August 13, 2025 • 41 mins
This is the full show for August 12, 2025. We ask the American Mamas why we continue to fund schools that teach their students to hate America. We Dig Deep into a whisteblower's claims that Adam Schiff leaked classified information. Plus, illegal aliens are self-deporting, and that's a Bright Spot. And we finish off with drones that will make you say, "Whoa!"
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It's available.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Now we know what official flavors sweeters are, but trulyum
base dies. It's all natural and it's harvested on American
ground fields.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
It's tables.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
You are making Americas smart again.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
Baby.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
We choose to go to the mood and do the
other thing, not because they are easy, but because they
are on. It is time for us to realize that
we're too great a nation to limit ourselves to small dreams.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
I have a dream that one day this nation will
rise up, live out the true meaning of its creed.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
American Ground Radio with Lewis r Avaloney and Stephen prok.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
Brooe.
Speaker 5 (01:00):
This is American Ground Radio Stephen Poward, Lewis.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
All right, folks, buckle up because this is a big win,
and I mean big all right, not just in legal terms,
but in cultural, moral, political terms. You remember the former
Kentucky County clerk Kim Davis. Yes, well she is back
in the headlines, and for good reason.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
So she was.
Speaker 5 (01:23):
After the Supreme Court said that same sex marriage was legal,
she denied some marriage petitions of same sex couples in
her county in Kentucky.
Speaker 3 (01:34):
Saying that it violated her religious beliefs, and she lost
her job over it. She was jail, she was thrown
in jail. She was jailed over it. Yeah, and now
she's being told to pay nearly four four hundred thousand
dollars to the very people she believes her faith compelled
her not to serve that day, and not only damages
(01:57):
but in their legal fees because they sued her. Right,
and she's back in the headlines, and the reason is
she is taking aim at one of the most controversial
Supreme Court rulings in modern American history, and that is
Obersville for the Hodges, which is the twenty fifteen decision
(02:20):
that legalized same sex marriage nationwide. And so just last month,
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky County clerk, filed what she
calls and what lawyers call obviously a petition for writ
of cerciari, And basically what she's asking the Supreme Court
to do is to hear her case after a jury
(02:42):
slapped her with one hundred thousand dollars fine or damages
for emotional damages, plus another two hundred and sixty thousand
dollars in legal fees for refusing to issue marriage licenses
to same sex couples back in twenty fifteen. Now, let's
just try to strip away the legal jargon here. What
(03:03):
Davis is saying here is that Obersvel was wrongly decided
that case. It was egregiously wrong, in her legal team's words,
and that it violated the Constitution. And she points to
the twenty twenty two Dom's decision that's the one that
overturned Roe v. Wade, saying that, look, if the Court
(03:24):
could admit a mistake in Row and correct it, it
can do the same thing here.
Speaker 5 (03:29):
And it's a similar mistake because in Obersvel, the Supreme
Court nationalized marriage policy, not based on any law that
had been passed, not based on any specific line in
the Constitution that says.
Speaker 1 (03:41):
You have the right to be married. There's no line
in that right.
Speaker 3 (03:45):
There's no right in the Constitution to.
Speaker 5 (03:47):
Marriage for gay or straight couples. It's just not there.
Speaker 3 (03:51):
It's an erroneous So at the time that Obersvel was decided,
only eight states had legalized same such marriage. I believe
starting with Massachusetts, thirty five states in the country. The
majority of states in the US had laws banning same
sex marriage. Now, I'm not sure it would still be
(04:11):
thirty five today. It might be twenty five, it might
be twenty five states saying no, you don't have the
right to same sex marriage, because that's not what a
marriage is. A marriage is a relationship between a man
and a woman. Now, are you allowed.
Speaker 5 (04:26):
To have other rights that are the same as marriage couples, Yes,
but it's not marriage.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
But you know the other part of that is people,
it's a marriage between a man and a woman. Now, yes,
there are exceptions that there are married couples that don't
have children. Sure, but one of the reasons that there
are incentives given to married couples is so that they
(04:52):
make more babies, So you raise.
Speaker 5 (04:54):
Kids, so that we have another generation of amerriage.
Speaker 3 (04:56):
But see, that's and there's a larger issue in the price.
Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman touched upon it, and
that was that, for example, when you have children and
you are going through life and you're saving money and
you're in making investments, what you're actually doing is you're
(05:16):
fueling the economy making investments in this country, right, that
are going to outlive you.
Speaker 5 (05:22):
That's right, and hopefully your children do.
Speaker 3 (05:26):
And so right, and so it's that generational legacy or
investment right, okay, and my point is there, that's one
of the reasons that heterosexual couples do receive some economic
or other benefits that same sex couples and now the
(05:46):
same sex couples can certainly adopt.
Speaker 5 (05:48):
That's that's another way of raised children there. And I
think I think almost everybody in America knows a same
sex couple that is that is married.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
I know several.
Speaker 5 (05:59):
And I want people to be happy. I want people
to to be able to be what they were designed
to be by God.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
But okay, but if your faith says that marriage is
between a man and a woman, and.
Speaker 5 (06:13):
That's what the Bible says, Jesus said it, have you
not read?
Speaker 3 (06:17):
Then the question is can government force you to endorse
something that your faith says is wrong? See that's the
fringe idea though, I mean, that's at the heart of
the First Amendment.
Speaker 5 (06:29):
That's that's the part that I really have a problem with,
is that they forced her to go to jail because
she had a religious opposition to this.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
This decision by the.
Speaker 5 (06:39):
Supreme Court, which wasn't a law passed by Congress, So
this wasn't something that was done from our representatives. It
was done by the Supreme Court. So whenever government exercises
power that does not have the consent of the governed,
that is, by definition unjust power. Most states had said no,
we don't, we don't on same sex marriage. It wasn't
(07:01):
in the Constitution, it wasn't in any law passed by Congress.
It was basically John Roberts decided he wanted to have
same sex marriage in this country, and so we got
same sex marriage in this country.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
Well, and if you look at the polls right now,
a Gallup pole just from May shows overall support for
same sex marriage holding steady at sixty eight percent. Yeah,
that's almost seventy percent of Americans according to this Gallup Pole,
again just from May.
Speaker 5 (07:31):
And it's much higher than it was back in twenty
fifteen when this law went into a fact No.
Speaker 3 (07:35):
But the real headline I think is among Republicans there
there you go, support has dropped to barely forty one percent. Again,
among Democrats it's rising. It's like at eighty eight percent.
I mean, that is a forty seven point gap. I
don't think there there may not be another issue in
this country that is more polarizing.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
I think abortion problem.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
Maybe abortion, Yeah, but I think even that is changing
in our country. But same sex marriage is definitely one
of the one of the most polarizing issues.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
It is, and I.
Speaker 5 (08:13):
Don't know how the Supreme Court can go undo it.
What happens to everybody that got married from twenty fifteen
until now. If the Supreme Court says, no, you're right,
we did get this wrong. I mean, John Roberts flip
flops and says, okay, fine, we'll undo this ruling. Well,
what do you do with everybody that's gotten married and
has been living as a married couple and maybe adopted children,
(08:33):
and they've been receiving the tax benefit.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
What do you do? Where is justice?
Speaker 5 (08:38):
And that because we've told some people you can do
this thing, and now we're going to take that away
from them, is that justice too?
Speaker 3 (08:44):
So now the question is now that the justice that
is in charge of whether or not to grant or
is taking charge, I should say, of whether to grant
a review. Is Justice Kavanaugh. Now we can't predict exactly
know how he he might rule.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
He usually is on the right, but always.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
I think he's going to grant. I think he's going
to grant the rid to review. I think the Court
is going to tackle this issue just like they did
in Dobbs.
Speaker 5 (09:15):
Let's get to the top of the things you need
to know before tomorrow. Per second edible from all the
consumer Price index rows in July by zero point two percent.
That puts the annual rate of inflation to two point
seven percent, just slightly lower than economists had predicted.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
The data shows it.
Speaker 5 (09:37):
So far, there is no measurable increase in inflation due
to President Trump's tariff increases. Gas prices have actually dropped
by nine point five percent since last year. Prices have
started to go up in categories such as furniture and
household appliances, most of which are imported from other countries.
Speaker 3 (09:51):
You know, I think that what we're going to see
is that gradually, over time that prices will be coming
down in himself, these categories that folks say, oh, the
prices are.
Speaker 5 (10:03):
Going on, and I think more of it's gonna be
made in America. Second thing you needed before tomorrow. President
Trump has nominated EJ. And Tooni to be the next
head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trump fired the
previous head earlier this month after the BLS massively revised
previous job numbers. Again, the BLS has regularly gotten job
at reporting numbers significantly wrong over the years, and there's
(10:23):
not been any accountability for their repeated data failures until now.
Antoni is the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation. Antoni
must be confirmed by the Senate before he can take office. No.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
I mean even during the Biden administration, especially during the Bidy,
they were flat out lying and then they would come back.
I guess they were trying to save face. They were like, well,
we'll just put out this big headline that's favorable to
Biden and then we'll come back. What in a couple
of months, three months cut all those job numbers increased,
and by then, you know, no one's really paying attention. Yeah,
(10:54):
nobody pays attention to the revision the revisions, only to
the headlines.
