June 12, 2025 • 35 mins
Hour 3 of A&G features...
- The India Air flight & the LA riots
- Gay MAGA friendship explodes on social media
- The India Air take off video & who commits crime?
- No Kings protest
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe, Katty.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Arm Strong and Jettie and no He Armstrong and Yetty.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
Well, guys, there's just five days left until Father's Day,
that's right.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Yeah, No one cared at all.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Yeah, five days left till Father's Day. This year, everyone's
rushing to buy a Father's Day card before Elon's kids
get them all.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
Sold out. Tap it, applause, and nobody cares at all
about Father's Day. I don't huh. The whole Fathers Don't
Matter movement in the United States. It's been going on
for several decades. Look at the statistics. The statistics are
out there for prison pregnancy, whatever you want to use
(01:04):
on how not having a father around affects things.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Yeah, it's undeniable. It's a diseased society, it really is.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
It really is.
Speaker 1 (01:12):
If men had a little testosterone, they'd be resisting. They're
afraid of the women. Our tee's been dropping like a stone.
Speaker 4 (01:19):
So did. That plane flying out of India didn't get
very far off the ground, flew about a minute, crashed
Boeing Dreamliner two hundred and forty plus on board. Everybody
was assuming everyone dead, but we have breaking news on that, Katie.
Speaker 5 (01:34):
Yeah, it looks like so far they've found two over
two hundred and four bodies. Looks like they might have
just found two hundred and five. But there's this one
guy that they're saying is the miracle of seat eleven A,
which is located directly behind the emergency exit on the
side of the plane.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
Why everybody's gonna be fighting for that seat from now on.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Oh yeah.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
But they're saying he said that he heard a really
loud noise about thirty seconds after takeoff.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
But I mean he I mean, he's talking clearly, not
only alive, but like, wow, that was awful.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Holy yeah, crap. Can you imagine, I mean, the whole
survivor's guilt thing that seems to be a real thing.
How would you not have some why me, Yeah, you'd have.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Some uh some stuff to go through, no doubt.
Speaker 5 (02:20):
Whoa how his brother was seated in a different row
on the plane?
Speaker 4 (02:24):
Holy crapy, I mean just psychologically. Oh yeah, And so.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
Like everyone person survived it.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
So there might be two hundred and forty dead and
one guy, the miracle of c eleven a who's of alive?
Mm hmm, that's an interesting story.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
Huh.
Speaker 5 (02:41):
When I it happened so quickly. When I got up,
there were bodies all around me. I was so scared.
I stood up and ran Wow.
Speaker 4 (02:49):
So he's really not hurt. Holy smoke.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
Somebody grabbed me and put me in an ambulance and
I woke up at the hospital.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (02:59):
That is Yeah. We're gonna hear a lot more about
this dude, and he's going to form a religion around
himself or something.
Speaker 1 (03:04):
I was thinking the same thing. Yeah, he's a brit
right kid? Is that what I heard? Yeah?
Speaker 5 (03:10):
Huh isn't it Vish wash Ramesh? And he lives in London.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
I got a question for you. Yeah, why do people
from India have an accent? You speak English, but why
do you have an accent? Since the Brits ran it
for so many years, the accent didn't go away. I mean,
the Brits ran it an Indian accent you may know,
but the Brits ran it long enough for English to
become the dominant language.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
But the accent didn't go away, Well it did. It
depends where you're from in India. I think a lot
of Indians like upper crust Indians speak English like Brits.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
I'm not just assuming everybody talks like a poo who
runs a quickie mart.
Speaker 6 (03:52):
No.
Speaker 7 (03:52):
Wow, wow, wow, that's all I've got to say. Okay,
well a pooh doesn't speak like a poo anymore. Or
as Hanka's area has lost his testicules.
Speaker 4 (04:03):
Because of all the damage it did. Oh yeah, before
we get back into some of the rioting stuff and
some funny stuff I think you're gonna agree with, take
on the protesters. The FBI has busted the alleged LA
riot leader who has filmed handing out bionic shields. And
there's a picture here of the van he drove in
(04:23):
handing out these shields, which are between seventy and one
hundred dollars to purchase, and they're all brand new in
the box.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Howling they can't hand out shields. I thought this was America.
And that's a half serious inquiry.
Speaker 4 (04:36):
He's Alejandro Theodro or Alana faces a charge of conspiracy
to commit civil disorders, et cetera, et cetera. We're moving
quickly to identify and arrest those involved in organizing and
or supporting the civil disorder. You're talking about a RICO
thing the other. I don't know what other laws are involved,
but clearly some organization involved.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
I mean.
Speaker 4 (04:59):
On footage taken Tuesday showed, uh, dozens of protesters running
toward a truck to grab the shields as soon as
they showed up. Who was prepared enough to have these
ordered or in their garage or whatever to show up
in a van and get ready for that and you
(05:20):
wear a shield, you're ready to do ma'am?
Speaker 1 (05:23):
Right.
Speaker 4 (05:24):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
We've had a couple of correspondents to point out the
ridiculousness of the media referring to somebody in a helmet, goggles,
elbow pads, knee pads, et cetera as a protester. I mean,
that's they're They're a rioter from a legal perspective, and
I'm not arguing against finding these people and figuring out
who they are and prosecuting them for crimes. But uh,
(05:46):
it is not illegal to hand out face shields of course, noggles,
of course not. What if it was bottles of water?
Would I be supporting? What was that phrase they used specifically?
That was that that troubled me as a lover of liberty?
Joe all right, there it comes. Uh, the scumbags who
(06:09):
are like shipping bricks to rioters and stuff like that,
I want them in jail for a good long time.
Speaker 4 (06:13):
This this is a charge of conspiracy to commit civil disorders.
Uh yeah, but I think it's super vague. Aside from
the crime, I think what's interesting is who funds organizes
these things and how have they managed to be in
the shadows right for all these years through George Floyd
in the Palette of Bricks or or whatever was going
(06:36):
on in Portland and Seattle or there's there's there are
people funding these things that have managed to stay.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
In the clear. What's interesting, in ironic is we had
a conversation not long ago with our friend Tim Sanderfer
from the Goldwater Institute, which is based in Arizona, and
they were suing the state of Arizona because the lefties
in Arizona tried to get this law going that all
nonprofits have to disclose who donates to them, so that
if it's a nonprofit right right, the Koch brothers involved
(07:06):
in it something that point that the lefties can find
out everybody financing them and docks them at wakh, call
their boss and tell them this guy contributes to like
stopping sex changes for eight year olds. They're a monster.
Speaker 4 (07:19):
You win, intellectual point of the day. That is amazing
that those two things could exist. You want a list
of where people donate their money so they can be
attacked and ruined because they're on the wrong kind to things.
But you know, go ahead and keep it a secret.
Who's providing palettes of bricks to throw at cops?
Speaker 1 (07:37):
Yeah? You first? Wow, waw full disclosure. Go ahead, set
an example. Wow, that's a good one. It's there are
so many examples. It's practically all of them, not all
of them, because there are some lefty people or good people.
I just see the world differently than them, And that's fine.
Speaker 4 (07:54):
They're monsters, the all of them.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
The percentage of time runs in the nineties that what
are offered up as principled arguments are merely an attempt
to seize more power they dress up there there would be,
you know, totalitarianism in what seemed to be principled arguments.
In the same way that you know, they took over
institution after institution saying we're just in favor of diversity
(08:21):
and equity and inclusion. Diversity means more neo Marxists. Equity
means neo Marxism, and inclusion means including more neo Marxists. Yeah, okay, so.
Speaker 4 (08:31):
Here's some funny commentary on the rioters. I mean it's
funny and it's also I don't know what you would
call it important. I mean, make some important points. He
goes by cruise control on your social media. I don't
know if he's a comedian or a writer or whatever
it is. It's a black guy sitting in his car
and here's what he says.
Speaker 8 (08:51):
Someone asked me if I support the protests that are
going on in LA I percent do please keep going
burn down your own backyard if you must know why,
because this right here is the greatest campaign that this
side never had to pay for it.
Speaker 9 (09:03):
Y'all mother out there a Los.
