Christian Talk That Rocks with Richie L Ep. 7/16/2025

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Start secrets five four three two words, now.

Speaker 2 (00:11):
Rocks get in.

Speaker 3 (00:12):
I'm a discussion.

Speaker 4 (00:12):
Now lines are now.

Speaker 3 (00:14):
Here's your host, Richie L. That's me. A couple of
websites for you, Christian talkdid rocks dot com or Christian
talkdt rocks dot net. I want to email address talk
to richielot gmail dot com. T A O K T

(00:35):
O R I C H I E L at gmail
dot com, schell always get this broadcast and podcast format.
Here is just a handful of locations where you can
find that. There's way more than this. How about the iHeartRadio,
their podcast section, Spotify, Apple, Dzer, Spreaker, Good Pods, Amazon,
Google Podcasts, just to name a few, way more than nets. Also,

(01:00):
once this podcast is in the can, but we'll be
loading it up to netnews and Network dot net and
the newscasters dot com. Also when we're live. Who we're
not live available at thunderis radio dot com or dot net,
So you'll need to go to the second stream on
that website. Stream one is music. Stream two is the
talkside talk radio side, and you can click on that.

(01:22):
You can also go to streamture dot COMI tuner dot
com and radio dot net. And you can also click
on there to hear the show when that's live, and
then also to pick up Thunder's Radio and get us
when we're not live, along with several other great talk
shows that we have there on Thunderius radio dot com.
You can all look for an icon at those last

(01:44):
three locations that I just rattled off that has lightning
bolt on the left hand side, has radio font on
the right hand side. That's the icon you want. You
can see a different icon other than that that says
Thunderous Radio or thunder Radio or something like that thanning
the one. Okay, just make sure you click on the
right one. There's been some confusion that one. Where does
one begin? So much so much happening? Although I am

(02:06):
aware that sometimes when the shiny object should turn up
in front of you, it's to make you look elsewhere.
I'm aware of that. I've done this long enough that
and don't ask me how long. I don't want admit
that long. But it's been a long time anyway, I've
done it long enough that I've I've learned the tricks
sometimes of the trade in terms of what sometimes government
types and mainstream media types do, and so on and

(02:28):
so forth. They want you looked at this shiny object,
but hey, there's something else that's even more massive going
on over here. They really kind of don't want you
to look at because if the mainsteam media things, they
don't report about it, well it never happened. It's kind
of like the old adage, Well, if a tree fell
in the woods and nobody heard the sound of it
or saw it, it didn't really fall. So that's the
attack that a lot of these folks take. But we're
gonna but we're gonna get into some things. We're gonna

(02:50):
get into some things. In fact, let's start with one
of the biggest trending topics on social media. Now, I've
got mixed feelings about this because in a sense it
kind of old news and in a sense there's some
bigger stuff going on which I want to get into.
But a lot of people have questions and concerns about it.
According to the latest polls that are out there, here's
one in fact, this is a Quinnipiac poll. Quinnipiac, they're

(03:18):
one of the bigger posters out there, and Quinnipiac Poll
is saying that sixty three percent that is of the
general public here in America disapprove of Epstein files handling.
This being reported by Theodore bunkernewsmax dot com. Most voters
disapproved of the way of President Donald Trump and his
administration have handled the investigation into convicted sex of ener

(03:41):
Jeffery Epstein in a new polic that's come after the
release of the Justice Department's memo closing the case allegedly
on the notorious billionaire. Last week, the Justice Department announced
that the government would not release its files on Epstein
and claim that there is no list of clients involved
in sex trafficking. Trumps are be dismissed concerns about the
Epstein files in a recent statements, telling his supporters to

(04:03):
stop focusing on the issue. Cork to Quinipiac University poll,
most voters disapproved of the Trump administration. Trump Administration's handling
of the situation a fewer than one of five voters
approving of their approach. Sixty three percent disapprove of Trump
administration's handling of the Epstein files, seventy percent approved, twent
percent have a new opinion. Repubs are far more likely

(04:23):
than Democrats are independent to approve of the Trump administrations
handling of the matters prize there, which is under half approving.
That would be forty percent of Republicans approve, of thirty
six percent disapprove, Democrats to approve, eighty three percent disproved.
No his prize there. And amongst independence, here's what's interesting.
Amongst independence, which yours truly is eleven percent approved, seventy
one percent disapprove. Hmm Gwinnipiac University polling analyst Tim malloy

(04:48):
said in a statement, quote Epstein has been dead and
gone for years, but his tawdry legacy looms large in
a country waiting to know more about who he knew
and whether secrets have been buried with him. Well, you
know they probably have. Attorney General Pambondi is also in
hot water with voters, according to the poll, with most
voters disapproving of her job performance a thirty two percent approved,
fifty three percent disapprove fifteen percent. Are kind of like

(05:13):
if you had director cash matail, if it only slightly better.
With less than half of voters disapproving of his job performance,
thirty six percent disapproving, forty seven percent approving, and seventy
percent who could care less. And this was a Quarnimpiak.
Sure we have twelve hundred ninety readishire voters across the
country from July tenth, fifteen and margin and blah blah,
blah blah. But you know how that goes, all right? Ah,
here's my thoughts is the Epstein thing is fodder, and

(05:41):
it's fodder for what. Well, there is a growing in
this country, a growing distrust and it's it's in folks
in both parties and especially amongst a lot of independence
seem like it's hire Mikes independence anybody else. It seems
from what I can gather, just sort of vang notally,
but there is a distrust of our federal government's handling

(06:07):
and ways of doing things. And you know, I mean
it goes back to the GfK thing and the conspiracy
stuff when you mishandled don't handle sit on things. And
a lot of this, really we have to be honest
and some of the coverages and being very clear on
this or very honest on this. Frankly, a lot of
this goes back to New York and it goes back

(06:28):
to the FBI division. There goes back to the government
types there who kind of sat on this thing and
maybe still are sitting on this thing for all we know.
I don't know. I don't know, but it seems like
that's where the root of the whole thing began, because
not long after the Orange Man was given the keys

(06:49):
to the White House, Pam Bondi and others were saying, Okay,
give us all you got, and their attitude was like, well,
you know, we're gonna go play golf. That looks suspicious.
That kind of attitude looks suspicious when people in government
begin to stonewall or sit on things for whatever reason, good,
bad or ugly, people go well, what are you hiding?

(07:14):
And it's kind of a sort of a natural human
I guess response, right, wrong or different that people have. Now,
are there bigger issues out there than this? Absolutely, we're
gonna get into them, trust me. There's way bigger issues
than this. But it is an issue we're speaking about.
It's gonna take a little time on the show to
talk about it, because again, it feeds when you do
this kind of stuff, or when you fumble and mishandle

(07:37):
it feeds the conspiracy theories. Is it plausible? Is it
plausible that mister Epstein hung himself? Yeah? I think it
is plausible. Is it just as plausible, perhaps more plausible,
that somebody walked in there and oft him. Yes, it's

(08:01):
very plausible, sure, quite plausible. There were a lot of
people who had a lot to lose if he squealed
too much, and if certain documents and things came out,
which it may anyway, regardless of what anybody does, because
there's a wild card in the mixture. They we're going
to talk about just a moment, who may who may
we I don't know, may blobble it off of this

(08:24):
thing and keep it even further in the news, even longer,
and could point to some to some folks. This is why,
this is why I'm talking about it, because for most folks,
it is it's it. It's the dead fish in the water.

(08:49):
Shall we say, that's creating the smell of a bigger
problem of even more dead fish in the water, Like
what's killing the fish? Okay? In other words, how come
it seems like things are always stonewalled when when folks
want to know, when folks want to investigate, when people
start poking around, things get set on, things get exposed.

(09:12):
People have brought before Congress complete the fifth which is
there certainly their consciutional Right, people in government agencies who
you know, when there's four year requests your request is,
they sit on it. They redact the daylights out of it.
I mean we've seen this story over and over and
over and over and over played out for a number
of years now on a number of issues. You know,

(09:36):
what does the government have on UFOs? What's what else
is in the JFK file that wasn't released or they
RFK file this file of that file. Yeah, whatever, And
so it feeds this whole thing. And there's a whole
conspiracy industry out there. As ask Alex Jones, he became
a multi millionaire on it. You have whole podcasts dedicated

(09:59):
to just nothing but conspiracy after conspiracy, and it sells.
Conspiracy sells. I mean, there is a whole industry on
this thing. I'm not one of those folks in the
conspiracy theory realm who makes a living off of it. However,
there are times I will poke around into things because

(10:20):
I think they deserve to be poked around into. And
my instincts, again at having done this for a while,
tell me, hmm, something here seems a bit off. Now,
maybe there's some honest mistakes that have been made, okay,
and people do that. I believe the Trump administration fumbled
on this thing. I'm not alone in that. And there's

(10:42):
a lot of his supporters and people that really are
all run around wearing the red Maga hats and everything
that think he kind of dropped the ball. He in
the administration and BONDI and everybody else kind of dropped
the ball on this thing, all right. So in other words,
there's a broad opinion on this that transversus party affiliation,

(11:04):
no party affiliation. Big Trump supporter, not a big Trump supporter,
And it's worth looking at now. It's again, it is
a shiny object that I think can be used and
maybe is being used right now to distract her from
some other things. And I'm going to get into some
of these other things. There's other things going on that

(11:25):
deserve a lot of attention, and we're going to give
them the attention on this show. I think they deserve.
But I'm going to kind of run through these. I mean,
you draw your own conclusions, but I don't think it's
something you can just kind of blow off. I don't
think that's I don't think that's right either at all. Now,

(11:49):
Islaane Maxwell is sort of the wild card here because,
acording to reports, she may be ready to blow the
lid off the Epstein files and Pedophile network. One report says,
I'm going to go to break, we get back, We'll
get into this and some other stuff. But remember that
she's had some appeals. She's got some appeals that are
still in the pipeline. So the government kind of is

(12:13):
required to handle things regarding this and her and her
connection to it and other things connected it and her
and blah blah blah with some with some care because
you know, her lawyers could jump on this and says
mistrial misappeal blah blah blah, and you know, blow the
whole thing out of the water. Next thing you know,
she's walking free. So the government, the FEDS and others

(12:34):
involved in this have to kind of keep cards close
to the chest until this appeals process is played out.
Now that maybe some of it is why some folks
are still being a little tight lipped. I don't know.
I'm giving a little benefit of the doubt here, but
we're gonna get into this come back from the break.
That may be what's what's behind some of this hush

(12:58):
mouthed type of thing going on. I don't know, but
of course you know how much of what comes out
of her mouth do you believe in terms of negotiating
a deal for appeal? You understand what I'm saying. So
there's a lot of shifty, shaky, shady players in this
whole thing. They just kind of add fuel to the
whole whole stinky file, the whole mess. You know. So people,

(13:20):
I mean human nature kind of come to some conclusions
that are like, well, gee, what's what's going on here? This?
This looks sort of sort of fishy, something a little
smelly in Denmark, right, And we got a lot more,
I mean just this, oh a lot more. As always,

(13:41):
we'll get into stick around.

Speaker 4 (13:50):
More.

Speaker 2 (13:50):
Talk continues next with Ritchie l More Christian Talk that rocks.

Speaker 3 (13:55):
Next.

Speaker 5 (13:57):
Needing a tuxedo? Why rent? And you can buy one
at only eighty nine ninety nine at suit City. Suit
City has tuxedos, Steve Harvey, suits and blazers and suits
starting at thirty nine ninety nine, shoes starting at nineteen
ninety nine with brands such as Stacy Adams and Moore.
At suit City, we have all your accessories, hats, ties,

(14:19):
and a wide variety to suit your needs. On any occasion,
suit City will have you looking your best. Suit City
has passed a roads men's suits and dress suits, blazers
plus men's shirts. Why rent a tuxedo when you can
buy at suit City at only eighty nine ninety nine.
Visit our website at SUITCITYUSA dot com. That SUITCITYUSA dot com,

(14:43):
SUITCITYUSA dot com. Look your best with tuxedos and suits
at suit City with stores in Collegeville, Danville, and Rono.

Speaker 4 (14:52):
You may know me as an actor, but one of
the things that I'm most proud of is my service
to this country and Iami I saw firsthand. House training,
discipline is still are values that create great leadership abilities
and a can do spirit. Those same strong values stay
with service members when they returned to civilian life and
enter the workplace. So remember the highest smart and bet

(15:13):
on a vent.

Speaker 5 (15:14):
To learn more.

Speaker 4 (15:15):
Call eight eight eight four four Salute or visit Salute
Heroes dot g.

Speaker 6 (15:20):
Now the world's oldest living teenager, your host Richie eld All.

