December 10, 2024 • 36 mins
ICYMI: Hour Two of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – Thoughts on the NY Mets signing outfielder Juan Soto to a $765M, 15-year contract AND the launch of OpenAI’s ‘Sora’ video generator…PLUS – A look at the allegations of “sexual assault” against Jay-Z - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Oh Wimbo Kelly.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Six live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. I love talking
about sports, but not the data, not the stats per se,
not the inside baseball pun intended where people want to
talk about. Well, with this draft pick and this sign
and the you know, the Dodgers could go all the way. No, no, no,
(00:29):
that's not what I do. I can do it, but
that's not what I want to do. Tonight, you may
hear the name Juan Soto more and more this week.
Juan Soto was a member of the New York Yankees.
In fact, he played against the Dodgers in the World Series.
He's one of the best young ballplayers in baseball. I
(00:50):
qualified as young because Shoheo Tani's on the other side
of thirty. Soto is only twenty six. He is not
yet in his prime. But today he signed the largest
contract in sports history, not just baseball history, but sports history,
(01:12):
a fifteen year contract worth seven hundred and sixty five
million dollars three quarters of a billion dollars. And that's
more than shoe hey Otani's deal. Sho hey Otani's deal
is fifteen years for seven hundred million, and most of
it is deferred. In other words, will pay you two
(01:33):
million a year now, and it's like a balloon payment
on a house. All of a sudden, it balloon up
to like sixty and seventy million dollars a year. That's
what the Dodgers did, and there are a lot of
people who are angry about that. How is it the
Dodgers can sign all these players? They just signed Blake Snell,
one of the top pitches in the league.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
And the truly.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
Sports angle is, how is it the Dodgers can do this?
It's just so unfair And this kind of goes back
to my discussion last week. But this is about sports business,
and you are what you can negotiate. Your value is
what you can negotiate. And people say, no player is
worth seven hundred and sixty five million dollars.
Speaker 3 (02:16):
Not true, Wan Soto is, but he hasn't done anything.
They'd have to win like five or six World Series.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
No, that's not true. He asked for seven hundred and
sixty five million, he got seven hundred and sixty five million.
That means, according to the Mets, he is worth seven
hundred and sixty five million. And there are a lot
of baseball fans are out there. That's like, well, how
would the San Diego Padre supposed to compete with that?
(02:45):
How would the San Francisco Giants supposed to compete with that?
They can't offer that much money for a player. That's
not true. They can. It's just a question of whether
the ownership of either of those teams are that dedicate
to winning or risking that level of investment. If you're
(03:05):
going to play pay one player seven hundred and sixty
five dollars over fifteen years. Yes, there is no salarycap
in baseball, but there is a luxury tax. It could
be one of the biggest disasters in your franchise's history.
Juan Soto or any player for that matter, can come
(03:25):
down with a debilitating injury and never be the same.
It's not something that you can guarantee. You can't say
that you're going to get the very best out of
Juan Soto for the next fifteen years.
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Let's be clear, this is simple math.
Speaker 2 (03:40):
He's twenty six now, the deal won't be done until
forty one. He's forty one years old. Yes, they could
presumably try to trade him, but who exactly would want
to take on this contract. There was only one offer
even comparable to that. Not the Dodgers, but it was
the New York Yankees who offered sixteen years and seventy
(04:01):
seven hundred and sixty million, So it's comparable, not quite
the same. In other words, there aren't many other takers
for Juan Soto, and if the New York Mets are
not getting the return on that investment, it's going to
be hard as hell, if not impossible, to unload such
a contract to anybody. But if you look at this
(04:22):
big picture, this and I got to look at Mark
Rono when I say this, this is capitalism. And if
you don't like how the ticket prices are going to increase,
if you don't like the increase and carriage fees for
like the YES network for the different New York teams
or whatever the New York Mets TV network is, if
(04:44):
you don't like that, blame capitalism because this is something
that you, as a baseball fan, are going to have
to pay for now. You may not mind paying for
a show hal Tony's contract in the way that you
may notice that you're cable bills a little bit higher
now because the Dodgers on spectrum cost a little bit more.
(05:07):
You may not like how these players are making ungodly
sums of money. But again it's what I said before.
You are what you can negotiate. Your worth is what
your employer or the market says you're worth. Now I
can have some fun with Stephan and say Stephan is
probably tired of making six hundred and fifty thousand dollars
(05:29):
per year. He's probably sick of it, and he probably
is wondering whether he could get let's say, a million
dollars a year at some other radio station. Well, either
he can or he can't. But his value is what
he can negotiate.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Period.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
In the story, it's not about whether you think that
Stephan's worth six hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year.
It's not whether you think I'm worth fifty five thousand
dollars a year. It's only what we can negotiate. And
the lesson here is don't get mad at Juan Soto.
Don't get mad at baseball for running their business in
(06:07):
a way which allows players like a show, Hey a
tani And if you're a Dodger fan, you think, ooh,
that's wonderful.
Speaker 3 (06:14):
If you're not, you think, ooh, that's terrible.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Don't get mad at Sho Heo Tani or a Juan
Soto for getting this my word, outlandish contract. Scott boris
the agent for Juan Soto. He negotiated the deal, he
made it happen. He gets a percentage of it. No
one made the New York Yankees or the New York
Mets offer more than three quarters of a billion dollars
(06:39):
to one player. Nobody, but he's viewed as that valuable
in this particular market. And that I think is I
would say it's a good lesson to be applied to
life in general. You may look at someone else and say,
how does so and so make so much money? Well,
(07:00):
he's worth what he can negotiate. How did she get
that job? Well she's worth what she can negotiate. And
that's the takeaway. That's the takeaway. And I don't know
what Juan Soto's going to mean for the New York Mets.
I personally think that it maybe five or six years
(07:20):
if they don't win a World Series. And I say
this even though the deal is comparable to show Heyltani,
I think it's going to be virtually impossible for them
to unload Juan Soto if it goes badly. And what
that means is you may be able to trade him,
but the Mets will have to end up paying him
a good portion of the contract. And if you really
know your baseball history, I want you to google the
(07:41):
name Bobby Bonia. Bobby Bunia retired like twelve thirteen years ago,
used to play for the New York Mets. But they're
still paying Bobby Bonia. In fact, they have Bobby Bonia Day.
Need to just look that up real quick. Where they're
still playing a player who retired many years ago because
of deferred money and no one wanted to take care
(08:04):
of his contract. This July first, the New York Mets
pay Bobby Bania a deferred fee. The Mets bought out
Bania's contract in nineteen ninety nine when he was thirty
nine years old and owed him five point nine million.
Instead of paying him immediately, they deferred the payments of
twenty four years with an eight percent interest rate. The
result is that Bobby Bania, even though he retired back
(08:28):
in like nineteen ninety nine, he will be paid one
point two million from twenty eleven to two thousand and
thirty five. That is what you will likely see with
these balloon contracts, including Otani and also Juan Soto. But
don't blame the players, you know, as they say, don't
(08:50):
hate the players, hate the game. They got their worth.
So Mark Ronner may make two dollars an hour, but
that's not our fault.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
Enough hate to go around to believe me, plenty of
hate when.
