President Trump gives illegal aliens a very straightforward, binary offer - take a free flight to wherever else you want to, or get deported and lose all of your property and possessions.
Since we're all paying for 'gender-affirming care' in the form of reassignment surgeries for minors, which body parts are you willing to fund?a
Since we're all paying for 'gender-affirming care' in the form of reassignment surgeries for minors, which body parts are you willing to fund?a
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Perfect day to
fight for the American way. Wow, one of the nicest
weekends I think in Colorado history. How perfect it fell
(00:21):
on Mother's Day. So hopefully you had an absolutely phenomenal
Mother's Day weekend and the week off to a great
start as well. So and so many things to celebrate, right,
I mean, Trump obviously continuing his role on multiple fronts.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
Let's hope that that's about to lead.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
To some really serious peace negotiations between Ukraine and aggressor Russia.
And we'll talk about that more as the meat starts
to fall onto or off of that bone. But I
got to get your take on this right out of
the break, because you know, we have a lot of
interesting stuff pop up around here over the decades. But
this business today with President Trump not only saying he
(01:01):
wants to accept this four hundred million dollar aircraft quote
gift from Qatar, but calling stupid people who don't want
him to and again it's not him, right, it's the
Department of Defense.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
This is not for President Trump personally.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
But I really want to get your take on that,
because obviously, I don't think, respectfully there's been anybody on
air more fear to President Trump than I've been, you know,
just calling balls and strikes, you know, calling the good,
mentioning the bad when it happens. But I just think
this is either a really interesting play by him trying
(01:37):
to accomplish something else.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
I e.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
Ryan's theory is trying to put pressure on Boeing, which
I think is a really solid theory. Boeing way behind
on the new Air Force One, or he's got some
other play. It's hard for me to believe that he
really does just intend on the US Department of Defense
accepting this this aircraft, which will then serve as Air
Force one until Boeing gets the.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
New Air Force One done.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
Hard for me to believe that that's the ultimate intent here.
So love to get your thoughts assuming that is what
he intends to do. You think it's right or wrong? Hey,
is there some other country that you would accept this
kind of aircraft from? For me, it's it's blank no
to Qatar. That's easy, right, There's no way in the world,
(02:21):
this tremendous American symbol of pride and superiority and success
should be something given to us by Qatar. We are
not a beggar nation. And Katar obviously has its hands dirty,
you know, I think, with various forms of terrorism support.
On the other hand, if France wanted to give it
to us for saving France in the free world in
(02:42):
World War II, you bet, just like the Statue of Liberty,
that would be a positive symbol. But no, no way,
in my opinion, to Qatar. And hard for me to
imagine that's really what the president intends in the end,
but maybe he does. Three or three someone three A
two five five text d A N seven seven three
nine Dan. I personally would not trust any aircraft from
(03:03):
any other nation at this point in time.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
And fair enough, right, fair enough? And do you think
that was Ryan?
Speaker 1 (03:11):
Those stories out there, and I'm not giving him any credibility.
I'm just intrigued. There are so many Now do you
think that was cocaine on the train?
Speaker 2 (03:18):
Was that on the train? Oh? Mccron macrone and the crew.
Speaker 3 (03:22):
I default to the Okham's razor explanation that it was
a tissue. They might have been. I don't know. I
can't jump to that conclusion. No, just Willie Nelly, nor
can I. But anyway, coming back to aircraft, Yeah, no,
that that's a fair point, right is I mean, in
your suretack, wouldn't accept an aircraft from Qatar? And you know,
(03:43):
an earlier callers suggested the texture pardon me, you know what, you.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
Have a felon, and let's extend it. Would you have
a home burglary, home invasion felon put in your security system?
Speaker 4 (03:56):
No?
Speaker 1 (03:57):
And so no, it just doesn't make sense on any level.
And Trump obviously super smart guy. So I just think
there's something else in play here, some other intention. But
the President very very strong in his comments here. Let's
start with this one.
Speaker 5 (04:14):
Now, I could be a stupid person to say, oh, no,
we don't want a free plane. We get free things
that we'll take one too. And it helps us out
because again we're talking about we have forty year old aircraft.
The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those
planes to keep them tippy top is astronomical. You wouldn't
even believe it. So I think it's a great gesture
(04:35):
from Qatar. I appreciate it very much.
Speaker 1 (04:38):
Yeah, I know that we really need a new aircraft, etc.
But that doesn't answer the questions that I raised. And
I've got to think this is like an eighty twenty
issue at least in America. Americans don't want air force
one that simple of pride to be donated to us
by Katar of all countries. So and by the way,
for those doubting the pronunciation, And I'm not the best
(05:01):
at pronunciations, says you know, But I know I'm right
on that one because Amy and I, through a combination
of canceled flights all over the Western Hemisphere, ended up
in Qatar on our anniversary.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
And so it was cool. The hotel was cool, the
whole thing was cool.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
But I do know how to pronounce it because I
heard them pronounce it, and I would think they would
know when it's Katar.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
What other text do we have coming in on this? Dan,
you got to be kidding?
Speaker 1 (05:28):
Okasee swept the Grizzlies, are you nots They're not that
great a team that from Eric?
Speaker 2 (05:34):
Eric, you great American mark my words.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
If the Nuggets don't knock him out, the next team
will Dan Trump already owns his own plane. He also
donates his presidential salary back to the government. If he
were to donate a plane to the government to be
used as Air Force one for the next forty years,
how do you suppose the left would respond, he's negotiating. Interesting, Well,
this comes back to the point that I led with earlier,
(05:59):
which is, hey, none of this, none of this is
for the president's personal benefit. That's why I was so
happy to hear him go after ABC, particularly since look
at this guy, look at this guy.
Speaker 2 (06:11):
That this is a guy who gave.
Speaker 1 (06:13):
Up a life of comfort and ease to jump into
this meat grinder, and it very easily could have should have,
I think, except for divine intervention cost him his life
in that field in Butler and all the other torture
he's been put through.
Speaker 2 (06:26):
So no, none of this is about his personal comfort.
Speaker 1 (06:31):
And I was mentioned to Ryan, I think we've all
heard this from our moms and or dad's growing up.
You know, we were not created for comfort. We were
created for courage. And Trump embodies that he left a
life of kind of ultimate comfort. So no, this is
not about his own comfort. I just think if he's
serious about it. It's a rare mistake. You know, the
(06:54):
guy has been historically brilliant. Every now and then, he
has an unforced era like any human. I think he
has fewer of them than most presidents and far more successes.
But I think the meme that he recirculated, retweeted the
meme of him as Pope was an unforrecedare. I think
it was wrong and should not have been done. At
(07:15):
the same time, you look in the plus category, he
has been the greatest president otherwise for Catholics in my
lifetime by multiples. I don't think there's any other president
in my short lifetime who's been half as good for
Catholics and the vast majority of them. Trump's one hundred
times better for Catholics. But he's not perfect. And if
(07:36):
he's serious about this plane, I think that's a rare
unforced error. But he was right to go after this
ABC reporter.
Speaker 2 (07:45):
Saying, people who view that luxury jet as a personal
to get to you, why not leave it.
Speaker 4 (07:50):
Your NBC fake plus only ABC?
Speaker 5 (07:53):
Well, a few of you would, let me tell you,
you should be embarrassed to asking the question.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
They're giving us a free jen I.
Speaker 5 (08:02):
Could say, no, no, no, don't give us I want
to pay you a billion or four hundred million or
whatever it is.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Well, I just say thank you very much.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
Yeah, And he's right to call out APC there for
the reasons I mentioned a gift to him. And it
may be Ryan, I've got another theory, got a new theory.
