he will go back and
he will see he will pardon other people in his family.
And I wouldn't be surprised if he provides a bank
a blanket pardon to himself for you know, ten years
on the way out the door, it wouldn't surprise me
(09:36):
a bit. But yes, absolutely answer questions. Congress should be
doing every single thing that we can to continue to
dig in this, dig into this and hold them accountable,
because look, Sean, if we don't hold people accountable, you know,
there's you know, President Trump has a lot of big
plans for the country. He's going to reform things and
make things a lot better. But in the process, people
that have done what they've done country over the last
four years, they have to be held accountable. If there's
(09:58):
no accountability, this will happen and again. And we can't
afford as a country for any of this kind of
stuff to happen again. With the weaponization and some of
the stuff that's gone on for the last four years.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
The leftwolds claim this is weaponization. However, you know, when
you look at the basic, simple fundamental facts, no experience
paid millions Russian oligarch Elena Batarina, Kazakhstan, Romania, Mexico, China,
et cetera. And the sheer volume of money that they
(10:28):
were making without any experience, and then it's being distributed
and given to this family member and that family member.
It really is remarkable, And I think you're right, the
double standards thinks to high heaven. With all of that said,
and in the interest of justice, I think it has
to be. It certainly has to be investigated, and we
have to get to the bottom of it. But the
(10:49):
second part of it is, I don't want it to
interfere with fixing the economy, making us energy dominant. I
don't want this to interfere at all with securing our borders,
restoring law and order in small towns and big cities.
We already see the world reacting to Donald Trump's presidency.
You see little Justin in Canada, you see Mexico reacting.
(11:11):
You see all over the Middle East his Ballah and
Hamas and the Iranians are hiding. The Chinese have been
awfully quiet, and you know, the world and even Zelensky's
talking about, Yeah, I'd give up land in order to
make this work.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 8 (11:26):
No, I don't think it only fear. I think that,
you know, the Republicans can can do this and do
the work of the work of the people at the
same time, and that's really what the judiciary or what sorry,
what the Oversight committee and committees like that, they're they're
supposed to be doing stuff like this, like you know,
looking into things that have happened and holding people accountable.
And I think that they'll be able to do this,
(11:47):
and I think they had. Like I said, I think they.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
Have to do this.
Speaker 8 (11:50):
I'm a firm believer that if no one's held accountable
that and and people get away with this. It's the
same thing with the voter fraud that we've seen over
the last few years. As long as no one goes
to jail for voter fraud, voter fraud's going to keep happening.
No one's going to care. And it's the same kind
of thing here with the weaponization of government. As long
as people that have done this I don't pay a
price for it, the people that fall in in the
next democratic administration, we'll pull that out of the playbook
(12:13):
and do the exact same thing. It worked last time,
and they'll do it again.
Speaker 3 (12:17):
Yeah. I mean, it really is.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
And you know, I think some of the more important
things that we've got to do here is put in
place measures that this type of weaponization can't happen again.
I mean, you know, Joe Biden talked about, well, this
only happened to my son because of politics. I Meanwhile,
he sat idly by when the Statute of Limitations case
in New York was going on and a novel leag
(12:39):
legal theory was put forward that had never been tried before,
and the third highest ranking member of the Justice Department
go out goes to New York to help Alvin Bragg.
Nobody would take that kind of demotion unless you really
wanted to get somebody running on a campaign of get Trump.
Alan Dershwitz wrote a book about it. You know they
(13:01):
call it, you know they would. They stacked the charges
one after another, but again it was a legal nda
put together by an attorney and labeled the legal expense.
It should have gone away. Then we have the whole
January sixth issue. Alan Dershowitz is out there today's saying
and urging Joe Biden a pardon the January sixth protesters,
(13:21):
not the people that were violent, but the many people
that you know, their their mistake was they they they
went into the Capitol when they shouldn't have the uh,
but they're getting five ten year sentences.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
That sounds excessive to me.
Speaker 8 (13:33):
Yeah, I agree with to Sewan, and I think, you know,
if he doesn't do that, which I doubt he will,
but Trump's gonna, you know, President Trump is going to
do that. They made one big miscalculation in this whole thing, Sean,
and that was that they were dealing with Donald Trump, because,
to be honest with you, it didn't succeed. Overall, the weaponization,
all the things you just described that were directed to
President Trump to try to, you know, to politically kill
him and get him, get him, you know, out of
(13:55):
the game. None of that worked. And the only reason
that didn't work but worked was because it was done Trump.