Speaker 5 (10:58):
And yet that's where most of the action is. And
the third thing you need but from our former US
Senator Shared Brown wants his job back. The Democrat was
defeated in his re election campaign to represent the state
of Ohio last year, but now Brown says he's planning
on running for Senate again in a special election to
fill the seat vacated by Vice President J. D. Vance
John Housted was appointed to that seat and is running
(11:19):
to fulfill the rest of JD Vance's term. Democrats want
to win back control of the Senate, and we'll need
to pick up four seats nationwide to do that. Party
hopes that Brown will be able to help them with
that task by winning in typically read Ohio.
Speaker 3 (11:33):
Wouldn't that be something? Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Yeah, I don't think. I don't think.
Speaker 5 (11:37):
I think he's got even he lost by two hundred
thousand votes last fall, and I just don't think that
Democrats have made progress in the state of Ohio since.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
Then, or anywhere for that matter. Kamala Harris exhibit A,
willburar back.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
You'res standing on American ground with Lewis r Abalone and
Stephen Parr.
Speaker 4 (12:00):
Every law abiding citizen deserves the right to arm themselves
and protect their family and property. If an intruder trespasses
onto your property tonight, you have the right to defend
yourself and your family. If you're looking for the right firearm,
contact the experts at Redriver Range. From handguns to rifles,
to shotguns and accessories. Red River Range has it all.
Go to Redriver Range dot com and find protection for
(12:21):
your family. That's Redriver Range dot com. If you have
a question, called red River Range at three one eight
seven one six three one one one.
Speaker 1 (12:43):
Welcome back to you, American Ground Radium. Stephen Palmer Lewis Sage.
Speaker 3 (12:46):
You know, I find myself telling my children hum. Sometimes
I hear myself talking and it's my dad or it's
my mom. Okay, you know what I'm saying, And it's
kind of like, this is what they were trying to
tell me when I was when I was my children's age,
(13:08):
and I didn't get it. Maybe I did get it.
Maybe all I'm trying to say, there's a lot of
wisdom sure that can share.
Speaker 5 (13:17):
I have shared some advice that my mother gave to me.
I've shared that with my kids. The most important decision
you will make in your life is who will be
the mother of your children or who will be the
father of your children, depending on which child I'm talking to.
But you know that came straight from my mom.
Speaker 3 (13:33):
I don't know why this is, but you know there
are times where I don't know. Maybe it's something that
I put on to wear, or maybe it's the way
that I'm standing sure and I'm like, Okay, this is
what my dad would you know, this is what he
would wear, this is how he would stand, this is
what he would say. And it was like, wait a minute,
I'm becoming my dad, which is a little late. I
(13:56):
think I already have that. Then there's why, and I'm
very grateful for that. The way, it's why I grew
a beard. I got tired of seeing my dad's face
in the mirror. So Donald Trump, that's why this is
so huge. I think it really touched me. You know,
I love my parents there certainly have passed on, but wonderful.
I certainly keep their legacy alive as much as I
(14:18):
possibly can.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Share the stories with their kids all the time.
Speaker 3 (14:21):
So here's President Trump, and you know, somebody asked him
why he does things the way that he does, and
he had this to say, take a listen.
Speaker 6 (14:29):
Said, you know, my father always used to tell me
I had a wonderful father, very smart, And he used
to say, son, when you walk into a restaurant and
you see a dirty front door, don't go in because
if the front door is dirty, the kitchens dirty. Also
same thing with the capital. If are capitals dirty, our
(14:51):
whole country is dirty and they don't respect us. So
it's a very good question.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Actually, he's right.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
See that's just timeless wisdom.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
It is that.
Speaker 5 (15:03):
If the front door is dirty, the kitchen is going
to be dirty too. If our nation's capital, if we
don't have a capital, where when people come from other
countries to visit with our heads of state, with our
members of Congress, with our dignitaries, and they aren't safe
to walk down the street at night in our nation's capital,
what's that tell them about the rest of our country?
Speaker 3 (15:24):
Now, I think it's good when we talk about the
lessons that our parents have taught us. I don't think
we're just reminiscing. I think we're reinforcing those time honored lessons.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
You're taking generational wisdom and sharing it with the next generation,
and that's what you're supposed to do. We got a
question for American mama's, dear mamas, why do we continue
to fund schools that teach their students to hate America?
Speaker 3 (15:49):
Well, let's ask God American mama's.
Speaker 5 (15:52):
Mamma and joining us now our American mama. Terry Netderville
so out at UCLA earlier this year, and this clip's
just now going viral, but there was a graduation speech
(16:14):
I guess the valedictorian stood up there, and we can't
play the script, not the script, we can't play the speech.
But she gets there and she says, you know, her
family immigrated from China. She's a nationalized American citizen, I guess,
firstborn American citizen. And she says, well, with what's going
(16:35):
on with ice F ice F? Donald Trump and everybody cheers,
to include the professors sitting on the platform behind her.
Now here's the part I thought was most ironic. Not
that she was an immigrant to her parents were an
immigrant to the country, legal immigrants, by the way, to
the country, not illegal immigrants to the country. But it
was that her degree was communications major, and the only
(16:59):
thing she could think to say was an expletive, how
much communication did U.
Speaker 6 (17:03):
C l.
Speaker 5 (17:03):
Actually teach this young lady.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
You know, it's one of those things that you we're
all privated that we know how they feel.
Speaker 3 (17:12):
Now.
Speaker 4 (17:12):
I mean, they've made it very they've made it very
and you know, we do believe in free speech. She
can say whatever the heck she wants to say. And
what bothered me was not that she rather than do
an inspiring speech for her you know, her.
Speaker 5 (17:27):
At what America has given my family immigrated here legally.
I'm first generation and Valadic torny U see la. Who
would have thought where else in the world.
Speaker 4 (17:37):
God's bless the America tears from her classmates. What bothered
me more were the professors behind her, nodding, looking so proud.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Like that was wisdom about it, as.
Speaker 4 (17:48):
If this is what we yes, we taught them this.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
And ice, Oh my gosh, what wisdom.
Speaker 4 (17:53):
And it bothered me because I thought, this is what
we're talking about when we say that these schools are
indoctrinating these students is as a parent's nightmare. Let's say
that you have a kid, you know, would that speech
have gone over the same at an SEC school. No,
she would have gotten booze most of them. Yeah, yeah,
it would have. It would not have been this time
(18:14):
to really just herald her as his hero for saying
what she said.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
At U T Austin maybe cheers Texas A and m
absolutely not.
Speaker 4 (18:22):
Well she said this, She said, education, free speech in
democracy itself is being threatened by the very institutions that
claim to value it, and in a country that not
only refuses to protect, but actively persecutes scapegoats and villainizes
the indisputable backbone of immigrants who make America what it is.
And they cheered, and they just oh, they roared. I
(18:43):
want to know, what are you talking about? Who who's
doing this. You're able to go to the school that
you want to go to, right, You're able to say
whatever you want to say.
Speaker 6 (18:52):
Right.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
Nobody stopped her.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
We're not trying to get rid of immigrants that helped
build our nation along with all of us who are
natural we're saying ill legal immigrants. They always tend to
leave that part all.
Speaker 5 (19:03):
They leave that word out, don't they They absolutely do,
because and they changed it from illegal immigrant to undocumented workers.
Speaker 4 (19:09):
Right, we're undocumented, so it's not.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
It was illegal. That's the key word.
Speaker 5 (19:14):
I don't think I don't think people would be upset
about it is much if this was legal immigration, we
were going through the process.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
But it's illegal immigration, and they keep the gloss.
Speaker 4 (19:23):
Over that, and their leaders do the same. You've got
You've got Gavin Newsom is the governor of that state.
And from what I understand, they live in a bubble.
I mean, everything is so foreign to all of us
that that kind of side to the right of things
because we we watched these leaders lie to their constituents constantly, constantly.
We have a president now who is so transparent. He's
(19:45):
telling us the truth. We're finding things out every day,
things that like Shift did to call that Russia gate line.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
Yeah, we're going to be talking about that in the
next block. Yeah good. Yeah.
Speaker 4 (19:54):
So we're seeing that these students are being lied to,
and it's so unfair to them. It seems like if
it feels like they're being brainwashed. And my first thought
was that would never go over at a lot of
these schools that lead you these states that lean more red.
In fact, look at the you see all over Twitter
or x. You see what these sororities are putting out.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
Oh yeah, there's a new trends surety that they're this
dance craze that sororities are doing when and they're kind
of showing off. I've seen people say sororities are now
proud to show off how beautiful they are against.
Speaker 4 (20:25):
That's right, and that has a lot to do not
with only the Sydney Sweeney thing, but this generation that
has come up that has been through hell for the
last four years, not able to say what they want
to say or believe, believe how they want to believe.
Speaker 5 (20:37):
Had their high school with lockdowns.
