The Naked TRUTH _ Steve Bassett

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:10):
I'm gone.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
Welcome to the Naked Truth and now your host Bridgid
bar Clad.

Speaker 1 (00:36):
Good evening, America and a very good early morning here
in England. Tonight's guest is a very very good friend
of mine, Steve Bassett. He is back back with vengeance
even more this year. I'm sure everyone is totally aware
who Steve Bassett is. But today me and Steve are
going to be talking about the drones and the real
UFOs that are going on around the world, and also

(00:58):
the recent egg shaped retrieval foot because that needs to
be talked about. This controversial and all of that stuff.
But we're going to talk about that. But with Steve,
he organized and conducted the citizens Hearing on Disclosure and
National Press Club in Washington. He is the co founder
of the Hollywood Disclosure Alliance in Los Angeles, media organization

(01:19):
to help all of us with UAP disclosure on every
single front. Listen, we haven't got a lot of time.
Our internet hit in England. It was really bad, hit,
a mess, so we're just going to go for it.
Steve Betett, are you there.

Speaker 3 (01:34):
Yes, and you're coming through quite well. Okay, whatever the
cable is under the ocean is.

Speaker 1 (01:42):
Well let's just keep our fingers crossed because it has
been hit a mess. How are you, my friend? And
I'm sure you can update absolutely everybody on so many things,
and that's why I wanted you back. How are you okay?

Speaker 3 (01:56):
Little stressed? Yeah? One thing that's more more stressful than
failure is success, and yeah, right, and success right now?

Speaker 1 (02:06):
And I'm really stressed, okay, okay, Yeah, I suppose I'm
really stressed right now because there's a lot of successful
things going on as well. So I kind of get it. Yeah,
I kind of get it because we had a lovely
chat earlier. Right, So let's go into it. Let's talk
let's talk about let's not talk about Trump at the minute,
but let's let's let's let's where do you want to

(02:27):
lead into give people information of what they really kind
of need to know right now, Whether you want to
start on the drones right now?

Speaker 3 (02:35):
Just a basic basic background here. Most people have watched
the Olympics, and there's there's one of the classic races
is the four hundred meter Yeah, not relay, but individual race.
It's tough, it is really tough, and so you watch
these runners they start off and you're cruising, but they're
not going very fast, and there's cruising around, cruising around,

(02:56):
and then they get to about I don't know, about
a third through the last, and all of a sudden
they take off boom, and they've just everything they've got
and they come racing into the finish Okay, well, think
of the disclosure movement is in the last third lap.
In fact, it's well into the last third lap. So

(03:16):
not too long ago things started picking up fast, and
some people were more aware of that than others. Some
people just track it by the news and what have you.
But my job is to pretty much kind of pay
attention as much as possible, and so in the last
four years in particular, we have been increasingly going faster.

(03:37):
More things are happening in every direction, and we are
very close to the finish line. To categorize this, over
the last four years, a lot is happening in Hollywood.
A lot of major A lists. People have figured out
this is going to be a big deal. They're putting
together docs, they're putting together streaming series. All kinds of

(04:00):
stuff is in play. I wish I had a piece
of action of all of them, but I don't. But
the thing is that that's happening, and so the amount
of stuff and content that's coming out and will come
out is growing very quickly. And then in Washington we
see we're making unprecedented progress. Eight eight hearings, four pieces
of legislation, Members of Congress coming out and simply matter

(04:24):
of fact saying that, yeah, this is non human tech
and others of rank and station, which has happened before
Gordon Cooper and doctor edgar Mitchell. But back then that
was not the last third of the race, you know,
it was kind of an early lapse. But now, oh,
there's another hearing coming up very soon. It's going to

(04:47):
be in our nazy mace. It looks as if the
nuclear weapons shut down, witnesses, the most important of all
my view, will have their chance to testify. So it
is very difficult to keep up. And then on top
of all of the terrestrial matters that are taking place
that are pushing towards closure, are our visiting friends decided to.

Speaker 1 (05:08):
Join in, and also obviously our conversations which is top
secret at this moment in time, when you know my situation,
that is going to be absolutely mind blowing. Yeah, So
it's happening for experiences as.

Speaker 3 (05:21):
Well, so starting two years ago, craft started turning up
around our ships. We know about this. There were some
videos taken by seamen that Dennis Now got out, got
on the internet and so forth, and it came. And
when it came, initially came to my attention. The most

(05:42):
remarkable thing about it was not what was flying around
the ship, because you could you could sort of see
it too much. But the thing is, they're supposed to
shoot that down. You just you're a worship You don't
allow anything to fly around your ship right right. It
isn't identifying itself, you just blow it away because drone,
for instance, could literally sink the ship and they didn't

(06:03):
do anything. So I'm going, okay, I know what that's
going on going on there. And then a little time
went by and something happened. The first hearing since nineteen
sixty eight took place at a Senate Intel subcommittee on
May seventeenth, twenty twenty two. There were I forget who

(06:24):
chaired it, but Mike Gallagher was on it and some
other people, and they brought in the reason was that
it was to get a briefing from mister Bray and
mister Moultrie, who were the current people running the UAP
Task Force, which had been set up by the previous
year's legislation, and they came in to give him a
report card, right, A little of this, little of that,
nothing much, right. They weren't there to present any major evidence.

