November 19, 2025 • 36 mins
Dan observes that instances of female teachers preying upon and sexually abusing students seem to be on the rise - the question is, why?
A video posted by Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) and other elected members of Congress who served in the military appears to encourage enlisted service members to disregard 'illegal orders' given to them by the Trump administration. What is the purpose and intent behind this?
A video posted by Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) and other elected members of Congress who served in the military appears to encourage enlisted service members to disregard 'illegal orders' given to them by the Trump administration. What is the purpose and intent behind this?
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, the American
way is we protect our children, right, and there are
so many different ways you prove the Colorado Democratic Party
(00:22):
that the big time elected Democrats in Colorado know they
don't care at all about kids. I mean, it's mind
blowing how little they care about children. And I'm talking
about different concrete ways to prove that. They come up
almost every single day. And obviously you start with killing
them before they're born, right, We talk about that a lot,
but there are so many other ways as well. So
(00:43):
we're going to touch on one of those as we
come out of the gate today, and then we have
so much more to do throughout the show. But it
all kind of ties together, right, because what I promoted
for today was why are so many people leaving Colorado?
Why are home values in Denver dropping faster than most
of the rest of the nation. Why do we have
(01:05):
all of these very bad not only signs, but concrete
developments in this state that show slippage and set up
a very very perilous futures. Why is all of that happening?
And of course the latest on the Epstein front is
I just had to.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
Laugh my head off.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
I mean, they think we are so stupid, right, And
this fundraising email I get from Bennett before I come
on air today, Michael Bennett, I voted to release the
Jeffrey Epstein files because the truth must be known. You
know the rest of it. We just heard some of
it from Brittany Petterson at the top. Well, why didn't
you do it when Biden was president? Why Michael Bennett?
(01:44):
Why Brittany Petterson? Why didn't we hear a word from
you on this? Why weren't you pushing for the victims?
Speaker 3 (01:50):
End?
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Joe Biden? You run the DOJ release the files, Joe Biden.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
We didn't hear any of that, right, No, because the
Democrats are up to there, you know what in Epstein.
So we didn't hear a word of that. So why
didn't Michael Bennett and Brittany Petterson care about the victims?
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Then?
Speaker 1 (02:05):
When when the Democrats had control over those files? Even
from a strictly left brain logical.
Speaker 5 (02:11):
I know that's tough to apply to the left, but
I'm trying to figure the calculus out here, Dan, of
they know a whole bunch of Democrats are going to
be implicated here, and we just got the tip of
the iceberg with this Delegate Stacy Plaskett who is texting
with Jeffrey Epstein during the agressional hearing Bill Clinton.
Speaker 6 (02:29):
Looks like maybe Hockey and Jeffries.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
I'm not hearing about any Republicans tied to Epstein. They're hoping, Dan,
it's like pin the tail of the donkey that somehow
this Hail Mary pass they'll connect and Donald Trump will
be implicated in the Epstein files.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
Well, but they know that isn't gonna happen because they've
had the Epstein files for years, right. But what they're
doing is is again and Trump's ray when you compare
it to Russia, Russia, Russia, because that was all lot
That was all a big lie that was used to
undermine his administration. Here, they know there's no there there,
or it would have been out there a long time ago.
They know there's not even enough in that file that
(03:04):
they could come up with a lie about Trump that
they could have tried to sell for a while. No,
but what they're doing is they're using their media arm,
which is most of the mass media, to now try
to fill the air waves with this so they wash
away you know, Trump's accomplishments, try to prevent him from
getting momentum, try to get am angry.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
So that's what that's all about.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
So I think the only way this hurts the only
way this hurts President Trump long term is personally, and
I feel badly about that after everything he's been through,
the coup attempts, the false allegation, the Banana Republic law fare,
all the efforts to destroy him personally because they couldn't
beat him at the polls.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
I feel bad for him as a.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
Person that he has to go through this, But politically,
if there's any long term impact, it's going to backfire
on the Democrats coyote E Wiley Coyote and the Roadrunner
kind of stuff, as this almost all always dus. But
I just feel bad for Trump personally. Whoever ends up
running against Bennett, I sure.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Hope they point this out.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
Hey, Michael Bennett didn't care about those victims all those
years your party had control over those files, did you know?
I hope that at least makes its way into the
conversation and hicking Loooper too. By the way, did you
see that video of Hicklooper. I didn't pull the sound
because there's nothing interesting for anybody to look at.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
But some reporter pinned him down on you know.
Speaker 1 (04:29):
Whether the shutdown was worth it, and he mumbled a
few words.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
The point of that video was the video, not the audio.
People could hear.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
It just looks like he's done, literally that the phantom
of the Senate. Yeah, he's got the big Overcote Island,
the big lapels up and you can barely see his face.
And I like the guy personally, so none of this
is personal. But the man should not be in the
US Senate. Let's be very grateful if we have to
(04:58):
have a Democrat, Let's be very grateful it's John hicken
Hooper and Michael Bennett because they get nothing done, nothing.
They are like air, they are like ghosts. Can you
imagine if we had one of these young firebrand socialist
lefties holding that Senate seat down, there'd be a lot
more damage done. What we need is a Republican. So
you have a Republican you know, majority in the Senate.
(05:19):
But yeah, wow, we're lucky to have these two do nothings.
Speaker 5 (05:22):
Did Hick turn to the report and go, you should
be protecting.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Me from I think he's lost the energy. Do we
have that sound somewhere? I'm looking right now.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
Those are new to the area, He said the quiet
part out loud. When KUSA was interviewing him. Do you
remember who that was? Was that Kyle Clark or Marshall?
I can't remember who, but they're interviewing him about and
ethics complaint.
Speaker 6 (05:45):
Oh no, I got it.
Speaker 1 (05:47):
Looper says stuff like this one more time, that all
day stuff like this. How do you even say that
to the press. Well, you say to the press because
that's what they've always done for you.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
There are some noble accepts. It's like Sean Boyd doesn't
do that for people over at Casey. And there are
some noble exceptions everywhere. But yeah, so, and how do
the Dems not revolt against ticking Looper and against Bennett?
You know, the ultimate royalty, the ultimate do nothing royalty,
the ultimate silver spoon guy. He goes handed this Senate
(06:20):
seat and then lux into keeping it, and now he's
standing in the school out store. We could have our
first Senator of color tomorrow and Joe Nogose, well, ideologically
he's wrong on all the big stuff. Joanah Goose is
a very intelligent, competent person, just wrong on the big issues.
And we could have Joona Goose as an appointed US
(06:42):
Senator tomorrow. We have a Britney Patterson female who again
you know, she's an intelligent person, wrong on all the
big issues.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
We could have her first female senator tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (06:52):
Who is stopping Colorado from having its first female senator
or center of color. It's Michael Bennett, just like Jared
poulis stop Colorado from having the first woman governor.
Speaker 5 (07:02):
Bingo, That's an interesting comparison, Dan, and I've got to
ask you. You talk about these two guys that are
kind of bumps on a log don't get anything done,
which is to our bests to bump some blow Bennett
and Hickenlooper.
Speaker 6 (07:13):
But let's say let's play this out. Worst case scenario.
Speaker 4 (07:16):
Michael Bennett, who's next governor and he appoints Joe and
the Goose.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
Do you do you think that deal's done?
Speaker 5 (07:24):
I think so, but I'm just playing this out for
you in this sense that would we be better or
worse off with the Goose in that Senate seat versus
Bennett much worse off, worse and.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Why he's going to be much more effective?
Speaker 5 (07:35):
You thinking, do you think's further left than Bennett?
Speaker 2 (07:38):
And then Hickenlooper and the Goose they're also far left?
How do you go any further less? It's just a
different dressing put on it.
Speaker 5 (07:45):
He like the squad Left is Britney Peterson the squad Left?
Speaker 6 (07:49):
Are they that far away?
Speaker 1 (07:50):
You are asking great questions, But let me ask you this,
how would you distinguish on policy? They dress it up better.
