Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Working with the engineer on a couple of things. He's
very excited to fix our little issue here. So all right,
but uh, we'll do we'll do that later after the show.
Uh So, A few things, few things I was reading
some I don't tend to get super wonky and into
a lot of the local races. And unless there's some quirkiness,
(00:20):
it's not out of disinterest. Local races are really important,
very important. In fact, they're so important. It's why you
saw such dedicated uh so many dedicated plans uh and
pivots by some big money domor especially among Democrats. All right,
and this and by the way, here we're going to
(00:42):
partisan attack. No, no, no, no, this is this is
trackable and provable. And it's a strategy that that Democrats
and a couple of big, big, big organizations. Yes I
got to the George Soros, but the Tides.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
And uh you know several of those other foundations.
Speaker 1 (00:59):
They they did a strategy where they felt that there
was more bang for their buck in local races, especially
local judicial races and district attorneys races.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
Right, and they bragged about.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
It because they're very successful in doing that, getting some
real moonbats in there. So they're really important.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
And I tend not to.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Drill down unless there's something kind of weird going on
or it's in some way, shape or form becomes high profile,
because inevitably I get a you know, we had two
hundred calls, people going, hey, I'm running for county whatever,
can we get some airtime? And the answer is maybe, maybe,
(01:45):
but we're not booking all individual stuff. That's why we
do those casting calls, those open calls, so to speak. However,
I was reading about one of the races in Wake County,
and what I found interesting is not that there's allegations
going on back and forth. That's par for the course.
And then you get, you know, your mailbox gets a
(02:06):
thousand of those high you know, high gloss, high quality
little attack cards that you know you're probably using right
now to keep a table up or something because they're
worthless for anything else, and you know, and then those
local races. However, this one, the the folks over McClatchy
(02:27):
decided to go and analyze the race, and uh, for
for whatever reason, go ahead and jump in on this
one because there's this this allegations, Like one of them,
I'm going to tell you about they exist in every
race darn near. So the question becomes, why, all of
a sudden am I greeted with a giant explainer article. Well,
(02:51):
it's because it's a it's a really important competitive get
of a seat.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
And so.
Speaker 1 (03:01):
My theory is that you know, if you're if you're
news and observer, r e L for that matter, these
are the races.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
You want to jump in on.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Because you got your finger on the scale again my opinion,
or why else would you break this down? So if
you don't, if you don't know what I'm what I'm
rambling on about. And I understand not everyone lives in
southern Wake County. But if you go ahead and you
look at the if you go ahead and and you
(03:33):
look at the the race, and I'm trying to find
the district here real quick, House District thirty seven.
Speaker 2 (03:40):
Okay, all right, so this is.
Speaker 1 (03:41):
Currently held by Republican. The incumbent is is it Aaron
is Eric?
Speaker 3 (03:47):
Party?
Speaker 1 (03:48):
Is it pair or party? How do I not know
how to say that name all of a sudden? Anyway, Yeah,
you know who she is, especially for those of you
live in southern and she she is running against a Democrat.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
There's also libertarian in the race. His name is Christopher Robinson.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
But the article here is about her Democratic challenger, a
woman by the name of Sophia Jackson, not Sophia Sophia
safiy Ah. So I'm assuming that's pronounced Sofia who's running
there and the attack ads And I actually saw it
(04:26):
because you know, I get all the press releases stuff.
I saw this and it just got filed along with
the one hundred others that I get sent every day,
and so I found it really weird that they were
doing a race. But basically it's this and most ninety
percent of this is confirmed. But remember it's also about
interpretation by the McClatchy folks. So I basically Sophia Jackson.
(04:54):
They describe her in the attack ads as a Chicago
slum lord.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (05:00):
That's a charged allegation. Man, Right, Chicago is that prime
example of Holy hell. Social order is broken down and
nobody cares we might have Venezuelan slash Chicago gang fights
coming up. So understandably, the Democrat challenger is probably going
(05:20):
to hold more traditional or current traditional I should say,
you know, great ideas for making sure that you know,
kids are kept safe, because this is what it's all
about kids, and one of those is she's opposed to
or has been opposed to, metal detectors in schools. So
(05:41):
obviously I think that that is a dumb position.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
In an if it doesn't.
Speaker 1 (05:47):
Mean every school has to start with the metal detector,
but if you have issues someplace, this is how things happen.
Speaker 2 (05:55):
But rather, the focus of.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
This whole piece is that she she owned a rental
property and I guess it was a house that was
split into multiple apartments, and apparently she was the according
to the City of Chicago and complaints. Now these are
administrative actions, and I don't know why the paper points
that out. I don't think they claimed that she was arrested,
(06:21):
but rather she received a series of complaints in her
unit over over the time that she owned it, which
was occupied by children in each of these instances, not
just children obviously, of doing things like uh, you know heat, Ross,
if you run in a place in Chicago in the winter, well,
(06:45):
how would you feel about heat? You'd be a big
fan of heat, right December.
Speaker 3 (06:49):
I mean I would rather have her than not have it,
you would, I would prefer to have heat?
Speaker 1 (06:54):
All right?
Speaker 2 (06:55):
All right, we're right right, we're gonna right. Well, you know.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
What, Uh, I had some bad news for you, dude.
How about how about the week of Christmas and all
of that, and then you issue a thing and then
still doesn't fix it and no heat from December basically
most of the month of December.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
How about hot water? I guess it's another form.
Speaker 3 (07:16):
Of heat, but yeah, I'm a hot water fan.
Speaker 4 (07:19):
I would say probably when I take like a shower,
ten percent is actually cleaning my body and ninety percent
is me just in in there going wow.
Speaker 3 (07:25):
I love heat as you do.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
As you do, I'm telling you.
Speaker 1 (07:30):
If I didn't, if I couldn't just momentarily pop my head, yeah,
I don't even I don't even need a long shower
in the morning. But what a difference just a couple
minutes makes, right, even if just that little bit. So yeah,
I'm I'm a fan too. We don't get that for
three months and that's just one of the incidents here,
(07:51):
and it just goes on and on and on.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
Now, can I provide my own heat by setting something
on fire? Well, it's Chicago, right, so I mean whether
it be frowned upon.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
Or no, Well, I don't know. I remember they did
it that one time the whole city was cold, I guess,
and and I think that they consider that a problem,
so you probably shouldn't do that. And so now you
have and I don't know who's sending it out, the
state GOP or something.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Who did I see tweet? This was it Wiley? So
that's going to be state.
Speaker 1 (08:21):
Party, all right. So they're sending out these mailers and
the news and observer decides to go ahead and get
in there. So for every every little attack, ad is
or are you going to do this or is it
just in races that you've decided are competitive and you
feel like you need to swoop in and save this
because the problem is when when you have somebody who
(08:45):
I kid you not literally, then works on behalf of kids,
which which the candidate does, and you hear allegations like that,
that seems a little hypocritical if you work for as
she works with the head Start program.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
Which is you know about the kids.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
And then if you're running a building and you know
these these issues were followed through and I guess she
ended up getting rid of the building. But if you
run a building in Chicago in the winter and you
have kids, as your tenants. You have families in there,
and you don't give them heat or hot water for
extended periods of time, and yet you say you've dedicated
(09:31):
your life to working with kids. I don't know how
that's a smear. I don't know how that's a smear
right there, especially because I have heard about Donald Trump's
you know, getting into people going, well, why there's just
a tenant, it's a rental situation then, And I've had
(09:52):
to listen to Trumps for years.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
I've over the years, we've seen different different races where
these became an issue.
Speaker 3 (10:00):
Right.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
You know why because if you own a rental property
and and you and you are literally renting to low
income individuals, uh and uh, well there's a term that
they would use, vulnerable, vulnerable families is what they like
to use. If you're doing that, and you're also not
meaning the most basic requirements and then ignoring it and oh,
(10:24):
by the way, you like, oh, ross, did you want power?
I'm sorry, I forgot to check. Did you want power
with your hot shower and your heat in the house?
Speaker 3 (10:35):
Yes, I would prefer to live like a modern human being.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
But sometimes it's fun though, right, you know, like camp
But I don't.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
Yeah, I mean if I want to go camping, yes,
and face some bears. Yeah, but you know my typical
day to day yeah, like power, hot water, and heat.
I mean that, but that's just me.
Speaker 1 (10:53):
For all twelve months. Yes, Can I interest.
Speaker 3 (10:55):
You in I as long as I can pay for it?
Speaker 1 (10:57):
Yes, as well, you are paying for it's a part
of your rent here. So yeah, So nine out of
twelve is pretty good though, right if you if you
were a Major League Baseball player and for every twelve
at bats you had nine hits, they'd name the Hall
of Fame after you. So, you know, nine out of
twelve months with any of these utilities, that's pretty good. So, like,
(11:23):
it's what got me is not the I would never eat.
I would never just do this. The reason I'm even
mentioning this on the show is because it's just such
a weird thing to task your your your journalists with
going through and trying to shed some light on this,
because how many attack ads are going on in every
(11:43):
one of these uh these these house districts across the
state of North Carolina. Full go check your you guys, know,
you go to your mailbox and they immediately just turn
and throw all that crap away? What made this one
so special? And what, in my opinion did is I
think that this is it is one of the identified
(12:04):
districts where they think they can flip it or it's
a purple district, so of course they're going to get
in there and uh, and and and and.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Jump to the defense. And there's there's all sorts of
little tells in the story. Right.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
I feel like a Rosetta Stone Dakota in this stuff
sometimes right where they keep pointing out that she was
a slum lord.
Speaker 2 (12:25):
Who faced justice.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
Well, it was an administrative thing. Yes, I'm aware that
Seal Team six and the Department of Homeland Security after
watching a two hour video, uh didn't kick the door
in and arrest her like she's Pablo Escobar. But that's
not the issue here. The issue is you're in Chicago.
You've got you know, you've got people in there that
(12:48):
probably don't have the means to just immediately pick up
and move and it it demonstrates to people in that
capacity a little about your character.
Speaker 2 (12:59):
Oh let's see, let's see, let's see. Yah.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
Yeah, we'll get this little NFL stuff down. That that
is uh, you know, it's a thing. How many of you,
how many of you caught some of the game. I
know you don't watch the Bills games ross because you're
you're superstition and your Twitter thing or whatever. Do you
watch other games or you just never actually watch You're
just a Twitter NFL.