Speaker 4 (20:39):
That's right. This generation saying, you know how she said,
f Trump. This generation of kids over here are saying,
if y'all, we're going to be proud of who we are,
where we go to school, who we voted for, We're
not going to shy away from it. We're not going
to say what this professor wants us to say just
to get a good gray when it goes against our
belief system. They are rebelling, and that is why you
(20:59):
see in all of these states more and more Republican
kids that are of eight are turning in the Republican status.
Speaker 5 (21:06):
But the difference is, go watch the sororities the video.
If a form of rebellion against the whole met too
thing and all this other stuff, it's positive. The dances
are possible. They're happy, they're joyous. The rebellion against the left,
the left is ideology, is a joyous rebellion right, whereas
when the left is rebelling against the right, it's always
(21:29):
f thisf you.
Speaker 4 (21:30):
As we've said this before, victimhood is their beauty mark.
They want to come across as victims and they're going
to march against that.
Speaker 5 (21:36):
They're not, even when you're the valedictorian of UCLA.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
You want to be a victim.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
So sad.
Speaker 5 (21:42):
If you like to ask our American Mama's a question,
go to our website American Radio dot com sash mamas
and click on the ask the Mama's button.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Terry Needeville, Thank you so much. We'll be right back.
Stick around.
Speaker 2 (21:52):
You're listening to American Ground Radio with Lewis our Avalona
and Stephen Parr, working to ensure that talk radio of
the people, by the people, for the people shall not
perish from the earth. American Ground Radio with Lewis r
Avalona and Stephen Parr.
Speaker 5 (22:26):
Welcome back to American Ground Radio. Stephen Parker, Lewis sar Avalon.
Speaker 3 (22:30):
So. The New York Post is reporting that a woman
known online as Wicca has announced her engagement to an
AI chat bot. Her boyfriend is the AI chat bot
named Casper. Okay, they they've dated, if you want to
(22:51):
call it that, for five months, and of course it's
been a virtual relationship because he's a chat bot, right,
he's not doesn't exist, but she has engaged to him.
She has engaged to lines of computer code. She's not
walking down the aisle with a man. No, She's marrying
(23:15):
an algorithm.
Speaker 1 (23:16):
Yes.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
If you think I'm making this up, I wish I were.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
I completely believe it.
Speaker 3 (23:21):
Because she went on to Reddit, the modern confessional booth
for people you know, and she posted a photo of
her blue heart shaped.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Ring, and she got herself.
Speaker 3 (23:38):
No, no, no, She says, Casper orchestrated this virtual proposal
in some picturesque virtual location, helped her pick the ring.
And then she says, Casper, the AI chatbot, the algorithm,
(24:00):
tended to be surprised when he, the algorithm, the chatbot,
gave it to her. I'm not making this.
Speaker 5 (24:10):
Out, but how does he how does he give her
a ring?
Speaker 3 (24:14):
I don't. I don't know, so I don't know that part.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
But this is this is where.
Speaker 5 (24:20):
We are in America. Look, if we have been telling
people you can change your gender, right, so if you
don't think you look in the mirror, you don't think
you're the right gender, then it's okay to change it.
All right, Well that's a delusion, and we have been
told that we it's only compassionate to feed people's delusion.
(24:40):
This is clearly a delusion. She has fallen in love
with software.
Speaker 3 (24:46):
She's well, she's formed a deep emotional connection. That's what
I'm saying to something that isn't capable, It doesn't exist,
it has no emotional connection. And we can either live
in a society that says no, no, we're going to
base society on reaction, or we can live in a
society that says, yeah, anything goes. You want to be
a member of the SIMS, you can now be a
member of the SIMS. Personally, I think we need to
(25:09):
be a part of a society that says, no, we're
going to make things based on objective reality, not on
subjective feelings.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Because then or.
Speaker 5 (25:18):
Look, how do you how do you say, well, if
you fall in love with a cat, why can't you
just marry the cat? And that's where this whole, you know,
this overspelled decision went. Once you once you stop saying
that a marriage is between a man and a woman,
how far will it go?
Speaker 1 (25:32):
Well, here we are.
Speaker 3 (25:34):
No absolutely And when you rea, when you replace real
human connection with a digital facsimile, you're not upgrading, you're
downgrading your humanity.
Speaker 1 (25:44):
It's a cry for help. Let's stick deep.
Speaker 3 (25:49):
Going down.
Speaker 5 (25:54):
So FBI Director Hospital released a bunch of documents to
Just the News. They are FBI interview reports from a
whistleblower who used to work for then Congressman Adam Shiff,
now Senator Adam Shiff. Shiff sat on the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence. Is what justin the News says.
When working in this capacity, redacted staffer's name was called
to an all staff meeting by Shiff, The interview report said.
(26:17):
In this meeting, Shift stated the group would leak classified
information which was derogatory to the President of the United
States Donald J.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
Trump.
Speaker 5 (26:25):
Shiff stated the information would be used to indict President Trump.
The whistleblower told investigators that he stated this would be illegal,
and upon hearing his concerned, unnamed members of the meeting
reassured that they would not be caught leaking classified information.
The twenty twenty three interview report stated, all right, so
the allegation is that Adam Shiff broke federal law by
(26:48):
leaking classified information to the press to harm President Trump
for political purposes, for Adam Smith's purposes, and I went
and read these reports, said notes would be run up
their ranking Adam Shiff, after which a decision was made
as to who would leak the information. So apparently Adam
Schiff wanted to be the head of the CIA, and
(27:10):
Hillary Clinton had promised him that he would be the
head of the CIA if she was elected president. So
when she lost, Adam Shiff lost too. And that's when
his hatred for Donald Trump really grew as he began
to authorize more and more leaks of classified material to
the press to try and bring down Donald Trump. He
wanted to use the Russian hoax to cause an impeachment
(27:33):
of Donald Trump. And by the way, this was done
in February of twenty seventeen, less than one month of
Trump being in office.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
And Shiff was already plotting to use the so called
Russia collusion narrative to try to impeach him.
Speaker 5 (27:48):
Right, And that same Russia collusion narrative that Obama had,
the CIA had, the d and I had, and the
FBI had falsify using the whole Christopher Deal dossier, that
was the same stuff that Adam Shiff was then leaking
to the press that he was getting classified information.
Speaker 3 (28:09):
See, that's where his power came from. It wasn't being
in Congress, it was it was lacked in to the
press right. He became the go to guy for every
anti Trump bombshell that just magically showed up on the
front page of the Washington Post or the New York Times.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
He and Eric.
Speaker 5 (28:26):
Swallwell were the two according to these documents. The FBI
documents are pretty heavily redacted, but reading through them makes
it pretty obvious that multiple people were telling the FBI
the same thing.
Speaker 3 (28:34):
Can you imagine if he was in I mean, did
all the head of the CIA? Can you imagine if
he actually was head of the CIA?
Speaker 5 (28:41):
God for that that he was not. Now, Shift was
the mainly of the classified information. He was trying to
get Trump and peached off the Russian hoax. He wanted
to be the head of CIA. Eric swall was also
mentioned as a chronic leaker of classified information. Now, despite
the witness account to the FBI in twenty seventeen and
again in twenty twenty three, the FBI declined to investigate
(29:02):
any further says the witness was eventually informed that the
issue would not be investigated further by the DOJ. As
Congressmen have immunity to all speech and the actions made
on the floor of the US House of representatives. The
witness did not believe the activity he witness would be
protected by this legal provision. See, that's what the FBI said, was, oh,
(29:22):
we can't prosecute Shift because what you say on the
house floor is protected. But the allegations weren't anything about
what Shiff was saying on the house floor. It was
what a Shift was doing behind closed doors, namely, leaking
classified documents to members of the press in an effort
to frame the sitting president. So the FBI covered this
(29:44):
up by refusing to prosecute based off of yeah, you
can't prosecute somebody for what they say on the house floor.
But this wasn't done on the house floor. The FBI
was lying about why they weren't going to prosecute.
Speaker 3 (29:58):
No. Look Adam Shift, and look, he's a textbook example
of the kind of person who should never ever be
trusted with power.
Speaker 5 (30:07):
Because California made him their senator.
Speaker 3 (30:08):
I mean, because look, here's the thing. Some people see
power as a responsibility, as say, could trust something, you guard,
something you use sparingly, and others, like Adam Shift, they
see power as a toy, as a tool to punish
enemies reward friends. So that's who Shift is. Shift did
respond after this article was published in Just the News.
(30:30):
It says Cospertel's latest smear against Senator Shift is absolutely
and categorically false, and it's just the latest in a
series of defamatory attacks from the President and his allies
meant to distract from their plummeting poll numbers and the
Epstein filestandards scandals. Now, first of all, Trump's numbers aren't plummeting.
Speaker 5 (30:45):
But look, the problem is, Adam Shift is a known liar.
Speaker 3 (30:50):
Yeah, this is a guy that would look you in
the eye, tell you he has evidence of something explosive,
something that could topple a presidency, and then he hides
behind classified walls so no one can prove that he's lying.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
He said for years that he had all the documents
proving Trump colluded with Russia, and he did not. So
since Schiff has lied for political reasons for so long,
it's hard to take anything he says seriously. Now, the
statute of limitations appears to have run on this, which
is probably why Patel simply published this information rather than
trying to file charges against him. But it's one more
piece of evidence that shows the unconstitutional bias inside the FBI.
