September 13, 2024 • 31 mins
David Schoen, Civil Liberties Attorney and Former Counsel for President Trump and Alan Dershowitz, attorney and author of Get Trump, discuss the legal news for President Trump this week.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thanks Scot chat on our two Sean Hannity
Show eight hundred nine to four one Sean if you
want to be a part of the program, only fifty
three days till election day, best election coverage available on
your radio dial, four days early voting Pennsylvania and ballots
now going out to even important swing states even as
(00:21):
we speak, and in the next week and a half,
two weeks a lot of states. All the information you'd
ever want is a public service is on Hannity dot com,
along with the Kamala files and the Balls files. I
didn't have a lot of time yesterday to get into
comments of Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, and him trying
(00:43):
to make the case that the DOJ treats all cases alike.
Is not one rule for friends and another for foes.
But we know that's not true. Just look at the
classified documents case. You know, Hillary Clinton top secret class information,
a lot more than was found in mar A Lago
(01:03):
on our servers. And then of course thirty three thousand
subpoena emails that were deleted with bleach bit and devices destroyed.
Everybody knew about it, nothing happened, There was no raid,
We had Joe Biden force separate independent locations, top secret
classified information, even hanging out in his garage next to
(01:23):
his precious corvette. So that claim is not true. Let's
listen Tomeric Garland from yesterday.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
Federal prosecutors and agents may never make a decision regarding
an investigation or prosecution for the purpose of affecting any election,
or the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to
any candidate or political party. In short, we must treat
(01:53):
like cases alike. There is not one rule for friends
and another for foes, one rule for the powerful and
another for the powerless, one rule for the rich and
another for the poor, one rule for Democrats and another
for Republicans, or different rules depending on one's race or ethnicity.
(02:16):
To the contrary, we have only one rule. We follow
the facts and apply the law in a way that
respects the Constitution and protects civil liberties.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
Well tell that to Donald Trump. We did have two
of the charges that were brought against Trump and others
in Georgia that were three of them actually, Yet yesterday
knocked out of Fannie Willis still claiming that the investigation
against her is racially motivated.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
They have decided in Georgia that they would like to come.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
Over after me.
Speaker 3 (02:52):
They use false reasons for wanting to come after me.
Georgia had never had a prosecutorial oversight committee, and all
of a sudden, fourteen minorities were elected to office to
serve as district attorney, and now all of a sudden,
they need an oversight committee to look after district attorneys
because they want to tell us how to prosecute and
(03:14):
who to prosecute, and where we should put our resources,
as opposed to allowing the voters that put us in
these seats to make those determinations anyway.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
David Shoon is with US Civil Liberties attorney former Council
for President Trump. Professor Alan Dershowitz is with US, author
of the best seller Get Trump. Let me go to
David Shon and start with you. David, do you agree
with Merrek Garland that we don't have any favoritism in
our Department of Justice? Because I would argue in the
document's case alone, there's no greater evidence that two Democrats
(03:47):
were treated very differently than Donald Trump.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
I think it's the biggest loss of the demot for
the Democratic Party that we've seen in my lifetime, probably
that he Alan Dershowitz has left the party for the
reasons that he left it. Now back to yours, Merrick Garland.
The timing and substance of Merrick Garland's statement could not
be more outrageous. In my career, I have never seen
this kind of political weaponization of the Department of Justice
(04:11):
as we've seen under the leadership of Merrick Garland. His
number two, Lisa Monico, is a life career long Andrew
Weisman Acolaite, so I expected it of her, but not
of him. I actually thought he was a great judge.
I had a case before him. He was an honest
and decent guy. You can point to any number of
examples here and you have already. But for example, his
(04:31):
appointment of Jack Smith, apart from the constitutional infirmity that
Judge Cannon has raised with the appropriation's clause on the
appointments clause, it just showed terrible judgment. Jack Smith has
had horrendous prosecutorial exercise of proscual discretion at all times.
In John Edwards case, the Governor McDonald case. He doesn't
(04:52):
listen to people when they tell him the evidence doesn't
support the case. He's out there for the headlines, and
he's done that in this case, got ethical violation in
this case alleged he has members of this team's J P. Cooney,
I have a sanctions motion going against him for lying
to a federal judge along with Molly Gast and another
member of the team the circumvented Congress. But just look
(05:12):
at this. Merrick Garland personally, he defied Congress's subpoena for
the Biden Weiss tape the audio of the tape, claiming
executive privilege. There's no way executive privilege applies there, and
he knows that the transcript of the whole conversation has
been turned over already, so.
Speaker 5 (05:29):
It's not privileged.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
The privilege doesn't protect facial expressions or a slow pace
of talk, and it wasn't it. There's no advice going
on there that kind of relationship between Biden and Weiss.
It was an investigation. So Merrick Garland is aware personally
of what he's doing, and his statement is like opposite day.
Speaker 5 (05:48):
Again, they have used the.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
Justice Department here to effect an election in favor of
one party over the other. Andrew Cormo said it in
the New York case. They never would have prosecuted Trump
if he hadn't an he was running for president again.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
I mean, that really says it all, Professor Durschwitz. Let's
first deal with the issue. You're no longer a Democrat.
Speaker 5 (06:08):
Look, I don't know who I'm going to vote for,
but I can't any longer be associated with a party
that hates America, that hates Israel, that hates Western values,
that undercuts democratic values, that undercuts the rule of law,
and that uses the resources of the Justice Department to
go after a candidate for president who they don't like.
(06:31):
Whether I vote for Trump or not, that's irrelevant. The
point is he is being victimized by the Justice Department
today and by the New York DA and by the
Fulton County DA, and I have to be on the
side of justice.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
Well, I think that's all fair, well and good. I mean,
you know, I felt that Merrik Carlin was suggesting that
that honest criticism of the Justice Department and a dual
standard of justice somehow is unaccepted in his world. And
I'm like, no, that would be the epitome of freedom
(07:04):
of expression number one, and something that I would think
he'd embrace. At number two. You know, all good people
of conscience deplore any violence, which you know brings us
to the whole obsession with January sixth. Fine, there were
people that did absolutely the wrong thing. I said it
in real time on this program. But there were people
(07:26):
In twenty twenty, there were five hundred and seventy four riots,
a couple of dozen dead Americans, thousands of injured cops
that lasted with bricks, rocks, bottles, molotov cocktails, police precincts
burned to the ground, billions in property damage. Why weren't
those riots and insurrections investigated? Why does Kamala Hiris get
a pass? She tweeted out a bail fund four days
(07:47):
after the police precinct then Minneapolis was burned to the
ground and said they're not going to stop. They shouldn't stop,
and we're not going to stop. How is that not
a call for insurrection?