Had that been a normal presidential candidate, another politician, they
would have devastated them and they would have went away.
So just because it didn't work this time doesn't mean
that they can't make it work next time if we
let them get away with it. The only reason it
didn't work this time was because they were dealing with
Donald Trump and any individuals.
Speaker 1 (14:17):
You know, let me play Hillary Clinton from two thousand
and eight talking about the illegal immigrants, and here's a quiz,
who does it sound like?
Speaker 11 (14:24):
I think we got to have tough conditions. Tell people
to come out of the shadows. If they've committed a crime,
deport them, no questions asked, They're gone.
Speaker 3 (14:33):
If they.
Speaker 11 (14:36):
If they've been working in are law abiding. We should say,
here are the conditions for you staying. You have to
pay a stiff fine because you came here illegally. You
have to pay back taxes, and you have to try
to learn English, and you have.
Speaker 10 (14:49):
To wait in line.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
Oh, who's that sound like? It sounds like Donald Trump?
Speaker 8 (14:55):
Anyways, she sounds maga, sounds mad.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
A great way to put it. Well, it's it's going
to be a little difficult in the House. Do you
believe that the slim majority will hold well Republicans? Will
they agree on the major portions of the President Trump's agenda.
Speaker 8 (15:15):
I think we have to sean. This is our last
chance to fix this. I think everybody knows that. I
think that there'll be people like me, and I've always
been very hesitant about calling out other Republicans if they
don't agree with me on something, or they don't you know,
vote you know the way. You know I would vote
with something like this, supporting President Trump. But I think
we're going to have to get to a point, honestly
where we just have to we have to hold each
(15:36):
other accountable. And you know, if they feel like they're
coming from a you know, a blue district and they
won their district there and they're a Republican in the
blue district and they can't do this, they can't do that.
The rest of us are just going to have to
give them top cover. Tell them that will help them
when reelection comes around. We'll make sure they keep their seat.
But they got to do the right thing. They got
to vote with President Trump and they got to save
this party. Are they going to save this country?
Speaker 1 (15:58):
Tungers and Ronnie Jackson, Doctor Ronnie Jackson, Thank you, sir,
appreciate it. Quick break right back will continue, all right.
Remember Mika Brazinski swearing up and down on the Liberal
Joe Show, Liberal Joe and Mika Show that oh no, no,
Joe will never pardon Hunters, not like Trump.
Speaker 12 (16:16):
Current President of the United States, has so much respect
for the law that he has said he would not
pardon his son. I mean, what you know, again, it's
all about the contrast.
Speaker 1 (16:30):
All about the contrast. So Joe to contrast pardons Hunter
and I bet there are more pardons to come. Time
will tell. And now what is Joe Liberal Joe and
Mika saying. They're they're ripping the New York Times and
other mainstream organizations for blowing you know, the Hunter Biden
(16:51):
pardon out of out of context and out of proportion.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
I'm like, you got to be kidding me.
Speaker 12 (16:56):
Listen, no matter what you think of this pardon, the
coverage of this is as if. I mean, you look
at what has happened on the Trump side, especially if
you have parallel pardons that Trump has done himself. It's
just always so it seems so hysterically imbalanced. I just
(17:17):
you know, when you when you read how they're covering this,
you look at the things that are happening on the
other side, it is well.
Speaker 7 (17:24):
Dave, that's something that you're hearing. I know you're not
a media critic, but I know you've heard this complaint.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
You know, the New York.
Speaker 7 (17:30):
Times, like the top six stories on online today we're
all about the pardon. You looked at the Washington Post yesterday,
you expected like war is over, you know, in massive
headlines talk about the frustration that many Democrats are having.
On the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal,
(17:51):
a lot of mainstream organizations blowing this up to a
size that they believe is really out of proportion given
everything down Trump has done in the past. So what
he's doing right.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Now hysterically imbalanced. That would describe the entire show and
network their show, and the network that is MSDNC, and
that would be fake New CNN, and that would be
most broadcast channels when it comes to all things Donald
Trump and the media, you know, legacy media, which I've
(18:22):
declared dead, gone and buried with no influence, and that
was proven in this election.