Speaker 3 (13:22):
Fan, I mean all all highlights and stuff.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Yeah, but great, No, no, no, I know that.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Yeah, and let's see here.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
I don't know did the Ravens look good or did
the Chiefs look I mean or just I said say that,
did the Chiefs look that good? Or did the Ravens
just also look good? It was twenty seven to twenty spoilers,
So oh no, it's good enough game, have no complaints.
We got another game today coming up from Brazil that
could be far more interesting. Right middle of the game,
(13:57):
Jalen hurts, who's the Eagles quarterback?
Speaker 2 (14:00):
Drops back and it's like.
Speaker 1 (14:01):
Oh my gosh, it's an uncontacted Amazonian tribe, right, like,
mix it up, make it yours, make it a theme.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
So I don't know how that's gonna go.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
I know the players aren't happy to be down there,
which yeah, kind of sucks. You get a free trip
to Brazil, but yeah, so that'll continue tonight, and it
couldn't happen to two nicer teams. We sent down to uh,
Brazil to play the NFL game, so that that'll be
(14:33):
Packers they're playing tonight.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
And then we're we're into this thing. We are.
Speaker 1 (14:38):
We are rocking and rolling Panthers take on what Saints
Vikings get to lose to the Giants. You can tell
I'm pumped for the season. Uh, Bills are in early
game two. You guys are who? You guys played Cardinals?
Speaker 5 (14:51):
Right?
Speaker 1 (14:51):
I think yes, Bill's Cardinals. Just updating everyone here. Oh,
let's check for Boston Paul's team, U Austin Paul. You
guys play the Commanders. You play the Commanders who are
in the news, I mean as Buccaneers, right, that's your team.
I can't remember who you ended up with after your
switch roof. If not, you play the Bengals, So alrighty
(15:15):
and uh And then we're just into this thing. And
of course we got we got some side stories emerging.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
We'll get to that in.
Speaker 1 (15:24):
Due time though. Let me let me flip back over
here though, so as as I'm going through and I'm
just kind of doing the round up here at the
end of the week as we do on Fridays. Oh,
by the way, we're gonna chat with Pete Callender. He
will join us coming up in you know, a couple
hours obviously at eight oh five.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Oh you know what I promised.
Speaker 1 (15:47):
I promised the bosses I would remind everybody remember, if
you don't attend this event, we will put you on
the dead to us list, So you really have no choice.
One of two events coming up next week, we will retweet.
So if you go to our Twitter account, two different tweets,
(16:08):
one right, because there's gonna be links in there, one
for the Triad Bourbon Tasting event and another for the
Triangle Bourbon Tasting Event, which happened next week Tuesday and Thursday, respectively. Tuesday,
I'm gonna start the week in Greensboro next week.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
With my my new studio over there.
Speaker 1 (16:30):
That makes me sound very basy, and we'll do that event,
and then on Thursday we'll do an event here in
the Triangle, and there are available tickets. Now.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
The Triad event is gonna be a little more basic.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
In the sense that it's not gonna be all the
full full, you know, like an overwhelming flight. But the
in the in the Triangle event. Because we have a
distributor partner with that, it's gonna be a little more meaty.
But if you like bourbon, are you just like hanging
out with folks, meeting some people and then talking about
(17:07):
how the world's gonna end. It's what we do, and
you know what, don't waste the effort. There's essentially been
a silent coup around here for when they said, hey,
do you want to do a listener? You know, a
listener if I don't like, well, we haven't done one
in a while, and I'm like sure, and instead it
turned into this weird hey, thank you. It's your birthday thing,
(17:27):
so obviously you know how much fun, how much I
enjoy that, So that put a cherry on top. So
if I have to suffer the birthday emails, you have
to come suffer in person with me.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
And you don't have to drink the bourbon. It's okay.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
They got other stuff. If you don't drink, fine, we'll
get you something else. So links for those at Casey
on the radio makes you're registering for the right one
or you like to drive, and that'll be next week.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
And the tickets, like I said, there's tickets available.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
They are limited, obviously, because we have to plan for
all the stuff there.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
So once we hit that number, that'll be it.
Speaker 1 (18:07):
Details at Casey on the Radio, or you can go
to Casey Ondradio dot com and go to our main
page and if you scroll at the bottom kind of
the station page, there'll be a link through. And then
we have a link obviously floating around like in a
bannerad right there on my page. Okay, so you see
this is this is I'm not asking to do anything crazy.
(18:29):
I'm asking you to come to a little happy hour.
And he got an excuse, Hey babe, I'm going to
a happy hour? Are you going to a happy hour?
Speaker 5 (18:39):
What? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (18:39):
Yeah, yeah, the guy from the radio. Oh we love him,
he's so smart. Yes, come to the thing. Do the
thing links. It's Casey on the Radio. All right. I
will hunt every one of you down if I don't
see you. All right, So let me get let me
get back to this. Why do you threat the listeners?
(19:00):
You know what. It's called tough love man. So coming uh,
coming up. We got to get into a few of
these stories. Uh, this is a hell of a plan.
I can see a giant loophole here. The Kamala Harris.
Let's uh cracking down on drug dealer's idea?
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Do you want to you want to talk about some.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
Bad ideas man? And and I want to be clear here,
I it's not I don't think it's a bad idea,
especially with somebody who was early on within the judicial
system to try, you know, to do deferred things.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Right. Let me tell you.
Speaker 1 (19:40):
Let me tell you about my criminal enterprise. So when
I was in high school, I may or may have
not been in the vicinity of small keg in a
thing of wine which I didn't even actually know that
was in there, in a friends truck. And somebody, uh it,
she snitched on us because we may or may not
(20:02):
have been going up to one of our big camp
and mountain parties.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
So we did in Wyoming.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
And uh so anyway, and I I was hit with
a very serious minor in possession charge, which I think
was a fifty dollars ticket. Uh and uh yes, yes, yes, yes, Now.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
Did they throw me in Alcatraz?
Speaker 5 (20:26):
No?
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Uh wasn't even mine.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
But what are you going to do?
Speaker 5 (20:32):
Right?
Speaker 2 (20:32):
Possession nine tenth of the law.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
They did a deferral program and they said, all right,
and this is mostly the handle is the first time
I'd ever had an issue, and they said, all right, uh,
you do this, and then if you're if you're a
good boy for a year, we'll go ahead and purge
this thing from your record. And then you had to
I had to do community service, uh, picking up trash
at the parking lot near the library. And and then
(20:57):
that was it. And and that's fine. And I never
got caught again or went to a party ever, But
I'm fine with that. And and on a more serious side,
I've watched with family members who were dealing with addiction issues,
and they were stacking up some of the criminal side
of it, and you know, they were willing to look
(21:20):
at at the record, but look at you know, the
escalation of it. And it was through some of those
interventions and it took a while.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
We were able to.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Extract extract them from the uh you know, the the
spiral that they were going through.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
And it wasn't easy. But like I understand that this
is not that.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
As District Attorney of San Francisco, Kamala Harris uh uh proposed,
because this is this is your own fault. By the way,
if you won't go on official public record, with some policies.
People are going to look at your proposals previously and
when you're pandering the San Francisco citizens, it's not going
to be a plus. Harris proposed a program for drug dealers.
Speaker 6 (22:10):
Now.
Speaker 1 (22:10):
The reason this is again coming up too is because
she stated the other day that she is all about
criminal justice reform, and she's she has been at the
forefront with her time at the AG's office.
Speaker 2 (22:21):
So you're the one who put this in there. And
what a work like this?
Speaker 1 (22:29):
Drug dealers would only be prosecuted after their third strike,
so not third strike like you get three felonies and
you go in for life.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
The state of California.
Speaker 1 (22:41):
Did, which actually was that was that was a pretty
big thing that California did that years ago. Three to
the three strikes and you're out.
Speaker 3 (22:51):
No.
Speaker 1 (22:52):
So let's say let's say you're selling drugs, right, you're
working your corner there, you're moving the prodding, making the paper.
I don't know all the words they use now, making
that cheddar and here comes here comes five.
Speaker 2 (23:09):
Oh, I'll give you.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
You know, you just walk. I'm just standing here, man,
I'm not doing anything. And then you go through the
process of them busting you under the program called Operations
Safe Streets. I love the naming. Uh. The proposal would
read like this, under the under the plan for prosecuting
(23:35):
criminal drug enterprises. And these are not simple possession. I
want to be very clear here. There is possession, but
it's up to an including dealers, maybe not the dudes
doing big weight, but for narcotic sales that are not
part of a larger federal investigation, you'd have to have
you have to get busted three times. So if you
(23:56):
know you're you're Danny drug dealers standing on the corner
there and the police come and they're like, hey, you're
selling drugs, we've been watching you and all of that.
Speaker 3 (24:06):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
They would then interact with you. They would confiscate your
drugs and then they would write your name down and
that would be it.
Speaker 3 (24:18):
But they'd keep that name.
Speaker 1 (24:20):
And then if you sold drugs again, what do you
think would happen? Same corn, They come back out there,
same cops, probably because this is like their jurisdic there's
was it with this guy? Just so blatant. So you're
right back on the corner slinging the drugs. They've already
written your name down, So what do you think happens
the second time? Nothing, Nah, they just they write the
(24:45):
they write it down. Oh we had Danny drug dealer
got busted again for this? This this all right?
Speaker 2 (24:50):
Hey, hey, do better.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
Then dudes out there dealing drugs is his passion.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
Man.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
Now he gets arrested a third time, then he gets prosecuted,
and because he didn't listen the first two times, that
will be taken into account as part of the charges
for the third time. So you at that point you
would not be eligible for deferral programs. So what you're
(25:22):
doing is you're essentially doing kind of the thing where
you do a deferral. Right, his first time, he got
busted for that. Let's see if this works. You're just
doing that, but you're never carrying out any of the
actual punishment penalties other than I guess confiscation for the
initial ones.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
Well, I have a question. If I'm not going to.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Get busted till it's the third time you caught me
selling drugs again, not possessing drugs, go big or go home. Boys.
If I get three strikes, I get two freebies, right,
I get two freebies selling drugs. Why wouldn't you go
as big as possible. It's like you're rolling the dice here.
(26:05):
I'm not some street level dealer. I'm gonna figure out
what the max is and I'm moving weight. I am escobar.