It may be that what I view as a mistake
here comes from a very good place other than one
of the pressure points on Boeing, etc. That you've suggested,
(08:36):
and that is Listen, this president is obviously laser focused
right now on saving this nation money because he gets
I mean the stuff he's been saying, Musk has been saying,
all that stuff is true. You know, we are headed
for this financial cliff, kind of a sleep at the
wheel denials. Not just a river in Egypt, right, the
thin veneer of civilization. There is a lot of trouble
(08:58):
out there, and it's not far down the road. Trump
could have just kicked the can and and you know,
had this sugar high through his four years. But but
he's stepping up for the country. And so it may
be that he is so focused right now on saving
every possible dollar that that that's what's driving what I
would views this mistake with Katar and yes, we hey
(09:19):
we've got to save four hundred million, We've got to
save a lot more than that. We got to save
four hundred billion. We got to save a lot more
than that. But there are some things that are not
for sale. And I think having another nation like Qatar
provide our air force one, yeah, I think that that
should rise above these financial considerations.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
What do you think? Three or three?
Speaker 1 (09:39):
Someone three eight two five five text d A N
five seven seven three nine. Then I want to come
back to Bill maher and is really kind of demonic,
insidious attack on the new Pope.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 5 (09:57):
You know those are all gout for named Sam Sneed.
Did you ever hear what eighty two Ternament was a
great golfer and he had a motto, when they give
you a putt, you say thank you very much, you
pick up your ball, and you walk to the next hole.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
A lot of people are stupid.
Speaker 5 (10:12):
They say no, no, I insist start putting it, and
then they put it and they miss it and their
partner gets angry at him.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
You know what, remember that sam sneed.
Speaker 4 (10:22):
When they give you a putt, you pick it up
and you walk to the.
Speaker 1 (10:24):
Next hole and you say, and I've been that guy.
He said, no, I'm going to put that. But now,
are we ever going to have a funnier president?
Speaker 2 (10:32):
I think of the joy we're in for it for
the next three years, three and a half years more
than that.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
But he knows golf. Oh he knows golf. He definitely
knows golf. But he was on an absolute role today.
But we tend to be seeing that most days. Right,
how about this one on his friend with Ozembic.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
I mean, I'll tell you a story.
Speaker 5 (10:52):
Friend of mine who's a business man, very very very
top guy. Most of you would have heard of him,
highly neurotic, brilliant businessman, seriously overweight, and he takes the
fat the fat shot drug. And he called me up
and he said, President calls He used to call me Donald.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
Now he calls me President. So that's nice respect.
Speaker 5 (11:18):
But it's a rough guy, smart guy, very successful, very rich.
I wouldn't even know how we would know this, but
because he's got comments the president.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
Could I ask you a question.
Speaker 5 (11:28):
What I'm in London and I just paid for this
damn fat drug I take.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
I said, it's not working. He said, he said, I
just paid eighty.
Speaker 5 (11:40):
Eight dollars and in New York I paid thirteen hundred dollars.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
What the hell is going on?
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Yeah, See, we haven't even gotten to the Executive Order
on drug prices, et cetera, which we will, but the
President didn't rear formal take some calls, will take some text.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
You know.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
It occurred to me during the break there is no way,
there is no way that he's serious about accepting a
four hundred million dollar aircraft from Qatar that's going to
become Air Force one. I just don't believe for a
second he's serious about that. It's part of some other play.
And we can debate what that other play may be.
(12:18):
But one of the many reasons why I just can't
believe you serious about it, Ryan, I was thinking about
it during the break, right, and I was thinking back
to the last air crash case that I handled in
my practice, and I was thinking back to all the
experts and all the testimony that we had, and this
was an aircraft that had come apart in midflight. And
(12:40):
I don't think there's any way possible. Let's say that
the US was to accept an aircraft from any other nation.
I know people are concerned, as they should be about surveillance, etc.
On the aircraft, legitimate concern. I think it may be,
may underline, may be possible to rule all of that out,
But could you ever really be sure?
Speaker 2 (13:00):
But here's my point.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
I don't think it's physically possible to rule out some
kind of structural sabotage. I mean, I don't know that
it'd be physically possible to look at every single millimeter
of metal or other materials on that plane, every single bolt,
(13:23):
every single this and that and rule out the possibility
of some kind of structural sabotage. So I just I
can't imagine that he's serious about taking that plane and
making an air force one.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
But if not, what, Yeah, what what is the play here?
Speaker 4 (13:40):
Three or three?
Speaker 1 (13:41):
Someone three eight two five five text d A N
five seven seven three Ninety's outsmarted a lot of smart
people over the years, so I bet he has some
other play going on. Let me get to some of
the great text on this one, Dan, I agree with you.
The tartroist woul bug that gift plane to the president
like Barack Obama bugged his office in twenty sixteen that
(14:03):
from Eric.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Are you familiar I don't. I'm not remembering any surveillance
controversy in the Oval office factory.
Speaker 3 (14:10):
My office, but they did spy on his campaignmember. He
had that interaction with Leslie Stall. Oh, yeah, I can't prove. Yeah,
I thought that was a Trump tower. I thought that
was a route. Yeah, yes, text or Dan. I'd be
worried about a bomb on board.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
I think that goes back to my last point about
not a tick tick tick boom bomb, but some kind
of structural some of structural espionage that might, yeah, might
undermine the integrity of the aircraft. Yeah, I'd sures ID
be worried about that some Now, maybe it's something just
(14:46):
built into the aircraft, so at some point it's going
to go. Maybe it's something that could be triggered remotely,
though that would require electronics that maybe you can detect.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
I just I don't know.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
It'd be great to hear from different forms of engineers
out there, auospace engineers. Would there be any way to
completely rule out some kind of structural sabotage?
Speaker 2 (15:08):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (15:09):
And I'm not sitting here saying, oh, Katar would structurally
sabotage the planes, so that the president area, But could
you ever really rule it out? Let's see some of
the others here, Dan Wood in Colorado. This goes back
to Representative Brandy Bradley, who is here talking about thirteen
oh nine where guess what you're soon going to be
(15:30):
paying for in the form of increased insurance rates a mandate.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
The Dems are.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
Imposing that somebody wants to go out there and have
a penis attached that they don't currently have, or some
kind of cheekbone.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
This or that or whatever.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Uh yeah, yeah, it's going to be an insurance mandate.
So guess who ends pain for that?
Speaker 2 (15:50):
Ryan?
Speaker 1 (15:51):
What I guess since you're going to be paying for
what body part do you want to pay for?
Speaker 2 (15:55):
What body part do you want to pay for that?
Somebody can add? Or you don't want to go there?
Not on the air at least okay, maybe during the break.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
But but anyway, this question from a Texter, Dan, wouldn't
the state be liable for lawsuits from mailpractice related to
these procedures that they're paying the bill for and making
it available. Great question, Thank you for the outside the
box question. Now, the state would would not be liable
there because they're just funding it.
Speaker 3 (16:22):
But what about down the line, Dan, That's a good question.
It prompts it in my mind. Have you watched What
Is a Woman? The documentary by Matt Walsh? No, I
want you have to, and you'll love it. I think
Amy would find it interesting too. What if down the line, so.
Speaker 1 (16:35):
You're suggesting I go home tonight and I say, Honey,
as soon as this trial's done, I've got this movie
we're going to watch.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
It's called What Is a Woman? But what do you
think the Yeah?
Speaker 3 (16:46):
I think that movie could help move Amy further in
our direction, That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (16:51):
But yeah, I think she might understand misunderstand the kind
of movie I was suggesting.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
What would shock her to her core? Hello?