They dressed it up better. They're not as blatant as
about it. But but you look at Mike Johnston. Mike
Johnston's made more radical statements than Mom Donnie. When it
comes to fighting ice. Johnston said he'd send Denver police
out to the county line to fight federal well, to
(08:12):
stop federal law enforcement. He'd put fifty thousand citizens in
the street to stop federal law enforcement. He dresses it
up better than Mom Donnie. He is just an open socialist.
Speaker 6 (08:21):
Good point.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
But what I'm saying is, yeah, no Goose is going
to be far more effective because he's competent and he's
high energy, and he knows how to get things done.
The problem is he gets bad things done because he's
ideologically wrong.
Speaker 6 (08:37):
Correct.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
No, Goose is another one of these guys who must
know that the stuff he's supporting is wrong backwards. But
he ended up being a Democrat, so this is the
price he pays to get power in the Democratic Party.
He'd be a great conservative if he had conservative ideology.
And yeah, no and same thing. But hopefully somebody will
(08:59):
beat both those guys. I know it's an uphill battle.
I know it's really tough. One thing we know for sure.
I look at this text that came in right before
the show, Dan Barb Kirkmarer equals rhino and then it
goes on from there. Listen, if we're going to do
this again, and I don't know if this is this
texture represents overall popular views, but if this is going
(09:20):
to once again be another election cycle where the GOP
eats itself and divides between the quote establishment and the
quote grass roots. And I know people in both camps
who are wonderful and they agree on ninety five percent
of everything. But if we're going to have those lines again,
and we're gonna have people from one of those camps
say I'm not going to vote for a candidate from
(09:42):
the other. Just save the money, don't even run a candidate,
because just the math is pretty simple. There is zero
chance to win unless you have an extremely united Republican
Party and Republican base, and even then it's going to.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Be really hard when we come back.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
Just more proof the Democrats is flat out liar hypocrites
to wait too kind of term. We have a five
alarm fire in Colorado and it is sexual abuse of
children by teachers. Now, the vast majority of teachers are
wonderful and they're heroes and they never even dream of
sexually assaulting a student, but we have a lot of
(10:19):
sexual assault of students going on. And where's Polis, Where's Johnston,
where's Bennett? Where's the Democratic Party? It's no five alarm
fire to them because it gets where they get all
their money and their boots on the ground.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
That's right, the teachers' union.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
So it's about time somebody in Colorado stands up and
calls them on that, because we got another one. I
want to run by in Have you noticed Ryan there
appears to be more and more of female teachers sexually
abusing male students. Why do you think we're seeing more
of that? You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 6 (10:51):
And now back to the Dan Taplas Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
Oh we do need another hero. That's what it's good
to take for the GOP.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
That GOP is going to need that special candidate who
can overcome all this.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
You know that the cards fall just right.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
Really well run campaign, they break through, they win statewide office,
and then they've got a face, got a face to
the GOP in Colorado?
Speaker 2 (11:13):
Right now?
Speaker 1 (11:13):
Who is the face of the GOP in Colorado? Let
me throw that out to you. Three or three seven
one three eight two five five the number text d
an five seven seven three nine. Who is the face
of the GOP in Colorado?
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Ryan?
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Before I read you the latest story of a Colorado
teacher sexually assaulting a Colorado student.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
And why is this not a five alarm fire?
Speaker 1 (11:36):
Now this we know this, we know for certain if
this was God forbid a Catholic priest who had sexually
assaulted someone, it would be headlines every newscast, every paper.
The Democrats had never stopped talking about it. And one
is too many, no matter who does it. And as
somebody who is so profoundly grateful to be Catholic and
who have gone to Catholic schools in a Catholic high
(11:57):
schools seminary, I can tell you that that one is
too many, and the fact the vast majority of priests
are heroes, one is too many. And I'm not trying
in any way, shape or form diminish any sexual assault
that has occurred by any priest anywhere.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
I can tell you all day, improve it all day.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
That doesn't reflect on your typical priest, and it certainly
doesn't reflect on the Catholic Church as a whole.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
But one is too many. It's demonic.
Speaker 1 (12:23):
So why why is it not a five alarm fire
in Colorado that we have so many students being sexually
assaulted by teachers, same drill. It's no reflection on teachers
as a whole. The vast majority of teachers would never
dream of anything like that, never in a million years.
But why the different treatment. Shouldn't sex assault on a
(12:45):
kid be just as horrific no matter who commits it. Ah, Well,
and it's committed by somebody from the Democrat Party's power base,
then yeah, no, you just have to That can't possibly
be a five alarm fire, right, well it should be.
Speaker 6 (13:00):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
Here's one the latest.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
One teacher accused of sexually assaulting students who sought help
from her for mental health. And here's another one where
it's a female teacher. It seemed to me and no
matter what the gender involved, and there are only two,
so it's got to be one of the other, male
or female, no matter what the gender involved, it's always horrific,
it's always demonic. But we seem to be hearing more
(13:25):
and more of women sexually assaulting students, female teachers.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
What do you think is behind that?
Speaker 1 (13:31):
Three oh three seven one three eight two five five
text d an five seven seven three nine. This one
out of Douglas County, Colorado, a teacher is accused of
sexually assaulting a student who sought help from her for
mental health.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Teresa Waylin WHA l I n.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
Twenty eight was arrested in charged with sexual assault internet
exploitation of a child in stalking. Cam gh reported as
students said they had an inappropriate sexual relationship with Whelan
during the twenty three to twenty four school year. Student
was struggling with mental health issues and started spending time
with Whalan after school in Whalan's office. According to arrest EFFI,
(14:09):
David Wayland is accused of sexually assaulting the student, and
the two shared photos and communicators communications over snap for
about fourteen months. Whalan also drove the student to and
from school for most of that time, and the student's
parents were unaware Whalan became ended the relationship with Whalan
(14:31):
because they were interested in dating a classmate. Why is
there no gender in this story? Why is the gender
of the victim not identified? I understand the name. Not
identifying the name?
Speaker 6 (14:41):
Good point?
Speaker 2 (14:42):
Why not the gender?
Speaker 5 (14:43):
Very good point? And what do you think that means? Well, Dan,
you would know this better than me. But one day
I think I might. If a teacher takes a special
unique interest in your child parents, your antenna.
Speaker 6 (14:56):
Should be up right.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
Yeah? Things have changed, right, definitely? Yeah? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (15:01):
I mean when I was a kid, teachers would take
an interest in us. I traveled with the teacher of
mine and there's nobody better than I at it. There
was absolutely nothing inappropriate, quite the opposite. It was a
tremendous mentorship relationship. And and that priest was at our
wedding you know, a great positive force for good in
(15:22):
my life.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
But it was a different era. Nobody would think twice
about that.
Speaker 1 (15:24):
Correct, Yeah, yeah, But why don't we have a gender
in this story?
Speaker 2 (15:28):
What's up there? It's a good point that, well does
that mean it's a female student?
Speaker 6 (15:33):
Well, you said suspect was Whalen And where did this
take place?
Speaker 2 (15:36):
She's a suspects a woman. They've got a picture.
Speaker 6 (15:38):
Where is this taking place? Against the location of the venue.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
It just says Douglas County that I have a guy
for you, and his name is George.
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Brockler heard him. Really funny guy. We got some clubs
from him for a really funny guy.
Speaker 1 (15:54):
Yeah, no, we yeah, it'll text George during the breakdown.
But we don't know whether the victim here was a
guy or a girl, and it's just as awful either way. Right,
But we see so much more of the female of
female teachers sexually assaulting children. Hey, headline just popping up
(16:15):
for those who own Nvidia Navidia beats earnings expectations amid
AI bubble fears, so have to dig deeper into the story.
I'll do that during the break but at least then
they're an awful lot of people with Navidia, and they're
four to one case. This is going to be a
particularly important.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
Report today.
