All Episodes

September 25, 2024 26 mins
Swamp Watch. Parenting with Justin Worsham.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Gary and Shannon and you're listening to KFI
AM six forty, the Gary and Shannon Show on demand
on the iHeartRadio app.

Speaker 2 (00:07):
Let's talk about hurricanes.

Speaker 3 (00:08):
Hurricane Helene will's strengthen into a hurricane. It's right now
tropical storm, but eighty mile an hour sustained winds hurricane
force gusts have been measured in some places. They're talking
about this right now, still northeast northeast, say of Cosamel,
but making its way through the Gulf of Mexico up
towards the Florida coastline. We're expecting parts of the western

(00:31):
part of the Florida Panhandle is where it's it's expected
to make landfall some point. The Big Bend area is
what they're calling it. The vast majority. I think sixty
seven counties in Florida, and sixty four of them are
under some sort of watch or warning as a result
of this. Some of those early bands of rain have
already spread as far north as South Florida as a

(00:54):
result of this.

Speaker 4 (00:54):
Hey, Gary Trucker branded here. I remember going to an
A's game up in the Coliseum. Had the best time
Craft stadium.

Speaker 5 (01:05):
Great game.

Speaker 4 (01:06):
Also remember going to see Aretha Franklin and Prince over
at Oracle Arena back then and had the best time.
Gonna miss those people, gonna miss those places. It was
a great time.

Speaker 6 (01:21):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:22):
Well, there is a new report that details a stunning
Secret Service leadership mess.

Speaker 6 (01:29):
That's where we kick off swamp watch.

Speaker 5 (01:31):
Swamp is horrible, The government doesn't work.

Speaker 7 (01:34):
Make it like a reality TV sho bad deus.

Speaker 2 (01:39):
Always a pleasure to be anywhere from Washington, d C. Hey, Joe.

Speaker 8 (01:44):
A town hall too, clearly built on a swamp in
so many ways, still a swamp to watching.

Speaker 5 (01:49):
Malarkey said, dream the swamp. I said, Oh, that's so,
I'll keep you know the thing.

Speaker 1 (01:57):
So there was a mypartisan Senate that released a report
today that says Secret Service agents failed to take charge
of decision making for security at the rally where Trump
was shot in July. There were key lapses in preparation
and communication that day. The locals were on a separate

(02:18):
frequency than the Secret Service. The guy running the drones
had no experience and was on the phone with tech support.
It's a what is it called the Keystone cops.

Speaker 6 (02:29):
That's what this sounds like.

Speaker 2 (02:30):
Some of the problems.

Speaker 3 (02:31):
They also pointed out the failure to set up visual
barriers around the rally that might have blocked the view
from the rooftop all the way to.

Speaker 2 (02:42):
Where the president was.

Speaker 1 (02:43):
Joe Cahill is on the story and joins us now
with more details about this report.

Speaker 6 (02:48):
Joe, how are you say?

Speaker 8 (02:51):
Good?

Speaker 5 (02:51):
How are you guys great?

Speaker 3 (02:52):
We're just going through some of these things, some of
the very very simple measures that appeared should have been
taken that weren't taken.

Speaker 2 (03:00):
So who's the one person to blame?

Speaker 8 (03:05):
You know, I don't think that there is any one person.

Speaker 2 (03:07):
I think it was.

Speaker 8 (03:08):
You have to look at the leadership, generally, the advanced
team that goes in ahead of time before any other
major event and tries to do the pre planning. We've
heard that the acting director of the Ciccret Service actually
told me last week that there were some people who
are going to be held accountable. And we pressed, is
that is that being fired? And he said held accountable.

(03:28):
So we think that that's going to happen. But look,
it's really hard to point to one thing. That's why
lawmakers that we talked to are so surprised shot appalled
by this because they look at it and say, if
there were one mistake or two mistakes, it's something they
would more easily digest. But this was a failure on

(03:49):
multiple levels before the event, during the event, and in
those crucial moments ahead of the time that Trump got shot.
That really makes this almost hard to believe.

Speaker 3 (03:59):
One of the things that the Senate did was voted
to make sure that protectees will get the same level
of protection that an active president or an a sorry,
an actual president would have. So if you've got Protection
Equality Bill that make sure that Kamala Harris and Donald

(04:23):
Trump have the same kind of protection that Joe Biden
would have as the sitting president. Is that going to
impact the campaign and the ability of candidates to actually
move about the country.

