March 26, 2025 • 57 mins
Segement 2 of 3. Jason Stallworth, Pajama Joe, and Lusty Laura join Drew in Studio. We are going to force feed Pajama Joe a Ding Dong and Lagers until he vomits. Also, this week's Drew News. DREW IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM AGAIN? RIP GEORGE FORMAN TRUMP AND THE SIGNAL APP MISHAP GET A PIECE OF IRON MAIDEN'S PLANE JESSICA ABER DEATH, CONSPIRACIES TESLA, VANDALISM OR TERRORISM? YOUR DNA ON THE BLACK MARKET? THE WEIRD BABY NAME THE POPULATION CALCULATION MISTAKE SUBURBAN BACKYARD CAMPING? CHINA VS CANADA? FLORIDA LICENSE PLATE LAW ROBBERY BY PYTHON? THE HORRID AIRPORT DOG DEATH MERCURY RETROGRADE TOUGH LOVE MORE SEX EQUALS HAPPY LIFE 95 DAYS LOST AT SEA MENTAL INSTITUTIONS REOPENING? Tune in!
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-drinking-with-drew-show--5728187/support.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-drinking-with-drew-show--5728187/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, So this is the second segment of the show,
and we are back. Now we are going to jump
right into Drew News. Jason Starwarth is here with us,
but Jama, Joe, Lusty, Laura, We're going to jump into
some Drew News, a lot of controversial Drew News. I
don't try to get too crazy political, but there are
a couple of political stories on here, and we're going
(00:21):
to see what people think in the audience.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Won't you Cal's are Republicans what you said earlier?
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Yes? So apparently okay, uh, there was a strike on
Yemen last week, and in doing so, Trump and his
team apparently discussed the strike on a very well known
(00:47):
app called Signal Now. Signal is known throughout the average
person's world of being an app that you can communicate
on that as private, it can't be infiltrated or searched
via subpoena. Like, there's certain reasons why people think they
(01:11):
use Signal Now. As a private investigator, I have never
worked a case where Signal transcripts were subpoenaed and provided
that's just my personal experience. I don't I've never met
an attorney that's told me that they use signal data
(01:31):
and a case. So at what level is signals data
encrypted and not provided to various agencies? This is strictly
my opinion, and my opinion only to my knowledge. I've
never heard of signal being used against somebody in the
court of law period. Okay, personal experience. Can it be
(01:57):
accessed by other agencies other governments? I would say it's possible.
I'm sure there's a way to do that.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Okay, same as what'sapp though, no, no.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
No, I don't have either, so I have no clue.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
I never heard WhatsApp, and I'm not a computer wiz.
But WhatsApp actually uses a phone number attached to their server.
Speaker 3 (02:22):
Yes, okay, so it's end to end encrypted as well, though, right.
Speaker 1 (02:26):
But I'm I don't know, Joe, Honestly, I've never used
I've never worked a case where WhatsApp data has been
used against somebody either. So, but Signal has the option
where it auto deletes, so you can put in there
that you want your messages auto deleted within five minutes
an hour.
Speaker 5 (02:45):
Sure, I'm no sat is, like said, I think at
twenty four hours and then it deletes. But it also
tells you if somebody screenshots.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Right, ig stories twenty four.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
Hours, but those probably can be like pulled somehow.
Speaker 1 (02:57):
Yeah, there's like if you The thing is, if you
subpoena a company, are they going to supply their records? Facebook?
Will Google?
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Will?
Speaker 1 (03:08):
It's complicated, but they will. You have not heard from
Will Will James. So this is just my personal experience.
I've never seen.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Okay, but the segment does that change the point of
the story though, I don't think it's.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Really now here's the thing my understanding, and I've seen
a ton of news stories on this from both CNN, Fox, MSNBC,
different stories, a lot of people saying it was an
extremely ignorant thing to do by the president and his staff.
Apparently they had a reporter on the group chat that
(03:44):
somehow got invited that they didn't know about. And this
reporter has historically been anti Trump, and of course he
released this and kind of made the story blow up.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
Well, there's a few details there that are believable and
some that are questionable. So first, he got invited on Tuesday,
and the chat started on Tuesday, and he didn't remove
himself from the chat until Sunday, well Monday, right.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
Why don't you remove yourself from that gold mines because
you don't have security clearance and you normally are part
of a conversation that is obviously not intended for you
to be on. Yes, So it's kind of like you
listening to a call.
Speaker 5 (04:24):
And it's not like I hacked the conversation added myself
to it. But if you, they added me, So why
am I going to be?
Speaker 6 (04:32):
Like?
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Kind of like if the bank accidentally deposits fifty dollars into.
Speaker 3 (04:38):
Your account, don't say anything.
Speaker 1 (04:40):
You're going to be convicted of theft if you don't
turn that in.
Speaker 5 (04:43):
If I leave it in my account and don't touch
it and it takes them three weeks to figure out
where it is, that's.
Speaker 4 (04:48):
Not my way.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
You didn't know, no, But if you knowingly knew it
and kept it, that's a different story.
Speaker 4 (04:55):
But keeping using it, I think are two different things too.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
Like I'm gonna.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
The story was he thought it could have been disinformation
or some sort of spoof or something, but then once
the details of what was discussed in the chat actually
happened and the bombing happened on Saturday, he's like, oh
wait a second, that's stuff I just read. It actually
happened today or yesterday. So then he goes and says,
this must be real. Let me take myself out of
(05:24):
this and report it. So he said, he removed himself
and then said, just so you guys know, I don't
belong here and you shouldn't have said this with me here.
So he self reported that.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
And I'm Kyle. I don't know when you got in,
but I cannot read chat right now, I can steal it.
Speaker 5 (05:41):
Respond Yeah, it's not it's as classified. It's not allowed
on their regard right as drug dealers, you signal.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
But regardless of whether or not there was a there
was a journalist in that chat, they shouldn't have had
it on there at all, which means either they were
using their personal devices, which they're not supposed to do,
or they allowed them to install an unapproved gap. Here's
on the government.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Here's what happened though, well, here's what happened when they
discussed the situation on what she's slacking. When they discussed
the situation and realized they had been talking a little
in too much detail, they basically said, let's go to
the I don't know how they worded it, but it
(06:28):
was something like, let's go to the higher level of communication,
which they.
Speaker 3 (06:31):
They have a private they have a private secure communications
specifically form.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
It should have been on that to begin with.
Speaker 3 (06:36):
Everything should be on that, begin with.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
So, yes, now here's the thing, and people correct me,
I don't. I'm just going back from history. Hillary apparently
discussed a lot of information on her phones too, and
she was she instructed people to smash their phones with hammers.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
She had a private server that could like monitor all
that stuff, and it was off of governments like system.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
All right, but I don't, okay, but there was information
that was not supposed to be whatever it was.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
None of it should have been taking None of that
business should be taking place outside of their closed nets.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
So and again me not being a political person, I
think politicians are idiots. They're gonna do shit whatever. But
what what do they want done with this? You know,
they want the one guy fired who's apparently in charge
of the security team or however the security advisor, which
Trump was always bitching because Biden wasn't firing enough people,
(07:42):
and he's like this guy he did X y Z,
he hasn't been fired. But so people are slamming Trump
because like, why aren't you firing this guy? Because he
is the one responsible for this group chat. Now they're saying, well,
it was an intern that set it up? Could it
be an intern that's kind of on the inside anti
Trump and he's like, hey, I'm gonna put this reporter
in here.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
No, maybe it was it was the National Security advisor
that created the group.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Now they're saying it was one of like a staff
was a staffer.
Speaker 4 (08:06):
They're probably just like saying that to save this guy's
to save face.
Speaker 3 (08:10):
But regardless, if it's on my team, everything comes for me.
I'm responsible for my team, whether I did it is
someone else, it's always It's always been the way I operate.
If if something goes wrong on my team, it's my buzz.
But I mean, I'm not going to say what company
I work for, but I am not allowed to communicate
any business activity on a personal device. If i'm if
(08:34):
I'm late for work, I can text an employee and
say hey, I'm gonna be late. Can you handle this meeting?
Speaker 1 (08:39):
I've been in the drink. I cannot.
Speaker 3 (08:42):
I cannot give you know specific details. And if I have,
if someone say can you get on a call, yes,
I can get on a call. Then I get on
and talk about it, but I cannot, They cannot send me.
We need to talk about this, this, this and this.
That's that's not allowed. We have a very very strict
social media policy, not even social media but communications policy.
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Right, but you're talking about a war strike.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
It doesn't matter what it is at what level. Like
to me, everything every single comunication between government employees should
be on their strict restricted.
Speaker 7 (09:17):
Prob absolutely at a bounce for what was talking about
because I used to we're not going to mention the company.
Speaker 3 (09:22):
But it's even gotten more strict since you left.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
Oh I'm sure, and these.
Speaker 3 (09:26):
Are the more technologies that are out there.
Speaker 2 (09:27):
Yeah, there's more risk out there.
Speaker 7 (09:29):
But we were very tight, no pun intended, but we
were like very tights. But no, we were very tight
on everything. Right, It was just you just you couldn't
be anywhere out of line. So I'm very surprised to
hear stuff like this in our government. I don't care
what side it's on.
Speaker 3 (09:44):
They should not have any communication between government and between
people of that level. It's like if if if Donald
Trump goes in text putin with his own cell phone,
like that would be not allowed at all, right, Like
that has to literally go through the high secure clearance.
Speaker 5 (10:01):
Well here's here's where are all of these individuals that
were on the group chat. They all work in the
White House anyway, Like why aren't they in some type.
Speaker 3 (10:10):
Of like the White House, the Pentagon, they all they're
all in the DC area.
Speaker 8 (10:13):
They're all right, So why don't they have just this
This is like they just all get together and be
like we're gonna fucking blow up a country.
Speaker 4 (10:18):
Whatever the hell they get.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
Like this is over over like a five day span, and.
Speaker 5 (10:22):
I feel like there should be like one central location
where it's like writing, especially.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
When something's happened.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
The situation room is like one room where everything's secure
that you go in and leave your phones outside.
Speaker 3 (10:37):
You know, it's called the skiff.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
Sure, so what he said, Yeah, it was dumb. I
don't know what's going to happen, you know whatever, but
definitely should not have happened.
Speaker 4 (10:48):
So I bet like.
Speaker 5 (10:49):
The reporter had the same first name as somebody else
who was supposed to be on the chat, and they
just added them by accident.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
So Kyle said, Uh, I was a owner intelligence special
agent and case officer. This group should have known better.
Uh Lisa says, they should have just posted in the
Drinking with Drew chat Chatlet's I agree with that.
Speaker 3 (11:11):
And then how many how many other conversations are taking
place off of the systems that just never get reported
because reporters weren't included. That's the thing is, like you
allow that to happen, eventually, mistakes are going to happen.
That's why you can't.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
He said, you think they'd have a way more secure,
a way more secure than that to allow us slip up,
you know, And I agree, I'm sure they do, they
just didn't use it. But Kyle again, he said, if
that happened at my old job, there were to be
there would have been several people fired. And that's true.
And that's kind of like you have people at this
(11:50):
upper echelon doing ship. Now they're you know, yeah, they're
blaming it on the staffer. But again, you know, it's
like they should have own better. It is what it is.
Speaker 7 (12:01):
But I think the problem is like governments in general,
not just US government, but all all Western governments, is
politicians get to a point where they can just do
whatever the hell they want.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
And this is both right and left.
Speaker 7 (12:12):
I'm very much I don't know, you call me independent
whatever you want, but they get to do it. And
we experienced this with COVID. They did whatever the hell
they wanted to do. Let's see how how much power
we really have.
Speaker 1 (12:24):
Right, they experimented with policies and laws.
Speaker 7 (12:28):
It's been a huge overstep. The government was not supposed
to be this big. It was never This is never
the intent of the forefathers.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Right, all right, moving on Tesla vandalism is it or
domestic terrorism?
Speaker 3 (12:45):
I got a problem with this, Go ahead, huge problem ahead. Now, Yes,
it's bad. You're destroying cars or whatever. You're destroying cars
of that people that are completely unrelated to what you're
fighting about or you're complaining about. So it's some guy
down the street that bought a car four years ago, Right,
you're mad at him. I understand the situation itself is wrong.
(13:08):
You shouldn't be destroying people's property regardless. But when a
single person comes out and labels them the domestic terrorism
or domestic terrorists, and that same person just went and
pardoned all the people that attacked the Capitol building, I
have a serious problem with that because they were they
(13:29):
were patriots, they were good people, preach and you know
my feeling that the moment they broke through that door,
the moment they entered the building, that they should not
have been there. They were all should have been labeled treason. Well,
and that and that is literally a physical attack against
(13:50):
our government, which by definition itself is treason. Right there, here's.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
The problem with the situation. And I'm not saying it's right.