And then if you bump, you're like, oh, yeah, is
that my Yeah? Is that my my MD eighty airplane
out there loaded with drugs? Yeah, but it's my first
time smuggling all of this. These are the kinds of
(26:25):
ideas that they're now pulling out of the woodwork. Let's
see here, And this was initially going back to two
thousand and five. According to Harris at the time, this
would allow narcotic sellers to immediately be released back into
the streets, but the records capped of essentially the interactions,
(26:45):
with further charges encouraged to be included. It would be
up to the prosecutor after the third arrest. You ready
for that, obviously. That is someone say that's a pretty
permissive environment. And we have a few too many promissive
(27:07):
environments right here. But this is good. This is the
kind if you're not going to go on the record
with policies. I can't wait for her to be asked
about it. This is one of those ideas she was
a big fan of although it's hard to ask her
when she's pretending to talk on her phone, which she keeps.
Do you has noticed that whenever she's getting on and
off the plane, she has her phone against her ear,
(27:31):
but people don't think she's talking to anybody. And there's
a couple gibbs, like how your iPhone acts when there
is a call, but also shell have like the is
she had like the charging cable hanging the other day
and she's on the phone one of the photos that
share the phone backwards. Yeah, you know, it's absurd. Yeah,
it's like I've seen like slide shows RRE. I'm convinced
(27:54):
that she's not on there, Like.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
She's holding her phone up to her head, but you
can see the screen in the side.
Speaker 1 (27:57):
Of her Like yes, yeah, no, no, no, that's what I'm
talking about. Your iPhone doesn't act like that when you're
on the phone with somebody. It acts like that when
you when it's trying to you know, face scan you
or whatever. That's not how that works. And uh yeah,
So I'm thoroughly convinced she's just like I should pretend
to be on the phone. Does that work? Can I
use that.
Speaker 3 (28:18):
If dude, I do all the time here when I'm
walking I was.
Speaker 1 (28:20):
Just gonna see all the time, dude, just I'm gonna
get a hat that looks like a phone taped to
my head. I'm walking by, you know, you walk by
the performance studio down there where they're always hold the
big meetings that we don't want to get, nobody wants
to go to, but you know, you do it because
it's part of the gig, right, and boss trying to
wave you in, you just point up to your head.
You're like, can you clearly not see this phone attached
(28:40):
to my head? It's just being done at the presidential level.
That's amazing. That's absolutely me. I know people who, in
the course of their job will do things to look busier.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
They will do things to.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
Look I got a buddy who worked He works for
one of a financial institution there, and we were joking
about this. He said that he when he first started
and he was getting his feet wet, and he kind
of apprenticed through. He's moved on, he said, in that sense,
he really wanted to be in this industry and he
does very well, but they don only give him so
(29:20):
much work, and he realized he had wanted. He wanted
to look like he was busy, so he had a
like power points and a bunch of crider he keeps
open on his computer, so at a distance it looked
like he was he was planking away open in the morning.
Speaker 3 (29:35):
It's the George Costanza Seinfeld thing.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah, ye see it.
Speaker 4 (29:38):
Every time your boss walks by, just look like you're
like really upset and busy at your desk.
Speaker 1 (29:42):
Talk walked up. You ever walked up on a coworker
who's a tab person, You know, the people who can
mentally operate fifty two open tabs at a given time.
Anytime I encounter somebody like that, I think you're insane.
But also I have zero interest in deciphering what's on
your screen now because I'm just overwhelmed by it. So
(30:04):
like I get, I thought that was hilarious, and I'm like,
that's smart because in the same way that you're probably
being the irresponsibly judged for your work output and they're
not assigning you enough work to keep you busy, and
they're squandering your internship. So what I said, but now
now you're the guy running interns, so yeah, yeah, they
better learn the tricks, So any who will continue onto this,
(30:28):
We've got to talk about Brazil and not just for
the football.
Speaker 2 (30:32):
That's that's turning in too much more of a thing.
Speaker 1 (30:35):
And some dude in North Carolina found a loophole and
it was quite profitable. I just don't understand how it exists.
All that more coming up, and yes, Hunter Biden, we'll
speculate as to what he'll do from a prison standpoint.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
Next hang on, talk about a little.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
Insanity, you know, down down Charlotte Way, and that's that's
always a fun way to end the week. And of course,
uh a roundup of many of the fun stories.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
So uh that'll be uh.
Speaker 1 (31:05):
Like I said, an hour from now, I have I
have a little question for the NFL. I was I
was asking ross this and then I ran out of time,
but I just I did want to mention this. You
had your opening game yesterday. You had your opening game,
uh yesterday, and it's people's first taste who are NFL
(31:30):
fans or enjoy it. And by the way, if you
are not a fan and you want to call and
tell me how you're boycotting it, don't care. I mean
it's fine for you and that and that's fine. And
if you do something you want a boycott, you want
to send a message, it's no disrespect.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
Do your thing.
Speaker 1 (31:50):
But but I don't waste my time if uh and uh,
because we're not gonna we're not gonna have a big
discussion about let's boy cut the NFL. If you want
to boycott him, that's fine. And if you want to
boycott him for the absolute ruining of the first few
minutes of the NFL season because I don't know what
(32:13):
the what the refs are thinking. Uh, you go ahead
and do that the reason that you open the NFL
season And in most cases, I don't know if it's
a hard and fast rule, but it's definitely how they
do stuff.
Speaker 5 (32:25):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (32:25):
With the with whoever.
Speaker 1 (32:26):
Won the Super Bowl along with another good team is
you don't want to put a you don't want to
put a turt out there, right, They're never going to
open the season with, you know, the the Browns playing
the I don't know.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
I don't even mean to pick.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
On the Browns, but you know what I mean, that's
not that's not gonna be your marquee opening thing. You
put the big boys up there so people are tuning
in and what would you rather watch? There's very few
people except for NFL coaches and players on the defense
who want to watch. Uh, you know, a three to
seven shootout or a defensive shootout, right, those are boring
(33:05):
games unless you took the under I guess, but I'll
work gambling in. Uh, but those are boring games. I
want to see. I want to see a game, whether
out their scoring or at the very least they're making
some amazing plays. And and you get people excited with that.
And yesterday and it was so weird. Uh, I don't
(33:30):
did they did they hire refs and then teach them
with a two hour video like the Secret.
Speaker 2 (33:36):
Service to go ahead?
Speaker 1 (33:40):
And uh? And and do this because on the opening
drive for the Ravens they called illegal formation three times
and it was just yellow flag and I'm all right,
can we just get this going? And then both yellow
flag and one dude got called twice in the in
the in the same drive. Was that Staley who did that?
(34:01):
The point is there was that there was clearly some
time out shenanigans and uh, they all seem to hit
Baltimore really weird, and it just kills the momentum. And
if that's what the season is gonna be where the
it's not about the two teams, but it's about the
(34:22):
three teams, you know, the two teams playing and then
the team of officials. That's the stuff people hate. I
understand the safety concerns and all that stuff, but give
me a break the NFL, the NFL any standard given
NFL play, you could all you could, almost every time
argue some sort of penalty.
Speaker 2 (34:41):
It'll be a blocking thing.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
It'll be uh, you know, one of one of the
more basic ones that gets your favorite touchdown called back.
You can do that holding. You could find holding or
make an argument damn near every play, but you don't
do it. You give them.
Speaker 2 (34:56):
You've heard the term, you know, let them let them play.
Speaker 1 (35:00):
It's like that in basketball, it's like that in football.
And I almost turned it off in you know, if
five minutes into the NFL season, could I just get
annoyed with that stuff? And that's what we were treated to.
And I do think it's interesting that the whoopsies as
(35:24):
I see them, seem to mostly go in one direction,
like you would think if they were out there officiating,
and and even if they were calling one of those
games like a tight strike zone kind of thing with
the NFL version of it, that both teams would be
equally dealing with the you know, these little nitpicky things.
And it was like, Nope, goes against the Ravens. Oh again,
(35:47):
here they go again, Here they go again. I can't
figure from the video what the illegal formation was in
two of.
Speaker 2 (35:53):
Those three.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
And and and then the chiefs come in and they're like,
oh no, Mahome's gonna have a chain saw.
Speaker 2 (36:01):
That's fine.
Speaker 1 (36:02):
Now you win that, you win a Super Bowl, you
get a chain site can run around with that thing.
So that's a little frustrating, but you know, you still
starve for football action, so you keep watching, all right,
who wants to solve a mystery? He doesn't want to
solve them? Miss Let's can we solve a mystery? This
one's gonna be pretty tough, though, I'm just warning you,
(36:23):
pretty tough because now an entire nation, an entire extended nation,
when you know, bring about European Union, folks in the
in the world watching what transpired on the streets of
London here over the last month, right, you had a
very high prison of high profile incidents. You had a
(36:43):
bunch of kids that were a U what was it
a Taylor Swift dance class? Obviously not with Taylor Swift.
But they're just just kids. They want to dance to
Taylor Swift songs. I don't get it, but you know,
I get why kids get it. That's great, that's innocent,
that's something you do. And then what do they get
for their troubles? A bunch of them get murdered, stabbed
(37:04):
A knife crime is to the point where you have
like sharpened spoon amnesty boxes. You got a lot of
stuff going on there, and I don't purport to understand
it fully from the ground, as I don't live there.
But when I see the policies and I see the
brazenness of protesters, including counter protesters that will escalate, you know,
(37:26):
stuff to violence, it does not surprise me that people
who purport to be fed up with stuff will come
out and some of them will do violent things, And
to be clear, I don't think any of them should.
But you then watch a very two tiered response from
the new idiots in charge over there, right where they are, Oh,
(37:48):
we're gonna we will extra.
Speaker 2 (37:50):
I have to say it out loud because it's so stupid.
Speaker 1 (37:54):
If you are a British citizen or even if you're
not and we feel that you violated, are you know,
don't hurt people's feelings of legislation over here. We want
we'll we'll extradite you, which is crap they're threatening to do.
So with all of that in mind, the Guardian decided
to go ahead and take a look at the thing
(38:15):
because I don't know if you know this. They've had
are you light coverage of some of the big incidents
that people say that they're they're concerned about, but a
lot of coverage when people are out there smashing windows
and doing all that, which again I might cover them both. Well,
now Keir Starmer has once again, because it's literally been
(38:42):
a month since.
Speaker 2 (38:43):
You saw some of these bigger riots.
Speaker 1 (38:45):
Uh he has, he has warned of elevated consequences and
a judge has worn't citizens will now be arrested.
Speaker 2 (38:53):
For casually observing rioting.