Speaker 3 (09:06):
We come back. I just want to make Mark mad
all night.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Why because there is now an AI video generator which
has launched. Only two questions, One what does that mean
for the industry?
Speaker 3 (09:18):
And two?
Speaker 2 (09:19):
How soon can I get aiporn? That's all I want
to know. Oh, I'm sure that's already here? Are you
kidding me?
Speaker 4 (09:25):
I mean, theoretically, I believe it could possibly be, not
that anybody's ever seen any.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
We'll talk about it next. KFIM six forty live everywhere
in the I HEARTRIDI you out.
Speaker 5 (09:35):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (09:41):
And if I could make a generalization, it's that new
technology ends jobs. Like a statement, but it's still true.
New technology may make things easier, faster, more efficient, but
in just about every single instance, it means jobs disappear.
(10:07):
We can say from the vhs and the beta machines,
if you're old enough to remember them, put a lot
of movie theaters out of business. You can talk about
smartphones and how they've put long distance operators out of business.
They've put telephone landline providers out of business. And now
(10:32):
we see with AI it's going to do much the
same thing. New technology. It's going to streamline a lot
of things, and we may not like what it may
lead to, but it is going to lead to loss
of jobs, the ending of certain jobs.
Speaker 3 (10:49):
Open ais Sora Video Generator.
Speaker 2 (10:53):
It's now available and if you use their popular chat
GPT program you'll find it there. And Sora sor can
currently take text prompts and produce short videos. In other words,
you type in a few parameters, it will spit out.
Speaker 3 (11:13):
A video course.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
That's probably going to end jobs. When you can have
instant video content. You think about, well, if you're old
enough to remember the creation of the four track recorder,
if you're in the audio it made a lot of
music studios obsolete and people started creating music on their
(11:40):
own at home.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
Professional grade studios closed.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
I would say this is almost a video equivalent, with
exception that AI is actually creating content, albeit derivative, albeit
is sourcing everything else which has already been created, but
it's still creating content. And people's jobs will go away
because now you've made it possible for people to create
(12:08):
their own trailers with no help from a studio or
any type of real video expertise. They can create movies
wholesale now, without the need of a studio, without the
need of any great technology, and people are going to
start creating these videos and selling them, post them to
(12:29):
get like shares, hearts, all sorts of revenue, and pretty
soon you've probably seen from just AI stills, it's going
to be real difficult to determine what is real, what
is an AI creation, or some combination of both. The
whole idea of a movie director may forever change rather quickly.
(12:53):
People will be not only creating movies on their iPhone,
but they will be doing it for virtually next to nothing.
How do movie studios continue to compete against that? And
I firmly agree with Mark Roner the quality cannot be
the same because it doesn't have the human spirit of
(13:13):
creation and innovation as.
Speaker 3 (13:16):
The human spirit of theft.
Speaker 4 (13:18):
Yes, by the way, you know Steven Soderberg made a
pretty decent movie on his iPhone, But you and I
aren't Steven Soderberg. No still talent that went into.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
That right, right, but in the way that the computer
has allowed us to do things that usually took a
number of people to do in various art forms and
various genres. I remember, just with the music technology, how
those advances like, for example, you know you get a keyboard.
Depending on your age, you may remember the first Moog synthesizer,
(13:50):
and how keyboards had these strings, patches and horns and
drum machines, and all of a sudden, people were creating
songs and didn't need an actual band, and they didn't
need musical instruments or instrumentation.
Speaker 4 (14:03):
Yeah, there's a certain democratizing nature to all this. At
the same time, there's a terrible theft nature to it.
That's the other side of the coin. More people have
access to putting out creative works, but this is a
system that relies on stealing from artists to put those
same artists out of work. I think it's all going
to shake out with the help of some pretty severe regulation,
(14:24):
which is sorely and quickly needed. But it could go
bad fast for a lot of people.
Speaker 2 (14:30):
I'm counting the days, maybe the hours before you have
either a major or a mid major movie studio embrace
this and start churning out content. We know about the
sag after the DGA and the fights in the strikes
of previous recent years that was about using AI instead
(14:51):
of actors or specific movies which were created by actual humans.
I don't think there's any stipulation preventing a studio from
using a completely AI piece of work and selling it.
Speaker 4 (15:04):
There may not be, and I just think the public
is going to reject that because even the worst things
by the worst director, like ed Wood Junior, the Plan
nine from Outer Space Guy, Okay, there is still something
distinctive and human and passionate about the absolute trash that
he turned out that people love today.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
All right, Think of this this way, just from a
business standpoint. If you could produce a completely a holy
AI movie for one thousand dollars, but you can turn
that into a million dollars because of people willing to
watch it pay to see it. Let's say you put
(15:42):
it on some sort of digital download service for a
dollar ninety nine and some of it is passable, good
enough where people have some sort of interest in it.
You don't think they wouldn't. They wouldn't go further down
that road. It's no investment, all profit.
Speaker 4 (15:58):
Well, any corporations reason for existing is to make more money,
and morality has nothing to do with it. Okay, we
know that about all corporations, not just movie studios.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
But I think people are going to reject it. You
say passable.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
I think that's a generous way to put what AI
can turn out in the creative realm. In other realms
and science. We just learned something today like an AI
specific AI was able to make medical calculations that like
ten quadrillion times the speed of a normal computer. That's
a legit use of that. I can't wait to find
out what that yields. But arts, you know, books, films,
(16:35):
what have you. That's going to be inferior just by definition.
Speaker 2 (16:38):
Okay, I'm going to use your own I want to
use his own argument and genre against him. In the
way that horror movies are made. You have a movie
like Pooh, Blood and Honey, which is made.
Speaker 1 (16:50):
For one hundred thousand dollars, we should we should specify
the Pooh is winny, yes.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
And they turned it into I don't know. I don't
know thirty million or something. Can't remember. Yeah, I generated
a profit for sure, Right, what did that lead to
another movie?
Speaker 3 (17:06):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (17:06):
But you're talking about stuff that these are public domain issues.
Speaker 3 (17:09):
This isn't an AI issue.
Speaker 4 (17:10):
There are real they're hacks, but they're people who are behind.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
These But what I'm saying, but when it comes down
to it, the companies only care about the money.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
Wait, but Mark, yes, you say that AI has figured
out medical computations and calculations within a fraction of a
millisecond of what the doctor could. That's gonna put doctors
out of business. That's gonna put a lot of really
really trained doctors out of business if you can just
easily sidestep all that knowledge and just apply AI training
(17:40):
to someone manually doing something and inn there are a
lot of advancements in robots performing medical procedures doctors out
of that. For a fact, well, I should specify this
wasn't a medical procedure. It was a calculation for some
DNA related thing. I don't think anybody's going to replace
(18:00):
a human treating other humans.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
No, it's already happened on a surgical level. I know
for a fact, that's the fact that's happening.
Speaker 4 (18:07):
I've seen it, and there there are ways that humans
will be able to use it, but it's not gonna
it's not gonna push.
Speaker 1 (18:14):
They can use it for now, and eventually there will
not be humans to do it. I got what they
do in Star Trek and Star Wars and all day,
the science of Star Trek and the medical procedures that
they're using. They may have Spock in there or or
McCoy or whoever, but but he's not actually touching anyone.