Speaker 5 (07:57):
Look, I agree, I think there has been a double
standards in which they've arrested some Trump people, you know,
going to their houses with guns drawn. They don't do
that to political people on the other side. And I
would love to see a joint congressional committee looking into
whether or not the Justice Department has been as fair
as Merrick Garland says it has been, and I doubt
that a legitimate committee of people experts would find that
(08:21):
he was actually being accurate. I just don't think this
Justice warman has been accurate. Now, it's no answer to
say that, you know, they'll if if Trump gets elected,
he's going to prosecute people selectively as well. I don't
think he's going to do that. But that's no answer.
You can't have it on either side. There has to
be one objective rule of law.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
Yeah, David Shoan, let me let you pick up from there.
You know, it's sort of like you know, refiling the
DC case, you know, with sixty days to go. I
thought we had a Justice Department policy that prevented that.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
So that's another example of exactly why Merrick Garland's statement is,
I got the today. They knew exactly what they were
doing when they issued the superseding indictment. They know it
affects the election, and to say, as they did at
the time, well, the rule doesn't apply because now this
is just a question for the judge. It's not an
original indictment, and still more than sixty eight before the election, nonsense.
(09:17):
As you pointed out earlier, early voting has started already.
Every voter and those states that allow this kind of
early voting can cancel their vote now would be affected
by this indictment. It has no business. And you asked
the question before, why hasn't the appointments clause and the
appropriation's clause issue about Jacksmith's appointment been an issue in
(09:38):
the DC case? And that to the dismay of the
Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court, as we heard
in oral argument, is because President Trump's lawyers didn't fail
to raise it in the DC case. Maybe they will
now to the superseding indictment. But one more thing I
want to say. You know you heard from Alan Dershowitz here,
who is one of the champions of free speech for
decades and decades. You sean spoken out in favor of
(10:01):
free speech rights since as long as I've known you,
and I'm sure well before. We haven't even touched on
the impact on free speech rights of this administration. The
censorship on social media that's only now coming out, the
canceling of people who dare to speak against an administrative
administration's position. We've never seen something like this, I say,
(10:23):
and I don't mean to really speak too hyperbolically, but
this is the kind of thing we saw in McCarthyism.
People lose their jobs for speaking out against the administration
and positions they take.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
That's not America, all right, quick break board with Professor
Dershowitz and David Schoan on the other side. You know,
you have powerful institutions. I mean, we saw this in
the last couple of presidential elections. The deep state, as
we call it, a weaponized Department of Justice. Then you've
got big tech was dragged into the twenty twenty campaign.
They were pre bunking what they knew to be very
(10:58):
true of very real laptop up that they knew that
that laptop story would be leaked by Rudy Giuliani's attorney,
and so they have, you know, cinder blocks on the
scale of an election. Then you've got a media mob
that is not going to report on Kamala having no
restrictions on abortion or comments on a mandatory gun buy back,
(11:20):
mocking a border wall, decriminalizing illegal immigration and offering free housing, healthcare, education,
legal drivers' licenses, and free college and Minnesota for example,
and the flow of information with big tech, and and
you know, the state, the deep state and the media
is very powerful, isn't it.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
It's far too powerful in a democracy which is supposed
to have a marketplace of ideas, and the marketplace of
ideas is the closed to important ideas. And this campaign
has not been fair, and I think the American public
deserves better.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Yeah, I think they do.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
Berman Sunders said it all the other day. You don't
need to go any further. He said, Essentially, Kamala Harris
will say whatever it takes to get elected, and then
she will return to our fold, meaning Sanders, Elizabeth Warren,
AOC and the hate squad. That's what the American public
needs to hear. President Trump fulfilled his promises in his
last campaign for president when he became president. And I
(12:23):
mean those specifically with respect the Israel, peace in the
Middle East and all of those kinds of things. We're
not hearing any policy economic and economy of opportunity, we
hear Kamala Harris. Nobody knows what any of these kinds
of things mean. We need specifics, and we have the
track record of President Trump. But as I told you before,
you know, Alan Dershowitz is the ultimate civil libertarian and
(12:45):
for him to come out with the positions that he has,
he speaks forthrightly as he always has, and that's important.
And as I say, you and he Sewan both have
been champions of free speech and that's what's at stake
in this election as well.
Speaker 5 (12:57):
So I have a question though, for President Trump, why
didn't he focus on the statement made by Bernie Sanders.
Bernie Sanders made the most important statement campaign. What he
said was that, look, what Kamala Harris is saying about
moving to the center isn't true. She is still a progressive,
woke radical everything she ever was. She's a Bernie Sanders guy.
(13:18):
She's just doing it to full the American public. Why
didn't he focus on that? Why didn't the ABC newspeople
focus on that?
Speaker 1 (13:24):
I mean, that's a great point, it really is. And
you know, I think there are a lot of opportunities
that were available to him in terms of him prosecuting
the case. But it was a three on one environment
as usual, and I thought it was very hostile. And
you know it's easy for us on the sidelines to
sit there Monday morning quarterback. Why didn't you say this or.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
That I'm not this quarterback. Now I'm talking about Thursday
afternoon quarterbacking for Sunday's game.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
It was Tuesday's game. But who's counting?
Speaker 5 (13:53):
Oh no? But why doesn't he demand another debate? Why
is she saying she wants another debate and he doesn't.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
I don't believe for one second she means it, and
I think they have figured out she doesn't mean it either.
I think what she wants is to create a perception
and then would create such onerous rules. I mean, every
single network was dictated by the Democrats, Professor, everyone, every
rule was dictated by the Democrats, and then they wanted
to change the rules. I know at some point you
(14:23):
got to just look at the opportunity and just say
I'm better off campaigning on my own and I you
know that. Look, I've talked to friends that have different
views on it. I'm not sure where I actually stand
on it, to be honest, and that's a rare moment
for me.
Speaker 5 (14:36):
Challenge him to a debate on Fox News, and if
she turns it down, debate her with an empty chair.
Have her statements have standards statements, and have there be
a debate on Fox And if she turns down a
debate on Fox after being on CNN and ABC. The
American public has the right to touch that.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I think that's a good idea. Actually, I think you
should suggest it to him. Anyway, I appreciate both of you.
Eight hundred ninety four one Seawan. If you want to
be a part of the program, Professor Dershowitz and David
Shoan information download Sean Hannity and the breaking news you
(15:16):
might have missed today. It's Shawn's Insider Information. Hannity is
on right now, all right, twenty five to the top
of the hour on this Friday. Eight hundred and nine
four one Sean our number if you want to be
a part of the program. Fifty three days till Election Day,
early voting Pennsylvania rolling out around the country that begins
(15:37):
early next week, and ballots now in the process of
being sent out in other states as we speak. We're
now approaching the one year anniversary of the horrific radical
Islamic terrorist attack. I know Kamala doesn't want me to
say it, but I guess I'm not courageous like she is.
