Rick Wilson

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Hey, everybody, welcome back to another edition of Behind the
Numbers with the Wilson's. I am the only Wilson here
at the moment, but the other one's coming back in
because he had to restart stream Yard, the software we
all use here on substect to do our broadcasts. Folks,
welcome to e the Epstein Network. Donald Trump's numbers, as
we say every damn week, don't seem like they could

(00:23):
go any lower, or he could be held in less
regard with the American people. And yet here we go
Andrew's new piece. Yeah, Crump's worse mount so far that Yeah,
so far is the key woman here?

Speaker 2 (00:36):
Kind of my my, My big question is you know
where do we go?

Speaker 1 (00:40):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (00:41):
I don't. There's no way to you know, when presidents
dip like this in pulling, we saw it with Biden.
There there can be a recovery of a handful of points. Maybe, Yeah,
there's there's a small bounce back. You know, it's possible.
I don't know if even a massive bounce back would
help Trump. So I think what's interesting about this, and
I pointed this out earlier, is that you can see

(01:05):
the disapproval overtakes approval in April and that was Liberation Day.
That was the start of the tariffs. And that is,
you know, when when the vibe of the economy started
feeling bad. And then you can see in later in
the year when the economy actually started started doing poorly,
it just gets worse and worse and worse. I think
Trump's approval you can tie it almost directly to what's

(01:28):
happening with tariffs and inflation.

Speaker 1 (01:31):
Yeah. That that that inflection point that you that you
discussed of Liberation Day and things start headed south from
start heading south from there. Man. That is just that
strikes me as a real insight into you know, something
that has been under reported frankly.

Speaker 2 (01:50):
And you know they're they're floating walking back some of
these tariffs to lower.

Speaker 1 (01:54):
The food the food tariff is uh is what Nutlick
is trying to get rid of.

Speaker 2 (02:01):
Just how can you how does it? How do you
square that? How do you square the idea of tariffs
are great for the economy and then you have to
relieve them to make things better.

Speaker 1 (02:11):
It just it's nuts, is what.

Speaker 2 (02:13):
It's nonsense. So you know, and he doesn't Trump doesn't
personally want to lay off of tariffs because he's so
obsessed with them. I think it's one of the few
things he really believes in.

Speaker 1 (02:24):
Yep.

Speaker 2 (02:25):
But you know, he's going to have to back off
if he wants to, you know, fix the economy, which
you want.

Speaker 1 (02:32):
You know, here's the thing, Andrew, I have a theory
of this case, and I don't know, I don't know
if it's fully fledged yet, but I think there is
a growing sense with Trump that he would almost like
there to be a collapse in the second half so
he can play the victim, play the martyrs, say it
could have been the greatest president of all time. I

(02:52):
was the greatest president, but all those all those Libs
and Rhinos kept me from it. Yeah. Well, right, at
this point, it just feels completely self destructive, it is.

Speaker 2 (03:04):
Yeah, I think this is really interesting. Something's happening with
Republicans right now.

Speaker 1 (03:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (03:09):
You see in March here it has eighty one percent
of Republicans approved of Trump's management of the federal government.
This was AP and Nork this week, and now it's
down to sixty eight percent. Now, that is an absolutely
massive number.

Speaker 1 (03:25):
I think. Isn't that the lowest approval he's had with Republicans.

Speaker 2 (03:31):
Yeah, I think when you break that out. I think
it's only twelve percent disapprove and the rest are not sure.
But that is still a significant number of Republicans who
have gone soft on Trump. You know, he's losing his base,
and you can see it anecdotally online with a lot
of the things that's been happening, you know, the H
one B controversy. I really saw that that roiling maga

(03:55):
and you know, there's there's no there's no off switch,
there's no release valve. He's it's just gonna get worse
and worse.

Speaker 1 (04:04):
You know. I think that's I think that's really something
to consider here is because his brand is they never
back down. But sometimes the politics you have to zig
or zag or swerve or turn right. And an intelligent
president with a competent staff would say, yeah, Boss, we

(04:25):
got to do a resso here. This ain't working. This
is this is the bad stuff. And I think that
there is a degree of of stubbornness. That is the
reason why I'm hearing that a lot of White House
staffers are like, I'm out, gotta go.

Speaker 2 (04:47):
Well, stubbornness and sinility go hand in hand.