Speaker 8 (09:04):
Angeles do on a full boom tantrum, like y'all just
crawled out the Rio Grand screaming death to America in
a country that gave you the freedom to do that.
You were born at Kaiser Permanente in Burbank.
Speaker 9 (09:13):
Stop it. You ain't now Chapel, You're christ from Pasadela.
You ain't cartail born.
Speaker 8 (09:17):
You were target born with a costco membership by age
five half you mother protesting ain't even Mexican. Mexican, You're
American with Mexican heritage and a tattoo of the Virgin
Mary you got on a Vegas bender.
Speaker 9 (09:27):
Don't get it twisted. I respect the heritage, but.
Speaker 8 (09:30):
Flying a foreign flag while in the country that gave
you the freedom to do it, that's not pride. You
don't even go to Mexico unless it's for sprint break
in Cancun with a passport you got from the US.
Speaker 9 (09:39):
Government, and you won't go live there. Why because you
like your.
Speaker 8 (09:42):
Door dash you're seven eleven's you're air conditioning your freedom
to scream dump shit without a cartel rolling up on
your mother. And let's be honest, Ain't nobody screaming death
to Mexico while flying an American flag through Guadalajara.
Speaker 9 (09:54):
You know why?
Speaker 8 (09:55):
Because that's how you end up in a back alley
starring in Cartail TikTok season three. Meanwhile, the rest of
America is sitting back watching you block freeways during rush hour,
destroying businesses, wearing three hundred dollars Jordan's screaming about injustice
in the city with the most social programs and diversity
hires in the country. Y'all are the political version of
throwing a Molotov cocktail out of freest because you're mad
(10:16):
about gas prices.
Speaker 9 (10:18):
So listen, I'm not mad, you're passionate. I'm mad you're dumb, and.
Speaker 8 (10:21):
Your dumb ass behavior is helping the other side more
than a Trump rally in Texas with free brisket. Every time,
y'all riot loop tearing up your own you're just birthing
another red voter. So yeah, I support the protests. Keep going,
keep flying flags of countries you ain't got the balls
to move to, and shot.
Speaker 9 (10:37):
On the system that literally gives you the right to
show on it.
Speaker 4 (10:39):
There's a lot of good stuff in there. Yeah, amen,
while you're living in the city with the most social
programs and diversity of any city in America. Interesting.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
In a while, around two dozen businesses in downtown in
LA have been looted, hundreds more vandalized as broadly peaceful
daytime protests have turned violent at night. Affected stores include Biggie's,
Apple and Nike, as well as small businesses run by
many immigrants, hard working, decent, law abiding immigrants. That's the story.
(11:15):
Towards your own neighborhood. Yeah, except that there's a lot
of innocent people there.
Speaker 4 (11:18):
It's going to be interesting. I assume soon we're going
to get some real polling on all of this stuff.
Because it takes a little while. I'll bet by this
weekend we have a lot of polling.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Yeah, as I say, oh, I'm looking at the clock.
We can continue this conversation on the other side of
the break, but we need to get down to the
fundamental question why everybody No, not that fundamental as everybody's
reporting on fire bomb this and Gavin Knew some that,
and you know, even what I was saying about the
(11:49):
business is being shut down. Are we going to have
an immigration system and follow it or are we not?
Speaker 9 (12:00):
Right?
Speaker 4 (12:01):
As I have been saying, I don't hear anybody calling
for new legislation to change the law. That the current
law is. You shouldn't be working even as a bus boy,
if you're a super nice person and raising your kids
and not committing crimes. You shouldn't be working as a
busboy at the restaurant if you're here illegally. That's the
current law. If you want to change it, go ahead
(12:21):
and make the argument and maybe I would agree. I'm
not sure, but that's the current law. I'm going to
drop a sea bomb on the air right now. You're
not hearing anybody use this word in this conversation.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Oh boy, raise yourselves. Here's your sea bomb. She is
a no no, no, no no. I can do it myself,
thank you. No Congress. Oh okay, the hell is Congress?
You stupid Congress. Do you have Congress? What Congress? Oh
my god, that Congress will not shut up. Actually it would.
(12:54):
It would be nice if they would say something. They're useless.
They're useless. It's all four hundred and thirty five of you,
even our friends.
Speaker 4 (13:03):
I finally pass you to see who you are. It's
some Congress in the left lane driving slow.
Speaker 9 (13:07):
I knew it.
Speaker 4 (13:10):
We got more on the waist here.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
Someone asked me if I support the protests that are
going on in LA I want hundred percent. Do please
keep going burn down your own backyard if you must
know why, Because this right here is the greatest campaign
that this ide never had to pay for.
Speaker 9 (13:27):
Y'all.
Speaker 8 (13:27):
I'm out there in Los Angeles doing a full bone
tantrum like y'all just crawled out the Rio Grand screaming
debt to America in a country that gave you the
freedom to do that. You were born at Kaisa Permanente
in Burbank stopping. You ain't ol Chapel, You're christ from Pasadeenland.
You ain't cartel born. You were target born with a
Costco membership by age five. Half you mother protests and
ain't even Mexican Mexican. You're American with Mexican heritage and
(13:48):
a tattoo of the Virgin Mary you got on a
Vegas bender.
Speaker 4 (13:51):
So we got a bunch of texts about that loving
that wanting to know where to find it. We got
this text, Please share the link to the guy talking
from his car about the protest. I'm Mexican and need
to share it with my compatriots that support them. Yeah,
that's pretty good anyway. I thought at.
Speaker 1 (14:06):
Armstrong and Getty dot com under hot links today and
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Cruise Control that's who he goes by. I have no
idea what he does or who he is, and somebody's
gonna find out. I don't know he looked at porn
once on his computer or so, I don't know. You
know some of the old docs that's.
Speaker 1 (14:23):
On a Katie's Corner.
Speaker 4 (14:24):
Okay at this time, so check it out. I thought
it was very, very good. Later, we want to talk
about Brian Wilson from The Beach Boys, some of the
bios yesterday on The Guy. Even if you're not into
the Beach Boys. What an interesting story of one of
the big musical geniuses in American history whoa some of
it tragic, but anyway, more on that later.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Really troubling. Speaking of troubling, wherever there is energy these days,
the grifters come a calling, they start circling like vultures.
The MAGA movement is no exception. And uh, if any
of you are of some of these people I'm about
to mention, I don't apologize in advance. The story starts
(15:06):
with Brandon Stroka and Scott Presler, who I didn't realize
by name that I was familiar with, but I am
at least one of them. Both had risen to become
charismatic MAGA celebrities. They both happen to be openly gay,
not that that really matters, but Presler became renowned in
(15:26):
the MAGA world for supposedly delivering Pennsylvania to Trump in
the twenty twenty four election. Straca, meanwhile, was the guy
who found his own startam at the head of the
campaign hashtag walk Away that encouraged disenchanted Democrats to follo
him out the door to join the Maga movement. I
remember some of those videos were really, really good from
the walk Away movement, But now they've turned on each other.
(15:49):
Straka is saying the truth about Scott Presler in a
series of posts. I have no idea who are what
the real Scott Presler is. He accused him of faking
everything from his voter registration totals to adopting a phony
Midwestern accent. The clause are out. These guys are fighting
online now, blah blah blah. But then they move into
(16:09):
after that feud. Around the same time Straca attack Presler,
accusations of Griff flew back and forth in a separate
brawl between conservative activist Laura Lumer and Cali Means, the
brother of Trump's Surgeon General nominee Casey Means. In a
similar Vain mag influencers have been called out by rivals
for allegedly taking money from big corporations to make social
(16:30):
media posts supporting their agendas. Then came last week's Trump
Musk beef, which prompted cat turd approach Trump influencer with
three point seven million X followers to deem far right
personality Alex Jones a fraud and a sellout for amplifying
Musk's claims about the president.
Speaker 4 (16:52):
CET's a really big deal. I don't like the name much,
but A and neither do I. It's amazing you can
become that popular with with like serious topics, with that moniker.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
It's memorable.