(18:36):
You He's not a handheld thing in his hands. You
just want a fancy cyborg hand Just hey, Mark.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Look, we got a story at the end of the
show where we're gonna get into button massages by an
AI robot that is putting.
Speaker 3 (18:52):
Stay out of the news.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
They're putting massuses or you know, people give happy endings.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
Out of work. Yeah, nobody's coming in here. I'm sorry,
No one's what.
Speaker 3 (19:03):
Don't do what there?
Speaker 4 (19:06):
Keep your pants a yellow police tape around my butt tonight.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
Okay, let's talk about did he No, we can't talk
about Diddy when we come back.
Speaker 3 (19:18):
We can't do that now. No, you have to, you
have to.
Speaker 5 (19:23):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI A M six forty.
Speaker 3 (19:28):
Let's just review very quickly.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
We told you that there would be more did He
accusations and allegations.
Speaker 3 (19:37):
Check mark.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
We told you that this me too music industry moment
was going to implicate other big name music personalities.
Speaker 3 (19:50):
We told you that. Check mark. Here we are.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Jay Z named with Diddy and a civil sexual assault lawsuit.
Shawn Carter that's his government name, was accused Sunday in
a civil lawsuit of raping a thirteen year old girl
back in two thousand, along with Sean Ditty Combs, and
there is an unnamed celebrity who allegedly witnessed the assault.
(20:20):
The lawsuit was first filed back in October and originally
only listed Combs as a defendant. It has been since
refiled to name jay Z as well. It has an
anonymous Jane Doe, who claimed that Combs and Carter both
raped her in two thousand after they brought her to
an MTV Music Video Awards after party. Jay Z since
(20:45):
has released a public statement impugning the credibility of the
opposing counsel of the lawyer who's brought this lawsuit Tony Busby.
We've talked about him, and jay Z claims that this
is just an effort to publicly shaming him into settling.
He says he's not going to settle at this point,
(21:06):
and he's also filed emotion to have the name of
his accuser unmasked. I don't know if we talked about
this on the show, Twala, but I know we talked
about it off the show. We both noted how quiet
jay Z was about the previous Diddy allegations. In other words,
(21:28):
regardless of what was being said about Diddy, jay Z
had nothing to say, absolutely nothing, no public comment, no
comment in support of him, nothing, absolutely nothing. And it
almost became a running jokes like where's jay Z, where's Beyonce?
They considered like one of the same because they're married.
Neither of them had anything to say about anything. I thought,
and I know you thought, well, put it this way.
(21:51):
When you live in a glasshouse and that glass house
is next to the glasshouse which is presently being investigated,
but some forty i'd lawsuits or whatever, you would probably
be quiet, if only because you don't want the focus
being taken off that glass house and start looking into
your glasshouse.
Speaker 3 (22:12):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
You know what's interesting is when I read this, and
not that I side with jay Z, but I do
know and you have seen this as well. Within the
Me Too movement and how it first launched, there were
lots of people who were having fingers pointed at them,
(22:35):
many justly, many unjustly. For all I've ever heard, for
all I've ever seen, for all I've ever known about
jay Z, I cannot recall a single story involving him
(22:55):
and the mistreatment of women in terms of sexual assault.
I know that Rockefeller records back in the day. They
would throw the big ballerrific parties just like everyone else,
lots of drinking, lots of I would only see maybe
(23:17):
weed don't know what would happen when I'm not around.
I'm actually surprised that he would be caught up indirectly
being implicated in sexual assault. All I have ever known
about jay Z is that he is not a good
guy in terms of just being just a complete and
(23:40):
utter ass, looking down on everyone, being being extremely disrespectful
to anyone who he felt slighted him in the least.
This is just shocking to me that he would be
caught up in this, and we saw when we first
saw that this story came out. When we first reported
on it, we said, who was that other person? When
(24:01):
they said Diddy in an unnamed a major music source,
I had no idea they were gonna come back with
jay Z him with the fire retort and you know,
this is not what we're doing in for my projects
and this, that and the other. I'm like, okay, but
you also claim to have sold goog gobs of drugs
to your same community. I don't want to hear about
(24:22):
I'm innocent. I've never done anything in my life. I'm like, yeah,
I don't know, man, I don't know that this is
a rough one. I pray that it's not not that
I'm like in some major support of jay Z or anything.
I just I hope that it's not going this far
(24:44):
down the ladder. But damn it, all's fair right now.
If you were associated with Diddy, this is on you.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
Dog.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
Here's my prediction.
Speaker 2 (24:56):
If you will, in the way that we saw what
happened with Bill Cosby, in the way that we saw
what happened with Ditty, you have that first allegation, and
with Ditty it had to do a venturer Cassi adventurer,
and then the floodgates open. I am more interested to
see not happens with this particular lawsuit, but whether it
(25:21):
leads to other people alleging other things completely unrelated to
this accuser. In other words, to do we start going
down the rabbit hole with jay Z? Because it usually
just takes one. History is shown that it takes one,
and then it starts to open the floodgates, and then
you get to see a bigger picture of someone's history,
(25:44):
and it gets to be a little bit more difficult
for plausible deniability. And I use the same litmus test.
You know, I need all y'all to be lying for
me to believe Diddy. Every single person needs to be
lying about every single portion of every allegation for Diddy
to be in no sent or not liable. If the
(26:05):
past is prologue and this opens similar floodgates on jay Z,
then I will have that same stance. And you know
it's I'm not going to be judging him by the one.
I will judge him by the thirty if it comes
to that, and I look at Diddy through the eyes
of the thirty, not the one.
Speaker 3 (26:24):
And given that their glass houses are probably.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
You know, hypothetically speaking metaphorically speaking right next door to
each other, there may be some overlap, you.
Speaker 3 (26:33):
Know, would they be at the same parties.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
Yeah, if one is engaged in felonious behavior.
Speaker 3 (26:40):
It's possible. Yeah, it's possible.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
I'm not gonna say it's guilt by association. I'm just
saying that to your point, Tauala, I don't know if
I can say that jay Z is a good dude
and it's above any of this, and there's also something else.
He is the entertainment guy for the NFL. If there
any is any legitimate smoke, the NFL will drop him
(27:05):
like a bad habit and a heartbeat, because they're not
going to let anyone damage the brand. And that to me,
would be the biggest indication of there being some sort
of a veracity or validity to any allegation.
Speaker 3 (27:19):
If the NFL somehow cuts.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Bait or disassociates with jay Z, that would be the
only thing I need to know. Be damn what happens
in a courtroom, That says to me, because the NFL
is going to do.
Speaker 3 (27:30):
Its own diligence.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Due diligence, they're going to have their own investigation that's
not privy for all of us to see. But they're
going to find out whether there's any smoke and there's
any fire connected to these allegations. My prediction is we're
not done with the allegations. So if we have to
remind you, then we will, But I don't think we're done.
Far from it. It's Later with mo Kelly, your horoscope
(27:53):
coming up next KFI AIM since forty Live Everywhere in
the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (27:57):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on a man
from KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
KFI Moll Kelly Live Everywhere on the iHeartRadio app, and
here is your horoscope. We have some tips on how
to survive the holiday trauma triggers. I think Twala pulled
this one for me.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
I just think so.