Speaker 1 (38:58):
Uh So the Guardian decided we better get in this
thing all right. So here's the article, Racism, question mark, poverty,
drink and social media. We still don't know why Britain's
rioted a month ago and we need answers. So the
(39:22):
Guardian newspaper and all these these little want to be dictators,
EU lovers and other progresses over in the UK system
there who love all this free speech clampdown stuff. You
don't know why people are mad because this is this
(39:42):
is the thing it was, and we talked about this.
If if people feel that they're at a breaking point
for whatever it is, whether it's you know, a BLM
thing or you don't feel that there's justice within police
and uh, and you not not just ignore it, but
you never even look into it, or we'll have that conversation,
(40:05):
then you're not going to do anything to appease people.
And if you pretend like there's not an issue, you
can't understand why they're mad, you're doing the gas lighting
that we see over we see in the US all
the time. Right, people are sitting there and they're looking
at a weaponized DJ and then they show up to
do stuff and and they there's an outsized treatment to
the way that the law handles them. You're in the
(40:27):
UK and you can't figure out why British citizens are
are going out and for the most part not rioting,
but a bunch are because you know opportunity there and
and you you want to pretend like you don't understand
why it is, and it's because it is. You can't
(40:47):
say it out loud, you can't sit there and you know,
let's say, let's say you're in a room that's filling
up with water.
Speaker 2 (40:57):
Right, you don't do something, you're gonna drown.
Speaker 1 (40:59):
And I want to be very clear here, this comes
down to how it plays out on the ground. Like
you can love the idea of let's move in you know,
a huge swath of people and fundamentally overnight change the
demographics of an area because people are people, There's there's
(41:20):
gonna be stuff there. You can say you're gonna do
that and there's not going to be fallout from it.
But you can't because there's there's too many examples that
we have both over in the UK and in the
US with these Venezuelan gangs where it is clear that
you have you have a significant number of people. They
asked me, there's a thousand of these Venezuelan gang members
in the US. Now that if you pretend they're not
(41:43):
there because you feel it detracts from your larger point
and you never address it. That's why people are getting med.
So I'm helping you out, Guardian. That would be my
theory on all of this, And you can tell them
they're wrong. That's the other thing too. You can go
and get him with statistics too, and if your statistics
hold up, that's how you do it. Well, yes, you're right,
(42:05):
crime is up here, but not among blah blah blah.
But there's so much spin and there's so much willful
ignorance in this stuff. This is this is if you
can't figure out why a bunch of drunk UK dudes
as well as soccer hooligans and mass waving flags from
the Crusades are are standing out there. You don't like
(42:31):
the theater of it, and you can go in and
the ledge all the racism you want, but the reality
is you have a lot of people that have very
silently said the way that you're going about this is
is is not done so in a way as to
create an integrated society. You can think diversity is your strength,
as long as you understand that it also requires a
(42:54):
certain amount of integration. Right, you got to be on
the same page. Look at everywhere in the world where
you have and have running massive conflict and it's because
on a very key issue, a very key issue which
some may argue as the most important issue in their lives,
are definitively not on the same page.
Speaker 2 (43:15):
Whether it is the you know, the different.
Speaker 1 (43:17):
Versions of Islam, which largely fuels inter Middle East interviolence. Right,
that's the that was That's really what that's the secret
sauce that made a racturn was a Saddam keeping that
whole thing where you had the minority Islam, this party
(43:38):
essentially subjugating the other one.
Speaker 2 (43:39):
It was and so but you always kept him.
Speaker 1 (43:42):
Fueled because if you're a dictator, you got to keep
your boys loyal. If it plays out in the streets
where you have a bunch of people coming in and
it is such a large influx, and then there one
looks to be preferential treatment on the part of people
who are already there. And then you couple it with
the inability of them to culturally understand each other. This
(44:08):
is what you get. This is that you get these
separated sections. And it's not the cute stuff like when
you go to New York and let's go to little Italy,
all right, you go to little Italy, They're happy to
see you there. Well, I don't know, they're New Yorkers.
Nobody's ever happy. But you know what I mean, and
and and and that's it. But again, what what drives
(44:30):
this forward is a shared fundamental understanding and an agreement.
And in the US, our agreement used to be the Constitution. Right,
you come over here, let's do our thing. But you
need to understand that. You know, see these right here,
these are fundamentally rights. I didn't give them to you, No,
not even the guys you found this place did. God did.
(44:51):
That's how That's how we wrote it. That's what we think.
We think that these fundamental rights are above and beyond
the rules of man. It is little the separation in
the Caesar rendering part of the Bible, and that's how
we act. And then and then folks would uh generally
go in there. And then you get the actual melting pot,
(45:12):
which is romanticized in this situation, that is not being accomplished.
And it's not being accomplished because it is such a
large number of people. There is no incentive. Uh, you know,
if you bring up language. If I told you listening
to the iHeartRadio app in some foreign country that if
you came to the US, that your experience would be
(45:34):
remarkably better if you spoke English. That's a microaggression. That's dumb.
That's dumb. That is one of that's one of the
truest things to be able to speak the language that
is the primarily the one that is used to do business,
interact and in many cases govern and and and then
(45:58):
to not provide any incentive for people to do that,
you're doing them a disservice. And you create these environments
where people do take to the streets and the Guardian
you can, oh, we don't, we don't know. The reason
is is because they're sitting there and they are looking
at the where they lived and around them. And it's
not necessarily out of racism.
Speaker 2 (46:20):
Some of it is.
Speaker 1 (46:21):
There's some super racist people out there who are loving
every minute of this. Twitter will prove that to you
right now. However, most people, they honestly, they really truly
don't care in the big sense. But they just want
things not to change. That's the beauty of getting older,
how curmudgeonly, I don't want.
Speaker 2 (46:41):
Things to change.
Speaker 1 (46:43):
And so when you make big fundamental changes and you
appear to be showing favoritism to the people whose money
you're using to do it, that's why they're doing it.
You know what, Guardian hire me as a consultant. This
is too easy, but to put out a piece of racism, poverty, drinking,
social media. We still don't know why Britain's were rioting.
(47:04):
Then they're gonna do it again because now you've just
told them we didn't hear you. Hang on.
Speaker 2 (47:08):
In the world of talk.
Speaker 1 (47:09):
Radio, there's a couple topics that really really get people
fired up.
Speaker 2 (47:13):
And it's good. That's fine.
Speaker 1 (47:15):
You can't do them all the time and in great depth,
because then you're it would just be your show because
the people who are really into this, understandably are really
into it. That being said, I think it's an appropriate
time to get into regulations, laws, and criminal prosecutions surrounding
gun violence. I know I sound like a moon bat han,
(47:37):
but hear me out. So the father of the fourteen
year old alleged shooter down in Georgia has now been
charged in the very similar fashion to the parents being
charged up there in Michigan. And I think this is
an interesting topic, but also I think it's it's pretty
(48:04):
it's pretty one sided here, and so I want to
follow me down this rabbit hole and and let's go.
Because I'm always thinking too. Because they are so intellectually
dishonest in the way that they do things, you have
to be very thoughtful about anything. For those of you
(48:28):
who honestly believe that all GOP are monsters, because they
won't even make this one little tweak to this one
law having to do with firearms. The reason that so
many people are hesitant is because every single time.
Speaker 2 (48:43):
They have they were.
Speaker 1 (48:44):
Given an inch, they've taken a thousand miles because you're
dealing with the constituously protected activity. So yeah, people are
snake bit on that, and it's why if you even
if you think one little thing might be reasonable, people
have such objections. However, I'm not objectionable to accountability. It's
a hallmark of the criminal justice system. So if we
(49:06):
agree something is criminal and it is not constitutionally protected,
then let's have that discussion. So question number one, do
you think charging parents of school shooters is a is
a viable strategy going forward? Now, the argument would be, well,
what it's going to tell parents that you can't just
ignore the problem.
Speaker 2 (49:26):
You think there's something wrong with your kids?
Speaker 1 (49:29):
All right, that's a good argument because you know, in
those cases if you have weapons in the house and
you don't secure them and your fourteen year old get
a hold of him, and all he does is run
around drawing the pictures of you know, dead other students
and telling you who's going to do it, and you
don't do anything. Yeah, I I you can convince me
(49:50):
that there is criminal, criminal negligence there. However, you got
to go on. You got to go on the whole
ride with me, okay, and the whole ride is this.
So not only are they alleging that the father should
have known that is something that work right there, they're
basing that off of previous interactions that school officials and
(50:13):
FBI and local law enforcement where they.
Speaker 2 (50:15):
Knew about it.
Speaker 1 (50:18):
And so my question becomes because initially, when you had
incidents with this fourteen year old allegedly come up, they
did look into it.
Speaker 2 (50:26):
At school and they didn't do anything.
Speaker 1 (50:29):
So you did an investigation and you went it's not
really we can't really jump in here, and you're the
arbiters of law and order. So how that father then
read it? And I'm not making an excuse a lot
of people are very irresponsible with guns, and it's very
irritating as somebody tries to be a responsible gun owner,
But how about the people who literally are on the job,
(50:55):
supposed to be at the schools seeing these things intervening
And from a law enforcement perspective, when there is something
that is chargeable, if only to you know, get the
ball rolling on dealing with somebody who is not right,
keeps making threats.
Speaker 2 (51:14):
And there's been all sorts of incidents.
Speaker 1 (51:16):
Is creeping everybody out, and you don't do anything in
a way you're telling that, you're telling the fantly the
behavior is not criminal, and maybe it's not. But my
question is if dad can be charged for making available
those guns due to a dereliction of duty, how come
(51:36):
you can't be charged school officials? Yeah, see that's the
hander and they were rolling into the room. How how
come because these charges are predicated not on dad being
part of the conspiracy. Are he's sitting with his kid
at the you know they're eating cheerios. You got a
big day to day. Remember you're shooting up the school today.
I got your guns all packed. That's not what the charges.
(51:58):
The charge is aid available firearms which were later used
in the commission of this horrific crime. So just like
they charged the Michigan parents. Now they're going to charge
that here, I I what do you think of that?