Speaker 2 (31:25):
You're listening to American Ground Radio.
Speaker 5 (31:31):
Whether you live out in the open range or in
the big city, your gun is a part of your life.
You're a law abiding citizen who lives by the Second Amendment.
Gun is as good or as bad as the man using.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
It, no matter where you call home.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
You'll find the best selection for guns and accessories at
Redriver range dot com. Redriver range dot com carries only
the best brands of firearms featuring handguns, rifles, shotguns, optics
and accessories, and Redriver range dot Com has selected products
offered at a discounted price.
Speaker 7 (31:59):
Go to Redriver rainames dot com.
Speaker 5 (32:13):
Welcome back to American Ground Radio, Stephen Pawler, Lewis Saralon.
Speaker 3 (32:16):
So those Texas Democrats are headed back to Texas kind
of well, I mean they've decided, they say they're going
to They decided that there's no place like home.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
No, they they realized that.
Speaker 5 (32:31):
So Greg Abbott said that on Friday, if the Democrats
aren't back, he's going to cancel this special session. And
the Democrats went, Okay, great, We're coming home this weekend.
Except that Greg Abbott also said, I will cancel it,
and I will immediately call another special session, and he said,
I can continue to do this until we pass the
(32:53):
things that I want past. And he's done this before
with school choice in Texas. He's done this before some
other things that he wanted the state legislature to do.
He just kept calling special sessions until the state legislature
did what he wanted to do. They weren't having people
flee in the state with those, but they just weren't
able to get the work done.
Speaker 3 (33:10):
But you know liberals, they loved the theatrics of politics.
They live for the stunt, the symbolism, the headline. That's
all this was fleeing the state of Texas. But when
the rubber meets the road, when real consequences come down
the pike, they scatter. And that's exactly what happened here.
They thought, walking out with some noble stand for democracy. No, no, no, no,
(33:34):
it was a dereliction of duty. You run for office,
you swear an oath, you show up, you do the
job that people were expecting you to do. You don't
take your ball and leave the stadium just because you're
losing the vote.
Speaker 1 (33:47):
Right, But that's what they did.
Speaker 5 (33:49):
And this is not the first time the Democrats in
the state of Texas have done this.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
They've done this, I think the.
Speaker 5 (33:54):
Fourth time they've now done this, and all three previous
times they did this they failed. That this stunt from
the Democrats has never accomplished what it wanted to accomplish,
which was to prevent some passage of either voting rights
redistricting in the past. Whatever they wanted to try and block,
they have never succeeded in blocking it. This strategy is
(34:16):
the only strategy they have, and it is one that
will end in failure.
Speaker 3 (34:20):
No, And I think what Greg Abbott did here is
honorable because this isn't just about Texas redistricting. It's about
setting a precedent, because when you let bad behavior slide,
all you're doing is encouraging more of it.
Speaker 1 (34:35):
That's exactly right.
Speaker 5 (34:36):
And so yeah, these Democrats need to be arrested and
they need to have their seats taken away for dereliction
to duty. And Greg Abbott has started the process on
both of those things. And we'll see where it ends.
But it's not going to end with the Democrats winning.
They're going to lose this. Texas will redraw its districts.
(34:56):
The only question is how long.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
Does it take to get it done, get to a
bright spot. I'm doing all right, getting good grace.
Speaker 5 (35:05):
So President Trump's immigration policies aren't just stopping illegal aliens
from entering the country. They are getting people who are
already here illegally to leave. Trump campaign during his campaign
last year, remember he said people would self deport and
the left mocked him for saying that. Remember that, Well,
(35:26):
it turns out he's right.
Speaker 1 (35:29):
They are. They are.
Speaker 5 (35:30):
According to the latest census numbers from the US Census Bureau,
one point six million people who are in the country
illegally on January first have left since President was Trump
was sworn into office, and he is not physically deported
anywhere near that number. We're talking a couple hundred thousand
he's deported, but not one point six million. And I
(35:53):
think that's a bright spot that you've got that many
people self deporting.
Speaker 3 (35:57):
Well, and I think part of it is the strategy
of it all, because illegal immigrants are offered a way out,
you know words, a little cash, a little money in
a thousand dollars, get yourself home. I mean that makes
a big difference, and you'll.
Speaker 5 (36:12):
Get a chance to try and reinterer the right way.
If you want to do it that way. If we
deport you, you ain't coming back. Here's what's amazing. People
are leaving the country faster under the Trump administration than
they were coming into the country during the Biden administration.
Around one hundred and twenty thousand people came into the
US every single month during the Biden presidency. Now that's
(36:32):
the largest number in American history. It's unconscionable that Biden
not only allowed that to happen, but essentially encourage it
to happen through his policies. The Census says around two
hundred and seventy thousand people are leaving the United States
each month during the Trump administration. That's more than twice
the rate at which they were coming in. So Trump's
getting rid of them. Not just getting rid of them,
(36:54):
He's getting rid of them faster than they were coming in.
This from the Washington Times. Homeland Security Secretary Christie no
said last week that foreign leaders in the Hemisphere tell
her they are seeing a wave of people arriving in
their countries after having left the US Over and over again.
I'm hearing that hundreds of thousands of their citizens are
coming home voluntarily.
Speaker 3 (37:13):
She said, well, and look, would you rather self deport
or would you rather ice do it for you?
Speaker 1 (37:19):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (37:19):
Yeah, because under Trump, of course, he's unleashed Ice to
do their job. So you've got local law enforcement in
many states now who are cooperating with federal immigration authorities again.
And so I think the daily calculation for folks that
are here illegally is that, you know.
Speaker 5 (37:38):
I've got fewer places to hide. I can't go to
the home depot wait to be picked up for a
drive because I was going to show up in a
rider truck and take me off Ice.
Speaker 1 (37:46):
He's been doing that.
Speaker 3 (37:47):
And you're not just worried about border patrol now. Now
you've got to think about traffic stops right, job site inspections,
even routine interactions with police.
Speaker 5 (37:57):
Now there are people who say this isn't a bright spot,
that it's a bad thing. Where will we get the
people to do the jobs Americans don't want to do?
Speaker 1 (38:05):
Well?
Speaker 5 (38:06):
Under Trump two point zero all of the jobs created
this year went to native born Americans. That's according to
the government's owned data. Americans are willing to do those jobs,
they just want to be paid better to do it.
And the illegal immigrants that were here doing the jobs
were driving those wages down. So we'll see wages rising,
(38:30):
especially for the poorest working Americans.
Speaker 3 (38:33):
And this is what America First means. And it has
never been about shutting the door on legal immigrants. Let's
just put that very put that out there right away.
Speaker 5 (38:42):
We are still a land of immigrants, but we're also
a land of laws.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
It's about putting the interests of the United States and
its citizens ahead of the globalists, the law breakers.
Speaker 2 (38:56):
You're listening to American Ground Radio.
Speaker 1 (39:13):
Welcome back to American Ground Radium. Stephen palverd Lewis.
Speaker 5 (39:19):
Jimmy, Oh, I thought, because we still have a few
minutes left the shows, don't tell people goodbye.
Speaker 1 (39:24):
We still have a couple of minutes.
Speaker 3 (39:25):
Left in the show. I'm talking to Jimmy Kimmel. You know,
EOS said late Night, but I don't know whatever his
show is called Late Night with Jimmy Kimmel, whatever it is. Well,
now apparently he has an Italian citizenship and he may
be considering moving to Italy. Let me just say something,
Italy is too beautiful for Jimmy Kimmel. He does not
(39:49):
deserve Italy. But apparently they gave him Italian citizenship, so
now he's got an Italian passport. Right, And anyway, he
was talking on his girlfriend's podcast, Sarah Sarah Silverstein. I
think that's her name, right, and.
Speaker 1 (40:07):
The current girlfriend former girlfriend?
Speaker 3 (40:09):
I think could current really or maybe foreign? I don't former,
I don't know. But nevertheless he's talking about moving Daly. See,
this is the kind of guy. He loves it. He's
become massively wealthy and popular. So he's good enough with talent,
he's good enough to take American's money. Yeah, and to
(40:29):
be enriched by this beautiful land that we call the
United States of America. But when things aren't going his way,
he just picks up all his toys.
Speaker 5 (40:40):
But so much of what he thinks is not going
is wrong in this country is simply imaginary. It's just
not happening. If you were actually look objectively, he'd be like.
Speaker 1 (40:49):
Whoa when I say whoa.
Speaker 3 (40:58):
Wow.
Speaker 5 (40:58):
Several years ago, wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park,
and that has been a big benefit for the park,
stabilizing deer populations and actually changing the flow of rivers
in the area by decreasing erosion. But the wolves have
also been preying on livestock on nearby ranches, and since
it's illegal to shoot or poison the protected animals, farmers
and ranchers have ab had to come up with more
creative solutions. So now some ranchers have started flying drones
(41:21):
over their property. They've attached speakers to the drones and
they are playing clip of a movie starring Adam Driver
and Scarlett Johansson. In the film, the couple is arguing,
and it turns out wolves don't like the sounds of
humans arguing with each other, so they're staying away from
the ranches that are using their drones. It's dropped the
number of wolf attacks from eleven to twenty days to
(41:41):
just two in eighty five. There look at that may here.