Speaker 4 (17:12):
We got a lot more on the way. Stay with
us if you miss the second, we get the podcast
Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
On the band Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 10 (17:19):
But I do have an ear for music. Yeah, and
I really, you know, I think music is played a
big role we have. I play great music. People like
the music I play, which is it was funny because
my father would not have thought about music for me.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
But I do.
Speaker 10 (17:35):
I think I have an ear for music. They play
a note and like on a piano, and then I
remember to this day, and then they ask you other
questions and then they play notes later on and they say,
which is the note we played from one hour ago?
And I'd like, get it right, I guess, But that
was a long time ago.
Speaker 4 (17:55):
That's interesting. Trump did a podcast and he claims that
his parents took him to some sort of testing thing
to see what like his talents are when he was young,
and he had great musical ability. But his dad, the
real estate developer, apparently like not cool with that sort
of waste of time. Waste of time, which is kind
of an interesting insight into his personality. Yeah, I guess
(18:20):
for a while played the flu If you'd be there earlier,
he says, his instrument of choices of flute not funny.
First major plane crash in quite a while, I don't
remember how long it's been. A Boeing Dreamliner went down
in India full of people headed to Britain.
Speaker 9 (18:35):
Is that right?
Speaker 1 (18:36):
I believe so.
Speaker 4 (18:37):
Two hundred and forty plus people on board. One person survived.
Sit in eleven A. Sit in seat eleven A. Apparently
it's the magic seat. But I haven't watched the video
of the plane taken off. It didn't go very far.
What did it look like?
Speaker 1 (18:49):
It was really interesting and troubling, as you might expect.
It just didn't get lyft it it went up in
the air, I don't know, six hundred feet it's tough
to say, but a few hundred feet and it just
stayed there. That's interesting because it didn't have that steep rise.
(19:10):
I saw the headline that the may Day came in
like right after takeoff, and they were at six hundred
and seventy five feet when they called.
Speaker 4 (19:16):
It the Mayday.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Yeah, okay, good guess. So it takes off and it
gets up in the air a little bit, but then
stops lifting, and then it very very slowly sinks down
as if it is in final approach to landing. And
what was remarkable about it, other than the obvious horrific
loss of human life, was that if there was another
(19:38):
runway in front of them, I think they just would
have landed, because the non violence of the descent was
the most striking thing. It was very gentle. They were
just gliding downward.
Speaker 9 (19:48):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (19:48):
I don't want to get too gruesome, I mean, because
I think a lot of us pictured dying in a
plane crash. If you ever picture it, it's kind of
a plunging out of the sky, spinning, you know, this
is it sort of horror.
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Good lord.
Speaker 4 (19:59):
These people might have thought, you know, we're not supposed
to be landing now, and that looks like a field,
but I don't I don't know if it was city.
I don't know if it would strike me immediately. Is
we're all going to die here if we're coming down
like it's a landing, the.
Speaker 1 (20:13):
Problem being you have fuel tanks completely full of aircraft fuel.
Speaker 4 (20:19):
So and the one guy did kurb blowy live and
just and he ran away from the thing and was
talking to reporters.
Speaker 1 (20:28):
Wild, Yeah, terrible, terrible.
Speaker 4 (20:31):
I don't music. Luckily, I don't ever think about that
for whatever reason. And I have plenty of quirks in
my brain, as everyone who listens knows, but I don't
ever contemplate the plane crash. And when I fly, I.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
Just, oh, I have to fight the thought all the time.
Interesting in fact, I was.
Speaker 9 (20:47):
I was a.
Speaker 1 (20:48):
Terrible flyer for a few years of my life, and
then I finally got hold of it somehow. But yeah, terrible.
Well I transition music no no, no, I want to
get back no no, yes, yes, yes. This is a
time about plane crashes in a about playing U. Welcome
to the Jack Show, the Jack Solo Show with absolutely
no Joe Getty enjoy it. This is garbage talks about
death all the time. I hate it.
Speaker 4 (21:10):
This is not about the plane crash. It's the as
you know, you were opposite me on this. If I'm
standing in center field and they hit me a flyball,
all I can think about is how people are going
to mock me if I drop this. But when I
get on a plane, it never crosses my mind that
this might crash. Whereas you think about crashing, you.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Get a flyball coming to you, you just think I'm
going to catch this right and remind myself where I
need to throw it right.
Speaker 4 (21:39):
So, I mean, how the human mind.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
It just shows how different we are. Thank you, Michael.
Speaker 4 (21:47):
Oh, you're fantastic with that sort of thing.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
Those are different in that, you know, my confidence came
from the experience of catching a thousand flyballs. I mean,
so it wasn't like inborn.
Speaker 4 (21:57):
I don't think my lack of confidence came from endless
mocking over every aspect of my life.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
Huh. Well, there you go, Charlie Brown moving along. So
I guess that was our transition, speaking of getting them
while they're young and that sort of thing. Really interesting.
Major study out of Australia about criminality. They tracked eighty
thousand youngsters from birth to adulthood that not shockingly revealed
(22:28):
stark differences between men and women in terms of criminal behavior.
Speaker 4 (22:32):
Now Australia is a people colony, right, everybody lives not
currently not currently originally haven't been reiche.
Speaker 1 (22:39):
Yeah. The findings point to a clear takeaway. Most people
will never seriously come into contact with the criminal justice system, obviously,
but interestingly enough for the small proportion who do, they're
paths into crime or shaped early, and very differently for
men and women. Let's see, let me scroll down. There's
a lot here. The clearest finding. Okay already said they.
Speaker 4 (23:03):
Should have teased this is your kid gonna be a
criminal find out.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
That would have been great showbiz. I wish I'd thought
of it anyway. One of the main takeaways is that
the vast majority of people never commit serious offenses aren't
prone to doing it. There's practically no scenario in which
they would, right, So that means efforts to prevent crime
can be more precisely targeted, ensuring interventions focus on a smaller,
(23:29):
high risk group rather than the general population when they're young.
Speaker 4 (23:35):
I wonder if this is something AYI could be good at,
Like really predicting, which I don't know what you'd do
other than surveyal them. But we all know, and cops
say this all the time. They're babysitting the same people
over and over again for the most part, because, like
you said, when you hear about somebody who's got, you know,
a lifetime of crime, they've been involved with the law
their whole lives, and for most of us, never once,
(23:56):
not one time.
Speaker 1 (23:57):
So I don't think we need AI because we have study.
Non offending was the most prevalent group, but five distinct
offending groups for both men and women were identified. Among men,
these range from those who rarely offended, to a small
group that started early and continued into adulthood, and another
that mostly offended during adolescents but later stopped. In contrast,
(24:21):
most women fell into the low or non offending groups.
Only a small proportion followed a pattern of serious or
repeat offending.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
I would like to know. There's a couple of things
I'd like to know. Maybe you have the answer here,
the like there's the Overton window for your own life,
Like ending up in jail is not within my Overtson
window of possibilities. But if you start early with that yeah,
it is. It is just it's just one of those
things that could happen. Or if you grow up in
a family where that's because I didn't grow up in
(24:49):
a family where that's an option for life really to
go to jail. But if you grow up around people
that are constantly interacting it, you would just think, well,
that's that's just life, that's normal life.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
So to summarize some of the key findings for boys
and young men, those in the persistent offending group, this
is the group we'd really like to understand and intercede
early and get a hold of them. They had earlier
and more frequent contact with police, and they were more
likely to face serious charges and often experienced youth the tension.
For girls and young women, fewer entered the system overall,
(25:21):
but those with repeat contact showed distinct patterns. Their offenses
tend to differ from those men with a greater focus
on property related crimes as well as doug drug and
traffic violations. Blah blah blah. But so they suggest a
nuanced approach to crime prevention, one that recognizes both the
gendered nature offending in the early life experiences that shape it.
(25:45):
For boys and young men. This could mean early identification
of behavioral issues, stronger support in schools, and support to
create stable, safe home environments, blah blah blah. But generally,
if somebody is going to be a career criminal, you
figure that out very early in their lives, which I
think you know, cops and judges and lawyers could probably
tell you that, But you know.