(06:47):
They were just kind of there to check in. It
was mostly for show, and most people were disappointed. They
hated this, you know what, I get it, but I
understand the process. So it was so in a sense
that that brief thing was not particularly important except lo
and behold. In the middle of that briefing, they trotted
out one of those videos of these things going around

(07:10):
one of our ships, and I'm going, why did you
do that? What is the purpose of bringing in that
video into that briefing, which is really a not particularly
significant briefing that's not going to say much. When they
were asked about Mountstrom, sort of I don't know what
Maulstrom is Moulstrom or is that? But here they brought
this in and then Bray kind of did a little

(07:32):
dbunk on it and pointed out, well, it's an angle
or of attack or the lens or whatever the hell.
And I finally figured out the reason that they brought
that film in is that that thing was causing a
lot of problem for the d O D on the
internet because a lot of people are watching it and going,
wait a minute, you're not shooting them out. Kind of
cool that down. So they brought it in, he debunked it,

(07:54):
and off they go, and then we didn't see it
for a while. What what what apparently was going on
was the beginning of the biggest UFO flap in history. Now,
anybody field knows what UFO flap. Maybe some of your
listeners don't, But it's when you have a lot of
sightings over a period of time. Yeah, not just one
or two on Wednesday and then one a month later. No, No,

(08:14):
we're talking sightings happening a lot and over a period
of time. They call it a flap. A lot of
reports are coming in to move on in Newfork and
all that, and there have been a number of them
over the last seventy years. The most famous flap occurred
in July of nineteen fifty two, exactly five years after Roswell,

(08:36):
in which plasma balls, fire balls we're going to call them.

Speaker 1 (08:40):
Yeah, flying over the Capitol Washington.

Speaker 3 (08:43):
Yeah, And I'm quite sure these are exactly the same
thing that was a period in World War Two that
they call full fighters and food was French for fire.
And this is scared that government because they can't do
anything about it, they're going to shoot them down. And
they just come in and went on for nine, ten
eleven days, and they tried. They came out with a
kind of I don't know, silly, ridiculous explanation. General Sandford

(09:07):
did an interview, kind of calmed things down, and then
they went away. But as a result of this is
when they finally called together a CIA panel called the
Robertson Panel to advise the government on what do you do?
What's going on here? Secret report, classified didn't come out
till later, and the report was extremely significant because one

(09:28):
it stated that these things don't pose a threat. Well,
there's nothing there. You don't need to point out they
don't pose a threat, So they acknowledge you something there,
and that the real threat was the growing public interest
in it and they needed to kind of do something
about that. And thus became the formal truth in Bargo.
So that was nineteen fifty two, and we've had a

(09:49):
few others. What's happened in the last two years is
the biggest UOFO flap ever. Yes, and so what they
started doing is flying multiple why say flying again, food fighters,
plasma balls, whatever the hell you want to call them.
Various sizes started turning up in numbers, primarily over military

(10:09):
bases and some nuclear sites or nuclear facilities and other
sensitive areas, which is important because if they were flying
over I don't know, the middle of Montana or over
some corn fields in Kansas, who.

Speaker 1 (10:26):
Cares, which they still did, but you.

Speaker 3 (10:30):
Know, it's not a big deal. But if they're flying
over a military base, the government's going to have to
respond to that. This could be questions. And so this
was going on and going on, and we were sort
of getting a sense of it. It was steff was
turning up, but you know, there's always sightings, there's always
this background noise of sighting.

Speaker 1 (10:48):
That's still important. We still need those sightings put in place.

Speaker 3 (10:52):
And then it escalated a couple of months ago. It
suddenly got really big and they moved east and they
started flying over a sensitive government facilities in the East area,
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut. And it's so densely populated here
that even if you're just flying over a military base,
to make a point. There's a whole lot of people

(11:13):
just living their lives in the neighborhoods and they're seeing it. Okay,
so it became a really big deal. And so I'm
suggesting that all of this for two years was the
extraterrestrials making a decision to create a massive UFO flap
for a purpose. Now, the effect of it was to
put the US government in an impossible position. By the way,

(11:35):
they were also flying a UK basis too, oh I
know that, yeah, but primarily here in the US, And
so it was an impossible position for the US government
because obviously they're going to get asked questions about this.
It's just something the media can't ignore. And on my
print media archive on my website so far in terms
of professional journalism, I logged in about two hundred plus

(11:59):
articles about the drone swarms. Okay, so it's well covered.
So eventually, I think exactly what the our non human
visitors wanted is that a major spokesperson for the Pentagon
by the name of Kirby had to come out in
front of the press and answer questions. And this there's

(12:20):
one moment, there, one little period section that will go
down in history. A woman journalist just went right to
the chase and it went like this, mister Kirby, you've
the government has referred to drone swarms and some people
are seeing some things are going to look like drones.
Are these are drones? And he said no, okay, So

(12:47):
the next question is pretty obvious. If they're not our drones,
are they another nation's drones?

Speaker 1 (12:54):
And he said no, Say much, doesn't it.

Speaker 3 (13:00):
And then she said, well, well do you know, well
what what what they are? And he said, we don't know.
Now this three question answer thing is going down in history,
all right, right, because if if let's assume for a
second that this is exactly what the E R e. T.
Or non human friends wanted, they just to put the
government in an absolute corner they can't get out of.

(13:22):
Let's let's review. So what she says, because drone swarms
have been brought up by the government, Okay, what she says,
are these are drones? He could say no, where yes.
If he says yes, the next question is why is
the government flying drones over multiple bases and the UK
and so forth? Is it a program? What you're not
telling us? What the hell is going on? This is

(13:44):
this is insane, and so he can't say yes, yes,
say no, okay, fine, safe, so far safe. And then
she asked them, well, there are there another nation's drones,
in which case he says no. Well, those of us
who have taken some logic studies and understand, you know,
you know, the mathematics of logic, No, that is impossible. Yes,

(14:06):
there is no way the government can know they're not
another nation's drones. The only way they can do that
is that one of their other our drones go up,
or actually one of our drones go up with a
light on it and get behind every single one of
these things and check, yeah, Chinese or whatever, until they

(14:28):
checked them all, and then they would know or they're
not another nation. But of course they can't know that.
It's a negative. So he cannot say no to that.
But he had no choice because if he says yes,
then the next question is, sir, are you saying that
there's other nations flying drones, possibly even our adversaries over
multiple basis in the United States, and we're not shooting
them down, We're not even sending up in her subcraft

(14:51):
buying lars up one or two. And of course you
can't answer that, so we had to say no, which
is ridiculous. And then she asked him, of course, do
you know what they are? And of course he can't
say that, so he says, we don't know. And so
this is absurd, ridiculous, embarrassing, one of the most embarrassing
things that any spokesman for the Pentagon has have to

(15:12):
do with. Okay, so then that's over. Now I had
already started, I had already started publishing or doing interviews,
and what I considered the only explanation for this, and
I've been repeating this for weeks and weeks and weeks
now maybe fifty podcasts after giving it careful, careful thought

(15:34):
without having to to, you know, sneak into the Pentagon
and break into some files. There is only one explanation
for what is happening. Only one. I mean, I've heard
a couple of other efforts. I've given points. One was
it's these are a bunch of drones coming from an
Iranian drone ship off the coast.

