Trump's Agenda Slammed by Judges at Warp Speed!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
These judges with these rulings against the Trump administration. We
haven't seen anything like this with any other administration ever
in the history of these United States of America. That,
let me remind you right now, is still an experiment
that we are in charge of. They're going to do
anything to stop President Trump from removing illegal aliens. We're

(00:23):
not stupid. We've talked about it. Connect the dots here.
These illegal aliens and Democrats eyes are future voters when
they get in power, that they'll they'll put in real quick,
they'll do a whole amnesty and within a decade or
maybe quicker, they'll have them all be voters. They're not

(00:43):
going to send that opportunity back. And then you got
your Chloword Piven. Destroy us from inside, bankrupt us. They
don't want to see the takers get removed. No, they
need takers here. That's how they continue, It's how they
continue the plan. See, they don't want makers. That's capitalism.

(01:06):
You have makers and takers. They don't want makers, they
want takers. That's Marxism. It never works because the takers
in the end have nothing left to take. Nearly all
these cases brought by these groups trying to change. All
the policies by the Trump administration, they are based on facts, right, No, No,

(01:30):
it's how these plaintive sea things so stupid it would
never ever first get expedited quickly, and it'd probably be
thrown out before it ever hit some of these other
courts here, and they're using these friendly. By friendly, we
mean Marxist liberal judges. Nearly all of them appointees of
Obama and Biden. That last one there with Portland happened

(01:53):
to be a Trump appointee. But hey, you don't think
there's still a lot of anti Trumpers out there. Come on,
and now they they're called temporary restraining orders tros that
block policy changes. And then when they do it, then
the judges go, hey, guys, we need to get some
facts together in the appeal process quick. We need to

(02:15):
give me some facts, bring some facts forward. You know,
if we ever cave from within, like General Douglas MacArthur predicted,
he says, it's not gonna be the Chinese, it's hung
gon be the Russians. Well, we'll be destroyed from within.
I'd say the likely cause of that big fall would
be corruption. And it is okay outside of even more

(02:40):
so because This is life and death in prison sentences.
I's gon say outside of organized sports these days, but
this the corruption in the court systems. And I know
that's it's not news to anybody, but I think it
goes way, way, way, way way deeper. It's not just
payoffs and lining judges pockets so that they can buy Mercedes.
This is like national policy. And if America ever falls,

(03:07):
I think it's going to be because loss of faith
in things like this. These are the pillars of our society.
I mean the left today, the Marxist left today, the
Democrat Party today. We're now going to say they're so
hostile toward judges and justices Supreme Court they targets of

(03:27):
assassination and did anybody step up and do anything about it?
Isn't that something These judges have the power to order
President Trump, well, let's just say it, to order him
around he does something that offends their liberal Marxists, anti
American view. That's where we are, aren't we? These court judges.

(03:49):
I never knew a court judge could be the commander
in chief. I never knew a court judge was an
expert in foreign policy. I did realize these judges had
really final authority on how the executive branch. But we
have separation of powers. Yeah, but they get a lifetime
on there. They become kings and queens. There's about seven

(04:11):
hundred federal district court judges. Now we have separation of
power because the judicial branch can look at things and
say it violates the Constitution, and that that really kind
of gives them a power over over Congress and the
White House. And if they're truly we always say coequal branches, right,

(04:32):
we say co equal? Why should why should Congress? Why
should the White House have less authority when it comes
to executing the Constitution. Like these judges say, we're making
our ruling, our opinion based on the constitution. Quote is
what they say. Okay, So if it's coequal of all
three branches there, why can't the president say no, I'm

(04:55):
standing up, No, I'm not going to follow that because
I'm going to faith fully execute the oath I was
sworn in on to protect the citizens of the United States.
We don't have local police, we don't have your state police. No,
that's not happening, their judge. We have law enforcement federal
officers being attacked. Here's the video, or why don't you

(05:16):
just go out there tonight and look right, So, who's
obeting the constitution in that regard exactly? But the power
that they that's a good Congress atomicclintalk. Can you write
down power a coequal branch constitution? That's a good question
for him. He's a he's a constitutionally minded fellow. We

(05:38):
have there in Congress, but we have four hundred and
thirty five members there. We have one hundred members of
the Senate, President Trump, we have Vice President Vance. And
then we got seven hundred judges. And remember unelected judges,
nobody really really know them. They had the final say

