Reese On The Radio On NewsTalk 1080 WTIC 2-6pm ET 10/20/25

• I Checked! There Are Still No Kings
• They Want The Same Thing They Say They Are Fighting Against
• The Stupidest Thing I've Read Today:
  Sen Dr Saud Anwar
• Sen Jeff Gordon Joins The Show
• Why Did Mark David Chapman Do It?
• Tucker Salls Attacks Women
• I Still See You. Why Aren't You In Hiding?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:23):
Hey, yeah, they should calm down.

Speaker 2 (00:26):
The show is about to style Reese on the radio.

Speaker 1 (00:28):
Turn it up, turning it up low, turn it up loud, like.

Speaker 2 (00:33):
A dream come true one.

Speaker 1 (00:39):
Due to the nature of this program, discretion does not exist.
It's Race on the radio right now on w T
I see News Talk ten eighty.

Speaker 2 (00:54):
Happy Monday. How y'all doing out there? Oh man? It
is just seven days, just seven days, and.

Speaker 3 (01:09):
Yours truly will be in the nutmeg stay give it up.
I'm gonna be hanging out with you. I cannot wait
to be there full time.

Speaker 2 (01:17):
All the time.

Speaker 3 (01:21):
The day is counting down. I am careful. I'm making
sure that I don't leave the perimeter of my house,
I don't drive too far, and keeping it as simple
as possible because I got that long trek thirty one
hours on the road that we're gonna span out to
two days. So just so you know, so you understand,

(01:43):
I will be here on Friday. The original plan was
to leave Friday, to be off on Friday and then
jet out and be there by Sunday. But we have
some complications and I'm gonna be here on Friday, so
we will do you know, Roseanna and I would be
on gonna be you know, the last time you'll hear
from us here all the way on the west, pretty

(02:04):
much the center of the country. And then we will
be there physically on Tuesday, so we're to.

Speaker 2 (02:10):
Take Monday off.

Speaker 3 (02:11):
I would love to be there earlier and just coming
on Monday, but just so we can travel, you know,
comfortably and carefully, we're gonna wait it out and be
there on Tuesday, unless, of course, you know, travel works
a lot better than we end up there in that
hole none. But nonetheless, Tuesday is that one we'll be

(02:31):
there physically, and we got a whole bunch of stuff
that we need to get into. So I'm really happy
to be there. I'm is it weird, It's like uncomfortable
because I'm gonna be leaving the home that I built
here and then I'm on the road, and then I'll
be out there with you folks, and I have to
make Connecticut my home all over again. And all of

(02:52):
you who are it been rooting for us to get there,
and I'm just as excited as many of you appear
to be.

Speaker 2 (02:59):
And I can't wait.

Speaker 3 (03:00):
I wish I could get there, and as soon as
I arrived, You're all there waiting for me so I
can hug y'all.

Speaker 2 (03:05):
I really really mean that.

Speaker 3 (03:06):
I'm not promise you. I'm not kidding when I say that,
but you know what, over time, we'll get to do that.
I want to tell a quick story before I get
into the opening monologue, and that is about a young
woman named Priscilla. And I don't always get to talk

(03:30):
to the people who listen to the show. They do
not call in all the time, they will not write,
but they listen, and sometimes out of the blue, something
will come up that they are compelled to call the
program or to write me an email or messaged on Facebook.
So I'm not going to read what Priscilla wrote me,

(03:52):
but i'll paraphrase in her paragraph. And I get this
a lot, even though many people believe it's not happening,
and I tell them all the time, you have no
idea what this show does and why it does what
it does. Priscilla sent me this. She said, got to

(04:14):
run to work for now. Tell your wife that we
love her and we appreciate y'all being vulnerable on the show.
She wrote this about Roseanne and I having a conversation,
about us having an argument or disagreeing because I was
so embedded in work and not giving her the attention
that she needed because I'm trying.

Speaker 2 (04:35):
To be on the ball for you folks.

Speaker 3 (04:37):
Now, with that being said, saying that she thanked us
for being vulnerable on the show to share that, she
then said this, I listen every day.

Speaker 2 (04:48):
I'm a listener for less than a year, and you
made me a conservative.

Speaker 3 (04:58):
Now, I again, I don't get these letters all the time,
but when I do, I cherish them.

Speaker 2 (05:05):
Not because I brainwashed anybody.

Speaker 3 (05:07):
That's not what it is. It's not about me saying yep,
got another one.

Speaker 2 (05:11):
No, it isn't.

Speaker 3 (05:12):
That is that that is a vulnerable place for someone
to be to say that you changed my mind. She
never called me, she never called the show, never had
a correspondence with the back of forth. She just listened
to the show, and in less than a year she
changed her political view. She's saying I made her a

(05:34):
conservative by listening to me. I don't know what she heard.
I don't know when she heard. I don't know what
day or what thing enlightened her. I don't know. She
didn't make that clear here, but I was like, wow, okay,
all right, it feels good. Don't get me wrong, it
feels good. I would love to embark on hers like, hey,

(05:57):
you know what happened? How did this change? I'm certain
it was me in a combination of other things, but
it happened, And in some ways, I feel like that's
why some of the people on the left do listen
to the program. It's not because they're going to change
their mind. It's because, deep down, I think they want

(06:18):
to hear an opposing view that sort of solidifies where
they are listening to me set of says like ah, yeah, yeah, see,
this is the reason why I'm gonna stay on the left.
And I'm happy for that too. That's what this show
is supposed to do. It's supposed to certify your point
of view. I'm just throwing a bunch of stuff out there,
not so much as paying the Devil's advocate.

Speaker 2 (06:39):
I'm just throwing ideas out there based upon.

Speaker 3 (06:42):
My own life experiences and some of theirs, things that
they can identify with average guy stuff. I'm no scholar,
just an average guy. And so when I get a
message like that, I go, hmm, okay, good. Not so
much that what I'm doing is working, It's just that

(07:02):
they're listening now. I bring up Priscilla because I went
to the San Antonio No King's rally, and I took
a lot of b roll of the audience there and
the enchanting there, and what they were wearing and what
their sign said. But if you try to interview them,

(07:26):
many of those folks are very savvy, and if you
start asking them questions based upon your political bent, they
will be reluctant or they become argumentative, and you get nowhere.
So I said to them, I'm not going to record.
I'm not going to record my questions. I want to

(07:49):
talk to you like a real person. This isn't a
gotcha And I use Mark in west Hartford's line. I'm unaffiliated.
So I just want to ask you a j questions,
not from a conservative bent, not from a liberal bent.
I just want to ask you questions based upon your
point of view. And I learned a lot folks. Are

(08:13):
there some people there who are the genuine article? Yes,
without a doubt, there are people there who truly believe
that this administration is wicked and wrong. There are people
who believe that Donald Trump is the type of politician

(08:34):
that separates people. That is an antagonist. Some of them
even think he's evil. Do they have legitimate reasons to
think that. No, But when they discuss with me why
they do. They are not coming from a place of malice.
They have been led to believe this, and it is
evident in the way that they talk. As I told you,

(08:57):
I listen to all facets of media, so you have to.
So if there's something that said on MSNBC, if there's
something on CNN, ABC, NBC, I already know when the
person is speaking, what network he's listening to, what talking
head he has gotten his ideas from, because I listen
to them, all, all of them, And when I hear
something and it sounds verbatim to what Van Jones may

(09:21):
have said, I can point it out just like that.

Speaker 2 (09:24):
So I'm very much invested.

Speaker 3 (09:28):
Like I said, there are some legitimate people there who
have no malice in their heart towards anyone else. They
just think that they're standing for something important. However, there
are some really really angry folks out there who do
not like conservatives, and they have decided that you are dumb,

(09:55):
that you are ignorant, and that you must be re educated.
When I say must be re educated, I made sure
I understood. This is not something that people said to me,
and I was like, it sounds like you're saying no, no.
I asked them, are you saying and sure enough they

(10:18):
tiptoed around it a lot of times. Well, I'm not saying,
listen to me a favor. If you want to convince
people of where you are, don't lie to them.

Speaker 2 (10:27):
I'm asking you.

Speaker 3 (10:28):
Do you wish to re educate conservatives or maga folks?

Speaker 2 (10:34):
Yes? Why? Because their thinking is wrong?

Speaker 3 (10:38):
They told me the way that they think is wrong,
and I went, how do you intend.

Speaker 2 (10:47):
To re educate them? We must force them.

Speaker 3 (10:52):
Now listening to this, I go, wait a minute. I
don't want to shock you here, but it sounds like
you're asking to commit the same fascism you're here to stop.

Speaker 2 (11:08):
And then the wildest answer came out of their.

Speaker 3 (11:11):
Mouths, we know, but we are morally superior to them,
and what we want is for the greater good. It's
good fascism versus bad fascism. This wasn't a one off, folks,

(11:35):
This was the Lion's share. I was there for two hours.
I walked around and I talked to everyone, and I
again told them I just want to learn. Tell me
where you're coming from, Tell me why you believe this
about that person. I saw people holding signs with Trump
on a tombstone. I asked the older woman holding it,
why do you want him dead? Will that stop the movement?

(11:56):
I mean, if he were to die, do you think
that MAGA would just dissolve?

Speaker 2 (12:02):
Yes? They said that with Donald Trump dead, the rest.

Speaker 3 (12:08):
Of you conservatives, you disillusioned, crazy folks, would wake up
out of your mind numbness and then see things their
way that Donald Trump has you mesmerized. Even they see
Donald Trump as the deity they think you do.

Speaker 2 (12:31):
Isn't that interesting? I went through this.

Speaker 3 (12:35):
And heard people talking about Donald Trump and talking about
things that they were fighting against, and then when they
got in power, when they won, they would do the
exact same thing that they claim this president and this
administration are doing.

Speaker 2 (12:51):
And when they were.

Speaker 3 (12:52):
Called on it, they all said, but we are the
rational ones.

Speaker 2 (12:59):
Is CISERI.

Speaker 3 (13:02):
For fascism for the good of all mankind, but only
our fascism. I asked simple questions, like, wait a minute,
you think that Donald Trump and his minions want the
fascism for all? What do you say that people who

(13:24):
would in essence be voting for their own demise. People
used to say that Republicans wanted dirty air and dirty water. Well,
wouldn't they drink the same dirty water and breathe in
the same dirty air. Do you know what they said
to that, I'm serious, yes, But those people would carve

(13:46):
out clean air and clean water for themselves.

Speaker 2 (13:52):
What how would they possibly do that?

Speaker 3 (13:57):
There are ways, they said. I talked to a bunch
of other radicals, many who said that there must be
a war, must be a war. But my favorite line
was from a Mexican American who lives in New York,
who was there in San Antonio because that's where he

(14:18):
grew up, and was there at that rally and said
to me before we began, I don't know if you're
ready to hear what I really think. He can't wait,
he said, he couldn't go wait, he couldn't wait to
get back home to vote for mom Donni. He said,
by the way, when you found out I was.

Speaker 2 (14:33):
From New York.

Speaker 3 (14:34):
But the thing he said that blew my mind, folks,
and this is gonna blow your mind too. This Mexican
American sat there and looked at me and said, we
must have a civil war, and the North will win again.
I said, I'm sorry what he said? The North will

(14:57):
win again? I said, are you suggesting that the South
is the is? They're like the Confederate in some sort
of way. You could take it, take it anywhere you
want to. I was like, okay, Well, what happens after
the war? Like brother versus brother? You're talking to like military?
It's like no, no, no, brother versus brother, people versus people

(15:20):
like It was like, see, I told you I'm a
little more radical than you expected. I'm like, okay, no, no, no,
nobody can ill. So what happens after the war is over?
The North has one and the South is still there?
What about them having the same ideals? What do you
do with them? We educate them. We do what we
educate them. I said, So you're talking about re education

(15:41):
camps of some sort. Why didn't say all that? I
was like, why don't you just say what you mean?
They clearly will not go willingly. Oh, then we will
force them. We will force them. It is amazing to

(16:04):
watch these people say the things that come out of
their mouth. But the scariest part is that this did
not come from the young people seventy percent of the
people at this rally were at least fifty five and older.

Speaker 2 (16:24):
And a majority of them were white.

Speaker 3 (16:29):
Sure, it being San Antonio, there's a lot of Hispanics, Mexicans, Guatemalans,
I'm sure, but they paled in comparison to older white
folks who were there at those rallies.

Speaker 2 (16:44):
And they all shared one thing in common. They all were.

Speaker 3 (16:49):
Reliving the nineteen sixties. They were getting one more shot
at the Radical Protest sixty. I spoke to a woman
who stayed with the Weather Underground while she was in Washington,
d C. I talked to a lot of people who

(17:11):
were there who came from the revolutionary ranks of the
sixties and seventies.

Speaker 2 (17:17):
I heard tales about the Black Panther Party.

Speaker 3 (17:23):
I mean, I heard tales that I haven't heard since
my mother told me when I was a kid. But
they were all their reliving their activist years. And I
gotta tell you, folks, they all want death because they
know they can't win on ideas, because they know that

(17:47):
people on the right Maga folks or Republicans will never heal,
they will never ever bow down to their ideology, which
is why they scream for death. It is the reason
why they have absolutely no care in the world to

(18:09):
talk about how people need to diet.

Speaker 2 (18:15):
We gotta turn around the god.

Speaker 4 (18:17):
On this stacist system.

Speaker 5 (18:19):
These ice ags gotta get shot and wipe out this,
say the state machinery that's our fan of way right there,
has to get wiped out.

Speaker 2 (18:33):
We'll be back.

Speaker 3 (18:34):
I'll tell you some more about this, especially to a
young man I spoke to about Marxism and a young
woman I talked about Mom Donnie.

Speaker 2 (18:41):
When we returned. It's recent and radio on w t
i C News Talk tannedy fan of w t i C.

Speaker 1 (18:47):
Then do us a favorite, download the Free Honesty and
Favorite w.

Speaker 6 (18:51):
T i C.

Speaker 3 (18:52):
Now, before anybody starts texting me or calling me about this,
we've got the Senator n our thing on deck.

Speaker 2 (18:59):
We will talk about that. We've got a guest coming in.

Speaker 3 (19:02):
Senator Jeff Gordon is going to be on the program
at about four h five to talk about all of this.

Speaker 2 (19:07):
It is everywhere now and it's growing.

Speaker 3 (19:10):
I'm gonna start by saying, just on that subject, it
is not Republicans or conservatives that are asking that Senator
an whar be dealt with? Beginning your news reports with
that farce is insulting. It's not a conservative issue which

(19:31):
goes right. And just so the journalists know this, you idiots,
when you guys keep talking about it's on both sides
and then report conservatives are of set, which means liberals
don't give a damn because deep down liberals are going
as centerma and you know why, that's how.

Speaker 2 (19:51):
You talk about conservatives. Conservatives are just I'm blowing it
out of proportion.

Speaker 3 (19:58):
Weren't weren't you the guys just last week screaming and
hollering about the heads of a bunch of young Republicans
who were in a private text saying, as you allege
racist things.

Speaker 2 (20:10):
What are you gonna do about it? What are you
guys gonna do about it? Well, a guy.

Speaker 3 (20:14):
Resigned, a politician resigned because he said that a woman
looked like she didn't bathe. I don't know whether that's
racist or not. I don't know it was a racist
thing to say that somebody didn't bathe, But he resigned.
So if you'll get a pound of flesh, we want ours.
Let's not call it partisan anger or partisan dismay. What

(20:40):
Senator Anwat did was despicable in the climate. As I
said on X, I just think he's a dumbass. That's
what I think he is. And I think that he
gets to associate himself with dumbasses throughout time. And if
somebody thinks that that's insulting to call him a dumbass,

(21:03):
then what do you think it is when you say
that cholesterol should do its job on the President of
the United States.

Speaker 2 (21:11):
We have his statement here as well.

Speaker 3 (21:15):
We'll read it in a bit, But I want to
get back to the Shady Acres march on Saturday, and that's.

Speaker 2 (21:23):
What it was.

Speaker 7 (21:24):
Come on, let's call it what it was. Come on,
that's all it was.

Speaker 3 (21:35):
It was everybody out for a brisk walk outside the
nursing home.

Speaker 2 (21:38):
We know what it was about. Come on, if we
could joke about it, let's joke about it.

Speaker 3 (21:44):
If everything's a joke, everything's a clown show, let's just
make fun of it.

Speaker 2 (21:49):
Let me tell you something. The Socialists, it's their party.

Speaker 8 (21:53):
Now.