Speaker 8 (04:35):
That's a great question. So the Secret Service says no.
They say that doesn't mean that their lifestyles or that
their campaigning events are going to change. What that means
is they do what they want to do, and it
is on us to figure out, no matter what their
activities are, how we can protect them. Now, if you're wondering, well,
we don't have much faith in the agency to do

(04:56):
that at this point. You know, that is also a
concern that many lawmakers. We brought up. The Secret Service says, no,
that they're not going to You know, they can do
what they want, and the task before the agency is
you got to protect him at all costs. Here, I
want to point out one thing in the report, if
I can, that really amazed me. It jumped out and
I read the whole thing this morning, cover to cover.

(05:18):
The thing that stood out most was in the middle
of it. If you're reading the reports, about page fifty
five fifty six, I think they have an interview with
the sniper teams lead that day, and he basically describes
the moment that local officers on the ground saw Thomas
Crooks climb this building and get into position with a gun.

(05:40):
He saw officers local officers reacting to that. He says,
I was watching as they put their hands on their
guns and ran towards the buildings. And so the Senate committee,
who's asking this team lead these questions, says, at that point,
wasn't it enough that you knew there was something concerning
to pull Donald Trump off stage? And he said no,

(06:01):
because we didn't know. It could have been a medical emergency,
could have also been a man with a gun. And
the committee asked, well, if it was even a possibility
that it was a man with a gun. You wouldn't
even consider calling off the former president from the stage
he was on. And the response was, well, it didn't
even cross our mind to do that.

Speaker 5 (06:22):
That amazed me that there.

Speaker 8 (06:23):
Wasn't even a consideration and that he said so much
to the committee. It just blew me away reading that.

Speaker 1 (06:29):
And why isn't there a separation of a medical emergency
versus someone with a gun? Those should be two different alerts.

Speaker 8 (06:39):
Yeah, and you know therein lies another problem, which was communication.
There were law enforcement on the ground at the local
level that were flagging there is a person with a
gun climbing the roof, and they were on their radios,
but the Secret Service was not on the same frequency
as the local officers on the ground out and I'm

(07:01):
told that is actually a regular thing. They don't want
to clog up each other's communication. But usually what happens
is there's one command center that's hearing all of this. Yes,
and if the command center says, hey, the local guys
see a man with a gun, that immediately gets to
the Secret Service agents who are around Donald Trump. And

(07:21):
that didn't happen in this case. Instead, of one command center,
they had two separate ones which were not communicating with
each other, another major failure of many that is laid
out in this report today.

Speaker 2 (07:33):
All right, Joe, thanks for your time. We appreciate it,
of course, happy to do it.

Speaker 3 (07:38):
Joe Khalil again, Washington correspondent there for News Nation on
the heels of what we talked about in the first
segment of Swamp Watch, which was this congressional report that
came out that detailed some of the failings of law
enforcement and secret Service in the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination attempt
on former President Trump. He also spoke about that today
while he was doing a rally in North Carolin.

Speaker 7 (08:00):
Really, why is it that the father of the shooter
in the Butler instance has one of the best and
most expensive lawyers in the entire state of Pennsylvania. How
did he get to this expensive lawyer, big big law firm,
the biggest in Pittsburgh. Where did he get this big

(08:21):
law firm from? It's so strange. If I were president
and a former president and a leading candidate, I'm the
leading candidate by far to be the next president.

Speaker 2 (08:33):
And hold for applause, please jeez.

Speaker 7 (08:36):
That leading candidate was under threat. I was president and
the candidate was under threat, any candidate, Republican or Democrat.

Speaker 2 (08:46):
And by the way, I want to thank the.

Speaker 7 (08:47):
Democrats because they just increased funding for the Secret Service,
who worked very hard. They increased funding for the Secret Service.
And nobody will believe this. It was a unanimous vote. Republicans,
every single Republican, every single Democrat president voted in favor.

(09:09):
That was a first unanimous vote.

Speaker 2 (09:10):
Get what would you do if you were president.

Speaker 7 (09:12):
And that's to increase the funding, yes, of the Secret Service.
So I thank everybody.

Speaker 9 (09:17):
Back to the teleprompter, please, But if I were the president,
I would inform the threatening country in this case Iran,
that if you do anything to harm this person, we
are going to blow your largest cities and the country
itself to smitherines.

Speaker 7 (09:33):
We're going to blow it to smitherings.

Speaker 2 (09:35):
You can't do that.

Speaker 6 (09:36):
I was wondering how he's gonna end that sentence.

