11-17-25 FULL SHOW - About Climate Predictions, And Be On Wheel Of Fortune Live!

Wheel of Fortune Live is coming to town, Dr. Matthew Wielicki checks on climate predictions, and a horrible deportation.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The Mandy Connell Show is sponsored by Belle and Pollock
Accident and injury Lawyers.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
No, it's Mandy Connell and.

Speaker 3 (00:11):
KOA ninety more one FM.

Speaker 4 (00:15):
Got way say the noisy three Andy Donald Keithing sad thing.

Speaker 5 (00:26):
Well, Le's welcome to a Monday edition of the show.
We gotta get Michael Brown a hearing client because that
man cannot hear a single thing based on the volume
that I experienced when I plug my headphones on Jay's
the waits Bayball Jay's lawais anyway, Anthony Rodriguez to my right.

Speaker 6 (00:47):
Hand man, Happy victory Monday, Mandy Lorio.

Speaker 5 (00:54):
I just watched a Roddy the big old pile of crow.
Because he chose the Kansas City yesterday.

Speaker 6 (01:01):
I can just choose him. I will old takes to
expose myself all day long. I said it to you,
I said to everybody, I thought it was going to
be a really bad day for the Denver Broncos, and
you were wrong, any wrongy wrong. Friends of the offense,
the injuries that they had, the chiefs coming in knowing
it was a big time must win for them if
they wanted to have a chance of the division, which
Pat Mahomes knows they no longer have, and I will

(01:24):
happily eat my crow all day long.

Speaker 5 (01:29):
Excellent, because I got to tell you another, you know,
heart stopping game.

Speaker 2 (01:33):
I all hat Broncos fans at your favorite heart it is.

Speaker 5 (01:37):
I recorded a segment for a friend of mine show
in Louisville, Kentucky that's going to play a little bit
later this week, and we were talking about that, and
I was like, you know, I will tell you that
by the end of these games, are you're just like you're.

Speaker 2 (01:50):
In a flop sweat.

Speaker 5 (01:51):
You know you got you got like Pitts Pitt's going because.

Speaker 6 (01:54):
It's just it would you like a wicked stat I
heard today that it amplifies how what.

Speaker 5 (01:59):
The collective blood pressures fans are in the fourth quarter
of every game.

Speaker 6 (02:03):
The Broncos Mandy are five and oher in games they
trail at any point in the fourth quarter.

Speaker 2 (02:10):
Good god, yeay.

Speaker 6 (02:13):
If you look up in a normal dictionary, it turns
into a pictionary when you get to.

Speaker 2 (02:17):
The word clutch because there's a big old picture.

Speaker 6 (02:19):
Of the twenty twenty five Denver Broncos squad. Good god,
they are nine to two, a three and a half
game lead on the Chiefs. He just beare their division
hopes a two game lead on the Chargers because they
just got blown out by Jacksonville two easy games coming
up after a much need to buy.

Speaker 2 (02:33):
In Washington and in Vegas.

Speaker 6 (02:35):
Mandy Connell, the Denver Broncos are once again time for
the best record in the NFL, in the driver's seat
for the division, and can maybe even be the number
one seed in the AFC.

Speaker 2 (02:43):
Good lord, let's go.

Speaker 7 (02:46):
Now.

Speaker 5 (02:46):
Let me just ask you this question because I've had
some beef with the last few games. I didn't like
the play calling. I didn't think the offense looked like
they felt comfortable, and a lot of people sort of
felt that way. No, No, what's the beef about yesterday's game? Yes,
it would be great if they win up forty eight
to zero and held that lead, right, that would be

(03:07):
a phenomenal. First of all, boring game, but second of
all after the forty eight But what is Bronco fan
going to complain about?

Speaker 3 (03:13):
Here?

Speaker 6 (03:14):
The only things they could complain about, Number one not
Broncos related. The refs once again were atrocious the Broncos.
Mandy Connell, The Broncos could have won by two more
touchdowns they have two touchdowns taken away. Julia mclafflin was
not out of bounds, could have ran for the touchdown
the pick six call back because of a terrible, terrible
phantom call. Yeah, but if you had to coplain about

(03:34):
the Broncos, you want them to turn those early field
goal drives in the touchdowns early in games. Typically the
great teams, which the Kenca Cheeves are not this year,
will make you pay for that. Instead of being up
ten to nothing or fourteen nothing, you're only up six nothing.
I think you want to see them do that. I
think you want to see them, I mean, be a
little bit more consistent in the first three quarters. But
pretty much they played pretty darn well through the entirety

(03:57):
of this game. Obviously, their best ball came in the
four where Bo just delivered a couple of darts to
get them.

Speaker 2 (04:03):
There was a couple balls that he threw on a
rope that I was like, holy crap, where's that been? Yes,
and where's that been?

Speaker 6 (04:11):
Not that we didn't already know this, but continue exclamation
point on the fact that the Denver Broncos have the
best defense in the NFL.

Speaker 2 (04:18):
Easily, they're the most clutch.

Speaker 6 (04:20):
They have pass rushers Galore missing PS two and Jakwan
McMillan thrust into the role that he is Chris Abrams drained.
They have the best secondary in the NFL in his
hands down, the best defense. And I'm telling you now,
I hate to say it, Broncos fans enjoy it under
Vance Joseph all he can because this man will.

Speaker 2 (04:37):
Be a head coach. He's gonna get snatched year rightfully.

Speaker 6 (04:40):
So it didn't work out in Denver, just like Josh
McDaniels years ago, Vance wasn't ready for his first head
coaching gig here in Denver.

Speaker 2 (04:47):
He's ready for it again. He's gonna be a head
coach again.

Speaker 5 (04:49):
In Vance Joseph's defense, he didn't exactly have the best
name to work that.

Speaker 2 (04:54):
He was not a good situation for him. He wasn't ready.
He is ready now because he's getting.

Speaker 5 (05:00):
Who's his number one guy, Vance Joseph's number one guy?
Is he elevatable or just Vance Joseph try and take him?
Do you see what I'm saying? No, Yeah, Vans will
try to take his guys. You just give it, You'll
give it.

Speaker 6 (05:11):
You give them all one little buck promotion to make
it so they cannot uh, the Brosers can't say anything
about it. But yeah, he'll he'll be gone. So you
got to enjoy this now because Vance is putting on
a masterclass. He's always really good against mahomes. But it
feels good. It feels good. We're in the driver's seat.
We have a lot and again we keep saying they
still haven't played their best ball on offense. And what

(05:32):
we haven't talked about is over the Over the weekend,
we learned that the foot injury for JK. Dobbins is
worse than Yeah, he's probably gonna be out for the year,
maybe plays in the Super Bowl if they make it.

Speaker 2 (05:41):
I have my doubts, but that, yeah, that kind of
forces your hand.

Speaker 6 (05:45):
The play calling a little bit more, more short passes,
Julil McLaughlin thrust into a lot of a lot more snaps,
a game elevation, if you will. And R J.

Speaker 2 (05:55):
Harvey, the rookie.

Speaker 6 (05:55):
I I even asked him yesterday, I say, hey, well,
the increased snaps, increased workload, does this going to help
you kind of move along your development and how do
you want to get better? He said, yeah, the carriers
are going to help me kind of expedite his development.
So he's got a lot of work to do, especially
between the tackles.

Speaker 2 (06:08):
But man, like these little.

Speaker 5 (06:09):
Running backs is squirt out, and once they're squirt out,
they're just feeling large.

Speaker 6 (06:13):
The space is wicked. The problem is JK. Dobbins was
the bruiser through the tackles. We don't have that right now.
So it's a big, big problem, a massive loss. Dobbins
was the MVP on offense for the first couple months
of the season, so they got to fill that hole
a bit.

Speaker 2 (06:27):
But man, still feels good. It feels great, and we're.

Speaker 5 (06:30):
Gonna get healthy now we get the bye week, and
I don't think anybody said, you know what, the Bronkers
are going to be nine and two after eleven games.

Speaker 2 (06:36):
I don't think anybody said that we haven't lost in
two months. Stop saying that that we're going to hecces us.

Speaker 5 (06:40):
By the way, for the texter who just hit the
Common Spirit Health text line by texting five six six
nine oher with.

Speaker 2 (06:46):
This Mandy still wearing the Lucky blue panties. They're still lucky.
You're welcome, Broncos.

Speaker 5 (06:52):
Did you have you don't ask follow up questions about
the Lucky Blue panties. There will be no follow up questions.
You wash that bit none if you haven't, it's working.
If it's working, it's not weird. Let's do the blog
for a moment, shall we, because we got a lot
of stuff on it. We got a couple of guests today,
and I have so much stuff that happened over the

(07:12):
weekend that I want to talk about. So buckle up, Buttercup.
Find the blog by going to mandy'sblog dot com. That's
mandy'sblog dot com. Look for the headline that says eleven
seventeen to twenty five blog about climate predictions and be
on Wheel of Fortune Live. Click on that and here
are the headlines you will find within.

Speaker 6 (07:30):
I think you're onsing office half American armerships and clipments
and say that's going to press plat.

Speaker 2 (07:36):
Today. I'm the blog.

Speaker 5 (07:37):
How have climate scientists really done with their predictions? Want
to be on Wheel of Fortune live? Army and competence.
Got this man deported? You best not leave a Broncos game.

Speaker 8 (07:47):
Early.

Speaker 5 (07:47):
Cutting medicaid is bad unless Polus does it. The shutdown
has was a failure for Democrats. Trump knows he's going
to lose the Epstein vote. Scrollings, scroll lings, scroll line.
Canadian healthcare is so bad people are asking to die.
Bad economic news, more late power bills, uh, Denver's women's

(08:10):
soccer team could move out of Denver. Muslim Man sentence
for Christian hate crimes. Air travels should even out soon.
The Trump admin wants custody of Tina Peters.

Speaker 2 (08:19):
You can afford to buy a home, but you can't.

Speaker 5 (08:21):
But can you afford to own a home? Who is
playing Red Rocks next year? No one wants to move
to Colorado anymore? Is Disney Plus even worth it? Scrolling scrolling?
Riley Moss takes accountability. Broncos get the w Miles gets
the hug. Why men don't live as long as women?
In one video, this is the most adorable Christmas tradition yet?

Speaker 2 (08:40):
Are we about to be invaded by aliens? Those are
the Germany resumed shipments to Israel.

Speaker 5 (08:46):
That one guy on the airplane don't take water from
a ridehair driver.

Speaker 2 (08:50):
I think the zapp is creepy.

Speaker 5 (08:51):
Those are the headlines on the blog whoo at mandisblog
dot com. Tit I know Nancy too, I know I
felt It's Monday it's Monday anyway, Mandy is at really
three pm in the sports So you guys, I get it.

Speaker 2 (09:10):
I get it.

Speaker 4 (09:10):
You think.

Speaker 5 (09:11):
Look, I listened to Mandy because she's kind of an idiot,
but she's entertaining and she doesn't talk about sports.

Speaker 2 (09:16):
I get it. People don't like sports talk. I really do.
It's a little flair. But we don't sit here and.

Speaker 5 (09:22):
Break down what happened in the Nuggets game last night
or what happened in the Avs game, mostly because.

Speaker 2 (09:25):
I don't watch those.

Speaker 5 (09:26):
We may occasionally talk Rockers baseball because I love baseball.

Speaker 2 (09:29):
I am a baseball fan.

Speaker 5 (09:30):
And how can you not be excited about Broncos football
right now if you live in this city.

Speaker 2 (09:36):
And for those of you who I don't know, I
get it.

Speaker 5 (09:39):
Not everybody loves the NFL, but you have to understand
it's it's this is this is the proverbial water cooler
conversation today at a lot of offices that still have
water coolers and.

Speaker 2 (09:49):
Still have people. We'll make it. Mandy, ask I saw
Chuck yesterday. That was cool. I know he loves doing that.

Speaker 5 (09:55):
He got to do the pair of boll with Mike yesterday,
running up and down the sidelines.

Speaker 6 (09:58):
He has a well name a cooler trio for for
for about sixty second yesterday, I was part of a
Steve Atwater Chuck trio, A conversation unlike any other. I bet,
I bet, yeah, I bet I love him. Not, I
mean I love I like Steve Atwater, but I but
I love. I am so spoiled in the press box.

(10:20):
Every game I get to watch the game with Steve
that Water. Every single game, I get to commentate my
thoughts back and forth with the goat, Steve that Water.

Speaker 2 (10:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (10:29):
To be to be clear, I want to clarify something, Anthony,
I am not wearing the lucky blue panties.

Speaker 2 (10:34):
That was from a texter, U was I know? I
mean he has blue boxer briefs. Do those count? He's
never called them panties to my knowledge. Oh, he hasn't
told you. I don't know about Mandy.

Speaker 5 (10:49):
But I let out a big old dart dute And
after that winning field goal is Will Let's the most
valuable player on the team this year.

Speaker 3 (10:56):
I beat.

Speaker 2 (10:57):
It's hard to arg you. It is hard to argue
not anyway. Man. He's Sean's guy all the gus in
Orleans days. He is Sean's well all, I mean, he's
earned that he really has.