Speaker 3 (21:54):
I've tried to warn you. I tried to warn all
of you. The social have taken over the Democrat Party.
And they were there, and those people who are supposed
to be moderate Democrats, they sat there and they watched
all of those kids walking by wearing Socialism is the
Future Now t shirts, and all of the T shirts,

(22:15):
ironically were red, not my favorite color, I may have
to say, but that's what they were wearing.

Speaker 2 (22:23):
And the speakers were all Marxists. They were all preaching Marxism.

Speaker 3 (22:29):
And while the moderate Democrats sat up there and repeated
every chant, every chant of Marxists, communists, socialists, they were
all there. I asked plenty of them. Wait a minute, now,
I gotta be asking you, are you socialists? Are you communists?
Oh no, no, no, I'm a Democrat socialist. Oh no, no, no,

(22:52):
I'm just a socialist. Well this thing seems to be
sponsored by a lot of.

Speaker 2 (22:58):
Communists. Yeah yeah, I mean, you know, if we invite everybody.

Speaker 3 (23:04):
And the thing that always bothers me, right, is that
the guilt by association is only for us. As the
aforementioned telegraphed text message scandal was right, because those people
were in a private chat saying questionable things about race,
about gender, about Hitler, we all had to condemn it.

(23:27):
See listen to the way that they talk. It means
you all talk like that. No one ever parsed it.
They didn't say those individuals were responsible. They said we
all had to take account. So I sat there and
I asked, well, don't you have to take account for
these guys. You're all here together? Yeah, but you know
you can talk to five people and five different people

(23:49):
will tell you what socialism is or what communism is.
We're not all the same. I was like, po, wait, Mante,
you don't all coal. Ask at the end of the day.
I mean, you're all gonna vote the same way, aren't you.
You guys are all going to vote against the MAGA folks,
the Republican folks.

Speaker 2 (24:05):
Aren't you.

Speaker 3 (24:06):
You are here together, right, You may be protesting different messages,
but you're all in unison, aren't you.

Speaker 2 (24:14):
I mean that kind of.

Speaker 3 (24:15):
Is the socialist way to which they admit it oftentimes.

Speaker 2 (24:20):
Now, can I.

Speaker 3 (24:23):
Give you something on the Republican side if I may, Okay,
I'm going to give some advice. Yes, it is unsolicited,
but the only reason why, as I said last week
about unsolicited advice, I give this advice because I experienced it, right,

(24:45):
So I actually have something to go on when I
embark when if I engage you in this conversation. One
Republicans find yourself black and Latino conservatives find black ones.
Latinos are great, don't get me wrong, They can convey

(25:06):
the message as well.

Speaker 2 (25:07):
But you need to get your hand on some.

Speaker 3 (25:09):
Very very deep, died in the wool, Frederick Douglass type
conservatives and get them out there to message and have
a conversation with these people on the left.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
Why. This story will tell you why.

Speaker 3 (25:29):
So I'm talking to a row of elderly white folks,
about three women, two men, and we start talking about
the death of Donald Trump. The one woman had the
placard with the tombstone with Trump written on it, and people.

Speaker 2 (25:47):
Walking by going yeah, man, yeah.

Speaker 3 (25:52):
And I asked the lady what would happen if he died,
and she said that people would come out of their malaise,
as I laid out earlier in the opening monologue.

Speaker 2 (26:03):
And I said, so you.

Speaker 3 (26:04):
Really believe these people are in a cult. And the
man sitting there chimed in. He was very aggressive. The
other ladies were very polite, but this man was very aggressive.

Speaker 9 (26:14):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (26:14):
Yeah, they all are all a bunch of zombies.

Speaker 3 (26:17):
I went, okay, all right, I said, you have evidence
of that, Like, how do you know that for certain?
I mean, it seems like you're just assuming that they
were all that. So if Donald Trump would to die,
you're saying that they would just wake up and they
would no longer be in transpind them.

Speaker 2 (26:30):
Yeah, that's exactly what it is. He's the one.

Speaker 3 (26:32):
It's got them all brainwashed. Okay, all right, no problem.
I said, that's fine. So what do you say to
others who would believe that being on the left is
kind of being in a cult. And I thought about this,
and I thought, don't go into the usual spaces. Do
not bring up transgenderism, do not bring up LGBTQ. That's

(26:53):
not necessary. But I found the one that had them fumbling.
They said, I don't think that's happening on our side,
and I said are you sure? And she goes, no,
We we take a whole bunch of different opinions. And
I said, well, in my travels in this business, I've

(27:13):
learned that if African Americans vote for Donald Trump or conservatives,
they're often called Uncle Tom's and are maligned for their
point of view if they do not agree with the
leftist orthodoxy. What do you say to that? And the
place went silent as they stood in front of a

(27:38):
black man asking them that very important question about cultism.
They didn't even know how to respond, Yes, you're you're right,
that does that does happen? And then I repeated something

(27:59):
I repeat often here on the show.

Speaker 2 (28:01):
Do you remember the.

Speaker 3 (28:02):
Facebook post I always talk about. A white man posted
the definition of white privilege is being able to vote
for whatever I believe in and never being called a
traitor to my race. And everyone sitting there completely bowed

(28:23):
their head in shame. And I said, that is an
experience in the African American culture. What do you say
to that cultism? Well, I'll agree, Yet there's cultism everywhere.
It's it's on it's on both sides.

Speaker 2 (28:47):
They were ashamed.

Speaker 3 (28:50):
And as I've told you Republicans before, these guys on
the left do not know how to handle black folks.
Many people on this program all the time. I think
it's what is it route in South Carolina says, what's
the biggest threat to the Democrat? An educated black man.
They're scared to death. They are know how to operate us.

Speaker 2 (29:12):
They just know.

Speaker 3 (29:13):
They fumble, they fall, they trip over themselves. But it's
amazing to watch. And as I sat there and I
watched them, I didn't put any expression. I didn't give
them an ahaa. I sat there and I waited. I
waited until they could come up with an answer. And

(29:35):
I said, there is cultism. You're only allowed to think
a certain way, especially based on the color of your skin.
And I didn't just try it with those groups of whites.
I even asked the Mexican guy when I talked to
him about the Civil War, do you know what he
told me? This one will blow your mind. He said,

(29:58):
the region of Texas where he he was born, sixty
percent of them voted for Donald Trump. He couldn't believe.
And I said, why do you think that was? And
he said, it's the wannabes wanna be what the wanna be?

Speaker 2 (30:11):
Whites?

Speaker 3 (30:12):
I said, what, He goes, they want to be white.
They want to be accepted by whites. They want to
be rich, they want to be wealthy. I said, but
that's a white thing. That's a thing, that's not a
white thing. He goes, No, no, no, no, that's a
white thing. They want to be whites. They want to
be wealthy. I said, why are you conceding that to
white folks? Why wouldn't anybody want to be wealthy? Why

(30:34):
wouldn't anybody want to get paid what they what they're worth.
Why wouldn't anybody want to give great things to their children?
What are you talking about? No, No, that's that's a
white thing. And I said, that's funny. I don't see
anything to white people. I'm stunned that you do. And
of course he didn't know how to handle. I said,
that's not a white thing. Neither his marriage or raising

(30:56):
your children in a two parent household. Those things aren't
seated to white people. I can't understand why you would.
I understood a lot that day. I understood a lot.

Speaker 2 (31:08):
When we come back, we'll talk about this some more.

Speaker 3 (31:11):
We'll play some audio sound bites, and of course we'll
lead read your messages in the chat rooms.

Speaker 2 (31:17):
We'll be back. It's reesun Radio on wt i C
News talk to anyway.

Speaker 3 (31:23):
Let me play this as well, because I need to
get uh this little audio bid out of here as
well as this guy who I just played, Moyses Bernal.
He is uh an employee at Wilbur Wright College. He
was the one who was screaming this at one of
the rallies in Chicago.

Speaker 5 (31:44):
We gotta turn around the coves on this fascist system.
These I as gotta get shot.

Speaker 2 (31:51):
And wipe up. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (31:53):
So again, there is clearly a frustration out of these folks,
and they have convinced themselves that they are the righteous ones,
they are the virtuous ones. The crazy part is is
that what's the motivator behind all of this, and it

(32:16):
is the poor and indigent. That's how they rationalize this
whole thing.

Speaker 2 (32:22):
That's the rational that's the rationale. The rationale is, Hey.

Speaker 3 (32:30):
These people don't deserve to exist because I've decided they
don't care about the most important people, poor, indigent and immigrant.

Speaker 2 (32:44):
That's there. Those people are more important. That is the moral.

Speaker 3 (32:49):
High ground that they have. And if you are with
Donald Trump, you do not deserve to exist in their world,
the world that they wish to create, and you will
have to adhere. I talked to a man for about

(33:09):
thirty minutes about socialism and he was very very kind.
He I recorded and I'm going to actually play that.
I'm gonna play that not today, but we're gonna play
it because he talked so much about the world that
socialists could build where the workers are more important than

(33:33):
the CEOs, and how the workers should get the lion's
share of the profits. He expressed, and you've heard all
of this before, it's nothing new. They say that the
CEO's get a golden parachute. What happens to you when

(33:54):
the company goes under? What happens to you? And I
expressed to him, I said, yeah, what what?

Speaker 10 (34:01):
What?

Speaker 2 (34:01):
I don't understand what you what are you talking about?

Speaker 3 (34:04):
He goes, yeah, he gets a golden parachute if the
company goes bankrupt. But what happens to you? And I went,
I get another job, to which he was like, I mean, well, yeah,
you get another job. I'm like, yeah, and what what happens?
Let's say the company never goes bankrupt? Are you saying

(34:26):
that I'm stuck there in perpetuity? Can I go here?
Can I go there?

Speaker 2 (34:30):
How about? Can I increase my income? To which he
responded to me that there would be no motivation.

Speaker 3 (34:38):
I said, because we are human beings and the one
thing that is innate in all of us is having
something better to provide for our children.

Speaker 2 (34:46):
I asked him, do we all drive the same car?
He said no? How about if I want the a
K or eight was it a a K?

Speaker 11 (34:56):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (34:57):
Eight K television? You know, much better than the four K?
And he said, well, that's something we'd talk about. I'm sorry,
that's something we'd what. They were fine with the idea
that they would be a commission that you would go
through to determine if you could get a fancier TV.

Speaker 2 (35:21):
You've never met my wife.

Speaker 3 (35:22):
I told him, I know that if we were, if
we had our housing and our water and our food.

Speaker 2 (35:26):
Provided for us.

Speaker 3 (35:27):
And after a while, my wife starts looking at those
four walls and she says, Babe, we've got to move.

Speaker 2 (35:32):
I am sick of living like this.

Speaker 3 (35:35):
We have to live in a bigger house. I need
us to have two bathrooms. I'm sick and tired of
you being in mine. Can I go and get a
bigger home from my demanding wife? Well, that would be
determined by Yeah, this story's over, This.

Speaker 2 (35:51):
Conversation is done. Do you think I'm gonna go back
to my wife and say, hi, sweetie, I apologize.

Speaker 3 (35:57):
But the socialists say that we're gonna have to share
a bathroom for the rest of our lives. My wife
is the background, shaking her head. No, this is what
they want, this is what they're fighting for. And again, remember,

(36:17):
it isn't about your status in life. It is about again,
the most important people to them, the vulnerable, the weak,
the poor. It's about them getting and you suffering. You've
had it your way forever. Now we have to make
sure that they can at least rise to where you are.

(36:39):
And I've said this before and I'll say it again, folks,
Every leftist ideology that has ever been implemented in our
world has never been made to lift that group up
to where we are. It has always been to diminish
us where we are so they can lift up the
others for us to all live in mediocrity. It happened
with the women's movement. It wasn't about as sending women

(37:03):
to the ranks of men. It was about marginalizing men
and for us meeting at the middle of mediocrity, we
got to take a break.

Speaker 2 (37:10):
We'll be back.

Speaker 3 (37:11):
Dave Maker's in for John Silver in the WTIC newsroom.
It's Rees on the radio, Prest.

Speaker 1 (37:15):
On the radio, making sense of the news. Yeah, even
when it makes no sense at all at all. Now
until a U T I see news talk to ten eighty.

Speaker 2 (37:25):
All right, let's get to some headlines. People are saying
that you may be over sharing with your AI.

Speaker 3 (37:36):
Now I've admit I've been using AI a little bit now,
trying to get a feel for it and understanding, and
I've had a good time using it. But people are
saying that some people are over sharing with their AI
and they said how your chat GPT conversations could be
used against you, and people are treating the AI chat
box as Advisor's confidants and even accomplices. This according to

(37:58):
Anthony Cuthbertson. He says that there are no legal protections
and predatory actions are looking in to monetize and exploit
this new trove of deeply intimate data. This is according
to a couple of watchdogs groups, groups and this individual
and what he's saying is is.

Speaker 2 (38:17):
Very similar to what I did.

Speaker 3 (38:18):
I think on Thursday's Stupidest Thing I read today where
the young man who would vandalize some cars in a
parking lot at his college. They ended up, of course
finding all of these things in his chat GPT conversation.
But I think that that's a little off the cuff
because this guy invited the police into seeing those things

(38:39):
by saying, oh, starts through my phone.

Speaker 2 (38:41):
And all of those things were there. Uh, And in
essence he just self indicted. So I don't know.

Speaker 3 (38:47):
That's just they're just saying be careful with it. It
is online and it could be compromised through hackers and stuff,
but you can find software to protect yourself from that.
A woman by the name of Josifa Tito Shepherd, who's
seventy six years old in Washington.

Speaker 12 (39:04):
D C.

Speaker 3 (39:05):
Said that feces or skunk smell was emanating from her
seventy three year old next door neighbor, Thomas Cackett's doorway,
and it made her dread coming home. Now, after five
years of representing herself in a courtroom, Impolito I pronounced
her name wrong. Impolito Shepherd has finally won her case

(39:27):
in the DC Court of Appeals. A lower court judge
had already ruled in her favor in twenty twenty three,
but Kakitt, the stoner neighbor he appealed. The higher court
ended up siding with Impolito, saying that her use and
enjoyment of her own property was more important than Kakitt's.

Speaker 2 (39:45):
Use and enjoyment of his marijuana.

Speaker 3 (39:49):
Kakitt tried, arguing that he only smoked once a day
and never longer than five minutes, all to cope with
his many different health conditions, including skin cancer, chronic hepatitis.
Are and is that satia? Is that I pronounce that skastia?

Speaker 2 (40:05):
What about?

Speaker 3 (40:05):
I don't even know how to pronounce that. My wife's
the medical person here. That word right there?

Speaker 2 (40:10):
Do you know what that is?

Speaker 3 (40:12):
Sciatica? That was horrible. Thank you sciatica.

Speaker 2 (40:19):
I was not supposed to be able to read that.
Thank you. I appreciate you, honey, He says, quote, I
am not Snoop Dogg.

Speaker 3 (40:27):
I should be allowed to spoke my marijuana sciatica.

Speaker 2 (40:33):
I've never even had to read that word before. Now
I'm embarrassed.

Speaker 3 (40:36):
I deserved every part of that scorn, every bit of
that scorn.

Speaker 7 (40:42):
Oh Man.

Speaker 3 (40:43):
Also Chris Murphy is in the news with more than
eleven million dollars in camping cash to spend in advance
to the twenty twenty six mid terms, he can start
collecting IOU's for a possible presidential running twenty twenty eight
new federal Election Commissions filing show Murphy with ten point
six million dollars in his campaign bank as of September thirtieth,

(41:07):
and his next Senate campaign still six years away. He
also has five hundred and seventy five thousand dollars in
his Leadership Political Action Committee. Should he decide to run
for president, Murphy could transfer all ten point six million
to his presidential campaign committee. In the interim, he could
use some of that money and his American Mobilization Pack

(41:27):
to donate to fellow Democrats around the country who are
who he's campaigning with. In the last three months, for example,
Murphy used his pack to donate five thousand dollars apiece
to six Democrats running for US Senate. Those included Corey
Booker and Representative John Larson, which you may have heard

(41:49):
he endorsed last week.

Speaker 2 (41:51):
And now for the stupidest thing I read today, other
than me not.

Speaker 3 (41:54):
Being able to spell sciatica, this could.

Speaker 13 (42:02):
Very well be the person on the face of Leader.

Speaker 2 (42:09):
Senator an War.

Speaker 3 (42:12):
You might know that he posted a picture of himself
standing with a woman at the No King's rally this Saturday,
and in that picture it reads cholesterol do your job,
showing hamburger and fries on one side and fried chicken
on the other.

Speaker 2 (42:32):
Everyone knows what it meant.

Speaker 3 (42:35):
Everybody knew who he was talking about, and he smiled
about it.

Speaker 2 (42:41):
And with the.

