August 25, 2023 • 48 mins
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
It is verdict was Senator Ted Cruz ben Ferguson with
you as well. And we are going to obviously talk
about the most famous mugshot I think in political history
of Donald Trump coming out of Georgia. What this means
to the campaign. We're going to do that for you
in a second. But we're also going to talk about
the presidential debate. Now here's the cool part. We're going
(00:22):
to talk about what it's like to be in a
presidential debate, how you prep for presidential debate, and what
it's like to walk out there for the first time,
because for many of these people they had never been
in this position before. Senator you watch the debate, give
us your overall review of this debate, this first debate
with Donald Trump not showing up. Was that smart of
him not to show up? And how did you think
(00:43):
people did on that stage?
Speaker 3 (00:45):
Well, look, I thought everyone did a good job on
Wednesday night. That being said, I think there were clear
winners that came out of the night. And to my view,
there were four winners that came out of the debate.
Number one was Vivek Ramaswami. He had a very strong
(01:06):
performance that night. Many Americans had ever heard of him,
didn't know him, and I think he impressed a lot
of people. His stock went up. He's going to raise
a lot of money off of that. He's going to
go up in the polls, particularly in the early primary states.
I think Secondly, Nikki Hayley did well.
Speaker 4 (01:23):
On Wednesday Night. She was crisp, she was strong.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
She was aiming for a different slice of the electric
She was not going for the Maga America first slice.
She was not particularly going for conservative. She was aiming
much more for the establishment lane.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
But she was.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
Aggressive, smart, well prepared, and I think she strengthened herself.
She had been out of the news for a while
and I think she enhanced her standing Wednesday night. The
third person who I think advanced himself somewhat is Mike Penn. Now, look,
Mike is a friend. Actually, all these guys, I know
everyone on the stage well, but Mike is a good man.
(02:07):
Mike had been having a tough time. He had not
been getting a lot of traction, and I think he
was pugnacious. He was in there fighting. I think he
made a deliberate play for evangelical voters, in particular in Iowa.
I think there were several of his answers that were
directed very much at evangelical voters, and I think he
probably helped himself. He reminded I mean, Mike is is
(02:30):
a Christian, a strong believer, and I think he reminded
people what they've always liked about Mike Pence. I think
he enhanced himself somewhat on Wednesday Night, But none of
the three of those were the biggest winners. I think,
by far the biggest winner Wednesday night was Donald Trump,
and I think Trump was very happy with everything that
(02:51):
went down. And the reason for that is severalfold.
Speaker 4 (02:55):
Number one.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
Obviously, Trump didn't show up, and by not showing up,
he forces a dynamic on the entire debate.
Speaker 4 (03:04):
That it's very difficult to avoid.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
The analogy of you think back in twenty sixteen, when
there were two debate stages, the main debate stage for
the candidates that were leading in the polls, and then
they had a second debate stage for the candidates that
were relatively low in the polls, and almost everyone referred
to the second stage as the kiddie table. And I
think by Trump's absence, it had the effect of diminishing everyone.
Speaker 4 (03:32):
On that stage, and I think that's what he wanted.
I think that was his intention. He has a big
lead in the polls, but.
Speaker 3 (03:37):
I think his absence made it feel like he's on
a stage by himself and everyone else is on the
other stage fighting between themselves. But secondly, and this is
the biggest reason why I think Trump was benefited. You
and I have talked about before, how I think this
primary is principally a two person race, person race between
(04:01):
Trump and Ron DeSantis.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (04:04):
DeSantis did fine on Wednesday night. He didn't screw anything up,
he didn't have any gaffs.
Speaker 4 (04:10):
UH.
Speaker 3 (04:10):
But he did not dominate. He did not own that stage.
He was not clearly head and shoulders above the rest.
Speaker 4 (04:18):
Uh. And and for the DeSantis campaign, that's a problem. Uh.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
In particular, the problem for DeSantis is what I started
by saying that Vivek and Hayley, h and Pence all
did quite well. I think all three of them are
going to enhance their numbers. And if their numbers are
going to be enhanced, that comes out of DeSantis's hide.
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Ye.
Speaker 3 (04:45):
For DeSantis to have a shot at beating Trump, it's
got to be a two man race. And so the
reason why I think Trump was the biggest winner Wednesday
night is that I think after the debate there were
more tenders gaining traction. And the more the contenders are
splitting support among multiple candidates, the better off Trump is.
(05:07):
And and so that's why I think the Trump team
was very happy when the debate was over, because he
looked at the field and saw the Veke gaining a
few points, Haley gating a few points, Pence gaining a
few points, and if they're splintered, that makes it much
harder for anyone on that stage to credibly go after
(05:27):
Trump when he's got.
Speaker 4 (05:28):
A thirty forty point lead over the field.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
And I didn't see anything Wednesday night that significantly changed
the dynamic of the large advantage Trump has.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
You know, sometimes there's a little bit of humor that
you have in these moments. I'd started my podcast this
Morning Center by saying, well, it was an incredible vice
presidential I'm sorry, I mean presidential debate, but that's kind
of what you're saying in a sense is no one
really moved up, and it's a significant way or solidified
or really took away from the group overall to challenge Trump,
(06:03):
who's still probably fifty points ahead. And again, you can
lose a lot of the debate if you're the winner,
if you're the leader, I should say, but you can
you can lose a lot very quickly if you're the
If you're the leader and you don't perform really well, Trump,
not even having to show up his poll numbers, are
going to probably say exactly the same this next week.
Speaker 4 (06:22):
Would you agree, Yeah, I think that's right.
Speaker 3 (06:26):
I think Trump will continue to have a very strong
position in the Republican primary. Now I've also said I
don't think the primary is over. I think everyone that
is trying to say Okay, it's it's done is looking
at it from an a historical lens. I think that
we still have a vigorous primary ahead of us. But look,
several things could happen in primaries, in primary debates. Number one,
(06:49):
in a debate, someone can screw something up badly. Someone
can tank their their campaign. I don't think anyone did
that Wednesday night. So no one, no one had a
major gaff, no one had a moment that that is
likely to be fatal to their campaign.
Speaker 4 (07:03):
That's important.
Speaker 3 (07:05):
Secondly, you can have a candidate that has a breakthrough
moment that just energizes, raises a mountain of money, soars
in the polls, and that's happened a number of times.
Speaker 4 (07:16):
I don't think that happened either.
Speaker 3 (07:17):
I think the winners on that stage that I was
discussing our relative winners and marginal winners. I think the
three candidates I identified are likely to gain some of
the polls. They'll gain a couple of points, they'll gain
some momentum, They'll raise some money. And that's actually the
money piece is a big chunk of it. You saw
in their closing statements several of the candidates pitch their
(07:39):
websites that's a good debate, can raise you millions of dollars.
And for all of these candidates, most of these campaigns
are gasping on fumes. And so that's one component is
they need the funds to make it to the next debate,
to make it through. Look, there's a reason presidential candidates
(08:00):
drop out. It's almost always the same reason they go bronk.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (08:04):
Yeah, that's when when campaigns end is when they can
no longer keep the lights on, they can no longer
pay the staff, they can no longer travel, they can
no longer communicate to communicate and politics takes money, and
and in my view, the fact that other candidates got
traction hurts the de Santus campaign. Now, I don't think
(08:29):
the Santus had any bad moments. I think he had
some good moments Wednesday night. I just don't think there
was a meaningful gulf between DeSantis and the other candidates
on the stage. And and in a campaign where you're
trying to make it a two man race between you
and Trump, that's not ideal.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
I want to tell you about amazing trip that we
as Verdict listeners are going to be taking to the
Holy Land Israel. Israel is the of Judaism, Christianity and
many of the principles that we hold dear as Americans.
And I want you to join me and many other
listeners as we visit sites like the Armageddon Battlefield, Nazareth, Jericho, Jerusalem, Bethlehem.
(09:14):
You're also on this trip going to set sail on
the Sea of Galilee, and you're going to float on
the Dead Sea. We're going to walk in the footsteps
of biblical figures like King David and Jesus Christ, and
you're going to do it all together with other listeners
from around the country. Now, I'm going to meet up
with you in Jerusalem and you're going to experience the
city and some of the most amazing sites like the
(09:35):
Western Wall, the Temple mount The trip is going to
deepen your understanding of the Bible and of Western civilization.
We're also going to have with us a spiritual advisor
pastor who's going to talk at each site about the
significance in the Bible. With this trip, it is going
to be incredible. Now you've got time to plan because
(09:55):
the trip's going to take place May the sixth through
the fifteenth of twenty twenty four. Now, the good news
is this is trip is amazing and it's signing. People
are signing up fast, so you need to find out
and book your spot now before it's too late. You
can go right now to Christian Expedition dot com slash ben.
It's Christian Expedition dot com slash ben. You can also
(10:18):
call them and get the information got and find out
everything you need to know about this once in a
lifetime trip to Israel. Eight seven seven two three four
three zero zero two. That's eight seven seven two three
four three zero zero two or online it Christian Expedition
dot com slash Ben sentater, I wanna I want you
(10:41):
to pull back the curtain for everybody, because I've got
a million questions that I want to ask. And I
was around your campaign in twenty sixteen, but there's very
few that see what happen when it comes to debate prep,
when it comes into the days and the hours before
a debate, the nerves that obviously everyone on stage is
going to feel in some point, especially in your first debate.
(11:04):
Take us back to twenty sixteen. How did you prep
for that first president of debate? Like so many were
having to prep for last night? And you had debated
in college, you had debated when you're running for senate.
But did it feel different when you were running for
president and that first debate? And what was your goal
for success as a candidate when you walk up there
(11:25):
night one of a debate?
Speaker 4 (11:28):
Yeah? Well, first of all, does it feel different? Absolutely?
Speaker 3 (11:32):
And I guarantee you everyone on that stage was unbelievably nervous.
I'm not someone who feels a whole lot of nerves
very often, but I distinctly remember that first debate in Cleveland.