Speaker 2 (28:19):
Aries, slow down and ease up. For Aries, your advice
to pull back as opposed to pushing forward at all costs.
This is the time to get good at building up
your patients and easing up in the pursuit. Being able
to take a step back instead of brute forcing your
way to a haphazard solution will save you a lot
of needless stress, especially during the holiday rush.
Speaker 3 (28:40):
Taurus audit and collect.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
This month for bullfolk, it's time for the chill Taurus
to put on their auditor hat and get better at
looking into the details of their transactions, whether it's with friends, colleagues,
or family. This season is having you squit a little
harder at the fine details of your congenial relationships, es
actially when it comes to time, money, and effort. Gemini, Mark,
(29:05):
I'm ready for Gemini. The theme of this season is
for relationships. All the beauty and the bloodshed and the
myriad ways they make and break us. Relationships take center
stage for you this season, Gemini, which means a lot
of room for melodramas to play out in your closest circles.
The best way to navigate the stress of social dramas
is to get good at active listening. I know this
(29:27):
is a hard ask, but it's necessary when so many
misunderstandings happen because of poor listening skills.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Active listening all.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
Right, remember that Mark as opposed to pass limahon before
you there.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
Yes, deep cut active listening. You are correct, sir.
Speaker 2 (29:47):
Really taking the time to hear another person out insure
as you will respond with tact rather than react with rage.
In other words, no double birds. What are we talking about?
Speaker 4 (29:58):
Shocking up with somebody or fight them in the Roman
colisseum whatever load both okay, cancer, get ready, Stefan, Beware
the ba humbug cancer.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
What is typically a season of flannel and merriment could
leave you philly, itchy, and isolated. Organize your schedule and
workflow to build in much needed time for restoration. Now
is the hour to power down and tune in so
that you can show up wholeheartedly and full force as
the year draws to a close. Leo, protect your heart
(30:30):
and know yourself, big cat Leo baby should be beware
of the lure of the x lest errant heartstrings fashioned
themselves into a noose. Whether you're welcoming your past or
cringing at the mere thought of it, this slow down
in your love life could lead to some real headaches
and heartbreaks.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
And just when you.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Thought cuffing season was going so smoothly, take the opportunity
to get good at asking yourself the hard questions, how
did your ex make you feel when you were with them?
It is just something you'd want to get back into.
Oftentimes we do romanticize our ex relationships Virgo delegate to
dominate for Virgos, delegation and patients will pave the way
(31:09):
to serenity, or at least send you down the dirt
path that leads away from chaos and self imposed exile.
No one bugs you more than family, and you're about
to be flanked on all corners. It's not surprising that
you are everyone's go to when it comes to details,
planning festivities and dispersing information. I know it's a thankless job,
(31:29):
but your family wouldn't know where to go if it
wasn't for you. Take the opportunity to get better at
patients and build out text messages and email templates to
help you send blasts to the family group chat and
email list. Sounds like something I would do, Libra. Do
not mince words or scream them this season. As ever,
(31:50):
you've done a bangup job of putting out fires whilst
keeping your cool, Libra. But December just might find you
reaching your ball league point short fuse alert, Libra. Most
likely to get your wires crossed and communication misunderstood, which
could lead to stress and anger over this holiday season.
So try your best to find the humor in these
inevitable communication blunders. If you can't laugh it off because
(32:13):
it's too frustrating, simply tell the people around you to
go to hell or how they feel whatever.
Speaker 3 (32:19):
Scorpio, here you go.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
Twelve Scorpios need to tighten their purse strings to avoid
the stress of over spending and lean into the art
of regifting. Of all the signs, you are most likely
to have major buyers remorse if you purchase anything new
or invest in new projects. At this point, you're better
off getting good at reviewing your inventory or reviewing contracts.
(32:41):
In the fine print that said, here's a loophole. You
can totally repurchase anything you already own and give that
as a gift to someone else cheap.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (32:52):
I don't do that. That's why I don't recommend that. No, Sagittarius,
here's mine. Caution is advised for the sh shoot from
the hip, Sagittarius, hold off on aesthetic overhauls and declarations
of newness until the new year. If you were planning
to get a drastic makeover, I'd reconsider. I say this
because the trade you're after might not stand the test
(33:13):
of time post retrograde. What you can consider is reevaluating
your esthetic vibes and the things that help you self
express in ways that don't require a dramatic change translation.
Go big and bold on personal betterment. But for the
love of all, don't cut your banks, got it? Don't
plan to at all? Do not cut banks? Got that mark?
(33:36):
I'm not cutting my bank. I like your bangs right
where they are. I was waiting for a William Hunk
joking them somewhere, but no twoies. Okay, right yeah, Capricorn.
Happy return of the sun to you, Capricorn. As you
await the glory of your season, note that it could
be rough before it gets right. This month is no
(33:57):
walk in the park, since you'll be confronted with past
limiting beliefs, bouts of imposter syndrome, and all the nasty
little bits that you've tried to hide in that one
box in the corner of your mind. Your dreams will
quite literally speak to you as a way for you
to process some of these themes. This makes for a
great opportunity to go inward and talk about your hidden
struggles with a loved one or even better, a trusted therapist. Aquarius.
(34:21):
Everyone will want a piece of you, and your social
calendar might overwhelm you.
Speaker 3 (34:26):
This month.
Speaker 2 (34:27):
The best way to handle this is to gather as
many people together with aligned values as possible so that
you can knock out quality time in groups. Try to
see these mix and mingle situations as opportunities rather than obligations,
and steal the conversations toward issues that matter rather than
trivial pursuits that don't. Yes, you're in charge of merrymaking,
and if you don't feel that you're a true or
(34:47):
natural host, this is the perfect time to learn and
become one Pisces. Pisces folks should be aware that authority figures,
both parental and professional, could be particularly accusatory slash instacut.
This month, we'll have you in a workaholics slash people
please her boot, eager to cross off as many things
as possible before the holiday rush sweeps the office with
(35:09):
tensions high and holiday cheered threatening productivity. Make sure you
triple check deadlines and get a paper trail going to
ensure you cover your fine ass.
Speaker 3 (35:17):
That's what it says when Scroogi just starts.
Speaker 2 (35:19):
When scroog just starts asking questions, you'll be safe from
their scrutinizing wrath. And that is your horoscope. As we
lead into the Christmas season, and you know, have to
deal with these a whole relatives and keep coming to
your house and won't leave, stink up the place, and
you try to use your house like it's some vacation
(35:41):
spot because you're the only one who happens to live
in California, and they're thankless and they keep coming back
every single year.
Speaker 1 (35:47):
Wait, are we still talking about a horoscope?
Speaker 3 (35:50):
Yeah, well that's what I This is all theoretical, right, Yes.
Speaker 2 (35:54):
Well there, yeah, we're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio Act.
Speaker 3 (35:58):
Will help you figure it out. It's kind of what
we do. K f I and k os t
Speaker 1 (36:05):
H D two Los Angeles, Orange County live everywhere on
the radio.