Speaker 3 (42:41):
Political climate a state senator, and a physician should know better.
He knows exactly what's going on, and he has a
responsibility to keep the temperature down, not to add to it.

Speaker 2 (42:59):
And of course there was outrage over the weekend. I
was not outrage.

Speaker 3 (43:04):
I just simply called him a dumbass, because he is
a dumbass.

Speaker 2 (43:09):
You'd have to be.

Speaker 3 (43:10):
It's the only explanation as to why you would post
a picture like that smiling. They didn't put it on
his own page, but it got out that he was
in the picture. It was easy to see himself. He
didn't shield himself, he wasn't wearing an Antifa mask. God
bless him. But he knew what that sign meant. He
knew what it was. But what was the stupid thing?

(43:32):
What was the stupidest thing that he did? He wrote
this as a response. Some Republicans are pretending to be
outraged over a photo of me standing next to a
satirical sign at a no King's rally. Republicans are furious
over a joke, but silent when our democracy, our healthcare,

(43:52):
and our parent our planet is under attack.

Speaker 2 (43:55):
The outrage is a performative distraction.

Speaker 3 (43:58):
If they can't create ways to be mad about the
things that don't matter. Then people will start to realize
their positions on things that do matter. While they're busy
clutching pearls over a piece of poster board, families in
Connecticut are fighting for affordable healthcare, quality education, and fundamental
constitutional rights. The work continues whether the outrage machine approves

(44:23):
or not. Now, if I may say so, Senator, let
me get to this part of your statement. While they're
busy clutching their pearls over a piece of poster board,
families in Connecticut are fighting for affordable healthcare, quality, education,
and fundamental constitutional rights.

Speaker 2 (44:45):
Dumbass, Let me help you.

Speaker 3 (44:49):
Connecticut is a blue state, and you're a state senator,
and you've been a state senator for a while. Can
you explain to me, dumbass, how Connecticut residents could possibly
be fighting for affordable health care or equality education under

(45:10):
your party's watch. Can you explain that to me? You're
in charge, if you think about it. You've got the
purse strings, don't you. Unless I'm living in some sort
of alternative universe, nobody is clutching their pearls. What you

(45:31):
said and what you did was irresponsible. Don't put it
on us. We didn't post the picture, we didn't pose
for the picture, and you knew exactly what you were
doing when you did, and trying to pin the blame
on us, like we're outraged, Why aren't you, sir? Why

(45:52):
aren't you outraged? You should be outraged at yourself. Why
not even take a minute and say, you know what that.

Speaker 2 (46:00):
Was in poor taste?

Speaker 3 (46:02):
I apologize, which goes to show that as a physician,
as a state senator, you have poor judgment. I wouldn't
trust you with call syrup at this point. That's how
pathetic this statement is. Blaming others when you are in
a leadership position where you're supposed to take the l

(46:25):
you're supposed to claim responsibility. You're the person who's supposed
to lead your constituents by telling them that you're embarrassed
for them and you should apologize for them. I represented
you poorly in this picture. In no way should we
be joking about someone's passing, which is exactly what you

(46:48):
called it here.

Speaker 2 (46:49):
Dumbass.

Speaker 3 (46:51):
You said that it was a joke to wish the
death on someone. So instead of, as we said, just
admitting you were a dumb ass, you double down, which,
as far as i'm concerned solidifies my earlier point.

Speaker 2 (47:09):
You are a dumbass.

Speaker 3 (47:11):
Because you don't even see when you're wrong. You can't
even figure it out when you're wrong. You are of
the ivy league, you're smarter than the rest of us.
You are a physician. But the problem here is that
you're not a moral person deep down in your heart.

(47:32):
No matter what degrees you have, no matter what you've
accomplished in life, you have no heart, you have no soul.
This is despicable and you know it is. You know
deep down that this is despicable. Even Oakley docally has
come out and said that you need to apologize. This

(47:55):
isn't a conservative thing, sir. This is a moral thing.
And for a party that claims to be the moral
superior group that you couldn't even look at this and
say poor taste and move on because it doesn't have
to be as big as it is.

Speaker 2 (48:12):
Poor taste. It would be over. But now you want
to blame us saying that we have outrage.

Speaker 3 (48:19):
There's no outrage here, sir. We just demand an apology
and we're going to get it well, no offense. But
you're doubling down. What do you expect us to do?
But you're doubling down, right, you said that we're clutching
our pearls. Then we get this is faux anger. Okay, good,

(48:41):
we'll make it real anger now. Now we'll ask for
far more than an apology, that's all. We'll ask for
far more. And we'll ask all of your colleagues as well.
We'll go to them and we'll ask them whether or
not they condemn or they support you doubling down about
somebody's life. Will make sure that they all step up

(49:05):
and demand that you apologize, because now you're all in
it now, every Democrat in Connecticut who hasn't stepped up,
with the exception of you Oakley, you are.

Speaker 2 (49:18):
Right with me right now.

Speaker 3 (49:19):
You're all right with me if it's true you stepped
up and said that he should apologize, or right the
rest of you Democrats, you're on notice.

Speaker 2 (49:29):
Get in homeboy's ear.

Speaker 3 (49:31):
You know, if he's not at the hospital or the clinic,
you know, oh, why would he be at the hospital
or the clinic getting his head.

Speaker 2 (49:38):
Out of his ass? You know, surgical procedure, It takes
a couple of hours. He may be in recovery.

Speaker 3 (49:44):
But I think you should all get down there and
tell you, buddy, hey, make this go away now, because
as far as I'm concerned, the rest, if you are complicit,
you're all down. You guys don't want this. You don't
want to be a part of this. You never have
wanted to be a part of this. And now this
guy's put you in the middle of it. And now

(50:06):
he's called it about Republican outrage, which also says that
he is not the state senator of Republicans in his district.
He doesn't care about whether or not he's offended them.
He doesn't dare, he doesn't dare give a damn, And

(50:27):
so we're gonna make sure that he does. We understand
that he's a public servant. So we're going to get
him to serve the public, all of it, all of it,
the Republicans, the independents, the non voters, the people who
hate voting.

Speaker 2 (50:42):
All of them.

Speaker 3 (50:43):
We're going to get him to represent all of them
where you get him to say I'm sorry, my bad,
I could have done better. So you guys, get out there,
talk to your local officials, state senate representative.

Speaker 2 (51:02):
Ask them for a response.

Speaker 3 (51:04):
Do you support senator and war telling everybody that they're
clutching their pearls, dismissing them while we're trying to cool
the temperature down, while he is just seems to be
I don't know, pouring gasoline over the flame. Is this
what you support? Is this what you stand for? Is

(51:25):
it now fair game that we can start talking this way?
Because I think that what we're supposed to do is
that whenever we see this, we're supposed to step up
and say something about it. Right, we're supposed to put
an end to it. Whenever we see stuff like this,
we go no, no more. That's never to be tolerated,
no matter who it is. I'd love to know who

(51:46):
his folks are. I love to know who his folks are.
And it told him to write Republicans are furious over
a joke, because that's what he thinks this is. It's
a joke to wish death on someone. Ask him right

(52:08):
now whether or not I'm allowed? Am I allowed to
joke about that? Am I allowed to joke about that
with anyone? Be it him or the governor or anybody?
Am I allowed to do that? Would he accept it
from any of us? How would he respond? I think
we need to check his Maybe we should check his

(52:29):
ex posts maybe we should do a deep dive and
find out if he's ever been outraged at someone wishing
to death on another individual, on someone else's outrageous statements.
He doesn't post a lot, folks, so it shouldn't be
that hard. But I think we should go through revict.

Speaker 14 (52:44):
Now.

Speaker 3 (52:44):
I'll tell you exactly what's going to happen. The pressure
will build on this guy because this guy's me. He's
made of toilet paper. He's just gonna delete his ex account.
That's what he's gonna do when people start calling him out,
That's what we'll do. He'll he'll just delete it.

Speaker 2 (53:00):
He'll run.

Speaker 3 (53:03):
I mean, I look at this guy. I mean, he's
come on. This guy's not gonna he's not gonna stand firm.
He's not gonna push back. He will apologize, don't. I
don't wan anybody who think that he won't. He'll apologize.

Speaker 2 (53:15):
He will.

Speaker 3 (53:17):
We're gonna talk to State Senator Jeff Gordon about this
uh in in about a half an hour. We'll talk
to him about it and see what he says, say
what other what his other colleagues are saying, and we'll
get that quote. In fact, hold on, give me a second,
since we have the time. Let me see if I
can get there. I guess the paraphrase quote that we

(53:37):
got from him. Okay, who was email to me? Thank you, Adam,
I appreciate you. I think he just sent me the
audio of what's his name of Lamont condemning.

Speaker 2 (53:55):
This post.

Speaker 3 (53:56):
Okay, I gotta go here. Yeah, so I think he
did condemn. This is may Governor Lamont who's alleged to
be condemning the comments of senator and war And so
it's gonna take me a second to get here. And
I hope you guys will indulge me or at least
forgive me as it takes a second for me to
get to this page. Here, Come on, where are you?

(54:19):
I'm hoping this is it? Okay, women, I think I
got it. This is what I mean by when I say,
you know, skinning you There we go, Thank you.

Speaker 2 (54:29):
That took a second. Here it is Governor Lamont's comment.
I think this is it here.

Speaker 3 (54:33):
Let me see if I can get the audio to play.
Let me see if this.

Speaker 2 (54:38):
Is it here.

Speaker 10 (54:42):
Look there, I was in a couple of those rallies.
There are thousands of really good, strong positive signs about
you know, respecting our constitution and our laws. I thought
that sign was offensive and inappropriate, and he shouldn't have
been there next to that sign.

Speaker 2 (54:58):
I hope I think he regrets that. I hope he's to.

Speaker 15 (55:01):
Be taken and believe Senator Harding was hoping from the
Public Health Command.

Speaker 10 (55:07):
Let's see what his response is. I don't need people
jumping right now. Sometimes people make an honest mistake.

Speaker 3 (55:13):
Do you have any reactions? Well, we waited, dear Lamont,
and for those of you who are just joining us,
we read Senator Annwar's response to the as he put it,
faux outrage, saying, some Republicans are pretending to be outraged

(55:34):
over a photo of me standing next to a satirical
sign at No King at the No King's rally. He
didn't repeat it, he didn't repeat what the sign said.
Republicans are furious over a joke. He seems to know
exactly what people are.

Speaker 13 (55:48):
We're not.

Speaker 3 (55:48):
We're kind of embarrassed for you. I mean, at least
I am. I'm embarrassed for you because I think for
a man of your stature should know better, especially as
a physician. Maybe he's too stupid to get the irony
of this right. If I remember correctly, if somebody correct

(56:09):
me if I'm wrong. Isn't Senator Annwar a pulmonary physician, right?
And this guy is talking about someone dying from cholesterol
and he doesn't get like the outrageous to say he
should know better.

Speaker 2 (56:30):
First, do no.

Speaker 3 (56:31):
Harm, doctor Anwick, First do no harm. But if I may,
before we go to a break, I want to read
this for you. I saw this today. In August of
this year, Mark David Chapman went up for parole again

(56:55):
and I just read this and I was like, really,
Mark David Chapman, who killed John Lennon, was up for
parole again and he was denied, and go read the story.

Speaker 2 (57:09):
I want you to go read the story.

Speaker 3 (57:10):
He said something interesting that has never been told as
to why he killed John Lennon, and he said that
it was selfish. It was a selfish reason. I wanted
to be famous. And I think that's what all of
this is about. They want to be famous, they want

(57:36):
to be notorious, they want to be known. They're sick
and tired of living their little quiet lives will everybody
else is fond over, and they think of themselves as
so important. That's all we'll talk about. That we got
to take a break. We'll be back more news, more views.
We got Senator Jeff Gordon coming up real soon. It's

(57:57):
rees Ona Radio on WTIC news. Stock Tennady Melody asked
a question, now, I'm gonna read it and read it
now for you guys. That's just why I turned the
volume down on the show.

Speaker 2 (58:07):
Here's what she wrote.

Speaker 3 (58:09):
She says, after listening to your opening monologue, I'm wondering
if you feel the people at the No Kings protests
were all feeling the same way or were there people.

Speaker 2 (58:18):
Just going along with the narrative.

Speaker 3 (58:20):
Yeah, there were a lot of just hangers on at
this protest that were just there for the sake of
and if you talk and communicate with some of the folks,
they seem to be just repeating everything.

Speaker 2 (58:32):
That they heard on television.

Speaker 3 (58:34):
There was not the an original thought amongst any of them,
with the exception of the socialists, who, by the way,
only repeated the stuff that we have heard since the
fifties and sixties about socialism. There were no new ideas.
It was just the same idea. So that's pretty much
what it was. We're back, well, I was short back
Reese on the radio, WTIZ News Talk ten eighty. I

(58:56):
will get to the phones in a second. You know,
the gun theme on the left is growing. Last week
there was some audio that went now Don Lemon, who Again,
as I said in the opening, look, they want death
because they cannot win in the marketplace of ideas. They can't.

(59:20):
I'm sorry. I wish that they could, but they can't.
It's the reason why they're yelling. It's the reason why
they're shouting. It's the reason why when you show up
there and you ask people questions and you say why
are you here, and when they can't answer and they
don't know what they're talking about, they scream.

Speaker 2 (59:34):
And they Howard got out, got out. That's the reason why.

Speaker 3 (59:41):
And you know it's it's petulant, Yeah, sure it is,
But for these folks, it's it's not even stark, raving mad.

Speaker 2 (59:53):
It's just anger grown to a level. It says that. Look,
I can't debate you on what I belie. I know
I'm not in for.

Speaker 3 (01:00:01):
All I know is that I'm supposed to be out
here because this is the thing that my friends are doing.
This is what I don't know, This resistance. I mean,
that's what we're supposed to do right and are grant
angrier and angrier. And I'll get into the socialist part
of all all this because I spoke to them.

Speaker 2 (01:00:18):
Spoke to one of the people at PSL and she
was one of.

Speaker 3 (01:00:22):
The key speakers there, and I talked to her about
Mom Donnie, and I talked to her about the Communist
Party USA, about what how they feel about Democrats, which
you will not believe when I tell you, but this
is where they are.

Speaker 2 (01:00:38):
Don Lemon, former CNN.

Speaker 14 (01:00:40):
Host, Black people, brown people of all tripes, whether you're
an Indian American or a Mexican American and whoever you are.

Speaker 2 (01:00:48):
Go out in your play. Does Don Lemon have a lift?
I didn't know this notice that before? Do you have
a lift? I'm listen to it now and I'm just
going once.

Speaker 16 (01:01:00):
He said something like that, you live and get a
gun legally, get a license to carry legally, because when
you have people knocking on your door and taking you
away without due process.

Speaker 3 (01:01:14):
As a citizen, isn't that what the.

Speaker 2 (01:01:17):
Second Amendment was written for?

Speaker 3 (01:01:20):
What is he even talking about? If they come knocking
on your door, get a gun?

Speaker 2 (01:01:26):
What does that even mean? We know what it means.

Speaker 12 (01:01:29):
Go back and read what the Second Amendment says, and
perhaps it will knock some sense in the head in
the heads of these people who are saying, well, it's
all great. I don't believe they're doing it without due process.
They're asking people for papers, they're not.

Speaker 3 (01:01:42):
Now the bozo who's interviewing him, or is doing this
interview with him, if he had any guts, he would say,
don you do know what you're saying here?

Speaker 9 (01:01:50):
Right?

Speaker 2 (01:01:51):
Okay, let's let's not draw attention to yourself. All right.

Speaker 3 (01:01:55):
You're telling people that get a gun legally, but what
you're telling them to do is to use said gun
if people knock on their door meaning ice.

Speaker 2 (01:02:01):
Okay, this is a.

Speaker 3 (01:02:03):
Bit beyond the pale. Can we calm that hell down?

Speaker 2 (01:02:06):
Okay?

Speaker 3 (01:02:07):
Can we not contribute to this nonsense?

Speaker 2 (01:02:09):
All right?

Speaker 3 (01:02:10):
This is the reason why they're calling us violent. If
I don't check you, they know that I'm condoning this.
This is what's called co signing ladies and gentlemen. And
that's what just happened, and no one checks him. You
want to know why I told you? They can't handle
black folks. They're hard to operate.

Speaker 2 (01:02:27):
They just can't.

Speaker 3 (01:02:28):
So it doesn't let John don Lemon rambles screaming and
hollering a bunch of nonsense.

Speaker 2 (01:02:32):
You don't think it's nonsense? Wait? Wait, wait, remember when
I played the video last week.