Speaker 1 (16:35):
So hopefully that headline holds up and they beat it
by enough, because you see so many companies now right
that they're beating with their earnings and they go down
four percent because they didn't beat enough. But we'll find out.
We'll get the details on the video and report back
to you. On the other side. If you're wondering what
the fuss is about with Nvidia, it's a chip maker that's.
Speaker 2 (16:58):
Done really, really well.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
A lot of people have, you know, had thousand percent
or two thousand percent or more gains with Navidia, and and.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
So they have it in their four o one case.
But why so much more? Sex assault of.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Male students off in middle school sometimes high school by
female teachers.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Anybody have an explanation for that?
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Three oh three seven one three eight two five five
d A N five seven seven three nine Is it
better reporting?
Speaker 2 (17:29):
Is it better reporting?
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Back in the day, Ryan, did did you ever have
a female teacher do anything inappropriate with you?
Speaker 2 (17:36):
No?
Speaker 1 (17:37):
Male teacher, No, not at all? Okay me, either male
or female. I had that.
Speaker 2 (17:43):
You know, we blow guy when I was in the
wee Blows the ten year old boy scouts now.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
In the Pennanty, Well, I was actually it's called it
was called we blows back then.
Speaker 6 (17:54):
We blows wobble, but they don't fall down.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
What do you mean we below?
Speaker 5 (17:59):
We both said, even, well, it's there's an extra syllable
in there that you're missing. Well, the way you're saying
to people misconstrue it.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Okay, Sorry, it's been a minute, and I did leave
the wee Blows under a less than pleasant circumstances.
Speaker 6 (18:13):
I don't think I've ever heard this one though.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Yeah, but that was a day where you would never
dream of telling your parents. No, oh not back in
that era.
Speaker 6 (18:21):
Really.
Speaker 2 (18:22):
Oh yeah, yeah, my dad.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
My dad was a six foot three two d and
four times would have killed the police officer.
Speaker 2 (18:29):
They never would have found the body. Oh yeah, you know,
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (18:32):
My dad, hero hero cop forty years main streets of Chicago.
Always got it done, but never had the fire's gun,
which is no criticism anybody you ever had to just that.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Kind of cop.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
But but no, I yeah, I would not have ended well,
it didn't end well.
Speaker 2 (18:51):
The guy's been in the state Penn Forever you're on
the Dan Kapla.
Speaker 6 (18:54):
Show, you're listening to the Dan Camplust Show podcasts.
Speaker 7 (19:02):
Intersections across the city might seem like any other. Research
found what makes them different.
Speaker 5 (19:07):
And we found that there were differences in trauma mechanisms
at different levels of neighborhood severity.
Speaker 7 (19:12):
The doctors behind the studies, doctor Myers and doctor Acker
with Children's Hospital Colorado, saying they identified what makes intersections
more dangerous. They started by looking at what's called the
neighborhood deprivation Index, a tool that measures how disadvantaged neighborhoods
are on factors like income, education, or employment.
Speaker 3 (19:32):
And so what we were able to find by focusing
first on Dever County, just as a proof of concept
of the methodology that you know, there were specific intersections
with high levels of deprivation at the neighborhood level and
then high rates of injury, of high rates of kids
getting hit by cars.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
Yeah, and the point of this story is it just
goes back to Democrat leadership in Colorado. They don't care
about kits, They just don't care about children, period. And
part of it just goes back to their radical, far left,
secular worldview.
Speaker 2 (20:04):
They just don't value human life as much.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
And so when you start out that way, then at
that point, obviously you're not going to value children as
much because it's all transactional. Human life doesn't have any
of this inherent value or dignity. People who have a
worldview where every human life has value in dignity, well,
then at that point that the young, vulnerable human life
(20:28):
is going to need even more protective But that's not
how the people who own and operate the Democratic Party
see the world. That Democratic Party is long gone. This
is just another example. What it means is that you've
got a lot more poor kids, you know, being hit
by cars in their neighborhoods. And why well you can
if the story goes on from there, you can see that, Okay,
(20:50):
those dangerous intersections, they don't get the same attention. And
we talked about this other data out of Colorado before
in the Denver metro area. But if you live in
the wrong neighborhood, if you live in one of the
neighborhoods that's economically disadvantage, your life expectancy is going to
be up to ten years less. That's what Democrat rule
(21:12):
does for you. And that ties into a bigger issue
we're talking about on the show today on the heels
of yesterday, Why Denver? Why Denver losing ground on property
values twice as fast as most of the country. And
today we're going to talk about Colorado leaking oil. You know,
all the people moving out of Colorado, the population getting smaller,
(21:32):
and what does that mean for the future. Why is
it happening? So you can see the trend line for
this stick. And the only thing that could cause his
trend line is leftist rule, because we've been blessed with
one of the most perfect spots in the world. So
that's what's going on there. Now. It ties into our
current topic, which is why aren't the Democrats who controlled
(21:52):
this state declaring a five alarm fire over all the
teacher sex abuse, which is no reflection on the fast
number of.
Speaker 2 (21:59):
Tea teachers out there, but it is a five alarm fire.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
And if you had the same situation going on, God forbid,
with Catholic priests, you can beat. The Democratic Party would
declare it a five alarm fire, but their media arm
and the party itself nothing to see here all these
When when do you ever open the paper and not
read a new story about a teacher arrested for sexual
abuse of a child? How often does that happen in
(22:23):
the course of a week for you? And then for
everyone who is caught, how many are not caught? What
do you think that ratio is? You tell me three
or three seven one three eight two five five the
number text d A N five seven seven three nine.
For every child who ends up reporting their abuser, the
(22:45):
criminal who is sexually assaulting them, how many other children don't?
What do you think that ratio? As I know, we're
blessed with a lot of people in the audience for education,
law enforcement. You probably have the study at your fingertips.
What do you think that ratio is? Anecdotally extrapolating other factors,
I would say it's at least ten to one, but
I wouldn't be surprised if experts called the show and
(23:07):
said it's one hundred to one. Now want to shift
gears for a second. Everybody knows this is wrong. You know,
it's like obsenator. You know when you see it. As
soon as you hear this, you'll know it's wrong. But
what do you think? What do you think these insurrection
flirters are really up to, including Jason Crowe. Why do
you think they did this knowing that immediately that there
(23:29):
would be all these appropriate outcries that they're calling for
an insurrection among the members of our military. Think they
knew that was coming. Why do you think they did this?
What's their real endgame? I'm Senator Alissa Stockins, Senator Mark Kelly,
Representative Chris Stluzio, Congressman Mattie Goodlanders, Representative Chrissy Hulahan, Congressman
Jason Crowe.
Speaker 8 (23:49):
I was a captain in the United States Navy.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
Former CIA officer, former Navy, former paratrooper and Army ranger.
Speaker 6 (23:55):
Former intelligence officer.
Speaker 2 (23:56):
Former Air Force.
Speaker 8 (23:57):
We want to speak directly to members of the military
and the.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
Intelligence community to take risks each day keep Americans safe.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
Speaker 8 (24:10):
This administration is pitting our uniform military.
Speaker 6 (24:13):
And intelligence community professionals.
Speaker 8 (24:15):
Against American citizens like us. You all swore an.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Oath to protect and then this constitution.
Speaker 1 (24:21):
Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming
from abroad, but from right here at home.
Speaker 8 (24:26):
Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (24:30):
You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 6 (24:32):
You must refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 5 (24:34):
No one has to carry out orders that violate the
law or our constitution.
Speaker 8 (24:39):
We know this is hard and that it's a difficult
time to be a public servant.
Speaker 2 (24:42):
But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, or Navy,
the Air.
Speaker 8 (24:45):
Force, your vigilance is critical.
Speaker 2 (24:48):
And know that we have your back, because now more
than ever.
Speaker 5 (24:52):
The American people need you.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
We need you to stand up for our laws, our.
Speaker 8 (24:55):
Constitution, and who we are as Americans.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
Go give up, don't give up.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
Don't give up, don't give up the ship.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
What do you think that was really all about? What
do you think that was really all about?