Oh Wimbo Kelly.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Six live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. I love talking
about sports, but not the data, not the stats per se,
not the inside baseball pun intended where people want to
talk about. Well, with this draft pick and this sign
and the you know, the Dodgers could go all the way. No, no, no,
(00:29):
that's not what I do. I can do it, but
that's not what I want to do. Tonight, you may
hear the name Juan Soto more and more this week.
Juan Soto was a member of the New York Yankees.
In fact, he played against the Dodgers in the World Series.
He's one of the best young ballplayers in baseball. I
(00:50):
qualified as young because Shoheo Tani's on the other side
of thirty. Soto is only twenty six. He is not
yet in his prime. But today he signed the largest
contract in sports history, not just baseball history, but sports history,
(01:12):
a fifteen year contract worth seven hundred and sixty five
million dollars three quarters of a billion dollars. And that's
more than shoe hey Otani's deal. Sho hey Otani's deal
is fifteen years for seven hundred million, and most of
it is deferred. In other words, will pay you two
(01:33):
million a year now, and it's like a balloon payment
on a house. All of a sudden, it balloon up
to like sixty and seventy million dollars a year. That's
what the Dodgers did, and there are a lot of
people who are angry about that. How is it the
Dodgers can sign all these players? They just signed Blake Snell,
one of the top pitches in the league.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
And the truly.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
Sports angle is, how is it the Dodgers can do this?
It's just so unfair And this kind of goes back
to my discussion last week. But this is about sports business,
and you are what you can negotiate. Your value is
what you can negotiate. And people say, no player is
worth seven hundred and sixty five million dollars.
Speaker 3 (02:16):
Not true, Wan Soto is, but he hasn't done anything.
They'd have to win like five or six World Series.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
No, that's not true. He asked for seven hundred and
sixty five million, he got seven hundred and sixty five million.
That means, according to the Mets, he is worth seven
hundred and sixty five million. And there are a lot
of baseball fans are out there. That's like, well, how
would the San Diego Padre supposed to compete with that?
(02:45):
How would the San Francisco Giants supposed to compete with that?
They can't offer that much money for a player. That's
not true. They can. It's just a question of whether
the ownership of either of those teams are that dedicate
to winning or risking that level of investment. If you're
(03:05):
going to play pay one player seven hundred and sixty
five dollars over fifteen years. Yes, there is no salarycap
in baseball, but there is a luxury tax. It could
be one of the biggest disasters in your franchise's history.
Juan Soto or any player for that matter, can come
(03:25):
down with a debilitating injury and never be the same.
It's not something that you can guarantee. You can't say
that you're going to get the very best out of
Juan Soto for the next fifteen years.
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Let's be clear, this is simple math.
Speaker 2 (03:40):
He's twenty six now, the deal won't be done until
forty one. He's forty one years old. Yes, they could
presumably try to trade him, but who exactly would want
to take on this contract. There was only one offer
even comparable to that. Not the Dodgers, but it was
the New York Yankees who offered sixteen years and seventy
(04:01):
seven hundred and sixty million, So it's comparable, not quite
the same. In other words, there aren't many other takers
for Juan Soto, and if the New York Mets are
not getting the return on that investment, it's going to
be hard as hell, if not impossible, to unload such
a contract to anybody. But if you look at this
(04:22):
big picture, this and I got to look at Mark
Rono when I say this, this is capitalism. And if
you don't like how the ticket prices are going to increase,
if you don't like the increase and carriage fees for
like the YES network for the different New York teams
or whatever the New York Mets TV network is, if
(04:44):
you don't like that, blame capitalism because this is something
that you, as a baseball fan, are going to have
to pay for now. You may not mind paying for
a show hal Tony's contract in the way that you
may notice that you're cable bills a little bit higher
now because the Dodgers on spectrum cost a little bit more.
(05:07):
You may not like how these players are making ungodly
sums of money. But again it's what I said before.
You are what you can negotiate. Your worth is what
your employer or the market says you're worth. Now I
can have some fun with Stephan and say Stephan is
probably tired of making six hundred and fifty thousand dollars
(05:29):
per year. He's probably sick of it, and he probably
is wondering whether he could get let's say, a million
dollars a year at some other radio station. Well, either
he can or he can't. But his value is what
he can negotiate.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Period.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
In the story, it's not about whether you think that
Stephan's worth six hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year.
It's not whether you think I'm worth fifty five thousand
dollars a year. It's only what we can negotiate. And
the lesson here is don't get mad at Juan Soto.
Don't get mad at baseball for running their business in
(06:07):
a way which allows players like a show, Hey a
tani And if you're a Dodger fan, you think, ooh,
that's wonderful.
Speaker 3 (06:14):
If you're not, you think, ooh, that's terrible.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Don't get mad at Sho Heo Tani or a Juan
Soto for getting this my word, outlandish contract. Scott boris
the agent for Juan Soto. He negotiated the deal, he
made it happen. He gets a percentage of it. No
one made the New York Yankees or the New York
Mets offer more than three quarters of a billion dollars
(06:39):
to one player. Nobody, but he's viewed as that valuable
in this particular market. And that I think is I
would say it's a good lesson to be applied to
life in general. You may look at someone else and say,
how does so and so make so much money? Well,
(07:00):
he's worth what he can negotiate. How did she get
that job? Well she's worth what she can negotiate. And
that's the takeaway. That's the takeaway. And I don't know
what Juan Soto's going to mean for the New York Mets.
I personally think that it maybe five or six years
(07:20):
if they don't win a World Series. And I say
this even though the deal is comparable to show Heyltani,
I think it's going to be virtually impossible for them
to unload Juan Soto if it goes badly. And what
that means is you may be able to trade him,
but the Mets will have to end up paying him
a good portion of the contract. And if you really
know your baseball history, I want you to google the
(07:41):
name Bobby Bonia. Bobby Bunia retired like twelve thirteen years ago,
used to play for the New York Mets. But they're
still paying Bobby Bonia. In fact, they have Bobby Bonia Day.
Need to just look that up real quick. Where they're
still playing a player who retired many years ago because
of deferred money and no one wanted to take care
(08:04):
of his contract. This July first, the New York Mets
pay Bobby Bania a deferred fee. The Mets bought out
Bania's contract in nineteen ninety nine when he was thirty
nine years old and owed him five point nine million.
Instead of paying him immediately, they deferred the payments of
twenty four years with an eight percent interest rate. The
result is that Bobby Bania, even though he retired back
(08:28):
in like nineteen ninety nine, he will be paid one
point two million from twenty eleven to two thousand and
thirty five. That is what you will likely see with
these balloon contracts, including Otani and also Juan Soto. But
don't blame the players, you know, as they say, don't
(08:50):
hate the players, hate the game. They got their worth.
So Mark Ronner may make two dollars an hour, but
that's not our fault.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
Enough hate to go around to believe me, plenty of
hate when.
Speaker 3 (09:06):
We come back. I just want to make Mark mad
all night.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Why because there is now an AI video generator which
has launched. Only two questions, One what does that mean
for the industry?
Speaker 3 (09:18):
And two?
Speaker 2 (09:19):
How soon can I get aiporn? That's all I want
to know. Oh, I'm sure that's already here? Are you
kidding me?
Speaker 4 (09:25):
I mean, theoretically, I believe it could possibly be, not
that anybody's ever seen any.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
We'll talk about it next. KFIM six forty live everywhere
in the I HEARTRIDI you out.