Speaker 3 (15:32):
Right, So Elaine Maxwell is ready to blow the lid
off of the Epstein Files and the Pedophile Network. One
reporter is saying, They've been ported by Joe Kovac Rulen
Daily dot Com. No one from the government has ever
asked her to share what she knows, which I find
rather strange. But anyway, she remains the only person to
be jailed in connection to Epstein, and she would welcome

(15:52):
the chance to tell the American public the truth. According
to reports, Daylon Palm Beach, Florida, is a complim. He
is reportedly ready to testify Epstein's accomplice is reportedly ready
to testify before the US Congress, potentially exposing the depths
of the sordid pedophile network to pay around. Now, of course,
she would be put under oath, and if she lies,

(16:13):
she could be found a contempt of Congress. But she's
ready to go to Congress. I smell a deal here
in the works. I smell, let's make a deal in
the works, okay, hrcus. I mean she's looking at well,
probably dying in jail. I mean she's no spring chicken.
She's what in the early sixties now, So she's looking
at probably dying in jail. And pedophiles and people who

(16:38):
are associated with pedophiles and that kind of thing don't
usually do too well in jail in general anyway, with
the rest of the crowd. I don't know if she
would be put in some kind of continual isolation or
maybe or maybe on a cell block with the other pedophiles,
so you know, they're all kind of birds of a feather,
so to speak. I don't know, but I'm sure she's
looking at that and going hmmm, probably desperate to make

(17:00):
any kind of deal now, according to Britain's Daily Mail,
and it's interesting that a lot of I keep saying
all the time, sometimes you got to go to foreign
news sources to find out what's really happening here in
this country because the mainstream media here won won't tell you.
But according to Britain's Daily Mail, the sixty three year
old Maxwell, who is the only person behind bar is
a connection with the Epstein network of underage girls, is
willing to speak in front of Congress. Source told the paper.

(17:22):
Despite the rumors Slaine was never offered any kind of
plea deal, she'd be more than happy to sit before
Congress and tell her story, though quote Norm from the
government has ever asked her to share what she knows.
She remains the only person to be jailed, which I
find interesting. Why not you see again, this kind of
just fuels the fire. She remains the only person to
be jailed in connection, of course, with the Epstein thing.

(17:44):
They say she would welcome the chance to tell the
American public the truth. She is currently incarcerated in Tallahassee
State Prison in Florida, serving twenty years for child sex traffick,
which means, you know, like I said, she'll be in
an early eighties, maybe dead before she gets out. As
of course, she was the groomer of underage girls for
both the Epstein and his group of powerful elites, which
he was basically blackmailing. Though Todate, not a single purported

(18:06):
client of the former Palm Beach resident has faced criminal
charges at least of yeah. The Daily Mail went on
to report that this horse close to Maxwell told the
Male that the former girlfriend of Epstein, who continues to
protest her innocence, would welcome the chance to sit in
front of Congress tell her story. She said, Congressional hearings
Sevan Hill and everything from jef Kids assassination of Line eleven,

(18:26):
the Epstein files rank up there with those cases. Slaine
would be willing to speak before Congress and tell her story,
and of course I think because there might be an
Orangeman implication. Democrats are all over that. They were pretty
lukewarm about it before them because it seemed to kind
of implicate maybe one Bill Clinton. So they were just like, well,
you know, there's nothing to see here. Now all of
a sudden, have you noticed it that perhaps the Orange

(18:49):
man's name might come up? Oh wait a minute now now,
yoh yeah, bring up before Congress. Maxwell is also finding
to have her appeal heard by the Supreme Court only
fourteenth Lawyers for the are a Supreme Court rather on
July fourteenth, let's just said it was a period there.
Lawyers for the US government will submit their response to

(19:11):
her plea for the Supreme Court to take up her case.
President Trump's former first buddy Elon Musk and sately claimed
there is a cover up because Trump is mentioned in
the Epstein file, something sourci As close to Maxwell says
a false flag. President Trump was a photographed of Epstein
several times and they ran in the same choices. But
Trump was one of the first to break all contact
with Epstein because they fell out over a business deal.

(19:32):
In Epstein's treatment of women, the informed source said, he didn't.
He just couldn't deal with the do now. Over the
weekend World Daily Reporter that President Donald Trump also voices
extreamed his pleasure with ongoing controversial over Turny Jerald Pambondi's
refusal to release files on the convicted pedophile. I med
rumors FBI Deputies director and Dan Bongino may resign over

(19:53):
the issue. A lengthy post on Saturday, true Social Trump said, quote,
what's going on with my boys and in some cases gas,
They're all going after Attorney General Pambondy, who was doing
a fantastic job. He put in big capital letters because
everything is fantastic, amazing, incredible. You know, it's his favorite adjis.
But some of us don't agree with that. And of

(20:13):
course held the press commerce with Attorney John Pambody. That
was back on June twenty seventh, which was when this
kind of started blowing up, and he kind of jumped
on a reporter for even asking him about it. But
you know, here's here's the bottom line. Like it or not.
It was one of his campaign promises to get to
the bottom of this stuff, along with the JFK stuff. Oh,
we're going to declass for all this stuff. I'm gonna
declass for all this, all these fires are not gonna

(20:34):
be any more hiding the truth. Blah blah blah blah.
I mean we heard that. I mean they're real clear
on the campaign trail. And this was one of the
things he planned overly, throwing out there and exposing what
was there. And then all of a sudden, hey, it's
this who cares about crazy Epstein that, you know, let's
move on. Well, you did it six months ago, seven eight,
nine months ago, you did what changed? So it kind

(20:58):
of it kind of begs the question, what's going on?
What changed? And it's a fair question. Well it's a
very fair question. So that's possibly something that may happen.
I wouldn't hold my breath on it, but there are

(21:18):
some folks in Congress I think would perhaps welcome it.
This may be one of them. Maybe that's Representative Jip Roy,
Republican from Texas, big big, big constitutional guy, big big
big let's clean up the debt guy, big hardcore Republican,

(21:41):
et cetera, et cetera, from Texas. He said the Trump
administration needs more transparency on the Jeffrey Epstein files. It's
been reported by Olivi Roondeau pridepart dot com. So the
drum administration needs better transparency regarding the Epstein case. Shortly
after President Trump doubled down on calling the files made

(22:02):
up hoax orchestrated by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other
Democrat leaders. I don't know about that. Uh, they certainly,
I mean, I think the Dems certainly have an opportunity
to make hay on this thing, no doubt about it.
And along with the mainstream media having said that though,
the best way to put something to to rest is

(22:24):
to just put out what you've got out there. If
there is something she's sitting on now, if it's related
to this actual appeal, to come out and say it.
I mean, just come out and say, look, yeah, we
got some juicy tidbits here, but I can't tell you
because it can mess up to her appeal deals. So
we've got to sit on it for a little while.
She's going to the Supreme Court on this thing. Da

(22:46):
da da or maybe, and so we've got to kind
of play this close to the chest. Once that all
blows over, then I can give you this stuff. I mean,
if that's the reason, just come forward and say it.
You know, I think people will. I think, well, some
people won't buy it, and some people will never buy it,
but I think the majority of folks would buy it.
I think most intelligent thing people say. Okay, if that
makes sense, that sounds reasonable, all right, then we'll just

(23:08):
have to wait a little while longer, you see. So
I don't know, let me let you hear a clip.
This was Chuck Chuck chip Roy rather being asked some
questions by a reporter on this thing. I had to
kind of doctor the audio a little bit, not in
terms of making aybody say something that didn't, but it
was a kind of some noise in the background and
the reporter was kind of speaking softly, So I had

(23:29):
to kind of make some adjustments here just for sake
a transparent exact it over here. I had to do
a little bit of editing to this, but not to
make somebody say something that they didn't. It's just it's
in context. But I just had to take some technical
audio adjustments so that, you know, you could hear things
a little better. So let me let you hear this clip.

Speaker 7 (23:49):
Because a member of the Judiciary Committee, do you think that
the Justice departments are transparent enough?

Speaker 8 (23:53):
When it comes to the Eppstein matter, like, I'll let
the you know, Department Justice continue to carry out what
they need to do. I do think there needs to
be more transparency. I do think that all needs to
move forward, and I think I think the administration needs
to address that. But we'll we'll we'll keep you know,
uh uh, you know, talking to them about what they're
gonna do.

Speaker 3 (24:12):
Their memor wasn't good enough for well, we'll see, we got,
we got. We want to see more information out of that. Yeah,
so he's taking he says they need more transparency, but
let's wait and see. I think that's I think it's
a fair, fair assessment. Let's let's see, you know, come on,
let's if you got it, then be transparent on this thing.
Let's let's go. I mean, uh, this is kind of

(24:36):
I'm scratching my head on this. I really am going
wait a minute, what because again, when you go back
to what was said and during the campaign, on the
campaign trail, well, the Orange Man seemed pretty ready to
just throw it all out there, but put all the
dirty laundry out there, let the chips fall where they
were going to fall. No U pun there intended on
chip Roy. But now let's move on. Just a hoax,

(25:00):
A hoax, Okay, we weren't saying that ten months ago,
eight months ago, So what's again, what's changed? I don't
know what's going on here. I don't know. Is he
afraid something may point to him that's actually innocent, but
it may hurt him politically. I don't know. That's the
problem here. We don't we don't know, and people are

(25:23):
holding tight. So let's see. I'm curious to see how
this whole thing with Maxwell goes. And again, she could
be using some bargaining chips here. She could say, look,
I've got some really juicy stuff. If you really want
to know about abcdef or G cut me a deal here,
or or at least giving a chance to share my

(25:44):
stuff in front of Congress. Of course, you know, she
could also be playing with fire, because this is let's
be honest, there's a chance that well, she might be
found hung in her jail cell. You know what I'm saying.

(26:07):
And I'm sure that's crossed your mind. But they say
they got her pretty pretty, pretty protected. But so is Epstein,
you know, And again it makes you wonder.

Speaker 9 (26:26):
Jesus, hey, what's up? This is Toby Mack with the
five loves of a Jesus Freak, Write him down, hide
them in your heart. Here they are Love God, love
his Word, love your enemies, love your neighbor, love truth.

(26:47):
Sound easy. Not likely. If all that does come too
easy for you, you're probably not working hard enough. On the
other hand, these five loves should become second nature to
any authentic Jesus freak. If you let God's grace off
in your heart one more time, Love God, love his Word,
love your enemies, love your neighbor, love truth.

Speaker 1 (27:09):
Amen.

Speaker 10 (27:11):
Jesus Streaks Radio is brought to you by DC Talk,
the voice of the martyrs in this station. For more,
go to persecution dot Com.

Speaker 3 (27:29):
Well well, well, what a web we weave when we
seek to deceive? All right, So I'm gonna shift gears
here and again. This is kind of I know somebody
will think while you're doing a conspiracy show today, I'm not.
I'm just I'm just gonna hit you with things right
and left and keep rolling, and you judge for yourself
because this is not one of the This is not

(27:51):
a conspiracy show. It never has been, never will be.
But I do I do jump into some things that
flirt with a conspiracy realm from time to time because
I just think they need to be talked about it
honestly and openly, which is the problem with so much
of this stuff that winds up being conspiracy stuff because
for whatever reasons, people ain't and I don't know why
or aren't. I'm from the South. We use ain't sometimes

(28:12):
when we get fired out, we go ain't, which I
know ain't the proper thing to say. Ain't. It ain't
a good word to use, but we use it, and
ain't nobody going to tell me different? All right, So
there is a video that has come out from James O'Keefe,

(28:33):
you know, the project Veritas guy OMG deal Now, by
the way, for the for the sake of transparency, mister
o keif and I do follow each other a bit
on social media. I believe we still follow each other
on next. I think we follow each other on LinkedIn.
Don't we follow each other on one of them? I
mean we're not big buddies. I'd love to give him
on the show sometime, but I mean we're not like

(28:54):
just hey, you know, how's it going and going out
and having you know, a coffee or something. I've never
met the guy, and I've commented on some of his
posts and so forth in the past, and ye YadA,
and I think you may comment back or whatever that
but just for the sake of transparency, okay, but we're
not big buddies. And I don't have a dog in
his hunt. He don't have a dog on my hunt.
Let's put it that way, all right. So Johnson and

(29:15):
Johnson scientists admits this in an undercover sting video, admits
COVID shots that Johnson Johnson anyway, COVID shots lacked safety effectiveness.
That's been whatted by Bob by New World n Daily.
Johnson and Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky, you might remember him,
and he kind of buddied up with a Biden administration.