Speaker 3 (18:27):
Washington Post.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
By the way, I'm laughing at this some idiot over there,
you know today slamming me.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
Well, Hannity quotes the mainstream media.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
Usually I'm making fun of them, or we actually do
something called attribution on this program, and if I see something,
I attributed to what the source is, even when I
disagree with it or mocking it, just as a means
of being accurate. And they're wrong all the time, and
we end up getting everything right. But anyway, the media,
(18:57):
you know, was out there telling America you know that
Joe's not going to do it list.
Speaker 7 (19:03):
And this week, of course, Hunter Biden was found guilty,
and Joe Biden has very clearly said he would not
pardon his son.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
He would not commute his sentence.
Speaker 12 (19:11):
The current president of the United States has so much
respect for the law that he has said he would
not pardon his son.
Speaker 13 (19:20):
He is not pardoning his son, which he could do.
These are federal charges. He is not doing that. That
is a power. He is a power for both of those.
He is not doing it because he is living what
it means to have a rule of law in this country.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
So I guess now he doesn't believe in the rule
of law. Wasn't that the pitbull of Robert Muller Andrew
Weisman making that comment. I think it was him, I'm
not sure. And then we have Dan Goldman, I love
this today, confronted with his past comments that Biden wouldn't
pardon Hunter and lo and behold, he did listen to this.
Speaker 10 (19:59):
Do you think pardon for his son would be a mistake?
Speaker 2 (20:03):
Yes, And I don't think there's any chance that President
Biden is going to do that, unlike his predecessor, who
pardoned all of his friends and anyone who had any
access to him. And I think you see that in
this case where he kept on and Merrick Garland kept on.
A Trump appointed US attorney to investigate the president's son.
If there is not an indication of the independence of
(20:26):
the Department of Justice beyond that, I don't know what
we could look for.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
Well, when you reacted, this was when the deal had
fallen through. And I hear what you're saying about the
Cash Petel appointment. But you know you took him at
his word. So what does that feel like knowing that
he's gone back on it.
Speaker 14 (20:47):
Well, as I said, I'm disappointed that after the plea
fell through and it became clear about why it did,
including Republican congressional inter mention in this case, which made
this case very unique and very different from any other case.
(21:07):
I think that we all, perhaps I should have as well,
recognized that this is not the normal prosecution. I said
many times that if Hunter Biden were not Hunter Biden,
he would never be charged with these crimes.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Anyway, let's get to our phones. James and Mississippi.
Speaker 3 (21:25):
How are you. You're on the Sean Hannity Show, thy.
Speaker 4 (21:27):
Son, how are you doing today? Man?
Speaker 3 (21:29):
I'm good man. What's going on?
Speaker 2 (21:31):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (21:31):
Not much hope you had it, Happy Thanksgiving and everything.
Speaker 3 (21:34):
Love it. I like a little time off, can't wait
what's going on?
Speaker 4 (21:38):
But yeah, I was wondering, since Cash Pateel did get
the FBI director spot, would it be possible for Donald
Trump to tell him or anybody who he appoints to
try and find something to go after the bidens with
this blanket pardon.
Speaker 1 (21:53):
And look, I've talked about this publicly and I'll repeat
it again because it's so important to me, and I
just I think that the power of the pardon can
be transformational under this administration coming in. And you know,
for example, Aliceburray Johnson is somebody that we love on
(22:14):
this program, and why not make her like the pardons
are and task her with finding people in jail with
excessive sentences, people who have been have dramatically changed their
lives behind bars, People like her, You had a life sentence,
one drug offense. Donald Trump let her out, and you know,
transform that power of the presidential pardon.
Speaker 3 (22:37):
And I would.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
I'd give out pardons, you know, once a week at
least to worthy people that people like Alicebury Johnson confined.
And I would I'd have I'd focus on disparity in sentencing,
which is very real, and and that's against minorities. They've
been unfairly sentenced. For example, cocaine is cocaine. To me,
I don't care if it's crack or powder, but you
get a bigger sentence of its crack versus powder cocaine. Well,
(23:02):
to me, it's it's it's you know, if we're gonna
have laws against using cocaine, which I think we should
not for full drug legalization, I think that would be
such a danger to our society. But you know, you know,
I think we have to be fair and sentencing, and we're.
Speaker 4 (23:18):
Not absolutely and I think even the pardon should extend
all the Jay six people.
Speaker 8 (23:24):
Violent or not.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
Well, that's what Alan Dershowitz is are urging Joe Biden
to do, you know, except for maybe the few people
that were involved in violence against police or whatever. I mean,
the sentences were so over the top. I mean it
was pretty unbelievable. You know, five ten years for trespassing.