Do you think parents should have liability if it's so,
if they so blatantly dropped the ball, and if you
(52:18):
do and and by the way, we charge people with
criminal offenses without without them intending to do it all
the time, all the time. There were many charges, yes,
even up to an including murder and manslaughter. If you
work in a medical environment and you have a responsibility
to clean, you know, clean stuff and everybody, and now
(52:41):
you're the you you're the angel of death or whatever
because it's so irresponsible how your clinics being operated. Those
people do get charged with crimes. It has to rise
to that level. But what what they were shown was
to be criminally uh you know, you see they were
so criminally darely and their duty that this happened. So
(53:03):
if you're going to charge it, the father is derelict
in his duty. Can I also suppose that school officials
who were notified this kid was unnotice the family was,
you know, like they knew that there was stuff going on.
How come you're not charging the school officials. Now coming
down to Florida, they didn't throw that one officer who
(53:25):
ran and hidden there could you could make a better
argument at the very least he did intend to run away.
But ultimately, where does the responsibility end? And if you're
telling me that in this one instance within our schooling system,
this is the only instance that you moonbats thay because
one hundred percent on the parents, when in every other
(53:47):
controversial discussion you have advocated for the state being able
to snatch kids out of homes because the parents won't
let them transition because they're eleven and their friends suggested
it and now they're on board. Lord, where does your
responsibility lie? So eight eight eight nine three four seven
eight seven four do you think parents who make available
(54:09):
and then should there have to be noticed there a
fourteen year old b versus that fourteen year old were
incredibly different individuals when it came to firearms. And I'm
going to tell you at fourteen, I had I and
earlier than I have had access to an arsenal my
life arsenal. And you know what, never shot up as school,
(54:32):
never shot anybody else. So you can't even just do
it on the age. What do you do? And it
would it be appropriate if you're if you're a school counselor, right,
and you got a folder a mile thick, and I
understand that bureaucracy's bureaucracy, but if you also have to
(54:54):
figure out that eventually, at some point, it's not just
about helping that fourteen year old, It's about an obligation
of safety that you have to the rest of that school.
And you don't do anything, or in like in Parkland, Florida,
where he had thirty eight individual reactions or interactions with
law enforcement and school officials over criminal matters and nobody
(55:17):
did anything, how come you're not charged. You want this responsibility.
You want to be able to tell parents that they
have to literally get their kids neutered if if the
kid wants it, you're willing to flex that level of responsibility.
Where's your responsibility for this? Where's the responsibility that you
have for your sheer in neptness and unwillingness to address
(55:42):
this situation. And arguably Dad in this case, and again
I'm not as lawyer, I'm not making excuses for him.
Dad in this case could make the argument that, well,
look where there was this incident, you guys investigated and
you decided that it was not a criminal incident. So
I took that to me and that my kid wasn't
a potential school shooter. I don't know he's going to
make that argument, but I could understand it. But if
(56:07):
you charge with people keeping people safe in schools, want
to start charging others who have unknowing, you know, unindicted
co conspirators, so to speak, just based on negligence, then
buckle in because it needs to be the same for everybody,
especially when you're among those that want to If you
(56:28):
know who don't think the parents should be the primary
people telling how to raise kids, fine, you're on the hook.
So you charge individuals within that that that chain there
who you know either didn't investigator I he'll grow out
of it. Right there, They didn't intend for people to
get killed, but through their own inaction, people got killed.
(56:50):
And if that's the argument you want to make, I
would say I'm in.
Speaker 2 (56:53):
For all of it.
Speaker 1 (56:56):
Or none of it, or you get a standard more
so than just my kid did the shooting. We had
guns in the house, we didn't lock them. You got
you have to have something more that more there, And
if people just chose not to deal with it, this
is what you get. I'm sick of hearing well, oh yeah,
(57:17):
the FBI was, Yeah, they were totally yeah, they knew them.
You're talking about kids, man, So you know, let's let's
see what you think. Let's first get rased agic from
the Weather Channel. We'll get your calls here in the
next segment. What is up, my friend, I'm buch Stacy.
Speaker 5 (57:34):
How are you doing today?
Speaker 2 (57:35):
God's so over the season?
Speaker 1 (57:40):
Did you want to Why do I get to see
nine flags for procedural in the first drive for the Ravens.
Speaker 2 (57:46):
I think that it's not going to be the year
of the refs again. I just can't.
Speaker 5 (57:50):
Yeah, and I don't know, I yeah, I don't know. Yeah,
wear the white shoes next time, right, I guess that's
what some people are saying with the toe on the
line there at I just na almost right.
Speaker 1 (58:06):
It was no And you know, if you just looked
at the post score, you should be like, all right,
but that was a pretty good game. They're good teams, right.
You don't want to see a seven to three defensive
battle for the for the you know, for the first.
Speaker 2 (58:19):
Game of the season. They didn't do that.
Speaker 1 (58:21):
But but you know, just repetitive, repetitive, first five minutes.
I'm like, come on, would you shut up? I can't.
I looked at I can't figure out what the what
the procedural violation was.
Speaker 5 (58:30):
The third time, Yeah, I get a little flot you
know how the first few games go. It'll be floppy.
It'll be floppy this weekend. I don't know about tonight
and wherever they're playing in Brazil. That's interesting, but you know,
we'll see. But this weekend tar Heel in.
Speaker 2 (58:50):
The jungle is actually literally in the rain forest.
Speaker 5 (58:53):
They probably but I don't. But I don't think any
rain in the forecast at least that's what the last
check what I what I scene and not much locally.
Bigh schoot ball games tonight in good shape, tar Hills
in town tomorrow afternoon and evening. I can't leave out
a passing shower, but if it is there, it won't
last long. RE really not too concerned about that. So
(59:16):
you know, all although we're pretty decent shape, the weather's
going to be nice. Got a little bit of a
cool downcoming, a little fog this morning, up for seventies,
low eighties today, Tomorrow probably only reaching the upper seventies,
low eighties again and then near sixty at night with
fifties around and once again a small chance of the
passing shower. But Sunday looks beautiful, load of bit seventies
(59:37):
for daytime highs and plenty of sunshine and a forecast
and then warming up again next week is go back
above eighty. Maybe it was the middle eighties for the
Triangle by Wednesday. So the cool lights and the warm
days coming up, not much rain over the next few
and looking pretty good for any football games this weekend.
Wakes in town seven o'clock, you know, maybe maybe a
(59:59):
shower doesn't look like anything, not too significant. And of
course over at Death Valley tomorrow night, I'll be there again.
Not much of a chance of rain, should be should
be a pretty good shape against that state.
Speaker 1 (01:00:11):
By the way, you guys didn't hear this. It was
before so Ross said or Ross said, Ray said that
if Clemson loses any games this year, he will eat
dog poop out of a Red Solo Cup.
Speaker 5 (01:00:21):
Yeah. I didn't say that, but some but somebody did
say that, didn't.
Speaker 2 (01:00:25):
That was you? Yeah, you mean that would be the game?
No social media accounts anymore?
Speaker 1 (01:00:31):
Yeah, all right, so.
Speaker 2 (01:00:32):
You're raised on the record. There you go. We'll talk
in the next hour, sir.
Speaker 5 (01:00:35):
Have a good one.
Speaker 1 (01:00:36):
All right there you go, Oh look at that. Some
of you are sniffed out by slip slope already with
this topic. Well, good for you. We'll get your calls next.
Speaker 2 (01:00:45):
Hang on.
Speaker 1 (01:00:45):
Charge parents, and you could convince me that there is.
But if simple dereliction of providing access to a firearm
is a chargeable offense with no you know, no help
and maybe even no warning in some instance, then everyone
in the food chain who is tasked with keeping schools safe?
Why is that not the discussion? And that's that's where
(01:01:07):
I'm at here, because I think you could, really you can,
like everything else, you can use a rule or a
law like this to go after parents to accomplish other
things that you want on Second Amendment issues.
Speaker 2 (01:01:20):
Right, you want to terrify.
Speaker 1 (01:01:21):
If you terrify enough parents that they won't even take
their kids to the range because they just don't want
to deal with that, you harm the future of shooting, sports,
hunting and things like that. And I'm not being over
toly dramatic, I promise you somebody in a think take
thinks that it's a good idea.
Speaker 2 (01:01:36):
It's why they do.
Speaker 1 (01:01:37):
Things like, we can't get the death penalty thrown away,
so we'll create, like in North Carolina, a quagmire where
nothing happens or will sue drug companies, so it's not
worth them to do business. It is a dishonest way
to accomplish what you're going after. But if you think
it's good for one of the parties involved, shouldn't it
be good for the rest?
Speaker 2 (01:01:54):
John, what's up?
Speaker 5 (01:01:56):
Hey?
Speaker 7 (01:01:57):
You're You're absolutely right. I couldn't agree with you more.
But I need I think they need to look at
all all of the people, like you said, they need
to look at law enforcement. This Dad took the advice
of them by them saying that they found nothing wrong
and now they want to come back and they want.
Speaker 1 (01:02:15):
To charge And said, yeah, I don't think they said
nothing wrong, just to be clear, but they didn't. They
didn't treat it in a manner with the importance that
have probably deserved.
Speaker 2 (01:02:25):
And Dad may have taken a read.
Speaker 1 (01:02:27):
I don't know that he's going to say that, but
that's the thought that crossed my mind.
Speaker 7 (01:02:31):
So right, and I do believe that it's detrimental to
to all of us for all our shooting, sports, hunting
and our children that want to have I want to
participate that stuff.
Speaker 5 (01:02:41):
They're going to scare us all away.
Speaker 1 (01:02:43):
And and thanks for the calling, John, and and seriously,
you want basic control of the kid, then you get
the basic responsibility. Now most of you listen, if you
listen long enough, you know that I'm kind of tongue
in cheek here because I want laws that are easy
to understand and standards that's you know, whether you're on
the right side of it. And the problem is here
(01:03:03):
is this is another law that is very up to
whatever moonback prosecutors there, and so it wouldn't work. It's
so I started with a little bit of a fib.
I don't think you can functionally make it work unless
you have it without defining standards.
Speaker 2 (01:03:19):
Cam real quick, what's up?
Speaker 8 (01:03:21):
Yeah, Hey, okay, see we got a lot in common.
You grew up just like my sons grew up.
Speaker 5 (01:03:28):
I have three boys.
Speaker 8 (01:03:29):
We are out here in rural Jallas County. We're able
to have our own little.
Speaker 5 (01:03:33):
Range in the backyard.
Speaker 8 (01:03:35):
We should be, you know, they thought that would be beguns,
you know. And and if any of my sons, if
I thought they had a mental illness, I would stop
either one at whichever one it was from having access
to a weapon quickly. And but that's that's a that's
the father's responsibility, of parents responsibility. But when it comes
(01:03:56):
to you know, the law, you look at what offshooters
allow people to walk right out of the court room
after they've been charged.