Speaker 5 (09:35):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (09:41):
And if I could make a generalization, it's that new
technology ends jobs. Like a statement, but it's still true.
New technology may make things easier, faster, more efficient, but
in just about every single instance, it means jobs disappear.
(10:07):
We can say from the vhs and the beta machines,
if you're old enough to remember them, put a lot
of movie theaters out of business. You can talk about
smartphones and how they've put long distance operators out of business.
They've put telephone landline providers out of business. And now
(10:32):
we see with AI it's going to do much the
same thing. New technology. It's going to streamline a lot
of things, and we may not like what it may
lead to, but it is going to lead to loss
of jobs, the ending of certain jobs.
Speaker 3 (10:49):
Open ais Sora Video Generator.
Speaker 2 (10:53):
It's now available and if you use their popular chat
GPT program you'll find it there. And Sora sor can
currently take text prompts and produce short videos. In other words,
you type in a few parameters, it will spit out.
Speaker 3 (11:13):
A video course.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
That's probably going to end jobs. When you can have
instant video content. You think about, well, if you're old
enough to remember the creation of the four track recorder,
if you're in the audio it made a lot of
music studios obsolete and people started creating music on their
(11:40):
own at home.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
Professional grade studios closed.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
I would say this is almost a video equivalent, with
exception that AI is actually creating content, albeit derivative, albeit
is sourcing everything else which has already been created, but
it's still creating content. And people's jobs will go away
because now you've made it possible for people to create
(12:08):
their own trailers with no help from a studio or
any type of real video expertise. They can create movies
wholesale now, without the need of a studio, without the
need of any great technology, and people are going to
start creating these videos and selling them, post them to
(12:29):
get like shares, hearts, all sorts of revenue, and pretty
soon you've probably seen from just AI stills, it's going
to be real difficult to determine what is real, what
is an AI creation, or some combination of both. The
whole idea of a movie director may forever change rather quickly.
(12:53):
People will be not only creating movies on their iPhone,
but they will be doing it for virtually next to nothing.
How do movie studios continue to compete against that? And
I firmly agree with Mark Roner the quality cannot be
the same because it doesn't have the human spirit of
(13:13):
creation and innovation as.
Speaker 3 (13:16):
The human spirit of theft.
Speaker 4 (13:18):
Yes, by the way, you know Steven Soderberg made a
pretty decent movie on his iPhone, But you and I
aren't Steven Soderberg. No still talent that went into.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
That right, right, but in the way that the computer
has allowed us to do things that usually took a
number of people to do in various art forms and
various genres. I remember, just with the music technology, how
those advances like, for example, you know you get a keyboard.
Depending on your age, you may remember the first Moog synthesizer,
(13:50):
and how keyboards had these strings, patches and horns and
drum machines, and all of a sudden, people were creating
songs and didn't need an actual band, and they didn't
need musical instruments or instrumentation.
Speaker 4 (14:03):
Yeah, there's a certain democratizing nature to all this. At
the same time, there's a terrible theft nature to it.
That's the other side of the coin. More people have
access to putting out creative works, but this is a
system that relies on stealing from artists to put those
same artists out of work. I think it's all going
to shake out with the help of some pretty severe regulation,
(14:24):
which is sorely and quickly needed. But it could go
bad fast for a lot of people.
Speaker 2 (14:30):
I'm counting the days, maybe the hours before you have
either a major or a mid major movie studio embrace
this and start churning out content. We know about the
sag after the DGA and the fights in the strikes
of previous recent years that was about using AI instead
(14:51):
of actors or specific movies which were created by actual humans.
I don't think there's any stipulation preventing a studio from
using a completely AI piece of work and selling it.
Speaker 4 (15:04):
There may not be, and I just think the public
is going to reject that because even the worst things
by the worst director, like ed Wood Junior, the Plan
nine from Outer Space Guy, Okay, there is still something
distinctive and human and passionate about the absolute trash that
he turned out that people love today.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
All right, Think of this this way, just from a
business standpoint. If you could produce a completely a holy
AI movie for one thousand dollars, but you can turn
that into a million dollars because of people willing to
watch it pay to see it. Let's say you put
(15:42):
it on some sort of digital download service for a
dollar ninety nine and some of it is passable, good
enough where people have some sort of interest in it.
You don't think they wouldn't. They wouldn't go further down
that road. It's no investment, all profit.
Speaker 4 (15:58):
Well, any corporations reason for existing is to make more money,
and morality has nothing to do with it. Okay, we
know that about all corporations, not just movie studios.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
But I think people are going to reject it. You
say passable.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
I think that's a generous way to put what AI
can turn out in the creative realm. In other realms
and science. We just learned something today like an AI
specific AI was able to make medical calculations that like
ten quadrillion times the speed of a normal computer. That's
a legit use of that. I can't wait to find
out what that yields. But arts, you know, books, films,
(16:35):
what have you. That's going to be inferior just by definition.
Speaker 2 (16:38):
Okay, I'm going to use your own I want to
use his own argument and genre against him. In the
way that horror movies are made. You have a movie
like Pooh, Blood and Honey, which is made.
Speaker 1 (16:50):
For one hundred thousand dollars, we should we should specify
the Pooh is winny, yes.
Speaker 2 (16:55):
And they turned it into I don't know. I don't
know thirty million or something. Can't remember. Yeah, I generated
a profit for sure, Right, what did that lead to
another movie?
Speaker 3 (17:06):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (17:06):
But you're talking about stuff that these are public domain issues.
Speaker 3 (17:09):
This isn't an AI issue.
Speaker 4 (17:10):
There are real they're hacks, but they're people who are behind.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
These But what I'm saying, but when it comes down
to it, the companies only care about the money.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
Wait, but Mark, yes, you say that AI has figured
out medical computations and calculations within a fraction of a
millisecond of what the doctor could. That's gonna put doctors
out of business. That's gonna put a lot of really
really trained doctors out of business if you can just
easily sidestep all that knowledge and just apply AI training
(17:40):
to someone manually doing something and inn there are a
lot of advancements in robots performing medical procedures doctors out
of that. For a fact, well, I should specify this
wasn't a medical procedure. It was a calculation for some
DNA related thing. I don't think anybody's going to replace
(18:00):
a human treating other humans.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
No, it's already happened on a surgical level. I know
for a fact, that's the fact that's happening.
Speaker 4 (18:07):
I've seen it, and there there are ways that humans
will be able to use it, but it's not gonna
it's not gonna push.
Speaker 1 (18:14):
They can use it for now, and eventually there will
not be humans to do it. I got what they
do in Star Trek and Star Wars and all day,
the science of Star Trek and the medical procedures that
they're using. They may have Spock in there or or
McCoy or whoever, but but he's not actually touching anyone.
(18:36):
You He's not a handheld thing in his hands. You
just want a fancy cyborg hand Just hey, Mark.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Look, we got a story at the end of the
show where we're gonna get into button massages by an
AI robot that is putting.
Speaker 3 (18:52):
Stay out of the news.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
They're putting massuses or you know, people give happy endings.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
Out of work. Yeah, nobody's coming in here. I'm sorry,
No one's what.
Speaker 3 (19:03):
Don't do what there?
