March 13, 2025 • 38 mins
ICYMI: Hour Three of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – An in-depth analysis of the most viral stories of the week in “The Viral Load” with regular guest contributor Tiffany Hobbs weighing in on everything from the viral “airport theory” TikTok trend that advises arriving at the airport just 15 minutes prior to departure, to the dedicated fan that dressed as ‘Wile E. Coyote’ and protested outside the Warner Bros. lot demanding the release of the shelved “Coyote vs. Acme” film, and MORE…PLUS – A deep dive into the ‘Age of Disclosure’ documentary - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
kf I Am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Now Kelly Show.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
It's social media, Facebook gets, x stick Talk, Viral Load,
Viral Load, the Viral.
Speaker 4 (00:30):
Load Lad with Timney.
Speaker 5 (00:34):
Kf I AM six forty Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
It's Tiffany Hobbs here with you. And this is Tonight's
issue of the Viral Load. The first story kind of
flew under my radar. I scan the Internet daily for
stories to bring to you, stories that go viral over
the different social media apps or YouTube or anywhere on
(00:56):
the Internet, and this story escaped me.
Speaker 4 (00:59):
But I'm glad that I found it. It's a feel
good story.
Speaker 5 (01:02):
It involves a party, and it involves the police, but
it all coalesces in a wonderful moment. And what am
I talking about. There's an eighty seven year old man
named Doug Turner. He's from Illinois, and he decided that
he wanted to throw a party, a rip roaring fun
party for his neighbors. So what Doug Turner, eighty seven
(01:26):
years old, did, is he went door to door in
his neighborhood and he passed out handwritten invitations to this party.
He put the invitations in mailboxes, he knocked on doors
and personally handed these invitations to his neighbors. It was
called the party was called a Celebration of Winter, and
(01:48):
it read February fifteenth, four pm until the Cops come,
Food and drinks on offer, bring only a smile. Well
one of his names found a footage of Doug on
her ring video. She saw the footage, she found it charming,
(02:08):
She accepted the invitation, and, like is such of this
current day and age, she uploaded the footage to her
social media TikTok. To be exact, the footage is of
Doug on her doorstep passing out this invitation, and of
course it went viral millions of times over.
Speaker 4 (02:29):
And not only did it go viral, but.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
It really made this party public in a way that
people started to respond. Now it got out a little
out of hand. Doug's house couldn't accommodate the millions of
people who saw the post. But what happened was a
few dozen of his neighbors actually showed up on February
fifteenth for this four pm until the Cops Come party,
(02:55):
and they enjoyed the presence physically with Doug while that
thousands of others, perhaps even hundreds of thousands of others,
watched a viral stream of the party so that they
could still participate. You had people like Rob Gronkowski, former
football player and now he's a pitchman for.
Speaker 4 (03:17):
Insurance right something.
Speaker 5 (03:19):
You had different celebrities, big and small, people who tuned
into this stream of the party on February fifteenth. The
party was a success, so much so that people were saying, hey,
what are you going to do next February fifteenth, And
Doug said, he's pretty much all tunk, tuckered out. He
doesn't want to do this anymore.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
This is a lot.
Speaker 5 (03:41):
But we do have a clip of Doug appearing on
a TV show in which he described what happened during
the party a rager.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
How did it go Saturday night? It was a rager.
Speaker 6 (03:53):
Yeah, we started at four pm and most of the
twenty four people invited to showed up and we just
ate and drank a beer and they even suck into
my whiskey stash and drank that and that was pretty well.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
They lasted until midnight. You're a Scotch guy, so it's okay.
If they took the whiskey.
Speaker 5 (04:09):
I guess, huh yeah, So, as you heard Doug Turner say,
it was an absolute rager full of whiskey and fun.
And yes the cops were involved, but not in a
way that crashed the party. No, there was one lone
cop car positioned at the end of Doug Turner's block
to make sure that no unwanted guests made it to
(04:31):
his home. So that is Doug's winter party, February fifteenth,
and I guess we have to stay tuned for what
he might do next year. Our second story involves something
a little less fun. It's a new day, which means
a new TikTok challenge. And this challenge, to me, is
one of the dumbest challenges I've ever heard. It's called
(04:56):
airport theory. And what yeah airport And what this TikTok
challenge encourages people to do is to get this show
up fifteen minutes before your flight in understanding that a
flight very well may be held for you. That's the challenge.
(05:18):
Show up fifteen minutes early and you will be able
to board your flight. Show up as in walk in,
walk or in through the doors into the security line.
From door to boarding is a fifteen minute process is
what this new TikTok challenge alleges.
Speaker 4 (05:37):
No way in hell, No way in hell.
Speaker 5 (05:39):
And here's the funny part about it. You have all
these people taking to TikTok, trying the challenge out going
to airports. You have some who are saying, yeah, it worked.
You have others who are saying, this absolutely didn't work.
And not only did it not work, but I lost
my flight. My flight left without me. Ironically, there's a
(06:02):
secondary trend of people googling what do you do when
you miss your flight? So it's perfectly in tandem with
the TikTok challenge of showing up fifteen minutes before again.
Advice that people are dishing out on TikTok not advice
that should be taken seriously. It can put you in
(06:23):
a world of hurt. Mo Kelly, what is your recommendation?
The recommendation says, and this is floating around virally as well.
Of course, we've all been told get to a flight
or an airport two point five to three hours before
your flight. Do you abide by that suggestion? When it
comes to domestic international as a whole other.
Speaker 4 (06:44):
Animal, domestic, If I'm leaving out of lax and I'm
not checking a bag, so those things are important. I
am still at the airport two hours in advance, two
hours in a man not checking a bag. In other words,
I have just my carry on. I can just go
straight to the gate through security.
Speaker 5 (07:05):
What is the closest you've ever come to missing a
flight because of getting to an airport late or getting
held up in some way in security?
Speaker 4 (07:15):
Have you run through an airport? Do you have a story?
I've had to run to get a connection. Same at Ohair.
I remember that I have never been late to the
airport for a flight in my life.
Speaker 5 (07:31):
People who have those stories of getting to the airport
just before the door goes up on the plane give
me a lot of anxiety because I am like you,
Mo Kelly. I have abided by the rule of you
get there at least two hours ahead of time. And
things might bar that from happening. But a TikTok trend
to encourage people in this day and age where flights
(07:52):
are already upit compromised within the court of public opinion,
flying is not necessarily as comfortable as we.
Speaker 4 (08:01):
May want it to be.
Speaker 5 (08:02):
But to encourage people to then get there late with
the expectation that their game, that this trend will avail
itself so that they can film, so that they can post.
Speaker 4 (08:17):
It's just it's asinine.
Speaker 5 (08:19):
It's asinine, it's dangerous, it's stupid.
Speaker 4 (08:23):
Stupid is probably the best word for it. Hey, you're
going to lose out a lot of money. I mean, look,
if you want to risk not getting to your destination,
and depending on your ticket, what type of ticket, whether
it's refundable or it's going to be a change fee.
If you want to risk that, knock yourself out. I'm
not going to be the one who's ever going to
miss a flight because of my poor choice.
Speaker 5 (08:46):
Hey, Mark Ronner, you listen in there. Yes, have you
ever had to run through an airport?
Speaker 7 (08:53):
You've had to run through airports. I've had to spend
the night in airports after missed flights. Yeah, I would
do any thing to avoid going to an airport, especially lax.
Speaker 5 (09:03):
What's your rule of thumb? Are you doing for domestic fights?
Two point five to three hours ahead of time? Are
you cutting it close?