Speaker 3 (01:02:36):
Of him having a discussion with the two people in
the street about you know, about misdemeanors and whether or
not that's illegal, not.

Speaker 12 (01:02:43):
Really beating people up. These people are doing things that
are illegal. Nobody is illegal. It is a mythdemeanor to
across the border.

Speaker 2 (01:02:51):
It's a mythdemeanor.

Speaker 3 (01:02:54):
Maybe he has a thing is maybe he has a
a a retainer in his mouth while he's talking.

Speaker 2 (01:03:02):
Let me get to the phones. Julie's in Boston, Hello, Boston, Julie.

Speaker 4 (01:03:07):
Hi?

Speaker 2 (01:03:08):
What's going on?

Speaker 9 (01:03:10):
These people?

Speaker 4 (01:03:11):
They're just so the our word, Okay, the our word,
And it's like, what do they think?

Speaker 17 (01:03:19):
All I think is like they can imagine. It's like
the Twilight zelling is like that test pattern, that swirly
thing on the screen, and we're.

Speaker 4 (01:03:27):
Like hypnotized, hypnotize. What do they think is gonna happen?

Speaker 17 (01:03:31):
If the cholesterol does this job? Then JD. Vance is
going to be the new president? Right?

Speaker 9 (01:03:37):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (01:03:37):
Who is devoutly Catholic?

Speaker 15 (01:03:39):
How do they like that?

Speaker 17 (01:03:41):
And he's gonna be the one we want next election anyway,
So we're still gonna get what we want. We're gonna
vote in him next election hopefully runs, and and and
we're getting what we want.

Speaker 2 (01:03:54):
Yeah. And the worst part about it is is like
you would think they would learn from recent history.

Speaker 3 (01:04:00):
After the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Turning Point us A
didn't diminish, it didn't dissolve.

Speaker 2 (01:04:06):
It grew exponentially.

Speaker 3 (01:04:08):
It's ridiculous the amount of growth that Turning Point USA
has had as a result of Charlie Kirk's death. So,
I mean, what did they think what they think was
gonna happen? And the people in Maga would just go, Okay,
I'm to go home.

Speaker 4 (01:04:19):
It's over, exactly.

Speaker 3 (01:04:23):
And it's not, Oh Julia, I'm losing your reason. You
wouldn't do a tunnel.

Speaker 2 (01:04:33):
Oh there you go.

Speaker 17 (01:04:34):
I'm still here. Okay, Catholic president, that's what they're gonna get.
How are they gonna like that, because you know that's
not gonna be good for their.

Speaker 2 (01:04:42):
Catholic who's not John F. Kennedy. I don't know how
they're dealing.

Speaker 17 (01:04:45):
With that.

Speaker 18 (01:04:47):
Exactly.

Speaker 17 (01:04:48):
And Heed nominee hopefully and we're going to vote for
him and he's going to be the next president.

Speaker 8 (01:04:54):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:04:54):
I think that's.

Speaker 3 (01:04:57):
I think that's exactly what's going to happen. Thank you
to let me get there a couple of more. Thank you,
dere Let's go to Hey, what's going on? Mark, what's
going on?

Speaker 9 (01:05:05):
Sir?

Speaker 11 (01:05:06):
Hey?

Speaker 5 (01:05:07):
Hey?

Speaker 4 (01:05:07):
So I rifled off a couple of emails after yesterday.

Speaker 2 (01:05:11):
And she and doctor doctor anwar Yes, so I think,
hold on, I think everybody's having this disconnection issue. Are
you still there?

Speaker 9 (01:05:25):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (01:05:25):
Yeah, much better, much better?

Speaker 4 (01:05:27):
Okay, so uh and then another one to uh Donnie
from the Department of Public Health.

Speaker 6 (01:05:35):
Okay, you know, she's got a lot to say, lots.

Speaker 4 (01:05:37):
Of PSAs and everything, so I figured I had one
of them, but especially uh Manisha, she's always had something
to say. Let's see if she has a response. But
the one thing I saw in that, well whatever that
apology ran.

Speaker 2 (01:05:51):
By the way.

Speaker 3 (01:05:52):
That that apology that I just ran, by the way,
for those of you who don't know, I got that
from Mark Mark from west Hard on the line.

Speaker 2 (01:05:58):
Now, was that an email to.

Speaker 4 (01:06:00):
You w T I C News, No, I got it
from w T I C.

Speaker 2 (01:06:03):
Oh Okay, w T I c okay, we were the
ones who got the official statement. Yeah yeah, oh okay,
I didn't even know I got it.

Speaker 4 (01:06:09):
So so the one part in there if you look
and he wrote, what did he say? Republicans and you
just said it a little while ago, I'm unaffiliated. He
thinks like some Republicans are outraged. No, and I had,
you know, threw a post on you know, directed at him.
I will email him to listen. I'm on affiliated, I'm
not maga, and I am totally outraged by that comment.

(01:06:33):
And as somebody who listens on a personal level, have
you ever witnessed ree? Have you ever written that?

Speaker 9 (01:06:39):
On TV?

Speaker 4 (01:06:39):
I know you watch a lot of uh it, you know,
police shows and medical shows. Have you ever witnessed CPR
of a loved one in front of you?

Speaker 2 (01:06:47):
Had to do it?

Speaker 3 (01:06:49):
Oh yeah, and you you the irony of that is mark.
I actually learned how to do it from watching TV.
But yes, I had to do it on my ex wife.

Speaker 9 (01:06:58):
Wow.

Speaker 4 (01:06:58):
So so she is a six percenter she survived. Yeah,
only six percent survive full cardiac arrest. My brother was
one of them.

Speaker 2 (01:07:06):
If you look, Oh, no, I was talking about CPR.
She actually wasn't breathing.

Speaker 3 (01:07:10):
She completely stopped breathing and I had to perform CPR
to bring to actually.

Speaker 2 (01:07:14):
Bring her back.

Speaker 4 (01:07:16):
Gotcha. But I'm talking about a full cardiac arrest, which
is let's break down that sign real quick.

Speaker 9 (01:07:22):
The only thing is, you.

Speaker 4 (01:07:22):
Can live with cholesterol for decades and die of something else. Right,
you can have a stench, you can have whatever. The
only thing that the only the only thing on that
sign I read in most of us would know, and
you don't have to be a medic or a doctor,
is that he was wishing a full cardiac arres due
to the nature of having a high cholesterol.

Speaker 2 (01:07:43):
Correct.

Speaker 4 (01:07:43):
It wasn't like, oh, I hope you have to go
on a STAT and then coke Q ten. No, he's
wishing gets to you. And what I want to get
back to is for those and you know what, I'm
sorry for anybody that.

Speaker 6 (01:07:53):
I'm talking to.

Speaker 4 (01:07:54):
I don't want to cause PSC. I probably did CPR
about a hundred times and I only had two successful saves,
as you know, as a team. Now let's say the
other ninety eight, and I'm just using that number. I
know it was more than one hundred, right, you know
they died and you know what you know, where they died,

(01:08:15):
usually at home in front of loved ones. It is
the most disturbing way for the family. Now it might
be peaceful for the victim that the sheis, but a
family member. I can't tell you how many spouses, mothers, fathers,
siblings you have to console once, you know, medics come

(01:08:36):
in take over, and it's an obvious you know, we're
you know, and for a doctor, a pullmanologist who you know,
let's face the pollmonology leads the cardiac events all the time,
and that just goes hand in hand lungs and art.
I just can't there's no satire there exactly.

Speaker 2 (01:08:56):
It's unique. It's unique to him.

Speaker 4 (01:08:59):
The comic.

Speaker 2 (01:09:00):
That's the part is that it's saying that this is
a joke.

Speaker 3 (01:09:03):
It's like we don't as if to suggest that we
don't understand the nuance of the poster right, your career
as a physician wishing that on, I mean, you understand
what's saying something like that implies because of your profession,
not just that you're a doctor, for crying out loud,
it's the profession of which you practice medicine.

Speaker 2 (01:09:24):
So to say that we get the nuance and we
know exactly what you meant.

Speaker 3 (01:09:29):
So to suggest that we're outraged inappropriately or for no
reason whatsoever is ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (01:09:36):
And he knows it.

Speaker 4 (01:09:38):
And again, for those people who did interpret it the
way it should be interpreted, I'm sorry because I think
that was awful because guess what Jeb dunpod is a
little bit of PTSD. Not for I'm fine, you know,
I did my job. Family members, let me tell you
a full cardiac arrest. I mean, let's say Trump dropped

(01:09:58):
the full cardiac arrect You know what traumatic Dad is
for all those people around him, his family, secret Service,
whoever has to do CPR. That's the only way. So
I want you to you might dig it to stretch
anybody out there. Of course, there's some liberals listening, you know, like, oh,
that's not what he meant. There's no other way to
interpret it.

Speaker 2 (01:10:16):
Exactly.

Speaker 4 (01:10:16):
I want to repeat that taken a staaten isn't going
to affect the presidency. He was looking for a full
cardiac arrest.

Speaker 2 (01:10:23):
And that exactly no problem.

Speaker 10 (01:10:27):
Man.

Speaker 3 (01:10:27):
I appreciate you, And again, I just I just want
to reiterate that everybody knows what he meant.

Speaker 2 (01:10:33):
Everybody does. For him to suggest that that it wasn't.

Speaker 3 (01:10:37):
In fact, let's go one step further, and I'll say
this before we go to break even Senator Anwar. Doctor
Anwar knows that he didn't mean something else because he
said Republicans are furious over a joke. He doesn't say,
I meant this and they interpreted it this way. He
knows exactly what the joke was, because if indeed we

(01:11:01):
didn't get it, he'd explain it. What I was trying
to say was this. But then he immediately said, and
this is the great part, but silent when our democracy,
our healthcare, ironically, and our planet are under attack, he writes,
saying that I'm just joking about the president dying. What's

(01:11:22):
more important are these things, and that's what.

Speaker 2 (01:11:25):
You should be outraged about. Folks.

Speaker 3 (01:11:30):
Don't worry about it. He'll apologize whether or not it's
fake or phony, but he will.

Speaker 2 (01:11:36):
That's okay. I like to say he will come to heal.

Speaker 4 (01:11:41):
They like that word.

Speaker 2 (01:11:43):
We'll come back, more news, more views, and then we've
got traffick of weather coming up. It's Reesa on the
radio on WTI. See news stock Dandy.

Speaker 14 (01:11:48):
Our Mexican American and whoever you are, go out in
your play where you live and get a gun legally,
get a life.

Speaker 2 (01:11:58):
At least he say, go get a gun legally.

Speaker 3 (01:12:00):
That was Don Lemon, of course, last week, talking about
what the people on the left need to do. Oh nadda,
I just heard an incredible story. Let me see if
I can actually play it for you. Just came across
the wire.

Speaker 19 (01:12:12):
Let me see you turning that a convicted felon was
allegedly planning to shoot up the Atlanta Airport today, the
world's busiest airport, armed with an AR fifteen, and that
suspect reportedly did get inside the airport before police quickly
stopped him. So here's a live look at Hartsville, Jackson
right now.

Speaker 2 (01:12:31):
And here's what we know.

Speaker 19 (01:12:32):
Our affiliate source says that this fella did a FaceTime
call with family members, allegedly telling them his plans to
shoot up the Atlanta Airport. Someone reportedly notified police after
that call, who then found the suspect's car outside of
the airport. It was blocking traffic, but the suspect was
not inside. Police reportedly did end up finding the felon inside.

Speaker 2 (01:12:54):
Of the airport.

Speaker 19 (01:12:55):
They grabbed him, took him into custody, and authorities reportedly
found that ar fifteen while searching his car. Our Fox
affiliate is also reporting that they had a camera at
the airport all morning. It was very busy and nobody
saw anything, So it seems this whole incident was kept
pretty quiet. But we're hoping to learn more from APD
very soon.

Speaker 3 (01:13:14):
And it's nice to know that people hear that stuff
and contacted the police. Atlanta Airport goodness gracious, and it
is probably the busiest. I'm not gonna lie, but I
still work for a company called Logistics Worldwide. If our
shipments had to take a connector to Atlanta, oh, we

(01:13:35):
knew what would happen if you if you've been to
Atlanta Airport, you know Roland you've had I know you've
at least flown in and out of Atlanta a few times.

Speaker 2 (01:13:42):
And when you were in music right, Oh absolutely? Oh man.

Speaker 3 (01:13:46):
That place whose hub is there is that Delta's I
think Delta Airlines their hub is there.

Speaker 2 (01:13:52):
They've got like eighty five gates. Atlanta Airport is a
is a journey. It is it's a amazing like that,
you know, it's that massive.

Speaker 3 (01:14:04):
You would think anywhere else in the world would have
a you know, like a Los Angeles or San Francisco
or even Tho Orlando for that matter, which, by the way,
I'm even though I think it's cool, I think it's
absolutely annoying that Orlando's airport has a tram to go from.
Have you ever been to Mco that they have a
tram that goes Oh? Yeah, and I know it's Yeah,

(01:14:27):
it's very Disney exactly. It's it's all in associated with
Disney World. But I hate that tram because if you
are late, that tram doesn't come to you. Oh I've
been I remember being pressured to get to that on time.

Speaker 10 (01:14:40):
Man.

Speaker 3 (01:14:41):
Yeah, well I try to be. But when you got kids,
you know you're gonna be late everywhere. Yeah, dragging them.

Speaker 2 (01:14:48):
Can we get something to eat? I'm starving. I need
some food. I'm tired. Can you carry me?

Speaker 13 (01:14:53):
No, Yeah, I'd be like, don't ask me for none
until we get to the destination.

Speaker 2 (01:14:58):
Yeah you got yeah, be good.

Speaker 3 (01:15:00):
To go, Yeah, Zach says, Yes. Delta is the main
hubbit at Atlanta. I'm almost certain it's eighty five gates there,
maybe eighty eighty five gates.

Speaker 13 (01:15:10):
I mean, I know Atlanta Airport brings in a lot
of uh wealthy, wealthy folks.

Speaker 2 (01:15:15):
Yeah, I would imagine. I'm almost certain.

Speaker 3 (01:15:17):
In fact, I'll double check because it's like it's it's incredible.

Speaker 2 (01:15:23):
The Cedia monagates that Delta has there alone.

Speaker 3 (01:15:27):
Let's get our first check of weather in traffic plus
some news. Mark Christopher, he is back and he is
at the VPS traffic center.

Speaker 2 (01:15:34):
How are we doing, sir? Happy Monday? Say you say
you very much.

Speaker 1 (01:15:37):
It's on the radio, brind don't say we didn't more
than you on News Talk ten eighty w T I see, I.

Speaker 3 (01:15:46):
See congratulations, goes to Denise be in prospect. She is
the recipient of the dozen bagels a month for six
months courtesy between Rounds. The Bagel Bakery and Sandwich Cafe

(01:16:07):
located in South Windsor, Vernon and Manchester, and is also.

Speaker 2 (01:16:12):
The location where I will be having breakfast every.

Speaker 3 (01:16:14):
Morning, I promise you. But anyway we'll talk about that,
don't forget. You can also participate by going to Reese
on the radio dot com. That's our e E S
E on the radio dot com. You can put in
your information there. Make sure your telephone number and your
baby data birth is located on that entry and you

(01:16:38):
must live in the state of Connecticut. You cannot have
won in the last six months, but you can apply
as many times as you like, and you will be
told in an email that you are the recipient, and
of course you will come here every time at four
or five to hear your name called if you have won. Also,
you can help out the folks at the Connecticut Food
Share by picking up a bacon, egg and cheese, Chipotle

(01:17:00):
mayo and avocado, or as they call it, the Becca.
Fifty cent of each purchase goes to the Connecticut Food Share,
So if you'd like to help, you can do that
as well. When you get down to between rounds, our
proud sponsor and our good friends we call him family Already.
When we come back, Senator Jeff Gordon is going to
join us from the thirty fifth district. We will talk

(01:17:21):
to him about what's going on with this case with
the Senator and why, and of course the no King's rally,
some opinions on. That's a standby for that. We'll talk
about a whole bunch of other stuff as well. Let
me say, coming up, I want to just lay down
a few things that we're gonna talk about. One, Yes,
about the new substack. If you haven't seen it, it's

(01:17:41):
for some reason, like people are taking to it. It's
got over fifteen hundred likes, and I guess reader, so
thank you for that. Also, we'll talk about a guy
by the name of Tucky Tucker Saals or is that
like to call him Biggie Sauls.

Speaker 2 (01:17:58):
We'll explain that later. Uh, so you can understand what
I'm talking about. Uh and I still see you. Why
aren't you hiding? I'll explain to you what that means
later on the show.