Speaker 3 (04:50):
Indeed, indeed, are you trying to tell me something, ma, No,
it's it's definitely reaching that level of.

Speaker 1 (05:03):
Irrationality colliding with the damage. And you're right, at some
point a good president can pull out of the dive.
Are giving a couple examples. Bill Clinton pulled out of
the dive, not completely ever after the scandal, but he
he stabilized. Barack Obama stabilized. W did not stabilize. He

(05:30):
basically once the two thousand and six economic crisis hit,
it never quite came back. He came, he stated at a
pretty low level. Biden could not stabilize really at the
end until the very end. There's a little uptick, a
tiny uptick, but it really never quite undid it. But
Bush and Biden were facing economic headwinds that they did

(05:53):
not create on their own. Trump has made all these
things happen. This is his creation, right, and there's nothing
here that's an externality. It's all internal.

Speaker 2 (06:04):
So this this next bit from the Navigator Research.

Speaker 1 (06:07):
Go Go, This is my favor slide of the day.

Speaker 2 (06:10):
So you'll see nearly a third of Trump voters regret
their vote or disappointed.

Speaker 1 (06:17):
This.

Speaker 2 (06:18):
You know, this really shows how soft the Trump coalition
really was in twenty twenty four, which it's regrettable that
we couldn't get to a lot of these people. You know,
we saw this with with Hispanic voters early on, slightly
earlier in the administration, where they flipped completely there. You know,
they if they could take it back, they would have

(06:39):
voted for Harris. But you know, non Maga Republicans, right,
twenty six percent say they regret voting for Trump. If
those folks had stayed home, right, you know, this would
be a totally different story.

Speaker 1 (06:53):
Those are our people. Come back to the tribe, come
home to the Lincoln project. Although my preation, yeah, go ahead.

Speaker 2 (07:01):
Is that quite a lot of those non Maga Republicans
who say they regret voting for him or are disappointed
by him are going to stay home in the midterms.

Speaker 1 (07:09):
I think that's right.

Speaker 2 (07:11):
And you know, you'll see those Maga voters that eighty
four percent who say they're not disappointed, they're not regretful,
they'll show up to the polls, but they don't make
up a sizable enough portion of the Republican Party to
pull Republicans over the line.

Speaker 1 (07:24):
In a lot of these players, and without the offset
of Trump on the ballot to pull them out, that
we're going to see a lot of those lower propensity
folks staying home. And if you even just look at
the MAGA Republicans, you've got fifteen percent of them who
are telling us no, did they regret it. That is
a that is a cataclysmic change in the MAGA coalition. Folks.

Speaker 2 (07:48):
Yeah, and you know, people, you know, this often seems
like small numbers when we're talking about, you know, the
movement among Republicans, but seven and eight percent is absolutely
enormous for MAGA Republicans because they have been stalwart from
the beginning. You know, on most issues, they're ninety six percent,
you know. So this is the Republican the Trump coalition

(08:11):
breaking down.

Speaker 1 (08:12):
Yeah, it is. It is a hard that that is
a hard, ugly knock in the head of of of
the coalition that they really really need to pump up
and turn out for twenty six.

Speaker 2 (08:26):
So, folks, you look at you look at what they
point to, and you know, those who regret voting for
Trump are are pointing to the shutdown as the as
the real issue, which is no surprise in many ways.
And then the economy. But this is this is his
approval during the shutdown, and this is something I want
to talk about a lot because we go through this Democrats,

(08:47):
Democrats fuck this up.

Speaker 1 (08:50):
Rating.

Speaker 2 (08:51):
His approval rating was taking a nose dive during the shutdown.
He went from negative ten around the time the shutdown
ended to negative eighteen. That is a nose dive that
you know, it felt like a long time, felt like
a long shutdown, but losing eight points in a month

(09:11):
is astounding.

Speaker 1 (09:14):
How how quickly? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (09:17):
Why did Democrats give up?

Speaker 1 (09:20):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (09:21):
I just don't get it.

Speaker 1 (09:22):
You and I have talked about this on the show,
We've talked about it offline. We've talked about it all
and every every damn chat in Lincoln, on our on
our various signal chats. The Democrats were the Republicans were
taking the shut down in the face every day like
a like a like a a cast iron frying pan
hitting them in the face every day, and the Democrats decided, oh, well,

(09:45):
you know, we should stop because it would we don't
want them to hurt too much.