Twenty four million people watched that first debate, and I
remember before the debate, you go out and you do
(11:53):
a walk through sort of a practice where they show
you where your podium is, and you stand on the
stage and you look up this couple hours for the
bait starts. And I remember standing there and just.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
Looking up and up and up.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
And it was a big, big auditorium in Cleveland, and
and it kind of takes your breath away. You're like, Okay,
they're shooting with real bullets here tonight, right like this
this is for real. Everyone was feeling that on Wednesday night,
and and and that It's just it is a huge stage.
(12:23):
Part of the reason that the debates matter so much.
So much of a presidential debate is and so much
of a presidential campaign is driven by the media cycle
is driven by what the news chooses to cover. And look,
our corporate media is thoroughly corrupt, and so if you
have a campaign that you're trying to drive a message,
it can be maddeningly infuriating when the media is doing
(12:47):
everything they can to frustrate your message and push the
message they want. And debates are one of the very
few instances where you can go around the media gatekeepers
and go straight to the voters and and they, in
the course of a presidential campaign, debates have the power
to change the entire trajectory of a debate, either to
take a candidate out. Look if you remember in twenty
(13:10):
sixteen the New Hampshire debate where Chris Christie went after
Marco Rubio hard and I was standing just a few
feet away from from Christy and I got to tell you, look,
it's it may be the only time in my life
I've been physically present for homicide. I mean, holy cow,
(13:30):
Christy went after him, and I kind of just sort
of stepped back.
Speaker 4 (13:34):
I sort of.
Speaker 3 (13:36):
Figuratively pulled out a newspaper and just kind of read
my newspaper, said, you know, never mind, proceed, I'm not
saying stop, just just leave me out of this. And
it was and Christy just he wouldn't give up.
Speaker 4 (13:48):
I mean, he just.
Speaker 3 (13:49):
Kept pounding and pounding, and you know, there were a
few of us thinking, all right, enough, christ you made
your point.
Speaker 4 (13:56):
But it was it.
Speaker 3 (13:58):
It changed the course of that debate. In that campaign,
there are other moments where were a candidate soars and
and they can suddenly get get energy. You know, if
you remember one of the early debates where where John
Harwood from CNBC was blasting every candidate and just being nasty,
(14:23):
was insulting every candidate, was was drippingly condescending, as I remember,
left wing reporter, and it came to me and I
just unloaded on him, and and my point was, look, dude,
this is not about you, this is not your chance.
You're a friggin Marxist. You intend to vote for the Democrat.
You want everyone on the stage to lose, and you're
(14:45):
just insulting every person here. But you know what, the
American people and Republican primary voters actually give a damn.
And and I kind of took his head off, and
I got to tell you, the impact that our campaign
was astonishing. I mean we had that night, like as
the debate was ongoing, suddenly our fundraising exploded. I think
(15:06):
I think we raised over a million bucks the next day.
I mean, it was Pete.
Speaker 4 (15:10):
It was a moment.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
Yeah, it was the moment.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
I remember watching it and I was sitting there when
that happened, and I was watching it, and obviously I
was yelling at the TV. I was there at that
debate and we were I was back in a green
room getting ready to do TV afterwards, and it was
like that is a moment that everybody in the room
was writing down on their notebook because everyone referenced that
not on TV like this was a moment in the
(15:33):
debate that no one was going to forget well.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
And the mechanics of what happens when you have a
moment that that resonates your fundraising explodes. And I remember
we went back out on the roads and suddenly our
crowds that had been three four hundred became a thousand.
Like it it the impact was almost instantaneous that that
(15:57):
people are like, hey, I want to see with this
campaign is about. And so there's very little in a
campaign that has the potential of a debate to change
the underlying dynamic powerfully. And last night, as I said,
(16:17):
I don't think anyone had a disqualifying gaff that killed them.
I don't think anyone had a dominant breakout. But I
do think Vivek had the best performance of the night.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
I and is that because we didn't know him.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
I mean, it's easier for people to go notice you
if they haven't seen you before. Everybody else on stage
people had kind of seen I thought it was one
of those moments where it's like, oh, I noticed you
now in the room, and you were look like I
think part of it was this. He looked like he
was genuinely having fun and happy to be there.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
He was having a blast.
Speaker 3 (16:49):
The two people who had the most fun on that
stage were Vivek and Chris Christy. Yea, and listen, Christy
has the advantage he's done this before, and it's just
different when you've done it before. He he was the
one least scared to be there, and he walked out
on that stage and his objective is to beat the
crap out of Donald Trump. And he's just gonna stand
there and just pound Trump. And that's that's what he's
(17:12):
decided to do, and he was having fun with it.
Vivek is smart and he I'm sure he was nervous,
but he seemed very relaxed. It was actually impressive to
be to come across as relaxed as he as he did,
given what surely were the nerves he was feeling. Now,
(17:32):
you asked about the prep session, So, so everyone prepares differently.
Often people prepare by They will sit down and do
a moot and they will get other people to play
the other.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
Candidates, and that can be it.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
We did a little bit of it at the beginning,
but that's not actually how we did our principal preparation.
So fairly early on our debate prep, we would typically
spend at least a full day, in some times two
full days preparing for a debate, and we just block
the time off and not be out campaigning, not doing fundraisers,
just just be locked at a conference room. And I
(18:11):
treated debate prep the same way I treated Supreme Court
oral arguments. So I've argued nine cases in front of
the Supreme Court, I've done a lot of oral argument preps,
and sort of like for a Supreme Court oral argument,
many people do moots where you stand up and have
people pretend to be Supreme Court justices and ask questions,
and I've done a lot of those. But actually, particularly
(18:32):
as I did more and more arguments, I tended to
favor getting really really smart people in the room and
then talking through Okay, what do we want to do,
so let me let me address it from the Supreme
Court perspective first and then apply it to the debate.
So for a Supreme Court oral argument, I'd have a
really smart team of lawyers, Supreme Court advocates, experienced constitutional
(18:56):
lawyers sit around the table, and I'd be one question.
I would always say, ask, is all right, what are
our must raise points? What are the points where if
when my argument is done and I sit down, I
have not said I'm gonna kick myself, I'm gonna be
like you idiot, you had to say this point. And
so I would go into any oral argument with a
(19:17):
one pager of typically three to five must raise points
that I thought were the most important points. They were
what I wanted the justices to hear and know, and
I was going to make sure to make them. That's
part of debate prep figuring out, Okay, what are the
points that are most important for you to say. Another
part of debate prep is what's your strategy? And they
(19:41):
are different times, So I'll tell you how we would
approach it. We would talk about whether you want to
how vigorously you want to engage with other candidates on
the stage, and that depends on strategically and tactically where
you are. There were debates where we said, okay, we're
go to mix it up. We're gonna and the analogy
(20:02):
we always used is we're going to scrape some paint
off the doors. We're gonna get out in a demolition
derby and mix it up and take some shots and
have some shots back and forth, and that there are.
Speaker 4 (20:13):
Times when you need to do that.
Speaker 3 (20:15):
I think that DeSantis camp expected the other candidates to
be coming at him and mixing it up a little,
and they didn't. So much like Sherlock Holmes, some of
what was interesting about the debate were the dogs that
didn't bark. Very few of the candidates attacked Ron DeSantis,
and so I think all of the other people on
(20:38):
that stage view to Santus as their principal impediment, but
they really didn't go after him directly. What is interesting
also is very few of the candidates went after Donald Trump.
It was actually fascinating. Yeah, how little Trump's name was
said is said in that room. Look the guy's got
(20:58):
a thirty forty point lead in polls. And yet now,
look you have some exceptions, Chris Christy, whatever, you know,
you ask him what time of day it is, the
time is Trump is terrible? Okay, fine, that's that's what
Christy's gonna say. But the other candidates, DeSantis, if if
he criticized Trump, I.
Speaker 4 (21:17):
Don't remember it. It wasn't much of anything Vivek. I
can't remember any criticism of Trump at all.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
No, he said he was the best president of the twenty
first century. He was making it very clear from the beginning,
I'm not here to make Trump supporters hate me.
Speaker 4 (21:32):
I think that's right.
Speaker 3 (21:33):
And a lot of people have speculated that the role
Vivek is doing is is being something of a stalking
horse for Trump. That that and and I don't know
if that's true or not, but he was certainly full
throatedly defending Trump. Look, I remember back to twenty sixteen,
and there were portions of the debates early on where
(21:55):
I made a conscious decision not to go at Trump,
not to vigorous engaged Trump, and Trump and I early
in the primary, had a very good relationship, a very
friendly relationship. It drove the media crazy because they wanted
me to blast him and I wasn't doing that. There
were later stages in the debate. Look what came down
to basically a two man battle between me and Trump.
(22:17):
Both he and I took the gloves off and began
smacking the hell out of each other. And it changed
based on where the race was and who the relative
players are. I thought it was interesting that almost nobody
was trying to prosecute a case number one, that they
(22:38):
have a stronger record than Trump. So Dessatus made the
case that he had a great record as Florida, but
he had very little comparative of his record versus Trump's,
which I expected more of that in the debate, and
almost nobody other than again Christy made the case that
they had a better chance of winning than Trump. I
(23:01):
guess Nikki Haley did too. Yeah, but Haley is running
for the moderate establishment lane, and so the argument she
was making was not It wasn't surprising, but I found
it interesting how little of that we saw on Wednesday night.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
The biggest shock for me was honestly the lack of
distinguishing one candidate from the other. And that's something that
you did a very good job of back in twenty sixteen,
was making it clear who you were as a candidate.
Walking away from last night, I don't feel like any
of these candidates really left an impression of how I
(23:41):
am very different or unique from the others on the stage.
I mean, there was there were moments jests where it
was like, for example, where Vivic, you know, proudly raise
his hand and said he would support Donald Trump as
a nominee even if he was, you know, convicted. That
was one of those moments. And then you saw which
was into meme. It's been all over the internet over
(24:02):
the last two days of the other candidates trying to
figure out what they're going to do. And it was
probably bad timing because for our bad placement for Desantans
because right next to him, and you see DeSantis look
to his right, look to his left, and then he's like, oh okay,
everybody else raised her hand, I'll raise mine halfway too
as well. That didn't look good for him.