Are indifferent. I'm just telling you the facts. And depending
on who you talk to and what reports you read
and conspiracy theories you believe in, there were a lot
of people in that crowd who were put there and
(14:17):
allegedly FBI agents who incited that whole situation. I'm not
saying I believe that. I'm just telling you that's a
story that has come to florition for whatever reason.
Speaker 4 (14:30):
Here's my thing about like inciting violence. Okay, sure, you
stay along with it, thank you. No, off, No, that's
exactly what I was gonna say.
Speaker 5 (14:40):
You can say, oh, they planted people in there to
like rev up everybody's emotions and kind of get them going,
But the fact.
Speaker 4 (14:47):
Is that people fell for it.
Speaker 5 (14:50):
They literally plant bikes on the corners like look a
little like PD people trying to get theft's bike.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
Thefts they'll put a fucking bike. Yeah and yeah, bait,
I can stole.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
It if you for being stupid, you hated you, whatever,
but you did it, so you should shouldn't.
Speaker 3 (15:11):
Do But every one of those should have been labeled
a treason. But because he gave them a pardon, all right,
I disagree with it, But I see this like complete opposite.
If you give people like that a pardon, how do
you go and take this, which I see is not
even as bad and call that domestic terrorism. Again, it's
(15:35):
not politics, has nothing to do with my political leanings
because I was I was raised Republican.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
I'm not saying it or not. I'm just telling you.
I'm just telling.
Speaker 9 (15:45):
You can't has been said, and again Kyle says that's untrue.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
I'm just saying, what's what's been reported where they see
somebody's photo or face in the crowd and they match
it up to like an agent whatever. I don't know,
And honestly it could have been an agent that was
there to protest the capitol.
Speaker 4 (16:03):
Who knows talking about the planting people.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
That's right, Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
But think of just this current situation. If I go
and blow up a car. Do you think that's better,
like worse than breaking into the Capitol building? I mean, yeah,
it's bad.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Well, but would you.
Speaker 3 (16:23):
Consider that domestic terrorism when this is not considered treason?
Speaker 4 (16:28):
How many actual teslas have been damaged?
Speaker 3 (16:31):
There's protests and stuff all across the country. They're like
attacking the dealerships and stuff.
Speaker 5 (16:37):
But like I need like, I feel like I don't
hear that. There's like a ton of them and it's
like maybe one hundred cars.
Speaker 3 (16:43):
The funny part is if Elon Musk had nothing to
do with Doge and Trump right now, then Trump would
be celebrating attacking tesla's because he is completely anti electric vehicle.
Speaker 4 (16:55):
Yeah, well, now he was sitting in the front of
the White House.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
But he he's the one who wanted to try to
get rid of EV's to support the support.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
Well, I don't think I don't think he was ever
trying to get rid of him. He was just not
trying to mandate that everybody get an EV by twenty
thirty five.
Speaker 2 (17:12):
That was the big thing when they started.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
Yes, there was a mission.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
Well can't California had mandates put out by specific dates.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
Why does Trump carey? He doesn't even live in California.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
But it just goes to show that you know, you're
trying to mandate. And he said, I don't belie. They
don't even have.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Can I just he wants to control people's vehicles and
what they drive. You can drive gas all you want.
He wants people to have a choice in that, but
he doesn't want alone to have a choice in what
they do with their own bodies, just saying that's where
that's for me.
Speaker 1 (17:47):
That's where Republicans are losing. So you have two issues. Okay,
Republicans lose a lot of their gusto when they start
preaching religion, and then Democrats start losing a lot of
the gusto and then start preaching I want men to
compete against.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
My thinking when they are going religion into it, and
my God says that we should cherish every life, even
when it starts in the womb all that. That's when
you bring out the loons.
Speaker 5 (18:16):
But when you stop bringing religion into politics, then you
have to get down to just the legal side of
it and not what does your Bible say, what is
your religion?
Speaker 4 (18:26):
Because all religions are different.
Speaker 5 (18:28):
But when you bring in religion, that's when the crazies
come out, and that's when ship hits the fan, in
my opinion, So take religion out of it and just
have the legal side of it. I don't care what
your Bible says. I'm not asking you what you want
to do with your body. Do whatever the fuck you
want to do it. If you want to go about
what your God says or your spiritually or whatever that is,
(18:50):
by all means, do that.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
But who's the one that was yelling about that on
the chat about that's not that's not what I said.
I don't fucking know. Don't tell what to do with
my uterus, Okay, just saying and that's good.
Speaker 7 (19:04):
No, I think there's a and I'm I'm with Laura
one hundred percent on that. I mean, if if he's
just but if right, look at my face, look at it.
Speaker 2 (19:16):
I asked.
Speaker 7 (19:16):
I have been using the lotion that my wife bought me,
so hopefully that's shiny and pretty and all that stuff.
Speaker 2 (19:21):
But anyway, so no, I just.
Speaker 7 (19:23):
I think there's a bigger thing above what we can see,
and you know that's controlling this with the narratives and such.
And I think we're bickering against each other and that's
exactly where the power or whatever you want to call
it wants us to be. Right, that's exactly where they
want us to be. As long as we're fighting each other,
then we're not really paying attention to what's really going on.
(19:44):
So we're going to talk about all this stuff. And
there's a lot there are some other countries that were
considered third world years ago or whatever.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
They're seeing what's going on in the West.
Speaker 7 (19:56):
And I'm not talking about just America, but Canada as well,
the UK, a lot of stuff. You European countries going
through the same thing we're going through, right, but they're
starting to really like work on their own country and
their infrastructure, and they're attracting a lot of people out.
I watch this guy sometimes. I'm not wealthy enough to
do this, but he's called the Nomad Capitalists, and his
slogan is go where you're treated best. He actually announced
(20:17):
his US citizenship because he was tired of America trying
to take his money and taxation and all this other shit, right,
so he left and he's got citizenships in multiple countries.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
Now you can do that.
Speaker 7 (20:28):
So it's kind of I think they have us bickering
against one another and we're all losing while we're doing that,
because nobody's ever going to agree. Nobody's ever going to like, Okay,
you're right, I'm wrong.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
That makes sense.
Speaker 1 (20:43):
Yeah, absolutely, And I think Russia and China and even
North Korea they want us as divided as possible.
Speaker 7 (20:49):
They will never have to fire any missiles to they'll
destroy ourselves. And we're already there, we're already arguing about
dumb shit that you can't change any of this.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
You're not going to change it. I think the only
the only hope our country would ever really have.
Speaker 7 (21:03):
And just my opinion, I don't know anything, because you
know whatever, but I think if we if we pulled
our head out of our political party's assholes and went independent,
we'd probably be much better off. Right, Just do what's
best for your country, your citizens, put them first.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
Do what's best.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
The first problem is Republicans want to throw religion into everything. Yeah,
and that's just absinine. They need to fucking get rid
of that mentality. And Democrats are just really they're not
the Democrats of the nineties and two thousands. Democrats, Yeah,
(21:42):
they're they're really getting to the point where they're socialists
on a level of people are turned off by it.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
You know, and it doesn't work. Though you had the
Met Too.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
Movement where you had okay, Democrats are pushing for me too,
women's rights, women's rights, but then ten years later they're saying, well,
we want this thirty year old man to compete against
women and take the gold because he's saying he's a woman.
That's where people hit the brakes and they're like, should.
Speaker 6 (22:12):
We do that?
Speaker 1 (22:13):
Like they questioned it.
Speaker 3 (22:14):
I don't support that one either, though.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
It's really weird how they are supporting Hamas, who is
anti jew but yet saying I'm anti anti Nazi. You
can't confuse people like that. So if you're out there
supporting Hamas and Palestine and saying where for Palestine? But
you're a fucking Nazi because you're a Republican. But then
(22:39):
Hamas is at protest flashing Nazis flags, people are going
to hit the brakes and be like, what the fuck
what are you talking about? Because I have a lot
of Jewish friends who were Democrats and now they're like, well,
why am I democratic friends at a protest with Palestine
when they just threatened my kid and school. Oh, it
(23:01):
doesn't make sense. So can we just pull ourselves out
of our asses and make sense?
Speaker 2 (23:06):
Please?
Speaker 1 (23:06):
There we go, That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 6 (23:07):
I like that.
Speaker 7 (23:08):
Pull your head out of your political party's ass. That's
that's the slogo. Learn to think for yourself for a change. Right,
You don't have to. Too many people are like, well,
my political party says this, but I kind of lean
over here towards some things too. But if I can't
say anything, because then I'll be ousted. Right, just just
think for yourself.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
I've always had problems with you know, this passed a
lung party lines or failed along party lines. Does that
mean like every Republican believes this stance on abortion, this
dance on capital punishment, this stance on on this tack.
Like you can't just otherwise? Why why do we even
need you?
Speaker 2 (23:42):
There?
Speaker 3 (23:42):
You just you just both the way the party votes.
You're supposed to be an independent thinker to the values
of the people that you represent. And maybe Georgia, you know,
community is different than North Dakota community. But you can't
just be blanket all Republican have to all vote Republican, Like,
(24:02):
I don't get it.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Well, unfortunately we're a two party system.
Speaker 3 (24:06):
Yeah, but I mean, just because you're a two party
system doesn't mean every Republican is going to vote the
same way on this issue and every demograt At the.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
End of that four year term, you're required to vote
on that two party system. And that's where we as
a people fail, because that's what we are being required
to do at the end of that four years is
to no matter what kind of lunacy those two parties
are representing, we have to pick one or the other.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
I think we've let our government gain too much control
on both sides of the fence, and then we're experiencing
that now. I think over the decades, we've let government
become too big and it's overstepped, it's overreached in so
many ways. And if you look at some of the
other countries, if you study some of the other smaller
countries that are given their people more freedoms, it's working
(24:54):
in those areas. It's working in those countries. There's a
lot of other attractive countries that are they're attracting people,
especially wealthy people.
Speaker 3 (25:00):
Careful what you say it might sound on American.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
Maybe so I might get shuttle the way at it right,
You're not American ball.
Speaker 4 (25:07):
I think we're so political. You're going into a direction
you said you never would, right, right.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Well, Kyle said, pull your head out of your out
of your fourth point of contact.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Yeah, there you go. Well that's a good that's actually
it's a very good point though, right.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
No, yeah it is. I mean, all right, we're gonna
move on.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Thank you, Thank you American.
Speaker 3 (25:32):
Are you praised Republican?
Speaker 1 (25:35):
Now?
Speaker 3 (25:35):
Proud independent?
Speaker 2 (25:37):
I'm a proud independent. I'm registered Independent.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
So I support drudism. Please be a druism.
Speaker 2 (25:45):
All right?
Speaker 1 (25:45):
So do you want to own a part of our
Maidens airplane?
Speaker 4 (25:52):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (25:53):
I'm not interested.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
No, I mean I love how you're talking about.
Speaker 3 (25:56):
An actual part of it, or you're talking about like
a factional share. They're they're decommissioned, they're going to take
it apart.
Speaker 4 (26:03):
Right, So does that mean Iron Maiden's done, they're not
touring anymore.
Speaker 1 (26:07):
No, it just means the plane's fucking probably thirty years old.
Speaker 7 (26:11):
I would like to see this in something like the
Tampa Bay Metal Museum, you know, with Dave Allis and
Death Meental Day.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
They not Tampa.
Speaker 7 (26:16):
I know it's not Tampa, but I'm just saying, like
something like that of the plane. Yeah, I just I
would like to see some kind of museum like that.
I don't me personally, I don't care about owning any
part of the plane, but.
Speaker 4 (26:26):
They should turn the plane into a museum.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
It's playing to see.
Speaker 3 (26:29):
He right, Like they do it with a lot of warships.
They make worship museums.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
All right. Let me read a quick snippet of this
English heavy metal band Iron Maiden, once saying bring your
daughter to the slaughter. But when it comes to dismantling
the band's bowing seven forty seven tour plane, that's a
little more complicated. The German Company Aviate Avion tag which
specially Joe that rappers killing me. Uh, the Germans.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
And he's blaming No, it.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
Was definitely the creakling.
Speaker 2 (26:59):
It was.
Speaker 1 (27:02):
Shut up German Company av tag, which I that's a
very weird game. Avia Aviation Tag Tag, which specializes and
upcycling scrapped airplanes, has created a limited run of one
of the kind tags made from the fuselage of ed
(27:23):
Force one, the moniker given to the plane that was
served the band. Since it's twenty sixteen book of Soul's
World Tour. Now this must be a different plane because
I remember Iron Maiden flying on a plane way before
twenty sixteen, so this must be a new plane from
twenty sixteen. The tail fin was decorated with the image
(27:44):
of Eddie Iron Maiden, zombie like mascot. But it's now
the planes turn to be dismembered and then resurrected. Each tag,
which can be used as a key chain or simply
as a collector's item, is made from the planes. Usege.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
They're cutting it up into small pieces, right, So it's
not like you can take.
Speaker 2 (28:05):
Idea, Okay, you know when my wife has an idea.
Speaker 4 (28:11):
Into a cafe, restaurants have a museum.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
That'd be a cool that'd be a really cool thing.