Speaker 4 (26:06):
I would like to know some stats around that crowd
in their home situation in terms of intact households or
a father being present, etc.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
Yes, and I'm glad you brought that up, because that
brings us to one of the most interesting and fraught
aspects of this Not fraught for me, but the rest
of society seems to have a problem with it, or
at least some people do. And some of the scientists
involved in this say, what if we saw a child's
aggression at school not as bad behavior exactly, although it
(26:38):
is you can see it as both, but as a
red flag for issues at home, family violence, lawlessness, et cetera.
At home.
Speaker 4 (26:47):
I would have to look into that. Because I am
now a mandated reporter in the state of California. I
did the training, so I am by law I have
to report that if I see that sort.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
Of thing, if a teenage girls shoplifting was a symptom
of trauma or mental illness, targeted early intervention, not more programs,
just smarter programs. One thing that we will never one
thing that we must overcome. I think in the US
of A. Never mind the assies, the words, they live
(27:20):
upside down, the toilets swirled a different way. It's just
crazy down there. In southern hemisphere, we.
Speaker 4 (27:25):
Got kangaroos for crying out loud.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
Well right, yeah. Anyway, in the US of A, we
have to stop the idiotic notion of quote unquote not
blaming the victim. Where there is pathology, fatherlessness, crime, drugs,
we've got to say why because the family's crumbling. And
(27:51):
if it happens to be disproportionately blonde headed people from Norwegian,
you know, extraction, say it. Likewise, if it's other ethnic groups,
say it. Stop that idiotic notion of not blaming the victim.
Nobody's blaming anybody.
Speaker 4 (28:09):
Just trying to figure out who's most likely or causes.
It's interesting for the mandated reporter training. One of the
things was, you know, things to look for in a
household that might make it more likely a child is
being abused and it was substance abuse in the home, unemployment,
a variety of things like that. That then when it
(28:30):
gets into the political cycle, you think, no, no, no, no,
you can't. You can't be talking about that'd be you know,
blaming a certain sort of person.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
What even though the statistic, statistical evidence is just undeniable
about the lack of a father in the home and
similar issues.
Speaker 4 (28:49):
My niece is in Australia for the summer. She's interning
for a doctor. She wants me be a doctor, and.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
So she's in Australia for the winter.
Speaker 4 (29:00):
Yeah, I guess, although she was wearing shorts and a
T shirt so it didn't look very cold. She's sent
a picture of her holding the biggest snake I've ever
seen in my life. I don't know what that. I
don't choose at a zoo or if that's Parker for learning
to be a doctor, I don't know what Australia is like.
That's an Australian tape for him. You don't want them,
or somebody came in with that wrapped around them. I
don't know what happened there, Riiche. So a judge is
(29:22):
going to rule today, whether or not, as Gavin Newsom claims,
Trump violated something by calling in the National Guard. Most
legal experts seem to think, no, he has every right
to do that. We'll have some of those experts weighing in,
among other things on the way, stay here. Have you
(29:43):
heard about the no Kings rallies that are planned for Saturday.
I got some more information on that. It's all about
resisting Trump, who's trying to be a king, which is
what Gavin Newsom's talking about here.
Speaker 6 (29:53):
Donald Trump, without consulting California law enforcement leaders, commandeered two
thousand of our state's National Guard members to deploy on
our streets illegally and for no reason.
Speaker 4 (30:06):
Okay, there you go. So he stated that the other
day Trump commandeered the National Guard illegally and for no reason.
I think there was a reason on TV. We all
saw it as soon as we flipped on the TV.
But guarding federal facilities is the reason. Is it legal
or not? I don't know that much about but Jonathan
truly does.
Speaker 11 (30:26):
And under Title ten, it says that the president may
federalize a national guard and says that that order shall
be issued through the governor.
Speaker 4 (30:36):
Now, Governor Newsham.
Speaker 11 (30:37):
Saying, well, that means that I also have to sign off.
Speaker 4 (30:41):
I think that's pretty wrong headed.
Speaker 11 (30:42):
I mean, the Congress knew how to say that a
governor makes a separate decision. There's tow other provisions under
Title ten that say that the governor has to give
his consent or make a request.
Speaker 4 (30:55):
Congress didn't do that here.
Speaker 11 (30:57):
It said that the president issues the order based on
what he believes is a threat, and that order goes
through the office of the governor. So I think that
this is a very weak argument going before the court.
Speaker 4 (31:10):
Now that's Jonathan Turley is always on Fox, and I
mean he sometimes slaps down Trump and says he's wrong,
but he seems he's in agreement with most every other
political expert that I've seen say yeah, he can do this,
and then they get into I don't think it's going
to be popular with the American people though, which may
or may not be true. But whether or not Trump
has the right to do it, he can do it,
(31:31):
and it's to protect federal buildings at least. I was
watching a report this morning on News Nation. What is
their slogan? A news for all Americans that they're looking around.
They were in La in the morning, and they said,
the National Guard troops in front of federal buildings, standing
there protecting federal buildings.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
Okay, well, and it's interesting that a great deal was made.
This is the first time since nineteen sixty five that
this has been done. Blah blah blah. Well, back then,
the president didn't ask the governors if it was okay
if the National Guard escorted black kids into schools, et cetera. No,
or it's a specious argument, or the.
Speaker 4 (32:07):
Hundreds of times you don't have a lunkhead governor who
calls out the National Guard of their own so the
president doesn't have to go around the governor. The Texas
governor has called out multiple units of the National Guard
to deal with their unrest in a couple of cities,
and a bunch of people got arrested last night, so
Trump doesn't need to call in the National Guard there.
The governor did what you should do. Gavin Newsom should
(32:29):
want to protect those buildings.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
And during the era of old George Floyd and his riots,
the idea that oh no, we're not We've got to
wait until there's mayhem and fire and death and looting
in the streets and only then can we react. No, no,
how about an era of we're having none of that.
Why don't we try that for a minute. Jonah Goldberg
Dispatch yesterday. I heard him predict we will have a
(32:52):
Kent State this summer. That's when a bunch of students
got shot on was it Ohio State, Kent State? Kent
State campus. But then somebody pointed out, yeah, that happened
in nineteen seventy and then in seventy two Nixon won
forty nine states. He was making the point that they
couldn't come with an example where left wing protests led
(33:14):
to them like winning the politics of the day, it's
always backlashed against them, and every example they could come
up with over the years, which is kind of interesting
on its own. Maybe that fits in with some more
that Jonathan Turley wanted to point out about all this
insurrection talk.
Speaker 11 (33:33):
But Democrats have to be careful about They just spent
the last few years watering down the meaning of insurrection
in the litigation over the Fourteenth Amendment, where they were
trying to bar not just President Trump but dozens of
Republicans from ballots. They argue that an insurrection doesn't have
to be a rebellion. It could just be a large
(33:54):
assemblage of people who are trying to prevent the execution
of federal law.
Speaker 4 (33:58):
Does that sound familiar you? Yeah, So that's that's what
we got going on right now, is each party goes
kind of to an extreme level on things, but then
the other party can take advantage of that when they
get the reins executive orders for instance, or lots of it,
lots of for instances.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
Yeah. Wow, Yeah, that's not the way I see an insurrection.
That's not the way I would define the term.
Speaker 4 (34:24):
I wouldn't call it an insurrection Saturday. But it is
the no Kings, No Crowns protest that, according to the
USA Today and the organizers of it, is scheduled for
or designed to show up in eleven hundred different communities.
They're that organized, the No King's Day that comes from
(34:46):
like Antifa language, your anarchist language. If no Kings or
whatever they're the organizers claim or are just trying to
be patriotic. We don't want to have kings. I don't
want to have a king either, But that's going to
be on Saturday. I have no idea if this is
going to end up being a big deal or not?
Speaker 1 (35:04):
Well, and if it is a big deal, will that
be a big deal? I mean, if they get a
good turnout and lots of people are chanting around the
country and very pleased with themselves, then what what's the
next thing that happens?