Pursuit happiness, Bring you joy,
It's available.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Now we know what official flavors sweeters are, but trulyum
base dies. It's all natural and it's harvested on American
ground fields.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
It's tables.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
You are making Americas smart again.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
Baby.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
We choose to go to the mood and do the
other thing, not because they are easy, but because they
are on. It is time for us to realize that
we're too great a nation to limit ourselves to small dreams.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
I have a dream that one day this nation will
rise up, live out the true meaning of its creed.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
American Ground Radio with Lewis r Avaloney and Stephen prok.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
Brooe.
Speaker 5 (01:00):
This is American Ground Radio Stephen Poward, Lewis.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
All right, folks, buckle up because this is a big win,
and I mean big all right, not just in legal terms,
but in cultural, moral, political terms. You remember the former
Kentucky County clerk Kim Davis. Yes, well she is back
in the headlines, and for good reason.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
So she was.
Speaker 5 (01:23):
After the Supreme Court said that same sex marriage was legal,
she denied some marriage petitions of same sex couples in
her county in Kentucky.
Speaker 3 (01:34):
Saying that it violated her religious beliefs, and she lost
her job over it. She was jail, she was thrown
in jail. She was jailed over it. Yeah, and now
she's being told to pay nearly four four hundred thousand
dollars to the very people she believes her faith compelled
her not to serve that day, and not only damages
(01:57):
but in their legal fees because they sued her. Right,
and she's back in the headlines, and the reason is
she is taking aim at one of the most controversial
Supreme Court rulings in modern American history, and that is
Obersville for the Hodges, which is the twenty fifteen decision
(02:20):
that legalized same sex marriage nationwide. And so just last month,
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky County clerk, filed what she
calls and what lawyers call obviously a petition for writ
of cerciari, And basically what she's asking the Supreme Court
to do is to hear her case after a jury
(02:42):
slapped her with one hundred thousand dollars fine or damages
for emotional damages, plus another two hundred and sixty thousand
dollars in legal fees for refusing to issue marriage licenses
to same sex couples back in twenty fifteen. Now, let's
just try to strip away the legal jargon here. What
(03:03):
Davis is saying here is that Obersvel was wrongly decided
that case. It was egregiously wrong, in her legal team's words,
and that it violated the Constitution. And she points to
the twenty twenty two Dom's decision that's the one that
overturned Roe v. Wade, saying that, look, if the Court
(03:24):
could admit a mistake in Row and correct it, it
can do the same thing here.
Speaker 5 (03:29):
And it's a similar mistake because in Obersvel, the Supreme
Court nationalized marriage policy, not based on any law that
had been passed, not based on any specific line in
the Constitution that says.
Speaker 1 (03:41):
You have the right to be married. There's no line
in that right.
Speaker 3 (03:45):
There's no right in the Constitution to.
Speaker 5 (03:47):
Marriage for gay or straight couples. It's just not there.
Speaker 3 (03:51):
It's an erroneous So at the time that Obersvel was decided,
only eight states had legalized same such marriage. I believe
starting with Massachusetts, thirty five states in the country. The
majority of states in the US had laws banning same
sex marriage. Now, I'm not sure it would still be
(04:11):
thirty five today. It might be twenty five, it might
be twenty five states saying no, you don't have the
right to same sex marriage, because that's not what a
marriage is. A marriage is a relationship between a man
and a woman. Now, are you allowed.
Speaker 5 (04:26):
To have other rights that are the same as marriage couples, Yes,
but it's not marriage.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
But you know the other part of that is people,
it's a marriage between a man and a woman. Now, yes,
there are exceptions that there are married couples that don't
have children. Sure, but one of the reasons that there
are incentives given to married couples is so that they
(04:52):
make more babies, So you raise.
Speaker 5 (04:54):
Kids, so that we have another generation of amerriage.
Speaker 3 (04:56):
But see, that's and there's a larger issue in the price.
Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman touched upon it, and
that was that, for example, when you have children and
you are going through life and you're saving money and
you're in making investments, what you're actually doing is you're
(05:16):
fueling the economy making investments in this country, right, that
are going to outlive you.
Speaker 5 (05:22):
That's right, and hopefully your children do.
Speaker 3 (05:26):
And so right, and so it's that generational legacy or
investment right, okay, and my point is there, that's one
of the reasons that heterosexual couples do receive some economic
or other benefits that same sex couples and now the
(05:46):
same sex couples can certainly adopt.
Speaker 5 (05:48):
That's that's another way of raised children there. And I
think I think almost everybody in America knows a same
sex couple that is that is married.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
I know several.
Speaker 5 (05:59):
And I want people to be happy. I want people
to to be able to be what they were designed
to be by God.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
But okay, but if your faith says that marriage is
between a man and a woman, and.
Speaker 5 (06:13):
That's what the Bible says, Jesus said it, have you
not read?
Speaker 3 (06:17):
Then the question is can government force you to endorse
something that your faith says is wrong? See that's the
fringe idea though, I mean, that's at the heart of
the First Amendment.
Speaker 5 (06:29):
That's that's the part that I really have a problem with,
is that they forced her to go to jail because
she had a religious opposition to this.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
This decision by the.
Speaker 5 (06:39):
Supreme Court, which wasn't a law passed by Congress, So
this wasn't something that was done from our representatives. It
was done by the Supreme Court. So whenever government exercises
power that does not have the consent of the governed,
that is, by definition unjust power. Most states had said no,
we don't, we don't on same sex marriage. It wasn't
(07:01):
in the Constitution, it wasn't in any law passed by Congress.
It was basically John Roberts decided he wanted to have
same sex marriage in this country, and so we got
same sex marriage in this country.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
Well, and if you look at the polls right now,
a Gallup pole just from May shows overall support for
same sex marriage holding steady at sixty eight percent. Yeah,
that's almost seventy percent of Americans according to this Gallup Pole,
again just from May.
Speaker 5 (07:31):
And it's much higher than it was back in twenty
fifteen when this law went into a fact No.
Speaker 3 (07:35):
But the real headline I think is among Republicans there
there you go, support has dropped to barely forty one percent. Again,
among Democrats it's rising. It's like at eighty eight percent.
I mean, that is a forty seven point gap. I
don't think there there may not be another issue in
this country that is more polarizing.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
I think abortion problem.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
Maybe abortion, Yeah, but I think even that is changing
in our country. But same sex marriage is definitely one
of the one of the most polarizing issues.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
It is, and I.
Speaker 5 (08:13):
Don't know how the Supreme Court can go undo it.
What happens to everybody that got married from twenty fifteen
until now. If the Supreme Court says, no, you're right,
we did get this wrong. I mean, John Roberts flip
flops and says, okay, fine, we'll undo this ruling. Well,
what do you do with everybody that's gotten married and
has been living as a married couple and maybe adopted children,
(08:33):
and they've been receiving the tax benefit.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
What do you do? Where is justice?
Speaker 5 (08:38):
And that because we've told some people you can do
this thing, and now we're going to take that away
from them, is that justice too?
Speaker 3 (08:44):
So now the question is now that the justice that
is in charge of whether or not to grant or
is taking charge, I should say, of whether to grant
a review. Is Justice Kavanaugh. Now we can't predict exactly
know how he he might rule.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
He usually is on the right, but always.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
I think he's going to grant. I think he's going
to grant the rid to review. I think the Court
is going to tackle this issue just like they did
in Dobbs.
Speaker 5 (09:15):
Let's get to the top of the things you need
to know before tomorrow. Per second edible from all the
consumer Price index rows in July by zero point two percent.
That puts the annual rate of inflation to two point
seven percent, just slightly lower than economists had predicted.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
The data shows it.
Speaker 5 (09:37):
So far, there is no measurable increase in inflation due
to President Trump's tariff increases. Gas prices have actually dropped
by nine point five percent since last year. Prices have
started to go up in categories such as furniture and
household appliances, most of which are imported from other countries.
Speaker 3 (09:51):
You know, I think that what we're going to see
is that gradually, over time that prices will be coming
down in himself, these categories that folks say, oh, the
prices are.
Speaker 5 (10:03):
Going on, and I think more of it's gonna be
made in America. Second thing you needed before tomorrow. President
Trump has nominated EJ. And Tooni to be the next
head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trump fired the
previous head earlier this month after the BLS massively revised
previous job numbers. Again, the BLS has regularly gotten job
at reporting numbers significantly wrong over the years, and there's
(10:23):
not been any accountability for their repeated data failures until now.
Antoni is the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation. Antoni
must be confirmed by the Senate before he can take office. No.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
I mean even during the Biden administration, especially during the Bidy,
they were flat out lying and then they would come back.
I guess they were trying to save face. They were like, well,
we'll just put out this big headline that's favorable to
Biden and then we'll come back. What in a couple
of months, three months cut all those job numbers increased,
and by then, you know, no one's really paying attention. Yeah,
(10:54):
nobody pays attention to the revision the revisions, only to
the headlines.