Speaker 3 (24:21):
DeSantis hesitated, and that hesitation was not a good moment.
That that is, others are going to use that against him.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
The hesitation.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
What I actually thought one of the most interesting moments
of the debate happened right after that, where Vivet came
back and said, and he said it to Pence, he said,
if I'm elected the I will pardon Donald Trump.
Speaker 4 (24:47):
Will you do the same.
Speaker 3 (24:49):
And I got to tell you, I was surprised, and
I think it was a strategic mistake by every other
candidate on that stage not to respond hell yes, like
the answer should have been absolutely. I will pardon Donald
Trump on January twentieth, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 4 (25:09):
Why.
Speaker 3 (25:10):
Because this prosecution is an abusive power. This is Merrick
Garland and Joe Biden who don't trust the voters. They
are abusing the justice system. These indictments are a sham,
and the voters ought to decide. And so if I'm elected,
We're going to end this abuse of power. And even
if a candidate on that stage despises Donald Trump, that
(25:34):
was a It was a hanging curveball, and I was
genuinely surprised that nobody took that opportunity because that was
a moment to shine and nobody jumped on it.
Speaker 2 (25:48):
I want to tell you about our friends ever at Chalk.
If you are a guy, you're getting a little bit older,
and you feel like you're losing some of that strength
and vitality, and complacency and weakness are starting to set in.
Maybe you just don't feel like you have the same
energy you used to have. Maybe you want to go
work out, but you just don't feel like you have
that energy, and you're going, what's going on?
Speaker 1 (26:09):
Well, you're not alone.
Speaker 2 (26:10):
Did you know that tasostrum levels are off a cliff
historically to an all time low. Thankfully, the patriots at
chalk choq dot com are here to help real American
men just like you, get back your strength and vitality
and get rid of that weakness and complacency. I've been
(26:30):
taking the Chalkmail Vitality Stack now for several months.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
It works.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
You can boost your mask your masculinity by boosting your
sistostrum up to twenty percent over ninety days. Go to
chalk choq dot com Okay chalkschoq dot com and you
can check out it's manufactured right here in the US
of A. Chalk is a natural herbal supplements that are
clinically proven to have game changing effects in your energy,
(26:56):
your focus, your mood. So maximize your masculinity today Chalk
choq dot com. Use the promo code Ben for thirty
five percent off any chalk subscription for life. That's chock
choq dot com promo code Ben for thirty five percent off. Sinna,
I want to ask you one other question about debates,
because it, I mean, rarely do you get to talk
(27:18):
to somebody and pull back the curtain. Who's actually done
this before? If you're leaving this first debate, what changes
then going into the next debate? If you're if you're
any of these candidates, now, what do they have to
do and what could they take away from this? And
how much do you think the next debate will change
because of what they weren't two nights ago?
Speaker 3 (27:41):
Well, I think each of the candidates is going to
come out in a different place. For the candidates that
didn't gain momentum, they're going to feel a greater urgency.
Look than the next debate is going to have a
higher threshold, a higher threshold, a polling to get in
a higher threshold of donors. I expect the next debate
to have few candidates on the stage. I suspect at
(28:03):
least two of the candidates who were there on Wednesday
night will not be there at the next debate. When
you're not gaining traction, it impacts every part of the campaign.
It impacts your large dollar fundraising. Donors are following this,
and if they think you have momentum, they're excited neger
to write a check. And if they think you don't
(28:25):
have momentum, suddenly the money drives up the small dollar fundraising.
I mean it is an amazing when people are energized,
when you've got grassroots activists that are really exciting. Look,
I got to tell you, towards the end of my
campaign in twenty sixteen, we had online over a million
bucks a day coming in and it was people were
(28:47):
just excited. They went to my website, they contributed and it.
You know, we ended up raising ninety two million dollars,
which which is still to date the most money any
Republican has ever raised in the history of presidential prime
We raised more than George W. Bush or Romney or
John McCain. When you've got momentum, it rolls aggressively, but
it unrolls just as vigorously. And so for the candidates
(29:13):
that didn't have a moment that energized their supporters, they're
going to find when they're out on the trail their
crowds are smaller. They go to Nevan and maybe last
week they had fifty people and tomorrow they have twenty five.
And that can be a hard look. If you remember
(29:35):
one hard moment in twenty sixteen, when Jeb Bush went
his campaign towards the end, he was giving a talk
and he said and people were not responding and he said,
please clap, and it was that can be really tough.
But like, momentum is real in a campaign, and when
it's with you, it feels great, and when it's going
(29:58):
away it sucks.
Speaker 4 (29:59):
And and.
Speaker 3 (30:01):
Different candidates from Wednesday night are feeling the good and
the bad of that, and each debate it kind of
ratchets up another level. It's sort of like, you know,
it's sort of like different rounds of March madness with
the playoff. As it gets to the next level, the
stakes keep going up and up.
Speaker 2 (30:21):
If you're Donald Trump, do you continue with this? I'm
not showing up for the debates based on what you
just saw. Would you show up for the next one
or would you say hell.
Speaker 4 (30:29):
No, Absolutely, he will skip the next debate.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
I think it's one hundred percent from his perspective, from
his campaign's perspective, skipping it was a complete win. What
could have changed it? You remember in twenty sixteen he
skipped the Iowa debate. Yeah, and he was mad. He
was mad at Megan Kelly, and he skipped the Iowa debate,
and then the Iowa caucus happened and I beat him.
(30:54):
He didn't skip the next debate, but like like, if
you see an electoral result that that is not good
for your side, that then you change your path. From
Trump's perspective, why would he change that? This was it
was a calculated gamble. If someone had had a breakout
moment on Wednesday, if someone had sizzled and gained a
(31:17):
ton of momentum, you could see the Trump team reevaluating.
If Ron DeSantis had clearly been in a different league
from everyone else and made clear that he's the principal
alternative to Trump, and people had rallied behind DeSantis, that
could have caused the Trump team to reevaluate. If someone
else had had a moment that just lit every If
(31:40):
someone had had made an indictment, and I don't mean
an indictment in the legal sense, but a political indictment
of Trump had prosecuted the case that they would be
a better nominee to win in November and lead the
country than Trump. If someone had really lit it up,
(32:01):
you could imagine the Trump teams say, Okay, you need
to get on that stage and fight back against so
and so. I didn't see anything on Wednesday that's going
to cause them to reevaluate. And so I think unlessen
until something changes significantly. My expectation is Trump is not
showing up at any of these debates.
Speaker 2 (32:21):
Well, the good news is, if you had a bad
night in the debate stage, twenty hours later, no one
was talking about you. If you had a good night
on the debate stage, the bad news for you is
no one was talking about you afterwards. Because of Donald
Trump having to head down to Georgia. Not only do
we have, for the first time in history, a president
who has an actual mugshot, which they has now become
(32:43):
probably the most iconic political picture in history. People are
already selling shirts with it and hats with it. It's
actually hysterical. But Donald Trump also came out after this happened,
after he turned himself in, and this is what he
had to say as he was about to get on
the plane leaving Atlanta.
Speaker 5 (33:01):
So it's a very sad day for America. This should
never happen. If you challenge an election, you should be
able to challenge an election. I thought the election was
a rigged election. There stolen election, and I should have every.
Speaker 3 (33:13):
Right to do that.
Speaker 5 (33:13):
As you know, you have many people that you've been
watching over the years do the same thing. Whether it's
Hillary Clinton or Stacy Abrams or many others. When you
have that great freedom to challenge, you have to be
able to otherwise you could have heard dis honest elections.
What has taken place here is a travesty of justice.
We did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong, and everybody
(33:34):
knows that I've never had such support, and that goes
with the other ones too. What they're doing is election interference.
They're trying to interfere with an election. There's never been
anything like it in our country before. This is their
way of campaigning. This is one instance, but you have
three other instances. It's election interference. So I want to
(33:54):
thank you for being here. We did nothing wrong at all,
and we have every right angle right to challenge an election.
Speaker 1 (34:03):
That we think is dishonest.
Speaker 4 (34:04):
So we think it's very dishonest.
Speaker 5 (34:06):
So thank you all very much, and I'll see you
very soon.
Speaker 2 (34:09):
Thank you very much for president with pretty cool, calm
and collected is Mugshody looked like he was pretty irritated.
I can imagine why. This to me was one of
those moments where I'm still in shock by it, honestly,
like I'm not shocked at what the left has done,
but when I see this happen. This when I say
the Democratic Party is dead, they're now communists and socialists.
(34:30):
This has been in a republic. Ask I still cannot
believe that the rest of the world, and this does
make me very angry, is now watching as America is
losing its way and indicting a former president. How is
this not one election interference? And how big of a
fall is this for this country in general?
Speaker 3 (34:51):
Look at Trump is exactly right in what he said there.
This is blatant election interference. This is partisan and political.
The demoocrats, both at the federal level and state level,
hate Donald Trump. They're blinded by their rage and they're
using the justice system. Listening in this podcast, we've discussed
(35:11):
at great length each of the four indictments, and so
you can go back and listen to earlier podcasts if
you want an analysis of each of them, because we've
broken them down on a level that you can't get
on CNN or CBS or ABC or NBC, and all.
Speaker 4 (35:25):
Of them I think are garbage.
Speaker 3 (35:28):
They are partisan and political, particularly when you put it
in the broader framework, which is that our country is
more than two centuries old. We've never previously indicted a
president of the United States, a former president of the
United States, a major candidate for president of the United States,
and in less than a year, the Democrats have done
so four separate times. And you use the phrase banana republic,
(35:50):
that's what this is. They the Democrats don't trust the voters.
The reason they're indicting Donald Trump over and over again
is there afraid he could win November and they want
to use the legal system to hurt him. And I
think it is absolutely outrageous. I will say also, look,
(36:12):
there are a lot of things that you and I
and many people like about Donald Trump. One of the
things I like is that he's got enormous guts, and
he's willing to fight the media. He's willing to fight
the Democrats. One of the things which I also respect
is the guy is a marketing and branding genius. And
I got to say, just the timing of number one,
you have a debate of all of its rivals, his rivals,
(36:34):
and he simultaneously does an interview with Tucker Carlson on
Twitter or on x whatever it's called. That was a
very strong and effective move. Number Two. The day after
the debate, he promptly goes and turns himself in and
has his mugshot released. That was an even stronger move.
