Senator Mike Lee - September 22nd, Hour 2

Senator Mike Lee of Utah is here to talk about his efforts to stand alongside the American people, and urge the Senate to do the right thing: pass a clean Continuing Resolution.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
It's for the highest inflation rate, mister President in forty years.
I got that. But guess what we are. We're in
a position where for the last several months it has
its spiked. You know, at the end of the day,
I had zero classified materials. The governor of California sent
a letter to the Department of Justice saying you need
to prosecute Texas and Florida governors. And all I can

(00:23):
say is, um, I think his hair gel is interfering
with his brain function. Joe, Kamala, Chuck, Nancy, let's send
them all a nice message. On November the eighth, get
out and vote. It's only forty seven days still election day. Yeah,
where I'm coming. You want to play our confeow I'm

(00:56):
the Seas Information on breaking news and more old inspired
solutions for America. All right, our two Sean Hannity Show
eight hundred nine for one sewn on number. You want
to be a part of the program. You know, we
don't think about this, but we have thirty one trillion
dollars in debt. Joe Biden goes to the UN yesterday.

(01:17):
I'm gonna spend three hundred and sixty nine billion dollars
on climate change and another two hundred billion dollars on
the cost of food. Now, the Senate is dealing with
their spending bill right now. Continuing resolution is what they call.
And we'll get to Senator Mike Lea Utah in a minute,
because he wants what's called a clean continuing resolution where

(01:40):
they don't dump all this pork barrel spending into a bill.
And okay, I'll support your four hundred billion if you
support my three hundred billion, and we'll pass it now
because all the pressure is to get spending so the
government doesn't shut down. I mean, it's insanity. Anyway. Let's
go to Biden yesterday at the UN. Here's what he's

(02:00):
I've signed a historic piece of legislation here in the
United States that includes the biggest, most important climate commitment
we have ever made in the history of our country.
Three hundred and sixty nine billion dollars toward climate change.
That includes tens of billions of new investments and offshore
wind and solar, doubling down on zero mission vehicles, increasing

(02:25):
energy efficiency, supporting clean manufacturing. Our Department of Energy estimates
that this new law will reduce US emissions by one
gigaton a year by twenty thirty. It is impossible, as
we've been talking about, in the foreseeable future, we don't
have the technology to get where they're forcing us to

(02:48):
go at a point where we're non technologically advanced to
do so. By the way, and I am in all
of the above. Guy, if you can give me cheaper,
cleaner energy and produce it on a mass scale and
do it easily, you're going to be a trillionaire, never
mind a billionaire. So whoever comes up with that technology.
But in the near future, and I'm talking about ten
twenty thirty years, we don't have the ability to get

(03:11):
the energy that this country needs, which is the lifeblood
of every country's economy, to be renewable energy independent. It
just doesn't exist that new electric vehicles twenty two thousand
dollars more than a gas powered vehicle. Then, of course
you've got a pillage mother Earth and mine out the
minerals like cobalt and nickel and manganese, etc. And you're

(03:35):
going to use big, heavy equipment that uses a lot
of diesel to get the minerals out of the earth.
And then of course the electric grid is ninety percent
fossil fuels. So when you charge your electric vehicle, except
in California where a lot of hours in the day
you can't because they don't have the ability to power them,
it's coming from fossil fuels. I mean, it's it's it

(03:57):
is insanity at a level I've never heard, you know,
telling people that Americans now suffering average couple paying sixty
eight hundred dollars per couple per year because of Biden inflation.
To go buy an electric vehicle when two thirds of
Americans are living paycheck to paycheck is by definition insanity. Anyway,
Senator Mike Lely of Utah's with us. He has put

(04:18):
out a letter and it's calling for a clean continuing resolution.
This is just part of the problem. Senator, welcome to
the program again. And by the way, we are fully
endorsing supporting your candidacy in your reelection in the great
state of Utah as you go up against the guy
that claims he's an independent and he's nothing short of
a Biden Schumer Democrat Ed McMuffin, as my friend Rod