Speaker 2 (25:14):
Right there?
Speaker 1 (25:14):
Now understand the context, the people who decided to do this,
and we've never seen anything like it before, at least
in modern American politics. Those people understood that this president
was almost assassinated twice.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
If not for divine intervention. In my view, anybody else
would have to.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
Argue one in a trillion chance that he turns his
head at that precise millisecond he is assassinated in that
Butler field. The people who recorded that know that they
know he could have easily been assassinated with the second
attempt at the golf course. So, knowing that this president
(26:02):
has already been the target of two very very real
assassination attempts, why do you think they did that? And then,
as you endeavor to answer that question for yourself, ask
yourself what innocent explanations are there? What were they If
(26:25):
they're trying to.
Speaker 6 (26:26):
Talk to.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
The vast majority of our service members who are extremely stable,
emotionally and mentally, extremely intelligent, extremely disciplined, do you think
they were talking to those people? And if they were
talking to the vast majority of our heroic service members,
(26:49):
what were they asking them to do or not do?
They never got around to that, did they. They never
got it all specific about what they were asking them
to not obey. What kind of orders are illegal? Jason Crowe?
(27:09):
What kind of orders are you asking the sworn members
of the military not to obey? And when you say
you have their back, what do you mean by that?
Before cutting an ad like that and funding an ad
like that and putting it out there to the members
(27:30):
of our military, don't you think the people behind this
ad would have thought about that? Now? At the same time,
the people who cut this ad, they understand that in
a group as large as the American military, you're going
to have as you would in any group. Take take
(27:51):
all lawyers in America, take all anything in America. Take
the most respected profession you could think of, and I
know that wouldn't be lawyers. You are going to have
some unhinged people, just by virtue of the numbers, the math.
(28:11):
It being a human process, you're going to have some
unstable people. You're going to have some dangerous people in
any large group of humans, whether it's lawyers, the military,
fill in the blank, whatever it is. So do you
think they intended that ad to reach the vast majority
(28:33):
of our military members who are stable, emotionally stable, mentally
incredibly disciplined, extremely smart. Do you think that was intended
for them? Or do you think it was intended for
the small percentage who are unstable? And no matter who
they intended it for at the time they conceived of
(28:56):
this call for insurrection, as it will be perceived by many,
no matter how they intended it, they were certainly aware
that the group they were addressing, like any group of
humans in America, would have a small percentage of unstable people.
So what do you think the real intent is with
(29:19):
this ad. I'd love to hear from you on that.
I'd love to hear from Jason Crow on that.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
But he's too much of a coward to come on
this show. Now.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
He showed tremendous courage, physical courage in serving this country
the way he did, and he should be respected for
that immensely, But when it comes to his work as
a congressman, he's a coward and he won't come on
a little radio show like this and stand up and
defend an ad like that. In fairness to him, we
(29:50):
didn't invite him because he's never come on, but we
will invite him. Won't invite him for tomorrow in every
way we can't, And let's see if he comes on,
because people need to understand you can have people who
showed tremendous courage like Jason Crow did in serving this
country so nobly in the military. Deserves utmost respect from that,
(30:10):
and he has mine. And that same person can then
be a coward in a different endeavor in life as
he has been in the US Congress. And this ad
that he put up incredibly cowardly, incredibly irresponsible, incredibly dangerous
(30:32):
physically to our president and to hag Seth, what do
you think his real intent was here?
Speaker 2 (30:38):
I think you know you're on the Dan Kapla.
Speaker 6 (30:40):
Show and now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Thank you for that, Ryan, four fifty three lines on
fire and text exploding as well. And yes, Jason Crow
is a real coward in this ad that was just posted.
He's been a coward through much of his congressional service,
which is quite the contrast because he was a true
American hero, showing great physical courage when he served.
Speaker 2 (31:04):
In the military.
Speaker 1 (31:05):
We could use some more of that now from Jason Crow,
because what he just did puts this commander in chief
in grave danger. And no matter what his intent was
when he cut this obscenely reckless ad, he had to
know the ad would put President Trump in grave danger.
Speaker 2 (31:24):
Let's go to the phone lines. We'll start with Eerie.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Mike, who we can always count on us count on
to disagree and we're grateful for that.
Speaker 6 (31:31):
Eerie.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Welcome back to the program. Hey, thank you for shing
it a while, so you can call me worse than that.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
Lyle that's supposed to offend me. Calling me Lyle, well.
Speaker 4 (31:47):
You know, google it up. Starry Night Live David Carney,
you can, Dave mccrvey, you can. You can see if
you want to be offended or not. Hey, you post
the question what did they have in mind? And then
you went on to talk about unstable people and such.
I think that's exactly what's had in mind. They know
(32:08):
based on the cho Secretary ray uh is sharing what
Trump suggested that authority shoot people in the leg the protesters,
that he's unstable and he would very likely ask military
members to do illegal order to make an illegal orders.
(32:31):
Could stand up to him.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
Let me understand, Ary you.
Speaker 4 (32:34):
Let me understand a guy who who who represented us
in the military coward? When you did you have service?
Speaker 2 (32:47):
As I've said a million times on there, I have not.
I have not.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
I have shown guy have shown courage, including physical courage
and many other ways. And you can find anything you want, Mike,
But I'm going to get to talk to and if
you want of a back and forth, will do that.
Your childishness is usually amusing today with what Jason crow
did not so much for anybody who wasn't with us.
I prefaced my comments about Crow by saying that he
(33:11):
had shown great physical courage.
Speaker 2 (33:13):
In the military.
Speaker 1 (33:14):
But what I'm going to come back and ask Mike
is does that mean that by definition he shows courage
in his job as a congressman. So tell us that, Mike,
the fact that Jason Crow showed great physical courage and
his tremendous service to this country in special forces, does
that by definition mean that he's showing courage in his
(33:34):
service as a congressman.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
No, it does not.
Speaker 4 (33:40):
It's just physical courage. Why do you say, well, you've.
Speaker 2 (33:44):
Got to You've got to listen, You've got to.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
You've got to listen to this show, Michael, what I
said was physical emotional courage.
Speaker 2 (33:55):
As well when he served in the military.
Speaker 1 (33:57):
But getting back to my point so well, and Mike
often misquotes man Airr. He's a waste of our time
right now. The point is this that you can have
people who show great courage in one part of their
life in this case for Jason Crow and his military service,
and then be cowardly in a different part of their life,
which is his congressional service. And anybody who doesn't get
(34:19):
that distinction is either too dumb to be able to
call a show like this, or it's just willful ignorance.
Mike is not a dumb guy for Mike, it's just
wilful ignorance. But the point is this, And if Mike
had been willing to engage in a conversation, I would
have asked him, will you can see that when Jason
Crow cut this at he knew there was a real
(34:41):
risk that some unstable member of the military. Very small percentage,
but some unstable member of the military might take that
as a call to arms against what Jason Crow is
labeling to be implicitly an enemy of the.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
People in the White House.
Speaker 1 (35:00):
Crow had to know of that profound risk when he
cut that ad, right, or would Mike disagree with that?
We'll never know because Mike won't engage. Mark and Aurora,
you're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 2 (35:09):
Welcome, Hi, Thank you.
Speaker 4 (35:13):
I was hoping that they could recalled him into active
duty and court martially for disparaging the president.
Speaker 1 (35:20):
I thought, why would it be if he had legitimate
criticism or even illegitimate criticism of a president, that shouldn't
be the grounds for court martial. But should it be
once he's out of the military.
Speaker 4 (35:33):
Yeah, I think it should be. You know, he served
as an officer, he has his commission, he has is
old and he's just stick by it.
Speaker 2 (35:42):
Well, and Mark, you're welcome to stand on the other side.
Speaker 1 (35:44):
I don't do military justice cases, so I don't know
the legal answer to that.
Speaker 2 (35:49):
But Jason Crowe is a smart man.