Speaker 7 (28:15):
Man, Thailand actually turned one of their old warplanes or
whatever into like this thing that you can go into,
and so yeah, that'd be a suff dick.
Speaker 3 (28:24):
Well, most of the time what they do with old
planes that now this one is only from twenty sixteen,
so it's not even old planes at that age would
just be like sold to another not of movie producers
around ye. But what they do with literally legit planes
that are being decommissioned is they basically disassemble them and
they and they recycle the parts for repairs on other
(28:46):
airplanes that they don't want to, like, Oh, we're not
going to go back to the to Boeing and ask
them to re manufacture a tail a tail wing for
this model now. So they have like twenty of the
decommissioned planes that they can they can basically scrap parts from.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
So this is the air tag that they're giving or
the keychain from out of the frame itself. So basically, yeah,
it says each tag, which can be used as a
keychain or simply as a collector's item, is made from
the plane's white fuselage create to create color variations, we
also incorporated a material from the blue tail fin, which
(29:24):
had up to nine layers of paint applied over time.
I would want that.
Speaker 4 (29:30):
What if you can request a certain part of it,
I'm sure.
Speaker 1 (29:34):
Website says they're sized around one point five by three
point five inches. The price point is not so listen
to this the price. The price point, of course is
a nod to six sixty six and the iron Maiden hit.
The number of the beasts a bowing seven forty seven,
(29:55):
yea seventy I'm sorry. In theory, at forced one could
be turned into uh up to one hundred thousand tags,
explains Richter, but the price the preferences is to keep
things to a limited run. Aviation Tag has been up
cycling aviation materials since two thousand and six and has
(30:16):
turned everything from commercial craft like the Airbus A three
eighty to military planes such as the DC three candy
Bomber into collector's items.
Speaker 2 (30:25):
Candy Boy.
Speaker 3 (30:29):
Jason after Taco Bell.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
So, yeah, there you go.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
You better not be coming to bed like that.
Speaker 2 (30:37):
But he did.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
All right, I'm gonna go pee again.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Discuss by the way, is it ding dong time?
Speaker 5 (30:44):
Guys?
Speaker 2 (30:46):
He did it? He just doesn't listen. Does He's never.
Speaker 4 (30:52):
Done it before and it's the first time, like he
never remembered. I don't know how it's still did take pill?
Bring your water? Where's the ding Dong ding dongs right
over here? Toss him out.
Speaker 3 (31:04):
I can't reach him. They're closer to Jason.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
I'm getting him out for you. Let's get the ding Dong's.
Speaker 4 (31:08):
Show, ding Dong ding Dong.
Speaker 3 (31:13):
Right here.
Speaker 1 (31:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (31:15):
I need a high life, drinking the Miller high Life,
the Champagne of beers. I feel like a prince.
Speaker 6 (31:27):
Oh.
Speaker 5 (31:27):
Lisa says that she knows they're publicist Ironmading's publicist. Should
I pass the message along about the cafe, Yeah, call
him up, ask him to come on the show right,
request that we get the entire tail fan with.
Speaker 4 (31:43):
The Eddy on it. That's what we want now.
Speaker 7 (31:46):
I will say that I saw Bruce Dickinson speak at
the Tampa Theater a couple of years ago. I think
it was me and my friend Paul went, and I
think Doug was there with Chris Jericho too, and he
and he's really going to speak here. He's he's got
a really cool story. So, speaking of Iron Maiden, I
was never like I mean, I always loved Iron Maiden,
like the imagery and all that, but I never really
(32:08):
dove heavy intended but dove heavy into there has a
bad fun. Uh let's supposed left Monte jokes. Seriously, I know, yeah, no,
but I never dove heavy into them. But it doesn't
mean I don't like them. So in any case, Uh,
(32:30):
ding dongs are being handed out here now that I
got to figure out how to open these things for
the gifted.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
I see that Andrew didn't watch his sounds again. Christ
oh Man.
Speaker 3 (32:51):
Did you sing the Happy Birthday song in your head twice. Right,
that's what the sign of the office says.
Speaker 1 (32:57):
I sung, I'm gonna wipe my hands on Joe's face twice.
Speaker 5 (33:01):
There's a new video because you know how with what
was the office where they had the episode where they
were teaching them CPR and they were using the BEG
song Staying Alive as the rhythm for doing the chest compressions.
Speaker 4 (33:15):
So a nurse just well, I just thought today a
nurse created a video.
Speaker 3 (33:19):
I got fucking diabetes and you want to eat me
fucking That's true.
Speaker 4 (33:22):
So Joe stop giving me that he got the beats.
Speaker 3 (33:28):
But there's I take my head no twice, and he's
still trying to push it on.
Speaker 4 (33:34):
To say anybody sorry, No, you're fine, But.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
I'm just frustrated he don't want to listen to me
when I say no twice staying alive? Keep going?
Speaker 1 (33:47):
All right, y'all, listen to our A S M.
Speaker 5 (33:49):
S R.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
Rappers being unwrapped. We're going to unwrap hostess ding Dongs. Well,
I take my medication.
Speaker 3 (33:58):
The hostess of the mostest.
Speaker 4 (34:00):
The ding dongs were the ones that were more shaped
like twinkies, that were chocolate like ing.
Speaker 7 (34:04):
It was a host ho hos Okay, Yeah, she saw
ho ho I think my wife saw ho hooes as well.
Speaker 2 (34:09):
She thought ding dongs would be more funny for the show.
Speaker 1 (34:13):
Well, I guess they can't talk or ask anybody questions
from the next minute because we're all going to have
her mouth full of ding dongs?
Speaker 2 (34:20):
Mmm? Do you eat around the sides first if you
want and save the middle for a laugh?
Speaker 1 (34:28):
No, I just take one, big fucking mike. That's not
the way to do j Just since you're not biting
into a ding dong? Do you want to take control
and talk to the topics?
Speaker 4 (34:39):
So hard to eat ding dong and talk at the
same time.
Speaker 2 (34:41):
Mm hmm.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
So you did you ever use twenty three in me?
Speaker 6 (34:45):
No?
Speaker 1 (34:45):
Are you worried about your DNA or somebody.
Speaker 9 (34:47):
Else's DNA ancestry DNA? You did ancestry, so you're still
kind of in the same boat. So twenty three of
me is going bankrupt. They're probably going to sell the
comple whatever the read.
Speaker 3 (35:02):
It's not about. The point is that they already have people.
But it's not just the fact that they have your DNA,
but they have information that was screened from your DNA profile,
such as oh, you have this, well, you're at risk
for diabetes or at risk for heart disease, or at
risk for this. So the risk that people are worried
(35:22):
about is that the information contained in there would be
sold to an insurance company who's going to deny your
claim because you have a pre existing condition, or they
may charge your higher rates because.
Speaker 5 (35:34):
You have this.
Speaker 3 (35:35):
They might try to market certain things to you because
you have certain conditions.
Speaker 4 (35:40):
They're going to sell the DNA with the person's name.
Speaker 3 (35:43):
No, the point is that people are worried that now
that the company is having problems, that may happen and
if someone else buys out the company or they sell
the information or what, you don't know what can happen
in the future. So, I mean there's some agreements that
the company promises not to get released it and not
(36:04):
to sell it, so you don't know what they're gonna
do once they're out of business.
Speaker 1 (36:07):
So when you ran your DNA with them and they
saw that you had.
Speaker 3 (36:10):
Ed they I mean that's self reported usually okay, but.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
It could be in your DNA. Do are they denying
your claim on medication in the future or what are
they doing?
Speaker 3 (36:21):
Well right now, they can't because the insurance companies aren't
supposed to have access to things like that. But you know,
there's there's a lot of debates on you know, law
enforcement having access to those genealogy websites, and you not
that they have it directly, but what they can do
is they can go and put in you know, wave
(36:42):
kits and say, oh, well, we'll get a familiar match. Oh,
your your cousin. We find someone that's a first cousin
of the of the DNA profile.
Speaker 4 (36:50):
And I feel like they should do that anyway.
Speaker 5 (36:52):
Are sorry, But if you raped somebody, you murdered somebody,
and your cousin wants to go send their DNA in
to find out their anti street.
Speaker 4 (37:02):
All No, no, I mean no, you want to rape somebody? Okay, sure,
you held up a liquor store, nobody.
Speaker 5 (37:08):
Died, don't waste don't waste resources on you know, but
if you if it is a serious crime with bodily injury,
airplane bathroom, yes.
Speaker 3 (37:22):
Let's let's let's I mean yeah, let's put this uh
DNA thing aside because I think it's a bullshit conversation.
We're not going to get anything good out of it.
Let's go and complain about these dog people. We have
two in the same week.
Speaker 8 (37:34):
The other one's going to talk about it next to
So the woman goes to get on a plane or
a lambo, and they tell her you don't have the
right paperwork to bring the dog on the plane for you.
Speaker 3 (37:48):
Now granted that she wasn't the dog she just got
a week earlier. She's had the dog for several years.
The neighbor says, oh, we see her out. She walks
the dog all the time. She's very friendly. Her and
the dog. They're inseparable. Okay, she goes to get on
the plane. They don't let her on the plane because
she doesn't have the right paperwork. So rather than call
your friend, rather than call your friend, call your sister
(38:09):
and say, hey, do you pick the dog? And you
pick up the dog, she goes into the bathroom, drowns
the dog and then gets on the plane in the toilet. Yeah,
that's fucked up. Now you said just leave the dog.
There was the other one, I think it was Colorado
or something two years ago, where they went to get
on the plane. They couldn't get on with the dog,
so they went outside. They tied the dog to a
(38:31):
pole and they left right people that that was fucked up.
Speaker 4 (38:34):
Toot this dog.
Speaker 3 (38:36):
This is even worse.
Speaker 4 (38:38):
At least that dog will get adopted.
Speaker 3 (38:39):
Now, within the same week, we have the one over
here in Tampa where the guy set the dog on
fire before crashing on the Courtley Campbell like two days ago.
Oh my god, I did this is this is why
fucking people are fucked up.
Speaker 5 (38:53):
There was another report of a local I think it
was Florida, maybe even like local here where a guy
the cops got called whatever, they go and they find
this guy. He hung two dogs from his backyard a
tree in his backyard.
Speaker 3 (39:05):
Now this is donastic terrorist.
Speaker 1 (39:07):
Hang on, yes, let's the least play what we're going.
Speaker 6 (39:10):
I think his dog on fire and causing a crash
that shut down the Courtney Campbell Causeway.
Speaker 3 (39:16):
This was Sunday night.
Speaker 6 (39:16):
Police were called about a fire when they found a
dead dog. Police then found forty three year old Jason
Larson about thirty minutes later standing on the ledge of
the causeway with his car crashed nearby. Police they Larson
stated that he killed his dog and was armed and
wanted to harm himself. The causeway was shut down for
hours as officers negotiated with him. He was eventually taken
(39:39):
into custody on animal cruelty charges. Causeway reopened around midnight.
Speaker 3 (39:44):
So this was at like seven thirty on Sunday. I
was on the Courtney Campbell about an hour before that.
Speaker 1 (39:50):
Oh my god, true.
Speaker 3 (39:51):
And I said to Christy. I was like, it's a
good thing we left when we did, because I didn't
hit traffic. An hour later we would have the whole
thing was shut down. We would have been stuck in
that traffic.
Speaker 1 (40:00):
So this brings us to our next conversation.
Speaker 3 (40:07):
About why we should execute people in our countries.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
Should mental institutions be reopened, because yes, but here's they.
Speaker 4 (40:15):
Should have a higher like they should watch them better
than they did before.
Speaker 1 (40:22):
What do you mean, like before you had either.
Speaker 5 (40:25):
The state run facilities or you have like char which
was like federal, but there should be more. Right now,
there's only regulations.
Speaker 1 (40:35):
Right now, there's only private mental institutions, and you have
to pay or have insurance to get your family members
into those institutions.
Speaker 2 (40:43):
Which means the people that need it's not going to
be right.
Speaker 1 (40:45):
And you have a lot of these homeless people there
are one hundred percent mentally ill, and they need a
place to live and they're not provided that because nobody's paying.
So this is just my opinion. Instead of giving billions
of dollars to another country, let's put that in our
own country and maybe support some more veterans because ninety
(41:08):
percent of our veterans and we need to get them
in a home and get them help, very large, very high,
very high percentage.
Speaker 2 (41:18):
I'm with you, yet I don't.
Speaker 7 (41:19):
I never understood why we give people money to come
in and then send money out. But we have so
much here, so many people here that they could use
the help. And it's it's like you we talked about
treason earlier. I mean, what the hell like, why why
are we giving all this money everywhere?
Speaker 1 (41:35):
Absolutely reason why a person that serves this country should
be living on the streets yep? Period, And I don't
care what political party your you're part of. That should
never happen. Nobody should agree with that.
Speaker 3 (41:49):
Would it would be cheaper to buy every veteran a
house for one hundred and fifty thousand dollars per veterans.