But that's what happened. Anyway, the International Fellowship of Christians
(15:59):
and Jews, they lost the equivalent of forty thousand Americans
in a day, and they're inviting all of us to
join them and their flags for fellowship. And it's an
opportunity for people of all faiths to remember the victims
and honor the heroes, and pray for those still held hostage,
and highlight the unwavering support of people of other faiths
(16:21):
the Christian faith of which I consider myself Christian, for
Israel and for the Jewish people. And now the day
before the anniversary, on October the six, thousands of people
will be praying for those impacted by the war, planting
flags all across our country here in America, honoring the
victims of October the seventh, and I hope all of
(16:41):
you will join with us and letting the world know
that we stand with Israel and their battle against radical
Islamis that have you know We're in there murdering and
kidnapping and raping and beheading and taking hostages. It's unreal.
Your generous donation is desperately needed to provide just the
(17:03):
basics for people that have been displaced, that has been
now an ongoing war ever since that day, and not
only provide a flag symbolizing your support all across the country,
but supporting the Fellowship's ongoing emergency efforts. The need is great.
People displaced, people need basics like food and medicine. We
(17:24):
can't stay silent, we can't stay on the sidelines. We
have anti semitism in the halls of Congress, college campuses
and worldwide. It needs to stop. Please join this effort.
Go to their website. It's one word support IFCJ dot org.
Support IFCJ dot org today. You know I don't. I'm
(17:46):
not going to join this chorus of people. David Portnoy
had an interesting commedy. I didn't know David Portnoy was
a big swifty you know. I know he's got is
what's the name of the dogie has? Oh my god, Peaches, Peaches,
come here, peaches. You know here. You got this this
hyper alpha male, and he's got these videos with his
(18:07):
dog that he rescued and flew in on a private jet.
Uh and and he's raised I think millions of dollars,
you know, to help rescue animals. I love animals too.
I love dogs in particular. I wish I was at
a point in my life where I actually could be
a good dog owner. I'd love to have a dog again,
but I am not. And anyway, I just I just
(18:28):
love animals. I love dogs, and I make fun of
Linda's cat that you know, had to go to the
heavy cat farm. You're not allowed to say the F word.
That at that F word right anymore, Linda. That's the illegal.
I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 6 (18:40):
I don't I don't subscribe to those things.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
But you know, all right, you so overfed this animal.
It was four times its normal size. Let's be honest, listen.
You know, I know you did it out of love,
but you nearly killed the thing.
Speaker 6 (18:55):
I didn't almost kill her. She just walked a little slower.
But you know she did go to a an away
camp and she's.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
Nice an away care. Now, is she really skinny? I
haven't said she's.
Speaker 6 (19:07):
Skinny. And she's living on the farm and she's living
her best life and I have.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
To love to keep her on the farm because you're
not capable of withholding.
Speaker 6 (19:16):
True, it's because I got another cat and that cat
was mean to her, and I, you know, I had
somebody that needed a cat at the time, who was
very lonely, and so I gave that person this cat.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
Anyway, so you have you have Portnoy going ms peach
is ah and then he pushes around the dog in
a stroller. It's hilarious. It's some of the funniest things
I've ever seen.
Speaker 6 (19:41):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
But anyway, putting that aside, he's done a lot of
good work. And but he's apparently as SWIFTYE. I didn't
know that part, and and that's fine, but he's not
voting the way Taylor Swift is. I don't know if
celebrity endorsements matter too much. The only thing I would
say is, you know one thing Taylor Swift started out with,
you know, tears in my guitar. I kind of watched
(20:03):
the whole career. She's enormously talented, writes all her own songs,
is extraordinarily kind to her fans. I mean, see, I
see a lot of things that I like about her.
I think that the press and the mob and the
media and her critics need to leave her in Travis
Kelsey alone and let them live their lives. And she's
allowed to vote for whoever she wants to vote for.
But when she made a public endorsement, it made me think,
(20:26):
I really wonder if she supports this idea of no
restrictions on late term abortion. With both Kamala Harris and
Tim Wall's support, that means in the months seven, eighth,
the ninth, that would be a question I want to
I would like to have known or supports. I mean,
not that I know of. I don't think she has
any children, but you know, if she had a son,
(20:49):
is she okay with the idea of putting feminine products
in boys bathrooms and schools or like in the case
of Minnesota and now moving into California to have a
gender assignment care. And I'm talking about care which could
(21:10):
be life altering given to students without parental notification. She
said for people to do their own research, which I
think was a responsible thing to do. I don't know now.
Brittany Mahomes, who seems to be her friend, was made
some favorable comments about Donald Trump, and you know, there's
(21:30):
oh a big outcry. Patrick Mahomes. They they tried to
drag him into this at a press conference, and honestly,
I think he probably wisely decided, I'm not bringing politics
into my sport. This is what he said for President.
Speaker 7 (21:45):
Trump rot the student family a game, getting Fox News
in relations to his campaign.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
I just wonder what your reaction is to seeing that.
Speaker 7 (21:51):
Yeah, I think I've always said I don't want I
don't want my place in my platform to be used
to endorse a candidate or do whatever each either way,
I think my place is to inform people to get
registered to vote, is to inform people to do their
own research and then make their best decision for them
and their family.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
When you were at the.
Speaker 7 (22:09):
US Open this fast weekend, and you guys were there
with Taylor and Travis, I mean, is that an important
image to show that you know people who may have
different philosophies. Whenever I'm hanging out with with whoever, I'm
not I'm not thinking about their political views or anything
like that. I'm thinking about the people when how they
how they treat other people. And I was with a
lot of great people this weekend.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
I mean, probably a smarting answer on his part. Uh,
let us go to our busy telephones. Jeff is in Missouri. Jeff, Hey,
how are you glad you've checked in? How are a
happy Friday to you?
Speaker 8 (22:41):
Happy Friday? You, Shan, thanks for having me on there
about the second debate, And I know Kamala has asked
for it, and Trump decided he wasn't going to do that,
which I think is probably a bad idea. I think
he should go on along with it and let in
(23:04):
the same forum that they did last time.
Speaker 1 (23:08):
The problem is when I did my town hall, I
don't know if you saw the town hall I did
with President Trump and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Did you see that
town hall I did? Okay, that was supposed to be
a Fox debate. Every debate so far, every rule, every location,
every moderator, all of it was dictated by the Democrats.
(23:30):
That's the only debate they're going to agree to. It's
their terms and their terms only. And we saw, you know,
I felt it was a three zho one debate Tuesday.
