Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Capla Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Prayers please where
everybody in Florida, as it's about to make landfall. Make
landfall during this next hour on The Dan Capla Show.
(00:23):
Obviously a couple of hours later back there in Florida,
so we'll keep you posted on Milton eight five to
five for zero five A two five five text d
A N five seven seven three nine. Theme of the
day is great young conservative talent and our next guest
it can self define. But we had Gabe Evans with
us at four thirty six, pick it off the pod,
(00:45):
who was a plus. It was like a jd Vance
like performance last night against Jadiro Caraveo on TV and
at times Kyle Clark. At times it was two on one.
But Kyle Clark, to his credit, you know, did a
very very effective riff with Caravail where he went through, Hey,
before you voted this way and you said you believed X,
(01:06):
and now you say believe the opposite why and it
was a very effective riff. But Brittany Vesley is with us.
She's executive director Colorado Catholic Conference. And I don't care
if you're Catholic, another type of Christian, no religion at all.
She's fighting for something that's just a matter of basic
human rights and decency, which is, hey, we shouldn't put
(01:27):
in phantaside in our constitution. And it goes beyond that.
We're talking about the insidious Amendment seventy nine. And Brittany,
you had your own debate last night, and I respect
everybody who gets in the area to tell people about that.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
And thanks for having me on Dan.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Sure.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
So last night we had a Denver Decide debate on
Amendment seventy nine, which is the constitutional right to abortion
amendment that does a lot of terrible things that we
can discuss. But it was against COBALT's representative, Danny Newsom,
who's a former ACLU attorney in a staunch progressive and
a very ardent proponent of abortion access.
Speaker 1 (02:05):
Yeah, and listen, I've known Danny forever. I like Danny
a lot. We're on opposite sides almost everything, including this.
But she's she's going to be a very formidable opponent.
Now she's trying to defend the indefensible, and she's up
against somebody incredibly formidable in you. But let me play
this clip. This is a clip Ryan pulled newsom It
(02:27):
says saying abortion is healthcare? Why would you have a restriction?
And then get your reaction.
Speaker 3 (02:31):
To that the common sense restrictions that you are talking about.
Abortion is health care? Why would you have a restriction pregnancy?
Every pregnancy is different, Every pregnant person is different. You
don't know when something is going to wrong with the pregnancy.
You don't know how something is going to go wrong
with the pregnancy. Medical care must be provided.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
Yes, so abortion is healthcare like kidnapping his childcare? I mean,
how do you respond to that?
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Thank you?
Speaker 1 (03:01):
Dan?
Speaker 2 (03:02):
So there are two arguments that Danny was really trying
to get me to bite on that would run along
the traditional pro life and religious lines of argumentation. I
think she just wasn't ready for what our campaign has
prepared for the main arguments against Amendment seventy nine that
this eliminates parental notifications, some minors.
Speaker 4 (03:21):
Can be coercion to abortions.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
It allows for a direct taxpayer stream of funding for
abortion millions of dollars come January with this new legislature
coming in. And it also allows for abortion on healthy
mothers and healthy babies without any type of restriction. And
this was interesting where I pressed Danny on that last
one on abortion for health others for all nine months
and she kept it was very fun to keep going
(03:47):
back to the parental notification and made her go a
little crazy, I think, But she couldn't defend the fact
that her one on one side, she's making the argument
abortion is healthcare and there should be no restrictions or
regulations on abortion, and then the other side he saying,
oh wait, this doesn't affect PRINCH notification. Oh wait, this
means that she would you would actu you wouldn't engage this.
(04:09):
That abortion clinics have no regulations comparable to other surgical
institutions like hospitals. So when there's a woman who's an
emergency emergency situation in an abortion clinic, she's bleeding out heavily,
there are zero regulations from the state because that is
considered a regulation upon a right to abortion. Danny couldn't
(04:30):
answer that because on one side of her mouth she
was saying no, you can't regulate a quote unquote fundamental
right to abortion because abortion is healthcare. And then the
other side she says, oh wait, no, no, abortion is healthcare,
and parental notification stays that has nothing to do with that.
She just couldn't she couldn't wed those two together because
(04:50):
they are not able to be connected.
Speaker 1 (04:53):
Well, just another way that the pro abortion industry is
an anti woman, starting with the fact that they kill
over five hundred thousand females a year before birth. Let's
start with that. But yeah, you know, trying to put
this in the constitution where it's going to block any
kind of restrictions as the ones you describe as I
understand it, Britney vestly. But let's go back to the
(05:15):
point you're making a second to go and tell us
more about when, and we're going to be playing sound
from that debate throughout the week and beyond because it's
so instructive. But when you're trying to pin Danny down
the way that Trump was trying to pin Kamala Harris
down and Vance was trying to pin down Walls, trying
to pin him down on the fact that wait a second,
(05:36):
you you democrats, you want it legal to kill a
healthy baby with a healthy mother, to kill that baby
just seconds before that baby is delivered. They always want
to try and lie and deny that that's right.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
So we were allowed to ask three questions of each
other during the debate, and the third question was a
point to this. I said that the color Apartment of
Health's own data shows that four percent of abortions in
Colorado happened after twenty two weeks. And the Boulder abortionist
doctor Hearn, has stated that he conducts about three hundred
and fifty late abortions on healthy mothers with healthy babies
(06:17):
each year. That's about one per day. And after you
support late abortion on healthy mothers and healthy babies, when
a baby feels panic can survive.
Speaker 4 (06:24):
Outside the women. Her response was that was a trope.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
And I actually really love somebody to set this that
debate at seven fifty five, this is what it is.
Speaker 4 (06:34):
She goes on to say.
Speaker 2 (06:35):
Doctor her needs to retire because he's an outlier, and
she tries to say something about fire that the pro
life side firebombs abortion clinics, so we.
Speaker 4 (06:44):
Have no room to talk about outlier lord like Warren Hearn.
Speaker 2 (06:47):
So I thought that was a terrible response by Danny Newsomb,
especially because later on in the debate I bring it
back again to remind her. She makes a comment that
not actually one percent and it late abortion on healthy
mothers and healthy.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Baby that do not happen.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
But the data out of our own Department of Health
says it's four percent and it does happen. And Gutmocker
says that's underrepresented. And by the way, there are several
other late abortionists in the state of Colorado, including one
very young abortionist he just moved to Colorado, doctor Bennett Langren,
who brags about not stigmatizing late abortion on saying that
(07:22):
they're only fetal anomalies. He makes it very clear this
is healthy mother's, healthy babies that he connects abortion on.
So that is a complete falsehood that Danny was trying
backpeddling a lot.
Speaker 4 (07:33):
He's really trying to recover. He even made a comment let.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
The Reproductive Health Equity Act doesn't allow for late abortionsers
and health but also fall this is the problem nationally.
This is the problem with Danny's argument too, that the
other side, cobaltson Planned Parenthoods are the two biggest pro
abortion lobbyists in the state of Colorado, the biggest funding
and they can't answer the question of how many abortions
(07:59):
happen on late my with healthy baby happens on healthy
mothers with healthy babies in the late term of pregnancy,
because it's indefensible.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Well, it's an admission that you're right, it's an admission
that every abortion takes an innocent human life. And they
know this, right, Brittany, they know that if they admit
the truth that wait a second, note that they want
this in the constitution, that you can kill a healthy
baby at nine months, just seconds before it's delivered. They
want that in the constitution, a healthy baby, healthy mother.