Speaker 1 (15:54):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (15:55):
Yeah. And then then the Internet, which is a big
giant rain right, came up with something that had a
little you know, action. It was, these drones are flying
all of this because a weapon of mass destruction has
been in the United States and they're looking for radiation
signatures so they can find it. Yeah, and so I'm going,

(16:19):
all right, so you're saying that there could be a
bomb anywhere in the United States because these drones are
all over the country going on a different basis, don't
know where it is. You're trying to find it. But
there's nothing to worry about, okay. And so the fact
that so there was no way that government's going to
say that is true and it's not true. And that's
the best the Internet can do. And I came up
with I feel is the absolute explanation and it's it's

(16:41):
actually quite simple. Yeah, ets, Yeah, it's ours in them.
ETS are doing a major intervention, I think because they
want to get disclosure done, They want to get past that.
They have other things to do, they want to move
on to other stuff, and we are so close, but
yet we keep backing off. Meanwhile, the risk, the risk

(17:02):
of conflict maybe even nuclear events is growing and growing and.

Speaker 1 (17:07):
Spiritual spiritual worldwide for everybody in it as well.

Speaker 3 (17:11):
Yeah, big deal. And so they decided, look, let's get
this done, and so they started flying out all the bases.
What could the government do. The government, as I said,
had almost nothing. They can't shoot him down, they can't
admit they're not ours, they can't admit they're in other nations.
All they can do is try to stall for time
and hope that people will get bored, the media will
eventually tire, which it did after about two months. It's

(17:34):
kind of slowed back, and maybe they can get by
not a chance in help. What the government did is this,
they started sending up their own drones. So you have
these these these fruit food fighters plasma balls flying generally
in the vicinity of our bases. Well, guess what, we
have drones at all those bases. We have lots of drones.

(17:55):
We have a lot of drone types that public has
never seen. Drone research is one of the most intensive
research areas in the militaries of all the major nations.
And so that's one of the reasons why the Russia
Ukraine War is in many respects a giant drone war.
So do we set up our own drones. And they
got some lights here and some lights there, and you

(18:17):
can kind of see the outline everything else. Some are
the size of the cars and so people are saying, yeah,
that's a drone, and so they're saying, hey, I'm seeing drones,
and that the government could say yes, yes, yes, So
obviously this is a drone swarm. So what they have
done by putting up that as the kind of the

(18:38):
is the diversion, you're able to call it all drone
swarms and facto exactly, and that that kind of settles
some people down. It may have made it a little
easier to maneuver, of course, until that that journalist woman
ask him those questions. But that is the best they
can do. They're stalling for time, hoping that it'll stop

(19:01):
all right. But unlike nineteen fifty two when they flew
all over Washington, ninety five percent of everybody living in
Washington did not have Yeah, of course, and tens of
hundreds of thousands of videos were taken and there was
no internet to upload them, and so this whole thing

(19:22):
is utterly archived and seeing it'll be seen and re
seen and reseeing. There's no way out.

Speaker 1 (19:28):
Absolutely, So that is what.

Speaker 3 (19:31):
Has been happening in terms of how fast this thing
is accelerating forward. And of course the media coverage is intense.
The internet is always intense on this issue, and so
that is the basic background for the next part of
my discussion. But I'll give you a chance here to
break in and ask question.

Speaker 1 (19:52):
Well, no interestingly enough, I just think as soon as
because obviously this happened the pairge quite a bit before Christmas,
and then obviously Christmas was in the middle and of everything,
so that was a great sort of like diversion as well.
And obviously everyone you know going out outside at Christmas
and going to you know, church and the Christmas Christmas
light up in the sky, the Christmas Star and everything.

(20:13):
I mean, more people are sort of I think this
year staying at home a lot more with their family
due to maybe financial reasons and everything else. A lot
of people spending more time on the internet. But it
was quite obvious to me because my encounters. I've had
three big encounters in the last you know, three months,
four months, three months, So it's quickening up. And it's

(20:34):
even if it's quickening up for them for footage, for
just the person next door photographing them or videoing them,
you know, that's a one off, big encounter that's going
to change someone's life majorly in so many different ways.
And I know, like I say, you know, I always
I totally got it, the fact that they were military,

(20:55):
but they were extraterrestrial, And it is quickening up, and
just by what they're what's happened to me recently, it's
just like absolute bonkers, which yeah, which you know, but yeah.

Speaker 3 (21:08):
Well you're a d And as this was all going on,
and I concluded that this was a direct intervention by
the nine humans to accelerate the terrestrial process. Yeah, it
incurn to me. Is it possible that the ets are
also possibly turning up around contact ease, sort of engaging

(21:30):
them more than usual in order to get them kind
of fired up another way to kind of move things
worth We're kind.

Speaker 1 (21:36):
Of fired up anyway in the community anyway. And obviously
you know, and we all have somewhere to go, and
we all have someone great to speak to, and we've
got a great we've got great collective amount of friends.
We know that, right, But is it quickening up? Well,
from what I told you, you know, it is, and
from a lot of the big people out there in
the UFO community that do know, and there's a handful

(21:57):
of them, and what they and what I've got it
is bonkers. So if they've given me what they've given me,
it is literally for me to put it out to
the public and let the public make their own decision.
And it's come from me a lifetime experience of so
many different varied UFO encounters. You know, I've witnessed those orbs,

(22:17):
I've witnessed the plasma balls, I've witnessed the craft, you know,
you know, first contact and having to deal with that
myself as well, just in normal life. But what they've
given me is quite remarkable, and I can't wait for
it to go out on the internet. Like I say,
it's just been sorted a few things being sorted out
first for it does.