Speaker 5 (11:07):
Okay, guys, the blog is enormous today, and that's why
I struggled, because I have a lot of statistics and
stuff like that, but I also have just a whole
bunch of cool stuff that I find super interesting and
I hope you will too. So check out the blog
at mandy'sblog dot com. Now what are we gonna do today? Well,
doctor Matthew Willicky is coming up at one. He is
the guy who goes back and does something that many don't,

(11:30):
and he goes back to old climate predictions.

Speaker 2 (11:33):
And he sees how they turned out.

Speaker 5 (11:36):
Now, you would think that the climate sciences would be
extremely interested in this. They probably are, but privately they
probably don't even talk about it at climate scientist parties.
I wonder what climate scientist parties are like nerdy? Do
you think there's like but do you think it's like
there's nerdy parties where you have a bunch of guys
standing around talking about you know, like anime or coding.

Speaker 2 (12:00):
I've been to those parties.

Speaker 6 (12:01):
By the end of it, they're either hunkering down for
the end of the world or they've solved all the
world's problems.

Speaker 5 (12:08):
Oh, or they're making nerdy inside jokes about coating or
anime that nobody else gets. But imagine, like, these guys
are trying to solve a problem that may or may
not exist, and.

Speaker 2 (12:18):
Donald thinks you can solve them with E equals MC square.

Speaker 5 (12:23):
Exactly. But these guys really believe they're trying to save
the word. I just see them sitting around around them
like everybody's got a glass of scotch with way too
much liquor in it, you know what I mean, And
they're smoking, and they're like, yeah, we gotta figure this out.

Speaker 2 (12:36):
We gotta do something we lose. I'm just kidding. I
have no idea what climate scientist is that glass of
scotch made with pure coal?

Speaker 7 (12:43):
Uh.

Speaker 5 (12:44):
To the person who said, Mandy, I imagine you wear
big old granny panties. You can imagine your little heart out.
You can imagine whatever you want to imagine that is
entirely on you and has absolutely no impact on me
or the panties that I will wear.

Speaker 2 (12:57):
Thank you, sir, Mandy.

Speaker 5 (12:58):
What does Mandy contribute to the eight to fifty KOA
Broncos broadcast?

Speaker 2 (13:02):
That is, I contribute Anthony. Yeah, that is who I
can contribution.

Speaker 6 (13:06):
Yep, all of the social coverage at KOI caller, I
don't cost all of our social channels.

Speaker 2 (13:10):
Yep, that would be Anthony.

Speaker 5 (13:12):
You're a Maryland listener here, I was watching and happy
to see your team win.

Speaker 2 (13:15):
Yeah, the the Ravens aren't having a great year. Now
they're coming back. Tell you and let me just have
one more sports talk moment here. I love parody.

Speaker 5 (13:27):
I love that any weekend, any team can beat any
team within reason. I mean, there are some that start
to by the end of the season, the cream really
starts to rise at the top, but legitimately, every single
team can beat every single team.

Speaker 2 (13:41):
I feel like most weekends.

Speaker 6 (13:43):
That very parody, specifically in the AFC. Is why the
Denver Broncos could be hosting on Lombardi in February. That
is what we're talking about right now. Yes, that's a
legitimate chance of happening.

Speaker 2 (13:52):
So let's just let's just be excited.

Speaker 3 (13:57):
Its crazy.

Speaker 5 (13:58):
I mean, if you are not happy right now as
a Broncos fan, I would like to take you back
to two years ago.

Speaker 6 (14:04):
Okay, about the last ten years. Oh wait, the last
time the Broncos won the division. Yeah, when they won
those Super Ball Yep, there you go.

Speaker 5 (14:11):
Anyway, Matthew Willock, he's gonna come on at one o'clock.
He's got a long substack about this and I can't
share it with you because it is paywalld.

Speaker 2 (14:20):
I mean, this is how he makes money.

Speaker 5 (14:22):
But it's super interesting and he's going to come on
and talk about these climate predictions and how accurate they are.
And you are not going to be shocked to find
out not as accurate as one might hope when you're
considering that we're changing our entire economy based on the
word of the people that are making these predictions. So
we'll do that at one and then at two thirty

(14:46):
game show host Mark l Wahlberg, not Marky Mark, but
Mark L Wahlberg. He is part of the Wheel of
Fortune Live and Wheel of Fortune Live is well.

Speaker 2 (14:58):
That's good, Anthony.

Speaker 5 (15:00):
Wheel of Fortune Live is coming to the Paramount tomorrow
and there are still tickets available as you can. We're
gonna find out if it's too late to participate, but
you can go down and watch people play Wheel of Fortune.

Speaker 2 (15:09):
Are you a Wheel of four? Are you a wheel watcher? Anthony?
You know of nothing's on. If nothing's one, I'm in
a bar and I'm drunk and just there. Yeah. Otherwise
not really, I I it's same, same.

Speaker 5 (15:22):
I don't mind it when it's on, I don't hate it,
but I usually solve the puzzle too fast.

Speaker 2 (15:28):
No, I'm just kidding.

Speaker 6 (15:29):
Way more of a wheel of fortune or in like
a casino when you get to play the game that's
the best slot machine.

Speaker 1 (15:35):
You know.

Speaker 5 (15:35):
My my falling away as a wheel watcher really happened
when they did away with the showcase like it used
to be this. I don't even know if it was
like this when you were a kid. You used to
win a bunch of money and then they showed you
the prize showcase and you had to spend down your
winnings right, and.

Speaker 2 (15:52):
It was like, there's a trip to anymore. It's so fun. No,
they don't do that anymore. So fun.

Speaker 5 (15:58):
And there was always this ceramic dog that was like
eighty bucks and everybody was like they get down to
like ninety dollars, like it, I'll take this ceramic dog.

Speaker 2 (16:06):
It was just I loved that. Or this mystery box
is that nothing?

Speaker 5 (16:12):
No, they didn't do the mystery box. That was more
of a Oh gosh, make it deal, Let's make a deal.
Let's make a deal. Oh sometimes we'll are price is right,
thank you song as everyone still yells will Mandy, It
doesn't matter what panties you wear, It matters about what's

(16:33):
behind the panties. Okay, that's were last comedy comment we're
gonna do on.

Speaker 2 (16:38):
Fair.

Speaker 5 (16:39):
I've heard Broncos fan says this texture. I don't give
a rats. That's okay, You're fine, Mandy. I think at
least once Mandy should either be in the booth with
Dave or on the postgame show.

Speaker 2 (16:49):
You know what, maybe someday we'll see Mandy. Why did that.

Speaker 5 (16:52):
Referee tackle the head coach on the sideline and Sean
got called for so you're not allowed to be in
the playing service?

Speaker 6 (17:00):
They literally have coaches. I don't know if all teams
have them. Sean McVay of the Rams famously has one
because it's hilarious. They have what's called a get back coach. YEP.

Speaker 2 (17:11):
I don't know if Sean Payton has one. I don't.

Speaker 6 (17:13):
I've never seen him have one. He didn't have one there.
They have to pull them back and keep them up
the playing service. They collided. It's a penalty. We move
on there you go, get back coach, Get back coach.
And it's just so they don't get creamed like you saw.

Speaker 2 (17:27):
Because the the field they are not watching anything else
like that.

Speaker 5 (17:31):
We also today are going to talk a little bit
about the horrible story that is a run. I have
a task for you, and I have a feeling. I
know how the task is going to end, but I'm
giving it.

Speaker 2 (17:41):
To you anyway. No, President Trump will not come on
the show. Yeah, that ship has sailed.

Speaker 5 (17:45):
And US Representative Britney Patterson I would like to reach
out to her office and see if she would come
on the show to talk specifically about the healthcare situation.

Speaker 6 (17:56):
To that, I say, let me try to get President
Trump because that might be more likely.

Speaker 2 (17:58):
Well, I'd like you at least try. Well, okayant effort
for it and the.

Speaker 5 (18:03):
Rest on a Georgio gift certificate.

Speaker 9 (18:05):
You are so right?

Speaker 5 (18:06):
Text her that was the wheel of fortune I loved,
and what the ceramic dog.

Speaker 2 (18:12):
It would be so good, so good.

Speaker 5 (18:15):
Now Britney Peterson is out there and she is doing
the same thing that the Democrats are doing. Here's the
subject of one of her text law or one of
her tweets on the matter. Republicans created this healthcare crisis
and they're doing nothing but perpetuating it. I'm just gonna
stop right there, because anything after that is completely suspect,

(18:37):
because the Republicans created this healthcare crisis, no matter how
many times the Democrats repeat that mantra. And by the way,
it's going to be believed by a lot of low
information voters who just see things that Democrats post on
x and take it for gospel. Some of those people
are in the media. But that is an abject lie.

(18:58):
It's just a comple complete fabrication, and the Democrats know it.
And I would love to have her on the show
to talk about how she is continuing to use that line.
And I'm just going to ask her explain to me
how Republicans created a healthcare crisis. When we get back,
I'm gonna explain to you again, now there's zero percent
chance that Republicans created healthcare crisis. I need you to

(19:19):
be able to push back against the false narrative that
this current healthcare crisis is Republican created. Although I did
think of a way that this is a Republican's fault,
and I blame the late John McCain. Because the Republicans
had the opportunity to repeal Obamacare, and because John McCain

(19:40):
was super mad at Donald Trump, he decided he wanted
to cast a no vote preventing the repeal of Obamacare,
so that part of it is a Republican failure. Well,
let me just remind you one more time, so you
are armed with the facts and you can go ahead
and spread the facts, because the facts are this. The
Affordable Care Act, which was comically named, was passed with

(20:03):
zero Republican votes. Republicans offered amendments, they were voted down.
There was no Republican input on the Affordable Care Act
to speak of. There may have been some tiny thing
here or there, but nothing major that the Republicans wanted
or asked for was part of the Affordable Care Act.
And then in twenty twenty, the Democrats saw an opportunity
with COVID, and again with zero Republican votes and input,

(20:27):
they passed the American Recovery Act, which was designed to
help people get through COVID, and in doing so, they
lifted the income caps, putting more people in the subsidy
game for Obamacare, and they put a sunset provision in
that bill, it was to sunset in twenty twenty two.

Speaker 2 (20:47):
In twenty twenty two, when.

Speaker 5 (20:49):
The sunset was coming up, they passed the ironically named
Inflation Reduction Act, which again pushed the sunset to twenty
twenty five, which is where we are right now. So
if they had maintained control of the government, they would
have almost certainly either made those expansions permanent or they

(21:11):
would have again pushed.

Speaker 2 (21:13):
The sunset out.

Speaker 5 (21:15):
But all of this was done without a single Republican vote,
without any Republican input. And so for the Democrats now
to say the Republican healthcare crisis that the Republicans created,
what now.

Speaker 2 (21:29):
Don't get me wrong.

Speaker 5 (21:30):
There are a lot of things that need to happen,
and the Republicans have had full power multiple times. They
tried to repeal Obamacare, but they didn't do anything else.
The problem with healthcare reform is that a vast majority
of people in Congress have barely a rudimentary understanding of
how health insurance currently works. They have no understanding of

(21:51):
the business of delivering health care. And that's Republicans and
Democrats alike, both sides of the out no clue so
whoever's lobbyist to have a better ear, that's who's going
to get healthcare reform done.

Speaker 2 (22:05):
And it's never the people who have a lobbyist, right,
It's never us.

Speaker 5 (22:10):
Being represented by a knowledgeable person saying, hey, you know what,
we could actually inject market forces into this in some
ways and make it easier for people to maintain control
of their own healthcare, but we.

Speaker 2 (22:20):
Don't do it.

Speaker 5 (22:22):
Mandy Patterson is just so disingenuous. Isn't her husband a
TV journalist? She is a huge disappointment for the seventh
and should go back to breastfeeding full time.

Speaker 2 (22:34):
And resign immediately.

Speaker 5 (22:36):
Jared log Cabin, who unfortunately lives in her district. No,
her husband is actually a very very prominent democratic strategist.
He now has a consulting firm that has managed to
get some quite lucrative consulting contracts from people like the
Jefferson County school Board, and he has some kind of podcast,

(22:59):
and he to be the chair of Progress Now, which is,
in my opinion, the nastiest left wing organization there is
just nasty. So that is her husband, Ian Sylvieri anyway,
So there's no way to pin this on the Republicans.
So I'm just gonna I'm reaching out, like, Okay, would

(23:22):
you like to come on the show and tell me,
Explain to me the logic here, tell me the math,
because I would love for Republicans to step up and
make some significant changes to healthcare.

Speaker 2 (23:34):
I put out my list. It's on my Facebook page.
I pinned it to the.

Speaker 5 (23:37):
Top, and lots of people have weighed in with really
good suggestions. Because I don't have all the answers. I
don't think any one person has all the answers, but
we should be having a robust discussion about what we
can do that doesn't look anything like what we have now,
because what we have now clearly is not working. Oh
and by the way, for all of you, please please

(23:58):
let us have single payer people. I have got a
story for you on the blog today, lack of adequate
healthcare pushing Canadians.