(36:58):
And then number three, he returns to Twitter and his
first tweet is a tweet of his mugshot, which basically
broke Twitter. Yeah, that combination sucks all of the energy
out of every other candidate. And listen, one challenge that
(37:22):
every candidate in this race not named Donald J. Trump
faces is the difficulty of driving even ten seconds of
discussion or narrative, because Trump, by design, seizes and dominates
the discussion. And I think the last twenty four hours
are as good an illustration of it as we've ever seen.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
I laugh because the bab one b put up pictures
of everybody on stage. Last I said, Republicans gathered a
debate who will lose to Trump in a distant second,
And then you see what he did and how smart
he was with this. If you're Donald Trump, and it's
like plays two big games, wins stupid prizes for the Democrats,
I'm referencing that, it's like, if you guys keep doing this,
(38:04):
you seem to just be helping Donald Trump. Now there's
also many Democrats go, yeah, that's exactly what we want.
We want Donald Trump to get the nomination. We're not stupid.
We know exactly what we're doing when we indict him.
Could this be one of the Democrats?
Speaker 3 (38:21):
Yes, Look one hundred percent, the Democrats want Trump to
get the nomination. One hundred percent. The corporate media wants
Trump to get the nomination. They believe he cannot win
in November. I don't think that's right. I think Trump
absolutely can win in November. Now I think he can lose. Also,
we're a very polarized country, and it's clear there are
a lot of voters that love Trump and a lot
(38:43):
of voters that hate Trump. And so I don't know
what happens in a general but I think in the
in the echosphere, the bubble, that is the left wing,
that is Democrats, in the media, everyone they know thinks
Donald Trump is Hitler, and so they want him to
be the nominee. If he ends up winning in November,
(39:05):
I have to say the meltdown we saw in twenty sixteen,
the Rachel Maddows of the world basically having a nervous
breakdown on television, I think would be utterly dwarfed by
the reaction if Trump wins again in November. We'll see
what happens. But I got to say the media desperately
want him to be the nominee.
Speaker 1 (39:28):
I want to tell you about in Viral Quinns.
Speaker 2 (39:30):
If you are like me, you've got asthma, maybe you
are allergic to a lot of different things, pollen or dust.
My wife is just unbelieva are allergic to dust. You
have got to check out in viral Quinns. You need
to choose an air purifier, literally, like your life depends
on it. And this is something that is incredible. Look,
(39:51):
no matter where you live, you're probably gonna deal with
bad air quality. This year alone, there's been thirty five
thousand wildfires that have devastated the US. Toxins and particles
and wildfire wildfire smoke can penetrate our lungs and threatn
our health. And that's why Enviralquins developed military grade air
purification for your home. I have this in my bedroom
(40:11):
and this thing is a game changer. They just announced
their biggest sale of the year. You can save a
massive thirty percent off during their Labor Day sale, and
viro Clins is specifically designed to wipe out airborne chemicals
and viruses known to call illness, allergies, and difficulty breathing.
Even toxic gases and particles found in wildfare smoke are
(40:35):
no match for enviro Quins. That's why the US Navy
selected viro Clins to protect and purify the air in
their facilities. And vira Clints comes with a free professional
air quality monitor, so you know your family's breathing purified air.
Now is the time to save thirty percent off your
air purification unit, get the free air quality monitor and
(40:57):
fast free shipping. That's a two hundred and fifty dollar
savings right there. Go to ekpure dot com. That's ekpure
dot com. Use promo code verdict, that's ekpure dot com.
Use promo code verdict and save the biggest savings of
the year. Last question I got to ask you, Senator,
(41:19):
is this we're now seeing that they're rushing these prosecutors
and these people that are coming after Trump.
Speaker 1 (41:26):
This is fourth indictment. They're wanting to pack all this.
Speaker 2 (41:29):
Into the presidential election cycle that we've seen this, it's
very clear they want to put him in court and
said on the campaign trail that's election interference by definition.
Is there a anything Trump can do? Delay and then
the other question is if he is elected, could he
still go to jail? How would that work if they
(41:50):
do find a jury in New York, which is not
insane idea, or in Delaware or in Atlanta to actually
say he's guilty, how does that work?
Speaker 1 (42:00):
Now?
Speaker 3 (42:00):
Knowing everything, Yeah, look, we are in uncharted territory. The
short answer is, nobody knows. This has never happened before.
I think there is a very real chance we will
see one or more trials between now and November. And
I think there is a very real chance, particularly in
in d C, in New York, or in Atlanta, I
(42:24):
think we could see convictions. We've talked about how the
judges and or the juries in those respective places are
not favorable. I don't expect the convictions to be upheld
on appeal, but the appeals could take years, and so
I think there is a very real risk that we
get to November of next year and Trump will have
(42:45):
endured a trial and have been convicted, and the matter
will not be resolved on appeal. What happens when you're
convicted of a crime, It varies. Sometimes your sentence will
be stayed pending the appeal. Sometimes it won't. I would
anticipate that no one would try to incarcerate or no
(43:07):
one would succeed in incarcerating Trump before the appeal had
run its course. But look these wild eyed prosecutors. Actually,
when I said no one would try, as soon as
I said that, I didn't really believe that, because they're
brazen enough. I think they would try. I think the
odds are decent. The appellate courts would say, no, we're
(43:27):
not going to let Trump go to prison while the
appeal is pending. We're going to wait to resolve the appeal.
That's what I would expect. But this is uncharted territory.
And by the way, there's nothing in the law that
prevents a candidate for president being incarcerated in jail. There's
(43:50):
nothing in the law that prevents the Republican nominee or
the Democrat nominee for president being incarcerated and in prison.
There's nothing in the law that prevents the sitting president
of the United States from being incarcerated. Now, the Secret
Service would have an aneurism. I don't know how that
would actually mechanically work. If you have the sitting president
of the United States and sing sing next to murderers
(44:15):
that's part of why this is such uncharted territory. I
don't think that will happen, but as I said, I
do think there's a real risk of a conviction, a trial,
and a conviction before election day.
Speaker 4 (44:26):
All Right, I want to ask you something, Ben, So
the mugshot.
Speaker 3 (44:31):
The mugshot is going to be an iconic picture, and
Trump obviously has an expression of pissed off, angry, badass.
It's a different approach if you remember different presidential or
political mug shots. If you remember Rick Perry, if you
remember Tom Delay. Both of them were indicted, both of
(44:53):
them had mugshots, and both of them took the same approach,
which is they grinned, they smiled widely like a political headshot.
And my question to you is should should Trump have
smiled or should he have looked as pissed off as
he was? And I don't think there's an absolute clear answer.
I have an inclination, but I'm curious what you think.
Speaker 2 (45:16):
Yeah, I think that exactly how he took that picture
is exactly why he should. Because one of the things
that's going viral, and this actually has happened while we've
been recording, is somebody I know put that picture up
underneath it all capital letters legend and it's now gone
to like two hundred and eighty thousand retweets. This is
going to be on I mean now there's like fifteen
(45:36):
people since we've been doing this taping this that have
put out T shirts that say rock Star Legend. You know,
I stand with him. I think this was the perfect
look of watch me.
Speaker 4 (45:48):
Now.
Speaker 2 (45:48):
You think it was four years of me trying to
drain the swamp. You have no idea what's coming for you, Washington.
I would have played it this way. I think it's
a brilliant mugshot for him.
Speaker 3 (46:00):
Well, it's why he has the the media and marketing
and branding instincts that he does. And you're right, it's
going viral and it's making a heck of a statement.
Speaker 2 (46:10):
Yeah, Legend is the one that just made me laugh.
I was like, yep, that's the one. They're gonna these
These will be at the next Trump rally and there'll
be vendors out there selling this mug shot on every
T shirt ye everything they can get their hat on,
and and and by the way, by.
Speaker 3 (46:24):
The way, do you do you remember with the first
indictment the Alvin Bragg indictment, where the Trump team was
saying they wanted a mug shot. I think they had
decided that this that was And and by the way,
the Alvin Brag one, which seems like a long time ago,
it was the first indictment. We said on verdict at
the time, Trump will go up ten points in the
(46:44):
polls in the primary. And that's exactly what happened. We
predicted it when the Brag indictment came down, and and
and I think the Trump campaign was disappointed they didn't
get a mug shot there, and and so ironically, I
think they're very happy to have the mug shot now.
Speaker 1 (46:59):
All right, I'm gonna ask you this question. Another prediction.
Speaker 2 (47:02):
Then, when the polls come out, post debate, post this indictment, mugshot,
who moves up the most, and does Trump get even
higher in the poles than he is now?
Speaker 3 (47:12):
I don't know that Trump goes materially higher, although I
mean he's he's at a pretty dominant position right now. My
guess is Ramaswami up the most. Wouldn't surprise me to
see him pick up four or five points. Wouldn't surprise
me to see Nikki Haley pick up three points. Wouldn't
surprise me to see Pence pick up one or two points,
(47:35):
And that probably comes mostly at the expense of DeSantis,
maybe some at the expense of Tim Scott's, and maybe
a little bit at the expense of Trump. But I'm
not sure. I kind of feel like the people on
that stage are fishing in a different pond than Trump is.
Speaker 1 (47:52):
Yeah, no doubt about it. Don't forget.
Speaker 2 (47:55):
We do this show Monday, Wednesday and Fridays, so make
sure you hit that follow or a subscribe button. And
on those days when we don't publish. We've never said
this before, and we probably should have said it more.
I do a podcast, Ben Ferguson Podcast. Make sure you
download that wherever you get your podcasts. Is I do
a unique podcast on those days in between. So if
you're looking for something to keep you updated in between
(48:17):
our Monday, Wednesday and Friday, make sure you download the
Ben Ferguson podcasts as well, and we will see you
back here in a couple of days.