(08:30):
Then at that point people are going to change their
view of whoever's making that argument, whether it's Dannie, whether
it's Waltz, whether it's Harris, whether it's Polis, and they're
going to view them as monstrous. That's why they won't
admit the truth, in my opinion, And then beyond that,
once they concede that, oh yeah, there's no doubt that
baby who's just seconds away from being born is a
(08:51):
human entitled to protection, then they have to acknowledge it's
a human all along, just at a different stage.
Speaker 4 (08:59):
Exactly.
Speaker 2 (09:00):
The other argument Danny really tried to keep going back
to is also very similar to what we're seeing on
the national level.
Speaker 4 (09:06):
It's, oh, if we don't do this, if we.
Speaker 2 (09:08):
Don't quote unquote safeguard, are right, we are going to
have a ban. We're going to have a ban in Colorado,
which is completely laughable considering the political climates in our
state right now and the ouse that are statutorily on
the books. Now, what this, what this amendment does is
go far beyond the Reproductive Healtic Equity Act, way beyond
Roe v. Wade, and it will remove any common sense
(09:31):
safeguard to abortion, including parental notification for minors being coerced
into abortion, including the millions of dollars that our taxpayer
dollars will have to go to late abortion on healthy
dollars and healthy babies, even for out of state women
if this thing gets passed, because our very progressive legislature
will come back and allocate that funding. So sure, Danny,
it doesn't have a fiscal note right now, but in
(09:53):
two months, it definitely will when when our tax dollars
are going to be going to abortion for millions of.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Eighties and Brittany will have you back often and others
back often to talk about different aspects, including doing away
with parental notification and now taxpayers are going to have
to pay for this in fantaside they want in the constitution.
But tell people how they can help the campaign.
Speaker 4 (10:16):
Yes, thank you Dan.
Speaker 2 (10:17):
So our campaign is called Right to Note Colorado because
ColorOS have a right to know what is.
Speaker 4 (10:23):
In this horrific self.
Speaker 2 (10:24):
So you can see more information at www. Write our
idht do o pynow dot co dot com, Right to
Note ceo dot com and learn more, but also support
the campaign because we have a lot of things that
we need in order, but we really need to have
more support from our broader community to get that message
(10:46):
out the horrific amendment.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Amen, and we'll be playing sound from that great debate
performance by you last night for a weeks to come.
Thank you, Brittany, look forward to the next one.
Speaker 4 (10:56):
Thank you, Dan.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
Take care. That's Brittany Vesli, Colorado Catholic Conference. And the
opposition to seventy nine goes way beyond Catholics, way beyond
christian It's just basically anybody you know who's just sensible
and supports decency. You're on the Dan Kapla Show, And.
Speaker 5 (11:14):
Now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 6 (11:17):
Well that is happening. We have some new CNN reporting
today about what is going on behind the scenes inside
the Harris campaign and more broadly among Democrats who are
growing more and more anxious about a twenty sixteen redoct.
Speaker 1 (11:31):
Cnaw, this is going to be so great list anything
that happened, right, But isn't it exactly what I said
it would be? And I've been saying so for months.
We're twenty seven days out, right? Is that the right math?
About twenty seven days out? And she's lost momentum. The
worm is turned. She's dropping, not like a rock, but
(11:55):
she you don't have to drop like a rock in
a race like this. She is dropping, and Trump is rising.
The American people are figuring her out. And here's the problem.
She's still got twenty seven more days for Trump to
educate the people in the Swing States about who she
really is. And it's all in her own words on video,
coming right out of her mouth. And I'm telling you
(12:16):
right now, Ryan that the single most powerful spot we've
seen in the last thirty years is this spot that's
on right now. And we've talked about it, so I
won't beliebor it. But everybody's probably seen it now if
you're watching football or sports or now it's running midday
and Trump is raising more money right because because people
are smelling the victory now, so they want to get
(12:38):
on the right side of the winter. And so he's
blanketing America with this spot. Everybody's going to see it
multiple times by election day, and it cuts through all
the noise, right this spot where in her own words,
she says she wants to take your hard earned taxpayer
dollars and use it so illegal immigrate inmates can get
sex change operations. That goes far beyond the issue. It
(12:59):
just tells people so everything they need to know.
Speaker 7 (13:01):
About her and convicted felons like murderers, transgenders in prison. No,
we're going to pay for your sex change surgery?
Speaker 5 (13:07):
How about No?
Speaker 7 (13:08):
And there's another one that she cut for him, Dan
and that sunny hastin exchange she had man. She couldn't
think of anything that she would do differently than Joe Biden.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
Yeah, yeah, so no, it is shaping up beautifully. But
my question for you, and we'll go to the phone
lines now and text as well. Is Okay, we saw
what the left did before when my prediction came true
and it was clear Biden was going to lose. And
I still want to know who issued those that letter.
Clearly it was not Joe Biden that letter saying he
was withdrawing his nominee. But yeah, this backroom deal dead
(13:38):
of night. They stripped the democratically elected nominee of that
position and inserted somebody else. What do they do now?
What do they do now? Because they can't replace Harris.
They could replace Walls, and they may try to do
that with Shapiro, But what do they do now? Down
the stretch? What do you see coming? Millennial Mike, You're
on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4 (13:58):
Welcome, Hey Dan, good to be with you. Can you
hear me?
Speaker 1 (14:01):
Okay, I can hear you now? Trademark that please?
Speaker 4 (14:05):
Perfect? Perfect? So what I was going to talk about
in great interviews, By the way, I love Gabe and
your other guests. They were both fantastic, but absolutely so
what I was going to talk about. Kamala Harris today
on the Howard Stern Show said she told Stern that
talking to him was kind of a form of therapy,
then offered a bit of self reflection about those she
(14:28):
does not engage with. She said, she said, I choose
not to have mean people in my life. And why
I think this is so telling is because whenever there's
a reporter that asked her a serious, challenging question, she
dances around it, she avoids it. And it's these little
tells that are really important. And you know what Ryan
was just talking about. Also with the View, when they
(14:51):
asked her, you know, what do you disagree with Trump on?
She said, nothing that comes to mind? Well, why not Afghanistan?
What about the withdrawal? But you know, she's not reaching
any independent voters by you know, not acknowledging the faults
of Biden. That's one of the only ways I think
she could reach Oh, absolutely not. I think that a
(15:14):
lot of the Democrats are so delusional. She thinks that
she's They think that she is going to win, that
she's going to be this transformative, you know, revolutionary candidate.
And I don't get it personally, but I just how
is it that it's as close as it is right now? Dan?
That's my question. I mean, are there that many low
(15:34):
IQ voters out there that the mainstream media is convincing
that Kamala is this, you know, monumental. You know, Obama, what.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
A great question you ask, Mike, what a great question.
What I'd start with, I'm interested in your take. What
I'd start with is, listen, it's it's a very polarized
country politically to begin with, and because of abortion, it's
a very polarized country in general. So under the best circumstances,
these are going to be close races, right and so,
(16:04):
but then you take it a step beyond that, and
you have the horrific dishonest in so many ways vilification
of Donald Trump and all these false allegations against Trump,
and he's a trader, Russia collusion, all this, and every
now and then he's made a mistake that adds to that.