(06:02):
over what we went out and voted to have happened. Well,
you go back to the founding fathers, man be mad
at them. And now I'm gonna say the founding fathers
probably didn't have You know that some judge up in
Portland had authority over the president as commander in chief.
I think we might have fallen for something here. But

(06:27):
these judges, most of these federal civil cases take years
to finish. But it's not shocking that all of these
cases the outcome was most of them against the Trump administration.
He had a Biden appointed US District judge announced that
he plans to grant bonds to illegal aliens detained during

(06:52):
ICE's Chicago Operation Midway Blitz. So they went out there,
put their life on the line, faced hostility on the street, rocks.
All this kind of stuff slurs, just foul mouth people
in the middle of the day. WI aren't you at work? Oh?
Forty two million are okay? Gotcha? According to the Chicago Tribune,

(07:15):
they said the illegals can walk free or the undocumented
to walk free on fifteen hundred dollars bond as long
as they lack a prior criminal rap sheet or deportation order.
So if they if they've snuck into America and they're

(07:35):
not even in the system, never even been caught once
until ICE caught them, they don't have a deportation order
because they're not in a system, and they say they
lack a prior criminal rap sheet, how do you know that?
They man, this is so undermining law enforcement. It rewards

(07:56):
those that break our laws. No, I say, these judges
are treason us to That's how I view it's treason
this behavior because you're not back in the constitution of
the United States of America. You're sitting up there acting
like you're some campaign manager for some political movement out there.

(08:18):
There really is nothing they'd rather be doing with their time,
is there. That's how I see this, the Insurrection Act.
That's the final straw that the President of the United
States can bring out. And when we think back to
everything they said since twenty sixteen, I think we can
close our eyes unless you're driving, and if you are
turning your headlights on and it starts raining out there,

(08:40):
please but close your eyes here. Go with me for
a moment. Think about this. They want to. They've been saying,
he's a fascist, he's a dictator, he's Hitler. Can you
imagine the reports they would have on this that the president.
There have been numerous presidents. I had to of how
many times they've called out. There's been Democrat president's, Republican

(09:04):
presidents who have called out on the Insurrection Act. But
I think they're forcing his hand. I think that's what
these judges are up to. I think it's part of
the plan. I think it's part of the ploy and
all of this. So if I said, if I think
I said what a month ago, that if by January first,
if this is still happening on the street. Then somebody

(09:26):
wants this to happen, and I still feel that way.

Speaker 2 (09:30):
This is the Trevor Carry Show on the Valley. He's
power Talk.

Speaker 1 (09:36):
NFL legend Drew Brees. He's gonna make his Fox Sports
debut this weekend. Somebody else's demise is somebody else's opportunity.
Mark Sanchez, he should have gone around stabbing people. Breeze
is going to be in the booth. He's gonna it's
vacated by Sanchez after that incident. Incident, after the stabbing happened,

(09:58):
you know, he got into a fight with an older
gentlemen and it led to the older gentleman and being
was he stabbed or did he stab Sanchez? I can't
lip read. You're right, he's self defense. He stabbed back
at Sanchez. So Drew Brees is gonna be now. Color
analysts on Fox's number threeteen Giant's take on the Packers.

(10:20):
He's worked. He worked for NBC back in twenty twenty one.
He joined Fox Sports on Friday, Quick Call, I'm there,
I'm ready, let's roll. This was truly, truly disturbing. I
don't know if there's any documentary out on this or
if this is just a brand new story that's coming out.
Sounded to me like they've known about this or alhlah blah.
But this was back in Sarao, Sarajevo, Sir Bosnia, back

(10:44):
in the early nineteen nineties. I saw the story Metro
UK tourists paid seventy thousand to shoot innocent people in
a human safari hunting trip to Sarajevo. Shooting at innocent
people were in. Thirty years later, prosecutors opened investigation into
Italian tourists who are accused of paying seventy grand to

(11:05):
join the shooting and killing innocent Bosnians. They said, these
tourists paid the Bosnian Serb Army for weekend trips to
Sarajevo where they shot from rooftops at the city below.
You know what that is, that's that eyes wide shut crowd.
Those Satanists, occult people that got a whole lot of money. Yeah,