Speaker 3 (22:37):
And let me be clear, let me clear these plasma effects.
People had plenty of sidings of ships, yeah, define saucerers,
the whole nine yards. They've seen that, but not in
the numbers of what we'll call the plasma effects or
balls or whatever. There's more sightings like that, and they've
been going on.

Speaker 1 (22:56):
I was going to say, I've seen the plasma balls.
And you know, all throughout history, there's some amazing books
out there was The Uninvited Three Frank Taylor. All of
that book is about a family that witnessed this egg
ball that was following them and actually wouldn't wouldn't leave
the family alone. It's you know, goes throughout history all
of these plasma balls or also these eggs, so it's

(23:18):
you know, it is there.

Speaker 3 (23:20):
Well, they've been around and they're part of the contact experience.
What's different now is large numbers of them are specifically
flying over military bases where the press and the government
simply can't ignore them. If you're having a plasma ball
siting at your farm, I don't know, out in Tennessee
and you report it and it gets picked up a
little bit, okay, fine, government doesn't have to respond to that.

(23:42):
They don't do anything. So they just they have this technology,
they use it.

Speaker 1 (23:46):
The officers police officers were involved and did witness it
on that one.

Speaker 3 (23:51):
But yeah, yeah, but it's not that's about as far
as it goes. Not Now. What they're doing now is
forcing literally the Department of Defense and other and of
course other members of members of Congress are then coming
forward and say, yeah, we know about this, we know
about this extraterrestrial We're going to have another hearing and
so forth. So we are and you used a very
good term called the quickening. This was a very favorite

(24:12):
term of Art.

Speaker 4 (24:12):
Bill.

Speaker 3 (24:13):
He used it all the time. He loved it. He
felt that we were in the quickening. It wasn't clear
if we were in a quick interneut back then, but
things were interesting now. I wish Art was still alive,
because this definitely qualifies as a quickenting.

Speaker 1 (24:24):
Well, all of them, all of the good ones that
have passed away, are really really helping and quickening it
for us and for them because they're all working together
up there. Anyway, we are going to have to go
into a commercial break right now, so Race is going
to put us on a quick commercial break. We're going
to be back in a minute, hopefully, because we've got
so much chest about all right, let's see if he does.

Speaker 5 (24:45):
Tickets are now on sale for Rebels of Disclosure twenty
twenty five, May twelfth through the fifteenth in Grafton, Illinois
at the Beautiful Pere Marquette Lodge and Conference Center. This
will be a four day event with twelve speakers covering
topics such as ET contact, experience, your testimonies, lost history,
secret space programs, time travel, Illuminati, parallel realities, and so

(25:08):
much more. Visit Journey to Truth dot online for more details.

Speaker 4 (26:29):
The unexed Network classes and workshops are enrolling now for
twenty twenty five. If you're interested in psychic protection, chakra balancing, dowsing,
or perhaps healing with sound and music, visit unexnetwork dot
com to see our complete series of live and on
demand classes and workshops hosted by the one and only

(26:53):
Margie KA. For example, in January twenty twenty five, you
could spend four Saturdays with Margie for her exclusive live
remote viewing workshop. Margie K is one of the most
accomplished remote viewers in the world, and she will share
her secrets and totally unique methods in this course. Some

(27:15):
courses are open now. Seating is limited for these live courses,
so register now at unexnetwork dot com. On ex members
use promo code XMM for an additional fifteen percent discount.

Speaker 1 (27:43):
Welcome back to the Naked Truth. Myself is Bridget Barklay
and my guest, my special guest, is Steve Bassett. Steve,
how are you there still? Of course you are hiding
in the wings. He's there, Hello you. I know that
we have you sent me a trailer that we are
going to play a little bit later on the age
of disclosure. I haven't I didn't get to see it,

(28:03):
so I don't know how long it is, So you
have to how long is the trailer?

Speaker 4 (28:07):
Call?

Speaker 3 (28:08):
Two minutes twenty seven?

Speaker 1 (28:09):
Okay, all right, so we'll do that kind of towards
the end, because that's that all sort of like trailing nicely.
But you can you can advise race when you want
to play it as well whenever if it if you
find a part a moment to put it in, you'll
say it. Right. Continue we're talking. We'd finished off about
the kind of the drones, go for it.

Speaker 3 (28:30):
Well, then there's the political situation here in the US.
All right, So we've had eight hearings and four pieces
of legislation. The fourth one was actually the total package
that had everything we needed, but it was too much,
went too far, so got some pushback and they kind
of cut it in half. And then the entire that

(28:52):
entire same legislation was represented the next year for this
year's national defensive opposition. Now, but things were getting they
you know, we now wait getting close to the election,
and so uh in the fall of last year, it
was learned that because it was submitted as an amendment
and didn't didn't have to go through the what we

(29:12):
call reconciliation House to Senate, but it could. It was
it was vulnerable to a filibuster by any one of
a number of committee chairs. And they learned apparently that
one somebody uh was had that could block it had
blocked it, meaning that it's not going to go through.
And they only have three choices. They could go public
and say it's been blocked and then fight it out,

(29:34):
you know, in public and the internet with a lot
of stuff as we're getting close to the election. Not
not a good idea.

Speaker 4 (29:40):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (29:40):
The other was to withdraw it formally withdraw it in
which but that's a loss, you know, it's.

Speaker 1 (29:47):
Send up many red flags anyone.

Speaker 3 (29:49):
Yeah, it's like, you know, it shows weakness. So what
they did, it's cool. And this did not really get publicized.
It wasn't in the press.