But so much of this dishonesty about Trump and coordinated
(16:25):
media attempt to politically end him, And so that helps
explain why it still remains relatively close. Then the other piece,
and hey, we're brutally honest on this show. You know,
the other piece is President Trump, like any human, had
some missteps, but certainly you know that some of the
stuff we've talked about on the show, he did not
(16:47):
Inside violence on January sixth, not in any way, shape
or form. But he could have responded better and sooner,
and he didn't, and that was a mistake. So you know,
these things pile up together, almost all of them unfair
to our Trump, some self inflicted. And that's why I
think it's still close. But Mike, what we see now
is what we've seen in sixteen and twenty. Right. Trump
(17:10):
is a great closer. And when we get the A Trump,
nobody's beating the A Trump. And right now we've got
the A Trump and it's on display every day. That
great decision of his right, Mike, to not do a
third debate because it's not going to be a fair fight.
He's not going to have a fair chance, and he
doesn't need it. He's ahead the great decision not to
(17:32):
do sixty minutes because they wouldn't be fair to him
in the way they question, the way they edit, the
way they represent it. Look at the way you've seen it, Mike.
They are falsely editing Kamala Harris's interview with them to
make it sound like she's coherent, when earlier they ran
versions of the same statement showing she wasn't. Yeah, so
(17:54):
I think he's going to pull away. I think he's
going to win by a comfortable margin.
Speaker 4 (17:59):
Yeah. I would also say very quick. I think a
lot of the shows she is going on, I guess
he went on this call her dad.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah podcast.
Speaker 4 (18:07):
It's like she's trying to appeal to younger voters. I
get it, but I don't think the messages coming across
effectively when she's focusing more on just her daily routines
and things she does.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
Great point, I hope you call every day. I'm sorry,
we need to bail for news right now. But that
goes to the question of has she given up here
on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 5 (18:33):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
I think only a person that hates our country, actually
maybe it's a down deep hatred can want open voters. Wow.
So we took in more than twenty one about that
for a second, and then President Trump documenting this success
he had at the border. Think about that statement, and
do you agree that only a person who hates America
(18:58):
could want open borders? Love your take on that. How
would anybody counter that argument? Eight five five four zero
five eight two five to five the number? I don't
know how anybody would counter that argument, And that's no
reflection on people in general south of the border. It's
(19:21):
no criticism of them. But it just comes back to
the reality that if you open the border, you are deciding, deliberate, premeditated,
that you're going to allow lots and lots of murderers, rapists,
other types of criminals in to prey on Americans. Now
(19:43):
that percentage, it may be that ninety ninety five, ninety eight,
ninety nine percent of the people who come in through
those open borders are not criminals, they're not rapists, they're
not murderers, They're very good people who just want a
better life. That doesn't mean we should have an open border.
But even if it's just one percent, and the percentage
(20:03):
is higher than one percent, even if it's just one
percent who are vicious murderers, rapist other kinds of criminals,
as President Trump wright, than anybody who makes a decision
to open our border knowing that they're inviting that one
percent or that two percenter, that three or four percent
(20:25):
in to prey on the women of America, the children
of America, the men of America, the communities of America. Yeah,
do those folks just hate America. How could anybody who
loves America make a conscious decision to just open the borders.
And then we get to the other very high percentage
(20:46):
of folks who come through open borders, who are just
good people looking for a better life. It's still obviously
not something America can handle. America can't handle those unrestricted numbers,
that unrestricted flow, even if the people are really good people,
as so many are, but not all. America can't handle that.
(21:09):
We've seen it. We've seen it in Colorado, We've seen
it all over the place. So is he right that
people who just want truly open borders hate America? Eight
five to five for zero five A two five five
the number techs d A N five seven seven three nine.
And listen to my personal belief whether or not I
(21:31):
happen to be Catholic. You know, my personal belief is
is wait a second, I believe I'm required as a
Christian and a Catholic Christian to have a special kind
of love, a special kind of support for immigrants, and
I think that's a sacred obligation regardless of religion. I
(21:53):
think it's absolutely the right thing to do. But that
doesn't mean open borders. That doesn't mean unrestricted flow. That's
that's bad for everybody. So yeah, I would really really
like your take on that. Let's start with Carol in Denver, Colorado.
You're on the Dan Kaplis.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
You'll welcome, Hi, Dan.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Hey.
Speaker 8 (22:17):
My take on that is, I do agree with him,
and I think when you love something dearly, you are
very protective of it and you don't just you don't
just throw it out to the wolves. I mean, and
at the open borders, you know for a fact that
(22:40):
you're letting in murderers or letting in drug addicts, drug pushers,
sex traffickers, gang members, and that is not protecting something
that you love.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Well. I love your point, Carol. Kind of like your house.
I mean, I love my family, and that's why locker doors,
you know that, right? What would it say about my
love for my family if I just left our doors
open at night and let anybody you wanted to come
wandering into the.
Speaker 8 (23:12):
House, and you would you would have some you know,
parameters or requirements filters on who you would let in
your home. And you can be a very generous, kind
love person and say I want to help and I
want to allow these people to come stay in my home,
but you're not going to do it at the expense
(23:34):
of your family members possibly being flaughtered or raped or
you know, anything else like that. So it doesn't mean
you're mean, it doesn't mean you're selfish. It just means
you're being careful because you love your family, you love
your home, and you want to do it selectively and responsibly.
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Yeah, beautifully said, beautifully said. Thank you for that, Carol.
And it's the same in my view with immigrants with
who want to come to this country. Listen, I consider
myself a lottery winner because I was born in the
United States of America. Any of us born in the
United States of America, we are lottery winners. And this
is just my personal worldview. But I look at others
(24:14):
who didn't have that good fortune, and they just happened
to be born on the other side of the border.
I can love this country, which means controlling the border,
because if you just leave it open, obviously you are
knowingly inviting all sorts of bad things to happen in
this country. But I can love this country and want
(24:35):
that border controlled and still love the people on the
other side of the border who want a better life
and want to be here. You can do both at
the same time, and you don't have to have an
open border to accomplish that. You can have a sane
immigration policy that gives folks who have not committed crimes
in other countries a fair chance to get in here
(24:56):
in a controlled way the country can handle, and that
benefits this nation. And then you can do other things
to help them in their lives on the other side
of the border. You know, such as my wife and
daughter and son who have made multiple trips down to Mexico,
along with other really good people we know here in
Colorado to care for desperately poor people outside of RS
(25:20):
and I know that many many others listening can tell
similar stories. You can send money, you can encourage political change,
You can do both. You can love this country, which
means controlled borders, and you can love the good people
on the other side of the border. That is not hard.
Eight five five forur zero five A two five five
the number. We have so much hot sound, I don't
(25:41):
know where to start. And since you were kind enough
to join us today a quick recap, I don't think
there's any real question now. And we played lots of
sound of the left sounding the warning that Trump is
starting to pull away, and as I predicted, and it's
not a nothing is in life, right, but all indicators
(26:02):
are starting to pull away. So I'd love to hear
from you. What do you think the left does next?
We saw what happened last time, right dead of night
backroom deal depos a democratically elected nominee who happened to
be a sitting president and replaced him with somebody else,
totally on democratic process. So they'll stop at almost nothing.