(04:40):
Arket calls him out in Salt Lake City, exactly. Well,
thank you, Sean, thanks for having me on your show
and thanks for your support. Yeah, I'm in a tough
race and I can use it all the help I
can get me any other way, It only maybe a
little tough, And I'll tell you why. Because the guy
you're running against as a phony. He's not being honest
with the people of Utah. That's my take on him, right,

(05:03):
And not all of them know that. It's my job
to make sure that the people of Utah know what
they're voting for. And I need help to do that.
So anyone wanted to help can help me at leaf
or Senate dot com. We need that seed desperately. And
I know you're gonna win. But I take nothing for granted, exactly,
taking nothing for granted at all. Nor are we taking

(05:25):
anything for granted about spending. You're exactly right. The cost
of living has escalated to unacceptable degrees. In Utah. Inflation
is even worse than it is in many other places.
In fact, it's worser it is almost anywhere else. Inflation
has gone up fifteen point six percent since the beginning
of last year. As a result, the average Utah family

(05:46):
is spending an additional nine hundred and twenty five dollars
a month every month just to meet their basic needs.
This is an average annual household cost in excess of
eleven thousand dollars just relative to January of last year.
All of this shown is the result of out of
control spending by Congress. We're spending too much money under

(06:07):
Joe Biden's direction, with the help of Chuck Schumer, and
it's one of many reasons why we've got to stop
Evan McMullan from being elected to the Senate where he
could be Chuck Schumer's fifty first vote and Joe Biden's guy.
But in order to fight this bike right now, we
need to pass a clean continuing resolution that will keep
the government funded through sometime in January of twenty twenty three.

(06:30):
The reason for that is I believe that the Republicans
are going to take the majority at leaked in one house.
I believe probably both, And if that happened in either
one house, we'll have more bargaining power. We won't have
to engage in the same spending orgy that we will
otherwise face if we try to pass an omnibus spending
bill during the lame duck period between the election and
the time the new Congress takes over. That's why I'm

(06:52):
encouraging my colleagues to push this sort of clean CR.
Let's just pass a clean CR taken us into January.
No lame duck spending. We shouldn't have that, all right,
I explain that, and I'll tell you what I'm disappointed about,
and it has nothing to do with you. So you
write your colleagues and you say, as the fiscal year
comes to a close, we look to fund the government,

(07:13):
we must use our spending power to ensure that we
do not enable the Biden Administration's reckless progressive agenda to
move forward. We must not accept anything short of a
clean CR continuing Resolution that contains no additional spending or
extraneous policy writers. At a minimum, any agreement on a

(07:34):
clean CR must carry over into the beginning of the
one hundred and eighteenth Congress. Failure to stand strong against
lame duck spending and caving to the Democrats will likely
worsen inflation, prolong the current economic recession. Advanced policies contained
in the Biden administration's progressive wish list meaning New Green Deal,

(07:55):
and the American people not afford another Washington feeding friend ze.
We must not let them down. Look, I'm reading and
you've got all right six of you that signed it
on page one, and you've got eight of you that
signed it on page two. That's not enough in terms
of Republicans. Why isn't every Republican on board with you

(08:16):
on this? That's a good question. I've presented it to
the whole conference that pitched it widely. I can tell
you with a lot of confidence there are other people
who agree with the message, but who for one reason
or another, opted not to sign it. I actually think
most members of our commence conference agree with it. I'm
also confident that if we could put a clean CR

(08:37):
on the floor right now, and Chuck Schumer called it
up for a vote, a clean CR would pass. And
that's why we need to have that. I'd love to
have every member of the conference on board with this letter.
The important point shown is that we do everything we
possibly can to avoid a lame duck spending bill, because
what that would mean is it, in the very likely

(08:57):
event that we win majority in at least one House
of Congress, maybe even both, we can't surrender what the
American people have just given us, which is the power
to stand up to Biden's excessive spending, demands on Congress
the power to stand up for the American people by
pushing back on more DCS spending. What did you hear