Speaker 4 (09:08):
You live on the edge? What do you do?
Speaker 7 (09:10):
Never ever cut it close, Get there hours ahead of,
spend the night there before if you have to, you
do not want to risk, and it's getting worse as
time passes.
Speaker 4 (09:19):
If you haven't noticed it is it is go ahead now.
I had to spend a night in the airport because
when I was in college, I got snowed in at
Dulles and so you know, what was I gonna do?
Dulles is not close to Georgetown University. It's good, I
don't know, thirty thirty five miles and back then there
was no ubers. You had to get a cab and
after a certain time, good luck trying to get a cab.
(09:40):
So I had to just sleep at the airport, and
then when we were able to fly out, I flew
out the next morning.
Speaker 7 (09:46):
And here's the thing about airports. They're not designed for
people to sleep in them.
Speaker 4 (09:50):
No, no, And I can't sleep in one of those
chairs with a with an arm, get me in my back.
I have to sleep on the floor at that point
on my luggage.
Speaker 5 (09:59):
That's inten and the idea that you're vulnerable to people
as well walking into your space.
Speaker 4 (10:04):
It's not comfortable or conducive. You're going to say, Mark what.
Speaker 7 (10:08):
There are no accidents. It's intentional that they're uncomfortable like that.
They don't watch you sleep in there, not at all.
Just they should design our homeless policy. I think it's
the same people.
Speaker 4 (10:19):
The bus benches and the airport chairs are very similar. Yeah, genius,
pure genius.
Speaker 5 (10:25):
On the other side of the break, because it deserves
its own segment and it should not be rushed. Trust me,
there's a wonderful clip, a sound clip that you're going
to hear.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
And let me tell you what the caption is.
Speaker 5 (10:40):
Now, large octopus squeezes itself into small hole. Yeah, and
I'll tell you all about it and why it's going viral.
On the other side of the break.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
You're listening too. Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 4 (11:03):
Now it's tough for the viral Lot Tiffany Live on
camp Later in Oky, she'll talk about the toughness.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
On social media.
Speaker 4 (11:17):
Room Load with Tiffany Hubbs if I.
Speaker 5 (11:22):
Am six forty live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. It's
later with mo Kelly And this is segment two of
the Viral Load with Me Tiffany Hobbs in news you
didn't know you needed large octopuses Octopi, Pie Octopi. It's
it's National Pie Day. In a couple of days National
(11:42):
Pie Day. More than one octopus is an octopi. It
all goes together. Look at us in sync. He talked
about Backstreet Boys earlier, and I'm an InSync fan. I
had to get that in there. There you go, really, yes, Yes,
that's a that's a subject for another. Don't make that
face in sync? Go over Backstreet all day, I guess.
As a quick little deviation from the topic. Back to
(12:04):
the topic though in news you didn't know you needed.
Large octopi can squeeze themselves into very small holes. Why
because they have no bones, They only have a hard
beak careful which makes their soft, muscular bodies highly flexible.
(12:26):
Why do you need this information, you might be asking,
And honestly, you probably don't need. You're unlikely to encounter
an octopus in the wild or in any other capacity
unless you go looking for one. But should you do
that and you see it squeeze into a hole, and
you will understand why. This next footage went viral, and
this footage has been seen all over social media. It's
(12:48):
a video of a large octopus, again squeezing and contorting
itself into a teeny tiny hole that looks to be
about the size of a small saucer plate. Now, while
that description of a large octopus going into a hole
might not give you any sort of excitement, the next
(13:11):
sound very well, may this is what it sounds like.
Speaker 4 (13:29):
Excuse me, gus me, my bed, my bad, my Michael's on.
I've been waiting all week to play that clip. I've
been very excited. So who was holding the mic? That's
what I want to know, who was holding the microphone?
I want that job.
Speaker 5 (13:46):
I want to be a videographer who just follows octopi
around and watches them contort themselves into small spaces, just
so that I can recover that sort of sound. That
is amazing and that is natural courtesy of that octopus.
Speaker 4 (14:00):
I'm proud of it. So what do we learn from
that little sound demonstration.
Speaker 5 (14:04):
Well, we learned that again, octopus or octopi are very
skilled and their ability to contort themselves and adapt to
tight spaces actually makes them effective hunters and survivors. So
while that sound was fun for us to listen to,
it actually is very functional. This is the way in
(14:24):
which an octopus survives. And that video, that footage, you
can find all over social media because it is going viral,
and there are people like me who are extremely excited
about that story.
Speaker 4 (14:37):
I don't know about you, Mo Kelly, but I loved it.
I'm not excited. You should be. But it was a tingling.
Yeah I heard it. Yeah, I heard it. I heard it.
I don't know if it was a videographer or a fluffer,
but I heard it. Big things, small spaces. Come on, careful,
OCTOPI next story, next story. That's okay.
Speaker 5 (14:59):
You might have heard of Wiley Coyote. I'm a Warner
Brothers fan, or you a Warner Brothers fan. Warner Brothers
is right down the street from the studio. Well, there's
a prospective Wiley Coyote movie and that movie is called
Coyote Versus Acme. Now, the movie has been yet to
(15:20):
be released. It is shelved at this point. It was
in pre production. It stalled for different reasons. Some of
the stars associated with this movie include Will Forte, John Cena,
and Lana Condor, and Will Forte has actually spoken out
about it.
Speaker 4 (15:40):
He is saying this movie needs to be released.
Speaker 5 (15:44):
That it's an abomination that their work has yet to
be seen by the masses. But what Will Forte is
saying is not what's going viral. What's going viral is
that Earlier this week, a dedicated fan dressed as Wiley
Coyote and protested outside of Warner Brothers Studios right down
(16:04):
the street here from KFI. This person dressed completely as
Wildly Coyote, and he held up a cute little sign
that looks like it's straight out of the cartoon, and
it said simply no, release me, release me. He's picketing.
Wiley Coyote is a protester. Now he has to be
(16:27):
careful because I hear those things are not welcome. You're legal,
might mess around and get himself deported. But it is
all in conjunction with the press and the marketing for
this yet to be released movie that is considered to
be live action and animation. It's a hybrid of the two.
(16:49):
And who knows when it will come out. It was
supposed to come out in twenty twenty three. We're now
in twenty twenty five, but the materials there apparently, and
Wildly Coyote, the protester is demanding that it be shown,
and he has gone viral all over social media.
Speaker 4 (17:05):
We have someone who's connected to that movie who is
the voice of Bugs, Bunny and other characters. Eric Bowser,
who was a guest on this show, and he'd been
fighting for the past two years to your point there,
to get this movie released, And it's never been clear
to me why it has been released. Because it's done,
the movie is complete, you know, release it to HBO Max, yeah. Something.
Speaker 5 (17:29):
And the one of the things that will Forte, one
of the stars, is saying is that it was possibly
shelved due to budgeting back in twenty twenty three, some
sort of restructuring there at Warner Brothers Discovery. But all
of these people involved are saying, we need it to
(17:49):
come out. Why it's done? Why are we holding onto it?
Speaker 4 (17:53):
Just like you said, yeah, there's something else and maybe
Mark you know about this as well. Remember the whole
Batwoman movie that they shoved as well.
Speaker 7 (18:00):
It was a write down and it really broke a
lot of people's hearts because it's not like those studios
never put out anything subpar.
Speaker 4 (18:08):
Just release it. What are you ashamed of at this point?
I mean, if Madam Webb can come out, I know,
different studio, but if a studio can release Madam Webb,
oh yes, the bar is low, Okay, No one is
going to judge you any differently. I don't get it.