Speaker 3 (16:58):
But from your legal perspective, Dan, ten years online fifteen,
we're seeing it already with those who are testifying D
transitioners damaging their bodies in there's got to be some
kind of litigation possible on the live.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
Oh yet now you're talking about different criticals. Right now,
you're talking about suing the people who are out.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
There doing this. There you go, Amen to that, Amen
to that.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
I hope we see all sorts of that going on,
because the truth is, and it's a good thing. We're
coming up on a break, or everybody would quit this
show because this is what I do for a living, right,
and do catastrophic injury cases.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
But the truth is, you.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
Know, some of these lawsuits have done more to make
people safer than all this legislation out there. And you
go out there and you legitimately and successfully sue some
of the people who are mutilating kids this way, some
of the kids come back and do that. Yeah, that's
that's going to have more effect in stopping this madness
and all sorts of legislation. Three ah three someone three
(17:52):
eight two five five the number text d A N
five seven seventy three nine. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 5 (18:15):
Now, I could be a stupid person to say, oh, no,
we don't want a free plane. We get free things
that we'll take one too, and it helps us out
because again we're talking about we have forty year old aircraft.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Listen, President Trump obviously the opposite of a stupid person,
but he would know better than anybody, right, nothing is
truly free.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
So how do you feel.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
About this idea of Qatar of all nations donating to
the Defense Department our next Air Force one? And the
President's right and is great about Boeing, and then they're
behind schedule, etc. And we've got this old Air Force one.
But I'm sorry, you know, when it comes to this nation,
the greatest nation in the history of the world, this
(18:56):
nation and many others have sacrificed in many other nations
so this, this world could be free. But without the
United States of America, this world is not free. This
world is controlled by evil and darkness, evil and dark people.
If not for the United States of Americas, for the
greatest nation in the history of the world. Say, our
president is going to fly around on a plane donated
(19:17):
by another nation, let alone guitar.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
No way, no way.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
And so that's why I have to believe the President
has another play at work here for lots of different
reasons including hey, wait a second, well, the American people
are not going to like this. But then beyond that,
just the other security concerns, right, And I understand people
are talking about surveillance, etc. Legitimate issues for sure, but
(19:42):
I'm talking about structural integrity of the aircraft. If somebody
wants to build in some failure, how could that ever
be detected?
Speaker 2 (19:52):
Because there are so many subtle ways that could be done, right, I.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
Mean, how many big aircraft have been brought down because
of a small mistake here or there. All right, let's
get to the phone lines. Let's get to some text
on this as well. Three oh three seven, one, three eight,
two five five the number. A lot more going on
as well. Representative Brandy Bradley joined us at four thirty
six to talk about some of the truly insidious stuff
(20:16):
coming out of the Colorado legislature this session. She believes
that police is going to sign thirteen twelve and uh
and she called more attention at thirteen oh nine, which is,
you know, I would have to expect going to raise
your health insurance rates in mind to pay for people
who want to be a different gender to get the surgeries.
(20:37):
They need to pretend that's what they are. And you
can bet the insurance companies aren't going to eat that.
So what what would you want to pay for? I mean,
if you're going to pay for it anyway, you know what,
what what body part would you want to pay for?
I mean, think about it. That that's what Colorado democrats
are reducing us to dan body parts to be paid for. Yeah,
(21:01):
this one gets too long and I'm not quite sure
where it ends.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
Dan.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
There should be no statute of limitations, either criminally or civilly,
for the doctors and parents pushing minor children into getting
these transgender surgeries and mutilating their bodies.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Amen to that.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
Now let me get and this spins off an earlier texture.
Let's get into that a little deeper. I agree one
thousand percent no statute of limitations against any of the
medical people involved in these mutilations. Now what about the parents?
What about the parents? Do you really want in Colorado
(21:36):
law this ability to sue parents? Now, listen, I'm all
for doing anything at all reasonable under the sun we
can to protect these children, because think about, they're human
sacrifices right to this leftist ideology.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
And some parents that they go, oh, it's so cool
they have a trans kid.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Now I know other parents who are just the greatest
people in the world, and their hearts are absolutely broken
that they're children are going through this confusion, and the
parents are doing everything under the sun to lovingly help
their children through that. Very difficult time. So you got
that group of parents, and they're wonderful. I do think
there are another group of parents out there. I haven't
met one, but I see this stuff and I think
(22:15):
there are some parents who think this gives them social
status right to have a kid who's transing, and then
those parents are no better than the left, which at
this point, again, these kids, their lives mean nothing to
the left. You know, they're pawns, their tools, their human
sacrifices for this leftist ideology. And it was interesting when
Brandy Bradley joined US earlier and I was talking to
(22:37):
her about, hey, when does Colorado get to that tipping
point where people say the left is so bad? I
got to start voting for Republicans statewide, And she said
she thinks we're there because of the explosion of opposition
they saw at thirteen twelve. And I do hope she's right,
because Ryan, I think there is this perception out there
(22:57):
that crosses party lines, that the Left is coming for
your children in lots of different ways and try including
trying to transom. I think there's a very powerful perception
out there, and maybe that finally does start to show
up at the ballot box in ways that even crime
has not, right, that even crime is not because we
(23:18):
all know that it's the way God created us. It's
the way we are for the vast majority of people
out there, the only exception being true psychopaths. That the
love for our children is beyond any power anyone could imagine.
It's beyond any strength anyone could imagine. And you start
(23:39):
screwing with people's children, you know that that crosses parting
lines right there, especially when the perception develops as it
clearly has now that the Left is coming for your kids,
wants to trans your kids, wants to trans your kids,
or at least, at the very quote, least raised with
the kids whether they really are their gender, always without
(24:00):
the parents knowing or.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
Being able to do anything about it.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Yeah, I think that's the sort of thing that cuts
through the noise and may lead to a tipping point.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
Now, please don't get me wrong.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
I think there are so many positive reasons people should
want to vote for GOP candidates, But in the end
it may take a huge honk and negative like that
to get people to make that move.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
Because I'm just telling.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
You, as a former Democrat, there are just so many
good people out there who will, just in their current
state of mind, never even imagine voting for a Republican
just because that negative stereotype, which is false. But he's
so strong and so deeply embedded, not just in them,
but in probably generations of their family members. So think
(24:46):
about what a tough ask that is to people out
there who've been Democrats and their mama was a Democrat
and their granddad was a Democrat, and even if they
grew up in a family like ours, My parents were
so relentlessly positive.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
I didn't I don't think I know.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
I didn't hear my dad swear once in his entire life,
and he was a successful college basketball player and then
a Chicago police officer for thirty years.
Speaker 2 (25:10):
Never heard him swear.
Speaker 1 (25:12):
I don't think I heard him say anything critical about
anybody more than three or four times in his life.
So we had this very positive environment in our house.
So they didn't sit around knocking Republicans. I remember one
negative comment about Republicans in my entire life, grown up
with them, and that was sitting around watching some convention,
(25:38):
you know, sometime in the sixties. I was a little kid,
and it was a Republican convention and my dad pointed
to the TV screen and he said, look at not
a single not a single black face, and he was
disgusted that there wasn't a single black face at that
GOP convention. Now the beauty is the GOP has changed
dramatically and right now the GOP is the People's Party,
(26:00):
and the Democratic Party has become the party of holding
down people of color. I think that's become clear to
an awful lot of people. All I'm saying is a
lot of positive reasons to vote for GOP, but we
got to be realistic. It's a heavy ask to get
people to shift where there have been generations because you know,
it may sound trivial, but think about how tough Thanksgiving is.