(09:21):
with a lame duck spending bill? Okay, So Biden goes
to the UN yesterday and on the day that day
after Vladimir Putin is threatened to use nuclear weapons and
says he means that, he means what he says, pretty
scary scenario. And as backs against the wall, and a
lot of his friends seem to be showing up dead lately,

(09:41):
so who knows what he's capable of. He goes to
the UN and he focuses most of the speech on
climate alarmism and climate cultism. Now he went back in
the Paris Accords and that we paid the bulk of money,
as we are designated as as a top economy in

(10:02):
the world. But yet China and India are rated as
developing nations and pay next to nothing. Can you explain
why any US president would not require China and India
to have the same classification as US. It defies reason,
It defies logic to suggest that China should be deemed

(10:24):
a developing nation by the United Nations. In fact, the
United Nations has itself acknowledged that China is a highly
developed population. Even under the UN's own definition. They're highly developed,
and yet we're subject to some international agreements, including the
Montreal Protocol and the amendment to that protocol known as

(10:44):
the Kagali Amendment, which the Senate ratified yesterday as a treaty.
It did too, against my objecting vote, notwithstanding effect that
this protocol still classifies China as a developing country, and
as a developing country, it's not required to comply with

(11:05):
the same burdens that the United States will face. In fact,
it's given an additional ten years to comply with significant
restrictions on the emission of hydrofluora carbons. Now, they adopted
an amendment that I introduced, declaring a China is not
a developing country and saying that it shouldn't be treated

(11:26):
as a developing nation by the UN. I wanted them
to go a step further and had introduced another amendment
that would have required that as a condition for ratifying
the treaty. They didn't get that part. But think about this, Sean,
they're not a developing nation because China is the world's
largest manufacturer China is the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases.

(11:49):
China is the world's largest lending nation. And those are
all things that are entirely incompatible with the notion that
they're developing, that they need funds provided by the US
to improve their environmental record, or that they need ten
additional years to comply with the exacting demands of an

(12:10):
international treaty that we've now ratified. This is insane, it's absurd,
and it's giving an undue competitive advantage to Chinese firms
over American firms by giving them benefits we don't have
under this false pretense that they are developing country. Right
quick break right back will continue eight hundred and nine
four one sewn. If you want to be a part
of the program more would Senator Mike Lee. His reelection

(12:32):
critical forty seven days from now in the great state
of Utah. Look, everyday life, we talk about it all
the time, is getting very expensive and it can be
very difficult now to live on a fixed income now,
especially if you're in your retirement years. Look, it's important
to do what you can do to protect your finances. Now,
here's an option you may want to consider if you're

(12:53):
sixty two years of age or older. It is worth
considering what's called a reverse mortgage, and our friends at
America and Financing dot net will tell you all about it.
You can access home equity as tax free cash to
supplement your income. You can also also stop making monthly
mortgage payments and that provides additional financial relief to your budget.

(13:14):
And keep in mind, you don't have to lose ownership
at all in your home. You still live there, you
own it. These are all the things that our friends,
the mortgage experts, the financial experts, the debt consolidation experts
at American Financing will discuss with you for free, with
no obligation. They're waiting for your call. Takes less than
ten minutes. Give him a call see if they can

(13:36):
save you money. Eight six six six two hundred eight
six six six two hundred. On the web, it's American
Financing dot net, American Financing nmls. When a two three
three four mls consumer access dot org. You're ready to
get out of the media spin room, Well, you've come

(13:58):
to the right place. Is the Sean Hannity Show. I
would continue with Senator Mike Lee. Don't forget he's up
for reelection. If you're in Utah while you're eating your
Crown Burger on election day, you've got to get to
the polls and vote for Mike Lee. You know, I
look at China, and I look at not only the coronavirus,