Speaker 1 (01:04:05):
Here on the CaCO Day radio program where we're having
big intellectual discussions about parental responsibility and perhaps others responsibility
in the event of a mass shooting and donuts. So
to continue those conversations and much more, we welcome in
our radio Buddy.
Speaker 2 (01:04:21):
To the South. It's Pete Calender WBT middays.
Speaker 1 (01:04:25):
Hey you doing, sir, I'm doing okay.
Speaker 6 (01:04:27):
How are you doing?
Speaker 2 (01:04:28):
I'm good.
Speaker 1 (01:04:29):
You like donuts? You find of donuts?
Speaker 6 (01:04:32):
I mean I like them. I don't eat them though.
Speaker 1 (01:04:35):
But you could, okay, So to avoid eating them, though,
if you were to walk in, if you were to
walk into one of these events that we end up
at and they got you know, the standard food spread
on the table, you would know which are the donuts?
Speaker 5 (01:04:48):
Right?
Speaker 6 (01:04:49):
Yes, I can I believe successfully identified donuts on a table.
Speaker 3 (01:04:53):
Yeah I have.
Speaker 2 (01:04:54):
I'm now being told that it is near.
Speaker 1 (01:04:56):
It is near impossible with this whole stupid Timwall donut
Gate thing. Are you following this story on your big show.
Speaker 6 (01:05:05):
Donut Gate? Oh don't. Yeah, donut shop that that he
he closed down during COVID went out of business.
Speaker 1 (01:05:13):
You're giving away, you're giving away some of the it's
it's so much more than so sorry jd. Vance went
into a donut shop and you know how it is
when you're trying to pick out twelve but there's only.
Speaker 6 (01:05:22):
Real eight that you thought of me And they mocked
him for being Yeah, they were mocking him for being
like socially awkward or something while he was talking to
the staff.
Speaker 1 (01:05:32):
Yes yes, yes, yes, And so I'm going to turn
into a meme, but not a good meme because you
can't mean all right left. Yeah, So so Tim Walls
decided he's going to go own him and uh so
Walls decided to go into it's like a a convenience
store or whatever, and uh he goes, look, I have
(01:05:52):
no problem picking out donuts and proceeds to grab two
whoopee pies. So now they're like, you tried to own
him by saying you knew what donuts are and you
bought things in a plastic thing at Agasta that are
actually not donuts. And then after he got wrung up
on that and his whoopee pies, Tina Smith, who's the
(01:06:18):
idiot you at one of the two idiot US senators
in Minnesota, decided to come to his aid. So she
posted a picture of that time her and Tim Walls
at an event at a really famous donut shop, right,
and that one I saw and.
Speaker 6 (01:06:33):
I was like, why, I don't understand, And then I
realized this thing is like years ago.
Speaker 1 (01:06:38):
Years ago, because that donut shop ran into a little
they rented a few problems back in the early twenty twenties.
Speaker 2 (01:06:48):
Called COVID, and we're put out of business.
Speaker 1 (01:06:52):
So yeah, that whole thing is part of the news
cycle and everyone's arguing over donuts and I just want
to be done. I want to do the south Park model,
is what I want. Pete Calender, do you see South
Park announce that they're not going to be doing a
new season this fall. You're gonna take one one season
hiatus because because they don't want to just do Trump
and election jokes.
Speaker 2 (01:07:12):
They said, I'm on board with this.
Speaker 1 (01:07:16):
Man, Well are you here? I mean, yeah, you do
a lot of times, a lot of times you just oh,
I just want to I want to hit that person
in the face with a board, but you don't do it.
And uh, the amount of stress that we could say
if you just sit around, eat donuts, do whatever you want.
I got so much sick time saved up.
Speaker 6 (01:07:35):
Saying here, Uh no, I look all right. So I
as I rode in my op ed at the blade.
Speaker 1 (01:07:43):
Oh, here we go, here we go. I well, it's like,
did you did you write something? Do you write something?
I was writing a time or to see how long
before you brought it up?
Speaker 6 (01:07:53):
I will, So it's like a it's like you're interviewing
an author.
Speaker 2 (01:07:56):
Now like author, I don't book author interviews.
Speaker 6 (01:08:01):
Right, because like they always have to talk about their
book that they wrote. You know, but I but only
I only mentioned it for this reason, which is I
started off. I think you did as well as a reporter, right,
doing news, and.
Speaker 2 (01:08:17):
I'm not able to do. That's how I transitioned to talk.
I did news first.
Speaker 1 (01:08:21):
I was in music, but then I came over and yes,
you start in news and then you know you do
your things right, Yeah, absolutely right?
Speaker 6 (01:08:28):
And so but and so I went to when I
went to school, I went to school, you know, mass communication,
broadcast journalism, and with a minor in political science and philosophy.
And so this is what I was always interested in,
and I believe and why I got into journalism was
because I believe it is very very important for our
(01:08:50):
society to have a free press that holds government accountable.
That's my first principle, right, And that's why I did
the job. That's why, as you might say, I did
the work. You know, I did the work for yeah,
for a decade. And I'm not even counting my high
school newspaper here in that in that decade, right, But
(01:09:11):
I got into it for that reason, and so I
still believe in that principle, and so I don't ever,
I don't ever really get bored or fed up with
these election cycles because I do believe that it is
vitally important and you know, and I recognize I'm probably
(01:09:33):
in the minority.
Speaker 1 (01:09:33):
There, Okay, no, no, no, no, And here here's the thing.
It is vitally important, but it's still aging me, so.
Speaker 6 (01:09:40):
You know, yeah, yeah, well yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2 (01:09:44):
I shouldn't have gray. I don't. And yet this is
what these people do to me.
Speaker 1 (01:09:48):
And so we find ourselves, you know, sitting here and
look at another election cycle where we're either going to
argue about donuts or whether Hitler had some good points.
And I just have to pull out of this thing, man,
because like, well, social media is just those last week
has just been a dumpster fire.
Speaker 6 (01:10:03):
Yeah yeah, well, and so that's the I try not
to get distracted by the dumb assery, you know, and
the debate over that guy, you know, World War two
historian guy, and they're talking about Hitler and Church and all
this stuff.
Speaker 1 (01:10:22):
What are we doing?
Speaker 6 (01:10:23):
Yeah, yeah, I'm not, Like, I'm not going to go
listen to it. I don't listen to Tucker Carlson's podcast generally.
I think I'd seen maybe two or three since he
has launched them. I don't. Yeah, I don't make a
point to watch his stuff. I feel like he's I
feel like he's kind of become somebody that I can't
(01:10:44):
identify with, and I don't. I don't trust him. So
I unless he's got some guest on there that I
care to hear what that guest says, then I would
go find it and watch it. But no, I don't
watch him. It's not worth the effort or time for me.
So this this fight though, that people are having over
(01:11:04):
this guy. He goes by Martyr Meade, I think is
his Twitter account, and I've actually read one of his
tweet storms or threaded tweets, whatever you want to call him,
about a year or so ago, and that's when he
first came on to my raidar. I'd never heard of
the guy, but he had made some really good points
on some matter I forget what it was. And so
(01:11:26):
then I saw him on Carlson's thing and he's talking
all of this stuff about World War Two, and I'm like,
I'm out, you know, like I'm okay, Well, I'm done.
I don't need to ever really listen to him again.
And look, if you have a different opinion, or you know,
the audience is a different opinion, go watch him. It
literally does not bother me. I don't care. The problem
is when you see the connection with the story of
(01:11:47):
Tenant Media and the foreign actors, and I know there
are people that are saying, oh, it didn't happen, this
is just the DJ, and I get it. I totally
get it that the DJ cannot be trusted costs of
their pattern of abuse and the way that they have
attempted to influence our elections. I get it. I agree. However,
that does not mean that Russians, Chinese, Venezuelans, Iranians, that
(01:12:13):
these governments are not trying to mess up and mess
with our elections.
Speaker 3 (01:12:19):
Oh you just do.
Speaker 2 (01:12:20):
Why are you just picking on foreigners?
Speaker 5 (01:12:22):
Right? Well, I don't have to, I don't have to choose.
Speaker 1 (01:12:25):
It's I mean, those are all foreigners.
Speaker 6 (01:12:29):
So wow, right, but the DJ there, the DJ isn't like.
Speaker 5 (01:12:34):
I don't have to pick.
Speaker 1 (01:12:35):
You might take on the Chen thing. And I think
you and I agree on this. Two things can be
correct at the same time. Like, okay, so could a
company in this case Tenant Media, who who saw pretty
substantial growth in a very short period of time right
with with with especially Pool is probably the one that's
done the most growth for him and and so they've
(01:12:57):
taken this company and tried to model it after for
companies like The Blaze, who you just wrote for Ross
Did you know he wrote a op ed for The
Blaze on your Twitch channel? Sorry making a point there.
So so anyway, so you sit there and you go
into these startups, so multiple things can be true.
Speaker 2 (01:13:18):
And I don't know if you know this.
Speaker 1 (01:13:20):
So in addition to doing radio, I've worked in a
multimedia capacity because you know, before you get your own show,
you got to eat, and so I worked with media
production companies for some of the shows that air on
like Outdoor Life and ESPN and whatnot based out of
Minnesota and these companies. Once you have the infrastructure to
(01:13:40):
be a content producer, do you have that? We had?
Speaker 7 (01:13:44):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (01:13:44):
And I didn't own on the company, but the company
which is North American Media, I'll.
Speaker 2 (01:13:49):
Say who it is, Uh, Fishermen.
Speaker 6 (01:13:52):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (01:13:53):
They a good portion of their staff was not working
on their own products, and then they were working on
contracted editing and video production work. It's a really beefy
segment because you got all the cool stuff and you
have other entities who want a better production quality. It's
what you see in YouTube right. Most YouTubers, the bigger ones,
(01:14:15):
they don't edit their own stuff. They hire professional folks
to do that, who do the editing for multiple things.
So it can be true that Chen's company was hired
by two people who were mislabeling themselves and said, hey,
that's a ten million dollar contract. You want us to
edit this stuff. It's repackaging of stories from other countries.