Speaker 3 (09:39):
He also said big threats on my life by Iran.
The entire US military is watching and waiting. He wrote
that on truth Social He said moves were already made
by Iran that didn't work out, but they will try again.
Not a good situation for anything.

Speaker 1 (09:54):
I'm surrounded by more men, guns and weapons than I
have ever seen before. Okay, So, and Biden told the
co hosts of the View that he did not sense
an overwhelming reluctance from Democrats about his reelection effort.

Speaker 6 (10:06):
Says he was confident he could have beat Donald Trump.

Speaker 7 (10:09):
Wow.

Speaker 1 (10:09):
Sarah Griffin asked about Pelosi and about the pressure she
put on Democrats to urge him to drop out, and
he actually had pretty natural moment of everything's fine, and
then he just goes.

Speaker 10 (10:26):
It makes sense. There are some folks who would like
to see me step aside so they have a chance
to move on. I get that that's just human nature.
But that wasn't the reason that I stepped down. I
stepped down because I started thinking about it.

Speaker 3 (10:40):
He again, I don't know if you're a candidate like
that and you're surround I know he's the president, but
if you're a candidate and you're running for president or
any major seat like that, you've got people around you
who are going to lie to you about your chances
of win. After the debate, after the assassination attempt, Joe

(11:06):
Biden was going to drop so precipitously in those polls
that it wasn't It was not going to be close.
It was not going to be anywhere close to what
he imagined an actual what he imagined the election was
going to be, because you could not argue that all
of the momentum was behind Trump after those two events,

(11:27):
all of the momentum had Joe Biden gone into Chicago
at the convention and tried to deliver the closing argument,
tried to deliver the speech that was going to rouse
all of the party and draw all of those independent
voters who didn't quite want to vote for Donald Trump
but thought that there was a better He's completely delusional

(11:51):
at that point. And I'm surprised that he's doing interviews. Yeah,
I mean, Kamala Harris has finally apparently decided she will
do an interview. I'll let you guess which network it is.

Speaker 6 (12:04):
CNN, no ABC, no CBS.

Speaker 3 (12:07):
Get more obscure and left than that, I don't know, MSNBC.

Speaker 2 (12:11):
Ah, they're going to do.

Speaker 3 (12:12):
Stephanie Rule is going to be the one who interviews her,
and it's going to be a lot of like Drew
Barrymore's we need a Mama La, Right, now it's going
to be that kind of interview.

Speaker 1 (12:21):
I heard some recent clips of her, and she's back
into word salad mood.

Speaker 2 (12:26):
Because no one asks me.

Speaker 6 (12:28):
No one's replaying it.

Speaker 3 (12:29):
If Oprah's the one asking her the questions, Oprah's never
going to press in and go wait a minute. Okay,
you said a lot of things in forty five seconds,
But what exactly are you.

Speaker 2 (12:39):
Going to do?

Speaker 8 (12:40):
Right?

Speaker 6 (12:42):
Would you like your Jeopardy question? How about that? Cheer
you up a little bit.

Speaker 5 (12:47):
Right there? Oh?

Speaker 6 (12:48):
Why isn't that all? We're going to be ready?

Speaker 1 (12:52):
Time to fall into autumn for one thousand dollars fall
from the Latin.

Speaker 6 (12:57):
For fall off.

Speaker 1 (12:58):
This adjective describe trees that lose their leaves in the.

Speaker 2 (13:02):
Fall, trees that lose their leaves in the floor.

Speaker 1 (13:09):
Missus Twillager is not happy now.

Speaker 6 (13:14):
Trees that lose their leaves?

Speaker 2 (13:16):
Why are you mad at me?

Speaker 6 (13:17):
Deciduous?

Speaker 5 (13:18):
What is it? I didn't I'm not you.

Speaker 2 (13:20):
Can't at the answer when.

Speaker 6 (13:21):
The something right away from Missus Twilliger. And now she's
rolling over in her graves somewhere.

Speaker 3 (13:31):
I think I just saw my first glimpse of miss Patricia.

Speaker 6 (13:36):
Justin Worsham is host of the Dad podcast.

Speaker 2 (13:45):
I like that, and I was waiting for you to see.

Speaker 5 (13:47):
What I was.

Speaker 6 (13:49):
I'm like everyone everywhere.

Speaker 11 (13:55):
I'm still in my head about our off air conversation,
just just imagining such a manly Justine exists there.

Speaker 5 (14:05):
It's altered the universe. It's just this.