(26:21):
But it can be done, and we're starting to see
it happen. All I'm saying is some of this nuttiness, lunacy,
obscenity from the left is probably our best chance to
flip the big switch in Colorado three oh three someone
three eight two five five text d A N five
seven seven three nine text in Fuego when we come back,
(26:42):
I want to get to a few more of those
regarding both these issues, but also this idea should the
US be accepting a new plane that would become air
Force one from Qatar.
Speaker 2 (26:53):
Here on the Dan Gapler Show.
Speaker 4 (26:56):
And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 5 (27:00):
On an executive order to launch the first ever self
deportation program for illegal aliens. We are making it as
easy as possible for illegal aliens to leave America.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
Any illegal alien.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
Can simply show up at the airport and receive a
free flight out of our country.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
Love the creativity. How many takers do you think you're
going to have there, my friend?
Speaker 3 (27:24):
Well, the alternative is not so great because you're going
to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,
deported to have all your belongings taken. So but you're
still going to get one thousand dollars stipend right along
with the plane ticket, the free plane ticket.
Speaker 1 (27:36):
Well, and that's my thought is that, wait a second,
this announcement, they're not just expecting people to flock to
the airport, right. I think this announcement is a harbinger
of things to come.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
I think it's.
Speaker 1 (27:50):
It's the lead on probably deportation efforts expanding, and just
wants to put the word out there now. And so yeah,
I think it's probably part of a broader strategy there,
my friend.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
Now, I'll be anxious to hear from folks on this.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
Three of three someone three eight two five five text
d A N five seven seven three nine Broncos to
play on Christmas Night in Kansas City.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Ooh, I know there's some.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
Prominent sports guy recently who has been very outspoken in
opposition to requiring players to play on religious holidays.
Speaker 2 (28:26):
So my guess is this.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
Is probably going to be ninety nine to one in
favor of the Broncos playing on Christmas Night.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
I know, I love to hear it. I hope there's
no frostbite.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
But you have to think Christmas Night in Kansas City. Yeah,
that's uh plus, but should be a heck of a game.
I think they should ad Kansas City back there last year.
Speaker 3 (28:48):
There's always motivation behind the scheduling too. And think about
when that game happens. That'll be very late in the season. Yeah,
it could be for all the marbles in the AFC West.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
Yeah, no, that's right. And so six fifteen Mountain Time
on Christmas Night. Looking forward to that. How about you,
Broncos chiefs?
Speaker 1 (29:03):
Oh my goodness, yes, And I personally me who cares.
I have no religious qualms about it. Whereas do you
remember were you even born yet? The Rockies home opener?
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Yes? Do you remember that? Remember first year of the.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
Rockies over at the Old Mile Hot and then the
challenge for that was it was Good Friday. Now that's
a different deal. That's a different deal I mean. But Christmas, No,
no issue with that. But I know it's a really
tough thing for a lot of people. Do do you
go to some big sporting event on Good Friday? And
then you know, I think the common answers no, But
(29:39):
then you have something like the Rockies home opener. I
do not view the Broncos at Kansas City on Christmas
Night as anything like that. Dan, how about insurance pain
for dental care? Fairly important? Insaying that is not covered
in trans madness?
Speaker 2 (29:53):
Is boy? That is so beautifully stated, isn't it?
Speaker 1 (29:56):
And what we're talking about represented Bradley joined us earlier
to kick it around thirteen oh nine. Yeah, is latest
gift to craziness from the left. You're going to be paying,
I bet, because it's now going to be mandated and insurance
coverage and you really think the health insurance are going
to cut into their profits so that some guy can
(30:17):
get a.
Speaker 2 (30:17):
New cheekbone because he says he's a woman. I don't
think so.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
I think they're going to be digging into your wallet
for that. But yeah, how crazy is that. At the
same time, there's no real dental insurance. Do we have
dental Do you have dental insurance through iHeart?
Speaker 2 (30:34):
I do? Does it pay for anything? Because I've had.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
Dental insurance for years. I don't think it's ever paid
for anything. It pays for a portion, but it isn't
like what.
Speaker 2 (30:42):
Like the toothpaste they give you when you leave.
Speaker 3 (30:45):
My dad had his job at NSF. We had like
the gold standard insurance. We didn't pay I think maybe
a ten dollars copay with that for any dental visit
for any reason.
Speaker 2 (30:54):
Oh man, yeah, yeah, how was your dentist?
Speaker 4 (30:57):
Very good?
Speaker 1 (30:58):
Okay, maybe it's back in the eighties saying is I
think we have like really good we try to provide
really good insurance that are love for me.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (31:06):
I don't think dental insurances ever paid for anything, So
this texture is right. I mean, we're going to be
paying now for guys to get new jaws because they
want to say they're women, but we don't pay for
dental care.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
Well, this is the discussion too about why Trump and
Pete Hegseth are looking to eliminate trans serving the military
because the on the taxpayer dime. They're viewing gender affirming
care soil called as being essential, so that that should
be covered under the military package of whatever you're paid.
And there was an interview I'm trying to remember it
(31:37):
over the weekend. I believe on one of the Sunday shows,
like millions, if not billions of dollars claim to have
been spent on trans serving members of the military for
these procedures that you're describing.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
Unimaginable, right, I mean, it truly is madness. But speaking
of madness, let me ask you this. I just saw
the chiron that the defense team for Sean Combs is
now saying, and they're putting out there publicly.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
I don't know if they had openings today, might have
been in openings.
Speaker 1 (32:06):
That his longtime girlfriend was a quote willing participant in
the freakoffs. Listen, I don't practice criminal law. I do
catastrophic injury work. All I have to tell you is
when your case depends on convincing people that somebody was
a willing participant in the quote freakoffs, you're in trouble,
(32:26):
and then CNN reporting that the prosecution's putting in all
sorts of evidence of these freak.
Speaker 2 (32:31):
Offs, and this is the term they're using on air.
Speaker 1 (32:34):
My question for you right, asked by a guy who's
been unbelievably happily married for more than thirty.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
Years, what's a freak off? Well, I think.
Speaker 3 (32:43):
These used to be called, or were at one time called,
the white parties, where they were all dressed in white.
And there was that even referenced in one of my
favorite television program shits, Creak and Puff Daddy.
Speaker 2 (32:54):
What did you most of these?
Speaker 3 (32:55):
I can say it's the name of the title of
the show, I know, but it's not that. But anyway
that it was kind of just glanced over by you know,
Hollywood and those people in the entertainment industry, and much
the same way as they kind of a little joked
about Harvey Weinstein, and it just became part of that
sub called breakoff.
Speaker 2 (33:15):
So all I'm hearing from you is everybody's dressed well,
that could be like you know, swinging that sort of thing. Okay, Well,
and I guess we're about to hear a lot about that.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
I don't know anything about it personally, you know. All
I have to tell you is presumed innocent, but not
for long.
Speaker 2 (33:33):
Yeah. With that guy, I mean.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Just the video that's been out there of him, you know,
of him abusing his girlfriend in the hallway of that hotel.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
Did you see that? I remember that. Man, that's bad. Yeah.
I think you gotta do decades for that.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
So we'll I think we'll continue to cover that trial
to the extent a family show can.
Speaker 2 (33:55):
Cover that trial.
Speaker 4 (33:57):
They go cover that one live, Dan, like you did
in the past.
Speaker 2 (33:59):
No, you know.
Speaker 1 (34:01):
The Rodney King oj Yeah yeah, special era, Yeah, this one.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
I mean, what could you what could you actually say
on air? Right? Yeah? Yeah? Holy cow?