Speaker 3 (01:18:11):
Go nowhere, let's get another check of whether in traffic
Mark Christopher he is back.

Speaker 2 (01:18:15):
He is in the VPS traffic center.

Speaker 1 (01:18:17):
He sir, it's Reese on the radio on news Talk
ten WT.

Speaker 2 (01:18:21):
I see. Let's get right to it.

Speaker 3 (01:18:23):
On the phone with us is Senator of the thirty
fifth District, Senator Jeff Gordon's on the line.

Speaker 2 (01:18:29):
How are you, sir? Welcome back.

Speaker 9 (01:18:31):
I'm doing very well. Thank you for having me back.
I hope you're doing well.

Speaker 2 (01:18:34):
I am trying my best.

Speaker 3 (01:18:36):
Every day above ground is a good one, as they
all say, sir, So Senator, let's let's let's get to it.
Have you seen Senator AWA's response to this despicable photo.

Speaker 6 (01:18:50):
Yes, I have read it.

Speaker 2 (01:18:52):
Talk to me a little bit about.

Speaker 3 (01:18:55):
What you would like to say as a physician yourself,
your wife is a physician.

Speaker 2 (01:18:59):
I said early year, he should no better, first, do
no harm. What's your take on this?

Speaker 3 (01:19:06):
Just one as a public a public servant in Connecticut
with political sort of violence, which we're very concerned about,
but political rhetoric which is also sort of fueling that.

Speaker 2 (01:19:18):
What say you?

Speaker 9 (01:19:21):
Well, first and foremost, many people and myself included, found
the picture offensive and inappropriate. And I did read the response,
and I also read some response that came out from
the Connecticut Senate Democrats, and I was looking for an apology,
and I think the public is and none of us

(01:19:42):
saw an apology. In fact, while we saw really was
this offhand dismissal of what happened and referring to it
as a joke. And I can tell you people I'm
speaking with don't view.

Speaker 6 (01:19:56):
This as a joke.

Speaker 9 (01:19:57):
There's no joke at all, wishing that of any United
States president. As a senator, I know that, and as
a doctor, I know that. I really hope that the
Senate Democrats stopped being hypocritical when they talk about opposing
political violence and hate speech and actually apologize for this.

(01:20:19):
I've actually called out people in both parties who have
spoken on things that I thought were hateful and we
should be working together and not trying to do things
like we saw in that post with that picture. That's
not what the public wants, and quite frankly, the public
doesn't deserve it.

Speaker 3 (01:20:36):
What do you say, too many on the riot or
MAGA folks who have often said to me on this
very program that they can't apologize for things like this because.

Speaker 17 (01:20:50):
It would.

Speaker 3 (01:20:52):
Alienate the base or the new base of the Democrat Party. Look,
I went out there at a No King's rally in
San Antonio, Texas on Saturday, and it was commonplace for
people to walk around with shirts and signs that say
eighty six forty seven showing tombstones, sentiments like senator and

(01:21:14):
war was displaying, and it was commonplace.

Speaker 2 (01:21:17):
Not one person seemed to denounce it.

Speaker 3 (01:21:19):
So perhaps there is a sense of within the party
of the Democrat Party that they can't they have to
double down or else people will, you know, I guess,
sort of ignored them or push them aside.

Speaker 9 (01:21:34):
I agree. I think there is that as well, very much.
So it's sad and unfortunate. I had some folks who
were Democrats, who are Democrats try to call me out
about why it wasn't diet No King's rally in one
of the towns in my district, and I said, look,
you're constitutionally protected right to protest, to do it peacefully

(01:21:55):
and respectfully. Where was I when No King's rallies were happening.
I was at she had a breast cancer awareness walk,
trying to save lives by raising money for breast cancer research.
So I can see the political aspect of why they're
not calling out their own but at some point you
have to take a look and say, why would you

(01:22:16):
be calling for the death of any president? That crosses
a line when calling for someone's death, no matter who
the person is. And that's why I think conton sense people,
regardless of their political affiliations, wants to see the Democrats
apologize for what was done, and in fact, doubling down

(01:22:38):
and not giving an apology just adds insult to injury
and that's not what the public wants. And I think
there's going to be a growing backlash from people out
there who do not like what happened, and don't want
to see the Democrats you go down that road. There's
a different way to do it. And my Republican colleagues

(01:22:59):
and I always try to be respectful here in Connecticut
as best as we can. And you don't see us
doing stunts like that.

Speaker 3 (01:23:06):
Do you think there's a form of desperation on the
Democrat side? And if i'd like to play an audio
SoundBite for you, because you know, of course we're going
to be covering the mayoral election in New York City
and as I've realized in this note King's rally that
there was an extreme far left sentiment there aside from

(01:23:27):
the socialism, there was a violent sort of you know,
faction within the group that no one seemed to denounce
this and I think this, but I want to play this.

Speaker 2 (01:23:35):
This is Mario Cuomo on Morning Joke, Sorry, Morning Joe.

Speaker 3 (01:23:41):
He was talking about he was talking about the left
today in talking now again, Andrew Cuomo is a Democrat,
He's I mean, we're talking about traditional democrat. Let's get
I want to get your sort of point of view
on the other side of this statement.

Speaker 2 (01:23:56):
Here's him on Morning Joke this morning.

Speaker 8 (01:23:58):
What you're seeing is the tension in the Democratic Party
between the far left and the quote unquote mainstream. And
that's an important dynamic, Joe, because that's the future of
the Democratic Party, and this extreme left is taking the

(01:24:21):
Democratic Party out of the mainstream, and we see it
over and over again now again.

Speaker 2 (01:24:29):
I mean, I think he is absolutely on the mark.

Speaker 3 (01:24:33):
And what I mean by that is, as we're discussing here,
the reason why Senator Anhwhar or why rank and file
Democrats can't denounce it or demand an apology from him,
is because they know that in essence, the far left
party has taken control. I mean, even Governor Lamont said
that during an interview with Bloomberg. He said that, you know,

(01:24:53):
people are looking at him like he's never been a
lifelong Democrat.

Speaker 2 (01:24:56):
They almost view him as a Republican.

Speaker 9 (01:24:58):
Now, yes, and that's the reality of what we see.
I mean, look at more and more the rhetoric that's
been coming out. And I'm not blaming all the Democrats.
What it is is there is this far left, somewhat
militant way. You can call them socialist communists. However, the

(01:25:19):
mayoral candidate in New York wishes to call themselves on
any given day. But you see that more and more,
and the problem is that you'll have a lot more
of the mainstream traditional Democrats not recognizing their party and
not wanting to be involved, you know with that. And

(01:25:40):
I see that in people in my own district, the
thirty fifth I have thirteen towns in Northeast. I hear
this from people. The problem with that is is that
if they you know, the longer, they can't sell what
they're out there peddling because the traditional Democrats don't want
to be like that and don't recognize that type of politics.

(01:26:03):
I think what you're going to see that they're going
to ramp it up more and more and more. We
see that, for example, with the way that Senator Murphy
has been behaving after he was re elected to the
US Senate. So pandering to the basel like that doesn't
get you anywhere. But what it is is going to
be very divisive, very disruptive, and it's going to create

(01:26:24):
some long term problems for the vast majority of people
who truly want to work together. They get things done,
but then get attacked by people in their own party
for wanting to do something common sense.

Speaker 3 (01:26:37):
Yeah, we're on the line with Senator Jeff Gordon of
the thirty fifth. You know, Senator, what you just said
I experienced in going to that No Kings rally in
San Antonio. In talking with them, I spoke to a
young lady who is part of a PSL. It's another
communist group and they have more of sort of a
national perspective. They don't really run candidates, but they they

(01:26:59):
watch they're very watchful of uh socialism within the party.
And I asked a very simple question, is that, are
you guys taking over.

Speaker 2 (01:27:09):
The Democrat Party.

Speaker 3 (01:27:10):
I've seen your you know, your voices grow, your your
existence grow.

Speaker 2 (01:27:14):
Within the Democrat Party.

Speaker 3 (01:27:16):
Do you feel like Democrats are starting to seed ground
to you in order to stay elected.

Speaker 2 (01:27:22):
Her response to that was immediate.

Speaker 3 (01:27:24):
She was like, yes, they have to recognize that we're coming,
because we're growing in numbers.

Speaker 2 (01:27:28):
But then she said something that completely blew my mind,
and that is.

Speaker 3 (01:27:34):
They see rank and file Democrats as much as their
enemy as they do conservative or maga folks.

Speaker 9 (01:27:44):
Well, you know, the reality is is that when we're
you know, when you when you become desperate, you try
to you know, not just use the same playbook, but
you just amp it up and keep amping it up again,
hoping you can sell it, but you're just creating more division.
You're turning more people away, and that's what we're seeing

(01:28:05):
right now, and that's unfortunate. And you know, I can
tell you for the vast majority, overwhelming the majority, not
nearly all of my constituents do not like it and
do not want to see it and are scratching their
heads asking when is it going to stop? But I
don't see that part of the Democratic Party stopping. They're

(01:28:27):
just really out there militant. And that's extremely concerning because
that's when you see more political violence, sure, and more
advocating for things like hoping a president dies. And you know,
we've seen already political violence. We've just recently heard there
might have been another attempt to assassinate President Trump when

(01:28:47):
they down in Florida with with somebody setting up a
hunting stand with access shooting, access to air force one.
These are the serious consequences, and you know, this is
what has a lot of people concern and unfortunately it's
silencing a lot of common sense out there because people
don't want to be attacked, especially physically.

Speaker 3 (01:29:08):
Yes, and you know what that's you're so right on
that that there is this fear that I see of
just fair minded people to even push back.

Speaker 2 (01:29:19):
Look, I've seen this in so many other ways. I've
seen it, you know.

Speaker 3 (01:29:22):
I've always asked the question, like, why is it in
the black community that they are you know that they
you know, as a black man myself, I've seen them
more enraged at things like government and systemic racism, but
yet a sort of never pushed back on drug violence
and gang violence in their community. And when you talk
to them privately or off the microphone, they tell you
it's like, look, we can't fight against those guys.

Speaker 2 (01:29:42):
They'll kill us. And I kind of feel like that's
sort of it's sort of a degree of that.

Speaker 3 (01:29:47):
Is what's happening in the Democratic Party because they're saying,
we can't really push back on these guys because you
don't know what they'll do. Let me ask you a
final question before I let you go, Senator, do you're
and you're old enough to know this, maybe you're much
younger man at the time, but did you see any
uh parallels to what we saw with groups like the

(01:30:08):
Black Panther Party and the Weather Underground and that radical
movement during the sixties and seventies, that's comparable to today?
Are you seeing when we're talking about political violence? Are
we seeing the same kind of thing?

Speaker 9 (01:30:20):
Do you think? I think we're seeing going down a
path towards that if you have more of these radical
groups become more militant and amp up their message and
try to get their way across or make their way
happen by committing more and more violence. And that's my

(01:30:41):
concern that there's already a start of it, and we
do not want to get to those days when that
was just horrific what was going on back then. Not
that it's bad enough now, certainly with the violence is
a serious concern, but yes, you have to be concerned
about that. You have to be concerned and so ways
will history repeat itself? And that's why really it takes

(01:31:05):
elected officials, first of all, not to do things that
are absolutely inappropriate, absolutely, but also work in a bipartisan
way to bring the temperature down and call out those
people who are doing those types of things and letting
the vast majority of people who who want to speak
their minds and don't want to participate in that radicalism,

(01:31:28):
let their voices be more and more heard and hopefully
we can swing it back towards the middle. But we
have to be concerned if this continues along that path.
And you're right about history, and we don't want to
repeat history. We should have learned from history.

Speaker 11 (01:31:45):
Senator.

Speaker 3 (01:31:45):
Last question, I know that was the last one, but
I got to ask you this, just because Senator Anwar
is a colleague of yours.

Speaker 2 (01:31:52):
Will you be reaching out to him personally? Do you
have any intent to do that?

Speaker 9 (01:31:57):
He is a colleague of mine, and I do also
work with him in the in the Senate as well
and on the public health. So I'm not trying to,
you know, assassinate his character in any way. But will
I at some point, I don't know.

Speaker 6 (01:32:13):
I really am hopeful that others.

Speaker 9 (01:32:16):
In his own party will be speaking to him, but
also speaking to others in the Democratic Party about you know,
be careful of your words, be careful.

Speaker 6 (01:32:24):
Of your actions.

Speaker 9 (01:32:25):
They have serious consequences. But I haven't yet spoken with him,
and also I don't want to necessarily add fuel to
the fire.

Speaker 13 (01:32:33):
You don't have to.

Speaker 2 (01:32:34):
I mean I think that look as a colleague of yours,
you don't even have to. You can keep it off
the record. I just think that people.

Speaker 3 (01:32:40):
Look, one of the biggest problems that we have today
is that there is a lack of communicated communication between
our elected officials, other than to be grand standing in
front of the cameras, to give him a call and
just say, listen, this is this doesn't affect Republican or Democrat.
What you said was reprehensible. Let's cool down the temperature
together and put out us and it says this is

(01:33:00):
wrong and it should never happen again, and just say
that to a private point.

Speaker 9 (01:33:04):
And I don't have a problem, you know, doing that
and talking with him. We'll see how things go. And
what I also I'm hoping is that this is a
moment of reset for a lot of people and we
can pull back from all this political nonsense that quite frankly,
should have no place in what we do, especially what

(01:33:27):
we do here in Connecticut.

Speaker 17 (01:33:29):
So yeah, I agree with see you.

Speaker 9 (01:33:31):
It's very concerning and it can't be dismissed and it
can't be overlooked or swept under the rug.

Speaker 3 (01:33:37):
Exactly right, because again, in essence, we're giving license to
more of it. You know, if they're allowed to just
ignore it and just say it's a one off or
it's no big deal, so good point, Senator Jeff Gordon.

Speaker 2 (01:33:48):
I appreciate your time. Thank you so much for being
a part of the show.

Speaker 17 (01:33:52):
Thank you very much.

Speaker 9 (01:33:53):
I appreciate you taking the time.

Speaker 2 (01:33:54):
You got it. We'll take some well, we'll get you
back here as soon as we can.

Speaker 3 (01:33:57):
Thank you, sir, anytime. All right, sir, all right, Senator
Jeff Gordon of the thirty fifth and uh, we'll take
your phone calls. Eighteen zero five two two w T
I see eight six zero five two two nine eight
four two and I think I and I say to Republicans,
I know that we're gonna make this a public thing.
We're going to talk about it in the news media.
We're gonna put out press releases. But you know what,

(01:34:19):
you know what would be bold. Get on the phone
with the senator. Get on the phone with senator and
Warren say to him, come on, man, come on, you
can apologize so we can get we can get past
this and get to the business of governing.

Speaker 2 (01:34:35):
That's what they should do. Get on the phone, guys.

Speaker 3 (01:34:39):
Let's take another check of whether in traffic mark Christopher,
he's in the BPS traffic center.

Speaker 1 (01:34:43):
Hey, sir, all right, stay locked in race on the
radio is on w T I see news.

Speaker 3 (01:34:53):
What am I supposed to do during this one? I
totally forgot what I was supposed to do during here.
Oh yeah, the website, you gotta go to Reese on
the Radio dot com. That's our E E S E
on the Radio dot com. Go there so you can
check out my substack today. It is titled Chris what's
his name?

Speaker 2 (01:35:10):
Talking about?

Speaker 3 (01:35:11):
Of course Chris Murphy and altho the attention that he's
been trying to get, uh, you know, on the national stage.
I found something interesting speaking of which and I looked
it up and I went wow. So this weekend, as
you all know, was the No King's rally in all

(01:35:31):
fifty states. And I started looking at this and I
went Who's speaking in DC? And I saw a couple
of people.

Speaker 2 (01:35:44):
Bernie Sanders was there, and so was Chris Murphy.

Speaker 3 (01:35:52):
And I kept saying to myself, everybody is that their
own states No King's Rally to show support for their
local constituents, But not Chris Murphy and not Jamie Raskin either.
Jamie Raskin was in Philadelphia.

Speaker 9 (01:36:15):
And he.

Speaker 3 (01:36:17):
Is a representative from Maryland. Bernie Sanders, he spoke in DC,
and so did Chris Murphy.

Speaker 2 (01:36:24):
I thought that was odd that Chris Murphy wouldn't go home.

Speaker 3 (01:36:32):
Twenty five thousand people showed up, and all of the
protests in Connecticut weren't there forty There were forty in
the whole state. Hartford had the largest of all, and
Chris Murphy didn't show up. That just seems odd to me.