Speaker 2 (24:08):
Toward assisted suicide. Oh yeah, you know that.

Speaker 5 (24:13):
The Canadians are very proud of their national health service.
They love their socialized medicine. And the thing about Canadian
health care is it's great if you're young and healthy,
but if you're sick and you have a difficult to
manage long.

Speaker 2 (24:27):
Term illness, good luck in Canada. Let me read this
to you.

Speaker 5 (24:32):
The family of Cleo Gratton, an eighty four year old
retired diamond driller, who died earlier this month in Chelmsford, Ontario,
of natural causes after being approved for assisted suicide, is
speaking publicly about their appalling experience in the Canadian health
care system. According to the CBC, the elderly man told

(24:54):
his family he would rather die than go back to
Health Sciences North in Sudbury, and then a recent stay
there found Gratton, who was suffering from heart disease and
kidney failure, spending one night in the emergency room and
then being transferred to a bed Sitting in the hallway
on the seventh floor. There were no lights. All the

(25:15):
bulbs of that hallway had been completely removed. His daughter
Lynn told the CBC the only light.

Speaker 2 (25:20):
We had was like a desk lamp that had bolted
to the wall.

Speaker 5 (25:24):
Patients are passing by, nurses are going by no privacy,
no compassion, no dignity. The visit took place in mid October,
after which Gratton decided to apply for medical aid in
dying or assistant suicide. Lynn said that the nurses had
to use headlamps to inspect her father's feet, and that
the experience was just one thing after another, and it

(25:46):
really opened our eyes to what's going on in our hospitals.
My dad said, Push push, push for change. Make people
aware of what's going on. Open the discussion, bring it
to your MP. Your MPP keeps going straight up. His
family's now honoring his wishes to speak out against his experience.
The doctors and nurses, lend emphasized, were amazing, but noted

(26:10):
that they seemed overworked. Why are they still taking in
patience if we have an overcrowding issue and they have
no place to put these people, she said. Cleogratin, who
died of natural causes surrounded by his family before he
could go.

Speaker 2 (26:24):
Through with his assisted suicide, is just the latest.

Speaker 5 (26:27):
In Quebec last year, Norman Munier, a quadriplegic man, developed
bed sores after four days left on an er stretcher
without a good mattress. That experience, combined with a lack
of available home care, pushed him to request and receive
assisted suicide. An unnamed woman in her eighties referred to

(26:48):
in the mad report as Missus B, received medical assistance
in dying earlier this year after requesting but being denied
palliative or hospice care instead whether her spouse burning out
as the result of her care. A rushed assisted suicide
assessment was completed and she died by lethal injection. In

(27:11):
twenty twenty two, forty four year old Winnipeg woman Sasatya
Dara Kovac died by youth in Asia after failing to
receive the home care resources she had desperately sought. In
a posthumous obituary, she said she could have had more
time if she just had more help.

Speaker 2 (27:28):
I mean, it goes on and on. Single payer in Canada.

Speaker 5 (27:32):
Is failing so spectacularly that they are about to expand
their assisted suicide law to include people who are mentally ill.
So before you tell me that healthcare is such a disaster,
we have to scrap it and do something completely different,
which I'm actually saying, meaning single payer, you need to

(27:53):
understand you can have free health care, but you can't
have quick health care, and you can't have quality health
care and you can't have free health care at the
same time. So which one do you want when it
comes to your health care? For equality right up there
and not being rushed to euthanasia because they don't know

(28:14):
what to do with me. That would be probably number
two this texter says, and our system is working, which
is a legit question. They then went on to say,
my boss lost his house because he got cancer. With
good health insurance, he killed himself. But let's hear about
how awful the alternative is. Rather than fixing anything. Now,
if you want to, oh geez, and I just did

(28:35):
something to my monitor and it's stopped. Eric, can you
see if you can mess with this while I'm doing
this literally my monitors, Oh no, wait, maybe it's coming back,
is it something is?

Speaker 2 (28:48):
Oh? There we go. Guys. What I'm talking about is
we have to stop saying, oh, what we have now
or what we had before or those weren't. That's exactly
what I'm talking about.

Speaker 5 (29:02):
It's time to look at completely different options for our
health care delivery. Now, in the case of your boss,
you had cancer. What I'm advocating for are two different things. One,
we've got to inject free market solutions back in where
we can. You cannot inject a free market cancer solution, right,

(29:23):
We don't choose to get cancer.

Speaker 2 (29:25):
But where we can, we can take care.

Speaker 5 (29:27):
Of basic stuff and we need to separate that Outum,
when someone gets cancer, they should have a catastrophic plan
that is going to pick up a vast majority of
those costs, but it doesn't kick in until ten thousand dollars.
I mean, there's a lot of ways to do this,
but we have to reject the notion that it's either single.

Speaker 2 (29:46):
Payer or what we have now, or what we have
now or what we had before.

Speaker 5 (29:50):
There are so many different creative ways, but most of
the time it includes getting more government out of health
care and putting more responsibility on you, the consumer, to
be more involved in your healthcare planning, right. I mean,
we have all abdicated that we do. Our doctor says
you're gonna go see this other doctor. We're gonna refer you,

(30:11):
and you're like, oh, okay, fine, do we even need
to do this? But the notion that somehow it's either
this or that instead of what creative, amazing things can
we think of that we can do differently. For instance,
I got this healthcare work for a small business. My
Bronze employer plan is going from six hundred and fifty
nine dollars a month for one person to eight hundred

(30:32):
and thirty nine dollars a month. My wife's plan is
going from six hundred and fourteen to seven hundred and ninety.
Both our employers asked us to look at ACA plans.
We can't get anything under one thousand dollars a month
individual or nineteen hundred joint. You, sir or madam, are
talking about the perfect situation to do away with traditional

(30:53):
health care for you and your wife and go to
a direct primary care model while using a medshare. Commercials
for Pinnacle advance primary care for you for people like you,
because Pinnacle is changing the way healthcare is delivered and
they're making it affordable.

Speaker 2 (31:11):
It's not just Pinnacle.

Speaker 5 (31:13):
Look up direct primary care, look at medical health shares.
There are options out there right now.

Speaker 2 (31:20):
And the problem for a.

Speaker 5 (31:21):
Lot of this is that Obamacare expressly forbids certain things
that would be very effective in bringing healthcare costs down
now expressly forbids it.

Speaker 2 (31:31):
Why would they do that?

Speaker 5 (31:33):
Because Obamacare was never about saving money. Ever, it was
about making the system so miserable and so expensive that
everybody clamored for single payer. It was just a step
on the road. They're counting on you to hate what
we have, so much that you will beg the government
to take the responsibility off your hands because it will

(31:55):
seem easier, when in reality it will end up.

Speaker 2 (31:58):
Far far work.

Speaker 5 (32:00):
Our health outcomes in the United States are better than
they are in Canada. Our health outcomes here meaning people
that are still alive five years after being diagnosed with cancer,
people that survive a heart attack, people that survive a stroke.
The outcomes are still better here in the United States
than they are in the NHS, in the United Kingdom,
in Canada, and in many other developed nations. Our problem

(32:22):
with health in this country is that we are all
fat and we don't exercise. If we could control human
behavior and make everyone exercise and make everyone eat good
food that feeds your body properly, then we would have
far less in terms of health care costs than we
do now. And if you want to incentivize people to

(32:46):
make those choices, make them in control of a lot
more of their health care dollars.

Speaker 2 (32:51):
And that's what we can do.

Speaker 5 (32:54):
Mandy, you have to pay one hundred percent and then
maybe get reimbursed. I don't know what you're talking about there.
Medical health shares are a skilled Do you have any
I've known people for literally going over a decade that
have only used a medical health Share program, one of
whom had a premature child that was in the hospital
for six weeks and had over two hundred thousand dollars

(33:16):
in medical bills and the med Share paid it. They
don't work if you have massive pre existing conditions or
you have a really big kind of illness. I'm just
going to say that, But for everybody else, We're never
going to have a perfect solution that is perfect for
every single person.

Speaker 2 (33:31):
We're just not going to do it.

Speaker 5 (33:34):
But we need to allow people to make the choices
for themselves that work for them and their family, and
that is what would change healthcare completely.

Speaker 1 (33:42):
The Mandy Connell Show is sponsored by Bell and Pollock
Accident and injury Lawyers.

Speaker 2 (33:47):
No It's Mandy Connell and nine FM. O God.

Speaker 4 (34:00):
Can the Noisy, Benny Connell, Keith who is sad Babe.

Speaker 2 (34:08):
Welcome, Wescal, Welcome to the second hour of the show.
I'm Mandy Condle.

Speaker 5 (34:12):
That guy over there is Anthony Rodriguez, and together we'll
take you right through three pm when the sports guys
are taken over. If you know me, you know I
love to talk about climate change. One of my favorite topics,
and mostly I'm being critical of what passes for climate science.
But the guy that I'm bringing on again is well,
he's even more critical than I am, only he brings

(34:33):
receipts and not just opinions. His name is doctor Matthew
White Leaky, and he writes a great substack blog. It's
called Irrational Fear, and I link to it on my
blog today. If you want to go check it out.
It is paywalld, but it is worth every penny and it's.

Speaker 2 (34:47):
Not very expensive. So welcome back to the show. First
of all, Matthew, thanks Mandy, thanks for having me.

Speaker 5 (34:53):
So you did something that I often wonder, and that
is you went back and looked down predictions and about
the climate and really just said were they right?

Speaker 2 (35:06):
Right now?

Speaker 5 (35:06):
What's fascinating me is I love it when I see
in the newspapers we're fact checking no Stradamus right, the
very famous prognosticator from hundreds of years ago, and yet
there's never that same intellectual curiosity about climate change predictions.
You have that intellectual curiosity. What did you find in
this rather voluminous report?

Speaker 9 (35:27):
Yeah, I think that, I mean, we have to have
some accountability for past practices. I think, you know, we
will hear a lot of rhetoric from the media, and
you'll hear some of the normal characters. We'll say things
like the oceans are boiling. We all know that's not true.
I don't think anybody's going to make policy on that.
But the official documents that the government puts out, which
which primarily comes from the Global Change Research Act that

(35:50):
started in nineteen ninety, we make what's called the National
Climate Assessment every year, well every like five years or so,
and that document is you to drive policy. It gets
involved in every policy decision that we have as a country.
And so I wanted to go back and look at
some of these. So I went back and looked at
the National Climate Assessments one and two. So when the

(36:11):
first one was published in two thousand and the second
one was published in two thousand and nine, they're not
exactly always five years apart. And so when I started
to dig into this, I kind of started to see
a lot of the same rhetoric that they were talking
about before, and increase in heat waves and increase in hurricanes,
heavy precipitation, and you know, if you only have predictions

(36:32):
that are relatively close. It's hard to judge them. But
we have now twenty five years since the first report
came out, and that's a decent amount of time to
start to look into these And with most of these
things that I looked into, I realized why they're not
going back and checking on themselves. It is because most
of these predictions aren't happening. Sometimes they have the trend
actually completely wrong in opposite other times it's just moving

(36:55):
and oscillating, and you know, natural variability, and there is
no real clear and so it's just this lack of
accountability from all of these past predictions and how many
times can you cry wolf before the public and hopefully
the policy makers stop listening.

Speaker 5 (37:10):
Well, And that's really my point, and that's one of
the reasons that I wanted to have you on because
it's not just hey, look at these goofy climate scientists.

Speaker 2 (37:17):
They got all this stuff wrong.

Speaker 5 (37:19):
We are using these reports to make policy that is having,
in my view, an incredibly detrimental effect on our economy.
In oil in Colorado, we've shut down oil and gas.
We know that energy prices of skyrocket, and I've got
a story on my blog today about now we're almost
a ten percent delinquency for utility bills, and utility prices
have gone up twelve percent in the last year. These

(37:42):
are all choices that are being thrust upon the American
people based on science.

Speaker 2 (37:47):
You know, we're always supposed to.

Speaker 5 (37:48):
Trust the science, But if we're not checking the science
for accuracy, then we are making massive and trillion dollar
decisions based on garbage.

Speaker 2 (37:59):
Maybe not garbage, but certainly not good science.

Speaker 9 (38:03):
Yeah, and the foundational pillar of all of this is
the science, right because we're making these sacrifices. We're going
to be willing to pay a little bit more on
energy because the weather was going to get really bad.
That's what they were telling us in two thousand. This
is why you have to make all these sacrifices. And
now we're seeing that that's not actually the case. These
trends aren't trending in any other way that they predicted.
And so the foundational pillar, the reason for implementing all

(38:26):
of this change and radically transforming our energy sector for
the most part, is really not supported by the observational
data anymore. It existed in their models in two thousand.

Speaker 3 (38:36):
I believe it.

Speaker 2 (38:37):
Did.

Speaker 9 (38:37):
I really think that they were convinced that this was
what going to happen. But you know, the observational data
is what we have to really go on, and it's
just not there.