(11:27):
that they're tired of raping kids, they need a new thrill.
That that's probably money well spent for them. They said.
Wealthy people, reputation businessmen paid to kill unarmed civilians on
the street. They're bringing in now, people that survived this

(11:49):
witnesses for this trial. They also said allegations at Bosnian
intelligence had proof of Italians in the hills surrounding Sarajevo
who were up there and paid for this. They even
had pictures of people running on the street, you know,
just regular business people just for work, fleeing and running.
And during this time when they were popping off shots

(12:12):
at people down on the street, the Sarajevo had electricity issues,
gas and water supplies were cut off. Some people were
already freaking out. Have you ever heard of this? You have?
This is the first I'd heard of this. The siege

(12:32):
ended in nineteen ninety five, leaving thirteen thousand people dead,
fifty four hundred were civilians. I remember walking out of
the offices on Fifth Avenue, turning the corner, walking down
a side street there, past the parking garage to Union Square,
and as I got closer to Union Square, I could
hear the drum beats and all this and people chanting,

(12:52):
and I'm like what, I'd never seen a demonstration there,
and it was all over when Clinton started the bombing
and Boza they were the Bosnians are out in Union Square.
I mean literally, I didn't want to have to go
up to some other subway. So excuse me, excuse me,
excuse me to get to the stairs and go down
to the subway. It was an excuse me, excuse me.

(13:15):
There Bosnian mad people. I no skin in this game,
just trying to get home. I actually have video of that, yeah,
at that summer sure too. All right, so wow, there's
some really sick people out there that would pay any
kind of money to go do something like that. Uh,
he's okay, Senator John Fetterman. He's shown himself to be

(13:39):
sane minded and I think he actually cares about the
people of Pennsylvania. He's okay. He did take a fall today,
He's doing okay for you.

Speaker 3 (13:47):
From Senator Fetterman's team, During an early walk, he sustained
a fall near his home. Out of an abundance of caution,
he was transported to a hospital. Upon evaluation, it was
established he at a ventricular fibrillation flag that led to
him feeling lightheaded, falling to the ground, and hitting his
face with minor injury. Senator Fetterman always in good spirit's

(14:07):
always an optimist, equiped to his team, if you thought
my face looked bad before wait until you see it
now and then you think the amts our prayers.

Speaker 1 (14:15):
Senator Fetterman, all right, he's going to be all right,
you know, autocracy, it's government by by one man. One
man runs, well, I'd like to be president. Okay, yeah, yeah,
our wellman. Sorry sorry Hillary. Katie Kurk, she has a

(14:36):
little podcasting going there and he had Senator John Fetterman
on here, and she's a you know, Trump is an autocrat,
and you've said that Donald Trump, in your view, is
not an autocrat because his presidency is quote the product
of a democratic election.

Speaker 4 (14:53):
For me, it's it's like, you know, here here we are.
But I think at this point right now, we are
not in an a talkcracy. You know, we're in the democracy.
And that's why they were able to shut our government down.

Speaker 1 (15:05):
Yeah, it was an autocracy. Trump is what power by
one man. I will say there because I got mad
at BBC for editing. I did edit Katie Kirk and
Fetterman there he said he said what Trump did Questioning
twenty twenty. I didn't agree with him on record saying that,

(15:26):
and then he went right into what I played.

Speaker 4 (15:28):
You you know, here we are. But I think at
this point right now. We are not in an autocracy.

Speaker 1 (15:34):
Thank you, sir, and pray for his health as well.
You like that how it was in BBC like that?
Let people put it into context. Let you know that
no fake news around here. Feederman was on Cuomo. Cuomo
was like, hey, senator, or it's a party, go on,
socialist there, buddy.

Speaker 5 (15:51):
Do you believe that this may be at least in
part about your party changing and the populace movement and
reaction to MAGA and the Democratic Socialists, that this may
be a moment where they want to take over the
Democratic Party.

Speaker 4 (16:09):
I promise you America's future and my party's future is
not socialism or kinds of outlandish far left kinds of ideas.

Speaker 1 (16:20):
So good, I'm glad you agree.

Speaker 2 (16:22):
You're in the United States.

Speaker 1 (16:24):
We are alarmed by the new.

Speaker 6 (16:27):
Calls to adopt socialism in our country. Tonight we renew
our resolve that America will never be a socialist country.