Welcome.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
It is verdict was Senator Ted Cruz ben Ferguson with
you as well. And we are going to obviously talk
about the most famous mugshot I think in political history
of Donald Trump coming out of Georgia. What this means
to the campaign. We're going to do that for you
in a second. But we're also going to talk about
the presidential debate. Now here's the cool part. We're going
(00:22):
to talk about what it's like to be in a
presidential debate, how you prep for presidential debate, and what
it's like to walk out there for the first time,
because for many of these people they had never been
in this position before. Senator you watch the debate, give
us your overall review of this debate, this first debate
with Donald Trump not showing up. Was that smart of
him not to show up? And how did you think
(00:43):
people did on that stage?
Speaker 3 (00:45):
Well, look, I thought everyone did a good job on
Wednesday night. That being said, I think there were clear
winners that came out of the night. And to my view,
there were four winners that came out of the debate.
Number one was Vivek Ramaswami. He had a very strong
(01:06):
performance that night. Many Americans had ever heard of him,
didn't know him, and I think he impressed a lot
of people. His stock went up. He's going to raise
a lot of money off of that. He's going to
go up in the polls, particularly in the early primary states.
I think Secondly, Nikki Hayley did well.
Speaker 4 (01:23):
On Wednesday Night. She was crisp, she was strong.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
She was aiming for a different slice of the electric
She was not going for the Maga America first slice.
She was not particularly going for conservative. She was aiming
much more for the establishment lane.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
But she was.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
Aggressive, smart, well prepared, and I think she strengthened herself.
She had been out of the news for a while
and I think she enhanced her standing Wednesday night. The
third person who I think advanced himself somewhat is Mike Penn. Now, look,
Mike is a friend. Actually, all these guys, I know
everyone on the stage well, but Mike is a good man.
(02:07):
Mike had been having a tough time. He had not
been getting a lot of traction, and I think he
was pugnacious. He was in there fighting. I think he
made a deliberate play for evangelical voters, in particular in Iowa.
I think there were several of his answers that were
directed very much at evangelical voters, and I think he
probably helped himself. He reminded I mean, Mike is is
(02:30):
a Christian, a strong believer, and I think he reminded
people what they've always liked about Mike Pence. I think
he enhanced himself somewhat on Wednesday Night, But none of
the three of those were the biggest winners. I think,
by far the biggest winner Wednesday night was Donald Trump,
and I think Trump was very happy with everything that
(02:51):
went down. And the reason for that is severalfold.
Speaker 4 (02:55):
Number one.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
Obviously, Trump didn't show up, and by not showing up,
he forces a dynamic on the entire debate.
Speaker 4 (03:04):
That it's very difficult to avoid.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
The analogy of you think back in twenty sixteen, when
there were two debate stages, the main debate stage for
the candidates that were leading in the polls, and then
they had a second debate stage for the candidates that
were relatively low in the polls, and almost everyone referred
to the second stage as the kiddie table. And I
think by Trump's absence, it had the effect of diminishing everyone.
Speaker 4 (03:32):
On that stage, and I think that's what he wanted.
I think that was his intention. He has a big
lead in the polls, but.
Speaker 3 (03:37):
I think his absence made it feel like he's on
a stage by himself and everyone else is on the
other stage fighting between themselves. But secondly, and this is
the biggest reason why I think Trump was benefited. You
and I have talked about before, how I think this
primary is principally a two person race, person race between
(04:01):
Trump and Ron DeSantis.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (04:04):
DeSantis did fine on Wednesday night. He didn't screw anything up,
he didn't have any gaffs.
Speaker 4 (04:10):
UH.
Speaker 3 (04:10):
But he did not dominate. He did not own that stage.
He was not clearly head and shoulders above the rest.
Speaker 4 (04:18):
Uh. And and for the DeSantis campaign, that's a problem. Uh.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
In particular, the problem for DeSantis is what I started
by saying that Vivek and Hayley, h and Pence all
did quite well. I think all three of them are
going to enhance their numbers. And if their numbers are
going to be enhanced, that comes out of DeSantis's hide.
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Ye.
Speaker 3 (04:45):
For DeSantis to have a shot at beating Trump, it's
got to be a two man race. And so the
reason why I think Trump was the biggest winner Wednesday
night is that I think after the debate there were
more tenders gaining traction. And the more the contenders are
splitting support among multiple candidates, the better off Trump is.
(05:07):
And and so that's why I think the Trump team
was very happy when the debate was over, because he
looked at the field and saw the Veke gaining a
few points, Haley gating a few points, Pence gaining a
few points, and if they're splintered, that makes it much
harder for anyone on that stage to credibly go after
(05:27):
Trump when he's got.
Speaker 4 (05:28):
A thirty forty point lead over the field.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
And I didn't see anything Wednesday night that significantly changed
the dynamic of the large advantage Trump has.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
You know, sometimes there's a little bit of humor that
you have in these moments. I'd started my podcast this
Morning Center by saying, well, it was an incredible vice
presidential I'm sorry, I mean presidential debate, but that's kind
of what you're saying in a sense is no one
really moved up, and it's a significant way or solidified
or really took away from the group overall to challenge Trump,
(06:03):
who's still probably fifty points ahead. And again, you can
lose a lot of the debate if you're the winner,
if you're the leader, I should say, but you can
you can lose a lot very quickly if you're the
If you're the leader and you don't perform really well, Trump,
not even having to show up his poll numbers, are
going to probably say exactly the same this next week.
Speaker 4 (06:22):
Would you agree, Yeah, I think that's right.
Speaker 3 (06:26):
I think Trump will continue to have a very strong
position in the Republican primary. Now I've also said I
don't think the primary is over. I think everyone that
is trying to say Okay, it's it's done is looking
at it from an a historical lens. I think that
we still have a vigorous primary ahead of us. But look,
several things could happen in primaries, in primary debates. Number one,
(06:49):
in a debate, someone can screw something up badly. Someone
can tank their their campaign. I don't think anyone did
that Wednesday night. So no one, no one had a
major gaff, no one had a moment that that is
likely to be fatal to their campaign.
Speaker 4 (07:03):
That's important.
Speaker 3 (07:05):
Secondly, you can have a candidate that has a breakthrough
moment that just energizes, raises a mountain of money, soars
in the polls, and that's happened a number of times.
Speaker 4 (07:16):
I don't think that happened either.
Speaker 3 (07:17):
I think the winners on that stage that I was
discussing our relative winners and marginal winners. I think the
three candidates I identified are likely to gain some of
the polls. They'll gain a couple of points, they'll gain
some momentum, They'll raise some money. And that's actually the
money piece is a big chunk of it. You saw
in their closing statements several of the candidates pitch their
(07:39):
websites that's a good debate, can raise you millions of dollars.
And for all of these candidates, most of these campaigns
are gasping on fumes. And so that's one component is
they need the funds to make it to the next debate,
to make it through. Look, there's a reason presidential candidates
(08:00):
drop out. It's almost always the same reason they go bronk.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (08:04):
Yeah, that's when when campaigns end is when they can
no longer keep the lights on, they can no longer
pay the staff, they can no longer travel, they can
no longer communicate to communicate and politics takes money, and
and in my view, the fact that other candidates got
traction hurts the de Santus campaign. Now, I don't think
(08:29):
the Santus had any bad moments. I think he had
some good moments Wednesday night. I just don't think there
was a meaningful gulf between DeSantis and the other candidates
on the stage. And and in a campaign where you're
trying to make it a two man race between you
and Trump, that's not ideal.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
I want to tell you about amazing trip that we
as Verdict listeners are going to be taking to the
Holy Land Israel. Israel is the of Judaism, Christianity and
many of the principles that we hold dear as Americans.
And I want you to join me and many other
listeners as we visit sites like the Armageddon Battlefield, Nazareth, Jericho, Jerusalem, Bethlehem.
(09:14):
You're also on this trip going to set sail on
the Sea of Galilee, and you're going to float on
the Dead Sea. We're going to walk in the footsteps
of biblical figures like King David and Jesus Christ, and
you're going to do it all together with other listeners
from around the country. Now, I'm going to meet up
with you in Jerusalem and you're going to experience the
city and some of the most amazing sites like the
(09:35):
Western Wall, the Temple mount The trip is going to
deepen your understanding of the Bible and of Western civilization.
We're also going to have with us a spiritual advisor
pastor who's going to talk at each site about the
significance in the Bible. With this trip, it is going
to be incredible. Now you've got time to plan because
(09:55):
the trip's going to take place May the sixth through
the fifteenth of twenty twenty four. Now, the good news
is this is trip is amazing and it's signing. People
are signing up fast, so you need to find out
and book your spot now before it's too late. You
can go right now to Christian Expedition dot com slash ben.
It's Christian Expedition dot com slash ben. You can also
(10:18):
call them and get the information got and find out
everything you need to know about this once in a
lifetime trip to Israel. Eight seven seven two three four
three zero zero two. That's eight seven seven two three
four three zero zero two or online it Christian Expedition
dot com slash Ben sentater, I wanna I want you
(10:41):
to pull back the curtain for everybody, because I've got
a million questions that I want to ask. And I
was around your campaign in twenty sixteen, but there's very
few that see what happen when it comes to debate prep,
when it comes into the days and the hours before
a debate, the nerves that obviously everyone on stage is
going to feel in some point, especially in your first debate.
(11:04):
Take us back to twenty sixteen. How did you prep
for that first president of debate? Like so many were
having to prep for last night? And you had debated
in college, you had debated when you're running for senate.
But did it feel different when you were running for
president and that first debate? And what was your goal
for success as a candidate when you walk up there
(11:25):
night one of a debate?
Speaker 4 (11:28):
Yeah? Well, first of all, does it feel different? Absolutely?
Speaker 3 (11:32):
And I guarantee you everyone on that stage was unbelievably nervous.
I'm not someone who feels a whole lot of nerves
very often, but I distinctly remember that first debate in Cleveland.