Speaker 1 (41:58):
Which can't buy a house for that, But well, I
mean I get some places.
Speaker 5 (42:00):
You can you can get a company that makes them
their costs or something you can you can build a
community habitat of humanity three hundred.
Speaker 3 (42:08):
Downhouses or whatever, and they.
Speaker 1 (42:10):
Could they can have mentally ill.
Speaker 3 (42:15):
Together and veans in general before they get to that
stage of mental decline people.
Speaker 5 (42:21):
And also too when you get I think that if
you have people that have been through the same things
living closer together, they kind of feel like it's family again.
At least that's how my thinking would be. I don't know,
so I think that that would.
Speaker 4 (42:36):
But also I think you it would almost be like
setting up like do you understand, go ahead.
Speaker 5 (42:44):
I'm just it's like setting up an ALF so like
an assisted living like for elderly people, they don't necessarily
need round the clock care, but they're all within one area,
so they do have nurses that are around and this, that.
Speaker 4 (42:55):
And the other.
Speaker 5 (42:55):
So it's kind of it kind of could be like
the same thing where they have a facility where they
have like an on call therapist or doctor or whatever
to help out the people that are living in their community.
Speaker 4 (43:06):
And then they're not on the streets. They're living together.
Speaker 5 (43:08):
They're sharing stories and they're bonding and you know, they
have their friendships there, but they also have the medical
attention if they need it.
Speaker 3 (43:15):
Not all of them are mental issues, but some of
them are just homeless, right, some of them just homeless.
Speaker 5 (43:19):
Of them actually have like, you know, disabilities that they
got from their service that they could help.
Speaker 4 (43:24):
With those kinds of things.
Speaker 2 (43:25):
I think they want to be. They might want to be.
Speaker 7 (43:28):
I could be wrong, but they might want to be
around each other like you're talking about, Like if you
look at places like the villages for example, right and okalla,
I mean each other exactly, and they don't want.
Speaker 3 (43:39):
To be around help each other very well.
Speaker 7 (43:41):
Right, right, So they don't want to be around us
teenagers call them problems and kids, you know, whining and
all that shit. Right, they want to be just around
each other. There's the same mindset and that sort of thing.
Speaker 2 (43:49):
So I get that.
Speaker 7 (43:51):
I think the details could probably be figured out later,
but I think probably something needs to be done. And
let's stop sending money there and stop give money to
people coming over, and let's take care of our own
type of thing and solve her own problems, and then
if we have some left over, then maybe we can
start helping others.
Speaker 3 (44:08):
You think that I'm not saying I agree, But do
you think some of that goes a little too far
into socialism because you're giving away money to people that
you know.
Speaker 2 (44:17):
That's a good question.
Speaker 3 (44:19):
That's what I'm just I'm not saying I agree with.
I'm just no, no, no, I understand on the thoughts
of giving people stuff for free.
Speaker 7 (44:28):
Well, I mean, in a veterans case, maybe that's been earned, right,
so you know, no, but I know, I know that's
a good that's a great question. It's a good it's
a good topic because uh yeah, I'm not I being
on YouTube.
Speaker 2 (44:41):
I get to talk to people.
Speaker 7 (44:42):
Around the world, so like cut the news out for
a minute, and I get to talk to people that
actually live in other countries and they can tell me
some love it where they live, some don't and this
is why and so forth. So I get to have
this wealth of information from people who actually live it.
So I can tell you most people that live in
social countries it's you know, yeah, health care for example,
it's quote unquote free if you want to make wait
(45:05):
six to eight months to go see a doctor for something, right,
So that's the that's the caveat that you're not told.
Speaker 2 (45:11):
But no, I see what you're saying.
Speaker 3 (45:12):
Is that an issue because nobody wants to be a doctor,
and the shortage of doctors because they don't get paid enough.
Speaker 7 (45:18):
Well, that wore That could be the case too, Joe.
That could very well be because I don't know that
deep into it, to be honest with you. But but no,
you bring a good point, So I think there's I
think it goes back to forcing people to do something right. So, uh,
we have enough money if we didn't send so much
money out and didn't waste so much money. I think
we have enough money to take care of those who
(45:40):
are in need and everyone else can maybe you know,
go to work and not have to pay so much
in taxes. We're taxed to death in this country. I
think that's a no brainer. I mean, doesn't matter what
side of the fense you're on, we're taxed out of
our assd like left and right. It's almost criminal how
we're taxed, if you think about it from every angle.
But I think there'd be enough on the plot to
(46:03):
take care of those the small percentage that might you.
Speaker 1 (46:06):
Can spend what we spent on COVID and take care
every veteran that is on the streets. You know, And
there was so much fraud in COVID, So many people
paid that should not have been paid.
Speaker 3 (46:18):
During COVID, still like investigating.
Speaker 1 (46:20):
Oh they are, and that's what they're saying is they're
following the money trails, and you know, whatever it is,
what it is. But yeah, I definitely agree that money
spent on the belt. You should never sign up to
fight for your country and be left homeless. That to
me is just the most ridiculous. You're picking your nose, Joe,
(46:44):
That's why. But yeah, I mean that's kind of you know,
it's a topic we were going to talk about anyways,
but they kind of railed right into it. Mental institutions.
I think we definitely need them back open to care
for people on the streets and why people are going
to fight for it. I guess in the in the fifties, sixties, seventies.
(47:07):
I think the sixties is when they are technically abolished.
I could be wrong about that. Maybe it was the seventies,
but they were just they were being abused. People in
those institutions were being abused, and it was like, oh,
you know, it's the where do you weigh in and say, okay,
well we need to just cut this because every story
we hear is about a person being abused in that situation.
Speaker 7 (47:30):
So I mean, maybe we should call it something else too,
you know, because when people see a mental institution, they're like, okay,
I called the looney ben.
Speaker 1 (47:39):
But probably even anthrax it's a madhouse, you know, Like
they had a whole fucking video about how the mentality
of it is. But even that was the eighties, you know,
when it was more of a privately funded situation. But
I don't know. It's a sticky situation.
Speaker 2 (47:53):
Is all right?
Speaker 1 (47:54):
China versus Canada. Do you know why Canada is mad
at China?
Speaker 2 (47:57):
I know nothing about it.
Speaker 1 (47:59):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (48:00):
I thought they should be friends now that they both
have a common enemy. Of your enemy is your friend,
all right? So yeah, I'm a little annoyed with going
to going to war with China now, No, I'm I
mean going to war with Canada. Like, why are we
pissing them off? They don't even bother.
Speaker 1 (48:20):
Us, all right? So China executed. They're gonna make me
do this?
Speaker 4 (48:29):
Projected the cookies? How to do it again?
Speaker 2 (48:32):
More cookies? Is that what you want?
Speaker 1 (48:35):
So Ottawa condemns Chinese execution for Canadians. So China executed
for Canadians drugs.
Speaker 5 (48:48):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (48:48):
And here's the problem with these countries like China and
North Korea and Russia. When they accuse you of something,
they don't need evidence. It's like you're do you did this? Okay?
Speaker 5 (49:01):
Well, like.
Speaker 3 (49:05):
No, if they did that ship here, people would stop
doing it.
Speaker 1 (49:08):
What do you mean, Oh?
Speaker 3 (49:09):
Well, I mean right now, people get away with so
much stuff. But because they know there's a small percentage
chance of you getting caught, and then even if you
get caught, there'sn't even smaller percent chance of you getting convicted.
And then even if you get convicted, doesn't even smaller
percent chance of you being executed. So that's the reason
why people keep murdering.
Speaker 1 (49:26):
We don't execute people for drug possession anything like that, right,
so China does so uh March nineteen.
Speaker 3 (49:35):
China's got the right idea, the guilty of it though.
Speaker 1 (49:38):
Canada said on Wednesday that China had executed four Canadian
citizens on drug smuggling charges early this year and strongly
condemn Beijing's use of the death penalty. Foreign Minister Monley
Melanie Jolly told reporters that all four have been dual citizens,
and said Ottawa would ask for leniency for other Canadians
(49:59):
face the same fate. There are four Canadians that have
been executed and therefore we are strongly condemning what happened.
She added that four had been convicted on drug charges. Separately,
the Canadian Foreign Ministry said that Robert Schillingberg, a Canadian
man sentenced to death in twenty nineteen for drug smuggling,
(50:21):
had not been executed yet. Canada's Canada China ties have
been icy since twenty eighteen, when meing Wanzu, chief financial
officer of Chinese telecoms firm Hui, was detained Huawei Thank
You Joe was detained in Vancouver at Washington's request. China
(50:42):
arrested two Canadians shortly after Me and the Canadian duo
were released in twenty twenty one. So the basics are
so people, all you hear in the news is bullshit
about the United States and Canada. Canada or Beijing has
(51:07):
tariffs on Canada two point six billion work of agriculture
food products. Retaliating against levies, Ottawa slapped the Chinese electric
vehicle and steal a luminant product tariff on China last year.
Combating drug related offenses as a shared responsibility about countries.
(51:31):
China Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Thursday, YadA, YadA. So
here's the thing. All you hear about the news is
the United States and their issues. Other countries have issues.
China seeds to be pissing a lot of people off.
They always did, right, So why don't we hear about it?
Like this is like a short article. I'm not sure
how many people got like this notice and news. It
(51:54):
wasn't in the national news.
Speaker 2 (51:56):
You hear about it again in weeks to come, it'll
be gone, right.
Speaker 1 (52:01):
So I think Trump's problem with Canada was they were
allowing a lot of people through their border and not
being being very strict on putting, like allowing people to
leave Canada. In the United States, where you go into Canada,
(52:23):
you can't even go to Canada if you've been convicted
of a dui. They have a very very strict policy
on entering Canada. But they allow people to come into
the United States who have questionable backgrounds.
Speaker 3 (52:39):
But yeah, but that's not them. It's not their responsibil
ability who leaves, it's their responsibility who comes in. We
don't care. We don't care who smuggles out of the
US into Mexico.
Speaker 6 (52:49):
Do we.
Speaker 1 (52:52):
Joe, If somebody comes into the United States from Mexico,
yes they care. If somebody comes in the United States
from Canada, yes they care.
Speaker 3 (53:01):
Do we care who smuggles out of the US into
another country?
Speaker 1 (53:04):
There's not been a lot of reports of people smuggling.
Speaker 3 (53:07):
In because we don't care. If you want to leave, go,
Why would Canadians care who leave Canada?
Speaker 1 (53:15):
I agree with that, but Canada. What I'm saying is
Canada has a much more strict policy on entry than
the United States.
Speaker 3 (53:21):
And that's awful. It's not theirs right, yeah thing, okay,
but people, So.
Speaker 1 (53:27):
If if Trump from the twenty sixteen Trump had Canada's
border policy, people would have screamed racist because he was.
That's what started this whole thing. If you remember, everybody
loved Trump when he was a Democrat. He had the
same policies. If you go back and you listen to
his interviews from two thousand and five and even in
(53:51):
the nineties, his policies that he talked about on Oprah
and all these shows, exactly, I guess they are the
exact same policies that he is doing and talking about
right now. And people loved him but when he started
running for president and he started talking about shutting down
(54:12):
the border and walls against Mexico, he was immediately labeled
a racist, and every Democrat in the world turned against
them because they found out he was running as a Republican.
They thought he was going to run as a Democrat.
He ran as a Republican and they immediately turned against him.
But obviously every country in the world has strict border policies.
(54:37):
And now even Bernie Sanders is turning around and saying, well, yeah,
we need strict border policies. Yeah, he literally said we
need strict border policies. He said that this week, and
you know it's common sense. Barack Obama had strict border policies.
He deported much more people than anybody, you know.
Speaker 2 (55:01):
So it is what it is.
Speaker 1 (55:03):
People people name things that they want to name, and
you know, that's that's the the term of Trump's I
guess demise was racist, race, call him this, that, whatever.
So that's what's stuck and that's what they used against
them in the twenty sixteen election. So anyhow, Canada and
(55:23):
China are now at odds because of this.
Speaker 4 (55:27):
Okay, so the end the segment are leaving who's taking over?
What's the video control?
Speaker 3 (55:35):
Jason does?
Speaker 2 (55:36):
I guess someone going to walk up? I thought learn
was saying for another hour or so to eleven thirty.
Speaker 3 (55:42):
Now that she's leaving, can we do the stuff that
we couldn't do while she was here?
Speaker 5 (55:45):
Yep?
Speaker 2 (55:46):
I guess.
Speaker 3 (55:51):
It's nice meeting you. Did you take your phone with you?
Speaker 1 (55:56):
I need a beer? Yeah? All right?
Speaker 3 (56:05):
No, are you gonna beset your audio again?
Speaker 1 (56:11):
I mean I can?
Speaker 3 (56:12):
I mean you already did another hour?
Speaker 2 (56:21):
All right?
Speaker 1 (56:23):
What are you looking at all the reces? All right,
we're gonna If you're streaming with us, stay on. You're
not going anywhere. We're going to end the audio version
of this for our guys watching and our ladies watching
or listening, uh on the audio version of our podcast.