Speaker 4 (35:15):
Turn If it turns violent, then there will be some
political fallout, and as we were just talking about, almost
certainly to the left's detriment, which is what usually happens
if you miss an hour or segment. Get the podcast
Armstrong and Getty on demand Armstrong and Getty
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe, Katty.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Arm Strong and Jettie and no He Armstrong and Yetty.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
Well, guys, there's just five days left until Father's Day,
that's right.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Yeah, No one cared at all.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Yeah, five days left till Father's Day. This year, everyone's
rushing to buy a Father's Day card before Elon's kids
get them all.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
Sold out. Tap it, applause, and nobody cares at all
about Father's Day. I don't huh. The whole Fathers Don't
Matter movement in the United States. It's been going on
for several decades. Look at the statistics. The statistics are
out there for prison pregnancy, whatever you want to use
(01:04):
on how not having a father around affects things.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Yeah, it's undeniable. It's a diseased society, it really is.
Speaker 4 (01:11):
It really is.
Speaker 1 (01:12):
If men had a little testosterone, they'd be resisting. They're
afraid of the women. Our tee's been dropping like a stone.
Speaker 4 (01:19):
So did. That plane flying out of India didn't get
very far off the ground, flew about a minute, crashed
Boeing Dreamliner two hundred and forty plus on board. Everybody
was assuming everyone dead, but we have breaking news on that, Katie.
Speaker 5 (01:34):
Yeah, it looks like so far they've found two over
two hundred and four bodies. Looks like they might have
just found two hundred and five. But there's this one
guy that they're saying is the miracle of seat eleven A,
which is located directly behind the emergency exit on the
side of the plane.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
Why everybody's gonna be fighting for that seat from now on.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Oh yeah.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
But they're saying he said that he heard a really
loud noise about thirty seconds after takeoff.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
But I mean he I mean, he's talking clearly, not
only alive, but like, wow, that was awful.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Holy yeah, crap. Can you imagine, I mean, the whole
survivor's guilt thing that seems to be a real thing.
How would you not have some why me, Yeah, you'd have.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Some uh some stuff to go through, no doubt.
Speaker 5 (02:20):
Whoa how his brother was seated in a different row
on the plane?
Speaker 4 (02:24):
Holy crapy, I mean just psychologically. Oh yeah, And so.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
Like everyone person survived it.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
So there might be two hundred and forty dead and
one guy, the miracle of c eleven a who's of alive?
Mm hmm, that's an interesting story.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
Huh.
Speaker 5 (02:41):
When I it happened so quickly. When I got up,
there were bodies all around me. I was so scared.
I stood up and ran Wow.
Speaker 4 (02:49):
So he's really not hurt. Holy smoke.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
Somebody grabbed me and put me in an ambulance and
I woke up at the hospital.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (02:59):
That is Yeah. We're gonna hear a lot more about
this dude, and he's going to form a religion around
himself or something.
Speaker 1 (03:04):
I was thinking the same thing. Yeah, he's a brit
right kid? Is that what I heard? Yeah?
Speaker 5 (03:10):
Huh isn't it Vish wash Ramesh? And he lives in London.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
I got a question for you. Yeah, why do people
from India have an accent? You speak English, but why
do you have an accent? Since the Brits ran it
for so many years, the accent didn't go away. I mean,
the Brits ran it an Indian accent you may know,
but the Brits ran it long enough for English to
become the dominant language.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
But the accent didn't go away, Well it did. It
depends where you're from in India. I think a lot
of Indians like upper crust Indians speak English like Brits.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
I'm not just assuming everybody talks like a poo who
runs a quickie mart.
Speaker 6 (03:52):
No.
Speaker 7 (03:52):
Wow, wow, wow, that's all I've got to say. Okay,
well a pooh doesn't speak like a poo anymore. Or
as Hanka's area has lost his testicules.
Speaker 4 (04:03):
Because of all the damage it did. Oh yeah, before
we get back into some of the rioting stuff and
some funny stuff I think you're gonna agree with, take
on the protesters. The FBI has busted the alleged LA
riot leader who has filmed handing out bionic shields. And
there's a picture here of the van he drove in
(04:23):
handing out these shields, which are between seventy and one
hundred dollars to purchase, and they're all brand new in
the box.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Howling they can't hand out shields. I thought this was America.
And that's a half serious inquiry.
Speaker 4 (04:36):
He's Alejandro Theodro or Alana faces a charge of conspiracy
to commit civil disorders, et cetera, et cetera. We're moving
quickly to identify and arrest those involved in organizing and
or supporting the civil disorder. You're talking about a RICO
thing the other. I don't know what other laws are involved,
but clearly some organization involved.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
I mean.
Speaker 4 (04:59):
On footage taken Tuesday showed, uh, dozens of protesters running
toward a truck to grab the shields as soon as
they showed up. Who was prepared enough to have these
ordered or in their garage or whatever to show up
in a van and get ready for that and you
(05:20):
wear a shield, you're ready to do ma'am?
Speaker 1 (05:23):
Right.
Speaker 4 (05:24):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
We've had a couple of correspondents to point out the
ridiculousness of the media referring to somebody in a helmet, goggles,
elbow pads, knee pads, et cetera as a protester. I mean,
that's they're They're a rioter from a legal perspective, and
I'm not arguing against finding these people and figuring out
who they are and prosecuting them for crimes. But uh,
(05:46):
it is not illegal to hand out face shields of course, noggles,
of course not. What if it was bottles of water?
Would I be supporting? What was that phrase they used specifically?
That was that that troubled me as a lover of liberty?
Joe all right, there it comes. Uh, the scumbags who
(06:09):
are like shipping bricks to rioters and stuff like that,
I want them in jail for a good long time.
Speaker 4 (06:13):
This this is a charge of conspiracy to commit civil disorders.
Uh yeah, but I think it's super vague. Aside from
the crime, I think what's interesting is who funds organizes
these things and how have they managed to be in
the shadows right for all these years through George Floyd
in the Palette of Bricks or or whatever was going
(06:36):
on in Portland and Seattle or there's there's there are
people funding these things that have managed to stay.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
In the clear. What's interesting, in ironic is we had
a conversation not long ago with our friend Tim Sanderfer
from the Goldwater Institute, which is based in Arizona, and
they were suing the state of Arizona because the lefties
in Arizona tried to get this law going that all
nonprofits have to disclose who donates to them, so that
if it's a nonprofit right right, the Koch brothers involved
(07:06):
in it something that point that the lefties can find
out everybody financing them and docks them at wakh, call
their boss and tell them this guy contributes to like
stopping sex changes for eight year olds. They're a monster.
Speaker 4 (07:19):
You win, intellectual point of the day. That is amazing
that those two things could exist. You want a list
of where people donate their money so they can be
attacked and ruined because they're on the wrong kind to things.
But you know, go ahead and keep it a secret.
Who's providing palettes of bricks to throw at cops?
Speaker 1 (07:37):
Yeah? You first? Wow, waw full disclosure. Go ahead, set
an example. Wow, that's a good one. It's there are
so many examples. It's practically all of them, not all
of them, because there are some lefty people or good people.
I just see the world differently than them, And that's fine.
Speaker 4 (07:54):
They're monsters, the all of them.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
The percentage of time runs in the nineties that what
are offered up as principled arguments are merely an attempt
to seize more power they dress up there there would be,
you know, totalitarianism in what seemed to be principled arguments.
In the same way that you know, they took over
institution after institution saying we're just in favor of diversity
(08:21):
and equity and inclusion. Diversity means more neo Marxists. Equity
means neo Marxism, and inclusion means including more neo Marxists. Yeah, okay, so.
Speaker 4 (08:31):
Here's some funny commentary on the rioters. I mean it's
funny and it's also I don't know what you would
call it important. I mean, make some important points. He
goes by cruise control on your social media. I don't
know if he's a comedian or a writer or whatever
it is. It's a black guy sitting in his car
and here's what he says.
Speaker 8 (08:51):
Someone asked me if I support the protests that are
going on in LA I percent do please keep going
burn down your own backyard if you must know why,
because this right here is the greatest campaign that this
side never had to pay for it.
Speaker 9 (09:03):
Y'all mother out there a Los.
Speaker 8 (09:04):
Angeles do on a full boom tantrum, like y'all just
crawled out the Rio Grand screaming death to America in
a country that gave you the freedom to do that.
