March 18, 2025 • 35 mins
ICYMI: Hour Two of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – ‘Beyond the Box Score’ with regular guest contributor Jackie Rae; Long Beach Post/WNBA Reporter and host of ‘The Jackie Rae Show,’ weighing in on the Philadelphia Eagles decision to accept an invitation to the White House to celebrate their Super Bowl LIX win AND the unifying spirit of March Madness…PLUS – Thoughts on AI nurses vs. human nurses AND a look at your weekly horoscope and “what makes you intelligent, based on your Zodiac Sign - KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Let's go beyond the box Score with Jackie Ray. We're
live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. Good evening, Jackie Ray,
It's always good to see you on the Saint Patrick's Day.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
Oh yeah, where's my green? Look?
Speaker 2 (00:16):
I got called anybody that I got a little bit
of green on. I got some army green Dockers. But
you know, my last name's O Kelly. How dona green?
I'll get my fit free drink later on tonight at
the Problem.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
I love it.
Speaker 4 (00:32):
I love it.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Speaking of green, how about that for a seguy.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
The Philadelphia Eagles are officially committed to visiting the White
House on April twenty eighth, and this is per Caroline Levitt,
the White House Press Press Secretary.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Listen to this.
Speaker 5 (00:47):
I have two more quick notes before I wrap up.
April twenty eighth, I can confirm that the Philadelphia Eagles
will be here at the White House to celebrate their
Super Bowl victory. I know there was a lot of
fake news about an invitation that wasn't sent or was sent.
We want to correct the record. We sent an invitation.
They enthusiastically accepted, and you will see them here on
April twenty eighth.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Caroline Levett was very enthusiastic. She said that the Eagles
were very enthusiastic. They enthusiastically accepted the invitation to come
to the White House on April twenty eighth. We all
know that in twenty eighteen, the Eagles, last time they
were Super Bowl champions, did not accept an invitation to
the White House and decline to attend.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
Should we make anything of this either way?
Speaker 1 (01:32):
Uh, that is a.
Speaker 6 (01:33):
Great question, because I've been thinking about this a lot.
I was drastically disappointed to find out the Eagles were
actually going to go to the White House because despite
what she said, we know that the Eagles originally did
say that as a team they had decided not to go,
and I their reasoning for not going made since individuals
on that team they know that in general there is
(01:54):
an attack on them, not maybe specifically, but they're part
of communities that the White House has long tax on,
so it made sense that they would say no. So
there's no part of me that believes that in any
way them declining the offer, because we saw them decline
the offer that that wasn't a legitimate thing. I think
what I'm concerned about now, though, is what's the turning point?
(02:16):
Because we've seen this unfortunately a lot as far as
this administration. People realize that the things that are coming
out of the White House are very anti whatever, anti black,
anti women, anti LGBTQ plus whatever. So they're taking stances
against that. So now my concern is what power is
(02:36):
he wielding that is making an entire organization change their mind.
That's number one and number two. Are there going to
be individuals who say I'm not going, Because in my mind,
Jalen and Saquan should absolutely not go because they're the
faces of the team and who they individually stand for.
I don't think that they should go. But then if
(02:57):
they don't go, what does that mean for the team?
I think everything is just in a very weird limbo spot.
Speaker 3 (03:02):
For me, let's not get ahead of ourselves. And you
touched upon it.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
Just because the organization said that it has accepted the
invitation to the White House, it does not mean that
all the members of the team have accepted that invitation
and will show up. And also, as I said earlier,
it's April twenty eighth, the whole world is going to
change between now and then, and the Philadelphia Eagles individually
(03:26):
as players and collectively as an organization, did not forget
that President Trump talked a lot of trash about the
Eagles and supported the Kansas City Chiefs because of their
MAGA associations having nothing to do with football.
Speaker 3 (03:41):
So I know that's still going to be an issue.
We know that Jalen.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
Hurts, to your point, was asked about the President during
Super Bowl Week and he brushed it aside in a
very clear way that he was not a fan. What
this looks like in April is going to look very
different from now. We're going to have other controversies. The
President's going to make other statements. We might be in
the middle of an economic catastrophe. We might be in
the middle of a war in the Middle East, you know,
(04:06):
because of things which have happened recently. We don't know
what it's going to be. But this is my takeaway.
According to our last conversation, I'm more of the opinion
we need to be done with this tradition.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
It should not be a part of a White House briefing.
Speaker 2 (04:19):
Because clearly it's in all of our consciousness about whether
the team is going to go or not, and you're
putting these players in an impossible position. Don't tell me
everyone's going to agree with it. We need to dead
this all together.
Speaker 6 (04:31):
And I think the president that has made it his
mission to say we should keep politics out of sports
should be.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
The one to dead this.
Speaker 6 (04:41):
He should be the one who says, which now I'm
being facetious here if you guys can't pick up on
my sarcast, but he should be the one who says,
I'm going to practice what I preach. If I don't
want athletes involved in politics, I'm going to stop making
this a thing where now people have to choose between
their morals, their ethics, their ideology, and if they're going
(05:03):
to stand with their team.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
We are done with this tradition.
Speaker 6 (05:06):
Congratulations for Philadelphia Eagles on your Super Bowl win.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
Go with God. You know, I think that's it.
Speaker 2 (05:13):
That's the easiest way to acknowledge them, to celebrate them
across the sports. You know, we're going to talk about
March Madness in the next segment. It doesn't have to
be just the NFL, could be the NBA, it could
be MLB, all the sports you have the President acknowledge
that team and say, congratulations, wonderful season, you are champions,
You're representing America in a great way on the world stage.
Speaker 3 (05:35):
YadA YadA, yadah blah blah blah, thank you, good night. Yeah,
you're very very good. You're very good.
Speaker 6 (05:40):
He could say anything he wanted to say. But now
here's the reason why I think this president specifically. Other
presidents could have done the same thing, but it has
been a more Typically when teams have gone to the
White House, it's been funds. We get a lot of
one liners from it. It's just this fun anecdotal thing.
But that's at the time we live in right now.
(06:01):
We live in a time where hate crimes are up.
We live in a time where older people are having
a hard time getting medication, specifically because of this administration,
they have wiped out history from black Mexican and women
at the Arlington Cemetery. So we live in a very
trying time where you're mere association with somebody or standing
(06:22):
next to somebody all of a sudden puts you in
their saying stratosphere. Whether you believe as or as an endorsement,
it's perceived as an endorsement so I would be vastly disappointed.
Like I said, if there's certain specific players on the
team that go, in my opinion, the only person that
should be there as the owner in the GM, because
I would feel like their ideologies might align with that.
(06:44):
Everybody else should just stay home and watch it on
television my personal opinion. But I can't be the only
one that's like that. There's people out there who are
going to see certain people standing next to Trump and
they're going to assume that this wave of destruction that
we're seeing across our country they a co sign on
that they agree with that and they support it. And
that's not a fair assumption, but it is an assumption
(07:06):
that's going to be made.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
Let me put it in real terms, this is exactly
what is going to happen. Jalen Hurts, the quarterback for
the Philadelphia Eagles, is going to be asked, point blank,
are you going to the White House? Do you support
the president when he's doing X, Y and Z. And
then he is in the impossible position of having to
make a political assessment and give a political answer having
(07:27):
nothing to do with sports, having nothing to do with
anything he's done. It's now been placed in his lap,
and if he says anything other than I am happy
to do this, I have no problem to do this
and not acknowledge the actual question which is going to
be asked of him. He's then going to be put
in some sort of box that he endorses everything that
Donald Trump has said and done, and it's unfair to him.
(07:49):
And we say keep politics out of sports, but that
is what's going to happen, and it's unfair to the players.
Speaker 6 (07:55):
And let's just I know, we talk about gambling a lot.