(26:25):
What do they do now that it appears clear and
many many credibly sore stories that the left sees it
now as well, that she is likely to lose and
it's likely to get even worse, and those margins may
well get big enough to win more GOP seats in
the Senate, though that isn't certain yet, and to keep
(26:45):
the GOP House and expand it. So what do you
think the left does next? Texter says Dan. I believe
Biden will resign, Harris becomes potus. DEM's believe that will
give her momentum to put her over the finish line.
Russ in Florence, Colorado, you know we've been talking about
that for months now, Ryan, do you think Russ is right?
I thought sorry to do that to you. Zach, A
(27:08):
great young trainee is back there today. He's an up
and comer, up and comer, a newcomer as well, Zach. Yeah,
he's new newer. Oh wonderful. But I was using that
on board term in the Mike Johnson sense, and I
always wonder Mayor Mike Johnson. This is Mayor Mike Johnston
of Denver. Now, let's say somebody just comes uninvited through
(27:29):
the back door of the mayor's house and please nobody
do that. Nobody do that. But let's say somebody did.
Would Mike Johnston call him newcomer?
Speaker 4 (27:40):
Hmm?
Speaker 1 (27:41):
It would technically be accurate based on his terminology. I
hope nobody doesn't and we don't have to find out. No,
but young Ryan, I just noticed. I better hit this brake.
But I want to continue this with you after the break.
I really want to get your take on this, because
we've been talking about this for months. Okay, Yeah, they've
got this card to play force Biden out, and they
(28:01):
have the leverage to do it. And it's the same
leverage that was able to strip him of the nomination
and to put her in as president. But my thought was,
and we'll get Ryan's take on this in years when
we come back, wouldn't they have had to done that,
do that a week or two ago. Isn't it too
late right now for that to work for them? And
what else do you think they'll do now that they
(28:22):
can see it slipping away? Eight five to five hours
five eight two five five text Dan five seven seven
three nine.
Speaker 5 (28:30):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Well that Da, that's a new.
Speaker 6 (28:35):
CNN reporting today about what is going on behind the
scenes inside the Harris campaign and more broadly among Democrats
who are growing more and more anxious about a twenty
sixteen REDOC scene.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
Oh man, this is going to be so much fun
to watch, right, That's one thing we're talking about right now.
And nothing's guaranteed in life, right, But all of these indicators,
not each and everyone, but almost all of these indicators
pointing to Trump not only winning but starting to pull away,
maybe taking more House and Senate seats with him. So,
you know, it'd be one thing if we were like
(29:08):
three or four days out from election day, but we're
twenty seven days out. So what do you think the
left does now, and we have a texture who talks
about Okay, you know, after Trump wins, they're they're going
to deny the legitimacy of the election. Well, you can
bet on that. That's the starting point, right, We saw
that in sixteen. But they do so at their own
peril with the American people because remember, and I know
(29:30):
you don't want to hear it now, but there are
elections coming up in twenty six, really important elections in
the twenty six races begin on November sixth. So Trump
goes ahead and wins, as we expect at this point,
he pulls away and then the Democrats want to question
the legitimacy or go to court and claim that he's
(29:51):
ineligible to serve because they claim he's an insurrectionist. Yeah.
I think the American people are going to spank the
left hard. I think they're spanking the left right hard
in this race. I think they're saying, hey, no, we
are not electing a San Francisco lefty. Let's go to Denver.
Tuk to Michelle. You're on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 4 (30:10):
Welcome, Hi, Dan.
Speaker 9 (30:14):
That was my point. So if oh, they boot, if
they boot Biden out of the White House now and
Kamala steps up as potus and Trump wins as.
Speaker 4 (30:27):
We all expect.
Speaker 9 (30:30):
Who's to say that the Left isn't going to certify
the election and say Trump go ahead and be in
the White House. I don't think they're going to let
Trump into the White House.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
Well, yeah, you can expect every type of maneuver imaginable
knowing it will fail. Right, So the left starts all
of this knowing it will fail. But their only mission
is to cripple his presidency as it was in sixteen.
They knew the Russia Oaks and all of that was
total made up garbage, and they were responsible for making
a lot of it up. But they just wanted to
(31:04):
cripple his presidency. And what he was able to accomplish
despite all of that is stunning. But yeah, so you're right, Michelle,
they're going to do all of that, and then the
question is do they do anything beyond that, because look
what they did with Biden. I mean, Michelle, we still
don't know who wrote that note where he allegedly gave
(31:28):
up the nomination. I mean, even Nancy Pelosi had said
Biden didn't write that note. So what else do they
come up with. This is going to be fascinating to watch.
But don't you think, Michelle, they do it at their
own peril because the American people are about to, I believe,
reject the Democratic Party, reject the current path. They're about
(31:50):
to reject Kamala Harris as a lefty. And if the
Democrats double middle finger the American people again right after
election day, what do you think happens to the Democrats?
Speaker 9 (32:02):
Oh, I agree, I agree. I think I think that
we just don't the Democrats have no path forward yet.
Speaker 4 (32:11):
If they're in the White.
Speaker 9 (32:12):
House, they're not going to leave, and they've already they
seem to project onto the Republicans everything that they're doing. Yeah,
you know, they said that Trump would never leave the
White House. Well he did, and he did it peacefully.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (32:28):
Well, I'm just I'm afraid that they're going to do
exactly what they said Trump would do.
Speaker 1 (32:34):
Well. I do think that, you know, obviously Biden's going
to leave, Harris's is going to leave. I expect that, Michelle.
Thank you for your call. Really do appreciate that. You know, now,
violence has been, you know, part of the left's playbook
in America for many, many, many years, and So will
there be some kind of violent reaction coordinated, funded by
(32:58):
sources You'll never be able to identify conclusively violent reaction
to President Trump winning a second term. I think we
can be virtually certain there will be, right but what
format will take? How long it will last? Yeah, I
just think we're heading into an amazing time. The fun part, though,
but before all of that ugliness and before the fun
(33:20):
of Trump being president in this nation being much safer
and better off. The fun part is these next twenty
seven days, because what are they gonna do over these
twenty seven days? Ryan, what's your prediction, my friend? I
don't think there's any chance Biden resigns the presidency. I
think that was part of the bargain. And I know
(33:40):
you're saying he doesn't hold any cards, but he can.
He can make a real ugly and sticky and difficult
for Kamala Harris and that whole campaign. And we saw
him you surp her a couple of times already, and
he kind of threw her a bone today by including
her in the hurricane press conference.
Speaker 5 (33:53):
It looked really weird doing it too.
Speaker 1 (33:55):
But I think he stays in office. Yeah, I think
it's it's too late to pull that. I respectfully disagree.
I think the people who had the leverage they needed
to force him out because my personal belief right. We've
discussed it at length. These he's just corrupt. He's just corrupt,
and he engaged in corruption with Hunter. They've got tons
of evidence on him, and they had enough evidence to
(34:15):
force him to give up the nomination. I think they
have enough evidence to force him to leave the White
House if they want to. I just think it's too
late now. I think that move had to be made
late September or so. So I think we're in agreement
that you at this point now, they could still replace walls,
and I'm not predicting that, but they could still do
(34:36):
it and bring in Shapiro, but they run a greater
risk now with that. So I just think it's going
to be a fun, amazing twenty seven days together between
now and election day. Thank you Ryan, thank you Kelly,
thank you Zach. Good to meet you, Zach. Hope you
join us tomorrow four oh six. I'm the Dan Kapli Show.