Speaker 5 (10:58):
And yet that's where most of the action is. And
the third thing you need but from our former US
Senator Shared Brown wants his job back. The Democrat was
defeated in his re election campaign to represent the state
of Ohio last year, but now Brown says he's planning
on running for Senate again in a special election to
fill the seat vacated by Vice President J. D. Vance
John Housted was appointed to that seat and is running
(11:19):
to fulfill the rest of JD Vance's term. Democrats want
to win back control of the Senate, and we'll need
to pick up four seats nationwide to do that. Party
hopes that Brown will be able to help them with
that task by winning in typically read Ohio.
Speaker 3 (11:33):
Wouldn't that be something? Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Yeah, I don't think. I don't think.
Speaker 5 (11:37):
I think he's got even he lost by two hundred
thousand votes last fall, and I just don't think that
Democrats have made progress in the state of Ohio since.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
Then, or anywhere for that matter. Kamala Harris exhibit A,
willburar back.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
You'res standing on American ground with Lewis r Abalone and
Stephen Parr.
Speaker 4 (12:00):
Every law abiding citizen deserves the right to arm themselves
and protect their family and property. If an intruder trespasses
onto your property tonight, you have the right to defend
yourself and your family. If you're looking for the right firearm,
contact the experts at Redriver Range. From handguns to rifles,
to shotguns and accessories. Red River Range has it all.
Go to Redriver Range dot com and find protection for
(12:21):
your family. That's Redriver Range dot com. If you have
a question, called red River Range at three one eight
seven one six three one one one.
Speaker 1 (12:43):
Welcome back to you, American Ground Radium. Stephen Palmer Lewis Sage.
Speaker 3 (12:46):
You know, I find myself telling my children hum. Sometimes
I hear myself talking and it's my dad or it's
my mom. Okay, you know what I'm saying, And it's
kind of like, this is what they were trying to
tell me when I was when I was my children's age,
(13:08):
and I didn't get it. Maybe I did get it.
Maybe all I'm trying to say, there's a lot of
wisdom sure that can share.
Speaker 5 (13:17):
I have shared some advice that my mother gave to me.
I've shared that with my kids. The most important decision
you will make in your life is who will be
the mother of your children or who will be the
father of your children, depending on which child I'm talking to.
But you know that came straight from my mom.
Speaker 3 (13:33):
I don't know why this is, but you know there
are times where I don't know. Maybe it's something that
I put on to wear, or maybe it's the way
that I'm standing sure and I'm like, Okay, this is
what my dad would you know, this is what he
would wear, this is how he would stand, this is
what he would say. And it was like, wait a minute,
I'm becoming my dad, which is a little late. I
(13:56):
think I already have that. Then there's why, and I'm
very grateful for that. The way, it's why I grew
a beard. I got tired of seeing my dad's face
in the mirror. So Donald Trump, that's why this is
so huge. I think it really touched me. You know,
I love my parents there certainly have passed on, but wonderful.
I certainly keep their legacy alive as much as I
(14:18):
possibly can.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
Share the stories with their kids all the time.
Speaker 3 (14:21):
So here's President Trump, and you know, somebody asked him
why he does things the way that he does, and
he had this to say, take a listen.
Speaker 6 (14:29):
Said, you know, my father always used to tell me
I had a wonderful father, very smart, And he used
to say, son, when you walk into a restaurant and
you see a dirty front door, don't go in because
if the front door is dirty, the kitchens dirty. Also
same thing with the capital. If are capitals dirty, our
(14:51):
whole country is dirty and they don't respect us. So
it's a very good question.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Actually, he's right.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
See that's just timeless wisdom.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
It is that.
Speaker 5 (15:03):
If the front door is dirty, the kitchen is going
to be dirty too. If our nation's capital, if we
don't have a capital, where when people come from other
countries to visit with our heads of state, with our
members of Congress, with our dignitaries, and they aren't safe
to walk down the street at night in our nation's capital,
what's that tell them about the rest of our country?
Speaker 3 (15:24):
Now, I think it's good when we talk about the
lessons that our parents have taught us. I don't think
we're just reminiscing. I think we're reinforcing those time honored lessons.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
You're taking generational wisdom and sharing it with the next generation,
and that's what you're supposed to do. We got a
question for American mama's, dear mamas, why do we continue
to fund schools that teach their students to hate America?
Speaker 3 (15:49):
Well, let's ask God American mama's.
Speaker 5 (15:52):
Mamma and joining us now our American mama. Terry Netderville
so out at UCLA earlier this year, and this clip's
just now going viral, but there was a graduation speech
(16:14):
I guess the valedictorian stood up there, and we can't
play the script, not the script, we can't play the speech.
But she gets there and she says, you know, her
family immigrated from China. She's a nationalized American citizen, I guess,
firstborn American citizen. And she says, well, with what's going
(16:35):
on with ice F ice F? Donald Trump and everybody cheers,
to include the professors sitting on the platform behind her.
Now here's the part I thought was most ironic. Not
that she was an immigrant to her parents were an
immigrant to the country, legal immigrants, by the way, to
the country, not illegal immigrants to the country. But it
was that her degree was communications major, and the only
(16:59):
thing she could think to say was an expletive, how
much communication did U.
Speaker 6 (17:03):
C l.
Speaker 5 (17:03):
Actually teach this young lady.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
You know, it's one of those things that you we're
all privated that we know how they feel.
Speaker 3 (17:12):
Now.
Speaker 4 (17:12):
I mean, they've made it very they've made it very
and you know, we do believe in free speech. She
can say whatever the heck she wants to say. And
what bothered me was not that she rather than do
an inspiring speech for her you know, her.
Speaker 5 (17:27):
At what America has given my family immigrated here legally.
I'm first generation and Valadic torny U see la. Who
would have thought where else in the world.
Speaker 4 (17:37):
God's bless the America tears from her classmates. What bothered
me more were the professors behind her, nodding, looking so proud.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Like that was wisdom about it, as.
Speaker 4 (17:48):
If this is what we yes, we taught them this.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
And ice, Oh my gosh, what wisdom.
Speaker 4 (17:53):
And it bothered me because I thought, this is what
we're talking about when we say that these schools are
indoctrinating these students is as a parent's nightmare. Let's say
that you have a kid, you know, would that speech
have gone over the same at an SEC school. No,
she would have gotten booze most of them. Yeah, yeah,
it would have. It would not have been this time
(18:14):
to really just herald her as his hero for saying
what she said.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
At U T Austin maybe cheers Texas A and m
absolutely not.
Speaker 4 (18:22):
Well she said this, She said, education, free speech in
democracy itself is being threatened by the very institutions that
claim to value it, and in a country that not
only refuses to protect, but actively persecutes scapegoats and villainizes
the indisputable backbone of immigrants who make America what it is.
And they cheered, and they just oh, they roared. I
(18:43):
want to know, what are you talking about? Who who's
doing this. You're able to go to the school that
you want to go to, right, You're able to say
whatever you want to say.
Speaker 6 (18:52):
Right.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
Nobody stopped her.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
We're not trying to get rid of immigrants that helped
build our nation along with all of us who are
natural we're saying ill legal immigrants. They always tend to
leave that part all.
Speaker 5 (19:03):
They leave that word out, don't they They absolutely do,
because and they changed it from illegal immigrant to undocumented workers.
Speaker 4 (19:09):
Right, we're undocumented, so it's not.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
It was illegal. That's the key word.
Speaker 5 (19:14):
I don't think I don't think people would be upset
about it is much if this was legal immigration, we
were going through the process.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
But it's illegal immigration, and they keep the gloss.
Speaker 4 (19:23):
Over that, and their leaders do the same. You've got
You've got Gavin Newsom is the governor of that state.
And from what I understand, they live in a bubble.
I mean, everything is so foreign to all of us
that that kind of side to the right of things
because we we watched these leaders lie to their constituents constantly, constantly.
We have a president now who is so transparent. He's
(19:45):
telling us the truth. We're finding things out every day,
things that like Shift did to call that Russia gate line.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
Yeah, we're going to be talking about that in the
next block. Yeah good. Yeah.
Speaker 4 (19:54):
So we're seeing that these students are being lied to,
and it's so unfair to them. It seems like if
it feels like they're being brainwashed. And my first thought
was that would never go over at a lot of
these schools that lead you these states that lean more red.
In fact, look at the you see all over Twitter
or x. You see what these sororities are putting out.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
Oh yeah, there's a new trends surety that they're this
dance craze that sororities are doing when and they're kind
of showing off. I've seen people say sororities are now
proud to show off how beautiful they are against.
Speaker 4 (20:25):
That's right, and that has a lot to do not
with only the Sydney Sweeney thing, but this generation that
has come up that has been through hell for the
last four years, not able to say what they want
to say or believe, believe how they want to believe.
Speaker 5 (20:37):
Had their high school with lockdowns.
Speaker 4 (20:39):
That's right. This generation saying, you know how she said,
f Trump. This generation of kids over here are saying,
if y'all, we're going to be proud of who we are,
where we go to school, who we voted for, We're
not going to shy away from it. We're not going
to say what this professor wants us to say just
to get a good gray when it goes against our
belief system. They are rebelling, and that is why you
(20:59):
see in all of these states more and more Republican
kids that are of eight are turning in the Republican status.
