Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
Kfi A M six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Now Facebook viral Load, Viral Load, the viral load.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Lady Kfi, Mo Kelly, Wativity Hobbs is now time for
the viral load.
Speaker 4 (00:40):
So if you enjoy ketchup like I do, but only
on certain foods, then you may consider yourself to be
a ketchup snob. What do I mean? Well, there are
certain brands of ketchup that are synonymous with quality, and
the main brand that comes to mind probably is Heintz. Now,
Heintz also has very descriptive and very obvious insignia. You
(01:06):
notice it, you understand what you're looking at. Their branding
is off the charts and has been for close to
one hundred years. But something is happening and Heinz has
taken notice. At your local restaurant or eatery or fast
food place, whatever it may be, you'll often see a
Heintz bottle on your table or on the counter at
(01:27):
the place. But what you don't know is that inside
of that ketchup bottle is not always Heintz brand ketchup.
Even though that Heintz bottle is on the table or counter,
and there's a YouTuber who decided that he was going
to take the opportunity to let you know that you
(01:48):
are being frauded. Facebook user man behaving Deadly what a
Name posted a useless but slightly interesting fact that Heintz
is so tired of restaurants and eateries refilling their bottles
with this non Heinz ketchup that they have decide or
that they have created a new border detection method using
(02:13):
their bottles. On their bottle at the top is the
Heintz colored kind of like a strip that goes across
the bottle. And the way you know that you're actually
using real Heinz ketchup is once that bottle starts to
become depleted and you can see kind of the clear
through of the bottle. If the strip at the top
(02:35):
of the bottle on the plastic on the outside is
not the exact color as the ketchup or vice versa,
that is not Heintz ketchup. You might have a darker color,
you might have something else. It has to match up perfectly.
So Heintz has alerted its customers through this really crafty
(02:56):
way that this is really Heintz ketchup. Or you are
being frauded, and if you are being frauded, Heinz wants
you to demand that their product is used in stores
and cafes.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
I gotta be honest. I gotta be honest that never
in my life have I cared. I know this is
a thing, it's a real thing. It's turned into a
big thing. But I've never said, hey, is this really
Hines fifty seven, or know Hi's this or Hines that.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
I just is it ketchup?
Speaker 3 (03:21):
Is it red? What I'm more concerned with is the
consistency because a lot of restaurants, whether they call it
Hines or not, it's runny and it says to me
like it's watered down, and that is more important to
me than whether it's the original Heinz brand of ketchup.
Speaker 4 (03:38):
I agree with you, there's nothing like opening that ketchup
and trying to squirt a bit onto your fries and
having it splatter everywhere because it's watered down. I'm with you,
consistency over color, but Heinz is telling you it's also
taste and quality over anything, And to you, they want
you to know that Heinz is above all so you
can be a snob if you want, that's how you're
(03:58):
going to detect what wether or not you have a
true Heinz product. All right, Another day, another simulation, Kelly.
Another day, another simulation, and this time it's from a
user we actually have covered before by the name of
zach d Films. He is a YouTuber who is very
well known for making these digital simulations, one of which
(04:22):
we talked about as far as being caught in the
mouth of a whale. Well, today, this particular story is
about cremation. Whatever you choose to do at end of
life care for end of life care is your personal business.
But there are some statistics about the more popular or
(04:42):
more used methods for burial. You have the echo friendly
natural burials where people are putting themselves or being put
into biodegradable coffins. You have the pod burial. You can
turn your up into a tree. There are lots of
new trendy ways to go out in style, if you will,
(05:06):
but the most popular alternative to just a natural in
the ground burial remains as cremation. And cremation, as you know,
is the process by which a body is reduced to
ash due to intensely high heat. Well, YouTuber Zacdfilms recently
uploaded a short video that has gone viral. It shows
(05:29):
a simulation of what happens to the body exactly at
the moment of cremation. You might know a bit about it,
but what you might not know is what is going
viral according to zach dfilms users and what happened is
users have found out and have been very surprised that
once a body is reduced to ash, a magnet is
(05:53):
then used to remove any metal objects like surgical pins,
hidden piercings, and dental implants. They run a large magnet
over the pile of ash, and on that magnet then
is attracted to or is attracted your loved ones metal fillings, again, piercings,
(06:18):
and other things that might have been in the body
or on the body that you don't know about. That
is going viral. People are discussing it just in time
for Halloween. It's very macabre. It's quite gruesome and grotesque
to some, but it makes for very popular conversation online
on places like Reddit and on YouTube.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
Yeah, given that my father was cremated, I learned a
lot more about that process than I ever wanted to learn,
including how they have to remove pacemakers because they may
explode during the cremation process. So yeah, I understand why
it would be eye opening for a lot of people.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
But the more you learn, the unless you want to know.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
Really, I agree with that there are some things I
could have gone without learning. This story was one of them.