(14:19):
the Wuhan virology lab, but I watched China. We see
their open hostility towards Taiwan, flying their fighter jets over
Taiwan airspace, threatening even the Speaker of the House to
shoot a plane out of the sky. It wasn't like
that under Donald Trump. I think President she had a
healthy fear of President Trump, so it kind of pushed

(14:42):
him back. He wasn't as aggressive. Putin wasn't as aggressive
him Jong Lun, the Mullas weren't as aggressive. And then
I see China as buying up all of this land.
Have you have you been reading about this buying up
a lot of ranch land, a lot of farmland, and
a lot of land that happens to be around US
mill military installations. Why wouldn't we ever allow a hostile

(15:03):
regime like China to be buying land in our country well,
to be buying land, and to be buying land through
state owned enterprises. It's one thing if these were just
individuals doing it who happen to have some connection to China.
But when you've got a state owned enterprise by China
buying up land, and especially if that land is very

(15:25):
near a sensitive military installution installation or something like that,
that's something that we've got to be prepared to block.
There are means by which we can do that. I
hope and expect our administration will take the steps in
order to do that we're appropriate, But the underlying concern
also remained separate and apart from those. We've been giving

(15:47):
China a pass on all sorts of things. We give
China a pass on these international environmental obligations, for example,
it's not fair to the American people. And by the way,
what kind of message does that sens to the rest
of the world. When President Biden has a chance to
speak at the UN and instead of talking about Russia's aggression,

(16:07):
about the evil that is Vladimir Putin, the threat that
he presents not only to the United States and the Ukraine,
but to the rest of the world, about China's horrible
aggressive behavior in the South China see relative to Taiwan,
and otherwise, instead he goes to speak there, and he

(16:28):
chooses to talk about how the United States is choosing
essentially unilaterally to disarm when it comes to energy. That's
a disgrace. It's absolutely silly. And the policies that he's pushing,
the cutbacks in what he claims will be a reduction
of how many giga tons of carbon there is. You

(16:51):
know what he never says. He never tells us what
that will translate into in terms of a reduction in
global temperature. He never says that because he can, because
they don't have the science to back it up. Senator listen,
we're just short on time. By the way, Crownburgers on
me favorite place on Earth. Your election now Utah. You

(17:13):
might think, okay, what Utah is reliably Republican. You have
egg McMuffin, as my buddy rodar Quick calls him, is
running a phony campaign to deceive the people of Utah
into thinking that he's not going to caucus with the
Democrats and the radical socialists in Washington. They will so

(17:33):
Senator Mike Lee's reelection is crucial if Republicans have any
chance of taking back the Senate. We're going to follow
this race closely Senator. Thanks for being will us. We
appreciate it. Thank you, Sean. You can read all about it.
Leaper Senate dot Com. All right, eight hundred nine one,
Sean our number. We'll get to your calls coming up

(17:55):
exposing government waves down abuse of your liberties every day.
Sean Hannity is on right now. All right, twenty five
to the top of the hour, eight hundred nine four one,
Shawn our number. We'll get to your calls on a minute.
Interesting exchange. You know, one of the top issues for
Democrats this election year is on the overturning of Roe v. Wade,

(18:18):
in other words, that states will decide what restrictions, if any,
they would have on the issue of abortion. And you
know liberal states like California. By the way, Gavin Newsom
is out there now with campaigns putting up billboards in
red states saying come to California to get your late
term abortion. I'm like, okay, great, is that a new tourism,

(18:39):
you know, tactic of California. But anyway, states, I think
they'll end up probably where Mississippi, the Dobbs case, you know,
where it where they were looking to go, which is
probably around fifteen weeks we know very early on in
pregnancy you can detect a harpyat and anyway, I had

(18:59):
never heard if you follow the science, I was shocked
The Today Show Today actually made the case that young
developing fetus's children in the womb can in fact experienced taste.
Listen to this exchange. Wait, so you guys have to
see this? Have you heard about this? So this morning