Speaker 1 (16:49):
Rubble for he's a jolly good president. Well he won
in twenty twenty four. And how did the Democrats respond?
Fetterman responded to that.

Speaker 4 (17:00):
And it's been a year ago, you know, after we
lost the election, a lot of those parts and part
of those ideas pushed our party over the cliff. And
that's why we're in this situation right now. That's why
we're firmly in the minority, and that's why we've lost
control of the White House.

Speaker 1 (17:18):
Yep, Okay, thank you. If they had realized, like imagine,
if all of them had realized that and come out
with policy, it stop it. Quit dreaming like that. They
don't want to sit down and talk. They don't want
to have a competition of ideas.

Speaker 7 (17:33):
Do you left gloves?

Speaker 3 (17:34):
Free speech too, don't.

Speaker 1 (17:35):
We all right? Listen to betterman?

Speaker 4 (17:37):
So some people, you know, if you think that's a solution,
that's fine, but it's going to be it's going to
be a competition of ideas, and we know that's not
going to prevail. You know, what's going to prevail is
common sense. What's going to prevail, you know, choosing this
country over you know, part of the extreme in our party.

Speaker 2 (17:54):
This is the trebor Chary show on the Valley's Power Talk.

Speaker 1 (18:00):
Why have we heard of this word? We should never
have to hear of this word. If they were doing
their jobs correctly, we would not have to hear of
this word. It should be procrastination spending, not a continuing resolution.
That makes it sound like, well, it's continuing and we've
resolved it. Now it's you're not doing your job right,

(18:21):
you're not having a balanced budget, you're having to do
all these Well, let's just fill this in real quick.
Let's just get another credit cards so we can keep
rolling the dice guys. But Republican senators took a provision
into the continuing Resolution Procrastination build to reopen the government
that will not allow DOJ or any judges or any subpoena. Well,

(18:44):
we got a court order from targeting their phone records.
I can understand why, so I sue Republicans beingspied on
by Democrats. I understand that Senate's protected from the abuse
of the Fourth Amendment, but we're not. If you violated,
each instance of violation will result in a half a

(19:08):
million dollar fine. Hey, why don't we change that wording
to payment and have it go to us? All right?
That sounds good, All right done. Yeah, if somebody spies
on you, you get half a million dollars. It goes to
the senator. Yeah, yeah, it sound like a little dog barking. Yeah,

(19:31):
that's almost worth Hey, I'll split two hundred fifty two
hundred and fifty thousand each. Why don't you I'm should
record this phone call. Provision states electronic service providers must
know ify a Senate office if the provider receives a
request to disclose the data from that senator or senator's office.
Shouldn't that be all of us guys? Now? No, fiz

(19:53):
A seven h two reauthorization Congress stopped any member from
being subject to the illegal u of our NSA surveillance system.
But we're not Congress exempt from abuse that they don't
want in their lives that they authorize on our lives. Now,
do you believe we're in an abusive relationship with our government? Well,

(20:16):
I'm just not a big person like they are that
who's going to spile? Who's going to spile me? It's
just I never understand anybody that thinks of me. Well,
I'm just writing letters to my mom and they're opening
and reading it. So what you never said? We would
have never said that. We've been upset by that. No,
we have privacy. How much privacy do we really have?

(20:41):
Who controls the data that the government collects?

Speaker 8 (20:45):
You?

Speaker 1 (20:47):
What about the h I don't know insurance company data
on your driving, what about your doctor you know things
like that, right, Well, it's our data. They don't control it. Well,
do you own it? No, it means you don't on it.
It's that simple, from birth until the last Social Security

(21:08):
check that gets cash. Think of all our data that's
been collected over our lives by federal agencies, by state agencies,
by companies we work for all the things we fill
out online. And I think about all the people that
you know, I put power, talk stuff up, political stuff up.