For our next story. This is kind of from the
file of you didn't know that? Are you kidding? It's
another airplane seat hack and it has the Internet going
crazy because a mom has disclosed a way to get
(07:24):
an entire row of seats to yourself. I knew about
this before it went viral. I'm now upset that more
people are catching on because what it means is that
exclusivity of knowing the hack is going to become so
popular that the hack will no longer exist. There's a
woman named Jess Darrington. She's an Idaho based creator of
(07:47):
a platform called where is Briggs. She specializes in travel
tips for parents with kids under four, and she shared
a viral seating hack that is masked over eight point
one million views on TikTok. What Darrington said is that
you can select an aisle seat and a windows seat
(08:11):
in a single row, leaving the middle seat open. Again,
you can select an aisle seat, say you're traveling with family,
or even by yourself, if you want to do that,
I guess, but usually it's with family, select an aisle
seat and a window seat. So now that middle seat
is vacant. She says that, and this is what went viral,
(08:33):
that most people are not going to want to situate
themselves in a middle seat, most people, especially if people
are flying with others. Therefore, when that middle seat is
left open, you very well may be able to claim
the entire row to yourself. And Darrington said that while
(08:56):
this method is not full proof, foolproof, surprise surprise, surprise, surprise,
captain obvious there, it has worked for her many times
and on numerous flights no one has booked that middle seat,
including one eleven hour flight to Amsterdam which she and
(09:16):
her family then had the entire row to themselves for.
So again, she said, she's tried this hack numerous times.
It has worked. But in the event that it doesn't
work for you, don't be mad at her, but you
can try it, and if you do, you say that, hey,
this woman, Darrington, just Darrington, where is Briggs? Gave you
(09:36):
that hack?
Speaker 3 (09:37):
Again, or you just pay for you know, a first
class seat or something.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
You can just be dumb pay or.
Speaker 4 (09:43):
Pay for an exit row, pay for something. Why this
isn't very surprising or avant garde, but again, it's going
to allow people to try this, which is going to
irritate the rest of us who just want a normal flight.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
When we come back, we'll have the second portion the
Viral Load with Tiffany Hobbs in just a moment.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty. Now it's suing the Viral Loade
with Tiffany Live on Camfies Lisa with Loo Kelly.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
She'll talk about the tough this on social media. Blue
Viral Load with Tiffany.
Speaker 3 (10:28):
Hubbs, KFI Mo Kelly, Tiffany Hobbs. We're live everywhere on
the iHeartRadio app. Now is time for part two of
the Viral Load.
Speaker 4 (10:39):
A group of teenagers made an unexpected and gruesome discovery
while creating an innocent TikTok video on a local beach.
Dot dot dot. Where is this story going? What did
these teenagers uncover? Well, three teenagers were filming videos on
(11:00):
an alki Beach or Alcai Beach in West Seattle. So
you Seattle people, if I'm mispronouncing it, I apologize. I'm
sure you'll let me know. But they were on a
beach in West Seattle, and this actually took place in
twenty twenty, but as is the nature of viral videos,
many times they reappear years later because someone has gotten
(11:23):
wind of the story, shared it, and now it is
being shared multiple times over. Well. These teenagers were climbing
down onto a rocky part of the beach, just trying
to get camera footage and sharing what they were doing
that day, on this beautiful day, and they spot a suitcase.