(29:35):
All right. Well, now there's a scientist for Johnson. Johnson,
one of the corporations that assembled a COVID shot with
the Big Three, really that assembled a COVID shot during
the the COVID virus pandemic, has confirmed in an undercover
video that proper testing wasn't done, the effectiveness was unknown,
and somebody eventually will get sued, he claimed. Over the

(29:58):
catastrophe that developed for Americans Now, the comments were reported
by o'keef Media group OMG, which released undercover video and
a subsequent video in which the sciences identified as Joshua Reese.
That's Roys Joshua Reese, who was a lead regulatory scientist
for Johnson and Johnson all right, trying to avoid questions
about his comments. Now, the OG report noted that the

(30:20):
scientists confessed that the Jay and J COVID shots were
not safe and effective, and you're going to hear that
in a minute on the center cover video. And there
was a lack of basic research. Dohn bangs the question
kind of why why. In fact, there's also a report
from the Gateway Punded that explained two years ago Santa
Ron Johnson called for Congress to investigate vaccine manufacturers and

(30:42):
the COVID vac's approval process in response to Project veritases
explosive undercover video exposing the ffizer alleged plans to mutate
the virus. And you might recall that one, and I
played clips from that undercover video too, and that one
kind of went south shortly after the undercurverent for video
was recorded. And then and then o'keef contacted that guy,

(31:02):
and then that guy pushed somebody, and somebody pushed somebody
else and Keith and anyway, and then o'keith got got
pulled from Project Veritas, suspended and all that. You may
recall all that debacle, but let me let you hear
the clip on this and if you go back and
look at the video, and you can, you can go
to his OMG web page, just google James o'keef and

(31:25):
a bunch of stuff comes up. You go check out
this video and you can see that he confronts the guy.
Didn't play that part of it, but he confronts the guy,
uh later on and he denies it. You know, he
said any of that stuff and gets on his bicycle
and right it's away. Uh So, But let me let
you hear the the undercover video portion in a little

(31:49):
bit of commentary about Keith himself. So this does come
from from his side. I want hit music because I
ever have any issues with o'keef saying hero, you're can't
put your stopper on your sho I think he probably
won't with anybody putting stuff on their show. I haven't
seen him ever get upset with anybody. So it's a
little liberty here and hopefully James won't get mad at me.
If he does, he does, we'll deal with that. But uh,

(32:10):
I want you to hear this. And again I'm not
promoting him. This is not a big promotion of his
network or whatever. But this is just I think he
does some good work. He sort of does what sixty
minutes used to do back in the day. And some
of you may be old enough to remember that what
they used to do until maybe I don't know, fifteen
twenty years ago, and they would you know, they would
do undercover videos and sting videos. And then you'd see

(32:32):
when the reporters can front of somebody coming out of
an office or going into a building, or coming out
of a building or confront some politician, you know, and
they look sort of that that person would look sort
of crazy and dumb on you know, sixty minutes and
next thing, you know, boom, it was all hitting the fan, right,
So they used to expose a lot of a lot
of junk and a lot of corruption. They used to
do that. They would have I mean, they would have

(32:52):
female reporters with cameras like in the purse, you know,
going into wherever and talking to somebody that's the way
sixty minut she used to do it. They were they
were sort of these undercover busters of of of folks,
and they had these seasoned, old grizzled news reporters on
there that would for CBS and so forth. It would
bust these folks out. Now and it's a little more

(33:14):
you know that they've evolved into what they've evolved into.
They know what they were, sadly, and I think James
w'll Keith kind of stepped in that gap and now
he's sort of doing what they used to do way
back in the day. But let me let you hear
this clip and again, this is this guy from this
is a scientist, one of the top leading research or scientists,
guys from Johnson and Johnson, talking about this faccine and

(33:39):
how they kind of just pushed it on through. It
really didn't do the due diligence that you're supposed to
do because it was fast tracked. And you might recall
the government was all and it really kind of started
with the Trumble administration but went on with the Biden
administration where they're really fast tracked trying to get this
stuff out the door as fast as they could. And
you know, there was I think a bit of a
race between Johnston, Johnson, Pfizer, and some of the others
to see who get the biggest, bettest, the biggest, bestest, best,

(34:02):
h fastest, most powerful, whatever, bestest vaccine out the door.
Like you know, there was a big like somebody who
was gonna win a Cadillac at the end if if
they know by the company to get a catac or whatever,
if they got the thing out. So let me but hate.
What's your ad is haste makes ways right right.

Speaker 11 (34:22):
Deep inside Johnson and Johnson's little machine. As a scientist,
a lead scientist who's very approval or disapproval of Jay
and J products can change millions of American lives. Meet
Joshua Reeves, a lead regulatory scientist at Johnson and Johnson. Joshua,
in his role, leads the creation and execution of regulatory
strategies for new and existing products across Johnson and Johnson.

Speaker 12 (34:46):
We run the whole not's like, not only we're working
on the products, but everything that has to get the drug.
We have to make sure that you understand how to
use the drug, how to be able to prescribe certain
pieces of information, how to communicate that to the patient now.

Speaker 11 (35:00):
According to a Johnson and Johnson press release from December
twenty twenty one, the safety and well being of those
who use the Johnson and Johnson vaccine continues to be
our number one priority. Now for the first time ever,
an official from Johnson and Johnson admits to our hidden
cameras that the Johnson and Johnson COVID vaccine was quote

(35:21):
not safe and effective unquote, and the company wanted to
quote just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and
see what happens unquote.

Speaker 1 (35:30):
In other life makes the world enlightened in some sacred RCTI.

Speaker 7 (35:35):
But like he died, now, there's no proof. I mean,
none of that stuff was seeking effectively.

Speaker 1 (35:40):
We didn't do the typical tests.

Speaker 7 (35:42):
Like the typical process. And that's why I take someone
we had a product and market typical process his oldest
clinical trial testing and stuff in a small population. This
was just let's test it on some you know lab
runs models, analyze and secret works and stuff like that.
Just throw it to the wind and see what happens.

Speaker 12 (36:03):
Said, That's what I'm saying. I'm sure somebody's gonna get
suited with that stuff.

Speaker 11 (36:07):
Eventually, the lead regulatory scientist for Johnson and Johnson went
into detail about how the federal government applied heavy pressure
on big pharma in order to hastily create the Johnson
and Johnson COVID vaccine, encouraging speed over efficacy or safety.

Speaker 12 (36:22):
Do you have any idea the lack of research that
was done on those products? Like, are you you shouldn't
be surprised if this happened. It was pretty much the
government connimated deal with pharmaceutical companies and kind of pressured
the pharmaceutical companies because we're not going to say no

(36:43):
to help like the government. Like the government's like, Yo,
these three biggest companies, we need help, we need to
figure this out. You are you're solving this problem?

Speaker 1 (36:54):
Is that operational work speed?

Speaker 12 (36:56):
I mean, we basically just had a race to figure
out who can solve it best.

Speaker 7 (37:00):
Like people wanted it, we'll.

Speaker 1 (37:03):
Gave with you.

Speaker 11 (37:04):
The CDC has previously announced they're pulling the J and
J vaccine from use in the United States. Jay and
J claims this is due to the vaccines declining use
and the company's strategic shift away from the vaccines. But
as you just heard, jnj's own regulatory scientist was well
aware of the ineffectiveness of their own COVID vaccine.

Speaker 7 (37:27):
There's something side effect that's going to happen. It's more
or less all right, what's the worst side effect that's
going to happen? And is that better than the benefit that.

Speaker 3 (37:37):
The consumer is going to get.

Speaker 12 (37:39):
It's like, that's that's the interesting thing that I've found
about it, because it's like, all right, you know what,
cancer region is going to die anyway, So there's quality
of life?

Speaker 7 (37:48):
Is the questioning in that.

Speaker 12 (37:50):
Instance, as opposed to whether you're carrying someone, You're.

Speaker 3 (37:53):
Not carrying anything. At that point, it's just all right,
are you going to have a.

Speaker 11 (37:57):
Nicer Six months now, I caught up with Joshua Rye
and Tom's River New Jersey on the Jersey Shore to
get clarification on what he meant by his comments on
hidden camera. What led him to say this, What led
him to tell a total stranger that his product was
not safe and effective. Here's a little sneak peek of

(38:21):
how this went. This is one of the most extraordinary
interactions ever, maybe rivaling the one that I had with
the other guy inside Pfizer back two and a half
years ago. Are you, Joshua from Johnson, josh you to
deny your identity, yes, sir, And you said that your
vaccine was not safe and effective.

Speaker 3 (38:42):
You said that, you know.

Speaker 1 (38:45):
Where's he going. He's gonna un away.

Speaker 11 (38:47):
He's going in the women's restaurant.

Speaker 7 (38:49):
Are you confused?

Speaker 2 (38:53):
I am a human man.

Speaker 1 (38:54):
I am allowed to take a fee in the man's restroom.

Speaker 11 (38:58):
You shouldn't be surprised that this happened.

Speaker 3 (39:00):
You have no idea.

Speaker 11 (39:00):
People, I got it from your mouth. Stand behind what
you said and explain to us what you meant by it.
Undercover investigations like these carried out by our OMG undercover
journalists are pulling back the veil on the corruption and
lies in our government and our corporations in the pharmaceutical industry. Remember,
sometimes sixty seventy eighty percent of revenue for cable news

(39:25):
organizations and other organizations in the news business come from
big farmer.

Speaker 3 (39:29):
That's right, they sure do. And I've sort of poked
fun at that and documented that had nausea bed infinitem
on this show. I mean, he's I've you heard what
the guy said, this scientist guy with Johnson and Johnson. Look,

(39:52):
whenever the government throws big money out there. Remember who
was paying for these vaccines ultimately, because I mean they
were pretty much distributed for free. Well, the government bought them.
So there's a lot of big government cash on a table.
You better believe the sharks start swimming towards it in
the waters, right, And I mean, something like this was
bound to happen with at least one of these companies,

(40:12):
maybe all of them, who knows. But we've seen so
many complications that people have had with these with these vaccines.
And I've got family members who had complications from taking
these vaccines. And I won't get into that and say
who they worrying what it was, because they deserve privacy.
But I'm telling you a lot of folks had issues

(40:35):
that didn't have issues after taking these things, and many
were pressured or they would be canned. I was in
a similar situation. I was pressured and then softly fired
because I wouldn't well not softly fired, just plainly fired
because I wouldn't take with the organization I was working with,
because I wouldn't take the JAB and I was working

(40:56):
from home. I wasn't in an office building where I
could be in ttendially exposed somebody to I was at
the house, I was at the bunker. Who was I
going to infect my neighbor's cat? I mean, come on,
so a lot of us experienced this, a lot of folks.
Let me move on to this one before we leave

(41:16):
this subject and go to break. But Secretary Defense Hesith
has taken the helm at the Pentagon. Remember him maybe
from Fox News? Well? A US Navy commander and now
investigated for exposing unconstitutional legal actions by military leadership during
COVID shot mandates. It's being reported by J. M. Phelps
World and Daily. One of the US military's most high
profile and respected whistleblower's active duty Navy commander Robert A.

(41:38):
Green Junior, says his chain of command was has informed
him that he is, as of July eighth, under investigation
for publicly calling out the unconstitutional legal actions by military
leadership during the COVID nineteen mandates. He made the announcement
in an ex post the following day. Quote for four years,
I have been using the same language and the same
demand for accountability that I continue to use on this platform.

(42:00):
If we want to say, my leadership does not like that,
I have used the words domestic enemies of the Constitution
to describe many of them for their actions during the mandates,
But where were they when thousands of US notified them
about the laws they were breaking. There is a clear
line drawn between service members who will defend the constitution
and admirals and generals who violate constitutional rights with impunity. Well,

(42:22):
here's the thing about a lot of admirals and generals,
not all, but a lot their career government workers. They're
part of what some people call the deep state, but
I just call it just the statists, part of the bureaucracy.
You know, I've said on this show before, there's really
four branches of government you've got that has sort of

(42:42):
evolved or devolved if you will, in our federal government system.
You've got, of course, the legislative branch, you have the
executive branch, the judicial brands branch, and now you have
pretty much to bureaucratic branch, which would include some of
these big wigs in the military. Okay, I'm not saying
this to dial military. I love our military. You'd be
harder pressed to find anyone yacting on a microphone these

(43:04):
days doing the podcast is more of a fan of
our military than I am, and I've had a ton
of people in my family, cousins, second cousins, aunts, uncles,
great aunts and uncles, grandparents, great great grandparents, blah blah blah,
going all the way back to pretty much revolution who
have fought for this nation in one way or another.

(43:26):
And I'm very proud of that history. But I understand
that today we are in a moment in time where
we are besieged by bureaucrats in Sconce's bureaucrats who won't budge,
who don't care about the constitution, who care more about
the government of the government, by the government for the government,

(43:48):
and covering their own their own bark sides than following
the constitution even none, or cared about what's even in
the darn constitution. They could care less, even though they swear,
ohstood up, are you up? And down? He want to say,
my leadership is not like that. I have used words
domestic enemies of the Constitution, And that's what these people
in essence are, That's what these so called deeps stay.

(44:11):
But I just call him ensconced bureaucratic statists that are
just infested in our government like I don't know, termites
in an old House. A former of service members are
reacting strongly, clearly disturbed by the news. World and Daily
spoke to one such individual, doctor Chase Spears, retard US Army,
a public affairs officer. When Green published his book Defending

(44:33):
the Constitution Behind Enemy Lines in July twenty twenty three,
Spears quickly took notice. Having been a writer himself while
serving in the Army, and also knowing the challenges that
come with a hostile chain of command, he admired Green's
direct approach. He went on to say, quote that guy
has spying like no one I've ever seen in the
military in my lifetime. Spirits remembers, thinking as fate would
have it. Two years later, Spears was able to welcome

(44:53):
Green to his podcast, Finding Your Spine with news of
a former military probe the commander of Green's public statements
regarding the illegalities of the now restricted or rescinded rather
but now rescinded COVID nineteen military shot mandate. It was rescinded, well,
why because they knew there was some craziness going on here,
and they knew there was constitutional questions and everything else.

(45:15):
Spurars told World in Daily he has surprised to see
him investigated now, he said, quote, it surprised me that
that he was being investigated and not being investigated in
the past while we were under a very hostile Biden
administration when he wrote his book and we began pointing
out the law breaking and widespread rampant corruption in the military.
From what I can tell, he has not changed, remaining

(45:35):
consistent in making the argument that the military continues to
violate law to violent due process and a violet constitution.
Spears would want to say that he's now doing it
under an administration that knows the reality of rampant progressivism
and the ranks. So why has Green being investigated at
this time? Ever since the Truble administration came in and
Secretary of Defense Hegseth took the helm at the Pentagon,
said Spears, life hasn't gotten easier for some, for conservatives

(45:59):
to the cod trade said, it has gotten harder. He's
talking about the military because progressively wanted officers who were
raised under the Obama and Biden administration are insecure about
the fact that there's a new sheriff in town, and
they're clamping down even harder on those who hold a
basic constitutional traditional world view. In other words, that's who
I just was describing, these people who are of the government,
by the government, for the government. People who think that

(46:21):
they more or less took more or less took an
oath to the government, not of the constitution. When you're
in the military. When you're in the military, your job
is defended is to defend the constitution, which is is
is a constitutional government of the people, by the people,
for the people. So in a sense, you're defending the
people and the constitution. You're not defending the government. Some
people with the military kind of get this backwards. Your
job isn't to defend the government. Your job is to

(46:42):
defend the constitution. Your job is to defend the people. Remember,
we're government of the people, by the people, for the people.
The parable of the Constitution says we the people of
the United States, in order to form of more priviate,
didn't say we the government workers, we the politicians, we
the Bureaucract's right. So that's really who you're ultimately taking

(47:05):
an oath two and four. I don't know if this
needs I said, I was wondring if constitutional educational classes
and classes need to start happening happening more often in
the military, if that needs to be like prerequisite training.
I mean, you swear an oath of the thing. Anybody
that's in our military swears an oath. Anybody that goes

(47:26):
to work for the military swears an oath to defend
an uphold the Constitution against enemies, both foreign and domestic.
All right, not just people over in the Middle East,
or the Russians or the Chi Comms or whoever, martians
from matter space. Whatever. Your job is to defend the
job one is to defend the Constitution against enemies forign domestic.