Speaker 4 (29:56):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (29:56):
They just sort of let it be known internally that
and it finally got to people like myself and others
that one of the staffers just had a bad day,
you know, had a rough week and didn't get it
submitted on time, so it missed the deadline, so it
couldn't be considered right, yeah, In other words, might the
dog gate my homework and so there you go, and

(30:19):
so but still they actually resubmitted it again. We will
eventually get that bill. Now, what's going on now is
that the second hearing that was held on November the thirteenth,
again under the House Oversight Committee, chaired in this kind
by Nancy Mace, was very strong, four witnesses. The audience
was packed, there were hundreds out in the halls and

(30:41):
up up in the viewing room. Got plenty of coverage,
very significant hearing. And six days later a Senator agillibrand,
this is on our Senate, which is like your House
of Lords. She brought had another hearing, a briefing with
the new director of ERROW, the All Domain Resolution Office,
named John Kozlowski, and so she it's not a big hearing,

(31:03):
not a big deal. It's kind of a introducing him
to the world because he's taking over for Jean Kirkpatrick
who had a real rough time and there was some
problems there. And showed the guy to be a solid guy,
and that was good. They weren't going to reveal much
people are expecting, you know, another special No, No, there

(31:23):
weren't many people in the audience project. So but something
did happen. A couple of things are important about that
hearing that I would someone like myself would notice, others
would not. Is that he did something you would expect.
He said, we've been looking at some of these very
well known sightings and he defunked two of them. One
of them was to go fast right and showed that

(31:45):
no what, it didn't go in the water. It's a
it's a night vision take and it's all based on temperature,
and it's some in some places the temperature of the
object matched the temperture of the ocean beneath it, and
so it looked like this whatever, and they had some
triangulation stuff.

Speaker 1 (32:01):
Okay, yeah, problem, no problem.

Speaker 3 (32:04):
I've never said absolutely that those three videos were et.
I just made it clear they were the first gun
camera footage has ever released and that was a big deal.
But then he says, well, there were a couple of
things we could not explain, and he describes one of them,
and anybody that goes and I'll just tip you off
if you go watch that hearing Kozlowski and Jilli Brandon Ernst,

(32:26):
watch listen or watch for when he describes the one
one of the cases that couldn't explain because it's a
very unexplainable case, right, I mean, it's really a big deal.
So I'm going okay, that was interesting, all right, But
then she said something that really caught my attent. She
said that, well, we we mentioned that they spoke to

(32:48):
and talk with Kozlowski prior to the hearing. This is standard, Yeah,
very typical to talk with. This is ahead of time,
get a sense, talk about it. Yeah. But she said
they did it in a skiff. Now, Giff, is the
sensitive sensitive compartmentalized? Okay, these are the no way anybody

(33:12):
can can listen in or max security. So they told Skiff,
now why And so I realized, of course why. This
is where she was able to ask him the very
tough questions, able to give the very difficult answers, so
that they were briefed based on Avkoslawsky of what he

(33:35):
has been seeing and where he intends to go and
so forth. Is he going to be another chahn Ker Patrick?

Speaker 6 (33:39):
No?

Speaker 3 (33:40):
Uh And that was a significant tip off. But then
gets better because after the hearing was over, because it
was a very small audience, it wasn't announced, but a
short time ahead, uh Ron James was in there during
some filming. I was in there. We were able to
get up and actually talk with her, and I led
her at that time. I let her know that hers

(34:01):
was one of let's see, third, how many about thirty
five offices that I had submitted hard copies of the
witness statements and witness affidavits of the nuclear shutdown ICBM commanders,
all right, and then there was they had those physical
copanies in their office at that time, and I'd also

(34:23):
send an electronic version of these witness statements to one
of their staffers, and that they with a cover letter
that reminds them that for thirty years, since ninety four,
they have been wanting to testify before Congress, and it
simply isn't being allowed to happen, but they want to

(34:44):
do it. And I asked her, would you talk with
Captain Sallis, who was essentially leading this group, and she
said yes, And so again.

Speaker 1 (34:52):
That was Congress for a long time ago.

Speaker 3 (34:55):
No, he's never he spoke at the citizen Hearing Disclosure
on disclosure, which was a mock congressional herring that I
put together and May of twenty thirteen, But that's in
an effort to show and also I did send a
link with the video of their testimony at the Mock
Congressional hearing in twenty thirteen, So I've so so I'm

(35:18):
doing what I can to get those witnesses into Congress.
And May says she wants them, Burlison says he wants them,
and uh and Jilli Brown is indicated that she's certainly
willing to talk with Captain Sallace. So I'm pretty sure
the next hearing is going to include those witnesses. And
I can tell you this won't be like the Grush hearing.

(35:40):
It won't be like the hearing that Nancy held on
the Nacy is held on the thirteenth, when the world
hears these former command based officers, street air commandsact based
officers giving testimony that has been in books and put
out and presented in press releases about their being present
when this a craft comes down, harvers directly over the

(36:04):
security fences and all the missiles are turned off. When
when the world hears that in under oath, things are
going to be taken to another level, and so I
think that is coming.

Speaker 1 (36:15):
And also also with Robert as well Sallas, you know
the fact that he's had, you know, encounters, other encounters
as well, and also with beings as well. So I
mean that came out a lot later on that he
didn't go public, and now he went public about So,
I mean, you know, it's just you know, it's not
just the sighting, it's not just the above the nuclear

(36:38):
it's expanded for him and which you know, in which
it has done.

Speaker 3 (36:43):
Well, let's say this. It's not going to come up
in any testimony.

Speaker 1 (36:45):
But no, I know that.

Speaker 3 (36:46):
But Robert, it's an example of one of many examples.
I know, we're people of in the military or scientists
and so forth eventually get into this and come out
or like Jim semi Van and we learned they're contact
ee in other words, that that contact the experience, even
if it was a one as well. Yeah, it is

(37:08):
one of the reasons why ultimately they simply had to
step out.

Speaker 4 (37:11):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (37:12):
And that's fine, that's great. It's not it's not easy. Uh,
and it can create problems. But when people of substantial
careers and including military intelligence also come out and say
I'm a contact d makes it a little easier for
the rest of us or the rest of the contact ees.

