Diddy Ordered to Justify Civilian Wardrobe Ahead of October Sentencing

Diddy has been ordered by a federal judge to explain why he should be allowed to wear civilian clothing instead of prison garb at his sentencing on October 3, 2025. Judge Arun Subramanian denied a prior motion from Diddy’s legal team to wear civilian clothes at a hearing on September 25, noting the defense failed to give a valid justification.  He indicated that he would consider a more detailed explanation ahead of the sentencing. 

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/spate-radio-the-hip-hop-podcast--6251846/support.

© 2025 Spate Media. All rights reserved. The #1 Hip Hop + Business Podcast from Spate Media.
Follow us: @Spatemediaempire | Visit: Spatehiphopnews.com
Views expressed are those of the hosts and guests.
Support the show by subscribing, rating, and sharing.
Spate Radio Podcast Founded in 2007

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Ditty has been ordered by a federal judge to explain
why he should be allowed to wear civilian clothing instead
of prison garb at his sentencing on October third, twenty
twenty five. Judge Aran Subramanian denied a prior motion from
Ditty's legal team to wear civilian clothes at a hearing

(00:22):
on September twenty fifth, noting the defense failed to give
a valid justification. He indicated that he would consider a
more detailed explanation. A head of the sentencing, Ditty's attorneys
submitted a reduced wardrobe request two button down shirts, two
pairs of pants, two sweaters, and one pair of lace

(00:44):
free shoes. This is much more limited than what he
was permitted during his criminal trial earlier this year, when
he was allowed up to five of each item to
avoid appearing in prison attire for jurors. The October hearing
will determine his sentence following his conviction on two counts
of transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution charges based

(01:07):
on alleged violations of the Man Act. His defense argues
prosecutors misapplied the Man Act, failed to prove he profited
from prostitution, and that payments made were to escorts for
relations with his romantic partners, which they claim is protected
by the First Amendment. They also contend didt he never

(01:28):
personally transported any one or received proceeds, while prosecutors maintain
he directed or participated secretly recorded encounters and met trafficking thresholds.
Judge Supermanian heard arguments on motions for acquittal or a
new trial on September twenty fifth. As of now, no

(01:49):
ruling has been made. Ditty has been detained since September
twenty twenty four.