Speaker 7 (18:22):
Yeah, there's been a lot of good word about the
Warner Brothers movie as well. Everybody who's seen it has
high praise for it, So it's kind of baffling why
they're keeping that under lock and key.
Speaker 5 (18:33):
Well, people might get out there with Wiley Coyote and
protest that this movie be released. If he continues to
go viral, he's definitely amassing a fan base of his own.
As he stands on the corner with his cute little
white sign before you go to break, Steph, can we
play that octopus squeezing itself into a small hole one
more time?
Speaker 4 (18:53):
Please? I guess so so much. Any window there, squeeze yourself,
been there, you get in there? Mark loves it. That's
usually the sounds something makes when it's coming out of
the hall. I all I can think of was like
(19:15):
Caddy shackle. That's tonight's viral Loade. Let's talk about aliens
and UFOs when we come back KFI AM six forty.
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 4 (19:33):
And If you haven't heard me talk about UFOs, you
may think I'm kidding. When I say UFOs. I call
them a UFOs unidentified flying objects. The government has now
started calling them, or at least in the past ten years,
started calling them UAPs Unidentified aerial phenomena. Call them what
you want. But I'm a firm believer, not in a
(19:55):
conspiratorial way. I'm talking about in a mathematical reality sort
of way. I believe in the mathematical certainty of their
being intelligence other than ours in this universe, probably in
our galaxy. In other words, our neighborhood. Say that absolutely completely.
If I had a couple of hours, I would run
(20:17):
down the Fermi paradox and all those things. Why I
believe we are not as smart as we think we are.
Our civilization has not been around all that long. Our
technological capabilities are minuscule, I believe. Look, we had the
first flight barely over one hundred years ago with the
(20:38):
Wright Brothers. We've done a lot in one hundred years,
which only says that we haven't done much over the
totality of our existence. Now we will exponentially quicken our
growth in technology and our capabilities thanks to the computer
thanks to the advanced computing which it is yielded, and
(20:59):
the Internet and also AI. So one hundred years from now,
who knows where our society will be in a technological sense.
I mention that because this is a distinct possibility that
there is a society which existed before us. Maybe think
about a society which had a thousand year head start
on us, where would they be in a technological sense
(21:21):
or ten thousand or one hundred thousand years. And I'm
treading on the Fermi paradox, but I won't get into that.
My point is it is more reasonable than unreasonable to believe,
given the vastness of this known universe, that we're not
the only ones here. To that end, there has been
(21:41):
an ongoing fight to get the government to reveal at
least how much they know or how much they've obtained
over the years. In the beginning, going back to Roswell
in the crash in New Mexico in forty seven, I
think it was people used to use it. There's some
sort of idea of a conspiracy theory that the government
(22:04):
just didn't want us to know X, Y and Z.
But now it's a national security issue where if there
are unidentified aerial phenomena which is far beyond our technology,
zipping in and out of our restricted air space. You
have to ask ourselves the question of one, is it
(22:24):
non human and non terrestrial or could it be non
human non terrestrial origin? But then maybe earthlings have reverse
engineered some technology they've come across, and if that technology
were reverse engineered by an adversarial nation like a China
(22:44):
or Russia, that could tip the balance of power all
around the world. So there is a real substantive conversation
about this aerial phenomena which pilots have talked about, military's
talk about, politicians and elected officials now feel comfortable to
talk about. There is a new documentary which is going
(23:07):
to be hitting streaming in the next two weeks, or
so called Age of disclosure. Disclosure is the terminology used
to discuss when eventually we general society will know everything,
or at least an approximation of what the government knows,
whether there is non earth bound technology in our possession,
and there will be there will be an admission of that,
(23:29):
whether there'll be non terrestrial beings in our possession. That's
called disclosure. And this documentary I have not seen it,
but can't wait to see it. From all accounts, is
probably the most comprehensive and the most serious look at
the issue of disclosure what our government does or does
(23:50):
not know. This is a trailer. The American people are
ready to receive the truth. Humanity is not the only
intelligence in the universe. Humanity is not the only intelligence species.
We are absolutely not alone. Non human intelligence exists. The
UAPs are real, they're here, and they're not human. I
(24:15):
spent twenty five years as a senior official with the CII.
I worked on a highly classified UAP program. Twenty eight
years as an astrophysicist. I served as the fourth Director
of National Intelligence.
Speaker 8 (24:25):
Director of Aviation Security in the National Security Council.
Speaker 6 (24:28):
The one star admiral after thirty two years of service.
Speaker 4 (24:31):
Able to come forward with this. I feel like they've
taken their life from their own. Nineties.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
I was recruited into a highly sensitive government program that
investigated unidentified aerial phenomenon.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
For over sixteen years on behalf of the US government,
I worked as a senior intelligence official on the unidentified
aero phenomenon topic.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
We learned that the US government was involved in a
long running secret war with other nations to collect and
verse engineer vehicles not made by humans.
Speaker 9 (25:02):
I have seen with my own eyes non human craft
and non human beings.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
So creative.
Speaker 9 (25:13):
The first country that cracks the code on this technology
will be the leader for years to come.
Speaker 8 (25:17):
China has established its own version of a UAP task force.
Do you think for a second that they wouldn't consider
using it to achieve their ends of domination.
Speaker 4 (25:26):
This is similar to the Manhattan Project. This is the
atomic weapon on steroids.
Speaker 8 (25:31):
This is so secret, very very few people in our
entire government that can allowed access to it.
Speaker 4 (25:38):
Even presidents have been operating on a need to know basis,
but that begins to rap out of control. It's not
acceptable to have secret parts of government that no one
ever sees.
Speaker 9 (25:47):
You better be careful about a government doesn't trust you
speak because there's no telling what they'll pull on you.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
This is the biggest discovery in unionistry.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
You had information being locked away that could change the
trajectory for species.
Speaker 9 (26:03):
It has so many beneficial impacts, including queen energy.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
We should have disclosure today, We should have disclosure tomorrow.
Speaker 4 (26:18):
The time has come. What else you want to know?
That last voice you heard is Luis Alessando, who was
a guest on our show years ago and one of
(26:40):
the principal people connected to the UAP program with the
federal government. There have been you couldn't see the trailer obviously,
but it was now Secretary of State Marco Rubio also featured.
The late Harry Reid was also part of these programs.
So it's more than just people you know in their
homes and ham radios talking trying to expose as these
(27:04):
are legitimate people within our federal government, asking the questions
and also providing some of the answers. And Tiffany, Howbes
you said that you're all in as well.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
I'm a huge fan of anything Unknown. I love Coast
to Coast, been a longtime listener, very familiar with Luis
Alisando and the pursuit of UFOs or uabs now and
this is so riveting and interesting to me because to
have these people like Louise Alisando, Kirsten gillibrand the late
(27:35):
Harry Reed, Marco Rubio, these names really lend a lot
of credibility to any claims that could be made in
this film. I was just looking it up and there
I don't see a release date specifically for it. There
are multiple dates as of today that this could come out,
including March fourteenth, right, I can't wait. I am all
(28:00):
over this as soon as it comes out.
Speaker 4 (28:03):
Mark Runner. Have you ever concerned yourself with the discussion
of UFO's UAPs.
Speaker 7 (28:09):
Well, I've always been interested, and I've also been a
coast listener way back into the Art Bell days. But
I think it's one of these kind of things that
you've got to really be careful to tune out the BS.
You know, we have a tendency as people to want
to complete patterns and puzzles in our brain. That's where
our brain's structured, and so if there are gaps, we
can fill those gaps in with some nonsense. And so
(28:30):
I'm interested, But I'm a skeptic. I think we should
all be healthy skeptics.