(56:49):
So hang tight. We're gonna get to segment three in
just a second. All right, everybody, This has been another
episode of The Drinking with Drew Show. Check us out
every Tuesday at seven thirty pm Eastern Time. Subscribe to
our YouTube channel, Spread the word, Spread the love. Check
us out on all of our socials, Facebook, x, Instagram, TikTok,
(57:14):
and Humble Social. Big thank you to our sponsor and
lawweitrust dot com. We'll see you next week.
All right, So this is the second segment of the show,
and we are back. Now we are going to jump
right into Drew News. Jason Starwarth is here with us,
but Jama, Joe, Lusty, Laura, We're going to jump into
some Drew News, a lot of controversial Drew News. I
don't try to get too crazy political, but there are
a couple of political stories on here, and we're going
(00:21):
to see what people think in the audience.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Won't you Cal's are Republicans what you said earlier?
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Yes? So apparently okay, uh, there was a strike on
Yemen last week, and in doing so, Trump and his
team apparently discussed the strike on a very well known
(00:47):
app called Signal Now. Signal is known throughout the average
person's world of being an app that you can communicate
on that as private, it can't be infiltrated or searched
via subpoena. Like, there's certain reasons why people think they
(01:11):
use Signal Now. As a private investigator, I have never
worked a case where Signal transcripts were subpoenaed and provided
that's just my personal experience. I don't I've never met
an attorney that's told me that they use signal data
(01:31):
and a case. So at what level is signals data
encrypted and not provided to various agencies? This is strictly
my opinion, and my opinion only to my knowledge. I've
never heard of signal being used against somebody in the
court of law period. Okay, personal experience. Can it be
(01:57):
accessed by other agencies other governments? I would say it's possible.
I'm sure there's a way to do that.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Okay, same as what'sapp though, no, no.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
No, I don't have either, so I have no clue.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
I never heard WhatsApp, and I'm not a computer wiz.
But WhatsApp actually uses a phone number attached to their server.
Speaker 3 (02:22):
Yes, okay, so it's end to end encrypted as well, though, right.
Speaker 1 (02:26):
But I'm I don't know, Joe, Honestly, I've never used
I've never worked a case where WhatsApp data has been
used against somebody either. So, but Signal has the option
where it auto deletes, so you can put in there
that you want your messages auto deleted within five minutes
an hour.
Speaker 5 (02:45):
Sure, I'm no sat is, like said, I think at
twenty four hours and then it deletes. But it also
tells you if somebody screenshots.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Right, ig stories twenty four.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
Hours, but those probably can be like pulled somehow.
Speaker 1 (02:57):
Yeah, there's like if you The thing is, if you
subpoena a company, are they going to supply their records? Facebook?
Will Google?
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Will?
Speaker 1 (03:08):
It's complicated, but they will. You have not heard from
Will Will James. So this is just my personal experience.
I've never seen.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Okay, but the segment does that change the point of
the story though, I don't think it's.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Really now here's the thing my understanding, and I've seen
a ton of news stories on this from both CNN, Fox, MSNBC,
different stories, a lot of people saying it was an
extremely ignorant thing to do by the president and his staff.
Apparently they had a reporter on the group chat that
(03:44):
somehow got invited that they didn't know about. And this
reporter has historically been anti Trump, and of course he
released this and kind of made the story blow up.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
Well, there's a few details there that are believable and
some that are questionable. So first, he got invited on Tuesday,
and the chat started on Tuesday, and he didn't remove
himself from the chat until Sunday, well Monday, right.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
Why don't you remove yourself from that gold mines because
you don't have security clearance and you normally are part
of a conversation that is obviously not intended for you
to be on. Yes, So it's kind of like you
listening to a call.
Speaker 5 (04:24):
And it's not like I hacked the conversation added myself
to it. But if you, they added me, So why
am I going to be?
Speaker 6 (04:32):
Like?
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Kind of like if the bank accidentally deposits fifty dollars into.
Speaker 3 (04:38):
Your account, don't say anything.
Speaker 1 (04:40):
You're going to be convicted of theft if you don't
turn that in.
Speaker 5 (04:43):
If I leave it in my account and don't touch
it and it takes them three weeks to figure out
where it is, that's.
Speaker 4 (04:48):
Not my way.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
You didn't know, no, But if you knowingly knew it
and kept it, that's a different story.
Speaker 4 (04:55):
But keeping using it, I think are two different things too.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
Like I'm gonna.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
The story was he thought it could have been disinformation
or some sort of spoof or something, but then once
the details of what was discussed in the chat actually
happened and the bombing happened on Saturday, he's like, oh
wait a second, that's stuff I just read. It actually
happened today or yesterday. So then he goes and says,
this must be real. Let me take myself out of
(05:24):
this and report it. So he said, he removed himself
and then said, just so you guys know, I don't
belong here and you shouldn't have said this with me here.
So he self reported that.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
And I'm Kyle. I don't know when you got in,
but I cannot read chat right now, I can steal it.
Speaker 5 (05:41):
Respond Yeah, it's not it's as classified. It's not allowed
on their regard right as drug dealers, you signal.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
But regardless of whether or not there was a there
was a journalist in that chat, they shouldn't have had
it on there at all, which means either they were
using their personal devices, which they're not supposed to do,
or they allowed them to install an unapproved gap. Here's
on the government.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Here's what happened though, well, here's what happened when they
discussed the situation on what she's slacking. When they discussed
the situation and realized they had been talking a little
in too much detail, they basically said, let's go to
the I don't know how they worded it, but it
(06:28):
was something like, let's go to the higher level of communication,
which they.
Speaker 3 (06:31):
They have a private they have a private secure communications
specifically form.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
It should have been on that to begin with.
Speaker 3 (06:36):
Everything should be on that, begin with.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
So, yes, now here's the thing, and people correct me,
I don't. I'm just going back from history. Hillary apparently
discussed a lot of information on her phones too, and
she was she instructed people to smash their phones with hammers.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
She had a private server that could like monitor all
that stuff, and it was off of governments like system.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
All right, but I don't, okay, but there was information
that was not supposed to be whatever it was.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
None of it should have been taking None of that
business should be taking place outside of their closed nets.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
So and again me not being a political person, I
think politicians are idiots. They're gonna do shit whatever. But
what what do they want done with this? You know,
they want the one guy fired who's apparently in charge
of the security team or however the security advisor, which
Trump was always bitching because Biden wasn't firing enough people,
(07:42):
and he's like this guy he did X y Z,
he hasn't been fired. But so people are slamming Trump
because like, why aren't you firing this guy? Because he
is the one responsible for this group chat. Now they're saying, well,
it was an intern that set it up? Could it
be an intern that's kind of on the inside anti
Trump and he's like, hey, I'm gonna put this reporter
in here.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
No, maybe it was it was the National Security advisor
that created the group.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Now they're saying it was one of like a staff
was a staffer.
Speaker 4 (08:06):
They're probably just like saying that to save this guy's
to save face.
Speaker 3 (08:10):
But regardless, if it's on my team, everything comes for me.
I'm responsible for my team, whether I did it is
someone else, it's always It's always been the way I operate.
If if something goes wrong on my team, it's my buzz.
But I mean, I'm not going to say what company
I work for, but I am not allowed to communicate
any business activity on a personal device. If i'm if
(08:34):
I'm late for work, I can text an employee and
say hey, I'm gonna be late. Can you handle this meeting?
Speaker 1 (08:39):
I've been in the drink. I cannot.
Speaker 3 (08:42):
I cannot give you know specific details. And if I have,
if someone say can you get on a call, yes,
I can get on a call. Then I get on
and talk about it, but I cannot, They cannot send me.
We need to talk about this, this, this and this.
That's that's not allowed. We have a very very strict
social media policy, not even social media but communications policy.
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Right, but you're talking about a war strike.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
It doesn't matter what it is at what level. Like
to me, everything every single comunication between government employees should
be on their strict restricted.
Speaker 7 (09:17):
Prob absolutely at a bounce for what was talking about
because I used to we're not going to mention the company.
Speaker 3 (09:22):
But it's even gotten more strict since you left.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
Oh I'm sure, and these.
Speaker 3 (09:26):
Are the more technologies that are out there.
Speaker 2 (09:27):
Yeah, there's more risk out there.
Speaker 7 (09:29):
But we were very tight, no pun intended, but we
were like very tights. But no, we were very tight
on everything. Right, It was just you just you couldn't
be anywhere out of line. So I'm very surprised to
hear stuff like this in our government. I don't care
what side it's on.
Speaker 3 (09:44):
They should not have any communication between government and between
people of that level. It's like if if if Donald
Trump goes in text putin with his own cell phone,
like that would be not allowed at all, right, Like
that has to literally go through the high secure clearance.
Speaker 5 (10:01):
Well here's here's where are all of these individuals that
were on the group chat. They all work in the
White House anyway, Like why aren't they in some type.
Speaker 3 (10:10):
Of like the White House, the Pentagon, they all they're
all in the DC area.
Speaker 8 (10:13):
They're all right, So why don't they have just this
This is like they just all get together and be
like we're gonna fucking blow up a country.
Speaker 4 (10:18):
Whatever the hell they get.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
Like this is over over like a five day span, and.
Speaker 5 (10:22):
I feel like there should be like one central location
where it's like writing, especially.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
When something's happened.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
The situation room is like one room where everything's secure
that you go in and leave your phones outside.
Speaker 3 (10:37):
You know, it's called the skiff.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
Sure, so what he said, Yeah, it was dumb. I
don't know what's going to happen, you know whatever, but
definitely should not have happened.
Speaker 4 (10:48):
So I bet like.
Speaker 5 (10:49):
The reporter had the same first name as somebody else
who was supposed to be on the chat, and they
just added them by accident.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
So Kyle said, Uh, I was a owner intelligence special
agent and case officer. This group should have known better.
Uh Lisa says, they should have just posted in the
Drinking with Drew chat Chatlet's I agree with that.
Speaker 3 (11:11):
And then how many how many other conversations are taking
place off of the systems that just never get reported
because reporters weren't included. That's the thing is, like you
allow that to happen, eventually, mistakes are going to happen.
That's why you can't.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
He said, you think they'd have a way more secure,
a way more secure than that to allow us slip up,
you know, And I agree, I'm sure they do, they
just didn't use it. But Kyle again, he said, if
that happened at my old job, there were to be
there would have been several people fired. And that's true.
And that's kind of like you have people at this
(11:50):
upper echelon doing ship. Now they're you know, yeah, they're
blaming it on the staffer. But again, you know, it's
like they should have own better. It is what it is.
Speaker 7 (12:01):
But I think the problem is like governments in general,
not just US government, but all all Western governments, is
politicians get to a point where they can just do
whatever the hell they want.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
And this is both right and left.
Speaker 7 (12:12):
I'm very much I don't know, you call me independent
whatever you want, but they get to do it. And
we experienced this with COVID. They did whatever the hell
they wanted to do. Let's see how how much power
we really have.
Speaker 1 (12:24):
Right, they experimented with policies and laws.
Speaker 7 (12:28):
It's been a huge overstep. The government was not supposed
to be this big. It was never This is never
the intent of the forefathers.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Right, all right, moving on Tesla vandalism is it or
domestic terrorism?
Speaker 3 (12:45):
I got a problem with this, Go ahead, huge problem ahead. Now, Yes,
it's bad. You're destroying cars or whatever. You're destroying cars
of that people that are completely unrelated to what you're
fighting about or you're complaining about. So it's some guy
down the street that bought a car four years ago, Right,
you're mad at him. I understand the situation itself is wrong.
(13:08):
You shouldn't be destroying people's property regardless. But when a
single person comes out and labels them the domestic terrorism
or domestic terrorists, and that same person just went and
pardoned all the people that attacked the Capitol building, I
have a serious problem with that because they were they
(13:29):
were patriots, they were good people, preach and you know
my feeling that the moment they broke through that door,
the moment they entered the building, that they should not
have been there. They were all should have been labeled treason. Well,
and that and that is literally a physical attack against
(13:50):
our government, which by definition itself is treason. Right there, here's.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
The problem with the situation. And I'm not saying it's right.
Are indifferent. I'm just telling you the facts. And depending
on who you talk to and what reports you read
and conspiracy theories you believe in, there were a lot
of people in that crowd who were put there and
(14:17):
allegedly FBI agents who incited that whole situation. I'm not
saying I believe that. I'm just telling you that's a
story that has come to florition for whatever reason.
Speaker 4 (14:30):
Here's my thing about like inciting violence. Okay, sure, you
stay along with it, thank you. No, off, No, that's
exactly what I was gonna say.
Speaker 5 (14:40):
You can say, oh, they planted people in there to
like rev up everybody's emotions and kind of get them going,
But the fact.
Speaker 4 (14:47):
Is that people fell for it.