(47:49):
Defend the people, really, not government bureaucrats. You take an
oath to that, I mean you mean it. You don't
you keep your fingers crossed behind your back when you
say it, or you men are genuinely I mean, I
don't know. So anyway, it is kind of a head
scratching that now this guy is getting hammered. You kind

(48:12):
of have to wonder a lot of the investigation against
green Spears. The sanatory of the declaration said, now is
the time for other constituously minded to military members to
stand up with him. He challenges them, asking will you
be courageous or will you be cowardly. So anyway, he

(48:34):
goes on to say, you know, man up about this thing,
and to other military folks and say, you know, stand
with this guy and speak out. So but again this
is just part and parcel for those who are statists,
big government types. Call them the deep the deep state,
what do you want label them? It's the same thing.
Who are bureaucrats sitting there and watching the clock that

(48:57):
are covering their backsides and trying to protect a gargantuan
overbloated governmental system. And our founding fathers never intended in
their wildest nightmares, but this is what has developed in
more recent decades over the years, and this is why

(49:18):
part of me applauds what Trump is doing in terms
of cutting some of this blow to bureaucracy, clamping down
on some of these are pretty much all but abolishing
some of these, because you really can't constitutionally, it's Congress
that makes up the that makes these departments typically, but
at least gutting them a bit to where they it

(49:39):
almost you know, there's aitus shell them formerselves. They can't
do much harm. I sort of applaud that in a
way because I get how far we have pushed from
the mooring compared to what our funding fathers initially gave
us to where we're at now in this monstrosity, this

(49:59):
fed zillophane that is overbloated, requires a ton of money
to keep to keep operating. And I don't know if
you've been keeping up with the big beautiful bill thing.
And now they've done rescending what they call a rescending
a part of the bill where they're and then they're
hanging over nine billion bucks. We're gonna say, maybe when

(50:21):
it's all saiding done, nine billion bucks and we're approaching
thirty seven trillion bucks in debt and we're talking nine
billion bucks, we're arguing over nine billion bucks. Really, I mean,
think about the the the how ludicrous that is. Think
about the insanity all billionaires and millionaires and rich people

(50:43):
are getting track cuts. That's that's that's expanding the debt. Now,
cut back on your spending. That's how you decrease the debt.
You kept back. If you are in debt personally, you
listen again, which one on one. If you're in debt personally,
and you look at your bank accounts, you look at
your statement, you look at your bills and you say, Okay,

(51:05):
I want to quit eating out three times a week.
I'm gonna quit. You know, there's some magazines I've subscribed
to only halfway read. I'm gonna get rid of those.
I'm gonna switch from cable to you know, a different
streaming outlet. Kind of means we're gonna talk about that
later on, which I have done personally, and look to
save money and next time I go buy a carlicle
values instead of a brand new one and so on. Okay,

(51:28):
when you cut your spending, do you not end up
saving money that you can then use towards paying off
your debt? Isn't that how it typically works in our
personal lives? Why is the government different? Why are the
same principles that tend to work for just you and I,
Joe and Jane public? Why is it though when it's
in the government setting. Oh well no, no, no, that's causing.
That's causing the debt torage. That's causing the federal debt

(51:48):
Torage's that's that's real. That's causing because they view it
is there, they view your money? Is there money? Not
your money? Their money? My god, you'd better cough it up.
These corporations aren't paying a fire show, which means really,
when you retranslate that, you aren't paying your fair sharese
corporation's never pay it. They pass it along to you.

(52:10):
You don't see it on your receipt at the you know,
at the grocery store, at Walmart or Target, wherever you shop,
but it's built in to the price tag of what
you're buying. Maybe they ought to start putting it on
the receipts and you go, WHOA. Then people might have
a little different attitudes about some of the politicians they
keep voting for who want to brib people for their vote,

(52:31):
because but they're bringing home the goodies, they're bringing home
the bacon, they're bringing home the pork from the government.
See what a lot of these politicians are really upset
about is that some of that pork might get cut
and they can't bribe people, so to speak, for the
vote anymore because they're not bringing to be able to
bring back as much goodies from free goodies from the
government for people, and then they're not going to be
voted for and they'll be out of a job. They'll

(52:53):
have to get a real job. Imagine that. Look, they're
always hiring greeterers at Walmart. I'm telling you think a pause.
We got more Christian talking rocks right ahead, stick are out.

Speaker 13 (53:29):
You deserve a laugh today. Let's enjoy a family Comedy
minute with Bob Smiley.

Speaker 14 (53:35):
So the captain comes on and the captain's doing his
whole you know, this is your captain speaking. Welcome to
flight one from Phoenix to Houston with a short layover
in Michigan. So everybody's trying to get situated and we
never can just take off. We always have to go
through the whole oxygen mask that you know, ectid, it's
a whole everything. They always stay in the event of
a crash landing water crash landing that you can use

(53:56):
your seat cushion as a flotation device. I'm ever in
a crash the sea cushion I was just sitting on.
I don't want anywhere near me.

Speaker 13 (54:15):
Remember it's smart to laugh. Come visit us at Familycomedy
Radio dot com. That's Family Comedy Radio dot com.

Speaker 3 (54:25):
Hi, I am Danny Ilong.

Speaker 4 (54:27):
You may know me as an actor, but one of
the things that I'm most proud of is my service
to this country and Heami. I saw firsthand how training
and discipline is still are values that create great leadership
abilities and a can do spirit. Those same strong values
stay with service members when they returned to civilian life
and enter the workplace. So remember the highest smart and

(54:47):
bet on a vent To learn more call eight eight
eight four four salute or visit Salute Heroes dot org.

Speaker 15 (54:56):
Have you ever tried to sit on a fence?

Speaker 3 (54:58):
How long did you do it for?

Speaker 5 (54:59):
I try the other day.

Speaker 3 (55:01):
It's not very comfortable. Don't recommend it.

Speaker 15 (55:03):
Spiritually, it's so easy to sit on the fence, to
have one foot in the world and one foot in
God's word, to be so spiritual on Sunday morning, But
then Friday night's a completely different scene. Jesus challenges us
in Revelation chapter three, verse sixteen.

Speaker 3 (55:17):
Don't be lukewarm.

Speaker 15 (55:19):
Look some people, they're not hot, they're not cold, They're
just lukewarm. They're going through the motion. Spiritually, it's like
having one foot on the boat one foot on the dock.

Speaker 3 (55:27):
You can't do both at the same time. You're going
to fall into the water.

Speaker 15 (55:31):
I have a little silver square that's in my bathroom
I look at every day. Joshua chapter twenty four, verse fifteen,
It says, choose this day whom you will serve. But
as for me and my house, we will serve the
Lord every single day. Temptations come, and they're difficult, but
we need to remember that we don't want to be lukewarm.

Speaker 3 (55:50):
Let's move with God, not the world. For more information,
go to activatelife dot org.

Speaker 1 (55:57):
Everybody online, look good.

Speaker 7 (56:01):
I'm kind of in the mood for some stimulating conversation.

Speaker 1 (56:03):
Start secrets five four three two one night Now.

Speaker 4 (56:13):
Get in.

Speaker 3 (56:13):
I'm a discussion. Now line are now. Here's your host,
Richie L. You have entered the second hour of Christian
Talk at Rocks. A couple of websites for your Christian
talkt at Rocks dot noo, Christian talkdat rocks dot com,
Live Wonder email adress, talk to Richie L at gmail
dot com, t A O K T O R I
C H I E L at gmail dot com. Talkt

(56:34):
to Richiel at gmail dot com. Several ways get this
broadcast in podcast format. Here is just a handful podcast
addict podt chaser. Uh, let's see anchor FM player FM
uh mix your box cast box. I'm forgetting too many
to even mention. There's more than that Pandora. There's a
big one. Also when we get things uh squared away,

(56:58):
we load up the podcast those two Netnewsnetwork dot net,
also the newscasters dot com. Also when we're live. When
we're not live, you can check us out on thunderous
Radio dot com. That will be the channel to stream
or stream two. Stream one is music, so stream two
is the talk side of thunders Radio dot com or
dot net. Also available when we are live. And then

(57:18):
when Thunder's Radio is streaming just doing its regular streaming thing,
and we pop because it shows available there as well.
With when we're live and not live, you can go
to streamer doer dot com, i tuner dot com or
radio dot net where we're also there as podcast format
as well a radio dot net, and you'll look for
an icon with lining boat on the left hand side
and then the kind of radio looking front on the

(57:39):
right hand side, kind of blackish blue icon. That's one
you want to click on. Okay, by the way, before
I forget folks down in Central Texas Hill Country of Texas,
West westside Hill Country of Texas at Centert Ceter Curve
area and on, and that whole region really still really
from the impact of those floods, still hunting for folks

(58:00):
that they haven't found yet. I think the last death
tailler casual I saw was it one hundred nine hundred
and ten. Maybe more than that, I don't recall. It's
a lot going on here in my own personal world
as well, but they're still looking for it. I think
one hundred and some odd that are still missing that
they're still hunting for. This thing has turned into, obviously
if I'm a rescue to recovery effort now, because has

(58:22):
been you know, a couple of weeks going into two weeks,
but or more than two weeks. There are organizations helping
out down there that you that you can donate to.
Just go online do that. You got the typical usual
suspects that are always there to help folks out when
they're in need. So do what you can. In fact,
I was speaking to a relative of mine yesterday who

(58:46):
about a couple of weeks before the Curville thing happened.
In this sort of exacerbate dixascerbated, what happened in that
part of Texas was that there was a lot of heavy,
heavy rains in the week or two prior to that
Cerville in Central Texas flood Hill Country flood because the
ground was also so saturated, and in fact, a couple

(59:07):
of rooms and this relative's house got flooded and the
insurance wouldn't cover it. And a lot of these folks
have no insurance that will cover it. Some folks are
too close to the river, they're in a flood plain, whateverever,
and they just don't have the coverage. So they're having
to pay for a lot of stuff out of pocket. Now,
some of these folks may qualify for some programs and
government programs and state programs and treederble programs and this

(59:30):
one and that one's, but even then sometimes it's just
pennies on the dollar. So they're either just a kind
of out of lock or homeless, or they have to
pay out of pocket to repair and or rebuild and
clean up from these these floods, and from many of
these folks, you're not even talking about weeks. Sometimes you're

(59:50):
talking about months and maybe even years to deal with stuff.
And of course, when water gets in your home, there's
mold goes everywhere, and you know you can bleach things,
bleach things, but then you know you have to peel
back sometimes layers of of sheet rock or paneling, pulling
up flooring, pulling up carpeting, et centa, sert, et cetera.
And you've got a big mess and there's usually nobody

(01:00:12):
that can or wants to help you. So you're in
there by yourself doing all this stuff. And I've had
had a disrelative to Kentucky that was in a similar
situation a few months back from some flooding down there.
So it's bad and these folks are struggling and they
need help. So there are organizations out there, charitable organizations
that you can donate to to help these folks in need.