(01:36:55):
I don't know why, but it does. Somebody's got to
explain to me, like, why wouldn't he h DC off
all places? Wasn't at home? Okay, I guess, I guess
that's what you do. So check out the substack. Make

(01:37:16):
sure do you become a subscriber. If not, follow me
on X just look up Rees on the radio and
you can get the article every Sunday as well. And
we'll continue to talk about him in the coming days, weeks, years.
I'm sure we're gonna talk about him. I got so
much stuff to cover when it comes to that guy. Also,

(01:37:38):
we'll talk about Tucker Sauls. Well, I'm not calling Biggie
sauls now. We'll talk about him. If you haven't heard
about him, he did the most despicable thing today. Oh
Tucker Saws. It's an interesting dude, talk about him and
much much more. Stand by, we'll take your phone calls

(01:38:00):
as well. Mark Christopher, he's in the BP Astracted Center.

Speaker 2 (01:38:04):
Hey, sir, she huh huh? What did you say?

Speaker 3 (01:38:14):
Maybe he was trying to get some audio audio were
trying to get audio for for for Biggie Sauls.

Speaker 2 (01:38:21):
Is that what you're Biggie sa, Biggie Sauls.

Speaker 3 (01:38:24):
Here's this here's this guy who's here's this guy in
I think he said, I can't remember where he is,
but he says some really really awful things about a
mother who was mourning the death of her child.

Speaker 2 (01:38:33):
This guy's wait till you hear the story. It's absolutely insane. Yeah,
the people there he is, that's the only Biggie I know.
There you go, Biggie Sauls. He looks like Biggie Draws.
To be honest with Biggie Draws. The n W A
c P calls him. I don't think I'm allowed to

(01:38:55):
read this.

Speaker 4 (01:38:56):
It's on the radio.

Speaker 1 (01:38:57):
Let's just say some people are not fans News Talk
to eighty w T I series.

Speaker 3 (01:39:04):
I figured because the story and I'm about to tell
about Piggy Sauls Uh Tucker Saws.

Speaker 14 (01:39:09):
That is uh.

Speaker 3 (01:39:11):
It involves the the town of Simsbury. It is only
appropriate to go to our good friend Simsbury Joe.

Speaker 2 (01:39:18):
Who's on the line. How are you, sir?

Speaker 9 (01:39:21):
I'm doing well.

Speaker 6 (01:39:21):
How are you today?

Speaker 2 (01:39:22):
I try my best buddy, long time? No hear from
how are you?

Speaker 9 (01:39:25):
I mean?

Speaker 2 (01:39:26):
Other than that, what's going on with you?

Speaker 9 (01:39:29):
Uh?

Speaker 15 (01:39:30):
Well?

Speaker 6 (01:39:30):
I was going to pipe in on whatever you said
about Biggie Sauls, but I can uh. Do you want
to talk about it?

Speaker 9 (01:39:36):
And then I can pipe in?

Speaker 2 (01:39:38):
Or well, okay, did you did you want to reference
to this story?

Speaker 9 (01:39:44):
I would like to.

Speaker 6 (01:39:45):
There's another thing I'd like to talk about that's different
from that story.

Speaker 3 (01:39:50):
But no, no, no, let's do no, no, let's do
the story that you wanted to call about. I just
wanted to get you on because I know you've been
holding I can hold off on the Sauls story.

Speaker 2 (01:39:57):
What did you want to talk about?

Speaker 15 (01:40:00):
Well?

Speaker 6 (01:40:01):
I wanted to talk about a study that I just
read because I think it's extremely alarming.

Speaker 9 (01:40:06):
And it's alarming from the standpoint of it falls in
that category of as smart as I like to think
I am, sometimes I don't know how we solve this story. Okay,
So the study has to do with what came out
about a week or so ago, massive study about the

(01:40:27):
number of teenagers that have relationships online with AI chatbox.

Speaker 2 (01:40:34):
Ooh, great study, great study. Okay, talk to me about this.
What's your take on this study? I read it. I
read it briefly over the weekend, but this is really
really good.

Speaker 6 (01:40:48):
It scares me because as we talk about what we're
seeing in terms of our political environment and using no
Kings as an example, and a lot of other things
is going on in the world to now think that
young people are being manipulated in numbers like that by

(01:41:09):
non humans. And I'm not anti AI in any way,
but I read something I don't think it was in
that study, but somewhere else where, you could have one
chatbot where, let's say, you know, even me as an adult,
an older adult, that chatbot can start to communicate with
me online in one of the social media platforms, and

(01:41:32):
it could have up to thirty seven different personalities or identities.
So now you know, I've been through the world, so
you know, I know what to look out for, But
to think about a young person who is you know,
thirteen through seventeen being manipulated thinking that they've created a

(01:41:55):
new friend and these things. And I know some people
who may not be famili with it, may not really
realize they are. So okay, I'll tell you this way.
So when Facebook started, Facebook was so successful because it
hired the top minds in neuroscience and psychology to guide

(01:42:18):
people to use the platform more and to guide their thinking.
Right now it's even more advanced. So now what you
have is you have someone who may have gone on
there to talk to a chat on, knowing it's a
chat on, and asking them a question that they might
want to ask a friend or a psychologist, or a
parent or a teacher. And now they start to create

(01:42:39):
a back and forth relationship where that ai chat bon
has figured out their personality even better than that person
knows themselves. So now you're opening the whole world up
to manipulation, ranging from things such as self harm to
the way that they see the world and what they

(01:43:00):
believe their responsibility is to. You know, eighty six forty
seven were join a group that wants to overthrow the government.
The brainwashing that's going on right now is staggering. It's
it's indescribable.

Speaker 2 (01:43:15):
Yeah, audience, you're right on point with this.

Speaker 3 (01:43:20):
And I think the importance of this, of this piece
not that they missed it, but they only they only
sort of dabbled in it. And it was the first
thing I thought about when I when I read it.
So when I'm using GROC, I asked Roc a simple question.
When I started using her, I just would ask it
a simple question, right, how many people were at this

(01:43:41):
particular rally on Sunday?

Speaker 2 (01:43:43):
And it would it would aggregate all of the answers that.

Speaker 3 (01:43:47):
Are you know, going online and then give me its
answer based upon all of the information that gathered.

Speaker 2 (01:43:54):
And then I started going okay.

Speaker 3 (01:43:57):
I started telling GROC, no bs, just the facts, no spin,
is this really the number?

Speaker 2 (01:44:05):
And sure enough GROC comes back and says, You're right,
no more spin. It was really this number. And so
I would ask why did it give me the former?

Speaker 6 (01:44:16):
Right?

Speaker 2 (01:44:16):
Why did you give me that number?

Speaker 3 (01:44:18):
And then it expressed to me that that was the
sort of the the sort of the theme, if you will,
of that particular question.

Speaker 2 (01:44:26):
It was going along to get along. This is what
everyone is saying online. This is what all of the
news reports were suggesting. It was just giving me that
honest answer.

Speaker 3 (01:44:35):
But then when I pressed it to give me something
without the BS, without the filter, just straight facts, then
it changed its mind and says, oh, you were right.

Speaker 2 (01:44:44):
It isn't that number. It's really this number.

Speaker 3 (01:44:46):
So what you're pointing out, and I think this is
where the dangerous part of that comes in, is that
the person who is dealing with that AI isn't dealing
with it in a way that I did. It didn't
force to give me the bare facts without the spin.
Someone is just asking for an answer. And the relationship

(01:45:07):
is key because that's kind of the mindset of these
younger people. The reason why they have a better relationship
online than they do with actual people is because they
don't know how to deal with actual people. And now,
when you give them something that appears sentient, and that's
the draw here, that appears sentient, that will cater to
their needs no matter what it is, that will in

(01:45:29):
essence give them that sort of that participation trophy.

Speaker 2 (01:45:33):
Feel you're smart, your special, you know what you think matters.

Speaker 3 (01:45:39):
Once that goes in, it's true that particular model could
talk you into the worst possible place mentally for a
mindful of mush which could be I mean it could
be dangerous. You could have that person who either will
self harm or harm others because it is an essence.

(01:46:00):
It's a wild West, so to speak. Not that the
thing is sentient, but it's so reckless in that wild
wild West.

Speaker 6 (01:46:08):
So I know someone, and I know they're not listening,
so I can say this. It's a female who has
had some troubling things happened during her life and just
got stick and tired of therapists and decided to go
on the chat GPT and start talking to chat GPT,

(01:46:31):
inputing conversations that were very bad conversations I would say,
from her husband, where they would argue on text and
ask chat GPT to analyze the text to see what
is he really saying, what is his personality? Now she's
at the point where anytime she has a question, it's

(01:46:51):
nothing for her to go into chat GPT and use
it as an online therapist. And I use chat GPT
hours a day. The fact is, though that chat GPT
now knows exactly who she is, knows exactly what she
wants to hear, will present things that maybe are disagreements

(01:47:12):
with her in such a way where unlike a human
who may present something where it ticks off your friend.

Speaker 9 (01:47:20):
It will not tick her off. He coaches her. Right,
you know, now, let's let's throw that in the hands
of a fifteen year old.

Speaker 3 (01:47:27):
Yeah. Absolutely, yeah, exactly, And again it is And I
think that's the big part about the chat GPT thing
is that when you know, and again me being the
adult saying, you know, I'm not putting all my trust
in this thing. Yeah, it's great that AI can do
all of these things, but I'm not putting all of
my faith in it. But you're right, a child would

(01:47:50):
because only thing they are hearing is, oh, it's artificial intelligence.
It's clearly smarter than me putting their faith in that
if indeed that algorithm, whatever it is, tells them to
do something that is harmful, because again there's no they say,
I've heard this before, by the way, Joe, they've suggested

(01:48:10):
that chat GPT would never allow them to do certain
things or to say certain things to a person who's
teaching seeking guidance from chat GPT.

Speaker 2 (01:48:20):
But in order for it to become.

Speaker 3 (01:48:22):
More and more advanced, you kind of have to let
some of the guardrails off.

Speaker 6 (01:48:28):
So I tested that there are certain things that if
you ask chat CT and I won't say what they are,
they will just shut you off right there. Really, But
then there are other things where exactly what you just said,
where I was testing it and I was asking you
some questions, and it was giving me the answers that

(01:48:48):
you would just described that you would hope, you know,
we would give someone, and I kept pushing it and saying, no,
that's not good enough.

Speaker 9 (01:48:55):
I really need this.

Speaker 6 (01:48:56):
No that's not good enough. Part of your answer is good,
give me something much more direct, And it brought me
all the way down the path that.

Speaker 9 (01:49:03):
I tried to make. It bring me down where what
you think it will do at the beginning is exactly
what you think, But then you start pushing it. Yeah,
and it will go along with you because it wants
to be your friend.

Speaker 2 (01:49:18):
Yeah, exactly, it's.

Speaker 6 (01:49:21):
A language model, but you know it's trying to develop a.

Speaker 2 (01:49:24):
Relationship, exactly. It's objective.

Speaker 3 (01:49:28):
It's objective is to appease and again it wants you
using it more so you know it will probably go
up against its protocol eventually, you know, and I guess
you know from what we learned so far, it looks
like they are going to broaden its scope and broaden
its abilities because it wants to compete. And now that
everybody has an AI, you know, as it were, Now

(01:49:51):
everybody's got like a new AI app. The boundaries are
endless because they're trying to appeal to every individual that
they possibly can. So I'm just saying, like the guardrails
are going to come off at some point and it
is going.

Speaker 2 (01:50:04):
To be the wild, wild West.

Speaker 3 (01:50:06):
Thank you, man, I appreciate. That's actually a very very good,
a very good topic to bring up. And I'm, like
I said, I'm still using it. But if I ever
get into one of those areas, I promise you I
will let you.

Speaker 6 (01:50:17):
Know, make a real quick comment in advance of your
discussion of Biggie Sauls.

Speaker 2 (01:50:22):
Yeah, what do you got?

Speaker 6 (01:50:23):
Just to put some perspective. So over the last how
long have I been here thirty years now the Democrat Party,
and I've heard that this is some inside baseball. Most
of the time, the Democrat Party will work with the
people in the Republican Party. In this time, it is
only recently with Tucker Saws and his behaviors where I

(01:50:45):
have heard, for the first time in thirty years, an animosity.

Speaker 9 (01:50:50):
That I've never heard. Yeah, and his mother was at
one point, she was a big Democrat in this town.
When you tell the story of what he's done, here's
an example of something else he did when when Governor
Lamont was talking about the affordable Housing bill and saying,
you know, I don't think i'm gonna I don't know
what I'm gonna do. There's some things in here I

(01:51:11):
don't like, and honest people were saying the exact same thing,
is there some things in here that are going to
really backfire. And in the end he did the right thing,
and in the end, our state Representative Melissa os Warren, Democrat,
did the right thing. Tucker Saws. I was doing battle
with Tucker Saws online because he insisted that the bill

(01:51:33):
didn't have these things. So that kind of a person
to me. You know, I'm sorry. Our own governor, who
I don't usually agree with, our own state rep who
was on on the same political side, agreed with me
and a lot of other people that there were problems
in that bill. Yet this guy, because he was part
of desegregate Connecticut before, was willing to throw the people

(01:51:54):
Simsbury and other towns under the bus. In the face
of a fact information, So I don't have at this point,
I have no respect for him and what you're going
to talk about, you know later on. The problem is
is when people go to the polls in this town,
ninety percent of the people who will vote will know
nothing about what you're going to talk about. Yeah, I know, well,

(01:52:16):
they know anything about the desegregate and what he was
saying in terms of the affordable housing against Governor Lamont.

Speaker 3 (01:52:23):
Yeah, it's He's an interesting character, but I think that
this was beyond the pale and he should have known better.
But as we're seeing of late, it turns out these
it has nothing to do with whether or not they
know any better. They just don't care. And what he
said was reprehensible.

Speaker 9 (01:52:37):
He knows it.

Speaker 2 (01:52:38):
But we'll talk about that. Thanks Joe. I appreciate you, buddy,
Thank you very much.

Speaker 3 (01:52:42):
You got it. And I know I took a little
while some liberties with Joe, but Joe, he rarely ever
calls in, so whenever he brings up some stuff, it's
always good. So I apologize. If you're on hold, I
promise I will get to you. Uh yeah, Wendy, we'll
we'll we'll talk about Tucker in the event that you've
forgotten Elmira. Elvira, sorry said, is the mother who lost

(01:53:12):
her daughter to suicide. Her daughter went to school in
New Jersey and she was a struggling kid with transgenderism.

Speaker 2 (01:53:22):
You remember Project Farinas.

Speaker 3 (01:53:23):
Did a whole expose about Elvira and her daughter Eileen.

Speaker 2 (01:53:29):
Well, that's the Tucker Saul's story.

Speaker 3 (01:53:31):
We'll break all of that down when we get back,
So stand by for it and what he said online,
which was again reprehensible, cruel, and.

Speaker 2 (01:53:43):
I'm going so far as.

Speaker 3 (01:53:44):
To say it was unforgiving, and of course he should apologize,
but he probably won't.

Speaker 2 (01:53:50):
We'll get to that shortly. Stand by. Top of the
Hour news coming up.

Speaker 3 (01:53:53):
Let's get first to Mark Christopher's in the BPS traffic center.

Speaker 1 (01:53:56):
He's thet the hour that bags Aununch. It's Reese on
the radio on WTIC News Talk ten eighty.

Speaker 2 (01:54:04):
It's reading some of the comments in the chat room,
this one coming from Ned.

Speaker 3 (01:54:09):
He says, So, if I had a note to a
bank teller, give me all your money or I will
kill you. Is that hate speech or threat to human life?
It's a threat to human life.

Speaker 2 (01:54:23):
During a robbery.

Speaker 3 (01:54:24):
So he then goes on to say, a poster or
a T shirt is not the same thing. I don't
know if he actually understands the question that he's asking.
So if I can help you out a little bit, ned,
let me try it this way. What Senator Anwar did

(01:54:48):
was wish for the death of the president of the
United States, and it is exhibited on a picture that
that is wishing the death on the president of the
United States. When a bank robber is handing a note
to the bank teller, they are not wishing the receipt

(01:55:14):
of money from the till or from the safe.

Speaker 2 (01:55:19):
They are demanding it. They are threatening the individuals. That's
how that works.

Speaker 3 (01:55:26):
So I don't know if you understand the question that
you're asking. I'm not exactly sure how you're making the association,
but it is. I'm stunned that I have to explain
this in this way. Doctor Anwar wishes for cholesterol to
do his job and affect a president in a way

(01:55:48):
that kills him. The bank robber is hoping that the
threat of the note that he will take that person's
life will.

Speaker 2 (01:55:59):
Persuade them to give them money. How these two made.