(01:14:36):
I don't know that most people would think that it
could also be true that that is definitively a Russian
operation who said, go find me some folks to do this,
and we'll go ahead and get this stuff into the
news cycle. I think the envision what the DOJ is
would the DOCHA have charged a production company if Media
(01:14:58):
Matters was doing it in the same way to and
with the same narrative.
Speaker 6 (01:15:03):
Right, No, I agree both, Right, So it can be
a Russian operation and the DOJ chose the timing and
the and the focus of the probe. Right, both of
those things can be true because reading the indictment it
appears pretty clearly, and reading the statements from the commentators
(01:15:24):
like Dave Ruben and Denny Johnson and Tim Pooley, they
were like, we have no idea, We had no idea
like the financial backing of Tenant Media. Lauren Chen it
appears did absolutely know which she is a former employee
of Russia Today RT right. And also I would point
(01:15:46):
out that on her own channels she has been advising
conservatives to not vote for Donald Trump. So I'm not
exactly clear how this is supposed to be a pro
Trump f by the Russians, especially after you saw Vladimir
Pitcheton yesterday.
Speaker 1 (01:16:03):
Explain it.
Speaker 2 (01:16:04):
You don't have to explain it.
Speaker 1 (01:16:05):
You can say she runs a company that is the
distributor for and then throwing conservative shows, and you don't
have to.
Speaker 2 (01:16:11):
It is it is.
Speaker 1 (01:16:12):
It is an indictment with an admission. Can I pick
you real quick? Did you know what I thought on this?
I'm curious. I threw this little talker out and I
haven't done the big review. You ever do that where
you throw a thing out and you use the hook
to go and get the calls, But really there's a
different point you wanted to make.
Speaker 2 (01:16:29):
It's like a special episode.
Speaker 1 (01:16:31):
So I saw that they charged the dad down in
Georgia for essentially providing access to that fourteen year old
is alleged to have killed his classmates and teachers.
Speaker 2 (01:16:39):
And remember in Michigan they did that as well.
Speaker 1 (01:16:42):
And I think it's an interesting topic because most conservatives
see anything that you want to do to guns is
you trying to get a camel's nose under the tent.
Make big changes, because that's what they always do, right,
There's just this little thing, No, you need this other
all these things, so and but we charge people with
criminal liability and other aspects for doing things not with intent,
(01:17:05):
but rather because they created a scenario. And could you
make an argument that if you had a fourteen year
old is running around drawing pictures of dead classmates all day,
said I'm going to get them, that you should have
liability if you don't secure your firearms.
Speaker 2 (01:17:17):
I'll have that discussion.
Speaker 1 (01:17:18):
My question is, if that liability is in fact a
criminally prosecutable liability.
Speaker 2 (01:17:25):
Why is it just the parents?
Speaker 1 (01:17:27):
Why would a school counselor why would remember the guy
in Parkland? We found out that sheriff had thirty eight
interactions with your shooter.
Speaker 2 (01:17:36):
His department did.
Speaker 1 (01:17:38):
So my question is for all of you big government
people who want to be able to force parents to
neuter their kids under threat of removals. So you're the parent,
because it takes a village, why shouldn't you carry the
same level of responsibility when you drop the ball and
you don't allow this kid in here? And so that
was the question. I'm curious your thoughts. And then my
follow up to it, and the point that I was
(01:17:58):
going to make is because like too many other laws,
it would be arbitrary. Yeah, you go, You go ahead,
and you get the dad because he's got a gun safe. Well,
I don't know what if you're a single mom trying
to raise your kid in a socioeconomically challenged thing and
that kid goes, you know what, I'm gonna go get
some guns and some drugs and I'm gonna I'm gonna
get paid man, and you don't do anything to intervene
because you're overwhelmed with all your other kids. Does that
(01:18:19):
woman should she be charged the same way that dad
who took his kid to the range a couple times
a year should be charged. What do you think of
that conversation, because it's nobody's having the total part of it,
and I think it needs to be a package here.
Speaker 6 (01:18:34):
Yeah, no, I yeah, So in theory, I agree with
the concept of holding people who who behaved in a
negligent fashion right accountable and libel. But just like the
red flag laws or watch lists or anything like that,
the challenge becomes in, as you mentioned, the arbitrary nature
(01:18:57):
of the enforcement, but also how does one get off
lists get off lists? And that gets to the you know,
the decision making process and who's in charge, and that's
the concern you know, people like, oh, let's put a
you know, let's get a list of you know, all
of the terrorists and all of this, and then all
of a sudden, everybody's getting tossed onto the list. Well,
how do you get off the list? Who's deciding on
the list?
Speaker 1 (01:19:17):
You know?
Speaker 6 (01:19:17):
Who do I appeal to all of this? That's always
the challenge. So yeah, because as soon as people start
using this law against as you said, the single mom
maybe in Chicago where her son just murdered four people
over the Labor Day weekend but didn't get any media attention, right,
are you gonna go back for her too?
Speaker 1 (01:19:37):
No? This is this is the slippery slope part of this.
And I think that dad, and I'm not his lawyer
if because remember it sounds like the school don investigation,
and if you're that father, I maybe you are Darrel,
Maybe you're an idiot.
Speaker 2 (01:19:49):
Some people can't see what their kids are gonna do.
I get that.
Speaker 1 (01:19:52):
But if the school said, yeah, we investigate, and he's
still in school, that is that's an informed source and
authoritative source telling you they don't think your kid dangerous
enough to not be around other kids.
Speaker 2 (01:20:03):
So he might use that as a defense.
Speaker 1 (01:20:05):
But all right, I'm gonna you tweet out a link
on your Twitter there and uh, we'll retweet it for
you so people can go read your Blaze story.
Speaker 2 (01:20:14):
Mister, I'm writing for the Blaze, all right, it was just.
Speaker 6 (01:20:18):
A single op ed, dude.
Speaker 5 (01:20:19):
I just want to know.
Speaker 1 (01:20:22):
I saw you posting little excerpts through it. I'm like,
I'll see how long before he mentions it? So we'll
get that at Casey on the radio. P We'll talk
to you later. Thanks, man, hang on, hang on you guys.
Ever you guys see how weird jd Vance is super weird,
super duper weird. Is he is that a skin suit? Ross?
Do we know? I just gotta be a skin suit?
This dude is not human? So what did he strew
(01:20:43):
up this time? Do you know how to order donuts?
How many of you know how to order donuts?
Speaker 5 (01:20:49):
Right?
Speaker 1 (01:20:49):
You get to go get a dozen donuts? You go
to the Krispy Kreme or the Duncan or you know
wherever duck Donuts or whatever it is, and then you
got to go through that dance right because you got
to get twelve. And let's be real honest, Okay, let's
be let's be real even though you make care for
you know, family members or coworkers or whomever will be
dining on those donuts with you.
Speaker 2 (01:21:11):
Ordering donuts goes like this.
Speaker 1 (01:21:13):
If I got to go get a dozen donuts, I'm
not a big sweet skuy, but I can get down on.
Speaker 2 (01:21:18):
One of those French egg glazed donuts.
Speaker 1 (01:21:20):
I like those. So if I go to the Duncin
over here by the station and I walk in there
and I'm like, I need a dozen, and then you
got to do the thing really, you know, And I'm sure,
by the way, I'm sure the employees love it just
as much. I don't blame them for being like, oh,
here we go, because it's you know, you do it
all day. My give a crap on the contents of
(01:21:42):
those twelve donuts is at about twenty five percent. I'm
going to with with very thoughtful process, make sure that
I acquire at least two of those those those French
egg donuts that I like, and then I'm going to
turn to the person and go, duh, just give me
a variety, and then that's it. That's my donut ordering methodology.
(01:22:05):
Ross You ever ordered donuts, go get a dozen donuts
at any point? Yeah, you know, Ross doesn't do nothing,
but if you yes, no, I had forgotten about this.
So back back before Ross was trapping all his own
food with his bare hands or whatever his protein intake
his you feel, but you would feel comfortable in that
retail situation making it happen, like you could. You could
(01:22:28):
go ahead make it happen. So with that in mind, jd.
Vance goes and orders some donuts, and then apparently all
of the activists like might's touch and whatnot or reacting
to the the the work are looking a little annoyed.
But now they're like, oh, man, he can't even order donuts.
He's so stupid. Oh would you look at him? He
(01:22:50):
doesn't know how to order donuts. And then the Walls
campaign posts a snippet from a thing he was doing.
I can't look like. He's in the deli section of
a high V just a grocery store chain on the Midwest.
I used to shot there, and he says, look at me,
I have no problem picking out donuts, and then he
(01:23:12):
proceeds to hold up in a you know, and this
is in the plastic package. So he's not even picking
out donuts from a worker like at one of those
he's grabbing the you know when you go the deli
section and he's holding these two boxes and he goes,
look at me. I have no problem picking out donuts.
The audio is a little hard to hear. He's holding
not donuts, He's holding whoopee pies. Well, I guess it
(01:23:35):
would be the term for it, which are not a donut?
Do we agree? But a whoopy pie is not a donut. Basically,
any of the any of the things that would look
little debis aren't technically really donuts just ain't a donut.
So you're holding this thing, then you know how to
pick out donuts, and you're not holding any donuts if
(01:23:57):
you wanted to get Now, if it was normal people
having a normal conversation, I would think, and I'll play
the audio that jd Vance ordered donuts in a name
in a in a normal way. And I would also
not have a problem with Tim Walls come, you know, going, hey,
I picked up some donuts at high ve and I
look and it's, uh, it's you know, it's a whoopie pie.
Would you mean don't know what a whoopy pie is?
(01:24:20):
It's you know, it's the cookies with the cream in
the middle. It is literally the little Debbie snack, but
that's not a donut. And by the way, and I've
noticed that people who really go whoopy pie stuff are
usually people from Maine.
Speaker 2 (01:24:32):
And they want to tell you all about it.
Speaker 1 (01:24:35):
So anyway, excuse me. So if you're going to correct
a dude and you're gonna be less correct, fine, But
it gets better from there because the idiot Senator Tina
Smith from Minnesota then decided that she would back it
up after she saw that Walls's tweet was getting just
torn apart. And she then posts a picture from years
(01:24:57):
ago of her and Walls on the stump in front
of this this bakery in Saint Paul, right, and uh,
they got the box, you know, and they're both holding
what is clearly a donut. And she's like, God, see
you look at this. We know how to order donuts.
The donut shopping question is has been closed since almost
(01:25:18):
beginning of COVID because they were murdered by his restrictions.