Speaker 5 (38:45):
So let's talk about two things. Number one, hurricanes because
they're flashy, right, And when I was living in Florida
in two thousand and four and two thousand and five,
when we had a lot of storms make landfall and
all of the climate alarmists, we're like, oh, there it is.
This is just the beginning of hurricane nightmares. And then
after two thousand and four, in two thousand and five,

(39:06):
it was like crickets for a really long time. So
let's start with hurricane data. What did they say was
going to happen versus what has happened.

Speaker 9 (39:15):
So you hear the common increase in frequency, intensity, increase
in heavy precipitation associated with hurricanes, increased landfalls that you know,
they kind of cover the gamut of all of it.
And when we go back now and look at the
last twenty five years, we see that hurricane landfalls are
well within natural variability. In fact, this year Florida didn't

(39:35):
get hit at all. That's not I mean, the US
coastline didn't get a direct landfall at all, so that's
pretty rare. None of this looks like it's trending. What
you're seeing now is they play a lot of these
mental gymnastics where they're transitioning from frequency and intensity to
rapid intensification. This is a new metric that we haven't

(39:55):
really been able to measure since we've had these fancy satellites,
right and these crazy pie it's willing to fly into
these hurricanes where now we can actually measure them hour
by hour. So you can see that as the story
isn't working out in the observe observational data, that they're
morphing into these new kind of more more more difficult
to get metrics where we can't really look back one
hundred years and they say, well, we might have not

(40:17):
seen the intensity and frequency going up, but look they're
rapidly intensifying. But overall, I mean, it's hurricane landfalls that
we should be concerned with. There's absolutely no data that
we're seeing a trend in that. Noah confirms that, the
EPA confirms that, so you know that that's the real
metric that we should be worried about because that's where
we lose lives and property.

Speaker 5 (40:36):
I would go one step further in that now because
and this is me speculating, it seems that the meteorologists
to work in hurricane alley who are going to be
talking to the people who are in the line of
the storm, they because they have bought into the narrative
that is going to make storms, you know, more powerful
and more damaging. Now we have a greater sort of

(40:59):
pre hurricane threat level coming from meteorologists, and that's damaging
because people stop listening when you keep telling them that
there's going to be a twenty foot storm surgeon, that
there's going to be damaging winds and everything's going to
be flattened, and then it doesn't happen. And I know
this from experience of living in a hurricane alley. People

(41:20):
stop listening and then that gets dangerous. So I wonder
how much of that sort of feeds into these prediction
models that are saying to people, this is going to
be the worst storm ever, and then when it kind
of comes through and it's a Category two, which isn't
that bad, people just discount that in the future.

Speaker 7 (41:38):
I do.

Speaker 2 (41:38):
I'm very concerned about that.

Speaker 9 (41:41):
No, I think you're right. I think there is a
big psychological aspect to that, to whether the public is
going to listen to experts and warning systems. I think
they play a lot of games too. Now that everybody
has a camera, you see all the images. Now, you know,
constantly somebody's showing an image of a hurricane somewhere, because
there's if there's not one landing year, there could be
a typhoon in the Fieldloppines, for example. And so you

(42:01):
know this this this kind of if it bleeds, it leads,
really does it drives this whole climate thing. The more destruction,
the more the narrative fits, and that drives everybody's fear up.
And my whole argument is it's not in the data.
That's why I named the substack irrational fear, because it's
if you look at the data, it's not a rational
fear to be afraid of hurricanes increasing and you know,
damaging the US coastline. Obviously it's going to happen, It's

(42:24):
going to happen again. But it's no trend that this
is some sort of runway train where where climate change
is driving these more. You know they call them super
charged hurricanes, right, that's just not in the observable data.

Speaker 5 (42:35):
So here in Colorado, we don't have to worry about hurricanes,
but we do have to worry about drought, and drought
is the big thing that we have to worry about
when it comes to food production and everything else.

Speaker 2 (42:44):
Drought is what led us to the dust Bowl. While
that and bad.

Speaker 5 (42:48):
Farming practices back in the nineteen twenties and thirties. So
what did they predict for drought back in twenty twenty.

Speaker 9 (42:54):
Yeah, so they go back and forth. The first NCA one,
so that's a National Climate Assessment one talks about heightened
drought in the Southwest and regional droughts in the West.
The second one increases that even into the south and
the southeast. The NOAH and the EPA monitor this constantly.

(43:16):
We have real time now remote sensors all over the place.
So we have what's known as a Palmer Drought Index,
and that's essentially just a scale that we use to
try to identify if we're really getting much drier or
much wetter regionally and as a whole nation. And if
you look back at that, we have data that goes
back to eighteen ninety and there's just no reason to

(43:38):
think that this is trending in any direction. We recently
did have a little bit of a drought area, but
the late twenty tens we're kind of wet. The nineties
were very wet, and so you have this oscillation where
you kind of move in and out, and that has
a lot to do with ocean circulation patterns and these
these these large long term scales that we don't really
fully understand yet because we haven't been monitoring the Earth's

(44:00):
system for that long. But nothing in the data would
suggest that we're driving towards drought. I think that the
infrastructure that we have for managing water has not been
updated in a long time. California, for example, hasn't added
any surface capacity since the late seventies, even though their
population has doubled. So we have a lot of mismanagement

(44:22):
in water, but it's not coming from the fact that
climate is increasing drought. And you know, even though there
are areas that have seen increased drought and there's areas
that have seen increased precipitation, there's just no overall long
term trend. I think water mismanagement has a lot more
to do with our issues than climate change.

Speaker 5 (44:39):
Is there any area of the initial Climate Assessment where
they nailed it right, Like, dang, guys, great job, got
it one hundred percent. Is there any specific area where
you can say they got that right.

Speaker 9 (44:51):
So the thing that's most on trend, where we're actually
seeing something that's increasing, would be heavy precipitation events. So
these are short term events where we have a very
high increased amount of precipitation. We do start to see that.
There's some arguments that that has to do with just
having a little bit of warmer weather and warmer atmosphere
holds more moisture. You know, people have probably seen no

(45:13):
experience that you go skiing, you get very dry. You
go down to Florida, it's warm and very wet. That's
because that the air capacity to hold water increases as
you increase temperature. So that kind of makes sense to us.
Most people don't know that liquid fresh water is minuscule
on the planet. It's only about two percent of all
of the water budget. Most of that's locked up as ice.

(45:34):
So I would argue that if we could increase our
flood infrastructure and think about this a little bit, this
a little bit of increase in heavy precipitation may be
a really good thing for adding more fresh water to
the surface where places like the southeast, that's the primary
use of waters surface water. So I would say that's
the one place that they got it pretty close. We're
seeing it. I wouldn't say it's abnormal increase, but we

(45:55):
are seeing a trend that is continuously increasing in these
heavy precipitation events in terms of keys. So they got
it exactly wrong. They got it exactly opposite. We're seeing
less days above ninety five degrees and they predicted way more.
So you know, it's hit or miss. But overall, I
would I would give them, you know, a D for
their predictions.

Speaker 5 (46:14):
So moving forward, and this is one of the things
that I've had people say, well, you know, the science
is always getting better, the technology is always getting better.
We're always able to know more. But to your point
about the very brief amount of time that we even
have significant rudimentary sort of weather you know, analysis on

(46:36):
a consistent basis, We've only been doing this for what
like one hundred and thirty years with any real consistency,
and that back then was with again almost you know,
ancient style of barometric pressure measurement and things of that nature.
So how do you how would you argue or make
the point that perhaps we're maybe out ahead of our

(46:58):
skis with proclamations we one hundred percent understand what we're
seeing when we only have that limited amount of data.

Speaker 9 (47:08):
Yeah, I think I think one hundred and thirty is
a very generous number. I would probably say more like
fifty years, because it's really satellites. Right that the whole
climate crisis was sold to us as a global problem
and it was going to take this radical transformation because
things were going to go haywire.

Speaker 2 (47:24):
And in the early.

Speaker 9 (47:26):
IPCCS assessments in the late nineties and even in this
first National Climate Assessment in two thousand, we just didn't
really have enough data to make to say one way
or the other. And so you know, it was a
fair game to make these predictions. But we're twenty five
years later, and we have more and more satellites, We
have more and more technology, remote sensing stations all over
the planet. We have the data. So if it was

(47:48):
so obvious, right, the science was settled, this was I
was called a denier to question it. If it's so obvious,
how come we have to do more and more gymnastical
gymnastics to find the little things that are that are
that are kind of getting a little bit wacky. If
it was supposed to be so obvious and we were
going to supposed to have this radical transformation, I mean,
the way that it was sold to us was that

(48:10):
this was just going to be right in our faces.
I mean, there's gonna be fires burning everywhere, and there's
no water and the last time you're ever going to
see a ski area because snow is going to disappear.
I mean I heard all of these things that the
snow no more snow was on the front of New
York Times, and we're just seeing that this, all of
this rhetoric was just for one reason, and it was
for creating an emotional response and essentially taking money from

(48:33):
the Western world. That was the motive. We now have
the observational data. None of it was coming true, and
so why are we doing all this?

Speaker 2 (48:41):
So I agree wellheartedly.

Speaker 5 (48:43):
I mean, who the reality is is that this is
where I find this so concerning that we're not having
genuine robust discussions about the wrongness of these predictions as
we're decapping our own economy. I mean, especially here in Colorado,
our governor is all in on net z zero and
it is going to cost a small fortune to move

(49:03):
Colorado to where he wants it to be. And if
it's all based on bad intel, that is criminal. And
yet because of the way the climate industry works, And Matthew,
you probably know some of the scientists that I've spoken
to since I got my first show in two thousand
and five. If you have a theory that you want
to test that does not end with it's man made

(49:26):
global climate change, it's man's fault, it is emissions. If
that's not your theory, you can't get funding. No one
will fund your study because the dogma is so entrenched
that we can't even look at at other alternatives, like
perhaps we should be spending this much time and energy
on mitigation instead of trying to change the climate. It

(49:47):
feels like a don keyxoty like quest based solely an
ego at this point.

Speaker 9 (49:54):
Yeah, I mean, I'll tell you from a personal experience
as a young academic trying to land some of my
first grants, seeing the ideological stances that the funding agencies
like NSF and NAH and NASA we're taking. It's just
I mean, you could you could see it, all right,
you know, this was had nothing to do with the science.
This has nothing to do with finding the truth or

(50:14):
anything like that. It was just let's just push this
mantra down the road that the narrative has to stay
alive no matter what, and we're just going to keep
going down this road regardless of what the observational data says.
And if there's no money to do it, none of
these young academics are going to go try to prove
this anyway, so we'll have this what I call manufactured consensus. Right,
it's not it's not a conspiracy where there's somebody up

(50:37):
there like pulling the strings. But it is a conspiracy
in the way that the system essentially is manufacturing a
consensus by taking by having funding agencies, journals, essentially anyway
to make your academic record. If you make that so ideological,
then if you don't follow the you know, toe the line,
you're out. I experienced that personally, and so it creates

(50:57):
this kind of false sense of consensus. But what you're
doing is just kicking out people that don't agree. And
so I think we should start with getting rid of
some of these funding agencies and their ideologies. They should
be about the truth, regardless of where it takes you,
especially now that we have all this observational data that
proves that a lot of these predictions were incorrect.

Speaker 5 (51:15):
A text just asks this, Mandy, Oh, ask chat if
climate change is real and see what your answers.

Speaker 2 (51:21):
I will all do that.

Speaker 5 (51:22):
Chat is my personal assistant. Now I'm Matthew, So I
asked chat everything. Does your guest have an opinion on
the movie Climate. Somebody's trying to get me to watch
this movie. I don't really care. I don't know what
it's about.

Speaker 9 (51:35):
Is it called Climate the movie? Because I'm in that
that's mad for a skeptical take, I'm not sure. I
haven't I haven't heard. Is there a new one coming out?

Speaker 6 (51:43):
I can.

Speaker 2 (51:43):
I don't know if that's it or not.

Speaker 5 (51:44):
I only get so much information regarding water mismanagement. Recently
visited Hoover Dam. Does that play into the water mismanagement.
I'm going to go one step further, Matthew, and to
partially answer this question in my view, because now we
have the states trying to figure out how to divvy
up the Colorado River, and they're supposed to have already
done this, and they can't come to an agreement. My
question is is why is California getting any of the

(52:06):
water because they are literally on the Pacific Ocean. Build
desalinization plants and leave our water alone. I mean, but
that's a whole different conversation.

Speaker 9 (52:17):
Well, unfortunately, desalization takes a lot of energy, and they
are very energy poor at the moment because they are
also just gung ho on this you know, green energy thing.
But that the main thing with the Colorado River, Lake
Meat Lake Powell. This was the Colorado River Compact. It
was signed in the twenties. The twenties were really an
abnormally wet decade and so when they originally signed this,

(52:40):
they made predictions. This is one of the again a faulty.
You know, we have to be very careful about our predictions,
and we have to understand that the planet's not just
going to go along with this. There's a lot of
natural variability. They estimated a significantly larger amount of water
than what they got for the next decades, and that's
what we think is now the average. We just think
that there was this little heightened blip in the twenties

(53:01):
and so the allocations were wrong from the start. And
you know, population has been growing dramatically and throughout the
southwest and the west, and so you add all those
factors together, you make you have some water issues. But
none of this is really related to climate or CO two.