Speaker 2 (09:49):
I'm sorry you heard this argument played out by a
few people that Democrats wanted to shutdown and prolong the
shutdown because they wanted to win these elections last week.
That is a stupid argument. If you look at the
outcome of these elections, they are lined up with Trump's
approval in those states almost exactly the same. Now, if

(10:13):
you had held if you had held those elections with
the September thirtieth, for example, yeah we would the result
have been the Senate, it would have been the same.

Speaker 1 (10:21):
Right.

Speaker 2 (10:22):
So it just there's no logic to quitting the shutdown
when they do.

Speaker 1 (10:26):
So can we go back to that prior slide. I
want to make one more point on that prior slide.
If you look at the numbers on the Democrats, okay,
going down from plus four to zero, that's inside the margins, folks,
that's noise. Tiny. But if you look at Republicans going
from five to negative thirteen, from Trump negative eleven to

(10:48):
negative nineteen, this was a clean setup. This was a win.
This was teed up for a massive political victory. And
these eight fucking moron socided We're going to get a
good hoodline from the Journal of Centrist Niceness or whatever,
and these.

Speaker 2 (11:05):
People aren't even up for election.

Speaker 1 (11:06):
Next to it, there's no it makes my.

Speaker 2 (11:13):
And you know this is I think the risk that
the Democratic Party runs here is that you know, they
have a lot of a lot of their Norman candidates,
a lot of their you know more centrist candidates get
blown out by younger socialist or or far left candidates.
And the thing is that I want people remember is
not all of those candidates are going to be Mom Donnie.

(11:35):
They might be losers in general elections. So I really
think that Democrats have set themselves up for failure in
some ways. In other ways, the current has taken them along.

Speaker 1 (11:45):
The damage has hurt the Republicans. It will, it will persist.
But they could have laid in more licks on them
as we go. Yeah right, let's let's go back to
that other side. I'll let you continue. I'm sorry I
had a little divergence there.

Speaker 2 (11:57):
So this is the this is the blame for the
show to from Navigator Research.

Speaker 1 (12:03):
Carolyn Lovett can spin this all. She wants that numbering changing.

Speaker 2 (12:10):
Why why would they quit while they were ahead?

Speaker 1 (12:14):
It is just snatching defeat from the jaws of victory
and Republicans I said this in my piece this week.

Speaker 2 (12:22):
It was a pyrrhic victory. They are they are now
getting getting absolutely blown up by.

Speaker 1 (12:30):
Yeah, well we're going to that folks.

Speaker 2 (12:31):
Don't you worry, don't you worry? So there was a
lot of epscene pulling earlier in the year, and there's
not been as much yet because this is really developing.
I think Trump is politically finished after this. The Mega
Coalition hates it. Everybody hates it's it is really really bad.

(12:55):
So this was a previous wave of the Navigator research
pull earlier in the.

Speaker 1 (13:00):
Year up to get strongly negative.

Speaker 2 (13:04):
And this was before we found out Trump had Thanksgiving
dinner with Jeffrey Epstein in twenty nineteen while he's president.
I don't know, I've never invited any known pedophiles to
my Thanksgiving dinner. He seemed normal to me. Yeah, this
is gonna be this is going to be really really
bad for him. Then then here we go. You got

(13:29):
from this week they described most Americans described Donald Trump
as a close friend to Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 1 (13:37):
Yep.

Speaker 2 (13:39):
And you know the the I see a lot of
people on magazonline pointing to the fact that Virginia Jeffrey
said that Trump was never creepy with her. But clearly
Epstein believes he has some sort of.

Speaker 1 (13:52):
Oh uh, there's no doubt about that.

Speaker 2 (13:55):
Killer information for Trump, and you know, clearly trump. Epstein
says that Trump knew about the girls. So this is
not a mystery to him.

Speaker 1 (14:06):
And by the way, that that narrow window of people
who think he's some sort of enemy of Epstein or
that he ratted out Epstein and all that stuff, even cash,
Buttel says, no, Donald Trump's in no FBI, in no
way that he report Epstein to the FBI.

Speaker 2 (14:21):
And you know, just just for the record, the way
you get, the way you to become an informant for
the FBI is they catch you doing a crime. Yeah, correct,
that's just uh, let's just.

Speaker 1 (14:30):
Correct out there. Yeah, there's not a lot of walk
ins for that kind of thing.