Speaker 1 (34:12):
Well, thank you Ryan, tremendous job, Kelly you as well,
and boy, this weather just got to soak it up,
enjoy every minute of it. Lots to talk about tomorrow,
including Bill Maher some really obscene, insidious, hateful stuff toward
the new Pope.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
He's dead wrong. I'll prove it tomorrow on the Dan
Kapitala Show.
This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Perfect day to
fight for the American way. Wow, one of the nicest
weekends I think in Colorado history. How perfect it fell
(00:21):
on Mother's Day. So hopefully you had an absolutely phenomenal
Mother's Day weekend and the week off to a great
start as well. So and so many things to celebrate, right,
I mean, Trump obviously continuing his role on multiple fronts.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
Let's hope that that's about to lead.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
To some really serious peace negotiations between Ukraine and aggressor Russia.
And we'll talk about that more as the meat starts
to fall onto or off of that bone. But I
got to get your take on this right out of
the break, because you know, we have a lot of
interesting stuff pop up around here over the decades. But
this business today with President Trump not only saying he
(01:01):
wants to accept this four hundred million dollar aircraft quote
gift from Qatar, but calling stupid people who don't want
him to and again it's not him, right, it's the
Department of Defense.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
This is not for President Trump personally.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
But I really want to get your take on that,
because obviously, I don't think, respectfully there's been anybody on
air more fear to President Trump than I've been, you know,
just calling balls and strikes, you know, calling the good,
mentioning the bad when it happens. But I just think
this is either a really interesting play by him trying
(01:37):
to accomplish something else.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
I e.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
Ryan's theory is trying to put pressure on Boeing, which
I think is a really solid theory. Boeing way behind
on the new Air Force One, or he's got some
other play. It's hard for me to believe that he
really does just intend on the US Department of Defense
accepting this this aircraft, which will then serve as Air
Force one until Boeing gets the.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
New Air Force One done.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
Hard for me to believe that that's the ultimate intent here.
So love to get your thoughts assuming that is what
he intends to do. You think it's right or wrong? Hey,
is there some other country that you would accept this
kind of aircraft from? For me, it's it's blank no
to Qatar. That's easy, right, There's no way in the world,
(02:21):
this tremendous American symbol of pride and superiority and success
should be something given to us by Qatar. We are
not a beggar nation. And Katar obviously has its hands dirty,
you know, I think, with various forms of terrorism support.
On the other hand, if France wanted to give it
to us for saving France in the free world in
(02:42):
World War II, you bet, just like the Statue of Liberty,
that would be a positive symbol. But no, no way,
in my opinion, to Qatar. And hard for me to
imagine that's really what the president intends in the end,
but maybe he does. Three or three someone three A
two five five text d A N seven seven three
nine Dan. I personally would not trust any aircraft from
(03:03):
any other nation at this point in time.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
And fair enough, right, fair enough? And do you think
that was Ryan?
Speaker 1 (03:11):
Those stories out there, and I'm not giving him any credibility.
I'm just intrigued. There are so many Now do you
think that was cocaine on the train?
Speaker 2 (03:18):
Was that on the train? Oh? Mccron macrone and the crew.
Speaker 3 (03:22):
I default to the Okham's razor explanation that it was
a tissue. They might have been. I don't know. I
can't jump to that conclusion. No, just Willie Nelly, nor
can I. But anyway, coming back to aircraft, Yeah, no,
that that's a fair point, right is I mean, in
your suretack, wouldn't accept an aircraft from Qatar? And you know,
(03:43):
an earlier callers suggested the texture pardon me, you know what, you.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
Have a felon, and let's extend it. Would you have
a home burglary, home invasion felon put in your security system?
Speaker 4 (03:56):
No?
Speaker 1 (03:57):
And so no, it just doesn't make sense on any level.
And Trump obviously super smart guy. So I just think
there's something else in play here, some other intention. But
the President very very strong in his comments here. Let's
start with this one.
Speaker 5 (04:14):
Now, I could be a stupid person to say, oh, no,
we don't want a free plane. We get free things
that we'll take one too. And it helps us out
because again we're talking about we have forty year old aircraft.
The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those
planes to keep them tippy top is astronomical. You wouldn't
even believe it. So I think it's a great gesture
(04:35):
from Qatar. I appreciate it very much.
Speaker 1 (04:38):
Yeah, I know that we really need a new aircraft, etc.
But that doesn't answer the questions that I raised. And
I've got to think this is like an eighty twenty
issue at least in America. Americans don't want air force
one that simple of pride to be donated to us
by Katar of all countries. So and by the way,
for those doubting the pronunciation, And I'm not the best
(05:01):
at pronunciations, says you know, But I know I'm right
on that one because Amy and I, through a combination
of canceled flights all over the Western Hemisphere, ended up
in Qatar on our anniversary.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
And so it was cool. The hotel was cool, the
whole thing was cool.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
But I do know how to pronounce it because I
heard them pronounce it, and I would think they would
know when it's Katar.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
What other text do we have coming in on this? Dan,
you got to be kidding?
Speaker 1 (05:28):
Okasee swept the Grizzlies, are you nots They're not that
great a team that from Eric?
Speaker 2 (05:34):
Eric, you great American mark my words.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
If the Nuggets don't knock him out, the next team
will Dan Trump already owns his own plane. He also
donates his presidential salary back to the government. If he
were to donate a plane to the government to be
used as Air Force one for the next forty years,
how do you suppose the left would respond, he's negotiating. Interesting, Well,
this comes back to the point that I led with earlier,
(05:59):
which is, hey, none of this, none of this is
for the president's personal benefit. That's why I was so
happy to hear him go after ABC, particularly since look
at this guy, look at this guy.
Speaker 2 (06:11):
That this is a guy who gave.
Speaker 1 (06:13):
Up a life of comfort and ease to jump into
this meat grinder, and it very easily could have should have,
I think, except for divine intervention cost him his life
in that field in Butler and all the other torture
he's been put through.
Speaker 2 (06:26):
So no, none of this is about his personal comfort.
Speaker 1 (06:31):
And I was mentioned to Ryan, I think we've all
heard this from our moms and or dad's growing up.
You know, we were not created for comfort. We were
created for courage. And Trump embodies that he left a
life of kind of ultimate comfort. So no, this is
not about his own comfort. I just think if he's
serious about it. It's a rare mistake. You know, the
(06:54):
guy has been historically brilliant. Every now and then, he
has an unforced era like any human. I think he
has fewer of them than most presidents and far more successes.
But I think the meme that he recirculated, retweeted the
meme of him as Pope was an unforrecedare. I think
it was wrong and should not have been done. At
(07:15):
the same time, you look in the plus category, he
has been the greatest president otherwise for Catholics in my
lifetime by multiples. I don't think there's any other president
in my short lifetime who's been half as good for
Catholics and the vast majority of them. Trump's one hundred
times better for Catholics. But he's not perfect. And if
(07:36):
he's serious about this plane, I think that's a rare
unforced error. But he was right to go after this
ABC reporter.
Speaker 2 (07:45):
Saying, people who view that luxury jet as a personal
to get to you, why not leave it.
Speaker 4 (07:50):
Your NBC fake plus only ABC?
Speaker 5 (07:53):
Well, a few of you would, let me tell you,
you should be embarrassed to asking the question.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
They're giving us a free jen I.
Speaker 5 (08:02):
Could say, no, no, no, don't give us I want
to pay you a billion or four hundred million or
whatever it is.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Well, I just say thank you very much.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
Yeah, And he's right to call out APC there for
the reasons I mentioned a gift to him. And it
may be Ryan, I've got another theory, got a new theory.