Speaker 1 (35:51):
He must have known that he was creating additional danger,
physical danger for this president with that ad.
Speaker 2 (36:00):
By the way, what orders is he asking them to violate?
He doesn't say.
This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, the American
way is we protect our children, right, and there are
so many different ways you prove the Colorado Democratic Party
(00:22):
that the big time elected Democrats in Colorado know they
don't care at all about kids. I mean, it's mind
blowing how little they care about children. And I'm talking
about different concrete ways to prove that. They come up
almost every single day. And obviously you start with killing
them before they're born, right, We talk about that a lot,
but there are so many other ways as well. So
(00:43):
we're going to touch on one of those as we
come out of the gate today, and then we have
so much more to do throughout the show. But it
all kind of ties together, right, because what I promoted
for today was why are so many people leaving Colorado?
Why are home values in Denver dropping faster than most
of the rest of the nation. Why do we have
(01:05):
all of these very bad not only signs, but concrete
developments in this state that show slippage and set up
a very very perilous futures. Why is all of that happening?
And of course the latest on the Epstein front is
I just had to.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
Laugh my head off.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
I mean, they think we are so stupid, right, And
this fundraising email I get from Bennett before I come
on air today, Michael Bennett, I voted to release the
Jeffrey Epstein files because the truth must be known. You
know the rest of it. We just heard some of
it from Brittany Petterson at the top. Well, why didn't
you do it when Biden was president? Why Michael Bennett?
(01:44):
Why Brittany Petterson? Why didn't we hear a word from
you on this? Why weren't you pushing for the victims?
Speaker 3 (01:50):
End?
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Joe Biden? You run the DOJ release the files, Joe Biden.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
We didn't hear any of that, right, No, because the
Democrats are up to there, you know what in Epstein.
So we didn't hear a word of that. So why
didn't Michael Bennett and Brittany Petterson care about the victims?
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Then?
Speaker 1 (02:05):
When when the Democrats had control over those files? Even
from a strictly left brain logical.
Speaker 5 (02:11):
I know that's tough to apply to the left, but
I'm trying to figure the calculus out here, Dan, of
they know a whole bunch of Democrats are going to
be implicated here, and we just got the tip of
the iceberg with this Delegate Stacy Plaskett who is texting
with Jeffrey Epstein during the agressional hearing Bill Clinton.
Speaker 6 (02:29):
Looks like maybe Hockey and Jeffries.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
I'm not hearing about any Republicans tied to Epstein. They're hoping, Dan,
it's like pin the tail of the donkey that somehow
this Hail Mary pass they'll connect and Donald Trump will
be implicated in the Epstein files.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
Well, but they know that isn't gonna happen because they've
had the Epstein files for years, right. But what they're
doing is is again and Trump's ray when you compare
it to Russia, Russia, Russia, because that was all lot
That was all a big lie that was used to
undermine his administration. Here, they know there's no there there,
or it would have been out there a long time ago.
They know there's not even enough in that file that
(03:04):
they could come up with a lie about Trump that
they could have tried to sell for a while. No,
but what they're doing is they're using their media arm,
which is most of the mass media, to now try
to fill the air waves with this so they wash
away you know, Trump's accomplishments, try to prevent him from
getting momentum, try to get am angry.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
So that's what that's all about.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
So I think the only way this hurts the only
way this hurts President Trump long term is personally, and
I feel badly about that after everything he's been through,
the coup attempts, the false allegation, the Banana Republic law fare,
all the efforts to destroy him personally because they couldn't
beat him at the polls.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
I feel bad for him as a.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
Person that he has to go through this, But politically,
if there's any long term impact, it's going to backfire
on the Democrats coyote E Wiley Coyote and the Roadrunner
kind of stuff, as this almost all always dus. But
I just feel bad for Trump personally. Whoever ends up
running against Bennett, I sure.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Hope they point this out.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
Hey, Michael Bennett didn't care about those victims all those
years your party had control over those files, did you know?
I hope that at least makes its way into the
conversation and hicking Loooper too. By the way, did you
see that video of Hicklooper. I didn't pull the sound
because there's nothing interesting for anybody to look at.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
But some reporter pinned him down on you know.
Speaker 1 (04:29):
Whether the shutdown was worth it, and he mumbled a
few words.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
The point of that video was the video, not the audio.
People could hear.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
It just looks like he's done, literally that the phantom
of the Senate. Yeah, he's got the big Overcote Island,
the big lapels up and you can barely see his face.
And I like the guy personally, so none of this
is personal. But the man should not be in the
US Senate. Let's be very grateful if we have to
(04:58):
have a Democrat, Let's be very grateful it's John hicken
Hooper and Michael Bennett because they get nothing done, nothing.
They are like air, they are like ghosts. Can you
imagine if we had one of these young firebrand socialist
lefties holding that Senate seat down, there'd be a lot
more damage done. What we need is a Republican. So
you have a Republican you know, majority in the Senate.
(05:19):
But yeah, wow, we're lucky to have these two do nothings.
Speaker 5 (05:22):
Did Hick turn to the report and go, you should
be protecting.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Me from I think he's lost the energy. Do we
have that sound somewhere? I'm looking right now.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
Those are new to the area, He said the quiet
part out loud. When KUSA was interviewing him. Do you
remember who that was? Was that Kyle Clark or Marshall?
I can't remember who, but they're interviewing him about and
ethics complaint.
Speaker 6 (05:45):
Oh no, I got it.
Speaker 1 (05:47):
Looper says stuff like this one more time, that all
day stuff like this. How do you even say that
to the press. Well, you say to the press because
that's what they've always done for you.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
There are some noble accepts. It's like Sean Boyd doesn't
do that for people over at Casey. And there are
some noble exceptions everywhere. But yeah, so, and how do
the Dems not revolt against ticking Looper and against Bennett?
You know, the ultimate royalty, the ultimate do nothing royalty,
the ultimate silver spoon guy. He goes handed this Senate
(06:20):
seat and then lux into keeping it, and now he's
standing in the school out store. We could have our
first Senator of color tomorrow and Joe Nogose, well, ideologically
he's wrong on all the big stuff. Joanah Goose is
a very intelligent, competent person, just wrong on the big issues.
And we could have Joona Goose as an appointed US
(06:42):
Senator tomorrow. We have a Britney Patterson female who again
you know, she's an intelligent person, wrong on all the
big issues.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
We could have her first female senator tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (06:52):
Who is stopping Colorado from having its first female senator
or center of color. It's Michael Bennett, just like Jared
poulis stop Colorado from having the first woman governor.
Speaker 5 (07:02):
Bingo, That's an interesting comparison, Dan, and I've got to
ask you. You talk about these two guys that are
kind of bumps on a log don't get anything done,
which is to our bests to bump some blow Bennett
and Hickenlooper.
Speaker 6 (07:13):
But let's say let's play this out. Worst case scenario.
Speaker 4 (07:16):
Michael Bennett, who's next governor and he appoints Joe and
the Goose.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
Do you do you think that deal's done?
Speaker 5 (07:24):
I think so, but I'm just playing this out for
you in this sense that would we be better or
worse off with the Goose in that Senate seat versus
Bennett much worse off, worse and.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Why he's going to be much more effective?
Speaker 5 (07:35):
You thinking, do you think's further left than Bennett?
Speaker 2 (07:38):
And then Hickenlooper and the Goose they're also far left?
How do you go any further less? It's just a
different dressing put on it.
Speaker 5 (07:45):
He like the squad Left is Britney Peterson the squad Left?
Speaker 6 (07:49):
Are they that far away?
Speaker 1 (07:50):
You are asking great questions, But let me ask you this,
how would you distinguish on policy? They dress it up better.
They dressed it up better. They're not as blatant as
about it. But but you look at Mike Johnston. Mike
Johnston's made more radical statements than Mom Donnie. When it
comes to fighting ice. Johnston said he'd send Denver police
out to the county line to fight federal well, to
(08:12):
stop federal law enforcement. He'd put fifty thousand citizens in
the street to stop federal law enforcement. He dresses it
up better than Mom Donnie. He is just an open socialist.