Let's make a bet. Because what I would assume, how
I would assume Jalen is going to answer that question,
is I am not going to support this president. I'm
going as a member of this team and to support
my teammates. That's not going to fly to your point, no,
because it's not going to be this blanket statement that
(08:16):
might have worked in the past, because now there is
a very specific overtone undertone, whatever you want to call it,
in this country, and as a black man, you cannot
deny the racist undertones. You have to say to me,
you have to look a black journalist in the face
and say, I, as a black man, am okay shaking
the hand of this man who has been very open
(08:38):
that he doesn't even like diversity in the country.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
Well, not only that, has made it very clear that
he doesn't even like the Philadelphia Eagles, and drag Hurts
has made it clear that he's not a fan of
the president. So let's stop playing games here. We got
to go to a break here. But on the other side,
it's kind of a continuation of this conversation because it's
now March Madness. The brackets are out, my team's not
in it, but I know that the old country is
(09:01):
going to be wasting time at work watching it. So
let's talk some March Madness when we come back. It's
Jackie Ray with me Beyond the box Score Later with
Mo Kelly CAFI AM six forty live everywhere in the
iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
It's March Madness. Let's continue to go beyond the box
Score with Jackie Ray. Jackie Ray, I used to love
March Madness, and my reasons for not loving it now
are selfish because my team, my alma mater, Georgetown Hoyas,
have been horrible for about a decade. They've sniffed the
tournament once in the past ten years, so I don't
have any reason to watch. I'm not invested.
Speaker 3 (09:39):
Are you serious right now? Oh? Here you go. Here's
some history.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
The last time we made the tournament, we lost to
Colorado in the first round. I know you remember that, yep.
But all around the country people are filling out their brackets.
It's easier now to watch the tournament than ever before.
It's on like six different channels, and because of streaming,
you're not gonna miss really any of the games. People
are gonna be watching work or they're gonna call in sick.
(10:05):
How would you describe the importance to March madness to
our culture in general?
Speaker 6 (10:12):
March madness is one of my favorite things in the world,
because this is where you really to your point. I
can remember being in school, on a job, whatever, and
I would have either classmates or fellow colleagues that I
wasn't really close to, but then March Madness rolls around
and we're all talking brackets. We got a boss one time,
two jobs ago, I had a boss that was like, Hey,
(10:34):
are we all getting sick this day? So we can
go to the local bar and watch games all day.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
Fantastic.
Speaker 6 (10:40):
It's one of those things that we all want to
be the one person, which is I think the statistics
are like point zero zero point one, you.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
Have a better chance to hitt into the lottery.
Speaker 6 (10:49):
But go ahead, Yeah, yeah, I'm getting your home. Most
people's brackets are going to blow up on the first day,
but it's just a fun thing to really sit down,
go through your brackets, talk shop. You can kind of
tell who knows a little bit about has been following
certain teams or certain players versus the people who are
just doing that crash course trying to get the brackets done.
It really is a great way, in my opinion. I
(11:11):
feel the same way about fantasy football, when you guys
can get together and it just brings people together who
normally wouldn't hang out together. So I do like the
unifying spirit of it. I've never won it, I've never
even gotten close to. My bracket always is blown up
the first day.
Speaker 3 (11:25):
Same with mine.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
I've never been adept at choosing brackets, and my team
usually never goes far in the tournament. And also when
my team is out of the tournament, I usually tune
out because I'm not rooting for Duke. I'm not, For example,
I'm not rooting for some other team from the Big
East Conference where Georgetown plays in the case of this
(11:46):
case would be Saint John's. It's the number two seed,
it's a great turnaround story for the university. And also
Rick Patino can't root for them, So yeah, don't care.
There's nothing in it for me. But I'm so invested
personally in college basketball it's hard for me. Whenever my
team is out, I can't even watch ESPN. It's a
painful reminder. But that's how serious it is for a
(12:08):
lot of people, and I don't know if we for me.
Here's the question, is there anything more exciting than an
NC two way final four?
Speaker 6 (12:20):
I don't know, absolutely not, especially if there's an underdog
in there that kind of flew under everyone's radar. What
was it like five six years ago Villanova was the
underdog and that just had everyone glued to the television.
Speaker 3 (12:34):
Who are these people?
Speaker 7 (12:35):
You know?
Speaker 6 (12:36):
Those kinds of storylines that help you fall in love
with the kids. Now, I do feel like the men's
game specifically, and I know I've said this before, they
need that, they need that underdog to try to push
that storyline because a lot of the kids, we're not
going to know who they are next year.
Speaker 3 (12:49):
We're gonna have a whole different lineup next year. Yeah
they're going to the pros or transit, Yeah.
Speaker 6 (12:54):
They're going to the Pro. So we don't really have
the opportunity in the men's game to build those relationship
and build those fandoms. So the NCAA men's game really does,
in my opinion, rely on those underdogs to kind of
carry the story. So if we don't have one of
those great storylines, I don't even know how interested I'm
going to be in the men's game just in general
versus the women's game. You know these players, these women,
(13:17):
they have been with their teams. A lot of these
players have been two three years, some of them even
play four years. So you have that opportunity to just
really become a fan of that player in that school.
So it's an easier storyline to carry. But either way,
I absolutely love it.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
Question.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
Was USC women's team disrespected by getting a number one
seed but the lowest number one seed? In other words,
the most difficult path to the final four, largely on
the strength of losing to UCLA, who they already beaten
twice in the Big Ten Championships. Was usc disrespected by
(13:52):
their placement?
Speaker 3 (13:53):
I think so.
Speaker 6 (13:54):
I don't think you really can say, oh, they've lost
to UCLA when they beat them. But I've also have
been one to say for my entire life, this whole
decision by committee thing is just weird to me. There's
a lot of things that don't necessarily make sense. People
will say, oh, well, they lost the last three or four,
so that's why whatever. None of this is actually logical.
It is based largely on feelings.
Speaker 3 (14:15):
However, even though I think.
Speaker 6 (14:17):
They were disrespected and their path is going to be harder,
I think they're going to come out stellar, and so
this specific path is going to solidify that, Yes, this
is the team that we think they are.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
Yeah, they weren't ready last season to take that next step.
They're definitely ready. It's all laid out in front of them,
and it probably would be even more satisfying yes, to.
Speaker 6 (14:40):
Say, hot, look, you try to make this hard, and
here we are. Last season we saw a glimpse of
who they were who they are. Now we kind of
know who they are. I think this is going to
be a fun series to watch.
Speaker 2 (14:51):
I will be tuning in because I definitely won't be
tuning in to the Mids because I am petty, I'm salty.
Speaker 6 (14:59):
Name your face favorite NCUBA men's basketball player right now.
Speaker 2 (15:04):
You know what I don't know about favorite. I'm curious
to see if Duke's Cooper Flag is the real deal.
If he is, because he's forecast to be the number
one pick overall, I like his game, I don't know
if he is as not necessarily as good as advertised,
will have as an immediate impact as thought right.
Speaker 6 (15:27):
And that's that's one of the problems we see all
the time in the nc DOUBLEA men's game.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
It doesn't it takes a couple of years.
Speaker 6 (15:33):
It does Leangelo in my LaMelo and you know, I
get the LaMelo ball. Lamela he's the exception to that
rule in my opinion. He translated seamlessly, but he was
always also born with a basketball in his hand, so
that's probably not a fair comparison. But it does take
a year or two, probably two or three actually for
them to catch up, but it's because they didn't spend
(15:54):
enough time in school.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Yeah, they're only eighteen, nineteen years old.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
You know, that's what college would give you two three
years of legitimate pre NBA experience as opposed to going
from basically high school to NBA.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
You know, you're jumping two levels in one year.
Speaker 6 (16:10):
So that's what I'll bet Alonzo, speaking of the Bob
Brothers didn't work out, Alonzo, he definitely could have benefited
from another year or two in college.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
Absolutely chasing that money. It's Later with Mo Kelly, Jackie Ray,
I'll see you soon, See you soon.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (16:29):
Imagine Scrubs a TV show like that in a world
today and Mark Runner is gonna hate this where we
have AI doing a lot of the jobs that nurses
would do in assistance of medical doctors. Like, for example,
you can be due for a medical exam and you
could get a phone call, an actual phone call from
(16:51):
someone like Anna, this friendly voice that could help you
prepare for your appointment and answer any pressing questions. You
might have to have a car warm demeanor, and Anna
has been trained to put patients at ease. Like Mark
and me, we have this apprehension when it comes to
stuff like this.
Speaker 4 (17:09):
Can Anna give me a sponge bath? That's what I
want to know. Maybe not today, okay, but in the future.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Case closed.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
But Anna is doing the job of many actual nurses.