(01:00:32):
Are going to be in need for some time. Please
prayerfully consider doing that. Okay, okay, speaking of the Epstein thing,
I forgot to share this quick story with you. Move
on this Mantle things being ported by Adam Pack Daily
Caller News Foundation. This is about trust. Republicans said, trust
of us, vote for us. We will release these files.
We are, we are. They are backtracking here, we are,

(01:00:54):
they are backtracking. House Republicans actually blocked a Democratic back
to effort. Maybe that's why a late Monday evening to
require the Department of Justice to release all records related
to the convicted sex criminal guide Jeffrey Epstein. The House
Rules Committe voted five to seven to reject an amendment
that would force Attorney General of pambody to publish any

(01:01:14):
records or evidence regarding the federal government's prosecution and incarceration
of Epstein. Just one House Republican, Ralph Norman of South Carolina,
voted in favor of the amendment. Just one. You see,
I want to know why, I kind of said, gudios.
The Repubs. Democratic California Representative Rocanna Pipulist, with some admirers

(01:01:35):
on the right, introduced the measure as a potential amendment
to a procedural rule containing major crypto legislation and defense appropriations,
et cetera, et cetera. Some Republicans on the powerful committee
argue that the House Rules Panel was not the right
form to debate releasing the Epstein files. Okay, well what is? However,
most up lawmakers on the panel did not comment on

(01:01:55):
the amendment before voting against it. And yes, I understand
that the Damns now all of sudden on board after
kind of wanting to be a little hush hush about
the Epstein thing, especially during the last administration, which of
course is run by a damn uh uh now all
of a sudden because I think it might throw a
little shade on the Orange man. Now they are all
of a sudden for it. I get that. I get
the hypocrisy here, I get the hypocrisy on the part
of the Damns. I totally get it. But then again,

(01:02:18):
I'm reminded of the promise that we were made by Republicans.
Oh yeah, we're gonna throw the We're gonna blow the
lid off all this stuff that Democrats been sitting on
by the administration and Epstein files and bla Jeff K
going back, JFK, All right, right, wrong, yeah, okay, here
we are. So there you have it. You draw your
own conclusions, all right. So I have been using the

(01:02:42):
term new Confederates to describe a lot of what's going
on with sanctuary states, sanctuary cities, politicians that run them,
and how yearly similar many of the things that they're
saying about illegal aliens is awful daggum similar to what
Southern Democrats said about slaves. Okay, you know in the

(01:03:03):
late eighteen fifties and right before the Civil War. There's
interesting parallels, interesting Parallels documented some of that on the
show last week. Well let me uh share this with
you as some sort of indication for that. This being
putted by Candae Hathaway the Blaze dot Com. This is
governor Newsomber is like calling Governor Nuisance admits admits that

(01:03:28):
California depends on illegal labor. We've got to have a
group of brown people that we can exploit or we
just go down. That's quite similar to what Southern Democrats
were saying about Savery. We got to have these negroes
on the plantation picking this to back and cotton or else.
We are economic calamity here and picking the other vegetables

(01:03:48):
that you people up north want to eat. We're gonna
you like to smoke to back in the conton. We
send abroad to make money, but you gonna you who's
gonna do it? You're not gonna do it. It's the
same argument basically at its root. In fact, each to
out's eight bion dollars in taxes from I legal immigrants,

(01:04:09):
well ignoring the thirty bion dollars in costs now Gavin
Nuisance continue to defend legal immigration and call for a
pathway to citizenship amid the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts.
There is a pathway to citizenship. Well, give a pathway.
There is one. It's called doing it legally, coming in
the front door, notf the back door. There is a
pathway to citizenship. That, by the way, buying large works

(01:04:31):
for anywhere from eight hundred and fifty thousand to upwards
of a million people each year, depending on how you
define legal immigration entry into this country. Okay, it's clunky,
it needs some tweaks. I get it. I've said that
for a long time. It's clunky and needs some tweaks.
But we have a pathway. Problems is people aren't taking

(01:04:52):
the pathway. That's why we're here. To the tune of
at least eight and a half a million the blew
across the border, maybe more. We were already dealing with
a good eleven to fifteen men, depending on whose numbers
you want to believe. So we're arguably somewhere in the
ballpark of twenty to twenty five million plus illegal immigrants
in this nation, maybe more. California Governor Gavin Newsom's continue

(01:05:18):
to defend this on The Sean Ryan Show, released and
released to an interview on Monday with the Democratic governor,
in which he claimed that legal immigration has not negatively
impacted American's ability to find work. Abuse of those those
h one visus ass but anyway, we talked about that
in the past. Past shows as one of California's most

(01:05:38):
vital industries. Governor Newsom should be incentivizing this sort of
monernization rather than justifying out data and explotative labor practices.
Exploitative labor practices. It's kind of what happened in slavery.
I mean, these people aren't slaves, but they're being exploited.
They're being paid lousy wages, and these people are not
going to say much aout it because they don't want

(01:05:59):
to deported. And they're here because even what they're making
here as crummey as it is, bearing what they were
probably making where they came from there. Some stated they
roughly half of the agricultural workers and forty one percent
of construction workers in California are illegal immigrants. Don't even
have The state collects eight point five billion tax dollars
from illegal immigrants each year, not insignificant. News Some stated, ah,

(01:06:20):
follow the money trail, you see, always follow the munch tink.
That's aware. That was a money trail for the for
the southern slave owners. Follow the money trail, plantation owners
were making pretty decent money off the backs of well
free labor more or less wasn't totally free. They had
to feed them, clothes them, clothe them, house them. Some
of them gave them stipends to go or gave them

(01:06:41):
shares the crops really to go sell and make a
little money for themselves to pay for some of the
stuff to sort of get the plantation owner off the hook.
They did happen in some areas and with some plantation owners,
true enough, But it's still the same mentality, is it not.
By the way, what was a party that was real
big on that, Yeah, the Southern Democrats, and these are
now just Democrats period, not just from the South, but
from other parts of the country, well, the sun Belt.

(01:07:03):
I guess it's half forricultural work. Care about farmers and ranchers,
that's your number one go to commitment, Then you sure
as blank better carry about their workers. For there per
cent of our construction workers. Texas California have the highest
tender construction workers that will fall in that category. Blah, blah.
First of all, let me talk about the let me
talk about the ranches and the farms. More and more

(01:07:26):
and more each year of agriculture is automated. There are
no They don't need illegal immigrants per se pulling up
stuff out of the ground or picking stuff off the
trees in most cases anymore. In some cases they do,
but in most cases they don't. Why because it's become automated.
It's become mechanized, mechanized farm work. They have machines that

(01:07:46):
do This's got machines that shake the stuff out of
the trees. They got machines that pull the stuff up
out of the ground that picked the stuff, and other
machines that have little things that shake it and sword
it and blah blah blah, and other machines that rent
it off and boom, it goes a bit trek and
goes to wherever it's going to, the to the pickle
making plant or whatever, the tomato sauce making plant. So
so much of this is automated. Now you know who

(01:08:08):
your farm workers are. International harvester, John Deere, husk Varna. Okay,
those are the makers of these automated machines that picks
them if if you ever flying over, if you ever
go with Flywer country, especially in the middle of Parle
the country, agriculture part of the country. Taxes the mid
mid part of the country. Some parts of the western US,

(01:08:28):
you see these big crop circle I'm gona talk about
the ones that suppose the UFOs are making or demons
or whoever. You see these these big circular deals. It's
that they're dotted all over the place. And you see
these big deals that go around and water the plants
and those things, those same deals with water the plant,
fertilize the plants, the different the different plants and different crops,
and then sometimes they can put stuff on there that

(01:08:50):
will shear the crops. And then they just come in
and gathered up in a big truck and out, you know,
down the road that go. So much of this is
mechanized and automated to where you don't need that many
people anymore. I mean in dairy farms, you see that
those things they stick up to the cow's utters and church,
you know, and and it's it's so much of this

(01:09:10):
is is now automated, and mac has been really for
some decades. So they need less and less of these
folks in uh uh in agriculture where a lot of
these folks are going. That is true. Men, you're going
into construction, but when you're going into hospitality, casinos, hotels, motels.
I asked the lovely missus l about that years ago

(01:09:34):
when she was an assistant front desk manager of one
of the nation's few of this particular chain, which I'll
leave uh Uh. Nameless hotels are mostly known from hotels.
If people in there were legal, she wasn't hiring them.
The owners were, and uh, they were kind of get

(01:09:54):
in trouble. But uh, you saw us all over the place.
I mean when I when I was living in I
lived in Austin for the majority of my adult life.
A few years back before we moved up. Period of
the old dominion, I remember going to we didn't need
much fast food, but I can remember going a few
fast food chains and you pretty much had to speak

(01:10:18):
Spanish to get your order through. Sometimes they didn't understand
the English is very bad. A lot of times orders
really was really messed up. So these people go into
a lot of these low age, low age jobs, and
Americans will do Younger Americans will certainly do it. College

(01:10:40):
kids will do it. High school kids will do it.
And yet you hear a lot a lot about college
kids in high school kids having a hard time finding work. Right, Well,
wonder why?

Speaker 16 (01:10:51):
Uh?

Speaker 3 (01:10:52):
Anyway, nuisance nuisance went on? You question out of state?
Whatever you build after the day ivastating wildfire earlier this year,
President Donald Trump deported deportation genders allowed to persist. Well,
how do we rebuild all these things without that workforce
you see, without these brown skinned people that we can exploit.

(01:11:12):
How in the world do we pick California up? Come on,
what's wrong with you people? He said, we're not talking
ambassy advocating for legal aliens already in the US. He
simultaneously claimed that he believes in border security and that
his administration has handed eleven thousand criminals to Immigration and

(01:11:34):
Customs enforcement. Never mind, there's probably one or two million
illegals living in a state, when that's where the legal
immigrants are taking jobs away from American zoom, responding, not
in to Lark County, not in Ventura County. I don't
know many people that want a job out there in
those packing facilities. I don't see many people that look
like me jumping at those jobs. I just don't so

(01:11:58):
because you know white people won't do it, ahead and
get the brown people to do. Do you see them mental?
I mean, Jesus said himself out of the treasures of them,
of the heart and mouthful speak. There's no leg it says,
if you give a fool enough rope, he will hang
himself or herself. You see the mentality here? Do you
see the mentality anyway? I think I made the point.

(01:12:19):
So again, he's one of the new Confederates out there,
and the new confederacy sanctuary cities and states that say
the heck with the federal government. And don't you dare
try to come down here and free our slaves. Don't
you dare come down here and try to free us
of our brown skinned workers that we can we can exploit.

(01:12:39):
Don't you dare speaking of an elite? Here's one that
actually count of believe it or not. You might want
to check and make sure gravity is working when I
share this one with you. You might want to make
sure there's double check things. Brace yourself for this one.
Might want to put a just hang on to your
chair for listening chair. If you're driving and listening to this,

(01:13:01):
hang on tighter steering wheel, keep your eyes on the road,
of course, pull over if you need to. John Kerry,
Yes that John Kerry, John Kerry, mister Hines ketchup that. Yes, yes,
that guy admits that the Orange Man was right about
the border. He said, quote, without a border protecting, you

(01:13:23):
don't have a nation.

Speaker 1 (01:13:24):
Duh.

Speaker 3 (01:13:25):
That's what yours Julie has been screaming on this show,
or saying sometimes screaming without sovereign boarders, you don't have
a sovereign nation. The two go hand in hand. It's
just like, you know, you can have a Lamborghini. You
can have one of the most expensive, nicest sports car
race cars in your driveway, but if the thing is

(01:13:45):
up on center blocks because there's no wheels for it, well,
what's the point? Just kind of well, it's nice look
at and got a great stereo, and I can kind
of rive up the engine and play with it. You know,
it looks cool, but I can't go anywhere in it because,
you know, what's the point, there's no wheels on it.
That's the same thing with a nation without a sovereign
border is like a Lamborghini with no wheels on it.
I guess it's kind of well there it's sits. But

(01:14:06):
you can't. I mean, where's it going to go? It's
kind of useless. You just have a boat anchor basically
very expensive boat anchor Dayline Washington, d c OA and
a staff Blake Wolf. John Kerry, formed President Joe Biden's
climates are, admitted during an interview Thursday of last week

(01:14:29):
that President Holan Trump is right about the need for
border security while the Dems are allowed it to fall
under siege during Biden's presidency. Kerry, who also served as
former President Barack Obama Secretary of State in addition to
being the Democrat presidential nominee back in four, admitted that
Trump was right to prior toize border security, unlike his
prior to Democrat colleagues. Quote, the first thing any president

(01:14:54):
should say, any president or anybody in public life is
without a border protected, you don't have a nation. You
have to have a border. That means something. Well, yeah,
I gotta agree with him. He's right. You gotta agree
with mister Kerry, mister Hines, let's catch up. Gotta agree

(01:15:14):
with him. I gotta agree with him. I mean, I'm
still a huge fan he is, But I mean, you
have to admit the Irish man got that one right,
And look what's happening at the border. It's kind of
down to a trickle now. I mean it's still not great,

(01:15:35):
but it's it's way better than what it was, way better, way, way, way,
way way better. And even if you hate the man's got,
you gotta give him credit for well kind of securing
the border, kind of slowing all that down to a
dramatic trickle compared to what it was. But that's coming
from John Kerry died in the world, democrat died in

(01:15:59):
the world, quote unquote progressive. I would see a borderline
socialist at least compliment the Orange man. I know, I
couldn't believe it. I thought, wait a minute, this has
got to be a joke, because this is hold on,
who's this by the onion? What's going on here? Babylon
b No, it's the legit. It's legit. Bipartisan bill would

(01:16:20):
grant illegal would grant I legal status to certain illegal
immigrant workers. And we're gonna through this. It's being imported
by Landon Milind Fox News. Republic led legislation what allows
certain illegal immigrants to stay and work while enhancing border security.
Governor newsim you might get your brownskinned people you can

(01:16:41):
exploit at least a few of them. Demogrants have no
sem of the year. Sorry for these families, border prosecution
official says. Representatives Maria Alvira Salazar Republic of Florida and
veronicasco Bard, Democrat from tex Aos, introduced legislation on Tuesday
to reform the US immigration system, including offering legal status. Now,
this will be the second one of these, if it

(01:17:01):
goes to him, becomes a bill that we've had in
less than thirty years. Remember you had one. It was
the Immigration Reform Act, which took a lot with illegal immigration,
actually back in nineteen ninety six, signed off on by
then that was in the fall of ninety six, signed
off phone by President Bill Clinton. That then went into
effect in ninety seven because people who But then, you know,
like ten years later, not even ten years later, about

(01:17:23):
eight years later, people were screaming for were new comprehensive
remembigration reform. You just had one dummy eight years ago.
What was that about? And by the way, it was
bipartisan and it signed off on by a Democrat president
that was all about it, who touted and waved it
and everything practically licked the bill kissed it, and then

(01:17:45):
eight nine years later, oh we need we need comperence,
we everbrag for you just got that. No, what you
need is to follow the laws that are on the
books at USC thirteen twenty four, eight USC thirteen twenty five,
at USC thirteen twenty six, and that immigration bill that
Slick will he signed off on. Okay, now they're calling
this a Dignity Act of twenty twenty five would allow

(01:18:05):
legal immigrants who have been in the US since before
twenty twenty one the opportunity to apply for up to
seven years of legal status with work authorization. It's just
sort of like an extended glorified work bill, really work visa.
The immigrants would pay restitution now in order for them
to be tailed to be qualified for this and not deported,
they got to pay restitution that would be check in

(01:18:29):
regularly with the Prominent of Homeland Security, and their legal
status could be renewed based on good conduct and paying restitution.
If your nose clean, pay your restitution, et cetera, et cetera.
If not, then idiosmachacos. The bill would offer a pathway
to permanent residency, but the legal status supported to the
immigrants would not allow for any federal benefits or a

(01:18:51):
path to US citizenship. Right quoth the Didney Act of
twenty twenty five is revolutionary bill. Say that ten time
twice that offers the solution to our immigration crisis, secure
the border, stopa leagal immigrants, and provide an earned opportunity
for the long term immigrants to stay here and work.