You were born at Kaiser Permanente in Burbank.
Speaker 9 (09:13):
Stop it. You ain't now Chapel, You're christ from Pasadela.
You ain't cartail born.
Speaker 8 (09:17):
You were target born with a costco membership by age
five half you mother protesting ain't even Mexican. Mexican, You're
American with Mexican heritage and a tattoo of the Virgin
Mary you got on a Vegas bender.
Speaker 9 (09:27):
Don't get it twisted. I respect the heritage, but.
Speaker 8 (09:30):
Flying a foreign flag while in the country that gave
you the freedom to do it, that's not pride. You
don't even go to Mexico unless it's for sprint break
in Cancun with a passport you got from the US.
Speaker 9 (09:39):
Government, and you won't go live there. Why because you
like your.
Speaker 8 (09:42):
Door dash you're seven eleven's you're air conditioning your freedom
to scream dump shit without a cartel rolling up on
your mother. And let's be honest, Ain't nobody screaming death
to Mexico while flying an American flag through Guadalajara.
Speaker 9 (09:54):
You know why?
Speaker 8 (09:55):
Because that's how you end up in a back alley
starring in Cartail TikTok season three. Meanwhile, the rest of
America is sitting back watching you block freeways during rush hour,
destroying businesses, wearing three hundred dollars Jordan's screaming about injustice
in the city with the most social programs and diversity
hires in the country. Y'all are the political version of
throwing a Molotov cocktail out of freest because you're mad
(10:16):
about gas prices.
Speaker 9 (10:18):
So listen, I'm not mad, you're passionate. I'm mad you're dumb, and.
Speaker 8 (10:21):
Your dumb ass behavior is helping the other side more
than a Trump rally in Texas with free brisket. Every time,
y'all riot loop tearing up your own you're just birthing
another red voter. So yeah, I support the protests. Keep going,
keep flying flags of countries you ain't got the balls
to move to, and shot.
Speaker 9 (10:37):
On the system that literally gives you the right to
show on it.
Speaker 4 (10:39):
There's a lot of good stuff in there. Yeah, amen,
while you're living in the city with the most social
programs and diversity of any city in America. Interesting.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
In a while, around two dozen businesses in downtown in
LA have been looted, hundreds more vandalized as broadly peaceful
daytime protests have turned violent at night. Affected stores include Biggie's,
Apple and Nike, as well as small businesses run by
many immigrants, hard working, decent, law abiding immigrants. That's the story.
(11:15):
Towards your own neighborhood. Yeah, except that there's a lot
of innocent people there.
Speaker 4 (11:18):
It's going to be interesting. I assume soon we're going
to get some real polling on all of this stuff.
Because it takes a little while. I'll bet by this
weekend we have a lot of polling.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Yeah, as I say, oh, I'm looking at the clock.
We can continue this conversation on the other side of
the break, but we need to get down to the
fundamental question why everybody No, not that fundamental as everybody's
reporting on fire bomb this and Gavin Knew some that,
and you know, even what I was saying about the
(11:49):
business is being shut down. Are we going to have
an immigration system and follow it or are we not?
Speaker 9 (12:00):
Right?
Speaker 4 (12:01):
As I have been saying, I don't hear anybody calling
for new legislation to change the law. That the current
law is. You shouldn't be working even as a bus boy,
if you're a super nice person and raising your kids
and not committing crimes. You shouldn't be working as a
busboy at the restaurant if you're here illegally. That's the
current law. If you want to change it, go ahead
(12:21):
and make the argument and maybe I would agree. I'm
not sure, but that's the current law. I'm going to
drop a sea bomb on the air right now. You're
not hearing anybody use this word in this conversation.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Oh boy, raise yourselves. Here's your sea bomb. She is
a no no, no, no no. I can do it myself,
thank you. No Congress. Oh okay, the hell is Congress?
You stupid Congress. Do you have Congress? What Congress? Oh
my god, that Congress will not shut up. Actually it would.
(12:54):
It would be nice if they would say something. They're useless.
They're useless. It's all four hundred and thirty five of you,
even our friends.
Speaker 4 (13:03):
I finally pass you to see who you are. It's
some Congress in the left lane driving slow.
Speaker 9 (13:07):
I knew it.
Speaker 4 (13:10):
We got more on the waist here.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
Someone asked me if I support the protests that are
going on in LA I want hundred percent. Do please
keep going burn down your own backyard if you must
know why, Because this right here is the greatest campaign
that this ide never had to pay for.
Speaker 9 (13:27):
Y'all.
Speaker 8 (13:27):
I'm out there in Los Angeles doing a full bone
tantrum like y'all just crawled out the Rio Grand screaming
debt to America in a country that gave you the
freedom to do that. You were born at Kaisa Permanente
in Burbank stopping. You ain't ol Chapel, You're christ from Pasadeenland.
You ain't cartel born. You were target born with a
Costco membership by age five. Half you mother protests and
ain't even Mexican Mexican. You're American with Mexican heritage and
(13:48):
a tattoo of the Virgin Mary you got on a
Vegas bender.
Speaker 4 (13:51):
So we got a bunch of texts about that loving
that wanting to know where to find it. We got
this text, Please share the link to the guy talking
from his car about the protest. I'm Mexican and need
to share it with my compatriots that support them. Yeah,
that's pretty good anyway. I thought at.
Speaker 1 (14:06):
Armstrong and Getty dot com under hot links today and
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Cruise Control that's who he goes by. I have no
idea what he does or who he is, and somebody's
gonna find out. I don't know he looked at porn
once on his computer or so, I don't know. You
know some of the old docs that's.
Speaker 1 (14:23):
On a Katie's Corner.
Speaker 4 (14:24):
Okay at this time, so check it out. I thought
it was very, very good. Later, we want to talk
about Brian Wilson from The Beach Boys, some of the
bios yesterday on The Guy. Even if you're not into
the Beach Boys. What an interesting story of one of
the big musical geniuses in American history whoa some of
it tragic, but anyway, more on that later.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Really troubling. Speaking of troubling, wherever there is energy these days,
the grifters come a calling, they start circling like vultures.
The MAGA movement is no exception. And uh, if any
of you are of some of these people I'm about
to mention, I don't apologize in advance. The story starts
(15:06):
with Brandon Stroka and Scott Presler, who I didn't realize
by name that I was familiar with, but I am
at least one of them. Both had risen to become
charismatic MAGA celebrities. They both happen to be openly gay,
not that that really matters, but Presler became renowned in
(15:26):
the MAGA world for supposedly delivering Pennsylvania to Trump in
the twenty twenty four election. Straca, meanwhile, was the guy
who found his own startam at the head of the
campaign hashtag walk Away that encouraged disenchanted Democrats to follo
him out the door to join the Maga movement. I
remember some of those videos were really, really good from
the walk Away movement, But now they've turned on each other.
(15:49):
Straka is saying the truth about Scott Presler in a
series of posts. I have no idea who are what
the real Scott Presler is. He accused him of faking
everything from his voter registration totals to adopting a phony
Midwestern accent. The clause are out. These guys are fighting
online now, blah blah blah. But then they move into
(16:09):
after that feud. Around the same time Straca attack Presler,
accusations of Griff flew back and forth in a separate
brawl between conservative activist Laura Lumer and Cali Means, the
brother of Trump's Surgeon General nominee Casey Means. In a
similar Vain mag influencers have been called out by rivals
for allegedly taking money from big corporations to make social
(16:30):
media posts supporting their agendas. Then came last week's Trump
Musk beef, which prompted cat turd approach Trump influencer with
three point seven million X followers to deem far right
personality Alex Jones a fraud and a sellout for amplifying
Musk's claims about the president.
Speaker 4 (16:52):
CET's a really big deal. I don't like the name much,
but A and neither do I. It's amazing you can
become that popular with with like serious topics, with that moniker.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
It's memorable.
Speaker 4 (17:12):
We got a lot more on the way. Stay with
us if you miss the second, we get the podcast
Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
On the band Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 10 (17:19):
But I do have an ear for music. Yeah, and
I really, you know, I think music is played a
big role we have. I play great music. People like
the music I play, which is it was funny because
my father would not have thought about music for me.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
But I do.