Speaker 6 (08:21):
Good point.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
But what I'm saying is, yeah, no Goose is going
to be far more effective because he's competent and he's
high energy, and he knows how to get things done.
The problem is he gets bad things done because he's
ideologically wrong.
Speaker 6 (08:37):
Correct.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
No, Goose is another one of these guys who must
know that the stuff he's supporting is wrong backwards. But
he ended up being a Democrat, so this is the
price he pays to get power in the Democratic Party.
He'd be a great conservative if he had conservative ideology.
And yeah, no and same thing. But hopefully somebody will
(08:59):
beat both those guys. I know it's an uphill battle.
I know it's really tough. One thing we know for sure.
I look at this text that came in right before
the show, Dan Barb Kirkmarer equals rhino and then it
goes on from there. Listen, if we're going to do
this again, and I don't know if this is this
texture represents overall popular views, but if this is going
(09:20):
to once again be another election cycle where the GOP
eats itself and divides between the quote establishment and the
quote grass roots. And I know people in both camps
who are wonderful and they agree on ninety five percent
of everything. But if we're going to have those lines again,
and we're gonna have people from one of those camps
say I'm not going to vote for a candidate from
(09:42):
the other. Just save the money, don't even run a candidate,
because just the math is pretty simple. There is zero
chance to win unless you have an extremely united Republican
Party and Republican base, and even then it's going to.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Be really hard when we come back.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
Just more proof the Democrats is flat out liar hypocrites
to wait too kind of term. We have a five
alarm fire in Colorado and it is sexual abuse of
children by teachers. Now, the vast majority of teachers are
wonderful and they're heroes and they never even dream of
sexually assaulting a student, but we have a lot of
(10:19):
sexual assault of students going on. And where's Polis, Where's Johnston,
where's Bennett? Where's the Democratic Party? It's no five alarm
fire to them because it gets where they get all
their money and their boots on the ground.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
That's right, the teachers' union.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
So it's about time somebody in Colorado stands up and
calls them on that, because we got another one. I
want to run by in Have you noticed Ryan there
appears to be more and more of female teachers sexually
abusing male students. Why do you think we're seeing more
of that? You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 6 (10:51):
And now back to the Dan Taplas Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
Oh we do need another hero. That's what it's good
to take for the GOP.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
That GOP is going to need that special candidate who
can overcome all this.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
You know that the cards fall just right.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
Really well run campaign, they break through, they win statewide office,
and then they've got a face, got a face to
the GOP in Colorado?
Speaker 2 (11:13):
Right now?
Speaker 1 (11:13):
Who is the face of the GOP in Colorado? Let
me throw that out to you. Three or three seven
one three eight two five five the number text d
an five seven seven three nine. Who is the face
of the GOP in Colorado?
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Ryan?
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Before I read you the latest story of a Colorado
teacher sexually assaulting a Colorado student.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
And why is this not a five alarm fire?
Speaker 1 (11:36):
Now this we know this, we know for certain if
this was God forbid a Catholic priest who had sexually
assaulted someone, it would be headlines every newscast, every paper.
The Democrats had never stopped talking about it. And one
is too many, no matter who does it. And as
somebody who is so profoundly grateful to be Catholic and
who have gone to Catholic schools in a Catholic high
(11:57):
schools seminary, I can tell you that that one is
too many, and the fact the vast majority of priests
are heroes, one is too many. And I'm not trying
in any way, shape or form diminish any sexual assault
that has occurred by any priest anywhere.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
I can tell you all day, improve it all day.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
That doesn't reflect on your typical priest, and it certainly
doesn't reflect on the Catholic Church as a whole.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
But one is too many. It's demonic.
Speaker 1 (12:23):
So why why is it not a five alarm fire
in Colorado that we have so many students being sexually
assaulted by teachers, same drill. It's no reflection on teachers
as a whole. The vast majority of teachers would never
dream of anything like that, never in a million years.
But why the different treatment. Shouldn't sex assault on a
(12:45):
kid be just as horrific no matter who commits it. Ah, Well,
and it's committed by somebody from the Democrat Party's power base,
then yeah, no, you just have to That can't possibly
be a five alarm fire, right, well it should be.
Speaker 6 (13:00):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
Here's one the latest.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
One teacher accused of sexually assaulting students who sought help
from her for mental health. And here's another one where
it's a female teacher. It seemed to me and no
matter what the gender involved, and there are only two,
so it's got to be one of the other, male
or female, no matter what the gender involved, it's always horrific,
it's always demonic. But we seem to be hearing more
(13:25):
and more of women sexually assaulting students, female teachers.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
What do you think is behind that?
Speaker 1 (13:31):
Three oh three seven one three eight two five five
text d an five seven seven three nine. This one
out of Douglas County, Colorado, a teacher is accused of
sexually assaulting a student who sought help from her for
mental health.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Teresa Waylin WHA l I n.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
Twenty eight was arrested in charged with sexual assault internet
exploitation of a child in stalking. Cam gh reported as
students said they had an inappropriate sexual relationship with Whelan
during the twenty three to twenty four school year. Student
was struggling with mental health issues and started spending time
with Whalan after school in Whalan's office. According to arrest EFFI,
(14:09):
David Wayland is accused of sexually assaulting the student, and
the two shared photos and communicators communications over snap for
about fourteen months. Whalan also drove the student to and
from school for most of that time, and the student's
parents were unaware Whalan became ended the relationship with Whalan
(14:31):
because they were interested in dating a classmate. Why is
there no gender in this story? Why is the gender
of the victim not identified? I understand the name. Not
identifying the name?
Speaker 6 (14:41):
Good point?
Speaker 2 (14:42):
Why not the gender?
Speaker 5 (14:43):
Very good point? And what do you think that means? Well, Dan,
you would know this better than me. But one day
I think I might. If a teacher takes a special
unique interest in your child parents, your antenna.
Speaker 6 (14:56):
Should be up right.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
Yeah? Things have changed, right, definitely? Yeah? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (15:01):
I mean when I was a kid, teachers would take
an interest in us. I traveled with the teacher of
mine and there's nobody better than I at it. There
was absolutely nothing inappropriate, quite the opposite. It was a
tremendous mentorship relationship. And and that priest was at our
wedding you know, a great positive force for good in
(15:22):
my life.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
But it was a different era. Nobody would think twice
about that.
Speaker 1 (15:24):
Correct, Yeah, yeah, But why don't we have a gender
in this story?
Speaker 2 (15:28):
What's up there? It's a good point that, well does
that mean it's a female student?
Speaker 6 (15:33):
Well, you said suspect was Whalen And where did this
take place?
Speaker 2 (15:36):
She's a suspects a woman. They've got a picture.
Speaker 6 (15:38):
Where is this taking place? Against the location of the venue.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
It just says Douglas County that I have a guy
for you, and his name is George.
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Brockler heard him. Really funny guy. We got some clubs
from him for a really funny guy.
Speaker 1 (15:54):
Yeah, no, we yeah, it'll text George during the breakdown.
But we don't know whether the victim here was a
guy or a girl, and it's just as awful either way. Right,
But we see so much more of the female of
female teachers sexually assaulting children. Hey, headline just popping up
(16:15):
for those who own Nvidia Navidia beats earnings expectations amid
AI bubble fears, so have to dig deeper into the story.
I'll do that during the break but at least then
they're an awful lot of people with Navidia, and they're
four to one case. This is going to be a
particularly important.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
Report today.
Speaker 1 (16:35):
So hopefully that headline holds up and they beat it
by enough, because you see so many companies now right
that they're beating with their earnings and they go down
four percent because they didn't beat enough. But we'll find out.
We'll get the details on the video and report back
to you. On the other side. If you're wondering what
the fuss is about with Nvidia, it's a chip maker that's.