Speaker 2 (14:34):
No, So yeah, yeah, and even.

Speaker 1 (14:41):
Even you know, look, as always Republicans are gonna are
gonna wait till the last to break. But but when
eight percent say he was involved in crimes and twenty
five percent of Republicans aren't sure, that's not where Donald
wants to be.

Speaker 2 (14:57):
No, definitely not. And this is this is not getting better.
This is getting worse. I I mean it, the what's
been released this week was shocking. I was honestly, it
was vile. And you know, clearly Trump had a ongoing

(15:21):
relationship with Epstein during his presidency.

Speaker 1 (15:24):
His presidency, including including with one of you know, including
at a level where they he felt it powerful enough
an ongoing relationship to advise the Russians how to manipulate Trump. Gee, folks,
do you think he was advising the Russians by saying,
you know, Donald Trump's trade policy? Certainly, No, he was
advising the Russians on saying by saying, you know, he

(15:46):
likes the little guys.

Speaker 2 (15:47):
And you know the that that Russian ambassador, that Jeffrey
Epstein was he he's not He's now dead. No, not live.

Speaker 1 (15:55):
Yeah, the other guy right right.

Speaker 2 (15:56):
Right, he's now dead. And you can imagine it probably
has something to do with falling out of a window.

Speaker 1 (16:04):
It is a common cause of death in Russia.

Speaker 2 (16:06):
It just so happens. It makes you wonder, like, what
does what is what is going on with Glaine? All
this stuff about her special treatment.

Speaker 1 (16:18):
Oh listen, I gotta tell you Glaine Glaine is they
have treated her like a queen in prison for a
reason because Todd Blanche made a deal with Glaine. He
walked in that room. And you notice that when you
read the transcript of the Blanche Gallaine interview, she is like, no,
Donald Trump was always a perfect gentleman. I never saw
Donald Trump anywhere. Todd Blanche and her lawyer are friends.

(16:43):
They made a deal ahead of time. It was a
kabookie dance interview. And now these emails, just these emails
show that Todd Blanche knew she was lying, let it go,
and then sent her to Club fed cause she you know,
country club prison.

Speaker 2 (16:59):
She's a puppy. She's a Puppy's a puppy in prison.

Speaker 1 (17:02):
Hey, you sent me somewhere where there's three hots and
a cot and it could do yoga and play tennis
every day. And I get a puppy. That's a fucking resort.
That's not a prison.

Speaker 2 (17:12):
Yeah, what is this a Sweden? Right?

Speaker 1 (17:17):
I don't know?

Speaker 2 (17:17):
You know this this stuff is And I said, I
texted this to you the other day. It's no wonder
that Epstein. It's not a coincidence that Epstein was at
the center of all of Maga's conspiracy thinking from the beginning.
Of course, that is because the Epstein story is the
original accusation as confession. That is what we're dealing with.

(17:41):
And you know, it couldn't be more obvious now. Of
course it was evident somewhat then but it's clear.

Speaker 1 (17:50):
But herew when you think about it, this myth persisted
until February of this year, when Pam Bond had those
MAGA influencers to the White House and when she had
them given their special notebooks. That that myth persisted right
up until then. And now, man, they are back pedaling

(18:13):
furiously the story.

Speaker 2 (18:16):
And what's so funny to me is, I was reading
a lot about the emails this week, and you know,
one thing you heard Republicans say throughout the year was
we can't release the e f scene files because there's
a lot of people who could be.

Speaker 1 (18:26):
Hurt by all that stuff.

Speaker 2 (18:29):
Of course, they weren't referring to victims.

Speaker 1 (18:30):
They were referring Donald Trump and.

Speaker 2 (18:33):
Steve Bannon, et cetera.

Speaker 1 (18:36):
So it just it's, you know, yeah, yeah, it's a
straight line of inference in this case. It's it's it's
it's not it's not even second order inference. It's right there.
Speaking of right there, I mean, we have to look
at one o the fact about the political leadership in

(18:59):
the country, I think right now, and then, folks, you
can't you can't rely just on the Ebstein story to
get to twenty twenty six it's going to hurt him.
We're going to use it because it does hurt them,
and it is the right thing to do to expose this.
But the Democratic Party is led by the weakest minority
leader by far in our lifetimes. Chuck Schumer is not

(19:25):
a popular leader.