And I just think the President realizes, Okay, she's not
going to speak to the press, and you know, I've
got to move on with my campaign and stop. You know,
(23:52):
it was Kamala that said the debate over debates is over.
You know, I we going to not learn about her
position in fifty six days. Fifty four days, she hasn't
done a formal press conference. Donald Trump just finished one
before we started the show today. There was an interesting
comment that was made. It was on Foxnews dot Com.
(24:13):
Author Susan Page told Fox News Barbara Walters would would
be pushing hard and demanding a debate. Trump and Vance
did a combine forty eight interviews since last month, you know,
compared to you know, the one on fake news. CNN
combined James Clyburn saying that Harris, you know, probably shouldn't
(24:33):
do because do another interview, because she'll probably make a mistake.
I mean, it's a disservice to the American people. I
think I don't think this is wearing well. And I
think that as I've been pointing out, her radicalism is
becoming more and more well known. And I'm actually giving
many of you in this audience a lot of credit.
I've put the Kamala files, the Walls files on Hannity
(24:55):
dot Com as of public service them in their own words,
their radicalism, the list that I mentioned or play on
a daily basis, and more and more people discover how
extreme she is, which ABC had an obligation to bring
out ABC Disney and they didn't. You know, look, I
don't call for boycotts. I just don't or cancelations or
(25:16):
any such I just I don't live that way. But
you know, if a company is that hostile and woke
and political and their views are just the antithesis of mine,
I really have no interest in ABC Disney, and I
think their credibility as a quote news organization has been
shot and is forever tarnished as a result of that.
(25:39):
We just learned from the New York Post today that
apparently Kamala and oh, what's what's the Lindsay Davis is
that her name. I was not that familiar with her
before this. You know, we're sorority sisters went to the
we're part of the same sorority. I'm like, oh, that
would have been nice if it was disclosed ahead of time.
(26:00):
But you know, I'm not sure you really get a
lot out of this. It's if we had gotten to
the substance of Kamala sponsoring the Green New Deal mandatory
gun buybacks instead of her lying about it or her
own words, and fracking or sponsoring government healthcare for all,
no no private health insurance, and deepfund and dismantle and
(26:23):
no bail laws, and you know, sex change operations for
prisoners and for illegal immigrants paid for by you. Had
we gotten to all of that, that would be worthwhile.
But none of that happened, and I don't think it's
going to happen the next time. And she's not going
to agree to Fox, I can tell you that. So
(26:45):
Donald Trump is then put in a position yet again
to be in a hostile environment, and I'm just at
some point, I mean, he's just got to realize that
this is there's no upside here for him. Anyway. We'll see,
though it's yeah, I could go either way. To be
honest on it, I don't really care that much about
(27:05):
it because it's a lot of theater. Thanks Jeff. All Right,
quick break, right back to our phones. It's eight hundred
and nine to four one, Shawn. If you want to
be a part of the program.
Speaker 5 (27:19):
Broadcasting throughout the greatest country in.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
The world, you are lockdown on.
Speaker 5 (27:27):
The Sean Hannity Show, Show Show Show.
Speaker 1 (27:42):
All right, this Friday, we get back to our busy phones.
Dave new Jersey, Dave Joysey, what's going on man? How
are you hey, Sean?
Speaker 5 (27:49):
How are you?
Speaker 9 (27:50):
First on caller?
Speaker 1 (27:51):
What's going on man? How are you doing good?
Speaker 9 (27:54):
Before I hit my point, I got to say, being
the number one multi media superstar that you are, I
gotta tell you, you're a very humble man. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
I come. I don't know about the superstar part. I'm
kind of laughing and chuckling to myself. I will tell
you this, There's two things in my life that have
been great for me in my life. One is my
belief in God. Without it, I can't do anything. I
understand all you know of ourselves, we can do nothing.
(28:26):
The second thing is I had parents that grew up
very poor and grandparents that were very, very poor. And
I got a work ethic and I did real work
for you know, two decades in my life, and it
has shaped my world view. So if it's kept me
grounded it anyway, I'm extremely grateful for it.
Speaker 4 (28:47):
Well it has.
Speaker 1 (28:48):
Oh you're very kind. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 9 (28:50):
Yeah, I just wanted to say, you know, I watched
a debate the other night. I like to go to
bed at nine point thirty. Kept me up till eleven.
I realized it's a complete waste of time. It'solitical theater.
Trump already has the proof in the putting. He did
it for four years. He made this country the best
it's been in decades, and she's done nothing so I
(29:12):
believe I agree with him. No more debates. Let's get
to the election, keep him on the trail, and he
will win with flying colors.
Speaker 4 (29:21):
That's my belief.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
Well, I look, I think at this point we this
is where I think this audience being deputized and just
do it a public service for our country and getting engaged.
I think people. Again, I go back to something that
is probably annoying for me to repeat for many of you,
and for that I apologize, I really do. But voting early,
(29:44):
voting by mail, you got to embrace it. Not the
system we want, the system we're stuck with. You can't
start out election day down hundreds of thousands of votes.
It's critical, you know. Going to Hannity dot com. All
of this is free. There's no charge to go to
my website. You can download the Kamalo files, walls files.
You can share it on social media. You can give
it to your friends, you can give it to your family,
(30:06):
you can give it to your co workers, give it
to strangers. If we do that, that helps get out
how extreme, radical and dangerous she is, and frankly, what
a fraudulent campaign this whole thing has been. And then
you begin to also see the media in a whole
new light because you ask yourself, well, why haven't they
(30:27):
done their job? And I think back in my career
and all the times that I got it right and
they got it wrong. We were right about the Russia hoax,
we were right about the impeachment hoax. Were I was
right about Richard Jewel back in the day. I was
right about UVA. I was right about Duke Lacrosse. I
was right about Ferguson Missouri. I was right about Freddie Gray.
(30:48):
I've been right about a weaponized system of justice, right
about the dirty disinformation dossier, right about the Piza applications,
right about Hunter's laptop. And the media is wrong. And
I don't say that pridefully, to go back to your
earlier comment. I just say it as a matter of fact.
And I learned the lesson that you don't rush to judgment.
(31:10):
You know, Kamala Harris, you know rushed the judgment in
the Jesse Smilett case high tech lynching. No, it wasn't.
It was a fraud. And I was very suspicious from
day one, but I was waiting for evidence. Anyway, my friend,
God bless you. We appreciate you being out there. Thank
you for your kind words as well. I'll take it
to heart. I think we should all remain humble and kind.
(31:33):
To quote the great Tim mcgrass song, don't you.
Speaker 9 (31:36):
Like that song? Lida?
Speaker 6 (31:37):
I don't know that song?