Speaker 4 (28:35):
To be healthy skeptic is to assess the information and
the provided evidence and look for reasonable explanations for that.
But I also know that there's something certain things which
are reasonable and reasonably beyond our understanding and explanation. There
are too many things which are not just a weather balloon,
(28:57):
too many things which are not just a light in
the sky, too many things which are not a test
at Vandenberg Air Force Base and so forth, which to
a reasonable person you could provide a level of explanation
which is not filly in the gaps. It's like, look,
that is beyond earth bound capabilities. Yeah, and maybe you
(29:18):
should explain to people what the Fermi paradox is. I'm
not sure that that's widely known. Okay, Well, the Firmi
paradox is, like, well, if there's other life out there,
and I'm really condensing it, why is it we've not
on Earth found another civilization. Well, you're making some assumptions
that the civilization wasn't here a million years ago earth
years and then either died out or self destructive or
(29:42):
what have you, and we're just missing each other in time.
Speaker 7 (29:44):
Yeah, and there are some experts who say you better
hope that there's nobody out there, because if they've visited us,
they're smarter than we are, and they can obliterate us effortlessly.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
Exactly, we can't even get to Mars. So any intelligence
which can visit us is probably coming from beyond Mars
is far technologically advanced, and it's their benevolence or indifference,
which is why we're still here. If we had. If
they had any type of intentions of I don't know,
(30:18):
hegemony or imperialism, we just wouldn't be here. Yeah, you
got to remember that we are a really young civilization.
Speaker 7 (30:25):
We've only been going to the bathroom indoors for about
one hundred and fifty years. I if that we we'd
be pretty easy to wipe out. Yeah, if somebody has
the technology to make it to our planet, I don't
call an outhouse indoors.
Speaker 4 (30:37):
Yeah. Okay, and that was like the nineteen hundreds, so
I don't know about one hundred and fifty years.
Speaker 7 (30:41):
I'm really curious about alien bathroom tech. They probably all
use bidets, right, space bidets maybe, Oh, don't steal that.
Speaker 4 (30:50):
I'm gonna use that. No, you're assuming that they have Yes,
I am. I am assuming they have those. I AM
six forty were live everywhere in the iHeart Radio app.
We'll talk to George Norman. We come back.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 4 (31:20):
KFI A six forty is Later with Mo Kelly Live
everywhere in the iHeartRadio app. Close to Coast AM with
George Norri, Who's joining me now How are you tonight,
sir Greg, mister Kelly, how about yourself? I'm doing well.
Can't wait for the Age of disclosure. It's coming, you
think so yeah? I think so. It's taken long enough,
but it probably will happen, all right. What's on the
(31:40):
show tonight? Tonight we're going to talk about how safe
is the food we eat? And then later on I'll
look at the afterlife on coast to coast. I don't
want to go anytime soon, but I'm curious to find
out what's waiting for me on the other side. When
you get there, let us know. Well, hopefully it won't
be before you. I want to be last here. Don't
(32:01):
be so greedy by George. So yeah. And for my
final thought tonight, it was guided by the story earlier
tonight when I talked about the father whose daughter died
from measles and he was still standing by his decision
not to vaccinate her. He's a manday Night, a Christian
(32:23):
sect which doesn't really believe in vaccines, even though nothing
like that is in the Bible. But that's what informed
what I had to say for this final thought. We
all would like to think that we're special. You me
Stephen Mark Twala, your neighbor, your gardener, everybody. We all
(32:49):
would like to think we're special, but some of us
want to believe we're special in a very very specific way.
Special in the way of knowing what other people don't know.
Like they have the inside track on all the secrets
of the world, or especially this country. They have some
particular insight into the mysteries that only they know. It's
(33:13):
the foundation of conspiracy theory culture which permeates our society today.
We have a nation full of people, and I'm specifically
talking about the United States. We have a nation full
of people who fancy themselves as knowing something the rest
of us just don't know. We tell ourselves that, regardless
of the facts, the science or documented history, our opinions
(33:35):
and only ours, you know, often unsubstantiated and unvetted, are
somehow right they know we don't. And because of this,
I argue, and I frequently argue, that this is the
dumbest nation on the face of the earth, because we
lean into that. In twenty twenty five, you will easily
find deep pockets of people who still deny that the
(33:58):
aforementioned Earth is spherical, despite all the available science and
evidence at our fingertips. We have people literally who are
building rockets to prove that the Earth is flat twenty
twenty five or in twenty twenty five, some will argue
with you tooth and nail that vitamin A helps prevent
(34:18):
the measles. Like RFK Junior. We live in a time
in which conviction is confused with knowledge. Just believing something
deeply is far too often masquerading as legitimate knowledge. They
are not the same. And I'm sure that social media
plays a role, a damn large role, but not the
(34:40):
only role. The moment news sites like The Washington Post
and New York Times and others first attached a comment
section to their articles at the dawn of social media.
Remember that, Remember the first time you saw a comment
section and you could actually type in what you thought
about an article and it would get published. That moment,
right there was when it all started to go to hell.
(35:01):
And here's why. For the first time, people who had
never been published or been read on any level on
a legitimate news site, we're reading themselves and were read
by others right under legitimate news just by posting a
comment right under that article, which had to pass multiple
editors just to get published. You just went click, click, click, click, send,
(35:27):
and you got published. It'scet the wrong message that just
about anybody could have an opinion and that opinion had merit,
and on most subjects it probably was not true. I'm
here to tell you no, it was not true, because
not all opinions are created equal. Some are more informed,
some are uninformed, some are less informed, some are misinformed.
(35:48):
And because we live in this world where we're meeting
on the same social media platforms, it sends the wrong
message that any and all opinions are either valid or
have merit or on the same level. You know, you
have Twitter, I have Twitter, you have Facebook, I have
Facebook threads, what have you? So therefore our opinions must
be equal because they're being expressed on the same platform. No,
(36:13):
they're not, but that's how we got here. That's why
there are Facebook groups dedicated to exposing the truth behind
the Earth actually being flat. That's why people still believe
we didn't land on the moon any of the six
times we did. That's why people are convinced iverbectin was
and still is an effective treatment for COVID because social
(36:37):
media told them so. That's why people are willing to
risk having their child die from measles, even recommending having
measos parties because they saw one video on YouTube or
some other random posts on their preferred social media platform
and feel they have more knowledge in every virologists, pathologists, immunologists,
and epidemiologists, who, of course recommended the exact opposite, because
(37:02):
why go to college for ten years when you can
just watch three YouTube videos from three people who aren't
credible but at least confirm your bias That that right
there is why polio and whooping cough are back, because
we all think we're special and live in an age
where we've been trained to not trust or believe actual experts,
(37:24):
and for that people die needlessly. Social media, designed specifically
to cater to our id and our worst selfish impulses,
is how we got here, elevating every ridiculous, uninformed, and
ignorant thought which crosses our minds, and in some and
(37:44):
in some instances, it's getting us killed, including our children.
For KF I am six forty. I'm mo Kelly.
Speaker 1 (37:54):
If you find yourself agreeing with everything we say, we're
doing it wrong.
Speaker 6 (38:00):
S I M M K O S T H D
two los Angeles, Orange County loves everywhere on the K
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
kf I Am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Now Kelly Show.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
It's social media, Facebook gets, x stick Talk, Viral Load,
Viral Load, the Viral.
Speaker 4 (00:30):
Load Lad with Timney.