Speaker 4 (19:06):
Keep your pants a yellow police tape around my butt tonight.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
Okay, let's talk about did he No, we can't talk
about Diddy when we come back.
Speaker 3 (19:18):
We can't do that now. No, you have to, you
have to.
Speaker 5 (19:23):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI A M six forty.
Speaker 3 (19:28):
Let's just review very quickly.
Speaker 2 (19:31):
We told you that there would be more did He
accusations and allegations.
Speaker 3 (19:37):
Check mark.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
We told you that this me too music industry moment
was going to implicate other big name music personalities.
Speaker 3 (19:50):
We told you that. Check mark. Here we are.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Jay Z named with Diddy and a civil sexual assault lawsuit.
Shawn Carter that's his government name, was accused Sunday in
a civil lawsuit of raping a thirteen year old girl
back in two thousand, along with Sean Ditty Combs, and
there is an unnamed celebrity who allegedly witnessed the assault.
(20:20):
The lawsuit was first filed back in October and originally
only listed Combs as a defendant. It has been since
refiled to name jay Z as well. It has an
anonymous Jane Doe, who claimed that Combs and Carter both
raped her in two thousand after they brought her to
an MTV Music Video Awards after party. Jay Z since
(20:45):
has released a public statement impugning the credibility of the
opposing counsel of the lawyer who's brought this lawsuit Tony Busby.
We've talked about him, and jay Z claims that this
is just an effort to publicly shaming him into settling.
He says he's not going to settle at this point,
(21:06):
and he's also filed emotion to have the name of
his accuser unmasked. I don't know if we talked about
this on the show, Twala, but I know we talked
about it off the show. We both noted how quiet
jay Z was about the previous Diddy allegations. In other words,
(21:28):
regardless of what was being said about Diddy, jay Z
had nothing to say, absolutely nothing, no public comment, no
comment in support of him, nothing, absolutely nothing. And it
almost became a running jokes like where's jay Z, where's Beyonce?
They considered like one of the same because they're married.
Neither of them had anything to say about anything. I thought,
and I know you thought, well, put it this way.
(21:51):
When you live in a glasshouse and that glass house
is next to the glasshouse which is presently being investigated,
but some forty i'd lawsuits or whatever, you would probably
be quiet, if only because you don't want the focus
being taken off that glass house and start looking into
your glasshouse.
Speaker 3 (22:12):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
You know what's interesting is when I read this, and
not that I side with jay Z, but I do
know and you have seen this as well. Within the
Me Too movement and how it first launched, there were
lots of people who were having fingers pointed at them,
(22:35):
many justly, many unjustly. For all I've ever heard, for
all I've ever seen, for all I've ever known about
jay Z, I cannot recall a single story involving him
(22:55):
and the mistreatment of women in terms of sexual assault.
I know that Rockefeller records back in the day. They
would throw the big ballerrific parties just like everyone else,
lots of drinking, lots of I would only see maybe
(23:17):
weed don't know what would happen when I'm not around.
I'm actually surprised that he would be caught up indirectly
being implicated in sexual assault. All I have ever known
about jay Z is that he is not a good
guy in terms of just being just a complete and
(23:40):
utter ass, looking down on everyone, being being extremely disrespectful
to anyone who he felt slighted him in the least.
This is just shocking to me that he would be
caught up in this, and we saw when we first
saw that this story came out. When we first reported
on it, we said, who was that other person? When
(24:01):
they said Diddy in an unnamed a major music source,
I had no idea they were gonna come back with
jay Z him with the fire retort and you know,
this is not what we're doing in for my projects
and this, that and the other. I'm like, okay, but
you also claim to have sold goog gobs of drugs
to your same community. I don't want to hear about
(24:22):
I'm innocent. I've never done anything in my life. I'm like, yeah,
I don't know, man, I don't know that this is
a rough one. I pray that it's not not that
I'm like in some major support of jay Z or anything.
I just I hope that it's not going this far
(24:44):
down the ladder. But damn it, all's fair right now.
If you were associated with Diddy, this is on you.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
Dog.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
Here's my prediction.
Speaker 2 (24:56):
If you will, in the way that we saw what
happened with Bill Cosby, in the way that we saw
what happened with Ditty, you have that first allegation, and
with Ditty it had to do a venturer Cassi adventurer,
and then the floodgates open. I am more interested to
see not happens with this particular lawsuit, but whether it
(25:21):
leads to other people alleging other things completely unrelated to
this accuser. In other words, to do we start going
down the rabbit hole with jay Z? Because it usually
just takes one. History is shown that it takes one,
and then it starts to open the floodgates, and then
you get to see a bigger picture of someone's history,
(25:44):
and it gets to be a little bit more difficult
for plausible deniability. And I use the same litmus test.
You know, I need all y'all to be lying for
me to believe Diddy. Every single person needs to be
lying about every single portion of every allegation for Diddy
to be in no sent or not liable. If the
(26:05):
past is prologue and this opens similar floodgates on jay Z,
then I will have that same stance. And you know
it's I'm not going to be judging him by the one.
I will judge him by the thirty if it comes
to that, and I look at Diddy through the eyes
of the thirty, not the one.
Speaker 3 (26:24):
And given that their glass houses are probably.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
You know, hypothetically speaking metaphorically speaking right next door to
each other, there may be some overlap, you.
Speaker 3 (26:33):
Know, would they be at the same parties.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
Yeah, if one is engaged in felonious behavior.
Speaker 3 (26:40):
It's possible. Yeah, it's possible.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
I'm not gonna say it's guilt by association. I'm just
saying that to your point, Tauala, I don't know if
I can say that jay Z is a good dude
and it's above any of this, and there's also something else.
He is the entertainment guy for the NFL. If there
any is any legitimate smoke, the NFL will drop him
(27:05):
like a bad habit and a heartbeat, because they're not
going to let anyone damage the brand. And that to me,
would be the biggest indication of there being some sort
of a veracity or validity to any allegation.
Speaker 3 (27:19):
If the NFL somehow cuts.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
Bait or disassociates with jay Z, that would be the
only thing I need to know. Be damn what happens
in a courtroom, That says to me, because the NFL
is going to do.
Speaker 3 (27:30):
Its own diligence.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Due diligence, they're going to have their own investigation that's
not privy for all of us to see. But they're
going to find out whether there's any smoke and there's
any fire connected to these allegations. My prediction is we're
not done with the allegations. So if we have to
remind you, then we will, But I don't think we're done.
Far from it. It's Later with mo Kelly, your horoscope
(27:53):
coming up next KFI AIM since forty Live Everywhere in
the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 5 (27:57):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on a man
from KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
KFI Moll Kelly Live Everywhere on the iHeartRadio app, and
here is your horoscope. We have some tips on how
to survive the holiday trauma triggers. I think Twala pulled
this one for me.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
I just think so.
Speaker 2 (28:19):
Aries, slow down and ease up. For Aries, your advice
to pull back as opposed to pushing forward at all costs.
This is the time to get good at building up
your patients and easing up in the pursuit. Being able
to take a step back instead of brute forcing your
way to a haphazard solution will save you a lot
of needless stress, especially during the holiday rush.