Speaker 1 (31:38):
Oh, come on, you never heard that song? No, oh man,
you gotta download it. When we come back, we'll I'll
tell you what, We'll love it correct at the top
of the next hour. All right,
All right, thanks Scot chat on our two Sean Hannity
Show eight hundred nine to four one Sean if you
want to be a part of the program, only fifty
three days till election day, best election coverage available on
your radio dial, four days early voting Pennsylvania and ballots
now going out to even important swing states even as
(00:21):
we speak, and in the next week and a half,
two weeks a lot of states. All the information you'd
ever want is a public service is on Hannity dot com,
along with the Kamala files and the Balls files. I
didn't have a lot of time yesterday to get into
comments of Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, and him trying
(00:43):
to make the case that the DOJ treats all cases alike.
Is not one rule for friends and another for foes.
But we know that's not true. Just look at the
classified documents case. You know, Hillary Clinton top secret class information,
a lot more than was found in mar A Lago
(01:03):
on our servers. And then of course thirty three thousand
subpoena emails that were deleted with bleach bit and devices destroyed.
Everybody knew about it, nothing happened, There was no raid,
We had Joe Biden force separate independent locations, top secret
classified information, even hanging out in his garage next to
(01:23):
his precious corvette. So that claim is not true. Let's
listen Tomeric Garland from yesterday.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
Federal prosecutors and agents may never make a decision regarding
an investigation or prosecution for the purpose of affecting any election,
or the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to
any candidate or political party. In short, we must treat
(01:53):
like cases alike. There is not one rule for friends
and another for foes, one rule for the powerful and
another for the powerless, one rule for the rich and
another for the poor, one rule for Democrats and another
for Republicans, or different rules depending on one's race or ethnicity.
(02:16):
To the contrary, we have only one rule. We follow
the facts and apply the law in a way that
respects the Constitution and protects civil liberties.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
Well tell that to Donald Trump. We did have two
of the charges that were brought against Trump and others
in Georgia that were three of them actually, Yet yesterday
knocked out of Fannie Willis still claiming that the investigation
against her is racially motivated.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
They have decided in Georgia that they would like to come.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
Over after me.
Speaker 3 (02:52):
They use false reasons for wanting to come after me.
Georgia had never had a prosecutorial oversight committee, and all
of a sudden, fourteen minorities were elected to office to
serve as district attorney, and now all of a sudden,
they need an oversight committee to look after district attorneys
because they want to tell us how to prosecute and
(03:14):
who to prosecute, and where we should put our resources,
as opposed to allowing the voters that put us in
these seats to make those determinations anyway.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
David Shoon is with US Civil Liberties attorney former Council
for President Trump. Professor Alan Dershowitz is with US, author
of the best seller Get Trump. Let me go to
David Shon and start with you. David, do you agree
with Merrek Garland that we don't have any favoritism in
our Department of Justice? Because I would argue in the
document's case alone, there's no greater evidence that two Democrats
(03:47):
were treated very differently than Donald Trump.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
I think it's the biggest loss of the demot for
the Democratic Party that we've seen in my lifetime, probably
that he Alan Dershowitz has left the party for the
reasons that he left it. Now back to yours, Merrick Garland.
The timing and substance of Merrick Garland's statement could not
be more outrageous. In my career, I have never seen
this kind of political weaponization of the Department of Justice
(04:11):
as we've seen under the leadership of Merrick Garland. His
number two, Lisa Monico, is a life career long Andrew
Weisman Acolaite, so I expected it of her, but not
of him. I actually thought he was a great judge.
I had a case before him. He was an honest
and decent guy. You can point to any number of
examples here and you have already. But for example, his
(04:31):
appointment of Jack Smith, apart from the constitutional infirmity that
Judge Cannon has raised with the appropriation's clause on the
appointments clause, it just showed terrible judgment. Jack Smith has
had horrendous prosecutorial exercise of proscual discretion at all times.
In John Edwards case, the Governor McDonald case. He doesn't
(04:52):
listen to people when they tell him the evidence doesn't
support the case. He's out there for the headlines, and
he's done that in this case, got ethical violation in
this case alleged he has members of this team's J P. Cooney,
I have a sanctions motion going against him for lying
to a federal judge along with Molly Gast and another
member of the team the circumvented Congress. But just look
(05:12):
at this. Merrick Garland personally, he defied Congress's subpoena for
the Biden Weiss tape the audio of the tape, claiming
executive privilege. There's no way executive privilege applies there, and
he knows that the transcript of the whole conversation has
been turned over already, so.
Speaker 5 (05:29):
It's not privileged.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
The privilege doesn't protect facial expressions or a slow pace
of talk, and it wasn't it. There's no advice going
on there that kind of relationship between Biden and Weiss.
It was an investigation. So Merrick Garland is aware personally
of what he's doing, and his statement is like opposite day.
Speaker 5 (05:48):
Again, they have used the.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
Justice Department here to effect an election in favor of
one party over the other. Andrew Cormo said it in
the New York case. They never would have prosecuted Trump
if he hadn't an he was running for president again.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
I mean, that really says it all, Professor Durschwitz. Let's
first deal with the issue. You're no longer a Democrat.
Speaker 5 (06:08):
Look, I don't know who I'm going to vote for,
but I can't any longer be associated with a party
that hates America, that hates Israel, that hates Western values,
that undercuts democratic values, that undercuts the rule of law,
and that uses the resources of the Justice Department to
go after a candidate for president who they don't like.
(06:31):
Whether I vote for Trump or not, that's irrelevant. The
point is he is being victimized by the Justice Department
today and by the New York DA and by the
Fulton County DA, and I have to be on the
side of justice.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
Well, I think that's all fair, well and good. I mean,
you know, I felt that Merrik Carlin was suggesting that
that honest criticism of the Justice Department and a dual
standard of justice somehow is unaccepted in his world. And
I'm like, no, that would be the epitome of freedom
(07:04):
of expression number one, and something that I would think
he'd embrace. At number two. You know, all good people
of conscience deplore any violence, which you know brings us
to the whole obsession with January sixth. Fine, there were
people that did absolutely the wrong thing. I said it
in real time on this program. But there were people
(07:26):
In twenty twenty, there were five hundred and seventy four riots,
a couple of dozen dead Americans, thousands of injured cops
that lasted with bricks, rocks, bottles, molotov cocktails, police precincts
burned to the ground, billions in property damage. Why weren't
those riots and insurrections investigated? Why does Kamala Hiris get
a pass? She tweeted out a bail fund four days
(07:47):
after the police precinct then Minneapolis was burned to the
ground and said they're not going to stop. They shouldn't stop,
and we're not going to stop. How is that not
a call for insurrection?