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Capla Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Prayers please where
everybody in Florida, as it's about to make landfall. Make
landfall during this next hour on The Dan Capla Show.
(00:23):
Obviously a couple of hours later back there in Florida,
so we'll keep you posted on Milton eight five to
five for zero five A two five five text d
A N five seven seven three nine. Theme of the
day is great young conservative talent and our next guest
it can self define. But we had Gabe Evans with
us at four thirty six, pick it off the pod,
(00:45):
who was a plus. It was like a jd Vance
like performance last night against Jadiro Caraveo on TV and
at times Kyle Clark. At times it was two on one.
But Kyle Clark, to his credit, you know, did a
very very effective riff with Caravail where he went through, Hey,
before you voted this way and you said you believed X,
(01:06):
and now you say believe the opposite why and it
was a very effective riff. But Brittany Vesley is with us.
She's executive director Colorado Catholic Conference. And I don't care
if you're Catholic, another type of Christian, no religion at all.
She's fighting for something that's just a matter of basic
human rights and decency, which is, hey, we shouldn't put
(01:27):
in phantaside in our constitution. And it goes beyond that.
We're talking about the insidious Amendment seventy nine. And Brittany,
you had your own debate last night, and I respect
everybody who gets in the area to tell people about that.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
And thanks for having me on Dan.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Sure.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
So last night we had a Denver Decide debate on
Amendment seventy nine, which is the constitutional right to abortion
amendment that does a lot of terrible things that we
can discuss. But it was against COBALT's representative, Danny Newsom,
who's a former ACLU attorney in a staunch progressive and
a very ardent proponent of abortion access.
Speaker 1 (02:05):
Yeah, and listen, I've known Danny forever. I like Danny
a lot. We're on opposite sides almost everything, including this.
But she's she's going to be a very formidable opponent.
Now she's trying to defend the indefensible, and she's up
against somebody incredibly formidable in you. But let me play
this clip. This is a clip Ryan pulled newsom It
(02:27):
says saying abortion is healthcare? Why would you have a restriction?
And then get your reaction.
Speaker 3 (02:31):
To that the common sense restrictions that you are talking about.
Abortion is health care? Why would you have a restriction pregnancy?
Every pregnancy is different, Every pregnant person is different. You
don't know when something is going to wrong with the pregnancy.
You don't know how something is going to go wrong
with the pregnancy. Medical care must be provided.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
Yes, so abortion is healthcare like kidnapping his childcare? I mean,
how do you respond to that?
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Thank you?
Speaker 1 (03:01):
Dan?
Speaker 2 (03:02):
So there are two arguments that Danny was really trying
to get me to bite on that would run along
the traditional pro life and religious lines of argumentation. I
think she just wasn't ready for what our campaign has
prepared for the main arguments against Amendment seventy nine that
this eliminates parental notifications, some minors.
Speaker 4 (03:21):
Can be coercion to abortions.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
It allows for a direct taxpayer stream of funding for
abortion millions of dollars come January with this new legislature
coming in. And it also allows for abortion on healthy
mothers and healthy babies without any type of restriction. And
this was interesting where I pressed Danny on that last
one on abortion for health others for all nine months
and she kept it was very fun to keep going
(03:47):
back to the parental notification and made her go a
little crazy, I think, But she couldn't defend the fact
that her one on one side, she's making the argument
abortion is healthcare and there should be no restrictions or
regulations on abortion, and then the other side he saying,
oh wait, this doesn't affect PRINCH notification. Oh wait, this
means that she would you would actu you wouldn't engage this.
(04:09):
That abortion clinics have no regulations comparable to other surgical
institutions like hospitals. So when there's a woman who's an
emergency emergency situation in an abortion clinic, she's bleeding out heavily,
there are zero regulations from the state because that is
considered a regulation upon a right to abortion. Danny couldn't
(04:30):
answer that because on one side of her mouth she
was saying no, you can't regulate a quote unquote fundamental
right to abortion because abortion is healthcare. And then the
other side she says, oh wait, no, no, abortion is healthcare,
and parental notification stays that has nothing to do with that.
She just couldn't she couldn't wed those two together because
(04:50):
they are not able to be connected.
Speaker 1 (04:53):
Well, just another way that the pro abortion industry is
an anti woman, starting with the fact that they kill
over five hundred thousand females a year before birth. Let's
start with that. But yeah, you know, trying to put
this in the constitution where it's going to block any
kind of restrictions as the ones you describe as I
understand it, Britney vestly. But let's go back to the
(05:15):
point you're making a second to go and tell us
more about when, and we're going to be playing sound
from that debate throughout the week and beyond because it's
so instructive. But when you're trying to pin Danny down
the way that Trump was trying to pin Kamala Harris
down and Vance was trying to pin down Walls, trying
to pin him down on the fact that wait a second,
(05:36):
you you democrats, you want it legal to kill a
healthy baby with a healthy mother, to kill that baby
just seconds before that baby is delivered. They always want
to try and lie and deny that that's right.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
So we were allowed to ask three questions of each
other during the debate, and the third question was a
point to this. I said that the color Apartment of
Health's own data shows that four percent of abortions in
Colorado happened after twenty two weeks. And the Boulder abortionist
doctor Hearn, has stated that he conducts about three hundred
and fifty late abortions on healthy mothers with healthy babies
(06:17):
each year. That's about one per day. And after you
support late abortion on healthy mothers and healthy babies, when
a baby feels panic can survive.
Speaker 4 (06:24):
Outside the women. Her response was that was a trope.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
And I actually really love somebody to set this that
debate at seven fifty five, this is what it is.
Speaker 4 (06:34):
She goes on to say.
Speaker 2 (06:35):
Doctor her needs to retire because he's an outlier, and
she tries to say something about fire that the pro
life side firebombs abortion clinics, so we.
Speaker 4 (06:44):
Have no room to talk about outlier lord like Warren Hearn.
Speaker 2 (06:47):
So I thought that was a terrible response by Danny Newsomb,
especially because later on in the debate I bring it
back again to remind her. She makes a comment that
not actually one percent and it late abortion on healthy
mothers and healthy.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Baby that do not happen.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
But the data out of our own Department of Health
says it's four percent and it does happen. And Gutmocker
says that's underrepresented. And by the way, there are several
other late abortionists in the state of Colorado, including one
very young abortionist he just moved to Colorado, doctor Bennett Langren,
who brags about not stigmatizing late abortion on saying that
(07:22):
they're only fetal anomalies. He makes it very clear this
is healthy mother's, healthy babies that he connects abortion on.
So that is a complete falsehood that Danny was trying
backpeddling a lot.
Speaker 4 (07:33):
He's really trying to recover. He even made a comment let.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
The Reproductive Health Equity Act doesn't allow for late abortionsers
and health but also fall this is the problem nationally.
This is the problem with Danny's argument too, that the
other side, cobaltson Planned Parenthoods are the two biggest pro
abortion lobbyists in the state of Colorado, the biggest funding
and they can't answer the question of how many abortions
(07:59):
happen on late my with healthy baby happens on healthy
mothers with healthy babies in the late term of pregnancy,
because it's indefensible.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Well, it's an admission that you're right, it's an admission
that every abortion takes an innocent human life. And they
know this, right, Brittany, they know that if they admit
the truth that wait a second, note that they want
this in the constitution, that you can kill a healthy
baby at nine months, just seconds before it's delivered. They
want that in the constitution, a healthy baby, healthy mother.