Speaker 5 (53:18):
Doctor Matthew Williky, his sub sac is a rational fear.
It is great worth the worth the small price of
admission to keep up to date on this. I put
a link on the blog today. Thanks so much for
making time for us again, Matthew, really interesting stuff.

Speaker 9 (53:32):
Thanks Mandy.

Speaker 5 (53:33):
All Right, I have a good one, that is doctor
Matthew Willicky will be right back coming up bit about
an hour. We are going to talk with game show
hosts Mark L. Wahlberg, not Markey, Mark.

Speaker 2 (53:42):
I mean the mistake too. I'm not gonna lie. I
was like market Mark's doing a game show.

Speaker 5 (53:46):
No the other Mark Wahlberg I've totally seen hosting game shows.
He is the host of the touring company Well Fortune Live.
We're going to talk to them at about an hour
and find out if you can still be a contestant. Now,
I want to talk about a story. I've been talking
about the story of jose Barka for.

Speaker 2 (54:05):
Some time now. He is the Iraq war.

Speaker 5 (54:10):
Veteran who was brought here as a child, Jose Barco Charino,
and this Friday morning or last Friday morning, he was
taken to Nagalas, Arizona, his last stop before he was
deported to Mexico. And he was deported to Mexico because

(54:31):
he was brought here as a child. I'm gonna give
you a little background on his story. He was brought
here as a child illegally. And when he was seventeen
or eighteen, he joined the military, and the military of
the Army specifically said look, you serve honorably and we're
going to help you get your citizenship. And he was
like great, by the way, no, no, he didn't come

(54:51):
here illegally. I apologize. I got that a good two
stories mixed up in my head. He was born in Venezuela.
His father was a Cuban dissident. They had gone to Venezuela.
He was born in Venezuela. When he was like five,
they came to the United States and he was given asylum,
but he didn't have citizenship. He just had asylum. He
goes and serves in the military. He serves in a
rock multiple tours of duty, and at one point was

(55:15):
awarded the purple heart after he lifted a burning car
off of two fellow soldiers so they could be saved,
burning his hands significantly in the process. When he got
out of the military, he had struggled with PTS and
some traumatic brain injury, and he tried for some time

(55:35):
to get help for that, I guess, and was unable
to do that.

Speaker 2 (55:39):
At some point he made a terrible, terrible mistake. He
was in a crowd.

Speaker 5 (55:44):
Something happened and he ended up firing a weapon indiscriminately
into a crowd and hit a pregnant woman in the leg.
She survived, but obviously he shot her for that. He
was sentenced to prison. Now this is all you know
going along. He served his time, though he went through.
He served his time for that.

Speaker 2 (56:05):
He said.

Speaker 5 (56:06):
He's quoted as saying, I made a mistake. I shot
into a crowd and hit a woman in the leg.
I own that I paid for that. What else do
you want from me? So as he's getting out of
prison after serving like fourteen years, he's getting out of prison,
and there's ice. He was being released from prison and
now they're picking him up because he's not a citizen,

(56:30):
and they deported him.

Speaker 2 (56:32):
Now one of the reasons this case I think is
so tragic is because the army let him down.

Speaker 5 (56:39):
He fulfilled his requirements to the army, he joined the
army in the hopes of getting a citizenship, and then,
for whatever reason, the paperwork never made it from the
Army to Immigrations and Customers Enforcement to get him the
citizenship before he committed his crime. Because if he had
committed the crime after he had been granted citizenship, he
would just be a citizen who was also a felon

(57:01):
and he wouldn't be deported. This kind of stuff drives
me crazy because I've talked to enough people and I'm
hoping it's better than it used to be. But I've
talked to enough people about the way the military makes
a lot of promises in the recruiting office and often
they don't follow through.

Speaker 2 (57:20):
Now, it's one thing to be told, you know what, you're.

Speaker 5 (57:21):
Gonna be stationed in Hawaii and end up getting spationed
in Fort Riley, Kansas.

Speaker 2 (57:25):
Right, that's one kind of promise that can be broken.

Speaker 5 (57:28):
But this is a really big promise, and this guy
deserves better, and the Army just let him down. And
I don't know if the Army tried to intervene here
and say, oh, whoa, that's our mistake. We meant to
make him a citizen before all of this stuff happened.
I just I think this is a really rotten situation,
a really rotten situation. Isn't he the antiques road show

(57:51):
guy too? I don't think Mark Wahlberg is the antiques
road show guy, but I'm gonna pull it up right now.

Speaker 2 (58:01):
We'll find out.

Speaker 5 (58:01):
He's done a ton of stuff. He has the kind
of career that if you ever wanted to be Oh
he does do antiques road show?

Speaker 2 (58:09):
Huh, who knew? You did? Texter?

Speaker 4 (58:12):
You did?

Speaker 5 (58:14):
He's done Temptation Island, the game shows Russian Roulette on
Game Show Network, in the Moment of Truth on Fox
yep yep. So we're gonna talk to him at one
thirty about Wheel Fortune. So now, Jose Barca has been
deported from what we can tell, and been deported to Mexico,

(58:37):
where he's not from. As far as I know, he
has no family or friends in Mexico, so we'll just
have to figure it out.

Speaker 2 (58:47):
He is married, and.

Speaker 5 (58:52):
I don't know what his wife is going to do.
He has kids as well. Mandy you have to realize
he may be lying about what they said. But the
Army says they filled out the paperwork. The army has
verified what I'm saying. I would not just be going
on the word of somebody not doing that. The Army
has said, no, no, no, we filled out the paperwork.

(59:12):
We're just not sure what happened. Well, what you happened
is you didn't get it done. Andy, you said it
was promised.

Speaker 2 (59:21):
Was it proven?

Speaker 5 (59:22):
Apparently yes, the Army has said, Mandy, if the que
if it was a queue that was shot in the
leg by this guy, would you feel the same way. Yes, yes,
it would be terrible. By the way, it would be
a terrible thing if anybody. I mean, I feel terrible
for the pregnant woman, right, I feel terrible, and I
hope no one is blaming her for this, because she's

(59:42):
the true victim here. There's no doubt about that. And
I certainly am not excusing what he did because a
lot of people struggle with post traumatic stress and don't
shoot anybody. But when you've served your time, you've served
your time right. And my frustration is is that this
is consistent with what I have been told by more

(01:00:03):
than one person who has served in the military and
been told things by the military that they didn't follow
through on.

Speaker 2 (01:00:10):
And I think that's absolutely.

Speaker 5 (01:00:12):
Horrible, because when you join the military, you don't just
sign up to go do a job.

Speaker 7 (01:00:17):
Right.

Speaker 5 (01:00:17):
It's not like if I got a job as a
talk show host and I really hated it. I'm under contract,
but I could absolutely walk into my boss's office and
say this is not for me.

Speaker 2 (01:00:27):
I'm leaving and I'm not coming back. I get one
hundred percent do that.

Speaker 5 (01:00:31):
But you sign your life over to the military, you
promise them everything. You relinquish your rights when you sign
up for the military. So when I hear of the
military saying, you know, oh well, we're not going to
do or not doing what they promised, it infuriates me

(01:00:55):
because you're asking everything of the people that sign up
and you can't even follow through on the promises that
you made. Now, I will say this, I talked to
a friend of mine this morning. His son just graduated
from college from ROTC. He went to the RTC program
and he is about ready to complete nuke school for
the Navy, and they offered him signing bonuses that were

(01:01:20):
absolutely insane. He has a degree in either electrical or
mechanical engineering. I can't remember.

Speaker 2 (01:01:27):
He's a whiz kid. He's an officer in the military.

Speaker 5 (01:01:30):
And after he finishes his nuke school and he gave
them ten years, they paid him three hundred thousand dollars
cash money.

Speaker 2 (01:01:39):
So they know how to do it. But when they
don't follow through, I just get really, really salty.

Speaker 5 (01:01:45):
Over the weekend, President Trump did one of those things
that makes me remember why I personally find him a complete,
just an achy person. He went after you know, one
of my favorites, presentent of Thomas Massey, who I realize
is very unpopular with MAGA right now because he's demanding
the release of the Epstein files and he keeps voting

(01:02:07):
against these giant continuary resolutions that just keep Biden era
spending going.

Speaker 2 (01:02:14):
Oh he's awful. So MAGA is.

Speaker 5 (01:02:17):
Turning on him because Trump has turned on him. Thomas
Massey lost his wife in June of last year. His
wife Rohnda, and I know this from people who are
close to the family. She had been ill for some
time and kept it to herself. She didn't want it
to be the focus of attention, and she didn't want
to be the focus of attention. She was a lovely

(01:02:38):
woman who I met on several occasions, and they were
a very sweet couple. The first time I met them,
I asked them literally, I was like, so, how old
are you guys? Because you both look like you're about
fourteen and they were just incredibly sweet people. Well, his
wife passed away and he recently remarried, and oh boy,
Maga loves to throw at this. And as a matter

(01:03:01):
of fact, Donald Trump tweeted out this this week and
did Thomas Massey sometimes referred to as Rand Paul Junior
because of the fact, but he always votes against the
Republican Party.

Speaker 2 (01:03:13):
Get married already, boy, that was quick.

Speaker 5 (01:03:16):
No wonder the polls have him at less than an
eight percent chance of winning the election. Anyway, Have a
great life, Thomas, and question mark. His wife will soon
find out that she's stuck with a loser. First of all,
you know why this is just so patently offensive. Donald
Trump is the guy who couldn't keep it in his
pants during any of his marriages. At least, Thomas Massey

(01:03:41):
waited until death US part Thomas and his wife were
married for thirty one years, and there is a large
body of evidence of research the shows. Men and happy
marriages often remarried quickly.

Speaker 2 (01:03:54):
Because they like being.

Speaker 5 (01:03:55):
Married and they're good at it, and they want to
partner in life. And Thomas, I think is my age
or a little bit younger. I think he's like fifty four.
Maybe he might not even be that old. I don't
begrudge him anything. And I also know from watching my
many many years of life experience, that judging someone else's

(01:04:16):
process when they are widowed or you know, become a
widow or widower is just foul, really really foul. But
I expect nothing less from Donald Trump. Now many of
you are mad at Thomas Massey all the time. By
the way, he votes for the Republicans ninety one percent
of the time. But he won't vote to keep spending

(01:04:38):
more money than we take in. He won't vote for
Biden ears spending you know issues, He won't do it.
You know why, you know why people hate Thomas Massey
because he's this thing in DC that people don't understand,
and they hate it because they themselves are not. And
that is principled. He's consistent in his print. He believes

(01:05:02):
that we're spending ourselves into oblivity and therefore will not
support the level.

Speaker 2 (01:05:06):
Of spending that we see now. And I want to
play this. Gonna get my audio real quick. A rodg
This is him on ABC this week this past weekend.

Speaker 10 (01:05:15):
The President's gone after you in some deeply personal ways.
I mean, attacking you over and over again, even attacking
you for regarding your wedding, your recent wedding, which, by
the way, congratulations.

Speaker 2 (01:05:28):
What do you make of all that?

Speaker 10 (01:05:30):
And he's obviously supporting your primary opponents?

Speaker 2 (01:05:34):
I mean, what, what, what kind of retribution are you facing?

Speaker 8 (01:05:39):
You know, my wife's told me, she said, I told
you so we should have invited Donald Trump. He's mad
that he didn't get an invitation.

Speaker 2 (01:05:47):
So you know, we're taking it with the grain of salt.

Speaker 8 (01:05:49):
He's being a bully or trying to be a bully,
and they're trying to beat me here in Kentucky.

Speaker 9 (01:05:55):
But here's what's interesting.

Speaker 8 (01:05:57):
The people financing this campaign consists complet of three billionaires
and they're all in the Epstein class. In fact, one
of them is named in Epstein's phone book. Not the
secret files at the FBI is keeping, but in Epstein's
phone book.

Speaker 9 (01:06:10):
So it's a small world.

Speaker 8 (01:06:13):
Dogs don't bark at parked cars, and we are winning.
I'm not tired of winning yet, but we're winning. And
not only the Speaker, but the Attorney General, the FBI director,
and the President himself and the Vice president. They're taking
a big loss this week because after months of fighting,
I am winning this week with Rocanna.

Speaker 9 (01:06:34):
We're forcing this vote and it's going to happen.

Speaker 8 (01:06:37):
I would reminder of Republican colleagues who are deciding how
to vote. Donald Trump can protect you in red districts
right now by giving you an endorsement, but in twenty
thirty he's not going to be the president and you
will have voted to protect pedophiles. If you don't vote
to release these files and the president can't protect you,
then this vote, the record of this vote will last

(01:06:58):
longer than Donald Trump's presidency.