So yeah, this whole thing is just nuts. Now I
know what you're thinking. All right, let me hear jd
Vance ordered donuts and I'll be the judge of this dude,
and that I'd say absolutely, here we go. Here is
what jd Vance did to start donut gate yesterday. You're ready,
(01:25:40):
Here we go.
Speaker 3 (01:25:41):
Okay, it's a match, pleasure see it.
Speaker 1 (01:25:44):
Okay, how at the beginning that you're not talking to voters?
Speaker 3 (01:25:50):
Okay?
Speaker 1 (01:25:55):
Almost twos?
Speaker 8 (01:25:57):
Everything a long, blaze, tears, sprinkle stuff. Somebody sent in
the roles.
Speaker 2 (01:26:05):
He ordered donuts like a dude orders donuts.
Speaker 1 (01:26:10):
Can I if I just for it, just wro That's
how most guys I know ordered donuts.
Speaker 2 (01:26:15):
Again, they may pay special attention to him.
Speaker 4 (01:26:17):
And that guy is weird, Like that was super weird.
What was I think the only way to really order
at a restaurant is to go in there like you're
Chris Farley coming out like you're the motivational speaker and
high five and everybody. And that's the that's the normal.
That's the normal Minnesota way to do it.
Speaker 3 (01:26:32):
You know, it's not.
Speaker 1 (01:26:35):
He walked in, he said, give me some glaze and
some sprinkles or whatever works.
Speaker 3 (01:26:38):
That's how. That's how dudes order donuts. But dude ordered.
Speaker 4 (01:26:41):
Once you see soda in social media, once you see
like Chris Farley side by side with Tim Walls, you're
like they're the same dude.
Speaker 3 (01:26:48):
It's like they mean, we're like, it's the same picture.
Speaker 1 (01:26:50):
It's the same guy, same energy. So now I've been
apparently I've not been ordering donuts right now. I can't
remember the last time I ordered a dozen. Don't Oh
you know what I do remember? And you know why
because of retail exchanges that exist out there top ten
(01:27:11):
all time people. You don't want to be behind in line.
It's an indecisive donut order or an indici I want
to arson shopping centers. If I happen to go into
a donut shop and this happens in front of me,
all right, ma'am your next I'm a girl standing and
she just say, yeah, I need a dozen donuts. And
(01:27:34):
you know you've been in there and behind the work
or in the case in front of them, or all
the donuts they're clearly labeled. Plus you've been standing in line.
You've had a chance to mentally do this, and then
you have to listen to a conversation like, all right,
what do you want, man, Let's see which ones are
the most popular. And at that point I start rolling
(01:27:55):
my eyes. I'm like, all right, maybe they have a
specialty donut. I don't know, but I think it's glazed.
And then she's like, all right looking, and there's seventy
two thousand people in line, and then you know it's
just the workers now already tapped out. She's like, do
you have any round donuts? Do you have any round donuts?
What are the difference between the sprinkles? What are the
(01:28:16):
difference between the pink sprinkles and the white sprinkles? You
get that person in front of you. I know why
people snap. You ever been behind somebody trying to order
a dozen donuts? There should be a clock and if
you go too long, you don't do it? What was
damn it? What was the the There's a restaurant on
North Top, so the little bagel place that does like
(01:28:36):
the New York Bagels or whatever. That dude who works there,
if you take too long, he just stops talking to
you and starts talking to somebody else. I saw. I
saw some couple down on a beach vacation because I
go in there. I want to hot cap of cola.
This is very simple breakfast sandwich, which you should try it.
It's amazing. And I'm behind some idiot on her beach vacation,
(01:28:57):
which should be fine, come and join the coast and
she's just like, it's a deli setting, and she's like,
what meets do you have?
Speaker 2 (01:29:06):
It's a deli setting.
Speaker 1 (01:29:08):
And to that guy's credit, he's just like he looks
at her and then starts talking to the next customer.
She's like what it's like, Well, you're obviously not ready.
That's how you should do it. But you get behind
somebody donuts, somebody at a Chipotle, right, they're going down
the line, do you want guacamole? And they're like, which
one's the guacamole? That person needs to leave the restaurant.
You're not able to do this. You're at Subway and
(01:29:29):
you're like, I mean you mean I have to pick
what goes on this? Yes, So just just real quick,
Jade Vance ordered donuts like a normal person.
Speaker 2 (01:29:38):
Tim Walls doesn't know what a donut is.
Speaker 1 (01:29:41):
And if you can't go in there and order twelve
donuts in a reasonable amount of time.
Speaker 2 (01:29:45):
You need to be not allowed to do business or anything. Really.
Speaker 1 (01:29:52):
Sorry, I just a whole lot of stupid over the
last few weeks, just as I'm running errands in anything. Anyway,
let's go ahead and get to rast agent on the
Weather Channel. We're deciding how other people dudes ordered donuts
through the path of least resistance?
Speaker 2 (01:30:07):
Am I right?
Speaker 1 (01:30:07):
If you got to go get a dozen donuts? Are
you going in and individually researching each one? Are you
going in selecting the one the couple that you want
and then telling them just to give you a variety.
Speaker 2 (01:30:17):
For the rest?
Speaker 5 (01:30:17):
Right? Correct?
Speaker 1 (01:30:19):
Because yeah, because you got tie your things to do
an hour? Do you ordered donuts wrong?
Speaker 5 (01:30:25):
I'll go in there with my wife and I'll be like, no,
we got to get one of these and this.
Speaker 1 (01:30:31):
Oh kill me, kill me?
Speaker 2 (01:30:32):
I see no offense stateies. It doesn't have to be
because I see dudes like.
Speaker 1 (01:30:36):
If if I see a person's asked by the clerk, hey,
I doesn't know what do you want and there's surprise
on their face at the question, I'm out because that
person is going to waterboard me over the next fifteen
minutes with donuts, selection questions or everybody else in line.
And you can't used to be you could beat them
(01:30:56):
up and you know, hide them in the cooler.
Speaker 2 (01:30:57):
So you can't do that anymore.
Speaker 1 (01:30:59):
So yeah, correct, yeah, so.
Speaker 5 (01:31:07):
Not much so much. You know, we got you look
at the tropics and you look at and you say, wow,
you've got one, two, three, four areas the hurricane center
has circled, but all of them got less than twenty
percent chance of developing. Close it's Us' is just west
of Bermuda. It might be kicking up the surf and
the rip car risk a little bit that that twenty percent,
and then along the Gulf coast ten percent going into
(01:31:27):
the Bay of Mph over the next few days, twenty
percent and ten percent out over the Atlantic. So it's
all bark, no bite, nothing forecasts to develop, but still
the long ways to go. Just probably about sixty five
percent of the Atlantic hurricane season to go here, which
peaks in a couple of days on the tenth, but
still could be very active. After that pulled back in,
we should see more of the way of sunshine as
(01:31:49):
the afternoon goes on up first seventies to low eighties tomorrow.
For whatever your plans are, if it's a ball game,
we're just heading outside. A sprinkle rain or a passing shower.
That's it, especially south most cloud to otherwise low eighties
and a furgo through. It's a pleasant weather for Sunday.
You wake up, breeze and an, it's gonna be real nice.
Most of us will be in the fifty sun Raider
mid the seventies, but warm up is coming back. Next week.
(01:32:11):
We'll have Sunsei back in Casey. We might spend a
couple of days in the middle eighties in some spots,
so it looks like small Tanta rain, but really not
much over.
Speaker 1 (01:32:19):
The next seven We got listener events Tuesday and Thursday,
but they involved us inside drinking bourbons.
Speaker 5 (01:32:24):
So yeah, well the weather outside of the year two
so whatever you dose.
Speaker 1 (01:32:29):
Yeah, so when you take your designated drive home, be safe.
Speaker 2 (01:32:33):
There you go, feel nice?
Speaker 1 (01:32:34):
All right, thank you, sir, appreciate it having a weekend. Okay, yep,
all right, there you go, rach stage, I can coming
back with Jeff.
Speaker 7 (01:32:39):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (01:32:39):
I just thought somebody with irritation more than don't at
people and your calls coming up.
Speaker 9 (01:32:43):
Hanging well, Casey, good morning. Investors may not know what
to make of the August employment report that just came
out at eight thirty this morning. The Labor Department says
employers added one hundred and forty two thousand workers to
their payrolls last month. That was not as many as predicted,
but it was a big improvement from July, when just
eighty nine thousand jobs were added. That July number was
(01:33:05):
revised downward this morning. The unemployment rate ticked down to
four point two percent. It was a four point three
percent in July. Average hourly earnings were up a little
more than expected. Economists say. The report, though, does not
resolve the question of whether the Federal Reserve will cut
infrast rates by a quarter or half percent later this month,
and so now the focused photo of shifts.
Speaker 6 (01:33:28):
To the.
Speaker 9 (01:33:30):
Inflation report, as I was trying to think of the
Consumer Price Index CPI out next week. Right now, the
futures are mixed. S and P futures are up a fraction,
Nasdaq futures down forty three, the Dow futures are up eight.
If you shop for a new TV in the last
ten years, you didn't have the option of buying one
made by Panasonic, which was at one time the biggest
(01:33:52):
plasma TV maker in the world. Panasonic has just announced
it's returning to the United States with three new models
in a deal with am On. All of the sets
will have fire TV built in. They'll be sold by
Amazon and also Costco American support for a ban on
TikTok has stayed over the last year and a half.
Few research says about a third of all adults still
(01:34:14):
want to see the Chinese owned app band. The proposed
band had fifty percent support in March of last year,
and the Casey, the Japanese company that owns sevent eleven,
says the chain of convenience stores is worth more than
the thirty nine billion dollars being offered by Kushtard of Canada.
In rejecting the bids, Seven and I Holdings indicate that
(01:34:35):
it would be willing to consider a sweetened offer, so
stay tuned, Casey.
Speaker 1 (01:34:39):
People have no idea how many seven elevens there are
in the world. You can go to damn near any
third world country and they have seven elevens. But it's
just something that blows me away as somebody likes to travel.
Speaker 3 (01:34:50):
Yeah, they're everywhere.
Speaker 1 (01:34:51):
They're absolutely South America. I've seen them in Asia and
they're just everywhere. So all right, I didn't know the
Japanese company owned it, so that makes sense. Well, have
a good weekend, Jeff, appreciate it.
Speaker 9 (01:35:00):
Do the same. We'll talk to you on Monday.