(21:29):
Trevor Carey shows stuff up. But there's people that put
up every waking moment on Facebook or Instagram and all
those hundreds and thousands of images? Who owns who owns
all that? Have we thought about that too much? AI's
training models are called lms's with all that data. So

(21:52):
whoever owns all the rights to your data? And I
guess the government will tell us they owned that. Why
did they own all that? Well, they want to predict
how you're going to react. I'm noticing it now sometimes
with you two bats, and I'm like, the surveation is
quicker to go, go, go, go submit. I'll let them

(22:13):
know some of the generic stuff like hardware stores or
things like that. You know, they're just constantly trying to
figure us out what are our needs, what are our desires?
But with all that data and us all being connected,
it eventually will go to your You have a really

(22:33):
good citizenship score. Huh, Well, President Trump wouldn't do that.
He's not always going to be president. We got so
many Republicans in there right now that have authorized VISA
seven oh two, the continuing spying on Americans. But Vice

(22:55):
President JD. Vancy's I've talked a lot about about Vice
President Advances relationship with Peter Till Palateer, all that cool
AI stuff. Yeah, the government's watching, it's training training AI
about all of us. And there's nothing we can really
do about this. What about some stuff that's in the

(23:20):
data about us? It's not right, Maybe it's completely wrong.
Maybe it's a bunch of wrong stuff. President Trump gave
Pallateer a no bid, thirty million dollar contract to tie
these programs into one big, beautiful database. So all the
data collected about us, all about your family, and the
one big beautiful database, and you don't know if it's

(23:42):
right or wrong. Can we call good morning Pallateer.

Speaker 5 (23:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (23:45):
Hey, it's Trevor and Fresno. I noticed something here online
three you know what. You're right, certainly, we'll hold on.
Let me put you on hold this so I can
confirm we get rid of that. The government is building
or now can build the world's largest citizen level AI
train model, and all our personal data is in it,
going back to our birth. We don't control it, so

(24:10):
we don't own it. Oh it's free. Yes, here's an
AOL disc. Go home and put it on and you
can be tonight and give us some information. We run
down to office depot to get those discs when dial
up days. That's boy, they were just salivating look at

(24:30):
all this we're now. Really they don't have to fill
out a survey. We don't have to go look through
microfilm at a library. But the government's not the only
one with this. Well you think about with voter rolls, government, medicaid, DMV,
all of that, but all the credit reporting agencies, all
the data they have on us. All so President Trump

(24:55):
is paying Palanteer to integrate our data and it's provided
by all of us. They need our data, all right.
I'm glad I got that off my chest let me
every time I talk about it with Peter Thiel, though,
I got to do the Antichrist thing. Right.

Speaker 7 (25:13):
You're an investor in AI, You're deeply invested in palanteer
in military technology and technologies of surveillance and technologies of
warfare and so on.

Speaker 8 (25:23):
Right.

Speaker 7 (25:23):
It just seems to me that when you tell me
a story about the Antichrist coming to power and using
the fear of technological change to sort of impose order
on the world, I feel like that Antichrist would be
maybe be using the tools that you think that you
were building.

Speaker 1 (25:41):
Mmm, we're going to follow this story right here. Well,
some of the Antichrist demons, some of the Antichrist minions,
with the shutdown, they wanted Americans to suffer President Trump
on what they wanted for the.

Speaker 8 (25:56):
Past forty three days. Democrats in Congress shut down the
gun of the United States and an attempt to extort
American taxpayers for hundreds of billions of dollars for illegal
aliens and people that came into our country illegally from gangs,
from prisons, from mental institutions. They wanted to pay them
one point five trillion dollars, which would have really hurt

(26:19):
our health care businesses and our recipients at levels never
seen before. Today, we're sending a clear message that we
will never give in too extortion, because that's what it was.
They tried to extort. The Democrats tried to extort our country.
In just a moment, I'll sign a bill exactly like
we asked Democrats to send us all along many days ago.

(26:44):
This coursed the country one point five trillion dollars. This
little excursion that they took us on Republicans never wanted.
They shut down and voted fifteen times for a clean
continuation of funding. There's never been a time when one
or the other party ever didn't sign a continuation. Just

(27:05):
a continuation, not a big deal. That's a continuation and
we'll talk later. Yet the extremists in the other party
insisted on creating the longest government shut down in American history,
and they did it purely for political reasons.

Speaker 1 (27:20):
Are now when you hear about President Trump talking about
one that terminates philibuster, it has to be where it
has to have sixty votes to pass, and there's currently
fifty three Republican senator. So that's why they needed those
Democrats to come over and join them to get it
to sixty forty. Here, if you terminated the Philly Philly,
the Philly, the Motown Philly buster, right, we just need

(27:44):
the majority. Listen to President trumpre.