Twenty four million people watched that first debate, and I
remember before the debate, you go out and you do
(11:53):
a walk through sort of a practice where they show
you where your podium is, and you stand on the
stage and you look up this couple hours for the
bait starts. And I remember standing there and just.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
Looking up and up and up.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
And it was a big, big auditorium in Cleveland, and
and it kind of takes your breath away. You're like, Okay,
they're shooting with real bullets here tonight, right like this
this is for real. Everyone was feeling that on Wednesday night,
and and and that It's just it is a huge stage.
(12:23):
Part of the reason that the debates matter so much.
So much of a presidential debate is and so much
of a presidential campaign is driven by the media cycle
is driven by what the news chooses to cover. And look,
our corporate media is thoroughly corrupt, and so if you
have a campaign that you're trying to drive a message,
it can be maddeningly infuriating when the media is doing
(12:47):
everything they can to frustrate your message and push the
message they want. And debates are one of the very
few instances where you can go around the media gatekeepers
and go straight to the voters and and they, in
the course of a presidential campaign, debates have the power
to change the entire trajectory of a debate, either to
take a candidate out. Look if you remember in twenty
(13:10):
sixteen the New Hampshire debate where Chris Christie went after
Marco Rubio hard and I was standing just a few
feet away from from Christy and I got to tell you, look,
it's it may be the only time in my life
I've been physically present for homicide. I mean, holy cow,
(13:30):
Christy went after him, and I kind of just sort
of stepped back.
Speaker 4 (13:34):
I sort of.
Speaker 3 (13:36):
Figuratively pulled out a newspaper and just kind of read
my newspaper, said, you know, never mind, proceed, I'm not
saying stop, just just leave me out of this. And
it was and Christy just he wouldn't give up.
Speaker 4 (13:48):
I mean, he just.
Speaker 3 (13:49):
Kept pounding and pounding, and you know, there were a
few of us thinking, all right, enough, christ you made
your point.
Speaker 4 (13:56):
But it was it.
Speaker 3 (13:58):
It changed the course of that debate. In that campaign,
there are other moments where were a candidate soars and
and they can suddenly get get energy. You know, if
you remember one of the early debates where where John
Harwood from CNBC was blasting every candidate and just being nasty,
(14:23):
was insulting every candidate, was was drippingly condescending, as I remember,
left wing reporter, and it came to me and I
just unloaded on him, and and my point was, look, dude,
this is not about you, this is not your chance.
You're a friggin Marxist. You intend to vote for the Democrat.
You want everyone on the stage to lose, and you're
(14:45):
just insulting every person here. But you know what, the
American people and Republican primary voters actually give a damn.
And and I kind of took his head off, and
I got to tell you, the impact that our campaign
was astonishing. I mean we had that night, like as
the debate was ongoing, suddenly our fundraising exploded. I think
(15:06):
I think we raised over a million bucks the next day.
I mean, it was Pete.
Speaker 4 (15:10):
It was a moment.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
Yeah, it was the moment.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
I remember watching it and I was sitting there when
that happened, and I was watching it, and obviously I
was yelling at the TV. I was there at that
debate and we were I was back in a green
room getting ready to do TV afterwards, and it was
like that is a moment that everybody in the room
was writing down on their notebook because everyone referenced that
not on TV like this was a moment in the
(15:33):
debate that no one was going to forget well.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
And the mechanics of what happens when you have a
moment that that resonates your fundraising explodes. And I remember
we went back out on the roads and suddenly our
crowds that had been three four hundred became a thousand.
Like it it the impact was almost instantaneous that that
(15:57):
people are like, hey, I want to see with this
campaign is about. And so there's very little in a
campaign that has the potential of a debate to change
the underlying dynamic powerfully. And last night, as I said,
(16:17):
I don't think anyone had a disqualifying gaff that killed them.
I don't think anyone had a dominant breakout. But I
do think Vivek had the best performance of the night.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
I and is that because we didn't know him.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
I mean, it's easier for people to go notice you
if they haven't seen you before. Everybody else on stage
people had kind of seen I thought it was one
of those moments where it's like, oh, I noticed you
now in the room, and you were look like I
think part of it was this. He looked like he
was genuinely having fun and happy to be there.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
He was having a blast.
Speaker 3 (16:49):
The two people who had the most fun on that
stage were Vivek and Chris Christy. Yea, and listen, Christy
has the advantage he's done this before, and it's just
different when you've done it before. He he was the
one least scared to be there, and he walked out
on that stage and his objective is to beat the
crap out of Donald Trump. And he's just gonna stand
there and just pound Trump. And that's that's what he's
(17:12):
decided to do, and he was having fun with it.
Vivek is smart and he I'm sure he was nervous,
but he seemed very relaxed. It was actually impressive to
be to come across as relaxed as he as he did,
given what surely were the nerves he was feeling. Now,
(17:32):
you asked about the prep session, So, so everyone prepares differently.
Often people prepare by They will sit down and do
a moot and they will get other people to play
the other.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
Candidates, and that can be it.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
We did a little bit of it at the beginning,
but that's not actually how we did our principal preparation.
So fairly early on our debate prep, we would typically
spend at least a full day, in some times two
full days preparing for a debate, and we just block
the time off and not be out campaigning, not doing fundraisers,
just just be locked at a conference room. And I
(18:11):
treated debate prep the same way I treated Supreme Court
oral arguments. So I've argued nine cases in front of
the Supreme Court, I've done a lot of oral argument preps,
and sort of like for a Supreme Court oral argument,
many people do moots where you stand up and have
people pretend to be Supreme Court justices and ask questions,
and I've done a lot of those. But actually, particularly
(18:32):
as I did more and more arguments, I tended to
favor getting really really smart people in the room and
then talking through Okay, what do we want to do,
so let me let me address it from the Supreme
Court perspective first and then apply it to the debate.
So for a Supreme Court oral argument, I'd have a
really smart team of lawyers, Supreme Court advocates, experienced constitutional
(18:56):
lawyers sit around the table, and I'd be one question.
I would always say, ask, is all right, what are
our must raise points? What are the points where if
when my argument is done and I sit down, I
have not said I'm gonna kick myself, I'm gonna be
like you idiot, you had to say this point. And
so I would go into any oral argument with a
(19:17):
one pager of typically three to five must raise points
that I thought were the most important points. They were
what I wanted the justices to hear and know, and
I was going to make sure to make them. That's
part of debate prep figuring out, Okay, what are the
points that are most important for you to say. Another
part of debate prep is what's your strategy? And they
(19:41):
are different times, So I'll tell you how we would
approach it. We would talk about whether you want to
how vigorously you want to engage with other candidates on
the stage, and that depends on strategically and tactically where
you are. There were debates where we said, okay, we're
go to mix it up. We're gonna and the analogy
(20:02):
we always used is we're going to scrape some paint
off the doors. We're gonna get out in a demolition
derby and mix it up and take some shots and
have some shots back and forth, and that there are.
Speaker 4 (20:13):
Times when you need to do that.
Speaker 3 (20:15):
I think that DeSantis camp expected the other candidates to
be coming at him and mixing it up a little,
and they didn't. So much like Sherlock Holmes, some of
what was interesting about the debate were the dogs that
didn't bark. Very few of the candidates attacked Ron DeSantis,
and so I think all of the other people on
(20:38):
that stage view to Santus as their principal impediment, but
they really didn't go after him directly. What is interesting
also is very few of the candidates went after Donald Trump.
It was actually fascinating. Yeah, how little Trump's name was
said is said in that room. Look the guy's got
(20:58):
a thirty forty point lead in polls. And yet now,
look you have some exceptions, Chris Christy, whatever, you know,
you ask him what time of day it is, the
time is Trump is terrible? Okay, fine, that's that's what
Christy's gonna say. But the other candidates, DeSantis, if if
he criticized Trump, I.
Speaker 4 (21:17):
Don't remember it. It wasn't much of anything Vivek. I
can't remember any criticism of Trump at all.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
No, he said he was the best president of the twenty
first century. He was making it very clear from the beginning,
I'm not here to make Trump supporters hate me.
Speaker 4 (21:32):
I think that's right.
Speaker 3 (21:33):
And a lot of people have speculated that the role
Vivek is doing is is being something of a stalking
horse for Trump. That that and and I don't know
if that's true or not, but he was certainly full
throatedly defending Trump. Look, I remember back to twenty sixteen,
and there were portions of the debates early on where
(21:55):
I made a conscious decision not to go at Trump,
not to vigorous engaged Trump, and Trump and I early
in the primary, had a very good relationship, a very
friendly relationship. It drove the media crazy because they wanted
me to blast him and I wasn't doing that. There
were later stages in the debate. Look what came down
to basically a two man battle between me and Trump.
(22:17):
Both he and I took the gloves off and began
smacking the hell out of each other. And it changed
based on where the race was and who the relative
players are. I thought it was interesting that almost nobody
was trying to prosecute a case number one, that they
(22:38):
have a stronger record than Trump. So Dessatus made the
case that he had a great record as Florida, but
he had very little comparative of his record versus Trump's,
which I expected more of that in the debate, and
almost nobody other than again Christy made the case that
they had a better chance of winning than Trump. I
(23:01):
guess Nikki Haley did too. Yeah, but Haley is running
for the moderate establishment lane, and so the argument she
was making was not It wasn't surprising, but I found
it interesting how little of that we saw on Wednesday night.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
The biggest shock for me was honestly the lack of
distinguishing one candidate from the other. And that's something that
you did a very good job of back in twenty sixteen,
was making it clear who you were as a candidate.
Walking away from last night, I don't feel like any
of these candidates really left an impression of how I
(23:41):
am very different or unique from the others on the stage.
I mean, there was there were moments jests where it
was like, for example, where Vivic, you know, proudly raise
his hand and said he would support Donald Trump as
a nominee even if he was, you know, convicted. That
was one of those moments. And then you saw which
was into meme. It's been all over the internet over
(24:02):
the last two days of the other candidates trying to
figure out what they're going to do. And it was
probably bad timing because for our bad placement for Desantans
because right next to him, and you see DeSantis look
to his right, look to his left, and then he's like, oh okay,
everybody else raised her hand, I'll raise mine halfway too
as well. That didn't look good for him.