(19:19):
we wanted to show you, trying to change the subject
some amazing baby faces. Look at this. So researchers in
Britain wanted to know if babies in the womb react
when the mom ingests a flavor of food. And this
is what they saw. Do you want to guess what
was on the left? So the left is of a
baby in its resting state, and then on the right

(19:40):
you see how he smiles. Twenty minutes the mom made
some carrot l There was just a resting state. So
were there other foods? Yes, there were other foods. I'm
glad you asked you want to look at this? Baby's
your action before mom? Mom at kale? Wow. So here's
the thing had ice cream. I don't know why would
they go why would they go with Let me explain

(20:02):
the vegetable. So the Setti's co author says the images
could just shell muscle movements when a baby's reacting to
maybe a flavor that's fitter. So you shouldn't interpret it
whether you know it's happy or distaste, because once they
get out. The fascinating thing about that, Linda, did you
pick this up? Is they're referring to a child in

(20:23):
the womb as a baby. They're talking about feelings that
a baby would have. And yet I bet if you
surveyed most of these people at the Today Show, they
probably support no restrictions on abortion. I may be mistaken,
that's just a guess, because I mean with more leftists
and liberals, they don't want any restrictions. A woman has
a right to choose. Government can't tell her what she

(20:44):
can and cannot do with her body, okay, And then
you have little states that will allow abortion even up
to the hours before giving birth. I mean it's insanity,
that's infanticide. But now they're now talking about a baby
that can feel, sense and even taste food. That kind
of blew me away. Yeah, I gotta say, I think
they think what happened was they forgot to check their

(21:07):
human souls at the door today, and they just act
at like regular people and thought like regular people, and
they weren't trying to cowtown to the woke left, and
so they forgot to say things like it's not a
baby until it's born, or it's just a fetus, or
it doesn't have it doesn't feel pain, it doesn't have
a heartbeat like Stacy Abrams claims to say. And I think,

(21:27):
you know, when they're just talking like regular people and
they actually look at the sonograms and they start to
just have a conversation and they they're not thinking like, oh,
I better not say that, because you know that's not
politically correct. Who identifying laughing and watching this that were
kind of fascinated by it. You mentioned Stacy Abrams. She
actually said this week that there's no such thing as

(21:49):
a heartbeat. It's six weeks. She's not exactly following the
science listens. The only problem is, and this is a

(22:14):
problem Democrats have because general, I guess, conventional wisdom was
that the overturning row would result in many, many women
being mobilized going to the polls just on the issue
of abortion. There's not a single person I know, and
I know a lot of people that says that their
pro choice, that supports late term abortion because they know

(22:36):
that the child is viable on their own outside of
the womb. You know that, you know, fetal heartbeat is
picked up extremely early once fertilization takes place. Can I
meant that point as well? And I said this the
other day, and I don't think it bears constant repeating.
You know, Steve se Abrams has never had children, She's

(22:56):
never had a sonogram. To my knowledge, she's never given
birth to a child. And so to say that you
don't think that it has a heartbeat, or you you're
saying it's biologically incorrect. You know, if you're if you've
borne a child and a child has lived in your stomach,
I can assure you at six weeks, baby's heartbeat loud
and clear. Baby in a few months advanced so much,

(23:18):
even from the time that I had my kids and
my youngest, I mean, it's advanced to the point where
like you had three D imaging, you could forty Sean
at the end of Liam, I had a four dum
image of his face. It was insane. You knew exactly
what he'd look like before. Dude, I did and I
was like, oh my goodness, gracious, that baby looks just
like my ex husband. Oh my word. It was insane.

(23:41):
But well that's to say again, just one more point.
If we look at Merkle, if we look at my Crone,
if we look at all of these different people who
are making rules and regulations for our children, they are
not parents. Do not tell me how to walk in
my shoes until you have walked a mile them them yourself.
Do me a favor. Connie in the Free State of Florida,
Connie High, how are you glad you called? I'm great?