Speaker 5 (07:57):
Look, I agree, I think there has been a double
standards in which they've arrested some Trump people, you know,
going to their houses with guns drawn. They don't do
that to political people on the other side. And I
would love to see a joint congressional committee looking into
whether or not the Justice Department has been as fair
as Merrick Garland says it has been, and I doubt
that a legitimate committee of people experts would find that
(08:21):
he was actually being accurate. I just don't think this
Justice warman has been accurate. Now, it's no answer to
say that, you know, they'll if if Trump gets elected,
he's going to prosecute people selectively as well. I don't
think he's going to do that. But that's no answer.
You can't have it on either side. There has to
be one objective rule of law.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
Yeah, David Shoan, let me let you pick up from there.
You know, it's sort of like you know, refiling the
DC case, you know, with sixty days to go. I
thought we had a Justice Department policy that prevented that.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
So that's another example of exactly why Merrick Garland's statement is,
I got the today. They knew exactly what they were
doing when they issued the superseding indictment. They know it
affects the election, and to say, as they did at
the time, well, the rule doesn't apply because now this
is just a question for the judge. It's not an
original indictment, and still more than sixty eight before the election, nonsense.
(09:17):
As you pointed out earlier, early voting has started already.
Every voter and those states that allow this kind of
early voting can cancel their vote now would be affected
by this indictment. It has no business. And you asked
the question before, why hasn't the appointments clause and the
appropriation's clause issue about Jacksmith's appointment been an issue in
(09:38):
the DC case? And that to the dismay of the
Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court, as we heard
in oral argument, is because President Trump's lawyers didn't fail
to raise it in the DC case. Maybe they will
now to the superseding indictment. But one more thing I
want to say. You know you heard from Alan Dershowitz here,
who is one of the champions of free speech for
decades and decades. You sean spoken out in favor of
(10:01):
free speech rights since as long as I've known you,
and I'm sure well before. We haven't even touched on
the impact on free speech rights of this administration. The
censorship on social media that's only now coming out, the
canceling of people who dare to speak against an administrative
administration's position. We've never seen something like this, I say,
(10:23):
and I don't mean to really speak too hyperbolically, but
this is the kind of thing we saw in McCarthyism.
People lose their jobs for speaking out against the administration
and positions they take.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
That's not America, all right, quick break board with Professor
Dershowitz and David Schoan on the other side. You know,
you have powerful institutions. I mean, we saw this in
the last couple of presidential elections. The deep state, as
we call it, a weaponized Department of Justice. Then you've
got big tech was dragged into the twenty twenty campaign.
They were pre bunking what they knew to be very
(10:58):
true of very real laptop up that they knew that
that laptop story would be leaked by Rudy Giuliani's attorney,
and so they have, you know, cinder blocks on the
scale of an election. Then you've got a media mob
that is not going to report on Kamala having no
restrictions on abortion or comments on a mandatory gun buy back,
(11:20):
mocking a border wall, decriminalizing illegal immigration and offering free housing, healthcare, education,
legal drivers' licenses, and free college and Minnesota for example,
and the flow of information with big tech, and and
you know, the state, the deep state and the media
is very powerful, isn't it.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
It's far too powerful in a democracy which is supposed
to have a marketplace of ideas, and the marketplace of
ideas is the closed to important ideas. And this campaign
has not been fair, and I think the American public
deserves better.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Yeah, I think they do.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
Berman Sunders said it all the other day. You don't
need to go any further. He said, Essentially, Kamala Harris
will say whatever it takes to get elected, and then
she will return to our fold, meaning Sanders, Elizabeth Warren,
AOC and the hate squad. That's what the American public
needs to hear. President Trump fulfilled his promises in his
last campaign for president when he became president. And I
(12:23):
mean those specifically with respect the Israel, peace in the
Middle East and all of those kinds of things. We're
not hearing any policy economic and economy of opportunity, we
hear Kamala Harris. Nobody knows what any of these kinds
of things mean. We need specifics, and we have the
track record of President Trump. But as I told you before,
you know, Alan Dershowitz is the ultimate civil libertarian and
(12:45):
for him to come out with the positions that he has,
he speaks forthrightly as he always has, and that's important.
And as I say, you and he Sewan both have
been champions of free speech and that's what's at stake
in this election as well.
Speaker 5 (12:57):
So I have a question though, for President Trump, why
didn't he focus on the statement made by Bernie Sanders.
Bernie Sanders made the most important statement campaign. What he
said was that, look, what Kamala Harris is saying about
moving to the center isn't true. She is still a progressive,
woke radical everything she ever was. She's a Bernie Sanders guy.
(13:18):
She's just doing it to full the American public. Why
didn't he focus on that? Why didn't the ABC newspeople
focus on that?
Speaker 1 (13:24):
I mean, that's a great point, it really is. And
you know, I think there are a lot of opportunities
that were available to him in terms of him prosecuting
the case. But it was a three on one environment
as usual, and I thought it was very hostile. And
you know it's easy for us on the sidelines to
sit there Monday morning quarterback. Why didn't you say this or.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
That I'm not this quarterback. Now I'm talking about Thursday
afternoon quarterbacking for Sunday's game.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
It was Tuesday's game. But who's counting?
Speaker 5 (13:53):
Oh no? But why doesn't he demand another debate? Why
is she saying she wants another debate and he doesn't.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
I don't believe for one second she means it, and
I think they have figured out she doesn't mean it either.
I think what she wants is to create a perception
and then would create such onerous rules. I mean, every
single network was dictated by the Democrats, Professor, everyone, every
rule was dictated by the Democrats, and then they wanted
to change the rules. I know at some point you
(14:23):
got to just look at the opportunity and just say
I'm better off campaigning on my own and I you
know that. Look, I've talked to friends that have different
views on it. I'm not sure where I actually stand
on it, to be honest, and that's a rare moment
for me.
Speaker 5 (14:36):
Challenge him to a debate on Fox News, and if
she turns it down, debate her with an empty chair.
Have her statements have standards statements, and have there be
a debate on Fox And if she turns down a
debate on Fox after being on CNN and ABC. The
American public has the right to touch that.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I think that's a good idea. Actually, I think you
should suggest it to him. Anyway, I appreciate both of you.
Eight hundred ninety four one Seawan. If you want to
be a part of the program, Professor Dershowitz and David
Shoan information download Sean Hannity and the breaking news you
(15:16):
might have missed today. It's Shawn's Insider Information. Hannity is
on right now, all right, twenty five to the top
of the hour on this Friday. Eight hundred and nine
four one Sean our number if you want to be
a part of the program. Fifty three days till Election Day,
early voting Pennsylvania rolling out around the country that begins
(15:37):
early next week, and ballots now in the process of
being sent out in other states as we speak. We're
now approaching the one year anniversary of the horrific radical
Islamic terrorist attack. I know Kamala doesn't want me to
say it, but I guess I'm not courageous like she is.