Speaker 5 (00:34):
Kf I AM six forty Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
It's Tiffany Hobbs here with you. And this is Tonight's
issue of the Viral Load. The first story kind of
flew under my radar. I scan the Internet daily for
stories to bring to you, stories that go viral over
the different social media apps or YouTube or anywhere on
(00:56):
the Internet, and this story escaped me.
Speaker 4 (00:59):
But I'm glad that I found it. It's a feel
good story.
Speaker 5 (01:02):
It involves a party, and it involves the police, but
it all coalesces in a wonderful moment. And what am
I talking about. There's an eighty seven year old man
named Doug Turner. He's from Illinois, and he decided that
he wanted to throw a party, a rip roaring fun
party for his neighbors. So what Doug Turner, eighty seven
(01:26):
years old, did, is he went door to door in
his neighborhood and he passed out handwritten invitations to this party.
He put the invitations in mailboxes, he knocked on doors
and personally handed these invitations to his neighbors. It was
called the party was called a Celebration of Winter, and
(01:48):
it read February fifteenth, four pm until the Cops come,
Food and drinks on offer, bring only a smile. Well
one of his names found a footage of Doug on
her ring video. She saw the footage, she found it charming,
(02:08):
She accepted the invitation, and, like is such of this
current day and age, she uploaded the footage to her
social media TikTok. To be exact, the footage is of
Doug on her doorstep passing out this invitation, and of
course it went viral millions of times over.
Speaker 4 (02:29):
And not only did it go viral, but.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
It really made this party public in a way that
people started to respond. Now it got out a little
out of hand. Doug's house couldn't accommodate the millions of
people who saw the post. But what happened was a
few dozen of his neighbors actually showed up on February
fifteenth for this four pm until the Cops Come party,
(02:55):
and they enjoyed the presence physically with Doug while that
thousands of others, perhaps even hundreds of thousands of others,
watched a viral stream of the party so that they
could still participate. You had people like Rob Gronkowski, former
football player and now he's a pitchman for.
Speaker 4 (03:17):
Insurance right something.
Speaker 5 (03:19):
You had different celebrities, big and small, people who tuned
into this stream of the party on February fifteenth. The
party was a success, so much so that people were saying, hey,
what are you going to do next February fifteenth, And
Doug said, he's pretty much all tunk, tuckered out. He
doesn't want to do this anymore.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
This is a lot.
Speaker 5 (03:41):
But we do have a clip of Doug appearing on
a TV show in which he described what happened during
the party a rager.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
How did it go Saturday night? It was a rager.
Speaker 6 (03:53):
Yeah, we started at four pm and most of the
twenty four people invited to showed up and we just
ate and drank a beer and they even suck into
my whiskey stash and drank that and that was pretty well.
Speaker 4 (04:06):
They lasted until midnight. You're a Scotch guy, so it's okay.
If they took the whiskey.
Speaker 5 (04:09):
I guess, huh yeah, So, as you heard Doug Turner say,
it was an absolute rager full of whiskey and fun.
And yes the cops were involved, but not in a
way that crashed the party. No, there was one lone
cop car positioned at the end of Doug Turner's block
to make sure that no unwanted guests made it to
(04:31):
his home. So that is Doug's winter party, February fifteenth,
and I guess we have to stay tuned for what
he might do next year. Our second story involves something
a little less fun. It's a new day, which means
a new TikTok challenge. And this challenge, to me, is
one of the dumbest challenges I've ever heard. It's called
(04:56):
airport theory. And what yeah airport And what this TikTok
challenge encourages people to do is to get this show
up fifteen minutes before your flight in understanding that a
flight very well may be held for you. That's the challenge.
(05:18):
Show up fifteen minutes early and you will be able
to board your flight. Show up as in walk in,
walk or in through the doors into the security line.
From door to boarding is a fifteen minute process is
what this new TikTok challenge alleges.
Speaker 4 (05:37):
No way in hell, No way in hell.
Speaker 5 (05:39):
And here's the funny part about it. You have all
these people taking to TikTok, trying the challenge out going
to airports. You have some who are saying, yeah, it worked.
You have others who are saying, this absolutely didn't work.
And not only did it not work, but I lost
my flight. My flight left without me. Ironically, there's a
(06:02):
secondary trend of people googling what do you do when
you miss your flight? So it's perfectly in tandem with
the TikTok challenge of showing up fifteen minutes before again.
Advice that people are dishing out on TikTok not advice
that should be taken seriously. It can put you in
(06:23):
a world of hurt. Mo Kelly, what is your recommendation?
The recommendation says, and this is floating around virally as well.
Of course, we've all been told get to a flight
or an airport two point five to three hours before
your flight. Do you abide by that suggestion? When it
comes to domestic international as a whole other.
Speaker 4 (06:44):
Animal, domestic, If I'm leaving out of lax and I'm
not checking a bag, so those things are important. I
am still at the airport two hours in advance, two
hours in a man not checking a bag. In other words,
I have just my carry on. I can just go
straight to the gate through security.
Speaker 5 (07:05):
What is the closest you've ever come to missing a
flight because of getting to an airport late or getting
held up in some way in security?
Speaker 4 (07:15):
Have you run through an airport? Do you have a story?
I've had to run to get a connection. Same at Ohair.
I remember that I have never been late to the
airport for a flight in my life.
Speaker 5 (07:31):
People who have those stories of getting to the airport
just before the door goes up on the plane give
me a lot of anxiety because I am like you,
Mo Kelly. I have abided by the rule of you
get there at least two hours ahead of time. And
things might bar that from happening. But a TikTok trend
to encourage people in this day and age where flights
(07:52):
are already upit compromised within the court of public opinion,
flying is not necessarily as comfortable as we.
Speaker 4 (08:01):
May want it to be.
Speaker 5 (08:02):
But to encourage people to then get there late with
the expectation that their game, that this trend will avail
itself so that they can film, so that they can post.
Speaker 4 (08:17):
It's just it's asinine.
Speaker 5 (08:19):
It's asinine, it's dangerous, it's stupid.
Speaker 4 (08:23):
Stupid is probably the best word for it. Hey, you're
going to lose out a lot of money. I mean, look,
if you want to risk not getting to your destination,
and depending on your ticket, what type of ticket, whether
it's refundable or it's going to be a change fee.
If you want to risk that, knock yourself out. I'm
not going to be the one who's ever going to
miss a flight because of my poor choice.
Speaker 5 (08:46):
Hey, Mark Ronner, you listen in there. Yes, have you
ever had to run through an airport?
Speaker 7 (08:53):
You've had to run through airports. I've had to spend
the night in airports after missed flights. Yeah, I would
do any thing to avoid going to an airport, especially lax.
Speaker 5 (09:03):
What's your rule of thumb? Are you doing for domestic fights?
Two point five to three hours ahead of time? Are
you cutting it close?
Speaker 4 (09:08):
You live on the edge? What do you do?
Speaker 7 (09:10):
Never ever cut it close, Get there hours ahead of,
spend the night there before if you have to, you
do not want to risk, and it's getting worse as
time passes.
Speaker 4 (09:19):
If you haven't noticed it is it is go ahead now.
I had to spend a night in the airport because
when I was in college, I got snowed in at
Dulles and so you know, what was I gonna do?
Dulles is not close to Georgetown University. It's good, I
don't know, thirty thirty five miles and back then there
was no ubers. You had to get a cab and
after a certain time, good luck trying to get a cab.
(09:40):
So I had to just sleep at the airport, and
then when we were able to fly out, I flew
out the next morning.