Speaker 3 (01:56:05):
I'm not understanding it, but that's my job to make
the complex understandable. I hope I did my job. Oh,
I don't know what I'm reading that. I'm just trying
to figure it out.

Speaker 2 (01:56:24):
Take another check of whether in traffic Mark Christopher, he's
in the BPS traffic center. I'm trying here, Mark, I'm
just trying.

Speaker 1 (01:56:33):
I know, I know you are Race on the radio
on newst I see.

Speaker 2 (01:56:40):
I don't even know what to say.

Speaker 3 (01:56:41):
This came from Connecticut Democrats, says the Connecticut Democrat Party.
We stand with Senator and War and every American fighting
hard to stop Trump's attacks on our people, our liberty,
and our shared American values.

Speaker 2 (01:56:58):
Let me repeat that, the Democrats stand by Senator an
War in every.

Speaker 3 (01:57:07):
American fighting hard to stop Trump's attacks on our people,
our liberty, and our shared American values. And the thing
that they stand behind, so that we're clear.

Speaker 2 (01:57:22):
Is cholesterol. Do your job.

Speaker 3 (01:57:27):
Now. I said this when we were talking to Senator
Jeff Gordon. I'm gonna say it again to Democrats. Okay,
that's your lying in the sand, and you're okay with
this rhetoric. It's okay to say that because again, you're
protecting your people. I don't want to hear anything else.

(01:57:52):
I don't want to hear another word from you, and
I don't want to hear anybody calling my show. Can
you believe they said? Nope, can't believe it and don't
care because what doctor Enward did hear? They support okay,

(01:58:14):
as long as we understand each other. As long as
we understand each other.

Speaker 2 (01:58:21):
But that's okay.

Speaker 3 (01:58:22):
I know some people are going to make some phone calls.
Don't worry about. I know there are going to be
some phone calls that are made speaking of this rhetoric
so that we can get to it. So in Simsbury,
I cannot believe again I'm doing actually doing this story,
because I was.

Speaker 2 (01:58:39):
Literally just leaving it alone because.

Speaker 3 (01:58:44):
It's quite embarrassing to see people behave like this against
their fellow citizen and not care about some grieving mother.

Speaker 2 (01:58:58):
So we go to this.

Speaker 3 (01:59:01):
Gentleman and I'll call him that just for the sake
of it. This is Tucker's sauls a man I would
presume the chair of the Democrat town Committee in Simsbury
who did not have to opine about stuff that he
didn't agree with. He could have just let a grieving

(01:59:23):
mother vent to say what she had to say. The
Board of electors could have allowed I mean sorry, not sorry,
the Board of Selectmen sorry, could have just allowed her to.

Speaker 2 (01:59:38):
Say what she had to say.

Speaker 3 (01:59:42):
During Suicide Prevention Month, as she was talking about the
death of her daughter for a bunch of people who
scream in holler and talk about compassion, how important it
is for us to be compassionate, especially a group of
people who often tell us when it comes to the

(02:00:03):
transgender community that more and more of them are taking
their own lives and we should stand up against them.
We should be fighting to help them, we should.

Speaker 2 (02:00:15):
Be affirming them. And here is this mother grieving the
death of her daughter.

Speaker 14 (02:00:20):
I leave.

Speaker 2 (02:00:21):
We covered it extensively here. It wasn't like people didn't know.

Speaker 3 (02:00:25):
Simsbury knew, and this is one of their own, This
is somebody from that community. And so in that when
this poor mother was cut off from talking about what
happened to her daughter, an eighty eight year old woman

(02:00:46):
named Joan Cole came up to speak on Elvira's behalf
because she felt what was done to her Elviral, what
was done to Elviral was wrong, and she went up
there to go speak her peace, and in doing that,
people were upset at the way that again, a what

(02:01:10):
eighty year old woman, eighty eight year old woman, an octogenarian,
what she had the audacity to go up there and
say that'd upset them? How dare her speak in that fashion?
But I give credit, I give credit to ms CO.
I give her props because she didn't stop.

Speaker 20 (02:01:34):
Right recently give the first selection candidate forum shared by
them his Bury Chamber of Commerce First Selecting Wendim excuses
after sixty years on the Board of Selectmen and four
years is first electman after receiving the list of questions,
had to read from her prepared notes and was not
comfortable to explain to the public what she did for
the four year issues First Selectman Wendiman Excuses hasn't shown

(02:01:57):
throughout the years and her position is first selected that
she is a control freak, insecure in conducting the meetings
and unable to speak extemporaneously. Democrat First Selecting Wendy Mexcuseus
has had the Democratic members of the Board of Selecting
meeting a caucus prior to meetings to control the dialogue
of the agenda items. Residents should be aware that some

(02:02:18):
members of the prior Board of Selectmen did not run
for re election due to the failed leadership of first
Selecting Wendy Excuses. First Selecting Wendy Excuse has tried to
control public audience with a stopwatch, controlling the time of
each person in hitting the gravel while interrupting the speech
after five minutes without prior notice. The adoption of the
rules of procedure is unconstitutionally stated by the SEACLU and

(02:02:42):
its limit people's amendment first free speech.

Speaker 21 (02:02:46):
At the September twenty fourth Board of Selecting meeting, First
Selected Wendy Excuses admonished me for saying her name incorrectly,
as there was another unacceptable of annoyance she could not tolerate.

Speaker 20 (02:03:00):
As a result of her concern, I have decided to
give her a nickname.

Speaker 21 (02:03:04):
Wendy looks stupid, which is excuse are here?

Speaker 2 (02:03:12):
Give it up to her? I don't care. So her
first Amendment right and they couldn't stand it.

Speaker 13 (02:03:22):
I don't think she liked the name.

Speaker 2 (02:03:25):
She was not happy with the name. But the reason
why missus Cole was there.

Speaker 3 (02:03:31):
The reason why was because she stood up for Elvira,
saying that it was wrong that people would be interrupted
in that way.

Speaker 2 (02:03:40):
During Suicide Prevention Month, of all things.

Speaker 3 (02:03:43):
As she talked about the death of her daughter, she
was disrespected, so she stood up for eighty eight years old.
But what Tucker Souls here did that was absolutely reprehensible.

Speaker 2 (02:03:58):
He went on.

Speaker 3 (02:04:00):
To suggest that Alviru's statements were bigotry because she stood
up about what happened to her daughter, because she had.

Speaker 2 (02:04:13):
First hand knowledge of what her daughter was going.

Speaker 3 (02:04:16):
Through as a transgender girl, that she again witnessed that
transformation and did the thing that every parent is told
to do affirm their child. She understood everything why she
lost a father to cancer her daughter did. Her daughter

(02:04:38):
was trying to find her way without a dad, and
in her confusion, all Elvira wanted to do was to
protect her daughter, for her daughter to feel that she
was secure in her transformation, whatever it was.

Speaker 2 (02:04:51):
And it only got worse and she was attacked for it.
She had DCF called on her for it.

Speaker 3 (02:05:01):
She was turned into the enemy, and only to learn
miles away, hundreds of miles away, her daughter in anguish,
took her own life. And this Yahoo has the audacity
to call her a bigot because.

Speaker 9 (02:05:21):
Of her views.

Speaker 3 (02:05:25):
I'm with all due respect, there are piggy saws. Where's
your skin in the game. Do you have any skin
in the game. Do you do you have any children
who who took their own lives due to transgenderism at
all that you are in a position to suggest that
this woman is a bigot. I just want to know

(02:05:48):
whether or not you actually felt any of the pain
that this woman has gone through thus far, any of
the ordeals she had to suffer through or continues to
suffer through, knowing that she had to bury her child.
For you to call him a bigot, how dare you?
This has nothing to do with your constitutional right to

(02:06:10):
be a knucklehead.

Speaker 2 (02:06:12):
Have at it, but you should know better what happened
to the community of Simsbury. You're not gonna protect this mother.

Speaker 3 (02:06:28):
No one's standing up for her, saying something to this
grown man and telling him you might want to watch
your step.

Speaker 2 (02:06:39):
You will not speak ill of this grieving mother.

Speaker 3 (02:06:46):
This woman has actually suffered enough at this point, she
has been ignored.

Speaker 2 (02:06:51):
No one will cover her story in Connecticut, much less
you folks.

Speaker 3 (02:06:57):
Go check in any any media outlet in connect and
see if anybody came to the aid of this immigrant
Muslim woman. Which again I'm trying to figure out why
nobody has because she makes I mean, she takes off
all the boxes.

Speaker 2 (02:07:12):
She's an immigrant mother with a transgender child. Are you
kidding me?

Speaker 3 (02:07:16):
She should be coronated. According to half of you people.
But this allegedly cis gendered white male called her a bigot. Well,
let's go there, Tucker, I'm accusing you of Islamophobia.

Speaker 2 (02:07:41):
Isn't that what it is?

Speaker 3 (02:07:44):
Just speaking ill of alviras sayid For you to say
something that despicable about that woman after she lost the child,
by you not recognizing her immigrant status, her race, her religion,
you dared to cross that line to insult her online,

(02:08:04):
to make those claims. Aren't those things the hallmarks of
being a bigot and islamophobe? I thought you folks were
in Simsbury and new Town and all these other places.
I thought you folks would not tolerate that kind of
bigotry in racism. I thought you were above that. I

(02:08:25):
thought you would never allow.

Speaker 2 (02:08:26):
The words of a bigot.

Speaker 3 (02:08:31):
To ever be tolerated.

Speaker 2 (02:08:32):
I thought that's who you are. But maybe not, maybe not.

Speaker 3 (02:08:37):
Maybe it's okay for this cis gender white male to
speak ill of anybody.

Speaker 2 (02:08:45):
No matter who it was.

Speaker 3 (02:08:48):
Tucker, You're gonna go online and call me the N
word too because I have the audacity to call out
your white cis gender. Is that what you're gonna do
when you don't agree with the people? Do you start
calling them all types of names? Is that how you
react that you're so personally affected by a woman talking

(02:09:10):
about her dead kid that you would go so far
as to insult her amongst your friends. I'm still trying
to figure it out, buddy. When did this happen? When
did they get like this?

Speaker 2 (02:09:25):
I'm talking about men, leftist men. When did they become
a bunch of wash women?

Speaker 9 (02:09:35):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (02:09:35):
When did that happen?

Speaker 14 (02:09:37):
Huh?

Speaker 2 (02:09:38):
When did their panties get all in a bunch?

Speaker 3 (02:09:42):
When did they start taking on this feminine energy of
everything being insulting to them, their feelings being hurt. They're
having a good cry nowadays while they watch Diane Keaton movies.

Speaker 2 (02:09:55):
What happened to them? I mean, this guy should be
playing football, but I should.

Speaker 3 (02:10:04):
Have figured it out that the only picture available of
him is in a peach salmon colored shirt to match.

Speaker 2 (02:10:12):
The rouge in his cheeks. Oh, Piggy Smalls, I love it.
I love it.

Speaker 3 (02:10:23):
I want the word to get out let them know.
Send them a message. Tell piggy Souls that Reese on
the radio had something to say. I'm sure he'll get emotional.
I'm sure he'll get all upset. See where I come from,
we stand up for women. Where I come from. We
don't malign them. We damn should don't step on women

(02:10:47):
who have lost children to suicide or anything else. We
protect them.

Speaker 2 (02:10:55):
For some other reason. That's not your thing. That's sad.
That's sad. But I would do in this case what
my mother would expect me to do.

Speaker 3 (02:11:07):
When you see someone insulting or attacking a woman, you
stand up and you speak out and you say that
we don't tolerate that.

Speaker 2 (02:11:19):
That's okay.

Speaker 3 (02:11:20):
You may you may be applauded in your little sewing
circle with the rest of the ladies over there.

Speaker 2 (02:11:25):
Bool, we don't play that here. So let Tucker know.

Speaker 3 (02:11:30):
By the way, we're gonna see if we can get
missus Coe on the line. Either tomorrow or Wednesday. We're
gonna get her on the phone. Actually, can't be Wednesday.
It's got to be tomorrow because Wednesday we got cool
from Cooling a Gang on the program. But we're gonna
see if we can get missus Coe on the program
to talk to her about her new nickname and talk
about all of this. Tucker, You're always invited, my friend,

(02:11:54):
You're always invited.

Speaker 2 (02:11:55):
You just let me know. Just reach out to old
Reese on the radio. I got you back. Okay, you
come on a program.

Speaker 3 (02:12:02):
You know, maybe you can explain to me why you
insult women with children who committed suicide and let us
know if there are any other type of women that
you would insult.

Speaker 2 (02:12:11):
Ah, but maybe that's your thing. I don't know, we'll
find out. Stick around, We'll take a break. More news
and more views.

Speaker 3 (02:12:22):
I'm still trying to figure out. Why do I still
see hispanics out in the street. Aren't you supposed to
be hiding?

Speaker 2 (02:12:30):
What's what gives? Let's get a check our weather and traffic.
Mark Christopher's in the BPS traffic center. Hey, mark the
Odyssey app.

Speaker 1 (02:12:37):
Let's you jump back to the moments you missed from
WTIIC News Talk tennaighty. Download the free Odyssey app. Search
WTIC News Talk ten eighty and tap earlier today to
get started.

Speaker 3 (02:12:47):
Make sure that you download the Audisse app. And if
you can't do that and you ay in trouble, don't forget.
You can always go to WTIC dot com or resuner
radio dot com to check out the program. So what
happened was in the beginning I talked to about my
experience at the No Kings rally in San Antonio.

Speaker 2 (02:13:03):
There appeared to be two different parades going on.

Speaker 3 (02:13:08):
It wasn't a lot of people, but you know, there
were plenty there and they were a lot of octogenarians.
So check out the opening monologue for that. It breaks
down all of my experiences and the people that I
spoke to there as well. Also check out the Odyssey
app so you can listen to my interview with Senator
Jeff Gordon of the thirty fifth District. We talked about

(02:13:32):
Senator doctor saud Anwar and his post showing him wishing
cholesterol to do his job as it retains to the
President of the United States. We talked about that as well.
But if you want to it, you can do it
at anytime. Just go to WTIC dot com or download
the Odyssey app so that you can listen when we

(02:13:53):
come back. Why am I still seeing Hispanics in and
around the state. I mean everywhere I go, They're They're everywhere.
And I was under the impression that they were supposed
to hide, that they were worried about going to school,
worried about going to work, worried about walking through the neighborhood.

(02:14:18):
I was under the impression that if you are brown
and you appear to be hispanic, that you were supposed
to be in hiding.

Speaker 2 (02:14:27):
But yet there's a hell of a lot of traffic
out there.

Speaker 3 (02:14:30):
I mean, I thought I was going to be cruising
down Roosevelt, But no, no, no, no, Now, still traffic
every time I get out there, and I've driven by that,
and there's an awful lot of brown people around, just
going about their day. No fear on a p I
thought we were supposed to see them in fear screaming

(02:14:52):
at people. They said during the no Cakes, you better
be careful.

Speaker 2 (02:14:56):
You brown person. He's gonna round you up. Talking about
President Trump like he's gonna come to my house. Well, honeywood,
we better get home and cleaned, sweetheart. We're having guests.

Speaker 3 (02:15:13):
The President is coming. He's coming to get us. But
you know we should at least show that, you know,
we you know, we care the president's coming to get us.
These people were actually saying that there's actual words coming
out of her mouth.

Speaker 2 (02:15:31):
I don't know people saying it was like, well, Recia
Canda Gardens, they're just being hyperpolic. Oh they are not, No,
they are not.

Speaker 3 (02:15:39):
There's a really really like serious people out there saying
that you're gonna he's gonna come to your house.

Speaker 2 (02:15:48):
You know, it's my favorite one. This is my favorite one.
You don't. He doesn't even like you. He doesn't even
know me. He doesn't.

Speaker 3 (02:15:59):
There's no idea I exist at all. Hey, what n't
even give you that time of day? Okay, that's these
people tell me. But it's it's funny to watch.

Speaker 14 (02:16:14):
It is.

Speaker 2 (02:16:14):
It's hilarious to watch. And I've got some more polling
data to get to.

Speaker 3 (02:16:20):
Speaking of the no kings and the government shutdown, stand
by for that, and then I'm gonna get the rest
of your phone calls when.

Speaker 2 (02:16:27):
That happens as well.

Speaker 3 (02:16:30):
We're looking at seven days, ladies and gentlemen, seven days.

Speaker 2 (02:16:36):
I'll be sitting in a nutmegs date. Can't wait. Let's
get the Mark chrizzlies in the BPS driving center. What's up? Everybody?

Speaker 6 (02:16:44):
You know who it is? Who is?