I mean that's ostensibly what happened, and it should it
(23:47):
have happened? No, should they have in place measures so
it never happens again? Yes, I said that in real time.
I meant it and the people that are responsible for
acting in ways that were absolutely responsible and law breaking,
they've got to be held accountable. But for the people
that had just walked in and were taking pictures and
roaming around and taking videos, did they really deserve five
(24:10):
ten years in jail. No, they did not, And to
me it was like such a hyper focus. Meanwhile, we
have known terrorists, cartels, illegal immigrants that are rapist, murderers,
and violent criminals, and nobody paid any attention to that.
And the prioritization of this and this weaponized DJ was
just to get Trump rather than keeping all of us
(24:32):
safe from wide open borders. That and those laws should
have been enforced. Or going after you know, traditional Catholics
are going after pro life people, or going after people
like Linda that dare to speak up at a school
board meeting. I mean not that they went after her,
but the point is they're going after moms and dads
at school board meetings. Anyway, my friend, appreciate the call.
(24:54):
Glad you're out there, Gary in Tennessee. Gary, how are
you glad you called?
Speaker 8 (24:59):
Yes?
Speaker 10 (25:00):
A big fan, Shawn. First of all, I'm going to
thank you for having me on. Thank you the epitome
of the unmitigated gall of Biden to think that his
son should be above the law of all of us,
and he just proved it by doing what he did.
(25:20):
He doesn't give two flips for the rest of the
United States. He never has. You know, I'm seventy seven.
About about four years ago, they put us put our
food stamps down to thirty dollars. That was Biden when
he first went in office. How can a person live
on thirty dollars a month. That's insane. That guy is criminal.
(25:42):
We know he's a criminal. They got the money trails
to him, They got everything they need to figure out
that he knew what he was doing when he put
that pardon on his son.
Speaker 6 (25:55):
He did a.
Speaker 10 (25:56):
Blanket anything he might have done, even if he don't
get caught, for if he gets caught later, he's pardoned.
So that is just that's just admitting that they're all criminals.
Like you said, the Biden crime family, that's what they are.
Speaker 1 (26:12):
If I called it, we affectionately refer to him as
the syndicate. Now do I do I think this is
the end of it. No, I think there's going to
be more pardons. I would not be surprised if Joe's
brother is next and other family members have pardoned as well.
I would not be surprised if Joe ends up pardoning
himself if he feels that the law is going to
be enforced equally.
Speaker 10 (26:33):
We'll know what the laws of treason are. But you know,
these things have to be looked into because a lot
of us know what has happened over these last four years.
And I watched you Know faithfully, and I watch your
program all the time. That was my favorite show. But
I can tell you that the laws they twisted around
(26:55):
to say like they're the good people, they're they're not
virtuous in any way in any means, you know. And
people like Obama, I remember him, he was doing the
same kind of thing, all behind everybody's back, giving away
billions of dollars, just like Biden. You know, these are
facts we all know that we've seen their place. Got
(27:15):
the video on it right.
Speaker 3 (27:17):
Well, I appreciate the call. Thank you. Eight hundred and
nine point one, Shawn is our number. Listen.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
I want to remind you, with the Harris Biden economy
still impacting so many Americans lives, one way to save
money non sacrifice service is with the cell phone provider
that you have. Now my provider, Pure Talk, a veteran
own company. Now they use the exact same five G network,
the same exact cell towers as the big carriers AT
and T, Verizon and T Mobile. And the beauty is
(27:45):
you get the exact same service, no difference at all whatsoever,
for about half the price.
Speaker 3 (27:51):
I mean, that's how real it is.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
They have better plans, they have better opportunities for you,
and you know, the average family saving close to it
that dollars a year for the exact same service. Now,
a lot of these big companies will say we're going
to give you a free phone, but you better go
see the fight in print, because that free phone means
you're going to sign your life away and sign a
contract and pay, you know what, one hundred dollars a month,
(28:14):
get an unlimited plan, thirty five dollars activation fee. Freeze
is usually not so free, and in this case it
absolutely is not. Now at pure Talk, you can get
a new iPhone fourteen all the bells and whistles you want,
unlimited talk and text, fifteen gigs of data, mobile hotspot
for about fifty bucks a month. That's half the price
(28:34):
no activation fee anyway. Just dial pound two to fifty
on your cell. The switch is simple, fast and easy.