Speaker 5 (14:50):
They literally plant bikes on the corners like look a
little like PD people trying to get theft's bike.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
Thefts they'll put a fucking bike. Yeah and yeah, bait,
I can stole.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
It if you for being stupid, you hated you, whatever,
but you did it, so you should shouldn't.
Speaker 3 (15:11):
Do But every one of those should have been labeled
a treason. But because he gave them a pardon, all right,
I disagree with it, But I see this like complete opposite.
If you give people like that a pardon, how do
you go and take this, which I see is not
even as bad and call that domestic terrorism. Again, it's
(15:35):
not politics, has nothing to do with my political leanings
because I was I was raised Republican.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
I'm not saying it or not. I'm just telling you.
I'm just telling.
Speaker 9 (15:45):
You can't has been said, and again Kyle says that's untrue.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
I'm just saying, what's what's been reported where they see
somebody's photo or face in the crowd and they match
it up to like an agent whatever. I don't know,
And honestly it could have been an agent that was
there to protest the capitol.
Speaker 4 (16:03):
Who knows talking about the planting people.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
That's right, Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
But think of just this current situation. If I go
and blow up a car. Do you think that's better,
like worse than breaking into the Capitol building? I mean, yeah,
it's bad.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Well, but would you.
Speaker 3 (16:23):
Consider that domestic terrorism when this is not considered treason?
Speaker 4 (16:28):
How many actual teslas have been damaged?
Speaker 3 (16:31):
There's protests and stuff all across the country. They're like
attacking the dealerships and stuff.
Speaker 5 (16:37):
But like I need like, I feel like I don't
hear that. There's like a ton of them and it's
like maybe one hundred cars.
Speaker 3 (16:43):
The funny part is if Elon Musk had nothing to
do with Doge and Trump right now, then Trump would
be celebrating attacking tesla's because he is completely anti electric vehicle.
Speaker 4 (16:55):
Yeah, well, now he was sitting in the front of
the White House.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
But he he's the one who wanted to try to
get rid of EV's to support the support.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
Well, I don't think I don't think he was ever
trying to get rid of him. He was just not
trying to mandate that everybody get an EV by twenty
thirty five.
Speaker 2 (17:12):
That was the big thing when they started.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
Yes, there was a mission.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
Well can't California had mandates put out by specific dates.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
Why does Trump carey? He doesn't even live in California.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
But it just goes to show that you know, you're
trying to mandate. And he said, I don't belie. They
don't even have.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Can I just he wants to control people's vehicles and
what they drive. You can drive gas all you want.
He wants people to have a choice in that, but
he doesn't want alone to have a choice in what
they do with their own bodies, just saying that's where
that's for me.
Speaker 1 (17:47):
That's where Republicans are losing. So you have two issues. Okay,
Republicans lose a lot of their gusto when they start
preaching religion, and then Democrats start losing a lot of
the gusto and then start preaching I want men to
compete against.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
My thinking when they are going religion into it, and
my God says that we should cherish every life, even
when it starts in the womb all that. That's when
you bring out the loons.
Speaker 5 (18:16):
But when you stop bringing religion into politics, then you
have to get down to just the legal side of
it and not what does your Bible say, what is
your religion?
Speaker 4 (18:26):
Because all religions are different.
Speaker 5 (18:28):
But when you bring in religion, that's when the crazies
come out, and that's when ship hits the fan, in
my opinion, So take religion out of it and just
have the legal side of it. I don't care what
your Bible says. I'm not asking you what you want
to do with your body. Do whatever the fuck you
want to do it. If you want to go about
what your God says or your spiritually or whatever that is,
(18:50):
by all means, do that.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
But who's the one that was yelling about that on
the chat about that's not that's not what I said.
I don't fucking know. Don't tell what to do with
my uterus, Okay, just saying and that's good.
Speaker 7 (19:04):
No, I think there's a and I'm I'm with Laura
one hundred percent on that. I mean, if if he's
just but if right, look at my face, look at it.
Speaker 2 (19:16):
I asked.
Speaker 7 (19:16):
I have been using the lotion that my wife bought me,
so hopefully that's shiny and pretty and all that stuff.
Speaker 2 (19:21):
But anyway, so no, I just.
Speaker 7 (19:23):
I think there's a bigger thing above what we can see,
and you know that's controlling this with the narratives and such.
And I think we're bickering against each other and that's
exactly where the power or whatever you want to call
it wants us to be. Right, that's exactly where they
want us to be. As long as we're fighting each other,
then we're not really paying attention to what's really going on.
(19:44):
So we're going to talk about all this stuff. And
there's a lot there are some other countries that were
considered third world years ago or whatever.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
They're seeing what's going on in the West.
Speaker 7 (19:56):
And I'm not talking about just America, but Canada as well,
the UK, a lot of stuff. You European countries going
through the same thing we're going through, right, but they're
starting to really like work on their own country and
their infrastructure, and they're attracting a lot of people out.
I watch this guy sometimes. I'm not wealthy enough to
do this, but he's called the Nomad Capitalists, and his
slogan is go where you're treated best. He actually announced
(20:17):
his US citizenship because he was tired of America trying
to take his money and taxation and all this other shit, right,
so he left and he's got citizenships in multiple countries.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
Now you can do that.
Speaker 7 (20:28):
So it's kind of I think they have us bickering
against one another and we're all losing while we're doing that,
because nobody's ever going to agree. Nobody's ever going to like, Okay,
you're right, I'm wrong.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
That makes sense.
Speaker 1 (20:43):
Yeah, absolutely, And I think Russia and China and even
North Korea they want us as divided as possible.
Speaker 7 (20:49):
They will never have to fire any missiles to they'll
destroy ourselves. And we're already there, we're already arguing about
dumb shit that you can't change any of this.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
You're not going to change it. I think the only
the only hope our country would ever really have.
Speaker 7 (21:03):
And just my opinion, I don't know anything, because you
know whatever, but I think if we if we pulled
our head out of our political party's assholes and went independent,
we'd probably be much better off. Right, Just do what's
best for your country, your citizens, put them first.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
Do what's best.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
The first problem is Republicans want to throw religion into everything. Yeah,
and that's just absinine. They need to fucking get rid
of that mentality. And Democrats are just really they're not
the Democrats of the nineties and two thousands. Democrats, Yeah,
(21:42):
they're they're really getting to the point where they're socialists
on a level of people are turned off by it.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
You know, and it doesn't work. Though you had the
Met Too.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
Movement where you had okay, Democrats are pushing for me too,
women's rights, women's rights, but then ten years later they're saying, well,
we want this thirty year old man to compete against
women and take the gold because he's saying he's a woman.
That's where people hit the brakes and they're like, should.
Speaker 6 (22:12):
We do that?
Speaker 1 (22:13):
Like they questioned it.
Speaker 3 (22:14):
I don't support that one either, though.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
It's really weird how they are supporting Hamas, who is
anti jew but yet saying I'm anti anti Nazi. You
can't confuse people like that. So if you're out there
supporting Hamas and Palestine and saying where for Palestine? But
you're a fucking Nazi because you're a Republican. But then
(22:39):
Hamas is at protest flashing Nazis flags, people are going
to hit the brakes and be like, what the fuck
what are you talking about? Because I have a lot
of Jewish friends who were Democrats and now they're like, well,
why am I democratic friends at a protest with Palestine
when they just threatened my kid and school. Oh, it
(23:01):
doesn't make sense. So can we just pull ourselves out
of our asses and make sense?
Speaker 2 (23:06):
Please?
Speaker 1 (23:06):
There we go, That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 6 (23:07):
I like that.
Speaker 7 (23:08):
Pull your head out of your political party's ass. That's
that's the slogo. Learn to think for yourself for a change. Right,
You don't have to. Too many people are like, well,
my political party says this, but I kind of lean
over here towards some things too. But if I can't
say anything, because then I'll be ousted. Right, just just
think for yourself.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
I've always had problems with you know, this passed a
lung party lines or failed along party lines. Does that
mean like every Republican believes this stance on abortion, this
dance on capital punishment, this stance on on this tack.
Like you can't just otherwise? Why why do we even
need you?
Speaker 2 (23:42):
There?
Speaker 3 (23:42):
You just you just both the way the party votes.
You're supposed to be an independent thinker to the values
of the people that you represent. And maybe Georgia, you know,
community is different than North Dakota community. But you can't
just be blanket all Republican have to all vote Republican, Like,
(24:02):
I don't get it.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Well, unfortunately we're a two party system.
Speaker 3 (24:06):
Yeah, but I mean, just because you're a two party
system doesn't mean every Republican is going to vote the
same way on this issue and every demograt At the.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
End of that four year term, you're required to vote
on that two party system. And that's where we as
a people fail, because that's what we are being required
to do at the end of that four years is
to no matter what kind of lunacy those two parties
are representing, we have to pick one or the other.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
I think we've let our government gain too much control
on both sides of the fence, and then we're experiencing
that now. I think over the decades, we've let government
become too big and it's overstepped, it's overreached in so
many ways. And if you look at some of the
other countries, if you study some of the other smaller
countries that are given their people more freedoms, it's working
(24:54):
in those areas. It's working in those countries. There's a
lot of other attractive countries that are they're attracting people,
especially wealthy people.
Speaker 3 (25:00):
Careful what you say it might sound on American.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
Maybe so I might get shuttle the way at it right,
You're not American ball.
Speaker 4 (25:07):
I think we're so political. You're going into a direction
you said you never would, right, right.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Well, Kyle said, pull your head out of your out
of your fourth point of contact.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Yeah, there you go. Well that's a good that's actually
it's a very good point though, right.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
No, yeah it is. I mean, all right, we're gonna
move on.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Thank you, Thank you American.
Speaker 3 (25:32):
Are you praised Republican?
Speaker 1 (25:35):
Now?
Speaker 3 (25:35):
Proud independent?
Speaker 2 (25:37):
I'm a proud independent. I'm registered Independent.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
So I support drudism. Please be a druism.
Speaker 2 (25:45):
All right?
Speaker 1 (25:45):
So do you want to own a part of our
Maidens airplane?
Speaker 4 (25:52):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (25:53):
I'm not interested.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
No, I mean I love how you're talking about.
Speaker 3 (25:56):
An actual part of it, or you're talking about like
a factional share. They're they're decommissioned, they're going to take
it apart.
Speaker 4 (26:03):
Right, So does that mean Iron Maiden's done, they're not
touring anymore.
Speaker 1 (26:07):
No, it just means the plane's fucking probably thirty years old.
Speaker 7 (26:11):
I would like to see this in something like the
Tampa Bay Metal Museum, you know, with Dave Allis and
Death Meental Day.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
They not Tampa.
Speaker 7 (26:16):
I know it's not Tampa, but I'm just saying, like
something like that of the plane. Yeah, I just I
would like to see some kind of museum like that.
I don't me personally, I don't care about owning any
part of the plane, but.
Speaker 4 (26:26):
They should turn the plane into a museum.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
It's playing to see.
Speaker 3 (26:29):
He right, Like they do it with a lot of warships.
They make worship museums.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
All right. Let me read a quick snippet of this
English heavy metal band Iron Maiden, once saying bring your
daughter to the slaughter. But when it comes to dismantling
the band's bowing seven forty seven tour plane, that's a
little more complicated. The German Company Aviate Avion tag which
specially Joe that rappers killing me. Uh, the Germans.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
And he's blaming No, it.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
Was definitely the creakling.
Speaker 2 (26:59):
It was.
Speaker 1 (27:02):
Shut up German Company av tag, which I that's a
very weird game. Avia Aviation Tag Tag, which specializes and
upcycling scrapped airplanes, has created a limited run of one
of the kind tags made from the fuselage of ed
(27:23):
Force one, the moniker given to the plane that was
served the band. Since it's twenty sixteen book of Soul's
World Tour. Now this must be a different plane because
I remember Iron Maiden flying on a plane way before
twenty sixteen, so this must be a new plane from
twenty sixteen. The tail fin was decorated with the image
(27:44):
of Eddie Iron Maiden, zombie like mascot. But it's now
the planes turn to be dismembered and then resurrected. Each tag,
which can be used as a key chain or simply
as a collector's item, is made from the planes. Usege.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
They're cutting it up into small pieces, right, So it's
not like you can take.
Speaker 2 (28:05):
Idea, Okay, you know when my wife has an idea.
Speaker 4 (28:11):
Into a cafe, restaurants have a museum.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
That'd be a cool that'd be a really cool thing.
Speaker 7 (28:15):
Man, Thailand actually turned one of their old warplanes or
whatever into like this thing that you can go into,
and so yeah, that'd be a suff dick.