It may be that what I view as a mistake
here comes from a very good place other than one
of the pressure points on Boeing, etc. That you've suggested,
(08:36):
and that is Listen, this president is obviously laser focused
right now on saving this nation money because he gets
I mean the stuff he's been saying, Musk has been saying,
all that stuff is true. You know, we are headed
for this financial cliff, kind of a sleep at the
wheel denials. Not just a river in Egypt, right, the
thin veneer of civilization. There is a lot of trouble
(08:58):
out there, and it's not far down the road. Trump
could have just kicked the can and and you know,
had this sugar high through his four years. But but
he's stepping up for the country. And so it may
be that he is so focused right now on saving
every possible dollar that that that's what's driving what I
would views this mistake with Katar and yes, we hey
(09:19):
we've got to save four hundred million, We've got to
save a lot more than that. We got to save
four hundred billion. We got to save a lot more
than that. But there are some things that are not
for sale. And I think having another nation like Qatar
provide our air force one, yeah, I think that that
should rise above these financial considerations.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
What do you think? Three or three?
Speaker 1 (09:39):
Someone three eight two five five text d A N
five seven seven three nine. Then I want to come
back to Bill maher and is really kind of demonic,
insidious attack on the new Pope.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 5 (09:57):
You know those are all gout for named Sam Sneed.
Did you ever hear what eighty two Ternament was a
great golfer and he had a motto, when they give
you a putt, you say thank you very much, you
pick up your ball, and you walk to the next hole.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
A lot of people are stupid.
Speaker 5 (10:12):
They say no, no, I insist start putting it, and
then they put it and they miss it and their
partner gets angry at him.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
You know what, remember that sam sneed.
Speaker 4 (10:22):
When they give you a putt, you pick it up
and you walk to the.
Speaker 1 (10:24):
Next hole and you say, and I've been that guy.
He said, no, I'm going to put that. But now,
are we ever going to have a funnier president?
Speaker 2 (10:32):
I think of the joy we're in for it for
the next three years, three and a half years more
than that.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
But he knows golf. Oh he knows golf. He definitely
knows golf. But he was on an absolute role today.
But we tend to be seeing that most days. Right,
how about this one on his friend with Ozembic.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
I mean, I'll tell you a story.
Speaker 5 (10:52):
Friend of mine who's a business man, very very very
top guy. Most of you would have heard of him,
highly neurotic, brilliant businessman, seriously overweight, and he takes the
fat the fat shot drug. And he called me up
and he said, President calls He used to call me Donald.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
Now he calls me President. So that's nice respect.
Speaker 5 (11:18):
But it's a rough guy, smart guy, very successful, very rich.
I wouldn't even know how we would know this, but
because he's got comments the president.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
Could I ask you a question.
Speaker 5 (11:28):
What I'm in London and I just paid for this
damn fat drug I take.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
I said, it's not working. He said, he said, I
just paid eighty.
Speaker 5 (11:40):
Eight dollars and in New York I paid thirteen hundred dollars.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
What the hell is going on?
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Yeah, See, we haven't even gotten to the Executive Order
on drug prices, et cetera, which we will, but the
President didn't rear formal take some calls, will take some text.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
You know.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
It occurred to me during the break there is no way,
there is no way that he's serious about accepting a
four hundred million dollar aircraft from Qatar that's going to
become Air Force one. I just don't believe for a
second he's serious about that. It's part of some other play.
And we can debate what that other play may be.
(12:18):
But one of the many reasons why I just can't
believe you serious about it, Ryan, I was thinking about
it during the break, right, and I was thinking back
to the last air crash case that I handled in
my practice, and I was thinking back to all the
experts and all the testimony that we had, and this
was an aircraft that had come apart in midflight. And
(12:40):
I don't think there's any way possible. Let's say that
the US was to accept an aircraft from any other nation.
I know people are concerned, as they should be about surveillance, etc.
On the aircraft, legitimate concern. I think it may be,
may underline, may be possible to rule all of that out,
But could you ever really be sure?
Speaker 2 (13:00):
But here's my point.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
I don't think it's physically possible to rule out some
kind of structural sabotage. I mean, I don't know that
it'd be physically possible to look at every single millimeter
of metal or other materials on that plane, every single bolt,
(13:23):
every single this and that and rule out the possibility
of some kind of structural sabotage. So I just I
can't imagine that he's serious about taking that plane and
making an air force one.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
But if not, what, Yeah, what what is the play here?
Speaker 4 (13:40):
Three or three?
Speaker 1 (13:41):
Someone three eight two five five text d A N
five seven seven three Ninety's outsmarted a lot of smart
people over the years, so I bet he has some
other play going on. Let me get to some of
the great text on this one, Dan, I agree with you.
The tartroist woul bug that gift plane to the president
like Barack Obama bugged his office in twenty sixteen that
(14:03):
from Eric.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Are you familiar I don't. I'm not remembering any surveillance
controversy in the Oval office factory.
Speaker 3 (14:10):
My office, but they did spy on his campaignmember. He
had that interaction with Leslie Stall. Oh, yeah, I can't prove. Yeah,
I thought that was a Trump tower. I thought that
was a route. Yeah, yes, text or Dan. I'd be
worried about a bomb on board.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
I think that goes back to my last point about
not a tick tick tick boom bomb, but some kind
of structural some of structural espionage that might, yeah, might
undermine the integrity of the aircraft. Yeah, I'd sures ID
be worried about that some Now, maybe it's something just
(14:46):
built into the aircraft, so at some point it's going
to go. Maybe it's something that could be triggered remotely,
though that would require electronics that maybe you can detect.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
I just I don't know.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
It'd be great to hear from different forms of engineers
out there, auospace engineers. Would there be any way to
completely rule out some kind of structural sabotage?
Speaker 2 (15:08):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (15:09):
And I'm not sitting here saying, oh, Katar would structurally
sabotage the planes, so that the president area, But could
you ever really rule it out? Let's see some of
the others here, Dan Wood in Colorado. This goes back
to Representative Brandy Bradley, who is here talking about thirteen
oh nine where guess what you're soon going to be
(15:30):
paying for in the form of increased insurance rates a mandate.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
The Dems are.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
Imposing that somebody wants to go out there and have
a penis attached that they don't currently have, or some
kind of cheekbone.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
This or that or whatever.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Uh yeah, yeah, it's going to be an insurance mandate.
So guess who ends pain for that?
Speaker 2 (15:50):
Ryan?
Speaker 1 (15:51):
What I guess since you're going to be paying for
what body part do you want to pay for?
Speaker 2 (15:55):
What body part do you want to pay for that?
Somebody can add? Or you don't want to go there?
Not on the air at least okay, maybe during the break.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
But but anyway, this question from a Texter, Dan, wouldn't
the state be liable for lawsuits from mailpractice related to
these procedures that they're paying the bill for and making
it available. Great question, Thank you for the outside the
box question. Now, the state would would not be liable
there because they're just funding it.
Speaker 3 (16:22):
But what about down the line, Dan, That's a good question.
It prompts it in my mind. Have you watched What
Is a Woman? The documentary by Matt Walsh? No, I
want you have to, and you'll love it. I think
Amy would find it interesting too. What if down the line, so.
Speaker 1 (16:35):
You're suggesting I go home tonight and I say, Honey,
as soon as this trial's done, I've got this movie
we're going to watch.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
It's called What Is a Woman? But what do you
think the Yeah?
Speaker 3 (16:46):
I think that movie could help move Amy further in
our direction, That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (16:51):
But yeah, I think she might understand misunderstand the kind
of movie I was suggesting.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
What would shock her to her core? Hello?