Pound two fifty keywords save now. Do it now you
save an additional fifty percent off your first month Pound
two fifty keyword save now from puret Talk, America's wireless company.
All right, quick break, we'll come right back. More your
calls coming up eight hundred and nine to four one, Sean.
(28:56):
If you want to be a part of the program,
Devin Neunz will on this at the top of the
next Now we're talking about Donald Trump's pick for the
FBI cash Betel. He knows him well. Trey Goudie has
come out very very hard for him, as also and
many other conservatives. But yet the media and of course Democrats,
they they don't want any Donald Trump pick to get through.
(29:18):
More on that and your call straight ahead as we continue.
Speaker 10 (29:26):
The final hour of the Sean Hannity Show was up next,
hang on for Shawn's conservative solutions.
Speaker 1 (29:43):
All right, let's get back to our busy phones. Robert Marilyn.
Next Sean Hannity Show, Robert, how are you man?
Speaker 6 (29:49):
Thank you for having me. Love the show and you
know a big fan and it's like.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
Thank you.
Speaker 6 (29:54):
It's like being in a house. It's the only window
that's open for fresh air nowadays.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
Well, I appreciate it. That's a pretty good analogy. I
need fresh air myself. What's going on.
Speaker 6 (30:04):
A couple of things. Uh, you know, we're the whole
four B thing and I'm like, you know, people, you
know it's half full, half empty. You kind of got
to look at it like, well, one less liberal will
ever be born, one less abortion will.
Speaker 3 (30:18):
Ever be ouch. You know you're you're going hard in
the pain here, keep going, I guess.
Speaker 6 (30:24):
Let me go, you know. And it's the other part
of that equation is is let's just say these women.
Speaker 1 (30:31):
Liberal liberals can have you know, conservative children. I mean
it probably would drive them nuts. I mean, if my
kids were liberally it would drive me nuts. Thank God
they're not, but they could.
Speaker 6 (30:42):
Be the preacher's kid syndrome.
Speaker 3 (30:44):
But yeah.
Speaker 6 (30:46):
And the other part of it is is, you know,
don't fland yourself. Is if you're a store, nobody wants
to shop there anyhow, if you know what I mean.
So if you're a store.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Look, I mean the bottom line is, if you're a woman,
you want to shave your head and you're a woman,
and that's a sign of protest, and you're you're you're
saying no sex, and you want to divorce your husband,
and you want to stockpile abortion pills or what you
want to get sterilized, which now women apparently are doing.
I believe in freedom. That's your choice. And I'm not
(31:17):
sure why if you're getting sterilized, or if you're not
having sex, why you need to stockpile the abortion pills.
Speaker 3 (31:23):
But they can do whatever they want. We live in
a free country.
Speaker 6 (31:25):
You look at it from from twenty thousand feet. Look
at what they value sex, nothing about moral compass or
anything like that. That's that's what they distill their value too.
So I wanted to mention something, and you.
Speaker 2 (31:40):
Know you have.
Speaker 3 (31:41):
I got about twenty seconds. Make it quick, go ahead, sir.
Speaker 6 (31:44):
I think you know they give all this money away
to Ukraine, unchecked free money. I think that, you know,
hopefully maybe the Trump administration can look at like forgiving
a lot of the ideal EIDL COVID loans because we're
basically working for the the government. We didn't shut the
country down, or at least make them interest free. Because
a lot of small businesses are being hammered by that
(32:08):
and barely surviving because they're on the hook for that.
And it was great that it was there, but you know,
that would be a wonderful thing to look at.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
You know, we just got to get this economy humming.
And the way to do it is energy. The way
to do it is lower taxes. The way to do
it is freedom, you know, less regulation. And I think
that's all going to happen. I think it's going to
be transformative. I do have a lot of hope, I
really do. Robert appreciate you being with us. Eight hundred
(32:36):
and ninety four to one, Shawn a number if you
want to be a part of the program.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Monster: BTK
'Monster: BTK', the newest installment in the 'Monster' franchise, reveals the true story of the Wichita, Kansas serial killer who murdered at least 10 people between 1974 and 1991. Known by the moniker, BTK – Bind Torture Kill, his notoriety was bolstered by the taunting letters he sent to police, and the chilling phone calls he made to media outlets. BTK's identity was finally revealed in 2005 to the shock of his family, his community, and the world. He was the serial killer next door. From Tenderfoot TV & iHeartPodcasts, this is 'Monster: BTK'.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.