Speaker 5 (01:07:00):
And I want to point out that today on Truth
Social Donald Trump said he didn't care release the files.

Speaker 2 (01:07:07):
You know why because he knows this boat is coming
and he would have lost.

Speaker 1 (01:07:11):
The Mandy Connell Show is sponsored by Belle and Pollock
Accident and injury lawyers.

Speaker 2 (01:07:16):
No, it's Mandy Connell and ton.

Speaker 3 (01:07:21):
On Ka ninety one FM, got.

Speaker 4 (01:07:28):
Stay the nicety three and Donald Keith real sadding Welcome, uncal,
Welcome to.

Speaker 2 (01:07:39):
The third hour of the show.

Speaker 5 (01:07:41):
I have no idea how this happened. The show's just
flown by. And Anthony Rodriguez here with me as well.
And I want to give a little extra air horn
to Sea Rod a Rod's dad, and happy birthday, Sea Rod.

Speaker 2 (01:07:57):
H Bay. We want to see you.

Speaker 5 (01:08:01):
I appreciate the fine child to you and your wife
helped create. Anyway, so I know this is a made
a Stanta sports show. We got that earlier and we
were talking about the Broncos big win last night, but
this is very interesting to me, this next story. So
you know, with great fanfare, they announced that Colorado was
getting a professional women's soccer team, and this was really

(01:08:26):
exciting for people who liked soccer. And I am not
one who loves soccer, but hey, you know what if
it makes you guys happy and you want to wear the.

Speaker 2 (01:08:35):
Long scarves, I'm here for you. I got your back.

Speaker 5 (01:08:39):
And when they announced it and they named the team
Denver Summit FC, they had a deal with the Denver
City Council in the city of Denver to build a
stadium and it was going to be amazing. It was
right along the South Platte River. It was absolutely stunning.

(01:09:01):
Budget reality came home to the Denver City Council and
now there is some question about whether or not this
is actually going to happen. When facing the City Council,
the outside council for the group working on the development
of the Summit Stadium, they were questioned hard by Amanda

(01:09:22):
Sandoval hard, and the stadium's development team is hoping, hoping
to close the deal on the stadium by the end
of this year, but they have to have the city
Council's approval, and the City Council still has more questions
than Amanda Sandoval actually said. It doesn't sound like you

(01:09:42):
guys are going to make it to the closing by
December thirty first, rather ominous. On Wednesday, the council moved
and this is from our friends at Fox thirty one.
On Wednesday, the council moved only one of the five
votes on the agenda related to the stadium. That vote
allowed the property to be rezoned for construction at the

(01:10:04):
stadium site.

Speaker 2 (01:10:05):
It passed without any objections.

Speaker 5 (01:10:06):
However, the City Council ultimately moved to postpone everything else,
including property and inter governmental agreements. As well as an
appropriation of fifty million dollars from the city to buy
the land where the stadium will sit. Now, this is
where it gets really interesting. So Fox thirty one reached

(01:10:27):
out to a spokesperson for the Denver Summit FC and
they provided the following statement. Denver Submit FC ownership is
committed to fulfilling our obligations to the league, our fans,
our athletes, and the community. That means we need to
deliver a purpose built stadium for women's professional soccer on time,

(01:10:49):
ready for play in March of twenty twenty eight. We've
been planning for a permanent stadium at Santa Fe Yards
in Denver's Urban Cores. Given the challenges we have faced
in the city council process, we are currently pursuing a
parallel path regarding the stadium site and engaging with other
jurisdictions outside of Denver. We will continue to engage in

(01:11:14):
an open, an honest dialogue with the mayor, city council,
and community in Denver. We're grateful for the steadfast support
that we've received from fans, the community, the mayor, the
business community and small businesses throughout Denver.

Speaker 2 (01:11:28):
HMM.

Speaker 5 (01:11:29):
Interesting, very, very, very interesting. I don't know if Loan
Tree could pull this off. I don't know if Douglas
County could pull this off. I don't know if Broomfield
could pull it off. I don't know what other surrounding
municipalities could offer this team enough to make it worth

(01:11:49):
their while to bring their stadium to somewhere else other
than Denver. And my guess is is that they're just
trying to unnerve the Denver City Council, make them think
they're gonna lose the women's soccer stadium and guys women's
soccer is very popular.

Speaker 1 (01:12:06):
It just is.

Speaker 2 (01:12:09):
So I am I'm very interested, and like I said,
I don't care about soccer. I just not my sport,
don't love it.

Speaker 5 (01:12:16):
But I will be following that story because that's a
lot of money, a lot of money for one community
to come up with.

Speaker 2 (01:12:25):
We'll see how that all comes out.

Speaker 5 (01:12:26):
I have not talked about what's going on with Tina
Peters and the Trump administration because there hasn't really been
anything to report. But the Trump administration, as of last week,
is now seeking a transfer from state prison to federal custody.
A former Colorado clerk, Tina Peters, and We don't know

(01:12:49):
how this is going to work, and I don't even
know if they can do this.

Speaker 3 (01:12:56):
Now.

Speaker 5 (01:12:57):
The letter didn't say why the federal agent and he
wanted to move Peters. He believes it is so she
could be more easily involved in investigations into voting machines
in the twenty twenty presidential election. And because of health
problems she has been having in state prison. So Tina
may get a move to you know, Kushy federal prison

(01:13:22):
and we'll see what happens after that.

Speaker 2 (01:13:23):
I have no idea, I have no clue. But that's
the latest on Tina Peters.

Speaker 5 (01:13:28):
I also have on the blog right now the current
list of twenty twenty six acts at Red Rocks, and
I am super excited to announce that I've actually heard
of some of the people on this list this past year.
I had only heard it like two And for those
of you who missed Weird Al Yankovic, he's coming.

Speaker 2 (01:13:48):
Back with the Bigger and Weirder tour.

Speaker 5 (01:13:52):
Back to Did you see it was Puddle's Pity Party
the opening act of that wise? Yeah, he was interesting,
he is interesting different. I just saw something on the internet.
Any right, have you ever seen your scrolling, you're looking
at stuff on Instagram or whatever, and you see a
video and for whatever reason, it just catches you and
you can't stop watching it.

Speaker 7 (01:14:13):
No.

Speaker 5 (01:14:14):
It was a guy in Germany and I can't remember
what his name is off the top of my head.
He is wearing an elaborate outfit, like a dancer's outfit,
and high, high high heels, like way higher heels than
I would ever try myself. And he's hula hooping and
he's doing it over a mix of Enya and and

(01:14:36):
oh no a rap song. I can't And it was
it was mesmerizing. I couldn't stop watching it. I watched
it like four times.

Speaker 2 (01:14:43):
In a row. You were down the rabbit hole? Yeah,
have you ever what catches?

Speaker 5 (01:14:47):
Okay, that's how I started watching hoof cleaning videos like
you know on cows. I watched tons of hoof cleaning
video You.

Speaker 2 (01:14:54):
Guys, ask me what mine is already have manser?

Speaker 1 (01:14:56):
What is it?

Speaker 2 (01:14:56):
It is amazing.

Speaker 6 (01:14:57):
I am always down the rabbit hole of the India
street food vendors that make the weirdest, most unhygienic dishes.

Speaker 2 (01:15:06):
Yeah, and there's a beautiful twist. My wife makes fun
of me for it.

Speaker 6 (01:15:12):
The videos I see are every single thing that they do,
whether they're opening up a bottle or they're like popping
something into a can, every single one has like a
brain rot sound effect added to each every single thing.
The sound effects I have to send you one like
the stupidest things, like they're popping, like they're like popping
a line and has like a gunshot, or or like

(01:15:33):
they're spreading.

Speaker 2 (01:15:34):
This thing is like a movie. Let's put one of
those on the block time. Holy cow, Mandy.

Speaker 5 (01:15:40):
I'm not sure how, but I too got stuck watching
hoof cleaning videos over and over again. It's mesmerizing to
see how those sharp instruments cut away the nail and.

Speaker 2 (01:15:49):
Then the fluid flows out of it.

Speaker 5 (01:15:50):
I can literally feel the relief the cow is experiencing.

Speaker 2 (01:15:54):
I haven't seen thee with fluid.

Speaker 5 (01:15:55):
Oh horrse cows reshoeing is different than the hoof cleaning videos.
The only problem with the hoof cleaning videos is I
have spent enough time in a barn that when the
hoof is really gnarly, I can smell.

Speaker 2 (01:16:11):
That in my nostrils and I don't like it.

Speaker 5 (01:16:15):
Not good man, If you want a weird rabbit hole
to explore. Check out Maramomo thirteen thirties on YouTube. Great music,
oddly entertaining VIDs.

Speaker 2 (01:16:27):
I don't Here's the.

Speaker 5 (01:16:28):
Thing I don't usually watch like one person, although this
Huloop guy now I can't stop watching his videos.

Speaker 6 (01:16:33):
Another great rabbit hole is all of the the dubbing,
the lip dubbing of all your favorite shows or the NFL.

Speaker 2 (01:16:41):
I don't get that. I don't.

Speaker 5 (01:16:42):
Oh, like, are you talking about like bad lip reading,
because there's funny, Yes, that bad lip reading is very funny,
But I don't understand like there's an entire genre on
the Internet that is just videos of like me standing
and mouthing the words to some sound bite. No, no,
I'm just saying, like some random person mouthing along to

(01:17:05):
some sound bite, and that's like a whole There's there's
people that have millions of followers just doing that. And
that's one of those things where I was like, you
know what, I don't want to be famous bad enough
to have to tell someone where they go.

Speaker 2 (01:17:19):
So what do you do for a living?

Speaker 5 (01:17:20):
Well, I feel myself mouthing the words to other people's uh,
you know, audio, and then I put it on the
internet and That's why I make a living.

Speaker 6 (01:17:26):
Here's another amazing rabbit hole, the ones where they have
the press and they just put in random items, the
hydraulic press.

Speaker 7 (01:17:33):
I love.

Speaker 2 (01:17:34):
Those are really good.

Speaker 5 (01:17:36):
Those are really really good. Those Mandy, my wife got
me hooked on baby Dad jokes.

Speaker 2 (01:17:42):
Those are funny. Those are really funny.

Speaker 5 (01:17:44):
The latest rabbit hole I went down says this is
near death experiences, and it is really had a profound
experience all my life.

Speaker 2 (01:17:51):
I agree.

Speaker 5 (01:17:52):
I'm right there with you, Texter one hundred percent. One
hundred percent. And my current rabbit hole porch pirates and
exploding packages.

Speaker 2 (01:18:03):
I can't get enough. Exactly those are always so gratifying.

Speaker 6 (01:18:08):
Yeah, exactly. You get smashed and blown up, you me
in real talk, though I know it's on your property.
Can you get at all in trouble like assault for
doing that to somebody.

Speaker 5 (01:18:21):
In all honesty, if you put an actual like a
bomb in a package, then yeah, I'm sure. But if
you have a glitter bomb in a package where it
just covers someone with glitter, I mean, if they really
wanted to be a jerk about it, they could probably
try and charge with AsSalt. But then you would be like, well,
it's only assault because you stole my package.

Speaker 2 (01:18:41):
And so I'm guessing the.

Speaker 5 (01:18:43):
Sort of people that are going to steal packages from
your porch are not the kind of people who are
going to follow up by going to the police. It's
like when your drug dealer rips you off. What are
you really gonna do, Anthony?

Speaker 3 (01:18:54):
Yes?

Speaker 2 (01:18:55):
Yes, what are you going to be? Analogy? Yeah?

Speaker 5 (01:18:58):
Do you still watch the cat music guy from Africa?
To be clear, the Kiffness from South Africa? He does
videos with dogs and cats and people. And yes, I
still do Mandy Wood turning or power washing videos. Oh,
I can get down with a power washing video.

Speaker 2 (01:19:15):
I can watch it. Power you guys.

Speaker 5 (01:19:16):
I'm not even gonna lie like I have a list
of things that I might want to do as part
time jobs when I retire.

Speaker 2 (01:19:22):
Power washing is one of them that looks so satisfying.

Speaker 5 (01:19:28):
You talk about instant gratification, Anthony, have you ever seen
him downe a moss.

Speaker 6 (01:19:32):
Covered wall when they douse the rugs rug?

Speaker 5 (01:19:38):
You know why I'm not going rugs is a part
time gig when I'm retired because moving a rug, see
a wet rug, especially, that seems hard and gross. Yeah. Yeah,
mixing paint by percentage of each color. Yes, yes, we'll
be right back, Ladies and gentlemen. Straight from Hollywood, California

(01:20:03):
or somewhere else. It is game show host extraordinaire Mark Wahlberg.
He has been the host of so many different things
it's not even funny whether you love Antiques Road Show
or you love Temptation Island, or you love game shows.
And now he's coming to town tomorrow night. He's going
to be at the Paramount with Wheel of Fortunate Live.

Speaker 2 (01:20:23):
Mark Wahlberg, Welcome to my show.

Speaker 1 (01:20:27):
Thank you.