Speaker 2 (19:27):
Chuck Schumer should resign, Yeah, yesterday, he is. He you know, listen,
he's either incredibly weak and he can't whip his caucus,
or he's devious this And you know, I think there
was a Republican senator who can't remember his name who

(19:49):
will line this up. He essentially said that that Chuck
was going to make a background deal with a certain
number of senators to say cover my ass. Yeah, let
me get out of this without without too much damag. Well,
the collateral is Yeah.

Speaker 1 (20:05):
I will tell you Andrew that his reaction to being
told he should resign and that people are mad at him.
I know for a fact. I've talked to three separate
reporters who he has called and bitched at and yelled at,
and commentators he's bitch and yelled at in the last
few days, like, how dare you? I did the best
I could. Well, if that is the best you can
fucking do. Don't do it anymore. Don't do it any

(20:28):
Let somebody else step up. There are other leaders who
are younger, sharper, and more competitive and aggressive in this
case than than Chuck Schumer. And and he has proven,
like you said, he's either devious and made a deal
with his eight senators to betray the cause, or he's
dumb and doesn't have control of this caucus. Neither one

(20:49):
of those is a good. Look.

Speaker 2 (20:50):
No, it's not. And it's it's you know, thinking back
to to past Senate leaders, he doesn't match up to
of course, Michim Donald, not even not even anywhere close
to Mitch mcconald's.

Speaker 1 (21:03):
He's not a Harry Red, he's not even a Bill Frist. No,
it's just not good at this work.

Speaker 2 (21:09):
He's not good. I feel like he's landed here because
he has some sort of seniority and.

Speaker 1 (21:16):
It's just the it's my turn stuff with Democrats is
killing the party.

Speaker 2 (21:20):
Yeah, and you know that that trickled down from you know,
we saw that with with Clinton and Biden, and it's
it is not a good recipe. It's not a recipe
to win Hillary Hillary Clinton.

Speaker 1 (21:34):
Yes, yeah, no, it really is not and and you know, folks,
as the ex Republicans in the room, we advise you
these things not because you know we have we think
we should run your party. We advise you these things
because we know how the other side works and how
they will destroy you. And they played Chuck Schumer. John
Thune played Chuck Schumer like a fiddle.

Speaker 2 (21:56):
But here's the thing. Any rube off the street would
have known that John Thune's promise yeah, was totally empty.
And oh yes, I don't check it's in the mail.

Speaker 1 (22:10):
I won't blank in your blank. You know all that stuff.
It's just astounding.

Speaker 2 (22:14):
How do you fall for that? That it's gullible?

Speaker 1 (22:19):
You know, I have a new theory in my my, my,
I'm like Isaac Newton. I come up with a new
fundamental principle of politics every five years or so. First
was e t TV, the second was the Ted Cruz Rule,
and the third one is I'm going to write it
up more elegantly, but it is the more corrupt and

(22:39):
dark and devious Republican behavior is, the more Democrats proportionally
want to have a bipartisan compromise with evil. Like I said,
I'm gonna I'm gonna phrase it more elegantly. I'll get it.
I'll get it to you know, a body in motion
stays in motion. But but it is the every time

(23:00):
the Republicans say, hey, by the way, we're going to
engage in evil and burn down the village, the Democrats say,
you're you're you want to what's so? What you're saying
is you want to bipartisan compromise, And it's just.

Speaker 2 (23:13):
How do you how do you how do you imagine
that they are telling the truth or are going to
follow through on this deal?

Speaker 1 (23:20):
Have you been watching Fox?

Speaker 2 (23:22):
Are you you? You know thinking Mike Johnson is some
sort of sincere actor.

Speaker 1 (23:26):
And he's he's good faith actor no matter how Yeah,
the the worse the bad faith actions of the Republicans,
the more the Democrats seek a bipartisan compromise. There you go.
But I mean, and you look at it, you look
at it with the with the result. I think it's
going to happen. You watch, guys, folks, mark my words.

(23:49):
Donald Trump has signed this thing, and in a week
or ten days or whenever it is, Russell Vought will
get in his ear and say, yeah, mister President, those
lazy negroes don't need that Snap funt effect, and I'm oh,
because that is all the coating that they're using. By
the way, they're using racial coding on Snap every day.
It's like those lazy people buying lottery tickets and multi liquor.

(24:13):
Oh no, that's so subtle. How could I be confused
by that message? White House? There you saw so bad
a flood. Cancel Snap again, you fucking watch.