(01:19:11):
Sales are said in the statement, no amnesty, no handouts
those edizenship, just accountability and a path to stability for
own economy in our future. And of course it would
still allow a govern nuisance to exploit brown people for
cheap labor, so it kind of keeps everybody happy. I
guess the bill will be fully funded through restitution payments

(01:19:33):
and application fees made by legal immigrants, meaning it would
not rely on any taxpayer money. The measure would also
aim to end catch and release and for the bolt
ser security of the southern border, as well as require
employers across the country to use everify. That's problem A
lot of times you don't they don't want to frankly
of the government system for checking the legal status of

(01:19:54):
workers because it is against the law and nuisance should
know this. It is against the LA law to knowingly
hire someone who doesn't pass that e verify thing. In
most cases, they've got to have the proper documents and
it's got to be verified. And if they don't, you
can't hire them because you're breaking the law if you do.
I can remember the in the days, back in the

(01:20:15):
day I'm old, remember back in the nineties when some
of these early nineties when some of these immigration laws
that I just quoted for you came online. And that
was back when Tip O'Neil and company were still running
Congress and others mostly pretty much run by Democrats both houses,
and they passed some pretty tough anti illegal immigration laws,

(01:20:36):
not anti immigration laws, but illegal immigration laws. And it
was not uncommon night after night on the evening news,
especially they're in Texas where I was living at the time,
to see managers and CEOs and high ranking officials companies
being pro walked out of their offices, out of their locations,
out of their stores, off of their construction sites, so

(01:20:58):
out of their buildings whatever for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants.
I mean, the FBI would be there, i ins would
be there, State police would be you know the DPS
would be there, three four different law agencies, news cameras there,
purp walking these guys out with their lawyers, trying to
cover the person's face with a file folder or a
briefcase and no comment, no comment, no comment. My client

(01:21:19):
has no comment, you know. And you see him being
phoned in the paddy wagon and taking down to wherever. Right.
That was almost every other night on the local news
for a few years, and all of a sudden it
kind of just get quit happening. Just that's the hiring
of the illegal. Didn't quit happening, I can tell you that.
But he just did do that. I kind of well,
you know, it just wasn't a thing anymore. What happened.

(01:21:43):
I keep going back to, this is largely more of
an enforcement issue than anything else. Let's enforce this stuff.
Let's enforce the laws on the books as written. Quit
bending them and twist them and ignoring them, and uh
whatever follow as written, Follow the as written. It's not
that hard. It's not that hard. Ice agents arrested in

(01:22:06):
legal alien with forty count them forty criminal convictions including
child sexhybuisias, being reported by John benderbriybar dot com the
Immigration and Customs enforcement. That would be icy if you're wondering.
Recently arrested in illegal alien with a staggering forty prior
criminal convictions in the US. His name was Murad Sahnie
Awad and illegal from illegally from Jordan, who was arrested

(01:22:28):
by ICE agents and Hotlanta, Georgia, after having been convicted
forty times forty times He's had his due process and
then so forty times on convicted past tense forty times
on criminal charges including child sex abuse, organized drug trafficking,
conspiracy for all the US coup. Just a real great guy,
just a real hard working guy trying to improve himself

(01:22:49):
and his lot in his family.

Speaker 4 (01:22:50):
Right.

Speaker 3 (01:22:51):
Yeah, Awat has yet another egregious example of what happens
when open border policies are paired with spineless leadership. The
Department of Homeland in Securities Tricia mclaughugh and said in
a statement Awad was allowed to terrorize American communities and
accumulate forty criminal convictions, including sexual battery without consequence by
an area of negligence is over. Under President Trump and

(01:23:13):
Secretary of Norman we are restoring law and order and
ensuring dangerous criminal aliens are removed before they can harm
more innocent Americans. Also, I also rectidvice agents recently is
Nissaphio nice Sepharo not very nice apparently Ruiz and Nahara
and legal alien from Mexico who was previously convicted in Shelbyville,
Tennessee for facilitation a aggravated sexual battery a four year

(01:23:35):
old child. Again, just a real great citizen. So these
are the people that they're grabbing and deport, not grabbing
just somebody off the street that has brown skin tone
or too much of a sun tanned. All right, that's
not what's going on here anyway. Uh, I'm gonna break

(01:23:57):
through this second, but I'll lunch you. Hear another clip,
and this is from one of the folks on the
Marxist Socialist Nationalist Broadcast and Collective also known as MSNBC MSNBC.
MSNBC's Vance claims anti deportation protesters might exercise lawful right

(01:24:18):
to attack eyes. It's being reported by Jeff Poor bright Bart.
This story actually originated NewsBusters during a recent appearance on
MSNBC's Velshi. MSNBC contributed Joyce Vance, also a law professor
at the University of Alabama argue that immigration and customers
enforcement agents wearing masks during immigration enforcement could face lawful,

(01:24:41):
lawful violence. Now there's been virtual calls for violence against
these people. Several days back, Wolfman Blitzer on CNN had
King Jeffres in the hot seat and Kim kind of
sliding around asking answering some of his questions. He says,
look at this is like, you got colleagues and Democrats

(01:25:02):
and others out there calling for violence, and he quoted
some quotes. We're pretty much calling for blood and streets,
well calling for it basically, and King Jefferies just went around, Well,
let's blame Orange man. You know, this is all it's
the Orange Man's fault, and blah blah blah blah, and okay,
well he wouldn't answer the questions, and he tried to
nail him twice, and the Wolfman let him slide because well,
you know, Wolfman was already pushing the envelope because these

(01:25:25):
are his fellow Democrats too, you know. So let me
let you hear this clip from the Marxist Socialist Nationalist
Broadcasting Collective. And I mean, I don't know if this
person has ever seen an ice agent. How they're dressed. Yeah,
they a lot of them are wearing masks, not all
of them. A lot of them are wearing masks. But
they still got the uniform, they still got the badges,

(01:25:47):
they still got the emblems, they still got the stuff,
they still got the vests. That's say Ice. You know
they're ICE people because they got the ICE they got
the Homeland of Security and ICE uniform all. They got
the stuff on, they got the vests on, they got
the hat. Okay, it's pretty obvious they're ICE agents. These
are not just a bunch of plain clothes people run

(01:26:07):
around jeans and T shirts with a mask on their face,
or wearing all black like Antifa with a mask on
their face. You know, let meally cheer the clip.

Speaker 1 (01:26:18):
Cherez.

Speaker 3 (01:26:19):
Let me ask you what thing the transformation. Because you're a.

Speaker 17 (01:26:22):
Prosecutor, I want to ask you there are legitimate reasons
why some enforcement agencies, some police agencies, go undercover or
you know, do things in shadows to achieve certain things.

Speaker 3 (01:26:32):
I would assume that's specific, and you know it needs
to be. It needs to comport with some laws.

Speaker 5 (01:26:43):
Exactly.

Speaker 18 (01:26:43):
There are very serious legal restrictions around the use of
For instance, FBI agents as undercover operatives, very strict.

Speaker 16 (01:26:54):
Rules regarding how it's done, what they can do, what
they can't do. But you know what I've never seen
a federal agent working a case do is pull a
mask up so nobody knows who they are and go
out and terrorize a civilian population. And I think it's
important for us at this point to be very plain
speaking when we say that this is not normal, it's

(01:27:15):
not acceptable, and it's a danger sign. You know, we
are well past the point where we can just identify
danger signs and say, oh, there might be problems down
the road. The problems are here, they're in the right now,
and as we see people being pulled off the streets,
you know that the danger to law enforcement, quite frankly,
is that when you're masked like that and people don't

(01:27:36):
know who you are, someone might exercise their lawful right
of self defense to protect themselves, thinking they're being kidnapped.
So the notion that this is for law enforcements protection
is utterly ludicrous, and we need to do away.

Speaker 3 (01:27:50):
With that one thing. She neglects to admit there though,
or say, is it even when they're wearing mak Look,
I'm not a fan of Wafer. I'm wearing mask ever,
and I know why they're doing it, to protect themselves
because they're being dogs. But they've got the uniforms on.
They're not kidnappers. They got vests that say ICE. I

(01:28:10):
mean these people are identifiable. These people are identifiable all right. Well,
back when COVID was happening, everybody was wearing a mask.
I didn't hear these people quining. I didn't hear this
lawyer whining. Then cops. A lot of cops wore masks.

(01:28:31):
I saw them. A lot of cops wore masks. Some
still do when there's COVID outbreaks or whatever in their community.
They still do. I mean tsa people. I've seen screenshots
of them wearing masks back during the thing. I mean
a lot of people law enforced wearing masks. I bet
she wasn't whining then, was she? I bet she had

(01:28:54):
nothing to say about that? And why some of these
ICE agents are doing I'm not fans of them doing it.
I've got mixed feelings about it. I agree, but they're
doing it because you know they're being targeted. But you
can tell who they are because they've got the vest
AT's say ICE. They've got the uniforms, they've got the emblems,
they've got the stuff, they got the hat, let you

(01:29:15):
know who they are. Most of these guys are fully
you know, I mean, they are obvious who they are.
And they're not just grabbing people off the street Willy Nearly.
Oh oh, slow down, Joe, there's another brown person we
can grab. Let's go grab them. That's not what's going on.
That's what the mainstinct media and politicians wants you to
think is going on. That's not how this is working.

(01:29:37):
They're serving, they're executing lawful apprehension, deportation warrants. A lot
of these are stale. They've been on the books for years.
In some cases, there's one point four million on the
books deportation orders by people who have had their due process.

(01:30:03):
In the vast majority of cases, it's time to get
him out of here, been time. Some of them have
been in the street, running the streets for years and
still haven't been deported. And judges and these are warrants.
These are orders, court orders, federal court orders signed off
on by federal judges both Republican and Democrat, and maybe
a few independence libertarian zone in who knows that these

(01:30:23):
folks need to go, and the Biden administration served very
few of them comparatively speaking, And in fact, Trump stok
as a long way to go to reach Obama's record
of about three quarters of a man. Of these folks.
Some of you might recall they called him to porter
in chief. A lot of folks got upset with him.
These are deportation orders, and the President and Ice and

(01:30:46):
all these other folks have to act on them. They
have no choice really, otherwise they're in violation of following
the courts. And for all these people screaming or Trump
reason to fall the courts, Well, okay, he is. See
they only want Trump to follow the courtsmanitsky Vinia for
their particular socialist communist marks this agenda. When it doesn't
fit that agenda, way, I'll forget it. Hypocrites. Take a pause.

(01:31:16):
Oh there's more, always more, stick around.

Speaker 10 (01:31:27):
More talk continues next with Richie el More Christian talk
that rocks.

Speaker 3 (01:31:32):
Next.

Speaker 2 (01:31:34):
Oh, this is Max McClain. God created all things by
his word. How does the word have the power to create?
Because his word is a person? Listen to the Bible
from John One in the beginning was the word and
the word was with God, and the Word was God.

(01:31:55):
He was with God in the beginning. Through him, all
things were made. Without him, nothing was made that has
been made. In him was life, and that light was
the light of men. The light shines in the darkness,
but the darkness has not understood it. He was in
the world, and though the world was made through him,

(01:32:19):
the world did not recognize him. From John One, listen
to the Bible. It's great for the soul.

Speaker 7 (01:32:27):
You're more at radiobible dot org.

Speaker 6 (01:32:30):
The views expressed on this talk show may not necessarily
reflect those of our affiliates, associates, providers, sponsors, or underwriters.
So there, now here's your host, Richie el.

Speaker 3 (01:32:55):
All right, So there are some lawmakers, pretty much Republicans
of course, House lawmakers that are floating the idea of
now grilling Joe and Jill Biden as former aide stonewall
cover up pro being reported by Elizabeth Elkin Fox News.
In fact, long time Joe Biden had anthe but now
spoke to investigators behind closed doors but really didn't say much.

(01:33:17):
In fact that Joe Biden i ate a silent after
pleading fifth pleading the fifth, which is the right to
House investigators. So now House Oversight Committee folks are not
ruling out potentially compelling former President Joe Biden and former
First Lady Joe Biden to appear before Congress as part
of an investigation to whether the signs of Biden's mental
decline were covered up during his time in the White House.

(01:33:38):
Plus also trying to figure out James Comy is still
trying to figure out, well, who was using the auto
pen because for certain things, certain things, I guess that
some fundus you're saying it really doesn't matter, some lawyers
and legal biggles on federal laws and some things that
don't really matter. And it happens a lot of times
in the program where the President tells somebody to go

(01:33:58):
sign saything, they do it and they use his pen,
so to speak. But on certain things that it has
to be the President's X on the spot otherwise it's
not legal. Quote. Every option is on the table. We're
going to try to get answers. We're going to try
to do this rapidly. Yeah, well, has Congress ever done
anything rapidly that you can recall of any consequence?