Speaker 3 (01:20:28):
That intro was longer than some series. That's awesome.

Speaker 2 (01:20:31):
There you go. I gotta start asking you. I have
to ask you.

Speaker 5 (01:20:34):
We'll talk about Wheel Fortune in just a second, because
people can actually go we can talk.

Speaker 3 (01:20:38):
About whatever you want, whatever you want to talk about.

Speaker 5 (01:20:40):
Tomorrow night, people are gonna have the opportunity to go
to the Paramount Theater and actually play Wheel Fortune.

Speaker 2 (01:20:45):
We're going to talk about that in a second.

Speaker 5 (01:20:46):
But I've always been fascinated with the genre of job
that is talk show host. And you're really in kind
of a very small club of successful talk show hosts
or games show that your jobs have primarily been moving
things along, right, I mean, that's the job of a

(01:21:07):
great host, to move things along in an entertaining fashion.
Did you ever when you were young, were you like,
I want to be a game show host when I
grow up.

Speaker 2 (01:21:15):
How did you land in this?

Speaker 7 (01:21:18):
You know, that's a great question, first of all, speaking
to what you're saying about being a game show host.
The job is to be an expert at the game,
to keep the train on the tracks, to make sure
we're playing the game the right way so that the
contestants get the best opportunity.

Speaker 3 (01:21:31):
How I got into it. I you know, when I
first got married, I was sort of wondering what my
career would be.

Speaker 7 (01:21:38):
I didn't have a degree. My wife was an actress.
I thought I wanted to do that, and I'm like,
one of us needs to get a job. And I
got a job at did Clark Productions. Wow, So I
kind of just menteed under one of the greatest hosts
and producers that's ever been in our business.

Speaker 3 (01:21:53):
And I learned a lot from him.

Speaker 7 (01:21:54):
I became his warm up comedian on a lot of
his shows, and then I started hosting my own shows.

Speaker 3 (01:21:59):
So I learned from but I think is the best I.

Speaker 5 (01:22:01):
Think that that's I think Dick Clark is arguably the
greatest host of all time.

Speaker 7 (01:22:07):
Yes, generalist, because one of the things that he does,
besides being a great game show host and being comedic
when he needs to be, and besides being a great
music host knowing everything about music. I've watched time and
time again. You know when he was with us, when
he would stracture or be in a segment that needed
to be longer, or something, he would add content. It

(01:22:28):
wasn't just talking. He would He was bright and smart
and aware and listening. And there are so many tools
I learned to become the host that I try to
be now based on watching hours of him.

Speaker 2 (01:22:40):
I think that's a great point.

Speaker 5 (01:22:41):
It is that a lot of times being a great
host is listening and really following along to what people
are saying and engaging that way. So let's talk about
what it's like to host Wheel of Fortune Lives. It's
a live program with the big Wheel Mark. We were
talking about Wheel of Fortune earlier, my producer and I
and I'm if I'm honest, I miss the showcase at

(01:23:04):
the end where people had to buy their prizes and
they always ended up with like eighty dollars and they
bought the ceramic dog, and then they took the rest
on the Georgio gift certificate. I would love for them
to bring that back. You know, maybe we make that
part of the touring company. I just wanted people, you know,
people's shop for their trip to hold.

Speaker 3 (01:23:21):
I'm a man of a certain age, so I kind
of agree with you. That was one of the things
I loved when I was a kid.

Speaker 7 (01:23:25):
At some point in the evolution of Wheel of Fortune,
the producers realized that the most of the audience once
more puzzles and less shopping, and so that went by
the wayside.

Speaker 6 (01:23:35):
But I love that.

Speaker 3 (01:23:36):
I'm up that age.

Speaker 2 (01:23:37):
It was soviod.

Speaker 3 (01:23:39):
Yeah, we don't do that on the live show. Obviously
we play it lasts it is on TV now, but yeah,
those were the days.

Speaker 5 (01:23:45):
So tell me about the what people can expect when
they go to the Paramount tomorrow night.

Speaker 2 (01:23:48):
What is that going to be like?

Speaker 3 (01:23:50):
So it's going to be a party, It's going to
be a celebration of America's game. Here, what's up? We
have the whole set, We've got the wheel, we've got
the letter board, We've got everything you need.

Speaker 7 (01:23:58):
And we realized that not everybody is going to get
a chance to ever go to Hollywood and watch it
taping with Bryan Seacrest or back when Pat Saint.

Speaker 3 (01:24:04):
Jack was doing it.

Speaker 7 (01:24:05):
So we're trying to give you that vibe of what
it's like to be there watching a taping of the episode,
an episode of.

Speaker 3 (01:24:12):
Will a Fortune.

Speaker 7 (01:24:13):
But anyone who comes to the show simply click something
in the lobby and you're.

Speaker 3 (01:24:19):
Registered to be a contestant.

Speaker 7 (01:24:21):
So everyone on stage that will happen tomorrow night at
the show will be plucked right out of the audience
at random. It doesn't matter if you wear a funny
shirt or you're a really great contestant or not. You're
getting picked out of the audience to come up on stage,
do your best, and ultimately will audition lots of people
to find three people who will play a full episode,
just like on TV, and then the winner will go

(01:24:41):
to the bonus ramp for a chance to win up
to five thousand dollars.

Speaker 3 (01:24:44):
Here's what's awesome. If they saw that bonus puzzle.

Speaker 7 (01:24:47):
And they win whatever's in the envelope, we match that
prize with somebody in the audience's good you, and we
do that throughout the night. So if you come you
have no intention of playing the game, that's fine. We
love that you still may end up winning.

Speaker 5 (01:25:00):
So I and tickets are super affordable. I was looking
this morning. There's not that many tickets left. I looked
this morning to see if there were any tickets left there.
There are tickets together, but they're they're kind of spread
around the Paramount.

Speaker 2 (01:25:13):
Have you ever been to the Paramount before?

Speaker 7 (01:25:15):
By the way, it's a good I think the last
time I was in Denver I played the Mission Ballroom,
which is a great venue.

Speaker 3 (01:25:21):
I think I have been to the Paramount before. I've
been in many Paramount theaters.

Speaker 7 (01:25:24):
It's sort of a chain around the country, and so yeah,
I think if I remember correctly, it's sort of an iconic.

Speaker 3 (01:25:31):
Theater from that era.

Speaker 9 (01:25:33):
I don't really remember.

Speaker 3 (01:25:34):
To be honest with you, I've been to Denver a lot.
So I'm excited to come back. O. Good.

Speaker 2 (01:25:38):
Well, we're glad to have you.

Speaker 5 (01:25:39):
So what is I'm guessing that you know, the audiences
for game shows when you're recording in California are fairly small.

Speaker 2 (01:25:47):
I mean there's not that many people the studio. Yeah,
I'm guessing this is like my teeth.

Speaker 7 (01:25:52):
Actually, so most of the shows that tape in Hollywood,
even talk shows, game shows, variety shows, sitcoms, maybe one
hundred people in the audience, sometimes more, sometimes a little less.
And I by happenstance, that's how my career started. We
were taking a show that Dick Clark was hosting. Audience
was loaded in, we were ready to roll tape and

(01:26:13):
Dick said, where's the audience guy, where's the comedian?

Speaker 2 (01:26:16):
And my boss was like, we.

Speaker 7 (01:26:17):
Didn't book one. We thought this would go pretty quick.
And he looked around and said, you know what, Mark'll
do just fine, and we set me out there and
that's how my career took a left turn. And now
I'm here today.

Speaker 5 (01:26:28):
That's fantastic. That is a great, great story. So people
have plenty of time the show tomorrow, and you don't
have plenty of time. You've got one day. Buy the ticket,
go and have a blast. This could be a little
fun way to make a little walking around money.

Speaker 2 (01:26:41):
Now you've done these before. How often do people win
the showcase?

Speaker 7 (01:26:47):
You know, I was trying to answer that question last night.
I'm gonna guess probably sixty five percent of the time.

Speaker 3 (01:26:53):
Oh, people are good.

Speaker 7 (01:26:54):
Yeah, we have a lot of winners. We had somebody
win a trip to Hawaii two nights ago. We had
somebody last night whin two thousand dollars.

Speaker 3 (01:27:00):
I think it was last night. I get confused what
night it was.

Speaker 7 (01:27:02):
But recently, and what's meant about it is when the
person when I opened up the envelo, they've solved the puzzle,
places going crazy oblo usas at Hawaii.

Speaker 3 (01:27:11):
Well not only they're going but some random audience member
who's done nothing to deserve it just with a triple away.
I love that it was. Spreading the wealth is one
of my favorite things.

Speaker 5 (01:27:22):
What city that you've been to had the best audience
in terms of just fun and engagement? And I don't
give me the All cities have good qualities. I want
to know the truth, Mark Wahlberg.

Speaker 3 (01:27:35):
I'll give you the truth. You know it's funny. I
really I've toured a lot in just doing Wheel of Fortune.

Speaker 7 (01:27:41):
I did Anti Drochrop for years, I did Prices Right
Live for years. So I have toured with game shows
and regionally, audiences are different. What's funny in one room
is not funny in the next room. So I can't
really I'm going to skate a little bit because I
can't really tell you what city had the best audience.
But I find it really fascinating that, you know, some big,

(01:28:02):
big city audiences like we were in San Francisco, they
were great, but sometimes you'll play like Davenport, Iowa, and
be shocked at how awesome the audience is.

Speaker 3 (01:28:10):
So but what's interesting is not that one better than
the other.

Speaker 7 (01:28:14):
But I found that certain audience is fining certain things funny,
and certain audience is flying other things funny.

Speaker 3 (01:28:20):
And so every night was one.

Speaker 7 (01:28:22):
Of the reasons why I love doing it every night,
not just comedy, of course, but gameplay and explanation how
we do it. You sort of have to adjust what
you're doing to talk to the audience that's there, and
you know, I guess I'm getting a little heady. But
as a host, I think the lesson is you meet
your audience where they are. You don't expect them to
be where you were yesterday. You meet them emotionally where

(01:28:42):
they are, talk to them and listen to what they
want to hear from you, and be the facilitator of
their good time, not yours.

Speaker 5 (01:28:48):
I think that's a really interesting insight into the world
of what you do because for most of us, like
I like to host in terms of I love to
be an MC and I do a lot of political stuff.
It is there is an art to it and an
art to doing it well. So you've obviously mastered the art.
And I've got one question before we go, and don't forget.
You can find all the information on how to get

(01:29:10):
those few tickets that are left on the blog today
at mandy'sblog dot com. You can just go to the
paramount or ticket Master if you want to search it
that way. The show is tomorrow night. Last question, are
you do you ever go down internet rabbit holes? Because
we were talking about this before you came on mine.
Right now, I've got three I've got pressure washing videos,
I've got host cleaning videos, and I have carpet cleaning videos.

(01:29:33):
Those are my things that I just watch mindlessly. And
now I've got this guy in Germany who does the
Hulo hoop wearing extremely high heels and showgirl outfits.

Speaker 2 (01:29:42):
Can't stop watching that guy?

Speaker 8 (01:29:44):
Is it?

Speaker 2 (01:29:44):
What does Mark Wahlberg do on the Internet? What do
you watch?

Speaker 7 (01:29:49):
Well, if you look at my algorithm, I get a
lot of crazy construction videos of construction mishaps and workarounds
for constructive stuff, which blows my mind because I don't
do construction, but I apparently love to watch it.

Speaker 3 (01:30:03):
I've been inundated with the TikTok trend of.

Speaker 9 (01:30:08):
Where the two people stand there across from.

Speaker 7 (01:30:10):
One another and I said, hey, hey, hey, yeah, and
they turn around and does the rap.

Speaker 3 (01:30:14):
So I've been practicing that. I can't stop singing that
and getting the words wrong. So that's cool. And then
uh yeah, and then I get a bunch.

Speaker 7 (01:30:22):
Of dance videos, like lots of dance stuff because my daughter,
I'll be as quick with this as I can. My
daughter was a professional ballerina. I woke up one morning
and I called her.

Speaker 3 (01:30:33):
I'm like, what the hell, gold, what are you doing?

Speaker 7 (01:30:35):
She put together a TikTok which was cutting all of
these clips of me pretending to be a dancer over
the years, and she put us things in petition for
my dad to be on Dance with the Stars.

Speaker 3 (01:30:45):
And I yelled her, I'm like, you maybe look like
an idiot, you know, and and why would you do that?

Speaker 7 (01:30:50):
She said, before you yell at me, why don't you
look and see how many views on TikTok you have?

Speaker 3 (01:30:54):
Five point one million, of course, so now she can
put anything she wants with me on it. By the way,
Dancing with the Stars hasn't called so well, Kenny.

Speaker 5 (01:31:02):
Maybe she should put one show in your overall improvement,
maybe as a follow up.

Speaker 7 (01:31:06):
You know, I think maybe there's a whole series that
could be, you know, taking somebody from absolute, you know,
ridiculous behavior to almost the semblance of a dance staff.

Speaker 3 (01:31:15):
But I don't know if I'm capable.