Speaker 7 (09:46):
And here's the thing about airports. They're not designed for
people to sleep in them.
Speaker 4 (09:50):
No, no, And I can't sleep in one of those
chairs with a with an arm, get me in my back.
I have to sleep on the floor at that point
on my luggage.
Speaker 5 (09:59):
That's inten and the idea that you're vulnerable to people
as well walking into your space.
Speaker 4 (10:04):
It's not comfortable or conducive. You're going to say, Mark what.
Speaker 7 (10:08):
There are no accidents. It's intentional that they're uncomfortable like that.
They don't watch you sleep in there, not at all.
Just they should design our homeless policy. I think it's
the same people.
Speaker 4 (10:19):
The bus benches and the airport chairs are very similar. Yeah, genius,
pure genius.
Speaker 5 (10:25):
On the other side of the break, because it deserves
its own segment and it should not be rushed. Trust me,
there's a wonderful clip, a sound clip that you're going
to hear.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
And let me tell you what the caption is.
Speaker 5 (10:40):
Now, large octopus squeezes itself into small hole. Yeah, and
I'll tell you all about it and why it's going viral.
On the other side of the break.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
You're listening too. Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 4 (11:03):
Now it's tough for the viral Lot Tiffany Live on
camp Later in Oky, she'll talk about the toughness.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
On social media.
Speaker 4 (11:17):
Room Load with Tiffany Hubbs if I.
Speaker 5 (11:22):
Am six forty live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app. It's
later with mo Kelly And this is segment two of
the Viral Load with Me Tiffany Hobbs in news you
didn't know you needed large octopuses Octopi, Pie Octopi. It's
it's National Pie Day. In a couple of days National
(11:42):
Pie Day. More than one octopus is an octopi. It
all goes together. Look at us in sync. He talked
about Backstreet Boys earlier, and I'm an InSync fan. I
had to get that in there. There you go, really, yes, Yes,
that's a that's a subject for another. Don't make that
face in sync? Go over Backstreet all day, I guess.
As a quick little deviation from the topic. Back to
(12:04):
the topic though in news you didn't know you needed.
Large octopi can squeeze themselves into very small holes. Why
because they have no bones, They only have a hard
beak careful which makes their soft, muscular bodies highly flexible.
(12:26):
Why do you need this information, you might be asking,
And honestly, you probably don't need. You're unlikely to encounter
an octopus in the wild or in any other capacity
unless you go looking for one. But should you do
that and you see it squeeze into a hole, and
you will understand why. This next footage went viral, and
this footage has been seen all over social media. It's
(12:48):
a video of a large octopus, again squeezing and contorting
itself into a teeny tiny hole that looks to be
about the size of a small saucer plate. Now, while
that description of a large octopus going into a hole
might not give you any sort of excitement, the next
(13:11):
sound very well, may this is what it sounds like.
Speaker 4 (13:29):
Excuse me, gus me, my bed, my bad, my Michael's on.
I've been waiting all week to play that clip. I've
been very excited. So who was holding the mic? That's
what I want to know, who was holding the microphone?
I want that job.
Speaker 5 (13:46):
I want to be a videographer who just follows octopi
around and watches them contort themselves into small spaces, just
so that I can recover that sort of sound. That
is amazing and that is natural courtesy of that octopus.
Speaker 4 (14:00):
I'm proud of it. So what do we learn from
that little sound demonstration.
Speaker 5 (14:04):
Well, we learned that again, octopus or octopi are very
skilled and their ability to contort themselves and adapt to
tight spaces actually makes them effective hunters and survivors. So
while that sound was fun for us to listen to,
it actually is very functional. This is the way in
(14:24):
which an octopus survives. And that video, that footage, you
can find all over social media because it is going viral,
and there are people like me who are extremely excited
about that story.
Speaker 4 (14:37):
I don't know about you, Mo Kelly, but I loved it.
I'm not excited. You should be. But it was a tingling.
Yeah I heard it. Yeah, I heard it. I heard it.
I don't know if it was a videographer or a fluffer,
but I heard it. Big things, small spaces. Come on, careful,
OCTOPI next story, next story. That's okay.
Speaker 5 (14:59):
You might have heard of Wiley Coyote. I'm a Warner
Brothers fan, or you a Warner Brothers fan. Warner Brothers
is right down the street from the studio. Well, there's
a prospective Wiley Coyote movie and that movie is called
Coyote Versus Acme. Now, the movie has been yet to
(15:20):
be released. It is shelved at this point. It was
in pre production. It stalled for different reasons. Some of
the stars associated with this movie include Will Forte, John Cena,
and Lana Condor, and Will Forte has actually spoken out
about it.
Speaker 4 (15:40):
He is saying this movie needs to be released.
Speaker 5 (15:44):
That it's an abomination that their work has yet to
be seen by the masses. But what Will Forte is
saying is not what's going viral. What's going viral is
that Earlier this week, a dedicated fan dressed as Wiley
Coyote and protested outside of Warner Brothers Studios right down
(16:04):
the street here from KFI. This person dressed completely as
Wildly Coyote, and he held up a cute little sign
that looks like it's straight out of the cartoon, and
it said simply no, release me, release me. He's picketing.
Wiley Coyote is a protester. Now he has to be
(16:27):
careful because I hear those things are not welcome. You're legal,
might mess around and get himself deported. But it is
all in conjunction with the press and the marketing for
this yet to be released movie that is considered to
be live action and animation. It's a hybrid of the two.
(16:49):
And who knows when it will come out. It was
supposed to come out in twenty twenty three. We're now
in twenty twenty five, but the materials there apparently, and
Wildly Coyote, the protester is demanding that it be shown,
and he has gone viral all over social media.
Speaker 4 (17:05):
We have someone who's connected to that movie who is
the voice of Bugs, Bunny and other characters. Eric Bowser,
who was a guest on this show, and he'd been
fighting for the past two years to your point there,
to get this movie released, And it's never been clear
to me why it has been released. Because it's done,
the movie is complete, you know, release it to HBO Max, yeah. Something.
Speaker 5 (17:29):
And the one of the things that will Forte, one
of the stars, is saying is that it was possibly
shelved due to budgeting back in twenty twenty three, some
sort of restructuring there at Warner Brothers Discovery. But all
of these people involved are saying, we need it to
(17:49):
come out. Why it's done? Why are we holding onto it?
Speaker 4 (17:53):
Just like you said, yeah, there's something else and maybe
Mark you know about this as well. Remember the whole
Batwoman movie that they shoved as well.
Speaker 7 (18:00):
It was a write down and it really broke a
lot of people's hearts because it's not like those studios
never put out anything subpar.
Speaker 4 (18:08):
Just release it. What are you ashamed of at this point?
I mean, if Madam Webb can come out, I know,
different studio, but if a studio can release Madam Webb,
oh yes, the bar is low, Okay, No one is
going to judge you any differently. I don't get it.
Speaker 7 (18:22):
Yeah, there's been a lot of good word about the
Warner Brothers movie as well. Everybody who's seen it has
high praise for it, So it's kind of baffling why
they're keeping that under lock and key.
Speaker 5 (18:33):
Well, people might get out there with Wiley Coyote and
protest that this movie be released. If he continues to
go viral, he's definitely amassing a fan base of his own.
As he stands on the corner with his cute little
white sign before you go to break, Steph, can we
play that octopus squeezing itself into a small hole one
more time?
Speaker 4 (18:53):
Please? I guess so so much. Any window there, squeeze yourself,
been there, you get in there? Mark loves it. That's
usually the sounds something makes when it's coming out of
the hall. I all I can think of was like
(19:15):
Caddy shackle. That's tonight's viral Loade. Let's talk about aliens
and UFOs when we come back KFI AM six forty.