(08:30):
Then at that point people are going to change their
view of whoever's making that argument, whether it's Dannie, whether
it's Waltz, whether it's Harris, whether it's Polis, and they're
going to view them as monstrous. That's why they won't
admit the truth, in my opinion, And then beyond that,
once they concede that, oh yeah, there's no doubt that
baby who's just seconds away from being born is a
(08:51):
human entitled to protection, then they have to acknowledge it's
a human all along, just at a different stage.
Speaker 4 (08:59):
Exactly.
Speaker 2 (09:00):
The other argument Danny really tried to keep going back
to is also very similar to what we're seeing on
the national level.
Speaker 4 (09:06):
It's, oh, if we don't do this, if we.
Speaker 2 (09:08):
Don't quote unquote safeguard, are right, we are going to
have a ban. We're going to have a ban in Colorado,
which is completely laughable considering the political climates in our
state right now and the ouse that are statutorily on
the books. Now, what this, what this amendment does is
go far beyond the Reproductive Healtic Equity Act, way beyond
Roe v. Wade, and it will remove any common sense
(09:31):
safeguard to abortion, including parental notification for minors being coerced
into abortion, including the millions of dollars that our taxpayer
dollars will have to go to late abortion on healthy
dollars and healthy babies, even for out of state women
if this thing gets passed, because our very progressive legislature
will come back and allocate that funding. So sure, Danny,
it doesn't have a fiscal note right now, but in
(09:53):
two months, it definitely will when when our tax dollars
are going to be going to abortion for millions of.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Eighties and Brittany will have you back often and others
back often to talk about different aspects, including doing away
with parental notification and now taxpayers are going to have
to pay for this in fantaside they want in the constitution.
But tell people how they can help the campaign.
Speaker 4 (10:16):
Yes, thank you Dan.
Speaker 2 (10:17):
So our campaign is called Right to Note Colorado because
ColorOS have a right to know what is.
Speaker 4 (10:23):
In this horrific self.
Speaker 2 (10:24):
So you can see more information at www. Write our
idht do o pynow dot co dot com, Right to
Note ceo dot com and learn more, but also support
the campaign because we have a lot of things that
we need in order, but we really need to have
more support from our broader community to get that message
(10:46):
out the horrific amendment.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Amen, and we'll be playing sound from that great debate
performance by you last night for a weeks to come.
Thank you, Brittany, look forward to the next one.
Speaker 4 (10:56):
Thank you, Dan.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
Take care. That's Brittany Vesli, Colorado Catholic Conference. And the
opposition to seventy nine goes way beyond Catholics, way beyond
christian It's just basically anybody you know who's just sensible
and supports decency. You're on the Dan Kapla Show, And.
Speaker 5 (11:14):
Now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 6 (11:17):
Well that is happening. We have some new CNN reporting
today about what is going on behind the scenes inside
the Harris campaign and more broadly among Democrats who are
growing more and more anxious about a twenty sixteen redoct.
Speaker 1 (11:31):
Cnaw, this is going to be so great list anything
that happened, right, But isn't it exactly what I said
it would be? And I've been saying so for months.
We're twenty seven days out, right? Is that the right math?
About twenty seven days out? And she's lost momentum. The
worm is turned. She's dropping, not like a rock, but
(11:55):
she you don't have to drop like a rock in
a race like this. She is dropping, and Trump is rising.
The American people are figuring her out. And here's the problem.
She's still got twenty seven more days for Trump to
educate the people in the Swing States about who she
really is. And it's all in her own words on video,
coming right out of her mouth. And I'm telling you
(12:16):
right now, Ryan that the single most powerful spot we've
seen in the last thirty years is this spot that's
on right now. And we've talked about it, so I
won't beliebor it. But everybody's probably seen it now if
you're watching football or sports or now it's running midday
and Trump is raising more money right because because people
are smelling the victory now, so they want to get
(12:38):
on the right side of the winter. And so he's
blanketing America with this spot. Everybody's going to see it
multiple times by election day, and it cuts through all
the noise, right this spot where in her own words,
she says she wants to take your hard earned taxpayer
dollars and use it so illegal immigrate inmates can get
sex change operations. That goes far beyond the issue. It
(12:59):
just tells people so everything they need to know.
Speaker 7 (13:01):
About her and convicted felons like murderers, transgenders in prison. No,
we're going to pay for your sex change surgery?
Speaker 5 (13:07):
How about No?
Speaker 7 (13:08):
And there's another one that she cut for him, Dan
and that sunny hastin exchange she had man. She couldn't
think of anything that she would do differently than Joe Biden.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
Yeah, yeah, so no, it is shaping up beautifully. But
my question for you, and we'll go to the phone
lines now and text as well. Is Okay, we saw
what the left did before when my prediction came true
and it was clear Biden was going to lose. And
I still want to know who issued those that letter.
Clearly it was not Joe Biden that letter saying he
was withdrawing his nominee. But yeah, this backroom deal dead
(13:38):
of night. They stripped the democratically elected nominee of that
position and inserted somebody else. What do they do now?
What do they do now? Because they can't replace Harris.
They could replace Walls, and they may try to do
that with Shapiro, But what do they do now? Down
the stretch? What do you see coming? Millennial Mike, You're
on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4 (13:58):
Welcome, Hey Dan, good to be with you. Can you
hear me?
Speaker 1 (14:01):
Okay, I can hear you now? Trademark that please?
Speaker 4 (14:05):
Perfect? Perfect? So what I was going to talk about
in great interviews, By the way, I love Gabe and
your other guests. They were both fantastic, but absolutely so
what I was going to talk about. Kamala Harris today
on the Howard Stern Show said she told Stern that
talking to him was kind of a form of therapy,
then offered a bit of self reflection about those she
(14:28):
does not engage with. She said, she said, I choose
not to have mean people in my life. And why
I think this is so telling is because whenever there's
a reporter that asked her a serious, challenging question, she
dances around it, she avoids it. And it's these little
tells that are really important. And you know what Ryan
was just talking about. Also with the View, when they
(14:51):
asked her, you know, what do you disagree with Trump on?
She said, nothing that comes to mind? Well, why not Afghanistan?
What about the withdrawal? But you know, she's not reaching
any independent voters by you know, not acknowledging the faults
of Biden. That's one of the only ways I think
she could reach Oh, absolutely not. I think that a
(15:14):
lot of the Democrats are so delusional. She thinks that
she's They think that she is going to win, that
she's going to be this transformative, you know, revolutionary candidate.
And I don't get it personally, but I just how
is it that it's as close as it is right now? Dan?
That's my question. I mean, are there that many low
(15:34):
IQ voters out there that the mainstream media is convincing
that Kamala is this, you know, monumental. You know, Obama, what.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
A great question you ask, Mike, what a great question.
What I'd start with, I'm interested in your take. What
I'd start with is, listen, it's it's a very polarized
country politically to begin with, and because of abortion, it's
a very polarized country in general. So under the best circumstances,
these are going to be close races, right and so,
(16:04):
but then you take it a step beyond that, and
you have the horrific dishonest in so many ways vilification
of Donald Trump and all these false allegations against Trump,
and he's a trader, Russia collusion, all this, and every
now and then he's made a mistake that adds to that.