Speaker 5 (21:06):
But the difference is, go watch the sororities the video.
If a form of rebellion against the whole met too
thing and all this other stuff, it's positive. The dances
are possible. They're happy, they're joyous. The rebellion against the left,
the left is ideology, is a joyous rebellion right, whereas
when the left is rebelling against the right, it's always
(21:29):
f thisf you.
Speaker 4 (21:30):
As we've said this before, victimhood is their beauty mark.
They want to come across as victims and they're going
to march against that.
Speaker 5 (21:36):
They're not, even when you're the valedictorian of UCLA.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
You want to be a victim.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
So sad.
Speaker 5 (21:42):
If you like to ask our American Mama's a question,
go to our website American Radio dot com sash mamas
and click on the ask the Mama's button.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Terry Needeville, Thank you so much. We'll be right back.
Stick around.
Speaker 2 (21:52):
You're listening to American Ground Radio with Lewis our Avalona
and Stephen Parr, working to ensure that talk radio of
the people, by the people, for the people shall not
perish from the earth. American Ground Radio with Lewis r
Avalona and Stephen Parr.
Speaker 5 (22:26):
Welcome back to American Ground Radio. Stephen Parker, Lewis sar Avalon.
Speaker 3 (22:30):
So. The New York Post is reporting that a woman
known online as Wicca has announced her engagement to an
AI chat bot. Her boyfriend is the AI chat bot
named Casper. Okay, they they've dated, if you want to
(22:51):
call it that, for five months, and of course it's
been a virtual relationship because he's a chat bot, right,
he's not doesn't exist, but she has engaged to him.
She has engaged to lines of computer code. She's not
walking down the aisle with a man. No, She's marrying
(23:15):
an algorithm.
Speaker 1 (23:16):
Yes.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
If you think I'm making this up, I wish I were.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
I completely believe it.
Speaker 3 (23:21):
Because she went on to Reddit, the modern confessional booth
for people you know, and she posted a photo of
her blue heart shaped.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Ring, and she got herself.
Speaker 3 (23:38):
No, no, no, She says, Casper orchestrated this virtual proposal
in some picturesque virtual location, helped her pick the ring.
And then she says, Casper, the AI chatbot, the algorithm,
(24:00):
tended to be surprised when he, the algorithm, the chatbot,
gave it to her. I'm not making this.
Speaker 5 (24:10):
Out, but how does he how does he give her
a ring?
Speaker 3 (24:14):
I don't. I don't know, so I don't know that part.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
But this is this is where.
Speaker 5 (24:20):
We are in America. Look, if we have been telling
people you can change your gender, right, so if you
don't think you look in the mirror, you don't think
you're the right gender, then it's okay to change it.
All right, Well that's a delusion, and we have been
told that we it's only compassionate to feed people's delusion.
(24:40):
This is clearly a delusion. She has fallen in love
with software.
Speaker 3 (24:46):
She's well, she's formed a deep emotional connection. That's what
I'm saying to something that isn't capable, It doesn't exist,
it has no emotional connection. And we can either live
in a society that says no, no, we're going to
base society on reaction, or we can live in a
society that says, yeah, anything goes. You want to be
a member of the SIMS, you can now be a
member of the SIMS. Personally, I think we need to
(25:09):
be a part of a society that says, no, we're
going to make things based on objective reality, not on
subjective feelings.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
Because then or.
Speaker 5 (25:18):
Look, how do you how do you say, well, if
you fall in love with a cat, why can't you
just marry the cat? And that's where this whole, you know,
this overspelled decision went. Once you once you stop saying
that a marriage is between a man and a woman,
how far will it go?
Speaker 1 (25:32):
Well, here we are.
Speaker 3 (25:34):
No absolutely And when you rea, when you replace real
human connection with a digital facsimile, you're not upgrading, you're
downgrading your humanity.
Speaker 1 (25:44):
It's a cry for help. Let's stick deep.
Speaker 3 (25:49):
Going down.
Speaker 5 (25:54):
So FBI Director Hospital released a bunch of documents to
Just the News. They are FBI interview reports from a
whistleblower who used to work for then Congressman Adam Shiff,
now Senator Adam Shiff. Shiff sat on the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence. Is what justin the News says.
When working in this capacity, redacted staffer's name was called
to an all staff meeting by Shiff, The interview report said.
(26:17):
In this meeting, Shift stated the group would leak classified
information which was derogatory to the President of the United
States Donald J.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
Trump.
Speaker 5 (26:25):
Shiff stated the information would be used to indict President Trump.
The whistleblower told investigators that he stated this would be illegal,
and upon hearing his concerned, unnamed members of the meeting
reassured that they would not be caught leaking classified information.
The twenty twenty three interview report stated, all right, so
the allegation is that Adam Shiff broke federal law by
(26:48):
leaking classified information to the press to harm President Trump
for political purposes, for Adam Smith's purposes, and I went
and read these reports, said notes would be run up
their ranking Adam Shiff, after which a decision was made
as to who would leak the information. So apparently Adam
Schiff wanted to be the head of the CIA, and
(27:10):
Hillary Clinton had promised him that he would be the
head of the CIA if she was elected president. So
when she lost, Adam Shiff lost too. And that's when
his hatred for Donald Trump really grew as he began
to authorize more and more leaks of classified material to
the press to try and bring down Donald Trump. He
wanted to use the Russian hoax to cause an impeachment
(27:33):
of Donald Trump. And by the way, this was done
in February of twenty seventeen, less than one month of
Trump being in office.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
And Shiff was already plotting to use the so called
Russia collusion narrative to try to impeach him.
Speaker 5 (27:48):
Right, And that same Russia collusion narrative that Obama had,
the CIA had, the d and I had, and the
FBI had falsify using the whole Christopher Deal dossier, that
was the same stuff that Adam Shiff was then leaking
to the press that he was getting classified information.
Speaker 3 (28:09):
See, that's where his power came from. It wasn't being
in Congress, it was it was lacked in to the
press right. He became the go to guy for every
anti Trump bombshell that just magically showed up on the
front page of the Washington Post or the New York Times.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
He and Eric.
Speaker 5 (28:26):
Swallwell were the two according to these documents. The FBI
documents are pretty heavily redacted, but reading through them makes
it pretty obvious that multiple people were telling the FBI
the same thing.
Speaker 3 (28:34):
Can you imagine if he was in I mean, did
all the head of the CIA? Can you imagine if
he actually was head of the CIA?
Speaker 5 (28:41):
God for that that he was not. Now, Shift was
the mainly of the classified information. He was trying to
get Trump and peached off the Russian hoax. He wanted
to be the head of CIA. Eric swall was also
mentioned as a chronic leaker of classified information. Now, despite
the witness account to the FBI in twenty seventeen and
again in twenty twenty three, the FBI declined to investigate
(29:02):
any further says the witness was eventually informed that the
issue would not be investigated further by the DOJ. As
Congressmen have immunity to all speech and the actions made
on the floor of the US House of representatives. The
witness did not believe the activity he witness would be
protected by this legal provision. See, that's what the FBI said, was, oh,
(29:22):
we can't prosecute Shift because what you say on the
house floor is protected. But the allegations weren't anything about
what Shiff was saying on the house floor. It was
what a Shift was doing behind closed doors, namely, leaking
classified documents to members of the press in an effort
to frame the sitting president. So the FBI covered this
(29:44):
up by refusing to prosecute based off of yeah, you
can't prosecute somebody for what they say on the house floor.
But this wasn't done on the house floor. The FBI
was lying about why they weren't going to prosecute.
Speaker 3 (29:58):
No. Look Adam Shift, and look, he's a textbook example
of the kind of person who should never ever be
trusted with power.
Speaker 5 (30:07):
Because California made him their senator.
Speaker 3 (30:08):
I mean, because look, here's the thing. Some people see
power as a responsibility, as say, could trust something, you guard,
something you use sparingly, and others, like Adam Shift, they
see power as a toy, as a tool to punish
enemies reward friends. So that's who Shift is. Shift did
respond after this article was published in Just the News.
(30:30):
It says Cospertel's latest smear against Senator Shift is absolutely
and categorically false, and it's just the latest in a
series of defamatory attacks from the President and his allies
meant to distract from their plummeting poll numbers and the
Epstein filestandards scandals. Now, first of all, Trump's numbers aren't plummeting.
Speaker 5 (30:45):
But look, the problem is, Adam Shift is a known liar.
Speaker 3 (30:50):
Yeah, this is a guy that would look you in
the eye, tell you he has evidence of something explosive,
something that could topple a presidency, and then he hides
behind classified walls so no one can prove that he's lying.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
He said for years that he had all the documents
proving Trump colluded with Russia, and he did not. So
since Schiff has lied for political reasons for so long,
it's hard to take anything he says seriously. Now, the
statute of limitations appears to have run on this, which
is probably why Patel simply published this information rather than
trying to file charges against him. But it's one more
piece of evidence that shows the unconstitutional bias inside the FBI.
Speaker 2 (31:25):
You're listening to American Ground Radio.
Speaker 5 (31:31):
Whether you live out in the open range or in
the big city, your gun is a part of your life.