Speaker 8 (27:46):
You also want to call for a termination to the
Philipbuster so that this could never happen again. If we
had the Philibuster terminated, this would never happen again. And
don't forget, we have another date coming up in the
not too distant future. You can never let this happen again,
and we should be able to pass great, really great legislation.
So I say terminate the filmbuster because, by the way,

(28:09):
the Democrats will do it immediately if they ever true,
which hopefully they won't.

Speaker 1 (28:15):
Because it's true. It's a good feeling Thursday, and why
we run it with you? Sorry, I have to. She
was asked if Schumer is going to get kicked out.

Speaker 9 (28:22):
I think it's important that we understand that this is
not just about Senator Schumer, but that this is about
the Democratic Party. Senator Schumer. There's no one vote that
ended this shutdown. We are talking about a coordinated effort
of eight senators with the knowledge of Leader Schumer, voting
to break with the entire Democratic Party in exchange for nothing,

(28:47):
and now people's healthcare costs are going to be skyrocketing,
and we want to make sure that we have a
path to ending this moment and finding relief for them
right now. But I think that when we talk about
this debate about the Democratic Party, it is indeed about
the party writ large and our ability to fight or not.

Speaker 1 (29:06):
You know, I'm just going to assume somebody was scanning
around and they caught aoc talking and they're like, oh,
I like her. I'm a Democrat every day. Though. The
only reason I really get up is I think maybe
there's one new Democrat that's never heard me that I
can get the truth to. And if you're a Democrat
right now and you actually believe your party statements that
Republicans wanted to eliminate healthcare, that was the root of it,

(29:31):
right Yeah, Well here is a Democrat, Senator John Fetterman,
with the truth.

Speaker 8 (29:38):
Well, then this is a good one. Is everybody listening?

Speaker 4 (29:42):
Two people that are watching, It's like the Democrats, we
we designed these to expire at the end of the year.
This wasn't something that Republicans are taking It's like, that's
how we designed this.

Speaker 2 (29:54):
This is the Tremor carry show condompt Valleys power talk.

Speaker 1 (30:00):
Let's see seven day fourcasts here on tomorrow, periods of
rain sixty two, Saturday rain fifty nine Sunday moderate rain
sixty Monday. Look at that shower just passing on by.
They're gonna be passing fifty nine Tuesday, dense fog fifty
eight Wednesday preaching cloud sixty. All right, that's the start
of the long fall that we have called winter in California. Good.

(30:22):
I've been waiting to literally, if I know I'm not
gonna do it, I'll probably do it this weekend. But
it's the winter close switch out thing. Take the air
conditioner out of the window. I oh, there have been
so many beautiful nights that I've been missing to have
that cool air with the window cracked open or open,
I guess at this temperature phase. But there's been too

(30:42):
many hot days where it gets too hot up there,
and I need that turned on for a little bit
at now. I'm not sleeping all night with it on anymore.
Got the ceiling fan. I walk in at eight eight thirty,
come home after six, cool it down, get it cold up,
get it going cold. So when I walk in, I
turn it off and then it's hold in there and
get the ceiling fan going. But all that goes by
by and I'm heading into my favorite time of the year,

(31:06):
that natural cold, that natural cold sleep. You will just
hear a difference in me. Let's go listen to that
crazy woman from Texas Democrat Rep. Jazzmine Crockett making fun
of how maga women look. And she's being introdewed by this.
I think it's. Yeah, he's got a suit and he

(31:26):
looks like a dude here, uh, standing next to a
six foot five transvestite. I mean, would make Tammy Faye
Baker look tamed down. Listen.

Speaker 8 (31:36):
Okay, a lot of the Maga women receive gender affirming care,
such as Lipfiller's breast augumentation, et cetera.

Speaker 6 (31:41):
Why do you think they are so against genderffirming care
for trans people?

Speaker 4 (31:47):
You know, you want to say it.

Speaker 10 (31:48):
Okay, So I have this thing where, like, you know,
a maga woman when you see one, they all have
a look, right.

Speaker 3 (31:54):
But.

Speaker 10 (31:57):
Like they live up to anyway, that's a whole other issue.
But yeah, it's they don't even know because window was
brought up on the house floor because there was a
discussion about this on the house floor. They were like,
how dare you say we use And it's like, no,
that's exactly what y'all do. Y'all just didn't realize that
that's what it is.