Anna is AI available twenty four to seven, can speak
multiple language languages from Hindi to Haitian creole. Anna is
a part of this company and an intelligence program called
Hippocratic AI, like Hippocratic Oath and so one. It's one
(17:39):
of a number of new companies offering ways to automate
time consuming tasks usually performed by nurses and medical assistants.
And if you don't know, most, not all, but most
nurses and medical assistance are paid in hourly wage. In
other words, that is a variable cost that most companies
(18:00):
would love to get rid of. Why am I going
to pay someone, let's say, forty five dollars an hour
when you have Anna who can do it basically for free,
with the exception of the cost of paying for the
service originally.
Speaker 8 (18:13):
Yeah, this is where Mark Ronner comes in and says,
because that's putting people out of a job.
Speaker 3 (18:19):
Isn't that the whole point of business? I'm being serious.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
The whole point of having employees is to make things
easier to make money. If you can do it. Without
an employee. What's the point of it during that expense.
What's the point of keeping employees around if you can
do it without them.
Speaker 8 (18:41):
I mean, look, I want to have an argument against that,
I really do.
Speaker 3 (18:46):
I don't though I'm not saying it's fair.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
I'm not saying that it's good for America in the
sense of the labor force. I've said many times that
eventually we'll get to the point where we have a
universal basic income.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Don't It'll be in my lifetime.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
But through automation, yes, some jobs change, but most jobs
go away. Especially when you're talking about the service industry.
How many jobs have disappeared because we don't have any
more elevator operators, or we don't have traffic light operators,
or we don't have people who are working at a
grocery store, or we don't have people working in just
(19:25):
those convenience stores. Most of that can be done through
automation for the most part. I mean, you go to
the movie theater, you can just you really don't need
someone behind the counter actually taking your order. You go
to McDonald's today and go and they just go walk up,
pick your food, pick up your food. They don't need
(19:46):
as many employees as they use right now. It's unfortunate reality,
but that's the way everything is trending. And if they
can find AI a use for AI in the medical field,
I'm not saying they can actually come in and do
a digital rectal exam which Mark is looking for.
Speaker 3 (20:04):
They're not there yet, but but thank you for that.
Speaker 7 (20:09):
But literally, yes, yes, now, I know that there is
a huge fight with human nurses against of course the
advancement of AI nurses, and there are cases where they
point out where the AI at this moment is not
necessarily as intuitive as it needs to be.
Speaker 8 (20:32):
There was a case where an individual came in with
a case of sepsis and the AI nurse, through them
entering information, recommended a large dose of ivy fluid. The
human nurse, upon further investigation in talking to the patient,
found out that the patient was a dialysis patient and
(20:56):
a large dose of ivy fluid can make your dialogue
is that much harder, and so using human common sense,
had to say, ah, a large dose of fluid is
not good for someone that's currently on dialysis, especially what
was being prescribed, So they had to use human means
(21:16):
to lower the dosage. And this that and the other
all I can say against that is yeah, this is
why AI is constantly advancing. I get that it may
not be as intuitive as need be right now, But
the thing about AI is it's actually growing faster than people.
People are not advancing through the medical field as fast
(21:38):
as AI is analyzing right.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
It can be trained, quote unquote and ready to be
a nurse's assistant in a relatively short amount of time.
Speaker 3 (21:48):
And it doesn't need to do everything, but it's doing
some of the things.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
It's doing some of the necessary things and allowing the
actual human element to do other things and be more productive.
Speaker 8 (21:59):
Trust and believe, as someone who has spent an ungodly
amount of time in hospitals, I am telling you for
a fact that I love each and every nurse who
has ever waited on me taking care of me, either
you know, got an IV in correctly, or just tended
to my needs.
Speaker 3 (22:21):
I mean that there have.
Speaker 8 (22:22):
Been a lot of instances where just because of the
nurse's presence in the room I felt at ease, because
they were able to walk me through a lot of
things that when the doctor comes through in the morning, Hey,
how you doing okay out, they're able to come and
say okay, so here's what the doctor has laid out.
Here are the orders for the day, this, that, and
the other. I don't know if I would be as
(22:44):
happy getting that from a teleprompter with an AI, you know,
picture on it saying Hi, this is Jody. Here's what's
going to be happening today. I like the personal element.
All I'm saying is what I like and what say
the hospital that I'm going to may like are two
different worlds.
Speaker 3 (23:02):
Well, think of it another way.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Let's use this in the way that we may outsource
a call center and you have either AI or a
foreign country doing some of this work, and if it
doesn't work, it's escalated up to a human, hopefully someone
there's maybe not a language barrier. Not trying to be
an ass, I'm just saying, let's be honest. Sometimes there's
a language barrier, or the computer automated system doesn't give
(23:28):
you the options that you actually want, and so it's
escalated to can I speak to your manager? So you
get an actual person on the phone. That's where I
think this is. It can do some things, limited things,
but the really important and difficult things still.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
You're going to need that human touch.
Speaker 2 (23:44):
But three years from now it's going to be doing
a hell of a lot more than it's right now.
Speaker 4 (23:49):
I want to know who takes the responsibility when an
AI screws up on some medical thing. It's probably written
into the contract written insurance a company that made the AI. Yeah,
it's still representing the hospital. Yeah right, that's not good enough.
And that's why you need people required, not what a sue,
not like what are you doing?
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Mark?
Speaker 4 (24:09):
I think that sometimes people need to have a connection
with another person, and not every single thing in human
life needs to be boiled down to efficiency and cost saving,
especially the medical profession.
Speaker 3 (24:22):
Well medicine is especially.
Speaker 9 (24:24):
I'm okay with AI being an assistant to a nurse,
but you need to have a human nurse there in
case there's a glitch or a malfunction. A long time ago,
there was a radiation machine that was supposed to be
controlled by software, and the software malfunctioned and it ended
up killing a bunch of people that were going in
for cancer radiation.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
Oh great, that makes me feel great. Okay, thank you, Sam. No,
but that's the thing.
Speaker 9 (24:46):
You need to have human touch there to make sure
that that kind of thing doesn't happen.
Speaker 3 (24:49):
That's right, logans run at I hear you on that zam.
Speaker 8 (24:54):
But did they not make the necessary improvements on set
machine and we haven't had that?
Speaker 10 (25:00):
It's didn't happen again, absolutely, that is my point. Thank
you for me, kim we boilet dounge of this AI
is brand new.
Speaker 3 (25:06):
Oh do you want to be part of the trial
and error? Do you want to be one of the
mistakes that?
Speaker 8 (25:10):
You know how much trial and error I go through
in my medical life, how many things I've had?
Speaker 3 (25:14):
You never heard the stories? Mark, you don't, don't.
Speaker 4 (25:16):
I can only imagine, But would you like to multiply
that by an order of magnitude?
Speaker 2 (25:20):
But no, AI is here in varying degrees, like, for example,
don't you think don't delude yourself into believing that when
you get on a plane and it's on autopilot, that's
not a form of AI.
Speaker 4 (25:31):
It's in varying degrees in all of our technology. Well maybe,
but would you get on a plane that only had autopilot?
Speaker 3 (25:37):
I wouldn't.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Not yet, I want to get into damn carr, which
is autonomous, So why would I get on a plane
it's autonomous?
Speaker 3 (25:43):
Well, we've got the expert on that right here.
Speaker 8 (25:45):
Okay, but in a few years that will be the
way because then, you know what, you don't have to
worry about Mark pilots doing cocaine before the flight.
Speaker 3 (25:53):
You know, we have proposed worried about Really, you're not
worried about cocaine, pilot.
Speaker 4 (25:58):
No, worried about the side of a In fact, I
think a little bit of coke might make them more alert.
Speaker 10 (26:03):
In fact, give them free coke, Give violets. Okay, all right,
I guess it's time to go to break.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
We'll come back with your horoscope this later with mo
Kelly ca if I AM six forty no AI here.
Speaker 3 (26:13):
We're live everywhere the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
You're listening to Later with mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
KFI mo Kelly, We're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Is now time for your horoscope for the week, and
we'll find out what makes you intelligent based on your
zodiac sign. Let's start with aries. Aries can make swift
decisions while others get lost in hesitation. They work well
in high pressure situations or emergencies. Ruled by warrior Mars,
(26:45):
the planet of ambition and preservation check the rhymes, y'all.