Speaker 3 (14:10):
If they if they're going to remake that movie Multiplicity with.

Speaker 11 (14:14):
Michael exactly, I need to revisit that. I've revisited mister Mom.
And that's a that's a good one.

Speaker 6 (14:20):
Problem right there.

Speaker 5 (14:22):
That's what I never had. Mister Mom was such a
good movie.

Speaker 3 (14:31):
Did you and your wife talk about childcare? Like, how
are you guys going to handle it?

Speaker 5 (14:35):
Or No?

Speaker 11 (14:36):
It was never because I was so unemployed, that's true.
No schedules allowed for no, honestly. I mean when they
were infants, Yes I was.

Speaker 5 (14:47):
I was.

Speaker 11 (14:48):
I was building my stand up career at that point,
and anytime I had a road gig as my schedule
is getting busier. Natalie was so successful working at the
bank that they would let her work from home before
that was even a thing, and so and then eventually
we started taking the kids to like a preschool, and
weirdly enough, though not because.

Speaker 5 (15:06):
Of the cost our preschool.

Speaker 11 (15:07):
At most for two kids to go there, I think
it was five days a week for a few hours,
was like nine hundred bucks a month. I did some
research and the average cost here in LA because this
article that I found is saying that people are spending
eighty thousand dollars fifty thousand dollars for two children, eighty
thousand dollars for triplets, fifty thousand dollars for two children.

(15:30):
In different areas like Chicago and the Carolinas, on average,
people are spending twenty percent of their annual income on childcare.
But here in Los Angeles it ranges from two hundred
and sixty bucks a month up to four thy two
hundred and twenty dollars a month, which averages about fifteen
hundred a month, which and they're saying it. It's also
people are paying more for childcare in America than they

(15:52):
are for their rent, which is.

Speaker 6 (15:54):
Kind of sense.

Speaker 11 (15:55):
I know what makes sense, But it shouldn't right, Like
that shouldn't we shouldn't be so like yeah, get well.

Speaker 3 (16:00):
And I remember this would have been early inn our
parenting career, so it's twenty plus years ago. But we
watched Dateline or twenty twenty or something like that, one
of the larger news magazine programs, and they discussed that
cost of childcare versus the cost of one of the
parents that come home.

Speaker 5 (16:20):
Yeah, and.

Speaker 3 (16:22):
Almost without fail, it was cheaper for a parent to
be home, lose that income from whatever job it was
then to have both parents working, and then shoving all
of that money into childcare. That's still true because you've
got the I'm sure I shouldn't say because but and
you have the impact of having a parent around all

(16:44):
the time.

Speaker 1 (16:45):
I have a friend whose husband she out earns him,
she's the breadwinner, and her husband did that he stopped
working because they would save money he wasn't making as much,
and they would save a bunch of childcare for two kids,
and recently has gone needed to go back to work.
Because that's a hard thing to ask. That is a

(17:07):
really hard thing to ask of a mother or a
father to stay home with the kids and not have
that satisfaction of earning money, going somewhere, having adult interactions
all the things right, especially for a man, I think
biologically speaking, and I don't know that's probably sexist to say,
but especially for a man to be able to bring
home money. I think it's even harder for them, not

(17:29):
you justin but every other man in America to be
the state.

Speaker 2 (17:33):
Did use a keyword there what you said. I don't
think it was empty dome.

Speaker 6 (17:39):
I'm sorry, but you did open the segment.

Speaker 5 (17:46):
Choice.

Speaker 1 (17:46):
But anyway, recently he went back to workship because he
did need that, like he needed he needed to go
back to work and and there, and they're paying through
the nose. I mean, the kids are older now, so
it's not as you know, labor intensive as when they
were little, but still.

Speaker 6 (18:00):
It's just so driving them around to practices and things is.

Speaker 5 (18:03):
Just well, and that's all.

Speaker 11 (18:04):
We could talk even more about that, I think in
the next segment, because they're about the other article about
just people being way too stressed about parenting.

Speaker 5 (18:11):
But I think this is part of the childcare thing.

Speaker 11 (18:13):
Definitely is a thing in my experience when the kids
are younger, as they get more into school, it gets
a lot easier. I personally, this is what's weird about me.
I loved being the stay at home mom, like I
love that, like the whole thing about the role.

Speaker 5 (18:26):
I love everything about the gig.

Speaker 11 (18:29):
But I still wrestled with the idea that I was
a sandback to my wife that I wasn't a real
man because I couldn't bring home the majority of the money.
Now things have completely reversed, and I don't know that
I like it. I'm I don't know, being the man
in the relationship. That kind of sucks a little bit.