Speaker 1 (37:29):
Well, yes, it does, thank you. Yes, So where are
we now? Because do you know what I I because
I've been so involved with what I've had to do
with all of my UAP sort of a situation. What
what is happening now with with in New Jersey? What's
the update?

Speaker 3 (37:49):
Well, the site, I understand there's apparently some there's still orbs,
but it the the the election, I mean, the the
inauguration was coming. The press had covered it in in
tensively for months, and at some point, you know, if
they're out, if they're out in the next night, it's
not news anymore. It's you know, it's and I get that,
And so the press is kind of settled back down.

(38:11):
They're focusing Obviously, major political things are happening in the US.
So I'm not concerned about that because all the film
is out there.

Speaker 1 (38:19):
Public's being sort of like desensitized now a little bit
to it.

Speaker 3 (38:23):
Well, yeah, I mean, at some point it almost becomes normal.
I'm not worried about somehow the government slipping by this
and it's like, oh, that whole drone thing, No, No,
that's not going to happen. But what is going to
happen is this We have had fourteen presidents since Oswell,
and thirteen of them had could have if they wanted to,

(38:47):
somehow forced disclosure to happen. I have no doubt that
every single one of them had been told that this
presence was real, not necessarily briefed, not necessarily given much information,
but they're told by the people in their staff or
in the National security complex, which they, of course are

(39:07):
the commander in chief or an outsider. They knew. It's
not like they went through a presidency and no one
bothered to mention, you know, that thing is real. Now
what you do with it is your business, and they
chose not to press it. Two presidents did make what
will CONSOLI consider a notable effort, and that was Jimmy
Carter and Bill Clinton. Both of those were stuffed. Okay,

(39:29):
like in basketball, they went to the Hope and a
seven foot guys, wow wow wow. Yeah yeah, so thirty.
But eventually a president was going to do it, and
it looks as if it's going to be the fourteenth president,
and that is Donald Trump. Now why do I know this?

(39:50):
Why am I saying this? You probably are asking. There
are several reasons. One, he has been asked about the
issue a few times. Yeah, the only only presidential candidate
or president asked more questions about this was Hillary Clinton
maybe about the same. Yes, his answers are not particularly robust.

(40:11):
They're kind of casual. Sometimes they're a little somewhat negative,
but sometimes they're not. But the point is that he's
asked these questions and he answers them, but very and
one of these questions, by the way, came from his
son back during the first election, first campaign, way back.
So what's happened recently is one when he went on

(40:36):
Joe Rogan, which has now been seeing fifty million times
or something like that, he brought up UFOs. He actually
brought it up on his own, now that it might
have been scripted. He also brought up to Kendidy papers
things like that, so he literally mentions it, thus connecting
himself to the issue in front of fifty million viewers
or at least eventual viewers. And then we knew that

(40:58):
several people around him we're actually keen on the issue,
all right, people in his inner circle. Yes, And I'm going, okay,
that's that's definitely going to be helpful all right lately,
But then something really interesting happened. His son Donald Jr.
Has a podcast. Who doesn't, right, I don't know how

(41:21):
long it's been up, but he's had a podcast for
a while since he's obviously the son of the president.
I think he's got a million subscribers already, all right,
And so I hadn't watched it, but then I heard
that there was a very important one that took place,
and so I went to YouTube and listened to it.
It's about hour and fifty forty five minutes. And so
what was this podcast? Don Junior brought on Ross Colthart,

(41:42):
the Australian and newspation journalist that's covering this thing big
time and help break rush story, all right, and none
other than Lou Elizondo. And so they're talking UFOs and
the whole thing for like an hour forty minutes and
he's responding very positively, totally into it, and either us
or Lou is saying, you know, and your dad might

(42:03):
do this or your dad may has your dad been
told this? And I'm going, okay, oh shit. So anybody
that knows anything about politics and stuff knows that no way.
Don Junior brings on Alexander.

Speaker 7 (42:20):
And Coultart one and a half unless his father has
greenlighted it absolutely, so he's literally setting him up now
he's had to do with Alizondo on another time. And
so Don Junior is totally in right and obviously and
guess what he's getting red rave reviews for doing this,
lots of positive stuff.

Speaker 3 (42:41):
Which everybody this engage this issue coming, yeah, yep. And
so at this point, with Nancy May's calling for hearings,
burlets and calling parents, and with it with the Republicans
pretty much leading on the issue, though there have totainly
been Democrats involved, I see no reason why Donald Trump

(43:01):
is either going to unilatererate unilateral, unilaterate lateral.

Speaker 1 (43:08):
I couldn't say that is past what I am.

Speaker 3 (43:09):
For me, it's easy for you right this time. I'm
not older. And so either do it right, which he
could do anytime he wants, and then of course hearings
will follow immediately, and then heads of states will join in,
or he could simply further incentivize the the Senate which

(43:30):
is now run by Republicans, or the House, which has
had two hearings and run by Republicans. Go ahead and
have a couple of big hearings, right, bring them in,
and then he can then step out and do it.
It's literally there for him to take it. And so
I am. I'm thinking that based on everything I see,
barring something really awful happening and you know that, is

(43:50):
that Trump will end up being the disclosure president sometime
within about forty five days maybe sixty days of the inauguration.
So that's how close I think we are. He will
be the disclosure president. He will be the first president
in the post disclosure era, and the only The other
thing I think it's important to understand for those that
are a little you know, tensed up right now, is

(44:11):
that if he if he doesn't unilaterate unilateral rate, boy,
I got a problem here. He does it unilaterally, Yeah,
the other heads of state may hold back a little bit,
you know, kind of state, right, what's what's going on
when the hearings immediately, when the hearings follow, they'll go okay,

(44:34):
and then they'll jump in. But if he does it
after there's a couple more hearings in the House of
Senates and comes out and confirms it meaning out, I
thought you saw it, we all saw it. I think
the heads of state will jump in immediately. So within
a week or less, you'll have almost all the well
maybe all of the nuclear nations and some of the
other major economic nations already on board with the fact

(44:57):
that we're not alone. And so it's not a Donald
Trump post disclosure. It is a global Yeah.