Speaker 10 (17:35):
I think I have an ear for music. They play
a note and like on a piano, and then I
remember to this day, and then they ask you other
questions and then they play notes later on and they say,
which is the note we played from one hour ago?
And I'd like, get it right, I guess, But that
was a long time ago.
Speaker 4 (17:55):
That's interesting. Trump did a podcast and he claims that
his parents took him to some sort of testing thing
to see what like his talents are when he was young,
and he had great musical ability. But his dad, the
real estate developer, apparently like not cool with that sort
of waste of time. Waste of time, which is kind
of an interesting insight into his personality. Yeah, I guess
(18:20):
for a while played the flu If you'd be there earlier,
he says, his instrument of choices of flute not funny.
First major plane crash in quite a while, I don't
remember how long it's been. A Boeing Dreamliner went down
in India full of people headed to Britain.
Speaker 9 (18:35):
Is that right?
Speaker 1 (18:36):
I believe so.
Speaker 4 (18:37):
Two hundred and forty plus people on board. One person survived.
Sit in eleven A. Sit in seat eleven A. Apparently
it's the magic seat. But I haven't watched the video
of the plane taken off. It didn't go very far.
What did it look like?
Speaker 1 (18:49):
It was really interesting and troubling, as you might expect.
It just didn't get lyft it it went up in
the air, I don't know, six hundred feet it's tough
to say, but a few hundred feet and it just
stayed there. That's interesting because it didn't have that steep rise.
(19:10):
I saw the headline that the may Day came in
like right after takeoff, and they were at six hundred
and seventy five feet when they called.
Speaker 4 (19:16):
It the Mayday.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Yeah, okay, good guess. So it takes off and it
gets up in the air a little bit, but then
stops lifting, and then it very very slowly sinks down
as if it is in final approach to landing. And
what was remarkable about it, other than the obvious horrific
loss of human life, was that if there was another
(19:38):
runway in front of them, I think they just would
have landed, because the non violence of the descent was
the most striking thing. It was very gentle. They were
just gliding downward.
Speaker 9 (19:48):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (19:48):
I don't want to get too gruesome, I mean, because
I think a lot of us pictured dying in a
plane crash. If you ever picture it, it's kind of
a plunging out of the sky, spinning, you know, this
is it sort of horror.
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Good lord.
Speaker 4 (19:59):
These people might have thought, you know, we're not supposed
to be landing now, and that looks like a field,
but I don't I don't know if it was city.
I don't know if it would strike me immediately. Is
we're all going to die here if we're coming down
like it's a landing, the.
Speaker 1 (20:13):
Problem being you have fuel tanks completely full of aircraft fuel.
Speaker 4 (20:19):
So and the one guy did kurb blowy live and
just and he ran away from the thing and was
talking to reporters.
Speaker 1 (20:28):
Wild, Yeah, terrible, terrible.
Speaker 4 (20:31):
I don't music. Luckily, I don't ever think about that
for whatever reason. And I have plenty of quirks in
my brain, as everyone who listens knows, but I don't
ever contemplate the plane crash. And when I fly, I.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
Just, oh, I have to fight the thought all the time.
Interesting in fact, I was.
Speaker 9 (20:47):
I was a.
Speaker 1 (20:48):
Terrible flyer for a few years of my life, and
then I finally got hold of it somehow. But yeah, terrible.
Well I transition music no no, no, I want to
get back no no, yes, yes, yes. This is a
time about plane crashes in a about playing U. Welcome
to the Jack Show, the Jack Solo Show with absolutely
no Joe Getty enjoy it. This is garbage talks about
death all the time. I hate it.
Speaker 4 (21:10):
This is not about the plane crash. It's the as
you know, you were opposite me on this. If I'm
standing in center field and they hit me a flyball,
all I can think about is how people are going
to mock me if I drop this. But when I
get on a plane, it never crosses my mind that
this might crash. Whereas you think about crashing, you.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Get a flyball coming to you, you just think I'm
going to catch this right and remind myself where I
need to throw it right.
Speaker 4 (21:39):
So, I mean, how the human mind.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
It just shows how different we are. Thank you, Michael.
Speaker 4 (21:47):
Oh, you're fantastic with that sort of thing.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
Those are different in that, you know, my confidence came
from the experience of catching a thousand flyballs. I mean,
so it wasn't like inborn.
Speaker 4 (21:57):
I don't think my lack of confidence came from endless
mocking over every aspect of my life.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
Huh. Well, there you go, Charlie Brown moving along. So
I guess that was our transition, speaking of getting them
while they're young and that sort of thing. Really interesting.
Major study out of Australia about criminality. They tracked eighty
thousand youngsters from birth to adulthood that not shockingly revealed
(22:28):
stark differences between men and women in terms of criminal behavior.
Speaker 4 (22:32):
Now Australia is a people colony, right, everybody lives not
currently not currently originally haven't been reiche.
Speaker 1 (22:39):
Yeah. The findings point to a clear takeaway. Most people
will never seriously come into contact with the criminal justice system, obviously,
but interestingly enough for the small proportion who do, they're
paths into crime or shaped early, and very differently for
men and women. Let's see, let me scroll down. There's
a lot here. The clearest finding. Okay already said they.
Speaker 4 (23:03):
Should have teased this is your kid gonna be a
criminal find out.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
That would have been great showbiz. I wish I'd thought
of it anyway. One of the main takeaways is that
the vast majority of people never commit serious offenses aren't
prone to doing it. There's practically no scenario in which
they would, right, So that means efforts to prevent crime
can be more precisely targeted, ensuring interventions focus on a smaller,
(23:29):
high risk group rather than the general population when they're young.
Speaker 4 (23:35):
I wonder if this is something AYI could be good at,
Like really predicting, which I don't know what you'd do
other than surveyal them. But we all know, and cops
say this all the time. They're babysitting the same people
over and over again for the most part, because, like
you said, when you hear about somebody who's got, you know,
a lifetime of crime, they've been involved with the law
their whole lives, and for most of us, never once,
(23:56):
not one time.
Speaker 1 (23:57):
So I don't think we need AI because we have study.
Non offending was the most prevalent group, but five distinct
offending groups for both men and women were identified. Among men,
these range from those who rarely offended, to a small
group that started early and continued into adulthood, and another
that mostly offended during adolescents but later stopped. In contrast,
(24:21):
most women fell into the low or non offending groups.
Only a small proportion followed a pattern of serious or
repeat offending.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
I would like to know. There's a couple of things
I'd like to know. Maybe you have the answer here,
the like there's the Overton window for your own life,
Like ending up in jail is not within my Overtson
window of possibilities. But if you start early with that yeah,
it is. It is just it's just one of those
things that could happen. Or if you grow up in
a family where that's because I didn't grow up in
(24:49):
a family where that's an option for life really to
go to jail. But if you grow up around people
that are constantly interacting it, you would just think, well,
that's that's just life, that's normal life.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
So to summarize some of the key findings for boys
and young men, those in the persistent offending group, this
is the group we'd really like to understand and intercede
early and get a hold of them. They had earlier
and more frequent contact with police, and they were more
likely to face serious charges and often experienced youth the tension.
For girls and young women, fewer entered the system overall,
(25:21):
but those with repeat contact showed distinct patterns. Their offenses
tend to differ from those men with a greater focus
on property related crimes as well as doug drug and
traffic violations. Blah blah blah. But so they suggest a
nuanced approach to crime prevention, one that recognizes both the
gendered nature offending in the early life experiences that shape it.
(25:45):
For boys and young men. This could mean early identification
of behavioral issues, stronger support in schools, and support to
create stable, safe home environments, blah blah blah. But generally,
if somebody is going to be a career criminal, you
figure that out very early in their lives, which I
think you know, cops and judges and lawyers could probably
tell you that, But you know.