Speaker 3 (28:24):
Well, most of the time what they do with old
planes that now this one is only from twenty sixteen,
so it's not even old planes at that age would
just be like sold to another not of movie producers
around ye. But what they do with literally legit planes
that are being decommissioned is they basically disassemble them and
they and they recycle the parts for repairs on other
(28:46):
airplanes that they don't want to, like, Oh, we're not
going to go back to the to Boeing and ask
them to re manufacture a tail a tail wing for
this model now. So they have like twenty of the
decommissioned planes that they can they can basically scrap parts from.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
So this is the air tag that they're giving or
the keychain from out of the frame itself. So basically, yeah,
it says each tag, which can be used as a
keychain or simply as a collector's item, is made from
the plane's white fuselage create to create color variations, we
also incorporated a material from the blue tail fin, which
(29:24):
had up to nine layers of paint applied over time.
I would want that.
Speaker 4 (29:30):
What if you can request a certain part of it,
I'm sure.
Speaker 1 (29:34):
Website says they're sized around one point five by three
point five inches. The price point is not so listen
to this the price. The price point, of course is
a nod to six sixty six and the iron Maiden hit.
The number of the beasts a bowing seven forty seven,
(29:55):
yea seventy I'm sorry. In theory, at forced one could
be turned into uh up to one hundred thousand tags,
explains Richter, but the price the preferences is to keep
things to a limited run. Aviation Tag has been up
cycling aviation materials since two thousand and six and has
(30:16):
turned everything from commercial craft like the Airbus A three
eighty to military planes such as the DC three candy
Bomber into collector's items.
Speaker 2 (30:25):
Candy Boy.
Speaker 3 (30:29):
Jason after Taco Bell.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
So, yeah, there you go.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
You better not be coming to bed like that.
Speaker 2 (30:37):
But he did.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
All right, I'm gonna go pee again.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Discuss by the way, is it ding dong time?
Speaker 5 (30:44):
Guys?
Speaker 2 (30:46):
He did it? He just doesn't listen. Does He's never.
Speaker 4 (30:52):
Done it before and it's the first time, like he
never remembered. I don't know how it's still did take pill?
Bring your water? Where's the ding Dong ding dongs right
over here? Toss him out.
Speaker 3 (31:04):
I can't reach him. They're closer to Jason.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
I'm getting him out for you. Let's get the ding Dong's.
Speaker 4 (31:08):
Show, ding Dong ding Dong.
Speaker 3 (31:13):
Right here.
Speaker 1 (31:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (31:15):
I need a high life, drinking the Miller high Life,
the Champagne of beers. I feel like a prince.
Speaker 6 (31:27):
Oh.
Speaker 5 (31:27):
Lisa says that she knows they're publicist Ironmading's publicist. Should
I pass the message along about the cafe, Yeah, call
him up, ask him to come on the show right,
request that we get the entire tail fan with.
Speaker 4 (31:43):
The Eddy on it. That's what we want now.
Speaker 7 (31:46):
I will say that I saw Bruce Dickinson speak at
the Tampa Theater a couple of years ago. I think
it was me and my friend Paul went, and I
think Doug was there with Chris Jericho too, and he
and he's really going to speak here. He's he's got
a really cool story. So, speaking of Iron Maiden, I
was never like I mean, I always loved Iron Maiden,
like the imagery and all that, but I never really
(32:08):
dove heavy intended but dove heavy into there has a
bad fun. Uh let's supposed left Monte jokes. Seriously, I know, yeah, no,
but I never dove heavy into them. But it doesn't
mean I don't like them. So in any case, Uh,
(32:30):
ding dongs are being handed out here now that I
got to figure out how to open these things for
the gifted.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
I see that Andrew didn't watch his sounds again. Christ
oh Man.
Speaker 3 (32:51):
Did you sing the Happy Birthday song in your head twice. Right,
that's what the sign of the office says.
Speaker 1 (32:57):
I sung, I'm gonna wipe my hands on Joe's face twice.
Speaker 5 (33:01):
There's a new video because you know how with what
was the office where they had the episode where they
were teaching them CPR and they were using the BEG
song Staying Alive as the rhythm for doing the chest compressions.
Speaker 4 (33:15):
So a nurse just well, I just thought today a
nurse created a video.
Speaker 3 (33:19):
I got fucking diabetes and you want to eat me
fucking That's true.
Speaker 4 (33:22):
So Joe stop giving me that he got the beats.
Speaker 3 (33:28):
But there's I take my head no twice, and he's
still trying to push it on.
Speaker 4 (33:34):
To say anybody sorry, No, you're fine, But.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
I'm just frustrated he don't want to listen to me
when I say no twice staying alive? Keep going?
Speaker 1 (33:47):
All right, y'all, listen to our A S M.
Speaker 5 (33:49):
S R.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
Rappers being unwrapped. We're going to unwrap hostess ding Dongs. Well,
I take my medication.
Speaker 3 (33:58):
The hostess of the mostest.
Speaker 4 (34:00):
The ding dongs were the ones that were more shaped
like twinkies, that were chocolate like ing.
Speaker 7 (34:04):
It was a host ho hos Okay, Yeah, she saw
ho ho I think my wife saw ho hooes as well.
Speaker 2 (34:09):
She thought ding dongs would be more funny for the show.
Speaker 1 (34:13):
Well, I guess they can't talk or ask anybody questions
from the next minute because we're all going to have
her mouth full of ding dongs?
Speaker 2 (34:20):
Mmm? Do you eat around the sides first if you
want and save the middle for a laugh?
Speaker 1 (34:28):
No, I just take one, big fucking mike. That's not
the way to do j Just since you're not biting
into a ding dong? Do you want to take control
and talk to the topics?
Speaker 4 (34:39):
So hard to eat ding dong and talk at the
same time.
Speaker 2 (34:41):
Mm hmm.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
So you did you ever use twenty three in me?
Speaker 6 (34:45):
No?
Speaker 1 (34:45):
Are you worried about your DNA or somebody.
Speaker 9 (34:47):
Else's DNA ancestry DNA? You did ancestry, so you're still
kind of in the same boat. So twenty three of
me is going bankrupt. They're probably going to sell the
comple whatever the read.
Speaker 3 (35:02):
It's not about. The point is that they already have people.
But it's not just the fact that they have your DNA,
but they have information that was screened from your DNA profile,
such as oh, you have this, well, you're at risk
for diabetes or at risk for heart disease, or at
risk for this. So the risk that people are worried
(35:22):
about is that the information contained in there would be
sold to an insurance company who's going to deny your
claim because you have a pre existing condition, or they
may charge your higher rates because.
Speaker 5 (35:34):
You have this.
Speaker 3 (35:35):
They might try to market certain things to you because
you have certain conditions.
Speaker 4 (35:40):
They're going to sell the DNA with the person's name.
Speaker 3 (35:43):
No, the point is that people are worried that now
that the company is having problems, that may happen and
if someone else buys out the company or they sell
the information or what, you don't know what can happen
in the future. So, I mean there's some agreements that
the company promises not to get released it and not
(36:04):
to sell it, so you don't know what they're gonna
do once they're out of business.
Speaker 1 (36:07):
So when you ran your DNA with them and they
saw that you had.
Speaker 3 (36:10):
Ed they I mean that's self reported usually okay, but.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
It could be in your DNA. Do are they denying
your claim on medication in the future or what are
they doing?
Speaker 3 (36:21):
Well right now, they can't because the insurance companies aren't
supposed to have access to things like that. But you know,
there's there's a lot of debates on you know, law
enforcement having access to those genealogy websites, and you not
that they have it directly, but what they can do
is they can go and put in you know, wave
(36:42):
kits and say, oh, well, we'll get a familiar match. Oh,
your your cousin. We find someone that's a first cousin
of the of the DNA profile.
Speaker 4 (36:50):
And I feel like they should do that anyway.
Speaker 5 (36:52):
Are sorry, But if you raped somebody, you murdered somebody,
and your cousin wants to go send their DNA in
to find out their anti street.
Speaker 4 (37:02):
All No, no, I mean no, you want to rape somebody? Okay, sure,
you held up a liquor store, nobody.
Speaker 5 (37:08):
Died, don't waste don't waste resources on you know, but
if you if it is a serious crime with bodily injury,
airplane bathroom, yes.
Speaker 3 (37:22):
Let's let's let's I mean yeah, let's put this uh
DNA thing aside because I think it's a bullshit conversation.
We're not going to get anything good out of it.
Let's go and complain about these dog people. We have
two in the same week.
Speaker 8 (37:34):
The other one's going to talk about it next to
So the woman goes to get on a plane or
a lambo, and they tell her you don't have the
right paperwork to bring the dog on the plane for you.
Speaker 3 (37:48):
Now granted that she wasn't the dog she just got
a week earlier. She's had the dog for several years.
The neighbor says, oh, we see her out. She walks
the dog all the time. She's very friendly. Her and
the dog. They're inseparable. Okay, she goes to get on
the plane. They don't let her on the plane because
she doesn't have the right paperwork. So rather than call
your friend, rather than call your friend, call your sister
(38:09):
and say, hey, do you pick the dog? And you
pick up the dog, she goes into the bathroom, drowns
the dog and then gets on the plane in the toilet. Yeah,
that's fucked up. Now you said just leave the dog.
There was the other one, I think it was Colorado
or something two years ago, where they went to get
on the plane. They couldn't get on with the dog,
so they went outside. They tied the dog to a
(38:31):
pole and they left right people that that was fucked up.
Speaker 4 (38:34):
Toot this dog.
Speaker 3 (38:36):
This is even worse.
Speaker 4 (38:38):
At least that dog will get adopted.
Speaker 3 (38:39):
Now, within the same week, we have the one over
here in Tampa where the guy set the dog on
fire before crashing on the Courtley Campbell like two days ago.
Oh my god, I did this is this is why
fucking people are fucked up.
Speaker 5 (38:53):
There was another report of a local I think it
was Florida, maybe even like local here where a guy
the cops got called whatever, they go and they find
this guy. He hung two dogs from his backyard a
tree in his backyard.
Speaker 3 (39:05):
Now this is donastic terrorist.
Speaker 1 (39:07):
Hang on, yes, let's the least play what we're going.
Speaker 6 (39:10):
I think his dog on fire and causing a crash
that shut down the Courtney Campbell Causeway.
Speaker 3 (39:16):
This was Sunday night.
Speaker 6 (39:16):
Police were called about a fire when they found a
dead dog. Police then found forty three year old Jason
Larson about thirty minutes later standing on the ledge of
the causeway with his car crashed nearby. Police they Larson
stated that he killed his dog and was armed and
wanted to harm himself. The causeway was shut down for
hours as officers negotiated with him. He was eventually taken
(39:39):
into custody on animal cruelty charges. Causeway reopened around midnight.
Speaker 3 (39:44):
So this was at like seven thirty on Sunday. I
was on the Courtney Campbell about an hour before that.
Speaker 1 (39:50):
Oh my god, true.
Speaker 3 (39:51):
And I said to Christy. I was like, it's a
good thing we left when we did, because I didn't
hit traffic. An hour later we would have the whole
thing was shut down. We would have been stuck in
that traffic.
Speaker 1 (40:00):
So this brings us to our next conversation.
Speaker 3 (40:07):
About why we should execute people in our countries.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
Should mental institutions be reopened, because yes, but here's they.
Speaker 4 (40:15):
Should have a higher like they should watch them better
than they did before.
Speaker 1 (40:22):
What do you mean, like before you had either.
Speaker 5 (40:25):
The state run facilities or you have like char which
was like federal, but there should be more. Right now,
there's only regulations.
Speaker 1 (40:35):
Right now, there's only private mental institutions, and you have
to pay or have insurance to get your family members
into those institutions.
Speaker 2 (40:43):
Which means the people that need it's not going to
be right.
Speaker 1 (40:45):
And you have a lot of these homeless people there
are one hundred percent mentally ill, and they need a
place to live and they're not provided that because nobody's paying.
So this is just my opinion. Instead of giving billions
of dollars to another country, let's put that in our
own country and maybe support some more veterans because ninety
(41:08):
percent of our veterans and we need to get them
in a home and get them help, very large, very high,
very high percentage.
Speaker 2 (41:18):
I'm with you, yet I don't.
Speaker 7 (41:19):
I never understood why we give people money to come
in and then send money out. But we have so
much here, so many people here that they could use
the help. And it's it's like you we talked about
treason earlier. I mean, what the hell like, why why
are we giving all this money everywhere?
Speaker 1 (41:35):
Absolutely reason why a person that serves this country should
be living on the streets yep? Period, And I don't
care what political party your you're part of. That should
never happen. Nobody should agree with that.
Speaker 3 (41:49):
Would it would be cheaper to buy every veteran a
house for one hundred and fifty thousand dollars per veterans.
Speaker 1 (41:58):
Which can't buy a house for that, But well, I
mean I get some places.
Speaker 5 (42:00):
You can you can get a company that makes them
their costs or something you can you can build a
community habitat of humanity three hundred.
Speaker 3 (42:08):
Downhouses or whatever, and they.
Speaker 1 (42:10):
Could they can have mentally ill.
Speaker 3 (42:15):
Together and veans in general before they get to that
stage of mental decline people.
Speaker 5 (42:21):
And also too when you get I think that if
you have people that have been through the same things
living closer together, they kind of feel like it's family again.