Speaker 4 (01:34:20):
That is.

Speaker 3 (01:34:23):
That'll be a First House silver SSID Committee Chairman James Comber,
Republican from Kentuck, he told reporters when asked if the
former president could be brought into questioning, he said, well,
he said, we'll decide as a committee what steps to
take next and who to bring in. But I think
right now every option is on the table. Unquote. Ryan
Byron Donald's, Republican of Florida, was more forceful in his

(01:34:46):
demands for a more high profile witnesses, noting he was
speaking for himself rather than the committee. Well, well, we'll see,
we'll see. Quote. As far as I'm concerned, every member
of the Biden administration at this point needs to be subpoenaed. Well,
some of them are writing books, so they're kind of
telling you. I don't care if they were as secretary.
I don't care if they were a janitor working in there.

(01:35:09):
They've all got to come in and answer questions. Donald said,
of course, they can all plead the fifth it's their
constitutional right, and that's what they're doing. When asked if
that meant the former First Lady as well, Donald's responded, quote,
of course. Now. He and Comer were both president for
the closed door deposition of Anthony Bernall, a long time
aide to Jill Biden who was subpoened in the Oversight

(01:35:29):
Committee's probe. Her right hand man, listen, Anthony Bernall was
the right hand man. That's her guy. Her chief of staff.
Donald said, if he came in here and pleaded the
Fifth I'm sorry the former First Lady, she's got to
come in here and answer the questions. Anthony Bernall, the
former senior advisor to the First Lady, pleaded the Fifth
Amendment during his deposition in the Oversight Committee's investigation. So

(01:35:53):
with all these folks pleading the fifth except those who
are writing the books to kind of cover themselves, you know,
probably per advice of a ernies, why don't you just
write a book and that way it's all out there
in public domain and you know you're covered. I don't know,
but this is a scandal, I have said, as everybody,
as big as Watergate. But will go anywhere? Will anybody?
Will anybody?

Speaker 4 (01:36:13):
Now?

Speaker 3 (01:36:14):
The Watergate thing you did have, you know, a couple
three people go to jail, and of course the President
stepped down a disgrace. Biden was just voted out in
disgrace in some ways, replaced in the replaced in the
in the campaign had an appalling debate. A lot of

(01:36:35):
people shocked, although it's like, where have you been the
past two or three years to what the rest of
us were seeing and saying, I mean, come on, I
don't know where this is going to go. I'm not
going to hold my breath that anybody's going to go
to jail. Has anybody in these other scandals gone to jail?
Has the funny money stuff that was revealed in the

(01:36:59):
Laptop from Hell? Has anybody of other other than one
of Biden's son's gone to jail? And he really, he's
he's still kind of fighting that. I mean, he's still
kind of just getting slapped around a little bit. Who's
who's gone to jail? Who's going to jail for any

(01:37:23):
of this stuff? For the funny money business? Who's been
tried and prosecuted other than the author of some of
what was on the on the Laptop from Hell? Who's
who's going to jail? All these investigations, all these committee hearings,

(01:37:48):
all we're gonna back them in here, We're gonna have
allow the book. I oh, yeah, okay, who's gone to jail?
Joe Biden's They're going to jail nope. Anybody in the
Biden family serving hard time right now? Nope, nope. So yeah,

(01:38:18):
somebody might have to pay a fine somewhere. Will be
probably about it. What we do, d n C. I
write the check for him. It's it. So this is
just more I hate to say it because you know,
for all the growling and snarling these people, have you
ever seen like a little uh sometimes like a little

(01:38:38):
chihuah or a little a little dog or it'll come
out and just you know, like as soon as you eat,
you alive, and then you stop your foot and it
goes running off about twenty feet and turns around a
bark set. That's the way these folks are in Congress. Okay.
They snarl, they and they and they show their teeth,
and they grit and they wag their little tails and
you know, dance around the ground like they can tell
you nothing happens. That's what these people remind me of,

(01:39:02):
just just a little little angry Chuahas or Pekinese or
something just sitting there growling and snarling, sniffing and snorting,
and you're like, yeah whatever, because you know, if they
run at you to bite you, you just kind of
stomp the ground and smack your hands and growl back.
They go running twenty feet off and then turn around
look at you, and then growl and snarling some more.
But but they stay twenty feet away from you. Have

(01:39:23):
you me, That's the way these people are. So I
don't give this. I don't really give this much hope.
Nothing's going to really happen. Call me again, king of
the King of the Skeptics, maybe even King of the
King of the Senex. I've just seen this, We've all
seen this movie before, and whatever happens, nothing, and it's
all hollow gestures from these Republicans. Oh they might might
kick up a few votes. And look what I fought

(01:39:44):
for when I was in the high Yeah, okay, boy,
I held their faith to the right. No you didn't, No,
you did not really, not really, not when it was
not when it's all just just added up. Not really.
This is interesting. Before we move on, broadcast viewership falls

(01:40:09):
below twenty percent of TV use for first time ever
as streaming rises, It's been reported by Warner TOODD Houston,
Brightbart dot com broadcast TV has now fallen to less
than twenty percent of TV use. That according to latest
dealson viewership survey. He surprised because there's junk on TV.
Of course, this is killing. This is killed in some
of the big news networks too. Nielsen only started attracting

(01:40:31):
all TV use on all platforms four years ago and
now includes streaming and internet based services. People are cutting
the cable, but in that time regular broadcast TV has
catered cratered in viewership. Latest ratings found that over the
air broadcast has dwindled to just eighteen point five percent
of usage, and I bet that's probably in some rural areas,

(01:40:52):
down from the twenty point one percent measured by the
service in May that according to The Hollywood Reporter, despite
the continued fall from grace old broadcast networks, TV use
grew by three percent. Neilsen said, though it seems likely
that much of the increase can be tied to children
being out of school for the summer. I was about
to say that is probably because the kids are at
the house is going, you know, flipping through the channels.
Netflix saw the biggest bump of thirteen point five percent

(01:41:14):
growth over the last month, which pushed the streamer to
add up to eight point three percent of all TV
usage in June Paramount's Peacock streaming services also grewing in
June represented zero point percent of all usage where it's part.
YouTube use grew by zero point three percent, giving the
service twelve twenty percent of all TV US YouTube YouTube

(01:41:35):
cable TV, you saw another small loss in the June
data and made cable TV made up made up twenty
four point one percent of TV usage, But in the
June data the numbers fall into twenty three point four
percent use. So people are cutting the cable. People are
getting away from some of the big networks and going
to other stuff, going to other stuff all some other times.

(01:41:57):
None of that's surprising to me. I'm actually surprised it's
not worse for cable. And be honest, some people are
still kind of hanging on, but most people are cutting
it and going to internet services and internet streaming. And
that's kind of the way with the future, right, wrong
or different, good, bad or ugly. There you have it. Ah,
let's uh, let me see here. Let's go go ahead

(01:42:20):
and go to break and then I want to get
into some other stuff that's going to make your hair curl,
especially if you're a person of faith. I'm of the mind,
but there are like small town and county bureaucrats that
need constitutional study courses. You're going to see that in

(01:42:40):
just a moment. Stick around.

Speaker 4 (01:42:47):
I am Danny. You may know me as an actor,
but one of the things that I'm most proud of
is my service to this country and the army. I
saw firsthand how training and discipline is still a value
that create great leadership abilities and a can do spirit.
Those same strong values stay with service members when they
return to civilian life and enodor workplace. So remember the

(01:43:08):
highest smart and bet on a vent To learn more,
call eight eight eight four four Salute or visit Salute
Heroes dot org.

Speaker 5 (01:43:16):
Needing a tuxedo? Why rent when you can buy one
at only eighty nine ninety nine at suit City. Suit
City has tuxedos, Steve Harvey, suits and blazers and suits
starting at thirty nine ninety nine, shoes starting at nineteen
ninety nine with brands such as Stacy Adams and Moore.
At suit City, we have all your accessories, hats, ties,

(01:43:38):
and a wide variety to suit your needs. On any occasion,
suit City will have you looking your best. Suit City
has passed the rooms mens suits and dress suits blazers
plus men's shirts. Why rent a tuxedo when you can
buy at suit city at only eighty nine ninety nine.
Visit our website at SUITCITYUSA dot com. That suit City

(01:44:00):
USA dot com.

Speaker 3 (01:44:11):
All right, uh, there's a government, a small government, little
little little area government. It's going full antichrist on a
man of promoting Jesus, claiming that their rule supersedes US constitution. Now,
I keep bringing these kinds of stories, and this one,

(01:44:32):
and a lot of them are from the Bible Belt.
It's not from California, New York, Illinois, the usual suspects,
from the heart of the Bible Belt. Okay, heart of
the Bible Belt, and not some big city like Chicago
or New York. Tell you some little town, some little town,

(01:44:54):
South Carolina town that's been parted about Bob Underworldandali a
south a South Carolina town. It he is being sued
for imposing the permitting scheme and demanding other limits on
the display of a religious sign. And I met this
is the town. It's probably got a church on every
other street, corner, church building.

Speaker 4 (01:45:10):
That is.

Speaker 3 (01:45:10):
First Liberty Institute is file the action in federal court
against the town of Chapin or Chapin. I don't know
if I'm pronouncing that right. Chapin or Chapin for its
agenda to it's a small town, for its agenda to
impose a permit requirement in other limits on Earnest Giardino quote,
no one should be forced to ask the government's permission
to express their faith in a public space. Well, yeah,

(01:45:32):
because it's protected by the First Amendment, And explained the
first liberty lawyer Nate Kellum in a statement about the case,
the first quote, the First Amendment is his permit. Like
any citizen in any city in America, mister Giardino is
free to peacefully share his religious beliefs on a public sidewalk.
Chapin's ordinance is overboard, unconstitutional and must be repealed or enjoined. Unquote. Now,

(01:45:56):
when you have to seek permission, in other words, if
you've got to seek permission to exercise, if you've got
to have a permit, in other words, to seek permission
to exercise your constitutional rights, they're no longer rights. They're
privileges and being granted to subjects. You're no longer a citizen,

(01:46:17):
You're a subject. See that's what back in the day
you have to go groveling the kings and get privileges
granted to you, get permissions granted to you. But our
founding fathers overthrew that kind of system. Right, So we
are citizens. We're not subjects of the government. We are citizens.

(01:46:40):
We don't work for the government. The government works for us.
We don't go crawling to the government to get permission
for our constitutionally guaranteed rights. Of course, you can see
the laundry list of those in the Bill of Rights,
and they're not privileges. I've even heard a lot of
politicians and say, well, you know, Americans, you know we
enjoy our privileges liberty with it. No, no, no, they're

(01:47:01):
not privileges. In fact, our founders held them as God
given rights. These aren't privileges that we go crawling to
some government bureaucrat and beg and plead and fill out
five thousand forms and can I please exercise my freedom
of religion? Because if you've got to do that, they
didn't ain't write anymore?

Speaker 4 (01:47:17):
Is it?

Speaker 3 (01:47:18):
It's a privilege granted by a king or some vassal
lord or something legal thing explained Jordina was on a
public sidewalk at the intersection of ole Lexington Road in
Shape and Road on a June twentieth, twenty twenty four,
including a and he was holding by the way a
twenty by twenty four inch stant very big sign attached
to a short handle which read trust Christ. He paid
the price on one side and on the other side

(01:47:40):
of the sign it said he saved others Jesus He'll
save you on the other side. How horrific, What horrible
things to be displaying in public. Right, Well, maybe for
an atheist who will have a meltdown, or a Satanist
that might have a meltdown, but otherwise for the average
Joe blow and you know, not that big of a deal.
It wasn't his first time there with a sign. The
report said he'd been there on and off for eight
months without any complication, But on that date a Chapin

(01:48:03):
police officer confronted him. Here we go, somebody who's a
member of a press gang paper hanger confronted him and
told him he needed the town's permission to share his
message of faith. No, he does. Let's call the First
Amendment officer again. This is why law enforcement officers and
city officials in some of these towns need constitutional training.