Speaker 1 (45:04):
It has to be global.

Speaker 3 (45:05):
Yeah, yeah, And so I think, and then we will
decide how all of us are going to do, how act,
how what we're going to do, how we're going to
engage it or not engage. It will be the post
disposure world. And like that ET said to Colonel Corso,
it's set sixty some years ago when he when he
asked Colonel Corso to turn all the radar off so

(45:27):
they could get their sauce or the hell out of
there and in one of the bases of the West,
and Corso looked at him and said, what's in it
for us? And the ET said, a new world if
you can take.

Speaker 1 (45:37):
Absolutely, yeah, totally. I mean, you know, the thing is
people talking about the craft, but it is also about
the content behind the phenomena. It is so fucking vast
excuse me on French again, but it is so vast
the content behind this phenomena. It's not just about video
and it's it is like, as you know from the pilots,

(46:00):
from the experiences, there is so much mentally spiritually involved
behind it that we have to take in. It's not
just you know, it's not just a citing and it's
I mean, yeah, it is a world thing and collectively
that's what we needed, you know at the end of
the day. That's why they are showing up in a

(46:22):
massive flat And it is like I say, you know,
when it first happened, it's like, yeah, there's definitely extraterrestrals
along with our government drones along with it. They're just
literally watching and waiting and just seeing. But obviously now
it's quickening and quickening up and they are making faster moves.
I e. Like you know what I told you did earlier,

(46:43):
but not just to me, but for other people as well,
other experiences as well.

Speaker 3 (46:46):
It's going to take years for us to absorb just
the information that the government is going to be putting out. Yeah,
not to mention, not the contact these are going to
have to say, not to mention what I mean, new
research will take place. It's gonna take years to absorb
it all. And then I think after a dignified amount

(47:08):
of time, I think we're gonna have open contact. I
mean I find you're having but open contact, meaning they're
talking to our people and we're talking to their people.
We're getting reports, you know.

Speaker 1 (47:18):
Yeah, I mean there's got to be a got to
be a deeper understanding to this. I mean I think
that all the time to myself anyway, you know, just
from speaking to people, reading, you know, in my own contacts.
But you know, for the military to be able to
just actually be really, really friggin open, you have to

(47:39):
have to put all the cards on the table. There's
no lying about any of this. It has to be total, total,
as they say, transparency, and it will frighten lots of people.

Speaker 3 (47:51):
We've got just enough tough time to do some promos.
I'm gonna do a couple of problems. Okay. First of all,
just an example of one of the extraordinary aspect this
phenomena which we're going to have to deal with post disclosure,
is that the ets are fully telepathic. And recently some
extraordinary research has been coming out on telepathy. And the

(48:13):
leader of that research in public sector right now is
a Diane Hennessy pal who is an MD psychiatrist, and
she was studying Sabans for many years and then at
some point realized that some of them were fully telepathic.
So she started focusing on that and ultimately, with the

(48:33):
help of another lady, they're making a documentary. But leading
into that documentary, they have put up the audio of
many of the interviews that they did and they're on
the net and they're quite quite a stir. They're called
the Telepathy Tapes. This Google the Telepathy Tapes, and essentially

(48:58):
it'll blow your mind. And so for that reason, Contact
of the Desert which is going to be May twenty
nine to June two, which is going to fifty speakers,
but one of the key speakers is Diane Hennessy Powell, Okay,
and she's going to be talking about her telepathy work
and of course talking about how it is it connects

(49:21):
obviously to the et issue and so forth. So that's
just one example of an area.

Speaker 1 (49:26):
Because you get told something first of all, and then
you have to go and do it. You know, I've
got so many examples to all of my encounters that
they talk to you first and then something happens. I mean,
what one thing I will say Birchett said, which I
really didn't like it. Said. There was a quote from
him says there's a movement in the UFO community that
people are opening themselves up to Demonic's suggestions. People are

(49:49):
doing seances and things to bring these craft down. Right,
absolute bullshit. I don't know anybody in the community that
does anything like that, you know. I you know, obviously
you've got the five, so you know you've got this
Stephen Greer stuff. But I don't know anybody that does
anything negative to be able to do this. You can
actually voluntary have these contacts without even even doing any

(50:12):
meditation and boom that you're having these contacts, you know,
or yes, you can do the meditation and you can
have contacts. But you know, that's for them to put
it out into the public that Stenomic and we we're
pulling these are trying to get these crafts down. I
don't know anybody that does anything like that. I just
wanted to say.

Speaker 3 (50:28):
That, Yeah, it's a misinterpretation of totally.

Speaker 1 (50:33):
It's so bad. I'm saying that because don't put me
in the category, and don't put any of us experiences
in that category, because we don't work like that at all,
and eats don't work like that with us at all. Right,
So you want we're going to go and show the
age of disclosure to the trailer that you sent it.

Speaker 3 (50:47):
Yeah, and so, but contact in the desert folks, contact
the Desert dot org. It could be a massive celebration.
I I will. I will have like five or six
presentations and panels and all kinds of stuff. I'm kind
of one of the producers. So I hope you'll come
and join me there Indian Well, south of Palm Springs,
May twenty nine to June two. Now what I want
to do now is show you the trailer that just

(51:08):
came out of a major doc that's coming out.

Speaker 1 (51:11):
Race has it? I sent it to Race or Race
can play his and if that makes itse.

Speaker 3 (51:16):
Race, go ahead and play it. If if you have
a problem, I have it up as well.

Speaker 1 (51:19):
Okay, drum roll Rice from the.

Speaker 3 (51:22):
American people are ready to receive the truth.

Speaker 8 (51:30):
Humanity is not the only intelligence in the universe. Humanity
is not the only intelligent species.

Speaker 3 (51:35):
We are absolutely not alone. Non human intelligence exists.

Speaker 8 (51:39):
UAPs are real, they're here, and they're not human. I
spent twenty five years as a senior official with the CIA.
I worked on highly classified UAP program twenty eight years
as an astrophysicist.