Speaker 2 (16:58):
Done really, really well.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
A lot of people have, you know, had thousand percent
or two thousand percent or more gains with Navidia, and and.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
So they have it in their four o one case.
But why so much more? Sex assault of.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Male students off in middle school sometimes high school by
female teachers.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Anybody have an explanation for that?
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Three oh three seven one three eight two five five
d A N five seven seven three nine Is it
better reporting?
Speaker 2 (17:29):
Is it better reporting?
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Back in the day, Ryan, did did you ever have
a female teacher do anything inappropriate with you?
Speaker 2 (17:36):
No?
Speaker 1 (17:37):
Male teacher, No, not at all? Okay me, either male
or female. I had that.
Speaker 2 (17:43):
You know, we blow guy when I was in the
wee Blows the ten year old boy scouts now.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
In the Pennanty, Well, I was actually it's called it
was called we blows back then.
Speaker 6 (17:54):
We blows wobble, but they don't fall down.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
What do you mean we below?
Speaker 5 (17:59):
We both said, even, well, it's there's an extra syllable
in there that you're missing. Well, the way you're saying
to people misconstrue it.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Okay, Sorry, it's been a minute, and I did leave
the wee Blows under a less than pleasant circumstances.
Speaker 6 (18:13):
I don't think I've ever heard this one though.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Yeah, but that was a day where you would never
dream of telling your parents. No, oh not back in
that era.
Speaker 6 (18:21):
Really.
Speaker 2 (18:22):
Oh yeah, yeah, my dad.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
My dad was a six foot three two d and
four times would have killed the police officer.
Speaker 2 (18:29):
They never would have found the body. Oh yeah, you know,
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (18:32):
My dad, hero hero cop forty years main streets of Chicago.
Always got it done, but never had the fire's gun,
which is no criticism anybody you ever had to just that.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Kind of cop.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
But but no, I yeah, I would not have ended well,
it didn't end well.
Speaker 2 (18:51):
The guy's been in the state Penn Forever you're on
the Dan Kapla.
Speaker 6 (18:54):
Show, you're listening to the Dan Camplust Show podcasts.
Speaker 7 (19:02):
Intersections across the city might seem like any other. Research
found what makes them different.
Speaker 5 (19:07):
And we found that there were differences in trauma mechanisms
at different levels of neighborhood severity.
Speaker 7 (19:12):
The doctors behind the studies, doctor Myers and doctor Acker
with Children's Hospital Colorado, saying they identified what makes intersections
more dangerous. They started by looking at what's called the
neighborhood deprivation Index, a tool that measures how disadvantaged neighborhoods
are on factors like income, education, or employment.
Speaker 3 (19:32):
And so what we were able to find by focusing
first on Dever County, just as a proof of concept
of the methodology that you know, there were specific intersections
with high levels of deprivation at the neighborhood level and
then high rates of injury, of high rates of kids
getting hit by cars.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
Yeah, and the point of this story is it just
goes back to Democrat leadership in Colorado. They don't care
about kits, They just don't care about children, period. And
part of it just goes back to their radical, far left,
secular worldview.
Speaker 2 (20:04):
They just don't value human life as much.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
And so when you start out that way, then at
that point, obviously you're not going to value children as
much because it's all transactional. Human life doesn't have any
of this inherent value or dignity. People who have a
worldview where every human life has value in dignity, well,
then at that point that the young, vulnerable human life
(20:28):
is going to need even more protective But that's not
how the people who own and operate the Democratic Party
see the world. That Democratic Party is long gone. This
is just another example. What it means is that you've
got a lot more poor kids, you know, being hit
by cars in their neighborhoods. And why well you can
if the story goes on from there, you can see that, Okay,
(20:50):
those dangerous intersections, they don't get the same attention. And
we talked about this other data out of Colorado before
in the Denver metro area. But if you live in
the wrong neighborhood, if you live in one of the
neighborhoods that's economically disadvantage, your life expectancy is going to
be up to ten years less. That's what Democrat rule
(21:12):
does for you. And that ties into a bigger issue
we're talking about on the show today on the heels
of yesterday, Why Denver? Why Denver losing ground on property
values twice as fast as most of the country. And
today we're going to talk about Colorado leaking oil. You know,
all the people moving out of Colorado, the population getting smaller,
(21:32):
and what does that mean for the future. Why is
it happening? So you can see the trend line for
this stick. And the only thing that could cause his
trend line is leftist rule, because we've been blessed with
one of the most perfect spots in the world. So
that's what's going on there. Now. It ties into our
current topic, which is why aren't the Democrats who controlled
(21:52):
this state declaring a five alarm fire over all the
teacher sex abuse, which is no reflection on the fast
number of.
Speaker 2 (21:59):
Tea teachers out there, but it is a five alarm fire.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
And if you had the same situation going on, God forbid,
with Catholic priests, you can beat. The Democratic Party would
declare it a five alarm fire, but their media arm
and the party itself nothing to see here all these
When when do you ever open the paper and not
read a new story about a teacher arrested for sexual
abuse of a child? How often does that happen in
(22:23):
the course of a week for you? And then for
everyone who is caught, how many are not caught? What
do you think that ratio is? You tell me three
or three seven one three eight two five five the
number text d A N five seven seven three nine.
For every child who ends up reporting their abuser, the
(22:45):
criminal who is sexually assaulting them, how many other children don't?
What do you think that ratio? As I know, we're
blessed with a lot of people in the audience for education,
law enforcement. You probably have the study at your fingertips.
What do you think that ratio is? Anecdotally extrapolating other factors,
I would say it's at least ten to one, but
I wouldn't be surprised if experts called the show and
(23:07):
said it's one hundred to one. Now want to shift
gears for a second. Everybody knows this is wrong. You know,
it's like obsenator. You know when you see it. As
soon as you hear this, you'll know it's wrong. But
what do you think? What do you think these insurrection
flirters are really up to, including Jason Crowe. Why do
you think they did this knowing that immediately that there
(23:29):
would be all these appropriate outcries that they're calling for
an insurrection among the members of our military. Think they
knew that was coming. Why do you think they did this?
What's their real endgame? I'm Senator Alissa Stockins, Senator Mark Kelly,
Representative Chris Stluzio, Congressman Mattie Goodlanders, Representative Chrissy Hulahan, Congressman
Jason Crowe.
Speaker 8 (23:49):
I was a captain in the United States Navy.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
Former CIA officer, former Navy, former paratrooper and Army ranger.
Speaker 6 (23:55):
Former intelligence officer.
Speaker 2 (23:56):
Former Air Force.
Speaker 8 (23:57):
We want to speak directly to members of the military
and the.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
Intelligence community to take risks each day keep Americans safe.
Speaker 2 (24:04):
We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
Speaker 8 (24:10):
This administration is pitting our uniform military.
Speaker 6 (24:13):
And intelligence community professionals.
Speaker 8 (24:15):
Against American citizens like us. You all swore an.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Oath to protect and then this constitution.
Speaker 1 (24:21):
Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming
from abroad, but from right here at home.
Speaker 8 (24:26):
Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (24:30):
You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 6 (24:32):
You must refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 5 (24:34):
No one has to carry out orders that violate the
law or our constitution.
Speaker 8 (24:39):
We know this is hard and that it's a difficult
time to be a public servant.
Speaker 2 (24:42):
But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, or Navy,
the Air.
Speaker 8 (24:45):
Force, your vigilance is critical.
Speaker 2 (24:48):
And know that we have your back, because now more
than ever.
Speaker 5 (24:52):
The American people need you.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
We need you to stand up for our laws, our.
Speaker 8 (24:55):
Constitution, and who we are as Americans.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
Go give up, don't give up.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
Don't give up, don't give up the ship.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
What do you think that was really all about? What
do you think that was really all about?
Speaker 2 (25:14):
Right there?