Speaker 3 (24:21):
DeSantis hesitated, and that hesitation was not a good moment.
That that is, others are going to use that against him.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
The hesitation.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
What I actually thought one of the most interesting moments
of the debate happened right after that, where Vivet came
back and said, and he said it to Pence, he said,
if I'm elected the I will pardon Donald Trump.
Speaker 4 (24:47):
Will you do the same.
Speaker 3 (24:49):
And I got to tell you, I was surprised, and
I think it was a strategic mistake by every other
candidate on that stage not to respond hell yes, like
the answer should have been absolutely. I will pardon Donald
Trump on January twentieth, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 4 (25:09):
Why.
Speaker 3 (25:10):
Because this prosecution is an abusive power. This is Merrick
Garland and Joe Biden who don't trust the voters. They
are abusing the justice system. These indictments are a sham,
and the voters ought to decide. And so if I'm elected,
We're going to end this abuse of power. And even
if a candidate on that stage despises Donald Trump, that
(25:34):
was a It was a hanging curveball, and I was
genuinely surprised that nobody took that opportunity because that was
a moment to shine and nobody jumped on it.
Speaker 2 (25:48):
I want to tell you about our friends ever at Chalk.
If you are a guy, you're getting a little bit older,
and you feel like you're losing some of that strength
and vitality, and complacency and weakness are starting to set in.
Maybe you just don't feel like you have the same
energy you used to have. Maybe you want to go
work out, but you just don't feel like you have
that energy, and you're going, what's going on?
Speaker 1 (26:09):
Well, you're not alone.
Speaker 2 (26:10):
Did you know that tasostrum levels are off a cliff
historically to an all time low. Thankfully, the patriots at
chalk choq dot com are here to help real American
men just like you, get back your strength and vitality
and get rid of that weakness and complacency. I've been
(26:30):
taking the Chalkmail Vitality Stack now for several months.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
It works.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
You can boost your mask your masculinity by boosting your
sistostrum up to twenty percent over ninety days. Go to
chalk choq dot com Okay chalkschoq dot com and you
can check out it's manufactured right here in the US
of A. Chalk is a natural herbal supplements that are
clinically proven to have game changing effects in your energy,
(26:56):
your focus, your mood. So maximize your masculinity today Chalk
choq dot com. Use the promo code Ben for thirty
five percent off any chalk subscription for life. That's chock
choq dot com promo code Ben for thirty five percent off. Sinna,
I want to ask you one other question about debates,
because it, I mean, rarely do you get to talk
(27:18):
to somebody and pull back the curtain. Who's actually done
this before? If you're leaving this first debate, what changes
then going into the next debate? If you're if you're
any of these candidates, now, what do they have to
do and what could they take away from this? And
how much do you think the next debate will change
because of what they weren't two nights ago?
Speaker 3 (27:41):
Well, I think each of the candidates is going to
come out in a different place. For the candidates that
didn't gain momentum, they're going to feel a greater urgency.
Look than the next debate is going to have a
higher threshold, a higher threshold, a polling to get in
a higher threshold of donors. I expect the next debate
to have few candidates on the stage. I suspect at
(28:03):
least two of the candidates who were there on Wednesday
night will not be there at the next debate. When
you're not gaining traction, it impacts every part of the campaign.
It impacts your large dollar fundraising. Donors are following this,
and if they think you have momentum, they're excited neger
to write a check. And if they think you don't
(28:25):
have momentum, suddenly the money drives up the small dollar fundraising.
I mean it is an amazing when people are energized,
when you've got grassroots activists that are really exciting. Look,
I got to tell you, towards the end of my
campaign in twenty sixteen, we had online over a million
bucks a day coming in and it was people were
(28:47):
just excited. They went to my website, they contributed and it.
You know, we ended up raising ninety two million dollars,
which which is still to date the most money any
Republican has ever raised in the history of presidential prime
We raised more than George W. Bush or Romney or
John McCain. When you've got momentum, it rolls aggressively, but
it unrolls just as vigorously. And so for the candidates
(29:13):
that didn't have a moment that energized their supporters, they're
going to find when they're out on the trail their
crowds are smaller. They go to Nevan and maybe last
week they had fifty people and tomorrow they have twenty five.
And that can be a hard look. If you remember
(29:35):
one hard moment in twenty sixteen, when Jeb Bush went
his campaign towards the end, he was giving a talk
and he said and people were not responding and he said,
please clap, and it was that can be really tough.
But like, momentum is real in a campaign, and when
it's with you, it feels great, and when it's going
(29:58):
away it sucks.
Speaker 4 (29:59):
And and.
Speaker 3 (30:01):
Different candidates from Wednesday night are feeling the good and
the bad of that, and each debate it kind of
ratchets up another level. It's sort of like, you know,
it's sort of like different rounds of March madness with
the playoff. As it gets to the next level, the
stakes keep going up and up.
Speaker 2 (30:21):
If you're Donald Trump, do you continue with this? I'm
not showing up for the debates based on what you
just saw. Would you show up for the next one
or would you say hell.
Speaker 4 (30:29):
No, Absolutely, he will skip the next debate.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
I think it's one hundred percent from his perspective, from
his campaign's perspective, skipping it was a complete win. What
could have changed it? You remember in twenty sixteen he
skipped the Iowa debate. Yeah, and he was mad. He
was mad at Megan Kelly, and he skipped the Iowa debate,
and then the Iowa caucus happened and I beat him.
(30:54):
He didn't skip the next debate, but like like, if
you see an electoral result that that is not good
for your side, that then you change your path. From
Trump's perspective, why would he change that? This was it
was a calculated gamble. If someone had had a breakout
moment on Wednesday, if someone had sizzled and gained a
(31:17):
ton of momentum, you could see the Trump team reevaluating.
If Ron DeSantis had clearly been in a different league
from everyone else and made clear that he's the principal
alternative to Trump, and people had rallied behind DeSantis, that
could have caused the Trump team to reevaluate. If someone
else had had a moment that just lit every If
(31:40):
someone had had made an indictment, and I don't mean
an indictment in the legal sense, but a political indictment
of Trump had prosecuted the case that they would be
a better nominee to win in November and lead the
country than Trump. If someone had really lit it up,
(32:01):
you could imagine the Trump teams say, Okay, you need
to get on that stage and fight back against so
and so. I didn't see anything on Wednesday that's going
to cause them to reevaluate. And so I think unlessen
until something changes significantly. My expectation is Trump is not
showing up at any of these debates.
Speaker 2 (32:21):
Well, the good news is, if you had a bad
night in the debate stage, twenty hours later, no one
was talking about you. If you had a good night
on the debate stage, the bad news for you is
no one was talking about you afterwards. Because of Donald
Trump having to head down to Georgia. Not only do
we have, for the first time in history, a president
who has an actual mugshot, which they has now become
(32:43):
probably the most iconic political picture in history. People are
already selling shirts with it and hats with it. It's
actually hysterical. But Donald Trump also came out after this happened,
after he turned himself in, and this is what he
had to say as he was about to get on
the plane leaving Atlanta.
Speaker 5 (33:01):
So it's a very sad day for America. This should
never happen. If you challenge an election, you should be
able to challenge an election. I thought the election was
a rigged election. There stolen election, and I should have every.
Speaker 3 (33:13):
Right to do that.
Speaker 5 (33:13):
As you know, you have many people that you've been
watching over the years do the same thing. Whether it's
Hillary Clinton or Stacy Abrams or many others. When you
have that great freedom to challenge, you have to be
able to otherwise you could have heard dis honest elections.
What has taken place here is a travesty of justice.
We did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong, and everybody
(33:34):
knows that I've never had such support, and that goes
with the other ones too. What they're doing is election interference.
They're trying to interfere with an election. There's never been
anything like it in our country before. This is their
way of campaigning. This is one instance, but you have
three other instances. It's election interference. So I want to
(33:54):
thank you for being here. We did nothing wrong at all,
and we have every right angle right to challenge an election.
Speaker 1 (34:03):
That we think is dishonest.
Speaker 4 (34:04):
So we think it's very dishonest.
Speaker 5 (34:06):
So thank you all very much, and I'll see you
very soon.
Speaker 2 (34:09):
Thank you very much for president with pretty cool, calm
and collected is Mugshody looked like he was pretty irritated.
I can imagine why. This to me was one of
those moments where I'm still in shock by it, honestly,
like I'm not shocked at what the left has done,
but when I see this happen. This when I say
the Democratic Party is dead, they're now communists and socialists.
(34:30):
This has been in a republic. Ask I still cannot
believe that the rest of the world, and this does
make me very angry, is now watching as America is
losing its way and indicting a former president. How is
this not one election interference? And how big of a
fall is this for this country in general?
Speaker 3 (34:51):
Look at Trump is exactly right in what he said there.
This is blatant election interference. This is partisan and political.
The demoocrats, both at the federal level and state level,
hate Donald Trump. They're blinded by their rage and they're
using the justice system. Listening in this podcast, we've discussed
(35:11):
at great length each of the four indictments, and so
you can go back and listen to earlier podcasts if
you want an analysis of each of them, because we've
broken them down on a level that you can't get
on CNN or CBS or ABC or NBC, and all.
Speaker 4 (35:25):
Of them I think are garbage.
Speaker 3 (35:28):
They are partisan and political, particularly when you put it
in the broader framework, which is that our country is
more than two centuries old. We've never previously indicted a
president of the United States, a former president of the
United States, a major candidate for president of the United States,
and in less than a year, the Democrats have done
so four separate times. And you use the phrase banana republic,
(35:50):
that's what this is. They the Democrats don't trust the voters.
The reason they're indicting Donald Trump over and over again
is there afraid he could win November and they want
to use the legal system to hurt him. And I
think it is absolutely outrageous. I will say also, look,
(36:12):
there are a lot of things that you and I
and many people like about Donald Trump. One of the
things I like is that he's got enormous guts, and
he's willing to fight the media. He's willing to fight
the Democrats. One of the things which I also respect
is the guy is a marketing and branding genius. And
I got to say, just the timing of number one,
you have a debate of all of its rivals, his rivals,
(36:34):
and he simultaneously does an interview with Tucker Carlson on
Twitter or on x whatever it's called. That was a
very strong and effective move. Number Two. The day after
the debate, he promptly goes and turns himself in and
has his mugshot released. That was an even stronger move.