At least that's how my thinking would be. I don't know,
so I think that that would.
Speaker 4 (42:36):
But also I think you it would almost be like
setting up like do you understand, go ahead.
Speaker 5 (42:44):
I'm just it's like setting up an ALF so like
an assisted living like for elderly people, they don't necessarily
need round the clock care, but they're all within one area,
so they do have nurses that are around and this, that.
Speaker 4 (42:55):
And the other.
Speaker 5 (42:55):
So it's kind of it kind of could be like
the same thing where they have a facility where they
have like an on call therapist or doctor or whatever
to help out the people that are living in their community.
Speaker 4 (43:06):
And then they're not on the streets. They're living together.
Speaker 5 (43:08):
They're sharing stories and they're bonding and you know, they
have their friendships there, but they also have the medical
attention if they need it.
Speaker 3 (43:15):
Not all of them are mental issues, but some of
them are just homeless, right, some of them just homeless.
Speaker 5 (43:19):
Of them actually have like, you know, disabilities that they
got from their service that they could help.
Speaker 4 (43:24):
With those kinds of things.
Speaker 2 (43:25):
I think they want to be. They might want to be.
Speaker 7 (43:28):
I could be wrong, but they might want to be
around each other like you're talking about, Like if you
look at places like the villages for example, right and okalla,
I mean each other exactly, and they don't want.
Speaker 3 (43:39):
To be around help each other very well.
Speaker 7 (43:41):
Right, right, So they don't want to be around us
teenagers call them problems and kids, you know, whining and
all that shit. Right, they want to be just around
each other. There's the same mindset and that sort of thing.
Speaker 2 (43:49):
So I get that.
Speaker 7 (43:51):
I think the details could probably be figured out later,
but I think probably something needs to be done. And
let's stop sending money there and stop give money to
people coming over, and let's take care of our own
type of thing and solve her own problems, and then
if we have some left over, then maybe we can
start helping others.
Speaker 3 (44:08):
You think that I'm not saying I agree, But do
you think some of that goes a little too far
into socialism because you're giving away money to people that
you know.
Speaker 2 (44:17):
That's a good question.
Speaker 3 (44:19):
That's what I'm just I'm not saying I agree with.
I'm just no, no, no, I understand on the thoughts
of giving people stuff for free.
Speaker 7 (44:28):
Well, I mean, in a veterans case, maybe that's been earned, right,
so you know, no, but I know, I know that's
a good that's a great question. It's a good it's
a good topic because uh yeah, I'm not I being
on YouTube.
Speaker 2 (44:41):
I get to talk to people.
Speaker 7 (44:42):
Around the world, so like cut the news out for
a minute, and I get to talk to people that
actually live in other countries and they can tell me
some love it where they live, some don't and this
is why and so forth. So I get to have
this wealth of information from people who actually live it.
So I can tell you most people that live in
social countries it's you know, yeah, health care for example,
it's quote unquote free if you want to make wait
(45:05):
six to eight months to go see a doctor for something, right,
So that's the that's the caveat that you're not told.
Speaker 2 (45:11):
But no, I see what you're saying.
Speaker 3 (45:12):
Is that an issue because nobody wants to be a doctor,
and the shortage of doctors because they don't get paid enough.
Speaker 7 (45:18):
Well, that wore That could be the case too, Joe.
That could very well be because I don't know that
deep into it, to be honest with you. But but no,
you bring a good point, So I think there's I
think it goes back to forcing people to do something right. So, uh,
we have enough money if we didn't send so much
money out and didn't waste so much money. I think
we have enough money to take care of those who
(45:40):
are in need and everyone else can maybe you know,
go to work and not have to pay so much
in taxes. We're taxed to death in this country. I
think that's a no brainer. I mean, doesn't matter what
side of the fense you're on, we're taxed out of
our assd like left and right. It's almost criminal how
we're taxed, if you think about it from every angle.
But I think there'd be enough on the plot to
(46:03):
take care of those the small percentage that might you.
Speaker 1 (46:06):
Can spend what we spent on COVID and take care
every veteran that is on the streets. You know, And
there was so much fraud in COVID, So many people
paid that should not have been paid.
Speaker 3 (46:18):
During COVID, still like investigating.
Speaker 1 (46:20):
Oh they are, and that's what they're saying is they're
following the money trails, and you know, whatever it is,
what it is. But yeah, I definitely agree that money
spent on the belt. You should never sign up to
fight for your country and be left homeless. That to
me is just the most ridiculous. You're picking your nose, Joe,
(46:44):
That's why. But yeah, I mean that's kind of you know,
it's a topic we were going to talk about anyways,
but they kind of railed right into it. Mental institutions.
I think we definitely need them back open to care
for people on the streets and why people are going
to fight for it. I guess in the in the fifties, sixties, seventies.
(47:07):
I think the sixties is when they are technically abolished.
I could be wrong about that. Maybe it was the seventies,
but they were just they were being abused. People in
those institutions were being abused, and it was like, oh,
you know, it's the where do you weigh in and say, okay,
well we need to just cut this because every story
we hear is about a person being abused in that situation.
Speaker 7 (47:30):
So I mean, maybe we should call it something else too,
you know, because when people see a mental institution, they're like, okay,
I called the looney ben.
Speaker 1 (47:39):
But probably even anthrax it's a madhouse, you know, Like
they had a whole fucking video about how the mentality
of it is. But even that was the eighties, you know,
when it was more of a privately funded situation. But
I don't know. It's a sticky situation.
Speaker 2 (47:53):
Is all right?
Speaker 1 (47:54):
China versus Canada. Do you know why Canada is mad
at China?
Speaker 2 (47:57):
I know nothing about it.
Speaker 1 (47:59):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (48:00):
I thought they should be friends now that they both
have a common enemy. Of your enemy is your friend,
all right? So yeah, I'm a little annoyed with going
to going to war with China now, No, I'm I
mean going to war with Canada. Like, why are we
pissing them off? They don't even bother.
Speaker 1 (48:20):
Us, all right? So China executed. They're gonna make me
do this?
Speaker 4 (48:29):
Projected the cookies? How to do it again?
Speaker 2 (48:32):
More cookies? Is that what you want?
Speaker 1 (48:35):
So Ottawa condemns Chinese execution for Canadians. So China executed
for Canadians drugs.
Speaker 5 (48:48):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (48:48):
And here's the problem with these countries like China and
North Korea and Russia. When they accuse you of something,
they don't need evidence. It's like you're do you did this? Okay?
Speaker 5 (49:01):
Well, like.
Speaker 3 (49:05):
No, if they did that ship here, people would stop
doing it.
Speaker 1 (49:08):
What do you mean, Oh?
Speaker 3 (49:09):
Well, I mean right now, people get away with so
much stuff. But because they know there's a small percentage
chance of you getting caught, and then even if you
get caught, there'sn't even smaller percent chance of you getting convicted.
And then even if you get convicted, doesn't even smaller
percent chance of you being executed. So that's the reason
why people keep murdering.
Speaker 1 (49:26):
We don't execute people for drug possession anything like that, right,
so China does so uh March nineteen.
Speaker 3 (49:35):
China's got the right idea, the guilty of it though.
Speaker 1 (49:38):
Canada said on Wednesday that China had executed four Canadian
citizens on drug smuggling charges early this year and strongly
condemn Beijing's use of the death penalty. Foreign Minister Monley
Melanie Jolly told reporters that all four have been dual citizens,
and said Ottawa would ask for leniency for other Canadians
(49:59):
face the same fate. There are four Canadians that have
been executed and therefore we are strongly condemning what happened.
She added that four had been convicted on drug charges. Separately,
the Canadian Foreign Ministry said that Robert Schillingberg, a Canadian
man sentenced to death in twenty nineteen for drug smuggling,
(50:21):
had not been executed yet. Canada's Canada China ties have
been icy since twenty eighteen, when meing Wanzu, chief financial
officer of Chinese telecoms firm Hui, was detained Huawei Thank
You Joe was detained in Vancouver at Washington's request. China
(50:42):
arrested two Canadians shortly after Me and the Canadian duo
were released in twenty twenty one. So the basics are
so people, all you hear in the news is bullshit
about the United States and Canada. Canada or Beijing has
(51:07):
tariffs on Canada two point six billion work of agriculture
food products. Retaliating against levies, Ottawa slapped the Chinese electric
vehicle and steal a luminant product tariff on China last year.
Combating drug related offenses as a shared responsibility about countries.
(51:31):
China Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Thursday, YadA, YadA. So
here's the thing. All you hear about the news is
the United States and their issues. Other countries have issues.
China seeds to be pissing a lot of people off.
They always did, right, So why don't we hear about it?
Like this is like a short article. I'm not sure
how many people got like this notice and news. It
(51:54):
wasn't in the national news.
Speaker 2 (51:56):
You hear about it again in weeks to come, it'll
be gone, right.
Speaker 1 (52:01):
So I think Trump's problem with Canada was they were
allowing a lot of people through their border and not
being being very strict on putting, like allowing people to
leave Canada. In the United States, where you go into Canada,
(52:23):
you can't even go to Canada if you've been convicted
of a dui. They have a very very strict policy
on entering Canada. But they allow people to come into
the United States who have questionable backgrounds.
Speaker 3 (52:39):
But yeah, but that's not them. It's not their responsibil
ability who leaves, it's their responsibility who comes in. We
don't care. We don't care who smuggles out of the
US into Mexico.
Speaker 6 (52:49):
Do we.
Speaker 1 (52:52):
Joe, If somebody comes into the United States from Mexico,
yes they care. If somebody comes in the United States
from Canada, yes they care.
Speaker 3 (53:01):
Do we care who smuggles out of the US into
another country?
Speaker 1 (53:04):
There's not been a lot of reports of people smuggling.
Speaker 3 (53:07):
In because we don't care. If you want to leave, go,
Why would Canadians care who leave Canada?
Speaker 1 (53:15):
I agree with that, but Canada. What I'm saying is
Canada has a much more strict policy on entry than
the United States.
Speaker 3 (53:21):
And that's awful. It's not theirs right, yeah thing, okay,
but people, So.
Speaker 1 (53:27):
If if Trump from the twenty sixteen Trump had Canada's
border policy, people would have screamed racist because he was.
That's what started this whole thing. If you remember, everybody
loved Trump when he was a Democrat. He had the
same policies. If you go back and you listen to
his interviews from two thousand and five and even in
(53:51):
the nineties, his policies that he talked about on Oprah
and all these shows, exactly, I guess they are the
exact same policies that he is doing and talking about
right now. And people loved him but when he started
running for president and he started talking about shutting down
(54:12):
the border and walls against Mexico, he was immediately labeled
a racist, and every Democrat in the world turned against
them because they found out he was running as a Republican.
They thought he was going to run as a Democrat.
He ran as a Republican and they immediately turned against him.
But obviously every country in the world has strict border policies.
(54:37):
And now even Bernie Sanders is turning around and saying, well, yeah,
we need strict border policies. Yeah, he literally said we
need strict border policies. He said that this week, and
you know it's common sense. Barack Obama had strict border policies.
He deported much more people than anybody, you know.
Speaker 2 (55:01):
So it is what it is.
Speaker 1 (55:03):
People people name things that they want to name, and
you know, that's that's the the term of Trump's I
guess demise was racist, race, call him this, that, whatever.
So that's what's stuck and that's what they used against
them in the twenty sixteen election. So anyhow, Canada and
(55:23):
China are now at odds because of this.
Speaker 4 (55:27):
Okay, so the end the segment are leaving who's taking over?
What's the video control?
Speaker 3 (55:35):
Jason does?
Speaker 2 (55:36):
I guess someone going to walk up? I thought learn
was saying for another hour or so to eleven thirty.
Speaker 3 (55:42):
Now that she's leaving, can we do the stuff that
we couldn't do while she was here?
Speaker 5 (55:45):
Yep?
Speaker 2 (55:46):
I guess.
Speaker 3 (55:51):
It's nice meeting you. Did you take your phone with you?
Speaker 1 (55:56):
I need a beer? Yeah? All right?
Speaker 3 (56:05):
No, are you gonna beset your audio again?
Speaker 1 (56:11):
I mean I can?
Speaker 3 (56:12):
I mean you already did another hour?
Speaker 2 (56:21):
All right?
Speaker 1 (56:23):
What are you looking at all the reces? All right,
we're gonna If you're streaming with us, stay on. You're
not going anywhere. We're going to end the audio version
of this for our guys watching and our ladies watching
or listening, uh on the audio version of our podcast.
(56:49):
So hang tight. We're gonna get to segment three in
just a second. All right, everybody, This has been another
episode of The Drinking with Drew Show. Check us out
every Tuesday at seven thirty pm Eastern Time. Subscribe to
our YouTube channel, Spread the word, Spread the love. Check
us out on all of our socials, Facebook, x, Instagram, TikTok,
(57:14):
and Humble Social. Big thank you to our sponsor and
lawweitrust dot com. We'll see you next week.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!