We're live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 4 (19:33):
And If you haven't heard me talk about UFOs, you
may think I'm kidding. When I say UFOs. I call
them a UFOs unidentified flying objects. The government has now
started calling them, or at least in the past ten years,
started calling them UAPs Unidentified aerial phenomena. Call them what
you want. But I'm a firm believer, not in a
(19:55):
conspiratorial way. I'm talking about in a mathematical reality sort
of way. I believe in the mathematical certainty of their
being intelligence other than ours in this universe, probably in
our galaxy. In other words, our neighborhood. Say that absolutely completely.
If I had a couple of hours, I would run
(20:17):
down the Fermi paradox and all those things. Why I
believe we are not as smart as we think we are.
Our civilization has not been around all that long. Our
technological capabilities are minuscule, I believe. Look, we had the
first flight barely over one hundred years ago with the
(20:38):
Wright Brothers. We've done a lot in one hundred years,
which only says that we haven't done much over the
totality of our existence. Now we will exponentially quicken our
growth in technology and our capabilities thanks to the computer
thanks to the advanced computing which it is yielded, and
(20:59):
the Internet and also AI. So one hundred years from now,
who knows where our society will be in a technological sense.
I mention that because this is a distinct possibility that
there is a society which existed before us. Maybe think
about a society which had a thousand year head start
on us, where would they be in a technological sense
(21:21):
or ten thousand or one hundred thousand years. And I'm
treading on the Fermi paradox, but I won't get into that.
My point is it is more reasonable than unreasonable to believe,
given the vastness of this known universe, that we're not
the only ones here. To that end, there has been
(21:41):
an ongoing fight to get the government to reveal at
least how much they know or how much they've obtained
over the years. In the beginning, going back to Roswell
in the crash in New Mexico in forty seven, I
think it was people used to use it. There's some
sort of idea of a conspiracy theory that the government
(22:04):
just didn't want us to know X, Y and Z.
But now it's a national security issue where if there
are unidentified aerial phenomena which is far beyond our technology,
zipping in and out of our restricted air space. You
have to ask ourselves the question of one, is it
(22:24):
non human and non terrestrial or could it be non
human non terrestrial origin? But then maybe earthlings have reverse
engineered some technology they've come across, and if that technology
were reverse engineered by an adversarial nation like a China
(22:44):
or Russia, that could tip the balance of power all
around the world. So there is a real substantive conversation
about this aerial phenomena which pilots have talked about, military's
talk about, politicians and elected officials now feel comfortable to
talk about. There is a new documentary which is going
(23:07):
to be hitting streaming in the next two weeks, or
so called Age of disclosure. Disclosure is the terminology used
to discuss when eventually we general society will know everything,
or at least an approximation of what the government knows,
whether there is non earth bound technology in our possession,
and there will be there will be an admission of that,
(23:29):
whether there'll be non terrestrial beings in our possession. That's
called disclosure. And this documentary I have not seen it,
but can't wait to see it. From all accounts, is
probably the most comprehensive and the most serious look at
the issue of disclosure what our government does or does
(23:50):
not know. This is a trailer. The American people are
ready to receive the truth. Humanity is not the only
intelligence in the universe. Humanity is not the only intelligence species.
We are absolutely not alone. Non human intelligence exists. The
UAPs are real, they're here, and they're not human. I
(24:15):
spent twenty five years as a senior official with the CII.
I worked on a highly classified UAP program. Twenty eight
years as an astrophysicist. I served as the fourth Director
of National Intelligence.
Speaker 8 (24:25):
Director of Aviation Security in the National Security Council.
Speaker 6 (24:28):
The one star admiral after thirty two years of service.
Speaker 4 (24:31):
Able to come forward with this. I feel like they've
taken their life from their own. Nineties.
Speaker 2 (24:36):
I was recruited into a highly sensitive government program that
investigated unidentified aerial phenomenon.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
For over sixteen years on behalf of the US government,
I worked as a senior intelligence official on the unidentified
aero phenomenon topic.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
We learned that the US government was involved in a
long running secret war with other nations to collect and
verse engineer vehicles not made by humans.
Speaker 9 (25:02):
I have seen with my own eyes non human craft
and non human beings.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
So creative.
Speaker 9 (25:13):
The first country that cracks the code on this technology
will be the leader for years to come.
Speaker 8 (25:17):
China has established its own version of a UAP task force.
Do you think for a second that they wouldn't consider
using it to achieve their ends of domination.
Speaker 4 (25:26):
This is similar to the Manhattan Project. This is the
atomic weapon on steroids.
Speaker 8 (25:31):
This is so secret, very very few people in our
entire government that can allowed access to it.
Speaker 4 (25:38):
Even presidents have been operating on a need to know basis,
but that begins to rap out of control. It's not
acceptable to have secret parts of government that no one
ever sees.
Speaker 9 (25:47):
You better be careful about a government doesn't trust you
speak because there's no telling what they'll pull on you.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
This is the biggest discovery in unionistry.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
You had information being locked away that could change the
trajectory for species.
Speaker 9 (26:03):
It has so many beneficial impacts, including queen energy.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
We should have disclosure today, We should have disclosure tomorrow.
Speaker 4 (26:18):
The time has come. What else you want to know?
That last voice you heard is Luis Alessando, who was
a guest on our show years ago and one of
(26:40):
the principal people connected to the UAP program with the
federal government. There have been you couldn't see the trailer obviously,
but it was now Secretary of State Marco Rubio also featured.
The late Harry Reid was also part of these programs.
So it's more than just people you know in their
homes and ham radios talking trying to expose as these
(27:04):
are legitimate people within our federal government, asking the questions
and also providing some of the answers. And Tiffany, Howbes
you said that you're all in as well.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
I'm a huge fan of anything Unknown. I love Coast
to Coast, been a longtime listener, very familiar with Luis
Alisando and the pursuit of UFOs or uabs now and
this is so riveting and interesting to me because to
have these people like Louise Alisando, Kirsten gillibrand the late
(27:35):
Harry Reed, Marco Rubio, these names really lend a lot
of credibility to any claims that could be made in
this film. I was just looking it up and there
I don't see a release date specifically for it. There
are multiple dates as of today that this could come out,
including March fourteenth, right, I can't wait. I am all
(28:00):
over this as soon as it comes out.
Speaker 4 (28:03):
Mark Runner. Have you ever concerned yourself with the discussion
of UFO's UAPs.
Speaker 7 (28:09):
Well, I've always been interested, and I've also been a
coast listener way back into the Art Bell days. But
I think it's one of these kind of things that
you've got to really be careful to tune out the BS.
You know, we have a tendency as people to want
to complete patterns and puzzles in our brain. That's where
our brain's structured, and so if there are gaps, we
can fill those gaps in with some nonsense. And so
(28:30):
I'm interested, But I'm a skeptic. I think we should
all be healthy skeptics.
Speaker 4 (28:35):
To be healthy skeptic is to assess the information and
the provided evidence and look for reasonable explanations for that.
But I also know that there's something certain things which
are reasonable and reasonably beyond our understanding and explanation. There
are too many things which are not just a weather balloon,
(28:57):
too many things which are not just a light in
the sky, too many things which are not a test
at Vandenberg Air Force Base and so forth, which to
a reasonable person you could provide a level of explanation
which is not filly in the gaps. It's like, look,
that is beyond earth bound capabilities. Yeah, and maybe you
(29:18):
should explain to people what the Fermi paradox is. I'm
not sure that that's widely known. Okay, Well, the Firmi
paradox is, like, well, if there's other life out there,
and I'm really condensing it, why is it we've not
on Earth found another civilization. Well, you're making some assumptions
that the civilization wasn't here a million years ago earth
years and then either died out or self destructive or
(29:42):
what have you, and we're just missing each other in time.