Speaker 4 (32:13):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (32:14):
Yeah, standing next to a transs a huge dude with
big bosoms and a low cut dress. Would I mean
the dude's so big? I mean the eye make up
right there would cover a normal woman's face, just the
blue eye makeup that Andre the Giant had on right there.
So maga women, huh got that look? Do they jazz? Mean?

Speaker 4 (32:36):
Huh?

Speaker 1 (32:37):
Is it safe to say that based off of your comments,
you're suggesting that these women at these rallies are ugly
and overweight.

Speaker 4 (32:43):
Yes, what do you say to people who think that
those comments are offensive?

Speaker 9 (32:47):
Be offended?

Speaker 1 (32:48):
Okay? Jazmine Crockett, she's something else and she didn't used
to be all they say she would say, They said,
here's your real accent. When she first came into the
legislature there in Texas.

Speaker 11 (33:02):
No one could have told me that when I went
down to Austin now looks like a little bit over
a year ago, that I would be running for Congress.
Is not what my plan was.

Speaker 1 (33:12):
All right, now, let's go listen to her now.

Speaker 10 (33:17):
Because these people, they are crazy because they always talk
about how Christian they is. Yeah, I don't know how
many of them on that side I getting divorced because
they getting caught up sleeping with their coworker staffers and
turns all the things.

Speaker 2 (33:30):
Yeah, you ain't.

Speaker 10 (33:31):
Gotta believe me.

Speaker 8 (33:32):
Just go Google.

Speaker 10 (33:32):
You'll find some of it, I'm telling you. And the
wives is being messy and petty. They putting it into divorce.
I'm like, whoa, that's gotta be true because your lawyer
would know that they gonna lose it.

Speaker 1 (33:42):
Listen, she grew up affluent, private schools, all of that
good stuff. I bet her mom would have corrected her
on her grammar growing up, because obviously here.

Speaker 11 (33:51):
No one could have told me that when I went
down to Austin now looks like a little bit of
her year ago, that I would be running for Congress.
It's not what my plan was.

Speaker 1 (34:01):
Okay, drama, drama, drama. Oh, speaking of that frozen un
if I could see change the way it evaluates its superintendent,
mph dot Com said the school boards reviewing a tool
that ties to superintendent's performance directly to the outcomes. Imagine
that kind of like a coach right, based on the record.

(34:23):
Little girl, stop, don't cry about it. You're gonna have
a system here, sixteen please here. It's a tool, It's
all it is, missy.

Speaker 9 (34:30):
Imagine what is possible when we come together.

Speaker 1 (34:34):
Yeah, get those goals up.

Speaker 9 (34:35):
Imagine what we kind of achieve.

Speaker 12 (34:39):
When we stay focused, when we lead with love and
when we refuse to let hate win.

Speaker 1 (34:48):
You so incredibly much. I don't that's not the point.
Teach them to read. Teach them to read well. This
tool was inspired by other school districts across the nation.
Good some of those retreats they went on. Some of
those consultants they hired. They said, Hi, high price consultant.
Where we need to learn something to take back to
give to kmph dot com. To tell them what we

(35:08):
did here. Let's see tie the superintendent to outcomes. Hey,
that's good. Other people are doing this. Yes, So she
scores flat or above satisfactory. If scores fall at or
above satisfactory, she gets a three percent raise. Well would

(35:30):
happen if it's below, Well we'll just evaluate. It'll be
brought up every year. Well, we know she's gonna be
good at it because she realizes that for them to
be able to read, they have to be taught to read.

Speaker 12 (35:43):
We said, and they what they said is that we
want all of our students to read on eighty percent
of our students to be able to read on grade
level by first grade.

Speaker 1 (35:56):
Okay, how you do that? How do you do that?

Speaker 9 (35:58):
First goal?

Speaker 1 (35:58):
How do you do it?

Speaker 12 (35:59):
And I think it's a really good goal because you
don't teach kids to read by first grade, but they're
not going you. They have to learn how to read
before they can read to really understand. They have to
learn how to read before they can read to really understand.

Speaker 2 (36:12):
This is the Trevor Carry Show on the Valley's Power
Dog