Speaker 4 (26:06):
I would like to know some stats around that crowd
in their home situation in terms of intact households or
a father being present, etc.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
Yes, and I'm glad you brought that up, because that
brings us to one of the most interesting and fraught
aspects of this Not fraught for me, but the rest
of society seems to have a problem with it, or
at least some people do. And some of the scientists
involved in this say, what if we saw a child's
aggression at school not as bad behavior exactly, although it
(26:38):
is you can see it as both, but as a
red flag for issues at home, family violence, lawlessness, et cetera.
At home.
Speaker 4 (26:47):
I would have to look into that. Because I am
now a mandated reporter in the state of California. I
did the training, so I am by law I have
to report that if I see that sort.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
Of thing, if a teenage girls shoplifting was a symptom
of trauma or mental illness, targeted early intervention, not more programs,
just smarter programs. One thing that we will never one
thing that we must overcome. I think in the US
of A. Never mind the assies, the words, they live
(27:20):
upside down, the toilets swirled a different way. It's just
crazy down there. In southern hemisphere, we.
Speaker 4 (27:25):
Got kangaroos for crying out loud.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
Well right, yeah. Anyway, in the US of A, we
have to stop the idiotic notion of quote unquote not
blaming the victim. Where there is pathology, fatherlessness, crime, drugs,
we've got to say why because the family's crumbling. And
(27:51):
if it happens to be disproportionately blonde headed people from Norwegian,
you know, extraction, say it. Likewise, if it's other ethnic groups,
say it. Stop that idiotic notion of not blaming the victim.
Nobody's blaming anybody.
Speaker 4 (28:09):
Just trying to figure out who's most likely or causes.
It's interesting for the mandated reporter training. One of the
things was, you know, things to look for in a
household that might make it more likely a child is
being abused and it was substance abuse in the home, unemployment,
a variety of things like that. That then when it
(28:30):
gets into the political cycle, you think, no, no, no, no,
you can't. You can't be talking about that'd be you know,
blaming a certain sort of person.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
What even though the statistic, statistical evidence is just undeniable
about the lack of a father in the home and
similar issues.
Speaker 4 (28:49):
My niece is in Australia for the summer. She's interning
for a doctor. She wants me be a doctor, and.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
So she's in Australia for the winter.
Speaker 4 (29:00):
Yeah, I guess, although she was wearing shorts and a
T shirt so it didn't look very cold. She's sent
a picture of her holding the biggest snake I've ever
seen in my life. I don't know what that. I
don't choose at a zoo or if that's Parker for learning
to be a doctor, I don't know what Australia is like.
That's an Australian tape for him. You don't want them,
or somebody came in with that wrapped around them. I
don't know what happened there, Riiche. So a judge is
(29:22):
going to rule today, whether or not, as Gavin Newsom claims,
Trump violated something by calling in the National Guard. Most
legal experts seem to think, no, he has every right
to do that. We'll have some of those experts weighing in,
among other things on the way, stay here. Have you
(29:43):
heard about the no Kings rallies that are planned for Saturday.
I got some more information on that. It's all about
resisting Trump, who's trying to be a king, which is
what Gavin Newsom's talking about here.
Speaker 6 (29:53):
Donald Trump, without consulting California law enforcement leaders, commandeered two
thousand of our state's National Guard members to deploy on
our streets illegally and for no reason.
Speaker 4 (30:06):
Okay, there you go. So he stated that the other
day Trump commandeered the National Guard illegally and for no reason.
I think there was a reason on TV. We all
saw it as soon as we flipped on the TV.
But guarding federal facilities is the reason. Is it legal
or not? I don't know that much about but Jonathan
truly does.
Speaker 11 (30:26):
And under Title ten, it says that the president may
federalize a national guard and says that that order shall
be issued through the governor.
Speaker 4 (30:36):
Now, Governor Newsham.
Speaker 11 (30:37):
Saying, well, that means that I also have to sign off.
Speaker 4 (30:41):
I think that's pretty wrong headed.
Speaker 11 (30:42):
I mean, the Congress knew how to say that a
governor makes a separate decision. There's tow other provisions under
Title ten that say that the governor has to give
his consent or make a request.
Speaker 4 (30:55):
Congress didn't do that here.
Speaker 11 (30:57):
It said that the president issues the order based on
what he believes is a threat, and that order goes
through the office of the governor. So I think that
this is a very weak argument going before the court.
Speaker 4 (31:10):
Now that's Jonathan Turley is always on Fox, and I
mean he sometimes slaps down Trump and says he's wrong,
but he seems he's in agreement with most every other
political expert that I've seen say yeah, he can do this,
and then they get into I don't think it's going
to be popular with the American people though, which may
or may not be true. But whether or not Trump
has the right to do it, he can do it,
(31:31):
and it's to protect federal buildings at least. I was
watching a report this morning on News Nation. What is
their slogan? A news for all Americans that they're looking around.
They were in La in the morning, and they said,
the National Guard troops in front of federal buildings, standing
there protecting federal buildings.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
Okay, well, and it's interesting that a great deal was made.
This is the first time since nineteen sixty five that
this has been done. Blah blah blah. Well, back then,
the president didn't ask the governors if it was okay
if the National Guard escorted black kids into schools, et cetera. No,
or it's a specious argument, or the.
Speaker 4 (32:07):
Hundreds of times you don't have a lunkhead governor who
calls out the National Guard of their own so the
president doesn't have to go around the governor. The Texas
governor has called out multiple units of the National Guard
to deal with their unrest in a couple of cities,
and a bunch of people got arrested last night, so
Trump doesn't need to call in the National Guard there.
The governor did what you should do. Gavin Newsom should
(32:29):
want to protect those buildings.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
And during the era of old George Floyd and his riots,
the idea that oh no, we're not We've got to
wait until there's mayhem and fire and death and looting
in the streets and only then can we react. No, no,
how about an era of we're having none of that.
Why don't we try that for a minute. Jonah Goldberg
Dispatch yesterday. I heard him predict we will have a
(32:52):
Kent State this summer. That's when a bunch of students
got shot on was it Ohio State, Kent State? Kent
State campus. But then somebody pointed out, yeah, that happened
in nineteen seventy and then in seventy two Nixon won
forty nine states. He was making the point that they
couldn't come with an example where left wing protests led
(33:14):
to them like winning the politics of the day, it's
always backlashed against them, and every example they could come
up with over the years, which is kind of interesting
on its own. Maybe that fits in with some more
that Jonathan Turley wanted to point out about all this
insurrection talk.
Speaker 11 (33:33):
But Democrats have to be careful about They just spent
the last few years watering down the meaning of insurrection
in the litigation over the Fourteenth Amendment, where they were
trying to bar not just President Trump but dozens of
Republicans from ballots. They argue that an insurrection doesn't have
to be a rebellion. It could just be a large
(33:54):
assemblage of people who are trying to prevent the execution
of federal law.
Speaker 4 (33:58):
Does that sound familiar you? Yeah, So that's that's what
we got going on right now, is each party goes
kind of to an extreme level on things, but then
the other party can take advantage of that when they
get the reins executive orders for instance, or lots of it,
lots of for instances.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
Yeah. Wow, Yeah, that's not the way I see an insurrection.
That's not the way I would define the term.
Speaker 4 (34:24):
I wouldn't call it an insurrection Saturday. But it is
the no Kings, No Crowns protest that, according to the
USA Today and the organizers of it, is scheduled for
or designed to show up in eleven hundred different communities.
They're that organized, the No King's Day that comes from
(34:46):
like Antifa language, your anarchist language. If no Kings or
whatever they're the organizers claim or are just trying to
be patriotic. We don't want to have kings. I don't
want to have a king either, But that's going to
be on Saturday. I have no idea if this is
going to end up being a big deal or not?
Speaker 1 (35:04):
Well, and if it is a big deal, will that
be a big deal? I mean, if they get a
good turnout and lots of people are chanting around the
country and very pleased with themselves, then what what's the
next thing that happens?
Speaker 4 (35:15):
Turn If it turns violent, then there will be some
political fallout, and as we were just talking about, almost
certainly to the left's detriment, which is what usually happens
if you miss an hour or segment. Get the podcast
Armstrong and Getty on demand Armstrong and Getty
Hosts And Creators
Joe Getty
Jack Armstrong
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.