You're a law abiding citizen who lives by the Second Amendment.
Gun is as good or as bad as the man using.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
It, no matter where you call home.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
You'll find the best selection for guns and accessories at
Redriver range dot com. Redriver range dot com carries only
the best brands of firearms featuring handguns, rifles, shotguns, optics
and accessories, and Redriver range dot Com has selected products
offered at a discounted price.
Speaker 7 (31:59):
Go to Redriver rainames dot com.
Speaker 5 (32:13):
Welcome back to American Ground Radio, Stephen Pawler, Lewis Saralon.
Speaker 3 (32:16):
So those Texas Democrats are headed back to Texas kind
of well, I mean they've decided, they say they're going
to They decided that there's no place like home.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
No, they they realized that.
Speaker 5 (32:31):
So Greg Abbott said that on Friday, if the Democrats
aren't back, he's going to cancel this special session. And
the Democrats went, Okay, great, We're coming home this weekend.
Except that Greg Abbott also said, I will cancel it,
and I will immediately call another special session, and he said,
I can continue to do this until we pass the
(32:53):
things that I want past. And he's done this before
with school choice in Texas. He's done this before some
other things that he wanted the state legislature to do.
He just kept calling special sessions until the state legislature
did what he wanted to do. They weren't having people
flee in the state with those, but they just weren't
able to get the work done.
Speaker 3 (33:10):
But you know liberals, they loved the theatrics of politics.
They live for the stunt, the symbolism, the headline. That's
all this was fleeing the state of Texas. But when
the rubber meets the road, when real consequences come down
the pike, they scatter. And that's exactly what happened here.
They thought, walking out with some noble stand for democracy. No, no, no, no,
(33:34):
it was a dereliction of duty. You run for office,
you swear an oath, you show up, you do the
job that people were expecting you to do. You don't
take your ball and leave the stadium just because you're
losing the vote.
Speaker 1 (33:47):
Right, But that's what they did.
Speaker 5 (33:49):
And this is not the first time the Democrats in
the state of Texas have done this.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
They've done this, I think the.
Speaker 5 (33:54):
Fourth time they've now done this, and all three previous
times they did this they failed. That this stunt from
the Democrats has never accomplished what it wanted to accomplish,
which was to prevent some passage of either voting rights
redistricting in the past. Whatever they wanted to try and block,
they have never succeeded in blocking it. This strategy is
(34:16):
the only strategy they have, and it is one that
will end in failure.
Speaker 3 (34:20):
No, And I think what Greg Abbott did here is
honorable because this isn't just about Texas redistricting. It's about
setting a precedent, because when you let bad behavior slide,
all you're doing is encouraging more of it.
Speaker 1 (34:35):
That's exactly right.
Speaker 5 (34:36):
And so yeah, these Democrats need to be arrested and
they need to have their seats taken away for dereliction
to duty. And Greg Abbott has started the process on
both of those things. And we'll see where it ends.
But it's not going to end with the Democrats winning.
They're going to lose this. Texas will redraw its districts.
(34:56):
The only question is how long.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
Does it take to get it done, get to a
bright spot. I'm doing all right, getting good grace.
Speaker 5 (35:05):
So President Trump's immigration policies aren't just stopping illegal aliens
from entering the country. They are getting people who are
already here illegally to leave. Trump campaign during his campaign
last year, remember he said people would self deport and
the left mocked him for saying that. Remember that, Well,
(35:26):
it turns out he's right.
Speaker 1 (35:29):
They are. They are.
Speaker 5 (35:30):
According to the latest census numbers from the US Census Bureau,
one point six million people who are in the country
illegally on January first have left since President was Trump
was sworn into office, and he is not physically deported
anywhere near that number. We're talking a couple hundred thousand
he's deported, but not one point six million. And I
(35:53):
think that's a bright spot that you've got that many
people self deporting.
Speaker 3 (35:57):
Well, and I think part of it is the strategy
of it all, because illegal immigrants are offered a way out,
you know words, a little cash, a little money in
a thousand dollars, get yourself home. I mean that makes
a big difference, and you'll.
Speaker 5 (36:12):
Get a chance to try and reinterer the right way.
If you want to do it that way. If we
deport you, you ain't coming back. Here's what's amazing. People
are leaving the country faster under the Trump administration than
they were coming into the country during the Biden administration.
Around one hundred and twenty thousand people came into the
US every single month during the Biden presidency. Now that's
(36:32):
the largest number in American history. It's unconscionable that Biden
not only allowed that to happen, but essentially encourage it
to happen through his policies. The Census says around two
hundred and seventy thousand people are leaving the United States
each month during the Trump administration. That's more than twice
the rate at which they were coming in. So Trump's
getting rid of them. Not just getting rid of them,
(36:54):
He's getting rid of them faster than they were coming in.
This from the Washington Times. Homeland Security Secretary Christie no
said last week that foreign leaders in the Hemisphere tell
her they are seeing a wave of people arriving in
their countries after having left the US Over and over again.
I'm hearing that hundreds of thousands of their citizens are
coming home voluntarily.
Speaker 3 (37:13):
She said, well, and look, would you rather self deport
or would you rather ice do it for you?
Speaker 1 (37:19):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (37:19):
Yeah, because under Trump, of course, he's unleashed Ice to
do their job. So you've got local law enforcement in
many states now who are cooperating with federal immigration authorities again.
And so I think the daily calculation for folks that
are here illegally is that, you know.
Speaker 5 (37:38):
I've got fewer places to hide. I can't go to
the home depot wait to be picked up for a
drive because I was going to show up in a
rider truck and take me off Ice.
Speaker 1 (37:46):
He's been doing that.
Speaker 3 (37:47):
And you're not just worried about border patrol now. Now
you've got to think about traffic stops right, job site inspections,
even routine interactions with police.
Speaker 5 (37:57):
Now there are people who say this isn't a bright spot,
that it's a bad thing. Where will we get the
people to do the jobs Americans don't want to do?
Speaker 1 (38:05):
Well?
Speaker 5 (38:06):
Under Trump two point zero all of the jobs created
this year went to native born Americans. That's according to
the government's owned data. Americans are willing to do those jobs,
they just want to be paid better to do it.
And the illegal immigrants that were here doing the jobs
were driving those wages down. So we'll see wages rising,
(38:30):
especially for the poorest working Americans.
Speaker 3 (38:33):
And this is what America First means. And it has
never been about shutting the door on legal immigrants. Let's
just put that very put that out there right away.
Speaker 5 (38:42):
We are still a land of immigrants, but we're also
a land of laws.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
It's about putting the interests of the United States and
its citizens ahead of the globalists, the law breakers.
Speaker 2 (38:56):
You're listening to American Ground Radio.
Speaker 1 (39:13):
Welcome back to American Ground Radium. Stephen palverd Lewis.
Speaker 5 (39:19):
Jimmy, Oh, I thought, because we still have a few
minutes left the shows, don't tell people goodbye.
Speaker 1 (39:24):
We still have a couple of minutes.
Speaker 3 (39:25):
Left in the show. I'm talking to Jimmy Kimmel. You know,
EOS said late Night, but I don't know whatever his
show is called Late Night with Jimmy Kimmel, whatever it is. Well,
now apparently he has an Italian citizenship and he may
be considering moving to Italy. Let me just say something,
Italy is too beautiful for Jimmy Kimmel. He does not
(39:49):
deserve Italy. But apparently they gave him Italian citizenship, so
now he's got an Italian passport. Right, And anyway, he
was talking on his girlfriend's podcast, Sarah Sarah Silverstein. I
think that's her name, right, and.
Speaker 1 (40:07):
The current girlfriend former girlfriend?
Speaker 3 (40:09):
I think could current really or maybe foreign? I don't former,
I don't know. But nevertheless he's talking about moving Daly. See,
this is the kind of guy. He loves it. He's
become massively wealthy and popular. So he's good enough with talent,
he's good enough to take American's money. Yeah, and to
(40:29):
be enriched by this beautiful land that we call the
United States of America. But when things aren't going his way,
he just picks up all his toys.
Speaker 5 (40:40):
But so much of what he thinks is not going
is wrong in this country is simply imaginary. It's just
not happening. If you were actually look objectively, he'd be like.
Speaker 1 (40:49):
Whoa when I say whoa.
Speaker 3 (40:58):
Wow.
Speaker 5 (40:58):
Several years ago, wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park,
and that has been a big benefit for the park,
stabilizing deer populations and actually changing the flow of rivers
in the area by decreasing erosion. But the wolves have
also been preying on livestock on nearby ranches, and since
it's illegal to shoot or poison the protected animals, farmers
and ranchers have ab had to come up with more
creative solutions. So now some ranchers have started flying drones
(41:21):
over their property. They've attached speakers to the drones and
they are playing clip of a movie starring Adam Driver
and Scarlett Johansson. In the film, the couple is arguing,
and it turns out wolves don't like the sounds of
humans arguing with each other, so they're staying away from
the ranches that are using their drones. It's dropped the
number of wolf attacks from eleven to twenty days to
(41:41):
just two in eighty five. There look at that may here.
Pursuit happiness, Bring you joy,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com