They go up to the suitcase because now we have content,
(11:46):
and that content is going to involve unearthing what's in
this suitcase. We got to open it up, we gotta
film it, and who knows what's in it, but it's
gonna make for good content. As they get closer and
closer to the suitcase, one person says, it stinks that
should have been a red flag right there, but they're teenagers.
(12:06):
They don't have red flags. They just kept going. They
get closer and closer, and as they get closer, the
smell grew worse, and when they opened the suitcase, they
found something wrapped in what looked to be a black
garbage bag. They weren't sure what it was, if it
was food or something else, but they said that the
(12:27):
smell smelled sinister. One group member actually called the police
to have them accompany the group as they were filming
footage because they were unsure as to what they were finding,
but they knew that something was amiss, something was wrong,
but you don't put your camera down because you gotta
get content. It was later confirmed that what was inside
(12:52):
of the suitcase was in fact human remains, and firefighters
who descended upon the area went on to find other
body parts in even more discarded bags in the same
area of the beach. After identifying the body, which was
then determined to be two bodies a couple, police later
(13:16):
were able to name their suspect as being the landlord
of this couple, and this landlord was eventually charged with
two counts of second degree murder and he was found
guilty after a jury trial back in December of twenty
twenty two. But again, this story has now grown new
legs and is going viral because these teenagers accidentally solved
(13:41):
a murder case. What do you think about that?
Speaker 3 (13:43):
Mo, Look, it's amazing what the Internet can do and
what social media can do, and it never ceases to
amaze me when you have stories like these, where I think,
if not for the power of social media and information available,
these stories don't happen.
Speaker 4 (14:02):
Yeah. Absolutely, And they weren't looking for notoriety. They were
just enjoying their day. But the happenstance of it all,
the byproduct of it all, is a cold case becomes
solved for our final story. If you are a reality
show watcher, you might watch something called married at First Sight.
(14:25):
I will watch it, but I definitely have seen a
clip of it, and a lot of these clips go viral,
and that's how I learn about many of these reality
shows because someone has shared something about what they saw
on the internet. Well, Married at Site UK, which is
just the counterpart to the US version, involves contestants getting
(14:46):
married site unseen. They first see each other when they
go to the altar. The entire premise is basically like
a blind date to the max. And I know we
think of blind dates and we think of dating shows.
This one is just it's extremely controversial because of the
(15:08):
reactions usually of the contestants on the show, and this
particular clip, this particular story, has all of the elements
of that. So the groom in this case decided that
he was going to try to trick his new bride,
his bride to be, into proving her love for him.
Not to say that appearing on a reality show is
(15:30):
an equalifier of love, but he wanted to take this
extra step and say, hey, we're getting married sight unseen.
I need to make sure that this woman wants me
for me and truly loves me. The jokes right themselves.
What he did was he put in fake teeth. He
kind of messed up his appearance to try and pull
(15:51):
a prank on this this bride to be, and once
she got to the actual altar, she thought that it
was not necessarily a prank. She thought that this person
really did, in fact look like that, and she burst
into tears, yelling, oh my god. This gentleman then was
(16:14):
left to respond to now what has become a viral
clip of married at First Sight UK, because not only
was her response what we would expect, but it shocked
him into believing that she was not the woman for him,
and that she was not interested in who he really was,
and he then responds, are you all right? You okay?
(16:36):
She then responds with curse words, cursing about the teeth,
before the entire wedding was called off. Again, this went
viral in the UK. It has gone viral in the
United States as well. But it's just this idea of
these exploitative reality shows, people trying to get things for
(17:00):
you know, these pranks for laugh and it's just again
this culture that has been created by these reality shows
that I consider to be kind of gross, especially when
you're coming to you know, coming into a topic of
proving your love. It's just again, it's just very exploit
exploitative and unbecoming. But it went viral, as many of
(17:24):
these stories do. You might have watched it. If you do,
good for you. That's what's going on in the viral
world of online social media.
Speaker 2 (17:35):
Thank you, Tiffity Hobbs.
Speaker 3 (17:36):
It's later with mo Kelly can if I am six
forty We're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app with kellym
six Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. Last hour, I
was talking about how Americans now can renew their past online,
(18:01):
how much time it was saved. How much easier it
would be, especially if you have forethought to plan it
out and not wait till the last minute. If you've
ever gone through the hell of having to set an
appointment and go down to the post office wherever trying
to get your passport renewed, I would say it's much
worse than the DMV, much worse, much worse than trying
(18:22):
to get your Solid Security card.