(36:58):
And then number three, he returns to Twitter and his
first tweet is a tweet of his mugshot, which basically
broke Twitter. Yeah, that combination sucks all of the energy
out of every other candidate. And listen, one challenge that
(37:22):
every candidate in this race not named Donald J. Trump
faces is the difficulty of driving even ten seconds of
discussion or narrative, because Trump, by design, seizes and dominates
the discussion. And I think the last twenty four hours
are as good an illustration of it as we've ever seen.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
I laugh because the bab one b put up pictures
of everybody on stage. Last I said, Republicans gathered a
debate who will lose to Trump in a distant second,
And then you see what he did and how smart
he was with this. If you're Donald Trump, and it's
like plays two big games, wins stupid prizes for the Democrats,
I'm referencing that, it's like, if you guys keep doing this,
(38:04):
you seem to just be helping Donald Trump. Now there's
also many Democrats go, yeah, that's exactly what we want.
We want Donald Trump to get the nomination. We're not stupid.
We know exactly what we're doing when we indict him.
Could this be one of the Democrats?
Speaker 3 (38:21):
Yes, Look one hundred percent, the Democrats want Trump to
get the nomination. One hundred percent. The corporate media wants
Trump to get the nomination. They believe he cannot win
in November. I don't think that's right. I think Trump
absolutely can win in November. Now I think he can lose. Also,
we're a very polarized country, and it's clear there are
a lot of voters that love Trump and a lot
(38:43):
of voters that hate Trump. And so I don't know
what happens in a general but I think in the
in the echosphere, the bubble, that is the left wing,
that is Democrats, in the media, everyone they know thinks
Donald Trump is Hitler, and so they want him to
be the nominee. If he ends up winning in November,
(39:05):
I have to say the meltdown we saw in twenty sixteen,
the Rachel Maddows of the world basically having a nervous
breakdown on television, I think would be utterly dwarfed by
the reaction if Trump wins again in November. We'll see
what happens. But I got to say the media desperately
want him to be the nominee.
Speaker 1 (39:28):
I want to tell you about in Viral Quinns.
Speaker 2 (39:30):
If you are like me, you've got asthma, maybe you
are allergic to a lot of different things, pollen or dust.
My wife is just unbelieva are allergic to dust. You
have got to check out in viral Quinns. You need
to choose an air purifier, literally, like your life depends
on it. And this is something that is incredible. Look,
(39:51):
no matter where you live, you're probably gonna deal with
bad air quality. This year alone, there's been thirty five
thousand wildfires that have devastated the US. Toxins and particles
and wildfire wildfire smoke can penetrate our lungs and threatn
our health. And that's why Enviralquins developed military grade air
purification for your home. I have this in my bedroom
(40:11):
and this thing is a game changer. They just announced
their biggest sale of the year. You can save a
massive thirty percent off during their Labor Day sale, and
viro Clins is specifically designed to wipe out airborne chemicals
and viruses known to call illness, allergies, and difficulty breathing.
Even toxic gases and particles found in wildfare smoke are
(40:35):
no match for enviro Quins. That's why the US Navy
selected viro Clins to protect and purify the air in
their facilities. And vira Clints comes with a free professional
air quality monitor, so you know your family's breathing purified air.
Now is the time to save thirty percent off your
air purification unit, get the free air quality monitor and
(40:57):
fast free shipping. That's a two hundred and fifty dollar
savings right there. Go to ekpure dot com. That's ekpure
dot com. Use promo code verdict, that's ekpure dot com.
Use promo code verdict and save the biggest savings of
the year. Last question I got to ask you, Senator,
(41:19):
is this we're now seeing that they're rushing these prosecutors
and these people that are coming after Trump.
Speaker 1 (41:26):
This is fourth indictment. They're wanting to pack all this.
Speaker 2 (41:29):
Into the presidential election cycle that we've seen this, it's
very clear they want to put him in court and
said on the campaign trail that's election interference by definition.
Is there a anything Trump can do? Delay and then
the other question is if he is elected, could he
still go to jail? How would that work if they
(41:50):
do find a jury in New York, which is not
insane idea, or in Delaware or in Atlanta to actually
say he's guilty, how does that work?
Speaker 1 (42:00):
Now?
Speaker 3 (42:00):
Knowing everything, Yeah, look, we are in uncharted territory. The
short answer is, nobody knows. This has never happened before.
I think there is a very real chance we will
see one or more trials between now and November. And
I think there is a very real chance, particularly in
in d C, in New York, or in Atlanta, I
(42:24):
think we could see convictions. We've talked about how the
judges and or the juries in those respective places are
not favorable. I don't expect the convictions to be upheld
on appeal, but the appeals could take years, and so
I think there is a very real risk that we
get to November of next year and Trump will have
(42:45):
endured a trial and have been convicted, and the matter
will not be resolved on appeal. What happens when you're
convicted of a crime, It varies. Sometimes your sentence will
be stayed pending the appeal. Sometimes it won't. I would
anticipate that no one would try to incarcerate or no
(43:07):
one would succeed in incarcerating Trump before the appeal had
run its course. But look these wild eyed prosecutors. Actually,
when I said no one would try, as soon as
I said that, I didn't really believe that, because they're
brazen enough. I think they would try. I think the
odds are decent. The appellate courts would say, no, we're
(43:27):
not going to let Trump go to prison while the
appeal is pending. We're going to wait to resolve the appeal.
That's what I would expect. But this is uncharted territory.
And by the way, there's nothing in the law that
prevents a candidate for president being incarcerated in jail. There's
(43:50):
nothing in the law that prevents the Republican nominee or
the Democrat nominee for president being incarcerated and in prison.
There's nothing in the law that prevents the sitting president
of the United States from being incarcerated. Now, the Secret
Service would have an aneurism. I don't know how that
would actually mechanically work. If you have the sitting president
of the United States and sing sing next to murderers
(44:15):
that's part of why this is such uncharted territory. I
don't think that will happen, but as I said, I
do think there's a real risk of a conviction, a trial,
and a conviction before election day.
Speaker 4 (44:26):
All Right, I want to ask you something, Ben, So
the mugshot.
Speaker 3 (44:31):
The mugshot is going to be an iconic picture, and
Trump obviously has an expression of pissed off, angry, badass.
It's a different approach if you remember different presidential or
political mug shots. If you remember Rick Perry, if you
remember Tom Delay. Both of them were indicted, both of
(44:53):
them had mugshots, and both of them took the same approach,
which is they grinned, they smiled widely like a political headshot.
And my question to you is should should Trump have
smiled or should he have looked as pissed off as
he was? And I don't think there's an absolute clear answer.
I have an inclination, but I'm curious what you think.
Speaker 2 (45:16):
Yeah, I think that exactly how he took that picture
is exactly why he should. Because one of the things
that's going viral, and this actually has happened while we've
been recording, is somebody I know put that picture up
underneath it all capital letters legend and it's now gone
to like two hundred and eighty thousand retweets. This is
going to be on I mean now there's like fifteen
(45:36):
people since we've been doing this taping this that have
put out T shirts that say rock Star Legend. You know,
I stand with him. I think this was the perfect
look of watch me.
Speaker 4 (45:48):
Now.
Speaker 2 (45:48):
You think it was four years of me trying to
drain the swamp. You have no idea what's coming for you, Washington.
I would have played it this way. I think it's
a brilliant mugshot for him.
Speaker 3 (46:00):
Well, it's why he has the the media and marketing
and branding instincts that he does. And you're right, it's
going viral and it's making a heck of a statement.
Speaker 2 (46:10):
Yeah, Legend is the one that just made me laugh.
I was like, yep, that's the one. They're gonna these
These will be at the next Trump rally and there'll
be vendors out there selling this mug shot on every
T shirt ye everything they can get their hat on,
and and and by the way, by.
Speaker 3 (46:24):
The way, do you do you remember with the first
indictment the Alvin Bragg indictment, where the Trump team was
saying they wanted a mug shot. I think they had
decided that this that was And and by the way,
the Alvin Brag one, which seems like a long time ago,
it was the first indictment. We said on verdict at
the time, Trump will go up ten points in the
(46:44):
polls in the primary. And that's exactly what happened. We
predicted it when the Brag indictment came down, and and
and I think the Trump campaign was disappointed they didn't
get a mug shot there, and and so ironically, I
think they're very happy to have the mug shot now.
Speaker 1 (46:59):
All right, I'm gonna ask you this question. Another prediction.
Speaker 2 (47:02):
Then, when the polls come out, post debate, post this indictment, mugshot,
who moves up the most, and does Trump get even
higher in the poles than he is now?
Speaker 3 (47:12):
I don't know that Trump goes materially higher, although I
mean he's he's at a pretty dominant position right now. My
guess is Ramaswami up the most. Wouldn't surprise me to
see him pick up four or five points. Wouldn't surprise
me to see Nikki Haley pick up three points. Wouldn't
surprise me to see Pence pick up one or two points,
(47:35):
And that probably comes mostly at the expense of DeSantis,
maybe some at the expense of Tim Scott's, and maybe
a little bit at the expense of Trump. But I'm
not sure. I kind of feel like the people on
that stage are fishing in a different pond than Trump is.
Speaker 1 (47:52):
Yeah, no doubt about it. Don't forget.
Speaker 2 (47:55):
We do this show Monday, Wednesday and Fridays, so make
sure you hit that follow or a subscribe button. And
on those days when we don't publish. We've never said
this before, and we probably should have said it more.
I do a podcast, Ben Ferguson Podcast. Make sure you
download that wherever you get your podcasts. Is I do
a unique podcast on those days in between. So if
you're looking for something to keep you updated in between
(48:17):
our Monday, Wednesday and Friday, make sure you download the
Ben Ferguson podcasts as well, and we will see you
back here in a couple of days.
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.