(24:01):
How are you? I was calling to comment on the
lawsuits being filed in New York by Latricia James. I
think it's absolutely absurd. I can't even begin to understand it.
Because bank are not stupid. They go out and do

(24:23):
their own appraisals. They also require audited financial statements in
order to make a loan, and I can only imagine
what they require to make a loan in the amounts
that Trump was getting from them. And not only that,
but the fdi C comes in they monitor those loans

(24:47):
and if they find any improprieties or anything like that,
the bank is required to put the amount of money
that they went into reserves and here touch that money.
So for her to accuse these I mean, I just
think it's such flood because it is virtually impossible because

(25:12):
you're right dealing with the amount of money, and most
of us can't relate to what a billionaire would have economically.
And I can only tell you that, you know, I
used to use H and R block as Thankfully I've
been blessed. I've gotten a little successful in my life.
And I'll tell you that the amount of work effort,

(25:34):
the number of people that have to work on my taxes,
and then my lawyer insists on an outside accounting firm
on top of my regular accounting firm, then a law
firm to follow up the third time, it gets very,
very complicated. Nobody can do their own taxes. Every year,
they have a group of account in some of the
top accounting firms in the country, get the same information,

(25:56):
and they're all tasked with giving the the tax amount
owed and they almost never come up with the same number.
It's crazy, not that, but these banks are not going
to do anything. Can you imagine the FDIC coming into
a big bank and saying, oh, you have to put

(26:17):
seventeen million dollars in reserves because you didn't follow a
proper protocol with rating this loan, and in order to
rate the loan, they have to have that information first
of all. Besides all these banks apparently being paid back
and there's no damages and nobody got hurt. It is

(26:38):
the fiduciary responsibility of any bank, any financial institution. You're
you look, you're not dealing with your local community bank.
If you're if you're raising the type of money Donald
Trump needed to raise to buy a big building or
build a big building in New York City, it's just
not you're dealing with billions. You're not dealing with millions
or hundreds of millions. So a massive amount of money.

(27:00):
The amount of vetting that any lending institution would do
is massive. And at that point, because they have a
responsibility to their own shareholders, their own fiduciary responsibility, they
could end up going to jail if they ever lent
money and didn't do their due diligence. That's how serious

(27:20):
it is. It's never going to happen. It never did happen.
And the idea that Trump gave these statements that were wrong,
I think the funniest thing, one of the funniest things
that Trump said to me last night was that, oh no,
we put in a disclaimer. These are our estimates. You
can give us yours. And it sounds to me, knowing Trump,
like he's negotiatingly. He always is. You know. I would

(27:43):
say to Trump, I need you, we need twenty minute
an interview. He goes, I'll give you ten. Or let's say,
if I wanted twenty, I'd say, give me, we need
thirty minutes of your time. That's it, and then you
can leave. How about I give you ten and then
we settled on twenty. I just I always knew with him,
whatever it is, it's a negotiation, and he does it
just as a matter of course. It's his nature, it's

(28:03):
in his blood. So there's no way that any of
these companies, now, if they did lend him money on
favorable terms but they didn't do their own evaluations, If
if they looked at the collateral and just took the
borrowers information as gospel truth, there's no way they can

(28:28):
survive in that industry because they've got to You only
lend money when the odds are really high that you're
gonna get paid back, and if you don't get paid back,
you're going to be compensated with a B or C
in other words, collateral that somebody would put up for
a loan. So it's insane on the surface. You raise
a great point, which is why this is a civil case,

(28:49):
and I don't think it's going to go very far.
That's my guess. Thank you, Connie, We appreciate it. Quick
break right back to the phone's toll free. It's eight
hundred and nine four one, Sean. You want to be
a part of the program. Our friends at the Tunnel
to Towers Foundation, they're now building their Do Good Village.
It's in Landa Lake, Florida. It's a first of a
kind community with over a hundred homes for program recipients.