Speaker 6 (18:48):
But a little bit of pressure.

Speaker 5 (18:51):
Can I make cookies and bread at home? I'm really
good at it, all that pressure.

Speaker 11 (18:56):
Whenever she wants to, By the way, I am a
very yeah, whenever she wants, guys, she barely.

Speaker 2 (19:04):
We'll come back.

Speaker 6 (19:05):
There is a new reports on the state of parenting
in America. It's like sixty minutes.

Speaker 5 (19:10):
Yeah, you dailed it. You're doing great, thank you. Everybody's stressed.
This I think goes off the heels you.

Speaker 11 (19:15):
We didn't get a chance to talk about it because
when I came back, I talked about my debt's passing
and then no, no, why I giggled at that. Sorry
that but anyway, then the next week, you guys are gone,
and so we kind of hit on a little bit.
But the Surgeon General is basically put out like a
warning like they put on cigarettes, saying, hey, maybe you
shouldn't be a parent if you're not like up for
it because it's very hard, which is fascinating to me

(19:36):
on so many levels. But now they're talking about this
new data that's showing the forty percent of US parents
report that on most days they are so stressed they
cannot function, which is interesting to me.

Speaker 8 (19:49):
Go for it.

Speaker 3 (19:50):
I want to push back on this too, because I mean,
I'm not pushing back on the findings of the study.
I am pushing back generally that we have allowed people
to say things like I can't function.

Speaker 2 (20:02):
No, no, you can. You clearly can't.

Speaker 3 (20:04):
Your heart still beating, you're still drawing breath, You're not
frozen in fear or ineptitude. You just want to say
something that makes it sound like you're the victim of
how awful your circumstances are.

Speaker 11 (20:19):
Yeah, we want to talk about how hard everything is.
And there's there's trust me, there's lots of societal benefits
of people being open about their struggles.

Speaker 1 (20:26):
Why is that that used to not be the case?
It's a it's is it contagious too? Or people want
to just struggle and they want to.

Speaker 11 (20:35):
That's yes, I think that they're they're definitely in the
mindset that is now like, I really feel like there's
I don't like it. I don't like the words that
my brain tells me to use. But I do think
that there's a lot of like a victim mindset of
like I'm a victim of everything, and I think it's
unfair to actual victims.

Speaker 5 (20:52):
That's right. My genuine opinion is that they're my kids.

Speaker 11 (20:56):
I have teachers tell my kid that they have ADHD,
and I'm like, my kid doesn't have ADHD.

Speaker 5 (21:00):
He just doesn't want to do your garbage social studies assignment.
That's it. That's not ADHD, And that's wildly.

Speaker 11 (21:05):
Disrespectful to people who actually struggle with ADHD or depression.

Speaker 6 (21:08):
It's just being a little boy.

Speaker 11 (21:10):
Yes's and again, you could call me an insensitive father.

Speaker 5 (21:13):
So you're blue in the face. I don't care. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (21:15):
But it also I mean that that labeling of something,
or mislabeling perhaps of what your kid's behavioral issue is
or lack of desire to do a homework assignment, then
gives them the excuse for the rest of their adolescents
where they're like, well, I I mean fourth grade, my
teacher told me I was ADHD, and therefore I don't
have to do the work because I can't.

Speaker 2 (21:36):
I famously ridiculously wrong.

Speaker 11 (21:38):
I famously got in trouble at a PTA meeting when
my son was in kindergarten because we had a psychologist
come and they were talking about kids who are experiencing
stress in elementary school. And I was just sitting there
like shaking my head, going but what like in elementary school?

Speaker 5 (21:52):
And they as long.

Speaker 1 (21:52):
As you have food to eat and a roof over
your head, there's no stress.

Speaker 11 (21:56):
You don't have perspective, right, Like I've told my kids
this a couple of times where I've just said, I go, Unfortunately,
you've had a pretty good life and so therefore it's
hard for you to understand what real struggle feels like
you have to go through some adversity.

Speaker 8 (22:09):
Well.

Speaker 3 (22:10):
And there are parents who will put their stress on
their kids, right, And I don't know if it's because
they feel like they're keeping their kids informed about what
life is really like, but they'll they'll use their kids to,
I don't know, share their burdens, perhaps when the kids
are not equipped to do that. So there I think
there could be some instances where kids do have stress,

(22:30):
but not from elementary school.