But that's what happened. Anyway, the International Fellowship of Christians
(15:59):
and Jews, they lost the equivalent of forty thousand Americans
in a day, and they're inviting all of us to
join them and their flags for fellowship. And it's an
opportunity for people of all faiths to remember the victims
and honor the heroes, and pray for those still held hostage,
and highlight the unwavering support of people of other faiths
(16:21):
the Christian faith of which I consider myself Christian, for
Israel and for the Jewish people. And now the day
before the anniversary, on October the six, thousands of people
will be praying for those impacted by the war, planting
flags all across our country here in America, honoring the
victims of October the seventh, and I hope all of
(16:41):
you will join with us and letting the world know
that we stand with Israel and their battle against radical
Islamis that have you know We're in there murdering and
kidnapping and raping and beheading and taking hostages. It's unreal.
Your generous donation is desperately needed to provide just the
(17:03):
basics for people that have been displaced, that has been
now an ongoing war ever since that day, and not
only provide a flag symbolizing your support all across the country,
but supporting the Fellowship's ongoing emergency efforts. The need is great.
People displaced, people need basics like food and medicine. We
(17:24):
can't stay silent, we can't stay on the sidelines. We
have anti semitism in the halls of Congress, college campuses
and worldwide. It needs to stop. Please join this effort.
Go to their website. It's one word support IFCJ dot org.
Support IFCJ dot org today. You know I don't. I'm
(17:46):
not going to join this chorus of people. David Portnoy
had an interesting commedy. I didn't know David Portnoy was
a big swifty you know. I know he's got is
what's the name of the dogie has? Oh my god, Peaches, Peaches,
come here, peaches. You know here. You got this this
hyper alpha male, and he's got these videos with his
(18:07):
dog that he rescued and flew in on a private jet.
Uh and and he's raised I think millions of dollars,
you know, to help rescue animals. I love animals too.
I love dogs in particular. I wish I was at
a point in my life where I actually could be
a good dog owner. I'd love to have a dog again,
but I am not. And anyway, I just I just
(18:28):
love animals. I love dogs, and I make fun of
Linda's cat that you know, had to go to the
heavy cat farm. You're not allowed to say the F word.
That at that F word right anymore, Linda. That's the illegal.
I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 6 (18:40):
I don't I don't subscribe to those things.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
But you know, all right, you so overfed this animal.
It was four times its normal size. Let's be honest, listen.
You know, I know you did it out of love,
but you nearly killed the thing.
Speaker 6 (18:55):
I didn't almost kill her. She just walked a little slower.
But you know she did go to a an away
camp and she's.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
Nice an away care. Now, is she really skinny? I
haven't said she's.
Speaker 6 (19:07):
Skinny. And she's living on the farm and she's living
her best life and I have.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
To love to keep her on the farm because you're
not capable of withholding.
Speaker 6 (19:16):
True, it's because I got another cat and that cat
was mean to her, and I, you know, I had
somebody that needed a cat at the time, who was
very lonely, and so I gave that person this cat.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
Anyway, so you have you have Portnoy going ms peach
is ah and then he pushes around the dog in
a stroller. It's hilarious. It's some of the funniest things
I've ever seen.
Speaker 6 (19:41):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
But anyway, putting that aside, he's done a lot of
good work. And but he's apparently as SWIFTYE. I didn't
know that part, and and that's fine, but he's not
voting the way Taylor Swift is. I don't know if
celebrity endorsements matter too much. The only thing I would
say is, you know one thing Taylor Swift started out with,
you know, tears in my guitar. I kind of watched
(20:03):
the whole career. She's enormously talented, writes all her own songs,
is extraordinarily kind to her fans. I mean, see, I
see a lot of things that I like about her.
I think that the press and the mob and the
media and her critics need to leave her in Travis
Kelsey alone and let them live their lives. And she's
allowed to vote for whoever she wants to vote for.
But when she made a public endorsement, it made me think,
(20:26):
I really wonder if she supports this idea of no
restrictions on late term abortion. With both Kamala Harris and
Tim Wall's support, that means in the months seven, eighth,
the ninth, that would be a question I want to
I would like to have known or supports. I mean,
not that I know of. I don't think she has
any children, but you know, if she had a son,
(20:49):
is she okay with the idea of putting feminine products
in boys bathrooms and schools or like in the case
of Minnesota and now moving into California to have a
gender assignment care. And I'm talking about care which could
(21:10):
be life altering given to students without parental notification. She
said for people to do their own research, which I
think was a responsible thing to do. I don't know now.
Brittany Mahomes, who seems to be her friend, was made
some favorable comments about Donald Trump, and you know, there's
(21:30):
oh a big outcry. Patrick Mahomes. They they tried to
drag him into this at a press conference, and honestly,
I think he probably wisely decided, I'm not bringing politics
into my sport. This is what he said for President.
Speaker 7 (21:45):
Trump rot the student family a game, getting Fox News
in relations to his campaign.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
I just wonder what your reaction is to seeing that.
Speaker 7 (21:51):
Yeah, I think I've always said I don't want I
don't want my place in my platform to be used
to endorse a candidate or do whatever each either way,
I think my place is to inform people to get
registered to vote, is to inform people to do their
own research and then make their best decision for them
and their family.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
When you were at the.
Speaker 7 (22:09):
US Open this fast weekend, and you guys were there
with Taylor and Travis, I mean, is that an important
image to show that you know people who may have
different philosophies. Whenever I'm hanging out with with whoever, I'm
not I'm not thinking about their political views or anything
like that. I'm thinking about the people when how they
how they treat other people. And I was with a
lot of great people this weekend.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
I mean, probably a smarting answer on his part. Uh,
let us go to our busy telephones. Jeff is in Missouri. Jeff, Hey,
how are you glad you've checked in? How are a
happy Friday to you?
Speaker 8 (22:41):
Happy Friday? You, Shan, thanks for having me on there
about the second debate, And I know Kamala has asked
for it, and Trump decided he wasn't going to do that,
which I think is probably a bad idea. I think
he should go on along with it and let in
(23:04):
the same forum that they did last time.
Speaker 1 (23:08):
The problem is when I did my town hall, I
don't know if you saw the town hall I did
with President Trump and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Did you see that
town hall I did? Okay, that was supposed to be
a Fox debate. Every debate so far, every rule, every location,
every moderator, all of it was dictated by the Democrats.
(23:30):
That's the only debate they're going to agree to. It's
their terms and their terms only. And we saw, you know,
I felt it was a three zho one debate Tuesday.
And I just think the President realizes, Okay, she's not
going to speak to the press, and you know, I've
got to move on with my campaign and stop. You know,
(23:52):
it was Kamala that said the debate over debates is over.