Speaker 2 (51:51):
I served as the fourth Director of.

Speaker 8 (51:53):
National Intelligence, Director of Aviation Security in the National Security Council, the.

Speaker 6 (51:57):
One star Admiral after thirty two years of service.

Speaker 3 (52:00):
Let come forward with this. I feel like they've taken
their life in their own nineties.

Speaker 8 (52:05):
I was recruited into a highly sensitive government program that
investigated unidentified aerial phenomenon.

Speaker 9 (52:12):
For over sixteen years on behalf of the US government,
I worked as a senior intelligence official on the Unidentified
aero phenomenon topic.

Speaker 8 (52:19):
We learned that the US government was involved in a
long running secret war with other nations to collect and
verse engineer vehicles not made by humans.

Speaker 9 (52:31):
I have seen with my own eyes non human craft
and non human beings. The first country that cracks the
code on this technology will be the leader for years
to come. China has established its own version of a
UAP task force.

Speaker 6 (52:50):
You think for a second that they wouldn't consider using
it to achieve their ends of domination.

Speaker 9 (52:55):
This is similar to the Manhattan Project. This is the
atomic weapon on steroids.

Speaker 6 (53:00):
This is so secret, very very few people in our
entire government that can allowed access to it.

Speaker 5 (53:06):
Even presidents have been operating on a need to know basis,
but that begins to ramp out of control.

Speaker 3 (53:12):
It's not acceptable to have secret parts of government that
no one ever sees. You better be careful about a
government who doesn't trust espeople, because there's no telling what
they'll pull on you. This is the biggest discovery in youstry.

Speaker 8 (53:26):
You had information being locked away that could change the
trajectory for species.

Speaker 3 (53:32):
It has so many beneficial impacts, including clean energy. We
should have disclosure today, We should have disclosure tomorrow. The
time has come.

Speaker 9 (53:57):
Well, bra.

Speaker 1 (54:00):
I feel honored and to be a part of the
disclosure with everybody because that is absolutely phenomenal, and that's
going to go to the theaters, right.

Speaker 3 (54:09):
Did you Well? I don't know, but I do know this.
As I said, major movement, major action is taking place
in Hollywood. Finally the big guys are getting into it.
JJ Abrams a List studio had two series UFO and
Beyond UFOs. Steven Spielberg get another documentary series Encounters. Other

(54:30):
docs are in the works. This one, this one is
a very high production, well funded documentary produced and directed
by Dan Harrah and he's a long time Hollywood guy.
He's pretty high level guy, and so there's a lot
of money behind this and they're able to He was

(54:52):
able to interview eighty people, all right, because he had
the connections and the money and everything else. There's a
lot of my colleagues and everything. They're doing doc and
they're pretty good. But without the big funding and the
access of some of these Hollywood big wigs, is only
so far we could go. Well, Okay, I hope there's
more of these docs are made. They reach out to
more people in this field who have been in it
for decades to get our thoughts and thinking. But what

(55:16):
he's done is brought together eighty witnesses, eighty people of
high rank and station all over the place. It is
going to hit like a bomb. And I believe that
it's good enough that I hope, because I don't know.
Then told me that this could be the very first
UAP disclosure documentary ever. It gets the theatrical distribution, which

(55:39):
is to three thousand theaters domestic and abroad, the big screen.
And for that to be up on the big screen, yeah.

Speaker 1 (55:47):
That's like watching Close and Cows for the first kind
of a drive in. It's like whoa level?

Speaker 3 (55:52):
Yeah, right, Millions will see it, and more important right
at the time that we're in the process of getting
so the timing is perfect, it could end up making
a ton of money. And so I hope, upon hope
that Dan harraw Will will get theatrical distribution. Hollywood has
never given a doc distribution for a reason, not because

(56:15):
they can't make money. They know they can make money.
They don't cost much to make, but because I think
the deal, implicit or explicit deal that Hollywood and the
film Ministry had, the big guys had with the government
make all the et movies you want make billions of dollars,
and they have one hundred plus maybe two hundred million
dollars that don't stick documentaries up on those big imax

(56:39):
screens because that puts pressure on our truth embargo, and
they've gone along with that. I could be wrong, but
I know enough about docs and what it cost them
make them, and how will they do. I know one
political documentary that just made nearly three hundred million dollars,
and so the idea, and the issue is incredibly well known,
the idea that they can't put a doc when they

(57:01):
put other docks up on the I believe there was
an understanding I'm I'm not too out of shape about it,
not too nonplused. I get it. But I think now
that's changed, and so this could be it. It will
be huge, and it will first show at the Texas
Southwest Film Festival in Austin, Texas on March the seven

(57:26):
to fifteen. It is a pretty well known film festival.
I believe that's going to be its first showing. It
might be sooner and so that that's another example, the.

Speaker 1 (57:36):
First time it's been shown today on.

Speaker 3 (57:38):
That on my could be it could be no, no, no, no, no.

Speaker 1 (57:40):
No, okay, okay, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 3 (57:43):
The premiere of the film might be at the Film
Festival in Austin on the March seventh, but there might
be an earlier one. But this is the one we
know about.

Speaker 1 (57:51):
Okay, Listen, Steve, we've got to wrap. I thank you
so much with all of my heart as always for
doing what you do, and thank you so much. You're
going to come back again as always and have another
chitty chat. But listen, exciting times. I'll keep you informed.
I'll be in touching the next week and let's see,
let's let's let's see what's going to happen soon.

Speaker 3 (58:17):
Paradigm Research Group dot or subscribe. I'm the five to
one C three now tax deductible donations for Americans. Sorry
about the Brits.

Speaker 1 (58:24):
Okay, no, no, no, it's all right. You're all in the
loop for on the bio for absolutely everything. Is there, everything,
Dan listen, Steve, thank you so much, my dear friend,
you very much, and thank you, thank you everyone for
tuning in and go to the website and all of
the information is there for you to look into anything
further and just just stay awake. People, all right, take

(58:47):
it easy. Bye for me, each

Speaker 4 (59:11):
Chichach