Speaker 1 (22:31):
I remember my mom working crazy hours as a nurse manager,
and I remember her saying, you know, on more than
one occasion, like, oh, I'm just so stressed.

Speaker 6 (22:39):
I'm just I've got to get this done. I've to
get this done.

Speaker 1 (22:42):
And I never remember that permeating my my psyche or
what have you. I remember thinking, oh, it.

Speaker 6 (22:47):
Sucks to have a job like that's how that was
my takeaway adult.

Speaker 2 (22:51):
Yeah, I will take away.

Speaker 11 (22:52):
I will talk for a living. So I this is
my personal theories. I've read a lot of books on
parenting everything, and in the seventies there was this self
esteem movement in parenting where the idea was to make
your kid feel good about themselves. Those kids then grew
up and found out it was hard to always feel

(23:12):
good about yourself. And then it became about we've all
heard the it happens a lot in TV and movies
where it's like, oh, my father was emotionally unavailable. He
never told me he loved me, he never told me
he was proud of me, and even like, I've had
conversations with my brother and my mom since my dad's passing,
and it's shocking to me, but my dad's perception of
that if he showed emotion as far as like sadness

(23:34):
or tears. He saw that as weakness, which is not
the man that I thought.

Speaker 5 (23:38):
I knew. That was not who I was. It's clearly
not who I am. That's a father.

Speaker 11 (23:43):
But I think it starts there, right like if you're
coming out of this, if you're being raised by somebody
who doesn't feel things and sink thinks that if they had,
because I felt this as a father, where if I
start to feel like I showed them the chinks in
my armor, then what I feel like I'm doing is
I'm enabling them.

Speaker 5 (23:59):
I'm saying it's okay to not try hard.

Speaker 11 (24:00):
I'm saying it's okay to give up a little in
any incident, which.

Speaker 5 (24:04):
Is not what I want.

Speaker 11 (24:05):
I want to hold them accountable in every possible way,
to try to push them to be their best in
a way I think a dad becomes a coach like
that only twenty four to seven and there.

Speaker 5 (24:14):
Is a balance.

Speaker 11 (24:15):
But I feel like we've overcorrected and now everybody wants
to talk about their feelings and their weaknesses, and then
that becomes the thing to be proud of. But then
nobody's really got this, Like pulling it up by your
bootstraps and just suck it up. Buttercup mentality. It seems
not nobody, but you know what I mean, Like the
majority seems to be let's talk about our feelings and
speak truth to power.

Speaker 2 (24:33):
M I don't like it like this.

Speaker 11 (24:35):
The examples of what to do in this article are
take responsibility for telling your truth. Consider asking someone to
look out for you. Consider group based intervention versus family
based interventions, like you're you're pulling away from your family
members for fear of judgment.

Speaker 5 (24:50):
Get in touch with your limits.

Speaker 6 (24:51):
I like any of this.

Speaker 5 (24:53):
Reframe your role as a parent. What the hell like?

Speaker 11 (24:56):
I honestly, and all of the experts that I talked
to on the podcast would say, calm the f down,
like just cut yourself flat, thinking you're overthinking it and
this whole thing they can always say. The first line
in most of these articles that I read about parenting
is like in today's high demanding schedule of kids, and
they're over like whelmed, Like scheduling stop, just stop. Your

(25:16):
kid doesn't have to do everything. You know what they
need to do. They need to sit down and have
dinner with you and screw around and get to work
at school.

Speaker 5 (25:22):
That's all. They don't have to do much more than that.

Speaker 6 (25:25):
But what is your truth?

Speaker 5 (25:27):
He up and get to work. There we go.

Speaker 6 (25:30):
That's what I want to hear.

Speaker 5 (25:31):
Read that the power there you get your chemistry work done.

Speaker 6 (25:34):
Son, I feel like we've done real work here today.

Speaker 11 (25:38):
I'm gonna go home and watch mister Mom Multiplicity first.
Watch Multiplicity First. Not as good as mister Mom, but
still I think, I think an underrated Michael Keaton vehicle.

Speaker 2 (25:48):
Yes, I will say that we lost her.

Speaker 5 (25:51):
She's staring at a corner of the clock. She's literally staring
at the second tap.

Speaker 6 (25:55):
No, please, let's do more, Michael Keaton and so please.

Speaker 2 (26:02):
You've been listening to The Gary and Shannon Show.

Speaker 3 (26:04):
You can always hear us live on KFI AM six
forty nine am to one pm every Monday through Friday,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.

Gary and Shannon News

Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.