Speaker 7 (29:44):
Yeah, and there are some experts who say you better
hope that there's nobody out there, because if they've visited us,
they're smarter than we are, and they can obliterate us effortlessly.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
Exactly, we can't even get to Mars. So any intelligence
which can visit us is probably coming from beyond Mars
is far technologically advanced, and it's their benevolence or indifference,
which is why we're still here. If we had. If
they had any type of intentions of I don't know,
(30:18):
hegemony or imperialism, we just wouldn't be here. Yeah, you
got to remember that we are a really young civilization.
Speaker 7 (30:25):
We've only been going to the bathroom indoors for about
one hundred and fifty years. I if that we we'd
be pretty easy to wipe out. Yeah, if somebody has
the technology to make it to our planet, I don't
call an outhouse indoors.
Speaker 4 (30:37):
Yeah. Okay, and that was like the nineteen hundreds, so
I don't know about one hundred and fifty years.
Speaker 7 (30:41):
I'm really curious about alien bathroom tech. They probably all
use bidets, right, space bidets maybe, Oh, don't steal that.
Speaker 4 (30:50):
I'm gonna use that. No, you're assuming that they have Yes,
I am. I am assuming they have those. I AM
six forty were live everywhere in the iHeart Radio app.
We'll talk to George Norman. We come back.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 4 (31:20):
KFI A six forty is Later with Mo Kelly Live
everywhere in the iHeartRadio app. Close to Coast AM with
George Norri, Who's joining me now How are you tonight,
sir Greg, mister Kelly, how about yourself? I'm doing well.
Can't wait for the Age of disclosure. It's coming, you
think so yeah? I think so. It's taken long enough,
but it probably will happen, all right. What's on the
(31:40):
show tonight? Tonight we're going to talk about how safe
is the food we eat? And then later on I'll
look at the afterlife on coast to coast. I don't
want to go anytime soon, but I'm curious to find
out what's waiting for me on the other side. When
you get there, let us know. Well, hopefully it won't
be before you. I want to be last here. Don't
(32:01):
be so greedy by George. So yeah. And for my
final thought tonight, it was guided by the story earlier
tonight when I talked about the father whose daughter died
from measles and he was still standing by his decision
not to vaccinate her. He's a manday Night, a Christian
(32:23):
sect which doesn't really believe in vaccines, even though nothing
like that is in the Bible. But that's what informed
what I had to say for this final thought. We
all would like to think that we're special. You me
Stephen Mark Twala, your neighbor, your gardener, everybody. We all
(32:49):
would like to think we're special, but some of us
want to believe we're special in a very very specific way.
Special in the way of knowing what other people don't know.
Like they have the inside track on all the secrets
of the world, or especially this country. They have some
particular insight into the mysteries that only they know. It's
(33:13):
the foundation of conspiracy theory culture which permeates our society today.
We have a nation full of people, and I'm specifically
talking about the United States. We have a nation full
of people who fancy themselves as knowing something the rest
of us just don't know. We tell ourselves that, regardless
of the facts, the science or documented history, our opinions
(33:35):
and only ours, you know, often unsubstantiated and unvetted, are
somehow right they know we don't. And because of this,
I argue, and I frequently argue, that this is the
dumbest nation on the face of the earth, because we
lean into that. In twenty twenty five, you will easily
find deep pockets of people who still deny that the
(33:58):
aforementioned Earth is spherical, despite all the available science and
evidence at our fingertips. We have people literally who are
building rockets to prove that the Earth is flat twenty
twenty five or in twenty twenty five, some will argue
with you tooth and nail that vitamin A helps prevent
(34:18):
the measles. Like RFK Junior. We live in a time
in which conviction is confused with knowledge. Just believing something
deeply is far too often masquerading as legitimate knowledge. They
are not the same. And I'm sure that social media
plays a role, a damn large role, but not the
(34:40):
only role. The moment news sites like The Washington Post
and New York Times and others first attached a comment
section to their articles at the dawn of social media.
Remember that, Remember the first time you saw a comment
section and you could actually type in what you thought
about an article and it would get published. That moment,
right there was when it all started to go to hell.
(35:01):
And here's why. For the first time, people who had
never been published or been read on any level on
a legitimate news site, we're reading themselves and were read
by others right under legitimate news just by posting a
comment right under that article, which had to pass multiple
editors just to get published. You just went click, click, click, click, send,
(35:27):
and you got published. It'scet the wrong message that just
about anybody could have an opinion and that opinion had merit,
and on most subjects it probably was not true. I'm
here to tell you no, it was not true, because
not all opinions are created equal. Some are more informed,
some are uninformed, some are less informed, some are misinformed.
(35:48):
And because we live in this world where we're meeting
on the same social media platforms, it sends the wrong
message that any and all opinions are either valid or
have merit or on the same level. You know, you
have Twitter, I have Twitter, you have Facebook, I have
Facebook threads, what have you? So therefore our opinions must
be equal because they're being expressed on the same platform. No,
(36:13):
they're not, but that's how we got here. That's why
there are Facebook groups dedicated to exposing the truth behind
the Earth actually being flat. That's why people still believe
we didn't land on the moon any of the six
times we did. That's why people are convinced iverbectin was
and still is an effective treatment for COVID because social
(36:37):
media told them so. That's why people are willing to
risk having their child die from measles, even recommending having
measos parties because they saw one video on YouTube or
some other random posts on their preferred social media platform
and feel they have more knowledge in every virologists, pathologists, immunologists,
and epidemiologists, who, of course recommended the exact opposite, because
(37:02):
why go to college for ten years when you can
just watch three YouTube videos from three people who aren't
credible but at least confirm your bias That that right
there is why polio and whooping cough are back, because
we all think we're special and live in an age
where we've been trained to not trust or believe actual experts,
(37:24):
and for that people die needlessly. Social media, designed specifically
to cater to our id and our worst selfish impulses,
is how we got here, elevating every ridiculous, uninformed, and
ignorant thought which crosses our minds, and in some and
(37:44):
in some instances, it's getting us killed, including our children.
For KF I am six forty. I'm mo Kelly.
Speaker 1 (37:54):
If you find yourself agreeing with everything we say, we're
doing it wrong.
Speaker 6 (38:00):
S I M M K O S T H D
two los Angeles, Orange County loves everywhere on the K
Later, with Mo'Kelly News
Popular Podcasts
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Decisions, Decisions
Welcome to "Decisions, Decisions," the podcast where boundaries are pushed, and conversations get candid! Join your favorite hosts, Mandii B and WeezyWTF, as they dive deep into the world of non-traditional relationships and explore the often-taboo topics surrounding dating, sex, and love. Every Monday, Mandii and Weezy invite you to unlearn the outdated narratives dictated by traditional patriarchal norms. With a blend of humor, vulnerability, and authenticity, they share their personal journeys navigating their 30s, tackling the complexities of modern relationships, and engaging in thought-provoking discussions that challenge societal expectations. From groundbreaking interviews with diverse guests to relatable stories that resonate with your experiences, "Decisions, Decisions" is your go-to source for open dialogue about what it truly means to love and connect in today's world. Get ready to reshape your understanding of relationships and embrace the freedom of authentic connections—tune in and join the conversation!