Speaker 2 (18:24):
You just don't want to do it.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
Doing it online would make it easier for you and
your family. Then Mark Ronnerd was talking about his horror
stories of having to get documents, and I said, Oh,
you don't know of a horror story about getting documents
until you've heard Tawalla's story about his documents.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
Hold my beer, no seriously for ever in the day.
Growing up, you know, I'd worked at Taco bell, I
worked at McDonald's, rouse for a little bit, soup plantation,
Jama juice twenty onunches. I worked all over the place,
even at one point worked for the postal annex at
(19:03):
Pasadena City College. But when I turned eighteen, I went
to get my driver's license, and beforehand I did not
have a California I DC. I didn't have any real
identification except for my Social Security card. I went to
get my driver's license and was denied. Why because it
(19:26):
was determined that I was actually not a US citizen. Yes,
because my parents who are who this is key? My
parents who are both American citizens. Wait a minute, Mom
from Texas, Dad from Chicago. They went to Africa and
(19:47):
were living for a time and had established dual citizenship
while I was born in Tanzania. I was born via
their dual citizenship, which made me actually African because they
considered that, well, your parents while in Africa where I
were African, and so you're African.
Speaker 3 (20:08):
But I thought that since they were American citizens' child
of American.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
Citizens, not born abroad. So I had to go through
three years of bureaucracy. Hell, I'm talking going to the Councilate,
going to the federal building down on Wheelshire, back and
forth for three years. And actually it took just I
(20:35):
think a year and a half two years to get
a copy of my birth certificates sent from Tanzania, because
that's how long it took my mother to find someone
who still lived where we were staying or where I
was born to be able to send it over a
year after that, and finally the only way that I
actually got it is by going through the Immigration department
(20:56):
and actually coming across one individual working there who took
mercy on us and said, you know what, I would
have to send you back to line G, which is
like a fifty eleven day weight, but I'm gonna take
care of this right I'm gonna stamp this right now.
And I had to swear in and all of that.
It was not fun, but that was three years of
(21:19):
trying to become a naturalized US citizen. And now I
absolutely want to get my passport because when we went
on the cruise, yep, I only have my naturalized birth certificate,
and watching my son who has this passport, just walk
on through, just do and then you have me stopped,
and then they like, hold on one second, and they
(21:40):
walk off too a counter and they're both looking at it,
looking at my at my burster and looking at me,
and they kind of looking at it and kind of
nodding at each other and looking over at me crazily,
and then they say, come here, sir. They say, okay,
you can go. I'm like, what's what's happening? It's about
to deport me or something. What has happened? Yes, well
you win. Listen, I could have saved you three years.
(22:01):
Here's what you do, Tuala. You go to a graveyard
and you find somebody who died as an infant the
same birthday as you or close enough that shouldn't be hard,
and then you just forge it. Just that's what they
do in the movie. That's only bodily illegal, that's what well, well,
you didn't know. I mentioned it had to be legal.
But if you've ever read oh, okay, Mark, where were
(22:22):
you back when I needed your criminal expertise reading those
books that show you how to do it? Okay?
Speaker 3 (22:27):
So wait, wait, so when you got your your various
jobs in fast food, you show them your Social Security
card and what.
Speaker 2 (22:35):
Oh that's it? Oh I had a school I D.
I had like my high school I D.
Speaker 3 (22:38):
Do you have to like show two from this column
or three from this column?
Speaker 2 (22:42):
No security card and not. Hey look we're talking like
the eighties early nights. Once you get one job, you
just go job to job to job to job. Job.
You have a Social Security number. That's all you did.
It was really crazy, right, It's like, how do you
give someone a social security number. But but but deny
that they are a citizen of the United States. What
(23:03):
the hell's going on around here? And it really and
truly it's sheer bureaucracy because all of that time could
have just been alleviated if one person would have taken
the time to say, Hey, you know what, I'm not
going to send you to Helen back. What I'm gonna
do is just go on and tell you to talk
to Joanne. She's literally right the booth right over there,
and you can go there. But sitting there going down
(23:26):
to one office, waiting all day just to be told, oh,
we can't do anything for you. You gotta go to
this office, and then this office tells you to go
to that office, and so forth so on. It's ridiculous.