Their rapid mind allows them to solve problems almost instantaneously,
as they are governed by in aligned with their instincts.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
Taurus, isn't it Sam, aren't you Tarus? Yep? All right,
here we go.
Speaker 2 (27:04):
Taurus is naturally resourceful. Ruled by Venus, the planet of
luxury and values, makes them dedicated to fulfilling their long
term goals. They innately understand the importance of money, practical aims,
material management, and intelligence.
Speaker 3 (27:21):
Do you make anything of that?
Speaker 9 (27:23):
I have some of it. If sounds about right. Some
of it feels like, you know, like financial management. That's
not me. Now we're on to Mark Runner and Gemini.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
Let's have it.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
We know very little about Mark, but he did tell
us that he was a Gemini. We'll assume he was
telling us the truth. Ruled by Mercury and of the
intellectual air element, Gemini is often the jack of all trades.
Their curiosity is their superpower. They usually educate themselves, research
their burning questions, and accumulate many skills. This zodiac is
(27:57):
often considered one of the most witty star signs. I'm
waiting for the other shoot to drop up here No,
that's the end of it.
Speaker 3 (28:03):
That's it. You're witty.
Speaker 4 (28:04):
Huh, I don't trust this.
Speaker 2 (28:07):
Sus This not like there's going to be more at
the end? Okay, cancer move on. Cancer is a natural
born healer. They excel in any activities that require heightened
emotional maturity or intelligence. Their profound perceptive skills and unconditional
empathy make them excellent at meditating, validating emotions, and building community. Leo,
(28:30):
you shine bright, ruled by our sun. Leo's are witty
in creative problem solving and projects. Their exceptional leadership skills
and aspirations make them successful in whatever they set their
minds to. Their charisma is natural and effortless, granting them
access to usually impossible spaces.
Speaker 3 (28:50):
Virgo, you're the Zodiac.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
Analysts innately in tune with the details that make up
the big picture of a successful operation. They see crucial
facts and elements that many just overlook. This Earth sign
is ruled by Mercury, the planet of cerebral activity, leading
to an intelligent disposition and personality. Libra, You're ruled by
charming Vetus. Understand social dynamics. Their lovely personalities allow them
(29:16):
to connect with people from various backgrounds, leading to their
popularity and vast network of context. Libras naturally find ways
to diffuse tension, uplift others, and make people feel seen,
understood and support it.
Speaker 3 (29:29):
That's very nice. Libra. Here comes swallow with Scorpio. Yeah.
When it comes to intuitive awareness, Scorpio has it made.
Their nearly psychic abilities to read situations, predict patterns, and
understand the core intentions of others make them influential personalities.
They excel with psychological intelligence and research skills and always
(29:52):
get to the bottom. This is so true. I wish
I was a Scorpio. This is so This is absolutely
one hundred percent true.
Speaker 4 (30:00):
Last bit of this. All this flattery is devalued everybody.
Everybody can't be great all at once.
Speaker 8 (30:05):
Sorry, hey, hey, hey, hey, don't hate the great.
Speaker 3 (30:10):
Can I move on now? Please do?
Speaker 2 (30:11):
Okay, Sagittarius, that's me being worldly and connected to the
big picture. Grant Sagittarius philosophical intelligence. They excel at navigating
ethical dilemmas, bringing others closer to their truth, and sometimes
finding common ground with opposing views. They love to educate
others right and travel to stay in the loop. Dude,
(30:32):
that's spot on spot on. I can stop right there,
write down yourself if I am six forty, We're alive
everywhere at iHeartRadio app Now, No, man, No, I did
not write that, but it is accurate.
Speaker 3 (30:44):
You pay to have it written. No, I did not
Tala tell them.
Speaker 5 (30:47):
No.
Speaker 8 (30:48):
Look, Mark, I found this. This is a gym accept yourself, though, Mark,
I need you to accept yourself.
Speaker 4 (30:55):
No. I told you Friday that I'm uncomfortable with anything
but self deprecation and we just have to live with them.
This is where you say, okay, let's move on. I
need you to engage in some self deprecation as well.
Please whatever, I'm perfect Capricorn. Capricorn thrives in organized systems
of success. As natural born leaders, this zodiac thrives in
(31:17):
the driver's seat, known for their career success, their intelligence
runs deeper in truth. They remain true to their initial intentions, goals,
and integrity. Their maturity grants them old soul wisdom. Aquarius well.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
Aquarius is on the edge of thought leading trends before
the common public understands them. They excel in technology, science, innovation,
and other non traditional logistical fields. Humanitarians at heart, this
zodiac advocates for many. Now this is just my own
personal pet peeve. Okay, all these are relatively positive, and
we have too many a holes out there for this
(31:53):
to apply to everyone.
Speaker 3 (31:54):
What was I just saying? Thank you? Did you say
something I didn't hear you.
Speaker 8 (31:58):
It's literally about how people apply their horoscopic wisdom. Not
too many people do. Too many people like to, you know,
move about without any horoscopic awareness, and I think that's
part of the problem. If people were to really tap
in to their inner true self, we would all be better.
Speaker 3 (32:19):
People.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
Know thyself, Yes, to thine own self be true. What
philosophical statement are you making horoscopically? We need to live
more horoscopically. Is that what you're saying? Yes, more endoscopically. Yeah, yeah,
I'm more comfortable with that. You're not more comfortable with
that one.
Speaker 3 (32:36):
I can tell you. I can tell you, good sir,
you are not. Okay, you're not. You don't want that one.
Speaker 2 (32:42):
Pisces, as we close it out, Spiritually intelligent and gifted.
Pisces is known for its abstract thinking. They can think
outside the box, making fantasy or reality. Artistic, compassionate, and ethereal,
Pisces leaves a lasting emotional impact. On others, they cross
paths with with words like poetry. They sense the true,
unspoken emotional undercurrents in any given moment.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
It's beautiful. Is that a way of like calling them
an mpath or something? Yeah? Yeah, roundabout?
Speaker 2 (33:11):
What are you still waiting for that other shoe to drop?
Speaker 3 (33:14):
Mark? No, these all sound like really swell people who
I'd like to know. Look, they're not existing in my life.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
I could throw a rocket hit a Gemini who's an
a hole with no effort.
Speaker 3 (33:24):
It's are you're a Gemini? Aren't you?
Speaker 4 (33:26):
A little great inflation across the board here. I don't
trust any of this stuff. I trust none of it.
Speaker 2 (33:31):
It's a little too sunny of a disposition for me.
I'd like to see the worst in people, not the best.
They need to have a negative horoscope out there. Every
horoscope I've seen seems to be trying to encourage people
to live up to something. Why not be have like
one that's like, Okay, here's the positive stuff about you,
but also here's the negative stuff about you. That's why
I do not like fortune cookies, because this is just
a bunch of bs.
Speaker 3 (33:52):
If they said.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
Receiver of the cookie, you know, a large sum of
money's gonna come your way and you're going to jail.
I would like that. Okay, let's be honest here. You
know your your career is about to change. You're going
to get fired. That would mean more because that's realistic. Yeah,
you're gonna win the lottery and use the money to overdose.
(34:15):
That's the fortune cookie.
Speaker 7 (34:17):
I want to.
Speaker 9 (34:19):
I would be surprised if I saw it like you
will perform in adult films, something that's like really deep
and intense, like let's.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
See that actually would be a seller That would be
a selling point. And the only place I get a
fortune cookie these days is a Panda Express and they're
all nice and positive and fluffy. It's like, give me
the real because my life is not fluffy. It's not
all positive. But you have to change your outlook, your outlook.
Speaker 10 (34:45):
What does my email have to do with this? I
want a fortune cookie, alarms me, Like you open it
up and says duck, right, can I get a win now?
Speaker 3 (35:01):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (35:02):
The fleshering cookies usually play the longer game, so I
would like to see more immediate ones as well, like
go see the doctor, like you have to do number
two plan for that. You don't want to get caught short.
Speaker 8 (35:16):
This is not how the realm of positivity works. This
is where fortune cookies and horse cops. It is trying
to guide you to become your better self.
Speaker 2 (35:27):
I would be better if I had to go number two,
So yeah, guide me to the bathroom.