Speaker 2 (24:22):
Yeah, you saw the flood of fake AI shit during
the shutdown about Snap and it was you know, it
was a woman from Atlanta, you know, saying how she
sells her Snap benefits. Right, of course it's bullshit.

Speaker 1 (24:34):
Of course, of course it's bullshit.

Speaker 2 (24:36):
But yeah, there will be there will be, you know,
ten percent of people who think that's real. Yeah, we
should get rid of this stuff.

Speaker 1 (24:43):
And just just like this morning, Mike Collins, and US
Senate candidate for the Republicans in Georgia puts out an
AI video that does a lookalike of John Ossoff and
it's awesome, saying, oh, I obey Chuck Schumer, I'm lazy
and I go to Hollywood and New York for my money, Jesus,
And he's like, I've never seen a farm. I don't
go to farm. I just want to say this about

(25:05):
AI stuff, folks, because right now I'm being the victim
of an AI impersonator. Is they're they're they're putting out
like three videos a day of me with over a
million views. Now it's crazy. It really will irritate you
when it happens to you. I just have a message
from Mike Collins and his campaign in Georgia. You opened
the door, We're going to close it. You open the door,

(25:29):
you are not gonna like what comes through the door next.

Speaker 2 (25:31):
Play with fire.

Speaker 1 (25:32):
Do not play with fire, especially with us, because what
are you gonna do? What do you do? Might be mad?

Speaker 2 (25:40):
The Democrats won't.

Speaker 1 (25:41):
We got something about me. By the way. The other
thing I wanted up to bring up before we close,
I running up on time. There is a civil war,
as you guys all know, browing in the Republican Party
between uh, the the Normies, the Trumpian worshiping magas, and

(26:03):
the groyper Nick Fuentes Tucker Carlson wing of the party. Today,
Tucker is pushing out material about the what he now
calls the alleged shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania of Trump. This
should be a fun weekend, y'all, I don't know. Yeah,
oh yeah, he's he angry, Tucker angry. He's like, I

(26:24):
have new information the FBI is covering up the truth
about these alleged shooting. I'm like, oh boy, here we go,
here we go.

Speaker 2 (26:32):
This kind of civil war. And I mentioned this earlier
with the H one B situation that really pissed MAGA off.
Trump saying Laura Ingram interview that there's not enough qualified.

Speaker 1 (26:41):
People in the US people. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (26:44):
Now, personally, I'm in favor of the H one B
visa because it is good for the country. Of course,
I like to bring in intelligent people. But you know,
obviously we need to train more here. But that really
set MAGA off. You know, he's backing away from some
of these more populous positions.

Speaker 1 (27:02):
Yeah, and and he and look, he's about to go
to war in Venezuela, which which is not in anywhere
in the MAGA food chain of like things.

Speaker 2 (27:11):
They want to do what in six days?

Speaker 1 (27:14):
It's uh, the clock is running for operation like Flat Southern.
Hey man, how subtle of you to do a to
do a dick reference in your in your military operation naming.

Speaker 2 (27:28):
Yeah, if I'm not mistaken. Heg Seth called it our hemisphere.
So we're doing that again.

Speaker 1 (27:34):
We're doing that again. It's it's the it's the Trump,
the Trump doctrine. Lordie. All right, folks, Andrew, thank you
for doing this again as always a fun time, great article. Today, folks,
check out Andrew's new piece on Lincoln Square today, Trump's
worst month so far. That that that goes back to
the old Simpsons gag. You know, it's the worst day ever.
Oh no, it's just the worst days so far. Uh

(27:58):
oh yeah, signage of them.

Speaker 2 (28:03):
I think the funniest thing I saw this week with
someone saying that the gold touches were reminding of a
of a strip mall Thai restaurant in the suburbs of Atlanta.

Speaker 1 (28:13):
You know what it does? That that is so the vibe,
isn't it? My god, it's it's it's it's his, it's
it's his playland. All right, folks, We'll see you again
next week on Behind the Numbers with more uh more
frivolity and hijinks, and as Donald Trump's numbers continue to
ask asymptotically approach zero. Thanks again everybody for watching and

(28:35):
for following us on Lincoln Square. Check me out on
every thou every every podcast I do, because you know
there are like a hundred of them. We will talk
to you guys again very soon. Thanks folks.