So that's look, I have a deep sympathy and understanding
for individuals trying to legally become citizens here in the US.
(23:48):
It is really and truly a problem. It is. But
I did not just skip the line and just you know,
not show up to appointments and keep on because I
could have kept on working.
Speaker 3 (23:59):
I didn't have to have is your inner Donald Trump
coming out?
Speaker 2 (24:04):
No, I'm just saying I just look you got to
get your The pathways to citizenship are arduous and they
are hellius. But if we were to just open up
more cubicles down there, I'm sure it would be a
lot smoother and you would probably have a lot more
people legally immigrating into this country. But seriously, that process
(24:25):
is not cool at all. You are opening up the
wound of the Stockholm syndrome that you feel when these people,
these bureaucrats, have such power over at least your next
several hours, if not the rest of your life. When
they cut you a brake, how grateful you are? Yeah?
Oh yeah, oh yes, you start saying thank you, oh,
thank you more please see I couldn't tell his story.
(24:49):
He had to tell his story. No, it's harrowing, man,
Glad you're here a swalla hey man. I tell you.
Anytime we would go in and get on a plane anywhere,
I would always think to myself, is this the time
that they say, like, you're not a citizen, You're going
back to Africa? And I'm like, I don't speak any
key Swahili at all. I know a couple of phrases
about it. Gotti, Joe Mo. Look, I can't speak.
Speaker 3 (25:12):
It's okay, it's all right. Just drop you in immersive classes.
You'd be fine in about six months. That I believe
is absolutely true. Be serious, you ever dropped into an environment.
I was never closer to being fluent in Spanish than
when I was in Spain for three weeks.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
You you give up.
Speaker 3 (25:31):
The idea of speaking English as an option, and my
first language is Swahili.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
It actually, you know, when I first came to America
and we were living with my grandmother, she also would
tell me how I didn't speak a lick of the
English and she didn't understand what I was saying. And
I think my first word was meat, because it's like
what my first time really tasting meat was being around
her and being around you know, the US family, and
she was like, first was me. She said, I don't
understand what you're saying, but if you want this, you're
(25:55):
gonna say meat. This is meat. Yeah, that's my first word.
Learn something about you today, Twala. Yeah, man, So we
should just call you meet from now on. Okay, damn it.
This story was about.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (26:18):
Before we get out of here, Mark, I just have
to tell you this because you know when I hate
to admit that Tuala was right. Oh yeah, of course,
this is one of those times we're going to have
to admit that you are right. Must be killing you.
It is, It's very painful. Before we go, Lionsgate has
inked the deal with an ai AI firm to mine
(26:39):
it's massive film and TV library and start creating content.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
Yeah. I emailed myself that story feel extra outrage Yeah.
Speaker 3 (26:49):
And it's like and that runs parallel to the story
of Governor Newsom signing the law about you know, actors
and actresses can't use their uh voice or their images
for AI purposes to protect their I don't know what
it's called, but they're you know, their their soul. Yeah,
(27:10):
so it can't be used against them in the creation
of content. But then you have a company saying, oh, no, no, no,
we're not going to use establish real people. No, we're
just going to create stuff on our own now, and
we're going to do it out in the open. Because
we already have the SAG deal in place. We know
what we can and can't do. It's not saying that
we can't just you know, Holly create new stuff and
(27:34):
not use any actors at all.
Speaker 2 (27:36):
It's so depressing and so vile. The thing that people
have to keep in mind is that AI can't create
anything without stealing from the people who were originally creators.
It can't come up with stuff on its own out
of the blue.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
No, but it has enough baseline information now it can
approximate a lot of things, and a lot of movie
and TV shows and content. Now, honestly, it's not very good,
not very good. So when you have AI stuff out there,
it can kind of mingle with the not very good stuff.
Speaker 2 (28:12):
Well yeah, I mean I'm not sure that's an argument
for allowing it.