Speaker 4 (35:31):
You'd certainly be lighter. Okay, look at the time, kay,
If I am six forty. We're live everywhere in the
iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (35:42):
Green Don't Get Pinched, kf I KOST HD two, Los Angeles,
Orange County lives
Speaker 3 (35:51):
Everywhere on the radio
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Let's go beyond the box Score with Jackie Ray. We're
live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. Good evening, Jackie Ray,
It's always good to see you on the Saint Patrick's Day.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
Oh yeah, where's my green? Look?
Speaker 2 (00:16):
I got called anybody that I got a little bit
of green on. I got some army green Dockers. But
you know, my last name's O Kelly. How dona green?
I'll get my fit free drink later on tonight at
the Problem.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
I love it.
Speaker 4 (00:32):
I love it.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Speaking of green, how about that for a seguy.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
The Philadelphia Eagles are officially committed to visiting the White
House on April twenty eighth, and this is per Caroline Levitt,
the White House Press Press Secretary.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Listen to this.
Speaker 5 (00:47):
I have two more quick notes before I wrap up.
April twenty eighth, I can confirm that the Philadelphia Eagles
will be here at the White House to celebrate their
Super Bowl victory. I know there was a lot of
fake news about an invitation that wasn't sent or was sent.
We want to correct the record. We sent an invitation.
They enthusiastically accepted, and you will see them here on
April twenty eighth.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Caroline Levett was very enthusiastic. She said that the Eagles
were very enthusiastic. They enthusiastically accepted the invitation to come
to the White House on April twenty eighth. We all
know that in twenty eighteen, the Eagles, last time they
were Super Bowl champions, did not accept an invitation to
the White House and decline to attend.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
Should we make anything of this either way?
Speaker 1 (01:32):
Uh, that is a.
Speaker 6 (01:33):
Great question, because I've been thinking about this a lot.
I was drastically disappointed to find out the Eagles were
actually going to go to the White House because despite
what she said, we know that the Eagles originally did
say that as a team they had decided not to go,
and I their reasoning for not going made since individuals
on that team they know that in general there is
(01:54):
an attack on them, not maybe specifically, but they're part
of communities that the White House has long tax on,
so it made sense that they would say no. So
there's no part of me that believes that in any
way them declining the offer, because we saw them decline
the offer that that wasn't a legitimate thing. I think
what I'm concerned about now, though, is what's the turning point?
(02:16):
Because we've seen this unfortunately a lot as far as
this administration. People realize that the things that are coming
out of the White House are very anti whatever, anti black,
anti women, anti LGBTQ plus whatever. So they're taking stances
against that. So now my concern is what power is
(02:36):
he wielding that is making an entire organization change their mind.
That's number one and number two. Are there going to
be individuals who say I'm not going, Because in my mind,
Jalen and Saquan should absolutely not go because they're the
faces of the team and who they individually stand for.
I don't think that they should go. But then if
(02:57):
they don't go, what does that mean for the team?
I think everything is just in a very weird limbo spot.
Speaker 3 (03:02):
For me, let's not get ahead of ourselves. And you
touched upon it.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
Just because the organization said that it has accepted the
invitation to the White House, it does not mean that
all the members of the team have accepted that invitation
and will show up. And also, as I said earlier,
it's April twenty eighth, the whole world is going to
change between now and then, and the Philadelphia Eagles individually
(03:26):
as players and collectively as an organization, did not forget
that President Trump talked a lot of trash about the
Eagles and supported the Kansas City Chiefs because of their
MAGA associations having nothing to do with football.
Speaker 3 (03:41):
So I know that's still going to be an issue.
We know that Jalen.
Speaker 2 (03:44):
Hurts, to your point, was asked about the President during
Super Bowl Week and he brushed it aside in a
very clear way that he was not a fan. What
this looks like in April is going to look very
different from now. We're going to have other controversies. The
President's going to make other statements. We might be in
the middle of an economic catastrophe. We might be in
the middle of a war in the Middle East, you know,
(04:06):
because of things which have happened recently. We don't know
what it's going to be. But this is my takeaway.
According to our last conversation, I'm more of the opinion
we need to be done with this tradition.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
It should not be a part of a White House briefing.
Speaker 2 (04:19):
Because clearly it's in all of our consciousness about whether
the team is going to go or not, and you're
putting these players in an impossible position. Don't tell me
everyone's going to agree with it. We need to dead
this all together.
Speaker 6 (04:31):
And I think the president that has made it his
mission to say we should keep politics out of sports
should be.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
The one to dead this.
Speaker 6 (04:41):
He should be the one who says, which now I'm
being facetious here if you guys can't pick up on
my sarcast, but he should be the one who says,
I'm going to practice what I preach. If I don't
want athletes involved in politics, I'm going to stop making
this a thing where now people have to choose between
their morals, their ethics, their ideology, and if they're going
(05:03):
to stand with their team.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
We are done with this tradition.
Speaker 6 (05:06):
Congratulations for Philadelphia Eagles on your Super Bowl win.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
Go with God. You know, I think that's it.
Speaker 2 (05:13):
That's the easiest way to acknowledge them, to celebrate them
across the sports. You know, we're going to talk about
March Madness in the next segment. It doesn't have to
be just the NFL, could be the NBA, it could
be MLB, all the sports you have the President acknowledge
that team and say, congratulations, wonderful season, you are champions,
You're representing America in a great way on the world stage.
Speaker 3 (05:35):
YadA YadA, yadah blah blah blah, thank you, good night. Yeah,
you're very very good. You're very good.
Speaker 6 (05:40):
He could say anything he wanted to say. But now
here's the reason why I think this president specifically. Other
presidents could have done the same thing, but it has
been a more Typically when teams have gone to the
White House, it's been funds. We get a lot of
one liners from it. It's just this fun anecdotal thing.
But that's at the time we live in right now.
(06:01):
We live in a time where hate crimes are up.
We live in a time where older people are having
a hard time getting medication, specifically because of this administration,
they have wiped out history from black Mexican and women
at the Arlington Cemetery. So we live in a very
trying time where you're mere association with somebody or standing
(06:22):
next to somebody all of a sudden puts you in
their saying stratosphere. Whether you believe as or as an endorsement,
it's perceived as an endorsement so I would be vastly disappointed.
Like I said, if there's certain specific players on the
team that go, in my opinion, the only person that
should be there as the owner in the GM, because
I would feel like their ideologies might align with that.
(06:44):
Everybody else should just stay home and watch it on
television my personal opinion. But I can't be the only
one that's like that. There's people out there who are
going to see certain people standing next to Trump and
they're going to assume that this wave of destruction that
we're seeing across our country they a co sign on
that they agree with that and they support it. And
that's not a fair assumption, but it is an assumption
(07:06):
that's going to be made.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
Let me put it in real terms, this is exactly
what is going to happen. Jalen Hurts, the quarterback for
the Philadelphia Eagles, is going to be asked, point blank,
are you going to the White House? Do you support
the president when he's doing X, Y and Z. And
then he is in the impossible position of having to
make a political assessment and give a political answer having
(07:27):
nothing to do with sports, having nothing to do with
anything he's done. It's now been placed in his lap,
and if he says anything other than I am happy
to do this, I have no problem to do this
and not acknowledge the actual question which is going to
be asked of him. He's then going to be put
in some sort of box that he endorses everything that
Donald Trump has said and done, and it's unfair to him.
(07:49):
And we say keep politics out of sports, but that
is what's going to happen, and it's unfair to the players.
Speaker 6 (07:55):
And let's just I know, we talk about gambling a lot.
Let's make a bet. Because what I would assume, how
I would assume Jalen is going to answer that question,
is I am not going to support this president. I'm
going as a member of this team and to support
my teammates. That's not going to fly to your point, no,
because it's not going to be this blanket statement that
(08:16):
might have worked in the past, because now there is
a very specific overtone undertone, whatever you want to call it,
in this country, and as a black man, you cannot
deny the racist undertones. You have to say to me,
you have to look a black journalist in the face
and say, I, as a black man, am okay shaking
the hand of this man who has been very open
(08:38):
that he doesn't even like diversity in the country.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
Well, not only that, has made it very clear that
he doesn't even like the Philadelphia Eagles, and drag Hurts
has made it clear that he's not a fan of
the president. So let's stop playing games here. We got
to go to a break here. But on the other side,
it's kind of a continuation of this conversation because it's
now March Madness. The brackets are out, my team's not
in it, but I know that the old country is
(09:01):
going to be wasting time at work watching it. So
let's talk some March Madness when we come back. It's
Jackie Ray with me Beyond the box Score Later with
Mo Kelly CAFI AM six forty live everywhere in the
iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
It's March Madness. Let's continue to go beyond the box
Score with Jackie Ray. Jackie Ray, I used to love
March Madness, and my reasons for not loving it now
are selfish because my team, my alma mater, Georgetown Hoyas,
have been horrible for about a decade. They've sniffed the
tournament once in the past ten years, so I don't
have any reason to watch. I'm not invested.