Speaker 3 (16:58):
But from your legal perspective, Dan, ten years online fifteen,
we're seeing it already with those who are testifying D
transitioners damaging their bodies in there's got to be some
kind of litigation possible on the live.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
Oh yet now you're talking about different criticals. Right now,
you're talking about suing the people who are out.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
There doing this. There you go, Amen to that, Amen
to that.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
I hope we see all sorts of that going on,
because the truth is, and it's a good thing. We're
coming up on a break, or everybody would quit this
show because this is what I do for a living, right,
and do catastrophic injury cases.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
But the truth is, you.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
Know, some of these lawsuits have done more to make
people safer than all this legislation out there. And you
go out there and you legitimately and successfully sue some
of the people who are mutilating kids this way, some
of the kids come back and do that. Yeah, that's
that's going to have more effect in stopping this madness
and all sorts of legislation. Three ah three someone three
(17:52):
eight two five five the number text d A N
five seven seventy three nine. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 5 (18:15):
Now, I could be a stupid person to say, oh, no,
we don't want a free plane. We get free things
that we'll take one too, and it helps us out
because again we're talking about we have forty year old aircraft.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Listen, President Trump obviously the opposite of a stupid person,
but he would know better than anybody, right, nothing is
truly free.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
So how do you feel.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
About this idea of Qatar of all nations donating to
the Defense Department our next Air Force one? And the
President's right and is great about Boeing, and then they're
behind schedule, etc. And we've got this old Air Force one.
But I'm sorry, you know, when it comes to this nation,
the greatest nation in the history of the world, this
(18:56):
nation and many others have sacrificed in many other nations
so this, this world could be free. But without the
United States of America, this world is not free. This
world is controlled by evil and darkness, evil and dark people.
If not for the United States of Americas, for the
greatest nation in the history of the world. Say, our
president is going to fly around on a plane donated
(19:17):
by another nation, let alone guitar.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
No way, no way.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
And so that's why I have to believe the President
has another play at work here for lots of different
reasons including hey, wait a second, well, the American people
are not going to like this. But then beyond that,
just the other security concerns, right, And I understand people
are talking about surveillance, etc. Legitimate issues for sure, but
(19:42):
I'm talking about structural integrity of the aircraft. If somebody
wants to build in some failure, how could that ever
be detected?
Speaker 2 (19:52):
Because there are so many subtle ways that could be done, right, I.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
Mean, how many big aircraft have been brought down because
of a small mistake here or there. All right, let's
get to the phone lines. Let's get to some text
on this as well. Three oh three seven, one, three eight,
two five five the number. A lot more going on
as well. Representative Brandy Bradley joined us at four thirty
six to talk about some of the truly insidious stuff
(20:16):
coming out of the Colorado legislature this session. She believes
that police is going to sign thirteen twelve and uh
and she called more attention at thirteen oh nine, which is,
you know, I would have to expect going to raise
your health insurance rates in mind to pay for people
who want to be a different gender to get the surgeries.
(20:37):
They need to pretend that's what they are. And you
can bet the insurance companies aren't going to eat that.
So what what would you want to pay for? I mean,
if you're going to pay for it anyway, you know what,
what what body part would you want to pay for?
I mean, think about it. That that's what Colorado democrats
are reducing us to dan body parts to be paid for. Yeah,
(21:01):
this one gets too long and I'm not quite sure
where it ends.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
Dan.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
There should be no statute of limitations, either criminally or civilly,
for the doctors and parents pushing minor children into getting
these transgender surgeries and mutilating their bodies.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Amen to that.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
Now let me get and this spins off an earlier texture.
Let's get into that a little deeper. I agree one
thousand percent no statute of limitations against any of the
medical people involved in these mutilations. Now what about the parents?
What about the parents? Do you really want in Colorado
(21:36):
law this ability to sue parents? Now, listen, I'm all
for doing anything at all reasonable under the sun we
can to protect these children, because think about, they're human
sacrifices right to this leftist ideology.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
And some parents that they go, oh, it's so cool
they have a trans kid.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Now I know other parents who are just the greatest
people in the world, and their hearts are absolutely broken
that they're children are going through this confusion, and the
parents are doing everything under the sun to lovingly help
their children through that. Very difficult time. So you got
that group of parents, and they're wonderful. I do think
there are another group of parents out there. I haven't
met one, but I see this stuff and I think
(22:15):
there are some parents who think this gives them social
status right to have a kid who's transing, and then
those parents are no better than the left, which at
this point, again, these kids, their lives mean nothing to
the left. You know, they're pawns, their tools, their human
sacrifices for this leftist ideology. And it was interesting when
Brandy Bradley joined US earlier and I was talking to
(22:37):
her about, hey, when does Colorado get to that tipping
point where people say the left is so bad? I
got to start voting for Republicans statewide, And she said
she thinks we're there because of the explosion of opposition
they saw at thirteen twelve. And I do hope she's right,
because Ryan, I think there is this perception out there
(22:57):
that crosses party lines, that the Left is coming for
your children in lots of different ways and try including
trying to transom. I think there's a very powerful perception
out there, and maybe that finally does start to show
up at the ballot box in ways that even crime
has not, right, that even crime is not because we
(23:18):
all know that it's the way God created us. It's
the way we are for the vast majority of people
out there, the only exception being true psychopaths. That the
love for our children is beyond any power anyone could imagine.
It's beyond any strength anyone could imagine. And you start
(23:39):
screwing with people's children, you know that that crosses parting
lines right there, especially when the perception develops as it
clearly has now that the Left is coming for your kids,
wants to trans your kids, wants to trans your kids,
or at least, at the very quote, least raised with
the kids whether they really are their gender, always without
(24:00):
the parents knowing or.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
Being able to do anything about it.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Yeah, I think that's the sort of thing that cuts
through the noise and may lead to a tipping point.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
Now, please don't get me wrong.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
I think there are so many positive reasons people should
want to vote for GOP candidates, But in the end
it may take a huge honk and negative like that
to get people to make that move.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
Because I'm just telling.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
You, as a former Democrat, there are just so many
good people out there who will, just in their current
state of mind, never even imagine voting for a Republican
just because that negative stereotype, which is false. But he's
so strong and so deeply embedded, not just in them,
but in probably generations of their family members. So think
(24:46):
about what a tough ask that is to people out
there who've been Democrats and their mama was a Democrat
and their granddad was a Democrat, and even if they
grew up in a family like ours, My parents were
so relentlessly positive.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
I didn't I don't think I know.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
I didn't hear my dad swear once in his entire life,
and he was a successful college basketball player and then
a Chicago police officer for thirty years.
Speaker 2 (25:10):
Never heard him swear.
Speaker 1 (25:12):
I don't think I heard him say anything critical about
anybody more than three or four times in his life.
So we had this very positive environment in our house.
So they didn't sit around knocking Republicans. I remember one
negative comment about Republicans in my entire life, grown up
with them, and that was sitting around watching some convention,
(25:38):
you know, sometime in the sixties. I was a little kid,
and it was a Republican convention and my dad pointed
to the TV screen and he said, look at not
a single not a single black face, and he was
disgusted that there wasn't a single black face at that
GOP convention. Now the beauty is the GOP has changed
dramatically and right now the GOP is the People's Party,
(26:00):
and the Democratic Party has become the party of holding
down people of color. I think that's become clear to
an awful lot of people. All I'm saying is a
lot of positive reasons to vote for GOP, but we
got to be realistic. It's a heavy ask to get
people to shift where there have been generations because you know,
it may sound trivial, but think about how tough Thanksgiving is.
(26:21):
But it can be done, and we're starting to see
it happen. All I'm saying is some of this nuttiness, lunacy,
obscenity from the left is probably our best chance to
flip the big switch in Colorado three oh three someone
three eight two five five text d A N five
seven seven three nine text in Fuego when we come back,
(26:42):
I want to get to a few more of those
regarding both these issues, but also this idea should the
US be accepting a new plane that would become air
Force one from Qatar.