Speaker 3 (28:16):
No, no, no, no, a lot. I'm just saying I can see
where this is going. Not that I appreciate it, not
that I think it should be allowed, but I'm saying
they're doing it above board. Oh yeah, it's like we're
going to start creating stuff strictly AI.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Yeah. I mean, there's stuff on the low end of
the continuum creative wise that could easily be confused with
AI stuff because it's lousy. But I still think that
this stuff needs to be regulated into oblivion.
Speaker 3 (28:41):
I'm not so sure that we can at this point,
I'm not so sure that the industry is going to
allow itself to be regulated.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
I think that you've zeroed in on one of our
key differences is that you're one of these. Unless I'm wrong,
feel free to correct me. But I perceive you as
the well it's going to happen anyway, might as well
lay back and enjoy it type, and I'm the do
not go gently into that dark Knight type rage rage
against blah blah. Yeah. I put it this way.
Speaker 3 (29:08):
I have to pick and choose my battles, and I
don't think there's some battles you must fight even if
you win. Excuse me, there's some battles you shouldn't fight
even if you win, and there's some battles you must
fight even if you lose. I don't know where this falls,
but I'm more to the end of This is not
a battle that I think I want to spend all
(29:29):
my emotional capital on.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
Are you saying you don't want to wake up angry
and go to bed angry? Like I do you know
what for?
Speaker 3 (29:36):
Look if you read all my hate mail, you'd assume
I'm angry all the time.
Speaker 2 (29:39):
Wow, you get some pretty entertaining hands.
Speaker 3 (29:40):
Oh, it's very entertaining, but it's a misread of who
I am. I I like going to bed, not angry,
and I have to be very measured with what I
am actually angry about, because I can always find something
to be angry about. And there are some things that,
you know what, I can get angry and I can protest.
(30:02):
I can use this microphone, but it's not going to
change a damn thing. And I have to choose between
the two.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Well, the world is a target rich environment lately, especially
when it comes to things you could be angry about,
isn't it right? And AI though, I mean, we're just
seeing the beginnings of this, and we it's gonna really
harm a lot of people. Yeah, harm a lot of people,
I feel you, but a lot of work. There's a
lot of people that will be out of work. Same
(30:28):
as with all of the advancements in automotive and manufacturing
and all that. I was in Erie, Pennsylvania. The bars
are full are full, the factories are not and that
was just a fact of life out there and they
had to adjust and say, you know what, ice fishing
it is. Guess what now? Global warming? Ice fishing hasn't
really been that popular out there. They have to keep
(30:49):
changing and adapting. But all those factors in Detroit, very
few of them have reopened. What if people done, They've
had to reinvent. Now there's there's tech cafes and all
this happening where in Detroit where once it was automotive heaven.
Remember internet cafes. They were the coolest, they were the
they were a thing. Now you have internet at the house. Internet.
(31:14):
I'm just saying, like on your phone, like we can
scream into the dark until we are horse at the
advancements of AI. But AI's just going and it's going
to keep on going. We have to find another way
around this. We can't stop this. We can't stop this. Well,
regulations are one way around it. And I see, I
understand your point. I think it's a valid point. But
(31:34):
there's a difference we could draw between say telling people,
all right, boys, the whale oil industry isn't going to
be around forever. You're gonna have to find something else
to do, and then something like you know, writing, acting,
creative things that only humans can realistically do, and if
AI does it, it's stealing from those people. I don't think
that this is the kind of thing that we just
lie back and say, well, it's going to happen one
(31:56):
way or the other. I think we have to be
vigilant about it, and there are ways to stop it
from hurting as many people as it's going to if
it were unimpeded. Because the people behind this always follow
the money. It's the Watergate lesson, it's the all the
president's men lesson. Well damn it.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
Put on that cape and I will salute you as
you fly off into the sky cape and no pants
deal or no, it's Captain Runner. There we go. Don't
you mock me? I would never do that if I am.
Since forty live everywhere the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (32:26):
How dare you? Will help you figure it out?
Speaker 1 (32:29):
It's kind of.
Speaker 2 (32:29):
What we do. Kf IM kost HD two Los Angeles,
Orange County log everywhere on the