Speaker 3 (09:39):
Are you serious right now? Oh? Here you go. Here's
some history.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
The last time we made the tournament, we lost to
Colorado in the first round. I know you remember that, yep.
But all around the country people are filling out their brackets.
It's easier now to watch the tournament than ever before.
It's on like six different channels, and because of streaming,
you're not gonna miss really any of the games. People
are gonna be watching work or they're gonna call in sick.
(10:05):
How would you describe the importance to March madness to
our culture in general?
Speaker 6 (10:12):
March madness is one of my favorite things in the world,
because this is where you really to your point. I
can remember being in school, on a job, whatever, and
I would have either classmates or fellow colleagues that I
wasn't really close to, but then March Madness rolls around
and we're all talking brackets. We got a boss one time,
two jobs ago, I had a boss that was like, Hey,
(10:34):
are we all getting sick this day? So we can
go to the local bar and watch games all day.
Speaker 3 (10:39):
Fantastic.
Speaker 6 (10:40):
It's one of those things that we all want to
be the one person, which is I think the statistics
are like point zero zero point one, you.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
Have a better chance to hitt into the lottery.
Speaker 6 (10:49):
But go ahead, Yeah, yeah, I'm getting your home. Most
people's brackets are going to blow up on the first day,
but it's just a fun thing to really sit down,
go through your brackets, talk shop. You can kind of
tell who knows a little bit about has been following
certain teams or certain players versus the people who are
just doing that crash course trying to get the brackets done.
It really is a great way, in my opinion. I
(11:11):
feel the same way about fantasy football, when you guys
can get together and it just brings people together who
normally wouldn't hang out together. So I do like the
unifying spirit of it. I've never won it, I've never
even gotten close to. My bracket always is blown up
the first day.
Speaker 3 (11:25):
Same with mine.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
I've never been adept at choosing brackets, and my team
usually never goes far in the tournament. And also when
my team is out of the tournament, I usually tune
out because I'm not rooting for Duke. I'm not, For example,
I'm not rooting for some other team from the Big
East Conference where Georgetown plays in the case of this
(11:46):
case would be Saint John's. It's the number two seed,
it's a great turnaround story for the university. And also
Rick Patino can't root for them, So yeah, don't care.
There's nothing in it for me. But I'm so invested
personally in college basketball it's hard for me. Whenever my
team is out, I can't even watch ESPN. It's a
painful reminder. But that's how serious it is for a
(12:08):
lot of people, and I don't know if we for me.
Here's the question, is there anything more exciting than an
NC two way final four?
Speaker 6 (12:20):
I don't know, absolutely not, especially if there's an underdog
in there that kind of flew under everyone's radar. What
was it like five six years ago Villanova was the
underdog and that just had everyone glued to the television.
Speaker 3 (12:34):
Who are these people?
Speaker 7 (12:35):
You know?
Speaker 6 (12:36):
Those kinds of storylines that help you fall in love
with the kids. Now, I do feel like the men's
game specifically, and I know I've said this before, they
need that, they need that underdog to try to push
that storyline because a lot of the kids, we're not
going to know who they are next year.
Speaker 3 (12:49):
We're gonna have a whole different lineup next year. Yeah
they're going to the pros or transit, Yeah.
Speaker 6 (12:54):
They're going to the Pro. So we don't really have
the opportunity in the men's game to build those relationship
and build those fandoms. So the NCAA men's game really does,
in my opinion, rely on those underdogs to kind of
carry the story. So if we don't have one of
those great storylines, I don't even know how interested I'm
going to be in the men's game just in general
versus the women's game. You know these players, these women,
(13:17):
they have been with their teams. A lot of these
players have been two three years, some of them even
play four years. So you have that opportunity to just
really become a fan of that player in that school.
So it's an easier storyline to carry. But either way,
I absolutely love it.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
Question.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
Was USC women's team disrespected by getting a number one
seed but the lowest number one seed? In other words,
the most difficult path to the final four, largely on
the strength of losing to UCLA, who they already beaten
twice in the Big Ten Championships. Was usc disrespected by
(13:52):
their placement?
Speaker 3 (13:53):
I think so.
Speaker 6 (13:54):
I don't think you really can say, oh, they've lost
to UCLA when they beat them. But I've also have
been one to say for my entire life, this whole
decision by committee thing is just weird to me. There's
a lot of things that don't necessarily make sense. People
will say, oh, well, they lost the last three or four,
so that's why whatever. None of this is actually logical.
It is based largely on feelings.
Speaker 3 (14:15):
However, even though I think.
Speaker 6 (14:17):
They were disrespected and their path is going to be harder,
I think they're going to come out stellar, and so
this specific path is going to solidify that, Yes, this
is the team that we think they are.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
Yeah, they weren't ready last season to take that next step.
They're definitely ready. It's all laid out in front of them,
and it probably would be even more satisfying yes, to.
Speaker 6 (14:40):
Say, hot, look, you try to make this hard, and
here we are. Last season we saw a glimpse of
who they were who they are. Now we kind of
know who they are. I think this is going to
be a fun series to watch.
Speaker 2 (14:51):
I will be tuning in because I definitely won't be
tuning in to the Mids because I am petty, I'm salty.
Speaker 6 (14:59):
Name your face favorite NCUBA men's basketball player right now.
Speaker 2 (15:04):
You know what I don't know about favorite. I'm curious
to see if Duke's Cooper Flag is the real deal.
If he is, because he's forecast to be the number
one pick overall, I like his game, I don't know
if he is as not necessarily as good as advertised,
will have as an immediate impact as thought right.
Speaker 6 (15:27):
And that's that's one of the problems we see all
the time in the nc DOUBLEA men's game.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
It doesn't it takes a couple of years.
Speaker 6 (15:33):
It does Leangelo in my LaMelo and you know, I
get the LaMelo ball. Lamela he's the exception to that
rule in my opinion. He translated seamlessly, but he was
always also born with a basketball in his hand, so
that's probably not a fair comparison. But it does take
a year or two, probably two or three actually for
them to catch up, but it's because they didn't spend
(15:54):
enough time in school.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Yeah, they're only eighteen, nineteen years old.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
You know, that's what college would give you two three
years of legitimate pre NBA experience as opposed to going
from basically high school to NBA.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
You know, you're jumping two levels in one year.
Speaker 6 (16:10):
So that's what I'll bet Alonzo, speaking of the Bob
Brothers didn't work out, Alonzo, he definitely could have benefited
from another year or two in college.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
Absolutely chasing that money. It's Later with Mo Kelly, Jackie Ray,
I'll see you soon, See you soon.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (16:29):
Imagine Scrubs a TV show like that in a world
today and Mark Runner is gonna hate this where we
have AI doing a lot of the jobs that nurses
would do in assistance of medical doctors. Like, for example,
you can be due for a medical exam and you
could get a phone call, an actual phone call from
(16:51):
someone like Anna, this friendly voice that could help you
prepare for your appointment and answer any pressing questions. You
might have to have a car warm demeanor, and Anna
has been trained to put patients at ease. Like Mark
and me, we have this apprehension when it comes to
stuff like this.
Speaker 4 (17:09):
Can Anna give me a sponge bath? That's what I
want to know. Maybe not today, okay, but in the future.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Case closed.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
But Anna is doing the job of many actual nurses.
Anna is AI available twenty four to seven, can speak
multiple language languages from Hindi to Haitian creole. Anna is
a part of this company and an intelligence program called
Hippocratic AI, like Hippocratic Oath and so one. It's one
(17:39):
of a number of new companies offering ways to automate
time consuming tasks usually performed by nurses and medical assistants.