Speaker 1 (25:14):
Now understand the context, the people who decided to do this,
and we've never seen anything like it before, at least
in modern American politics. Those people understood that this president
was almost assassinated twice.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
If not for divine intervention. In my view, anybody else
would have to.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
Argue one in a trillion chance that he turns his
head at that precise millisecond he is assassinated in that
Butler field. The people who recorded that know that they
know he could have easily been assassinated with the second
attempt at the golf course. So, knowing that this president
(26:02):
has already been the target of two very very real
assassination attempts, why do you think they did that? And then,
as you endeavor to answer that question for yourself, ask
yourself what innocent explanations are there? What were they If
(26:25):
they're trying to.
Speaker 6 (26:26):
Talk to.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
The vast majority of our service members who are extremely stable,
emotionally and mentally, extremely intelligent, extremely disciplined, do you think
they were talking to those people? And if they were
talking to the vast majority of our heroic service members,
(26:49):
what were they asking them to do or not do?
They never got around to that, did they. They never
got it all specific about what they were asking them
to not obey. What kind of orders are illegal? Jason Crowe?
(27:09):
What kind of orders are you asking the sworn members
of the military not to obey? And when you say
you have their back, what do you mean by that?
Before cutting an ad like that and funding an ad
like that and putting it out there to the members
(27:30):
of our military, don't you think the people behind this
ad would have thought about that? Now? At the same time,
the people who cut this ad, they understand that in
a group as large as the American military, you're going
to have as you would in any group. Take take
(27:51):
all lawyers in America, take all anything in America. Take
the most respected profession you could think of, and I
know that wouldn't be lawyers. You are going to have
some unhinged people, just by virtue of the numbers, the math.
(28:11):
It being a human process, you're going to have some
unstable people. You're going to have some dangerous people in
any large group of humans, whether it's lawyers, the military,
fill in the blank, whatever it is. So do you
think they intended that ad to reach the vast majority
(28:33):
of our military members who are stable, emotionally stable, mentally
incredibly disciplined, extremely smart. Do you think that was intended
for them? Or do you think it was intended for
the small percentage who are unstable? And no matter who
they intended it for at the time they conceived of
(28:56):
this call for insurrection, as it will be perceived by many,
no matter how they intended it, they were certainly aware
that the group they were addressing, like any group of
humans in America, would have a small percentage of unstable people.
So what do you think the real intent is with
(29:19):
this ad. I'd love to hear from you on that.
I'd love to hear from Jason Crow on that.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
But he's too much of a coward to come on
this show. Now.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
He showed tremendous courage, physical courage in serving this country
the way he did, and he should be respected for
that immensely, But when it comes to his work as
a congressman, he's a coward and he won't come on
a little radio show like this and stand up and
defend an ad like that. In fairness to him, we
(29:50):
didn't invite him because he's never come on, but we
will invite him. Won't invite him for tomorrow in every
way we can't, And let's see if he comes on,
because people need to understand you can have people who
showed tremendous courage like Jason Crow did in serving this
country so nobly in the military. Deserves utmost respect from that,
(30:10):
and he has mine. And that same person can then
be a coward in a different endeavor in life as
he has been in the US Congress. And this ad
that he put up incredibly cowardly, incredibly irresponsible, incredibly dangerous
(30:32):
physically to our president and to hag Seth, what do
you think his real intent was here?
Speaker 2 (30:38):
I think you know you're on the Dan Kapla.
Speaker 6 (30:40):
Show and now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Thank you for that, Ryan, four fifty three lines on
fire and text exploding as well. And yes, Jason Crow
is a real coward in this ad that was just posted.
He's been a coward through much of his congressional service,
which is quite the contrast because he was a true
American hero, showing great physical courage when he served.
Speaker 2 (31:04):
In the military.
Speaker 1 (31:05):
We could use some more of that now from Jason Crow,
because what he just did puts this commander in chief
in grave danger. And no matter what his intent was
when he cut this obscenely reckless ad, he had to
know the ad would put President Trump in grave danger.
Speaker 2 (31:24):
Let's go to the phone lines. We'll start with Eerie.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Mike, who we can always count on us count on
to disagree and we're grateful for that.
Speaker 6 (31:31):
Eerie.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Welcome back to the program. Hey, thank you for shing
it a while, so you can call me worse than that.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
Lyle that's supposed to offend me. Calling me Lyle, well.
Speaker 4 (31:47):
You know, google it up. Starry Night Live David Carney,
you can, Dave mccrvey, you can. You can see if
you want to be offended or not. Hey, you post
the question what did they have in mind? And then
you went on to talk about unstable people and such.
I think that's exactly what's had in mind. They know
(32:08):
based on the cho Secretary ray uh is sharing what
Trump suggested that authority shoot people in the leg the protesters,
that he's unstable and he would very likely ask military
members to do illegal order to make an illegal orders.
(32:31):
Could stand up to him.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
Let me understand, Ary you.
Speaker 4 (32:34):
Let me understand a guy who who who represented us
in the military coward? When you did you have service?
Speaker 2 (32:47):
As I've said a million times on there, I have not.
I have not.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
I have shown guy have shown courage, including physical courage
and many other ways. And you can find anything you want, Mike,
But I'm going to get to talk to and if
you want of a back and forth, will do that.
Your childishness is usually amusing today with what Jason crow
did not so much for anybody who wasn't with us.
I prefaced my comments about Crow by saying that he
(33:11):
had shown great physical courage.
Speaker 2 (33:13):
In the military.
Speaker 1 (33:14):
But what I'm going to come back and ask Mike
is does that mean that by definition he shows courage
in his job as a congressman. So tell us that, Mike,
the fact that Jason Crow showed great physical courage and
his tremendous service to this country in special forces, does
that by definition mean that he's showing courage in his
(33:34):
service as a congressman.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
No, it does not.
Speaker 4 (33:40):
It's just physical courage. Why do you say, well, you've.
Speaker 2 (33:44):
Got to You've got to listen, You've got to.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
You've got to listen to this show, Michael, what I
said was physical emotional courage.
Speaker 2 (33:55):
As well when he served in the military.
Speaker 1 (33:57):
But getting back to my point so well, and Mike
often misquotes man Airr. He's a waste of our time
right now. The point is this that you can have
people who show great courage in one part of their
life in this case for Jason Crow and his military service,
and then be cowardly in a different part of their life,
which is his congressional service. And anybody who doesn't get
(34:19):
that distinction is either too dumb to be able to
call a show like this, or it's just willful ignorance.
Mike is not a dumb guy for Mike, it's just
wilful ignorance. But the point is this, And if Mike
had been willing to engage in a conversation, I would
have asked him, will you can see that when Jason
Crow cut this at he knew there was a real
(34:41):
risk that some unstable member of the military. Very small percentage,
but some unstable member of the military might take that
as a call to arms against what Jason Crow is
labeling to be implicitly an enemy of the.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
People in the White House.
Speaker 1 (35:00):
Crow had to know of that profound risk when he
cut that ad, right, or would Mike disagree with that?
We'll never know because Mike won't engage. Mark and Aurora,
you're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 2 (35:09):
Welcome, Hi, Thank you.
Speaker 4 (35:13):
I was hoping that they could recalled him into active
duty and court martially for disparaging the president.
Speaker 1 (35:20):
I thought, why would it be if he had legitimate
criticism or even illegitimate criticism of a president, that shouldn't
be the grounds for court martial. But should it be
once he's out of the military.
Speaker 4 (35:33):
Yeah, I think it should be. You know, he served
as an officer, he has his commission, he has is
old and he's just stick by it.
Speaker 2 (35:42):
Well, and Mark, you're welcome to stand on the other side.
Speaker 1 (35:44):
I don't do military justice cases, so I don't know
the legal answer to that.
Speaker 2 (35:49):
But Jason Crowe is a smart man.
Speaker 1 (35:51):
He must have known that he was creating additional danger,
physical danger for this president with that ad.
Speaker 2 (36:00):
By the way, what orders is he asking them to violate?
He doesn't say.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com