Speaker 2 (26:53):
Here on the Dan Gapler Show.
Speaker 4 (26:56):
And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 5 (27:00):
On an executive order to launch the first ever self
deportation program for illegal aliens. We are making it as
easy as possible for illegal aliens to leave America.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
Any illegal alien.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
Can simply show up at the airport and receive a
free flight out of our country.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
Love the creativity. How many takers do you think you're
going to have there, my friend?
Speaker 3 (27:24):
Well, the alternative is not so great because you're going
to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,
deported to have all your belongings taken. So but you're
still going to get one thousand dollars stipend right along
with the plane ticket, the free plane ticket.
Speaker 1 (27:36):
Well, and that's my thought is that, wait a second,
this announcement, they're not just expecting people to flock to
the airport, right. I think this announcement is a harbinger
of things to come.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
I think it's.
Speaker 1 (27:50):
It's the lead on probably deportation efforts expanding, and just
wants to put the word out there now. And so yeah,
I think it's probably part of a broader strategy there,
my friend.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
Now, I'll be anxious to hear from folks on this.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
Three of three someone three eight two five five text
d A N five seven seven three nine Broncos to
play on Christmas Night in Kansas City.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Ooh, I know there's some.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
Prominent sports guy recently who has been very outspoken in
opposition to requiring players to play on religious holidays.
Speaker 2 (28:26):
So my guess is this.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
Is probably going to be ninety nine to one in
favor of the Broncos playing on Christmas Night.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
I know, I love to hear it. I hope there's
no frostbite.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
But you have to think Christmas Night in Kansas City. Yeah,
that's uh plus, but should be a heck of a game.
I think they should ad Kansas City back there last year.
Speaker 3 (28:48):
There's always motivation behind the scheduling too. And think about
when that game happens. That'll be very late in the season. Yeah,
it could be for all the marbles in the AFC West.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
Yeah, no, that's right. And so six fifteen Mountain Time
on Christmas Night. Looking forward to that. How about you,
Broncos chiefs?
Speaker 1 (29:03):
Oh my goodness, yes, And I personally me who cares.
I have no religious qualms about it. Whereas do you
remember were you even born yet? The Rockies home opener?
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Yes? Do you remember that? Remember first year of the.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
Rockies over at the Old Mile Hot and then the
challenge for that was it was Good Friday. Now that's
a different deal. That's a different deal I mean. But Christmas, No,
no issue with that. But I know it's a really
tough thing for a lot of people. Do do you
go to some big sporting event on Good Friday? And
then you know, I think the common answers no, But
(29:39):
then you have something like the Rockies home opener. I
do not view the Broncos at Kansas City on Christmas
Night as anything like that. Dan, how about insurance pain
for dental care? Fairly important? Insaying that is not covered
in trans madness?
Speaker 2 (29:53):
Is boy? That is so beautifully stated, isn't it?
Speaker 1 (29:56):
And what we're talking about represented Bradley joined us earlier
to kick it around thirteen oh nine. Yeah, is latest
gift to craziness from the left. You're going to be paying,
I bet, because it's now going to be mandated and insurance
coverage and you really think the health insurance are going
to cut into their profits so that some guy can
(30:17):
get a.
Speaker 2 (30:17):
New cheekbone because he says he's a woman. I don't
think so.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
I think they're going to be digging into your wallet
for that. But yeah, how crazy is that. At the
same time, there's no real dental insurance. Do we have
dental Do you have dental insurance through iHeart?
Speaker 2 (30:34):
I do? Does it pay for anything? Because I've had.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
Dental insurance for years. I don't think it's ever paid
for anything. It pays for a portion, but it isn't
like what.
Speaker 2 (30:42):
Like the toothpaste they give you when you leave.
Speaker 3 (30:45):
My dad had his job at NSF. We had like
the gold standard insurance. We didn't pay I think maybe
a ten dollars copay with that for any dental visit
for any reason.
Speaker 2 (30:54):
Oh man, yeah, yeah, how was your dentist?
Speaker 4 (30:57):
Very good?
Speaker 1 (30:58):
Okay, maybe it's back in the eighties saying is I
think we have like really good we try to provide
really good insurance that are love for me.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (31:06):
I don't think dental insurances ever paid for anything, So
this texture is right. I mean, we're going to be
paying now for guys to get new jaws because they
want to say they're women, but we don't pay for
dental care.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
Well, this is the discussion too about why Trump and
Pete Hegseth are looking to eliminate trans serving the military
because the on the taxpayer dime. They're viewing gender affirming
care soil called as being essential, so that that should
be covered under the military package of whatever you're paid.
And there was an interview I'm trying to remember it
(31:37):
over the weekend. I believe on one of the Sunday shows,
like millions, if not billions of dollars claim to have
been spent on trans serving members of the military for
these procedures that you're describing.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
Unimaginable, right, I mean, it truly is madness. But speaking
of madness, let me ask you this. I just saw
the chiron that the defense team for Sean Combs is
now saying, and they're putting out there publicly.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
I don't know if they had openings today, might have
been in openings.
Speaker 1 (32:06):
That his longtime girlfriend was a quote willing participant in
the freakoffs. Listen, I don't practice criminal law. I do
catastrophic injury work. All I have to tell you is
when your case depends on convincing people that somebody was
a willing participant in the quote freakoffs, you're in trouble,
(32:26):
and then CNN reporting that the prosecution's putting in all
sorts of evidence of these freak.
Speaker 2 (32:31):
Offs, and this is the term they're using on air.
Speaker 1 (32:34):
My question for you right, asked by a guy who's
been unbelievably happily married for more than thirty.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
Years, what's a freak off? Well, I think.
Speaker 3 (32:43):
These used to be called, or were at one time called,
the white parties, where they were all dressed in white.
And there was that even referenced in one of my
favorite television program shits, Creak and Puff Daddy.
Speaker 2 (32:54):
What did you most of these?
Speaker 3 (32:55):
I can say it's the name of the title of
the show, I know, but it's not that. But anyway
that it was kind of just glanced over by you know,
Hollywood and those people in the entertainment industry, and much
the same way as they kind of a little joked
about Harvey Weinstein, and it just became part of that
sub called breakoff.
Speaker 2 (33:15):
So all I'm hearing from you is everybody's dressed well,
that could be like you know, swinging that sort of thing. Okay, Well,
and I guess we're about to hear a lot about that.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
I don't know anything about it personally, you know. All
I have to tell you is presumed innocent, but not
for long.
Speaker 2 (33:33):
Yeah. With that guy, I mean.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Just the video that's been out there of him, you know,
of him abusing his girlfriend in the hallway of that hotel.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
Did you see that? I remember that. Man, that's bad. Yeah.
I think you gotta do decades for that.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
So we'll I think we'll continue to cover that trial
to the extent a family show can.
Speaker 2 (33:55):
Cover that trial.
Speaker 4 (33:57):
They go cover that one live, Dan, like you did
in the past.
Speaker 2 (33:59):
No, you know.
Speaker 1 (34:01):
The Rodney King oj Yeah yeah, special era, Yeah, this one.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
I mean, what could you what could you actually say
on air? Right? Yeah? Yeah? Holy cow?
Speaker 1 (34:12):
Well, thank you Ryan, tremendous job, Kelly you as well,
and boy, this weather just got to soak it up,
enjoy every minute of it. Lots to talk about tomorrow,
including Bill Maher some really obscene, insidious, hateful stuff toward
the new Pope.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
He's dead wrong. I'll prove it tomorrow on the Dan
Kapitala Show.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.