And if you don't know, most, not all, but most
nurses and medical assistance are paid in hourly wage. In
other words, that is a variable cost that most companies
(18:00):
would love to get rid of. Why am I going
to pay someone, let's say, forty five dollars an hour
when you have Anna who can do it basically for free,
with the exception of the cost of paying for the
service originally.
Speaker 8 (18:13):
Yeah, this is where Mark Ronner comes in and says,
because that's putting people out of a job.
Speaker 3 (18:19):
Isn't that the whole point of business? I'm being serious.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
The whole point of having employees is to make things
easier to make money. If you can do it. Without
an employee. What's the point of it during that expense.
What's the point of keeping employees around if you can
do it without them.
Speaker 8 (18:41):
I mean, look, I want to have an argument against that,
I really do.
Speaker 3 (18:46):
I don't though I'm not saying it's fair.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
I'm not saying that it's good for America in the
sense of the labor force. I've said many times that
eventually we'll get to the point where we have a
universal basic income.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Don't It'll be in my lifetime.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
But through automation, yes, some jobs change, but most jobs
go away. Especially when you're talking about the service industry.
How many jobs have disappeared because we don't have any
more elevator operators, or we don't have traffic light operators,
or we don't have people who are working at a
grocery store, or we don't have people working in just
(19:25):
those convenience stores. Most of that can be done through
automation for the most part. I mean, you go to
the movie theater, you can just you really don't need
someone behind the counter actually taking your order. You go
to McDonald's today and go and they just go walk up,
pick your food, pick up your food. They don't need
(19:46):
as many employees as they use right now. It's unfortunate reality,
but that's the way everything is trending. And if they
can find AI a use for AI in the medical field,
I'm not saying they can actually come in and do
a digital rectal exam which Mark is looking for.
Speaker 3 (20:04):
They're not there yet, but but thank you for that.
Speaker 7 (20:09):
But literally, yes, yes, now, I know that there is
a huge fight with human nurses against of course the
advancement of AI nurses, and there are cases where they
point out where the AI at this moment is not
necessarily as intuitive as it needs to be.
Speaker 8 (20:32):
There was a case where an individual came in with
a case of sepsis and the AI nurse, through them
entering information, recommended a large dose of ivy fluid. The
human nurse, upon further investigation in talking to the patient,
found out that the patient was a dialysis patient and
(20:56):
a large dose of ivy fluid can make your dialogue
is that much harder, and so using human common sense,
had to say, ah, a large dose of fluid is
not good for someone that's currently on dialysis, especially what
was being prescribed, So they had to use human means
(21:16):
to lower the dosage. And this that and the other
all I can say against that is yeah, this is
why AI is constantly advancing. I get that it may
not be as intuitive as need be right now, But
the thing about AI is it's actually growing faster than people.
People are not advancing through the medical field as fast
(21:38):
as AI is analyzing right.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
It can be trained, quote unquote and ready to be
a nurse's assistant in a relatively short amount of time.
Speaker 3 (21:48):
And it doesn't need to do everything, but it's doing
some of the things.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
It's doing some of the necessary things and allowing the
actual human element to do other things and be more productive.
Speaker 8 (21:59):
Trust and believe, as someone who has spent an ungodly
amount of time in hospitals, I am telling you for
a fact that I love each and every nurse who
has ever waited on me taking care of me, either
you know, got an IV in correctly, or just tended
to my needs.
Speaker 3 (22:21):
I mean that there have.
Speaker 8 (22:22):
Been a lot of instances where just because of the
nurse's presence in the room I felt at ease, because
they were able to walk me through a lot of
things that when the doctor comes through in the morning, Hey,
how you doing okay out, they're able to come and
say okay, so here's what the doctor has laid out.
Here are the orders for the day, this, that, and
the other. I don't know if I would be as
(22:44):
happy getting that from a teleprompter with an AI, you know,
picture on it saying Hi, this is Jody. Here's what's
going to be happening today. I like the personal element.
All I'm saying is what I like and what say
the hospital that I'm going to may like are two
different worlds.
Speaker 3 (23:02):
Well, think of it another way.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Let's use this in the way that we may outsource
a call center and you have either AI or a
foreign country doing some of this work, and if it
doesn't work, it's escalated up to a human, hopefully someone
there's maybe not a language barrier. Not trying to be
an ass, I'm just saying, let's be honest. Sometimes there's
a language barrier, or the computer automated system doesn't give
(23:28):
you the options that you actually want, and so it's
escalated to can I speak to your manager? So you
get an actual person on the phone. That's where I
think this is. It can do some things, limited things,
but the really important and difficult things still.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
You're going to need that human touch.
Speaker 2 (23:44):
But three years from now it's going to be doing
a hell of a lot more than it's right now.
Speaker 4 (23:49):
I want to know who takes the responsibility when an
AI screws up on some medical thing. It's probably written
into the contract written insurance a company that made the AI. Yeah,
it's still representing the hospital. Yeah right, that's not good enough.
And that's why you need people required, not what a sue,
not like what are you doing?
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Mark?
Speaker 4 (24:09):
I think that sometimes people need to have a connection
with another person, and not every single thing in human
life needs to be boiled down to efficiency and cost saving,
especially the medical profession.
Speaker 3 (24:22):
Well medicine is especially.
Speaker 9 (24:24):
I'm okay with AI being an assistant to a nurse,
but you need to have a human nurse there in
case there's a glitch or a malfunction. A long time ago,
there was a radiation machine that was supposed to be
controlled by software, and the software malfunctioned and it ended
up killing a bunch of people that were going in
for cancer radiation.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
Oh great, that makes me feel great. Okay, thank you, Sam. No,
but that's the thing.
Speaker 9 (24:46):
You need to have human touch there to make sure
that that kind of thing doesn't happen.
Speaker 3 (24:49):
That's right, logans run at I hear you on that zam.
Speaker 8 (24:54):
But did they not make the necessary improvements on set
machine and we haven't had that?
Speaker 10 (25:00):
It's didn't happen again, absolutely, that is my point. Thank
you for me, kim we boilet dounge of this AI
is brand new.
Speaker 3 (25:06):
Oh do you want to be part of the trial
and error? Do you want to be one of the
mistakes that?
Speaker 8 (25:10):
You know how much trial and error I go through
in my medical life, how many things I've had?
Speaker 3 (25:14):
You never heard the stories? Mark, you don't, don't.
Speaker 4 (25:16):
I can only imagine, But would you like to multiply
that by an order of magnitude?
Speaker 2 (25:20):
But no, AI is here in varying degrees, like, for example,
don't you think don't delude yourself into believing that when
you get on a plane and it's on autopilot, that's
not a form of AI.
Speaker 4 (25:31):
It's in varying degrees in all of our technology. Well maybe,
but would you get on a plane that only had autopilot?
Speaker 3 (25:37):
I wouldn't.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Not yet, I want to get into damn carr, which
is autonomous, So why would I get on a plane
it's autonomous?
Speaker 3 (25:43):
Well, we've got the expert on that right here.
Speaker 8 (25:45):
Okay, but in a few years that will be the
way because then, you know what, you don't have to
worry about Mark pilots doing cocaine before the flight.
Speaker 3 (25:53):
You know, we have proposed worried about Really, you're not
worried about cocaine, pilot.
Speaker 4 (25:58):
No, worried about the side of a In fact, I
think a little bit of coke might make them more alert.
Speaker 10 (26:03):
In fact, give them free coke, Give violets. Okay, all right,
I guess it's time to go to break.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
We'll come back with your horoscope this later with mo
Kelly ca if I AM six forty no AI here.
Speaker 3 (26:13):
We're live everywhere the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
You're listening to Later with mo Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
KFI mo Kelly, We're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Is now time for your horoscope for the week, and
we'll find out what makes you intelligent based on your
zodiac sign. Let's start with aries. Aries can make swift
decisions while others get lost in hesitation. They work well
in high pressure situations or emergencies. Ruled by warrior Mars,
(26:45):
the planet of ambition and preservation check the rhymes, y'all.
Their rapid mind allows them to solve problems almost instantaneously,
as they are governed by in aligned with their instincts.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
Taurus, isn't it Sam, aren't you Tarus? Yep? All right,
here we go.