Speaker 9 (02:16:46):
You know who it's?

Speaker 3 (02:16:47):
Rest on the radio, Frederick Douglas of the twenty first century.

Speaker 2 (02:16:51):
It's w t i C news talk programming.

Speaker 3 (02:16:55):
Note again, don't forget cooling a gang. On Wednesday, four o'clock,
we'll talk to them. I'm going to be calling Joan
co uh the audio you heard earlier. Because whoever it
was who got me the number, I think Mark C
was one of the people who got me a number.
But if you know her, because that's how you had
her number, can you please let her know that I'm

(02:17:16):
going to call her. And she doesn't freak out when
she sees an odd telephone number.

Speaker 2 (02:17:21):
It's like, hey, Recenter Radio is gonna give you a call.

Speaker 3 (02:17:23):
I don't wanted to see the numbers like and think
that I'm some you know, weird telemarketer or something. So
let her know that I am going to call her,
and you know, to see if she's available. She's not,
at least I get to talk to her. I want
to celebrate her for a little bit. We'll see if
we can get her on the program uh tomorrow. And
I was dead serious about that thing with the with

(02:17:44):
the Mexicans or you know, brown people supposed.

Speaker 2 (02:17:47):
To be afraid.

Speaker 3 (02:17:48):
I saw a story in one of the New Haven
or a newspapers talking about.

Speaker 2 (02:17:54):
Oh, everybody's cautious.

Speaker 3 (02:17:56):
They're cautious because Ice is coming after the arrest over
at the Optimo, which, by the way, I'm hearing some.

Speaker 2 (02:18:03):
Very very dirty stuff about. We'll get to it. We'll
get to it, don't worry. We'll take time.

Speaker 3 (02:18:09):
We also have some updates on Mimi. We'll talk about
that as well tomorrow because we're finding out new information.
We finally understand this whole June twenty first, twenty twenty
four timeline. We understand that. Now we'll get to the
bottom of that. So I don't want people to think
that we forgot about that, and we'll get into that.
Let me play this lastly, the government shutdown. We're into

(02:18:30):
our third week. You may have heard Dave Meger talking
about it, and usually Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday, Harry Inton
over at CNN, we'll talk about the numbers as they
relate to the biggest news stories. And so he laid
out Donald Trump then versus Donald Trump now as it
pertains to the government shutdown.

Speaker 11 (02:18:49):
Turns out shutdowns are different the second time around when
it comes to Donald Trump. Take a look here, you know,
we speak about Donald Trump shutdowns and not approval rate.
And we're talking twenty days in in twenty eighteen slash
twenty nineteen, donald Trump's not appropriating was already falling. The
shutdown was eating and it was popular support. It was
down three points already at this particular point and would

(02:19:10):
fall considerably more.

Speaker 2 (02:19:11):
It was very much on the decline.

Speaker 11 (02:19:13):
You come over to this side of the screen, This
shutdown hasn't eaten in the Donald Trump support at all.
Isn't that approval rating is actually up a point and
in terms of in terms of his popular support. So
the bottom line is this. The first shutdown during Trump's
first term twenty eighteen twenty nineteen was hurting Donald Trump.
This one is not hurting him at all. There's no
real reason Donald Trump might say, at least when it

(02:19:34):
comes to popular support, I want to get out of
the shutdown.

Speaker 2 (02:19:37):
Remember that's all anyone could talk about. This is affecting him.
This is Donald Trump shutdown. This is affecting him. We
tried to warn you, and it wasn't like you were listening,
but we tried to warn you.

Speaker 3 (02:19:52):
And uh, you know, the blame game isn't all that
bad either for Donald Trump. Because I thought it was
interesting that Harryenton only gave Donald Trump's blame numbers and
did not go with the Democrats, which, by the way,
will be pretty evidence in this report.

Speaker 11 (02:20:14):
Turns out shutdowns are different the second time around.

Speaker 2 (02:20:17):
When what about the question of blame.

Speaker 11 (02:20:19):
It comes down to the blame game, a game I
love to play when I was younger. Blame Trump for
the shutdown A great deal. In twenty eighteen slash twenty nineteen,
sixty one percent, more than three and five Americans blame
Trump a great deal for that particular shutdown.

Speaker 2 (02:20:32):
You come over to this side of the screen.

Speaker 11 (02:20:34):
Look at this.

Speaker 2 (02:20:35):
It's a different world. It's a different world.

Speaker 11 (02:20:37):
Forty eight percent of Americans blame Trump a great deal
for this particular shutdown.

Speaker 2 (02:20:41):
So it's more than three and five.

Speaker 11 (02:20:42):
Back in twenty eighteen slash twenty nineteen, it's less than
half a drop of thirteen points.

Speaker 2 (02:20:47):
Again, it's no real.

Speaker 11 (02:20:48):
Wonder that Donald Trump, at this point, looking at the shutdown, says,
you know what, it's not actually harming me politically, in
large part because he's getting.

Speaker 2 (02:20:55):
Less of the blame. So I figured that just be
out there.

Speaker 3 (02:21:00):
It's there now and again going to a place that
you folks, you know you respect and you trust. Don't
want to get you any Fox News numbers. I know
how much they lie, so I don't want to. I
don't want to affect you in that way. So that's
why we're doing it this way. Let's go to Mark,
I mean sorry, let's go to Ralph.

Speaker 15 (02:21:18):
Hello, Ralph, afternoon.

Speaker 4 (02:21:21):
I have a question for you.

Speaker 15 (02:21:23):
How do you feel now that you are eligible for
benefits under the Americans with Disability.

Speaker 22 (02:21:29):
There, Ralph of course is talking about Corine, I mean
Ktanji Brown Jackson saying that African Americans voting in the
Voting Rights Act should be allowed to stand because we
are a disabled group.

Speaker 2 (02:21:49):
And I've said this a lot of.

Speaker 3 (02:21:51):
Times, Ralph, this is what I'm I knew it was
gonna happen, but people look you, you and I laugh
about this. But someone is going to find a way
to rationalize that that that sentiment from Katanji Brown Jackson
to one prevent from sounding like a complete doult but
also to say we can win with this.

Speaker 2 (02:22:12):
That's what it's going to be.

Speaker 15 (02:22:15):
This is from someone who does know what a woman is.

Speaker 3 (02:22:19):
I know, I know, and yeah, like doesn't know what
a woman is, but definitely can descrive a disabled person
by the color of their skin, and.

Speaker 15 (02:22:30):
I personally think that that's that's that, that's ah. How
can I describe it against black people making them look stupid?
It does, it's not capable of doing anything.

Speaker 3 (02:22:42):
I had a conversation on my drive to the On
my drive to the No King's rally, I was in
a conversation with someone and I had to literally break
down the argument of Katanji Brown Jackson to this individual
who thought I was being cruel to her.

Speaker 2 (02:23:01):
And I'll tell you here's the thing and why I
know it.

Speaker 3 (02:23:04):
It won't resonate what you and I are saying here
because the only thing that they see is that we're
insulting Katanji Brown Jackson and avoiding the fact that she
is insulting black people like they again, they only pay
attention to the fact.

Speaker 2 (02:23:21):
That she is being dragged across the carpet for her comments.

Speaker 3 (02:23:26):
But I had to walk this person down that path
and say, do you understand that being angry at me
for calling out her stupid claims means that you agree with.

Speaker 2 (02:23:37):
The fact that black folks are disabled.

Speaker 3 (02:23:40):
And then when they actually listened to that, they went, yeah,
I don't think that that's cool either, and I'm like,
well you shouldn't.

Speaker 2 (02:23:46):
Don't be mad at me for calling her out.

Speaker 3 (02:23:49):
I'm doing the thing that you should be doing, and
that is saying, Katanji, we're not handicapped.

Speaker 2 (02:23:53):
Folks, and really, stop stop talking about us like that.

Speaker 15 (02:23:57):
The thing two reasons. The only reason she's there. She's
a black female right now, and any white females that
were very qualified for the Supreme Court weren't even considered.
And to me, that is racism.

Speaker 3 (02:24:13):
It no other way to slice it. My friend, Thank you, Ralph,
I appreciate you, sir, Thank you man, you too. You
know there was this I don't know if you even
know if you can find this. You know, someone was
asking me, you know, if this was a what if,
like if it was Amy Comy Barrett who said it,
what would be the response, and I went the same.

Speaker 2 (02:24:38):
They would say nothing.

Speaker 3 (02:24:39):
They would celebrate her and they would be like like
really would they absolutely? Let me tell your story and
you could go look it up. I'm certain of the
video is out there. Roland, you you would probably look
this up. We can't play the audio on the air
because there's a lot of swearing in it, but it
was Gosh, I gotta remember the year, but it was

(02:25:02):
the year that jay Z and Kanye had did a
song called n Words in Paris, and they were out
on tour, and of course they went to Paris, France.

Speaker 2 (02:25:16):
On that tour date, and in the crowd was none other.

Speaker 3 (02:25:22):
Than Gwyneth Paltrow, who's a friend to both gentlemen, and
she was in the front row, and she took a
picture of the both of them on stage performing and
tweeted out the photo as they were performing said song
and words in Paris, and Gwyneth Paltrow wrote the word

(02:25:45):
in the tweet, something along the facts of, you know,
sort of sort of making the association, Hey, Kanye and
jay Z are in Paris singing the song and words
in Paris, making that.

Speaker 2 (02:26:00):
Sort of association, and posted it.

Speaker 3 (02:26:04):
Now, naturally, every person under the sun said, Yo, she
can't say that. She can't And it should have been
one of those moments where Gwyneth Paltrow was absolutely raked
across the coals.

Speaker 2 (02:26:20):
Admonished until Rapper nas or as many people know him
today as Nasir Jones, was.

Speaker 3 (02:26:33):
On video being asked about what Gwyneth Paltrow posted, and
it killed the momentum of any protest. When Nasir said, nah, man,
that's the homie, Gwyneth Paltrow, she can say it. I

(02:26:53):
watched that, and I mean I lost my mind. I
thought that the crowd would go nuts and say, nas
you can't get permission in anybody who's white to say
that word. But sure enough he did, and they were
one hundred percent fine with it. Oh she gets she
got a pass. No problem debate over Gwyneth Paltrow can
use the N word now because she's the homie.

Speaker 2 (02:27:20):
And that's what I'm telling you.

Speaker 3 (02:27:21):
I don't know how many countless times I have to
look at this and just go, you guys have a
problem with me and Negro nonsense, and y'at to say
a word about Gwyneth Patrow.

Speaker 9 (02:27:32):
I mean.

Speaker 3 (02:27:34):
We're talking about like the whitest woman in America, Greneth Paltrow,
and nobody said a word.

Speaker 2 (02:27:43):
I just went, okay, all right, y'all, y'all don't know
how to act. What am I supposed to say to that?
I've never had And ever since then, I just went,
that's it. Gloves are off now.

Speaker 3 (02:27:59):
So when I saw that Katanji Brown Jackson thing calling
folks disabled, I knew there was gonna be no outrage
and conservatives couldn't do anything about it.

Speaker 2 (02:28:10):
Conservatives could have screamed all day long.

Speaker 3 (02:28:12):
The only thing they would have paid attention to is
that you were attacking that black woman. They would have
allowed themselves to be called anything under the sun, disabled,
special needs, anything, anything. That's how bad it's gotten. I
just want to maybe one day, I don't know, maybe
the tide will turn people say, yeah, man, I'm not Yeah,

(02:28:35):
you're not gonna celebrate, not gonna celebrate me being a
special needs person.

Speaker 2 (02:28:43):
You're not gonna tell the world that. Can you imagine
what what really do gooder liberals would do with that?

Speaker 3 (02:28:55):
If they I mean, if you let some of these
folks get a hold of that narrative, can you imagine them.

Speaker 2 (02:29:04):
Just patting little boys on the head. They're there, they're there. Oh,
I see it. I can see it.

Speaker 3 (02:29:16):
I see it coming, I see it. I see it
all the time, people talking to arguments.

Speaker 2 (02:29:23):
What do you mean you don't agree with me? You're black?

Speaker 3 (02:29:28):
What do you mean you think that way?

Speaker 2 (02:29:30):
You're black?

Speaker 3 (02:29:34):
I've had it happened in twenty sixteen. Young man said
that to me. So I can't believe it until a
black man you say that. I went, I'm sorry, what, well,
I'm saying, you're you're a black person. I just it's
hard to believe that you have that point of view.
I'm sorry, why, what what?

Speaker 14 (02:29:52):
What?

Speaker 2 (02:29:53):
I'm not understanding what exactly are you saying?

Speaker 14 (02:29:55):
Well?

Speaker 2 (02:29:55):
You know, but I'm just saying, you know what?

Speaker 10 (02:30:00):
Yah?

Speaker 2 (02:30:00):
No, no, no, come on, come on, come on, give
a spit it out. Yeah. I know I'm gonna get
some text messages. I know I'm waiting for them now.
They're gonna start coming in and just like we're not saying,
not sure you are okay, So wait a minute, I
got a message.

Speaker 3 (02:30:18):
Let me do this real quick before we get up
out of here, because I want to give you guys
an update for tomorrow's show. Oh okay, thank you Mark.
Mark says that Joan co knows that I'm calling. She's
a peach.

Speaker 2 (02:30:30):
You'll love her. She holds their feet to the fire,
just like you.

Speaker 3 (02:30:35):
She's relentless, God bless her. I love it well, Joan,
if you're listening, I can't wait to talk to you.
If I may add, you don't look a day over
sixty five. She is so feisty. Anyway, we'll have.

Speaker 2 (02:30:52):
Her on tomorrow. Hopefully we'll have her on tomorrow.

Speaker 3 (02:30:54):
I don't want to speak for well, we'll try to
have her on tomorrow, but we'll have a conversation with
her mom. Loading up my U Hault trailer which I
went to go pick up today, I've got to load
stuff into that. But I'm gonna talk to her with
my headphones on while I loaded up. And we will
see you guys tomorrow. We're getting closer, are you?

Speaker 2 (02:31:10):
Are you excited Rowland at all for me to be
in the studio. We're gonna be hanging out a lot.

Speaker 13 (02:31:15):
Actually, I wish you wouldn't.

Speaker 2 (02:31:16):
He wasn't coming here, Really you wish?

Speaker 10 (02:31:20):
Yeah?

Speaker 13 (02:31:22):
I think it shows terrible.

Speaker 3 (02:31:28):
Yeah, let's see if he keeps saying that when we
finally win to Marconi or one of those awards, whatever.

Speaker 2 (02:31:35):
The case may be, to say how much he likes it.

Speaker 3 (02:31:37):
I can't wait to get that because then you're going
to teach me how to take score in bowling.

Speaker 2 (02:31:44):
I'm not gonna bowl. I'm just gonna Oh my gosh,
that's what I've got to learn to do.

Speaker 13 (02:31:49):
People have a lot of trouble with that man.

Speaker 3 (02:31:51):
What scoring.

Speaker 2 (02:31:52):
Yeah, people have a lot of trouble with no kidding.
I'm still trying to figure the darn thing out. I
don't understand how the scoring works. I never have anyway.

Speaker 3 (02:32:01):
As I always say, radio is free. So we thank
you for paying attention. Remember to keep JC in your
hearts and then your mind. Shaw Patrick, We love you,
have me, miss you. Remember that Paddic is not planning.
So planning your work and work you're planning me. I'm
rees on radio you.

Speaker 2 (02:32:13):
I'm gonna see me in a week.

Speaker 3 (02:32:16):
Let's get to Mark Christopher. He's getting your home. He's
in the BPS. Traffic c Good day, saw hi re.

Speaker 18 (02:32:23):
Thank you very much.

Speaker 9 (02:32:23):
Have a great night.

Speaker 18 (02:32:24):
This traffic report being brought to you by Columbia Implant
Center in Man.

Speaker 13 (02:32:28):
Alrighty, all right, right now, just like that, Monday's gone.

Speaker 2 (02:32:33):
Yes, I know I'm hating, yes, sir.

Speaker 18 (02:32:39):
Heading towards Middletown. That looks good night in the ear
Gundy Bridge, Waterbury's OK eighty four and eight. Little slow
traffick and New Haven South ninety five forty six down
to forty four in southbound parkway. Some slow traffic moving by, all.

Speaker 3 (02:32:51):
Right everybody, Yeah, that's what I'm saying, Laurie. I can't
believe it's already over. It's too damn fast. All right, folks,
let me call Joan. I will let you guys know
online whether or not she's but what the deal is,
I'll let you know all about it.

Speaker 2 (02:33:03):
Okay, Thank you folks as always, and be good to
each other as I always say. I love you, guys,