You know, I we going to not learn about her
position in fifty six days. Fifty four days, she hasn't
done a formal press conference. Donald Trump just finished one
before we started the show today. There was an interesting
comment that was made. It was on Foxnews dot Com.
(24:13):
Author Susan Page told Fox News Barbara Walters would would
be pushing hard and demanding a debate. Trump and Vance
did a combine forty eight interviews since last month, you know,
compared to you know, the one on fake news. CNN
combined James Clyburn saying that Harris, you know, probably shouldn't
(24:33):
do because do another interview, because she'll probably make a mistake.
I mean, it's a disservice to the American people. I
think I don't think this is wearing well. And I
think that as I've been pointing out, her radicalism is
becoming more and more well known. And I'm actually giving
many of you in this audience a lot of credit.
I've put the Kamala files, the Walls files on Hannity
(24:55):
dot Com as of public service them in their own words,
their radicalism, the list that I mentioned or play on
a daily basis, and more and more people discover how
extreme she is, which ABC had an obligation to bring
out ABC Disney and they didn't. You know, look, I
don't call for boycotts. I just don't or cancelations or
(25:16):
any such I just I don't live that way. But
you know, if a company is that hostile and woke
and political and their views are just the antithesis of mine,
I really have no interest in ABC Disney, and I
think their credibility as a quote news organization has been
shot and is forever tarnished as a result of that.
(25:39):
We just learned from the New York Post today that
apparently Kamala and oh, what's what's the Lindsay Davis is
that her name. I was not that familiar with her
before this. You know, we're sorority sisters went to the
we're part of the same sorority. I'm like, oh, that
would have been nice if it was disclosed ahead of time.
(26:00):
But you know, I'm not sure you really get a
lot out of this. It's if we had gotten to
the substance of Kamala sponsoring the Green New Deal mandatory
gun buybacks instead of her lying about it or her
own words, and fracking or sponsoring government healthcare for all,
no no private health insurance, and deepfund and dismantle and
(26:23):
no bail laws, and you know, sex change operations for
prisoners and for illegal immigrants paid for by you. Had
we gotten to all of that, that would be worthwhile.
But none of that happened, and I don't think it's
going to happen the next time. And she's not going
to agree to Fox, I can tell you that. So
(26:45):
Donald Trump is then put in a position yet again
to be in a hostile environment, and I'm just at
some point, I mean, he's just got to realize that
this is there's no upside here for him. Anyway. We'll see,
though it's yeah, I could go either way. To be
honest on it, I don't really care that much about
(27:05):
it because it's a lot of theater. Thanks Jeff. All Right,
quick break, right back to our phones. It's eight hundred
and nine to four one, Shawn. If you want to
be a part of the program.
Speaker 5 (27:19):
Broadcasting throughout the greatest country in.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
The world, you are lockdown on.
Speaker 5 (27:27):
The Sean Hannity Show, Show Show Show.
Speaker 1 (27:42):
All right, this Friday, we get back to our busy phones.
Dave new Jersey, Dave Joysey, what's going on man? How
are you hey, Sean?
Speaker 5 (27:49):
How are you?
Speaker 9 (27:50):
First on caller?
Speaker 1 (27:51):
What's going on man? How are you doing good?
Speaker 9 (27:54):
Before I hit my point, I got to say, being
the number one multi media superstar that you are, I
gotta tell you, you're a very humble man. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
I come. I don't know about the superstar part. I'm
kind of laughing and chuckling to myself. I will tell
you this, There's two things in my life that have
been great for me in my life. One is my
belief in God. Without it, I can't do anything. I
understand all you know of ourselves, we can do nothing.
(28:26):
The second thing is I had parents that grew up
very poor and grandparents that were very, very poor. And
I got a work ethic and I did real work
for you know, two decades in my life, and it
has shaped my world view. So if it's kept me
grounded it anyway, I'm extremely grateful for it.
Speaker 4 (28:47):
Well it has.
Speaker 1 (28:48):
Oh you're very kind. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 9 (28:50):
Yeah, I just wanted to say, you know, I watched
a debate the other night. I like to go to
bed at nine point thirty. Kept me up till eleven.
I realized it's a complete waste of time. It'solitical theater.
Trump already has the proof in the putting. He did
it for four years. He made this country the best
it's been in decades, and she's done nothing so I
(29:12):
believe I agree with him. No more debates. Let's get
to the election, keep him on the trail, and he
will win with flying colors.
Speaker 4 (29:21):
That's my belief.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
Well, I look, I think at this point we this
is where I think this audience being deputized and just
do it a public service for our country and getting engaged.
I think people. Again, I go back to something that
is probably annoying for me to repeat for many of you,
and for that I apologize, I really do. But voting early,
(29:44):
voting by mail, you got to embrace it. Not the
system we want, the system we're stuck with. You can't
start out election day down hundreds of thousands of votes.
It's critical, you know. Going to Hannity dot com. All
of this is free. There's no charge to go to
my website. You can download the Kamalo files, walls files.
You can share it on social media. You can give
it to your friends, you can give it to your family,
(30:06):
you can give it to your co workers, give it
to strangers. If we do that, that helps get out
how extreme, radical and dangerous she is, and frankly, what
a fraudulent campaign this whole thing has been. And then
you begin to also see the media in a whole
new light because you ask yourself, well, why haven't they
(30:27):
done their job? And I think back in my career
and all the times that I got it right and
they got it wrong. We were right about the Russia hoax,
we were right about the impeachment hoax. Were I was
right about Richard Jewel back in the day. I was
right about UVA. I was right about Duke Lacrosse. I
was right about Ferguson Missouri. I was right about Freddie Gray.
(30:48):
I've been right about a weaponized system of justice, right
about the dirty disinformation dossier, right about the Piza applications,
right about Hunter's laptop. And the media is wrong. And
I don't say that pridefully, to go back to your
earlier comment. I just say it as a matter of fact.
And I learned the lesson that you don't rush to judgment.
(31:10):
You know, Kamala Harris, you know rushed the judgment in
the Jesse Smilett case high tech lynching. No, it wasn't.
It was a fraud. And I was very suspicious from
day one, but I was waiting for evidence. Anyway, my friend,
God bless you. We appreciate you being out there. Thank
you for your kind words as well. I'll take it
to heart. I think we should all remain humble and kind.
(31:33):
To quote the great Tim mcgrass song, don't you.
Speaker 9 (31:36):
Like that song? Lida?
Speaker 6 (31:37):
I don't know that song?
Speaker 1 (31:38):
Oh, come on, you never heard that song? No, oh man,
you gotta download it. When we come back, we'll I'll
tell you what, We'll love it correct at the top
of the next hour. All right,
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
1. Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
2. Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
3. Crime Junkie
If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people.