Speaker 3 (28:40):
Taurus audit and collect.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
This month for bullfolk, it's time for the chill Taurus
to put on their auditor hat and get better at
looking into the details of their transactions, whether it's with friends, colleagues,
or family. This season is having you squit a little
harder at the fine details of your congenial relationships, es
actially when it comes to time, money, and effort. Gemini, Mark,
(29:05):
I'm ready for Gemini. The theme of this season is
for relationships. All the beauty and the bloodshed and the
myriad ways they make and break us. Relationships take center
stage for you this season, Gemini, which means a lot
of room for melodramas to play out in your closest circles.
The best way to navigate the stress of social dramas
is to get good at active listening. I know this
(29:27):
is a hard ask, but it's necessary when so many
misunderstandings happen because of poor listening skills.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Active listening all.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
Right, remember that Mark as opposed to pass limahon before
you there.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
Yes, deep cut active listening. You are correct, sir.
Speaker 2 (29:47):
Really taking the time to hear another person out insure
as you will respond with tact rather than react with rage.
In other words, no double birds. What are we talking about?
Speaker 4 (29:58):
Shocking up with somebody or fight them in the Roman
colisseum whatever load both okay, cancer, get ready, Stefan, Beware
the ba humbug cancer.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
What is typically a season of flannel and merriment could
leave you philly, itchy, and isolated. Organize your schedule and
workflow to build in much needed time for restoration. Now
is the hour to power down and tune in so
that you can show up wholeheartedly and full force as
the year draws to a close. Leo, protect your heart
(30:30):
and know yourself, big cat Leo baby should be beware
of the lure of the x lest errant heartstrings fashioned
themselves into a noose. Whether you're welcoming your past or
cringing at the mere thought of it, this slow down
in your love life could lead to some real headaches
and heartbreaks.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
And just when you.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Thought cuffing season was going so smoothly, take the opportunity
to get good at asking yourself the hard questions, how
did your ex make you feel when you were with them?
It is just something you'd want to get back into.
Oftentimes we do romanticize our ex relationships Virgo delegate to
dominate for Virgos, delegation and patients will pave the way
(31:09):
to serenity, or at least send you down the dirt
path that leads away from chaos and self imposed exile.
No one bugs you more than family, and you're about
to be flanked on all corners. It's not surprising that
you are everyone's go to when it comes to details,
planning festivities and dispersing information. I know it's a thankless job,
(31:29):
but your family wouldn't know where to go if it
wasn't for you. Take the opportunity to get better at
patients and build out text messages and email templates to
help you send blasts to the family group chat and
email list. Sounds like something I would do, Libra. Do
not mince words or scream them this season. As ever,
(31:50):
you've done a bangup job of putting out fires whilst
keeping your cool, Libra. But December just might find you
reaching your ball league point short fuse alert, Libra. Most
likely to get your wires crossed and communication misunderstood, which
could lead to stress and anger over this holiday season.
So try your best to find the humor in these
inevitable communication blunders. If you can't laugh it off because
(32:13):
it's too frustrating, simply tell the people around you to
go to hell or how they feel whatever.
Speaker 3 (32:19):
Scorpio, here you go.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
Twelve Scorpios need to tighten their purse strings to avoid
the stress of over spending and lean into the art
of regifting. Of all the signs, you are most likely
to have major buyers remorse if you purchase anything new
or invest in new projects. At this point, you're better
off getting good at reviewing your inventory or reviewing contracts.
(32:41):
In the fine print that said, here's a loophole. You
can totally repurchase anything you already own and give that
as a gift to someone else cheap.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (32:52):
I don't do that. That's why I don't recommend that. No, Sagittarius,
here's mine. Caution is advised for the sh shoot from
the hip, Sagittarius, hold off on aesthetic overhauls and declarations
of newness until the new year. If you were planning
to get a drastic makeover, I'd reconsider. I say this
because the trade you're after might not stand the test
(33:13):
of time post retrograde. What you can consider is reevaluating
your esthetic vibes and the things that help you self
express in ways that don't require a dramatic change translation.
Go big and bold on personal betterment. But for the
love of all, don't cut your banks, got it? Don't
plan to at all? Do not cut banks? Got that mark?
(33:36):
I'm not cutting my bank. I like your bangs right
where they are. I was waiting for a William Hunk
joking them somewhere, but no twoies. Okay, right yeah, Capricorn.
Happy return of the sun to you, Capricorn. As you
await the glory of your season, note that it could
be rough before it gets right. This month is no
(33:57):
walk in the park, since you'll be confronted with past
limiting beliefs, bouts of imposter syndrome, and all the nasty
little bits that you've tried to hide in that one
box in the corner of your mind. Your dreams will
quite literally speak to you as a way for you
to process some of these themes. This makes for a
great opportunity to go inward and talk about your hidden
struggles with a loved one or even better, a trusted therapist. Aquarius.
(34:21):
Everyone will want a piece of you, and your social
calendar might overwhelm you.
Speaker 3 (34:26):
This month.
Speaker 2 (34:27):
The best way to handle this is to gather as
many people together with aligned values as possible so that
you can knock out quality time in groups. Try to
see these mix and mingle situations as opportunities rather than obligations,
and steal the conversations toward issues that matter rather than
trivial pursuits that don't. Yes, you're in charge of merrymaking,
and if you don't feel that you're a true or
(34:47):
natural host, this is the perfect time to learn and
become one Pisces. Pisces folks should be aware that authority figures,
both parental and professional, could be particularly accusatory slash instacut.
This month, we'll have you in a workaholics slash people
please her boot, eager to cross off as many things
as possible before the holiday rush sweeps the office with
(35:09):
tensions high and holiday cheered threatening productivity. Make sure you
triple check deadlines and get a paper trail going to
ensure you cover your fine ass.
Speaker 3 (35:17):
That's what it says when Scroogi just starts.
Speaker 2 (35:19):
When scroog just starts asking questions, you'll be safe from
their scrutinizing wrath. And that is your horoscope. As we
lead into the Christmas season, and you know, have to
deal with these a whole relatives and keep coming to
your house and won't leave, stink up the place, and
you try to use your house like it's some vacation
(35:41):
spot because you're the only one who happens to live
in California, and they're thankless and they keep coming back
every single year.
Speaker 1 (35:47):
Wait, are we still talking about a horoscope?
Speaker 3 (35:50):
Yeah, well that's what I This is all theoretical, right, Yes.
Speaker 2 (35:54):
Well there, yeah, we're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio Act.
Speaker 3 (35:58):
Will help you figure it out. It's kind of what
we do. K f I and k os t
Speaker 1 (36:05):
H D two Los Angeles, Orange County live everywhere on
the radio.
Later, with Mo'Kelly News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Monster: BTK
'Monster: BTK', the newest installment in the 'Monster' franchise, reveals the true story of the Wichita, Kansas serial killer who murdered at least 10 people between 1974 and 1991. Known by the moniker, BTK – Bind Torture Kill, his notoriety was bolstered by the taunting letters he sent to police, and the chilling phone calls he made to media outlets. BTK's identity was finally revealed in 2005 to the shock of his family, his community, and the world. He was the serial killer next door. From Tenderfoot TV & iHeartPodcasts, this is 'Monster: BTK'.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.