Speaker 2 (01:31:16):
Mark L Wahlberg, what does the L stand for?

Speaker 3 (01:31:21):
You know?

Speaker 7 (01:31:21):
I at this point I actually come up with something funny.
I don't have any money. It's that's for Lewis. I
just added my middle initial to my professional name. When
Mark Wahlberg started to become famous, Yeah, because I didn't
want people to be confused. I didn't want to look
like I would try to, you know, steal his clout,
and so I wanted to different change his best I
think in person it's easy to tell the difference.

Speaker 3 (01:31:41):
I have ads, but you can't find them.

Speaker 2 (01:31:43):
His are more than a parent.

Speaker 5 (01:31:45):
There you go, Mark el Wahlberg, thank you so much
for your time. Got a great time tomorrow night. I
hope somebody wins big.

Speaker 3 (01:31:53):
I hope so too, And I hope your listeners show
up and have a great time.

Speaker 2 (01:31:56):
On me too, Me too. Thanks Mark, Nice to meet you.

Speaker 3 (01:31:59):
Man, Nice to meet you too.

Speaker 2 (01:32:02):
That is Mark L. Wahlberg and making his way in
the studio right now. Rick L. Lewis, Well, I don't
know what rix middle name is. I don't know what's
your middle name. It starts with a W.

Speaker 5 (01:32:15):
I'm gonna say Richard william Is that it winner?

Speaker 2 (01:32:20):
It is not winner. Nobody names are well now they
they were born. Though your parents have.

Speaker 5 (01:32:25):
Named you winner, they would have been like those Lewis is,
they're taking drugs.

Speaker 2 (01:32:29):
I mean, you just didn't do that bad. It does
happen today, though, that's for sure. How you knowing a
freaking game yesterday?

Speaker 11 (01:32:36):
Rick Lewis, Oh, man, I'm still uh still processing it.

Speaker 2 (01:32:40):
I enjoyed. I enjoyed yesterday's game. I enjoyed it.

Speaker 5 (01:32:46):
I love the play calling in the first when the
whole first series, I don't care.

Speaker 2 (01:32:51):
I honestly don't care that it ended with a field goal.

Speaker 5 (01:32:53):
I truly don't, because it was so nice to see
the offense in the first series actually functioning properly.

Speaker 2 (01:33:02):
Yeah they got points. Yeah, on the first drive. It
was a field goal. I don't care.

Speaker 11 (01:33:08):
I thought that might have been bow Nicks's best game. Yes,
I think he said better stats in some games, but
he was in control the whole game.

Speaker 5 (01:33:16):
The offense look comfortable, which is not something that you've
been able to say about this offense this season. It's
like it is taken until the fourth quarter before you
start to see, Oh, now Steph has starting to gel.
That first series for me, I was like, I almost
don't care what happens after this.

Speaker 2 (01:33:31):
I'm I'm happy to see that happen. You got a
little emotional, did Yeah?

Speaker 7 (01:33:35):
It was?

Speaker 2 (01:33:36):
It was a special game. This is a special team.
I think we can say that now.

Speaker 11 (01:33:41):
I felt that for the past, I would say four
or five weeks, and now after after yesterday, yeah, I
think this is a special team hopefully going special places,
and it feels that way. I still can't believe they're
ninety two.

Speaker 5 (01:33:56):
I believe, I genuinely, like, did anybody anywhere say, you know,
I think the Brokers are gonna be nine to two?

Speaker 2 (01:34:02):
But after eleven games, like nobody said that.

Speaker 11 (01:34:05):
Well they started what wanted to Yeah? Who would have thought?
I know, they haven't lost a game.

Speaker 5 (01:34:10):
Since it's amazing, it's truly amazing. Let me ask you
a question, and I put this on the blog today
about Riley Moss and his pass interference calls, and I'd
like to ask Dave Liss because it seems like once
a guy gets wrung up on the same kind of thing.
We saw this happen in Garrett Bull's you know, inaugural
season when he had holding call after holding call after

(01:34:31):
holding call after holding call, and it's almost like, once
you get that reputation, the refs are going to watch
you like a hawk.

Speaker 2 (01:34:38):
And there was a couple.

Speaker 5 (01:34:39):
There's one that I thought, okay, that was pretty clearly
a pass interference. There was another one where you were
like he knew was that pass interferences?

Speaker 2 (01:34:48):
Was he pushing back when he was being pushed off on?

Speaker 7 (01:34:50):
Yeah?

Speaker 11 (01:34:51):
Well Number one teams really go at Riley Boss, especially
with passer tan out, but they've still been going targeting
him quite a bit. Yeah, once you get that reputation,
they're gonna watch you. And also the other team's offense,
YEP is going to attack you because if they need
to get a play on a third and long, they're
just going to take a chance on a long pass.

Speaker 2 (01:35:12):
Yeah, seriously, yeah, I would.

Speaker 11 (01:35:15):
It's either going to be incomplete, your guy's gonna catch it,
could be a pick, could be a PI. And so
there's some good things that can happen there for a quarterback.

Speaker 2 (01:35:24):
Just let it go.

Speaker 11 (01:35:25):
And even if Riley Moss would say intercept a forty
or fifty yard pass like a punt, sure, So uh yeah,
this is probably gonna happen for the rest of the season.
Riley Moss is really aggressive. He's a really confident cornerback.

Speaker 5 (01:35:40):
Aaron asked him a great question, got a great SoundBite
from him after the game yesterday about accountability, and he
did not shy away at all from saying I gotta
fix it. You know, I gotta fix it. It is
something that I'm working on all the time. And so
there was no excuse making. There was no you know, like, oh,
the rep none of that. He was just like, yep,
it's a problem, but here's why. And he's aggressive.

Speaker 2 (01:36:02):
I mean that seeing it.

Speaker 11 (01:36:03):
Yeah, and it does happen a lot and it doesn't
get called. I saw that happen with the Broncos receivers
yesterday that they didn't call anything, and so it's very subjective,
but you're right, he now has a target on his
back from the refs and the opposing team.

Speaker 5 (01:36:18):
I think so too, but I still, I mean, I
will take it all day long. I'm perfectly fined with that.
We would have won by two more touchdowns.

Speaker 2 (01:36:26):
It's fine, it's fine.

Speaker 11 (01:36:28):
Yeah, we'll take the win. We got a bye week
coming up, and consider they did this without their best
defensive player, without their defensive captain and leading tackler, their
best running back, and with their third string left guard.

Speaker 2 (01:36:42):
This was a big win yesterday, You win huge, huge,
enjoy it.

Speaker 5 (01:36:46):
Let me look at the flip side of this, though,
What does this say about the Chiefs and where they
are going forward?

Speaker 2 (01:36:51):
Have they already?

Speaker 5 (01:36:52):
I mean, are they a team that now after this season,
you're going to see a bunch of guys lost a
free agency in the core of that team is gone.
Championship window is essentially slam shut already.

Speaker 11 (01:37:02):
This is probably Travis Kelcey's last last year. I think
in some even saying maybe Andy Reid decides, you know,
he's had enough. They're not used to losing. Yep, they're
used to winning. Nine years with Patrick Mahomes, that's been
a heck of a run. And now they're on the
other side of it. Yep, they still got a lot
of talent on the team. They're still a good football team.
They may make some noise down the stretch. Next week.

(01:37:25):
They played the Colts in this game. You're hoping that
at least I'm hoping they beat the Colts next week.

Speaker 5 (01:37:31):
Yeah, I would be nice for us at this point
now that we're solidly, yes, solidly in control of the
AFC or the AFC West.

Speaker 2 (01:37:39):
By the way, I saw Chuck yesterday, I know. Oh
do you tell you? Yes?

Speaker 6 (01:37:42):
He did.

Speaker 2 (01:37:43):
He loves that. It's like his favorite thing. I saw
him seat Chuck, oh oh oh yeah.

Speaker 11 (01:37:47):
Hay Rod was there. He was sure enjoying the buffet
there in New York. In the press box. I gotta
say he was commenting on it. He liked the whatever
the meat was that they served. So yeah, Chuck's a
big man.

Speaker 4 (01:38:00):
He is.

Speaker 2 (01:38:01):
He likes, he loves to eat. He does, he absolutely
does it. Time for the most exciting segment all the radio.

Speaker 9 (01:38:09):
I'm this guy.

Speaker 2 (01:38:14):
Al the day. All right, what is our dad joke
of the before we do come up a moment for
our tournament.

Speaker 4 (01:38:21):
Of the day.

Speaker 2 (01:38:23):
Fantastic you guys, Jerry, Jack and Pat just phenomenal. That
is more to come, people, We hear you. More of
that to come. Yes, we will do Dad joke of
the day in honor of my dad.

Speaker 6 (01:38:32):
Happy birthday, Dad, A genie granted me one wish, so
I wish to be happy.

Speaker 2 (01:38:37):
Now I live with six dwarves and work on line. Nice.
That's very funny. That was a good dad joke. As
dad jokes, go over to give that a four. That's
a good way. U. What is the trivia or excuse
me the word of the day. It's an adjective adjective
radio what radio radio?

Speaker 8 (01:38:57):
R A D I A L.

Speaker 2 (01:38:59):
Correct. That means like radio. You have a radio and
an illness in your arm? Right radio radio?

Speaker 9 (01:39:07):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (01:39:07):
No, Rick, anything you say something on the perimeter in
the radius, That's what I'm going for. I'm going to
say the same I think of a radial tire.

Speaker 6 (01:39:16):
Yeah, your ladder, guess was a little closer to describes
things that are arranged or have parts arranged in straight
lines coming out from the center of a circle.

Speaker 5 (01:39:24):
All right there you what type of what what material
are ballet two two's typically made from?

Speaker 7 (01:39:30):
And I know this.

Speaker 2 (01:39:34):
I'm gonna say a silk tool. They're made out of
hool to make them fluffy. What tool to t U
L L E T.

Speaker 5 (01:39:42):
Yeah, fancy words, all right, Rick Lewis Mandy Connor, let's.

Speaker 2 (01:39:48):
Go with her category.

Speaker 6 (01:39:49):
I'm gonna every now and then adopt a bit of
a strategy for a guest like we did in Terment
of the Day, Rick, you get to choose between two categories,
commercial slogans or smell you later.

Speaker 2 (01:40:01):
Smell you later. We're attempted to take that one.

Speaker 11 (01:40:05):
I think if I did commercial slogans, Mandy with that's
exactly a crushed up.

Speaker 2 (01:40:10):
So let's go smell you right, smell you lator. I'm
also very well versed in smell.

Speaker 9 (01:40:14):
So you're here we go.

Speaker 2 (01:40:16):
A ratio is told that something is this in the
state of Denmark? What is rotten? That is correct? Wow? Rick,
do you have a chance you we go back?

Speaker 7 (01:40:24):
Oh?

Speaker 6 (01:40:25):
No, commercial slogans? Okay, this word meaning to get a
faint smell of something.

Speaker 2 (01:40:30):
Also, what's a with? That is correct? Finish the question.
Don't it's a blood sport here? Rick? Just write it
whatever you know it, whatever you know it.

Speaker 11 (01:40:37):
One.

Speaker 6 (01:40:37):
He's positioned in an army or a truly foul smell. Mandy,
what is it's correct? Ask the Tesla guy. The name
of this four letter type of pungent odor derives from
a certain male.

Speaker 2 (01:40:51):
Deer, Mandy musk. That is correct for the sweep.

Speaker 6 (01:40:56):
This body part, this body body part adjected adjective. Adjective
can mean intoxicating, shrewd or having a pleasing smell. Intoxicating
body part?

Speaker 2 (01:41:10):
Did you say? This body part?

Speaker 6 (01:41:11):
Adjective can mean intoxicating shrewd or having a pleasing smell.

Speaker 2 (01:41:16):
The body part has a y at the end of it. Okay,
it's a little I don't know what this is. What
is heady? Heady? Okay?

Speaker 6 (01:41:28):
Okay?

Speaker 5 (01:41:29):
I told her I do a lot about smells. You
should have gone with commercial slogans.

Speaker 2 (01:41:33):
I'm just saying the game maybe not.

Speaker 6 (01:41:38):
Rik, You are probably right because the first of commercial
slogans was I'm loving it and Mandy would have been
a millisecond.

Speaker 2 (01:41:45):
Game every day.

Speaker 5 (01:41:46):
That's why I do it, Rick, because it makes me
look smart smrt Right at the end of the game,
you can make me.

Speaker 2 (01:41:53):
Look what's coming up on kay sports, You're coming in
for this? Well yeah, heay, this were so much better
than defeat Monday. Ryan so much better.

Speaker 11 (01:42:05):
And man, we could sure get used to these victory mondays. Man,
we are stacking them up now.

Speaker 5 (01:42:09):
Seriously, let's not get let's not get you know, too overconfident.
I'm just saying we're gonna have one again next Monday
because we have a bye week. We'll we'll just have
victory lists or anyway, that's all coming up next.

Speaker 2 (01:42:22):
Keep it righty here on k