Speaker 2 (27:04):
Taurus is naturally resourceful. Ruled by Venus, the planet of
luxury and values, makes them dedicated to fulfilling their long
term goals. They innately understand the importance of money, practical aims,
material management, and intelligence.
Speaker 3 (27:21):
Do you make anything of that?
Speaker 9 (27:23):
I have some of it. If sounds about right. Some
of it feels like, you know, like financial management. That's
not me. Now we're on to Mark Runner and Gemini.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
Let's have it.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
We know very little about Mark, but he did tell
us that he was a Gemini. We'll assume he was
telling us the truth. Ruled by Mercury and of the
intellectual air element, Gemini is often the jack of all trades.
Their curiosity is their superpower. They usually educate themselves, research
their burning questions, and accumulate many skills. This zodiac is
(27:57):
often considered one of the most witty star signs. I'm
waiting for the other shoot to drop up here No,
that's the end of it.
Speaker 3 (28:03):
That's it. You're witty.
Speaker 4 (28:04):
Huh, I don't trust this.
Speaker 2 (28:07):
Sus This not like there's going to be more at
the end? Okay, cancer move on. Cancer is a natural
born healer. They excel in any activities that require heightened
emotional maturity or intelligence. Their profound perceptive skills and unconditional
empathy make them excellent at meditating, validating emotions, and building community. Leo,
(28:30):
you shine bright, ruled by our sun. Leo's are witty
in creative problem solving and projects. Their exceptional leadership skills
and aspirations make them successful in whatever they set their
minds to. Their charisma is natural and effortless, granting them
access to usually impossible spaces.
Speaker 3 (28:50):
Virgo, you're the Zodiac.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
Analysts innately in tune with the details that make up
the big picture of a successful operation. They see crucial
facts and elements that many just overlook. This Earth sign
is ruled by Mercury, the planet of cerebral activity, leading
to an intelligent disposition and personality. Libra, You're ruled by
charming Vetus. Understand social dynamics. Their lovely personalities allow them
(29:16):
to connect with people from various backgrounds, leading to their
popularity and vast network of context. Libras naturally find ways
to diffuse tension, uplift others, and make people feel seen,
understood and support it.
Speaker 3 (29:29):
That's very nice. Libra. Here comes swallow with Scorpio. Yeah.
When it comes to intuitive awareness, Scorpio has it made.
Their nearly psychic abilities to read situations, predict patterns, and
understand the core intentions of others make them influential personalities.
They excel with psychological intelligence and research skills and always
(29:52):
get to the bottom. This is so true. I wish
I was a Scorpio. This is so This is absolutely
one hundred percent true.
Speaker 4 (30:00):
Last bit of this. All this flattery is devalued everybody.
Everybody can't be great all at once.
Speaker 8 (30:05):
Sorry, hey, hey, hey, hey, don't hate the great.
Speaker 3 (30:10):
Can I move on now? Please do?
Speaker 2 (30:11):
Okay, Sagittarius, that's me being worldly and connected to the
big picture. Grant Sagittarius philosophical intelligence. They excel at navigating
ethical dilemmas, bringing others closer to their truth, and sometimes
finding common ground with opposing views. They love to educate
others right and travel to stay in the loop. Dude,
(30:32):
that's spot on spot on. I can stop right there,
write down yourself if I am six forty, We're alive
everywhere at iHeartRadio app Now, No, man, No, I did
not write that, but it is accurate.
Speaker 3 (30:44):
You pay to have it written. No, I did not
Tala tell them.
Speaker 5 (30:47):
No.
Speaker 8 (30:48):
Look, Mark, I found this. This is a gym accept yourself, though, Mark,
I need you to accept yourself.
Speaker 4 (30:55):
No. I told you Friday that I'm uncomfortable with anything
but self deprecation and we just have to live with them.
This is where you say, okay, let's move on. I
need you to engage in some self deprecation as well.
Please whatever, I'm perfect Capricorn. Capricorn thrives in organized systems
of success. As natural born leaders, this zodiac thrives in
(31:17):
the driver's seat, known for their career success, their intelligence
runs deeper in truth. They remain true to their initial intentions, goals,
and integrity. Their maturity grants them old soul wisdom. Aquarius well.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
Aquarius is on the edge of thought leading trends before
the common public understands them. They excel in technology, science, innovation,
and other non traditional logistical fields. Humanitarians at heart, this
zodiac advocates for many. Now this is just my own
personal pet peeve. Okay, all these are relatively positive, and
we have too many a holes out there for this
(31:53):
to apply to everyone.
Speaker 3 (31:54):
What was I just saying? Thank you? Did you say
something I didn't hear you.
Speaker 8 (31:58):
It's literally about how people apply their horoscopic wisdom. Not
too many people do. Too many people like to, you know,
move about without any horoscopic awareness, and I think that's
part of the problem. If people were to really tap
in to their inner true self, we would all be better.
Speaker 3 (32:19):
People.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
Know thyself, Yes, to thine own self be true. What
philosophical statement are you making horoscopically? We need to live
more horoscopically. Is that what you're saying? Yes, more endoscopically. Yeah, yeah,
I'm more comfortable with that. You're not more comfortable with
that one.
Speaker 3 (32:36):
I can tell you. I can tell you, good sir,
you are not. Okay, you're not. You don't want that one.
Speaker 2 (32:42):
Pisces, as we close it out, Spiritually intelligent and gifted.
Pisces is known for its abstract thinking. They can think
outside the box, making fantasy or reality. Artistic, compassionate, and ethereal,
Pisces leaves a lasting emotional impact. On others, they cross
paths with with words like poetry. They sense the true,
unspoken emotional undercurrents in any given moment.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
It's beautiful. Is that a way of like calling them
an mpath or something? Yeah? Yeah, roundabout?
Speaker 2 (33:11):
What are you still waiting for that other shoe to drop?
Speaker 3 (33:14):
Mark? No, these all sound like really swell people who
I'd like to know. Look, they're not existing in my life.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
I could throw a rocket hit a Gemini who's an
a hole with no effort.
Speaker 3 (33:24):
It's are you're a Gemini? Aren't you?
Speaker 4 (33:26):
A little great inflation across the board here. I don't
trust any of this stuff. I trust none of it.
Speaker 2 (33:31):
It's a little too sunny of a disposition for me.
I'd like to see the worst in people, not the best.
They need to have a negative horoscope out there. Every
horoscope I've seen seems to be trying to encourage people
to live up to something. Why not be have like
one that's like, Okay, here's the positive stuff about you,
but also here's the negative stuff about you. That's why
I do not like fortune cookies, because this is just
a bunch of bs.
Speaker 3 (33:52):
If they said.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
Receiver of the cookie, you know, a large sum of
money's gonna come your way and you're going to jail.
I would like that. Okay, let's be honest here. You
know your your career is about to change. You're going
to get fired. That would mean more because that's realistic. Yeah,
you're gonna win the lottery and use the money to overdose.
(34:15):
That's the fortune cookie.
Speaker 7 (34:17):
I want to.
Speaker 9 (34:19):
I would be surprised if I saw it like you
will perform in adult films, something that's like really deep
and intense, like let's.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
See that actually would be a seller That would be
a selling point. And the only place I get a
fortune cookie these days is a Panda Express and they're
all nice and positive and fluffy. It's like, give me
the real because my life is not fluffy. It's not
all positive. But you have to change your outlook, your outlook.
Speaker 10 (34:45):
What does my email have to do with this? I
want a fortune cookie, alarms me, Like you open it
up and says duck, right, can I get a win now?
Speaker 3 (35:01):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (35:02):
The fleshering cookies usually play the longer game, so I
would like to see more immediate ones as well, like
go see the doctor, like you have to do number
two plan for that. You don't want to get caught short.
Speaker 8 (35:16):
This is not how the realm of positivity works. This
is where fortune cookies and horse cops. It is trying
to guide you to become your better self.
Speaker 2 (35:27):
I would be better if I had to go number two,
So yeah, guide me to the bathroom.
Speaker 4 (35:31):
You'd certainly be lighter. Okay, look at the time, kay,
If I am six forty. We're live everywhere in the
iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (35:42):
Green Don't Get Pinched, kf I KOST HD two, Los Angeles,
Orange County lives
Speaker 3 (35:51):
Everywhere on the radio
Later, with Mo'Kelly News
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.