(29:11):
Now this is a place where gold Star families, families
of fallen first responders, catastrophically injured heroes, can all live
together and all of their neighbors will fully understand what
they're all going through. A place where all of their
children of these families will grow up together. They'll know
that they're not alone in dealing with challenges. Now the

(29:32):
foundation is on their mission to do more for these families,
and this Do Good Village is going to help beyond
measure now. It's all because of an extraordinary donation of
many acres of land, but also your generosity to build
the homes. Now you can help America's greatest heroes and
their families to heal together, and you can make the
Do Good Village the very first of many communities like

(29:54):
it around the country. And with every mortgage free home,
the Foundation makes good on their promise to do good
and never forget the sacrifices our heroes have made for
our country and our communities. They're asking all of us,
and I'm already on board eleven bucks a month to
the Tunnel to Towers Foundation their website, the letter T
the number two, the letter T dot org, The letter

(30:16):
T the number two, the letter T dot org to
help those they gave everything for us. The Final Hour
roundup is next. You do not want to miss it,
and stay tuned for the Final Hour freeverall on the
Sean Hannity Show. All right back to our busy phones

(30:39):
eight hundred and nine four one, Sean. If you want
to join us, don't forget Part two of our interview
with President Trump tonight on Hannity on the Fox News Channel.
Candice is in Colorado. Candice, how are you glad you called?
I'm fine, Sean, how are you? I'm good? Thank you,
it's good. Well, I actually I'll try to make this quick,
but I actually have a lot to say. So. But

(31:00):
I've been listening to all the discussions surrounding green energy,
electric vehicles and zero emissions, which we all know isn't obtainable,
and I think besides the obvious reasons of being dependent
on China for renewable energy, I think there needs to
be more discussion about the details of how that's actually

(31:22):
going to be implemented across America and what it looks
like for every day Americans to get to work, to drive,
to go to a vacation destination. I mean, there's so
many unanswered questions about the details of how that's going
to get implemented with the infrastructure and you know, the

(31:44):
devils and the details. I always say, for instance, Biden
says that he's going to be they'll they'll be charging
stations put in all across the country. Well, what does
that look like? I mean, what's in what is entailed
with like how long does it charge? Your how long

(32:07):
does it take a charge of vehicle, what are the costs,
and so they're varying, varying times um that you need
to charge it. By the way, ninety percent of the
charging is coming from fossil fuel related energy grids. Right,
And you're paying twenty two grand more on average for
an electric vehicle versus a gas powered vehicle, right right,
And then and you also have to pillage mother Earth.

(32:28):
I keep reminding everybody, uh that you got to get
the minerals specifically to build these batteries out, and which,
by the way, are themselves environmentally particularly unfriendly. So none
of what they're saying is true. There's no such thing
as as zero emissions. We played a cut earlier this
week from you know, an expert laying out exactly, you know,

(32:50):
the damage to the to the earth that is caused
by electric vehicles. But the point is we don't have
the technology, we don't have the grid with available by
any stretch, and the resulting chaos and catastrophe. We're now
putting America as a country at a financial disadvantage because

(33:12):
America is not competing on a level playing field. We
have a president and radical climate cultists that have now
put us on a path to take ourselves out of
the competitive economic arena and put on burdensome regulations to
the point that they would rather import at a much
higher price by reducing the world's supply of energy, thus

(33:34):
raising the costs. They would rather be dependent on countries
that hate us than produce all the energy we need
now domestically, much cleaner, much cheaper, and much faster. And
the only way this is going to end is in
a disaster, and we're already seeing the beginnings of the disaster.
The reason you pay more to fill up your tank

(33:56):
is because of Joe Biden's policies. The reason it costs
more to say goods to every store that you shop
at is because it costs more to put diesel in
the truck to transports it. And all of this would
have been preventable, and it adds to the supply chain
crisis on top of it. And the reality is, for
the foreseeable future, meaning the next couple of decades, this

(34:18):
is going to still remain fossil fuels the lifelotter of
our economy. We can't unilaterally disarm our economy at this
point in time. It is the results will be catastrophic.
There's no other way to put it anyway. I hope
that answers your question. Good point, we'll continue