(01:48:27):
That officer's job is to uphold the man's rights to
stand there all day long if he wants, as long
as he's not impeding traffick or hitting people upside the
head with a sign. You just by the way. He
was doing it quietly, he wasn't even talking. Let's make
him up to him and talk. You just stand there
by an hour or two a day. Town's code enforcement
officer in chief of police both affirmed that message, and
they handed him a permit application that suddenly limited his

(01:48:49):
sign display to only thirty minutes, including a demand to
change street corners after fifteen minutes. Why civil rights complain
challenges that the challenges the constitutionality of the town's agendas
because the town's regulating demonstrations is written vaguely enough to
allow officials to claim that a man holding the sign
is in fact the demonstration. They're a one man demonstration. Apparently,

(01:49:13):
Champin's application of the ordinance to Giordano has deprived and
will continue to deprive him of the exercise of his
fundamental freedoms and guarantees. The legal filing charges it seeks
nominal damages and injunctive and declaratory relief restoring his rights.
The town is also accused of violating the First and
fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution, as well as the

(01:49:34):
state's Religious Freedom Act. The case describes facts that undermine
the town's agenda to call a sign a demonstration. Quote.
Giardino does not engage in any form of protest or
demonstration with his signs. He does not object anyone or
anything with his signs, nor does he convey any political
views with his signs. When holding one of his gospel
oriented signs in public, Giardino consciously avoids blocking pathways or

(01:49:56):
disrupting traffic. Unquote. He's compelled to share his beliefs by
Christian faith. He wants to inform others of the salvation
they can find by believing in Jesus Christ and accepting
him as their savior. The following chargists to convey this
evangelistic message. Giordina holds a twenty inch by twenty four
inch It's not very big sign. Probably became hardly read
it if you're far and afoway and traffick from him,
attached to a short handle containing a short, pithy statement

(01:50:18):
about the Gospel. While standing on a public side walker
public right of way in the town limits of Shaven,
South Carolina. Unquote. His signs over the months have said
give your burdens to Jesus, don't give up, there's hope
in Jesus. Seek hey the Lord while he may be
found Christ, Jesus came to save sinners, etceter. I mean,
you know, nothing really horrible. Well to some people that

(01:50:39):
might be, you know, get over. It's called religious freedom.
You don't like it, Go somewhere they don't have religious freedom.
I don't know, like Pakistan. We'll talk about that in
a minute. He spontaneously picks us three quarters three corners
through signs, said Giardina, it can convey his message without
causing anyone to stop or speak with him. Individuals and
vehicles can read the statements on his sign as they
drive by him. Charred Dola typically holds a sign in
public space for over one hour and in the late

(01:51:00):
afternoon during rush, shower and door after Schools have to
let students out to maximize the number of people who
can view the messaging on his sign filling charges. He
does not use amplification or project his message orally to
share his religious beliefs. He remained silent when he holds
his sign, only speaking with individuals who are approach him
for conversation. City ravers set up a permit procedure that

(01:51:21):
allows the mayor to reject any request at his own discretion.
So the mayor of Chapin is not just a mayor,
he's a king. Apparently he's a king too many fight
a revolution and getting out a gout from under king, Yah,
something like that. Giordano initially complied with the demands anyway
and obtained a permit, but found police shutting down his

(01:51:43):
speech anyhow because he didn't carry a copy of the
permit with him while he read held a sign. Really,
I mean, give me a break. And these cops ought
to be ashamed of themselves. They're supposed to be. They
took an oath. Here we go again. They took an
oath to uphold and protect the Constitution and the people's
right right. The first job of a law enforcement officer,
the first job of a sheriff, is to actually protect

(01:52:05):
your rights. It's to protect your conscercal rights. Did you
know that? Sometimes they don't know that, but they swear
those are these things. Shame on them. Town officialsill promise
a statement on the dispute, which had not arrived by
a publication of this pictular article. So who knows, but

(01:52:26):
I can guarantee if that goes to court, they are
just about ninety nine point nine nine percent guarantee that
goes to court, they lose, and then the taxpayers are
on the hook. See then there's this mob violence and
the repression. US House hears about persecution of faith in
Pakistan Pakistan. This is being reported by Jacob Adams of

(01:52:48):
the Daily Signal. They're supposed to be big ally of
ally of ours. The pakistanis right dayline US Capital, Washington,
d C. Congress Tom Alanto's Human Rights Commission heard testimony
Tuesday condemning the government of Pakist Pakistan over its treatment
of Christians and other religious minorities. In his opening remarks,
Representative Chris Smith, Republican from New Jersey, the co chairman

(01:53:09):
of the bipartisan commission, noted what the US Commission on
International Religious Freedom has said about the state of religious
freedom and the Asian nation, that is to say, Pakistan
quote authorities failure to address mob violence associated with blashom
the accusations as well as forest conversions of religious minorities,
including Hindus, Christians and Sikhs to Islam reinforces a climate
of intolerance and fear, the Religious Freedom Commission concluded. But

(01:53:33):
I want to say Pakistan is a country of over
two hundred and fifty million people, the fifth largest country
in the world, so the human cost of this repression
is immense in its scope as well as its severity.
Smith explained, non Muslims, including Christians, Intus and Seeks because
it's it's majority of Muslim country now, along with some
Shiites and Sufis and other sects of Islam, have never

(01:53:53):
been truly safe or protected from the Suni Muslim majority.
They face relentless discrimination, systematic prosecute, persecution, and violence which
tragically goes unpunished. Unquote. Sadik Amini, founder of the Afghanistan
Impact Network, told the Commission Afghanistan shares a sixteen hundred

(01:54:14):
plus mile border with Pakistan. By the way, I want
to give a shout out to those who do listen
to this show, apparently from the data I'm getting in Afghanistan,
welcome to the show. The legal system far from being
a shield. We'll supposedly ranked third in terms of news
and commentary. According to one of the pot track outfits
that's out the international protract outfits that's out there, legal system,

(01:54:36):
far from being a shield, often becomes a tool of
their oppression. Failing to provide the protection and justice state
desperately need, blasphemy laws are weaponized against them, mob violence
is frequently condoned, and their places of worship are routinely attacked.
The systemic failure to protect its most vulnerable citizens exposes
the deep seated intolerance fostered by the state, particularly the military.
I mean he explained quote. In twenty twenty four alone,

(01:54:58):
three and forty four new cases were open following blaspheming
allegations that caused widespread harassment and intimidation against religious minorities,
though most cases were against the recognized Muslim community. Ten
of those accused of blasteing last year were extra judiciously killed.
That according to Ben Lyndon, an advocacy director at Ambassy International, testified.

(01:55:20):
The commission also a testimony about the imprisonment of Imran Khan,
former Prime Minister of Pakistan, who was outted from power
in twenty twenty two. Caught the conclusions is wrang by
US Congress and you and Working Group on Arbitrary Attention
all point two the same reality. Imran A. Khan is
a political prisoner and targeted for his popularity and open
criticism of the military's Medican politics. Khan is also being

(01:55:41):
held in solitary confinement and his wife was also in prison.

Speaker 4 (01:55:45):
Now.

Speaker 3 (01:55:45):
Tom Lantle Human Rights Commission is named, by the way,
after a California Democrat who served in the House from
nineteen eighty one until his death in two thousand and eight,
who was a big civil rights advocate and religious freedom avocate.
But don't kid yourself. A lot of these folks being
persecuted cues and blaspheming laws and so forth, are just
christ Are just Christians who are just not a lot
of times are really sharing their faith. They might be

(01:56:05):
wearing cross or not even just they just you know,
are walking down the street without a Quran or you know,
somebody an extra name. But I might hear them singing
a song about Jesus. And then here come the you know,
here come the thug mooted jack mooted thugs that burst
the door down and say you're coming with us because
you just committed blasphemy. And this is a country by
the way, it's opposed to one of our big allies,

(01:56:28):
and we send a lot of military aid to by
the way, a lot of military aid. Oh and they
do have nukes, So I throw that in there a
last but not at least got this little, this little tidbit,
and then we're gonna close it down. This memo showcases
DC Judge James Boseburg's bias against the Orange Man, being

(01:56:49):
reported by Handingnuts in bright bart dot com, a newly
surfaced memo reveals that DC judges, namely Federal Judge James
Bosberg and others he claims are his colleagues holding inherent
bias against the Orange Man, President Donald Trump. As many
Americans have surmised, Yeah, like that wasn't kind of obvious.
The federalists obtained the memos stemming from the March eleventh,

(01:57:10):
twenty twenty five judicial conference in DC. According to US Courts,
a judicial conference convenes twice a year. This is a
quote to consider administrative and policy issues affecting the federal
court system and to make recommendations to Congress concerning legislation
involving the judicial branch unquote. During this past conference, Federal
Judge James Bosberg reportedly told Chief Justice Roberts, the presiding
officer of the Digital Conference and head of the Supreme Court,

(01:57:32):
basically that both he and his colleagues were concerned that
the administration would disregard rulings of federal courts, leading to
a constitutional crisis unquote. As such, Roberts, per the memo,
expressed hope that would not happen and in turn, no
conscal crisis would materialize. He also told the others that
he had civil and respectful interactions with Trump as of late.

(01:57:53):
But as The Federalist points out, Donald Trump, however, is
not merely the president, he is the defendant and scores
of lawsuits, including multiple k in the DC District Court,
as such as conversation and not concerned generic concerns of
the judiciary, but specific discussions about a litigant currently before.
The same judges who expressed concern to the chief Judge
of the DC District Court that the Trump administration would

(01:58:15):
disregard the court's orders, Judge Boseburg Commons revealed that he
and his colleagues hold and anti Trump bias for the
Trump administration because the Trump administration had comply with every
single court order today and since for that matter, the
DC District Court judge's concern also went counter to the
normal presumption courts will hold, one that presumes public officials
probably discharge their official duties. Apparently that presumption does not

(01:58:37):
apply to the current president, at least if you are
litigating in DC. The Frelost also notes that just days later,
Boseburg ordered the Trump administration to stop deportations Tell Salvador. Further,
months later, Boseburg said Trump must provide legal alien legal
alien alien supported to El Salvador the chance to challenge
that move in court. However, later and June, the Supreme

(01:59:00):
Court handed the massive victory to Trump, curbing the ability
of lone wolf judges to completely haul Trump's agenda and
what has continued to shape up as an uphill battle.
So uh yeah again. Scripture says it, out of the
out of the treasure of the heart, olds in the
mouth will speak or right or whatever you know happens there.

(01:59:22):
And these people are telling on themselves right and left.
But look, pray, pray for Christians in Pakistan, in Afghanistan,
all the other parts of that part of the world
who are being beaten from pillar to post. There should
be a lot of Christians in that part of the world.
There's almost gone.

Speaker 4 (01:59:42):
Now.

Speaker 3 (01:59:42):
Nobody seems to say much about that. Mainstream media I
think kind of enjoys it. Very little talk about that
church that got shot up in Kentucky by that crazy guy. Well,
because you know, a few extra dead Christians is good
for the country, accord to Mainstammia. Get you know, these
darn Christian nationalists and more of need to be taken out.
Needs to be more blood the straits, by golly, then

(02:00:04):
needs to be the blood of these these Maggas supporters,
and or even if they're not Magas supporters, that they're
constitutional waivers and Christians, these Christian nationalists, they need to
be uh, they need to be taken out, taken down,
shut up ones overall one way or the other. Pretty
much has he had tude of mainstinc media. I'm not exaggerating.

(02:00:25):
Let me tell you something. Extreme socialst Communists and Marxists
are blood thirsty. Have you not noticed? Have you not noticed?
And they're self righteous and drunk on their ideologies. Self
righteous people tend to be blood thirsty. Jesus told the
scribes and Pharises, he said, you build the tombs of

(02:00:48):
the prophets, and you decorate the dead, you decorate the
graves of the dead. I mean, the self rightous will
will build a tomb and shove you in it if
they can better believe it. But this is part and parcel,
and we got to pray for the for the Christians.
A handful of little left huddling in the dark and

(02:01:09):
Afghanistan in places like Pakistan, Pakistan and Iran, other parts
of that of Asia, the Middle East where they are
beat from pillar to posts and pretty much you know,
have to have to keep quiet. It's it's a death
sentence in many of these places if you tried, or
at least a prison sentence if you even remotely try
to share your faith in any form of evangelism, even

(02:01:30):
if you're just living it out silently. Eventually they go, oh,
you want those Christians, aren't you come with us? And
then it's on. And of course the mainstink media won't
repoort the main seeing have you seen the msnbceries scene
and cover what I just shared with you, this this
thing about what's going on in Pakistan. No, and you won't.
Most of the stuff comes from underground media sources. Doesn't

(02:01:50):
mean it's illegitimate, just means the main stinkers won't talk
about it because well, it's not glamorous and sex things
done anything to do with the Orange Man, and they're
obsession with him or against as the case may be.
But we've got to be aware of what's going on
and pray for our brothers and sisters who are being
perskin And as I just shared, it ain't just always

(02:02:12):
in the Middle East. That's right there in South Carolina.
I didn't know the chape in South Carolina was under
some kind of Sharia law. I just didn't know. Maybe
they are. Maybe they are. I don't know. Some old
guy on the street corner for about an hour or two,
you know, during the weekdays, holding the sign said Jesus

(02:02:32):
loves you. Oh, we can't have that mess. That's a demonstration.
Come and get a permit from us, dude, And you
only got thirty minutes. And if you don't have the
permit on you, we're grabbing your sign and we're throwing
you know, we're tending you home, we're finding your throwing
your jail whatever, you know, whatever they're gonna do to
the guy. It's just ridiculous. He's got a first member
right to do that. He's not beating people over the

(02:02:53):
head with a sign. I mean, look, you've got people
beating up ice folks in LA and half of them
aren't even getting arrested. This guy just holding a sign
that says Jesus loves you, Turn to Jesus, Jesus saves whatever.
Oh well, you know this guy's trouble maker? Really okay,
all right? Yeah, I didn't know. I didn't know we

(02:03:16):
started spelling America with a K. Maybe we are and
I haven't looked. Maybe I've just been in the bunker
here too long, in my own little world and my
own bubble, and haven't looked out the door enough and
window enough time to see that. Maybe we are now
spelling America with a K. I don't know all that
number gotta roll. Be sure to take care of yourselves,

(02:03:37):
take care of the ones that you love, and remember
God as love. See you next time.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Law & Order: Criminal Justice System - Season 1 & Season 2

Dateline NBC

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Christian Talk That Rocks with Richie L Ep. 7/16/2025

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Law & Order: Criminal Justice System - Season 1 & Season 2

Dateline NBC

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

All Episodes

Christian Talk That Rocks with Richie L Ep. 7/16/2025

Law & Order: Criminal Justice System - Season 1 & Season 2