But so much of this dishonesty about Trump and coordinated
(16:25):
media attempt to politically end him, And so that helps
explain why it still remains relatively close. Then the other piece,
and hey, we're brutally honest on this show. You know,
the other piece is President Trump, like any human, had
some missteps, but certainly you know that some of the
stuff we've talked about on the show, he did not
(16:47):
Inside violence on January sixth, not in any way, shape
or form. But he could have responded better and sooner,
and he didn't, and that was a mistake. So you know,
these things pile up together, almost all of them unfair
to our Trump, some self inflicted. And that's why I
think it's still close. But Mike, what we see now
is what we've seen in sixteen and twenty. Right. Trump
(17:10):
is a great closer. And when we get the A Trump,
nobody's beating the A Trump. And right now we've got
the A Trump and it's on display every day. That
great decision of his right, Mike, to not do a
third debate because it's not going to be a fair fight.
He's not going to have a fair chance, and he
doesn't need it. He's ahead the great decision not to
(17:32):
do sixty minutes because they wouldn't be fair to him
in the way they question, the way they edit, the
way they represent it. Look at the way you've seen it, Mike.
They are falsely editing Kamala Harris's interview with them to
make it sound like she's coherent, when earlier they ran
versions of the same statement showing she wasn't. Yeah, so
(17:54):
I think he's going to pull away. I think he's
going to win by a comfortable margin.
Speaker 4 (17:59):
Yeah. I would also say very quick. I think a
lot of the shows she is going on, I guess
he went on this call her dad.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah podcast.
Speaker 4 (18:07):
It's like she's trying to appeal to younger voters. I
get it, but I don't think the messages coming across
effectively when she's focusing more on just her daily routines
and things she does.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
Great point, I hope you call every day. I'm sorry,
we need to bail for news right now. But that
goes to the question of has she given up here
on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 5 (18:33):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
I think only a person that hates our country, actually
maybe it's a down deep hatred can want open voters. Wow.
So we took in more than twenty one about that
for a second, and then President Trump documenting this success
he had at the border. Think about that statement, and
do you agree that only a person who hates America
(18:58):
could want open borders? Love your take on that. How
would anybody counter that argument? Eight five five four zero
five eight two five to five the number? I don't
know how anybody would counter that argument, And that's no
reflection on people in general south of the border. It's
(19:21):
no criticism of them. But it just comes back to
the reality that if you open the border, you are deciding, deliberate, premeditated,
that you're going to allow lots and lots of murderers, rapists,
other types of criminals in to prey on Americans. Now
(19:43):
that percentage, it may be that ninety ninety five, ninety eight,
ninety nine percent of the people who come in through
those open borders are not criminals, they're not rapists, they're
not murderers, They're very good people who just want a
better life. That doesn't mean we should have an open border.
But even if it's just one percent, and the percentage
(20:03):
is higher than one percent, even if it's just one
percent who are vicious murderers, rapist other kinds of criminals,
as President Trump wright, than anybody who makes a decision
to open our border knowing that they're inviting that one
percent or that two percenter, that three or four percent
(20:25):
in to prey on the women of America, the children
of America, the men of America, the communities of America. Yeah,
do those folks just hate America. How could anybody who
loves America make a conscious decision to just open the borders.
And then we get to the other very high percentage
(20:46):
of folks who come through open borders, who are just
good people looking for a better life. It's still obviously
not something America can handle. America can't handle those unrestricted numbers,
that unrestricted flow, even if the people are really good people,
as so many are, but not all. America can't handle that.
(21:09):
We've seen it. We've seen it in Colorado, We've seen
it all over the place. So is he right that
people who just want truly open borders hate America? Eight
five to five for zero five A two five five
the number techs d A N five seven seven three nine.
And listen to my personal belief whether or not I
(21:31):
happen to be Catholic. You know, my personal belief is
is wait a second, I believe I'm required as a
Christian and a Catholic Christian to have a special kind
of love, a special kind of support for immigrants, and
I think that's a sacred obligation regardless of religion. I
(21:53):
think it's absolutely the right thing to do. But that
doesn't mean open borders. That doesn't mean unrestricted flow. That's
that's bad for everybody. So yeah, I would really really
like your take on that. Let's start with Carol in Denver, Colorado.
You're on the Dan Kaplis.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
You'll welcome, Hi, Dan.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Hey.
Speaker 8 (22:17):
My take on that is, I do agree with him,
and I think when you love something dearly, you are
very protective of it and you don't just you don't
just throw it out to the wolves. I mean, and
at the open borders, you know for a fact that
(22:40):
you're letting in murderers or letting in drug addicts, drug pushers,
sex traffickers, gang members, and that is not protecting something
that you love.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Well. I love your point, Carol. Kind of like your house.
I mean, I love my family, and that's why locker doors,
you know that, right? What would it say about my
love for my family if I just left our doors
open at night and let anybody you wanted to come
wandering into the.
Speaker 8 (23:12):
House, and you would you would have some you know,
parameters or requirements filters on who you would let in
your home. And you can be a very generous, kind
love person and say I want to help and I
want to allow these people to come stay in my home,
but you're not going to do it at the expense
(23:34):
of your family members possibly being flaughtered or raped or
you know, anything else like that. So it doesn't mean
you're mean, it doesn't mean you're selfish. It just means
you're being careful because you love your family, you love
your home, and you want to do it selectively and responsibly.
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Yeah, beautifully said, beautifully said. Thank you for that, Carol.
And it's the same in my view with immigrants with
who want to come to this country. Listen, I consider
myself a lottery winner because I was born in the
United States of America. Any of us born in the
United States of America, we are lottery winners. And this
is just my personal worldview. But I look at others
(24:14):
who didn't have that good fortune, and they just happened
to be born on the other side of the border.
I can love this country, which means controlling the border,
because if you just leave it open, obviously you are
knowingly inviting all sorts of bad things to happen in
this country. But I can love this country and want
(24:35):
that border controlled and still love the people on the
other side of the border who want a better life
and want to be here. You can do both at
the same time, and you don't have to have an
open border to accomplish that. You can have a sane
immigration policy that gives folks who have not committed crimes
in other countries a fair chance to get in here
(24:56):
in a controlled way the country can handle, and that
benefits this nation. And then you can do other things
to help them in their lives on the other side
of the border. You know, such as my wife and
daughter and son who have made multiple trips down to Mexico,
along with other really good people we know here in
Colorado to care for desperately poor people outside of RS
(25:20):
and I know that many many others listening can tell
similar stories. You can send money, you can encourage political change,
You can do both. You can love this country, which
means controlled borders, and you can love the good people
on the other side of the border. That is not hard.
Eight five five forur zero five A two five five
the number. We have so much hot sound, I don't
(25:41):
know where to start. And since you were kind enough
to join us today a quick recap, I don't think
there's any real question now. And we played lots of
sound of the left sounding the warning that Trump is
starting to pull away, and as I predicted, and it's
not a nothing is in life, right, but all indicators
(26:02):
are starting to pull away. So I'd love to hear
from you. What do you think the left does next?
We saw what happened last time, right dead of night
backroom deal depos a democratically elected nominee who happened to
be a sitting president and replaced him with somebody else,
totally on democratic process. So they'll stop at almost nothing.
(26:25):
What do they do now that it appears clear and
many many credibly sore stories that the left sees it
now as well, that she is likely to lose and
it's likely to get even worse, and those margins may
well get big enough to win more GOP seats in
the Senate, though that isn't certain yet, and to keep
(26:45):
the GOP House and expand it. So what do you
think the left does next? Texter says Dan. I believe
Biden will resign, Harris becomes potus. DEM's believe that will
give her momentum to put her over the finish line.
Russ in Florence, Colorado, you know we've been talking about
that for months now, Ryan, do you think Russ is right?
I thought sorry to do that to you. Zach, A
(27:08):
great young trainee is back there today. He's an up
and comer, up and comer, a newcomer as well, Zach. Yeah,
he's new newer. Oh wonderful. But I was using that
on board term in the Mike Johnson sense, and I
always wonder Mayor Mike Johnson. This is Mayor Mike Johnston
of Denver. Now, let's say somebody just comes uninvited through
(27:29):
the back door of the mayor's house and please nobody
do that. Nobody do that. But let's say somebody did.
Would Mike Johnston call him newcomer?
Speaker 4 (27:40):
Hmm?
Speaker 1 (27:41):
It would technically be accurate based on his terminology. I
hope nobody doesn't and we don't have to find out. No,
but young Ryan, I just noticed. I better hit this brake.
But I want to continue this with you after the break.
I really want to get your take on this, because
we've been talking about this for months. Okay, Yeah, they've
got this card to play force Biden out, and they
(28:01):
have the leverage to do it. And it's the same
leverage that was able to strip him of the nomination
and to put her in as president. But my thought was,
and we'll get Ryan's take on this in years when
we come back, wouldn't they have had to done that,
do that a week or two ago. Isn't it too
late right now for that to work for them? And
what else do you think they'll do now that they
(28:22):
can see it slipping away? Eight five to five hours
five eight two five five text Dan five seven seven
three nine.
Speaker 5 (28:30):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Well that Da, that's a new.
Speaker 6 (28:35):
CNN reporting today about what is going on behind the
scenes inside the Harris campaign and more broadly among Democrats
who are growing more and more anxious about a twenty
sixteen REDOC scene.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
Oh man, this is going to be so much fun
to watch, right, That's one thing we're talking about right now.
And nothing's guaranteed in life, right, But all of these indicators,
not each and everyone, but almost all of these indicators
pointing to Trump not only winning but starting to pull away,
maybe taking more House and Senate seats with him. So,
you know, it'd be one thing if we were like
(29:08):
three or four days out from election day, but we're
twenty seven days out. So what do you think the
left does now, and we have a texture who talks
about Okay, you know, after Trump wins, they're they're going
to deny the legitimacy of the election. Well, you can
bet on that. That's the starting point, right, We saw
that in sixteen. But they do so at their own
peril with the American people because remember, and I know
(29:30):
you don't want to hear it now, but there are
elections coming up in twenty six, really important elections in
the twenty six races begin on November sixth. So Trump
goes ahead and wins, as we expect at this point,
he pulls away and then the Democrats want to question
the legitimacy or go to court and claim that he's
(29:51):
ineligible to serve because they claim he's an insurrectionist. Yeah.
I think the American people are going to spank the
left hard. I think they're spanking the left right hard
in this race. I think they're saying, hey, no, we
are not electing a San Francisco lefty. Let's go to Denver.
Tuk to Michelle. You're on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 4 (30:10):
Welcome, Hi, Dan.
Speaker 9 (30:14):
That was my point. So if oh, they boot, if
they boot Biden out of the White House now and
Kamala steps up as potus and Trump wins as.
Speaker 4 (30:27):
We all expect.
Speaker 9 (30:30):
Who's to say that the Left isn't going to certify
the election and say Trump go ahead and be in
the White House. I don't think they're going to let
Trump into the White House.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
Well, yeah, you can expect every type of maneuver imaginable
knowing it will fail. Right, So the left starts all
of this knowing it will fail. But their only mission
is to cripple his presidency as it was in sixteen.
They knew the Russia Oaks and all of that was
total made up garbage, and they were responsible for making
a lot of it up. But they just wanted to
(31:04):
cripple his presidency. And what he was able to accomplish
despite all of that is stunning. But yeah, so you're right, Michelle,
they're going to do all of that, and then the
question is do they do anything beyond that, because look
what they did with Biden. I mean, Michelle, we still
don't know who wrote that note where he allegedly gave
(31:28):
up the nomination. I mean, even Nancy Pelosi had said
Biden didn't write that note. So what else do they
come up with. This is going to be fascinating to watch.
But don't you think, Michelle, they do it at their
own peril because the American people are about to, I believe,
reject the Democratic Party, reject the current path. They're about
(31:50):
to reject Kamala Harris as a lefty. And if the
Democrats double middle finger the American people again right after
election day, what do you think happens to the Democrats?
Speaker 9 (32:02):
Oh, I agree, I agree. I think I think that
we just don't the Democrats have no path forward yet.
Speaker 4 (32:11):
If they're in the White.
Speaker 9 (32:12):
House, they're not going to leave, and they've already they
seem to project onto the Republicans everything that they're doing. Yeah,
you know, they said that Trump would never leave the
White House. Well he did, and he did it peacefully.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (32:28):
Well, I'm just I'm afraid that they're going to do
exactly what they said Trump would do.
Speaker 1 (32:34):
Well. I do think that, you know, obviously Biden's going
to leave, Harris's is going to leave. I expect that, Michelle.
Thank you for your call. Really do appreciate that. You know, now,
violence has been, you know, part of the left's playbook
in America for many, many, many years, and So will
there be some kind of violent reaction coordinated, funded by
(32:58):
sources You'll never be able to identify conclusively violent reaction
to President Trump winning a second term. I think we
can be virtually certain there will be, right but what
format will take? How long it will last? Yeah, I
just think we're heading into an amazing time. The fun part, though,
but before all of that ugliness and before the fun
(33:20):
of Trump being president in this nation being much safer
and better off. The fun part is these next twenty
seven days, because what are they gonna do over these
twenty seven days? Ryan, what's your prediction, my friend? I
don't think there's any chance Biden resigns the presidency. I
think that was part of the bargain. And I know
(33:40):
you're saying he doesn't hold any cards, but he can.
He can make a real ugly and sticky and difficult
for Kamala Harris and that whole campaign. And we saw
him you surp her a couple of times already, and
he kind of threw her a bone today by including
her in the hurricane press conference.
Speaker 5 (33:53):
It looked really weird doing it too.
Speaker 1 (33:55):
But I think he stays in office. Yeah, I think
it's it's too late to pull that. I respectfully disagree.
I think the people who had the leverage they needed
to force him out because my personal belief right. We've
discussed it at length. These he's just corrupt. He's just corrupt,
and he engaged in corruption with Hunter. They've got tons
of evidence on him, and they had enough evidence to
(34:15):
force him to give up the nomination. I think they
have enough evidence to force him to leave the White
House if they want to. I just think it's too
late now. I think that move had to be made
late September or so. So I think we're in agreement
that you at this point now, they could still replace walls,
and I'm not predicting that, but they could still do
(34:36):
it and bring in Shapiro, but they run a greater
risk now with that. So I just think it's going
to be a fun, amazing twenty seven days together between
now and election day. Thank you Ryan, thank you Kelly,
thank you Zach. Good to meet you, Zach. Hope you
join us tomorrow four oh six. I'm the Dan Kapli Show.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.